@kungfu-tech/buildchain 2.12.1 → 2.12.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +10 -5
- package/dist/site/buildchain-contract.json +6 -6
- package/dist/site/buildchain-site.json +73 -21
- package/dist/site/capability-registry.json +2 -2
- package/dist/site/kfd-claims.json +59 -10
- package/dist/site/kfd-upstream-aggregate.json +1 -1
- package/dist/site/manual-registry.json +3 -3
- package/dist/site/node-api-registry.json +1 -1
- package/dist/site/page-registry.json +62 -11
- package/dist/site/public-surface-audit.json +40 -7
- package/dist/site/publication-registry.json +4 -4
- package/dist/site/site-manifest.json +7 -7
- package/dist/site/workflow-registry.json +35 -3
- package/docs/MAP.md +2 -1
- package/docs/lifecycle-protocol.md +16 -0
- package/docs/release-governance.md +7 -0
- package/docs/shifu-gate-profiles.md +163 -0
- package/docs/stable-candidate-patrol.md +23 -3
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/packages/core/release-candidate.js +42 -0
- package/scripts/build-contract-core.mjs +21 -4
- package/scripts/check-inventory.mjs +4 -0
- package/scripts/gate-profile-core.mjs +413 -0
- package/scripts/generate-release-candidate-passport.mjs +4 -0
- package/scripts/shifu-gate-profile.mjs +351 -0
- package/scripts/stable-candidate-patrol.mjs +4 -0
|
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
|
|
8
8
|
"rendererOwner": "site repository",
|
|
9
9
|
"rule": "Site repositories render these markdown pages and metadata; they do not maintain separate Buildchain product copy."
|
|
10
10
|
},
|
|
11
|
-
"pageCount":
|
|
11
|
+
"pageCount": 47,
|
|
12
12
|
"categories": [
|
|
13
13
|
"action",
|
|
14
14
|
"api",
|
|
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
|
|
|
40
40
|
],
|
|
41
41
|
"maturity": "stable",
|
|
42
42
|
"sourcePath": "README.md",
|
|
43
|
-
"digest": "sha256:
|
|
43
|
+
"digest": "sha256:87e65f180b035d01e6ed9838210bb4b9f0e11bc0f709c8f7254f2c742d8a4899",
|
|
44
44
|
"headings": [
|
|
45
45
|
{
|
|
46
46
|
"level": 1,
|
|
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
|
|
|
98
98
|
"anchor": "read-next"
|
|
99
99
|
}
|
|
100
100
|
],
|
|
101
|
-
"markdown": "# Buildchain\n\n<!-- buildchain:badges:start -->\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/blob/HEAD/LICENSE)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/workflows/verify.yml)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/workflows/binary-distribution.yml)\n<!-- buildchain:badges:end -->\n\nBuildchain Release Passport is a mature product release record for artifacts\nthat users or agents depend on.\n\nBuildchain by Kungfu uses GitHub as the execution and trust substrate: protected\nrefs, reviewed promotion PRs, exact tags, GitHub Releases, npm Trusted\nPublishing, and machine-readable evidence. Its job is to turn release intent\ninto an auditable product record, not to ask a repository to migrate away from\nits existing CI.\n\nThe same mechanism releases Buildchain itself.\n\n## Install and Verify\n\nFor standalone use, install a platform archive from a GitHub Release and verify\nthe release passport before trusting the binary:\n\n```bash\n# Example for Linux x64. Use the archive that matches your platform.\ncurl -LO https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.2.1/buildchain-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz\ncurl -LO https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.2.1/buildchain.release.json\ncurl -LO https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.2.1/artifact-evidence.json\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain verify release-passport buildchain.release.json\ntar -xzf buildchain-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz\n./buildchain version\n```\n\nRelease pages publish platform archives, checksums, release passport files, and\na single evidence bundle:\n\n- `buildchain-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz`\n- `buildchain-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.gz`\n- `buildchain-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.zip`\n- `checksums.txt`\n- `buildchain.release.json`\n- `artifact-evidence.json`\n- `product-mechanism.json`\n- `impact.json`\n- `agent-index.json`\n- `check-report.json`\n- `llms.txt`\n- `buildchain-release-bundle.tar.gz`\n- `buildchain-release-bundle.json`\n\nLoose top-level `buildchain` and `buildchain.exe` assets are intentionally not\npublished. The executable lives inside each platform archive, which prevents\nLinux and macOS artifacts from overwriting each other in a merged release lane.\n\nFor npm consumers:\n\n```bash\nnpm install -D @kungfu-tech/buildchain\nnpx buildchain version\nnpx buildchain doctor --json\n```\n\nThe npm package is also the Buildchain toolkit. Use the command when a workflow\nor shell step needs an executable; use the ESM APIs directly from JavaScript\nbuild scripts. JavaScript callers should import the package instead of spawning\nthe CLI or unpacking the standalone binary:\n\n```js\nimport {\n createBuildchainLogger,\n verifyBuildchainLogEvents,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({\n path: \".buildchain/logs/native-build.jsonl\",\n source: \"user\",\n component: \"native-build\",\n});\n\nawait logger.span(\"native.compile\", { phase: \"build\" }, async () => {\n await compileNativeTargets();\n});\n\nconst report = verifyBuildchainLogEvents({\n path: logger.path,\n requireEvents: [\"native.compile.start\", \"native.compile.end\"],\n});\n```\n\nThe package also ships `dist/site/` as the Buildchain-owned fact source for\n`buildchain.libkungfu.dev`.\n\nRepositories can also generate README status badges from Buildchain-owned facts\ninstead of hand-maintaining badge Markdown:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain badges bundle --check\nbuildchain badges bundle --write\nbuildchain badges readme --check\nbuildchain badges readme --write\n```\n\n## Project Governance\n\n- [`LICENSE-POLICY.md`](LICENSE-POLICY.md) explains the Apache-2.0 project\n license, DCO-based contributions, and third-party notice boundary.\n- [`TRADEMARK.md`](TRADEMARK.md) explains official project marks and fork\n identity boundaries.\n- [`ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](ACCEPTABLE_USE.md) explains acceptable use of official\n services and maintainer-operated infrastructure.\n- [`PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md) explains the official\n posture for GitHub, npm, cloud, credential, release evidence, and other\n provider integrations.\n- [`SECURITY.md`](SECURITY.md) explains private vulnerability reporting.\n\nNative build consumers can import the diagnostics toolkit instead of copying\nrepository-local probes:\n\n```js\nimport {\n collectBuildchainDiagnostics,\n collectRunnerDiagnostics,\n writeDiagnosticsArtifact,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/diagnostics\";\n\nwriteDiagnosticsArtifact(\".buildchain/artifacts/diagnostics.json\", {\n contract: \"consumer-build-diagnostics\",\n buildchain: collectBuildchainDiagnostics({ cwd: process.cwd() }),\n runner: collectRunnerDiagnostics(),\n});\n```\n\n`buildchain lifecycle run` writes a small `diagnostics.json` next to the\nplatform manifest. It includes lifecycle-wide observability, runner/tool/cache\nsnapshots, Git state, and links to the larger manifest and artifact outputs.\n\nConsumers can report Buildchain-owned workflow failures directly to the\nBuildchain repository with a scoped issue-write token:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/report-buildchain-issue@v2\n if: failure()\n with:\n token: ${{ steps.buildchain-issue-token.outputs.token }}\n summary: \"Reusable build failed before artifact finalization\"\n failure-code: reusable-build-failed\n buildchain-ref: v2\n diagnostics-path: .buildchain/artifacts/diagnostics.json\n```\n\nThe action deduplicates by fingerprint, comments on existing open reports, and\nis fail-soft by default so issue reporting does not hide the original failure.\nUse `report-kind: workflow-friction` when Buildchain workflows should report\ntheir own repeated release friction back to the Buildchain issue tracker.\n\n## Use Buildchain\n\nBootstrap a repository:\n\n```bash\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain init --type package --package-manager pnpm\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain validate --require-version-state\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain release --dry-run --target-ref alpha/v2/v2.2\n```\n\nBuildchain supports package and non-package projects through\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml`. Legacy root `buildchain.toml` files remain\nreadable, but new consumers should keep Buildchain-owned files under\n`.buildchain/`:\n\n```text\n.buildchain/buildchain.toml\n.buildchain/contract-lock.json\n.buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/surfaces.json\n.buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json\n```\n\nLifecycle commands can call pnpm, npm, yarn, pip, Conan, CMake, Make, custom\nscripts, or any other command that can run in the repository checkout.\n\nThe KFD entrypoint is `buildchain kfd`. Buildchain currently provides concrete\nKFD-1 contract-world, KFD-2 trust-claim, and KFD-3 collaboration-surface\nworkflows; KFD-4 is exposed as schema-only until a verification protocol exists.\n\nBuildchain's active GitHub Action surface is deliberately small:\n\n- `actions/validate-config`\n- `actions/run-lifecycle`\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref`\n- `actions/report-buildchain-issue`\n\nThe active reusable workflow surfaces are:\n\n- `.github/workflows/.build.yml` for deterministic multi-platform build and\n artifact contracts;\n- `.github/workflows/build.yml` for the single-config channel router that uses\n `vN-alpha` during development/prerelease work and `vN` for stable releases;\n- `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml` for post-merge\n promote-only publication from a PR-stage release candidate, without a second\n heavy build;\n- `.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml` for preview, staging, production, and\n cleanup plans for site/app repositories;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for protected release\n promotion and version-state transactions;\n- `.github/workflows/binary-distribution.yml` for Buildchain's own release\n passport proof case.\n\nStable consumers should reference actions and workflows through floating major\nrefs after reviewing the exact release passport:\n\n```yaml\nuses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n```\n\n```yaml\nuses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/build.yml@v2\n```\n\n```yaml\nuses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml@v2\n```\n\n## Release Model\n\nBuildchain treats a reviewed branch merge as release intent:\n\n| Merge path | Meaning | Exact tag | Floating refs |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `dev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y` | publish the next testable alpha for a minor line | `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N` | `vX.Y-alpha`, `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y` |\n| `alpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y` | publish production for that minor line | `vX.Y.Z` | `vX.Y`, usually `vX`, `release/vX/vX.Y` |\n| `release/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major` | publish the next major from a reviewed production line | `v(X+1).0.0` | `v(X+1)`, `v(X+1).0`, new dev/alpha/release branches |\n\nExact tags are immutable. Floating channel tags and branches are machine-updated\nby Buildchain and must remain writable by the release authority.\n\nAfter a production release, Buildchain prepares the next alpha source commit for\nthe same minor line. That keeps production consumers pinned to the production\npassport while development can continue on the next testable patch.\n\n`publish-gate/major` is not an active development trunk. It is a reviewed\npromotion gate used when maintainers decide that the next production release\nshould open a new major line.\n\n## Toolkit Observability\n\nBuildchain includes a logging toolkit for release and build steps. Inside\nJavaScript build code, prefer the package API:\n\n```js\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({ source: \"user\", component: \"conan\" });\nlogger.mark(\"conan.profile.ready\", { phase: \"configure\" });\nawait logger.span(\"conan.install\", { phase: \"dependencies\" }, runConanInstall);\n```\n\nIn workflows or shell scripts, use the equivalent CLI:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain mark --event native.configure --phase configure --component cmake\nbuildchain span --event native.build --phase build -- cmake --build build\nbuildchain log summary --json\nbuildchain verify observability-log .buildchain/logs/events.jsonl --min-events 4\n```\n\nEvery event records a timestamp. `span` records duration. The API form can be\nimported from repository scripts so heavy builds can mark phases from inside\ntheir own code.\n\n## Site Fact Source\n\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain` publishes `dist/site/`:\n\n- `buildchain-site.json`\n- `site-manifest.json`\n- `page-registry.json`\n- `cli-registry.json`\n- `workflow-registry.json`\n- `release-model.json`\n- `artifact-schemas.json`\n- `product-mechanism.json`\n- `release-provenance.json`\n- `agent-index.json`\n\n`buildchain.libkungfu.dev` should render from these package-owned facts, then\nlayer presentation around them. The site should not hand-write Buildchain's\ncurrent release mechanics. `page-registry.json` is the complete markdown page\nsource for the public site: README homepage content, all packaged `docs/*.md`\nmanuals, action READMEs, the Node API package overview, and fixture guides.\n\n## Homepage Content Contract\n\nThis README is also the homepage text source for `buildchain.libkungfu.dev`.\nWhen a site repository consumes the `@kungfu-tech/buildchain` npm package, it\nshould use the generated `dist/site/buildchain-site.json` homepage fields\ninstead of parsing this README or maintaining separate homepage copy.\n\nThe first screen should be derived from:\n\n- Page identity: the top-level heading.\n- Lead: the opening paragraph that defines Buildchain Release Passport.\n- Trust signal: the start of `Install and Verify`, especially passport-first\n binary verification.\n- Use signal: the start of `Use Buildchain`, especially the reusable workflow\n and action surfaces.\n\nThe package-owned site bundle exposes ordered `homepage.sections`,\n`homepage.displayPlan`, `homepage.rendererContract`, and a complete\n`pages` collection mirrored from `page-registry.json`. A site renderer may adapt\nlayout, navigation, typography, examples, and visual assets, but it should not\nmaintain separate wording for Buildchain's release mechanics, workflow surface,\noperation manuals, Node API overview, fixture guides, or release-passport trust\nmodel. Renderer-contract text is machine/implementation metadata, not ordinary\nhomepage content.\n\n## Local Verification\n\n```bash\ncorepack enable pnpm\npnpm install --frozen-lockfile\npnpm run generate:site\npnpm run check\nnpm pack --dry-run --json --registry=https://registry.npmjs.org/\n```\n\n## Read Next\n\n- [Install and verify](docs/install.md)\n- [Documentation map](docs/MAP.md)\n- [Product mechanism](docs/product-mechanism.md)\n- [Release Passport and binary distribution](docs/release-passport.md)\n- [Binary distribution details](docs/binary-distribution.md)\n- [Toolkit observability](docs/toolkit-observability.md)\n- [Site bundle contract](docs/site-bundle-contract.md)\n- [Lifecycle protocol](docs/lifecycle-protocol.md)\n- [Reusable build surface](docs/reusable-build-surface.md)\n- [Release candidate passport](docs/release-candidate.md)\n- [Consumer issue reporting](docs/consumer-issue-reporting.md)\n- [Publish transaction](docs/publish-transaction.md)\n- [Release governance](docs/release-governance.md)",
|
|
101
|
+
"markdown": "# Buildchain\n\n<!-- buildchain:badges:start -->\n\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/blob/HEAD/LICENSE)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/latest/download/buildchain.release.json)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/workflows/verify.yml)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml)\n[](https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/workflows/binary-distribution.yml)\n<!-- buildchain:badges:end -->\n\nBuildchain Release Passport is a mature product release record for artifacts\nthat users or agents depend on.\n\nBuildchain by Kungfu uses GitHub as the execution and trust substrate: protected\nrefs, reviewed promotion PRs, exact tags, GitHub Releases, npm Trusted\nPublishing, and machine-readable evidence. Its job is to turn release intent\ninto an auditable product record, not to ask a repository to migrate away from\nits existing CI.\n\nThe same mechanism releases Buildchain itself.\n\n## Install and Verify\n\nFor standalone use, install a platform archive from a GitHub Release and verify\nthe release passport before trusting the binary:\n\n```bash\n# Example for Linux x64. Use the archive that matches your platform.\ncurl -LO https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.2.1/buildchain-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz\ncurl -LO https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.2.1/buildchain.release.json\ncurl -LO https://github.com/kungfu-systems/buildchain/releases/download/v2.2.1/artifact-evidence.json\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain verify release-passport buildchain.release.json\ntar -xzf buildchain-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz\n./buildchain version\n```\n\nRelease pages publish platform archives, checksums, release passport files, and\na single evidence bundle:\n\n- `buildchain-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz`\n- `buildchain-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.gz`\n- `buildchain-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.zip`\n- `checksums.txt`\n- `buildchain.release.json`\n- `artifact-evidence.json`\n- `product-mechanism.json`\n- `impact.json`\n- `agent-index.json`\n- `check-report.json`\n- `llms.txt`\n- `buildchain-release-bundle.tar.gz`\n- `buildchain-release-bundle.json`\n\nLoose top-level `buildchain` and `buildchain.exe` assets are intentionally not\npublished. The executable lives inside each platform archive, which prevents\nLinux and macOS artifacts from overwriting each other in a merged release lane.\n\nFor npm consumers:\n\n```bash\nnpm install -D @kungfu-tech/buildchain\nnpx buildchain version\nnpx buildchain doctor --json\n```\n\nThe npm package is also the Buildchain toolkit. Use the command when a workflow\nor shell step needs an executable; use the ESM APIs directly from JavaScript\nbuild scripts. JavaScript callers should import the package instead of spawning\nthe CLI or unpacking the standalone binary:\n\n```js\nimport {\n createBuildchainLogger,\n verifyBuildchainLogEvents,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({\n path: \".buildchain/logs/native-build.jsonl\",\n source: \"user\",\n component: \"native-build\",\n});\n\nawait logger.span(\"native.compile\", { phase: \"build\" }, async () => {\n await compileNativeTargets();\n});\n\nconst report = verifyBuildchainLogEvents({\n path: logger.path,\n requireEvents: [\"native.compile.start\", \"native.compile.end\"],\n});\n```\n\nThe package also ships `dist/site/` as the Buildchain-owned fact source for\n`buildchain.libkungfu.dev`.\n\nRepositories can also generate README status badges from Buildchain-owned facts\ninstead of hand-maintaining badge Markdown:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain badges bundle --check\nbuildchain badges bundle --write\nbuildchain badges readme --check\nbuildchain badges readme --write\n```\n\n## Project Governance\n\n- [`LICENSE-POLICY.md`](LICENSE-POLICY.md) explains the Apache-2.0 project\n license, DCO-based contributions, and third-party notice boundary.\n- [`TRADEMARK.md`](TRADEMARK.md) explains official project marks and fork\n identity boundaries.\n- [`ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](ACCEPTABLE_USE.md) explains acceptable use of official\n services and maintainer-operated infrastructure.\n- [`PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md) explains the official\n posture for GitHub, npm, cloud, credential, release evidence, and other\n provider integrations.\n- [`SECURITY.md`](SECURITY.md) explains private vulnerability reporting.\n\nNative build consumers can import the diagnostics toolkit instead of copying\nrepository-local probes:\n\n```js\nimport {\n collectBuildchainDiagnostics,\n collectRunnerDiagnostics,\n writeDiagnosticsArtifact,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/diagnostics\";\n\nwriteDiagnosticsArtifact(\".buildchain/artifacts/diagnostics.json\", {\n contract: \"consumer-build-diagnostics\",\n buildchain: collectBuildchainDiagnostics({ cwd: process.cwd() }),\n runner: collectRunnerDiagnostics(),\n});\n```\n\n`buildchain lifecycle run` writes a small `diagnostics.json` next to the\nplatform manifest. It includes lifecycle-wide observability, runner/tool/cache\nsnapshots, Git state, and links to the larger manifest and artifact outputs.\n\nConsumers can report Buildchain-owned workflow failures directly to the\nBuildchain repository with a scoped issue-write token:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/report-buildchain-issue@v2\n if: failure()\n with:\n token: ${{ steps.buildchain-issue-token.outputs.token }}\n summary: \"Reusable build failed before artifact finalization\"\n failure-code: reusable-build-failed\n buildchain-ref: v2\n diagnostics-path: .buildchain/artifacts/diagnostics.json\n```\n\nThe action deduplicates by fingerprint, comments on existing open reports, and\nis fail-soft by default so issue reporting does not hide the original failure.\nUse `report-kind: workflow-friction` when Buildchain workflows should report\ntheir own repeated release friction back to the Buildchain issue tracker.\n\n## Use Buildchain\n\nBootstrap a repository:\n\n```bash\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain init --type package --package-manager pnpm\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain validate --require-version-state\nnpx @kungfu-tech/buildchain release --dry-run --target-ref alpha/v2/v2.2\n```\n\nBuildchain supports package and non-package projects through\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml`. Legacy root `buildchain.toml` files remain\nreadable, but new consumers should keep Buildchain-owned files under\n`.buildchain/`:\n\n```text\n.buildchain/buildchain.toml\n.buildchain/contract-lock.json\n.buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/surfaces.json\n.buildchain/release-passport/buildchain.release.json\n```\n\nLifecycle commands can call pnpm, npm, yarn, pip, Conan, CMake, Make, custom\nscripts, or any other command that can run in the repository checkout.\n\nThe KFD entrypoint is `buildchain kfd`. Buildchain currently provides concrete\nKFD-1 contract-world, KFD-2 trust-claim, and KFD-3 collaboration-surface\nworkflows; KFD-4 is exposed as schema-only until a verification protocol exists.