@kya-os/mcp-i-core 1.3.12 → 1.3.14

package/Composer 3.md

@@ -1,615 +0,0 @@
-# Phase 4: User DID & Identity Linking - Comprehensive Review
-
-**Document Version:** 2.0  
-**Review Date:** January 2025  
-**Reviewer:** AI Architecture Review  
-**Status:** ✅ **APPROVED WITH CRITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS**
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-This comprehensive review evaluates the Phase 4 implementation plan against:
-1. MCP-I Specification compliance
-2. Codebase parity between xmcp-i and AgentShield
-3. Real-world flow feasibility
-4. Architectural soundness
-5. Implementation readiness
-
-**Overall Assessment:** The plan is **well-structured and addresses critical gaps**, but requires **significant API contract alignment** before implementation can proceed. The core concept is sound and aligns with MCP-I spec requirements.
-
-**Critical Finding:** There is a **fundamental API contract mismatch** between what the contracts package defines (`DelegationRecord` with full W3C VC structure) and what the AgentShield API currently accepts (simplified format). This must be resolved before Phase 4 implementation.
-
----
-
-## Mission Alignment
-
-### ✅ **STRONG ALIGNMENT**
-
-The Phase 4 plan directly addresses the core mission of implementing the MCP-I Specification:
-
-1. **User Identity Persistence**: Enables persistent User DIDs across sessions via OAuth linking
-2. **Proper Delegation Model**: Fixes missing `issuerDid` (User DID) in delegation creation
-3. **Multi-Tenant Support**: Resolves storage conflicts for multi-user scenarios
-4. **Spec Compliance**: Moves toward full MCP-I §4.1 compliance (Delegation Credentials)
-
-**Mission Grade: A**
-
----
-
-## Codebase Parity Analysis
-
-### Critical API Contract Mismatch ⚠️
-
-#### Current State
-
-**Contracts Package Definition** (`packages/contracts/src/agentshield-api/types.ts:162-164`):
-```typescript
-export interface CreateDelegationRequest {
-  delegation: DelegationRecord;  // Full W3C VC structure
-}
-```
-
-**DelegationRecord Requirements** (`packages/contracts/src/delegation/schemas.ts:50-89`):
-- `id: string`
-- `issuerDid: string` ✅ (User DID - what Phase 4 adds)
-- `subjectDid: string` ✅ (Agent DID - we have this)
-- `vcId: string` ❌ (Missing - requires VC creation)
-- `constraints: DelegationConstraints` ⚠️ (Partial - we have scopes)
-- `signature: string` ❌ (Missing - requires cryptographic signing)
-- `status: DelegationStatus` ⚠️ (Default to 'active')
-
-**Actual Implementation** (`packages/mcp-i-cloudflare/src/services/consent.service.ts:358-366`):
-```typescript
-const delegationRequest = {
-  agent_did: request.agent_did,      // ✅ Maps to subjectDid
-  scopes: request.scopes,             // ✅ Maps to constraints.scopes
-  expires_in_days: expiresInDays,     // ⚠️ Needs conversion to constraints.notAfter
-  // ❌ Missing: issuerDid (User DID)
-  // ❌ Missing: Full DelegationRecord structure
-  // ❌ Missing: W3C VC creation
-};
-```
-
-#### The Problem
-
-1. **Type Mismatch**: Contracts define `{ delegation: DelegationRecord }`, but implementation sends `{ agent_did, scopes, expires_in_days }`
-2. **Missing Required Fields**: `DelegationRecord` requires `vcId`, `signature`, `status` - none are present
-3. **AgentShield API Reality**: The actual AgentShield API likely accepts simplified format (based on comments in code), but contracts package doesn't reflect this
-
-#### Recommended Solution
-
-**Option A: Update AgentShield API to Accept Full DelegationRecord** (Preferred for spec compliance)
-- AgentShield creates W3C VC internally
-- Full spec compliance
-- Requires AgentShield changes
-
-**Option B: Create Simplified API Contract** (Faster, less compliant)
-- Add `CreateDelegationSimpleRequest` type
-- AgentShield accepts simplified format
-- Convert to `DelegationRecord` internally
-- Phase 4 can use simplified format initially
-
-**Option C: Hybrid Approach** (Recommended)
-- Phase 4 Part A: Use simplified format with `issuerDid` added
-- Phase 4 Part B+: Migrate to full `DelegationRecord` format
-- Maintain backward compatibility
-
-**Parity Grade: C+** (Needs immediate attention)
-
----
-
-## Plan Quality Assessment
-
-### ✅ **Strengths**
-
-1. **Clear Problem Identification**: Correctly identifies all 6 critical issues
-2. **Prioritized Implementation**: Parts A-F are well-ordered by priority
-3. **Test Coverage**: Includes comprehensive test plans
-4. **Security Considerations**: Part E addresses privacy and security
-5. **Mode Flexibility**: Part D supports ephemeral/persistent/hybrid modes
-6. **Realistic Timeline**: 12-day schedule is achievable
-
-### ⚠️ **Gaps & Recommendations**
-
-#### 1. API Contract Alignment Missing
-
-**Issue**: Plan doesn't address the API contract mismatch identified above.
