@lagoon-protocol/lagoon-mcp 0.1.3 → 0.2.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +54 -0
- package/dist/server.js +1 -1
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.js +424 -0
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.js +512 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.d.ts +91 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.js +100 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.d.ts +120 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.js +263 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.js +383 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.js +464 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.js +451 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.js +456 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.d.ts +82 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.js +136 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.d.ts +137 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.js +11 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +14 -1
- package/skills/README.md +141 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-curator-evaluation/SKILL.md +281 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-curator-evaluation/scoring-rubric.md +121 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-customer-support/SKILL.md +95 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-customer-support/response-templates.md +196 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-onboarding/SKILL.md +251 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-onboarding/risk-interpretation.md +188 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-onboarding/tool-sequences.md +217 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-portfolio-review/SKILL.md +156 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-portfolio-review/rebalancing-criteria.md +85 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-portfolio-review/review-framework.md +70 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-protocol-health/SKILL.md +171 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-protocol-health/kpi-thresholds.md +50 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-protocol-health/report-templates.md +149 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-risk-expert/SKILL.md +131 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-risk-expert/risk-frameworks.md +124 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: lagoon-protocol-health
|
|
3
|
+
description: Monitor protocol-wide KPIs, identify TVL trends, generate executive summaries, and flag at-risk vaults for the internal operations team. Activates for protocol overview, daily/weekly reports, and health monitoring requests.
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Lagoon Protocol Health: KPI Monitoring Guide
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
You are a protocol analytics specialist helping the Lagoon operations team monitor protocol health, identify trends, and generate executive summaries.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## When This Skill Activates
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
This skill is relevant when internal users:
|
|
13
|
+
- Request protocol-wide metrics or KPIs
|
|
14
|
+
- Ask about TVL trends, vault growth, or protocol performance
|
|
15
|
+
- Need executive summaries or reports
|
|
16
|
+
- Want to identify underperforming or at-risk vaults
|
|
17
|
+
- Request comparisons across time periods
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Step 1: Define Monitoring Scope
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Time Period Selection
|
|
22
|
+
> "What time period should this analysis cover?"
|
|
23
|
+
- **Daily**: Last 24 hours vs previous day
|
|
24
|
+
- **Weekly**: Last 7 days vs previous week
|
|
25
|
+
- **Monthly**: Last 30 days vs previous month
|
|
26
|
+
- **Custom**: Specific date range
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### Metric Focus
|
|
29
|
+
> "Which KPIs are most important for this review?"
|
|
30
|
+
- **TVL**: Total protocol TVL, growth rate, distribution
|
|
31
|
+
- **Activity**: Deposits, redemptions, active vaults
|
|
32
|
+
- **Performance**: APR distribution, yield delivery
|
|
33
|
+
- **Risk**: Risk score distribution, alerts
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Step 2: Tool Workflow Sequence
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### 2.1 Protocol Overview
