@lagoon-protocol/lagoon-mcp 0.1.2 → 0.2.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +54 -0
- package/dist/server.js +1 -1
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.js +424 -0
- package/dist/skills/curator-evaluation.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.js +512 -0
- package/dist/skills/customer-support.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.d.ts +91 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.js +100 -0
- package/dist/skills/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.d.ts +120 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.js +263 -0
- package/dist/skills/loader.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.js +383 -0
- package/dist/skills/onboarding.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.js +464 -0
- package/dist/skills/portfolio-review.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.js +451 -0
- package/dist/skills/protocol-health.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.js +456 -0
- package/dist/skills/risk-expert.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.d.ts +82 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.js +136 -0
- package/dist/skills/shared.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.d.ts +137 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.js +11 -0
- package/dist/skills/types.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/tools/discover-tools.d.ts +44 -0
- package/dist/tools/discover-tools.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/tools/discover-tools.js +108 -0
- package/dist/tools/discover-tools.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/tools/registry.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/tools/registry.js +12 -2
- package/dist/tools/registry.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/utils/validators.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dist/utils/validators.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/utils/validators.js +2 -1
- package/dist/utils/validators.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +14 -1
- package/skills/README.md +141 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-curator-evaluation/SKILL.md +281 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-curator-evaluation/scoring-rubric.md +121 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-customer-support/SKILL.md +95 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-customer-support/response-templates.md +196 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-onboarding/SKILL.md +251 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-onboarding/risk-interpretation.md +188 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-onboarding/tool-sequences.md +217 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-portfolio-review/SKILL.md +156 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-portfolio-review/rebalancing-criteria.md +85 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-portfolio-review/review-framework.md +70 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-protocol-health/SKILL.md +171 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-protocol-health/kpi-thresholds.md +50 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-protocol-health/report-templates.md +149 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-risk-expert/SKILL.md +131 -0
- package/skills/lagoon-risk-expert/risk-frameworks.md +124 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: lagoon-risk-expert
|
|
3
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
4
|
+
description: Deep risk analysis for advanced users seeking comprehensive understanding of vault risk factors
|
|
5
|
+
audience: customer-advanced
|
|
6
|
+
category: risk
|
|
7
|
+
triggers:
|
|
8
|
+
- deep risk analysis
|
|
9
|
+
- comprehensive risk
|
|
10
|
+
- risk factors
|
|
11
|
+
- risk breakdown
|
|
12
|
+
- detailed risk
|
|
13
|
+
- advanced risk
|
|
14
|
+
- risk decomposition
|
|
15
|
+
- volatility analysis
|
|
16
|
+
- drawdown analysis
|
|
17
|
+
- stress test
|
|
18
|
+
- scenario analysis
|
|
19
|
+
- risk assessment
|
|
20
|
+
- risk profile
|
|
21
|
+
- correlation analysis
|
|
22
|
+
- risk-adjusted returns
|
|
23
|
+
- sharpe ratio
|
|
24
|
+
tools:
|
|
25
|
+
- analyze_risk
|
|
26
|
+
- get_vault_performance
|
|
27
|
+
- get_price_history
|
|
28
|
+
- compare_vaults
|
|
29
|
+
estimated_tokens: 2200
|
|
30
|
+
---
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
# Lagoon Risk Expert: Deep Risk Analysis Guide
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
You are a DeFi risk analyst providing comprehensive risk assessments for advanced users. Your goal is to deliver detailed, multi-factor risk analysis that enables informed investment decisions.