-
-**Recommendation**: Add **Part A.0: API Contract Alignment** before Part A.1:
-
-```markdown
-#### A.0: Resolve API Contract Mismatch (Priority 0 - 1 day)
-
-**Problem**: Contracts package defines `CreateDelegationRequest` as `{ delegation: DelegationRecord }`, 
-but implementation sends simplified format `{ agent_did, scopes, expires_in_days }`.
-
-**Decision Required**:
-1. Update AgentShield API to accept full `DelegationRecord`?
-2. Create simplified contract type for Phase 4?
-3. Hybrid approach (simplified now, migrate later)?
-
-**Action Items**:
-- [ ] Audit AgentShield API actual implementation
-- [ ] Decide on contract approach
-- [ ] Update contracts package accordingly
-- [ ] Update consent.service.ts to match contract
-```
-
-#### 2. OAuth Flow Integration Details
-
-**Issue**: Part B.3 shows OAuth handler linking, but doesn't explain how consent page gets OAuth identity.
-
-**Recommendation**: Add flow diagram:
-
-```
-User → OAuth Provider → OAuth Callback → Set Cookie/Session → Consent Page → Extract OAuth Identity → Approval Request
-```
-
-#### 3. User DID Generation Strategy
-
-**Issue**: Plan shows `getUserDidForSession()` but doesn't clarify:
-- When is User DID generated? (Before OAuth? After OAuth?)
-- How does ephemeral → persistent transition work?
-
-**Recommendation**: Add state machine diagram:
-
-```
-Session Start → Ephemeral DID Generated
-    ↓
-OAuth Login → Link OAuth Identity → Persistent DID Retrieved/Created
-    ↓
-Consent Approval → Use Persistent DID as issuerDid
-```
-
-#### 4. Storage Key Strategy
-
-**Issue**: Part C fixes storage keys, but doesn't address:
-- Migration of existing delegations
-- Backward compatibility
-
-**Recommendation**: Add migration strategy:
-
-```typescript
-// Migration: Read old format, write new format
-const oldKey = `agent:${agentDid}:delegation`;
-const newKey = `delegation:user:${userDid}:agent:${agentDid}`;
-
-// Try new key first, fallback to old key
-const token = await storage.get(newKey) || await storage.get(oldKey);
-```
-
-#### 5. MCP-I Spec Compliance Timeline
-
-**Issue**: Plan mentions spec compliance but doesn't prioritize W3C VC creation.
-
-**Recommendation**: Add compliance roadmap:
-
-- **Phase 4**: Add `issuerDid`, proper constraints structure
-- **Phase 5**: Implement W3C VC creation (DelegationCredential)
-- **Phase 6**: Add cryptographic proof/signature
-- **Phase 7**: Implement StatusList2021 for revocation
-
-**Plan Quality Grade: B+**
-
----
-
-## Implementation Feasibility
-
-### ✅ **Highly Feasible**
-
-All parts are implementable with current infrastructure:
-
-1. **Part A**: User DID generation already exists (`UserDidManager`)
-2. **Part B**: OAuth handler exists, just needs integration
-3. **Part C**: Storage key changes are straightforward
-4. **Part D**: Mode configuration is architectural change
-5. **Part E**: Privacy service is new but well-defined
-6. **Part F**: Optional enhancement
-
-### ⚠️ **Dependencies**
-
-1. **AgentShield API Changes**: May need API updates for `issuerDid` support
-2. **Contracts Package Updates**: Must align API contracts
-3. **OAuth Provider Configuration**: Requires dashboard integration (already exists)
-
-**Feasibility Grade: A-**
-
----
-
-## Real-World Flow Analysis
-
-### ✅ **Flow is Sound**
-
-The proposed flow addresses real-world scenarios:
-
-1. **Single User, Single Agent**: ✅ Works with ephemeral mode
-2. **Single User, Multiple Sessions**: ✅ Works with persistent mode + OAuth
-3. **Multiple Users, Single Agent**: ✅ Fixed by Part C (storage keys)
-4. **OAuth Integration**: ✅ Properly integrated in Part B
-
-### ⚠️ **Edge Cases to Consider**
-
-1. **OAuth Provider Failure**: Plan mentions fallback but doesn't detail
-2. **User Switches OAuth Accounts**: How to handle DID migration?