\n\nBuildchain's active GitHub Action surface is deliberately small:\n\n- `actions/validate-config`\n- `actions/run-lifecycle`\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref`\n- `actions/report-buildchain-issue`\n\nThe active reusable workflow surfaces are:\n\n- `.github/workflows/.gate-profile.yml` for project-neutral Shifu Gate profile\n planning, capability-aware runner dispatch, receipt validation, and one\n stable aggregate check;\n- `.github/workflows/.build.yml` for deterministic multi-platform build and\n artifact contracts;\n- `.github/workflows/build.yml` for the single-config channel router that uses\n `vN-alpha` during development/prerelease work and `vN` for stable releases;\n- `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml` for post-merge\n promote-only publication from a PR-stage release candidate, without a second\n heavy build;\n- `.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml` for preview, staging, production, and\n cleanup plans for site/app repositories;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for protected release\n promotion and version-state transactions;\n- `.github/workflows/binary-distribution.yml` for Buildchain's own release\n passport proof case.\n\nStable consumers should reference actions and workflows through floating major\nrefs after reviewing the exact release passport:\n\n```yaml\nuses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n```\n\n```yaml\nuses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/build.yml@v2\n```\n\n```yaml\nuses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml@v2\n```\n\n## Release Model\n\nBuildchain treats a reviewed branch merge as release intent:\n\n| Merge path | Meaning | Exact tag | Floating refs |\n| --------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |\n| `dev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y` | publish the next testable alpha for a minor line | `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N` | `vX.Y-alpha`, `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y` |\n| `alpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y` | publish production for that minor line | `vX.Y.Z` | `vX.Y`, usually `vX`, `release/vX/vX.Y` |\n| `release/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major` | publish the next major from a reviewed production line | `v(X+1).0.0` | `v(X+1)`, `v(X+1).0`, new dev/alpha/release branches |\n\nExact tags are immutable. Floating channel tags and branches are machine-updated\nby Buildchain and must remain writable by the release authority.\n\nAfter a production release, Buildchain prepares the next alpha source commit for\nthe same minor line. That keeps production consumers pinned to the production\npassport while development can continue on the next testable patch.\n\n`publish-gate/major` is not an active development trunk. It is a reviewed\npromotion gate used when maintainers decide that the next production release\nshould open a new major line.\n\n## Toolkit Observability\n\nBuildchain includes a logging toolkit for release and build steps. Inside\nJavaScript build code, prefer the package API:\n\n```js\nimport { createBuildchainLogger } from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/logging\";\n\nconst logger = createBuildchainLogger({ source: \"user\", component: \"conan\" });\nlogger.mark(\"conan.profile.ready\", { phase: \"configure\" });\nawait logger.span(\"conan.install\", { phase: \"dependencies\" }, runConanInstall);\n```\n\nIn workflows or shell scripts, use the equivalent CLI:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain mark --event native.configure --phase configure --component cmake\nbuildchain span --event native.build --phase build -- cmake --build build\nbuildchain log summary --json\nbuildchain verify observability-log .buildchain/logs/events.jsonl --min-events 4\n```\n\nEvery event records a timestamp. `span` records duration. The API form can be\nimported from repository scripts so heavy builds can mark phases from inside\ntheir own code.\n\n## Site Fact Source\n\n`@kungfu-tech/buildchain` publishes `dist/site/`:\n\n- `buildchain-site.json`\n- `site-manifest.json`\n- `page-registry.json`\n- `cli-registry.json`\n- `workflow-registry.json`\n- `release-model.json`\n- `artifact-schemas.json`\n- `product-mechanism.json`\n- `release-provenance.json`\n- `agent-index.json`\n\n`buildchain.libkungfu.dev` should render from these package-owned facts, then\nlayer presentation around them. The site should not hand-write Buildchain's\ncurrent release mechanics. `page-registry.json` is the complete markdown page\nsource for the public site: README homepage content, all packaged `docs/*.md`\nmanuals, action READMEs, the Node API package overview, and fixture guides.\n\n## Homepage Content Contract\n\nThis README is also the homepage text source for `buildchain.libkungfu.dev`.\nWhen a site repository consumes the `@kungfu-tech/buildchain` npm package, it\nshould use the generated `dist/site/buildchain-site.json` homepage fields\ninstead of parsing this README or maintaining separate homepage copy.\n\nThe first screen should be derived from:\n\n- Page identity: the top-level heading.\n- Lead: the opening paragraph that defines Buildchain Release Passport.\n- Trust signal: the start of `Install and Verify`, especially passport-first\n binary verification.\n- Use signal: the start of `Use Buildchain`, especially the reusable workflow\n and action surfaces.\n\nThe package-owned site bundle exposes ordered `homepage.sections`,\n`homepage.displayPlan`, `homepage.rendererContract`, and a complete\n`pages` collection mirrored from `page-registry.json`. A site renderer may adapt\nlayout, navigation, typography, examples, and visual assets, but it should not\nmaintain separate wording for Buildchain's release mechanics, workflow surface,\noperation manuals, Node API overview, fixture guides, or release-passport trust\nmodel. Renderer-contract text is machine/implementation metadata, not ordinary\nhomepage content.\n\n## Local Verification\n\n```bash\ncorepack enable pnpm\npnpm install --frozen-lockfile\npnpm run generate:site\npnpm run check\nnpm pack --dry-run --json --registry=https://registry.npmjs.org/\n```\n\n## Read Next\n\n- [Install and verify](docs/install.md)\n- [Documentation map](docs/MAP.md)\n- [Product mechanism](docs/product-mechanism.md)\n- [Release Passport and binary distribution](docs/release-passport.md)\n- [Binary distribution details](docs/binary-distribution.md)\n- [Toolkit observability](docs/toolkit-observability.md)\n- [Site bundle contract](docs/site-bundle-contract.md)\n- [Lifecycle protocol](docs/lifecycle-protocol.md)\n- [Reusable build surface](docs/reusable-build-surface.md)\n- [Shifu Gate profile orchestration](docs/shifu-gate-profiles.md)\n- [Release candidate passport](docs/release-candidate.md)\n- [Consumer issue reporting](docs/consumer-issue-reporting.md)\n- [Publish transaction](docs/publish-transaction.md)\n- [Release governance](docs/release-governance.md)",
|
|
102
102
|
"slug": "home"
|
|
103
103
|
},
|
|
104
104
|
{
|
|
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@
|
|
|
624
624
|
],
|
|
625
625
|
"maturity": "stable",
|
|
626
626
|
"sourcePath": "docs/lifecycle-protocol.md",
|
|
627
|
-
"digest": "sha256:
|
|
627
|
+
"digest": "sha256:3a03359ec58db04f334303256b02020f6039616e8802c19dfc00e76bbb05bf18",
|
|
628
628
|
"headings": [
|
|
629
629
|
{
|
|
630
630
|
"level": 1,
|
|
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@
|
|
|
707
707
|
"anchor": "design-boundaries"
|
|
708
708
|
}
|
|
709
709
|
],
|
|
710
|
-
"markdown": "# Lifecycle Protocol\n\nBuildchain uses `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` as the v2 repository configuration format.\nThe file is optional for simple JavaScript repositories, but it is the preferred\nway to describe release version state and lifecycle commands when a project is\nnot a plain pnpm, npm, or yarn workspace.\n\nFor compatibility, Buildchain still reads a legacy root `buildchain.toml` when\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is absent. New repositories should use the\n`.buildchain/` layout so all Buildchain-owned local state lives under one\ndirectory.\n\nOnly TOML is supported in v2. YAML, JSON, and JavaScript config files are not\nloaded.\n\n## Minimal File\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n`schema = 1` is required. Buildchain fails closed when the schema is missing or\nunknown.\n\n## Version State\n\nVersion state is the source file evidence that matches a release tag. During\npromotion, Buildchain writes the selected release or prerelease version into the\nconfigured files, verifies the resulting tree, creates a source version commit,\nthen moves exact and floating refs.\n\nSupported version file types:\n\n| Type | Use case | Required fields |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `json` | `package.json`, JSON manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `toml` | `pyproject.toml`, other TOML manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `regex` | `CMakeLists.txt`, `conanfile.py`, plain version files | `path`, `pattern`, `replacement` |\n\n`key` is a dotted key path:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n```\n\nConfigured JSON and TOML version files are semantic no-ops when the declared\nkey already equals the requested version. Buildchain preserves the repository's\noriginal TOML bytes in that case instead of serializing the whole document and\ncreating formatter-only release state. When a TOML version really changes,\nBuildchain applies a parser-verified lossless edit to that key and fails closed\nif it cannot prove a unique edit; unrelated arrays, comments, and formatting\nremain repository-owned.\n\nRegex files must expose the current version through a named capture group called\n`version`:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n```\n\nIf `version.required = true`, promotion fails when no configured version files\nare available.\n\n### Anchored Manual Versions\n\nSome repositories do not derive their package version from the Buildchain\nrelease tag. `libnode` is the canonical example: the package version is anchored\nto an explicitly selected upstream Node.js release such as `22.22.3-kf.0`, while\nthe channel line may be `release/v22/v22.22`.\n\nThose repositories can opt into anchored manual semantics:\n\n```toml\n[version]\nrequired = true\nstrategy = \"anchored\"\nnext = \"manual\"\nmanifest = \"libnode.release.json\"\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n```\n\nWith `strategy = \"anchored\"` and `next = \"manual\"`:\n\n- Buildchain validates the configured version files and anchor manifest, but it\n does not rewrite those files to the Buildchain release tag.\n- `lifecycle.verify` is the project-owned truth gate. It should compare the\n package version, anchor manifest, and upstream source/submodule state.\n- release promotion still creates the exact/floating production refs for the\n current line;\n- release promotion does not auto-create the next alpha branch or tag;\n- the action output `next-anchor-required` is `true`, signaling that the next\n upstream anchor line must be created explicitly by the repository.\n\nThe configured anchor manifest must be JSON or TOML. Buildchain does not\ninterpret project-specific field names; it only loads the manifest and exposes\nits top-level fields to validation summaries and lifecycle environment:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_STRATEGY=anchored\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_NEXT=manual\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST=libnode.release.json\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST_JSON={\"nodeTag\":\"v22.22.3\",...}\n```\n\nThe upstream anchor decision remains outside Buildchain. A future line such as\n`dev/v24/v24.xx` should be created by an explicit repository workflow or human\ndecision after the upstream version has been selected and checked in.\n\n## Lifecycle Stages\n\nLifecycle stages are declarative shell commands. A stage can use exactly one of:\n\n- `command`: one shell command;\n- `commands`: multiple shell commands run in order;\n- `script`: a multiline shell script.\n\nAny command failure fails the stage. `timeout_minutes`, `retries`, `shell`, and\n`env` can be attached to a stage.\n\nDuring version-state verification, Buildchain also sets `BUILDCHAIN_VERSION` to\nthe release or prerelease version being verified.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ntimeout_minutes = 10\nretries = 3\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm install --frozen-lockfile\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run build\",\n \"pnpm run package\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\nshell = \"bash\"\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npnpm run check\ngit diff --check\n\"\"\"\n```\n\nShared environment variables can be declared once:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.env]\nPYTHONUNBUFFERED = \"1\"\n```\n\nStage-specific environment variables override shared lifecycle environment:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.test]\ncommand = \"pytest\"\n\n[lifecycle.test.env]\nPYTHONPATH = \"src\"\n```\n\n### Publish Stage\n\n`lifecycle.publish` is the project-owned side-effect stage. It may call npm,\nPyPI, Conan, CMake packaging scripts, Docker/OCI registries, S3 uploaders, or\nany other publisher. Buildchain does not assume the tool; it assumes the\nevidence contract.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.publish]\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npython scripts/publish_wheels.py\nnode scripts/publish-images.mjs\nnode scripts/write-publish-evidence.mjs\n\"\"\"\n```\n\nWhen `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` runs with `publish-transaction: \"true\"`,\nthe publish stage receives the transaction identity plus the resolved publish\ncontract:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION\nBUILDCHAIN_CHANNEL\nBUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_TARGET_REF\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_STATE\nBUILDCHAIN_EVIDENCE_DIR\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_MATERIAL_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_TOOLING_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_EVIDENCE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_MODE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_AUTH\nBUILDCHAIN_NPM_DIST_TAG\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_ORDER\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_MAIN_PACKAGE\n```\n\nThe stage must write publish evidence JSON. Buildchain validates that evidence\nbefore exact tags and floating refs move. In GitHub Actions, the promotion\naction also persists `state.json` and `evidence.json` to\n`refs/heads/buildchain/release-state/<version>` so fresh runners can recover\nwithout local workspace residue. See\n[`docs/publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) for the state machine,\nevidence schema, and recovery commands.\n\nFor npm packages, prefer:\n\n```toml\n[publish]\nmode = \"publish-final-version\"\nauth = \"trusted-publishing\"\ndist_tag = \"latest\"\n```\n\nUse `mode = \"promote-existing-version\"` only for explicit same-version\ndist-tag recovery, and pair it with `auth = \"npm-token\"`. Trusted Publishing\ndoes not authorize `npm dist-tag add`; Buildchain fails that combination before\nany publish transaction side effect.\n\n## Promotion Semantics\n\n`actions/promote-buildchain-ref` consumes `version.files`, `lifecycle.verify`,\nand optionally `lifecycle.publish`.\n\nThe verify stage runs after Buildchain has applied the generated version-state\nchanges to the local checkout, and before it creates release commits or moves\nrefs. After the command finishes, Buildchain checks that only declared\nversion-state files changed. This prevents verification from quietly adding\nextra source changes to the release commit.\n\nBuildchain-owned untracked runtime evidence is excluded only through an exact\ninternal allowlist. This includes contract-drift issue material under\n`.buildchain/contract-drift/` and the paper workflow's\n`.buildchain/publication-result.json`, alongside release-candidate, passport,\nrelease-state, KFD, and runtime evidence directories. Tracked changes, ordinary\nsource files, and undeclared `.buildchain/*` paths still fail version\nverification.\n\nOn protected alpha and release branches, the generated version-state commit is\napplied by the promotion automation after the reviewed channel PR has merged.\nBuildchain keeps review requirements, conversation resolution, strict status\nchecks, and admin enforcement for human channel changes, but adds the\nauthenticated promotion token user or app to the managed bypass allowlist for\ngenerated release bookkeeping. Buildchain also creates the configured required\ncheck on the exact generated version-state commit before patching the protected\nref, then applies the protected ref update with the declared generated ref\nupdate token. The reusable wrapper uses\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token` for that protected\nbookkeeping update. If release finalization bookkeeping is still rejected,\nBuildchain creates or reuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR\nfrom the current target channel head and reports `finalization-needed=true` so\na later idempotent promotion run can resume. Strict alpha bookkeeping remains\nfail-fast with a token/protection diagnostic instead of asking humans to review\na post-publish version-state PR.\n\nFor `version.strategy = \"anchored\"` with `version.next = \"manual\"`, release\npromotion does not generate a Buildchain-owned version-state commit. In that\nmode, a protected `alpha -> release` PR may carry the declared `version.files`\nfrom the tested alpha package version to the final package version, and may\ncarry the configured `version.manifest` with it. Buildchain only accepts that\nrelease tree difference when the PR is the valid channel-promotion PR, the\nchanged paths are limited to those declared version files plus the anchor\nmanifest, and `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` has validated the\nchecked-out release material. Any code or undeclared file change still fails the\nrelease tree gate.\n\nThe action input `verification-command` remains supported. When it is provided,\nit overrides `lifecycle.verify` for that invocation. The override inherits\n`[lifecycle.env]` and `lifecycle.verify.env`; when the configured stage declares\n`shell`, it also inherits that shell. If the stage has no explicit shell,\nBuildchain preserves the platform-default shell for compatibility.\n\n## Migration Preflight\n\nHeavy repositories can validate their Buildchain declaration before they are\nready to run the real build. `actions/validate-config` checks that\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` parses, configured version-state files exist, configured\nversion keys are strings, and required lifecycle stage names are declared.\nFor web-surface repositories it also validates `project`, `channels`, `deploy`,\n`retention`, and `security` declarations.\n\nIt does not run lifecycle commands. This is useful for repositories such as\n`libnode`, where `lifecycle.build` represents an expensive multi-platform native\nbuild and the first migration milestone is to prove the release metadata and\nlifecycle protocol without consuming build runners.\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-version-state: \"true\"\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"install,build,verify\"\n```\n\nWeb-surface repositories can use the same action without requiring version\nstate:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"build,verify\"\n```\n\nThe action exposes project and deploy metadata through outputs such as\n`project-type`, `project-site`, `channels`, and `deploy-adapters-json`.\n\n## Web-Surface Projects\n\n`project.type = \"web-surface\"` is for sites, docs, browser apps, and operator\nconsoles whose release object is a deployed surface, not a package version.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-libkungfu-dev\"\nsite = \"libkungfu-dev\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[deploy.production]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-production\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n```\n\nSee [Web-surface deployments](web-surface-deployments.md) for named surface host\nmappings, the manifest, preview alias, retention, cleanup, and dry-run deploy\ncontract.\n\n## Infra-Contract Projects\n\n`project.type = \"infra-contract\"` is for infrastructure contract repositories\nthat need provider-neutral desired, plan, approval, apply, observe, contract,\nand propagation evidence. `buildchain init --type infra-contract` wires\n`lifecycle.verify` to `buildchain infra-contract --mode ci`, which writes\nmutation-free plan, contract, propagation dry-run, evidence bundle, and\nverification artifacts under `.buildchain/`. The surface supports\nmanual-observed, observe-only, and mocked adapter fixtures without reading\ncloud state files or executing live infrastructure mutation. See\n[Infra Contract](infra-contract.md).\n\n## Examples\n\n### Node Workspace\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n### Python Package\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"python -m pip install -e .[test]\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"python -m build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"python -m build\",\n \"pytest\",\n]\n```\n\n### CMake and Conan\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n\n[lifecycle.configure]\ncommands = [\n \"conan install . --build=missing\",\n \"cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"cmake --build build --config Release\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"cmake --build build --config Release\",\n \"ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure\",\n]\n```\n\n### Docker Image\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:${BUILDCHAIN_VERSION} .\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:verify .\"\n```\n\nDocker publishing is an external side effect and should be gated by a release\nworkflow after version-state promotion has been verified.\n\n## Design Boundaries\n\nThe lifecycle protocol is also the command source for the reusable build\nsurface. `.github/workflows/.build.yml` runs `lifecycle.install`,\n`lifecycle.build`, and `lifecycle.verify` by default, while allowing callers to\noverride each stage with explicit workflow inputs. The underlying\n`actions/run-lifecycle` action can be used directly by repositories that need a\ncustom workflow but still want Buildchain's lifecycle and deterministic manifest\ncontract.\n\nBuildchain lifecycle commands are data, not executable configuration files.\nThey make release behavior reviewable in pull requests and keep the release\nfact chain simple:\n\n1. choose the channel branch and release line;\n2. generate a source version commit from declared version files;\n3. verify that exact tree;\n4. move exact tags and floating refs only after verification succeeds;\n5. run publish or deployment side effects in separately gated workflows."