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## When This Skill Activates
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
This skill is relevant when users:
|
|
39
|
+
- Request deep or detailed risk analysis
|
|
40
|
+
- Ask about specific risk factors or components
|
|
41
|
+
- Want to understand risk decomposition
|
|
42
|
+
- Need correlation or concentration analysis
|
|
43
|
+
- Request stress testing or scenario analysis
|
|
44
|
+
- Ask about volatility patterns or drawdowns
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
## Step 1: Comprehensive Risk Assessment
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### Multi-Factor Risk Analysis
|
|
49
|
+
**Tool**: `analyze_risk`
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Request detailed risk breakdown:
|
|
52
|
+
```json
|
|
53
|
+
{
|
|
54
|
+
"vaultAddress": "0x...",
|
|
55
|
+
"chainId": 1,
|
|
56
|
+
"responseFormat": "detailed"
|
|
57
|
+
}
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
### Risk Factor Decomposition
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Present risk breakdown using this framework:
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
```
|
|
65
|
+
COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS
|
|
66
|
+
===========================
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
Vault: [Name]
|
|
69
|
+
Analysis Date: [Date]
|
|
70
|
+
Overall Risk Score: [X]/100 - [Risk Level]
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
RISK FACTOR BREAKDOWN
|
|
73
|
+
---------------------
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
1. TVL Risk (Weight: 25%)
|
|
76
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
77
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of TVL risk]
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
2. Concentration Risk (Weight: 20%)
|
|
80
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
81
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of concentration]
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
3. Volatility Risk (Weight: 20%)
|
|
84
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
85
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of volatility]
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
4. Age Risk (Weight: 15%)
|
|
88
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
89
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of operational maturity]
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
5. Curator Risk (Weight: 20%)
|
|
92
|
+
Score: [X]/100
|
|
93
|
+
Analysis: [Interpretation of curator reliability]
|
|
94
|
+
```
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
## Step 2: Historical Performance Analysis
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
### Performance Deep Dive
|
|
99
|
+
**Tool**: `get_vault_performance`
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
Analyze multiple timeframes for comprehensive view.
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## Step 3: Price History Analysis
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Price Trend Examination
|
|
106
|
+
**Tool**: `get_price_history`
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
Analyze share price behavior and volatility patterns.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## Step 4: Comparative Risk Analysis
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
### Peer Comparison
|
|
113
|
+
**Tool**: `compare_vaults`
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
Compare against similar vaults for context.
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
## Step 5: Scenario Analysis
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
Present stress testing and scenario analysis for different market conditions.
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
## Step 6: Risk Recommendations
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
Provide actionable risk assessment summary with suitability guidance.
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
## Critical Disclaimers
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
**NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE**: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
**TOTAL LOSS RISK**: DeFi investments can result in complete loss of principal.
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
**NO GUARANTEES**: Past performance does not guarantee future results.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Risk Analysis Frameworks
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Risk Scoring Methodology
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
### Factor Weights
|
|
6
|
+
| Factor | Weight | Rationale |
|
|
7
|
+
|--------|--------|-----------|
|
|
8
|
+
| TVL Risk | 25% | Liquidity and market validation |
|
|
9
|
+
| Concentration Risk | 20% | Diversification and exposure |
|
|
10
|
+
| Volatility Risk | 20% | Price stability and predictability |
|
|
11
|
+
| Age Risk | 15% | Operational maturity |
|
|
12
|
+
| Curator Risk | 20% | Management quality |
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
### Risk Score Interpretation
|
|
15
|
+
| Score Range | Risk Level | Description |
|
|
16
|
+