-3. **Session Expiry During Consent**: How to maintain User DID?
-
-**Recommendation**: Add edge case handling section:
-
-```markdown
-### Edge Case Handling
-
-#### OAuth Provider Failure
-- Fallback to ephemeral DID
-- Log error for monitoring
-- User can retry OAuth later
-
-#### User Switches OAuth Accounts
-- Create new User DID for new OAuth identity
-- Old delegations remain valid (linked to old DID)
-- User can revoke old delegations via privacy service
-
-#### Session Expiry During Consent
-- User DID stored in session cookie (persistent)
-- Session expiry doesn't affect User DID
-- Consent approval retrieves DID from cookie
-```
-
-**Real-World Flow Grade: A**
-
----
-
-## MCP-I Specification Compliance
-
-### Current Compliance Status
-
-| Requirement | Current | Phase 4 | Full Spec |
-|------------|---------|---------|-----------|
-| issuerDid (User DID) | ❌ Missing | ✅ Added | ✅ Required |
-| subjectDid (Agent DID) | ✅ Present | ✅ Maintained | ✅ Required |
-| W3C VC Format | ❌ No | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Required |
-| Cryptographic Proof | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Required |
-| Constraints Structure | ⚠️ Simplified | ✅ Fixed | ✅ Required |
-| StatusList2021 | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Required |
-
-### Phase 4 Compliance Assessment
-
-**Level 1 Compliance**: ✅ Achieved
-- Basic delegation with issuerDid/subjectDid
-- Proper constraints structure
-
-**Level 2 Compliance**: ⚠️ Partial
-- Missing W3C VC format
-- Missing cryptographic proof
-
-**Level 3 Compliance**: ❌ Not Achieved
-- Missing OAuth 2.1 bridging (future work)
-- Missing anomaly detection (future work)
-
-**Compliance Grade: B** (Level 1 achieved, Level 2 partial)
-
----
-
-## Architectural Soundness
-
-### ✅ **Strong Architecture**
-
-1. **Separation of Concerns**: User DID, OAuth, Consent are properly separated
-2. **Storage Abstraction**: KV storage properly abstracted
-3. **Mode Flexibility**: Ephemeral/persistent/hybrid modes are well-designed
-4. **Privacy First**: Part E addresses GDPR compliance
-
-### ⚠️ **Architectural Concerns**
-
-1. **User DID Storage Location**: Plan uses KV, but doesn't specify namespace
-2. **OAuth Identity Storage**: Should be separate from delegation storage
-3. **Session Management**: User DID in session vs. cookie vs. storage?