|
|
710
|
+
"markdown": "# Lifecycle Protocol\n\nBuildchain uses `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` as the v2 repository configuration format.\nThe file is optional for simple JavaScript repositories, but it is the preferred\nway to describe release version state and lifecycle commands when a project is\nnot a plain pnpm, npm, or yarn workspace.\n\nFor compatibility, Buildchain still reads a legacy root `buildchain.toml` when\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is absent. New repositories should use the\n`.buildchain/` layout so all Buildchain-owned local state lives under one\ndirectory.\n\nOnly TOML is supported in v2. YAML, JSON, and JavaScript config files are not\nloaded.\n\n## Minimal File\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n`schema = 1` is required. Buildchain fails closed when the schema is missing or\nunknown.\n\n## Version State\n\nVersion state is the source file evidence that matches a release tag. During\npromotion, Buildchain writes the selected release or prerelease version into the\nconfigured files, verifies the resulting tree, creates a source version commit,\nthen moves exact and floating refs.\n\nSupported version file types:\n\n| Type | Use case | Required fields |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `json` | `package.json`, JSON manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `toml` | `pyproject.toml`, other TOML manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `regex` | `CMakeLists.txt`, `conanfile.py`, plain version files | `path`, `pattern`, `replacement` |\n\n`key` is a dotted key path:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n```\n\nConfigured JSON and TOML version files are semantic no-ops when the declared\nkey already equals the requested version. Buildchain preserves the repository's\noriginal TOML bytes in that case instead of serializing the whole document and\ncreating formatter-only release state. When a TOML version really changes,\nBuildchain applies a parser-verified lossless edit to that key and fails closed\nif it cannot prove a unique edit; unrelated arrays, comments, and formatting\nremain repository-owned.\n\nRegex files must expose the current version through a named capture group called\n`version`:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n```\n\nIf `version.required = true`, promotion fails when no configured version files\nare available.\n\n### Anchored Manual Versions\n\nSome repositories do not derive their package version from the Buildchain\nrelease tag. `libnode` is the canonical example: the package version is anchored\nto an explicitly selected upstream Node.js release such as `22.22.3-kf.0`, while\nthe channel line may be `release/v22/v22.22`.\n\nThose repositories can opt into anchored manual semantics:\n\n```toml\n[version]\nrequired = true\nstrategy = \"anchored\"\nnext = \"manual\"\nmanifest = \"libnode.release.json\"\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n```\n\nWith `strategy = \"anchored\"` and `next = \"manual\"`:\n\n- Buildchain validates the configured version files and anchor manifest, but it\n does not rewrite those files to the Buildchain release tag.\n- `lifecycle.verify` is the project-owned truth gate. It should compare the\n package version, anchor manifest, and upstream source/submodule state.\n- release promotion still creates the exact/floating production refs for the\n current line;\n- release promotion does not auto-create the next alpha branch or tag;\n- the action output `next-anchor-required` is `true`, signaling that the next\n upstream anchor line must be created explicitly by the repository.\n\nThe configured anchor manifest must be JSON or TOML. Buildchain does not\ninterpret project-specific field names; it only loads the manifest and exposes\nits top-level fields to validation summaries and lifecycle environment:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_STRATEGY=anchored\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_NEXT=manual\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST=libnode.release.json\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST_JSON={\"nodeTag\":\"v22.22.3\",...}\n```\n\nThe upstream anchor decision remains outside Buildchain. A future line such as\n`dev/v24/v24.xx` should be created by an explicit repository workflow or human\ndecision after the upstream version has been selected and checked in.\n\n## Lifecycle Stages\n\nLifecycle stages are declarative shell commands. A stage can use exactly one of:\n\n- `command`: one shell command;\n- `commands`: multiple shell commands run in order;\n- `script`: a multiline shell script.\n\nAny command failure fails the stage. `timeout_minutes`, `retries`, `shell`, and\n`env` can be attached to a stage.\n\nDuring version-state verification, Buildchain also sets `BUILDCHAIN_VERSION` to\nthe release or prerelease version being verified.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ntimeout_minutes = 10\nretries = 3\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm install --frozen-lockfile\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run build\",\n \"pnpm run package\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.check]\ncommand = \"pnpm run check:source\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\nshell = \"bash\"\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npnpm run check\ngit diff --check\n\"\"\"\n```\n\n`lifecycle.check` is the repository-owned source-acceptance gate. It should\nvalidate the checked-out source revision without entering the build, artifact,\nor release lifecycle. Consumers can run it on GitHub-hosted Linux through\n`.github/workflows/check.yml@v2` with `mode: source`; the reusable workflow runs\nonly `lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.check`. The default `mode: verify`\ncontinues to run `lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.verify` for existing callers.\nBoth executed stages receive `BUILDCHAIN_CHECK_MODE=source` or\n`BUILDCHAIN_CHECK_MODE=verify`, so a repository whose normal install path can\ncompile native tooling can select a provisioning-only install path for source\nacceptance without weakening promotion installs.\nThe reusable job name remains `check`, and `upload-artifacts: false` disables\nevidence upload without changing the job conclusion used by branch protection.\n\nShared environment variables can be declared once:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.env]\nPYTHONUNBUFFERED = \"1\"\n```\n\nStage-specific environment variables override shared lifecycle environment:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.test]\ncommand = \"pytest\"\n\n[lifecycle.test.env]\nPYTHONPATH = \"src\"\n```\n\n### Publish Stage\n\n`lifecycle.publish` is the project-owned side-effect stage. It may call npm,\nPyPI, Conan, CMake packaging scripts, Docker/OCI registries, S3 uploaders, or\nany other publisher. Buildchain does not assume the tool; it assumes the\nevidence contract.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.publish]\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npython scripts/publish_wheels.py\nnode scripts/publish-images.mjs\nnode scripts/write-publish-evidence.mjs\n\"\"\"\n```\n\nWhen `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` runs with `publish-transaction: \"true\"`,\nthe publish stage receives the transaction identity plus the resolved publish\ncontract:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION\nBUILDCHAIN_CHANNEL\nBUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_TARGET_REF\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_STATE\nBUILDCHAIN_EVIDENCE_DIR\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_MATERIAL_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_TOOLING_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_EVIDENCE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_MODE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_AUTH\nBUILDCHAIN_NPM_DIST_TAG\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_ORDER\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_MAIN_PACKAGE\n```\n\nThe stage must write publish evidence JSON. Buildchain validates that evidence\nbefore exact tags and floating refs move. In GitHub Actions, the promotion\naction also persists `state.json` and `evidence.json` to\n`refs/heads/buildchain/release-state/<version>` so fresh runners can recover\nwithout local workspace residue. See\n[`docs/publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) for the state machine,\nevidence schema, and recovery commands.\n\nFor npm packages, prefer:\n\n```toml\n[publish]\nmode = \"publish-final-version\"\nauth = \"trusted-publishing\"\ndist_tag = \"latest\"\n```\n\nUse `mode = \"promote-existing-version\"` only for explicit same-version\ndist-tag recovery, and pair it with `auth = \"npm-token\"`. Trusted Publishing\ndoes not authorize `npm dist-tag add`; Buildchain fails that combination before\nany publish transaction side effect.\n\n## Promotion Semantics\n\n`actions/promote-buildchain-ref` consumes `version.files`, `lifecycle.verify`,\nand optionally `lifecycle.publish`.\n\nThe verify stage runs after Buildchain has applied the generated version-state\nchanges to the local checkout, and before it creates release commits or moves\nrefs. After the command finishes, Buildchain checks that only declared\nversion-state files changed. This prevents verification from quietly adding\nextra source changes to the release commit.\n\nBuildchain-owned untracked runtime evidence is excluded only through an exact\ninternal allowlist. This includes contract-drift issue material under\n`.buildchain/contract-drift/` and the paper workflow's\n`.buildchain/publication-result.json`, alongside release-candidate, passport,\nrelease-state, KFD, and runtime evidence directories. Tracked changes, ordinary\nsource files, and undeclared `.buildchain/*` paths still fail version\nverification.\n\nOn protected alpha and release branches, the generated version-state commit is\napplied by the promotion automation after the reviewed channel PR has merged.\nBuildchain keeps review requirements, conversation resolution, strict status\nchecks, and admin enforcement for human channel changes, but adds the\nauthenticated promotion token user or app to the managed bypass allowlist for\ngenerated release bookkeeping. Buildchain also creates the configured required\ncheck on the exact generated version-state commit before patching the protected\nref, then applies the protected ref update with the declared generated ref\nupdate token. The reusable wrapper uses\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token` for that protected\nbookkeeping update. If release finalization bookkeeping is still rejected,\nBuildchain creates or reuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR\nfrom the current target channel head and reports `finalization-needed=true` so\na later idempotent promotion run can resume. Strict alpha bookkeeping remains\nfail-fast with a token/protection diagnostic instead of asking humans to review\na post-publish version-state PR.\n\nFor `version.strategy = \"anchored\"` with `version.next = \"manual\"`, release\npromotion does not generate a Buildchain-owned version-state commit. In that\nmode, a protected `alpha -> release` PR may carry the declared `version.files`\nfrom the tested alpha package version to the final package version, and may\ncarry the configured `version.manifest` with it. Buildchain only accepts that\nrelease tree difference when the PR is the valid channel-promotion PR, the\nchanged paths are limited to those declared version files plus the anchor\nmanifest, and `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` has validated the\nchecked-out release material. Any code or undeclared file change still fails the\nrelease tree gate.\n\nThe action input `verification-command` remains supported. When it is provided,\nit overrides `lifecycle.verify` for that invocation. The override inherits\n`[lifecycle.env]` and `lifecycle.verify.env`; when the configured stage declares\n`shell`, it also inherits that shell. If the stage has no explicit shell,\nBuildchain preserves the platform-default shell for compatibility.\n\n## Migration Preflight\n\nHeavy repositories can validate their Buildchain declaration before they are\nready to run the real build. `actions/validate-config` checks that\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` parses, configured version-state files exist, configured\nversion keys are strings, and required lifecycle stage names are declared.\nFor web-surface repositories it also validates `project`, `channels`, `deploy`,\n`retention`, and `security` declarations.\n\nIt does not run lifecycle commands. This is useful for repositories such as\n`libnode`, where `lifecycle.build` represents an expensive multi-platform native\nbuild and the first migration milestone is to prove the release metadata and\nlifecycle protocol without consuming build runners.\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-version-state: \"true\"\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"install,build,verify\"\n```\n\nWeb-surface repositories can use the same action without requiring version\nstate:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"build,verify\"\n```\n\nThe action exposes project and deploy metadata through outputs such as\n`project-type`, `project-site`, `channels`, and `deploy-adapters-json`.\n\n## Web-Surface Projects\n\n`project.type = \"web-surface\"` is for sites, docs, browser apps, and operator\nconsoles whose release object is a deployed surface, not a package version.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-libkungfu-dev\"\nsite = \"libkungfu-dev\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[deploy.production]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-production\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n```\n\nSee [Web-surface deployments](web-surface-deployments.md) for named surface host\nmappings, the manifest, preview alias, retention, cleanup, and dry-run deploy\ncontract.\n\n## Infra-Contract Projects\n\n`project.type = \"infra-contract\"` is for infrastructure contract repositories\nthat need provider-neutral desired, plan, approval, apply, observe, contract,\nand propagation evidence. `buildchain init --type infra-contract` wires\n`lifecycle.verify` to `buildchain infra-contract --mode ci`, which writes\nmutation-free plan, contract, propagation dry-run, evidence bundle, and\nverification artifacts under `.buildchain/`. The surface supports\nmanual-observed, observe-only, and mocked adapter fixtures without reading\ncloud state files or executing live infrastructure mutation. See\n[Infra Contract](infra-contract.md).\n\n## Examples\n\n### Node Workspace\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n### Python Package\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"python -m pip install -e .[test]\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"python -m build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"python -m build\",\n \"pytest\",\n]\n```\n\n### CMake and Conan\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n\n[lifecycle.configure]\ncommands = [\n \"conan install . --build=missing\",\n \"cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"cmake --build build --config Release\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"cmake --build build --config Release\",\n \"ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure\",\n]\n```\n\n### Docker Image\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:${BUILDCHAIN_VERSION} .\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:verify .\"\n```\n\nDocker publishing is an external side effect and should be gated by a release\nworkflow after version-state promotion has been verified.\n\n## Design Boundaries\n\nThe lifecycle protocol is also the command source for the reusable build\nsurface. `.github/workflows/.build.yml` runs `lifecycle.install`,\n`lifecycle.build`, and `lifecycle.verify` by default, while allowing callers to\noverride each stage with explicit workflow inputs. The underlying\n`actions/run-lifecycle` action can be used directly by repositories that need a\ncustom workflow but still want Buildchain's lifecycle and deterministic manifest\ncontract.\n\nBuildchain lifecycle commands are data, not executable configuration files.\nThey make release behavior reviewable in pull requests and keep the release\nfact chain simple:\n\n1. choose the channel branch and release line;\n2. generate a source version commit from declared version files;\n3. verify that exact tree;\n4. move exact tags and floating refs only after verification succeeds;\n5. run publish or deployment side effects in separately gated workflows."
|
|
711
711
|
},
|
|
712
712
|
{
|
|
713
713
|
"id": "manual:map",
|
|
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@
|
|
|
721
721
|
],
|
|
722
722
|
"maturity": "stable",
|
|
723
723
|
"sourcePath": "docs/MAP.md",
|
|
724
|
-
"digest": "sha256:
|
|
724
|
+
"digest": "sha256:5df6d6110d7c33da4625a2e1ebb6b778eef9c4420379cff342229bc0b02962e1",
|
|
725
725
|
"headings": [
|
|
726
726
|
{
|
|
727
727
|
"level": 1,
|
|
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@
|
|
|
749
749
|
"anchor": "how-this-map-is-maintained"
|
|
750
750
|
}
|
|
751
751
|
],
|
|
752
|
-
"markdown": "# Documentation Map\n\nStart here. Find the question you have; follow it to the document that answers\nit. This map is meant to be readable by both a person skimming for the right doc\nand an agent grounding a specific claim.\n\nEach row carries a **plane** - *why* (intent / rationale), *verify* (trust the\nrunning artifact), *use* (consume / extend) - and a **status**:\n\n- `stable` - current and holds.\n- `draft` - exists, rough or incomplete.\n- `to write` - planned; the material exists but is not yet a single doc.\n- `retired` - intentionally not part of the active Buildchain v2 surface.\n\n## Capability Coverage\n\nThis package should be usable by an agent from the npm artifact alone. The\nmachine-readable `dist/site/` bundle is the first fact source; the Markdown\nmanuals explain those facts and give operator examples.\n\n`dist/site/capability-registry.json` is the capability navigation entrypoint.\nIt groups the public surface into stable product areas so sites and agents do\nnot have to infer structure from file names. Each page, manual, CLI command,\nworkflow, action, and Node API export also carries a `capabilityGroup`,\n`audience`, and `maturity` field in its own registry.\n\n| Capability group | Primary facts | Primary manuals |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Getting Started | `capability-registry.json`, `product-mechanism.json` | [`install.md`](install.md), [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Release Passport and Trust | `release-model.json`, `artifact-schemas.json`, `kfd-claims.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md), [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) |\n| Reusable Build and Lifecycle | `workflow-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md), [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) |\n| KFD Trust and Surface Closure | `kfd-claims.json`, `public-surface-audit.json`, `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| Site Bundle, Web Surfaces, and Propagation | `buildchain-site.json`, `site-manifest.json`, `page-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md), [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| Publication Artifacts | `publication-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md), [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) |\n| Distribution Indexes and Badges | `badge-endpoint-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md), [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Build Facts, Observability, and Diagnostics | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, lifecycle artifacts | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md), [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md), [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) |\n| Governance, Versioning, and Runtime Drift | `buildchain-contract.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md), [`versioning.md`](versioning.md), [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) |\n| CLI and Node API Reference | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) |\n\n| Capability | Machine-readable entry | Manual entry |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Capability-grouped KFD navigation | `dist/site/capability-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json` | this map, [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 release-passport gates | `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| KFD-3 public surface reverse audit | `dist/site/public-surface-audit.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 first-class CLI and Node API | `.buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/surfaces.json`, `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `buildchain.release.json`, KFD schemas from `@kungfu-tech/kfd` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md#commands) |\n| Floating `@v2` drift detection and compatibility issues | `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) |\n| npm publish transactions, evidence, dist-tags, and recovery | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) |\n| Git/source/version/module/product build facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-module-build-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-product-build-facts` | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) |\n| GitHub Release passport/evidence publication | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) |\n| release propagation for package/publication/site chains | `dist/site/release-model.json` | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| publication artifact manifests, immutable archive registries, source bundles, and paper repository workflows | `dist/site/publication-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-manifest`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) |\n| Generated badge bundles, README badge blocks, and badge facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-badge-bundle-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-readme-badge-facts` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) |\n| Homebrew tap distribution indexes | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Buildchain CLI manual | `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Node API / package exports | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/release-provenance.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md#node-api-and-package-exports) |\n\n`dist/site/kfd-claims.json` is generated from\n`packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js`. Treat that module and JSON file as the\nsource claim registry; this map and the manuals explain those claims but do not\nreplace them.\n\n## Map\n\n| Your question | Document | Plane | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| What is Buildchain, in one idea? | [`../README.md`](../README.md) | - | stable |\n| Why is Buildchain a Release Passport mechanism rather than a generic workflow collection? | [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md) | why | stable |\n| How do agents and contributors enter this repo? | [`../AGENTS.md`](../AGENTS.md) + [`../CONTRIBUTING.md`](../CONTRIBUTING.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I install a standalone binary or npm package? | [`install.md`](install.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I run the `buildchain` CLI? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I import Buildchain toolkit APIs from JavaScript build code? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) + [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I initialize a new repository? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) + [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| Why does Buildchain use branch-driven release governance? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) | why | stable |\n| How do protected dev branches and scheduled ready-PR merging work? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) | use | stable |\n| How do I run daily, weekly, or monthly repository patrols? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol) | use | stable |\n| How does Buildchain decide patch, minor, and major release lines? | [`versioning.md`](versioning.md) | why | stable |\n| What exact branch/tag state machine runs on alpha, release, and major gate? | [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md) | verify | stable |\n| What did Buildchain migrate or retire from old action repositories? | [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md) | verify | stable |\n| What is the active action and workflow source of truth? | [`ownership.md`](ownership.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I declare version files and custom lifecycle commands? | [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| How does publish evidence, recovery, and finalization work? | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I collect and verify module/product build facts from Git source, version files, and outputs? | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I publish or verify release passport artifacts? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I gate release artifacts with KFD-1 contract-world witnesses? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I declare, render, and audit product KFD-2 release trust claims? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md#kfd-2) + [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I gate KFD-3 collaboration-interface releases? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I detect, register, audit, witness, or query KFD-3 product surfaces? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I keep `@v2` floating refs while detecting Buildchain contract drift? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I propagate finalized upstream releases to downstream package/site PRs? | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) | use | preview |\n| How do paper or report repositories publish PDFs, metadata, source bundles, site-consumable manifests, npm packages, and GitHub Releases? | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate KFD / Release Passport badge bundles without hand-maintaining Markdown? | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate and verify a Homebrew tap from release passport evidence? | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I prove a PR-stage reusable build is the artifact source promoted later? | [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) + [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | verify | stable |\n| Why are binary release assets archived by platform, and where is the single bundle? | [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I add timestamped logs inside build scripts? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) | use | stable |\n| What package-owned facts should buildchain.libkungfu.dev render? | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I call the reusable build workflow? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I use one build job that follows alpha during development and stable for releases? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#automatic-channel-router) | use | preview |\n| How do self-hosted runners relay large artifacts through S3 before GitHub artifacts? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay) | use | stable |\n| How do self-hosted runners reuse local Git checkout caches without weakening source locks? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache) | use | stable |\n| How do I validate an unreleased Buildchain runtime train while keeping `@v2`? | [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I automatically qualify alpha candidates and publish the newest non-revoked qualified candidate at a fixed window? | [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I deploy a site/app preview, staging, or production surface? | [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I publish observed infrastructure contracts for downstream consumers? | [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I use the active actions directly? | [`../actions/validate-config/README.md`](../actions/validate-config/README.md), [`../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md`](../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md), [`../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`](../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md), [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How can a consumer workflow report a Buildchain-owned failure back to Buildchain? | [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) + [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| What do the fixture repositories demonstrate? | [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md) | verify | stable |\n| What license and contribution terms apply? | [`../LICENSE`](../LICENSE) + [`../LICENSE-POLICY.md`](../LICENSE-POLICY.md) | use | stable |\n| What trademark, official-service, and provider-compliance boundaries apply? | [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md) + [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md) + [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I report a vulnerability? | [`../SECURITY.md`](../SECURITY.md) | use | stable |\n\n## Also asking about\n\n- **ABV / old workflows / old action repositories** -> [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md)\n and [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md).\n- **v2 / v2-alpha / v2.0 / v2.0-alpha / exact tags / floating tags** ->\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) and\n [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **Buildchain self-dogfood / released alpha canary / stable compatibility lane** ->\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood).\n- **qualified alpha ledger / scheduled stable selection / hold and revoke** ->\n [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n- **v2.1 vs v2.2 / when to open a new minor line** ->\n [`versioning.md`](versioning.md).\n- **dry-run / what would happen if this channel PR merges** -> [`cli.md`](cli.md)\n and [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **protected dev branches / scheduled ready-PR merge / daily-weekly-monthly patrol** ->\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) and\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol).\n- **pnpm / npm / yarn / package-manager adapters** ->\n [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md).\n- **pip / Conan / CMake / custom commands** -> [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md)\n and [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **libnode / native artifacts / self-hosted runner matrix** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) and\n [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md).\n- **S3 artifact relay / self-hosted runner artifact transfer** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay).\n- **local Git checkout cache / self-hosted source transport** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache).\n- **runtime train validation / temporary `buildchain-ref` override** ->\n [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) and\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **consumer workflow feedback / automatic Buildchain GitHub issues** ->\n [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md).\n- **PR-stage RC artifacts / promote-only release candidates** ->\n [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) and\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **infra contract / observed infrastructure outputs / downstream contract propagation** ->\n [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md).\n- **standalone binary install / platform archives / GitHub Release bundle** ->\n [`install.md`](install.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md),\n and [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md).\n- **Trusted Publishing / npm / publish evidence / recovery** ->\n [`cli.md`](cli.md) and [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md).\n- **Git source digest / module build facts / product build facts / legacy\n Kungfu build info** -> [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **release chains / upstream package or publication artifact as source of truth / site synchronization** ->\n [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md).\n- **paper repositories / PDFs / publication manifests / immutable archive registries / source bundles** ->\n [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md).\n- **README status badges / KFD badge bundles / badge facts JSON** ->\n [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Homebrew taps / distribution indexes / Formula drift checks** ->\n [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **KFD-1 contract worlds / byte-for-byte release gates** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate).\n- **KFD-2 public release trust claim audit** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit).\n- **KFD-3 collaboration-interface / agent-facing control surface closure** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate).\n- **floating `@v2` / contract lock / compatible drift issue** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock).\n- **GitHub Release passport / binary assets / artifact evidence / agent release checks** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md),\n [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md), and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Buildchain logging / timestamps / consumer build phase timing** ->\n [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) for JavaScript API\n imports, and [`cli.md`](cli.md) for workflow or shell command usage.\n- **buildchain.libkungfu.dev / package-owned site facts** ->\n [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md).\n- **sites / web previews / staging / production gates** ->\n [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md).\n- **trademark / fork / official service / provider compliance / release\n evidence boundary** -> [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md),\n [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md), and\n [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md).\n\n## How this map is maintained\n\n- A document becomes a row here when it is a stable entrypoint for a user,\n contributor, or workflow consumer.\n- A row's status must never claim more than the artifact delivers.\n- `why` documents explain intent and design pressure; `verify` and `use`\n documents should state what is guaranteed, where to verify it, and the current\n maturity of that guarantee."
