@kurokeita/add-skill 1.12.0 → 1.14.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: git-branch
3
+ description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a branch", "branch naming", "branch strategy", or "follow conventional branch". Provides guidelines for version control branching strategies and rules.
4
+ version: 1.0.0
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Git Branch
8
+
9
+ Guide for managing version control branching strategies following the Conventional Branch specification.
10
+
11
+ ## When to Use This Skill
12
+
13
+ - Creating new feature, bugfix, or maintenance branches
14
+ - Ensuring branch names follow project standards
15
+ - Managing branch lifecycle and organization
16
+ - Integrating issue tracker IDs into branch names
17
+
18
+ ## Branching Strategy
19
+
20
+ Follow the [Conventional Branch](https://conventional-branch.github.io/) specification for consistent and descriptive branch naming.
21
+
22
+ ### Structure
23
+
24
+ The branch structure follows a categorized format:
25
+ `<type>/<description>`
26
+
27
+ ### Types (`<type>`)
28
+
29
+ - `main`: The primary development branch (e.g., `main`, `master`, or `develop`).
30
+ - `feat/`: For new features (e.g., `feat/add-login-page`).
31
+ - `fix/`: For bug fixes (e.g., `fix/header-bug`).
32
+ - `hotfix/`: For urgent production fixes (e.g., `hotfix/security-patch`).
33
+ - `release/`: For preparing a new release (e.g., `release/v1.2.0`).
34
+ - `chore/`: For non-code tasks like dependencies or documentation updates (e.g., `chore/update-dependencies`).
35
+
36
+ ### Naming Rules
37
+
38
+ - **Character Set**: Use lowercase alphanumerics (`a-z`, `0-9`), hyphens (`-`), and dots (`.`).
39
+ - **Separators**: Use hyphens to separate words in the description. Dots are permitted in `release/` branches for versioning.
40
+ - **Restrictions**:
41
+ - Avoid special characters, underscores, or spaces.
42
+ - No consecutive hyphens or dots (e.g., avoid `new--login`).
43
+ - No leading or trailing hyphens/dots in the description.
44
+ - **Conciseness**: Keep names descriptive yet brief.
45
+ - **Ticket Integration**: Include project management ticket numbers if applicable (e.g., `feat/issue-123-new-login`).
46
+
47
+ ### Workflow
48
+
49
+ 1. Start from the main integration branch.
50
+ 2. Ensure the local branch is up-to-date: `git pull origin main`.
51
+ 3. Create the new branch: `git checkout -b <type>/<description>`.
52
+
53
+ ## Additional Resources
54
+
55
+ ### Reference Files
56
+
57
+ For detailed patterns and advanced git workflows, consult:
58
+
59
+ - **`references/branching-workflows.md`** - Advanced branching and merging strategies.
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
1
+ # Advanced Branching and Merging Strategies
2
+
3
+ Choosing the right branching strategy is crucial for team collaboration and continuous delivery.
4
+
5
+ ## Gitflow Workflow
6
+
7
+ Gitflow is a legacy Git workflow that was first published and made popular by Vincent Driessen. It's often used for projects that have a scheduled release cycle.
8
+
9
+ - `main` branch stores the official release history.
10
+ - `develop` branch serves as an integration branch for features.
11
+ - `feature/*` branches are used for developing new features.
12
+ - `release/*` branches support preparation of a new production release.
13
+ - `hotfix/*` branches are used to quickly patch production releases.
14
+
15
+ ## GitHub Flow
16
+
17
+ GitHub Flow is a lightweight, branch-based workflow that supports teams and projects where deployments happen regularly.
18
+
19
+ - Anything in the `main` branch is deployable.
20
+ - To work on something new, create a descriptive branch off of `main`.
21
+ - Commit to that branch locally and regularly push your work to the same named branch on the server.
22
+ - When you need feedback or help, or you think the branch is ready for merging, open a pull request.
23
+ - After someone else has reviewed and signed off on the feature, you can merge it into `main`.
24
+ - Once it is merged and pushed to `main`, you can and should deploy immediately.
25
+
26
+ ## Trunk-Based Development
27
+
28
+ A version control management strategy where developers merge small, frequent updates to a core “trunk” or main branch.
