@kungfu-tech/buildchain 2.13.0 → 2.14.0-alpha.0

package/dist/site/buildchain-site.json

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
   "contract": "kungfu-buildchain-site-bundle",
-  "generatedAt": "2026-07-16T07:45:10.422Z",
-  "publishedAt": "2026-07-16T07:45:10.422Z",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-07-16T17:11:20.307Z",
+  "publishedAt": "2026-07-16T17:11:20.307Z",
   "reproducible": true,
   "timestampPolicy": "ci-injected",
   "deterministicInputs": [
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
     "declared Buildchain surface manifest contract"
   ],
   "sourceDateEpoch": "0",
-  "sourceRevision": "eeac02686f845b4f496b2cbaa78713e6d4b2532b",
+  "sourceRevision": "d20ec69c151eacc49d4fe22afbd738f960f2553c",
   "timestampPolicyDetails": {
     "contract": "kungfu-buildchain-surface-timestamp-policy",
     "timestampFields": [
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
   },
   "package": {
     "name": "@kungfu-tech/buildchain",
-    "version": "2.13.0",
+    "version": "2.14.0-alpha.0",
     "versionSource": "package.json#version"
   },
   "source": {
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "stable",
       "sourcePath": "docs/cli.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:ef5be4484da8628b9e027f00fe0fdb5b295665ed23eeceefac48e63581f12c0c",
+      "digest": "sha256:a7a31bbec048acbc9759324c5421c7ea0734f394f8d6705b63d70654867fdfa6",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@
           "anchor": "npm-publish-gate"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "# Buildchain CLI, npm Package, and Toolkit API\n\nBuildchain is published as the public npm package\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain`. The package contains the `buildchain` command,\nthe importable ESM toolkit APIs, and the local scripts needed to initialize and\nvalidate repositories before they use the reusable GitHub workflow surface.\n\nThe npm package is not the release authority. Release authority still comes\nfrom the protected Buildchain branch and tag state machine. npm publishing is a\nside effect of an exact release tag that has already been produced by that\nstate machine.\n\n## Install and Run\n\nUse the published package directly:\n\n```bash\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain --help\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain init --type package\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain validate --require-version-state\n```\n\nOr install it in a repository:\n\n```bash\npnpm add -D @kungfu-tech/buildchain\npnpm exec buildchain validate\n```\n\nConsumers should pin the exact Buildchain version that was validated in their\nrepository. When dogfooding a fresh Buildchain release immediately after it is\npublished, pnpm may block the install through a minimum release-age policy. In\nthat case, add a temporary package/version-specific `minimumReleaseAgeExclude`\nentry, such as `@kungfu-tech/buildchain@2.2.5`, and remove it once the package\nhas aged past the normal policy window. Do not replace that with a broad\nregistry or scope-wide exclude.\n\nUse the package API directly inside JavaScript build scripts:\n\n```js\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({ source: \"user\", component: \"build\" });\nawait logger.span(\"build.native\", { phase: \"build\" }, async () => {\n  await buildNativeArtifacts();\n});\n```\n\nThe standalone binary and CLI are for workflow steps, shell scripts, and\nnon-JavaScript environments. JavaScript code that already depends on\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain` should import the toolkit API instead of spawning\n`npx buildchain` or a downloaded binary.\n\n## Node API and Package Exports\n\nBuildchain's public Node API is the package `exports` surface, not arbitrary\ninternal file paths. The npm package also ships\n`dist/site/node-api-registry.json` and exports it as\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/node-api-registry.json` so agents can enumerate\nthe supported imports from the installed package.\nFor navigation, start with `dist/site/capability-registry.json`: it groups\nmanuals, CLI commands, workflow/action inputs, Node exports, site pages, and KFD\nclaim facts by product capability before an agent chooses a concrete command or\nmanual.\n\nCurrent public import families include:\n\n```js\nimport * as buildchain from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain\";\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\nimport { collectModuleBuildFacts } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/build-facts\";\nimport { checkHomebrewTap } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/homebrew\";\nimport { verifyKfd1ReleaseGate } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/kfd-gate\";\nimport { collectBadgeBundleFacts } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/badges\";\nimport { collectReadmeBadgeFacts } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/readme-badges\";\nimport { verifyReleasePassport } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/release-passport\";\nimport { createReleasePropagationPlan } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/release-propagation\";\nimport { planReleaseLineBootstrap } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/release-line-bootstrap\";\nimport { collectPublicSurfaceReverseAudit } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/public-surface-audit\";\nimport { createBuildchainLayoutDiscovery } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/buildchain-layout\";\nimport contractWorld from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/buildchain-contract.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport capabilityRegistry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/capability-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport manualRegistry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/manual-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport nodeApiRegistry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/node-api-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport publicSurfaceAudit from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/public-surface-audit.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\n```\n\nUse `dist/site/manual-registry.json` to find the packaged operating manuals and\ntheir SHA-256 digests. Use `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` to verify the\nfloating-ref contract world for a runtime such as `@v2`.\n\n## Commands\n\n`buildchain layout` is the stable machine question for repository layout. Tools\nsuch as Shifu should call it instead of copying `.buildchain/` path constants:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain layout --cwd /path/to/repository --json\n```\n\nThe result identifies the Buildchain version pin, repository root and config,\nthe canonical and currently resolved KFD-3 registry paths, and the KFD field\nused to declare Shifu jurisdiction. A repository is in Shifu's distribution\njurisdiction only when a KFD-3 surface explicitly declares\n`distribution.registrar=\"shifu\"`; the presence of Buildchain configuration is\nnot sufficient. The same contract is available through\n`createBuildchainLayoutDiscovery()` from\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain/buildchain-layout`.\n\n`buildchain init` writes a starter `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` and a reusable workflow\ncaller at `.github/workflows/build.yml`.\n\nSupported presets:\n\n- `--type package` for Node package repositories with pnpm, npm, or yarn.\n- `--type native` for CMake-style native projects.\n- `--type web-surface` for preview/staging/production site or app deployments.\n- `--type infra-contract` for provider-agnostic infrastructure contract\n  validation, observation, contract publication, and downstream propagation\n  planning without default mutation. Provider adapters expose built-in command\n  plans by default, and only configured `[infra.commands]` hooks can execute.\n- `--type publication-artifact` for papers, reports, specifications, and other\n  publication repositories that produce PDFs, metadata, source bundles, and\n  site-consumable manifests without becoming web-surface repositories. The\n  scaffold uses Buildchain's pinned\n  `ghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/latex-pdf-builder:v1.2.0` toolchain for\n  LaTeX PDF builds.\n- `--type distribution-index` for Homebrew taps and other index repositories\n  whose files are projections of upstream release passport evidence.\n- `--type anchored-package` for packages whose version is anchored to an\n  explicit upstream release manifest.\n\nThe native preset includes an opt-in `[diagnostics.native]` profile with common\ntool/cache/artifact probes. Consumers can keep it enabled, adjust the tool and\ndirectory lists, or disable it if a repository does not need native diagnostics.\n\n`buildchain validate` parses `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`, checks configured version-state\nfiles, and can require named lifecycle stages:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain validate \\\n  --require-version-state \\\n  --require-lifecycle-stages install,build,verify\n```\n\n`buildchain lifecycle run <stage>` executes a lifecycle stage and writes the\nsame deterministic artifact manifest contract used by the reusable workflow:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain lifecycle run build \\\n  --artifact-path dist \\\n  --artifact-name \"{repo}-{version}-{platform}\"\n```\n\n`buildchain release line open` plans or writes the first version-state commit\nfor a new semver minor line. It does not publish anything. The dry-run mode is\nthe default and returns the dev/alpha/release refs, protection contract, default\nbranch action, and initial version before any GitHub mutation happens:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n  --major 2 \\\n  --minor 10 \\\n  --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe write mode only updates local version-state files. The repository workflow\n`Release Line Bootstrap` wraps this command and, when `apply=true`, commits the\ninitial version state, creates `dev/vX/vX.Y`, `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, and\n`release/vX/vX.Y`, applies one-review branch protection, switches the default\nbranch, and opens the first dev-to-alpha channel PR:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n  --major 2 \\\n  --minor 10 \\\n  --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n  --write \\\n  --json\n```\n\n`buildchain` also publishes a public surface reverse audit as\n`dist/site/public-surface-audit.json`. The audit enumerates CLI commands from\n`bin/buildchain.mjs`, workflow inputs, action inputs, site pages, and docs\ncommand references, then compares them with the generated registries. Buildchain\nself-checks fail closed when an enumerable public surface is missing from the\nregistry:\n\n```js\nimport {\n  collectPublicSurfaceReverseAudit,\n  assertPublicSurfaceReverseAudit,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/public-surface-audit\";\n\nassertPublicSurfaceReverseAudit(collectPublicSurfaceReverseAudit({ root: process.cwd() }));\n```\n\n`buildchain kfd` is the product-facing KFD namespace. Schema commands expose the\nmachine-readable KFD standards shipped by `@kungfu-tech/kfd`, while versioned\nsubcommands host concrete product workflows. KFD-1, KFD-2, and KFD-3 are\nfirst-class Buildchain surfaces. KFD-4 is schema-only until Buildchain has a\nreal verification protocol for it.\n\n`status` reports implemented support and the active repo-owned file layout.\n`migrate-layout` moves legacy root files into `.buildchain/`:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd status --json\nbuildchain kfd migrate-layout --write\n```\n\nKFD-1 commands generate and validate contract-world release evidence:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd 1 schema --json\nbuildchain kfd 1 witness --json\nbuildchain kfd 1 gate --witness-json kfd-1-witness.json --json\nbuildchain kfd 1 verify --gate-json kfd-1-gate.json --json\n```\n\nKFD-2 commands validate trust taxonomy entries and generate Buildchain's public\nclaim evidence. Product repositories use the `product-claims` subcommand to\nvalidate and render their own declared KFD-2 release claims under the canonical\nBuildchain KFD layout:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd 2 schema --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 taxonomy --entry-json residual-risk.json --kind residualRisk --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 claims --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 product-claims check --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 product-claims write --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 product-claims render --json\n```\n\nThe default source is `.buildchain/kfd/kfd-2/registry.json`; outputs are\n`.buildchain/kfd/kfd-2/release-claims.json`, per-claim release-passport inputs\nunder `claims/`, and `buildchain-claim-args.txt`. Use `--registry` or\n`--output-dir` only for an explicit product packaging projection. `check` never\nwrites and exits non-zero when outputs drift.\n\nKFD-3 commands are separate from Buildchain's self reverse audit: products can\ndetect standard public surfaces, register the accepted boundary, audit the\ncurrent source or artifact tree, generate a release-passport-compatible witness,\nand expose a capability map for agents:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd schema list --json\nbuildchain kfd schema show kfd-3 --json\nbuildchain kfd 3 detect --kind node-api --kind cli --json\nbuildchain kfd 3 register node-api --product Buildchain\nbuildchain kfd 3 audit --json\nbuildchain kfd 3 witness --kind prebuild --output .buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/collaboration-interface.prebuild.json\nbuildchain kfd 3 query buildchain --json\nbuildchain kfd 4 schema --json\n```\n\nThe public Node API is exported from `@kungfu-tech/buildchain/kfd`. See\n[`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) for the detected / declared / enforced model\nand the agent query flow.\n\nLifecycle runs also write a Buildchain observability JSONL log at\n`.buildchain/logs/events.jsonl` by default. Framework events use\n`source=buildchain`; consumer lifecycle commands use `source=user`. This lets a\nmaintainer tell apart time spent inside Buildchain's artifact/manifest\nframework from time spent in the repository's own build, test, packaging, or\npublish commands. The artifact manifest and summary embed the observability\nsummary for that lifecycle run id, so uploaded artifacts preserve the timing\nfacts without mixing in older JSONL events.\n\n`buildchain log`, `buildchain mark`, and `buildchain span` expose the same event\nprotocol to repository scripts:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain mark --event configure.ready --phase configure --attribute target=release\nbuildchain span --event native.build --phase build -- cmake --build build\nbuildchain log warn --event cache.miss --component conan --attribute token=hidden\nbuildchain log summary --json\nbuildchain verify observability-log .buildchain/logs/events.jsonl --min-events 4 --require-phase build\nbuildchain diagnostics summary .buildchain/artifacts/*/diagnostics.json --json\nbuildchain sample process-tree --label native-build --interval-ms 15000 -- make -j20\n```\n\nDuring `buildchain lifecycle run`, child processes receive\n`BUILDCHAIN_LOG_PATH` and `BUILDCHAIN_LOG_RUN_ID`. A shell, Python, CMake, Conan,\nor JavaScript helper can call `buildchain mark` or `buildchain span` mid-build\nand have those events grouped into the same lifecycle summary.\n`buildchain verify observability-log` is a release gate: it fails when the log\nis missing, has too few events, contains error events, or does not include\nrequired phases, components, or event names.\n\nThe event protocol is JSONL and is also available from the SDK:\n\n```js\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({ source: \"user\", component: \"native-build\" });\nlogger.mark(\"configure.ready\", { phase: \"configure\" });\n```\n\nSecret-looking attribute keys such as `token`, `password`, `secret`,\n`authorization`, `cookie`, and `private-key` are redacted before they are written.\nFull command strings are not recorded by `span`; scripts should provide stable\nevent names and safe attributes instead.\n\n`buildchain diagnostics summary` reads one or more small diagnostics artifacts\nand emits the same cross-platform summary as the diagnostics SDK:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain diagnostics summary \\\n  .buildchain/artifacts/linux-x64/diagnostics.json \\\n  .buildchain/artifacts/macos-arm64/diagnostics.json \\\n  --output .buildchain/artifacts/diagnostics-summary.json \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe JSON summary keeps per-platform lifecycle stage tables, adds lifecycle\ntotal durations, carries top slow spans, aggregates warning/error counts, and\nsorts the slowest platforms. Each platform row carries compact runner facts,\nchecked tool versions/missing tools, package manager/cache directory details,\ncompiler-cache availability, and a compact process sampler summary: requested\nparallelism, observed max active processes, the ratio between them, sample\ncount, process categories, and the top sampled command basenames. This lets\nmaintainers inspect matrix timing, runner, tool, cache, and concurrency context\nwithout downloading large platform binaries or process sidecars first.\nWhen a sibling `diagnostics-manifest.json` is available, the summary also records\nits file list and verifies the listed `diagnostics.json` byte count and sha256.\nMissing, unreadable, or mismatched sidecar manifests are reported through\n`diagnosticsManifestWarningCount` and the per-platform `diagnosticsManifest`\nfield without failing the timing rollup.\nThe summary also compares each `diagnostics.json` contract to\n`BUILDCHAIN_DIAGNOSTICS_CONTRACT`; mismatches are reported through\n`diagnosticsContractWarningCount` and the per-platform `diagnosticsContract`\nfield so reviewers can separate diagnostics schema drift from lifecycle\nwarnings or build failures.\n\nWithout `--json`, the command prints a compact lifecycle timing table with\ninstall/build/verify/publish, artifact scan/upload, total, warning, and error\ncolumns for each platform, plus `jobs` and `active` columns for requested and\nobserved process concurrency when sampler data is present.\n\n`buildchain facts` collects and verifies source/version/output facts for\nmodules and products:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain facts module \\\n  --module native-core \\\n  --output .buildchain/facts/native-core.json \\\n  --legacy-kungfu-buildinfo framework/core/src/kungfu/yijinjing/kungfubuildinfo.json\n\nbuildchain facts aggregate \\\n  --product kungfu \\\n  --module-fact .buildchain/facts/native-core.json \\\n  --artifact dist/kungfu.zip \\\n  --output .buildchain/facts/kungfu.json\n\nbuildchain facts verify --fact .buildchain/facts/kungfu.json\n```\n\nThe same implementation is available from\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain/build-facts`. Release passports can include these\nfacts with repeated `--build-facts-json` arguments to\n`buildchain collect github-release`. See\n[`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) for the config schema and Node API.\n\n`buildchain sample process-tree` wraps a long-running command and periodically\nwrites process-tree snapshots:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain sample process-tree \\\n  --label native-build \\\n  --interval-ms 15000 \\\n  --output .buildchain/diagnostics/process-samples.jsonl \\\n  --summary-output .buildchain/diagnostics/process-summary.json \\\n  -- \\\n  make -j20\n```\n\nThe command returns the wrapped command's exit status. The JSONL file contains\nsmall timestamped samples; the summary JSON records requested parallelism,\nobserved concurrency, sampled CPU, command categories, and top command\nbasenames. Use it when a native build requests high parallelism but appears to\nspend long stretches in low-concurrency compile, archive, link, or cache steps.\n\n`buildchain doctor` checks repository readiness before remote side effects:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain doctor --json\n```\n\nIt validates `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`, package-manager detection, Git repository state,\nand the reusable workflow caller. For `version.strategy = \"anchored\"` with\n`version.next = \"manual\"`, it also embeds the anchored package release contract\ncheck: anchor manifest readability, configured version files, trusted\npublishing, package publish order, and required lifecycle stages. Add\n`--require-publish-source-lock` inside a publish job when the doctor report\nshould also fail unless the job is running from a resolved `publish-gate/*`\nsource lock.\n\nAnchored/manual package publish jobs can run the narrower source-lock gate\ndirectly:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain publish-source validate-anchored-release --json\n```\n\nThe command requires `BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_REF`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_SHA`, and `BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_LOCKED` from the\nreusable build workflow outputs. It fails closed for direct `alpha/*` or\n`release/*` channel-branch publication, and checks the publish-gate consumer\nversion against configured version files and the anchor manifest. The JSON\nresult is shaped for future `buildchain.libkungfu.dev` fact ingestion.\n\n`buildchain release`, `buildchain web-surface`, `buildchain infra-contract`,\n`buildchain publication-artifact`, `buildchain publish-source`,\n`buildchain badges`, `buildchain homebrew`, and `buildchain build-contract`\nroute to the same implementation used by\nBuildchain's package APIs or GitHub Actions workflows. This keeps local\ninspection and CI behavior on the same implementation path.\n\nGenerate publication artifact metadata after building a paper or report:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain publication-artifact manifest \\\n  --source-sha \"$(git rev-parse HEAD)\" \\\n  --json\n```\n\nGenerate the Buildchain-owned npm paper package contents from declared\npublication facts:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain publication-artifact npm-package --json\n```\n\nThis command reads `project.type = \"publication-artifact\"`,\n`publication.version`, and `[publish] kind = \"npm-paper-package\"` plus\n`publish.package`; it writes `.buildchain/publication/npm-package` by default.\nThe `paper-release.yml@v2` reusable workflow uses the same command before\nrunning the standard npm publish transaction.\n\nThe command writes `.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact.json`,\n`.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact-passport.json`, a source bundle,\nand, when `[publication.archive]` is configured,\n`.buildchain/publication/publication-registry.json` by default. See\n[`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) for the repository\ncontract, pinned LaTeX builder, and reusable workflow.\n\nGenerate, check, or update the managed README badge block:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain badges readme --json\nbuildchain badges readme --check\nbuildchain badges readme --write\nbuildchain badges bundle --json\nbuildchain badges bundle --check\nbuildchain badges bundle --write\nbuildchain badges bundle --claims kfd-1,release-passport --write\n```\n\nThe `--json` form emits the `kungfu-buildchain-readme-badge-facts` object.\n`--check` fails closed when the README marker block is missing or stale.\n`--write` inserts or replaces only the marked block. KFD passed badges come\nfrom the repository's own verified release passport; unreleased repositories\ndowngrade to explicit local declarations such as `declared`, `aligned`, or\n`planned`. `buildchain badges bundle` is the focused trust-badge entrypoint: it\nemits `kungfu-buildchain-badge-bundle-facts` and defaults to KFD-1, KFD-2,\nKFD-3, and Release Passport. See [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) for the\nmarker contract and `[badges]` / `[badges.bundle]` configuration.\n\nGenerate or check Homebrew tap projections from upstream release passports:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain homebrew update-formula \\\n  --package buildchain \\\n  --release-passport https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.8.15/buildchain.release.json \\\n  --write\n\nbuildchain homebrew check --json\n```\n\n`update-formula` writes `Formula/buildchain.rb` and `tap-manifest.json` from\nupstream release passport evidence. `check` fails closed when the Formula,\nmanifest, artifact digests, or KFD status drift from the upstream passport. See\n[`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) for the distribution-index project contract.\n\n`buildchain collect github-release` creates a release passport bundle from\nGitHub Release assets or a local asset directory:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain collect github-release \\\n  --tag v2.2.0 \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --assets-dir dist \\\n  --output-dir .buildchain/release-passport\n```\n\nThe bundle includes `buildchain.release.json`, `artifact-evidence.json`,\n`impact.json`, `agent-index.json`, `product-mechanism.json`, `check-report.json`,\nand `llms.txt`. Production binary distribution defaults to GitHub-hosted\nrunners so other projects can reproduce the release lane; self-hosted runners\nremain compatibility fixtures and are recorded as runner facts when used.\n\nFor publish-transaction releases, pass the additional evidence inputs so\n`buildchain.release.json` becomes the unified passport instead of a binary-only\nasset summary:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain collect github-release \\\n  --tag v2.3.2 \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --assets-dir dist \\\n  --publish-evidence-json .buildchain/release-evidence/v2.3.2/evidence.json \\\n  --transaction-json .buildchain/release-state/v2.3.2/state.json \\\n  --package-set-json package-set.json \\\n  --impact-json impact.json \\\n  --trusted-publishing-json trusted-publishing.json \\\n  --anchor-manifest-json libnode.release.json \\\n  --build-summary-json .buildchain/artifacts/build-summary.json \\\n  --platform-manifest-json .buildchain/artifacts/linux-x64/manifest.json \\\n  --platform-manifest-json .buildchain/artifacts/darwin-arm64/manifest.json \\\n  --platform-manifest-json .buildchain/artifacts/win32-x64/manifest.json \\\n  --dist-tag-evidence-json .buildchain/release-evidence/v2.3.2/dist-tag-evidence.json \\\n  --kfd-1-witness-json .buildchain/kfd/kfd-1/contract-world.witness.json \\\n  --kfd-2-claim-json .buildchain/kfd/kfd-2/release-claims.json \\\n  --kfd-3-prebuild-witness-json .buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/collaboration-interface.prebuild.json \\\n  --kfd-3-artifact-verify-cmd \"kungfu agent verify --json\" \\\n  --release-extra-json '{\"channel\":\"release\",\"targetRef\":\"release/v2/v2.3\"}' \\\n  --output-dir .buildchain/release-passport\n```\n\nThe generated passport records the main and platform packages, npm dist-tags,\npublished versions, release source/ref state, anchor manifest digest, registry\nartifact digests, trusted publishing evidence, and Buildchain transaction\nresult. It also records `buildSummary`, `platformArtifactManifests`, and\n`distTagPromotion` when those JSON inputs are supplied. `packageSet` keeps the\nordered package set; `publish.packages[]` is the agent-readable npm publication\nsummary for each main/platform package. For Buildchain releases, verification\nexpects the supplied package set to include the main package plus the three\nplatform packages with version, dist-tag, and digest evidence. Verification\nfails closed if supplied sections are internally incomplete or point to\nartifacts without matching evidence.\n\n`--kfd-1-witness-json` attaches a KFD-1 contract-world release gate. The witness\nis structured JSON: consumers declare the contract world, canonical JSON policy,\nartifact paths, and expected SHA-256 digests. Buildchain imports KFD-owned\nmetadata from `@kungfu-tech/kfd`, freezes the witness before build publication,\nthen verifies the resulting artifact bytes itself and writes the evidence under\nthe KFD-provided top-level key currently named `kfd-1`. Consumers should not\nduplicate this by running repository-specific scripts or invoking the Kungfu\nSDK from their release workflow.\n\nFor the KFD repository, KFD-1 witnesses may be self-hosted standard-contract\nwitnesses: docs, schemas, standards metadata, package exports, and\nsite-consumption entrypoints are checked from source hashes to packaged artifact\nhashes, and the passport records schema IDs, self-hosting boundary, result, and\nresponsibility state.\n\n`--kfd-2-claim-json` attaches explicit public release claims to the KFD-2\nrelease trust passport audit. Buildchain also derives KFD-2 claims from KFD-1\nand KFD-3 gate evidence. Public claims must bind declared sources,\nmachine-readable evidence, hashes, artifact coordinates, verification results,\naudit boundary, responsibility state, and residual risk. Unbound claims fail\npassport verification; prose-only claims downgrade the KFD-2 audit and emit a\nwarning.\n\n`--kfd-3-prebuild-witness-json` attaches a KFD-3 collaboration-interface\nrelease gate. The product remains the source of truth: it emits a pre-build\nwitness that contains or points to its KFD-3 collaboration interface, declared\nparticipant-facing public surfaces, and registry digest. Buildchain freezes\nthat declaration before publication. The artifact side is supplied either by\n`--kfd-3-artifact-witness-json` or by a product-owned command such as\n`--kfd-3-artifact-verify-cmd \"kungfu agent verify --json\"`. Buildchain then\nchecks closure: every declared shipped public surface must be present in the\nartifact witness, and every artifact-exposed participant-facing public surface\nmust have been declared. The generated passport writes this evidence under the\nKFD-provided top-level key currently named `kfd-3`.\n\nThis gate is useful for agent-facing products because it turns KFD-3 from prose\ninto release evidence. A package cannot claim KFD-3 collaboration-interface\nsupport merely because the docs mention it; the release passport must show the\nfrozen declaration, the artifact-side witness digest, and a passing closure\ncomparison.\nFor the KFD repository itself, the witness can declare docs, schemas, standards\nmetadata, package exports, and site-consumption contracts as grouped public\nsurfaces; the artifact witness must expose the same enumerable package/site\nsurfaces or verification fails closed.\n\n`--impact-json` supplies the surface-aware impact ledger. Production release\npassports (`release/*`) and major publish-gate passports require\n`surfaceImpacts[]`; alpha, local, and legacy passport contexts keep it\noptional. When `surfaceImpacts[]` is required or supplied, the verifier requires\neach entry to include an id, impact, and rationale, and requires\n`versionImpact.final` to match the highest declared surface impact. The\ncollector copies `versionImpact` plus `surfaceImpacts` into\n`buildchain.release.json`. This lets\n`buildchain explain release --for agent --json` state why a release is patch,\nminor, or major instead of relying on file-path memory.\n\nBuildchain dogfoods its observability toolkit in this lane. The standalone\nbuilder writes API-generated events, while the workflow uses `buildchain mark`,\n`buildchain span`, `buildchain verify observability-log`, and `buildchain log\nsummary`; the event logs and summaries are published as release passport assets.\n\nVerify and explain release passports:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify release-passport .buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json\nbuildchain explain release --passport .buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json --for agent --json\nbuildchain inspect release --passport .buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json\n```\n\nThe verifier fails closed when required protocol files are absent, artifacts are\nnot covered by evidence, or digests disagree. The explanation output is shaped\nfor agents: trust, completeness, impact, recovery route, and next action.\n\nVerify a published artifact by subject:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify artifact ./Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe\nbuildchain inspect artifact ./Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe --json\nbuildchain explain artifact ./Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe --for agent --json\nbuildchain verify artifact npm:@kungfu-tech/libnode@22.22.3-kf.3-alpha.18 \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/libnode \\\n  --tag v22.22.3-kf.3-alpha.18 \\\n  --json\n```\n\n`verify artifact` computes or obtains the subject digest, discovers the\ndetached release passport, verifies the passport, then requires that the\nsubject digest appears in the passport's release assets, package set, publish\nevidence, or artifact evidence. Outcomes are explicit: `pass`, `fail`, or\n`unverifiable`. A filename is only a hint; trust comes from digest equality.\nFor `npm:<name>@<version>` subjects, Buildchain resolves `dist.integrity` from\nthe npm registry before matching passport evidence. Use `--npm-registry <url>`\nto verify packages from a custom registry; otherwise Buildchain uses\n`npm_config_registry` or `https://registry.npmjs.org/`.\n\nDiscovery is fail-closed and ordered:\n\n1. `--passport <file-or-url>`.\n2. Sidecar pointer, such as `<artifact>.buildchain-passport.json`.\n3. Embedded/package pointer, such as `package.json` `buildchain.releasePassport`.\n4. Local config or org index, such as `.buildchain/artifact-passport-locators.json`.\n5. GitHub Release default discovery from `github-release:` subjects, GitHub\n   Release asset URLs, or `--repository <owner/repo> --tag <tag>`.\n6. Custom `--locator-config <json-or-url>`.\n7. `unverifiable` with retry guidance.\n\nLocator files are policy, not protocol. They map subject fields such as\n`name`, `kind`, `version`, `digest`, `repository`, or `tag` to a detached\npassport location:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n  \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-artifact-passport-locator\",\n  \"locators\": [\n    {\n      \"match\": {\n        \"name\": \"Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe\",\n        \"digest\": \"sha256:...\"\n      },\n      \"passport\": \"../release-passport/buildchain.release.json\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\nSupported subject shapes include local files and directories, URLs,\n`npm:<name>@<version>`, `oci:...`, `s3:...`,\n`github-release:<owner/repo>@<tag>/<asset>`, and deployment endpoints. Local\nfiles, directories, and URLs are digestable directly; remote package, OCI,\nobject storage, and deployment subjects should provide a digest or resolve to a\nlocator that records one.\n\nSeal an exact artifact verification with the Node API, then verify or project\nthe resulting KFX admission envelope without reconstructing its roots:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify artifact-envelope envelope.json \\\n  --assessment-time 150 \\\n  --expected-root sha256:... \\\n  --expected-issuer buildchain.libkungfu.dev \\\n  --expected-publisher kungfu-systems \\\n  --expected-contract buildchain.release/v1 \\\n  --json\n\nbuildchain project kfx-admission envelope.json \\\n  --assessment-time 150 \\\n  --json\n```\n\nBoth commands call the public artifact-verification-envelope verifier. The\nprojected `attestation`, `trustInputs`, and `kfdAssessment` are direct copies of\nthe sealed envelope, and `envelopeRoot` stays identical across Node and CLI.\nSee [`artifact-verification-envelope.md`](artifact-verification-envelope.md).\n\nVerify infra-contract lifecycle evidence bundles:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain infra-contract --mode ci --source-sha \"$GITHUB_SHA\"\nbuildchain verify infra-contract-evidence-bundle .buildchain/infra-contract-evidence-bundle.json\n```\n\nThe infra-contract `ci` mode is mutation-free. It writes validate, plan,\ncontract, propagation dry-run, evidence bundle, and verification JSON artifacts\nunder `.buildchain/`, giving reusable workflows one standard responsibility\nchain instead of hand-written command sequences.\n\nThe infra-contract verifier is read-only. It recomputes the bundle hash and\nchecks that desired, plan, approval, apply, observe, contract, and propagate\nevidence remain bound to the same contract artifact. It also recomputes the\nbundle validation summary, so stale or misleading summary booleans fail closed\neven when the bundle hash has been refreshed.\n\n`buildchain release --dry-run` explains the release-line state machine before a\nmaintainer opens or merges a channel PR:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release --dry-run --target-ref alpha/v2/v2.2\nbuildchain release --dry-run --target-ref release/v2/v2.2 --sha <verified-sha>\nbuildchain release dry-run --target-ref publish-gate/major --source-ref release/v2/v2.2\nbuildchain release explain --target-ref alpha/v2/v2.1 --json\n```\n\nThis is a Buildchain-level dry-run, not an npm dry-run. It explains the legal\nsource branch, exact release or alpha tags, floating tags, channel branches,\nversion-state files, governance checks, and publish transaction behavior that\nwould apply if the corresponding PR merge were promoted. It does not move\nbranches, move tags, edit files, publish npm packages, or run lifecycle publish\ncommands. `release explain` is the same explanation surface with a clearer name.\nPass `--json` for a machine-readable plan.\n\n`buildchain transaction inspect` is the top-level recovery inspection command\nfor the publish transaction state:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain transaction inspect --version v2.1.0-alpha.0\n```\n\nIt reads or locally initializes the durable transaction record and validates\navailable publish evidence. Remote durable refs and public Git ref finalization\nremain owned by `actions/promote-buildchain-ref`; the CLI inspection surface is\nfor preflight and recovery reasoning before a maintainer reruns or resumes a\npromotion.\n\n`buildchain npm dry-run` verifies the package shape before a release tag exists:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain npm dry-run --json\n```\n\nThe command validates `package.json`, infers the exact release tag\n`v${package.json.version}`, chooses npm dist-tag `alpha` for prereleases and\n`latest` for stable releases, runs `npm pack --dry-run --json`, and then runs\n`npm publish --dry-run --access public --tag <alpha|latest>` unless\n`--skip-npm-publish-dry-run` is passed. It never performs a real publish.\n\n## npm Publish Gate\n\nBuildchain's own npm package is published from\n`.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`, inside the same publish\ntransaction that promotes release refs:\n\n- `v2.0.13-alpha.0` publishes to npm with dist-tag `alpha`.\n- `v2.0.13` publishes to npm with dist-tag `latest`.\n- moving refs such as `v2`, `v2.0`, and `v2.0-alpha` do not match the publish\n  workflow and do not publish.\n\nThe promotion workflow uses npm Trusted Publishing through GitHub Actions OIDC.\nIt runs on a GitHub-hosted runner with `id-token: write`, but it does not\nmanually run the release-candidate resolver or promote action. Buildchain's own\ndogfood path calls the declarative `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper with\nchannel, target ref/SHA, PR-stage workflow, artifact, status-check, and passport\ninputs. The wrapper generates the version-state commit, runs\n`lifecycle.verify`, runs `lifecycle.publish`, writes Buildchain publish\nevidence, validates that evidence, and only then moves exact tags and floating\nrefs.\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/npm-publish-transaction.mjs\n```\n\nBefore the first real release, configure npm Trusted Publishing for:\n\n- package: `@kungfu-tech/buildchain`\n- repository: `kungfu-systems/buildchain`\n- workflow: `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n\nNo npm package is published by manual dispatch or ordinary branch builds.\nManual dispatch on `.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml` remains dry-run only, so\nmaintainers can verify package contents and npm publish shape before opening or\nmerging the release PR."