|
|
752
|
+
"markdown": "# Documentation Map\n\nStart here. Find the question you have; follow it to the document that answers\nit. This map is meant to be readable by both a person skimming for the right doc\nand an agent grounding a specific claim.\n\nEach row carries a **plane** - *why* (intent / rationale), *verify* (trust the\nrunning artifact), *use* (consume / extend) - and a **status**:\n\n- `stable` - current and holds.\n- `draft` - exists, rough or incomplete.\n- `to write` - planned; the material exists but is not yet a single doc.\n- `retired` - intentionally not part of the active Buildchain v2 surface.\n\n## Capability Coverage\n\nThis package should be usable by an agent from the npm artifact alone. The\nmachine-readable `dist/site/` bundle is the first fact source; the Markdown\nmanuals explain those facts and give operator examples.\n\n`dist/site/capability-registry.json` is the capability navigation entrypoint.\nIt groups the public surface into stable product areas so sites and agents do\nnot have to infer structure from file names. Each page, manual, CLI command,\nworkflow, action, and Node API export also carries a `capabilityGroup`,\n`audience`, and `maturity` field in its own registry.\n\n| Capability group | Primary facts | Primary manuals |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Getting Started | `capability-registry.json`, `product-mechanism.json` | [`install.md`](install.md), [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Release Passport and Trust | `release-model.json`, `artifact-schemas.json`, `kfd-claims.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md), [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) |\n| Reusable Build and Lifecycle | `workflow-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md), [`shifu-gate-profiles.md`](shifu-gate-profiles.md), [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) |\n| KFD Trust and Surface Closure | `kfd-claims.json`, `public-surface-audit.json`, `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| Site Bundle, Web Surfaces, and Propagation | `buildchain-site.json`, `site-manifest.json`, `page-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md), [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| Publication Artifacts | `publication-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md), [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) |\n| Distribution Indexes and Badges | `badge-endpoint-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md), [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Build Facts, Observability, and Diagnostics | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, lifecycle artifacts | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md), [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md), [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) |\n| Governance, Versioning, and Runtime Drift | `buildchain-contract.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `release-model.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md), [`versioning.md`](versioning.md), [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) |\n| CLI and Node API Reference | `cli-registry.json`, `node-api-registry.json`, `workflow-registry.json`, `manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) |\n\n| Capability | Machine-readable entry | Manual entry |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Capability-grouped KFD navigation | `dist/site/capability-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json` | this map, [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md), [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 release-passport gates | `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) |\n| KFD-3 public surface reverse audit | `dist/site/public-surface-audit.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/page-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md), [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) |\n| KFD-1 / KFD-2 / KFD-3 first-class CLI and Node API | `.buildchain/kfd/kfd-3/surfaces.json`, `dist/site/kfd-claims.json`, `buildchain.release.json`, KFD schemas from `@kungfu-tech/kfd` | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md), [`cli.md`](cli.md#commands) |\n| Floating `@v2` drift detection and compatibility issues | `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) |\n| npm publish transactions, evidence, dist-tags, and recovery | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) |\n| Git/source/version/module/product build facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-module-build-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-product-build-facts` | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) |\n| GitHub Release passport/evidence publication | `dist/site/release-model.json`, `dist/site/artifact-schemas.json` | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md), [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) |\n| release propagation for package/publication/site chains | `dist/site/release-model.json` | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) |\n| publication artifact manifests, immutable archive registries, source bundles, and paper repository workflows | `dist/site/publication-registry.json`, `dist/site/workflow-registry.json`, `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-manifest`, `kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) |\n| Generated badge bundles, README badge blocks, and badge facts | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json`, `kungfu-buildchain-badge-bundle-facts`, `kungfu-buildchain-readme-badge-facts` | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) |\n| Homebrew tap distribution indexes | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) |\n| Buildchain CLI manual | `dist/site/cli-registry.json`, `dist/site/manual-registry.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md) |\n| Node API / package exports | `dist/site/node-api-registry.json`, `dist/site/release-provenance.json` | [`cli.md`](cli.md#node-api-and-package-exports) |\n\n`dist/site/kfd-claims.json` is generated from\n`packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js`. Treat that module and JSON file as the\nsource claim registry; this map and the manuals explain those claims but do not\nreplace them.\n\n## Map\n\n| Your question | Document | Plane | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| What is Buildchain, in one idea? | [`../README.md`](../README.md) | - | stable |\n| Why is Buildchain a Release Passport mechanism rather than a generic workflow collection? | [`product-mechanism.md`](product-mechanism.md) | why | stable |\n| How do agents and contributors enter this repo? | [`../AGENTS.md`](../AGENTS.md) + [`../CONTRIBUTING.md`](../CONTRIBUTING.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I install a standalone binary or npm package? | [`install.md`](install.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I run the `buildchain` CLI? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I import Buildchain toolkit APIs from JavaScript build code? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) + [`../packages/core/README.md`](../packages/core/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I initialize a new repository? | [`cli.md`](cli.md) + [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| Why does Buildchain use branch-driven release governance? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) | why | stable |\n| How do protected dev branches and scheduled ready-PR merging work? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) | use | stable |\n| How do I run daily, weekly, or monthly repository patrols? | [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol) | use | stable |\n| How does Buildchain decide patch, minor, and major release lines? | [`versioning.md`](versioning.md) | why | stable |\n| What exact branch/tag state machine runs on alpha, release, and major gate? | [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md) | verify | stable |\n| What did Buildchain migrate or retire from old action repositories? | [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md) | verify | stable |\n| What is the active action and workflow source of truth? | [`ownership.md`](ownership.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I declare version files and custom lifecycle commands? | [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md) | use | stable |\n| How does publish evidence, recovery, and finalization work? | [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I collect and verify module/product build facts from Git source, version files, and outputs? | [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I publish or verify release passport artifacts? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I gate release artifacts with KFD-1 contract-world witnesses? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I declare, render, and audit product KFD-2 release trust claims? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md#kfd-2) + [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I gate KFD-3 collaboration-interface releases? | [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I detect, register, audit, witness, or query KFD-3 product surfaces? | [`kfd-support.md`](kfd-support.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I keep `@v2` floating refs while detecting Buildchain contract drift? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock) | verify/use | stable |\n| How do I propagate finalized upstream releases to downstream package/site PRs? | [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md) | use | preview |\n| How do paper or report repositories publish PDFs, metadata, source bundles, site-consumable manifests, npm packages, and GitHub Releases? | [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate KFD / Release Passport badge bundles without hand-maintaining Markdown? | [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I generate and verify a Homebrew tap from release passport evidence? | [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) + [`cli.md`](cli.md) | use/verify | stable |\n| How do I prove a PR-stage reusable build is the artifact source promoted later? | [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) + [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | verify | stable |\n| Why are binary release assets archived by platform, and where is the single bundle? | [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md) | verify | stable |\n| How do I add timestamped logs inside build scripts? | [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) | use | stable |\n| What package-owned facts should buildchain.libkungfu.dev render? | [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I call the reusable build workflow? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) | use | stable |\n| How does Buildchain schedule and aggregate a project-owned Shifu Gate profile? | [`shifu-gate-profiles.md`](shifu-gate-profiles.md) | use/verify | draft |\n| How do I use one build job that follows alpha during development and stable for releases? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#automatic-channel-router) | use | preview |\n| How do self-hosted runners relay large artifacts through S3 before GitHub artifacts? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay) | use | stable |\n| How do self-hosted runners reuse local Git checkout caches without weakening source locks? | [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache) | use | stable |\n| How do I validate an unreleased Buildchain runtime train while keeping `@v2`? | [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I automatically qualify alpha candidates and publish the newest non-revoked qualified candidate at a fixed window? | [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I deploy a site/app preview, staging, or production surface? | [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I publish observed infrastructure contracts for downstream consumers? | [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md) | use | preview |\n| How do I use the active actions directly? | [`../actions/validate-config/README.md`](../actions/validate-config/README.md), [`../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md`](../actions/run-lifecycle/README.md), [`../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`](../actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md), [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| How can a consumer workflow report a Buildchain-owned failure back to Buildchain? | [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md) + [`../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md`](../actions/report-buildchain-issue/README.md) | use | stable |\n| What do the fixture repositories demonstrate? | [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publish-transaction-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/web-surface-shaped/README.md), [`../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/publication-artifact-shaped/README.md) | verify | stable |\n| What license and contribution terms apply? | [`../LICENSE`](../LICENSE) + [`../LICENSE-POLICY.md`](../LICENSE-POLICY.md) | use | stable |\n| What trademark, official-service, and provider-compliance boundaries apply? | [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md) + [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md) + [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md) | use | stable |\n| How do I report a vulnerability? | [`../SECURITY.md`](../SECURITY.md) | use | stable |\n\n## Also asking about\n\n- **ABV / old workflows / old action repositories** -> [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md)\n and [`migration-inventory.md`](migration-inventory.md).\n- **v2 / v2-alpha / v2.0 / v2.0-alpha / exact tags / floating tags** ->\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md) and\n [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **Buildchain self-dogfood / released alpha canary / stable compatibility lane** ->\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood).\n- **qualified alpha ledger / scheduled stable selection / hold and revoke** ->\n [`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n- **v2.1 vs v2.2 / when to open a new minor line** ->\n [`versioning.md`](versioning.md).\n- **dry-run / what would happen if this channel PR merges** -> [`cli.md`](cli.md)\n and [`release-flow.md`](release-flow.md).\n- **protected dev branches / scheduled ready-PR merge / daily-weekly-monthly patrol** ->\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#protected-dev-branches) and\n [`release-governance.md`](release-governance.md#buildchain-patrol).\n- **pnpm / npm / yarn / package-manager adapters** ->\n [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md).\n- **pip / Conan / CMake / custom commands** -> [`lifecycle-protocol.md`](lifecycle-protocol.md)\n and [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **libnode / native artifacts / self-hosted runner matrix** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md) and\n [`../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md`](../fixtures/libnode-shaped/README.md).\n- **S3 artifact relay / self-hosted runner artifact transfer** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#artifact-transfer-relay).\n- **local Git checkout cache / self-hosted source transport** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#locked-source-checkout-cache).\n- **runtime train validation / temporary `buildchain-ref` override** ->\n [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) and\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **consumer workflow feedback / automatic Buildchain GitHub issues** ->\n [`consumer-issue-reporting.md`](consumer-issue-reporting.md).\n- **PR-stage RC artifacts / promote-only release candidates** ->\n [`release-candidate.md`](release-candidate.md) and\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md).\n- **infra contract / observed infrastructure outputs / downstream contract propagation** ->\n [`infra-contract.md`](infra-contract.md).\n- **standalone binary install / platform archives / GitHub Release bundle** ->\n [`install.md`](install.md), [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md),\n and [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md).\n- **Trusted Publishing / npm / publish evidence / recovery** ->\n [`cli.md`](cli.md) and [`publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md).\n- **Git source digest / module build facts / product build facts / legacy\n Kungfu build info** -> [`build-facts.md`](build-facts.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **release chains / upstream package or publication artifact as source of truth / site synchronization** ->\n [`release-propagation.md`](release-propagation.md).\n- **paper repositories / PDFs / publication manifests / immutable archive registries / source bundles** ->\n [`publication-artifacts.md`](publication-artifacts.md).\n- **README status badges / KFD badge bundles / badge facts JSON** ->\n [`readme-badges.md`](readme-badges.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Homebrew taps / distribution indexes / Formula drift checks** ->\n [`homebrew.md`](homebrew.md) and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **KFD-1 contract worlds / byte-for-byte release gates** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-1-contract-world-release-gate).\n- **KFD-2 public release trust claim audit** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-2-release-trust-passport-audit).\n- **KFD-3 collaboration-interface / agent-facing control surface closure** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md#kfd-3-collaboration-interface-release-gate).\n- **floating `@v2` / contract lock / compatible drift issue** ->\n [`reusable-build-surface.md`](reusable-build-surface.md#floating-ref-contract-lock).\n- **GitHub Release passport / binary assets / artifact evidence / agent release checks** ->\n [`release-passport.md`](release-passport.md),\n [`binary-distribution.md`](binary-distribution.md), and [`cli.md`](cli.md).\n- **Buildchain logging / timestamps / consumer build phase timing** ->\n [`toolkit-observability.md`](toolkit-observability.md) for JavaScript API\n imports, and [`cli.md`](cli.md) for workflow or shell command usage.\n- **buildchain.libkungfu.dev / package-owned site facts** ->\n [`site-bundle-contract.md`](site-bundle-contract.md).\n- **sites / web previews / staging / production gates** ->\n [`web-surface-deployments.md`](web-surface-deployments.md).\n- **trademark / fork / official service / provider compliance / release\n evidence boundary** -> [`../TRADEMARK.md`](../TRADEMARK.md),\n [`../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md`](../ACCEPTABLE_USE.md), and\n [`../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md`](../PROVIDER_COMPLIANCE.md).\n\n## How this map is maintained\n\n- A document becomes a row here when it is a stable entrypoint for a user,\n contributor, or workflow consumer.\n- A row's status must never claim more than the artifact delivers.\n- `why` documents explain intent and design pressure; `verify` and `use`\n documents should state what is guaranteed, where to verify it, and the current\n maturity of that guarantee."