29
+
30
+ - High frequency of commits.
31
+ - Small PRs.
32
+ - Continuous Integration.
33
+ - Feature flags are often used to hide work-in-progress.
34
+
35
+ ## Merging vs Rebasing
36
+
37
+ ### Merging
38
+
39
+ `git merge` is a "non-destructive" operation. The existing branches are not changed in any way. This avoids all of the potential pitfalls of rebasing.
40
+
41
+ ```bash
42
+ git checkout feature/abc
43
+ git merge main
44
+ ```
45
+
46
+ ### Rebasing
47
+
48
+ `git rebase` moves the entire feature branch to begin on the tip of the `main` branch, effectively incorporating all of the new commits in `main`. It re-writes the project history by creating brand new commits for each commit in the original branch.
49
+
50
+ ```bash
51
+ git checkout feature/abc
52
+ git rebase main
53
+ ```
54
+
55
+ **Golden Rule of Rebasing**: Never use it on public branches.
56
+
57
+ ## Conflict Resolution
58
+
59
+ 1. Identify the conflict: `git status` will show unmerged paths.
60
+ 2. Open the files and look for `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, `>>>>>>>`.
61
+ 3. Decide which changes to keep.
62
+ 4. Stage the resolved files: `git add <file>`.
63
+ 5. Complete the merge or rebase: `git commit` or `git rebase --continue`.
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: git-clean
3
+ description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "clean the repository", "remove stale branches", "clear old stashes", "manage git hygiene", or "scan for redundant worktrees". Uses the @kurokeita/git-clean-up tool to audit and safely remove unused Git resources.
4
+ version: 1.0.0
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Git Clean Skill
8
+
9
+ Maintain repository hygiene by scanning for and removing stale branches, forgotten stashes, and redundant worktrees using the `@kurokeita/git-clean-up` tool.
10
+
11
+ ## When to Use This Skill
12
+
13
+ - Auditing the repository for stale or merged branches.
14
+ - Cleaning up old stashes or redundant Git worktrees.
15
+ - Improving local performance by removing unneeded Git objects.
16
+ - Automating repository hygiene tasks.
17
+
18
+ ## Workflow
19
+
20
+ Follow this procedure to safely clean the repository:
21
+
22
+ ### 1. Detect package runner
23
+
24
+ Determine whether to use `pnpx` or `npx` by checking if `pnpm` is installed. Always prioritize `pnpx`.
25
+
26
+ ```bash
27
+ # Check for pnpm
28
+ pnpm --version
29
+ ```
30
+
31
+ - If `pnpm` is available: Use `pnpx @kurokeita/git-clean-up`
32
+ - If `pnpm` is NOT available: Use `npx @kurokeita/git-clean-up`
33
+
34
+ ### 2. Audit findings
35
+
36
+ Run an initial scan using the `--json` flag to identify hygiene issues without making any changes. This enables precise analysis of the findings.
37
+
38
+ ```bash
39
+ <runner> @kurokeita/git-clean-up scan --json
40
+ ```
41
+
42
+ ### 3. Present report
43
+
44
+ Summarize the findings for the user, categorized by:
45
+
46
+ - **Branches**: Merged, squash-merged, or branches without upstreams.
47
+ - **Stashes**: Old stashes or stale WIPs.
48
+ - **Worktrees**: Missing paths or detached HEADs.
49
+
50
+ ### 4. Solicit confirmation
51
+
52
+ Present the findings to the user and ask which items or categories they would like to clean. Do NOT proceed to deletion without explicit user approval.
53
+
54
+ ### 5. Preview cleanup (Optional but Recommended)
55
+
56
+ If the user wants to see exactly what will be deleted for a specific selection, run the clean command without the `--apply` flag.
57
+
58
+ ```bash
59
+ # Preview all deletions
60
+ <runner> @kurokeita/git-clean-up clean --all
61
+
62
+ # Preview specific categories
63
+ <runner> @kurokeita/git-clean-up clean --include branches,stashes
64
+ ```
65
+
66
+ ### 6. Execute cleanup
67
+
68
+ After receiving confirmation, run the clean command with the `--apply` flag.