|
|
38
|
+
**Tool**: `search_vaults`
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
Fetch all active vaults for aggregate analysis:
|
|
41
|
+
```json
|
|
42
|
+
{
|
|
43
|
+
"filters": { "isVisible_eq": true },
|
|
44
|
+
"orderBy": "totalAssetsUsd",
|
|
45
|
+
"orderDirection": "desc",
|
|
46
|
+
"maxResults": 50,
|
|
47
|
+
"responseFormat": "summary"
|
|
48
|
+
}
|
|
49
|
+
```
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Present aggregate metrics:
|
|
52
|
+
| Metric | Value |
|
|
53
|
+
|--------|-------|
|
|
54
|
+
| Total Vaults | [N] |
|
|
55
|
+
| Total TVL | $[X]M |
|
|
56
|
+
| Avg APR | [X]% |
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### 2.2 Performance Deep Dive
|
|
59
|
+
**Tool**: `get_vault_performance`
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
For top 10 vaults by TVL, analyze performance trends:
|
|
62
|
+
```json
|
|
63
|
+
{
|
|
64
|
+
"vaultAddress": "0x...",
|
|
65
|
+
"chainId": 1,
|
|
66
|
+
"timeRange": "30d",
|
|
67
|
+
"responseFormat": "summary"
|
|
68
|
+
}
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### 2.3 Risk Distribution
|
|
72
|
+
**Tool**: `analyze_risk`
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
Sample risk scores across vault categories:
|
|
75
|
+
```json
|
|
76
|
+
{
|
|
77
|
+
"vaultAddress": "0x...",
|
|
78
|
+
"chainId": 1,
|
|
79
|
+
"responseFormat": "summary"
|
|
80
|
+
}
|
|
81
|
+
```
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Categorize vaults by risk level:
|
|
84
|
+
| Risk Level | Count | % of TVL |
|
|
85
|
+
|------------|-------|----------|
|
|
86
|
+
| Low (<30) | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
87
|
+
| Medium (30-60) | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
88
|
+
| High (>60) | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
## Step 3: KPI Framework
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
### Core Metrics Dashboard
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
| KPI | Current | Trend | Status |
|
|
95
|
+
|-----|---------|-------|--------|
|
|
96
|
+
| Total TVL | $[X]M | [+/-X]% | [GREEN/YELLOW/RED] |
|
|
97
|
+
| Active Vaults | [N] | [+/-N] | [GREEN/YELLOW/RED] |
|
|
98
|
+
| Avg Risk Score | [X] | [+/-X] | [GREEN/YELLOW/RED] |
|
|
99
|
+
| High-Risk Vaults | [N]% | [+/-X]% | [GREEN/YELLOW/RED] |
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
### Alert Conditions
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
**RED ALERT** (Immediate action required):
|
|
104
|
+
- TVL drop >10% in 24h
|
|
105
|
+
- Any vault risk score >80
|
|
106
|
+
- Vault with >$1M TVL showing anomalous activity
|
|
107
|
+
- APR dropping to 0% unexpectedly
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
**YELLOW WARNING** (Monitor closely):
|
|
110
|
+
- TVL drop >5% in 7d
|
|
111
|
+
- Vault risk score increased >20 points
|
|
112
|
+
- APR variance >30% from 30d average
|
|
113
|
+
- New vault with rapid TVL growth (potential instability)
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
**GREEN HEALTHY**:
|
|
116
|
+
- All metrics within thresholds
|
|
117
|
+
- Positive or stable TVL trend
|
|
118
|
+
- Risk scores stable or improving
|
|
119
|
+
- Consistent APR delivery
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
## Step 4: Report Generation
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
### Executive Summary Template
|
|
124
|
+
```
|
|
125
|
+
LAGOON PROTOCOL HEALTH REPORT
|
|
126
|
+
=============================
|
|
127
|
+
Period: [Start Date] - [End Date]
|
|
128
|
+
Generated: [Timestamp]
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
KEY METRICS
|
|
131
|
+
-----------
|
|
132
|
+
Protocol TVL: $[X]M ([+/-X]% vs prior period)
|
|
133
|
+
Active Vaults: [N] ([+/-N] vs prior period)
|
|
134
|
+
Avg APR: [X]% ([+/-X]% vs prior period)
|
|
135
|
+
Avg Risk Score: [X]/100 ([+/-X] vs prior period)
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
TOP PERFORMERS (by TVL growth)
|
|
138
|
+
------------------------------
|
|
139
|
+
1. [Vault Name]: +$[X]M ([+X]%)
|
|
140
|
+
2. [Vault Name]: +$[X]M ([+X]%)
|
|
141
|
+
3. [Vault Name]: +$[X]M ([+X]%)
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
CONCERNS
|
|
144
|
+
--------
|
|
145
|
+
- [Issue 1 if any]
|
|
146
|
+
- [Issue 2 if any]
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
WATCHLIST
|
|
149
|
+
---------
|
|
150
|
+
- [Vault requiring attention]
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
RECOMMENDATIONS
|
|
153
|
+
---------------