-
-**Recommendation**: Clarify storage architecture:
-
-```typescript
-// Storage Namespaces
-const STORAGE_KEYS = {
-  // User DID storage (persistent)
-  userDid: (oauthProvider: string, subject: string) => 
-    `userDid:oauth:${oauthProvider}:${subject}`,
-  
-  // OAuth identity mapping (persistent)
-  oauthIdentity: (provider: string, subject: string) =>
-    `oauth:${provider}:${subject}`,
-  
-  // Delegation tokens (temporary)
-  delegation: (userDid: string, agentDid: string) =>
-    `delegation:user:${userDid}:agent:${agentDid}`,
-  
-  // Session cache (temporary)
-  session: (sessionId: string) =>
-    `session:${sessionId}`,
-};
-```
-
-**Architecture Grade: A-**
-
----
-
-## Detailed Component Grades
-
-### 1. xmcp-i Codebase
-
-**Strengths**:
-- ✅ Well-structured packages (core, cloudflare, contracts)
-- ✅ Comprehensive test coverage
-- ✅ Clear separation of concerns
-- ✅ Good documentation
-
-**Weaknesses**:
-- ⚠️ API contract mismatch (critical)
-- ⚠️ Missing User DID integration in consent flow
-- ⚠️ OAuth handler not connected to consent
-
-**Grade: B+**
-
-### 2. AgentShield/Bouncer Dashboard
-
-**Strengths**:
-- ✅ OAuth provider configuration exists
-- ✅ Delegation API endpoints exist
-- ✅ Dashboard UI for configuration
-
-**Weaknesses**:
-- ⚠️ API may not accept full `DelegationRecord` format
-- ⚠️ Missing `issuerDid` support in delegation creation
-- ⚠️ OAuth identity not linked to User DIDs
-
-**Grade: B**
-
-### 3. Know That AI (Reputation Engine)
-
-**Strengths**:
-- ✅ Reputation system architecture
-- ✅ DID-based identity tracking
-
-**Weaknesses**:
-- ⚠️ Not directly involved in Phase 4
-- ⚠️ Future integration points unclear
-
-**Grade: B** (Not primary focus of Phase 4)
-
-### 4. Contracts Package
-
-**Strengths**:
-- ✅ Comprehensive type definitions
-- ✅ Zod schemas for validation
-- ✅ MCP-I spec alignment
-
-**Weaknesses**:
-- ⚠️ API contracts don't match actual implementation
-- ⚠️ Missing simplified delegation request type
-
-**Grade: B+**
-
----
-
-## Critical Recommendations
-
-### 🔴 **MUST DO Before Implementation**
-
-1. **Resolve API Contract Mismatch** (Part A.0)
-   - Audit AgentShield API actual implementation
-   - Decide on contract approach (simplified vs. full)
-   - Update contracts package
-   - Update consent.service.ts
-
-2. **Verify AgentShield API Supports issuerDid**
-   - Check if API accepts `issuer_did` field
-   - If not, plan API update or workaround
-
-3. **Clarify OAuth Flow Integration**
-   - Document exact flow: OAuth → Cookie → Consent → Approval
-   - Test OAuth callback → consent page handoff
-
-### 🟡 **SHOULD DO During Implementation**
-
-4. **Add Edge Case Handling**
-   - OAuth provider failure
-   - User switches OAuth accounts
-   - Session expiry scenarios
-
-5. **Implement Storage Migration**
-   - Migrate existing delegations to new key format
-   - Maintain backward compatibility
-
-6. **Add Comprehensive Logging**
-   - User DID generation events
-   - OAuth linking events
-   - Delegation creation with issuerDid
-
-### 🟢 **NICE TO HAVE**
-
-7. **Performance Optimization**
-   - Cache User DID lookups
-   - Batch OAuth identity queries
-
-8. **Enhanced Privacy Controls**
-   - User DID export functionality
-   - Delegation history viewing
-
----
-
-## Revised Implementation Plan
-
-### Phase 4.0: API Contract Alignment (NEW - 1 day)
-
-**Before Part A**, resolve API contract mismatch:
-
-1. **Audit AgentShield API** (2 hours)
-   - Check actual endpoint implementation
-   - Document current request/response format
-   - Identify gaps vs. contracts package
-
-2. **Decide Contract Strategy** (1 hour)
-   - Option A: Update AgentShield to accept full `DelegationRecord`
-   - Option B: Create simplified contract type
-   - Option C: Hybrid approach
-
-3. **Update Contracts Package** (3 hours)
-   - Add simplified type if needed
-   - Update schemas
-   - Ensure backward compatibility
-
-4. **Update Consent Service** (2 hours)
-   - Align with chosen contract
-   - Add `issuerDid` field
-   - Test API calls
-
-### Phase 4.1: Core Delegation Flow (Updated - 2 days)
-
-**Part A with API contract alignment**:
-
-1. **A.0**: API Contract Alignment (from Phase 4.0)
-2. **A.1**: Update Delegation Creation with User DID
-3. **A.2**: Add `getUserDidForSession` Method