+      "markdown": "# Buildchain CLI, npm Package, and Toolkit API\n\nBuildchain is published as the public npm package\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain`. The package contains the `buildchain` command,\nthe importable ESM toolkit APIs, and the local scripts needed to initialize and\nvalidate repositories before they use the reusable GitHub workflow surface.\n\nThe npm package is not the release authority. Release authority still comes\nfrom the protected Buildchain branch and tag state machine. npm publishing is a\nside effect of an exact release tag that has already been produced by that\nstate machine.\n\n## Install and Run\n\nUse the published package directly:\n\n```bash\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain --help\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain init --type package\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain validate --require-version-state\n```\n\nOr install it in a repository:\n\n```bash\npnpm add -D @kungfu-tech/buildchain\npnpm exec buildchain validate\n```\n\nConsumers should pin the exact Buildchain version that was validated in their\nrepository. When dogfooding a fresh Buildchain release immediately after it is\npublished, pnpm may block the install through a minimum release-age policy. In\nthat case, add a temporary package/version-specific `minimumReleaseAgeExclude`\nentry, such as `@kungfu-tech/buildchain@2.2.5`, and remove it once the package\nhas aged past the normal policy window. Do not replace that with a broad\nregistry or scope-wide exclude.\n\nUse the package API directly inside JavaScript build scripts:\n\n```js\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({ source: \"user\", component: \"build\" });\nawait logger.span(\"build.native\", { phase: \"build\" }, async () => {\n  await buildNativeArtifacts();\n});\n```\n\nThe standalone binary and CLI are for workflow steps, shell scripts, and\nnon-JavaScript environments. JavaScript code that already depends on\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain` should import the toolkit API instead of spawning\n`npx buildchain` or a downloaded binary.\n\n## Node API and Package Exports\n\nBuildchain's public Node API is the package `exports` surface, not arbitrary\ninternal file paths. The npm package also ships\n`dist/site/node-api-registry.json` and exports it as\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/node-api-registry.json` so agents can enumerate\nthe supported imports from the installed package.\nFor navigation, start with `dist/site/capability-registry.json`: it groups\nmanuals, CLI commands, workflow/action inputs, Node exports, site pages, and KFD\nclaim facts by product capability before an agent chooses a concrete command or\nmanual.\n\nCurrent public import families include:\n\n```js\nimport * as buildchain from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain\";\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\nimport { collectModuleBuildFacts } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/build-facts\";\nimport { checkHomebrewTap } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/homebrew\";\nimport { verifyKfd1ReleaseGate } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/kfd-gate\";\nimport { collectBadgeBundleFacts } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/badges\";\nimport { collectReadmeBadgeFacts } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/readme-badges\";\nimport { verifyReleasePassport } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/release-passport\";\nimport { createReleasePropagationPlan } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/release-propagation\";\nimport { planReleaseLineBootstrap } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/release-line-bootstrap\";\nimport { collectPublicSurfaceReverseAudit } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/public-surface-audit\";\nimport { createBuildchainLayoutDiscovery } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/buildchain-layout\";\nimport contractWorld from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/buildchain-contract.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport capabilityRegistry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/capability-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport manualRegistry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/manual-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport nodeApiRegistry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/node-api-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\nimport publicSurfaceAudit from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/public-surface-audit.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\n```\n\nUse `dist/site/manual-registry.json` to find the packaged operating manuals and\ntheir SHA-256 digests. Use `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` to verify the\nfloating-ref contract world for a runtime such as `@v2`.\n\n## Commands\n\n`buildchain layout` is the stable machine question for repository layout. Tools\nsuch as Shifu should call it instead of copying `.buildchain/` path constants:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain layout --cwd /path/to/repository --json\n```\n\nThe result identifies the Buildchain version pin, repository root and config,\nthe canonical and currently resolved KFD-3 registry paths, and the KFD field\nused to declare Shifu jurisdiction. A repository is in Shifu's distribution\njurisdiction only when a KFD-3 surface explicitly declares\n`distribution.registrar=\"shifu\"`; the presence of Buildchain configuration is\nnot sufficient. The same contract is available through\n`createBuildchainLayoutDiscovery()` from\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain/buildchain-layout`.\n\n`buildchain init` writes a starter `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` and a reusable workflow\ncaller at `.github/workflows/build.yml`.\n\nSupported presets:\n\n- `--type package` for Node package repositories with pnpm, npm, or yarn.\n- `--type native` for CMake-style native projects.\n- `--type web-surface` for preview/staging/production site or app deployments.\n- `--type infra-contract` for provider-agnostic infrastructure contract\n  validation, observation, contract publication, and downstream propagation\n  planning without default mutation. Provider adapters expose built-in command\n  plans by default, and only configured `[infra.commands]` hooks can execute.\n- `--type publication-artifact` for papers, reports, specifications, and other\n  publication repositories that produce PDFs, metadata, source bundles, and\n  site-consumable manifests without becoming web-surface repositories. The\n  scaffold uses Buildchain's pinned\n  `ghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/latex-pdf-builder:v1.2.0` toolchain for\n  LaTeX PDF builds.\n- `--type distribution-index` for Homebrew taps and other index repositories\n  whose files are projections of upstream release passport evidence.\n- `--type anchored-package` for packages whose version is anchored to an\n  explicit upstream release manifest.\n\nThe native preset includes an opt-in `[diagnostics.native]` profile with common\ntool/cache/artifact probes. Consumers can keep it enabled, adjust the tool and\ndirectory lists, or disable it if a repository does not need native diagnostics.\n\n`buildchain validate` parses `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`, checks configured version-state\nfiles, and can require named lifecycle stages:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain validate \\\n  --require-version-state \\\n  --require-lifecycle-stages install,build,verify\n```\n\n`buildchain lifecycle run <stage>` executes a lifecycle stage and writes the\nsame deterministic artifact manifest contract used by the reusable workflow:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain lifecycle run build \\\n  --artifact-path dist \\\n  --artifact-name \"{repo}-{version}-{platform}\"\n```\n\n`buildchain dev merge-queue` plans a GitHub merge-queue policy for a protected\nBuildchain dev channel. Declare every workflow that emits a required check; the\ncommand fails closed unless each file handles both `pull_request` and\n`merge_group` without reading `github.event.pull_request` directly:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain dev merge-queue \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/example \\\n  --branch dev/v4/v4.0 \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/source-acceptance.yml \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/affected-native-pr.yml\n```\n\nThe default output is a read-only plan. Add `--apply` only after reviewing it.\nApply creates the exact-branch merge-queue ruleset before changing classic\nrequired status checks from strict to loose, preserves the required check\nidentities, and is safe to repeat. `gh` must be authenticated with repository\nAdministration write permission for apply mode.\n\n`buildchain release line open` plans or writes the first version-state commit\nfor a new semver minor line. It does not publish anything. The dry-run mode is\nthe default and returns the dev/alpha/release refs, protection contract, default\nbranch action, and initial version before any GitHub mutation happens:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n  --major 2 \\\n  --minor 10 \\\n  --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe write mode only updates local version-state files. The repository workflow\n`Release Line Bootstrap` wraps this command and, when `apply=true`, commits the\ninitial version state, creates `dev/vX/vX.Y`, `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, and\n`release/vX/vX.Y`, applies one-review branch protection, switches the default\nbranch, and opens the first dev-to-alpha channel PR:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n  --major 2 \\\n  --minor 10 \\\n  --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n  --write \\\n  --json\n```\n\n`buildchain` also publishes a public surface reverse audit as\n`dist/site/public-surface-audit.json`. The audit enumerates CLI commands from\n`bin/buildchain.mjs`, workflow inputs, action inputs, site pages, and docs\ncommand references, then compares them with the generated registries. Buildchain\nself-checks fail closed when an enumerable public surface is missing from the\nregistry:\n\n```js\nimport {\n  collectPublicSurfaceReverseAudit,\n  assertPublicSurfaceReverseAudit,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/public-surface-audit\";\n\nassertPublicSurfaceReverseAudit(collectPublicSurfaceReverseAudit({ root: process.cwd() }));\n```\n\n`buildchain kfd` is the product-facing KFD namespace. Schema commands expose the\nmachine-readable KFD standards shipped by `@kungfu-tech/kfd`, while versioned\nsubcommands host concrete product workflows. KFD-1, KFD-2, and KFD-3 are\nfirst-class Buildchain surfaces. KFD-4 is schema-only until Buildchain has a\nreal verification protocol for it.\n\n`status` reports implemented support and the active repo-owned file layout.\n`migrate-layout` moves legacy root files into `.buildchain/`:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd status --json\nbuildchain kfd migrate-layout --write\n```\n\nKFD-1 commands generate and validate contract-world release evidence:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd 1 schema --json\nbuildchain kfd 1 witness --json\nbuildchain kfd 1 gate --witness-json kfd-1-witness.json --json\nbuildchain kfd 1 verify --gate-json kfd-1-gate.json --json\n```\n\nKFD-2 commands validate trust taxonomy entries and generate Buildchain's public\nclaim evidence. Product repositories use the `product-claims` subcommand to\nvalidate and render their own declared KFD-2 release claims under the canonical\nBuildchain KFD layout:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd 2 schema --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 taxonomy --entry-json residual-risk.json --kind residualRisk --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 claims --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 product-claims check --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 product-claims write --json\nbuildchain kfd 2 product-claims render --json\n```\n\nThe default source is `.buildchain/kfd/kfd-2/registry.json`; outputs are\n`.buildchain/kfd/kfd-2/release-claims.json`, per-claim release-passport inputs\nunder `claims/`, and `buildchain-claim-args.txt`. Use `--registry` or\n`--output-dir` only for an explicit product packaging projection. `check` never\nwrites and exits non-zero when outputs drift.\n\nKFD-3 commands are separate from Buildchain's self reverse audit: products can\ndetect standard public surfaces, register the accepted boundary, audit the\ncurrent source or artifact tree, generate a release-passport-compatible witness,\nand expose a capability map for agents:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain kfd schema list --json\nbuildchain kfd schema show kfd-3 --json\nbuildchain kfd 3 detect --kind node-api --kind cli --json\nbuildchain kfd 3 register node-api --product Buildchain\nbuildchain kfd 3 audit --json\nbuildchain kfd 3 witness --kind prebuild --output .buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/collaboration-interface.prebuild.json\nbuildchain kfd 3 query buildchain --json\nbuildchain kfd 4 schema --json\n```\n\nThe public Node API is exported from `@kungfu-tech/buildchain/kfd`. See\n[`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) for the detected / declared / enforced model\nand the agent query flow.\n\nLifecycle runs also write a Buildchain observability JSONL log at\n`.buildchain/logs/events.jsonl` by default. Framework events use\n`source=buildchain`; consumer lifecycle commands use `source=user`. This lets a\nmaintainer tell apart time spent inside Buildchain's artifact/manifest\nframework from time spent in the repository's own build, test, packaging, or\npublish commands. The artifact manifest and summary embed the observability\nsummary for that lifecycle run id, so uploaded artifacts preserve the timing\nfacts without mixing in older JSONL events.\n\n`buildchain log`, `buildchain mark`, and `buildchain span` expose the same event\nprotocol to repository scripts:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain mark --event configure.ready --phase configure --attribute target=release\nbuildchain span --event native.build --phase build -- cmake --build build\nbuildchain log warn --event cache.miss --component conan --attribute token=hidden\nbuildchain log summary --json\nbuildchain verify observability-log .buildchain/logs/events.jsonl --min-events 4 --require-phase build\nbuildchain diagnostics summary .buildchain/artifacts/*/diagnostics.json --json\nbuildchain sample process-tree --label native-build --interval-ms 15000 -- make -j20\n```\n\nDuring `buildchain lifecycle run`, child processes receive\n`BUILDCHAIN_LOG_PATH` and `BUILDCHAIN_LOG_RUN_ID`. A shell, Python, CMake, Conan,\nor JavaScript helper can call `buildchain mark` or `buildchain span` mid-build\nand have those events grouped into the same lifecycle summary.\n`buildchain verify observability-log` is a release gate: it fails when the log\nis missing, has too few events, contains error events, or does not include\nrequired phases, components, or event names.\n\nThe event protocol is JSONL and is also available from the SDK:\n\n```js\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({ source: \"user\", component: \"native-build\" });\nlogger.mark(\"configure.ready\", { phase: \"configure\" });\n```\n\nSecret-looking attribute keys such as `token`, `password`, `secret`,\n`authorization`, `cookie`, and `private-key` are redacted before they are written.\nFull command strings are not recorded by `span`; scripts should provide stable\nevent names and safe attributes instead.\n\n`buildchain diagnostics summary` reads one or more small diagnostics artifacts\nand emits the same cross-platform summary as the diagnostics SDK:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain diagnostics summary \\\n  .buildchain/artifacts/linux-x64/diagnostics.json \\\n  .buildchain/artifacts/macos-arm64/diagnostics.json \\\n  --output .buildchain/artifacts/diagnostics-summary.json \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe JSON summary keeps per-platform lifecycle stage tables, adds lifecycle\ntotal durations, carries top slow spans, aggregates warning/error counts, and\nsorts the slowest platforms. Each platform row carries compact runner facts,\nchecked tool versions/missing tools, package manager/cache directory details,\ncompiler-cache availability, and a compact process sampler summary: requested\nparallelism, observed max active processes, the ratio between them, sample\ncount, process categories, and the top sampled command basenames. This lets\nmaintainers inspect matrix timing, runner, tool, cache, and concurrency context\nwithout downloading large platform binaries or process sidecars first.\nWhen a sibling `diagnostics-manifest.json` is available, the summary also records\nits file list and verifies the listed `diagnostics.json` byte count and sha256.\nMissing, unreadable, or mismatched sidecar manifests are reported through\n`diagnosticsManifestWarningCount` and the per-platform `diagnosticsManifest`\nfield without failing the timing rollup.\nThe summary also compares each `diagnostics.json` contract to\n`BUILDCHAIN_DIAGNOSTICS_CONTRACT`; mismatches are reported through\n`diagnosticsContractWarningCount` and the per-platform `diagnosticsContract`\nfield so reviewers can separate diagnostics schema drift from lifecycle\nwarnings or build failures.\n\nWithout `--json`, the command prints a compact lifecycle timing table with\ninstall/build/verify/publish, artifact scan/upload, total, warning, and error\ncolumns for each platform, plus `jobs` and `active` columns for requested and\nobserved process concurrency when sampler data is present.\n\n`buildchain facts` collects and verifies source/version/output facts for\nmodules and products:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain facts module \\\n  --module native-core \\\n  --output .buildchain/facts/native-core.json \\\n  --legacy-kungfu-buildinfo framework/core/src/kungfu/yijinjing/kungfubuildinfo.json\n\nbuildchain facts aggregate \\\n  --product kungfu \\\n  --module-fact .buildchain/facts/native-core.json \\\n  --artifact dist/kungfu.zip \\\n  --output .buildchain/facts/kungfu.json\n\nbuildchain facts verify --fact .buildchain/facts/kungfu.json\n```\n\nThe same implementation is available from\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain/build-facts`. Release passports can include these\nfacts with repeated `--build-facts-json` arguments to\n`buildchain collect github-release`. See\n[`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) for the config schema and Node API.\n\n`buildchain sample process-tree` wraps a long-running command and periodically\nwrites process-tree snapshots:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain sample process-tree \\\n  --label native-build \\\n  --interval-ms 15000 \\\n  --output .buildchain/diagnostics/process-samples.jsonl \\\n  --summary-output .buildchain/diagnostics/process-summary.json \\\n  -- \\\n  make -j20\n```\n\nThe command returns the wrapped command's exit status. The JSONL file contains\nsmall timestamped samples; the summary JSON records requested parallelism,\nobserved concurrency, sampled CPU, command categories, and top command\nbasenames. Use it when a native build requests high parallelism but appears to\nspend long stretches in low-concurrency compile, archive, link, or cache steps.\n\n`buildchain doctor` checks repository readiness before remote side effects:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain doctor --json\n```\n\nIt validates `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`, package-manager detection, Git repository state,\nand the reusable workflow caller. For `version.strategy = \"anchored\"` with\n`version.next = \"manual\"`, it also embeds the anchored package release contract\ncheck: anchor manifest readability, configured version files, trusted\npublishing, package publish order, and required lifecycle stages. Add\n`--require-publish-source-lock` inside a publish job when the doctor report\nshould also fail unless the job is running from a resolved `publish-gate/*`\nsource lock.\n\nAnchored/manual package publish jobs can run the narrower source-lock gate\ndirectly:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain publish-source validate-anchored-release --json\n```\n\nThe command requires `BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_REF`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_SHA`, and `BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_LOCKED` from the\nreusable build workflow outputs. It fails closed for direct `alpha/*` or\n`release/*` channel-branch publication, and checks the publish-gate consumer\nversion against configured version files and the anchor manifest. The JSON\nresult is shaped for future `buildchain.libkungfu.dev` fact ingestion.\n\n`buildchain release`, `buildchain web-surface`, `buildchain infra-contract`,\n`buildchain publication-artifact`, `buildchain publish-source`,\n`buildchain badges`, `buildchain homebrew`, and `buildchain build-contract`\nroute to the same implementation used by\nBuildchain's package APIs or GitHub Actions workflows. This keeps local\ninspection and CI behavior on the same implementation path.\n\nGenerate publication artifact metadata after building a paper or report:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain publication-artifact manifest \\\n  --source-sha \"$(git rev-parse HEAD)\" \\\n  --json\n```\n\nGenerate the Buildchain-owned npm paper package contents from declared\npublication facts:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain publication-artifact npm-package --json\n```\n\nThis command reads `project.type = \"publication-artifact\"`,\n`publication.version`, and `[publish] kind = \"npm-paper-package\"` plus\n`publish.package`; it writes `.buildchain/publication/npm-package` by default.\nThe `paper-release.yml@v2` reusable workflow uses the same command before\nrunning the standard npm publish transaction.\n\nThe command writes `.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact.json`,\n`.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact-passport.json`, a source bundle,\nand, when `[publication.archive]` is configured,\n`.buildchain/publication/publication-registry.json` by default. See\n[`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) for the repository\ncontract, pinned LaTeX builder, and reusable workflow.\n\nGenerate, check, or update the managed README badge block:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain badges readme --json\nbuildchain badges readme --check\nbuildchain badges readme --write\nbuildchain badges bundle --json\nbuildchain badges bundle --check\nbuildchain badges bundle --write\nbuildchain badges bundle --claims kfd-1,release-passport --write\n```\n\nThe `--json` form emits the `kungfu-buildchain-readme-badge-facts` object.\n`--check` fails closed when the README marker block is missing or stale.\n`--write` inserts or replaces only the marked block. KFD passed badges come\nfrom the repository's own verified release passport; unreleased repositories\ndowngrade to explicit local declarations such as `declared`, `aligned`, or\n`planned`. `buildchain badges bundle` is the focused trust-badge entrypoint: it\nemits `kungfu-buildchain-badge-bundle-facts` and defaults to KFD-1, KFD-2,\nKFD-3, and Release Passport. See [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) for the\nmarker contract and `[badges]` / `[badges.bundle]` configuration.\n\nGenerate or check Homebrew tap projections from upstream release passports:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain homebrew update-formula \\\n  --package buildchain \\\n  --release-passport https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.8.15/buildchain.release.json \\\n  --write\n\nbuildchain homebrew check --json\n```\n\n`update-formula` writes `Formula/buildchain.rb` and `tap-manifest.json` from\nupstream release passport evidence. `check` fails closed when the Formula,\nmanifest, artifact digests, or KFD status drift from the upstream passport. See\n[`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) for the distribution-index project contract.\n\n`buildchain collect github-release` creates a release passport bundle from\nGitHub Release assets or a local asset directory:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain collect github-release \\\n  --tag v2.2.0 \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --assets-dir dist \\\n  --output-dir .buildchain/release-passport\n```\n\nThe bundle includes `buildchain.release.json`, `artifact-evidence.json`,\n`impact.json`, `agent-index.json`, `product-mechanism.json`, `check-report.json`,\nand `llms.txt`. Production binary distribution defaults to GitHub-hosted\nrunners so other projects can reproduce the release lane; self-hosted runners\nremain compatibility fixtures and are recorded as runner facts when used.\n\nFor publish-transaction releases, pass the additional evidence inputs so\n`buildchain.release.json` becomes the unified passport instead of a binary-only\nasset summary:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain collect github-release \\\n  --tag v2.3.2 \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --assets-dir dist \\\n  --publish-evidence-json .buildchain/release-evidence/v2.3.2/evidence.json \\\n  --transaction-json .buildchain/release-state/v2.3.2/state.json \\\n  --package-set-json package-set.json \\\n  --impact-json impact.json \\\n  --trusted-publishing-json trusted-publishing.json \\\n  --anchor-manifest-json libnode.release.json \\\n  --build-summary-json .buildchain/artifacts/build-summary.json \\\n  --platform-manifest-json .buildchain/artifacts/linux-x64/manifest.json \\\n  --platform-manifest-json .buildchain/artifacts/darwin-arm64/manifest.json \\\n  --platform-manifest-json .buildchain/artifacts/win32-x64/manifest.json \\\n  --dist-tag-evidence-json .buildchain/release-evidence/v2.3.2/dist-tag-evidence.json \\\n  --kfd-1-witness-json .buildchain/kfd/kfd-1/contract-world.witness.json \\\n  --kfd-2-claim-json .buildchain/kfd/kfd-2/release-claims.json \\\n  --kfd-3-prebuild-witness-json .buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/collaboration-interface.prebuild.json \\\n  --kfd-3-artifact-verify-cmd \"kungfu agent verify --json\" \\\n  --release-extra-json '{\"channel\":\"release\",\"targetRef\":\"release/v2/v2.3\"}' \\\n  --output-dir .buildchain/release-passport\n```\n\nThe generated passport records the main and platform packages, npm dist-tags,\npublished versions, release source/ref state, anchor manifest digest, registry\nartifact digests, trusted publishing evidence, and Buildchain transaction\nresult. It also records `buildSummary`, `platformArtifactManifests`, and\n`distTagPromotion` when those JSON inputs are supplied. `packageSet` keeps the\nordered package set; `publish.packages[]` is the agent-readable npm publication\nsummary for each main/platform package. For Buildchain releases, verification\nexpects the supplied package set to include the main package plus the three\nplatform packages with version, dist-tag, and digest evidence. Verification\nfails closed if supplied sections are internally incomplete or point to\nartifacts without matching evidence.\n\n`--kfd-1-witness-json` attaches a KFD-1 contract-world release gate. The witness\nis structured JSON: consumers declare the contract world, canonical JSON policy,\nartifact paths, and expected SHA-256 digests. Buildchain imports KFD-owned\nmetadata from `@kungfu-tech/kfd`, freezes the witness before build publication,\nthen verifies the resulting artifact bytes itself and writes the evidence under\nthe KFD-provided top-level key currently named `kfd-1`. Consumers should not\nduplicate this by running repository-specific scripts or invoking the Kungfu\nSDK from their release workflow.\n\nFor the KFD repository, KFD-1 witnesses may be self-hosted standard-contract\nwitnesses: docs, schemas, standards metadata, package exports, and\nsite-consumption entrypoints are checked from source hashes to packaged artifact\nhashes, and the passport records schema IDs, self-hosting boundary, result, and\nresponsibility state.\n\n`--kfd-2-claim-json` attaches explicit public release claims to the KFD-2\nrelease trust passport audit. Buildchain also derives KFD-2 claims from KFD-1\nand KFD-3 gate evidence. Public claims must bind declared sources,\nmachine-readable evidence, hashes, artifact coordinates, verification results,\naudit boundary, responsibility state, and residual risk. Unbound claims fail\npassport verification; prose-only claims downgrade the KFD-2 audit and emit a\nwarning.\n\n`--kfd-3-prebuild-witness-json` attaches a KFD-3 collaboration-interface\nrelease gate. The product remains the source of truth: it emits a pre-build\nwitness that contains or points to its KFD-3 collaboration interface, declared\nparticipant-facing public surfaces, and registry digest. Buildchain freezes\nthat declaration before publication. The artifact side is supplied either by\n`--kfd-3-artifact-witness-json` or by a product-owned command such as\n`--kfd-3-artifact-verify-cmd \"kungfu agent verify --json\"`. Buildchain then\nchecks closure: every declared shipped public surface must be present in the\nartifact witness, and every artifact-exposed participant-facing public surface\nmust have been declared. The generated passport writes this evidence under the\nKFD-provided top-level key currently named `kfd-3`.\n\nThis gate is useful for agent-facing products because it turns KFD-3 from prose\ninto release evidence. A package cannot claim KFD-3 collaboration-interface\nsupport merely because the docs mention it; the release passport must show the\nfrozen declaration, the artifact-side witness digest, and a passing closure\ncomparison.\nFor the KFD repository itself, the witness can declare docs, schemas, standards\nmetadata, package exports, and site-consumption contracts as grouped public\nsurfaces; the artifact witness must expose the same enumerable package/site\nsurfaces or verification fails closed.\n\n`--impact-json` supplies the surface-aware impact ledger. Production release\npassports (`release/*`) and major publish-gate passports require\n`surfaceImpacts[]`; alpha, local, and legacy passport contexts keep it\noptional. When `surfaceImpacts[]` is required or supplied, the verifier requires\neach entry to include an id, impact, and rationale, and requires\n`versionImpact.final` to match the highest declared surface impact. The\ncollector copies `versionImpact` plus `surfaceImpacts` into\n`buildchain.release.json`. This lets\n`buildchain explain release --for agent --json` state why a release is patch,\nminor, or major instead of relying on file-path memory.\n\nBuildchain dogfoods its observability toolkit in this lane. The standalone\nbuilder writes API-generated events, while the workflow uses `buildchain mark`,\n`buildchain span`, `buildchain verify observability-log`, and `buildchain log\nsummary`; the event logs and summaries are published as release passport assets.\n\nVerify and explain release passports:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify release-passport .buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json\nbuildchain explain release --passport .buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json --for agent --json\nbuildchain inspect release --passport .buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json\n```\n\nThe verifier fails closed when required protocol files are absent, artifacts are\nnot covered by evidence, or digests disagree. The explanation output is shaped\nfor agents: trust, completeness, impact, recovery route, and next action.\n\nVerify a published artifact by subject:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify artifact ./Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe\nbuildchain inspect artifact ./Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe --json\nbuildchain explain artifact ./Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe --for agent --json\nbuildchain verify artifact npm:@kungfu-tech/libnode@22.22.3-kf.3-alpha.18 \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/libnode \\\n  --tag v22.22.3-kf.3-alpha.18 \\\n  --json\n```\n\n`verify artifact` computes or obtains the subject digest, discovers the\ndetached release passport, verifies the passport, then requires that the\nsubject digest appears in the passport's release assets, package set, publish\nevidence, or artifact evidence. Outcomes are explicit: `pass`, `fail`, or\n`unverifiable`. A filename is only a hint; trust comes from digest equality.\nFor `npm:<name>@<version>` subjects, Buildchain resolves `dist.integrity` from\nthe npm registry before matching passport evidence. Use `--npm-registry <url>`\nto verify packages from a custom registry; otherwise Buildchain uses\n`npm_config_registry` or `https://registry.npmjs.org/`.\n\nDiscovery is fail-closed and ordered:\n\n1. `--passport <file-or-url>`.\n2. Sidecar pointer, such as `<artifact>.buildchain-passport.json`.\n3. Embedded/package pointer, such as `package.json` `buildchain.releasePassport`.\n4. Local config or org index, such as `.buildchain/artifact-passport-locators.json`.\n5. GitHub Release default discovery from `github-release:` subjects, GitHub\n   Release asset URLs, or `--repository <owner/repo> --tag <tag>`.\n6. Custom `--locator-config <json-or-url>`.\n7. `unverifiable` with retry guidance.\n\nLocator files are policy, not protocol. They map subject fields such as\n`name`, `kind`, `version`, `digest`, `repository`, or `tag` to a detached\npassport location:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n  \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-artifact-passport-locator\",\n  \"locators\": [\n    {\n      \"match\": {\n        \"name\": \"Kungfu-2.8.0-windows-x64.exe\",\n        \"digest\": \"sha256:...\"\n      },\n      \"passport\": \"../release-passport/buildchain.release.json\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\nSupported subject shapes include local files and directories, URLs,\n`npm:<name>@<version>`, `oci:...`, `s3:...`,\n`github-release:<owner/repo>@<tag>/<asset>`, and deployment endpoints. Local\nfiles, directories, and URLs are digestable directly; remote package, OCI,\nobject storage, and deployment subjects should provide a digest or resolve to a\nlocator that records one.\n\nSeal an exact artifact verification with the Node API, then verify or project\nthe resulting KFX admission envelope without reconstructing its roots:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify artifact-envelope envelope.json \\\n  --assessment-time 150 \\\n  --expected-root sha256:... \\\n  --expected-issuer buildchain.libkungfu.dev \\\n  --expected-publisher kungfu-systems \\\n  --expected-contract buildchain.release/v1 \\\n  --json\n\nbuildchain project kfx-admission envelope.json \\\n  --assessment-time 150 \\\n  --json\n```\n\nBoth commands call the public artifact-verification-envelope verifier. The\nprojected `attestation`, `trustInputs`, and `kfdAssessment` are direct copies of\nthe sealed envelope, and `envelopeRoot` stays identical across Node and CLI.\nSee [`artifact-verification-envelope.md`](artifact-verification-envelope.md).\n\nVerify infra-contract lifecycle evidence bundles:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain infra-contract --mode ci --source-sha \"$GITHUB_SHA\"\nbuildchain verify infra-contract-evidence-bundle .buildchain/infra-contract-evidence-bundle.json\n```\n\nThe infra-contract `ci` mode is mutation-free. It writes validate, plan,\ncontract, propagation dry-run, evidence bundle, and verification JSON artifacts\nunder `.buildchain/`, giving reusable workflows one standard responsibility\nchain instead of hand-written command sequences.\n\nThe infra-contract verifier is read-only. It recomputes the bundle hash and\nchecks that desired, plan, approval, apply, observe, contract, and propagate\nevidence remain bound to the same contract artifact. It also recomputes the\nbundle validation summary, so stale or misleading summary booleans fail closed\neven when the bundle hash has been refreshed.\n\n`buildchain release --dry-run` explains the release-line state machine before a\nmaintainer opens or merges a channel PR:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release --dry-run --target-ref alpha/v2/v2.2\nbuildchain release --dry-run --target-ref release/v2/v2.2 --sha <verified-sha>\nbuildchain release dry-run --target-ref publish-gate/major --source-ref release/v2/v2.2\nbuildchain release explain --target-ref alpha/v2/v2.1 --json\n```\n\nThis is a Buildchain-level dry-run, not an npm dry-run. It explains the legal\nsource branch, exact release or alpha tags, floating tags, channel branches,\nversion-state files, governance checks, and publish transaction behavior that\nwould apply if the corresponding PR merge were promoted. It does not move\nbranches, move tags, edit files, publish npm packages, or run lifecycle publish\ncommands. `release explain` is the same explanation surface with a clearer name.\nPass `--json` for a machine-readable plan.\n\n`buildchain transaction inspect` is the top-level recovery inspection command\nfor the publish transaction state:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain transaction inspect --version v2.1.0-alpha.0\n```\n\nIt reads or locally initializes the durable transaction record and validates\navailable publish evidence. Remote durable refs and public Git ref finalization\nremain owned by `actions/promote-buildchain-ref`; the CLI inspection surface is\nfor preflight and recovery reasoning before a maintainer reruns or resumes a\npromotion.\n\n`buildchain npm dry-run` verifies the package shape before a release tag exists:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain npm dry-run --json\n```\n\nThe command validates `package.json`, infers the exact release tag\n`v${package.json.version}`, chooses npm dist-tag `alpha` for prereleases and\n`latest` for stable releases, runs `npm pack --dry-run --json`, and then runs\n`npm publish --dry-run --access public --tag <alpha|latest>` unless\n`--skip-npm-publish-dry-run` is passed. It never performs a real publish.\n\n## npm Publish Gate\n\nBuildchain's own npm package is published from\n`.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`, inside the same publish\ntransaction that promotes release refs:\n\n- `v2.0.13-alpha.0` publishes to npm with dist-tag `alpha`.\n- `v2.0.13` publishes to npm with dist-tag `latest`.\n- moving refs such as `v2`, `v2.0`, and `v2.0-alpha` do not match the publish\n  workflow and do not publish.\n\nThe promotion workflow uses npm Trusted Publishing through GitHub Actions OIDC.\nIt runs on a GitHub-hosted runner with `id-token: write`, but it does not\nmanually run the release-candidate resolver or promote action. Buildchain's own\ndogfood path calls the declarative `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper with\nchannel, target ref/SHA, PR-stage workflow, artifact, status-check, and passport\ninputs. The wrapper generates the version-state commit, runs\n`lifecycle.verify`, runs `lifecycle.publish`, writes Buildchain publish\nevidence, validates that evidence, and only then moves exact tags and floating\nrefs.\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/npm-publish-transaction.mjs\n```\n\nBefore the first real release, configure npm Trusted Publishing for:\n\n- package: `@kungfu-tech/buildchain`\n- repository: `kungfu-systems/buildchain`\n- workflow: `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n\nNo npm package is published by manual dispatch or ordinary branch builds.\nManual dispatch on `.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml` remains dry-run only, so\nmaintainers can verify package contents and npm publish shape before opening or\nmerging the release PR."