|
|
753
753
|
},
|
|
754
754
|
{
|
|
755
755
|
"id": "manual:migration-inventory",
|
|
@@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@
|
|
|
1171
1171
|
],
|
|
1172
1172
|
"maturity": "stable",
|
|
1173
1173
|
"sourcePath": "docs/release-governance.md",
|
|
1174
|
-
"digest": "sha256:
|
|
1174
|
+
"digest": "sha256:3ae2bbc2df394726f350e58be1a71dd0379b99b19cd6ccf15fbe3b843f3890b6",
|
|
1175
1175
|
"headings": [
|
|
1176
1176
|
{
|
|
1177
1177
|
"level": 1,
|
|
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@
|
|
|
1259
1259
|
"anchor": "operational-reading-order"
|
|
1260
1260
|
}
|
|
1261
1261
|
],
|
|
1262
|
-
"markdown": "# Release Governance\n\nBuildchain v2 preserves the release semantics of the older ABV workflow while\nmoving the implementation into one modern repository.\n\nThe central idea is simple: a reviewed merge into a release channel is the\nrelease intent. Automation must then create the version-state commit, exact tag,\nfloating tag, and next alpha state that make that intent true in Git.\n\n## Design Problem\n\nKungfu release automation has to keep four facts aligned:\n\n1. The source tree that was reviewed.\n2. The package version recorded in manifests such as `package.json` or\n `lerna.json`.\n3. The exact immutable release or prerelease tag.\n4. The floating channel refs that consumers actually use.\n\nIf any one of these facts is updated by hand, the system can split:\n\n- a consumer can fetch `v2.0` and receive a tree whose package version still\n says the previous release;\n- a maintainer can move `v2` without producing an exact `v2.0.N` audit tag;\n- an alpha can be promoted to production even though the release tree is not the\n same tree that was tested;\n- a protected branch merge can succeed while the follow-up version commit is\n missing, or a flow-internal generated `dev`/`alpha`/`release` ref update can\n fail after publish because the automation identity was not declared in the\n branch-protection review bypass allowance.\n\nThe older ABV workflow addressed this by letting GitHub PRs drive release\nstate. Buildchain keeps that choice because it makes release intent reviewable,\nobservable, and recoverable from Git history.\n\n## What ABV Contributed\n\nThe old ABV model was not just \"bump a version number.\" It encoded a governance\nloop:\n\n- release branches are named as channels: `dev`, `alpha`, `release`, and the\n administrative `publish-gate/major`;\n- a PR from one channel to the next is the release request;\n- verify jobs check that the branch pair is valid before merge;\n- a maintainer review is required before the branch moves;\n- after merge, automation writes the version change and moves tags;\n- exact tags and floating refs are aligned with the resulting commit;\n- the next development channel is prepared automatically.\n\nABV also kept the version-state mutation in the repository. For JavaScript\nrepositories that usually meant changing `lerna.json` and/or `package.json`.\nThat commit is important because the tag alone is not enough evidence: the\nsource tree should also declare the version that the tag advertises.\n\nBuildchain v2 treats that as a hard semantic requirement for its own release\nline.\n\n## Buildchain Implementation\n\nBuildchain implements the same governance loop with:\n\n- `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` for PR verification;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for post-verify ref\n promotion; this workflow dogfoods the declarative\n `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper and does not hand-wire resolver,\n artifact download, publish-gate, or promote action steps;\n- Buildchain self promotion enables `release-passport-buildchain-self-kfd`, so\n the promote action generates KFD-1 witnesses, KFD-2 public claim JSON, and\n KFD-3 collaboration-interface witnesses from the final version-state workspace\n before release passport finalization. The witness hashes therefore bind to the\n exact published package and site facts from\n `packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js` instead of relying on prose release\n notes;\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` for branch, tag, version-state, and\n governance checks;\n- package-manager adapters that can update version state for pnpm, npm, and\n yarn style repositories;\n- `buildchain.toml` lifecycle configuration for repositories whose version\n state or verification commands are not Node package-manager defaults.\n\nThe implementation is intentionally stricter than a local release script:\n\n- manual workflow dispatch can only do dry-run promotion;\n- non-dry-run promotion must be driven by a completed `Verify` workflow;\n- target branch protection details must be readable, and branch protection must\n apply to administrators as well as regular contributors;\n- alpha promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `dev/vX/vX.Y` to `alpha/vX/vX.Y`;\n- release promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to `release/vX/vX.Y`;\n- major promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `release/vX/vX.Y` to `publish-gate/major`;\n- release promotion requires an existing same-patch alpha tag and checks the\n release source tree against that tested alpha tree;\n- generated version-state commits are verified before refs move.\n\nPromotion intents are serialized globally per caller repository with\n`cancel-in-progress: false`. A queued intent re-reads its protected target ref\nbefore checkout, dependency installation, release-candidate resolution, or any\npublish-gate/ref mutation. If the ref already points at a newer SHA, that older\nintent is no longer release authority: the workflow records the requested and\ncurrent SHAs, proves that the current target is ahead of the requested commit,\nand completes as a `target-ref-advanced` superseded no-op. Diverged or behind\ncomparisons are not superseded transactions and still fail closed.\nMissing refs, unreadable repository state, invalid channels, governance\nfailures, and artifact mismatches still fail closed. The promote action repeats\nthe target check at the mutation boundary, so a ref that advances after the\nworkflow preflight cannot receive a second set of publication side effects.\n\n## Version Lines\n\nKungfu uses Python-like version lines where a minor line can represent a\nlong-lived product train. A line such as `v2.0` can produce many production\npatch releases:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1\nv2.0.2\n...\nv2.0.1234\n```\n\nThis is why Buildchain maintains both exact and floating refs:\n\n- `v2.0.2` is immutable release evidence;\n- `v2.0` is the latest production release on the `2.0` line;\n- `v2` is the selected stable major-line entrypoint;\n- `v2.0.3-alpha.0` is immutable alpha evidence;\n- `v2.0-alpha` is the latest test channel for the `2.0` line.\n- `v2-alpha` is the latest test channel on the highest published alpha minor in major `2`.\n\nA release does not mean \"minor is complete.\" It means \"this patch on this minor\nline is now production.\"\n\nGitHub repository rules must preserve that distinction. Exact tags such as\n`v2.0.2` and `v2.0.3-alpha.0` should be immutable. Floating channel tags such as\n`v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`, and `v2-alpha` must remain movable by the Buildchain promotion\ntoken after governance checks and publish evidence pass. A tag ruleset that\nprotects every `refs/tags/v*` ref is too broad because it also locks the\nfloating channel tags that Buildchain is required to update. Prefer exact-tag\npatterns such as `refs/tags/v*.*.*` for immutable release evidence, while\nleaving floating channel tags under Buildchain automation control.\n\n## Alpha Semantics\n\nAn alpha merge is:\n\n```text\ndev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Computes the next prerelease for the minor line.\n2. Writes version state such as `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N`.\n3. Verifies the generated version-state tree.\n4. Creates or reuses the exact alpha tag.\n5. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to the generated alpha commit.\n6. Moves `dev/vX/vX.Y` to the same generated alpha commit when this is a\n fast-forward update.\n7. Moves `vX.Y-alpha` to the same generated alpha commit.\n8. Moves `vX-alpha` only when `X.Y` is the highest minor in major `X` with a published alpha; older minor alpha work records a skip and cannot move the major channel backwards.\n\nThis keeps the test channel self-describing. If a consumer checks out\n`v2.0-alpha` or `v2-alpha`, the manifests and exact alpha tag agree. The major\nalpha ref removes routine consumer edits when Buildchain opens a newer minor,\nwhile exact tags and SHAs remain the reproducible audit choice.\n\n### Buildchain Alpha Self-Dogfood\n\nBuildchain continuously consumes its own current major alpha through\n`.github/workflows/buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood.yml`. Both lanes call the\nreleased channel router at `build.yml@v2-alpha`. The auto lane must resolve\n`v2-alpha`; the explicit stable lane must resolve `v2`. Both execute the same\ndeclared install, build, and verify fixture, proving that a single consumer\nsurface routes to distinct released runtimes without duplicating lifecycle\nconfiguration in the consumer.\n\nThe reusable build trust gate reads `job.workflow_ref`, which identifies the\ncalled workflow and its selected ref. It does not infer the runtime from\n`github.workflow_ref`, because GitHub defines that context as the caller\nworkflow identity during a reusable call.\n\nThe router selects `.buildchain/alpha-contract-lock.json` for alpha and\n`.buildchain/contract-lock.json` for stable. The alpha lock records the exact\nreviewed alpha SHA and compatibility digest; it does not replace the stable\nconsumer lock. A later alpha with only compatible additive drift continues,\nwhile a changed breaking digest fails until the new alpha contract is reviewed.\n\nThe evidence job resolves `v2-alpha` and `v2` through the GitHub refs API,\ncompares those immutable SHAs with the reusable workflow outputs, verifies the\n`alpha` and `stable` classifications, and uploads a JSON evidence artifact.\nThe canary runs after successful Buildchain ref promotion, on a daily fallback\nschedule, and on manual dispatch. It shares the release-promotion concurrency\ngroup, so another promotion cannot move the floating refs between runtime\nresolution and evidence comparison.\n\nThis is a post-publication consumer canary, not a release bootstrap. Source\nverification still runs the current commit, and\n`buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` still passes the verified exact SHA into the\npromotion workflow. Patrol, dev-merge, repair, and promotion defaults remain on\nstable or exact refs so a broken alpha cannot prevent Buildchain from publishing\nits fix. When Buildchain opens a new major, inventory validation requires this\nworkflow's fixed GitHub `uses` refs to move from `vN`/`vN-alpha` to the new\nmajor; GitHub does not allow expressions in a reusable-workflow `uses` ref.\n\nIf `dev/vX/vX.Y` has already advanced before generated alpha version-state\nbookkeeping can sync back, Buildchain records `skipped-non-fast-forward` for the\ndev sync and still completes the exact and floating alpha tags for the reviewed\nalpha commit. Later dev changes must go through their own dev-to-alpha\npromotion instead of rewinding dev. The normal path is direct: after alpha\nmerges, Buildchain applies the generated version-state commit to alpha and then\nfast-forwards dev to the same commit without a human version-state PR.\n\nIf alpha finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain accepts the current alpha head as the generated\ncommit, or as a historical merge commit that contains the recorded release\nmaterial. An already-created exact alpha tag may point at the transaction\nrelease/material SHA or at the finalized alpha head; missing floating alpha\ntags are retried before the transaction becomes `complete`.\n\n## Release Semantics\n\nA release merge is:\n\n```text\nalpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Finds the same-patch alpha tag that was tested.\n2. Checks that the release source tree matches that alpha tag tree, excluding\n only generated version-state differences.\n3. Writes final release version state such as `vX.Y.Z`.\n4. Verifies the generated release tree.\n5. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `vX.Y.Z`.\n6. Moves `release/vX/vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n7. Moves `vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n8. Moves `vX` when this minor line should be the stable major entrypoint.\n9. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0`.\n10. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y`, and `vX.Y-alpha` to that next alpha\n commit.\n11. Moves `vX-alpha` to that next alpha only when this remains the highest published alpha minor.\n\nThe production channel and the test channel therefore intentionally diverge\nafter release: production stays on the release commit, while alpha/dev continue\nat the next prerelease commit.\n\n### Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate\n\nBuildchain's own stable channel has an additional pre-publication gate. It is\nevaluated after the PR-stage release candidate has been resolved and before the\npublish-gate ref, package registry, exact stable tag, or floating stable refs\nare mutated. Train refs and alpha promotion do not execute this gate.\n\nAll alpha and release promotions first run a metadata-only release-candidate\npreflight after queued-intent revalidation. The preflight uses the same resolver\nand exact target SHA as the publication job, but does not download payloads or\ninstall the candidate repository dependencies. Missing channel PRs, stale\nworkflow runs, expired passport pairs, and insufficient payload artifact sets\ntherefore fail before the full promotion job starts. The publication job still\ndownloads and validates the exact evidence again at the trust boundary; the\npreflight moves failure earlier without weakening the final check.\n\nThe policy is versioned in `.buildchain/stable-release-policy.json`. A stable\ncandidate is allowed only when all of these facts are true:\n\n- the candidate resolves to an immutable exact alpha tag and its GitHub\n prerelease timestamp;\n- at least 24 hours have passed since the preceding stable patch on the same\n minor line;\n- the preceding stable-to-alpha comparison contains a product or public\n contract path, not only version, test, evidence, or retrospective changes;\n- the version-bound impact record has a non-empty summary and at least one\n surface impact;\n- the `Build Surface Fixture` release-candidate run succeeded;\n- `site-libkungfu-dev` completed its no-apply `Buildchain Stable Canary` and an allowed\n maintainer attested that successful run on the exact alpha SHA through the\n `buildchain-canary/site-libkungfu-dev` commit-status context;\n- the canary runtime input is exactly the candidate alpha tag or the 40-character\n commit SHA resolved from that tag; a successful status pointing at another\n workflow, repository, tag, floating ref, or SHA is rejected as mismatched;\n- at least one hour has elapsed after the last required canary completed.\n\nThe machine report is written to\n`.buildchain/release-passport/stable-release-gate.json`. A passing report is\nuploaded with the stable release passport. A blocked run writes the same report\nbefore failing, so the missing or stale condition is inspectable without\nopening a publication transaction.\n\nGitHub's Actions run REST object does not expose `workflow_dispatch` inputs.\nBuildchain therefore verifies the run's `workflow_id` against the authoritative\nworkflow metadata, then reads the exact runtime from the workflow-owned\n`<workflow name> / <runtime ref>` run-name when no input field is available.\nAn explicit API input, when present, remains authoritative and cannot be\noverridden by the display name.\n\nThe cooldown is a minimum interval, not an instruction to release every day.\nCompatible work should still be batched until a stable release has a concrete\nconsumer need. Changing the interval, canary set, attestors, product path\nboundary, or soak time is a reviewed policy change.\n\nRepositories that want a predictable scheduled stable window can use\n[`Stable Candidate Patrol`](stable-candidate-patrol.md). It persists each exact\nalpha independently, qualifies it after repository-declared checks and soak,\nand selects the newest qualified non-revoked candidate. A newer soaking alpha\ndoes not invalidate an older qualified candidate. The selected tree enters the\nexisting strict `publish-gate/release/<line>/<version> -> release/<line>` PR\npath, so scheduled selection changes release intent timing without weakening\nsource locks, review, verification, publish transactions, or passports.\n\nIf release finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain applies the same recovery rule: the current\nrelease head may be the generated commit, or a historical merge commit that\ncontains the recorded release material, existing exact tags and alpha/dev refs\nare accepted when they match the transaction, and missing floating `vX.Y` or\n`vX` tags are retried idempotently before completion.\n\nOnce the durable release transaction is `complete` and the exact/floating\nstable refs have moved, next-alpha preparation is post-release bookkeeping. A\nfailure there records `deferred-post-release-bookkeeping` and\n`next-anchor-required` instead of retroactively reporting the stable release as\nfailed. Generated next-alpha merges use the current dev tree as their base and\noverlay only declared version-state paths, preserving concurrent dev changes.\n\n## Major Gate Semantics\n\nA major gate merge is:\n\n```text\nrelease/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is the explicit replacement for the older ABV `main`\nchannel. The name is intentionally operational: it is a gate for a rare\nadministrator decision, not the active trunk. Keeping this decision in the same\nPR UI as alpha and release promotion keeps the human workflow simple while\navoiding the misleading meaning of `main`. The older `major-gate` branch name is\na compatibility alias only.\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Verifies the source is a merged same-repository PR from a protected release\n line into `publish-gate/major`.\n2. Writes the next major production version state, such as `v(X+1).0.0`.\n3. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `v(X+1).0.0`.\n4. Moves `publish-gate/major` and `release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0` to that release commit.\n5. Moves `v(X+1).0` and `v(X+1)` to that release commit.\n6. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0`.\n7. Moves `alpha/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, `dev/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, and\n `v(X+1).0-alpha` to that next alpha commit.\n\nChecking out `publish-gate/major` should therefore look like a frozen release\nstate, not like a branch where day-to-day source work continues. Day-to-day\nsource work continues on `dev/vX/vX.Y`.\n\n## Protected Dev Branches\n\n`dev/vX/vX.Y` is a protected development channel, not a scratch branch. Normal\nsource changes should be made on work branches such as `feature/*`, `fix/*`,\n`chore/*`, `docs/*`, `ci/*`, or `refactor/*`, then reviewed through a pull\nrequest into the target dev line.\n\nThis keeps the earliest development channel audit-friendly:\n\n- the version line being changed is visible in the PR base branch;\n- CI and required checks run before the channel moves;\n- branch protection can prevent direct pushes and stale merges;\n- later `dev -> alpha -> release` promotion inherits a reviewable source\n lineage instead of trying to reconstruct how the dev branch changed.\n\nBuildchain provides the reusable\n`.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` workflow for repositories that want a\nscheduled or manual \"merge ready dev PRs\" pass. The consumer repository owns\nthe trigger schedule, but the merge decision is declared through workflow\ninputs: target dev branch, required status/check names, ready and block labels,\nallowed work-branch prefixes, review requirements, maximum merges per run,\nmerge method, and dry-run mode.\n\nThe workflow defaults are conservative. A PR is skipped unless it targets the\nconfigured dev line, is not a draft, has the ready label, has no block label,\ncomes from the same repository, uses an allowed work-branch prefix, has a\ncurrent approval, is mergeable, and has the configured required checks passing.\nAfter each merge, the next PR is re-evaluated before it can move the protected\ndev branch. This prevents one merge from silently making the next candidate\nstale or conflicting.\n\nThe canonical consumer required check context is `check / check`, matching the\nreusable workflow call plus its `check` job. Buildchain's own `Verify` workflow\nemits the repository-local context `check`, so Buildchain self-promotion,\nrelease-line bootstrap, and dogfood patrol wrappers pass `check` explicitly.\nRelease governance preserves the exact context emitted by the repository and\nrecords branch-protection policy before/after facts; it does not rewrite one\ncontext shape into the other. Consumer repositories can keep their context\nstable while changing the actual verification command declaratively in\n`buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"cargo fetch --locked\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"cargo test --workspace --locked\"\n```\n\nConsumers that want Buildchain to own the check wrapper can call\n`.github/workflows/check.yml@v2`. The wrapper runs the declared\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.verify` stages and fails the `check` job when\neither declaration is missing or the command exits non-zero.\n\nTypical consumer wrapper:\n\n```yaml\nname: Merge Ready Dev PRs\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 * * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n dry-run:\n type: boolean\n default: true\n\njobs:\n merge-dev:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml@v2\n permissions:\n contents: write\n pull-requests: write\n checks: read\n statuses: read\n with:\n target-branch: dev/v2/v2.6\n required-status-checks: check / check\n ready-label: ready\n block-labels: blocked,do-not-merge\n max-merges: 1\n dry-run: ${{ inputs.dry-run || false }}\n```\n\n## Buildchain Patrol\n\n`dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` remains the focused merge primitive. For repositories\nthat want a stable day-to-day operations contract, Buildchain also exposes a\npatrol workflow family:\n\n| Workflow | Intended cadence | Default intent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml` | daily | lightweight inspection plus ready dev PR maintenance |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml` | weekly | release-state, passport, gate, and stale-state health checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-monthly.yml` | monthly | governance, permission, branch-protection, and workflow drift checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/stable-candidate-patrol.yml` | repository-selected release window | qualify immutable alpha candidates and open the exact source-lock stable PR |\n\nThe cadence names describe patrol intensity, not release cadence:\n\n- daily patrol can run every day without implying a daily release;\n- weekly patrol is for medium-cost maintenance and audit checks;\n- monthly patrol is for structural drift checks that should not block ordinary\n development velocity.\n\nStable Candidate Patrol is separate from those maintenance cadences because its\ncaller-owned cron is a release-intent window. Its candidate ledger and selection\nremain generic; registry-specific side effects still run through the normal\nrepository `lifecycle.publish` transaction. See\n[`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n\nConsumers should schedule thin callers and keep their YAML declarative. For\nexample:\n\n```yaml\nname: Buildchain Daily Patrol\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 2 * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: false\n max-actions: 1\n```\n\nWeekly and monthly callers use the matching wrapper:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: true\n```\n\nAll three wrappers default to the `v2` floating Buildchain runtime. When\n`target-branch` is omitted, the caller's current/default branch selects the\nactive semver dev line, so consumers do not pin patrol to a stale minor branch.\nThe separate workflow names keep consumer schedules readable and stable while\nBuildchain adds new checks behind the cadence wrappers.\n\n## Package-Manager Adapters\n\nOld ABV assumed JavaScript repositories with root version state and often\nLerna. Buildchain keeps the version-state contract but does not assume every\nrepository is yarn/Lerna.\n\nThe promotion action discovers and updates:\n\n- root `package.json`;\n- `lerna.json`;\n- package manifests from `package.json` workspaces;\n- package manifests from `lerna.json` packages;\n- package manifests from `pnpm-workspace.yaml`.\n\nIt then runs the repository's detected package manager semantics where needed:\n\n- pnpm repositories use pnpm-oriented workspace discovery;\n- npm repositories use npm/package-lock semantics where present;\n- yarn repositories use yarn-style metadata where present.\n\nFor Buildchain itself, version state is required. For a consumer repository that\nhas no package manifest, the same action can degrade to ref-only behavior only\nwhen that is explicitly allowed by the caller.\n\n## Lifecycle Configuration\n\n`buildchain.toml` is the v2 user configuration format. It lets a repository\ndeclare version-state files and lifecycle commands without pretending every\nproject is a Node workspace. Supported version files include JSON, TOML, and\nregex-based files such as `CMakeLists.txt` or `conanfile.py`.\n\nThe promotion action currently consumes `version.files` and `lifecycle.verify`.\nThe verify stage runs after generated version-state changes are applied locally\nand before any release refs move. If `verification-command` is passed directly\nto the action, that explicit command overrides `lifecycle.verify`.\n\nProtected release-line branches keep their normal human review gate. Managed\n`dev/vN/vN.M`, `alpha/vN/vN.M`, and `release/vN/vN.M` branches are configured\nwith one required approving review, strict GitHub Actions checks, administrator\nenforcement, conversation resolution, no force pushes, and no deletions. The\nreusable `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper defaults\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`, which lets the workflow's\nautomation identity apply generated version-state or post-publish channel\nbookkeeping after the reviewed channel PR has merged. Direct\n`promote-buildchain-ref` callers must opt into the same controlled bypass with\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps`, `branch-protection-bypass-users`, or\n`branch-protection-bypass-teams`; the action also adds the current promotion\ntoken's authenticated user or app to the managed bypass allowlist. Before\npatching a protected generated bookkeeping ref, the action creates the\nconfigured required check on the exact generated version-state commit, so strict\nstatus checks are satisfied by machine-verifiable Buildchain evidence rather\nthan a human PR. The protected ref PATCH itself uses the generated ref update\ntoken; the reusable wrapper defaults it to\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token`. If direct generated\nrelease finalization bookkeeping is still rejected, Buildchain creates or\nreuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR based on the current\ntarget channel head and records `finalization-needed=true` in the durable\ntransaction output. Strict alpha bookkeeping still fails with a\ntoken/protection diagnostic instead of creating a post-publish PR.\nBuildchain's own promotion workflow reads `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_APPS`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_USERS`, and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_TEAMS` repository variables so the declared bypass\nidentity can match the actual `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` actor, but consumers\ndo not need to duplicate that actor manually when the token identity is\ndiscoverable.\n\n## What This Guarantees\n\nWhen the loop succeeds, maintainers and consumers can rely on these facts:\n\n- every production release has an exact tag such as `v2.0.2`;\n- every production minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0`;\n- every selected stable major has a floating tag such as `v2`;\n- every next-major release is driven by a reviewed `release -> publish-gate/major` PR,\n not a hidden manual button;\n- every test channel has an exact alpha tag such as `v2.0.3-alpha.0`;\n- every alpha minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0-alpha`;\n- every major with a published alpha has a cross-minor floating tag such as `v2-alpha`, owned by its highest published alpha minor;\n- version manifests match the tag visible from the same commit;\n- production releases are derived from the alpha tree that was tested;\n- manual non-dry-run promotion cannot bypass PR review and verification;\n- flow-internal automation bypasses apply only to declared GitHub Apps, users,\n or teams on Buildchain-managed channel branch protection, while one-review\n protection remains enforced for humans;\n- admin users cannot make a channel promotion valid by temporarily bypassing\n branch protection.\n\nThis is the practical meaning of \"governance closed loop\" in Buildchain: the\ndecision, code, version state, and Git refs close over the same evidence chain.\n\n## What This Does Not Do\n\nBuildchain release promotion does not embed registry clients or product-specific\npublish logic. When publish transactions are enabled, `promote-buildchain-ref`\ncan run the consumer's `lifecycle.publish` command and own the transaction,\nevidence validation, durable recovery state, and ref finalization order. The\nconsumer repository still owns registry truth: npm, PyPI, OCI, S3, Conan, CMake\npackaging, download pages, dist-tags, and similar side effects must be\nimplemented by project lifecycle commands that emit Buildchain publish evidence.\n\nEvery Buildchain publish model that can run registry side effects must bind the\npublish entrypoint to an immutable `publish-gate/*` source lock. The reusable\n`release-candidate-promote.yml@v2` wrapper creates or updates that gate ref and\npasses `require-publish-source-lock`, `publish-source-ref`,\n`publish-source-sha`, and `publish-source-locked` to\n`promote-buildchain-ref`. Direct action callers must pass the same four inputs\nfrom the reusable build outputs. Workflows that only collect passports or run\ndry-run package checks do not move publish refs and are not publish-gate\npublication models.\n\nSemver GitHub Release publication is owned by `promote-buildchain-ref`, not by\nconsumer shell glue. Consumers normally use the `release-candidate-promote.yml`\nwrapper, where GitHub Release publication is enabled by default and can be\ndisabled with `github-release: false`; the wrapper passes that declaration to\nthe action. After the publish transaction reaches `complete`, Buildchain creates\nor updates the public GitHub Release and uploads the generated\n`buildchain.release.json`, release-passport assets, and publish evidence. Semver\nprerelease tags are marked `prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`; stable\nsemver tags are marked latest. For anchored/manual package releases, the public\nrelease tag defaults to `v<publishedVersion>` while the internal exact\ntransaction tag remains in the release passport and release-state ref. This is\nthe supported path for downstream\n`release.published` propagation across semver, major, and promote-only release\ncandidate publication models.\n\nBuildchain also does not maintain bare exact tags such as `1.0.0`. The supported\nexact release and alpha refs are v-prefixed:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1-alpha.0\n```\n\n## Operational Reading Order\n\nWhen debugging or extending release behavior, read in this order:\n\n1. `docs/release-flow.md`\n2. `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml`\n3. `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n4. `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml`\n5. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`\n6. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/src/`\n7. `docs/migration-inventory.md`\n\nThat path gives the policy first, the workflow trigger second, and the action\nimplementation last."