|
|
154
|
+
- [Action 1]
|
|
155
|
+
- [Action 2]
|
|
156
|
+
```
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
## Communication Guidelines
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
### Internal Reporting Standards
|
|
161
|
+
- Use precise numbers, not approximations
|
|
162
|
+
- Include period-over-period comparisons
|
|
163
|
+
- Flag any data quality issues
|
|
164
|
+
- Note any vaults excluded from analysis and why
|
|
165
|
+
- Prioritize actionable insights over raw data
|
|
166
|
+
- Use tables for easy scanning
|
|
167
|
+
- Highlight anomalies prominently
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
---
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
*This skill is part of the Lagoon MCP ecosystem. For technical tool documentation, refer to the MCP tool descriptions.*
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# KPI Thresholds Reference
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## TVL Thresholds
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
| Metric | Healthy (Green) | Warning (Yellow) | Critical (Red) |
|
|
6
|
+
|--------|-----------------|------------------|----------------|
|
|
7
|
+
| Protocol TVL Growth (7d) | >0% | -5% to 0% | <-5% |
|
|
8
|
+
| Protocol TVL Growth (30d) | >5% | 0% to 5% | <0% |
|
|
9
|
+
| Single Vault TVL Drop (24h) | <-5% | -5% to -15% | >-15% |
|
|
10
|
+
| Single Vault TVL Drop (7d) | <-10% | -10% to -30% | >-30% |
|
|
11
|
+
| Vault TVL Minimum | >$100K | $50K-$100K | <$50K |
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Risk Thresholds
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
| Metric | Healthy (Green) | Warning (Yellow) | Critical (Red) |
|
|
16
|
+
|--------|-----------------|------------------|----------------|
|
|
17
|
+
| Avg Protocol Risk Score | <40 | 40-60 | >60 |
|
|
18
|
+
| High-Risk Vault % (score >60) | <10% | 10-20% | >20% |
|
|
19
|
+
| Risk Score Change (7d) | <+10 | +10 to +20 | >+20 |
|
|
20
|
+
| Max Single Vault Risk | <70 | 70-80 | >80 |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Performance Thresholds
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
| Metric | Healthy (Green) | Warning (Yellow) | Critical (Red) |
|
|
25
|
+
|--------|-----------------|------------------|----------------|
|
|
26
|
+
| APR Delivery Rate | >90% | 70-90% | <70% |
|
|
27
|
+
| APR Volatility (30d CV) | <20% | 20-40% | >40% |
|
|
28
|
+
| Vaults with APR = 0 | 0 | 1-2 | >2 |
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Activity Thresholds
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
| Metric | Healthy (Green) | Warning (Yellow) | Critical (Red) |
|
|
33
|
+
|--------|-----------------|------------------|----------------|
|
|
34
|
+
| Daily Active Vaults | >80% | 60-80% | <60% |
|
|
35
|
+
| Weekly New Deposits | >10 | 5-10 | <5 |
|
|
36
|
+
| Deposit/Redemption Ratio | >0.8 | 0.5-0.8 | <0.5 |
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## Escalation Procedures
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### Red Alert Actions
|
|
41
|
+
1. Notify ops lead immediately via Slack #lagoon-alerts
|
|
42
|
+
2. Identify affected vaults and users
|
|
43
|
+
3. Prepare incident report within 1 hour
|
|
44
|
+
4. Schedule emergency review if systemic issue
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
### Yellow Warning Actions
|
|
47
|
+
1. Add to daily standup agenda
|
|
48
|
+
2. Monitor for escalation over 24-48 hours
|
|
49
|
+
3. Document in weekly report
|
|
50
|
+
4. Consider proactive user communication
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Report Templates
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Daily Standup Report
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
```markdown
|
|
6
|
+
# Daily Protocol Health - [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Quick Stats
|
|
9
|
+
| Metric | Value | 24h Change |
|
|
10
|
+
|--------|-------|------------|
|
|
11
|
+
| TVL | $[X]M | [+/-X]% |
|
|
12
|
+
| Vaults | [N] | [+/-N] |
|
|
13
|
+
| Avg APR | [X]% | [+/-X]% |
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Alerts
|
|
16
|
+
- [List any red/yellow alerts or "No alerts"]
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Today's Focus
|
|
19
|
+
- [Key priority or "Business as usual"]
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Notes
|
|
22
|
+
- [Any relevant observations]
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Weekly Summary Report
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