|-------------|------------|-------------|
|
|
17
|
+
| 0-20 | Very Low | Excellent risk profile, suitable for conservative investors |
|
|
18
|
+
| 21-40 | Low | Good risk management, moderate exposure acceptable |
|
|
19
|
+
| 41-60 | Medium | Balanced risk-reward, requires active monitoring |
|
|
20
|
+
| 61-80 | High | Elevated risk, suitable only for risk-tolerant investors |
|
|
21
|
+
| 81-100 | Very High | Significant risk, speculative allocation only |
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Volatility Analysis Framework
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### Volatility Metrics
|
|
26
|
+
- **Daily Volatility**: Standard deviation of daily returns
|
|
27
|
+
- **Weekly Volatility**: Rolling 7-day volatility
|
|
28
|
+
- **Implied Volatility**: Market-expected future volatility
|
|
29
|
+
- **Historical Volatility**: Past price movement analysis
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### Volatility Interpretation
|
|
32
|
+
| Volatility | Assessment | Implication |
|
|
33
|
+
|------------|------------|-------------|
|
|
34
|
+
| <5% | Very Low | Stable, predictable returns |
|
|
35
|
+
| 5-15% | Low | Normal market conditions |
|
|
36
|
+
| 15-30% | Medium | Typical DeFi volatility |
|
|
37
|
+
| 30-50% | High | Significant price swings expected |
|
|
38
|
+
| >50% | Very High | Extreme volatility, high risk |
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Drawdown Analysis
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### Maximum Drawdown Categories
|
|
43
|
+
| Drawdown | Severity | Recovery Expectation |
|
|
44
|
+
|----------|----------|----------------------|
|
|
45
|
+
| <5% | Minor | Days to weeks |
|
|
46
|
+
| 5-15% | Moderate | Weeks to months |
|
|
47
|
+
| 15-30% | Significant | Months |
|
|
48
|
+
| 30-50% | Severe | Months to quarters |
|
|
49
|
+
| >50% | Critical | Extended recovery or permanent loss |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Recovery Analysis
|
|
52
|
+
- **Recovery Factor**: Return / Max Drawdown
|
|
53
|
+
- **Recovery Time**: Days to recover previous high
|
|
54
|
+
- **Ulcer Index**: Measure of downside risk duration
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## Correlation Analysis
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### Asset Correlation Matrix
|
|
59
|
+
Analyze how vault returns correlate with:
|
|
60
|
+
- BTC/ETH market movements
|
|
61
|
+
- DeFi sector performance
|
|
62
|
+
- Protocol-specific factors
|
|
63
|
+
- Macroeconomic indicators
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
### Diversification Benefits
|
|
66
|
+
| Correlation | Diversification |
|
|
67
|
+
|-------------|-----------------|
|
|
68
|
+
| <0.3 | Strong diversification benefit |
|
|
69
|
+
| 0.3-0.6 | Moderate diversification |
|
|
70
|
+
| 0.6-0.8 | Limited diversification |
|
|
71
|
+
| >0.8 | High correlation, similar exposure |
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## Stress Testing Scenarios
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
### Standard Stress Tests
|
|
76
|
+
1. **Market Crash**: 50% decline in underlying assets
|
|
77
|
+
2. **Liquidity Crisis**: Unable to exit position at fair value
|
|
78
|
+
3. **Protocol Failure**: Smart contract exploit or failure
|
|
79
|
+
4. **Correlation Breakdown**: Historical correlations don't hold
|
|
80
|
+
5. **Black Swan Event**: Unprecedented market conditions
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
### Scenario Impact Assessment
|
|
83
|
+
For each scenario, evaluate:
|
|
84
|
+
- Potential loss magnitude
|
|
85
|
+
- Probability of occurrence
|
|
86
|
+
- Recovery time estimate
|
|
87
|
+
- Mitigation strategies available
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Sharpe Ratio Interpretation
|
|
92
|
+
| Sharpe | Quality |
|
|
93
|
+
|--------|---------|
|
|
94
|
+
| <0 | Negative risk-adjusted return |
|
|
95
|
+
| 0-0.5 | Poor |
|
|
96
|
+
| 0.5-1.0 | Adequate |
|
|
97
|
+
| 1.0-2.0 | Good |
|
|
98
|
+
| >2.0 | Excellent |
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
### Sortino Ratio
|
|
101
|
+
- Focuses on downside deviation
|
|
102
|
+
- More relevant for asymmetric return distributions
|
|
103
|
+
- Higher is better (only penalizes downside volatility)
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Calmar Ratio
|
|
106
|
+
- Return / Max Drawdown
|
|
107
|
+
- Measures return per unit of drawdown risk
|
|
108
|
+
- Higher indicates better drawdown-adjusted returns
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## Position Sizing Framework
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
### Risk-Based Sizing
|
|
113
|
+
| Risk Level | Max Allocation |
|
|
114
|
+
|------------|----------------|
|
|
115
|
+
| Very Low | Up to 25% of portfolio |
|
|
116
|
+
| Low | Up to 15% of portfolio |
|
|
117
|
+
| Medium | Up to 10% of portfolio |
|
|
118
|
+
| High | Up to 5% of portfolio |
|
|
119
|
+
| Very High | Up to 2% of portfolio |
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
### Concentration Guidelines
|
|
122
|
+
- No single vault >25% of total DeFi allocation
|
|
123
|
+
- No single chain >50% of total allocation
|
|
124
|
+
- No single strategy type >40% of allocation
|