69
+
70
+ ```bash
71
+ # Clean everything confirmed
72
+ <runner> @kurokeita/git-clean-up clean --apply --all
73
+
74
+ # Clean specific categories
75
+ <runner> @kurokeita/git-clean-up clean --apply --include branches
76
+ ```
77
+
78
+ ## Safety Considerations
79
+
80
+ - **Protected Branches**: The tool automatically protects `main`, `master`, `develop`, and `dev`. Do not attempt to override these protections unless explicitly instructed.
81
+ - **Active Branches**: Branches checked out in other worktrees are skipped by default.
82
+ - **Verification**: Always verify the list of findings with the user before applying deletions.
83
+
84
+ ## Additional Resources
85
+
86
+ ### Reference Files
87
+
88
+ - **`references/tool-options.md`**: Detailed CLI options and configuration settings for `git-clean-up`.
89
+
90
+ ### Example Configurations
91
+
92
+ - **`examples/config.json`**: Sample `.git-clean-up.json` for repository-specific hygiene policies.
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "protectedBranches": ["release/*", "hotfix/*", "production"],
3
+ "includeCategories": ["branches", "stashes", "worktrees"],
4
+ "stashAgeDays": 21,
5
+ "defaultTargetBranch": "origin/main",
6
+ "branchInactiveDays": 60
7
+ }
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
1
+ # Git Clean Up Tool Options
2
+
3
+ Detailed reference for CLI options and configuration settings for the `@kurokeita/git-clean-up` tool.
4
+
5
+ ## Core Commands
6
+
7
+ ### `scan`
8
+
9
+ Audits the repository and lists hygiene issues without modifying any resources.
10
+
11
+ **Options:**
12
+
13
+ - `--json`: Output findings in JSON format for programmatic parsing.
14
+ - `--include <categories>`: Comma-separated list of categories to scan (branches, stashes, worktrees).
15
+ - `--target <branch>`: Specify the primary integration branch (default: `main` or `master`).
16
+ - `--age-days <number>`: Filter stashes or inactive branches older than X days.
17
+
18
+ ### `clean`
19
+
20
+ Previews or applies deletions based on hygiene audit results.
21
+
22
+ **Options:**
23
+
24
+ - `--apply`: Actually execute the deletion of selected items. Without this flag, the command only provides a preview.
25
+ - `--all`: Select all identified hygiene issues for cleanup.
26
+ - `--include <categories>`: Limit cleanup to specific categories (e.g., `--include branches`).
27
+ - `--force`: Force removal even if safety checks fail (use with extreme caution).
28
+
29
+ ## Configuration File
30
+
31
+ Behavior can be customized using a `.git-clean-up.json` file in the repository root or a global configuration at `~/.git-clean-up.json`.
32
+
33
+ ### Example Configuration
34
+
35
+ ```json
36
+ {
37
+ "protectedBranches": [
38
+ "release/*",
39
+ "hotfix/*",
40
+ "production"
41
+ ],
42
+ "includeCategories": [
43
+ "branches",
44
+ "stashes",
45
+ "worktrees"
46
+ ],
47
+ "stashAgeDays": 14,
48
+ "defaultTargetBranch": "origin/develop",
49
+ "branchInactiveDays": 30
50
+ }
51
+ ```
52
+
53
+ ## Policy Enforcement (CI Mode)
54
+
55
+ The tool can be used in CI pipelines to enforce repository hygiene.
56
+
57
+ - `--fail-on <level>`: Exit with a non-zero code if findings of a certain risk level (low, medium, high) are found.
58
+ - `--max-findings <number>`: Fail if the total number of hygiene issues exceeds the specified threshold.
59
+ - `--summary`: Output a high-level summary of findings, ideal for build logs.
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: git-commit
3
+ description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "commit changes", "commit message", or "follow conventional commits". Provides guidelines for Conventional Commits specification and commit message formatting.
4
+ version: 1.0.0
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Git Commit
8
+
9
+ Guide for managing version control commit message formatting following the Conventional Commits specification.