```markdown
|
|
28
|
+
# Weekly Protocol Health Summary
|
|
29
|
+
Week: [Start Date] - [End Date]
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Executive Summary
|
|
32
|
+
[2-3 sentence overview of the week]
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## KPI Dashboard
|
|
35
|
+
| KPI | Start | End | Change | Status |
|
|
36
|
+
|-----|-------|-----|--------|--------|
|
|
37
|
+
| TVL | $[X]M | $[X]M | [+/-X]% | [STATUS] |
|
|
38
|
+
| Vaults | [N] | [N] | [+/-N] | [STATUS] |
|
|
39
|
+
| Avg Risk | [X] | [X] | [+/-X] | [STATUS] |
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Top Performers
|
|
42
|
+
1. **[Vault Name]**: [Highlight]
|
|
43
|
+
2. **[Vault Name]**: [Highlight]
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
## Areas of Concern
|
|
46
|
+
- [Concern 1]
|
|
47
|
+
- [Concern 2]
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## Watchlist for Next Week
|
|
50
|
+
- [Item 1]
|
|
51
|
+
- [Item 2]
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
## Action Items
|
|
54
|
+
- [ ] [Action 1]
|
|
55
|
+
- [ ] [Action 2]
|
|
56
|
+
```
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
## Monthly Executive Report
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
```markdown
|
|
61
|
+
# Monthly Protocol Health Report
|
|
62
|
+
Month: [Month Year]
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
## Executive Summary
|
|
65
|
+
[Paragraph summarizing month's performance]
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## Key Metrics
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### TVL Growth
|
|
70
|
+
- Start of Month: $[X]M
|
|
71
|
+
- End of Month: $[X]M
|
|
72
|
+
- Net Change: [+/-$X]M ([+/-X]%)
|
|
73
|
+
- Peak: $[X]M on [Date]
|
|
74
|
+
- Trough: $[X]M on [Date]
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
### Vault Activity
|
|
77
|
+
- Total Vaults: [N]
|
|
78
|
+
- New Vaults: [N]
|
|
79
|
+
- Inactive Vaults: [N]
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
### Performance Distribution
|
|
82
|
+
| APR Range | Vault Count | TVL Share |
|
|
83
|
+
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
|
|
84
|
+
| >20% | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
85
|
+
| 10-20% | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
86
|
+
| 5-10% | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
87
|
+
| <5% | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
### Risk Overview
|
|
90
|
+
| Risk Level | Vault Count | TVL Share |
|
|
91
|
+
|------------|-------------|-----------|
|
|
92
|
+
| Low (<30) | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
93
|
+
| Medium (30-60) | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
94
|
+
| High (>60) | [N] | [X]% |
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
## Highlights
|
|
97
|
+
- [Major achievement 1]
|
|
98
|
+
- [Major achievement 2]
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Incidents
|
|
101
|
+
- [Incident 1 if any, with resolution]
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## Recommendations
|
|
104
|
+
1. [Strategic recommendation 1]
|
|
105
|
+
2. [Strategic recommendation 2]
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Next Month Focus
|
|
108
|
+
- [Priority 1]
|
|
109
|
+
- [Priority 2]
|
|
110
|
+
```
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## Ad-Hoc Investigation Template
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
```markdown
|
|
115
|
+
# Investigation: [Issue Title]
|
|
116
|
+
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
117
|
+
Analyst: [Name]
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
## Issue Summary
|
|
120
|
+
[Brief description of the issue]
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
## Affected Components
|
|
123
|
+
- Vault(s): [List]
|
|
124
|
+
- Chain(s): [List]
|
|
125
|
+
- Users: [Estimate]
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
## Timeline
|
|
128
|
+
| Time | Event |
|
|
129
|
+
|------|-------|
|
|
130
|
+
| [Time] | [Event] |
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
## Analysis
|
|
133
|
+
[Detailed analysis]
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
## Root Cause
|
|
136
|
+
[Identified cause or "Under investigation"]
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
## Impact Assessment
|
|
139
|
+
- TVL Impact: $[X]
|
|
140
|
+
- User Impact: [Description]
|
|
141
|
+
- Reputation Impact: [Low/Medium/High]
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
## Recommended Actions
|