-4. **A.3**: Test API Parity
-
-### Phase 4.2-4.6: Remain Unchanged
-
-Parts B-F remain as planned, with additions:
-- Edge case handling
-- Storage migration
-- Enhanced logging
-
----
-
-## Success Criteria (Updated)
-
-### Functional Requirements
-
-- [x] User DIDs persist across sessions when using OAuth
-- [x] Delegations include correct `issuerDid` (User) and `subjectDid` (Agent)
-- [x] OAuth identity correctly linked to User DIDs
-- [x] Multi-tenant conflicts resolved
-- [x] **API contracts aligned between xmcp-i and AgentShield** (NEW)
-- [x] **Edge cases handled gracefully** (NEW)
-
-### Non-Functional Requirements
-
-- [x] <100ms overhead for DID operations
-- [x] GDPR compliance for data operations
-- [x] 95% test coverage for new code
-- [x] Clear separation between dev/test/prod modes
-- [x] **Backward compatibility maintained** (NEW)
-
-### Security Requirements
-
-- [x] OAuth account verification prevents unauthorized linking
-- [x] Rate limiting on identity operations
-- [x] Audit trail for all identity changes
-- [x] Secure token storage with encryption
-- [x] **User DID privacy protection** (NEW)
-
----
-
-## Final Grades
-
-### Component Grades
-
-| Component | Grade | Notes |
-|-----------|-------|-------|
-| **xmcp-i Codebase** | **B+** | Well-structured, needs API contract alignment |
-| **AgentShield Dashboard** | **B** | OAuth UI exists, needs API updates |
-| **Know That AI** | **B** | Not primary focus, future integration |
-| **Contracts Package** | **B+** | Comprehensive but needs alignment |
-| **Phase 4 Plan** | **A-** | Excellent structure, needs API contract section |
-
-### Overall Grades
-
-| Category | Grade | Justification |
-|----------|-------|---------------|
-| **Mission Alignment** | **A** | Directly addresses MCP-I spec requirements |
-| **Codebase Parity** | **C+** | Critical API contract mismatch identified |
-| **Plan Quality** | **B+** | Well-structured, needs API contract section |
-| **Implementation Feasibility** | **A-** | Highly feasible with current infrastructure |
-| **Real-World Flow** | **A** | Addresses all major scenarios |
-| **Spec Compliance** | **B** | Level 1 achieved, Level 2 partial |
-| **Architecture** | **A-** | Sound design, needs storage clarification |
-
-### **Overall Project Grade: B+**
-
-### **Overall Plan Grade: A-** (with recommended additions)
-
----
-
-## Conclusion
-
-The Phase 4 plan is **well-conceived and addresses critical architectural gaps**. The core concept of linking OAuth identities to persistent User DIDs is sound and aligns with MCP-I specification requirements.
-
-**Key Strengths**:
-- ✅ Clear problem identification
-- ✅ Prioritized implementation
-- ✅ Comprehensive test planning
-- ✅ Security and privacy considerations
-
-**Critical Gaps**:
-- ⚠️ API contract mismatch must be resolved first
-- ⚠️ OAuth flow integration needs more detail
-- ⚠️ Edge case handling should be added
-
-**Recommendation**: **APPROVE with modifications**. Add Phase 4.0 (API Contract Alignment) before Part A, and incorporate edge case handling throughout.
-
-**Next Steps**:
-1. Resolve API contract mismatch (Phase 4.0)
-2. Verify AgentShield API supports `issuerDid`
-3. Begin Part A implementation
-4. Iterate based on testing results
-
----
-
-## Appendix: API Contract Alignment Decision Matrix
-
-### Option A: Full DelegationRecord (Preferred)
-
-**Pros**:
-- ✅ Full MCP-I spec compliance
-- ✅ Future-proof
-- ✅ Interoperable with other MCP-I systems
-
-**Cons**:
-- ❌ Requires AgentShield API changes
-- ❌ Requires VC creation infrastructure
-- ❌ More complex implementation
-
-**Effort**: High (3-5 days)
-
-### Option B: Simplified Contract (Faster)
-
-**Pros**:
-- ✅ Faster implementation
-- ✅ No AgentShield API changes needed
-- ✅ Simpler for Phase 4
-
-**Cons**:
-- ⚠️ Not fully spec compliant
-- ⚠️ May need migration later
-- ⚠️ Less interoperable
-
-**Effort**: Low (1 day)
-
-### Option C: Hybrid Approach (Recommended)
-
-**Pros**:
-- ✅ Phase 4 can proceed quickly
-- ✅ Path to full compliance
-- ✅ Backward compatible
-
-**Cons**:
-- ⚠️ Requires maintaining two formats
-- ⚠️ Migration complexity
-
-**Effort**: Medium (2-3 days)
-
-**Recommendation**: **Option C (Hybrid)** - Use simplified format for Phase 4, plan migration to full `DelegationRecord` in Phase 5.
-
----
-
-**Document End**
-