     },
     {
       "id": "manual:consumer-issue-reporting",
@@ -876,7 +876,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "stable",
       "sourcePath": "docs/MAP.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:ce439062d4ed9d8213499e607825afdcf8a65f825343a657d0438f3e229a0af0",
+      "digest": "sha256:a9a9594c0bd9584b145a8f41847db83e297c1c4d1b8b2d7c4bf8d10264ab1cef",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@
           "anchor": "how-this-map-is-maintained"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "# Documentation Map\n\nStart here. Find the question you have; follow it to the document that answers\nit. This map is meant to be readable by both a person skimming for the right doc\nand an agent grounding a specific claim.\n\nEach row carries a **plane** - *why* (intent / rationale), *verify* (trust the\nrunning artifact), *use* (consume / extend) - and a **status**:\n\n- `stable` - current and holds.\n- `draft` - exists, rough or incomplete.\n- `to write` - planned; the material exists but is not yet a single doc.\n- `retired` - intentionally not part of the active Buildchain v2 surface.\n\n## Capability Coverage\n\nThis package should be usable by an agent from the npm artifact alone. The\nmachine-readable `dist/site/` bundle is the first fact source; the Markdown\nmanuals explain those facts and give operator examples.\n\n`dist/site/capability-registry.json` is the capability navigation entrypoint.\nIt groups the public surface into stable product areas so sites and agents do\nnot have to infer structure from file names. Each page, manual, CLI command,\nworkflow, action, and Node API export also carries a `capabilityGroup`,\n`audience`, and `maturity` field in its own registry.\n\n| Capability group | Primary facts | Primary manuals |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Getting Started | `capability-registry.json`, `product-mechanism.json` | [`install.md`](install.md), [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Release Passport and Trust | `release-model.json`, `artifact-schemas.json`, `publication-authority-registry.json`, `kfd-claims.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md), [`publication-authority.md`](publication-authority.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md), [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) |\n| Reusable Build and Lifecycle | `workflow-registry.json`, `controller-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md), [`controller-evidence.md`](controller-evidence.md), [`shifu-gate-profiles.md`](shifu-gate-profiles.md), [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) |\n| KFD Trust and Surface Closure | `kfd-claims.json`, `public-surface-audit.json`, `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| Site Bundle, Web Surfaces, and Propagation | `buildchain-site.json`, `site-manifest.json`, `page-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md), [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| Publication Artifacts | `publication-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md), [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) |\n| Distribution Indexes and Badges | `badge-endpoint-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md), [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Build Facts, Observability, and Diagnostics | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, lifecycle artifacts | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md), [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md), [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) |\n| Governance, Versioning, and Runtime Drift | `buildchain-contract.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md), [`versioning.md`](versioning.md), [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) |\n| CLI and Node API Reference | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) |\n\n| Capability | Machine-readable entry | Manual entry |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Capability-grouped KFD navigation | `dist/site/capability-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json` | this map, [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 release-passport gates | `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| KFD-3 public surface reverse audit | `dist/site/public-surface-audit.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 first-class CLI and Node API | `.buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/surfaces.json`, `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `buildchain.release.json`, KFD schemas from `@kungfu-tech/kfd` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md#commands) |\n| Floating `@v2` drift detection and compatibility issues | `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) |\n| npm publish transactions, evidence, dist-tags, and recovery | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) |\n| Git/source/version/module/product build facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-module-build-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-product-build-facts` | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) |\n| GitHub Release passport/evidence publication | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) |\n| release propagation for package/publication/site chains | `dist/site/release-model.json` | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| publication artifact manifests, immutable archive registries, source bundles, and paper repository workflows | `dist/site/publication-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-manifest`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) |\n| Generated badge bundles, README badge blocks, and badge facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-badge-bundle-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-readme-badge-facts` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) |\n| Homebrew tap distribution indexes | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Buildchain CLI manual | `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Node API / package exports | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/release-provenance.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md#node-api-and-package-exports) |\n\n`dist/site/kfd-claims.json` is generated from\n`packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js`. Treat that module and JSON file as the\nsource claim registry; this map and the manuals explain those claims but do not\nreplace them.\n\n## Map\n\n| Your question | Document | Plane | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| What is Buildchain, in one idea? | [`../README.md`](../README.md) | - | stable |\n| Why is Buildchain a Release Passport mechanism rather than a generic workflow collection? | [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md) | why | stable |\n| How do agents and contributors enter this repo? | [`../AGENTS.md`](../AGENTS.md) + [`../CONTRIBUTING.md`](../CONTRIBUTING.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I install a standalone binary or npm package? | [`install.md`](install.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I run the `buildchain` CLI? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I import Buildchain toolkit APIs from JavaScript build code? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) + [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I initialize a new repository? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) + [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| Why does Buildchain use branch-driven release governance? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) | why | stable |\n| How do protected dev branches and scheduled ready-PR merging work? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) | use | stable |\n| How do I run daily, weekly, or monthly repository patrols? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol) | use | stable |\n| How does Buildchain decide patch, minor, and major release lines? | [`versioning.md`](versioning.md) | why | stable |\n| What exact branch/tag state machine runs on alpha, release, and major gate? | [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md) | verify | stable |\n| What did Buildchain migrate or retire from old action repositories? | [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md) | verify | stable |\n| What is the active action and workflow source of truth? | [`ownership.md`](ownership.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I declare version files and custom lifecycle commands? | [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| How does publish evidence, recovery, and finalization work? | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I collect and verify module/product build facts from Git source, version files, and outputs? | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I publish or verify release passport artifacts? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I seal exact artifact, identity, lifecycle, and KFD assessment roots for KFX admission? | [`artifact-verification-envelope.md`](artifact-verification-envelope.md) | verify/use | preview |\n| How is product publication authority sealed to an exact workflow, runner, control plane, nonce, and artifact? | [`publication-authority.md`](publication-authority.md) | verify | preview |\n| How do I gate release artifacts with KFD-1 contract-world witnesses? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I declare, render, and audit product KFD-2 release trust claims? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md#kfd-2) + [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I gate KFD-3 collaboration-interface releases? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I detect, register, audit, witness, or query KFD-3 product surfaces? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I keep `@v2` floating refs while detecting Buildchain contract drift? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do reusable workflows bind controller intent, source/runtime identity, outcomes, and receipt evidence? | [`controller-evidence.md`](controller-evidence.md) | verify/use | draft |\n| How do I propagate finalized upstream releases to downstream package/site PRs? | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) | use | preview |\n| How do paper or report repositories publish PDFs, metadata, source bundles, site-consumable manifests, npm packages, and GitHub Releases? | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate KFD / Release Passport badge bundles without hand-maintaining Markdown? | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate and verify a Homebrew tap from release passport evidence? | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I prove a PR-stage reusable build is the artifact source promoted later? | [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) + [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | verify | stable |\n| Why are binary release assets archived by platform, and where is the single bundle? | [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I add timestamped logs inside build scripts? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) | use | stable |\n| What package-owned facts should buildchain.libkungfu.dev render? | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I call the reusable build workflow? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | use | stable |\n| How does Buildchain schedule and aggregate a project-owned Shifu Gate profile? | [`shifu-gate-profiles.md`](shifu-gate-profiles.md) | use/verify | draft |\n| How do I use one build job that follows alpha during development and stable for releases? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#automatic-channel-router) | use | preview |\n| How do self-hosted runners relay large artifacts through S3 before GitHub artifacts? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay) | use | stable |\n| How do self-hosted runners reuse local Git checkout caches without weakening source locks? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache) | use | stable |\n| How do I validate an unreleased Buildchain runtime train while keeping `@v2`? | [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I automatically qualify alpha candidates and publish the newest non-revoked qualified candidate at a fixed window? | [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I deploy a site/app preview, staging, or production surface? | [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I publish observed infrastructure contracts for downstream consumers? | [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I use the active actions directly? | [`../actions/validate-config/README.md`](../actions/validate-config/README.md), [`../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md`](../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md), [`../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`](../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md), [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How can a consumer workflow report a Buildchain-owned failure back to Buildchain? | [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) + [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| What do the fixture repositories demonstrate? | [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md) | verify | stable |\n| What license and contribution terms apply? | [`../LICENSE`](../LICENSE) + [`../LICENSE-POLICY.md`](../LICENSE-POLICY.md) | use | stable |\n| What trademark, official-service, and provider-compliance boundaries apply? | [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md) + [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md) + [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I report a vulnerability? | [`../SECURITY.md`](../SECURITY.md) | use | stable |\n\n## Also asking about\n\n- **ABV / old workflows / old action repositories** -> [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md)\n  and [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md).\n- **v2 / v2-alpha / v2.0 / v2.0-alpha / exact tags / floating tags** ->\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) and\n  [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **Buildchain self-dogfood / released alpha canary / stable compatibility lane** ->\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood).\n- **qualified alpha ledger / scheduled stable selection / hold and revoke** ->\n  [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n- **v2.1 vs v2.2 / when to open a new minor line** ->\n  [`versioning.md`](versioning.md).\n- **dry-run / what would happen if this channel PR merges** -> [`cli.md`](cli.md)\n  and [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **protected dev branches / scheduled ready-PR merge / daily-weekly-monthly patrol** ->\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) and\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol).\n- **pnpm / npm / yarn / package-manager adapters** ->\n  [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md).\n- **pip / Conan / CMake / custom commands** -> [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md)\n  and [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **libnode / native artifacts / self-hosted runner matrix** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) and\n  [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md).\n- **S3 artifact relay / self-hosted runner artifact transfer** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay).\n- **local Git checkout cache / self-hosted source transport** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache).\n- **runtime train validation / temporary `buildchain-ref` override** ->\n  [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) and\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **consumer workflow feedback / automatic Buildchain GitHub issues** ->\n  [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md).\n- **PR-stage RC artifacts / promote-only release candidates** ->\n  [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) and\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **infra contract / observed infrastructure outputs / downstream contract propagation** ->\n  [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md).\n- **standalone binary install / platform archives / GitHub Release bundle** ->\n  [`install.md`](install.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md),\n  and [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md).\n- **Trusted Publishing / npm / publish evidence / recovery** ->\n  [`cli.md`](cli.md) and [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md).\n- **Git source digest / module build facts / product build facts / legacy\n  Kungfu build info** -> [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **release chains / upstream package or publication artifact as source of truth / site synchronization** ->\n  [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md).\n- **paper repositories / PDFs / publication manifests / immutable archive registries / source bundles** ->\n  [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md).\n- **README status badges / KFD badge bundles / badge facts JSON** ->\n  [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Homebrew taps / distribution indexes / Formula drift checks** ->\n  [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **KFD-1 contract worlds / byte-for-byte release gates** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate).\n- **KFD-2 public release trust claim audit** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit).\n- **KFD-3 collaboration-interface / agent-facing control surface closure** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate).\n- **floating `@v2` / contract lock / compatible drift issue** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock).\n- **GitHub Release passport / binary assets / artifact evidence / agent release checks** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md),\n  [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md), and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Buildchain logging / timestamps / consumer build phase timing** ->\n  [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) for JavaScript API\n  imports, and [`cli.md`](cli.md) for workflow or shell command usage.\n- **buildchain.libkungfu.dev / package-owned site facts** ->\n  [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md).\n- **sites / web previews / staging / production gates** ->\n  [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md).\n- **trademark / fork / official service / provider compliance / release\n  evidence boundary** -> [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md),\n  [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md), and\n  [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md).\n\n## How this map is maintained\n\n- A document becomes a row here when it is a stable entrypoint for a user,\n  contributor, or workflow consumer.\n- A row's status must never claim more than the artifact delivers.\n- `why` documents explain intent and design pressure; `verify` and `use`\n  documents should state what is guaranteed, where to verify it, and the current\n  maturity of that guarantee."
+      "markdown": "# Documentation Map\n\nStart here. Find the question you have; follow it to the document that answers\nit. This map is meant to be readable by both a person skimming for the right doc\nand an agent grounding a specific claim.\n\nEach row carries a **plane** - *why* (intent / rationale), *verify* (trust the\nrunning artifact), *use* (consume / extend) - and a **status**:\n\n- `stable` - current and holds.\n- `draft` - exists, rough or incomplete.\n- `to write` - planned; the material exists but is not yet a single doc.\n- `retired` - intentionally not part of the active Buildchain v2 surface.\n\n## Capability Coverage\n\nThis package should be usable by an agent from the npm artifact alone. The\nmachine-readable `dist/site/` bundle is the first fact source; the Markdown\nmanuals explain those facts and give operator examples.\n\n`dist/site/capability-registry.json` is the capability navigation entrypoint.\nIt groups the public surface into stable product areas so sites and agents do\nnot have to infer structure from file names. Each page, manual, CLI command,\nworkflow, action, and Node API export also carries a `capabilityGroup`,\n`audience`, and `maturity` field in its own registry.\n\n| Capability group | Primary facts | Primary manuals |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Getting Started | `capability-registry.json`, `product-mechanism.json` | [`install.md`](install.md), [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Release Passport and Trust | `release-model.json`, `artifact-schemas.json`, `publication-authority-registry.json`, `kfd-claims.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md), [`publication-authority.md`](publication-authority.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md), [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) |\n| Reusable Build and Lifecycle | `workflow-registry.json`, `controller-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md), [`controller-evidence.md`](controller-evidence.md), [`shifu-gate-profiles.md`](shifu-gate-profiles.md), [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) |\n| KFD Trust and Surface Closure | `kfd-claims.json`, `public-surface-audit.json`, `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| Site Bundle, Web Surfaces, and Propagation | `buildchain-site.json`, `site-manifest.json`, `page-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md), [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| Publication Artifacts | `publication-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md), [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) |\n| Distribution Indexes and Badges | `badge-endpoint-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md), [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Build Facts, Observability, and Diagnostics | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, lifecycle artifacts | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md), [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md), [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) |\n| Governance, Versioning, and Runtime Drift | `buildchain-contract.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md), [`versioning.md`](versioning.md), [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| CLI and Node API Reference | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) |\n\n| Capability | Machine-readable entry | Manual entry |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Capability-grouped KFD navigation | `dist/site/capability-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json` | this map, [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 release-passport gates | `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| KFD-3 public surface reverse audit | `dist/site/public-surface-audit.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 first-class CLI and Node API | `.buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/surfaces.json`, `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `buildchain.release.json`, KFD schemas from `@kungfu-tech/kfd` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md#commands) |\n| Floating `@v2` drift detection and compatibility issues | `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) |\n| npm publish transactions, evidence, dist-tags, and recovery | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) |\n| Git/source/version/module/product build facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-module-build-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-product-build-facts` | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) |\n| GitHub Release passport/evidence publication | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) |\n| release propagation for package/publication/site chains | `dist/site/release-model.json` | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| publication artifact manifests, immutable archive registries, source bundles, and paper repository workflows | `dist/site/publication-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-manifest`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) |\n| Generated badge bundles, README badge blocks, and badge facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-badge-bundle-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-readme-badge-facts` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) |\n| Homebrew tap distribution indexes | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Buildchain CLI manual | `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Node API / package exports | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/release-provenance.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md#node-api-and-package-exports) |\n\n`dist/site/kfd-claims.json` is generated from\n`packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js`. Treat that module and JSON file as the\nsource claim registry; this map and the manuals explain those claims but do not\nreplace them.\n\n## Map\n\n| Your question | Document | Plane | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| What is Buildchain, in one idea? | [`../README.md`](../README.md) | - | stable |\n| Why is Buildchain a Release Passport mechanism rather than a generic workflow collection? | [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md) | why | stable |\n| How do agents and contributors enter this repo? | [`../AGENTS.md`](../AGENTS.md) + [`../CONTRIBUTING.md`](../CONTRIBUTING.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I install a standalone binary or npm package? | [`install.md`](install.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I run the `buildchain` CLI? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I import Buildchain toolkit APIs from JavaScript build code? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) + [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I initialize a new repository? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) + [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| Why does Buildchain use branch-driven release governance? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) | why | stable |\n| How do protected dev branches and scheduled ready-PR merging work? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) | use | stable |\n| How do slow required checks land reliably on a busy dev channel? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) + [`cli.md`](cli.md#commands) | use | preview |\n| How do I run daily, weekly, or monthly repository patrols? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol) | use | stable |\n| How does Buildchain decide patch, minor, and major release lines? | [`versioning.md`](versioning.md) | why | stable |\n| What exact branch/tag state machine runs on alpha, release, and major gate? | [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md) | verify | stable |\n| What did Buildchain migrate or retire from old action repositories? | [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md) | verify | stable |\n| What is the active action and workflow source of truth? | [`ownership.md`](ownership.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I declare version files and custom lifecycle commands? | [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| How does publish evidence, recovery, and finalization work? | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I collect and verify module/product build facts from Git source, version files, and outputs? | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I publish or verify release passport artifacts? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I seal exact artifact, identity, lifecycle, and KFD assessment roots for KFX admission? | [`artifact-verification-envelope.md`](artifact-verification-envelope.md) | verify/use | preview |\n| How is product publication authority sealed to an exact workflow, runner, control plane, nonce, and artifact? | [`publication-authority.md`](publication-authority.md) | verify | preview |\n| How do I gate release artifacts with KFD-1 contract-world witnesses? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I declare, render, and audit product KFD-2 release trust claims? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md#kfd-2) + [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I gate KFD-3 collaboration-interface releases? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I detect, register, audit, witness, or query KFD-3 product surfaces? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I keep `@v2` floating refs while detecting Buildchain contract drift? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do reusable workflows bind controller intent, source/runtime identity, outcomes, and receipt evidence? | [`controller-evidence.md`](controller-evidence.md) | verify/use | draft |\n| How do I propagate finalized upstream releases to downstream package/site PRs? | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) | use | preview |\n| How do paper or report repositories publish PDFs, metadata, source bundles, site-consumable manifests, npm packages, and GitHub Releases? | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate KFD / Release Passport badge bundles without hand-maintaining Markdown? | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate and verify a Homebrew tap from release passport evidence? | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I prove a PR-stage reusable build is the artifact source promoted later? | [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) + [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | verify | stable |\n| Why are binary release assets archived by platform, and where is the single bundle? | [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I add timestamped logs inside build scripts? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) | use | stable |\n| What package-owned facts should buildchain.libkungfu.dev render? | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I call the reusable build workflow? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | use | stable |\n| How does Buildchain schedule and aggregate a project-owned Shifu Gate profile? | [`shifu-gate-profiles.md`](shifu-gate-profiles.md) | use/verify | draft |\n| How do I use one build job that follows alpha during development and stable for releases? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#automatic-channel-router) | use | preview |\n| How do self-hosted runners relay large artifacts through S3 before GitHub artifacts? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay) | use | stable |\n| How do self-hosted runners reuse local Git checkout caches without weakening source locks? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache) | use | stable |\n| How do I validate an unreleased Buildchain runtime train while keeping `@v2`? | [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I automatically qualify alpha candidates and publish the newest non-revoked qualified candidate at a fixed window? | [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I deploy a site/app preview, staging, or production surface? | [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I publish observed infrastructure contracts for downstream consumers? | [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I use the active actions directly? | [`../actions/validate-config/README.md`](../actions/validate-config/README.md), [`../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md`](../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md), [`../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`](../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md), [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How can a consumer workflow report a Buildchain-owned failure back to Buildchain? | [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) + [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| What do the fixture repositories demonstrate? | [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md) | verify | stable |\n| What license and contribution terms apply? | [`../LICENSE`](../LICENSE) + [`../LICENSE-POLICY.md`](../LICENSE-POLICY.md) | use | stable |\n| What trademark, official-service, and provider-compliance boundaries apply? | [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md) + [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md) + [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I report a vulnerability? | [`../SECURITY.md`](../SECURITY.md) | use | stable |\n\n## Also asking about\n\n- **ABV / old workflows / old action repositories** -> [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md)\n  and [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md).\n- **v2 / v2-alpha / v2.0 / v2.0-alpha / exact tags / floating tags** ->\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) and\n  [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **Buildchain self-dogfood / released alpha canary / stable compatibility lane** ->\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood).\n- **qualified alpha ledger / scheduled stable selection / hold and revoke** ->\n  [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n- **v2.1 vs v2.2 / when to open a new minor line** ->\n  [`versioning.md`](versioning.md).\n- **dry-run / what would happen if this channel PR merges** -> [`cli.md`](cli.md)\n  and [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **protected dev branches / scheduled ready-PR merge / daily-weekly-monthly patrol** ->\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) and\n  [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol).\n- **pnpm / npm / yarn / package-manager adapters** ->\n  [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md).\n- **pip / Conan / CMake / custom commands** -> [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md)\n  and [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **libnode / native artifacts / self-hosted runner matrix** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) and\n  [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md).\n- **S3 artifact relay / self-hosted runner artifact transfer** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay).\n- **local Git checkout cache / self-hosted source transport** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache).\n- **runtime train validation / temporary `buildchain-ref` override** ->\n  [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) and\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **consumer workflow feedback / automatic Buildchain GitHub issues** ->\n  [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md).\n- **PR-stage RC artifacts / promote-only release candidates** ->\n  [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) and\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **infra contract / observed infrastructure outputs / downstream contract propagation** ->\n  [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md).\n- **standalone binary install / platform archives / GitHub Release bundle** ->\n  [`install.md`](install.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md),\n  and [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md).\n- **Trusted Publishing / npm / publish evidence / recovery** ->\n  [`cli.md`](cli.md) and [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md).\n- **Git source digest / module build facts / product build facts / legacy\n  Kungfu build info** -> [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **release chains / upstream package or publication artifact as source of truth / site synchronization** ->\n  [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md).\n- **paper repositories / PDFs / publication manifests / immutable archive registries / source bundles** ->\n  [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md).\n- **README status badges / KFD badge bundles / badge facts JSON** ->\n  [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Homebrew taps / distribution indexes / Formula drift checks** ->\n  [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **KFD-1 contract worlds / byte-for-byte release gates** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate).\n- **KFD-2 public release trust claim audit** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit).\n- **KFD-3 collaboration-interface / agent-facing control surface closure** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate).\n- **floating `@v2` / contract lock / compatible drift issue** ->\n  [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock).\n- **GitHub Release passport / binary assets / artifact evidence / agent release checks** ->\n  [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md),\n  [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md), and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Buildchain logging / timestamps / consumer build phase timing** ->\n  [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) for JavaScript API\n  imports, and [`cli.md`](cli.md) for workflow or shell command usage.\n- **buildchain.libkungfu.dev / package-owned site facts** ->\n  [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md).\n- **sites / web previews / staging / production gates** ->\n  [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md).\n- **trademark / fork / official service / provider compliance / release\n  evidence boundary** -> [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md),\n  [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md), and\n  [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md).\n\n## How this map is maintained\n\n- A document becomes a row here when it is a stable entrypoint for a user,\n  contributor, or workflow consumer.\n- A row's status must never claim more than the artifact delivers.\n- `why` documents explain intent and design pressure; `verify` and `use`\n  documents should state what is guaranteed, where to verify it, and the current\n  maturity of that guarantee."
     },
     {
       "id": "manual:migration-inventory",
@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "preview",
       "sourcePath": "docs/publication-authority.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:920d4f14902ded1999f46d39f6d02db8cb5be6f22e376f6f2d456b3a1cc0c674",
+      "digest": "sha256:e191d248a52fc6488aef48050949ed0fd31064ab2a64cca2a5b529eeb68f0ff6",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -1131,6 +1131,11 @@
           "title": "Runner and control-plane evidence",
           "anchor": "runner-and-control-plane-evidence"
         },
+        {
+          "level": 2,
+          "title": "Managed web-surface production",
+          "anchor": "managed-web-surface-production"
+        },
         {
           "level": 2,
           "title": "Consumer qualification handoff",
@@ -1152,7 +1157,7 @@
           "anchor": "publication-lanes"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "---\nstatus: draft\nperiod: ongoing\ntheme: sealed-publication-authority\ndoc_type: protocol\nsource_level: local-files\nconfidence: high\nsensitivity: public\nevidence_grade: B\nreview_state: unreviewed\nlast_reviewed: 2026-07-15\nai_provenance:\n  model_family: GPT-5\n  product: Codex\n  generated_at: 2026-07-15\n  limits: Live provider configuration must be re-audited; no credential values are represented.\n---\n\n# Sealed Publication Authority\n\nBuildchain publication authority is a closed-world, fail-closed protocol. It does\nnot mint registry or cloud credentials. It independently verifies whether an\nalready protected publication job is allowed to request a short-lived provider\ncredential for one exact product, target, version, channel, and artifact digest.\n\nThe machine-readable authority inventory is\n`dist/site/publication-authority-registry.json`. Any workflow with a write,\nenvironment, OIDC, cloud credential, registry publish, release, or Git push\nsignal must have an explicit descriptor. A new authority-bearing workflow that\nis absent from the inventory fails site generation. Unknown workflows and every\ndescriptor not marked `product-publication` are denied product publication.\n\n## Evidence chain\n\nA qualifying admission binds exact source and runtime SHAs; contract, consumer\npolicy, qualifying controller receipt, Shifu/Gate aggregate, artifact, runner,\nand control-plane digests; repository, authority workflow, provider publisher\nworkflow, Environment policy,\nproduct, target, version, and channel; plus a unique nonce and a lifetime of no\nmore than 15 minutes. Every expected binding is mandatory at verification time;\nan omitted expected field is not a wildcard.\n\nThe independent verifier recomputes every digest and ignores a producer's own\nallow/deny conclusion. It fetches the exact evidence run, validates the actual\nrelease-candidate passport and referenced qualifying controller receipt,\nrecomputes the Shifu Gate aggregate or explicit consumer-owned no-Gate policy,\nrecomputes the downloaded artifact manifests, and hashes every declared product\npayload file against those manifests. The `.buildchain/` diagnostics envelope is\nbound by the manifest digest but excluded from the product-byte set because it can\nbe finalized after the lifecycle scan. The verifier also compares the PR evidence tree to the\nadmitted post-merge source commit tree. It rejects an unknown\nworkflow, stale or replayed nonce, runner downgrade, control-plane drift,\nsource/runtime mismatch, and artifact substitution. A successful result is a\nscoped capability receipt, not a bearer credential.\n\n## Runner and control-plane evidence\n\nRunner evidence uses exactly four classes: `ephemeral`, `reimaged`,\n`persistent-measured`, and `unqualified`. Ephemeral runners also record their\njob-isolation boundary. Reimaged and persistent runners qualify only when a\nclean baseline is proven and baseline, toolchain, cache-contract, and task-\nisolation digests are all present. Otherwise they still emit diagnostic\nevidence with `qualificationStatus = unqualified`, but cannot receive a product\ncapability.\n\nThe external audit records digests and pass/fail status for repository Actions\ndefaults, classic branch protection or an active matching repository ruleset,\ndeclared protected Environment policy or an explicit no-Environment binding,\njob-scoped credentials,\nabsence of long-lived workflow publication credentials, provider authority,\nand authorized runner class. Provider modes are `npm-trusted-publisher`,\n`github-token`, and `oidc-role`. The OIDC-role mode consumes only a sanitized\nprovider audit containing a role digest and qualifying decision; raw IAM policy,\ntokens, or credentials are rejected. Package-owner, cloud-root, GitHub\nadministrator, and registry-root credentials remain outside Buildchain's trust\nboundary. Missing or unreadable facts fail closed.\n\nAn unauthenticated local npm CLI is not evidence that Trusted Publishing is\nmissing. `npm whoami` reports only the local CLI session and does not report the\nOIDC identity that npm creates during `npm publish`. The default read-only audit\ntherefore binds the exact provider, repository, caller workflow, optional\nEnvironment, job-scoped OIDC permission, and absence of long-lived credentials,\nthen records `provider-at-transaction`: npm makes the final authorization\ndecision when `npm publish` exchanges the job's OIDC token. A missing or drifted\ntrusted-publisher configuration consequently denies the transaction safely; it\nis not preflighted through an unrelated long-lived npm login.\n\nAn authenticated external auditor can add stronger point-in-time evidence by\nsupplying sanitized `npm trust list --json` output with `--npm-trust-json`. This\nchanges the publisher fact to `audited-control-plane`; the workflow never runs\n`npm trust list` itself and never receives that auditor's npm credential.\n\nThe credential-free collector proves effective Actions and runner scope from\nthe publication workflow fetched at `--workflow-ref`: explicit read-only\nworkflow defaults, job-scoped write/OIDC permissions, and an exact GitHub-hosted\nrunner label. It does not call repository Actions-default or self-hosted-runner\nadministration endpoints. Branch/ruleset and OIDC subject facts remain live\nread-only provider queries. When the detailed branch-protection endpoint is not\nreadable with the workflow token, `--source-sha` binds the provider's public\nprotected-branch summary to the exact merged PR, independent approval, required\nsuccessful check, same-repository lineage, and current branch head. This records\nprovider-enforced transaction evidence without treating an unavailable\nadministration endpoint as an unprotected branch. It avoids turning a\nrepository-admin token into a publication prerequisite.\n\nFor non-dry-run workflows, missing admission, runner, control-plane, Gate, or\nexpected-binding evidence is rejected before Buildchain downloads candidate\nartifacts. The denial explicitly records that npm Trusted Publishing and OIDC\nwere not evaluated, so downstream diagnostics cannot misclassify an admission\nassembly failure as an npm authentication failure.\n\nAn explicitly opted-in managed `workflow_run` promotion lane may assemble those\ninputs from evidence owned by its caller repository. It downloads the exact prior RC passport,\nsummary, referenced controller receipt, manifests, and product payloads; proves\nthe admitted channel commit has the same Git tree as the RC; performs the live\nread-only control-plane audit; records the GitHub-hosted job as ephemeral runner\nprovenance; and consumes either a caller-supplied Gate aggregate or an explicit\ncaller no-Gate decision. The\nindependent verifier then recomputes every receipt and payload digest exactly as\nit does for externally supplied admission. Automatic assembly keeps Buildchain\nas the canonical authority repository, requires evidence to belong to the\ncaller, binds a repository-local publisher workflow, and rejects unknown refs,\nnon-exact source SHAs, package/target mismatches, or an undeclared Gate policy.\nManual apply and consumers that do not opt in still require their own explicit\nadmission inputs.\n\nBefore authority verification, the reusable promotion controller runs the same\nrelease transaction selector in read-only mode. That plan supplies one exact\npublication version and tag to the admission verifier, the publish-gate source\nlock, and the real promotion action. The verifier rejects a capability for a\ndifferent version, and the promotion action rechecks the planned version before\nany publish transaction side effect. Release-candidate fixture versions are\nartifact evidence only; they never name Buildchain's own source-lock or\npublication capability.\n\nEvidence publication is a separate authority class and never grants product\npublication.\n\n## Consumer qualification handoff\n\nConsumers may explicitly opt in to a final, consumer-owned qualification\npredicate. Buildchain then transports the complete Gate aggregate alongside the\nsealed capability instead of reducing it to a summary. The capability binds the\nauthority registry, consumer Gate registry and policy, exact source and runtime,\ncontroller, runner, control-plane, artifact, provider target, channel, version,\nfreshness window, nonce, and exact predicate command digest.\n\nThe predicate runs in a separate job with read-only source access, no inherited\nsecrets, no OIDC permission, and no provider write permission. It receives only\npaths to `capability.json` and `gate-aggregate.json` plus the exact predicate id\nand digest. The consumer writes a\n`kungfu-buildchain-consumer-publication-decision`; Buildchain seals that result\nas a deterministic\n`kungfu-buildchain-publication-qualification-receipt`. Buildchain does not parse\nproduct-specific Gate meanings.\n\nThe provider action revalidates the capability, full aggregate, receipt,\npredicate identity, freshness, nonce, source, version, channel, target, and all\nsealed digests immediately before the publish transaction. Missing, denied,\nstale, replayed, substituted, or drifted receipts fail before provider mutation.\nDirect calls to the provider action cannot bypass the receipt when\n`require-publication-qualification` is enabled. Consumers that do not opt in\nretain the existing publication contract.\n\n## API and CLI\n\nUse `@kungfu-tech/buildchain/publication-authority` or run:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify publication-admission admission.json \\\n  --registry-json publication-authority-registry.json \\\n  --runner-json runner.json \\\n  --control-plane-audit-json control-plane.json \\\n  --publication-evidence-json publication-evidence.json \\\n  --expected-json expected.json \\\n  --used-nonce previous-run-nonce \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe read-only live collector defaults to npm trusted publishing. Other product\nproviders select an explicit adapter:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch dev/v2/v2.12 \\\n  --source-sha <exact-merged-branch-sha> \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml \\\n  --workflow-ref <exact-buildchain-sha> \\\n  --publisher-workflow .github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml \\\n  --job promote \\\n  --environment none\n\n# Optional stronger external evidence; generate the JSON outside the workflow.\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch dev/v2/v2.12 \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml \\\n  --publisher-workflow .github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml \\\n  --job promote \\\n  --environment none \\\n  --npm-trust-json sanitized-npm-trust.json\n\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch release/v2/v2.12 \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/.binary-release-assets.yml \\\n  --job publish \\\n  --environment buildchain-release-assets \\\n  --publisher-mode github-token\n\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository OWNER/CONSUMER \\\n  --workflow-repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch main \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/.web-surface.yml \\\n  --job production-apply \\\n  --environment production \\\n  --publisher-mode oidc-role \\\n  --provider-audit-json sanitized-oidc-role-audit.json\n```\n\nThe authority workflow identifies the reusable implementation that performs the\npublication job. The publisher workflow identifies the caller filename bound by\nthe provider's trusted-publisher policy; these identities are deliberately\nseparate. `--environment none` is an explicit assertion that the job declares no\nGitHub Environment and the provider policy has no Environment restriction. A\nnamed Environment must exist, be protected, and be declared by the job. The\nBuildchain receipt alone is never sufficient authorization.\n\n## Publication lanes\n\n`Binary Distribution` is evidence-only. It builds platform archives and a\nrelease evidence bundle with read-only repository permissions. GitHub Release\nasset writes live in `Binary Release Assets`, which downloads an exact prior\nevidence run, verifies its bundle digest against the sealed capability, and is\nthe only binary job with `contents: write` in the protected\n`buildchain-release-assets` Environment.\n\nThe npm/promotion, paper, binary-release, and web-production lanes all depend on\nthe independent verifier. Preview, staging, build, source-check, controller,\nand failure-evidence lanes do not inherit product publication capability."