10
+
11
+ ## When to Use This Skill
12
+
13
+ - Formatting commit messages to follow project standards
14
+ - Learning the Conventional Commits specification
15
+ - Ensuring consistency across the repository's history
16
+
17
+ ## Conventional Commits
18
+
19
+ Format commit messages according to the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) specification to enable automated changelog generation and easier history browsing.
20
+
21
+ ### Structure
22
+
23
+ ```
24
+ <type>(<scope>): <description>
25
+
26
+ [optional body]
27
+
28
+ [optional footer(s)]
29
+ ```
30
+
31
+ ### Types
32
+
33
+ - `feat`: A new feature
34
+ - `fix`: A bug fix
35
+ - `docs`: Documentation only changes
36
+ - `style`: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)
37
+ - `refactor`: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
38
+ - `perf`: A code change that improves performance
39
+ - `test`: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
40
+ - `build`: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
41
+ - `ci`: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
42
+ - `chore`: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
43
+ - `revert`: Reverts a previous commit
44
+
45
+ ### Guidelines
46
+
47
+ - **Description**: Use the imperative, present tense (e.g., "add", not "added" or "adds").
48
+ - **Case**: The description should be in lower-case or sentence-case.
49
+ - **Scope**: Use a scope to provide additional contextual information (e.g., `feat(auth): add login validation`).
50
+ - **Body**: Use the body to explain the "what" and "why" of the change, not the "how".
51
+ - **Footer**: Use the footer to reference issues (e.g., `Closes #123`) or breaking changes.
52
+
53
+ ## Additional Resources
54
+
55
+ ### Reference Files
56
+
57
+ For detailed patterns and advanced git workflows, consult:
58
+
59
+ - **`references/conventional-commits.md`** - Detailed Conventional Commits specification.
60
+
61
+ ### Example Files
62
+
63
+ Working examples in `examples/`:
64
+
65
+ - **`commit-messages.txt`** - Examples of well-formatted commit messages.
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
1
+ # Example Commit Messages
2
+
3
+ ## Features
4
+ - `feat(ui): add progress bar component`
5
+ - `feat(auth): implement oauth2 login with google`
6
+ - `feat!: change default api version to v2`
7
+
8
+ ## Bug Fixes
9
+ - `fix(parser): handle empty input string gracefully`
10
+ - `fix: resolve race condition in database connection pool`
11
+ - `fix(styles): fix padding issues on mobile devices`
12
+
13
+ ## Documentation
14
+ - `docs: update readme with installation instructions`
15
+ - `docs(api): document the new /user/profile endpoint`
16
+ - `docs: add contributing guide`
17
+
18
+ ## Refactoring
19
+ - `refactor(core): simplify the request handling logic`
20
+ - `refactor: move utility functions to a separate module`
21
+ - `refactor(tests): reduce duplication in integration tests`
22
+
23
+ ## Performance
24
+ - `perf(image): optimize image loading speed using lazy-loading`
25
+ - `perf: add caching layer for frequently accessed data`
26
+
27
+ ## Tests
28
+ - `test(auth): add unit tests for jwt validation`
29
+ - `test: increase coverage for the math module`
30
+
31
+ ## Chore
32
+ - `chore: update dependencies`
33
+ - `chore(deps): bump vite from 4.0 to 5.0`
34
+ - `chore: remove unused log statements`
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
1
+ # Conventional Commits Specification
2
+
3
+ The Conventional Commits specification is a lightweight convention on top of commit messages. It provides an easy set of rules for creating an explicit commit history; which makes it easier to write automated tools on top of.
4
+
5
+ ## The Specification
6
+
7
+ The commit message should be structured as follows:
8
+
9
+ ```
10
+ <type>[optional scope]: <description>
11
+
12
+ [optional body]
13
+
14
+ [optional footer(s)]
15
+ ```
16
+
17
+ ### Type
18
+
19
+ The type is a short string that describes the category of the change. Common types include:
20
+
21
+ - `feat`: (feature)
22
+ - `fix`: (bug fix)
23
+ - `docs`: (documentation)
24
+ - `style`: (formatting, missing semi-colons, etc; no code change)
25
+ - `refactor`: (refactoring production code)
26
+ - `test`: (adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change)
27
+ - `chore`: (updating grunt tasks etc; no production code change)
28
+
29
+ ### Scope
30
+
31
+ A scope MAY be provided after a type. A scope MUST consist of a noun describing a section of the codebase surrounded by parenthesis, e.g., `fix(parser):`
32
+
33
+ ### Description
34
+
35
+ The description contains a succinct description of the change:
36
+
37
+ - use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
38
+ - don't capitalize the first letter
39
+ - no dot (.) at the end
40
+
41
+ ### Body
42
+
43
+ A longer commit body MAY be provided after the short description, providing additional contextual information about the code changes. The body MUST begin one blank line after the description.