|
|
1262
|
+
"markdown": "# Release Governance\n\nBuildchain v2 preserves the release semantics of the older ABV workflow while\nmoving the implementation into one modern repository.\n\nThe central idea is simple: a reviewed merge into a release channel is the\nrelease intent. Automation must then create the version-state commit, exact tag,\nfloating tag, and next alpha state that make that intent true in Git.\n\n## Design Problem\n\nKungfu release automation has to keep four facts aligned:\n\n1. The source tree that was reviewed.\n2. The package version recorded in manifests such as `package.json` or\n `lerna.json`.\n3. The exact immutable release or prerelease tag.\n4. The floating channel refs that consumers actually use.\n\nIf any one of these facts is updated by hand, the system can split:\n\n- a consumer can fetch `v2.0` and receive a tree whose package version still\n says the previous release;\n- a maintainer can move `v2` without producing an exact `v2.0.N` audit tag;\n- an alpha can be promoted to production even though the release tree is not the\n same tree that was tested;\n- a protected branch merge can succeed while the follow-up version commit is\n missing, or a flow-internal generated `dev`/`alpha`/`release` ref update can\n fail after publish because the automation identity was not declared in the\n branch-protection review bypass allowance.\n\nThe older ABV workflow addressed this by letting GitHub PRs drive release\nstate. Buildchain keeps that choice because it makes release intent reviewable,\nobservable, and recoverable from Git history.\n\n## What ABV Contributed\n\nThe old ABV model was not just \"bump a version number.\" It encoded a governance\nloop:\n\n- release branches are named as channels: `dev`, `alpha`, `release`, and the\n administrative `publish-gate/major`;\n- a PR from one channel to the next is the release request;\n- verify jobs check that the branch pair is valid before merge;\n- a maintainer review is required before the branch moves;\n- after merge, automation writes the version change and moves tags;\n- exact tags and floating refs are aligned with the resulting commit;\n- the next development channel is prepared automatically.\n\nABV also kept the version-state mutation in the repository. For JavaScript\nrepositories that usually meant changing `lerna.json` and/or `package.json`.\nThat commit is important because the tag alone is not enough evidence: the\nsource tree should also declare the version that the tag advertises.\n\nBuildchain v2 treats that as a hard semantic requirement for its own release\nline.\n\n## Buildchain Implementation\n\nBuildchain implements the same governance loop with:\n\n- `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` for PR verification;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for post-verify ref\n promotion; this workflow dogfoods the declarative\n `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper and does not hand-wire resolver,\n artifact download, publish-gate, or promote action steps;\n- Buildchain self promotion enables `release-passport-buildchain-self-kfd`, so\n the promote action generates KFD-1 witnesses, KFD-2 public claim JSON, and\n KFD-3 collaboration-interface witnesses from the final version-state workspace\n before release passport finalization. The witness hashes therefore bind to the\n exact published package and site facts from\n `packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js` instead of relying on prose release\n notes;\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` for branch, tag, version-state, and\n governance checks;\n- package-manager adapters that can update version state for pnpm, npm, and\n yarn style repositories;\n- `buildchain.toml` lifecycle configuration for repositories whose version\n state or verification commands are not Node package-manager defaults.\n\nThe implementation is intentionally stricter than a local release script:\n\n- manual workflow dispatch can only do dry-run promotion;\n- non-dry-run promotion must be driven by a completed `Verify` workflow;\n- target branch protection details must be readable, and branch protection must\n apply to administrators as well as regular contributors;\n- alpha promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `dev/vX/vX.Y` to `alpha/vX/vX.Y`;\n- release promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to `release/vX/vX.Y`;\n- major promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `release/vX/vX.Y` to `publish-gate/major`;\n- release promotion requires an existing same-patch alpha tag and checks the\n release source tree against that tested alpha tree;\n- generated version-state commits are verified before refs move.\n\nPromotion intents are serialized globally per caller repository with\n`cancel-in-progress: false`. A queued intent re-reads its protected target ref\nbefore checkout, dependency installation, release-candidate resolution, or any\npublish-gate/ref mutation. If the ref already points at a newer SHA, that older\nintent is no longer release authority: the workflow records the requested and\ncurrent SHAs, proves that the current target is ahead of the requested commit,\nand completes as a `target-ref-advanced` superseded no-op. Diverged or behind\ncomparisons are not superseded transactions and still fail closed.\nMissing refs, unreadable repository state, invalid channels, governance\nfailures, and artifact mismatches still fail closed. The promote action repeats\nthe target check at the mutation boundary, so a ref that advances after the\nworkflow preflight cannot receive a second set of publication side effects.\n\n## Version Lines\n\nKungfu uses Python-like version lines where a minor line can represent a\nlong-lived product train. A line such as `v2.0` can produce many production\npatch releases:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1\nv2.0.2\n...\nv2.0.1234\n```\n\nThis is why Buildchain maintains both exact and floating refs:\n\n- `v2.0.2` is immutable release evidence;\n- `v2.0` is the latest production release on the `2.0` line;\n- `v2` is the selected stable major-line entrypoint;\n- `v2.0.3-alpha.0` is immutable alpha evidence;\n- `v2.0-alpha` is the latest test channel for the `2.0` line.\n- `v2-alpha` is the latest test channel on the highest published alpha minor in major `2`.\n\nA release does not mean \"minor is complete.\" It means \"this patch on this minor\nline is now production.\"\n\nGitHub repository rules must preserve that distinction. Exact tags such as\n`v2.0.2` and `v2.0.3-alpha.0` should be immutable. Floating channel tags such as\n`v2`, `v2.0`, `v2.0-alpha`, and `v2-alpha` must remain movable by the Buildchain promotion\ntoken after governance checks and publish evidence pass. A tag ruleset that\nprotects every `refs/tags/v*` ref is too broad because it also locks the\nfloating channel tags that Buildchain is required to update. Prefer exact-tag\npatterns such as `refs/tags/v*.*.*` for immutable release evidence, while\nleaving floating channel tags under Buildchain automation control.\n\n## Alpha Semantics\n\nAn alpha merge is:\n\n```text\ndev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Computes the next prerelease for the minor line.\n2. Writes version state such as `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N`.\n3. Verifies the generated version-state tree.\n4. Creates or reuses the exact alpha tag.\n5. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to the generated alpha commit.\n6. Moves `dev/vX/vX.Y` to the same generated alpha commit when this is a\n fast-forward update.\n7. Moves `vX.Y-alpha` to the same generated alpha commit.\n8. Moves `vX-alpha` only when `X.Y` is the highest minor in major `X` with a published alpha; older minor alpha work records a skip and cannot move the major channel backwards.\n\nThis keeps the test channel self-describing. If a consumer checks out\n`v2.0-alpha` or `v2-alpha`, the manifests and exact alpha tag agree. The major\nalpha ref removes routine consumer edits when Buildchain opens a newer minor,\nwhile exact tags and SHAs remain the reproducible audit choice.\n\n### Buildchain Alpha Self-Dogfood\n\nBuildchain continuously consumes its own current major alpha through\n`.github/workflows/buildchain-alpha-self-dogfood.yml`. Both lanes call the\nreleased channel router at `build.yml@v2-alpha`. The auto lane must resolve\n`v2-alpha`; the explicit stable lane must resolve `v2`. Both execute the same\ndeclared install, build, and verify fixture, proving that a single consumer\nsurface routes to distinct released runtimes without duplicating lifecycle\nconfiguration in the consumer.\n\nThe reusable build trust gate reads `job.workflow_ref`, which identifies the\ncalled workflow and its selected ref. It does not infer the runtime from\n`github.workflow_ref`, because GitHub defines that context as the caller\nworkflow identity during a reusable call.\n\nThe router selects `.buildchain/alpha-contract-lock.json` for alpha and\n`.buildchain/contract-lock.json` for stable. The alpha lock records the exact\nreviewed alpha SHA and compatibility digest; it does not replace the stable\nconsumer lock. A later alpha with only compatible additive drift continues,\nwhile a changed breaking digest fails until the new alpha contract is reviewed.\n\nThe evidence job resolves `v2-alpha` and `v2` through the GitHub refs API,\ncompares those immutable SHAs with the reusable workflow outputs, verifies the\n`alpha` and `stable` classifications, and uploads a JSON evidence artifact.\nThe canary runs after successful Buildchain ref promotion, on a daily fallback\nschedule, and on manual dispatch. It shares the release-promotion concurrency\ngroup, so another promotion cannot move the floating refs between runtime\nresolution and evidence comparison.\n\nThis is a post-publication consumer canary, not a release bootstrap. Source\nverification still runs the current commit, and\n`buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` still passes the verified exact SHA into the\npromotion workflow. Patrol, dev-merge, repair, and promotion defaults remain on\nstable or exact refs so a broken alpha cannot prevent Buildchain from publishing\nits fix. When Buildchain opens a new major, inventory validation requires this\nworkflow's fixed GitHub `uses` refs to move from `vN`/`vN-alpha` to the new\nmajor; GitHub does not allow expressions in a reusable-workflow `uses` ref.\n\nIf `dev/vX/vX.Y` has already advanced before generated alpha version-state\nbookkeeping can sync back, Buildchain records `skipped-non-fast-forward` for the\ndev sync and still completes the exact and floating alpha tags for the reviewed\nalpha commit. Later dev changes must go through their own dev-to-alpha\npromotion instead of rewinding dev. The normal path is direct: after alpha\nmerges, Buildchain applies the generated version-state commit to alpha and then\nfast-forwards dev to the same commit without a human version-state PR.\n\nIf alpha finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain accepts the current alpha head as the generated\ncommit, or as a historical merge commit that contains the recorded release\nmaterial. An already-created exact alpha tag may point at the transaction\nrelease/material SHA or at the finalized alpha head; missing floating alpha\ntags are retried before the transaction becomes `complete`.\n\n## Release Semantics\n\nA release merge is:\n\n```text\nalpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Finds the same-patch alpha tag that was tested.\n2. Checks that the release source tree matches that alpha tag tree, excluding\n only generated version-state differences.\n3. Writes final release version state such as `vX.Y.Z`.\n4. Verifies the generated release tree.\n5. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `vX.Y.Z`.\n6. Moves `release/vX/vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n7. Moves `vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n8. Moves `vX` when this minor line should be the stable major entrypoint.\n9. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0`.\n10. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y`, and `vX.Y-alpha` to that next alpha\n commit.\n11. Moves `vX-alpha` to that next alpha only when this remains the highest published alpha minor.\n\nThe production channel and the test channel therefore intentionally diverge\nafter release: production stays on the release commit, while alpha/dev continue\nat the next prerelease commit.\n\n### Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate\n\nBuildchain's own stable channel has an additional pre-publication gate. It is\nevaluated after the PR-stage release candidate has been resolved and before the\npublish-gate ref, package registry, exact stable tag, or floating stable refs\nare mutated. Train refs and alpha promotion do not execute this gate.\n\nAll alpha and release promotions first run a metadata-only release-candidate\npreflight after queued-intent revalidation. The preflight uses the same resolver\nand exact target SHA as the publication job, but does not download payloads or\ninstall the candidate repository dependencies. Missing channel PRs, stale\nworkflow runs, expired passport pairs, and insufficient payload artifact sets\ntherefore fail before the full promotion job starts. The publication job still\ndownloads and validates the exact evidence again at the trust boundary; the\npreflight moves failure earlier without weakening the final check.\n\nThe policy is versioned in `.buildchain/stable-release-policy.json`. A stable\ncandidate is allowed only when all of these facts are true:\n\n- the candidate resolves to an immutable exact alpha tag and its GitHub\n prerelease timestamp;\n- at least 24 hours have passed since the preceding stable patch on the same\n minor line;\n- the preceding stable-to-alpha comparison contains a product or public\n contract path, not only version, test, evidence, or retrospective changes;\n- the version-bound impact record has a non-empty summary and at least one\n surface impact;\n- the `Build Surface Fixture` release-candidate run succeeded;\n- `site-libkungfu-dev` completed its no-apply `Buildchain Stable Canary` and an allowed\n maintainer attested that successful run on the exact alpha SHA through the\n `buildchain-canary/site-libkungfu-dev` commit-status context;\n- the canary runtime input is exactly the candidate alpha tag or the 40-character\n commit SHA resolved from that tag; a successful status pointing at another\n workflow, repository, tag, floating ref, or SHA is rejected as mismatched;\n- at least one hour has elapsed after the last required canary completed.\n\nThe machine report is written to\n`.buildchain/release-passport/stable-release-gate.json`. A passing report is\nuploaded with the stable release passport. A blocked run writes the same report\nbefore failing, so the missing or stale condition is inspectable without\nopening a publication transaction.\n\nGitHub's Actions run REST object does not expose `workflow_dispatch` inputs.\nBuildchain therefore verifies the run's `workflow_id` against the authoritative\nworkflow metadata, then reads the exact runtime from the workflow-owned\n`<workflow name> / <runtime ref>` run-name when no input field is available.\nAn explicit API input, when present, remains authoritative and cannot be\noverridden by the display name.\n\nThe cooldown is a minimum interval, not an instruction to release every day.\nCompatible work should still be batched until a stable release has a concrete\nconsumer need. Changing the interval, canary set, attestors, product path\nboundary, or soak time is a reviewed policy change.\n\nRepositories that want a predictable scheduled stable window can use\n[`Stable Candidate Patrol`](stable-candidate-patrol.md). It persists each exact\nalpha independently, qualifies it after repository-declared checks and soak,\nand selects the newest qualified non-revoked candidate. A newer soaking alpha\ndoes not invalidate an older qualified candidate. The selected tree enters the\nexisting strict `publish-gate/release/<line>/<version> -> release/<line>` PR\npath, so scheduled selection changes release intent timing without weakening\nsource locks, review, verification, publish transactions, or passports.\n\nIf release finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain applies the same recovery rule: the current\nrelease head may be the generated commit, or a historical merge commit that\ncontains the recorded release material, existing exact tags and alpha/dev refs\nare accepted when they match the transaction, and missing floating `vX.Y` or\n`vX` tags are retried idempotently before completion.\n\nOnce the durable release transaction is `complete` and the exact/floating\nstable refs have moved, next-alpha preparation is post-release bookkeeping. A\nfailure there records `deferred-post-release-bookkeeping` and\n`next-anchor-required` instead of retroactively reporting the stable release as\nfailed. Generated next-alpha merges use the current dev tree as their base and\noverlay only declared version-state paths, preserving concurrent dev changes.\n\n## Major Gate Semantics\n\nA major gate merge is:\n\n```text\nrelease/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is the explicit replacement for the older ABV `main`\nchannel. The name is intentionally operational: it is a gate for a rare\nadministrator decision, not the active trunk. Keeping this decision in the same\nPR UI as alpha and release promotion keeps the human workflow simple while\navoiding the misleading meaning of `main`. The older `major-gate` branch name is\na compatibility alias only.\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Verifies the source is a merged same-repository PR from a protected release\n line into `publish-gate/major`.\n2. Writes the next major production version state, such as `v(X+1).0.0`.\n3. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `v(X+1).0.0`.\n4. Moves `publish-gate/major` and `release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0` to that release commit.\n5. Moves `v(X+1).0` and `v(X+1)` to that release commit.\n6. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0`.\n7. Moves `alpha/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, `dev/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, and\n `v(X+1).0-alpha` to that next alpha commit.\n\nChecking out `publish-gate/major` should therefore look like a frozen release\nstate, not like a branch where day-to-day source work continues. Day-to-day\nsource work continues on `dev/vX/vX.Y`.\n\n## Protected Dev Branches\n\n`dev/vX/vX.Y` is a protected development channel, not a scratch branch. Normal\nsource changes should be made on work branches such as `feature/*`, `fix/*`,\n`chore/*`, `docs/*`, `ci/*`, or `refactor/*`, then reviewed through a pull\nrequest into the target dev line.