+      "markdown": "---\nstatus: draft\nperiod: ongoing\ntheme: sealed-publication-authority\ndoc_type: protocol\nsource_level: local-files\nconfidence: high\nsensitivity: public\nevidence_grade: B\nreview_state: unreviewed\nlast_reviewed: 2026-07-15\nai_provenance:\n  model_family: GPT-5\n  product: Codex\n  generated_at: 2026-07-15\n  limits: Live provider configuration must be re-audited; no credential values are represented.\n---\n\n# Sealed Publication Authority\n\nBuildchain publication authority is a closed-world, fail-closed protocol. It does\nnot mint registry or cloud credentials. It independently verifies whether an\nalready protected publication job is allowed to request a short-lived provider\ncredential for one exact product, target, version, channel, and artifact digest.\n\nThe machine-readable authority inventory is\n`dist/site/publication-authority-registry.json`. Any workflow with a write,\nenvironment, OIDC, cloud credential, registry publish, release, or Git push\nsignal must have an explicit descriptor. A new authority-bearing workflow that\nis absent from the inventory fails site generation. Unknown workflows and every\ndescriptor not marked `product-publication` are denied product publication.\n\n## Evidence chain\n\nA qualifying admission binds exact source and runtime SHAs; contract, consumer\npolicy, qualifying controller receipt, Shifu/Gate aggregate, artifact, runner,\nand control-plane digests; repository, authority workflow, provider publisher\nworkflow, Environment policy,\nproduct, target, version, and channel; plus a unique nonce and a lifetime of no\nmore than 15 minutes. Every expected binding is mandatory at verification time;\nan omitted expected field is not a wildcard.\n\nThe independent verifier recomputes every digest and ignores a producer's own\nallow/deny conclusion. It fetches the exact evidence run, validates the actual\nrelease-candidate passport and referenced qualifying controller receipt,\nrecomputes the Shifu Gate aggregate or explicit consumer-owned no-Gate policy,\nrecomputes the downloaded artifact manifests, and hashes every declared product\npayload file against those manifests. The `.buildchain/` diagnostics envelope is\nbound by the manifest digest but excluded from the product-byte set because it can\nbe finalized after the lifecycle scan. The verifier also compares the PR evidence tree to the\nadmitted post-merge source commit tree. It rejects an unknown\nworkflow, stale or replayed nonce, runner downgrade, control-plane drift,\nsource/runtime mismatch, and artifact substitution. A successful result is a\nscoped capability receipt, not a bearer credential.\n\n## Runner and control-plane evidence\n\nRunner evidence uses exactly four classes: `ephemeral`, `reimaged`,\n`persistent-measured`, and `unqualified`. Ephemeral runners also record their\njob-isolation boundary. Reimaged and persistent runners qualify only when a\nclean baseline is proven and baseline, toolchain, cache-contract, and task-\nisolation digests are all present. Otherwise they still emit diagnostic\nevidence with `qualificationStatus = unqualified`, but cannot receive a product\ncapability.\n\nThe external audit records digests and pass/fail status for repository Actions\ndefaults, classic branch protection or an active matching repository ruleset,\ndeclared protected Environment policy or an explicit no-Environment binding,\njob-scoped credentials,\nabsence of long-lived workflow publication credentials, provider authority,\nand authorized runner class. Provider modes are `npm-trusted-publisher`,\n`github-token`, and `oidc-role`. The OIDC-role mode consumes only a sanitized\nprovider audit containing a role digest and qualifying decision; raw IAM policy,\ntokens, or credentials are rejected. Package-owner, cloud-root, GitHub\nadministrator, and registry-root credentials remain outside Buildchain's trust\nboundary. Missing or unreadable facts fail closed.\n\nAn unauthenticated local npm CLI is not evidence that Trusted Publishing is\nmissing. `npm whoami` reports only the local CLI session and does not report the\nOIDC identity that npm creates during `npm publish`. The default read-only audit\ntherefore binds the exact provider, repository, caller workflow, optional\nEnvironment, job-scoped OIDC permission, and absence of long-lived credentials,\nthen records `provider-at-transaction`: npm makes the final authorization\ndecision when `npm publish` exchanges the job's OIDC token. A missing or drifted\ntrusted-publisher configuration consequently denies the transaction safely; it\nis not preflighted through an unrelated long-lived npm login.\n\nAn authenticated external auditor can add stronger point-in-time evidence by\nsupplying sanitized `npm trust list --json` output with `--npm-trust-json`. This\nchanges the publisher fact to `audited-control-plane`; the workflow never runs\n`npm trust list` itself and never receives that auditor's npm credential.\n\nThe credential-free collector proves effective Actions and runner scope from\nthe publication workflow fetched at `--workflow-ref`: explicit read-only\nworkflow defaults, job-scoped write/OIDC permissions, and an exact GitHub-hosted\nrunner label. It does not call repository Actions-default or self-hosted-runner\nadministration endpoints. Branch/ruleset and OIDC subject facts remain live\nread-only provider queries. When the detailed branch-protection endpoint is not\nreadable with the workflow token, `--source-sha` binds the provider's public\nprotected-branch summary to the exact merged PR, independent approval, required\nsuccessful check, same-repository lineage, and current branch head. This records\nprovider-enforced transaction evidence without treating an unavailable\nadministration endpoint as an unprotected branch. It avoids turning a\nrepository-admin token into a publication prerequisite.\n\nFor non-dry-run workflows, missing admission, runner, control-plane, Gate, or\nexpected-binding evidence is rejected before Buildchain downloads candidate\nartifacts. The denial explicitly records that npm Trusted Publishing and OIDC\nwere not evaluated, so downstream diagnostics cannot misclassify an admission\nassembly failure as an npm authentication failure.\n\nAn explicitly opted-in managed `workflow_run` promotion lane may assemble those\ninputs from evidence owned by its caller repository. It downloads the exact prior RC passport,\nsummary, referenced controller receipt, manifests, and product payloads; proves\nthe admitted channel commit has the same Git tree as the RC; performs the live\nread-only control-plane audit; records the GitHub-hosted job as ephemeral runner\nprovenance; and consumes either a caller-supplied Gate aggregate or an explicit\ncaller no-Gate decision. The\nindependent verifier then recomputes every receipt and payload digest exactly as\nit does for externally supplied admission. Automatic assembly keeps Buildchain\nas the canonical authority repository, requires evidence to belong to the\ncaller, binds a repository-local publisher workflow, and rejects unknown refs,\nnon-exact source SHAs, package/target mismatches, or an undeclared Gate policy.\nManual apply and consumers that do not opt in still require their own explicit\nadmission inputs.\n\nBefore authority verification, the reusable promotion controller runs the same\nrelease transaction selector in read-only mode. That plan supplies one exact\npublication version and tag to the admission verifier, the publish-gate source\nlock, and the real promotion action. The verifier rejects a capability for a\ndifferent version, and the promotion action rechecks the planned version before\nany publish transaction side effect. Release-candidate fixture versions are\nartifact evidence only; they never name Buildchain's own source-lock or\npublication capability.\n\nEvidence publication is a separate authority class and never grants product\npublication.\n\n## Managed web-surface production\n\nThe reusable web-surface controller owns a complete standard producer path for\nits documented production mechanisms. A reviewed matching release-PR merge or a\nmanual dispatch by an actor with current repository write authority creates a\nsigned decision bound to the exact source SHA. After build, verify, and\nproduction planning, the workflow creates a qualifying pre-publication\ncontroller receipt and assembles a ten-minute admission over the source tree,\nimmutable Buildchain runtime, deployment plan, artifact hash, production\nEnvironment, AWS role/deploy target, runner provenance, decision digest, and\nnonce. The independent verifier emits the scoped `web-production` capability.\n\nThe production job rechecks the capability and candidate against the same plan\nbefore downloading product artifacts. AWS authorization is deliberately\nrecorded as `provider-at-transaction`: the capability binds the exact role and\nEnvironment, while `configure-aws-credentials` performs the live OIDC exchange\nand remains the final provider authorization gate before mutation. Buildchain\ndoes not claim that an IAM trust relationship passed before that transaction.\n\nExternally assembled admissions remain an optional compatibility path and must\nprovide the full admission, runner, control-plane, Gate aggregate, expected\nbindings, and nonce set. They are not required for the managed web-surface\nrelease-PR or trusted-manual paths.\n\n## Consumer qualification handoff\n\nConsumers may explicitly opt in to a final, consumer-owned qualification\npredicate. Buildchain then transports the complete Gate aggregate alongside the\nsealed capability instead of reducing it to a summary. The capability binds the\nauthority registry, consumer Gate registry and policy, exact source and runtime,\ncontroller, runner, control-plane, artifact, provider target, channel, version,\nfreshness window, nonce, and exact predicate command digest.\n\nThe predicate runs in a separate job with read-only source access, no inherited\nsecrets, no OIDC permission, and no provider write permission. It receives only\npaths to `capability.json` and `gate-aggregate.json` plus the exact predicate id\nand digest. The consumer writes a\n`kungfu-buildchain-consumer-publication-decision`; Buildchain seals that result\nas a deterministic\n`kungfu-buildchain-publication-qualification-receipt`. Buildchain does not parse\nproduct-specific Gate meanings.\n\nThe provider action revalidates the capability, full aggregate, receipt,\npredicate identity, freshness, nonce, source, version, channel, target, and all\nsealed digests immediately before the publish transaction. Missing, denied,\nstale, replayed, substituted, or drifted receipts fail before provider mutation.\nDirect calls to the provider action cannot bypass the receipt when\n`require-publication-qualification` is enabled. Consumers that do not opt in\nretain the existing publication contract.\n\n## API and CLI\n\nUse `@kungfu-tech/buildchain/publication-authority` or run:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain verify publication-admission admission.json \\\n  --registry-json publication-authority-registry.json \\\n  --runner-json runner.json \\\n  --control-plane-audit-json control-plane.json \\\n  --publication-evidence-json publication-evidence.json \\\n  --expected-json expected.json \\\n  --used-nonce previous-run-nonce \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe read-only live collector defaults to npm trusted publishing. Other product\nproviders select an explicit adapter:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch dev/v2/v2.12 \\\n  --source-sha <exact-merged-branch-sha> \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml \\\n  --workflow-ref <exact-buildchain-sha> \\\n  --publisher-workflow .github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml \\\n  --job promote \\\n  --environment none\n\n# Optional stronger external evidence; generate the JSON outside the workflow.\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch dev/v2/v2.12 \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml \\\n  --publisher-workflow .github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml \\\n  --job promote \\\n  --environment none \\\n  --npm-trust-json sanitized-npm-trust.json\n\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch release/v2/v2.12 \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/.binary-release-assets.yml \\\n  --job publish \\\n  --environment buildchain-release-assets \\\n  --publisher-mode github-token\n\nbuildchain audit publication-control-plane \\\n  --repository OWNER/CONSUMER \\\n  --workflow-repository kungfu-systems/buildchain \\\n  --branch main \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/.web-surface.yml \\\n  --job production-apply \\\n  --environment production \\\n  --publisher-mode oidc-role \\\n  --provider-audit-json sanitized-oidc-role-audit.json\n```\n\nThe authority workflow identifies the reusable implementation that performs the\npublication job. The publisher workflow identifies the caller filename bound by\nthe provider's trusted-publisher policy; these identities are deliberately\nseparate. `--environment none` is an explicit assertion that the job declares no\nGitHub Environment and the provider policy has no Environment restriction. A\nnamed Environment must exist, be protected, and be declared by the job. The\nBuildchain receipt alone is never sufficient authorization.\n\n## Publication lanes\n\n`Binary Distribution` is evidence-only. It builds platform archives and a\nrelease evidence bundle with read-only repository permissions. GitHub Release\nasset writes live in `Binary Release Assets`, which downloads an exact prior\nevidence run, verifies its bundle digest against the sealed capability, and is\nthe only binary job with `contents: write` in the protected\n`buildchain-release-assets` Environment.\n\nThe npm/promotion, paper, binary-release, and web-production lanes all depend on\nthe independent verifier. Preview, staging, build, source-check, controller,\nand failure-evidence lanes do not inherit product publication capability."
     },
     {
       "id": "manual:publish-transaction",
@@ -1311,7 +1316,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "stable",
       "sourcePath": "docs/release-flow.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:c05905de6a905d1ce0dd977986175b8bc1ad908c6c2eee946809693ea2cb91de",
+      "digest": "sha256:a2f68d42f34acc35940e135285df5ba510d91b15b9d9ede8cabbe8bfa6ab0305",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -1369,7 +1374,7 @@
           "anchor": "failure-boundaries"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "# Release Flow Diagrams\n\nThis document describes the Buildchain v2 branch, tag, and version-state flow.\nSee [Release governance](release-governance.md) for the design rationale.\n\n## Architecture\n\n```mermaid\nflowchart TD\n  Maintainer[\"Maintainer opens channel PR\"]\n  Verify[\"Release - Verify\"]\n  Review[\"Protected branch review\"]\n  Merge[\"Merge PR into alpha or release\"]\n  Promotion[\"Buildchain Ref Promotion\"]\n  StableDecision{\"Release channel?\"}\n  StableGate[\"Stable only: exact-alpha canaries + soak + cooldown\"]\n  Action[\"promote-buildchain-ref action\"]\n  VersionState[\"Version-state commit\"]\n  ExactTag[\"Exact tag\"]\n  FloatingRefs[\"Floating tags and channel branches\"]\n  Consumers[\"Consumers pin stable or exact refs\"]\n\n  Maintainer --> Verify\n  Verify --> Review\n  Review --> Merge\n  Merge --> Promotion\n  Promotion --> StableDecision\n  StableDecision -->|yes| StableGate\n  StableDecision -->|no: alpha| Action\n  StableGate --> Action\n  Action --> VersionState\n  Action --> ExactTag\n  Action --> FloatingRefs\n  ExactTag --> Consumers\n  FloatingRefs --> Consumers\n```\n\nBuildchain treats the PR merge as release intent and the promotion action as the\nonly component allowed to turn that intent into release refs.\n\n`StableGate` applies only to Buildchain's release channel. Alpha and train\niteration bypass it. See [Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate](release-governance.md#stable-release-throttle-and-canary-gate)\nfor the versioned policy and evidence contract.\n\n## Ref State\n\n| Ref kind | Example | Mutability | Purpose |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Development branch | `dev/v2/v2.0` | moves | next source state for a minor line |\n| Alpha branch | `alpha/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest test state for a minor line |\n| Release branch | `release/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest production state for a minor line |\n| Major gate branch | `publish-gate/major` | moves | reviewed administrator gate for publishing the next major |\n| Exact alpha tag | `v2.0.3-alpha.0` | immutable | audit ref for one tested prerelease |\n| Exact release tag | `v2.0.2` | immutable | audit ref for one production release |\n| Floating alpha tag | `v2.0-alpha` | moves | latest test channel for a minor line |\n| Floating major alpha tag | `v2-alpha` | moves | latest test channel on the highest published alpha minor for a major line |\n| Floating minor tag | `v2.0` | moves | latest production patch on a minor line |\n| Floating major tag | `v2` | moves | selected stable major entrypoint |\n\n## Ref Protection Contract\n\nRepository rulesets must distinguish immutable evidence refs from mutable\nchannel refs.\n\nProtect exact release and alpha tags as immutable evidence:\n\n```text\nrefs/tags/v*.*.*\n```\n\nDo not apply immutable-tag rulesets to every `refs/tags/v*` ref. Buildchain\nmust be able to update floating channel tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`,\nand `v2-alpha` after the exact tag and publish evidence are valid. A ruleset that\nmatches all `v*` tags also matches floating tags, so release finalization can\nfail with GitHub protected-ref errors even though the exact release tag and\npublished artifacts are already durable.\n\nThe intended governance split is:\n\n- exact tags such as `v2.0.14` and `v2.0.15-alpha.0` are immutable audit refs;\n- floating tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`, and `v2-alpha` are mutable channel refs\n  owned by the Buildchain promotion token;\n- protected branches still require reviewed channel PRs before Buildchain can\n  move any exact or floating release refs.\n\n## Opening a Minor Line\n\nNew minor lines should be opened through Buildchain instead of hand-created\nbranches. The reusable entrypoint is the `Release Line Bootstrap` workflow. It\ndefaults to dry-run so maintainers can inspect the planned refs, protection\ncontract, initial version, and first alpha PR before any mutation.\n\nThe workflow is backed by the CLI command:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n  --major 2 \\\n  --minor 10 \\\n  --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n  --json\n```\n\nWhen the workflow is run with `apply=true`, Buildchain:\n\n- writes the initial version-state commit, such as `2.10.0-alpha.0`;\n- creates `dev/v2/v2.10` from that commit;\n- creates `alpha/v2/v2.10` and `release/v2/v2.10` from the selected source ref;\n- applies branch protection with one approving review and the configured\n  required status check;\n- switches the repository default branch to the new dev line when requested;\n- opens the first `dev/v2/v2.10 -> alpha/v2/v2.10` channel PR when requested.\n\nThis makes minor-line creation a single audited operation. The channel PR still\ngoes through the normal verify/review/promotion path before an alpha is\npublished.\n\n## Alpha Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n  participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n  participant PR as PR dev -> alpha\n  participant Verify as Release - Verify\n  participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n  participant Tags as Tags\n\n  Dev->>PR: open channel PR\n  PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n  Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n  PR->>Alpha: reviewed merge\n  Alpha->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n  Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n  Promote->>Promote: compute next vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n  Promote->>Promote: write and verify version state\n  Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\n  Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z-alpha.N\nvX.Y-alpha\nvX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nall point at the generated alpha version-state commit.\n\n## Release Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n  participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  participant PR as PR alpha -> release\n  participant Verify as Release - Verify\n  participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n  participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n  participant Tags as Tags\n  participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n\n  Alpha->>PR: open channel PR\n  PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n  Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n  PR->>Release: reviewed merge\n  Release->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n  Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n  Promote->>Promote: find same-patch alpha tag\n  Promote->>Promote: compare release tree with tested alpha tree\n  Promote->>Promote: write final version state or verify anchored material\n  Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX when eligible\n  Promote->>Release: move release/vX/vX.Y\n  Promote->>Promote: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n  Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\n  Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z\nvX.Y\nvX\nrelease/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the production version-state commit, while:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\nvX.Y-alpha\nvX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the next alpha version-state commit.\n\n## State Machine\n\n```mermaid\nstateDiagram-v2\n  [*] --> Development: work lands on dev/vX/vX.Y\n  Development --> AlphaCandidate: PR dev -> alpha\n  AlphaCandidate --> AlphaPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n  AlphaPublished --> ReleaseCandidate: PR alpha -> release\n  ReleaseCandidate --> ProductionPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n  ProductionPublished --> NextAlphaPrepared: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n  NextAlphaPrepared --> Development: dev and alpha refs move to next alpha\n```\n\nThe same minor line can loop through this state machine many times.\n\n## Version Examples\n\nAssume `v2.0.2-alpha.1` has been tested and a maintainer merges\n`alpha/v2/v2.0 -> release/v2/v2.0`.\n\nBuildchain should produce:\n\n```text\nv2.0.2                  exact production tag\nv2.0                    floating minor tag\nv2                      floating major tag when v2.0 is the selected major line\nrelease/v2/v2.0         production channel branch\n```\n\nIt should also prepare:\n\n```text\nv2.0.3-alpha.0          exact next alpha tag\nv2.0-alpha              floating alpha tag\nv2-alpha                floating major alpha tag when v2.0 is the highest published alpha minor\nalpha/v2/v2.0           alpha channel branch\ndev/v2/v2.0             development channel branch\n```\n\nThis is expected behavior. A production release closes one patch and opens the\nnext test patch on the same minor line.\n\n## Major Gate Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n  participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n  participant PR as PR release -> publish-gate/major\n  participant Verify as Release - Verify\n  participant Gate as publish-gate/major\n  participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n  participant Tags as Tags\n  participant Next as dev/alpha/release v(X+1).0\n\n  Release->>PR: open administrator PR\n  PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n  Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n  PR->>Gate: reviewed merge\n  Gate->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n  Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo release -> publish-gate/major PR\n  Promote->>Promote: write v(X+1).0.0 version state\n  Promote->>Tags: create v(X+1).0.0\n  Promote->>Tags: move v(X+1).0 and v(X+1)\n  Promote->>Gate: move publish-gate/major to v(X+1).0.0\n  Promote->>Next: move release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0 to v(X+1).0.0\n  Promote->>Promote: prepare v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0\n  Promote->>Next: move alpha/dev v(X+1).0 to next alpha\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is intentionally not an active source branch. It is the PR\ntarget for the administrator's \"publish the next major\" decision. The older\n`major-gate` name is a compatibility alias only.\n\n## Failure Boundaries\n\nPromotion should stop before moving refs when:\n\n- the run is a non-dry-run manual dispatch;\n- the expected same-repository PR cannot be found;\n- the PR was not merged;\n- the branch pair is not a valid channel path;\n- the required status check did not pass;\n- a release tree does not match the same-patch alpha tag tree, except for the\n  declared anchored/manual version files and anchor manifest that\n  `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` validates;\n- version-state verification fails;\n- a required exact tag already exists at a commit unrelated to the active\n  transaction or finalized channel head.\n\nThese failures are intentional. They protect consumers from refs that look\nreleased but do not have a complete evidence chain.\n\nDuring transaction finalization recovery, the current channel head may be a\ngenerated version-state merge commit. Buildchain validates that the durable\ntransaction version, exact tag, evidence, and release material match, and that\nthe current target ref contains or corresponds to the recorded\n`release_material_sha`. It must then tolerate exact tags, dev refs, or alpha\nrefs that have already moved and continue filling any missing floating tags\nbefore writing the transaction state as `complete`."
+      "markdown": "# Release Flow Diagrams\n\nThis document describes the Buildchain v2 branch, tag, and version-state flow.\nSee [Release governance](release-governance.md) for the design rationale.\n\n## Architecture\n\n```mermaid\nflowchart TD\n  Maintainer[\"Maintainer opens channel PR\"]\n  Verify[\"Release - Verify\"]\n  Review[\"Protected branch review\"]\n  Merge[\"Merge PR into alpha or release\"]\n  Promotion[\"Buildchain Ref Promotion\"]\n  StableDecision{\"Release channel?\"}\n  StableGate[\"Stable only: exact-alpha canaries + soak + cooldown\"]\n  Action[\"promote-buildchain-ref action\"]\n  VersionState[\"Version-state commit\"]\n  ExactTag[\"Exact tag\"]\n  FloatingRefs[\"Floating tags and channel branches\"]\n  Consumers[\"Consumers pin stable or exact refs\"]\n\n  Maintainer --> Verify\n  Verify --> Review\n  Review --> Merge\n  Merge --> Promotion\n  Promotion --> StableDecision\n  StableDecision -->|yes| StableGate\n  StableDecision -->|no: alpha| Action\n  StableGate --> Action\n  Action --> VersionState\n  Action --> ExactTag\n  Action --> FloatingRefs\n  ExactTag --> Consumers\n  FloatingRefs --> Consumers\n```\n\nBuildchain treats the PR merge as release intent and the promotion action as the\nonly component allowed to turn that intent into release refs.\n\n`StableGate` applies only to Buildchain's release channel. Alpha and train\niteration bypass it. See [Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate](release-governance.md#stable-release-throttle-and-canary-gate)\nfor the versioned policy and evidence contract.\n\n## Ref State\n\n| Ref kind | Example | Mutability | Purpose |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Development branch | `dev/v2/v2.0` | moves | next source state for a minor line |\n| Alpha branch | `alpha/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest test state for a minor line |\n| Release branch | `release/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest production state for a minor line |\n| Major gate branch | `publish-gate/major` | moves | reviewed administrator gate for publishing the next major |\n| Exact alpha tag | `v2.0.3-alpha.0` | immutable | audit ref for one tested prerelease |\n| Exact release tag | `v2.0.2` | immutable | audit ref for one production release |\n| Floating alpha tag | `v2.0-alpha` | moves | latest test channel for a minor line |\n| Floating major alpha tag | `v2-alpha` | moves | latest test channel on the highest published alpha minor for a major line |\n| Floating minor tag | `v2.0` | moves | latest production patch on a minor line |\n| Floating major tag | `v2` | moves | selected stable major entrypoint |\n\n## Ref Protection Contract\n\nRepository rulesets must distinguish immutable evidence refs from mutable\nchannel refs.\n\nProtect exact release and alpha tags as immutable evidence:\n\n```text\nrefs/tags/v*.*.*\n```\n\nDo not apply immutable-tag rulesets to every `refs/tags/v*` ref. Buildchain\nmust be able to update floating channel tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`,\nand `v2-alpha` after the exact tag and publish evidence are valid. A ruleset that\nmatches all `v*` tags also matches floating tags, so release finalization can\nfail with GitHub protected-ref errors even though the exact release tag and\npublished artifacts are already durable.\n\nThe intended governance split is:\n\n- exact tags such as `v2.0.14` and `v2.0.15-alpha.0` are immutable audit refs;\n- floating tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`, and `v2-alpha` are mutable channel refs\n  owned by the Buildchain promotion token;\n- protected branches still require reviewed channel PRs before Buildchain can\n  move any exact or floating release refs.\n\n## Opening a Minor Line\n\nNew minor lines should be opened through Buildchain instead of hand-created\nbranches. The reusable entrypoint is the `Release Line Bootstrap` workflow. It\ndefaults to dry-run so maintainers can inspect the planned refs, protection\ncontract, initial version, and first alpha PR before any mutation.\n\nThe workflow is backed by the CLI command:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n  --major 2 \\\n  --minor 10 \\\n  --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n  --json\n```\n\nWhen the workflow is run with `apply=true`, Buildchain:\n\n- writes the initial version-state commit, such as `2.10.0-alpha.0`;\n- creates `dev/v2/v2.10` from that commit;\n- creates `alpha/v2/v2.10` and `release/v2/v2.10` from the selected source ref;\n- applies branch protection with one approving review and the configured\n  required status check; dev starts strict, while alpha and release also require\n  the pair-specific `verify` aggregate without a source-up-to-date ancestry loop;\n- switches the repository default branch to the new dev line when requested;\n- opens the first `dev/v2/v2.10 -> alpha/v2/v2.10` channel PR when requested.\n\nThis makes minor-line creation a single audited operation. The channel PR still\ngoes through the normal verify/review/promotion path before an alpha is\npublished.\n\n## Alpha Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n  participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n  participant PR as PR dev -> alpha\n  participant Verify as Release - Verify\n  participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n  participant Tags as Tags\n\n  Dev->>PR: open channel PR\n  PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n  Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n  PR->>Alpha: reviewed merge\n  Alpha->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n  Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n  Promote->>Promote: compute next vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n  Promote->>Promote: write and verify version state\n  Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\n  Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z-alpha.N\nvX.Y-alpha\nvX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nall point at the generated alpha version-state commit.\n\n## Release Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n  participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  participant PR as PR alpha -> release\n  participant Verify as Release - Verify\n  participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n  participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n  participant Tags as Tags\n  participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n\n  Alpha->>PR: open channel PR\n  PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n  Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n  PR->>Release: reviewed merge\n  Release->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n  Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n  Promote->>Promote: find same-patch alpha tag\n  Promote->>Promote: compare release tree with tested alpha tree\n  Promote->>Promote: write final version state or verify anchored material\n  Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX when eligible\n  Promote->>Release: move release/vX/vX.Y\n  Promote->>Promote: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n  Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n  Promote->>Tags: move vX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\n  Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n  Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z\nvX.Y\nvX\nrelease/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the production version-state commit, while:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\nvX.Y-alpha\nvX-alpha when X.Y is the highest published alpha minor\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the next alpha version-state commit.\n\n## State Machine\n\n```mermaid\nstateDiagram-v2\n  [*] --> Development: work lands on dev/vX/vX.Y\n  Development --> AlphaCandidate: PR dev -> alpha\n  AlphaCandidate --> AlphaPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n  AlphaPublished --> ReleaseCandidate: PR alpha -> release\n  ReleaseCandidate --> ProductionPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n  ProductionPublished --> NextAlphaPrepared: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n  NextAlphaPrepared --> Development: dev and alpha refs move to next alpha\n```\n\nThe same minor line can loop through this state machine many times.\n\n## Version Examples\n\nAssume `v2.0.2-alpha.1` has been tested and a maintainer merges\n`alpha/v2/v2.0 -> release/v2/v2.0`.\n\nBuildchain should produce:\n\n```text\nv2.0.2                  exact production tag\nv2.0                    floating minor tag\nv2                      floating major tag when v2.0 is the selected major line\nrelease/v2/v2.0         production channel branch\n```\n\nIt should also prepare:\n\n```text\nv2.0.3-alpha.0          exact next alpha tag\nv2.0-alpha              floating alpha tag\nv2-alpha                floating major alpha tag when v2.0 is the highest published alpha minor\nalpha/v2/v2.0           alpha channel branch\ndev/v2/v2.0             development channel branch\n```\n\nThis is expected behavior. A production release closes one patch and opens the\nnext test patch on the same minor line.\n\n## Major Gate Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n  participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n  participant PR as PR release -> publish-gate/major\n  participant Verify as Release - Verify\n  participant Gate as publish-gate/major\n  participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n  participant Tags as Tags\n  participant Next as dev/alpha/release v(X+1).0\n\n  Release->>PR: open administrator PR\n  PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n  Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n  PR->>Gate: reviewed merge\n  Gate->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n  Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo release -> publish-gate/major PR\n  Promote->>Promote: write v(X+1).0.0 version state\n  Promote->>Tags: create v(X+1).0.0\n  Promote->>Tags: move v(X+1).0 and v(X+1)\n  Promote->>Gate: move publish-gate/major to v(X+1).0.0\n  Promote->>Next: move release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0 to v(X+1).0.0\n  Promote->>Promote: prepare v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0\n  Promote->>Next: move alpha/dev v(X+1).0 to next alpha\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is intentionally not an active source branch. It is the PR\ntarget for the administrator's \"publish the next major\" decision. The older\n`major-gate` name is a compatibility alias only.\n\n## Failure Boundaries\n\nPromotion should stop before moving refs when:\n\n- the run is a non-dry-run manual dispatch;\n- the expected same-repository PR cannot be found;\n- the PR was not merged;\n- the branch pair is not a valid channel path;\n- the required status check did not pass;\n- a release tree does not match the same-patch alpha tag tree, except for the\n  declared anchored/manual version files and anchor manifest that\n  `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` validates;\n- version-state verification fails;\n- a required exact tag already exists at a commit unrelated to the active\n  transaction or finalized channel head.\n\nThese failures are intentional. They protect consumers from refs that look\nreleased but do not have a complete evidence chain.\n\nDuring transaction finalization recovery, the current channel head may be a\ngenerated version-state merge commit. Buildchain validates that the durable\ntransaction version, exact tag, evidence, and release material match, and that\nthe current target ref contains or corresponds to the recorded\n`release_material_sha`. It must then tolerate exact tags, dev refs, or alpha\nrefs that have already moved and continue filling any missing floating tags\nbefore writing the transaction state as `complete`."