44
+
45
+ ### Footer
46
+
47
+ One or more footers MAY be provided one blank line after the body. Each footer MUST consist of a word token, followed by either a `:<space>` or `<space>#` separator, followed by a string value (this is inspired by the git trailer convention).
48
+
49
+ ### Breaking Changes
50
+
51
+ A breaking change MUST be indicated by an `!` after the type/scope, or as a footer entry starting with `BREAKING CHANGE:`.
52
+
53
+ ## Examples
54
+
55
+ ### Commit message with description and breaking change footer
56
+
57
+ ```
58
+ feat: allow provided config object to extend other configs
59
+
60
+ BREAKING CHANGE: `extends` key in config file is now used for extending other config files
61
+ ```
62
+
63
+ ### Commit message with ! to draw attention to breaking change
64
+
65
+ ```
66
+ feat!: send an email to the customer when a product is shipped
67
+ ```
68
+
69
+ ### Commit message with scope and ! to draw attention to breaking change
70
+
71
+ ```
72
+ chore(api)!: drop support for Node 6
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ ### Commit message with multi-paragraph body and multiple footers
76
+
77
+ ```
78
+ fix: prevent racing of requests
79
+
80
+ Introduce a request id and a reference to latest request. All
81
+ rest responses are checked against the current id before update.
82
+
83
+ Reviewers: adrian, jdoe
84
+ Fixes #123
85
+ ```
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: git-pr
3
+ description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a pull request", "open a PR", "prepare a pull request", or "review a PR description". Provides guidelines for effective pull request management and industry-standard templates.
4
+ version: 1.0.0
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Git Pull Request
8
+
9
+ Guide for creating and managing clear and informative pull requests to facilitate effective code review and collaboration.
10
+
11
+ ## When to Use This Skill
12
+
13
+ - Preparing and creating pull requests
14
+ - Writing pull request descriptions
15
+ - Ensuring pull requests meet quality standards before submission
16
+ - Managing the PR lifecycle and reviewer feedback
17
+
18
+ ## Pull Request Management
19
+
20
+ Create clear and informative pull requests to ensure that reviewers can understand the impact and context of your changes.
21
+
22
+ ### PR Creation Process
23
+
24
+ 1. **Push your branch**: `git push origin <branch-name>`.
25
+ 2. **Open the PR**: Use the GitHub CLI or web interface.
26
+ 3. **Title**: Use the Conventional Commits format for the title (e.g., `feat(ui): add dashboard widgets`).
27
+ 4. **Description**: Use a template (if available) to describe:
28
+ - What changes were made.
29
+ - Why they were made.
30
+ - How they were tested.
31
+ - Any breaking changes or new dependencies.
32
+
33
+ ### Best Practices
34
+
35
+ - **Keep it focused**: One PR per logical change. Avoid "mega-PRs".
36
+ - **Self-review**: Review your own changes before asking others.
37
+ - **Link issues**: Use keywords like `Fixes #123` or `Closes #123` in the description.
38
+ - **Update regularly**: Rebase or merge from the main branch if the PR becomes stale.
39
+
40
+ ## Additional Resources
41
+
42
+ ### Reference Files
43
+
44
+ For detailed patterns and industry-standard analysis, consult:
45
+
46
+ - **`references/pr-best-practices.md`** - Analysis of PR patterns from top repositories.
47
+
48
+ ### Example Files
49
+
50
+ Working examples in `examples/`:
51
+
52
+ - **`pr-description-template.md`** - A standard, industry-standard PR description template.