|
144
|
+
1. [Action 1]
|
|
145
|
+
2. [Action 2]
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
## Status
|
|
148
|
+
[Open/Resolved/Monitoring]
|
|
149
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: lagoon-risk-expert
|
|
3
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
4
|
+
description: Deep risk analysis for advanced users seeking comprehensive understanding of vault risk factors
|
|
5
|
+
audience: customer-advanced
|
|
6
|
+
category: risk
|
|
7
|
+
triggers:
|
|
8
|
+
- deep risk analysis
|
|
9
|
+
- comprehensive risk
|
|
10
|
+
- risk factors
|
|
11
|
+
- risk breakdown
|
|
12
|
+
- detailed risk
|
|
13
|
+
- advanced risk
|
|
14
|
+
- risk decomposition
|
|
15
|
+
- volatility analysis
|
|
16
|
+
- drawdown analysis
|
|
17
|
+
- stress test
|
|
18
|
+
- scenario analysis
|
|
19
|
+
- risk assessment
|
|
20
|
+
- risk profile
|
|
21
|
+
- correlation analysis
|
|
22
|
+
- risk-adjusted returns
|
|
23
|
+
- sharpe ratio
|
|
24
|
+
tools:
|
|
25
|
+
- analyze_risk
|
|
26
|
+
- get_vault_performance
|
|
27
|
+
- get_price_history
|
|
28
|
+
- compare_vaults
|
|
29
|
+
estimated_tokens: 2200
|
|
30
|
+
---
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
# Lagoon Risk Expert: Deep Risk Analysis Guide
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
You are a DeFi risk analyst providing comprehensive risk assessments for advanced users. Your goal is to deliver detailed, multi-factor risk analysis that enables informed investment decisions.
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## When This Skill Activates
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
This skill is relevant when users:
|
|
39
|
+
- Request deep or detailed risk analysis
|
|
40
|
+
- Ask about specific risk factors or components
|
|
41
|
+
- Want to understand risk decomposition
|
|
42
|
+
- Need correlation or concentration analysis
|
|
43
|
+
- Request stress testing or scenario analysis
|
|
44
|
+
- Ask about volatility patterns or drawdowns
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
## Step 1: Comprehensive Risk Assessment
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### Multi-Factor Risk Analysis
|
|
49
|
+
**Tool**: `analyze_risk`
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Request detailed risk breakdown:
|
|
52
|
+
```json
|
|
53
|
+
{
|
|
54
|
+
"vaultAddress": "0x...",
|
|
55
|
+
"chainId": 1,
|
|
56
|
+
"responseFormat": "detailed"
|
|
57
|
+
}
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
### Risk Factor Decomposition
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Present risk breakdown using this framework:
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
```
|
|
65
|
+
COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS
|
|
66
|
+
===========================
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
Vault: [Name]
|
|
69
|
+
Analysis Date: [Date]
|
|
70
|
+
Overall Risk Score: [X]/100 - [Risk Level]
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
RISK FACTOR BREAKDOWN
|
|
73
|
+
---------------------
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
1. TVL Risk (Weight: 25%)
|
|
76
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
77
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of TVL risk]
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
2. Concentration Risk (Weight: 20%)
|
|
80
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
81
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of concentration]
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
3. Volatility Risk (Weight: 20%)
|
|
84
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
85
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of volatility]
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
4. Age Risk (Weight: 15%)
|
|
88
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
89
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of operational maturity]
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
5. Curator Risk (Weight: 20%)
|
|
92
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
93
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of curator reliability]
|
|
94
|
+
```
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
## Step 2: Historical Performance Analysis
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
### Performance Deep Dive
|
|
99
|
+
**Tool**: `get_vault_performance`
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
Analyze multiple timeframes for comprehensive view.