     },
     {
       "id": "manual:release-governance",
@@ -1383,7 +1388,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "stable",
       "sourcePath": "docs/release-governance.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:cb6aafc3410c0e72da3d9c3ba330421005af27c3c67665a2f3356603f02da84a",
+      "digest": "sha256:e97fd55d09facff9a6a5087fca5881d9756f33e791c9c3b9f9a8164ed2030c1d",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -1471,7 +1476,7 @@
           "anchor": "operational-reading-order"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "# Release Governance\n\nBuildchain v2 preserves the release semantics of the older ABV workflow while\nmoving the implementation into one modern repository.\n\nThe central idea is simple: a reviewed merge into a release channel is the\nrelease intent. Automation must then create the version-state commit, exact tag,\nfloating tag, and next alpha state that make that intent true in Git.\n\n## Design Problem\n\nKungfu release automation has to keep four facts aligned:\n\n1. The source tree that was reviewed.\n2. The package version recorded in manifests such as `package.json` or\n   `lerna.json`.\n3. The exact immutable release or prerelease tag.\n4. The floating channel refs that consumers actually use.\n\nIf any one of these facts is updated by hand, the system can split:\n\n- a consumer can fetch `v2.0` and receive a tree whose package version still\n  says the previous release;\n- a maintainer can move `v2` without producing an exact `v2.0.N` audit tag;\n- an alpha can be promoted to production even though the release tree is not the\n  same tree that was tested;\n- a protected branch merge can succeed while the follow-up version commit is\n  missing, or a flow-internal generated `dev`/`alpha`/`release` ref update can\n  fail after publish because the automation identity was not declared in the\n  branch-protection review bypass allowance.\n\nThe older ABV workflow addressed this by letting GitHub PRs drive release\nstate. Buildchain keeps that choice because it makes release intent reviewable,\nobservable, and recoverable from Git history.\n\n## What ABV Contributed\n\nThe old ABV model was not just \"bump a version number.\" It encoded a governance\nloop:\n\n- release branches are named as channels: `dev`, `alpha`, `release`, and the\n  administrative `publish-gate/major`;\n- a PR from one channel to the next is the release request;\n- verify jobs check that the branch pair is valid before merge;\n- a maintainer review is required before the branch moves;\n- after merge, automation writes the version change and moves tags;\n- exact tags and floating refs are aligned with the resulting commit;\n- the next development channel is prepared automatically.\n\nABV also kept the version-state mutation in the repository. For JavaScript\nrepositories that usually meant changing `lerna.json` and/or `package.json`.\nThat commit is important because the tag alone is not enough evidence: the\nsource tree should also declare the version that the tag advertises.\n\nBuildchain v2 treats that as a hard semantic requirement for its own release\nline.\n\n## Buildchain Implementation\n\nBuildchain implements the same governance loop with:\n\n- `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` for PR verification;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for post-verify ref\n  promotion; this workflow dogfoods the declarative\n  `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper and does not hand-wire resolver,\n  artifact download, publish-gate, or promote action steps;\n- Buildchain self promotion enables `release-passport-buildchain-self-kfd`, so\n  the promote action generates KFD-1 witnesses, KFD-2 public claim JSON, and\n  KFD-3 collaboration-interface witnesses from the final version-state workspace\n  before release passport finalization. The witness hashes therefore bind to the\n  exact published package and site facts from\n  `packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js` instead of relying on prose release\n  notes;\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` for branch, tag, version-state, and\n  governance checks;\n- package-manager adapters that can update version state for pnpm, npm, and\n  yarn style repositories;\n- `buildchain.toml` lifecycle configuration for repositories whose version\n  state or verification commands are not Node package-manager defaults.\n\nThe implementation is intentionally stricter than a local release script:\n\n- manual workflow dispatch can only do dry-run promotion;\n- non-dry-run promotion must be driven by a completed `Verify` workflow;\n- target branch protection details must be readable, and branch protection must\n  apply to administrators as well as regular contributors;\n- alpha promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n  `dev/vX/vX.Y` to `alpha/vX/vX.Y`;\n- release promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n  `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to `release/vX/vX.Y`;\n- major promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n  `release/vX/vX.Y` to `publish-gate/major`;\n- release promotion requires an existing same-patch alpha tag and checks the\n  release source tree against that tested alpha tree;\n- generated version-state commits are verified before refs move.\n\nExact publication planning installs the checked-out promotion source's declared\ndependencies before version-state verification. This keeps the pre-authority\nversion plan on the same package-manager boundary as the later promotion job,\nincluding repositories whose verification commands import production packages.\nThe planning pass may materialize and verify declared derived files locally,\nbut dry-run never creates Git blobs, trees, commits, refs, or tags.\n\nPromotion intents are serialized globally per caller repository with\n`cancel-in-progress: false`. A queued intent re-reads its protected target ref\nbefore checkout, dependency installation, release-candidate resolution, or any\npublish-gate/ref mutation. If the ref already points at a newer SHA, that older\nintent is no longer release authority: the workflow records the requested and\ncurrent SHAs, proves that the current target is ahead of the requested commit,\nand completes as a `target-ref-advanced` superseded no-op. Diverged or behind\ncomparisons are not superseded transactions and still fail closed.\nMissing refs, unreadable repository state, invalid channels, governance\nfailures, and artifact mismatches still fail closed. The promote action repeats\nthe target check at the mutation boundary, so a ref that advances after the\nworkflow preflight cannot receive a second set of publication side effects.\n\n## Version Lines\n\nKungfu uses Python-like version lines where a minor line can represent a\nlong-lived product train. A line such as `v2.0` can produce many production\npatch releases:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1\nv2.0.2\n...\nv2.0.1234\n```\n\nThis is why Buildchain maintains both exact and floating refs:\n\n- `v2.0.2` is immutable release evidence;\n- `v2.0` is the latest production release on the `2.0` line;\n- `v2` is the selected stable major-line entrypoint;\n- `v2.0.3-alpha.0` is immutable alpha evidence;\n- `v2.0-alpha` is the latest test channel for the `2.0` line.\n- `v2-alpha` is the latest test channel on the highest published alpha minor in major `2`.\n\nA release does not mean \"minor is complete.\" It means \"this patch on this minor\nline is now production.\"\n\nGitHub repository rules must preserve that distinction. Exact tags such as\n`v2.0.2` and `v2.0.3-alpha.0` should be immutable. Floating channel tags such as\n`v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`, and `v2-alpha` must remain movable by the Buildchain promotion\ntoken after governance checks and publish evidence pass. A tag ruleset that\nprotects every `refs/tags/v*` ref is too broad because it also locks the\nfloating channel tags that Buildchain is required to update. Prefer exact-tag\npatterns such as `refs/tags/v*.*.*` for immutable release evidence, while\nleaving floating channel tags under Buildchain automation control.\n\n## Alpha Semantics\n\nAn alpha merge is:\n\n```text\ndev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Computes the next prerelease for the minor line.\n2. Writes version state such as `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N`.\n3. Verifies the generated version-state tree.\n4. Creates or reuses the exact alpha tag.\n5. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to the generated alpha commit.\n6. Moves `dev/vX/vX.Y` to the same generated alpha commit when this is a\n   fast-forward update.\n7. Moves `vX.Y-alpha` to the same generated alpha commit.\n8. Moves `vX-alpha` only when `X.Y` is the highest minor in major `X` with a published alpha; older minor alpha work records a skip and cannot move the major channel backwards.\n\nThe npm channel follows the same ownership rule. The highest alpha minor publishes\nwith dist-tag `alpha`; maintenance alphas on an older minor publish with the\nline-specific dist-tag `vX.Y-alpha` so they cannot roll the global `alpha`\nchannel backward. Exact prerelease versions remain installable directly.\n\nThis keeps the test channel self-describing. If a consumer checks out\n`v2.0-alpha` or `v2-alpha`, the manifests and exact alpha tag agree. The major\nalpha ref removes routine consumer edits when Buildchain opens a newer minor,\nwhile exact tags and SHAs remain the reproducible audit choice.\n\n### Buildchain Alpha Self-Dogfood\n\nBuildchain continuously consumes its own current major alpha through\n`.github/workflows/buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood.yml`. Both lanes call the\nreleased channel router at `build.yml@v2-alpha`. The auto lane must resolve\n`v2-alpha`; the explicit stable lane must resolve `v2`. Both execute the same\ndeclared install, build, and verify fixture, proving that a single consumer\nsurface routes to distinct released runtimes without duplicating lifecycle\nconfiguration in the consumer.\n\nThe reusable build trust gate reads `job.workflow_ref`, which identifies the\ncalled workflow and its selected ref. It does not infer the runtime from\n`github.workflow_ref`, because GitHub defines that context as the caller\nworkflow identity during a reusable call.\n\nThe router selects `.buildchain/alpha-contract-lock.json` for alpha and\n`.buildchain/contract-lock.json` for stable. The alpha lock records the exact\nreviewed alpha SHA and compatibility digest; it does not replace the stable\nconsumer lock. A later alpha with only compatible additive drift continues,\nwhile a changed breaking digest fails until the new alpha contract is reviewed.\n\nThe evidence job resolves `v2-alpha` and `v2` through the GitHub refs API,\ncompares those immutable SHAs with the reusable workflow outputs, verifies the\n`alpha` and `stable` classifications, and uploads a JSON evidence artifact.\nThe canary runs after successful Buildchain ref promotion, on a daily fallback\nschedule, and on manual dispatch. It shares the release-promotion concurrency\ngroup, so another promotion cannot move the floating refs between runtime\nresolution and evidence comparison.\n\nThis is a post-publication consumer canary, not a release bootstrap. Source\nverification still runs the current commit, and\n`buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` still passes the verified exact SHA into the\npromotion workflow. Patrol, dev-merge, repair, and promotion defaults remain on\nstable or exact refs so a broken alpha cannot prevent Buildchain from publishing\nits fix. When Buildchain opens a new major, inventory validation requires this\nworkflow's fixed GitHub `uses` refs to move from `vN`/`vN-alpha` to the new\nmajor; GitHub does not allow expressions in a reusable-workflow `uses` ref.\n\nIf `dev/vX/vX.Y` has already advanced before generated alpha version-state\nbookkeeping can sync back, Buildchain records `skipped-non-fast-forward` for the\ndev sync and still completes the exact and floating alpha tags for the reviewed\nalpha commit. Later dev changes must go through their own dev-to-alpha\npromotion instead of rewinding dev. The normal path is direct: after alpha\nmerges, Buildchain applies the generated version-state commit to alpha and then\nfast-forwards dev to the same commit without a human version-state PR.\n\nIf alpha finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain accepts the current alpha head as the generated\ncommit, or as a historical merge commit that contains the recorded release\nmaterial. An already-created exact alpha tag may point at the transaction\nrelease/material SHA or at the finalized alpha head; missing floating alpha\ntags are retried before the transaction becomes `complete`.\n\n## Release Semantics\n\nA release merge is:\n\n```text\nalpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Finds the same-patch alpha tag that was tested.\n2. Checks that the release source tree matches that alpha tag tree, excluding\n   only generated version-state differences.\n3. Writes final release version state such as `vX.Y.Z`.\n4. Verifies the generated release tree.\n5. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `vX.Y.Z`.\n6. Moves `release/vX/vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n7. Moves `vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n8. Moves `vX` when this minor line should be the stable major entrypoint.\n9. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n   `vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0`.\n10. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y`, and `vX.Y-alpha` to that next alpha\n    commit.\n11. Moves `vX-alpha` to that next alpha only when this remains the highest published alpha minor.\n\nThe production channel and the test channel therefore intentionally diverge\nafter release: production stays on the release commit, while alpha/dev continue\nat the next prerelease commit.\n\n### Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate\n\nBuildchain's own stable channel has an additional pre-publication gate. It is\nevaluated after the PR-stage release candidate has been resolved and before the\npublish-gate ref, package registry, exact stable tag, or floating stable refs\nare mutated. Train refs and alpha promotion do not execute this gate.\n\nAll alpha and release promotions first run a metadata-only release-candidate\npreflight after queued-intent revalidation. The preflight uses the same resolver\nand exact target SHA as the publication job, but does not download payloads or\ninstall the candidate repository dependencies. Missing channel PRs, stale\nworkflow runs, expired passport pairs, and insufficient payload artifact sets\ntherefore fail before the full promotion job starts. The publication job still\ndownloads and validates the exact evidence again at the trust boundary; the\npreflight moves failure earlier without weakening the final check.\n\nThe policy is versioned in `.buildchain/stable-release-policy.json`. A stable\ncandidate is allowed only when all of these facts are true:\n\n- the candidate resolves to an immutable exact alpha tag and its GitHub\n  prerelease timestamp;\n- at least 24 hours have passed since the preceding stable patch on the same\n  minor line;\n- the preceding stable-to-alpha comparison contains a product or public\n  contract path, not only version, test, evidence, or retrospective changes;\n- the version-bound impact record has a non-empty summary and at least one\n  surface impact;\n- the `Build Surface Fixture` release-candidate run succeeded;\n- `site-libkungfu-dev` completed its no-apply `Buildchain Stable Canary` and an allowed\n  maintainer attested that successful run on the exact alpha SHA through the\n  `buildchain-canary/site-libkungfu-dev` commit-status context;\n- the canary runtime input is exactly the candidate alpha tag or the 40-character\n  commit SHA resolved from that tag; a successful status pointing at another\n  workflow, repository, tag, floating ref, or SHA is rejected as mismatched;\n- at least one hour has elapsed after the last required canary completed.\n\nThe machine report is written to\n`.buildchain/release-passport/stable-release-gate.json`. A passing report is\nuploaded with the stable release passport. A blocked run writes the same report\nbefore failing, so the missing or stale condition is inspectable without\nopening a publication transaction.\n\nGitHub's Actions run REST object does not expose `workflow_dispatch` inputs.\nBuildchain therefore verifies the run's `workflow_id` against the authoritative\nworkflow metadata, then reads the exact runtime from the workflow-owned\n`<workflow name> / <runtime ref>` run-name when no input field is available.\nAn explicit API input, when present, remains authoritative and cannot be\noverridden by the display name.\n\nThe cooldown is a minimum interval, not an instruction to release every day.\nCompatible work should still be batched until a stable release has a concrete\nconsumer need. Changing the interval, canary set, attestors, product path\nboundary, or soak time is a reviewed policy change.\n\nRepositories that want a predictable scheduled stable window can use\n[`Stable Candidate Patrol`](stable-candidate-patrol.md). It persists each exact\nalpha independently, qualifies it after repository-declared checks and soak,\nand selects the newest qualified non-revoked candidate. A newer soaking alpha\ndoes not invalidate an older qualified candidate. The selected tree enters the\nexisting strict `publish-gate/release/<line>/<version> -> release/<line>` PR\npath, so scheduled selection changes release intent timing without weakening\nsource locks, review, verification, publish transactions, or passports.\n\nIf release finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain applies the same recovery rule: the current\nrelease head may be the generated commit, or a historical merge commit that\ncontains the recorded release material, existing exact tags and alpha/dev refs\nare accepted when they match the transaction, and missing floating `vX.Y` or\n`vX` tags are retried idempotently before completion.\n\nOnce the durable release transaction is `complete` and the exact/floating\nstable refs have moved, next-alpha preparation is post-release bookkeeping. A\nfailure there records `deferred-post-release-bookkeeping` and\n`next-anchor-required` instead of retroactively reporting the stable release as\nfailed. Generated next-alpha merges use the current dev tree as their base and\noverlay only declared version-state paths, preserving concurrent dev changes.\n\n## Major Gate Semantics\n\nA major gate merge is:\n\n```text\nrelease/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is the explicit replacement for the older ABV `main`\nchannel. The name is intentionally operational: it is a gate for a rare\nadministrator decision, not the active trunk. Keeping this decision in the same\nPR UI as alpha and release promotion keeps the human workflow simple while\navoiding the misleading meaning of `main`. The older `major-gate` branch name is\na compatibility alias only.\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Verifies the source is a merged same-repository PR from a protected release\n   line into `publish-gate/major`.\n2. Writes the next major production version state, such as `v(X+1).0.0`.\n3. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `v(X+1).0.0`.\n4. Moves `publish-gate/major` and `release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0` to that release commit.\n5. Moves `v(X+1).0` and `v(X+1)` to that release commit.\n6. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n   `v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0`.\n7. Moves `alpha/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, `dev/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, and\n   `v(X+1).0-alpha` to that next alpha commit.\n\nChecking out `publish-gate/major` should therefore look like a frozen release\nstate, not like a branch where day-to-day source work continues. Day-to-day\nsource work continues on `dev/vX/vX.Y`.\n\n## Protected Dev Branches\n\n`dev/vX/vX.Y` is a protected development channel, not a scratch branch. Normal\nsource changes should be made on work branches such as `feature/*`, `fix/*`,\n`chore/*`, `docs/*`, `ci/*`, or `refactor/*`, then reviewed through a pull\nrequest into the target dev line.\n\nThis keeps the earliest development channel audit-friendly:\n\n- the version line being changed is visible in the PR base branch;\n- CI and required checks run before the channel moves;\n- branch protection can prevent direct pushes and stale merges;\n- later `dev -> alpha -> release` promotion inherits a reviewable source\n  lineage instead of trying to reconstruct how the dev branch changed.\n\nBuildchain provides the reusable\n`.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` workflow for repositories that want a\nscheduled or manual \"merge ready dev PRs\" pass. The consumer repository owns\nthe trigger schedule, but the merge decision is declared through workflow\ninputs: target dev branch, required status/check names, ready and block labels,\nallowed work-branch prefixes, review requirements, maximum merges per run,\nmerge method, and dry-run mode.\n\nThe workflow defaults are conservative. A PR is skipped unless it targets the\nconfigured dev line, is not a draft, has the ready label, has no block label,\ncomes from the same repository, uses an allowed work-branch prefix, has a\ncurrent approval, is mergeable, and has the configured required checks passing.\nAfter each merge, the next PR is re-evaluated before it can move the protected\ndev branch. This prevents one merge from silently making the next candidate\nstale or conflicting.\n\nThe canonical consumer required check context is `check / check`, matching the\nreusable workflow call plus its `check` job. Buildchain's own `Verify` workflow\nemits the repository-local context `check`, so Buildchain self-promotion,\nrelease-line bootstrap, and dogfood patrol wrappers pass `check` explicitly.\nRelease governance preserves the exact context emitted by the repository and\nrecords branch-protection policy before/after facts; it does not rewrite one\ncontext shape into the other. Consumer repositories can keep their context\nstable while changing the actual verification command declaratively in\n`buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"cargo fetch --locked\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"cargo test --workspace --locked\"\n```\n\nConsumers that want Buildchain to own the check wrapper can call\n`.github/workflows/check.yml@v2`. The wrapper runs the declared\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.verify` stages and fails the `check` job when\neither declaration is missing or the command exits non-zero.\n\nDevelopment pull requests that need source acceptance without product build or\nartifact verification can opt into `mode: source`. That mode runs only\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.check` on GitHub-hosted `ubuntu-24.04` while\npreserving the stable `check / check` required-check context. Existing callers\nremain on `mode: verify` by default, and callers may set\n`upload-artifacts: false` without weakening the job conclusion.\n\nTypical consumer wrapper:\n\n```yaml\nname: Merge Ready Dev PRs\n\non:\n  schedule:\n    - cron: \"17 * * * *\"\n  workflow_dispatch:\n    inputs:\n      dry-run:\n        type: boolean\n        default: true\n\njobs:\n  merge-dev:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml@v2\n    permissions:\n      contents: write\n      pull-requests: write\n      checks: read\n      statuses: read\n    with:\n      target-branch: dev/v2/v2.6\n      required-status-checks: check / check\n      ready-label: ready\n      block-labels: blocked,do-not-merge\n      max-merges: 1\n      dry-run: ${{ inputs.dry-run || false }}\n```\n\n## Buildchain Patrol\n\n`dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` remains the focused merge primitive. For repositories\nthat want a stable day-to-day operations contract, Buildchain also exposes a\npatrol workflow family:\n\n| Workflow | Intended cadence | Default intent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml` | daily | lightweight inspection plus ready dev PR maintenance |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml` | weekly | release-state, passport, gate, and stale-state health checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-monthly.yml` | monthly | governance, permission, branch-protection, and workflow drift checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/stable-candidate-patrol.yml` | repository-selected release window | qualify immutable alpha candidates and open the exact source-lock stable PR |\n\nThe cadence names describe patrol intensity, not release cadence:\n\n- daily patrol can run every day without implying a daily release;\n- weekly patrol is for medium-cost maintenance and audit checks;\n- monthly patrol is for structural drift checks that should not block ordinary\n  development velocity.\n\nStable Candidate Patrol is separate from those maintenance cadences because its\ncaller-owned cron is a release-intent window. Its candidate ledger and selection\nremain generic; registry-specific side effects still run through the normal\nrepository `lifecycle.publish` transaction. See\n[`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n\nConsumers should schedule thin callers and keep their YAML declarative. For\nexample:\n\n```yaml\nname: Buildchain Daily Patrol\n\non:\n  schedule:\n    - cron: \"17 2 * * *\"\n  workflow_dispatch:\n\njobs:\n  patrol:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml@v2\n    with:\n      dry-run: false\n      max-actions: 1\n```\n\nWeekly and monthly callers use the matching wrapper:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  patrol:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml@v2\n    with:\n      dry-run: true\n```\n\nAll three wrappers default to the `v2` floating Buildchain runtime. When\n`target-branch` is omitted, the caller's current/default branch selects the\nactive semver dev line, so consumers do not pin patrol to a stale minor branch.\nThe separate workflow names keep consumer schedules readable and stable while\nBuildchain adds new checks behind the cadence wrappers.\n\n## Package-Manager Adapters\n\nOld ABV assumed JavaScript repositories with root version state and often\nLerna. Buildchain keeps the version-state contract but does not assume every\nrepository is yarn/Lerna.\n\nThe promotion action discovers and updates:\n\n- root `package.json`;\n- `lerna.json`;\n- package manifests from `package.json` workspaces;\n- package manifests from `lerna.json` packages;\n- package manifests from `pnpm-workspace.yaml`.\n\nIt then runs the repository's detected package manager semantics where needed:\n\n- pnpm repositories use pnpm-oriented workspace discovery;\n- npm repositories use npm/package-lock semantics where present;\n- yarn repositories use yarn-style metadata where present.\n\nFor Buildchain itself, version state is required. For a consumer repository that\nhas no package manifest, the same action can degrade to ref-only behavior only\nwhen that is explicitly allowed by the caller.\n\n## Lifecycle Configuration\n\n`buildchain.toml` is the v2 user configuration format. It lets a repository\ndeclare version-state files and lifecycle commands without pretending every\nproject is a Node workspace. Supported version files include JSON, TOML, and\nregex-based files such as `CMakeLists.txt` or `conanfile.py`.\n\nThe promotion action currently consumes `version.files` and `lifecycle.verify`.\nThe verify stage runs after generated version-state changes are applied locally\nand before any release refs move. If `verification-command` is passed directly\nto the action, that explicit command overrides `lifecycle.verify`.\n\nProtected release-line branches keep their normal human review gate. Managed\n`dev/vN/vN.M`, `alpha/vN/vN.M`, and `release/vN/vN.M` branches are configured\nwith one required approving review, strict GitHub Actions checks, administrator\nenforcement, conversation resolution, no force pushes, and no deletions. The\nreusable `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper defaults\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`, which lets the workflow's\nautomation identity apply generated version-state or post-publish channel\nbookkeeping after the reviewed channel PR has merged. Direct\n`promote-buildchain-ref` callers must opt into the same controlled bypass with\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps`, `branch-protection-bypass-users`, or\n`branch-protection-bypass-teams`; the action also adds the current promotion\ntoken's authenticated user or app to the managed bypass allowlist. Before\npatching a protected generated bookkeeping ref, the action creates the\nconfigured required check on the exact generated version-state commit, so strict\nstatus checks are satisfied by machine-verifiable Buildchain evidence rather\nthan a human PR. The protected ref PATCH itself uses the generated ref update\ntoken; the reusable wrapper defaults it to\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token`. If direct generated\nrelease finalization bookkeeping is still rejected, Buildchain creates or\nreuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR based on the current\ntarget channel head and records `finalization-needed=true` in the durable\ntransaction output. Strict alpha bookkeeping still fails with a\ntoken/protection diagnostic instead of creating a post-publish PR.\n\nFor a stable release, the wrapper also checks out the exact current development\nchannel into `.buildchain/reconciliation/dev`. When the prepared next-alpha\ncommit cannot fast-forward dev because reviewed work landed concurrently, the\npromotion action applies the next version to that checkout, regenerates every\ndeclared derived version-state file, reruns the verification lifecycle, and\nonly then creates the two-parent reconciliation commit. A checkout/current-ref\nSHA mismatch blocks reconciliation instead of committing stale projections.\nBuildchain's own promotion workflow reads `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_APPS`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_USERS`, and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_TEAMS` repository variables so the declared bypass\nidentity can match the actual `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` actor, but consumers\ndo not need to duplicate that actor manually when the token identity is\ndiscoverable. Buildchain's release-line bootstrap applies the same declared\nallowances when it creates new `dev`, `alpha`, and `release` branch protection,\nand fails closed before changing protection when no promotion authority is\ndeclared. This keeps a new minor line publishable without weakening its normal\nhuman review gate.\n\n## What This Guarantees\n\nWhen the loop succeeds, maintainers and consumers can rely on these facts:\n\n- every production release has an exact tag such as `v2.0.2`;\n- every production minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0`;\n- every selected stable major has a floating tag such as `v2`;\n- every next-major release is driven by a reviewed `release -> publish-gate/major` PR,\n  not a hidden manual button;\n- every test channel has an exact alpha tag such as `v2.0.3-alpha.0`;\n- every alpha minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0-alpha`;\n- every major with a published alpha has a cross-minor floating tag such as `v2-alpha`, owned by its highest published alpha minor;\n- version manifests match the tag visible from the same commit;\n- production releases are derived from the alpha tree that was tested;\n- manual non-dry-run promotion cannot bypass PR review and verification;\n- flow-internal automation bypasses apply only to declared GitHub Apps, users,\n  or teams on Buildchain-managed channel branch protection, while one-review\n  protection remains enforced for humans;\n- admin users cannot make a channel promotion valid by temporarily bypassing\n  branch protection.\n\nThis is the practical meaning of \"governance closed loop\" in Buildchain: the\ndecision, code, version state, and Git refs close over the same evidence chain.\n\n## What This Does Not Do\n\nBuildchain release promotion does not embed registry clients or product-specific\npublish logic. When publish transactions are enabled, `promote-buildchain-ref`\ncan run the consumer's `lifecycle.publish` command and own the transaction,\nevidence validation, durable recovery state, and ref finalization order. The\nconsumer repository still owns registry truth: npm, PyPI, OCI, S3, Conan, CMake\npackaging, download pages, dist-tags, and similar side effects must be\nimplemented by project lifecycle commands that emit Buildchain publish evidence.\n\nEvery Buildchain publish model that can run registry side effects must bind the\npublish entrypoint to an immutable `publish-gate/*` source lock. The reusable\n`release-candidate-promote.yml@v2` wrapper creates or updates that gate ref and\npasses `require-publish-source-lock`, `publish-source-ref`,\n`publish-source-sha`, and `publish-source-locked` to\n`promote-buildchain-ref`. Direct action callers must pass the same four inputs\nfrom the reusable build outputs. Workflows that only collect passports or run\ndry-run package checks do not move publish refs and are not publish-gate\npublication models. A dry-run of `release-candidate-promote.yml` computes and\nreports the exact `publish-gate/*` source lock that a real promotion would use,\nbut does not read, create, or move that ref.\n\nSemver GitHub Release publication is owned by `promote-buildchain-ref`, not by\nconsumer shell glue. Consumers normally use the `release-candidate-promote.yml`\nwrapper, where GitHub Release publication is enabled by default and can be\ndisabled with `github-release: false`; the wrapper passes that declaration to\nthe action. After the publish transaction reaches `complete`, Buildchain creates\nor updates the public GitHub Release and uploads the generated\n`buildchain.release.json`, release-passport assets, and publish evidence. Semver\nprerelease tags are marked `prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`; stable\nsemver tags are marked latest. For anchored/manual package releases, the public\nrelease tag defaults to `v<publishedVersion>` while the internal exact\ntransaction tag remains in the release passport and release-state ref. This is\nthe supported path for downstream\n`release.published` propagation across semver, major, and promote-only release\ncandidate publication models.\n\nBuildchain also does not maintain bare exact tags such as `1.0.0`. The supported\nexact release and alpha refs are v-prefixed:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1-alpha.0\n```\n\n## Operational Reading Order\n\nWhen debugging or extending release behavior, read in this order:\n\n1. `docs/release-flow.md`\n2. `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml`\n3. `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n4. `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml`\n5. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`\n6. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/src/`\n7. `docs/migration-inventory.md`\n\nThat path gives the policy first, the workflow trigger second, and the action\nimplementation last."
+      "markdown": "# Release Governance\n\nBuildchain v2 preserves the release semantics of the older ABV workflow while\nmoving the implementation into one modern repository.\n\nThe central idea is simple: a reviewed merge into a release channel is the\nrelease intent. Automation must then create the version-state commit, exact tag,\nfloating tag, and next alpha state that make that intent true in Git.\n\n## Design Problem\n\nKungfu release automation has to keep four facts aligned:\n\n1. The source tree that was reviewed.\n2. The package version recorded in manifests such as `package.json` or\n   `lerna.json`.\n3. The exact immutable release or prerelease tag.\n4. The floating channel refs that consumers actually use.\n\nIf any one of these facts is updated by hand, the system can split:\n\n- a consumer can fetch `v2.0` and receive a tree whose package version still\n  says the previous release;\n- a maintainer can move `v2` without producing an exact `v2.0.N` audit tag;\n- an alpha can be promoted to production even though the release tree is not the\n  same tree that was tested;\n- a protected branch merge can succeed while the follow-up version commit is\n  missing, or a flow-internal generated `dev`/`alpha`/`release` ref update can\n  fail after publish because the automation identity was not declared in the\n  branch-protection review bypass allowance.\n\nThe older ABV workflow addressed this by letting GitHub PRs drive release\nstate. Buildchain keeps that choice because it makes release intent reviewable,\nobservable, and recoverable from Git history.\n\n## What ABV Contributed\n\nThe old ABV model was not just \"bump a version number.\" It encoded a governance\nloop:\n\n- release branches are named as channels: `dev`, `alpha`, `release`, and the\n  administrative `publish-gate/major`;\n- a PR from one channel to the next is the release request;\n- verify jobs check that the branch pair is valid before merge;\n- a maintainer review is required before the branch moves;\n- after merge, automation writes the version change and moves tags;\n- exact tags and floating refs are aligned with the resulting commit;\n- the next development channel is prepared automatically.\n\nABV also kept the version-state mutation in the repository. For JavaScript\nrepositories that usually meant changing `lerna.json` and/or `package.json`.\nThat commit is important because the tag alone is not enough evidence: the\nsource tree should also declare the version that the tag advertises.\n\nBuildchain v2 treats that as a hard semantic requirement for its own release\nline.\n\n## Buildchain Implementation\n\nBuildchain implements the same governance loop with:\n\n- `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` for PR verification;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for post-verify ref\n  promotion; this workflow dogfoods the declarative\n  `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper and does not hand-wire resolver,\n  artifact download, publish-gate, or promote action steps;\n- Buildchain self promotion enables `release-passport-buildchain-self-kfd`, so\n  the promote action generates KFD-1 witnesses, KFD-2 public claim JSON, and\n  KFD-3 collaboration-interface witnesses from the final version-state workspace\n  before release passport finalization. The witness hashes therefore bind to the\n  exact published package and site facts from\n  `packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js` instead of relying on prose release\n  notes;\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` for branch, tag, version-state, and\n  governance checks;\n- package-manager adapters that can update version state for pnpm, npm, and\n  yarn style repositories;\n- `buildchain.toml` lifecycle configuration for repositories whose version\n  state or verification commands are not Node package-manager defaults.\n\nThe implementation is intentionally stricter than a local release script:\n\n- manual workflow dispatch can only do dry-run promotion;\n- non-dry-run promotion must be driven by a completed `Verify` workflow;\n- target branch protection details must be readable, and branch protection must\n  apply to administrators as well as regular contributors;\n- `alpha/vX/vX.Y` and `release/vX/vX.Y` branch protection must require both the\n  general `check` context and the Release Verify aggregate `verify` context, so\n  an invalid channel pair cannot merge even when repository checks pass;\n- release targets keep those checks non-strict with respect to source-branch\n  ancestry: generated channel bookkeeping intentionally makes the source and\n  target histories diverge, while the pair-specific `verify` context validates\n  the legal channel transition;\n- alpha promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n  `dev/vX/vX.Y` to `alpha/vX/vX.Y`;\n- release promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n  `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to `release/vX/vX.Y`;\n- major promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n  `release/vX/vX.Y` to `publish-gate/major`;\n- release promotion requires an existing same-patch alpha tag and checks the\n  release source tree against that tested alpha tree;\n- generated version-state commits are verified before refs move.\n\nExact publication planning installs the checked-out promotion source's declared\ndependencies before version-state verification. This keeps the pre-authority\nversion plan on the same package-manager boundary as the later promotion job,\nincluding repositories whose verification commands import production packages.\nThe planning pass may materialize and verify declared derived files locally,\nbut dry-run never creates Git blobs, trees, commits, refs, or tags.\n\nPromotion intents are serialized globally per caller repository with\n`cancel-in-progress: false`. A queued intent re-reads its protected target ref\nbefore checkout, dependency installation, release-candidate resolution, or any\npublish-gate/ref mutation. If the ref already points at a newer SHA, that older\nintent is no longer release authority: the workflow records the requested and\ncurrent SHAs, proves that the current target is ahead of the requested commit,\nand completes as a `target-ref-advanced` superseded no-op. Diverged or behind\ncomparisons are not superseded transactions and still fail closed.\nMissing refs, unreadable repository state, invalid channels, governance\nfailures, and artifact mismatches still fail closed. The promote action repeats\nthe target check at the mutation boundary, so a ref that advances after the\nworkflow preflight cannot receive a second set of publication side effects.\n\n## Version Lines\n\nKungfu uses Python-like version lines where a minor line can represent a\nlong-lived product train. A line such as `v2.0` can produce many production\npatch releases:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1\nv2.0.2\n...\nv2.0.1234\n```\n\nThis is why Buildchain maintains both exact and floating refs:\n\n- `v2.0.2` is immutable release evidence;\n- `v2.0` is the latest production release on the `2.0` line;\n- `v2` is the selected stable major-line entrypoint;\n- `v2.0.3-alpha.0` is immutable alpha evidence;\n- `v2.0-alpha` is the latest test channel for the `2.0` line.\n- `v2-alpha` is the latest test channel on the highest published alpha minor in major `2`.\n\nA release does not mean \"minor is complete.\" It means \"this patch on this minor\nline is now production.\"\n\nGitHub repository rules must preserve that distinction. Exact tags such as\n`v2.0.2` and `v2.0.3-alpha.0` should be immutable. Floating channel tags such as\n`v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`, and `v2-alpha` must remain movable by the Buildchain promotion\ntoken after governance checks and publish evidence pass. A tag ruleset that\nprotects every `refs/tags/v*` ref is too broad because it also locks the\nfloating channel tags that Buildchain is required to update. Prefer exact-tag\npatterns such as `refs/tags/v*.*.*` for immutable release evidence, while\nleaving floating channel tags under Buildchain automation control.\n\n## Alpha Semantics\n\nAn alpha merge is:\n\n```text\ndev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Computes the next prerelease for the minor line.\n2. Writes version state such as `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N`.\n3. Verifies the generated version-state tree.\n4. Creates or reuses the exact alpha tag.\n5. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to the generated alpha commit.\n6. Moves `dev/vX/vX.Y` to the same generated alpha commit when this is a\n   fast-forward update.\n7. Moves `vX.Y-alpha` to the same generated alpha commit.\n8. Moves `vX-alpha` only when `X.Y` is the highest minor in major `X` with a published alpha; older minor alpha work records a skip and cannot move the major channel backwards.\n\nThe npm channel follows the same ownership rule. The highest alpha minor publishes\nwith dist-tag `alpha`; maintenance alphas on an older minor publish with the\nline-specific dist-tag `vX.Y-alpha` so they cannot roll the global `alpha`\nchannel backward. Exact prerelease versions remain installable directly.\n\nThis keeps the test channel self-describing. If a consumer checks out\n`v2.0-alpha` or `v2-alpha`, the manifests and exact alpha tag agree. The major\nalpha ref removes routine consumer edits when Buildchain opens a newer minor,\nwhile exact tags and SHAs remain the reproducible audit choice.\n\n### Buildchain Alpha Self-Dogfood\n\nBuildchain continuously consumes its own current major alpha through\n`.github/workflows/buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood.yml`. Both lanes call the\nreleased channel router at `build.yml@v2-alpha`. The auto lane must resolve\n`v2-alpha`; the explicit stable lane must resolve `v2`. Both execute the same\ndeclared install, build, and verify fixture, proving that a single consumer\nsurface routes to distinct released runtimes without duplicating lifecycle\nconfiguration in the consumer.\n\nThe reusable build trust gate reads `job.workflow_ref`, which identifies the\ncalled workflow and its selected ref. It does not infer the runtime from\n`github.workflow_ref`, because GitHub defines that context as the caller\nworkflow identity during a reusable call.\n\nThe router selects `.buildchain/alpha-contract-lock.json` for alpha and\n`.buildchain/contract-lock.json` for stable. The alpha lock records the exact\nreviewed alpha SHA and compatibility digest; it does not replace the stable\nconsumer lock. A later alpha with only compatible additive drift continues,\nwhile a changed breaking digest fails until the new alpha contract is reviewed.\n\nThe evidence job resolves `v2-alpha` and `v2` through the GitHub refs API,\ncompares those immutable SHAs with the reusable workflow outputs, verifies the\n`alpha` and `stable` classifications, and uploads a JSON evidence artifact.\nThe canary runs after successful Buildchain ref promotion, on a daily fallback\nschedule, and on manual dispatch. It shares the release-promotion concurrency\ngroup, so another promotion cannot move the floating refs between runtime\nresolution and evidence comparison.\n\nThis is a post-publication consumer canary, not a release bootstrap. Source\nverification still runs the current commit, and\n`buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` still passes the verified exact SHA into the\npromotion workflow. Patrol, dev-merge, repair, and promotion defaults remain on\nstable or exact refs so a broken alpha cannot prevent Buildchain from publishing\nits fix. When Buildchain opens a new major, inventory validation requires this\nworkflow's fixed GitHub `uses` refs to move from `vN`/`vN-alpha` to the new\nmajor; GitHub does not allow expressions in a reusable-workflow `uses` ref.\n\nIf `dev/vX/vX.Y` has already advanced before generated alpha version-state\nbookkeeping can sync back, Buildchain records `skipped-non-fast-forward` for the\ndev sync and still completes the exact and floating alpha tags for the reviewed\nalpha commit. Later dev changes must go through their own dev-to-alpha\npromotion instead of rewinding dev. The normal path is direct: after alpha\nmerges, Buildchain applies the generated version-state commit to alpha and then\nfast-forwards dev to the same commit without a human version-state PR.\n\nIf alpha finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain accepts the current alpha head as the generated\ncommit, or as a historical merge commit that contains the recorded release\nmaterial. An already-created exact alpha tag may point at the transaction\nrelease/material SHA or at the finalized alpha head; missing floating alpha\ntags are retried before the transaction becomes `complete`.\n\n## Release Semantics\n\nA release merge is:\n\n```text\nalpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Finds the same-patch alpha tag that was tested.\n2. Checks that the release source tree matches that alpha tag tree, excluding\n   only generated version-state differences.\n3. Writes final release version state such as `vX.Y.Z`.\n4. Verifies the generated release tree.\n5. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `vX.Y.Z`.