\n\nThis keeps the earliest development channel audit-friendly:\n\n- the version line being changed is visible in the PR base branch;\n- CI and required checks run before the channel moves;\n- branch protection can prevent direct pushes and stale merges;\n- later `dev -> alpha -> release` promotion inherits a reviewable source\n lineage instead of trying to reconstruct how the dev branch changed.\n\nBuildchain provides the reusable\n`.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` workflow for repositories that want a\nscheduled or manual \"merge ready dev PRs\" pass. The consumer repository owns\nthe trigger schedule, but the merge decision is declared through workflow\ninputs: target dev branch, required status/check names, ready and block labels,\nallowed work-branch prefixes, review requirements, maximum merges per run,\nmerge method, and dry-run mode.\n\nThe workflow defaults are conservative. A PR is skipped unless it targets the\nconfigured dev line, is not a draft, has the ready label, has no block label,\ncomes from the same repository, uses an allowed work-branch prefix, has a\ncurrent approval, is mergeable, and has the configured required checks passing.\nAfter each merge, the next PR is re-evaluated before it can move the protected\ndev branch. This prevents one merge from silently making the next candidate\nstale or conflicting.\n\nThe canonical consumer required check context is `check / check`, matching the\nreusable workflow call plus its `check` job. Buildchain's own `Verify` workflow\nemits the repository-local context `check`, so Buildchain self-promotion,\nrelease-line bootstrap, and dogfood patrol wrappers pass `check` explicitly.\nRelease governance preserves the exact context emitted by the repository and\nrecords branch-protection policy before/after facts; it does not rewrite one\ncontext shape into the other. Consumer repositories can keep their context\nstable while changing the actual verification command declaratively in\n`buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"cargo fetch --locked\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"cargo test --workspace --locked\"\n```\n\nConsumers that want Buildchain to own the check wrapper can call\n`.github/workflows/check.yml@v2`. The wrapper runs the declared\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.verify` stages and fails the `check` job when\neither declaration is missing or the command exits non-zero.\n\nDevelopment pull requests that need source acceptance without product build or\nartifact verification can opt into `mode: source`. That mode runs only\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.check` on GitHub-hosted `ubuntu-24.04` while\npreserving the stable `check / check` required-check context. Existing callers\nremain on `mode: verify` by default, and callers may set\n`upload-artifacts: false` without weakening the job conclusion.\n\nTypical consumer wrapper:\n\n```yaml\nname: Merge Ready Dev PRs\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 * * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n dry-run:\n type: boolean\n default: true\n\njobs:\n merge-dev:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml@v2\n permissions:\n contents: write\n pull-requests: write\n checks: read\n statuses: read\n with:\n target-branch: dev/v2/v2.6\n required-status-checks: check / check\n ready-label: ready\n block-labels: blocked,do-not-merge\n max-merges: 1\n dry-run: ${{ inputs.dry-run || false }}\n```\n\n## Buildchain Patrol\n\n`dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` remains the focused merge primitive. For repositories\nthat want a stable day-to-day operations contract, Buildchain also exposes a\npatrol workflow family:\n\n| Workflow | Intended cadence | Default intent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml` | daily | lightweight inspection plus ready dev PR maintenance |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml` | weekly | release-state, passport, gate, and stale-state health checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-monthly.yml` | monthly | governance, permission, branch-protection, and workflow drift checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/stable-candidate-patrol.yml` | repository-selected release window | qualify immutable alpha candidates and open the exact source-lock stable PR |\n\nThe cadence names describe patrol intensity, not release cadence:\n\n- daily patrol can run every day without implying a daily release;\n- weekly patrol is for medium-cost maintenance and audit checks;\n- monthly patrol is for structural drift checks that should not block ordinary\n development velocity.\n\nStable Candidate Patrol is separate from those maintenance cadences because its\ncaller-owned cron is a release-intent window. Its candidate ledger and selection\nremain generic; registry-specific side effects still run through the normal\nrepository `lifecycle.publish` transaction. See\n[`stable-candidate-patrol.md`](stable-candidate-patrol.md).\n\nConsumers should schedule thin callers and keep their YAML declarative. For\nexample:\n\n```yaml\nname: Buildchain Daily Patrol\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 2 * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: false\n max-actions: 1\n```\n\nWeekly and monthly callers use the matching wrapper:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: true\n```\n\nAll three wrappers default to the `v2` floating Buildchain runtime. When\n`target-branch` is omitted, the caller's current/default branch selects the\nactive semver dev line, so consumers do not pin patrol to a stale minor branch.\nThe separate workflow names keep consumer schedules readable and stable while\nBuildchain adds new checks behind the cadence wrappers.\n\n## Package-Manager Adapters\n\nOld ABV assumed JavaScript repositories with root version state and often\nLerna. Buildchain keeps the version-state contract but does not assume every\nrepository is yarn/Lerna.\n\nThe promotion action discovers and updates:\n\n- root `package.json`;\n- `lerna.json`;\n- package manifests from `package.json` workspaces;\n- package manifests from `lerna.json` packages;\n- package manifests from `pnpm-workspace.yaml`.\n\nIt then runs the repository's detected package manager semantics where needed:\n\n- pnpm repositories use pnpm-oriented workspace discovery;\n- npm repositories use npm/package-lock semantics where present;\n- yarn repositories use yarn-style metadata where present.\n\nFor Buildchain itself, version state is required. For a consumer repository that\nhas no package manifest, the same action can degrade to ref-only behavior only\nwhen that is explicitly allowed by the caller.\n\n## Lifecycle Configuration\n\n`buildchain.toml` is the v2 user configuration format. It lets a repository\ndeclare version-state files and lifecycle commands without pretending every\nproject is a Node workspace. Supported version files include JSON, TOML, and\nregex-based files such as `CMakeLists.txt` or `conanfile.py`.\n\nThe promotion action currently consumes `version.files` and `lifecycle.verify`.\nThe verify stage runs after generated version-state changes are applied locally\nand before any release refs move. If `verification-command` is passed directly\nto the action, that explicit command overrides `lifecycle.verify`.\n\nProtected release-line branches keep their normal human review gate. Managed\n`dev/vN/vN.M`, `alpha/vN/vN.M`, and `release/vN/vN.M` branches are configured\nwith one required approving review, strict GitHub Actions checks, administrator\nenforcement, conversation resolution, no force pushes, and no deletions. The\nreusable `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper defaults\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`, which lets the workflow's\nautomation identity apply generated version-state or post-publish channel\nbookkeeping after the reviewed channel PR has merged. Direct\n`promote-buildchain-ref` callers must opt into the same controlled bypass with\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps`, `branch-protection-bypass-users`, or\n`branch-protection-bypass-teams`; the action also adds the current promotion\ntoken's authenticated user or app to the managed bypass allowlist. Before\npatching a protected generated bookkeeping ref, the action creates the\nconfigured required check on the exact generated version-state commit, so strict\nstatus checks are satisfied by machine-verifiable Buildchain evidence rather\nthan a human PR. The protected ref PATCH itself uses the generated ref update\ntoken; the reusable wrapper defaults it to\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token`. If direct generated\nrelease finalization bookkeeping is still rejected, Buildchain creates or\nreuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR based on the current\ntarget channel head and records `finalization-needed=true` in the durable\ntransaction output. Strict alpha bookkeeping still fails with a\ntoken/protection diagnostic instead of creating a post-publish PR.\nBuildchain's own promotion workflow reads `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_APPS`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_USERS`, and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_TEAMS` repository variables so the declared bypass\nidentity can match the actual `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` actor, but consumers\ndo not need to duplicate that actor manually when the token identity is\ndiscoverable.\n\n## What This Guarantees\n\nWhen the loop succeeds, maintainers and consumers can rely on these facts:\n\n- every production release has an exact tag such as `v2.0.2`;\n- every production minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0`;\n- every selected stable major has a floating tag such as `v2`;\n- every next-major release is driven by a reviewed `release -> publish-gate/major` PR,\n not a hidden manual button;\n- every test channel has an exact alpha tag such as `v2.0.3-alpha.0`;\n- every alpha minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0-alpha`;\n- every major with a published alpha has a cross-minor floating tag such as `v2-alpha`, owned by its highest published alpha minor;\n- version manifests match the tag visible from the same commit;\n- production releases are derived from the alpha tree that was tested;\n- manual non-dry-run promotion cannot bypass PR review and verification;\n- flow-internal automation bypasses apply only to declared GitHub Apps, users,\n or teams on Buildchain-managed channel branch protection, while one-review\n protection remains enforced for humans;\n- admin users cannot make a channel promotion valid by temporarily bypassing\n branch protection.\n\nThis is the practical meaning of \"governance closed loop\" in Buildchain: the\ndecision, code, version state, and Git refs close over the same evidence chain.\n\n## What This Does Not Do\n\nBuildchain release promotion does not embed registry clients or product-specific\npublish logic. When publish transactions are enabled, `promote-buildchain-ref`\ncan run the consumer's `lifecycle.publish` command and own the transaction,\nevidence validation, durable recovery state, and ref finalization order. The\nconsumer repository still owns registry truth: npm, PyPI, OCI, S3, Conan, CMake\npackaging, download pages, dist-tags, and similar side effects must be\nimplemented by project lifecycle commands that emit Buildchain publish evidence.\n\nEvery Buildchain publish model that can run registry side effects must bind the\npublish entrypoint to an immutable `publish-gate/*` source lock. The reusable\n`release-candidate-promote.yml@v2` wrapper creates or updates that gate ref and\npasses `require-publish-source-lock`, `publish-source-ref`,\n`publish-source-sha`, and `publish-source-locked` to\n`promote-buildchain-ref`. Direct action callers must pass the same four inputs\nfrom the reusable build outputs. Workflows that only collect passports or run\ndry-run package checks do not move publish refs and are not publish-gate\npublication models.\n\nSemver GitHub Release publication is owned by `promote-buildchain-ref`, not by\nconsumer shell glue. Consumers normally use the `release-candidate-promote.yml`\nwrapper, where GitHub Release publication is enabled by default and can be\ndisabled with `github-release: false`; the wrapper passes that declaration to\nthe action. After the publish transaction reaches `complete`, Buildchain creates\nor updates the public GitHub Release and uploads the generated\n`buildchain.release.json`, release-passport assets, and publish evidence. Semver\nprerelease tags are marked `prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`; stable\nsemver tags are marked latest. For anchored/manual package releases, the public\nrelease tag defaults to `v<publishedVersion>` while the internal exact\ntransaction tag remains in the release passport and release-state ref. This is\nthe supported path for downstream\n`release.published` propagation across semver, major, and promote-only release\ncandidate publication models.\n\nBuildchain also does not maintain bare exact tags such as `1.0.0`. The supported\nexact release and alpha refs are v-prefixed:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1-alpha.0\n```\n\n## Operational Reading Order\n\nWhen debugging or extending release behavior, read in this order:\n\n1. `docs/release-flow.md`\n2. `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml`\n3. `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n4. `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml`\n5. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`\n6. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/src/`\n7. `docs/migration-inventory.md`\n\nThat path gives the policy first, the workflow trigger second, and the action\nimplementation last."
|
|
1263
1263
|
},
|
|
1264
1264
|
{
|
|
1265
1265
|
"id": "manual:release-passport",
|
|
@@ -1529,6 +1529,57 @@
|
|
|
1529
1529
|
],
|
|
1530
1530
|
"markdown": "# Runtime Train Validation\n\nBuildchain consumers should keep stable workflow refs such as `@v2` in\ncommitted workflow YAML. Runtime trains provide a temporary validation pointer\nfor Buildchain changes that are ready for downstream testing but not yet\npromoted through the normal `dev -> alpha -> release` chain.\n\nOfficial floating channels are not runtime overrides. A consumer that\ndeliberately follows `@v2-alpha` gets the matching runtime on pull requests and\npushes because the reusable workflow reads the called workflow identity from\n`job.workflow_ref`. Passing `buildchain-ref: v2-alpha` explicitly is also\naccepted when the caller wants the channel binding visible in its input set.\nThe caller's `github.workflow_ref` is not used for this inference because it\nidentifies the caller workflow during reusable calls.\n\n## Train refs\n\nA train ref is a branch in the Buildchain repository:\n\n```text\ntrain/v2/v2.3/<capability>\n```\n\nIt is a validation pointer, not a release channel:\n\n- it does not move `v2`, `vX.Y`, `vX.Y-alpha`, exact tags, npm dist-tags, or\n production refs;\n- it must not be pinned as a long-term production dependency;\n- it should point at the Buildchain commit that downstream maintainers are\n expected to validate;\n- it is not a pending merge target or a delivery state;\n- the final durable path is still a pull request into the active `dev/*`\n channel, followed by the requested alpha or release promotion.\n- it may remain for a retention window after release so initiating repositories\n have a stable fast-use and rollback channel while stable refs, caches, or\n rollout windows settle.\n\n## Buildchain contributor requirement\n\nWhen a Buildchain change needs downstream validation before stable refs move,\npublish a train ref before asking consumers to test it:\n\n```sh\ngit push origin HEAD:refs/heads/train/v2/v2.3/<capability>\n```\n\nUse a capability slug that names the behavior being validated, for example:\n\n```text\ntrain/v2/v2.3/runtime-loader\ntrain/v2/v2.3/toolkit-diagnostics\ntrain/v2/v2.3/site-source-of-truth\n```\n\nThe pull request or validation request should include the train ref, the exact\ncommit SHA it points to, and the downstream evidence expected from consumers.\nIf the train is refreshed, state the new SHA in the validation thread.\n\nAfter downstream validation succeeds, close out through the normal release\npath. Merge the Buildchain pull request into the active `dev/*` mainline, run\nthe requested alpha or release promotion, and record the final mainline commit\nplus release ref or tag in the delivery thread. Do not leave the train as the\nitem that still needs to be merged; it is only a temporary fast-use,\ndiagnostic, and rollback channel for initiating repositories. Retained trains\nare cleaned up by a separate periodic Buildchain cleanup task.\n\n## Consumer workflow requirement\n\nConsumers keep their reusable workflow pinned to the stable shell:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n```\n\nTo validate a train without committing temporary workflow refs, expose a\ntrusted manual pass-through once:\n\n```yaml\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n buildchain-ref:\n description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref for trusted manual validation\"\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n```\n\nBuildchain initializes new package workflows with this pass-through. Existing\nconsumers that do not have it should add it once before validating a train.\n\n## Validation request\n\nUse this short request when a train is ready:\n\n```text\nBuildchain train ready: buildchain-ref=train/v2/v2.3/<capability>.\nKeep uses: ...@v2; run workflow_dispatch with that buildchain-ref and report the runtime evidence summary.\n```\n\nThe consumer should run a trusted `workflow_dispatch`, paste the train ref into\n`buildchain-ref`, and report the workflow summary or aggregate Buildchain\nsummary. The evidence should include:\n\n- workflow shell ref;\n- requested runtime ref;\n- resolved runtime ref;\n- resolved runtime SHA;\n- stability class;\n- trust decision;\n- rollback ref.\n\n## Trust and limitation\n\nOfficial floating channel refs such as `v2` and `v2-alpha` may be selected on\npull requests and pushes. Train refs and arbitrary exact-SHA overrides still\nfail closed unless the event is `workflow_dispatch` and the actor has write,\nmaintain, or admin permission on the caller repository. Pull requests,\nincluding fork-originated pull requests, cannot use train or exact-SHA\noverrides.\n\nRuntime train validation covers Buildchain runtime scripts, CLI code, local\nactions, configuration parsing, and lifecycle behavior. It cannot validate\nchanges that require the outer reusable workflow YAML itself to change, such as\nnew jobs, permissions, workflow outputs, or matrix topology. Those changes need\na canary workflow path or a temporary explicit workflow ref."