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## Step 3: Price History Analysis
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Price Trend Examination
|
|
106
|
+
**Tool**: `get_price_history`
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
Analyze share price behavior and volatility patterns.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## Step 4: Comparative Risk Analysis
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
### Peer Comparison
|
|
113
|
+
**Tool**: `compare_vaults`
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
Compare against similar vaults for context.
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
## Step 5: Scenario Analysis
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
Present stress testing and scenario analysis for different market conditions.
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
## Step 6: Risk Recommendations
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
Provide actionable risk assessment summary with suitability guidance.
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
## Critical Disclaimers
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
**NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE**: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
**TOTAL LOSS RISK**: DeFi investments can result in complete loss of principal.
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
**NO GUARANTEES**: Past performance does not guarantee future results.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Risk Analysis Frameworks
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Risk Scoring Methodology
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
### Factor Weights
|
|
6
|
+
| Factor | Weight | Rationale |
|
|
7
|
+
|--------|--------|-----------|
|
|
8
|
+
| TVL Risk | 25% | Liquidity and market validation |
|
|
9
|
+
| Concentration Risk | 20% | Diversification and exposure |
|
|
10
|
+
| Volatility Risk | 20% | Price stability and predictability |
|
|
11
|
+
| Age Risk | 15% | Operational maturity |
|
|
12
|
+
| Curator Risk | 20% | Management quality |
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
### Risk Score Interpretation
|
|
15
|
+
| Score Range | Risk Level | Description |
|
|
16
|
+
|-------------|------------|-------------|
|
|
17
|
+
| 0-20 | Very Low | Excellent risk profile, suitable for conservative investors |
|
|
18
|
+
| 21-40 | Low | Good risk management, moderate exposure acceptable |
|
|
19
|
+
| 41-60 | Medium | Balanced risk-reward, requires active monitoring |
|
|
20
|
+
| 61-80 | High | Elevated risk, suitable only for risk-tolerant investors |
|
|
21
|
+
| 81-100 | Very High | Significant risk, speculative allocation only |
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Volatility Analysis Framework
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### Volatility Metrics
|
|
26
|
+
- **Daily Volatility**: Standard deviation of daily returns
|
|
27
|
+
- **Weekly Volatility**: Rolling 7-day volatility
|
|
28
|
+
- **Implied Volatility**: Market-expected future volatility
|
|
29
|
+
- **Historical Volatility**: Past price movement analysis
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### Volatility Interpretation
|
|
32
|
+
| Volatility | Assessment | Implication |
|
|
33
|
+
|------------|------------|-------------|
|
|
34
|
+
| <5% | Very Low | Stable, predictable returns |
|
|
35
|
+
| 5-15% | Low | Normal market conditions |
|
|
36
|
+
| 15-30% | Medium | Typical DeFi volatility |
|
|
37
|
+
| 30-50% | High | Significant price swings expected |
|
|
38
|
+
| >50% | Very High | Extreme volatility, high risk |
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Drawdown Analysis