\n6. Moves `release/vX/vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n7. Moves `vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n8. Moves `vX` when this minor line should be the stable major entrypoint.\n9. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n   `vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0`.\n10. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y`, and `vX.Y-alpha` to that next alpha\n    commit.\n11. Moves `vX-alpha` to that next alpha only when this remains the highest published alpha minor.\n\nThe production channel and the test channel therefore intentionally diverge\nafter release: production stays on the release commit, while alpha/dev continue\nat the next prerelease commit.\n\n### Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate\n\nBuildchain's own stable channel has an additional pre-publication gate. It is\nevaluated after the PR-stage release candidate has been resolved and before the\npublish-gate ref, package registry, exact stable tag, or floating stable refs\nare mutated. Train refs and alpha promotion do not execute this gate.\n\nAll alpha and release promotions first run a metadata-only release-candidate\npreflight after queued-intent revalidation. The preflight uses the same resolver\nand exact target SHA as the publication job, but does not download payloads or\ninstall the candidate repository dependencies. Missing channel PRs, stale\nworkflow runs, expired passport pairs, and insufficient payload artifact sets\ntherefore fail before the full promotion job starts. The publication job still\ndownloads and validates the exact evidence again at the trust boundary; the\npreflight moves failure earlier without weakening the final check.\n\nThe policy is versioned in `.buildchain/stable-release-policy.json`. A stable\ncandidate is allowed only when all of these facts are true:\n\n- the candidate resolves to an immutable exact alpha tag and its GitHub\n  prerelease timestamp;\n- at least 24 hours have passed since the preceding stable patch on the same\n  minor line;\n- the preceding stable-to-alpha comparison contains a product or public\n  contract path, not only version, test, evidence, or retrospective changes;\n- the version-bound impact record has a non-empty summary and at least one\n  surface impact;\n- the `Build Surface Fixture` release-candidate run succeeded;\n- `site-libkungfu-dev` completed its no-apply `Buildchain Stable Canary` and an allowed\n  maintainer attested that successful run on the exact alpha SHA through the\n  `buildchain-canary/site-libkungfu-dev` commit-status context;\n- the canary runtime input is exactly the candidate alpha tag or the 40-character\n  commit SHA resolved from that tag; a successful status pointing at another\n  workflow, repository, tag, floating ref, or SHA is rejected as mismatched;\n- at least one hour has elapsed after the last required canary completed.\n\nThe machine report is written to\n`.buildchain/release-passport/stable-release-gate.json`. A passing report is\nuploaded with the stable release passport. A blocked run writes the same report\nbefore failing, so the missing or stale condition is inspectable without\nopening a publication transaction.\n\nGitHub's Actions run REST object does not expose `workflow_dispatch` inputs.\nBuildchain therefore verifies the run's `workflow_id` against the authoritative\nworkflow metadata, then reads the exact runtime from the workflow-owned\n`<workflow name> / <runtime ref>` run-name when no input field is available.\nAn explicit API input, when present, remains authoritative and cannot be\noverridden by the display name.\n\nThe cooldown is a minimum interval, not an instruction to release every day.\nCompatible work should still be batched until a stable release has a concrete\nconsumer need. Changing the interval, canary set, attestors, product path\nboundary, or soak time is a reviewed policy change.\n\nRepositories that want a predictable scheduled stable window can use\n[`Stable Candidate Patrol`](stable-candidate-patrol.md). It persists each exact\nalpha independently, qualifies it after repository-declared checks and soak,\nand selects the newest qualified non-revoked candidate. A newer soaking alpha\ndoes not invalidate an older qualified candidate. The selected tree enters the\nexisting strict `publish-gate/release/<line>/<version> -> release/<line>` PR\npath, so scheduled selection changes release intent timing without weakening\nsource locks, review, verification, publish transactions, or passports.\n\nIf release finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain applies the same recovery rule: the current\nrelease head may be the generated commit, or a historical merge commit that\ncontains the recorded release material, existing exact tags and alpha/dev refs\nare accepted when they match the transaction, and missing floating `vX.Y` or\n`vX` tags are retried idempotently before completion.\n\nOnce the durable release transaction is `complete` and the exact/floating\nstable refs have moved, next-alpha preparation is post-release bookkeeping. A\nfailure there records `deferred-post-release-bookkeeping` and\n`next-anchor-required` instead of retroactively reporting the stable release as\nfailed. Generated next-alpha merges use the current dev tree as their base and\noverlay only declared version-state paths, preserving concurrent dev changes.\n\n## Major Gate Semantics\n\nA major gate merge is:\n\n```text\nrelease/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is the explicit replacement for the older ABV `main`\nchannel. The name is intentionally operational: it is a gate for a rare\nadministrator decision, not the active trunk. Keeping this decision in the same\nPR UI as alpha and release promotion keeps the human workflow simple while\navoiding the misleading meaning of `main`. The older `major-gate` branch name is\na compatibility alias only.\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Verifies the source is a merged same-repository PR from a protected release\n   line into `publish-gate/major`.\n2. Writes the next major production version state, such as `v(X+1).0.0`.\n3. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `v(X+1).0.0`.\n4. Moves `publish-gate/major` and `release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0` to that release commit.\n5. Moves `v(X+1).0` and `v(X+1)` to that release commit.\n6. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n   `v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0`.\n7. Moves `alpha/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, `dev/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, and\n   `v(X+1).0-alpha` to that next alpha commit.\n\nChecking out `publish-gate/major` should therefore look like a frozen release\nstate, not like a branch where day-to-day source work continues. Day-to-day\nsource work continues on `dev/vX/vX.Y`.\n\n## Protected Dev Branches\n\n`dev/vX/vX.Y` is a protected development channel, not a scratch branch. Normal\nsource changes should be made on work branches such as `feature/*`, `fix/*`,\n`chore/*`, `docs/*`, `ci/*`, or `refactor/*`, then reviewed through a pull\nrequest into the target dev line.\n\nThis keeps the earliest development channel audit-friendly:\n\n- the version line being changed is visible in the PR base branch;\n- CI and required checks run before the channel moves;\n- branch protection can prevent direct pushes and stale merges;\n- later `dev -> alpha -> release` promotion inherits a reviewable source\n  lineage instead of trying to reconstruct how the dev branch changed.\n\nWhen required checks take longer than the normal dev-channel commit interval,\nclassic strict up-to-date protection can become a non-converging retry loop:\neach base update invalidates a completed check set and rebasing restarts the\nsame slow checks. Buildchain supports GitHub merge queues for that channel\nshape. The queue validates the projected merged result and serializes the final\nref update, so concurrent channel movement no longer invalidates the candidate.\n\nEvery required workflow must handle both `pull_request` and `merge_group`\nbefore the queue is enabled. Queue runs do not provide\n`github.event.pull_request`; required workflows must use the checked-out\n`github.sha` or event-neutral source facts. The governance command is dry-run by\ndefault and refuses to enable a queue when a declared required workflow lacks\neither trigger or still reads the pull-request-only payload directly:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain dev merge-queue \\\n  --repository owner/repository \\\n  --branch dev/v4/v4.0 \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/source-acceptance.yml \\\n  --workflow .github/workflows/affected-native-pr.yml\n```\n\nAfter reviewing the plan, repeat with `--apply`. Buildchain creates or updates\nan exact-branch `merge_queue` ruleset first, then changes only the classic\nrequired-status-check policy from strict to loose. Reviews, administrator\nenforcement, conversation resolution, required check identities, force-push\nprotection, and deletion protection remain owned by the existing branch\nprotection. The ruleset uses the first merge method that the repository itself\nallows, and fails closed when the repository has no enabled merge method.\nRe-running the command is idempotent.\n\nBuildchain provides the reusable\n`.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` workflow for repositories that want a\nscheduled or manual \"merge ready dev PRs\" pass. The consumer repository owns\nthe trigger schedule, but the merge decision is declared through workflow\ninputs: target dev branch, required status/check names, ready and block labels,\nallowed work-branch prefixes, review requirements, maximum merges per run,\nmerge method, and dry-run mode.\n\nThe workflow defaults are conservative. A PR is skipped unless it targets the\nconfigured dev line, is not a draft, has the ready label, has no block label,\ncomes from the same repository, uses an allowed work-branch prefix, has a\ncurrent approval, is mergeable, and has the configured required checks passing.\nAfter each merge, the next PR is re-evaluated before it can move the protected\ndev branch. This prevents one merge from silently making the next candidate\nstale or conflicting.\n\nThe canonical consumer required check context is `check / check`, matching the\nreusable workflow call plus its `check` job. Buildchain's own `Verify` workflow\nemits the repository-local context `check`, so Buildchain self-promotion,\nrelease-line bootstrap, and dogfood patrol wrappers pass `check` explicitly.\nRelease governance preserves the exact context emitted by the repository and\nrecords branch-protection policy before/after facts; it does not rewrite one\ncontext shape into the other. Consumer repositories can keep their context\nstable while changing the actual verification command declaratively in\n`buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"cargo fetch --locked\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"cargo test --workspace --locked\"\n```\n\nConsumers that want Buildchain to own the check wrapper can call\n`.github/workflows/check.yml@v2`. The wrapper runs the declared\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.verify` stages and fails the `check` job when\neither declaration is missing or the command exits non-zero.\n\nDevelopment pull requests that need source acceptance without product build or\nartifact verification can opt into `mode: source`. That mode runs only\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.check` on GitHub-hosted `ubuntu-24.04` while\npreserving the stable `check / check` required-check context. Existing callers\nremain on `mode: verify` by default, and callers may set\n`upload-artifacts: false` without weakening the job conclusion.\n\nTypical consumer wrapper:\n\n```yaml\nname: Merge Ready Dev PRs\n\non:\n  schedule:\n    - cron: \"17 * * * *\"\n  workflow_dispatch:\n    inputs:\n      dry-run:\n        type: boolean\n        default: true\n\njobs:\n  merge-dev:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml@v2\n    permissions:\n      contents: write\n      pull-requests: write\n      checks: read\n      statuses: read\n    with:\n      target-branch: dev/v2/v2.6\n      required-status-checks: check / check\n      ready-label: ready\n      block-labels: blocked,do-not-merge\n      max-merges: 1\n      dry-run: ${{ inputs.dry-run || false }}\n```\n\n## Buildchain Patrol\n\n`dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` remains the focused merge primitive. For repositories\nthat want a stable day-to-day operations contract, Buildchain also exposes a\npatrol workflow family:\n\n| Workflow | Intended cadence | Default intent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml` | daily | lightweight inspection plus ready dev PR maintenance |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml` | weekly | release-state, passport, gate, and stale-state health checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-monthly.yml` | monthly | governance, permission, branch-protection, and workflow drift checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/stable-candidate-patrol.yml` | repository-selected release window | qualify immutable alpha candidates and open the exact source-lock stable PR |\n\nThe cadence names describe patrol intensity, not release cadence:\n\n- daily patrol can run every day without implying a daily release;\n- weekly patrol is for medium-cost maintenance and audit checks;\n- monthly patrol is for structural drift checks that should not block ordinary\n  development velocity.\n\nStable Candidate Patrol is separate from those maintenance cadences because its\ncaller-owned cron is a release-intent window. Its candidate ledger and selection\nremain generic; registry-specific side effects still run through the normal\nrepository `lifecycle.publish` transaction. See\n[`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n\nConsumers should schedule thin callers and keep their YAML declarative. For\nexample:\n\n```yaml\nname: Buildchain Daily Patrol\n\non:\n  schedule:\n    - cron: \"17 2 * * *\"\n  workflow_dispatch:\n\njobs:\n  patrol:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml@v2\n    with:\n      dry-run: false\n      max-actions: 1\n```\n\nWeekly and monthly callers use the matching wrapper:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  patrol:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml@v2\n    with:\n      dry-run: true\n```\n\nAll three wrappers default to the `v2` floating Buildchain runtime. When\n`target-branch` is omitted, the caller's current/default branch selects the\nactive semver dev line, so consumers do not pin patrol to a stale minor branch.\nThe separate workflow names keep consumer schedules readable and stable while\nBuildchain adds new checks behind the cadence wrappers.\n\n## Package-Manager Adapters\n\nOld ABV assumed JavaScript repositories with root version state and often\nLerna. Buildchain keeps the version-state contract but does not assume every\nrepository is yarn/Lerna.\n\nThe promotion action discovers and updates:\n\n- root `package.json`;\n- `lerna.json`;\n- package manifests from `package.json` workspaces;\n- package manifests from `lerna.json` packages;\n- package manifests from `pnpm-workspace.yaml`.\n\nIt then runs the repository's detected package manager semantics where needed:\n\n- pnpm repositories use pnpm-oriented workspace discovery;\n- npm repositories use npm/package-lock semantics where present;\n- yarn repositories use yarn-style metadata where present.\n\nFor Buildchain itself, version state is required. For a consumer repository that\nhas no package manifest, the same action can degrade to ref-only behavior only\nwhen that is explicitly allowed by the caller.\n\n## Lifecycle Configuration\n\n`buildchain.toml` is the v2 user configuration format. It lets a repository\ndeclare version-state files and lifecycle commands without pretending every\nproject is a Node workspace. Supported version files include JSON, TOML, and\nregex-based files such as `CMakeLists.txt` or `conanfile.py`.\n\nThe promotion action currently consumes `version.files` and `lifecycle.verify`.\nThe verify stage runs after generated version-state changes are applied locally\nand before any release refs move. If `verification-command` is passed directly\nto the action, that explicit command overrides `lifecycle.verify`.\n\nProtected release-line branches keep their normal human review gate. Managed\n`dev/vN/vN.M`, `alpha/vN/vN.M`, and `release/vN/vN.M` branches are configured\nwith one required approving review, required GitHub Actions checks, administrator\nenforcement, conversation resolution, no force pushes, and no deletions. Dev\nkeeps its repository-selected strict or merge-queue policy. Alpha and release\nrequire both `check` and the pair-specific `verify` aggregate without requiring\nthe source branch to contain the target's generated bookkeeping history. The\nreusable `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper defaults\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`, which lets the workflow's\nautomation identity apply generated version-state or post-publish channel\nbookkeeping after the reviewed channel PR has merged. Direct\n`promote-buildchain-ref` callers must opt into the same controlled bypass with\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps`, `branch-protection-bypass-users`, or\n`branch-protection-bypass-teams`; the action also adds the current promotion\ntoken's authenticated user or app to the managed bypass allowlist. Before\npatching a protected generated bookkeeping ref, the action creates the\nconfigured required check on the exact generated version-state commit, so strict\nstatus checks are satisfied by machine-verifiable Buildchain evidence rather\nthan a human PR. The protected ref PATCH itself uses the generated ref update\ntoken; the reusable wrapper defaults it to\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token`. If direct generated\nrelease finalization bookkeeping is still rejected, Buildchain creates or\nreuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR based on the current\ntarget channel head and records `finalization-needed=true` in the durable\ntransaction output. Strict alpha bookkeeping still fails with a\ntoken/protection diagnostic instead of creating a post-publish PR.\n\nFor a stable release, the wrapper also checks out the exact current development\nchannel into `.buildchain/reconciliation/dev`. When the prepared next-alpha\ncommit cannot fast-forward dev because reviewed work landed concurrently, the\npromotion action applies the next version to that checkout, regenerates every\ndeclared derived version-state file, reruns the verification lifecycle, and\nonly then creates the two-parent reconciliation commit. A checkout/current-ref\nSHA mismatch blocks reconciliation instead of committing stale projections.\nBuildchain's own promotion workflow reads `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_APPS`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_USERS`, and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_TEAMS` repository variables so the declared bypass\nidentity can match the actual `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` actor, but consumers\ndo not need to duplicate that actor manually when the token identity is\ndiscoverable. Buildchain's release-line bootstrap applies the same declared\nallowances when it creates new `dev`, `alpha`, and `release` branch protection,\nand fails closed before changing protection when no promotion authority is\ndeclared. This keeps a new minor line publishable without weakening its normal\nhuman review gate.\n\n## What This Guarantees\n\nWhen the loop succeeds, maintainers and consumers can rely on these facts:\n\n- every production release has an exact tag such as `v2.0.2`;\n- every production minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0`;\n- every selected stable major has a floating tag such as `v2`;\n- every next-major release is driven by a reviewed `release -> publish-gate/major` PR,\n  not a hidden manual button;\n- every test channel has an exact alpha tag such as `v2.0.3-alpha.0`;\n- every alpha minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0-alpha`;\n- every major with a published alpha has a cross-minor floating tag such as `v2-alpha`, owned by its highest published alpha minor;\n- version manifests match the tag visible from the same commit;\n- production releases are derived from the alpha tree that was tested;\n- manual non-dry-run promotion cannot bypass PR review and verification;\n- flow-internal automation bypasses apply only to declared GitHub Apps, users,\n  or teams on Buildchain-managed channel branch protection, while one-review\n  protection remains enforced for humans;\n- admin users cannot make a channel promotion valid by temporarily bypassing\n  branch protection.\n\nThis is the practical meaning of \"governance closed loop\" in Buildchain: the\ndecision, code, version state, and Git refs close over the same evidence chain.\n\n## What This Does Not Do\n\nBuildchain release promotion does not embed registry clients or product-specific\npublish logic. When publish transactions are enabled, `promote-buildchain-ref`\ncan run the consumer's `lifecycle.publish` command and own the transaction,\nevidence validation, durable recovery state, and ref finalization order. The\nconsumer repository still owns registry truth: npm, PyPI, OCI, S3, Conan, CMake\npackaging, download pages, dist-tags, and similar side effects must be\nimplemented by project lifecycle commands that emit Buildchain publish evidence.\n\nEvery Buildchain publish model that can run registry side effects must bind the\npublish entrypoint to an immutable `publish-gate/*` source lock. The reusable\n`release-candidate-promote.yml@v2` wrapper creates or updates that gate ref and\npasses `require-publish-source-lock`, `publish-source-ref`,\n`publish-source-sha`, and `publish-source-locked` to\n`promote-buildchain-ref`. Direct action callers must pass the same four inputs\nfrom the reusable build outputs. Workflows that only collect passports or run\ndry-run package checks do not move publish refs and are not publish-gate\npublication models. A dry-run of `release-candidate-promote.yml` computes and\nreports the exact `publish-gate/*` source lock that a real promotion would use,\nbut does not read, create, or move that ref.\n\nSemver GitHub Release publication is owned by `promote-buildchain-ref`, not by\nconsumer shell glue. Consumers normally use the `release-candidate-promote.yml`\nwrapper, where GitHub Release publication is enabled by default and can be\ndisabled with `github-release: false`; the wrapper passes that declaration to\nthe action. After the publish transaction reaches `complete`, Buildchain creates\nor updates the public GitHub Release and uploads the generated\n`buildchain.release.json`, release-passport assets, and publish evidence. Semver\nprerelease tags are marked `prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`; stable\nsemver tags are marked latest. For anchored/manual package releases, the public\nrelease tag defaults to `v<publishedVersion>` while the internal exact\ntransaction tag remains in the release passport and release-state ref. This is\nthe supported path for downstream\n`release.published` propagation across semver, major, and promote-only release\ncandidate publication models.\n\nPublished GitHub Release assets are immutable evidence. A repeated promotion\npreserves an existing asset when its SHA-256 digest matches the regenerated\nbytes, uploads only missing assets, and fails with an immutable-release\ncollision when a same-name asset has different bytes. It never deletes and\nreplaces an existing asset during retry or duplicate workflow delivery.\n\nBuildchain also does not maintain bare exact tags such as `1.0.0`. The supported\nexact release and alpha refs are v-prefixed:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1-alpha.0\n```\n\n## Operational Reading Order\n\nWhen debugging or extending release behavior, read in this order:\n\n1. `docs/release-flow.md`\n2. `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml`\n3. `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n4. `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml`\n5. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`\n6. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/src/`\n7. `docs/migration-inventory.md`\n\nThat path gives the policy first, the workflow trigger second, and the action\nimplementation last."
     },
     {
       "id": "manual:release-passport",
@@ -1547,7 +1552,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "preview",
       "sourcePath": "docs/release-propagation.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:55895694a32b76dfaf5ed0eb9e32f1e10bd859fb590d6f4504d36692ebe61ea9",
+      "digest": "sha256:d5877075eb41a3d41e531549da113756d29d6f34c91e3b68b8ce650753d5ca1d",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -1580,7 +1585,7 @@
           "anchor": "kfd-to-site-libkungfu-dev"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "# Release Propagation\n\nRelease propagation lets a finalized upstream release open a downstream update\nPR using the upstream release passport as the audit source. It is for product\nchains such as:\n\n```text\nkfd -> site-libkungfu-dev\nA -> B -> C\n```\n\nThe downstream repository receives an exact lock, not a floating dist-tag. A\nsite or app can then consume the upstream package, site bundle, or release\npassport as its single source of truth without hand-copying release facts.\n\n## Contract\n\nThe propagation graph is declarative JSON:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n  \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-release-propagation-graph\",\n  \"nodes\": [\n    {\n      \"id\": \"kfd\",\n      \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/kfd\",\n      \"package\": \"@kungfu-tech/kfd\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"site-libkungfu-dev\",\n      \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/site-libkungfu-dev\",\n      \"lockPath\": \"buildchain.upstreams/kfd.release.json\",\n      \"baseRef\": \"dev/v2/v2.7\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"edges\": [\n    {\n      \"id\": \"kfd-to-site\",\n      \"from\": \"kfd\",\n      \"to\": \"site-libkungfu-dev\",\n      \"channelPolicy\": \"preserve\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n`channelPolicy: \"preserve\"` is the default and maps:\n\n```text\nalpha   -> alpha\nrelease -> release\n```\n\nCross-channel mapping is allowed only when an edge declares\n`channelPolicy: \"explicit\"` and a `channelMap`. Buildchain rejects cycles so a\nchain can fan out or continue as `A -> B -> C`, but cannot loop back into an\nalready visited release line.\n\n## Upstream Release Envelope\n\nThe upstream release envelope is the post-finalization fact set:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/kfd\",\n  \"channel\": \"alpha\",\n  \"tag\": \"v1.4.0-alpha.3\",\n  \"sourceSha\": \"1111111111111111111111111111111111111111\",\n  \"package\": {\n    \"name\": \"@kungfu-tech/kfd\",\n    \"version\": \"1.4.0-alpha.3\",\n    \"integrity\": \"sha512-...\"\n  },\n  \"releasePassport\": {\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/kfd/releases/download/v1.4.0-alpha.3/buildchain.release.json\",\n    \"sha256\": \"2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222\"\n  },\n  \"siteBundle\": {\n    \"manifestSha256\": \"3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThe package version and integrity must be exact. Downstream build logic should\ninstall that version directly, not resolve `alpha` or `latest` again.\n\nPublication repositories can propagate immutable publication archive evidence\nwithout npm package facts. The upstream envelope then includes\n`publicationArtifact`:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines\",\n  \"channel\": \"alpha\",\n  \"tag\": \"v0.1.0-alpha.1\",\n  \"sourceSha\": \"4444444444444444444444444444444444444444\",\n  \"releasePassport\": {\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/buildchain.release.json\",\n    \"sha256\": \"5555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555\"\n  },\n  \"publicationArtifact\": {\n    \"id\": \"observer-declared-timelines\",\n    \"kind\": \"paper\",\n    \"version\": \"0.1.0-alpha.1\",\n    \"canonicalUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/\",\n    \"latestUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/\",\n    \"latestEvidenceUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/buildchain.release.json\",\n    \"immutableVersionUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive/observer-declared-timelines/v0.1.0-alpha.1/\",\n    \"registry\": {\n      \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/publication-registry.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666\"\n    },\n    \"manifest\": {\n      \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/publication-artifact.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777\"\n    },\n    \"passport\": {\n      \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/publication-artifact-passport.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888\"\n    },\n    \"primaryArtifact\": {\n      \"path\": \"_build/main.pdf\",\n      \"url\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive/observer-declared-timelines/v0.1.0-alpha.1/main.pdf\",\n      \"sha256\": \"9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999\"\n    }\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThis lets a site repository render the latest reader page and historical\nversion index from release facts while keeping old PDFs, source bundles,\nmanifests, and passports immutable.\n\n## CLI\n\nGenerate a propagation plan:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release-propagation plan \\\n  --graph buildchain.release-propagation.json \\\n  --upstream-release .buildchain/upstream-release.json \\\n  --output .buildchain/release-propagation-plan.json \\\n  --json\n```\n\nWrite the downstream lock:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release-propagation write-lock \\\n  --plan .buildchain/release-propagation-plan.json \\\n  --target site-libkungfu-dev \\\n  --cwd downstream-checkout \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe written lock has contract\n`kungfu-buildchain-release-propagation-lock` and records:\n\n- upstream repository, channel, exact tag, source SHA;\n- optional npm package name, exact version, and sha512 integrity;\n- optional publication artifact canonical/latest/immutable URLs, registry,\n  manifest, passport, source bundle, and primary artifact digests;\n- release passport URL and SHA-256;\n- optional site bundle manifest SHA-256;\n- downstream repository, channel, base ref, lock path;\n- edge id and channel policy.\n\n## Reusable Workflow\n\nUpstream repositories can call\n`.github/workflows/release-propagation.yml@v2` after release finalization:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  propagate-site:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/release-propagation.yml@v2\n    with:\n      buildchain-ref: v2\n      graph-json: ${{ needs.release.outputs.propagation-graph-json }}\n      upstream-release-json: ${{ needs.release.outputs.upstream-release-json }}\n      downstream-target: site-libkungfu-dev\n      downstream-repository: kungfu-systems/site-libkungfu-dev\n      downstream-base-ref: dev/v2/v2.7\n      dry-run: false\n    secrets:\n      propagation-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nThe workflow checks out the Buildchain runtime selected by\n`buildchain-repository` and `buildchain-ref` into `.buildchain/runtime`, invokes\nthat runtime for the propagation plan and lock write, then checks out the\ndownstream repository, writes the exact lock, and opens or updates a PR. It does\nnot publish the downstream release directly. The downstream repository keeps its\nnormal Buildchain governance: the PR updates source-of-truth facts, then\ndownstream alpha or release publication runs through its own protected channel.\nThe workflow stages the declared lock path before checking the index, so the\nfirst propagation creates a PR even when the lock did not previously exist; a\nbyte-identical rerun is an explicit successful no-op.\nFor unreleased runtime validation, keep the caller's reusable workflow reference\non `@v2` and pass a temporary train ref through `buildchain-ref`.\n\n## kfd to site-libkungfu-dev\n\nFor `kfd -> site-libkungfu-dev`, the graph should preserve channels:\n\n- a `kfd` alpha release produces a downstream alpha lock and downstream alpha\n  publication consumes the exact `@kungfu-tech/kfd@...-alpha.N` package;\n- a `kfd` stable release produces a downstream release lock and downstream\n  stable publication consumes the exact stable package.\n\nThis keeps the site synchronized to the package truth without allowing the site\nto drift onto a floating npm dist-tag."
+      "markdown": "# Release Propagation\n\nRelease propagation lets a finalized upstream release open a downstream update\nPR using the upstream release passport as the audit source. It is for product\nchains such as:\n\n```text\nkfd -> site-libkungfu-dev\nA -> B -> C\n```\n\nThe downstream repository receives an exact lock, not a floating dist-tag. A\nsite or app can then consume the upstream package, site bundle, or release\npassport as its single source of truth without hand-copying release facts.\n\n## Contract\n\nThe propagation graph is declarative JSON:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n  \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-release-propagation-graph\",\n  \"nodes\": [\n    {\n      \"id\": \"kfd\",\n      \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/kfd\",\n      \"package\": \"@kungfu-tech/kfd\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"site-libkungfu-dev\",\n      \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/site-libkungfu-dev\",\n      \"lockPath\": \"buildchain.upstreams/kfd.release.json\",\n      \"baseRef\": \"dev/v2/v2.7\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"edges\": [\n    {\n      \"id\": \"kfd-to-site\",\n      \"from\": \"kfd\",\n      \"to\": \"site-libkungfu-dev\",\n      \"channelPolicy\": \"preserve\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n`channelPolicy: \"preserve\"` is the default and maps:\n\n```text\nalpha   -> alpha\nrelease -> release\n```\n\nCross-channel mapping is allowed only when an edge declares\n`channelPolicy: \"explicit\"` and a `channelMap`. Buildchain rejects cycles so a\nchain can fan out or continue as `A -> B -> C`, but cannot loop back into an\nalready visited release line.\n\n## Upstream Release Envelope\n\nThe upstream release envelope is the post-finalization fact set:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/kfd\",\n  \"channel\": \"alpha\",\n  \"tag\": \"v1.4.0-alpha.3\",\n  \"sourceSha\": \"1111111111111111111111111111111111111111\",\n  \"package\": {\n    \"name\": \"@kungfu-tech/kfd\",\n    \"version\": \"1.4.0-alpha.3\",\n    \"integrity\": \"sha512-...\"\n  },\n  \"releasePassport\": {\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/kfd/releases/download/v1.4.0-alpha.3/buildchain.release.json\",\n    \"sha256\": \"2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222\"\n  },\n  \"siteBundle\": {\n    \"manifestSha256\": \"3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThe package version and integrity must be exact. Downstream build logic should\ninstall that version directly, not resolve `alpha` or `latest` again.\n\nPublication repositories can propagate immutable publication archive evidence\nwithout npm package facts. The upstream envelope then includes\n`publicationArtifact`:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines\",\n  \"channel\": \"alpha\",\n  \"tag\": \"v0.1.0-alpha.1\",\n  \"sourceSha\": \"4444444444444444444444444444444444444444\",\n  \"releasePassport\": {\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/buildchain.release.json\",\n    \"sha256\": \"5555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555\"\n  },\n  \"publicationArtifact\": {\n    \"id\": \"observer-declared-timelines\",\n    \"kind\": \"paper\",\n    \"version\": \"0.1.0-alpha.1\",\n    \"canonicalUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/\",\n    \"latestUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/\",\n    \"latestEvidenceUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/buildchain.release.json\",\n    \"immutableVersionUrl\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive/observer-declared-timelines/v0.1.0-alpha.1/\",\n    \"registry\": {\n      \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/publication-registry.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666\"\n    },\n    \"manifest\": {\n      \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/publication-artifact.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777\"\n    },\n    \"passport\": {\n      \"url\": \"https://github.com/kungfu-systems/paper-observer-declared-timelines/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/publication-artifact-passport.json\",\n      \"sha256\": \"8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888\"\n    },\n    \"primaryArtifact\": {\n      \"path\": \"_build/main.pdf\",\n      \"url\": \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive/observer-declared-timelines/v0.1.0-alpha.1/main.pdf\",\n      \"sha256\": \"9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999\"\n    }\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThis lets a site repository render the latest reader page and historical\nversion index from release facts while keeping old PDFs, source bundles,\nmanifests, and passports immutable.\n\n## CLI\n\nGenerate a propagation plan:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release-propagation plan \\\n  --graph buildchain.release-propagation.json \\\n  --upstream-release .buildchain/upstream-release.json \\\n  --output .buildchain/release-propagation-plan.json \\\n  --json\n```\n\nWrite the downstream lock:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release-propagation write-lock \\\n  --plan .buildchain/release-propagation-plan.json \\\n  --target site-libkungfu-dev \\\n  --cwd downstream-checkout \\\n  --json\n```\n\nThe written lock has contract\n`kungfu-buildchain-release-propagation-lock` and records:\n\n- upstream repository, channel, exact tag, source SHA;\n- optional npm package name, exact version, and sha512 integrity;\n- optional publication artifact canonical/latest/immutable URLs, registry,\n  manifest, passport, source bundle, and primary artifact digests;\n- release passport URL and SHA-256;\n- optional site bundle manifest SHA-256;\n- downstream repository, channel, base ref, lock path;\n- edge id and channel policy.\n\n## Reusable Workflow\n\nUpstream repositories can call\n`.github/workflows/release-propagation.yml@v2` after release finalization:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  propagate-site:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/release-propagation.yml@v2\n    with:\n      buildchain-ref: v2\n      graph-json: ${{ needs.release.outputs.propagation-graph-json }}\n      upstream-release-json: ${{ needs.release.outputs.upstream-release-json }}\n      downstream-target: site-libkungfu-dev\n      downstream-repository: kungfu-systems/site-libkungfu-dev\n      downstream-base-ref: dev/v2/v2.7\n      dry-run: false\n    secrets:\n      propagation-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nThe downstream branch name may be reused across upstream releases. Before\nreplacing an existing managed branch, the workflow reads its exact remote SHA\nand pushes with an explicit `--force-with-lease=<ref>:<sha>`. A surviving branch\nfrom a merged PR is therefore reconciled without manual deletion, while a\nconcurrent writer makes the lease fail closed. The controller receipt includes a\n`propagation-branch-reconciliation` evidence file recording the branch, observed\nremote SHA, pushed SHA, lease mode, and the deterministically created or updated\nopen PR.\n\nThe workflow checks out the Buildchain runtime selected by\n`buildchain-repository` and `buildchain-ref` into `.buildchain/runtime`, invokes\nthat runtime for the propagation plan and lock write, then checks out the\ndownstream repository, writes the exact lock, and opens or updates a PR. It does\nnot publish the downstream release directly. The downstream repository keeps its\nnormal Buildchain governance: the PR updates source-of-truth facts, then\ndownstream alpha or release publication runs through its own protected channel.\nThe workflow stages the declared lock path before checking the index, so the\nfirst propagation creates a PR even when the lock did not previously exist; a\nbyte-identical rerun is an explicit successful no-op.\nFor unreleased runtime validation, keep the caller's reusable workflow reference\non `@v2` and pass a temporary train ref through `buildchain-ref`.\n\n## kfd to site-libkungfu-dev\n\nFor `kfd -> site-libkungfu-dev`, the graph should preserve channels:\n\n- a `kfd` alpha release produces a downstream alpha lock and downstream alpha\n  publication consumes the exact `@kungfu-tech/kfd@...-alpha.N` package;\n- a `kfd` stable release produces a downstream release lock and downstream\n  stable publication consumes the exact stable package.\n\nThis keeps the site synchronized to the package truth without allowing the site\nto drift onto a floating npm dist-tag."
     },
     {
       "id": "manual:reusable-build-surface",
@@ -1948,7 +1953,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "stable",
       "sourcePath": "docs/versioning.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:280d30e15552ab6a362cb121a7a1cafc3b907913cdc7d4d8a9e8e1930d856f7e",
+      "digest": "sha256:c3dce313b846fb36c69e4a725d086226ff2e875c376cc10e8554a0aff2f67c93",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -1976,7 +1981,7 @@
           "anchor": "runner-policy"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "# Buildchain Versioning\n\nBuildchain uses semantic version lines to describe public contracts, not only\ncode size. A release can be small in diff size and still open a new minor line\nwhen it adds a durable surface that consumers, workflows, or agents can depend\non.\n\n## Lines\n\n| Line | Meaning |\n| --- | --- |\n| Patch | Compatible fix, hardening, documentation correction, or implementation repair inside an existing surface. |\n| Minor | New compatible welded surface: reusable workflow output, CLI command family, config protocol, published subpath, evidence file, runner contract, or agent-readable artifact. |\n| Major | Breaking semantic change, removed stable surface, changed branch/tag governance, or incompatible protocol rewrite. |\n\nKungfu minor lines are long-lived trains. `v2.0`, `v2.1`, and `v2.2` can each\nreceive many patch releases. The major ref, such as `v2`, points at the\nselected stable major entrypoint; the minor ref, such as `v2.2`, points at the\nlatest stable production patch for that minor line.\n\n## Welded Surfaces\n\nThese surfaces are classified independently; the final release impact is the\nhighest impact across the affected registered surfaces:\n\n- reusable workflow inputs, outputs, and artifact contracts;\n- public CLI command families and their machine-readable JSON shapes;\n- public npm exports such as `@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging`;\n- config protocols such as `buildchain.toml`;\n- release governance state machines and protected ref semantics;\n- release evidence contracts such as passport, artifact evidence, impact\n  ledger, and agent index files;\n- binary distribution shapes that users can install or automate against.\n\nFor each surface:\n\n- content, documentation, or implementation-only work that does not touch a\n  registered surface is patch;\n- additive fields, new commands, new exports, new evidence sections, or new\n  registered surfaces are minor;\n- removals, incompatible renames, changed meanings, newly required fields,\n  weakened trust gates, or changed ref flow are major.\n\nThe release passport records this as `surfaceImpacts[]` plus\n`versionImpact.final`. The final impact must equal the highest surface impact,\nso an agent cannot silently label a release patch when one machine surface needs\nminor review.\n\n`surfaceImpacts[]` is mandatory for production release passports (`release/*`)\nand major publish-gate passports. Alpha, local, and legacy passport contexts\nkeep the field optional so temporary validation can proceed without pretending\nto be a production release decision.\n\nExample: a KFD document such as KFD-2 is content and remains patch, but adding a\n`kind` field to the machine-consumed KFD `registry.json` is an additive change\nto the `kfd-registry-schema` surface and therefore requires minor-impact\nreview. This avoids both false shortcuts: \"new KFD means minor\" and \"all KFD\nrepository changes are patch\".\n\n## Decision Log\n\n| Date | Action | Line | Faces | Class | Rationale | PR |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 2026-07-15 | open-minor | `v2.13` | artifact-verification-envelope, package-subpaths | additive | The public envelope seals exact artifact, provenance, identity, lifecycle, revocation, and existing KFD assessment roots into one consumer-ready KFX admission input, with a dedicated Node API export and fail-closed verifier. | |\n| 2026-07-11 | open-minor | `v2.12` | channel-build-router, channel-selection-protocol | additive | The public `build.yml` reusable workflow lets consumers declare one build job while Buildchain selects generic major alpha for development/prerelease intent and stable major for production release intent, with explicit overrides, separate locks, and fail-closed ambiguity handling. | |\n| 2026-07-08 | open-minor | `v2.9` | build-facts-contract | additive | Build Facts add a public CLI command family, Node API export, config protocol, module/product fact contracts, release-passport evidence section, and Kungfu legacy buildinfo projection from the same source facts. | |\n| 2026-07-06 | open-minor | `v2.8` | kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate, kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit, kfd-3-collaboration-interface-trust-proof, publish-source-lock-enforcement, required-check-protection | additive | KFD release gates add KFD-1 self contract verification, KFD-2 public release trust claim audit, KFD-3 collaboration-interface trust proofs, publish-side source-lock enforcement for promote-only wrappers, and protected channel required checks repaired to bind GitHub Actions check runs instead of legacy commit status contexts. | |\n| 2026-07-04 | open-minor | `v2.5` | scheduled-integration-governance | additive | Scheduled integration governance adds scheduled feature-branch discovery, conflict-free integration, reporting, and agent-visible governance automation for dev-line maintenance. | |\n| 2026-07-03 | open-minor | `v2.4` | infra-contract-lifecycle | additive | Infra contract lifecycle adds the provider-neutral `infra-contract` CLI command family, project type, adapter capability contract, lifecycle evidence bundle, propagation evidence, CI evidence mode, and consumer-facing contract artifacts. | |\n| 2026-07-02 | open-minor | `v2.3` | web-surface-host-mapping | additive | Web surface host mapping adds first-class multi-host surface bindings, reusable workflow URL outputs, per-surface deployment overrides, and an agent-readable fixture contract. | |\n| 2026-07-02 | open-minor | `v2.2` | release-passport, binary-distribution | additive | Release passport and binary distribution add agent-readable release passport files, artifact evidence, impact ledger, agent index, GitHub Release collection and verification commands, and standalone binary assets. | |\n| 2026-07-02 | open-minor | `v2.1` | logging-sdk, cli-observability, package-subpaths | additive | Buildchain toolkit observability adds the public logging SDK, CLI observability commands, and package subpaths that consumers can import. | |\n\n## Runner Policy\n\nThe `v2.2` binary distribution lane uses GitHub-hosted runners for production\nassets because that is the easiest release path for external users to reproduce:\n\n- `ubuntu-24.04`\n- `macos-latest`\n- `windows-2022`\n\nSelf-hosted runners remain compatibility fixtures. They prove Buildchain's\nprotocol does not depend on GitHub-hosted images, but they do not define the\npublic binary distribution path."
+      "markdown": "# Buildchain Versioning\n\nBuildchain uses semantic version lines to describe public contracts, not only\ncode size. A release can be small in diff size and still open a new minor line\nwhen it adds a durable surface that consumers, workflows, or agents can depend\non.\n\n## Lines\n\n| Line | Meaning |\n| --- | --- |\n| Patch | Compatible fix, hardening, documentation correction, or implementation repair inside an existing surface. |\n| Minor | New compatible welded surface: reusable workflow output, CLI command family, config protocol, published subpath, evidence file, runner contract, or agent-readable artifact. |\n| Major | Breaking semantic change, removed stable surface, changed branch/tag governance, or incompatible protocol rewrite. |\n\nKungfu minor lines are long-lived trains. `v2.0`, `v2.1`, and `v2.2` can each\nreceive many patch releases. The major ref, such as `v2`, points at the\nselected stable major entrypoint; the minor ref, such as `v2.2`, points at the\nlatest stable production patch for that minor line.\n\n## Welded Surfaces\n\nThese surfaces are classified independently; the final release impact is the\nhighest impact across the affected registered surfaces:\n\n- reusable workflow inputs, outputs, and artifact contracts;\n- public CLI command families and their machine-readable JSON shapes;\n- public npm exports such as `@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging`;\n- config protocols such as `buildchain.toml`;\n- release governance state machines and protected ref semantics;\n- release evidence contracts such as passport, artifact evidence, impact\n  ledger, and agent index files;\n- binary distribution shapes that users can install or automate against.\n\nFor each surface:\n\n- content, documentation, or implementation-only work that does not touch a\n  registered surface is patch;\n- additive fields, new commands, new exports, new evidence sections, or new\n  registered surfaces are minor;\n- removals, incompatible renames, changed meanings, newly required fields,\n  weakened trust gates, or changed ref flow are major.\n\nThe release passport records this as `surfaceImpacts[]` plus\n`versionImpact.final`. The final impact must equal the highest surface impact,\nso an agent cannot silently label a release patch when one machine surface needs\nminor review.\n\n`surfaceImpacts[]` is mandatory for production release passports (`release/*`)\nand major publish-gate passports. Alpha, local, and legacy passport contexts\nkeep the field optional so temporary validation can proceed without pretending\nto be a production release decision.\n\nExample: a KFD document such as KFD-2 is content and remains patch, but adding a\n`kind` field to the machine-consumed KFD `registry.json` is an additive change\nto the `kfd-registry-schema` surface and therefore requires minor-impact\nreview. This avoids both false shortcuts: \"new KFD means minor\" and \"all KFD\nrepository changes are patch\".\n\n## Decision Log\n\n| Date | Action | Line | Faces | Class | Rationale | PR |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 2026-07-16 | open-minor | `v2.14` | dev-merge-queue-governance | additive | The public CLI adds a dry-run-first, idempotent merge-queue governance command that verifies required workflow event compatibility before applying an exact dev-channel ruleset and removing the strict up-to-date race. | |\n| 2026-07-15 | open-minor | `v2.13` | artifact-verification-envelope, package-subpaths | additive | The public envelope seals exact artifact, provenance, identity, lifecycle, revocation, and existing KFD assessment roots into one consumer-ready KFX admission input, with a dedicated Node API export and fail-closed verifier. | |\n| 2026-07-11 | open-minor | `v2.12` | channel-build-router, channel-selection-protocol | additive | The public `build.yml` reusable workflow lets consumers declare one build job while Buildchain selects generic major alpha for development/prerelease intent and stable major for production release intent, with explicit overrides, separate locks, and fail-closed ambiguity handling. | |\n| 2026-07-08 | open-minor | `v2.9` | build-facts-contract | additive | Build Facts add a public CLI command family, Node API export, config protocol, module/product fact contracts, release-passport evidence section, and Kungfu legacy buildinfo projection from the same source facts. | |\n| 2026-07-06 | open-minor | `v2.8` | kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate, kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit, kfd-3-collaboration-interface-trust-proof, publish-source-lock-enforcement, required-check-protection | additive | KFD release gates add KFD-1 self contract verification, KFD-2 public release trust claim audit, KFD-3 collaboration-interface trust proofs, publish-side source-lock enforcement for promote-only wrappers, and protected channel required checks repaired to bind GitHub Actions check runs instead of legacy commit status contexts. | |\n| 2026-07-04 | open-minor | `v2.5` | scheduled-integration-governance | additive | Scheduled integration governance adds scheduled feature-branch discovery, conflict-free integration, reporting, and agent-visible governance automation for dev-line maintenance. | |\n| 2026-07-03 | open-minor | `v2.4` | infra-contract-lifecycle | additive | Infra contract lifecycle adds the provider-neutral `infra-contract` CLI command family, project type, adapter capability contract, lifecycle evidence bundle, propagation evidence, CI evidence mode, and consumer-facing contract artifacts. | |\n| 2026-07-02 | open-minor | `v2.3` | web-surface-host-mapping | additive | Web surface host mapping adds first-class multi-host surface bindings, reusable workflow URL outputs, per-surface deployment overrides, and an agent-readable fixture contract. | |\n| 2026-07-02 | open-minor | `v2.2` | release-passport, binary-distribution | additive | Release passport and binary distribution add agent-readable release passport files, artifact evidence, impact ledger, agent index, GitHub Release collection and verification commands, and standalone binary assets. | |\n| 2026-07-02 | open-minor | `v2.1` | logging-sdk, cli-observability, package-subpaths | additive | Buildchain toolkit observability adds the public logging SDK, CLI observability commands, and package subpaths that consumers can import. | |\n\n## Runner Policy\n\nThe `v2.2` binary distribution lane uses GitHub-hosted runners for production\nassets because that is the easiest release path for external users to reproduce:\n\n- `ubuntu-24.04`\n- `macos-latest`\n- `windows-2022`\n\nSelf-hosted runners remain compatibility fixtures. They prove Buildchain's\nprotocol does not depend on GitHub-hosted images, but they do not define the\npublic binary distribution path."
     },
     {
       "id": "manual:web-surface-deployments",
@@ -1990,7 +1995,7 @@
       ],
       "maturity": "stable",
       "sourcePath": "docs/web-surface-deployments.md",
-      "digest": "sha256:f1e92ba87417dc9aac4f8cf080565f7f2c114b5007bb68b90f33692c73fdad88",
+      "digest": "sha256:797d8f0e81974a49125b17256bb8b4a85fc60673e06d6bbecbbf399651163437",
       "headings": [
         {
           "level": 1,
@@ -2093,7 +2098,7 @@
           "anchor": "boundaries"
         }
       ],
-      "markdown": "# Web-Surface Deployment Contract\n\nBuildchain supports `project.type = \"web-surface\"` for repositories that publish\nsites, docs, product pages, operator consoles, or browser apps. These projects\nneed auditable deployment semantics, but they are not package release lines and\nshould not be forced into `dev/alpha/release` version-state automation.\n\nThe release object for a web surface is:\n\n```text\nsource commit + build artifact + deploy target + channel + deployment manifest\n```\n\nThis keeps the evidence chain clear:\n\n- the source SHA explains what code was built;\n- the artifact hash explains exactly what was deployed;\n- the channel explains who can see it and whether it is promotable;\n- the deploy target and adapter explain where it would be published;\n- the deployment manifest records retention, rollback, security, and secret\n  reference metadata.\n\n## Configuration\n\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is the source of truth. Web-surface projects must declare\npreview, staging, and production channels plus a deploy adapter for each.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nrequires_auth = false\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[deploy.preview]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"kungfu-tech-preview\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-PREVIEW\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n# Optional. Defaults to \"buildchain\".\n# Use \"external\" when an existing viewer-request CloudFront Function already\n# owns preview alias, surface-prefix, and directory-index routing.\ndirectory_index_rewrite = \"buildchain\"\n# Optional. Defaults to HTTP for public channels and S3 object evidence for\n# managed-network channels. Use \"s3-object\" when CI should verify uploaded\n# objects and manifests instead of waiting for public edge convergence.\nhealth_strategy = \"http\"\n```\n\n### Multi-Surface Host Mapping\n\nSome site repositories publish more than one first-class web surface from the\nsame artifact. For example, `site-libkungfu-dev` has a hub plus separate\nhostnames for core, Buildchain, and Kung Fu Decisions. These are not just\nnavigation paths; staging, production preflight, and post-deploy health checks\nmust verify host-level behavior for each surface.\n\nDeclare named surfaces with per-channel URLs:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.buildchain]\npath = \"/buildchain/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://buildchain.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://buildchain.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://buildchain-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.kfd]\npath = \"/kfd/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://kfd.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://kfd.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://kfd-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n```\n\nBuildchain resolves every `(channel, surface)` pair. A preview alias such as\n`pr-12` becomes:\n\n```text\nhub:        https://pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\ncore:       https://core-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nbuildchain: https://buildchain-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nkfd:        https://kfd-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\n```\n\nWhen `surfaces` is omitted, Buildchain preserves the legacy single-surface\ncontract by creating an implicit `default` surface from the channel URL. When a\nsurface is intentionally path-only, declare it explicitly:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.docs]\npath = \"/docs/\"\npath_only = true\n```\n\n`path_only = true` is an exception, not the default. Without it, every named\nsurface must declare `preview_url_pattern`, `staging_url`, and\n`production_url`. This makes staging/production mismatches fail during\nvalidation instead of becoming invisible deploy drift.\n\nAdapter strategy remains explicit. The default `aws-s3-cloudfront` plan uses the\nchannel deploy target for every surface, and each binding records its own\nbucket, distribution id, object prefix, manifest key, source path, and URL. A\nchannel can override target details per surface:\n\n```toml\n[deploy.staging.surfaces.core]\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-core-staging\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-CORE-STAGING\"\norigin_path = \"/core\"\n```\n\nBuildchain validates these hard constraints:\n\n- `channels.preview.url_pattern` is required and must contain the alias shape\n  used by preview deployments.\n- `channels.staging.access_control` must protect staging. Supported modes are\n  `managed-network`, `edge-basic-auth`, `oidc`, and `app-auth`.\n- `channels.staging.edge_auth` records whether the edge layer owns auth. Use\n  `edge_auth = \"none\"` when staging is protected by managed network controls\n  such as WAF/IP allowlists or VPN access.\n- `channels.staging.noindex = true` is required.\n- `channels.production.url` is required.\n- deploy adapters must be declared per channel.\n- named surfaces must declare first-class URLs for every channel unless\n  `path_only = true` is explicitly set.\n- secret material must be declared as reference names, such as\n  `secret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]`; inline secret-like deploy keys are rejected.\n\n### Floating Runtime Contract Lock\n\nWeb-surface repositories can consume the stable Buildchain workflow shell with a\nfloating ref, such as:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  web:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n      buildchain-contract-compatibility-policy: major-compatible\n      buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n      build-command: pnpm build\n      artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe caller repository commits `.buildchain/contract-lock.json` after reviewing an\naccepted Buildchain runtime SHA and contract digest. The reusable workflow then\nresolves the floating runtime to an immutable SHA, checks the lock before the\ncaller build command, and applies these rules:\n\n- unchanged lock: continue without feedback;\n- compatible drift: continue, write the drift summary, and open or update a\n  caller-repository issue when permissions allow;\n- breaking drift: fail closed before rendering, deployment planning, deploy\n  apply, or release publication.\n\nThe caller no longer needs to run `scripts/buildchain-contract-lock.mjs` inside\nits own build command. That check belongs to Buildchain because the actual\ncontract world is stored in the Buildchain runtime ref being used.\n\nSupported adapter names are:\n\n| Adapter | Initial use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `aws-s3-cloudfront` | Static site artifact sync plus CDN invalidation plan |\n| `aws-elastic-beanstalk` | Future dynamic app environment adapter |\n| `aws-ecs-service` | Future dynamic service adapter |\n\nThe channel ontology is independent of the adapter. A future dynamic staging\nenvironment still remains `channel = \"staging\"` with protected/noindex/security\nrequirements.\n\n## Preview Aliases\n\nPreview uses subdomains, not path prefixes:\n\n```text\nhttps://pr-123.preview.kungfu.tech\nhttps://sha-abcdef123456.preview.kungfu.tech\n```\n\nAlias semantics are explicit:\n\n| Alias | Meaning | Mutable | Retention |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `pr-123` | Current preview for a pull request | yes | short-lived |\n| `sha-abcdef123456` | Immutable preview for one source SHA | no | longer-lived |\n\nThis allows PR comments to stay stable while preserving immutable evidence for a\nspecific source commit.\n\n## Deployment Manifest\n\nBuildchain emits a manifest with the deployment facts that matter for audit and\nrollback:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n  \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-deployment\",\n  \"site\": \"libkungfu-dev\",\n  \"channel\": \"preview\",\n  \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n  \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n  \"generatedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"publishedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"reproducible\": true,\n  \"timestampPolicy\": \"ci-injected\",\n  \"deterministicInputs\": [\n    \"web-surface artifact content\",\n    \"buildchain.toml web-surface channels/deploy/surfaces\",\n    \"sourceSha\",\n    \"artifactHash\",\n    \"deployment channel\",\n    \"deployment alias\"\n  ],\n  \"sourceRevision\": \"...\",\n  \"timestampPolicyDetails\": {\n    \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-surface-timestamp-policy\",\n    \"timestampFields\": [\"generatedAt\", \"publishedAt\", \"deployedAt\"],\n    \"timestampFieldsParticipateInArtifactDigest\": false,\n    \"artifactDigestScope\": \"web-surface artifactHash excludes deployment manifest timestamps\"\n  },\n  \"sourceSha\": \"...\",\n  \"artifactHash\": \"...\",\n  \"deployTarget\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n  \"adapter\": \"aws-s3-cloudfront\",\n  \"deployedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"retentionClass\": \"preview-sha-immutable\",\n  \"expiresAt\": \"2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"accessControl\": \"none\",\n  \"edgeAuth\": \"none\",\n  \"noindex\": true,\n  \"secretRefs\": [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"],\n  \"surfaceBindings\": [\n    {\n      \"surface\": \"hub\",\n      \"channel\": \"preview\",\n      \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n      \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n      \"sourcePath\": \"/\",\n      \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n      \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n      \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n      \"directoryIndexResolution\": true,\n      \"canonicalUrl\": \"https://libkungfu.dev\",\n      \"bucket\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n      \"distributionId\": \"E-PREVIEW\",\n      \"originPath\": \"\",\n      \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n      \"manifestKey\": \".buildchain/deployments/sha-abcdef123456/hub.json\",\n      \"routing\": {\n        \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\",\n        \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n        \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n        \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n        \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n        \"directoryIndexResolution\": true\n      },\n      \"smokeUrls\": [\n        {\n          \"kind\": \"root\",\n          \"requestPath\": \"/\",\n          \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev/\",\n          \"required\": true\n        }\n      ],\n      \"noindex\": true,\n      \"accessControl\": \"none\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\nDynamic adapters can also fill `runtimeId`, `configFingerprint`,\n`healthCheck`, `migrationState`, `rollbackPointer`, and\n`rollbackLimitations`. Buildchain records secret reference names only, never\nsecret values.\n\nThe timestamp policy is shared with package site bundles. Public deployment\nmanifests should expose real workflow generation/publication times while\nseparately declaring why the deployed artifact remains reproducible. For\nweb-surface deployment manifests, `artifactHash` is the static site artifact\ndigest and does not include deployment timestamp fields; the manifest itself\nstill records those fields for human and agent audit.\n\n## Deploy Plans\n\nDeploy planning is the default behavior. It plans the adapter steps and writes\nmanifest JSON, but it does not touch AWS, DNS, CloudFront, or deployment\ncredentials.\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode deploy-plan \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --alias sha-aaaaaaaaaaaa\n```\n\nFor manifest-only output:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode manifest \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --alias pr-123 \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-manifest.json\n```\n\nThe CLI emits GitHub outputs when `GITHUB_OUTPUT` is present:\n\n- `web-surface-channel`\n- `web-surface-alias`\n- `web-surface-url`\n- `web-surface-urls-json`\n- `web-surface-artifact-hash`\n- `web-surface-manifest-json`\n\nThe reusable workflow resolves that same effective channel before running the\ncaller build or verify command. Both steps receive\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_CHANNEL` (`preview`, `staging`, or `production`) and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PREVIEW_ALIAS` for previews. Compatibility aliases\n`BUILDCHAIN_SURFACE_CHANNEL` and `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_ALIAS` are also\nprovided. Callers should consume these variables instead of reconstructing the\nrelease-intent state machine from raw GitHub events.\nAn unapproved manual canary resolves to `staging`; a trusted manual dispatch\nwith `production-approved=true` resolves to `production` through the same path.\n\n## Explicit Apply\n\n`deploy-apply` and `cleanup-apply` are explicit execution modes for the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` static-site adapter. They still default to `--dry-run true`;\nlive AWS mutation requires `--dry-run false`.\n\nDeploy apply syncs the artifact, writes the deployment manifest, and invalidates\nCloudFront when a distribution id is configured:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode deploy-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --channel staging \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --artifact-path dist \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\n### Immutable publication paths\n\nWhen a surface artifact contains `manifest.json` with\n`archivePolicy.contract = \"kungfu-buildchain-publication-archive-policy\"`,\nBuildchain treats every declared `publications[].versions[].immutablePath` as\nan append-only publication boundary. This applies identically to preview,\nstaging, and production adapters.\n\nThe adapter derives the protected archive root from those declared version\npaths and applies four ordered safeguards:\n\n1. every local immutable file is checked against an existing S3 object;\n2. missing files are uploaded with `aws s3 sync --no-overwrite` and a SHA-256\n   checksum;\n3. every immutable file is checked again after upload, closing the race between\n   the first check and the no-overwrite transfer;\n4. mutable site content keeps normal `sync --delete` behavior, but every parent\n   or owning surface sync excludes the protected archive root from deletion.\n\nAn existing object with a different SHA-256 digest fails apply before mutable\ncontent is changed. Older objects without a stored S3 SHA-256 checksum are read\nand byte-hashed for compatibility. Directory-index alias writes are skipped\nunder protected roots so they cannot overwrite immutable route objects; viewer\nrequest rewriting remains the directory-index authority.\n\nThe deploy plan and manifest record `immutablePublication`,\n`mutableDeleteExcludes`, and the parent-surface coverage. Apply output records\n`immutablePreservation` plus every pre-check, no-overwrite sync, post-check, and\nmutable sync operation. Health output adds an `__immutable__` check proving that\nthe owning and parent surface syncs carried their required delete exclusions.\nThe runner must provide an AWS CLI version whose `s3 sync` supports\n`--no-overwrite`.\n\nFor multi-surface sites, each surface host is treated as a root-relative view\nof that surface's artifact path prefix. For example, a `buildchain` surface with\n`path = \"/buildchain/\"` and preview URL\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev` syncs the artifact subtree\n`dist/buildchain/` to the preview object prefix `pr-29/buildchain`. A viewer\nrequest for `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` therefore\nresolves against the artifact's `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html`, not\n`dist/docs/index.html` and not the hub surface root. The deployment manifest\nrecords this as `routing.contract =\n\"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\"` with\n`viewerPathPrefix = \"/\"`, `artifactPathPrefix = \"buildchain\"`, and\n`directoryIndexResolution = true`.\n\nWhen a surface uses an S3 object prefix, directory-index routing must be handled\nat the viewer-request layer. By default, `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"buildchain\"` makes Buildchain install or update one CloudFront Function per\ndistribution before uploading payloads. The function rewrites any request path\nending in `/` to the corresponding `index.html`, so\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/index.html` and\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/docs/index.html`. This keeps multi-host preview roots\ncompatible with S3 REST origins, where copying alias objects such as\n`pr-29/buildchain` or `pr-29/buildchain/` is not a reliable substitute for an\nedge rewrite.\n\nIf the distribution already has a viewer-request function that owns preview\nalias routing and surface-prefix routing, set `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"external\"` on the deploy channel or surface override. In that mode Buildchain\ndoes not create, update, or attach a generic directory-index function. Instead,\nthe deployment manifest records `directoryIndexRewrite = \"external\"` and\n`directoryIndexStrategy = \"external-viewer-request-function\"`, then the normal\nhealth check still verifies every required root and nested surface URL. This is\nthe correct contract for shared preview distributions such as\n`site-libkungfu-dev`, where a generic function cannot replace the existing\nprefix router.\n\nBuildchain still writes directory-index alias objects during apply as\ncompatibility evidence, but root correctness comes from the viewer-request\nrewrite contract, not from extensionless S3 keys. If Buildchain-managed mode\nfinds a distribution with a different viewer-request function, apply fails\nclosed and records that conflict in the apply result instead of silently serving\n403s. The reusable workflow uploads `buildchain-web-surface-*-diagnostics`\nartifacts containing the apply and health JSON so the failing AWS operation or\nHTTP check is visible from the consumer run.\n\nIt can also execute a previously saved deploy plan. In that mode Buildchain\nrecomputes the local artifact hash before running AWS commands and fails closed\nif the artifact no longer matches the saved plan. Before any adapter operation,\nit also checks channel-aware JSON manifests in the artifact: top-level\n`canonicalHost` and declared `pages[].host` facts must belong to the plan's\nsurface hosts. A production plan therefore rejects staging/preview host facts\nbefore AWS apply:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode deploy-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --plan .buildchain/web-surface-staging-plan.json \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply deletes preview content, deletes the preview manifest, and\ninvalidates CloudFront:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode cleanup-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --event pull-request-closed \\\n  --pull-number 123 \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply can also execute a saved cleanup plan:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode cleanup-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --plan .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-plan.json \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nApply output records the channel, alias, source SHA, artifact hash, target\nbucket, object prefix, manifest key, all surface URLs, all surface bindings, CDN\ninvalidation paths, actor/run metadata, immutable preservation evidence, and\nevery adapter operation with\n`executed`, `exitCode`, `stdout`, and `stderr`. If an operation fails,\nBuildchain records the failed operation, stops subsequent adapter operations,\nand exits non-zero after writing the result JSON. Buildchain records secret\nreference names only; the runner must provide the AWS CLI and credentials\noutside Buildchain, typically through OIDC and the declared `secret_refs`.\n\n## Production Preflight And Health\n\nProduction promotion is not just `deploy-apply --channel production`. Before a\nlive production apply, the reusable workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode production-preflight \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --plan .buildchain/web-surface-production-plan.json \\\n  --execute true \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-preflight.json\n```\n\nThe production preflight checks that:\n\n- `channels.production` is canonical and indexable;\n- every surface has concrete production bucket and CloudFront targets;\n- every production surface URL is HTTPS;\n- the production AWS role can inspect the declared bucket and distribution;\n- CloudFront aliases cover every surface host, including product hosts such as\n  `kfd.libkungfu.dev`;\n- DNS resolves for every surface host.\n\nAfter preview, staging, and production apply, the workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode health-check \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --result .buildchain/web-surface-production-apply.json \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-health.json\n```\n\nWhen the apply result includes CloudFront invalidations from the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` adapter, health check waits for those invalidations to reach\n`Completed` before fetching public smoke URLs. This avoids reporting stale\nCloudFront 403 responses as deployment failures immediately after a successful\nS3 sync and invalidation request.\n\nAfter the invalidation wait, HTTP smoke checks also retry transient 403, 404, and\n5xx responses before recording failure. This keeps the public health signal\nstrict while absorbing short CloudFront edge propagation windows that can remain\nvisible after the invalidation waiter returns. By default, Buildchain attempts\neach HTTP smoke URL 12 times with a 10 second interval. Consumers can override\nthat window with `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_ATTEMPTS` and\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_INTERVAL_MS` when they need a\nsite-specific health policy.\n\nThe health check fetches every surface root URL and any nested smoke URLs\nrecorded in each surface binding. Nested smoke URLs are derived from nested HTML\nartifact files under the surface path prefix, with directory index resolution\nsuch as `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html` becoming `/docs/` on the buildchain\npreview host. If a surface has no nested HTML route, Buildchain records only\nthe root smoke URL; absence of nested HTML is not a deployment failure. When a\nnested route is present, the check fails closed if a deploy reports success but\nthat child page returns 403 or another unexpected status. Surface root checks\nexpect the apply result to have installed the directory-index rewrite, so a\nmulti-host preview root such as `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/`\nmust resolve to the surface `index.html`, not the bare prefix directory.\nProduction additionally fails if a response is unreachable, returns an\nunexpected status, or still sends `x-robots-tag: noindex`. The health check also\nverifies that each surface binding recorded a deployment manifest pointer. The\nproduction release passport embeds the deploy plan, apply result, production\npreflight, and health check so a reviewer or agent can audit why the production\nsite changed and whether every declared host and every existing nested route was\nactually covered.\n\nPublic channels can opt into object-level health with\n`deploy.<channel>.health_strategy = \"s3-object\"` when the deployment contract is\nalready covered by S3 manifest/object writes and public edge convergence is not\nthe right CI gate. This is useful for preview distributions whose viewer-request\nrouting is owned by an external CloudFront Function. The channel remains public;\nonly the CI health evidence changes from HTTP fetches to S3 `head-object`\nchecks.\n\nChannels declared with `access_control = \"managed-network\"` use a different\nhealth strategy by default. Buildchain does not require a GitHub-hosted runner\nto fetch a URL that is intentionally reachable only from an approved network.\nInstead, after a live apply the health check uses the deploy role to run S3\n`head-object` checks for each surface manifest and the smoke target object, such\nas the surface `index.html` or a nested `docs/index.html`. The check records\n`healthStrategy = \"s3-object\"` and skips the public HTTP fetch. Dry-run and\nplan-only checks fall back to deployment evidence: each surface must have a\nmanifest key, bucket, object prefix, `sync-static-artifact`, and\n`write-deployment-manifest` evidence, recorded as\n`healthStrategy = \"deployment-evidence\"`. If the workflow is running on a runner\nthat is allowed to reach the managed network, set\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_ALLOWED_RUNNER=true` or pass\n`--allowed-managed-network-runner true` to keep the normal HTTP smoke checks.\nSet `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_S3_OBJECTS=false` or pass\n`--managed-network-s3-object-verification false` only when an external channel\npolicy owns managed-network object verification.\n\n## Cleanup Plans\n\nPreview cleanup is an auditable cleanup contract. It can run as a dry-run plan,\nan apply-mode plan, or the explicit `cleanup-apply` executor with preview-only\ncredentials:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode cleanup-plan \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --event pull-request-closed \\\n  --pull-number 123 \\\n  --aliases pr-123,sha-abcdef123456\n```\n\nThe plan and apply result keep mutable PR aliases and immutable SHA aliases\ndistinct so a caller can expire them with different retention windows. Closed-PR\ncleanup can derive `pr-N` from `--pull-number`, records the event, source SHA,\nactor, run id, preview bucket/prefix, manifest key, and adapter steps, and is an\nauditable no-op when no aliases are requested.\n\n## Reusable Workflow Shape\n\nBuildchain ships `.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml` for repositories that want\nthe standard PR review and promotion flow without copying bespoke glue:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      build-command: npm run build\n      verify-command: npm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe reusable workflow maps GitHub events to Buildchain web-surface semantics:\n\n| Event | Buildchain behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `pull_request` opened / synchronized / reopened | validate, build, verify, and plan `preview` for `pr-N` |\n| `pull_request` closed | plan apply-mode cleanup for the `pr-N` preview alias and manifest |\n| `push` to `main` | validate, build, verify, plan and apply `staging` from the merged `main` SHA, then optionally open a production release PR |\n| `push` to `main` from a matching release PR merge | validate the associated release PR, plan `production`, and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n| `workflow_dispatch` with `production-approved = true` | plan `production` and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n\nThe optional `buildchain-ref` input is empty by default. Empty keeps the\nweb-surface run on the stable Buildchain runtime selected by the reusable\nworkflow ref, normally `@v2`. A trusted maintainer can expose a\n`workflow_dispatch` input and pass it through for one-off train validation.\nSee [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) for the shared\ntrain protocol and notification template:\n\n```yaml\non:\n  workflow_dispatch:\n    inputs:\n      buildchain-ref:\n        description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref for trusted manual validation\"\n        required: false\n        default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n      build-command: pnpm run build\n      verify-command: pnpm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nOnly trusted `workflow_dispatch` runs by repository actors with write,\nmaintain, or admin permission may use a non-empty runtime override. Train refs\nsuch as `train/v2/v2.3/site-source-of-truth` are temporary validation refs, not\nstable production dependencies or pending merge targets. They may remain for a\nretention window after release as a fast-use and rollback channel, with old\ntrains handled by periodic Buildchain cleanup. The web-surface deployment\nmanifest records the resolved runtime SHA as `runtimeId` and the stable\nrollback ref as `rollbackPointer`.\n\nThe workflow deliberately plans and emits manifests by default. Live mutation is\nopt-in per channel:\n\n```yaml\npermissions:\n  contents: read\n  id-token: write\n  pull-requests: write\n\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      build-command: pnpm run build\n      verify-command: pnpm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n      preview-apply: true\n      preview-cleanup-apply: true\n      preview-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-preview-github-actions\n      staging-apply: true\n      staging-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-staging-github-actions\n      production-apply: false\n      production-release-on-main: false\n      production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n      production-environment: production\n      release-feedback-actor-privacy: public\n```\n\nWhen enabled, Buildchain owns the full release apply state machine:\n\n- PR preview deploys run `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n  and update a single idempotent PR comment.\n- Closed PR cleanup runs `cleanup-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n  only.\n- Pushes to `main` run staging `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the staging\n  role, then write a staging release feedback passport artifact and comment the\n  associated merged PR with the staging URL, source SHA, artifact identity, run\n  URL, and failure context when apply did not complete.\n- When `production-release-on-main=true`, successful staging applies open or\n  update a Buildchain-owned release PR from\n  `release/<channel>-<short-sha>` to `main`, unless the current push already\n  came from a matching release PR merge. The release PR contains one empty\n  release-intent commit, carries `production-release-label`, and includes the\n  staging URLs, source SHA, artifact hash, and staging release-passport artifact\n  link in the PR body.\n- Production release PR handoff is permission-aware. Staging apply and staging\n  health remain successful even when the repository or organization has\n  GitHub Actions workflow permissions set to read-only. In that case Buildchain\n  records `release-pr-status=permission-denied`, uploads the release PR handoff\n  summary/body plus staging release passport artifacts, and writes an exact\n  manual `gh pr create` command to the step summary. Set\n  `fail-on-release-pr-error=true` only when PR creation failure should fail the\n  whole workflow.\n- Release pull requests that match the configured production gate get a\n  Buildchain review comment with the staging URL and production target, so the\n  operator can verify staging from the PR page and use merge as the approval\n  action. Consumers do not need to hand-write `gh pr create` or production\n  release-intent glue.\n- Production runs when `production-apply` is true and either:\n  - a trusted `workflow_dispatch` passes `production-approved=true`; or\n  - `production-release-on-main=true` and the `main` push commit is associated\n    with exactly one same-repository, merged release pull request matching\n    `production-release-label` and `production-release-head-prefix`.\n  The production job is then gated by the configured GitHub Environment.\n- Production apply writes a production release feedback passport artifact and\n  comments the release PR with the production URL, source SHA, artifact\n  identity, run URL, rollback pointer, and failure context when apply did not\n  complete.\n\nThe feedback passport records the release responsibility chain:\n\n- human decision actor;\n- trigger actor;\n- runner/execution actor;\n- OIDC/deploy identity reference;\n- decision type and time;\n- source event, PR number, merge commit, and required gate label/head-prefix.\n\n`release-feedback-actor-privacy` controls actor values in the passport and\ncomments. `public` records GitHub actor names, `redacted` records only the actor\nrole, and `private-ref` records a stable private reference hash without exposing\nthe actor name.\n\nFor release-PR publishing, callers opt in explicitly:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      build-command: npm run build\n      verify-command: npm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n      production-apply: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref_name == 'main' }}\n      production-release-on-main: true\n      production-release-label: buildchain-release\n      production-release-head-prefix: release/\n      production-release-branch-channel: production\n      production-release-pr-mode: auto\n      production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n      production-environment: production\n```\n\n`production-release-pr-mode` controls the post-staging handoff:\n\n| Mode | Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `auto` | Generate release PR facts, create/update the empty release-intent branch and PR, and label it when token permissions allow. This is the default. |\n| `summary-only` | Generate and upload release PR facts, body, passport evidence, and manual command, but do not call the GitHub PR API. |\n| `disabled` | Record a disabled handoff and skip release PR API calls. |\n\nAutomatic release PR creation normally uses the workflow `github.token`.\nConsumers that cannot enable \"GitHub Actions can create and approve pull\nrequests\" globally should prefer the first-class GitHub App path. Pass the App\nclient id as an input and the private key as a reusable workflow secret; Buildchain\ncreates an installation token inside the release PR job and uses it only for the\nrelease-intent branch, PR, and label operations:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n  production-release-app-client-id: ${{ vars.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_CLIENT_ID }}\nsecrets:\n  production-release-app-private-key: ${{ secrets.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}\n```\n\nWhen either side of the App configuration is missing, Buildchain does not hide\nthat behind the fallback `github.token`. The handoff JSON and job summary report\n`status: \"app-token-unavailable\"` with an `appTokenStatus` such as\n`missing-client-id`, `missing-private-key`, or `create-failed`, and still include\nthe manual PR creation command. If the repository intentionally uses another\nnarrow token, pass it through `production-release-pr-token`.\n\n`production-release-app-id` remains accepted as a deprecated alias for the input\nname, but the value should be the GitHub App client id. GitHub App numeric App\nIDs and client IDs are distinct, and Buildchain passes the value to\n`actions/create-github-app-token` through its non-deprecated `client-id` input so\nnew runs do not emit the deprecated `app-id` warning.\n\nIf a repository already generates its own narrow token or PAT, it can still pass\nthat through `production-release-pr-token`:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n  production-release-pr-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_PR_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nToken priority is: generated GitHub App installation token,\n`production-release-pr-token`, then `github.token`.\n\nThe merge button becomes the production approval only for a PR that carries the\nrelease label and comes from the configured source-branch prefix. Ordinary pull\nrequests merged into `main` deploy staging and open a release-intent PR; merging\nthat release PR triggers production. A release PR merge push does not open\nanother release PR.\n\nApply-only inputs are validated before the caller build or verification command\nruns. If the current event would run preview, staging, or production apply,\nmissing role inputs or a production apply without `production-approved=true`\non manual dispatch fail immediately instead of spending the build and plan jobs\nfirst.\n\nCallers must grant `id-token: write` for OIDC role assumption. Preview comments\nneed `pull-requests: write`. Automatic release PR creation also needs\n`contents: write`, `pull-requests: write`, and `issues: write` so Buildchain can\ncreate the release branch, write the empty release-intent commit, open or update\nthe PR, and apply the release label. If these permissions are unavailable,\nBuildchain degrades the release handoff instead of marking a successful staging\ndeployment as failed, unless `fail-on-release-pr-error=true`. The AWS roles remain caller-owned and\nshould be scoped by channel: preview can mutate only preview resources, staging\ncan mutate only staging resources, and production can mutate only production\nresources.\n\nApply mode fails closed when the deploy config still contains placeholder AWS\ntargets such as `pending-preview-distribution`. Planning can use placeholders\nfor dry-run-only design work, but live apply requires concrete bucket and\nCloudFront distribution identifiers.\n\n## Site Repository Shape\n\nA site repository can start with:\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"pnpm run build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"pnpm run check\"\n```\n\nThen add the channel, deploy, retention, and security declarations shown above.\nThe project may use pnpm, npm, yarn, Vite, Astro, Next static export, Sphinx,\nMkDocs, CMake-generated docs, or another lifecycle command source. Buildchain\nonly needs a deterministic artifact path and the manifest facts.\n\n## Boundaries\n\nBuildchain only performs live AWS mutations in explicit apply modes with\n`--dry-run false`. Production deploys must still be gated by a human-controlled\nworkflow, release, or GitHub Environment. DNS changes, staging auth\nimplementation, CloudFront distribution creation, and credential provisioning\nremain explicitly authorized infrastructure operations outside the web-surface\nartifact apply contract."
+      "markdown": "# Web-Surface Deployment Contract\n\nBuildchain supports `project.type = \"web-surface\"` for repositories that publish\nsites, docs, product pages, operator consoles, or browser apps. These projects\nneed auditable deployment semantics, but they are not package release lines and\nshould not be forced into `dev/alpha/release` version-state automation.\n\nThe release object for a web surface is:\n\n```text\nsource commit + build artifact + deploy target + channel + deployment manifest\n```\n\nThis keeps the evidence chain clear:\n\n- the source SHA explains what code was built;\n- the artifact hash explains exactly what was deployed;\n- the channel explains who can see it and whether it is promotable;\n- the deploy target and adapter explain where it would be published;\n- the deployment manifest records retention, rollback, security, and secret\n  reference metadata.\n\n## Configuration\n\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is the source of truth. Web-surface projects must declare\npreview, staging, and production channels plus a deploy adapter for each.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nrequires_auth = false\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[deploy.preview]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"kungfu-tech-preview\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-PREVIEW\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n# Optional. Defaults to \"buildchain\".\n# Use \"external\" when an existing viewer-request CloudFront Function already\n# owns preview alias, surface-prefix, and directory-index routing.\ndirectory_index_rewrite = \"buildchain\"\n# Optional. Defaults to HTTP for public channels and S3 object evidence for\n# managed-network channels. Use \"s3-object\" when CI should verify uploaded\n# objects and manifests instead of waiting for public edge convergence.\nhealth_strategy = \"http\"\n```\n\n### Multi-Surface Host Mapping\n\nSome site repositories publish more than one first-class web surface from the\nsame artifact. For example, `site-libkungfu-dev` has a hub plus separate\nhostnames for core, Buildchain, and Kung Fu Decisions. These are not just\nnavigation paths; staging, production preflight, and post-deploy health checks\nmust verify host-level behavior for each surface.\n\nDeclare named surfaces with per-channel URLs:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.buildchain]\npath = \"/buildchain/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://buildchain.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://buildchain.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://buildchain-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.kfd]\npath = \"/kfd/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://kfd.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://kfd.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://kfd-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n```\n\nBuildchain resolves every `(channel, surface)` pair. A preview alias such as\n`pr-12` becomes:\n\n```text\nhub:        https://pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\ncore:       https://core-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nbuildchain: https://buildchain-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nkfd:        https://kfd-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\n```\n\nWhen `surfaces` is omitted, Buildchain preserves the legacy single-surface\ncontract by creating an implicit `default` surface from the channel URL. When a\nsurface is intentionally path-only, declare it explicitly:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.docs]\npath = \"/docs/\"\npath_only = true\n```\n\n`path_only = true` is an exception, not the default. Without it, every named\nsurface must declare `preview_url_pattern`, `staging_url`, and\n`production_url`. This makes staging/production mismatches fail during\nvalidation instead of becoming invisible deploy drift.\n\nAdapter strategy remains explicit. The default `aws-s3-cloudfront` plan uses the\nchannel deploy target for every surface, and each binding records its own\nbucket, distribution id, object prefix, manifest key, source path, and URL. A\nchannel can override target details per surface:\n\n```toml\n[deploy.staging.surfaces.core]\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-core-staging\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-CORE-STAGING\"\norigin_path = \"/core\"\n```\n\nBuildchain validates these hard constraints:\n\n- `channels.preview.url_pattern` is required and must contain the alias shape\n  used by preview deployments.\n- `channels.staging.access_control` must protect staging. Supported modes are\n  `managed-network`, `edge-basic-auth`, `oidc`, and `app-auth`.\n- `channels.staging.edge_auth` records whether the edge layer owns auth. Use\n  `edge_auth = \"none\"` when staging is protected by managed network controls\n  such as WAF/IP allowlists or VPN access.\n- `channels.staging.noindex = true` is required.\n- `channels.production.url` is required.\n- deploy adapters must be declared per channel.\n- named surfaces must declare first-class URLs for every channel unless\n  `path_only = true` is explicitly set.\n- secret material must be declared as reference names, such as\n  `secret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]`; inline secret-like deploy keys are rejected.\n\n### Floating Runtime Contract Lock\n\nWeb-surface repositories can consume the stable Buildchain workflow shell with a\nfloating ref, such as:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  web:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n      buildchain-contract-compatibility-policy: major-compatible\n      buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n      build-command: pnpm build\n      artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe caller repository commits `.buildchain/contract-lock.json` after reviewing an\naccepted Buildchain runtime SHA and contract digest. The reusable workflow then\nresolves the floating runtime to an immutable SHA, checks the lock before the\ncaller build command, and applies these rules:\n\n- unchanged lock: continue without feedback;\n- compatible drift: continue, write the drift summary, and open or update a\n  caller-repository issue when permissions allow;\n- breaking drift: fail closed before rendering, deployment planning, deploy\n  apply, or release publication.\n\nThe caller no longer needs to run `scripts/buildchain-contract-lock.mjs` inside\nits own build command. That check belongs to Buildchain because the actual\ncontract world is stored in the Buildchain runtime ref being used.\n\nSupported adapter names are:\n\n| Adapter | Initial use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `aws-s3-cloudfront` | Static site artifact sync plus CDN invalidation plan |\n| `aws-elastic-beanstalk` | Future dynamic app environment adapter |\n| `aws-ecs-service` | Future dynamic service adapter |\n\nThe channel ontology is independent of the adapter. A future dynamic staging\nenvironment still remains `channel = \"staging\"` with protected/noindex/security\nrequirements.\n\n## Preview Aliases\n\nPreview uses subdomains, not path prefixes:\n\n```text\nhttps://pr-123.preview.kungfu.tech\nhttps://sha-abcdef123456.preview.kungfu.tech\n```\n\nAlias semantics are explicit:\n\n| Alias | Meaning | Mutable | Retention |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `pr-123` | Current preview for a pull request | yes | short-lived |\n| `sha-abcdef123456` | Immutable preview for one source SHA | no | longer-lived |\n\nThis allows PR comments to stay stable while preserving immutable evidence for a\nspecific source commit.\n\n## Deployment Manifest\n\nBuildchain emits a manifest with the deployment facts that matter for audit and\nrollback:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n  \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-deployment\",\n  \"site\": \"libkungfu-dev\",\n  \"channel\": \"preview\",\n  \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n  \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n  \"generatedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"publishedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"reproducible\": true,\n  \"timestampPolicy\": \"ci-injected\",\n  \"deterministicInputs\": [\n    \"web-surface artifact content\",\n    \"buildchain.toml web-surface channels/deploy/surfaces\",\n    \"sourceSha\",\n    \"artifactHash\",\n    \"deployment channel\",\n    \"deployment alias\"\n  ],\n  \"sourceRevision\": \"...\",\n  \"timestampPolicyDetails\": {\n    \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-surface-timestamp-policy\",\n    \"timestampFields\": [\"generatedAt\", \"publishedAt\", \"deployedAt\"],\n    \"timestampFieldsParticipateInArtifactDigest\": false,\n    \"artifactDigestScope\": \"web-surface artifactHash excludes deployment manifest timestamps\"\n  },\n  \"sourceSha\": \"...\",\n  \"artifactHash\": \"...\",\n  \"deployTarget\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n  \"adapter\": \"aws-s3-cloudfront\",\n  \"deployedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"retentionClass\": \"preview-sha-immutable\",\n  \"expiresAt\": \"2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z\",\n  \"accessControl\": \"none\",\n  \"edgeAuth\": \"none\",\n  \"noindex\": true,\n  \"secretRefs\": [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"],\n  \"surfaceBindings\": [\n    {\n      \"surface\": \"hub\",\n      \"channel\": \"preview\",\n      \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n      \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n      \"sourcePath\": \"/\",\n      \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n      \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n      \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n      \"directoryIndexResolution\": true,\n      \"canonicalUrl\": \"https://libkungfu.dev\",\n      \"bucket\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n      \"distributionId\": \"E-PREVIEW\",\n      \"originPath\": \"\",\n      \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n      \"manifestKey\": \".buildchain/deployments/sha-abcdef123456/hub.json\",\n      \"routing\": {\n        \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\",\n        \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n        \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n        \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n        \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n        \"directoryIndexResolution\": true\n      },\n      \"smokeUrls\": [\n        {\n          \"kind\": \"root\",\n          \"requestPath\": \"/\",\n          \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev/\",\n          \"required\": true\n        }\n      ],\n      \"noindex\": true,\n      \"accessControl\": \"none\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\nDynamic adapters can also fill `runtimeId`, `configFingerprint`,\n`healthCheck`, `migrationState`, `rollbackPointer`, and\n`rollbackLimitations`. Buildchain records secret reference names only, never\nsecret values.\n\nThe timestamp policy is shared with package site bundles. Public deployment\nmanifests should expose real workflow generation/publication times while\nseparately declaring why the deployed artifact remains reproducible. For\nweb-surface deployment manifests, `artifactHash` is the static site artifact\ndigest and does not include deployment timestamp fields; the manifest itself\nstill records those fields for human and agent audit.\n\n## Deploy Plans\n\nDeploy planning is the default behavior. It plans the adapter steps and writes\nmanifest JSON, but it does not touch AWS, DNS, CloudFront, or deployment\ncredentials.\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode deploy-plan \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --alias sha-aaaaaaaaaaaa\n```\n\nFor manifest-only output:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode manifest \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --alias pr-123 \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-manifest.json\n```\n\nThe CLI emits GitHub outputs when `GITHUB_OUTPUT` is present:\n\n- `web-surface-channel`\n- `web-surface-alias`\n- `web-surface-url`\n- `web-surface-urls-json`\n- `web-surface-artifact-hash`\n- `web-surface-manifest-json`\n\nThe reusable workflow resolves that same effective channel before running the\ncaller build or verify command. Both steps receive\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_CHANNEL` (`preview`, `staging`, or `production`) and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PREVIEW_ALIAS` for previews. Compatibility aliases\n`BUILDCHAIN_SURFACE_CHANNEL` and `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_ALIAS` are also\nprovided. Callers should consume these variables instead of reconstructing the\nrelease-intent state machine from raw GitHub events.\nAn unapproved manual canary resolves to `staging`; a trusted manual dispatch\nwith `production-approved=true` resolves to `production` through the same path.\n\n## Explicit Apply\n\n`deploy-apply` and `cleanup-apply` are explicit execution modes for the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` static-site adapter. They still default to `--dry-run true`;\nlive AWS mutation requires `--dry-run false`.\n\nDeploy apply syncs the artifact, writes the deployment manifest, and invalidates\nCloudFront when a distribution id is configured:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode deploy-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --channel staging \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --artifact-path dist \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\n### Immutable publication paths\n\nWhen a surface artifact contains `manifest.json` with\n`archivePolicy.contract = \"kungfu-buildchain-publication-archive-policy\"`,\nBuildchain treats every declared `publications[].versions[].immutablePath` as\nan append-only publication boundary. This applies identically to preview,\nstaging, and production adapters.\n\nThe adapter derives the protected archive root from those declared version\npaths and applies four ordered safeguards:\n\n1. every local immutable file is checked against an existing S3 object;\n2. missing files are uploaded with `aws s3 sync --no-overwrite` and a SHA-256\n   checksum;\n3. every immutable file is checked again after upload, closing the race between\n   the first check and the no-overwrite transfer;\n4. mutable site content keeps normal `sync --delete` behavior, but every parent\n   or owning surface sync excludes the protected archive root from deletion.\n\nAn existing object with a different SHA-256 digest fails apply before mutable\ncontent is changed. Older objects without a stored S3 SHA-256 checksum are read\nand byte-hashed for compatibility. Directory-index alias writes are skipped\nunder protected roots so they cannot overwrite immutable route objects; viewer\nrequest rewriting remains the directory-index authority.\n\nThe deploy plan and manifest record `immutablePublication`,\n`mutableDeleteExcludes`, and the parent-surface coverage. Apply output records\n`immutablePreservation` plus every pre-check, no-overwrite sync, post-check, and\nmutable sync operation. Health output adds an `__immutable__` check proving that\nthe owning and parent surface syncs carried their required delete exclusions.\nThe runner must provide an AWS CLI version whose `s3 sync` supports\n`--no-overwrite`.\n\nFor multi-surface sites, each surface host is treated as a root-relative view\nof that surface's artifact path prefix. For example, a `buildchain` surface with\n`path = \"/buildchain/\"` and preview URL\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev` syncs the artifact subtree\n`dist/buildchain/` to the preview object prefix `pr-29/buildchain`. A viewer\nrequest for `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` therefore\nresolves against the artifact's `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html`, not\n`dist/docs/index.html` and not the hub surface root. The deployment manifest\nrecords this as `routing.contract =\n\"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\"` with\n`viewerPathPrefix = \"/\"`, `artifactPathPrefix = \"buildchain\"`, and\n`directoryIndexResolution = true`.\n\nWhen a surface uses an S3 object prefix, directory-index routing must be handled\nat the viewer-request layer. By default, `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"buildchain\"` makes Buildchain install or update one CloudFront Function per\ndistribution before uploading payloads. The function rewrites any request path\nending in `/` to the corresponding `index.html`, so\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/index.html` and\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/docs/index.html`. This keeps multi-host preview roots\ncompatible with S3 REST origins, where copying alias objects such as\n`pr-29/buildchain` or `pr-29/buildchain/` is not a reliable substitute for an\nedge rewrite.\n\nIf the distribution already has a viewer-request function that owns preview\nalias routing and surface-prefix routing, set `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"external\"` on the deploy channel or surface override. In that mode Buildchain\ndoes not create, update, or attach a generic directory-index function. Instead,\nthe deployment manifest records `directoryIndexRewrite = \"external\"` and\n`directoryIndexStrategy = \"external-viewer-request-function\"`, then the normal\nhealth check still verifies every required root and nested surface URL. This is\nthe correct contract for shared preview distributions such as\n`site-libkungfu-dev`, where a generic function cannot replace the existing\nprefix router.\n\nBuildchain still writes directory-index alias objects during apply as\ncompatibility evidence, but root correctness comes from the viewer-request\nrewrite contract, not from extensionless S3 keys. If Buildchain-managed mode\nfinds a distribution with a different viewer-request function, apply fails\nclosed and records that conflict in the apply result instead of silently serving\n403s. The reusable workflow uploads `buildchain-web-surface-*-diagnostics`\nartifacts containing the apply and health JSON so the failing AWS operation or\nHTTP check is visible from the consumer run.\n\nIt can also execute a previously saved deploy plan. In that mode Buildchain\nrecomputes the local artifact hash before running AWS commands and fails closed\nif the artifact no longer matches the saved plan. Before any adapter operation,\nit also checks channel-aware JSON manifests in the artifact: top-level\n`canonicalHost` and declared `pages[].host` facts must belong to the plan's\nsurface hosts. A production plan therefore rejects staging/preview host facts\nbefore AWS apply:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode deploy-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --plan .buildchain/web-surface-staging-plan.json \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply deletes preview content, deletes the preview manifest, and\ninvalidates CloudFront:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode cleanup-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --event pull-request-closed \\\n  --pull-number 123 \\\n  --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply can also execute a saved cleanup plan:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode cleanup-apply \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --plan .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-plan.json \\\n  --dry-run false \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nApply output records the channel, alias, source SHA, artifact hash, target\nbucket, object prefix, manifest key, all surface URLs, all surface bindings, CDN\ninvalidation paths, actor/run metadata, immutable preservation evidence, and\nevery adapter operation with\n`executed`, `exitCode`, `stdout`, and `stderr`. If an operation fails,\nBuildchain records the failed operation, stops subsequent adapter operations,\nand exits non-zero after writing the result JSON. Buildchain records secret\nreference names only; the runner must provide the AWS CLI and credentials\noutside Buildchain, typically through OIDC and the declared `secret_refs`.\n\n## Production Preflight And Health\n\nProduction promotion is not just `deploy-apply --channel production`. Before a\nlive production apply, the reusable workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode production-preflight \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --plan .buildchain/web-surface-production-plan.json \\\n  --execute true \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-preflight.json\n```\n\nThe production preflight checks that:\n\n- `channels.production` is canonical and indexable;\n- every surface has concrete production bucket and CloudFront targets;\n- every production surface URL is HTTPS;\n- the production AWS role can inspect the declared bucket and distribution;\n- CloudFront aliases cover every surface host, including product hosts such as\n  `kfd.libkungfu.dev`;\n- DNS resolves for every surface host.\n\nAfter preview, staging, and production apply, the workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode health-check \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --result .buildchain/web-surface-production-apply.json \\\n  --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-health.json\n```\n\nWhen the apply result includes CloudFront invalidations from the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` adapter, health check waits for those invalidations to reach\n`Completed` before fetching public smoke URLs. This avoids reporting stale\nCloudFront 403 responses as deployment failures immediately after a successful\nS3 sync and invalidation request.\n\nAfter the invalidation wait, HTTP smoke checks also retry transient 403, 404, and\n5xx responses before recording failure. This keeps the public health signal\nstrict while absorbing short CloudFront edge propagation windows that can remain\nvisible after the invalidation waiter returns. By default, Buildchain attempts\neach HTTP smoke URL 12 times with a 10 second interval. Consumers can override\nthat window with `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_ATTEMPTS` and\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_INTERVAL_MS` when they need a\nsite-specific health policy.\n\nThe health check fetches every surface root URL and any nested smoke URLs\nrecorded in each surface binding. Nested smoke URLs are derived from nested HTML\nartifact files under the surface path prefix, with directory index resolution\nsuch as `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html` becoming `/docs/` on the buildchain\npreview host. If a surface has no nested HTML route, Buildchain records only\nthe root smoke URL; absence of nested HTML is not a deployment failure. When a\nnested route is present, the check fails closed if a deploy reports success but\nthat child page returns 403 or another unexpected status. Surface root checks\nexpect the apply result to have installed the directory-index rewrite, so a\nmulti-host preview root such as `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/`\nmust resolve to the surface `index.html`, not the bare prefix directory.\nProduction additionally fails if a response is unreachable, returns an\nunexpected status, or still sends `x-robots-tag: noindex`. The health check also\nverifies that each surface binding recorded a deployment manifest pointer. The\nproduction release passport embeds the deploy plan, apply result, production\npreflight, and health check so a reviewer or agent can audit why the production\nsite changed and whether every declared host and every existing nested route was\nactually covered.\n\nPublic channels can opt into object-level health with\n`deploy.<channel>.health_strategy = \"s3-object\"` when the deployment contract is\nalready covered by S3 manifest/object writes and public edge convergence is not\nthe right CI gate. This is useful for preview distributions whose viewer-request\nrouting is owned by an external CloudFront Function. The channel remains public;\nonly the CI health evidence changes from HTTP fetches to S3 `head-object`\nchecks.\n\nChannels declared with `access_control = \"managed-network\"` use a different\nhealth strategy by default. Buildchain does not require a GitHub-hosted runner\nto fetch a URL that is intentionally reachable only from an approved network.\nInstead, after a live apply the health check uses the deploy role to run S3\n`head-object` checks for each surface manifest and the smoke target object, such\nas the surface `index.html` or a nested `docs/index.html`. The check records\n`healthStrategy = \"s3-object\"` and skips the public HTTP fetch. Dry-run and\nplan-only checks fall back to deployment evidence: each surface must have a\nmanifest key, bucket, object prefix, `sync-static-artifact`, and\n`write-deployment-manifest` evidence, recorded as\n`healthStrategy = \"deployment-evidence\"`. If the workflow is running on a runner\nthat is allowed to reach the managed network, set\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_ALLOWED_RUNNER=true` or pass\n`--allowed-managed-network-runner true` to keep the normal HTTP smoke checks.\nSet `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_S3_OBJECTS=false` or pass\n`--managed-network-s3-object-verification false` only when an external channel\npolicy owns managed-network object verification.\n\n## Cleanup Plans\n\nPreview cleanup is an auditable cleanup contract. It can run as a dry-run plan,\nan apply-mode plan, or the explicit `cleanup-apply` executor with preview-only\ncredentials:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n  --mode cleanup-plan \\\n  --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n  --event pull-request-closed \\\n  --pull-number 123 \\\n  --aliases pr-123,sha-abcdef123456\n```\n\nThe plan and apply result keep mutable PR aliases and immutable SHA aliases\ndistinct so a caller can expire them with different retention windows. Closed-PR\ncleanup can derive `pr-N` from `--pull-number`, records the event, source SHA,\nactor, run id, preview bucket/prefix, manifest key, and adapter steps, and is an\nauditable no-op when no aliases are requested.\n\n## Reusable Workflow Shape\n\nBuildchain ships `.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml` for repositories that want\nthe standard PR review and promotion flow without copying bespoke glue:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      build-command: npm run build\n      verify-command: npm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe reusable workflow maps GitHub events to Buildchain web-surface semantics:\n\n| Event | Buildchain behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `pull_request` opened / synchronized / reopened | validate, build, verify, and plan `preview` for `pr-N` |\n| `pull_request` closed | plan apply-mode cleanup for the `pr-N` preview alias and manifest |\n| `push` to `main` | validate, build, verify, plan and apply `staging` from the merged `main` SHA, then optionally open a production release PR |\n| `push` to `main` from a matching release PR merge | validate the associated release PR, plan `production`, and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n| `workflow_dispatch` with `production-approved = true` | plan `production` and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n\nThe optional `buildchain-ref` input is empty by default. Empty keeps the\nweb-surface run on the stable Buildchain runtime selected by the reusable\nworkflow ref, normally `@v2`. A trusted maintainer can expose a\n`workflow_dispatch` input and pass it through for one-off train validation.\nSee [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) for the shared\ntrain protocol and notification template:\n\n```yaml\non:\n  workflow_dispatch:\n    inputs:\n      buildchain-ref:\n        description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref for trusted manual validation\"\n        required: false\n        default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n      build-command: pnpm run build\n      verify-command: pnpm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nOnly trusted `workflow_dispatch` runs by repository actors with write,\nmaintain, or admin permission may use a non-empty runtime override. Train refs\nsuch as `train/v2/v2.3/site-source-of-truth` are temporary validation refs, not\nstable production dependencies or pending merge targets. They may remain for a\nretention window after release as a fast-use and rollback channel, with old\ntrains handled by periodic Buildchain cleanup. The web-surface deployment\nmanifest records the resolved runtime SHA as `runtimeId` and the stable\nrollback ref as `rollbackPointer`.\n\nThe workflow deliberately plans and emits manifests by default. Live mutation is\nopt-in per channel:\n\n```yaml\npermissions:\n  contents: read\n  id-token: write\n  pull-requests: write\n\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      build-command: pnpm run build\n      verify-command: pnpm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n      preview-apply: true\n      preview-cleanup-apply: true\n      preview-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-preview-github-actions\n      staging-apply: true\n      staging-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-staging-github-actions\n      production-apply: false\n      production-release-on-main: false\n      production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n      production-environment: production\n      release-feedback-actor-privacy: public\n```\n\nWhen enabled, Buildchain owns the full release apply state machine:\n\n- PR preview deploys run `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n  and update a single idempotent PR comment.\n- Closed PR cleanup runs `cleanup-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n  only.\n- Pushes to `main` run staging `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the staging\n  role, then write a staging release feedback passport artifact and comment the\n  associated merged PR with the staging URL, source SHA, artifact identity, run\n  URL, and failure context when apply did not complete.\n- When `production-release-on-main=true`, successful staging applies open or\n  update a Buildchain-owned release PR from\n  `release/<channel>-<short-sha>` to `main`, unless the current push already\n  came from a matching release PR merge. The release PR contains one empty\n  release-intent commit, carries `production-release-label`, and includes the\n  staging URLs, source SHA, artifact hash, and staging release-passport artifact\n  link in the PR body.\n- Production release PR handoff is permission-aware. Staging apply and staging\n  health remain successful even when the repository or organization has\n  GitHub Actions workflow permissions set to read-only. In that case Buildchain\n  records `release-pr-status=permission-denied`, uploads the release PR handoff\n  summary/body plus staging release passport artifacts, and writes an exact\n  manual `gh pr create` command to the step summary. Set\n  `fail-on-release-pr-error=true` only when PR creation failure should fail the\n  whole workflow.\n- Release pull requests that match the configured production gate get a\n  Buildchain review comment with the staging URL and production target, so the\n  operator can verify staging from the PR page and use merge as the approval\n  action. Consumers do not need to hand-write `gh pr create` or production\n  release-intent glue.\n- Production runs when `production-apply` is true and either:\n  - a `workflow_dispatch` passes `production-approved=true` and the triggering\n    actor currently has `write`, `maintain`, or `admin` permission; or\n  - `production-release-on-main=true` and the `main` push commit is associated\n    with exactly one same-repository, merged release pull request matching\n    `production-release-label` and `production-release-head-prefix`.\n  The production job is then gated by the configured GitHub Environment.\n- Before production artifact download, Buildchain assembles a managed sealed\n  publication capability from the exact source/runtime SHAs, production plan\n  and artifact hash, a qualifying pre-publication controller receipt, the\n  trusted manual or reviewed-release-PR decision, production Environment and\n  AWS role target, an ephemeral-runner receipt, and a fresh nonce. Production\n  revalidates that capability against the downloaded plan before it downloads\n  product bytes. The later AWS OIDC exchange remains the provider's final\n  transaction-time authorization decision and fails closed before deploy apply.\n- The `publication-*-json` inputs are an advanced external-evidence\n  compatibility path, not a prerequisite for the standard release-PR or trusted\n  manual mechanisms. External evidence must now include\n  `publication-gate-aggregate-json`; supplying only a partial set still fails\n  closed.\n- Production apply writes a production release feedback passport artifact and\n  comments the release PR with the production URL, source SHA, artifact\n  identity, run URL, rollback pointer, and failure context when apply did not\n  complete.\n\nThe feedback passport records the release responsibility chain:\n\n- human decision actor;\n- trigger actor;\n- runner/execution actor;\n- OIDC/deploy identity reference;\n- decision type and time;\n- source event, PR number, merge commit, and required gate label/head-prefix.\n\n`release-feedback-actor-privacy` controls actor values in the passport and\ncomments. `public` records GitHub actor names, `redacted` records only the actor\nrole, and `private-ref` records a stable private reference hash without exposing\nthe actor name.\n\nFor release-PR publishing, callers opt in explicitly:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n  web-surface:\n    uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n    with:\n      build-command: npm run build\n      verify-command: npm run check\n      artifact-path: dist\n      production-apply: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref_name == 'main' }}\n      production-release-on-main: true\n      production-release-label: buildchain-release\n      production-release-head-prefix: release/\n      production-release-branch-channel: production\n      production-release-pr-mode: auto\n      production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n      production-environment: production\n```\n\n`production-release-pr-mode` controls the post-staging handoff:\n\n| Mode | Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `auto` | Generate release PR facts, create/update the empty release-intent branch and PR, and label it when token permissions allow. This is the default. |\n| `summary-only` | Generate and upload release PR facts, body, passport evidence, and manual command, but do not call the GitHub PR API. |\n| `disabled` | Record a disabled handoff and skip release PR API calls. |\n\nAutomatic release PR creation normally uses the workflow `github.token`.\nConsumers that cannot enable \"GitHub Actions can create and approve pull\nrequests\" globally should prefer the first-class GitHub App path. Pass the App\nclient id as an input and the private key as a reusable workflow secret; Buildchain\ncreates an installation token inside the release PR job and uses it only for the\nrelease-intent branch, PR, and label operations:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n  production-release-app-client-id: ${{ vars.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_CLIENT_ID }}\nsecrets:\n  production-release-app-private-key: ${{ secrets.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}\n```\n\nWhen either side of the App configuration is missing, Buildchain does not hide\nthat behind the fallback `github.token`. The handoff JSON and job summary report\n`status: \"app-token-unavailable\"` with an `appTokenStatus` such as\n`missing-client-id`, `missing-private-key`, or `create-failed`, and still include\nthe manual PR creation command. If the repository intentionally uses another\nnarrow token, pass it through `production-release-pr-token`.\n\n`production-release-app-id` remains accepted as a deprecated alias for the input\nname, but the value should be the GitHub App client id. GitHub App numeric App\nIDs and client IDs are distinct, and Buildchain passes the value to\n`actions/create-github-app-token` through its non-deprecated `client-id` input so\nnew runs do not emit the deprecated `app-id` warning.\n\nIf a repository already generates its own narrow token or PAT, it can still pass\nthat through `production-release-pr-token`:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n  production-release-pr-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_PR_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nToken priority is: generated GitHub App installation token,\n`production-release-pr-token`, then `github.token`.\n\nThe merge button becomes the production approval only for a PR that carries the\nrelease label and comes from the configured source-branch prefix. Ordinary pull\nrequests merged into `main` deploy staging and open a release-intent PR; merging\nthat release PR triggers production. A release PR merge push does not open\nanother release PR.\n\nApply-only inputs are validated before the caller build or verification command\nruns. If the current event would run preview, staging, or production apply,\nmissing role inputs, a production apply without `production-approved=true` on\nmanual dispatch, or a manual actor without repository write authority fail\nimmediately instead of spending the build and plan jobs first.\n\nCallers must grant `id-token: write` for OIDC role assumption. Preview comments\nneed `pull-requests: write`. Automatic release PR creation also needs\n`contents: write`, `pull-requests: write`, and `issues: write` so Buildchain can\ncreate the release branch, write the empty release-intent commit, open or update\nthe PR, and apply the release label. If these permissions are unavailable,\nBuildchain degrades the release handoff instead of marking a successful staging\ndeployment as failed, unless `fail-on-release-pr-error=true`. The AWS roles remain caller-owned and\nshould be scoped by channel: preview can mutate only preview resources, staging\ncan mutate only staging resources, and production can mutate only production\nresources.\n\nApply mode fails closed when the deploy config still contains placeholder AWS\ntargets such as `pending-preview-distribution`. Planning can use placeholders\nfor dry-run-only design work, but live apply requires concrete bucket and\nCloudFront distribution identifiers.\n\n## Site Repository Shape\n\nA site repository can start with:\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"pnpm run build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"pnpm run check\"\n```\n\nThen add the channel, deploy, retention, and security declarations shown above.\nThe project may use pnpm, npm, yarn, Vite, Astro, Next static export, Sphinx,\nMkDocs, CMake-generated docs, or another lifecycle command source. Buildchain\nonly needs a deterministic artifact path and the manifest facts.\n\n## Boundaries\n\nBuildchain only performs live AWS mutations in explicit apply modes with\n`--dry-run false`. Production deploys must still be gated by a human-controlled\nworkflow, release, or GitHub Environment. DNS changes, staging auth\nimplementation, CloudFront distribution creation, and credential provisioning\nremain explicitly authorized infrastructure operations outside the web-surface\nartifact apply contract."
     },
     {
       "id": "fixture:infra-contract-aws-cdk-shaped",
@@ -2483,7 +2488,7 @@
       "path": "docs/MAP.md",
       "plane": "use",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:ce439062d4ed9d8213499e607825afdcf8a65f825343a657d0438f3e229a0af0"
+      "digest": "sha256:a9a9594c0bd9584b145a8f41847db83e297c1c4d1b8b2d7c4bf8d10264ab1cef"
     },
     {
       "id": "install",
@@ -2515,7 +2520,7 @@
       "path": "docs/publication-authority.md",
       "plane": "verify",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:920d4f14902ded1999f46d39f6d02db8cb5be6f22e376f6f2d456b3a1cc0c674"
+      "digest": "sha256:e191d248a52fc6488aef48050949ed0fd31064ab2a64cca2a5b529eeb68f0ff6"
     },
     {
       "id": "release-candidate",
@@ -2531,7 +2536,7 @@
       "path": "docs/release-propagation.md",
       "plane": "use",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:55895694a32b76dfaf5ed0eb9e32f1e10bd859fb590d6f4504d36692ebe61ea9"
+      "digest": "sha256:d5877075eb41a3d41e531549da113756d29d6f34c91e3b68b8ce650753d5ca1d"
     },
     {
       "id": "readme-badges",
@@ -2619,7 +2624,7 @@
       "path": "docs/cli.md",
       "plane": "use",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:ef5be4484da8628b9e027f00fe0fdb5b295665ed23eeceefac48e63581f12c0c"
+      "digest": "sha256:a7a31bbec048acbc9759324c5421c7ea0734f394f8d6705b63d70654867fdfa6"
     },
     {
       "id": "build-facts",
@@ -2667,7 +2672,7 @@
       "path": "docs/release-governance.md",
       "plane": "why",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:cb6aafc3410c0e72da3d9c3ba330421005af27c3c67665a2f3356603f02da84a"
+      "digest": "sha256:e97fd55d09facff9a6a5087fca5881d9756f33e791c9c3b9f9a8164ed2030c1d"
     },
     {
       "id": "release-flow",
@@ -2675,7 +2680,7 @@
       "path": "docs/release-flow.md",
       "plane": "verify",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:c05905de6a905d1ce0dd977986175b8bc1ad908c6c2eee946809693ea2cb91de"
+      "digest": "sha256:a2f68d42f34acc35940e135285df5ba510d91b15b9d9ede8cabbe8bfa6ab0305"
     },
     {
       "id": "runtime-train-validation",
@@ -2691,7 +2696,7 @@
       "path": "docs/versioning.md",
       "plane": "why",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:280d30e15552ab6a362cb121a7a1cafc3b907913cdc7d4d8a9e8e1930d856f7e"
+      "digest": "sha256:c3dce313b846fb36c69e4a725d086226ff2e875c376cc10e8554a0aff2f67c93"
     },
     {
       "id": "web-surface-deployments",
@@ -2699,7 +2704,7 @@
       "path": "docs/web-surface-deployments.md",
       "plane": "use",
       "exists": true,
-      "digest": "sha256:f1e92ba87417dc9aac4f8cf080565f7f2c114b5007bb68b90f33692c73fdad88"
+      "digest": "sha256:797d8f0e81974a49125b17256bb8b4a85fc60673e06d6bbecbbf399651163437"
     }
   ],
   "releaseModel": {