|
|
1531
1531
|
},
|
|
1532
|
+
{
|
|
1533
|
+
"id": "manual:shifu-gate-profiles",
|
|
1534
|
+
"title": "Shifu Gate profile orchestration",
|
|
1535
|
+
"route": "/docs/shifu-gate-profiles",
|
|
1536
|
+
"category": "manual",
|
|
1537
|
+
"capabilityGroup": "getting-started",
|
|
1538
|
+
"audience": [
|
|
1539
|
+
"agent"
|
|
1540
|
+
],
|
|
1541
|
+
"maturity": "stable",
|
|
1542
|
+
"sourcePath": "docs/shifu-gate-profiles.md",
|
|
1543
|
+
"digest": "sha256:01550c79827ef6905ff5d9f6db3308139b63f40378c212df892cde09b6e0bbd7",
|
|
1544
|
+
"headings": [
|
|
1545
|
+
{
|
|
1546
|
+
"level": 1,
|
|
1547
|
+
"title": "Shifu Gate profile orchestration",
|
|
1548
|
+
"anchor": "shifu-gate-profile-orchestration"
|
|
1549
|
+
},
|
|
1550
|
+
{
|
|
1551
|
+
"level": 2,
|
|
1552
|
+
"title": "Ownership boundary",
|
|
1553
|
+
"anchor": "ownership-boundary"
|
|
1554
|
+
},
|
|
1555
|
+
{
|
|
1556
|
+
"level": 2,
|
|
1557
|
+
"title": "Runner matrix",
|
|
1558
|
+
"anchor": "runner-matrix"
|
|
1559
|
+
},
|
|
1560
|
+
{
|
|
1561
|
+
"level": 2,
|
|
1562
|
+
"title": "Execution and receipts",
|
|
1563
|
+
"anchor": "execution-and-receipts"
|
|
1564
|
+
},
|
|
1565
|
+
{
|
|
1566
|
+
"level": 2,
|
|
1567
|
+
"title": "Consumer workflow",
|
|
1568
|
+
"anchor": "consumer-workflow"
|
|
1569
|
+
},
|
|
1570
|
+
{
|
|
1571
|
+
"level": 2,
|
|
1572
|
+
"title": "Failure diagnosis and rollback",
|
|
1573
|
+
"anchor": "failure-diagnosis-and-rollback"
|
|
1574
|
+
},
|
|
1575
|
+
{
|
|
1576
|
+
"level": 2,
|
|
1577
|
+
"title": "Validation boundary",
|
|
1578
|
+
"anchor": "validation-boundary"
|
|
1579
|
+
}
|
|
1580
|
+
],
|
|
1581
|
+
"markdown": "---\nstatus: draft\nperiod: ongoing\ntheme: buildchain-shifu-gate-orchestration\ndoc_type: technical-manual\nsource_level: local-files\nconfidence: high\nsensitivity: public\nevidence_grade: B\nreview_state: self-reviewed\nlast_reviewed: 2026-07-13\nai_provenance:\n model_family: GPT-5\n product: Codex\n generated_at: 2026-07-13\n invisible_context_boundary: No private runner configuration, credentials, or unpublished Shifu implementation state was used.\n---\n\n# Shifu Gate profile orchestration\n\nBuildchain can schedule and aggregate a project-owned Shifu Gate profile without\nowning that project's gate ids, commands, dependencies, or dev/alpha/release\npolicy. The reusable workflow is\n`.github/workflows/.gate-profile.yml`.\n\n## Ownership boundary\n\n| Concern | Owner | Enforced surface |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| Gate schema, profile planning, execution, receipt qualification | Shifu | `shifu gate plan`, `shifu gate run --profile`, `shifu gate receipt validate` |\n| Concrete gate catalog and profile decisions | Consumer project | project Gate registry and detailed Gate docs |\n| Runner labels and declared capabilities | Consumer workflow / Buildchain preset | `runner-preset` or `platforms-json` |\n| Deterministic runner matrix, immutable checkout, receipt transport, aggregate check | Buildchain | `.gate-profile.yml` and `shifu-gate-profile.mjs` |\n| Whether a profile aggregate is required for dev, alpha, or release | Consumer project | protected-branch required-check policy and caller workflow |\n\nBuildchain treats the Shifu plan and receipt as versioned input contracts. It\ndoes not reimplement policy selection, execute raw shell strings, convert an\nexplicit diagnostic gate run into qualification, or mint missing evidence.\n\n## Runner matrix\n\nThe plan job asks the consumer's Shifu entrypoint for one plan per configured\nplatform. A platform is dispatchable only when:\n\n- the Shifu plan is qualifying;\n- every required selection is supported on that platform;\n- the runner declares every capability requested by the selected gates; and\n- all platform plans carry the same project id and registry digest.\n\nConfigured platforms are required by default. A required platform that cannot\nhost the profile fails before runner dispatch. A platform with\n`\"required\": false` may be omitted, but the omission and reasons remain in the\nmatrix and aggregate. Matrix entries retain the Shifu plan digest, ordered gate\ngroups, required/advisory modes, action ids, definition digests, skips, and\nunsupported selections.\n\n`github-hosted` declares only the inherent `node` capability. Projects that\nneed a native compiler, product artifacts, devices, or other facilities must\nuse a suitable preset or declare a custom matrix. Capabilities are scheduling\nclaims, not installation instructions.\n\n```json\n[\n {\n \"id\": \"linux-native\",\n \"name\": \"Linux native\",\n \"platform\": \"linux\",\n \"runner\": \"[\\\"self-hosted\\\",\\\"Linux\\\",\\\"X64\\\",\\\"product-build\\\"]\",\n \"capabilities\": [\"node\", \"native-toolchain\", \"product-artifacts\"]\n }\n]\n```\n\n## Execution and receipts\n\nEvery matrix job checks out the exact source SHA planned by Buildchain, invokes\n`shifu gate run --profile`, writes the receipt outside the source checkout, and\nthen invokes `shifu gate receipt validate`. Buildchain uploads the original\nreceipt and validation result even when the run fails.\n\nThe fixed `Gate profile / aggregate` job fails closed for missing receipts,\ninvalid or stale Shifu validation, dirty or mismatched source SHA, registry or\nplan drift, missing required results, required failures/skips, or gate action\nand definition digest drift. Advisory failures remain visible but do not turn a\nShifu-qualifying receipt into a required failure. Buildchain's aggregate is\n`buildchain.shifu-gate-aggregate/v1`; its digest covers the matrix, receipts,\nper-gate evidence pointers, omissions, and issues.\n\n## Consumer workflow\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n gates:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.gate-profile.yml@v2\n with:\n gate-profile: alpha-pr\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n include-advisory: true\n\n build:\n needs: gates\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/build.yml@v2\n with:\n release-candidate: true\n gate-profile-aggregate-json: ${{ needs.gates.outputs.gate-aggregate-json }}\n```\n\nThe command input is an argv map, not a shell string. The default supports the\nordinary Shifu launcher names on all three platforms. A project with a\ndifferent launcher can override it without teaching Buildchain project tasks:\n\n```yaml\ngate-command-json: >-\n {\"linux\":[\"./tools/shifu\"],\"macos\":[\"./tools/shifu\"],\"windows\":[\"./tools/shifu.cmd\"]}\n```\n\n`gate-command-json` is the execution command. If execution needs a cache,\ncontainer, or other project-owned wrapper that should not make the read-only\nplan depend on that service, pass a separate lightweight argv map through\n`gate-plan-command-json`. It defaults to the execution command for backward\ncompatibility; Buildchain still treats both inputs as argv and never evaluates\na shell string.\n\nProjects may also pass non-sensitive scalar environment through\n`gate-environment-json`; Buildchain validates the JSON shape and forwards it\nwithout interpreting names or values. Cache profile references use the same\nopaque `shifu-cache-profile-ref` and `shifu-cache-profile-digest` inputs as the\nreusable build. Do not place tokens, credentials, or other secrets in workflow\ninputs or Gate receipts.\n\nWhen a qualifying aggregate is passed to the build workflow, the\nrelease-candidate passport binds its profile, source SHA, registry digest,\nmatrix digest, aggregate digest, receipt count, and result count. A failed,\nnon-qualifying, or source-mismatched aggregate cannot produce a valid passport.\nPromote-only release validation preserves that same Gate evidence summary in\nthe final Release Passport release identity, so promotion cannot silently drop\nthe qualified profile provenance.\n\n## Failure diagnosis and rollback\n\nStart with the aggregate artifact, then the platform receipt named in its\nissues. Reproduce the exact project decision with Shifu, for example:\n\n```bash\n./shifu gate explain <gate-id> --profile <profile>\n./shifu gate plan <profile> --platform <platform> --json\n./shifu gate receipt validate <receipt.json> --json\n```\n\nThe existing reusable build workflow remains usable without Gate inputs. To\nroll back Gate orchestration, remove the caller's `gates` job and\n`gate-profile-aggregate-json` handoff; this does not alter the consumer's Shifu\nregistry or its direct diagnostic commands.\n\n## Validation boundary\n\nUnit fixtures prove deterministic matrix generation and required/advisory,\ncapability, unsupported, missing, stale, failure, and definition-drift\npropagation. Because a train ref changes runtime scripts but not the outer\nreusable workflow topology, an unreleased `.gate-profile.yml` must also be\nvalidated through a trusted `workflow_dispatch` canary that references the\ntemporary workflow ref or exact SHA. See\n[`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md)."
|
|
1582
|
+
},
|
|
1532
1583
|
{
|
|
1533
1584
|
"id": "manual:site-bundle-contract",
|
|
1534
1585
|
"title": "Site Bundle Contract",
|
|
@@ -1592,7 +1643,7 @@
|
|
|
1592
1643
|
],
|
|
1593
1644
|
"maturity": "stable",
|
|
1594
1645
|
"sourcePath": "docs/stable-candidate-patrol.md",
|
|
1595
|
-
"digest": "sha256:
|
|
1646
|
+
"digest": "sha256:a770bef5d60b47389db56592386bd04e8a8493402abf9e3429662cb241f2d76a",
|
|
1596
1647
|
"headings": [
|
|
1597
1648
|
{
|
|
1598
1649
|
"level": 1,
|
|
@@ -1625,7 +1676,7 @@
|
|
|
1625
1676
|
"anchor": "durable-recovery"
|
|
1626
1677
|
}
|
|
1627
1678
|
],
|
|
1628
|
-
"markdown": "---\nstatus: preview\nperiod: ongoing\ntheme: stable-candidate-patrol\ndoc_type: architecture-and-usage\nsource_level: local-files\nconfidence: high\nsensitivity: public\nevidence_grade: A\nreview_state: self-reviewed\nlast_reviewed: 2026-07-11\nai_provenance:\n model_family: GPT-5\n product: Codex\n generated_at: 2026-07-11\n visible_context: Buildchain candidate passport, stable gate, Patrol, publish transaction, exact source-lock PR contracts, tests, and user consensus.\n invisible_context_boundary: No credentials, private logs, or unpublished consumer content were used.\n---\n\n# Stable Candidate Patrol\n\nBuildchain can treat every exact alpha as an independent stable candidate. A\nnew alpha creates a new candidate; it does not silently revoke an older alpha\nthat already completed its checks and soak interval.\n\n## Candidate lifecycle\n\nThe durable ledger contract is `kungfu-buildchain-stable-candidate-ledger`:\n\n```text\nregistered -> soaking -> qualified -> promoted\n \\-> revoked\n```\n\nEach entry binds an exact alpha version to one immutable commit SHA. Registering\nthe same version at another SHA fails closed. Qualification records the required\nchecks, their completion times, the derived soak start, and elapsed time.\n\nScheduled selection chooses the newest `qualified` candidate that is neither\n`revoked` nor already `promoted`. A newer alpha that is still `soaking` does not\nhide an older qualified candidate. Once a stable version is promoted, remaining\nalphas for that exact stable version are closed because that immutable stable\nversion has been consumed; their later product changes continue through the\nnext patch alpha prepared by the normal release transaction.\n\nFor Buildchain's own release line, successful Alpha Self-Dogfood starts an\nidempotent qualification producer for the exact alpha SHA. It dispatches the\nexisting `Build Surface Fixture` at the immutable exact tag, runs the existing\n`site-libkungfu-dev` no-apply canary with the exact SHA, and writes the declared\ncommit-status attestation only after that authoritative canary succeeds. The\nproducer creates evidence only: Patrol still owns qualification and selection,\nand the normal source-lock PR, stable gate, transaction, and branch protections\nremain mandatory.\n\nCross-repository dispatch and repository-local attestation use separate tokens.\nThe promotion token can start the no-apply consumer workflow, while the\nrepository-scoped Actions token writes the status as `github-actions[bot]` only\nafter the producer has observed the successful authoritative workflow run. The\nstable gate still verifies the workflow identity, exact runtime SHA, target URL,\nand allowed attestor before accepting that status.\n\n## Repository policy\n\nDeclare the default once in `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[release.stable]\nstrategy = \"latest-qualified-alpha\"\ntimezone = \"Asia/Shanghai\"\npublish_at = \"03:00\"\nminimum_soak_seconds = 3600\nrequired_checks = [\n \"alpha-release\",\n \"workflow:Build\",\n \"status:buildchain-canary/consumer\",\n]\nauto_promote = true\nauto_merge = true\n```\n\nCheck identifiers use these forms:\n\n- `alpha-release`: the exact GitHub prerelease publication fact;\n- `workflow:<name>`: a successful Actions workflow run on the exact candidate SHA;\n- `status:<context>`: a successful commit status on the exact candidate SHA;\n- an unprefixed value: an exact status context or check-run name.\n\nCandidate discovery uses immutable exact alpha Git tags. When a repository also\npublishes GitHub prereleases, `alpha-release` binds qualification to that public\nrelease fact. Repositories that intentionally disable GitHub Releases omit\n`alpha-release` and declare their own exact-SHA workflow/status evidence; tag\ncommit time remains the earliest possible soak start.\n\n`publish_at` and `timezone` are the auditable policy declaration. GitHub only\nstarts scheduled workflows from caller-owned cron, so the thin caller keeps the\nmatching UTC trigger:\n\n```yaml\nname: Stable Candidate Patrol\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"0 19 * * *\" # 03:00 Asia/Shanghai\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n release-now:\n description: Exact alpha selected by explicit human authority\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\npermissions:\n contents: write\n pull-requests: write\n checks: read\n statuses: read\n\njobs:\n stable:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/stable-candidate-patrol.yml@v2\n with:\n release-now: ${{ inputs.release-now }}\n dry-run: false\n secrets:\n promotion-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nThe promotion token must be repository-owned and capable of creating the\nmachine ledger branch, exact source-lock branch, and pull request. Repositories\nthat require an approving review can
|
|
1679
|
+
"markdown": "---\nstatus: preview\nperiod: ongoing\ntheme: stable-candidate-patrol\ndoc_type: architecture-and-usage\nsource_level: local-files\nconfidence: high\nsensitivity: public\nevidence_grade: A\nreview_state: self-reviewed\nlast_reviewed: 2026-07-11\nai_provenance:\n model_family: GPT-5\n product: Codex\n generated_at: 2026-07-11\n visible_context: Buildchain candidate passport, stable gate, Patrol, publish transaction, exact source-lock PR contracts, tests, and user consensus.\n invisible_context_boundary: No credentials, private logs, or unpublished consumer content were used.\n---\n\n# Stable Candidate Patrol\n\nBuildchain can treat every exact alpha as an independent stable candidate. A\nnew alpha creates a new candidate; it does not silently revoke an older alpha\nthat already completed its checks and soak interval.\n\n## Candidate lifecycle\n\nThe durable ledger contract is `kungfu-buildchain-stable-candidate-ledger`:\n\n```text\nregistered -> soaking -> qualified -> promoted\n \\-> revoked\n```\n\nEach entry binds an exact alpha version to one immutable commit SHA. Registering\nthe same version at another SHA fails closed. Qualification records the required\nchecks, their completion times, the derived soak start, and elapsed time.\n\nScheduled selection chooses the newest `qualified` candidate that is neither\n`revoked` nor already `promoted`. A newer alpha that is still `soaking` does not\nhide an older qualified candidate. Once a stable version is promoted, remaining\nalphas for that exact stable version are closed because that immutable stable\nversion has been consumed; their later product changes continue through the\nnext patch alpha prepared by the normal release transaction.\n\nFor Buildchain's own release line, successful Alpha Self-Dogfood starts an\nidempotent qualification producer for the exact alpha SHA. It dispatches the\nexisting `Build Surface Fixture` at the immutable exact tag, runs the existing\n`site-libkungfu-dev` no-apply canary with the exact SHA, and writes the declared\ncommit-status attestation only after that authoritative canary succeeds. The\nproducer creates evidence only: Patrol still owns qualification and selection,\nand the normal source-lock PR, stable gate, transaction, and branch protections\nremain mandatory.\n\nCross-repository dispatch and repository-local attestation use separate tokens.\nThe promotion token can start the no-apply consumer workflow, while the\nrepository-scoped Actions token writes the status as `github-actions[bot]` only\nafter the producer has observed the successful authoritative workflow run. The\nstable gate still verifies the workflow identity, exact runtime SHA, target URL,\nand allowed attestor before accepting that status.\n\n## Repository policy\n\nDeclare the default once in `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[release.stable]\nstrategy = \"latest-qualified-alpha\"\ntimezone = \"Asia/Shanghai\"\npublish_at = \"03:00\"\nminimum_soak_seconds = 3600\nrequired_checks = [\n \"alpha-release\",\n \"workflow:Build\",\n \"status:buildchain-canary/consumer\",\n]\nauto_promote = true\nauto_merge = true\n```\n\nCheck identifiers use these forms:\n\n- `alpha-release`: the exact GitHub prerelease publication fact;\n- `workflow:<name>`: a successful Actions workflow run on the exact candidate SHA;\n- `status:<context>`: a successful commit status on the exact candidate SHA;\n- an unprefixed value: an exact status context or check-run name.\n\nCandidate discovery uses immutable exact alpha Git tags. When a repository also\npublishes GitHub prereleases, `alpha-release` binds qualification to that public\nrelease fact. Repositories that intentionally disable GitHub Releases omit\n`alpha-release` and declare their own exact-SHA workflow/status evidence; tag\ncommit time remains the earliest possible soak start.\n\n`publish_at` and `timezone` are the auditable policy declaration. GitHub only\nstarts scheduled workflows from caller-owned cron, so the thin caller keeps the\nmatching UTC trigger:\n\n```yaml\nname: Stable Candidate Patrol\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"0 19 * * *\" # 03:00 Asia/Shanghai\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n release-now:\n description: Exact alpha selected by explicit human authority\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\npermissions:\n contents: write\n pull-requests: write\n checks: read\n statuses: read\n\njobs:\n stable:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/stable-candidate-patrol.yml@v2\n with:\n release-now: ${{ inputs.release-now }}\n dry-run: false\n secrets:\n promotion-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN }}\n approval-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_APPROVAL_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nThe promotion token must be repository-owned and capable of creating the\nmachine ledger branch, exact source-lock branch, and pull request. Repositories\nthat require an approving review can pass an independent repository-owned App,\nbot, or human service-account token as `approval-token`. The approval identity\nmust differ from the promotion token identity that opens the PR. When no\n`approval-token` is passed, `auto-approve: true` falls back to the caller\n`github.token` and therefore requires GitHub Actions approval permission. The\ngenerated PR may use auto-merge, but it never bypasses the target branch checks.\n\nBefore enabling `auto-approve` and `auto-merge`, the caller repository must\nprovide one approval path and enable auto-merge:\n\n- pass an independent `approval-token`; or enable **Actions > General >\n Workflow permissions > Allow GitHub Actions to create and approve pull\n requests**, so the caller `github.token` can approve independently from the\n promotion token that opened the PR;\n- **General > Pull Requests > Allow auto-merge**, so Patrol can arm the\n protected merge while required reviews and checks are still pending.\n\nGitHub rejects approval from the same identity that opened the pull request;\nPatrol propagates that review failure instead of reporting success.\n\nPatrol treats a GraphQL refusal to enable auto-merge as a hard failure. A run\nmust not report publication authority when GitHub accepted the HTTP request but\nreturned a GraphQL error in the response body.\n\n## Exact-source stable promotion\n\nFor a selected `2.12.0-alpha.4`, Patrol creates the immutable source branch:\n\n```text\npublish-gate/release/v2/v2.12/2.12.0-alpha.4\n```\n\nand opens it against `release/v2/v2.12`. This is an existing strict Buildchain\ngovernance path. The PR freezes the qualified candidate even if `v2.12-alpha`\nor `alpha/v2/v2.12` has already moved to alpha.5. Normal Verify,\nrelease-candidate resolution, source-tree equivalence, publish transaction,\npassport, registry, tag, and floating-ref checks still run.\n\n## Hold, revoke, and immediate release\n\nPersistent repository controls can be supplied as reusable-workflow inputs or\nrepository variables:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_STABLE_HOLD=true\nBUILDCHAIN_STABLE_HOLD_REASON=release freeze\nBUILDCHAIN_STABLE_REVOKED_ALPHA_VERSIONS=2.12.0-alpha.5,2.12.0-alpha.7\nBUILDCHAIN_STABLE_REVOKE_REASON=consumer regression\n```\n\nRevocation is explicit evidence; publishing a newer alpha alone is not\nrevocation. A manual `workflow_dispatch` `release-now` chooses one exact,\nnon-revoked candidate immediately. It may bypass the scheduled soak decision,\nbut cannot change candidate SHA, reuse a consumed stable version, or bypass the\nsource-lock PR and publish transaction.\n\nFor Buildchain's own stable gate, Patrol automatically projects that explicit\nhuman decision into the exact-candidate `BUILDCHAIN_STABLE_RELEASE_NOW` and\nreason variables. A later Patrol run removes them after it observes the public\nstable release. This is an internal compatibility projection, not a manual user\nstep; the durable authority record remains the candidate ledger entry and PR.\n\n## Durable recovery\n\nThe default ledger ref is derived from the release line, for example:\n\n```text\nbuildchain/candidate-ledger/v2/v2.12\n```\n\nIt stores `.buildchain/stable-candidate-ledger.json`. Patrol runs are serialized\nper repository and release line. Repeated runs reuse the same exact source-lock\nbranch and PR, while later runs observe the public stable release and mark the\ncandidate `promoted`.\n\nWhen Patrol is enabled after a stable version already exists, it reconstructs\nthat consumed patch from GitHub Release truth and closes historical alpha\ncandidates for the same stable version. It never attempts to republish an\nalready claimed exact stable version."
|
|
1629
1680
|
},
|
|
1630
1681
|
{
|
|
1631
1682
|
"id": "manual:toolkit-observability",
|