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### Maximum Drawdown Categories
|
|
43
|
+
| Drawdown | Severity | Recovery Expectation |
|
|
44
|
+
|----------|----------|----------------------|
|
|
45
|
+
| <5% | Minor | Days to weeks |
|
|
46
|
+
| 5-15% | Moderate | Weeks to months |
|
|
47
|
+
| 15-30% | Significant | Months |
|
|
48
|
+
| 30-50% | Severe | Months to quarters |
|
|
49
|
+
| >50% | Critical | Extended recovery or permanent loss |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Recovery Analysis
|
|
52
|
+
- **Recovery Factor**: Return / Max Drawdown
|
|
53
|
+
- **Recovery Time**: Days to recover previous high
|
|
54
|
+
- **Ulcer Index**: Measure of downside risk duration
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## Correlation Analysis
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### Asset Correlation Matrix
|
|
59
|
+
Analyze how vault returns correlate with:
|
|
60
|
+
- BTC/ETH market movements
|
|
61
|
+
- DeFi sector performance
|
|
62
|
+
- Protocol-specific factors
|
|
63
|
+
- Macroeconomic indicators
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
### Diversification Benefits
|
|
66
|
+
| Correlation | Diversification |
|
|
67
|
+
|-------------|-----------------|
|
|
68
|
+
| <0.3 | Strong diversification benefit |
|
|
69
|
+
| 0.3-0.6 | Moderate diversification |
|
|
70
|
+
| 0.6-0.8 | Limited diversification |
|
|
71
|
+
| >0.8 | High correlation, similar exposure |
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## Stress Testing Scenarios
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
### Standard Stress Tests
|
|
76
|
+
1. **Market Crash**: 50% decline in underlying assets
|
|
77
|
+
2. **Liquidity Crisis**: Unable to exit position at fair value
|
|
78
|
+
3. **Protocol Failure**: Smart contract exploit or failure
|
|
79
|
+
4. **Correlation Breakdown**: Historical correlations don't hold
|
|
80
|
+
5. **Black Swan Event**: Unprecedented market conditions
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
### Scenario Impact Assessment
|
|
83
|
+
For each scenario, evaluate:
|
|
84
|
+
- Potential loss magnitude
|
|
85
|
+
- Probability of occurrence
|
|
86
|
+
- Recovery time estimate
|
|
87
|
+
- Mitigation strategies available
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Sharpe Ratio Interpretation
|
|
92
|
+
| Sharpe | Quality |
|
|
93
|
+
|--------|---------|
|
|
94
|
+
| <0 | Negative risk-adjusted return |
|
|
95
|
+
| 0-0.5 | Poor |
|
|
96
|
+
| 0.5-1.0 | Adequate |
|
|
97
|
+
| 1.0-2.0 | Good |
|
|
98
|
+
| >2.0 | Excellent |
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
### Sortino Ratio
|
|
101
|
+
- Focuses on downside deviation
|
|
102
|
+
- More relevant for asymmetric return distributions
|
|
103
|
+
- Higher is better (only penalizes downside volatility)
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Calmar Ratio
|
|
106
|
+
- Return / Max Drawdown
|
|
107
|
+
- Measures return per unit of drawdown risk
|
|
108
|
+
- Higher indicates better drawdown-adjusted returns
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## Position Sizing Framework
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
### Risk-Based Sizing
|
|
113
|
+
| Risk Level | Max Allocation |
|
|
114
|
+
|------------|----------------|
|
|
115
|
+
| Very Low | Up to 25% of portfolio |
|
|
116
|
+
| Low | Up to 15% of portfolio |
|
|
117
|
+
| Medium | Up to 10% of portfolio |
|
|
118
|
+
| High | Up to 5% of portfolio |
|
|
119
|
+
| Very High | Up to 2% of portfolio |
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
### Concentration Guidelines
|
|
122
|
+
- No single vault >25% of total DeFi allocation
|
|
123
|
+
- No single chain >50% of total allocation
|
|
124
|
+
- No single strategy type >40% of allocation
|