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
1
+ ## Summary
2
+ <!-- Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve? -->
3
+
4
+ ## Related Issue
5
+ <!-- Link to the issue this PR addresses (e.g., Fixes #123, Closes #456) -->
6
+ Fixes #
7
+
8
+ ## Type of Change
9
+ <!-- Please delete options that are not relevant -->
10
+ - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
11
+ - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
12
+ - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
13
+ - [ ] Documentation update
14
+ - [ ] Refactor (code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature)
15
+
16
+ ## How did you test this change?
17
+ <!--
18
+ Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.
19
+ Provide instructions so we can reproduce.
20
+ Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
21
+ -->
22
+ - [ ] Test Case A: ...
23
+ - [ ] Test Case B: ...
24
+
25
+ ### Screenshots (if applicable)
26
+ <!-- Add images to show visual changes -->
27
+
28
+ ## Checklist
29
+
30
+ - [ ] I have read the [CONTRIBUTING](CONTRIBUTING.md) document.
31
+ - [ ] My code follows the code style of this project.
32
+ - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code.
33
+ - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
34
+ - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
35
+ - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings.
36
+ - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
37
+ - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
38
+
39
+ ## Special notes for your reviewer
40
+ <!-- Any specific areas you want the reviewer to focus on? -->
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
1
+ # Pull Request Description Best Practices
2
+
3
+ A well-crafted pull request (PR) description is essential for effective code review, maintaining project history, and ensuring that changes meet quality standards.
4
+
5
+ ## Core Components
6
+
7
+ The most effective PR templates across major open-source repositories (like React, VS Code, and Kubernetes) share these core components:
8
+
9
+ ### 1. Summary & Motivation
10
+
11
+ Explain **what** you changed and **why** you changed it.
12
+
13
+ - What problem does this PR solve?
14
+ - What is the context for this change?
15
+ - Are there any architectural decisions or trade-offs made?
16
+
17
+ ### 2. Related Issues
18
+
19
+ Always link to the issue(s) being addressed. Use keywords that GitHub recognizes to automatically close issues when the PR is merged:
20
+
21
+ - `Fixes #123`
22
+
23
+ - `Closes #123`
24
+
25
+ - `Resolves #123`
26
+
27
+ ### 3. Type of Change
28
+
29
+ Categorize the PR to help maintainers quickly understand its impact:
30
+
31
+ - **Bug Fix**: Non-breaking change that fixes an issue.
32
+
33
+ - **New Feature**: Non-breaking change that adds functionality.
34
+
35
+ - **Breaking Change**: Fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change.
36
+ - **Documentation**: Changes to documentation only.
37
+ - **Refactor**: Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature.
38
+
39
+ ### 4. Test Plan (Verification)
40
+
41
+ Describe how you verified your changes. This is the most critical section for reviewers.
42
+
43
+ - **Automated Tests**: Mention new or existing tests that cover the changes.
44
+ - **Manual Testing**: List the steps taken to manually verify the behavior.
45
+ - **Screenshots/Gifs**: Provide visual evidence for UI/UX changes.
46
+
47
+ ### 5. Checklist
48
+
49
+ A set of mandatory steps the contributor must confirm:
50
+
51
+ - [ ] My code follows the project's style guidelines.
52
+ - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
53
+ - [ ] I have added tests that cover my changes.
54
+ - [ ] All new and existing tests passed.
55
+ - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
56
+
57
+ ### 6. Special Notes for Reviewers
58
+
59
+ Use this section to highlight specific areas where you need feedback or to explain complex logic that might be hard to follow.
60
+
61
+ ## Best Practices
62
+
63
+ - **Keep it focused**: One logical change per PR. Small PRs are easier to review and less likely to introduce bugs.
64
+ - **Write for the future**: Your PR description will be part of the repository's history. Write it so that someone reading it a year from now can understand the context.
65
+ - **Be concise but thorough**: Avoid "fluff," but don't leave out critical information.
66
+ - **Update the description**: If the PR evolves during the review process, update the description to reflect the final state of the changes.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@kurokeita/add-skill",
3
- "version": "1.12.0",
3
+ "version": "1.14.0",
4
4
  "description": "CLI to install AI agent skills to various platforms",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {