@kungfu-tech/buildchain 2.11.14-alpha.0 → 2.11.14-alpha.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "schemaVersion": 1,
3
3
  "contract": "kungfu-buildchain-site-bundle",
4
- "generatedAt": "2026-07-10T10:14:07.465Z",
5
- "publishedAt": "2026-07-10T10:14:07.465Z",
4
+ "generatedAt": "2026-07-10T13:03:42.866Z",
5
+ "publishedAt": "2026-07-10T13:03:42.866Z",
6
6
  "reproducible": true,
7
7
  "timestampPolicy": "ci-injected",
8
8
  "deterministicInputs": [
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
19
19
  "declared Buildchain surface manifest contract"
20
20
  ],
21
21
  "sourceDateEpoch": "0",
22
- "sourceRevision": "06c518d7c00527f0964e6c6eefd91532783565fe",
22
+ "sourceRevision": "d0be2b26d092ef5fa411d30888ea0ee3fa044c85",
23
23
  "timestampPolicyDetails": {
24
24
  "contract": "kungfu-buildchain-surface-timestamp-policy",
25
25
  "timestampFields": [
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
37
37
  },
38
38
  "package": {
39
39
  "name": "@kungfu-tech/buildchain",
40
- "version": "2.11.14-alpha.0",
40
+ "version": "2.11.14-alpha.2",
41
41
  "versionSource": "package.json#version"
42
42
  },
43
43
  "source": {
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@
678
678
  ],
679
679
  "maturity": "stable",
680
680
  "sourcePath": "docs/lifecycle-protocol.md",
681
- "digest": "sha256:16c8e4994276142e6b57a61a18a88998727dce5911cb2da96d3900c049fb76dc",
681
+ "digest": "sha256:60c39693878258d275e9d47983b306faed35d6416297c14570429de73284604c",
682
682
  "headings": [
683
683
  {
684
684
  "level": 1,
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@
761
761
  "anchor": "design-boundaries"
762
762
  }
763
763
  ],
764
- "markdown": "# Lifecycle Protocol\n\nBuildchain uses `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` as the v2 repository configuration format.\nThe file is optional for simple JavaScript repositories, but it is the preferred\nway to describe release version state and lifecycle commands when a project is\nnot a plain pnpm, npm, or yarn workspace.\n\nFor compatibility, Buildchain still reads a legacy root `buildchain.toml` when\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is absent. New repositories should use the\n`.buildchain/` layout so all Buildchain-owned local state lives under one\ndirectory.\n\nOnly TOML is supported in v2. YAML, JSON, and JavaScript config files are not\nloaded.\n\n## Minimal File\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n`schema = 1` is required. Buildchain fails closed when the schema is missing or\nunknown.\n\n## Version State\n\nVersion state is the source file evidence that matches a release tag. During\npromotion, Buildchain writes the selected release or prerelease version into the\nconfigured files, verifies the resulting tree, creates a source version commit,\nthen moves exact and floating refs.\n\nSupported version file types:\n\n| Type | Use case | Required fields |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `json` | `package.json`, JSON manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `toml` | `pyproject.toml`, other TOML manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `regex` | `CMakeLists.txt`, `conanfile.py`, plain version files | `path`, `pattern`, `replacement` |\n\n`key` is a dotted key path:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n```\n\nConfigured JSON and TOML version files are semantic no-ops when the declared\nkey already equals the requested version. Buildchain preserves the repository's\noriginal TOML bytes in that case instead of serializing the whole document and\ncreating formatter-only release state. When a TOML version really changes,\nBuildchain applies a parser-verified lossless edit to that key and fails closed\nif it cannot prove a unique edit; unrelated arrays, comments, and formatting\nremain repository-owned.\n\nRegex files must expose the current version through a named capture group called\n`version`:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n```\n\nIf `version.required = true`, promotion fails when no configured version files\nare available.\n\n### Anchored Manual Versions\n\nSome repositories do not derive their package version from the Buildchain\nrelease tag. `libnode` is the canonical example: the package version is anchored\nto an explicitly selected upstream Node.js release such as `22.22.3-kf.0`, while\nthe channel line may be `release/v22/v22.22`.\n\nThose repositories can opt into anchored manual semantics:\n\n```toml\n[version]\nrequired = true\nstrategy = \"anchored\"\nnext = \"manual\"\nmanifest = \"libnode.release.json\"\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n```\n\nWith `strategy = \"anchored\"` and `next = \"manual\"`:\n\n- Buildchain validates the configured version files and anchor manifest, but it\n does not rewrite those files to the Buildchain release tag.\n- `lifecycle.verify` is the project-owned truth gate. It should compare the\n package version, anchor manifest, and upstream source/submodule state.\n- release promotion still creates the exact/floating production refs for the\n current line;\n- release promotion does not auto-create the next alpha branch or tag;\n- the action output `next-anchor-required` is `true`, signaling that the next\n upstream anchor line must be created explicitly by the repository.\n\nThe configured anchor manifest must be JSON or TOML. Buildchain does not\ninterpret project-specific field names; it only loads the manifest and exposes\nits top-level fields to validation summaries and lifecycle environment:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_STRATEGY=anchored\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_NEXT=manual\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST=libnode.release.json\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST_JSON={\"nodeTag\":\"v22.22.3\",...}\n```\n\nThe upstream anchor decision remains outside Buildchain. A future line such as\n`dev/v24/v24.xx` should be created by an explicit repository workflow or human\ndecision after the upstream version has been selected and checked in.\n\n## Lifecycle Stages\n\nLifecycle stages are declarative shell commands. A stage can use exactly one of:\n\n- `command`: one shell command;\n- `commands`: multiple shell commands run in order;\n- `script`: a multiline shell script.\n\nAny command failure fails the stage. `timeout_minutes`, `retries`, `shell`, and\n`env` can be attached to a stage.\n\nDuring version-state verification, Buildchain also sets `BUILDCHAIN_VERSION` to\nthe release or prerelease version being verified.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ntimeout_minutes = 10\nretries = 3\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm install --frozen-lockfile\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run build\",\n \"pnpm run package\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\nshell = \"bash\"\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npnpm run check\ngit diff --check\n\"\"\"\n```\n\nShared environment variables can be declared once:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.env]\nPYTHONUNBUFFERED = \"1\"\n```\n\nStage-specific environment variables override shared lifecycle environment:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.test]\ncommand = \"pytest\"\n\n[lifecycle.test.env]\nPYTHONPATH = \"src\"\n```\n\n### Publish Stage\n\n`lifecycle.publish` is the project-owned side-effect stage. It may call npm,\nPyPI, Conan, CMake packaging scripts, Docker/OCI registries, S3 uploaders, or\nany other publisher. Buildchain does not assume the tool; it assumes the\nevidence contract.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.publish]\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npython scripts/publish_wheels.py\nnode scripts/publish-images.mjs\nnode scripts/write-publish-evidence.mjs\n\"\"\"\n```\n\nWhen `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` runs with `publish-transaction: \"true\"`,\nthe publish stage receives the transaction identity plus the resolved publish\ncontract:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION\nBUILDCHAIN_CHANNEL\nBUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_TARGET_REF\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_STATE\nBUILDCHAIN_EVIDENCE_DIR\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_MATERIAL_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_TOOLING_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_EVIDENCE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_MODE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_AUTH\nBUILDCHAIN_NPM_DIST_TAG\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_ORDER\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_MAIN_PACKAGE\n```\n\nThe stage must write publish evidence JSON. Buildchain validates that evidence\nbefore exact tags and floating refs move. In GitHub Actions, the promotion\naction also persists `state.json` and `evidence.json` to\n`refs/heads/buildchain/release-state/<version>` so fresh runners can recover\nwithout local workspace residue. See\n[`docs/publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) for the state machine,\nevidence schema, and recovery commands.\n\nFor npm packages, prefer:\n\n```toml\n[publish]\nmode = \"publish-final-version\"\nauth = \"trusted-publishing\"\ndist_tag = \"latest\"\n```\n\nUse `mode = \"promote-existing-version\"` only for explicit same-version\ndist-tag recovery, and pair it with `auth = \"npm-token\"`. Trusted Publishing\ndoes not authorize `npm dist-tag add`; Buildchain fails that combination before\nany publish transaction side effect.\n\n## Promotion Semantics\n\n`actions/promote-buildchain-ref` consumes `version.files`, `lifecycle.verify`,\nand optionally `lifecycle.publish`.\n\nThe verify stage runs after Buildchain has applied the generated version-state\nchanges to the local checkout, and before it creates release commits or moves\nrefs. After the command finishes, Buildchain checks that only declared\nversion-state files changed. This prevents verification from quietly adding\nextra source changes to the release commit.\n\nBuildchain-owned untracked runtime evidence is excluded only through an exact\ninternal allowlist. This includes contract-drift issue material under\n`.buildchain/contract-drift/` and the paper workflow's\n`.buildchain/publication-result.json`, alongside release-candidate, passport,\nrelease-state, KFD, and runtime evidence directories. Tracked changes, ordinary\nsource files, and undeclared `.buildchain/*` paths still fail version\nverification.\n\nOn protected alpha and release branches, the generated version-state commit is\napplied by the promotion automation after the reviewed channel PR has merged.\nBuildchain keeps review requirements, conversation resolution, strict status\nchecks, and admin enforcement for human channel changes, but adds the\nauthenticated promotion token user or app to the managed bypass allowlist for\ngenerated release bookkeeping. Buildchain also creates the configured required\ncheck on the exact generated version-state commit before patching the protected\nref, then applies the protected ref update with the declared generated ref\nupdate token. The reusable wrapper uses\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token` for that protected\nbookkeeping update. If release finalization bookkeeping is still rejected,\nBuildchain creates or reuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR\nfrom the current target channel head and reports `finalization-needed=true` so\na later idempotent promotion run can resume. Strict alpha bookkeeping remains\nfail-fast with a token/protection diagnostic instead of asking humans to review\na post-publish version-state PR.\n\nFor `version.strategy = \"anchored\"` with `version.next = \"manual\"`, release\npromotion does not generate a Buildchain-owned version-state commit. In that\nmode, a protected `alpha -> release` PR may carry the declared `version.files`\nfrom the tested alpha package version to the final package version, and may\ncarry the configured `version.manifest` with it. Buildchain only accepts that\nrelease tree difference when the PR is the valid channel-promotion PR, the\nchanged paths are limited to those declared version files plus the anchor\nmanifest, and `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` has validated the\nchecked-out release material. Any code or undeclared file change still fails the\nrelease tree gate.\n\nThe action input `verification-command` remains supported. When it is provided,\nit overrides `lifecycle.verify` for that invocation.\n\n## Migration Preflight\n\nHeavy repositories can validate their Buildchain declaration before they are\nready to run the real build. `actions/validate-config` checks that\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` parses, configured version-state files exist, configured\nversion keys are strings, and required lifecycle stage names are declared.\nFor web-surface repositories it also validates `project`, `channels`, `deploy`,\n`retention`, and `security` declarations.\n\nIt does not run lifecycle commands. This is useful for repositories such as\n`libnode`, where `lifecycle.build` represents an expensive multi-platform native\nbuild and the first migration milestone is to prove the release metadata and\nlifecycle protocol without consuming build runners.\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-version-state: \"true\"\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"install,build,verify\"\n```\n\nWeb-surface repositories can use the same action without requiring version\nstate:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"build,verify\"\n```\n\nThe action exposes project and deploy metadata through outputs such as\n`project-type`, `project-site`, `channels`, and `deploy-adapters-json`.\n\n## Web-Surface Projects\n\n`project.type = \"web-surface\"` is for sites, docs, browser apps, and operator\nconsoles whose release object is a deployed surface, not a package version.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-libkungfu-dev\"\nsite = \"libkungfu-dev\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[deploy.production]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-production\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n```\n\nSee [Web-surface deployments](web-surface-deployments.md) for named surface host\nmappings, the manifest, preview alias, retention, cleanup, and dry-run deploy\ncontract.\n\n## Infra-Contract Projects\n\n`project.type = \"infra-contract\"` is for infrastructure contract repositories\nthat need provider-neutral desired, plan, approval, apply, observe, contract,\nand propagation evidence. `buildchain init --type infra-contract` wires\n`lifecycle.verify` to `buildchain infra-contract --mode ci`, which writes\nmutation-free plan, contract, propagation dry-run, evidence bundle, and\nverification artifacts under `.buildchain/`. The surface supports\nmanual-observed, observe-only, and mocked adapter fixtures without reading\ncloud state files or executing live infrastructure mutation. See\n[Infra Contract](infra-contract.md).\n\n## Examples\n\n### Node Workspace\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n### Python Package\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"python -m pip install -e .[test]\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"python -m build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"python -m build\",\n \"pytest\",\n]\n```\n\n### CMake and Conan\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n\n[lifecycle.configure]\ncommands = [\n \"conan install . --build=missing\",\n \"cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"cmake --build build --config Release\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"cmake --build build --config Release\",\n \"ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure\",\n]\n```\n\n### Docker Image\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:${BUILDCHAIN_VERSION} .\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:verify .\"\n```\n\nDocker publishing is an external side effect and should be gated by a release\nworkflow after version-state promotion has been verified.\n\n## Design Boundaries\n\nThe lifecycle protocol is also the command source for the reusable build\nsurface. `.github/workflows/.build.yml` runs `lifecycle.install`,\n`lifecycle.build`, and `lifecycle.verify` by default, while allowing callers to\noverride each stage with explicit workflow inputs. The underlying\n`actions/run-lifecycle` action can be used directly by repositories that need a\ncustom workflow but still want Buildchain's lifecycle and deterministic manifest\ncontract.\n\nBuildchain lifecycle commands are data, not executable configuration files.\nThey make release behavior reviewable in pull requests and keep the release\nfact chain simple:\n\n1. choose the channel branch and release line;\n2. generate a source version commit from declared version files;\n3. verify that exact tree;\n4. move exact tags and floating refs only after verification succeeds;\n5. run publish or deployment side effects in separately gated workflows."
764
+ "markdown": "# Lifecycle Protocol\n\nBuildchain uses `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` as the v2 repository configuration format.\nThe file is optional for simple JavaScript repositories, but it is the preferred\nway to describe release version state and lifecycle commands when a project is\nnot a plain pnpm, npm, or yarn workspace.\n\nFor compatibility, Buildchain still reads a legacy root `buildchain.toml` when\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is absent. New repositories should use the\n`.buildchain/` layout so all Buildchain-owned local state lives under one\ndirectory.\n\nOnly TOML is supported in v2. YAML, JSON, and JavaScript config files are not\nloaded.\n\n## Minimal File\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n`schema = 1` is required. Buildchain fails closed when the schema is missing or\nunknown.\n\n## Version State\n\nVersion state is the source file evidence that matches a release tag. During\npromotion, Buildchain writes the selected release or prerelease version into the\nconfigured files, verifies the resulting tree, creates a source version commit,\nthen moves exact and floating refs.\n\nSupported version file types:\n\n| Type | Use case | Required fields |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `json` | `package.json`, JSON manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `toml` | `pyproject.toml`, other TOML manifests | `path`, `key` |\n| `regex` | `CMakeLists.txt`, `conanfile.py`, plain version files | `path`, `pattern`, `replacement` |\n\n`key` is a dotted key path:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n```\n\nConfigured JSON and TOML version files are semantic no-ops when the declared\nkey already equals the requested version. Buildchain preserves the repository's\noriginal TOML bytes in that case instead of serializing the whole document and\ncreating formatter-only release state. When a TOML version really changes,\nBuildchain applies a parser-verified lossless edit to that key and fails closed\nif it cannot prove a unique edit; unrelated arrays, comments, and formatting\nremain repository-owned.\n\nRegex files must expose the current version through a named capture group called\n`version`:\n\n```toml\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n```\n\nIf `version.required = true`, promotion fails when no configured version files\nare available.\n\n### Anchored Manual Versions\n\nSome repositories do not derive their package version from the Buildchain\nrelease tag. `libnode` is the canonical example: the package version is anchored\nto an explicitly selected upstream Node.js release such as `22.22.3-kf.0`, while\nthe channel line may be `release/v22/v22.22`.\n\nThose repositories can opt into anchored manual semantics:\n\n```toml\n[version]\nrequired = true\nstrategy = \"anchored\"\nnext = \"manual\"\nmanifest = \"libnode.release.json\"\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n```\n\nWith `strategy = \"anchored\"` and `next = \"manual\"`:\n\n- Buildchain validates the configured version files and anchor manifest, but it\n does not rewrite those files to the Buildchain release tag.\n- `lifecycle.verify` is the project-owned truth gate. It should compare the\n package version, anchor manifest, and upstream source/submodule state.\n- release promotion still creates the exact/floating production refs for the\n current line;\n- release promotion does not auto-create the next alpha branch or tag;\n- the action output `next-anchor-required` is `true`, signaling that the next\n upstream anchor line must be created explicitly by the repository.\n\nThe configured anchor manifest must be JSON or TOML. Buildchain does not\ninterpret project-specific field names; it only loads the manifest and exposes\nits top-level fields to validation summaries and lifecycle environment:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_STRATEGY=anchored\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION_NEXT=manual\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST=libnode.release.json\nBUILDCHAIN_ANCHOR_MANIFEST_JSON={\"nodeTag\":\"v22.22.3\",...}\n```\n\nThe upstream anchor decision remains outside Buildchain. A future line such as\n`dev/v24/v24.xx` should be created by an explicit repository workflow or human\ndecision after the upstream version has been selected and checked in.\n\n## Lifecycle Stages\n\nLifecycle stages are declarative shell commands. A stage can use exactly one of:\n\n- `command`: one shell command;\n- `commands`: multiple shell commands run in order;\n- `script`: a multiline shell script.\n\nAny command failure fails the stage. `timeout_minutes`, `retries`, `shell`, and\n`env` can be attached to a stage.\n\nDuring version-state verification, Buildchain also sets `BUILDCHAIN_VERSION` to\nthe release or prerelease version being verified.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ntimeout_minutes = 10\nretries = 3\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm install --frozen-lockfile\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run build\",\n \"pnpm run package\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\nshell = \"bash\"\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npnpm run check\ngit diff --check\n\"\"\"\n```\n\nShared environment variables can be declared once:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.env]\nPYTHONUNBUFFERED = \"1\"\n```\n\nStage-specific environment variables override shared lifecycle environment:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.test]\ncommand = \"pytest\"\n\n[lifecycle.test.env]\nPYTHONPATH = \"src\"\n```\n\n### Publish Stage\n\n`lifecycle.publish` is the project-owned side-effect stage. It may call npm,\nPyPI, Conan, CMake packaging scripts, Docker/OCI registries, S3 uploaders, or\nany other publisher. Buildchain does not assume the tool; it assumes the\nevidence contract.\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.publish]\nscript = \"\"\"\nset -euo pipefail\npython scripts/publish_wheels.py\nnode scripts/publish-images.mjs\nnode scripts/write-publish-evidence.mjs\n\"\"\"\n```\n\nWhen `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` runs with `publish-transaction: \"true\"`,\nthe publish stage receives the transaction identity plus the resolved publish\ncontract:\n\n```text\nBUILDCHAIN_VERSION\nBUILDCHAIN_CHANNEL\nBUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_TARGET_REF\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_STATE\nBUILDCHAIN_EVIDENCE_DIR\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_MATERIAL_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_TOOLING_SHA\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_EVIDENCE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_MODE\nBUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_AUTH\nBUILDCHAIN_NPM_DIST_TAG\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_ORDER\nBUILDCHAIN_PACKAGE_SET_MAIN_PACKAGE\n```\n\nThe stage must write publish evidence JSON. Buildchain validates that evidence\nbefore exact tags and floating refs move. In GitHub Actions, the promotion\naction also persists `state.json` and `evidence.json` to\n`refs/heads/buildchain/release-state/<version>` so fresh runners can recover\nwithout local workspace residue. See\n[`docs/publish-transaction.md`](publish-transaction.md) for the state machine,\nevidence schema, and recovery commands.\n\nFor npm packages, prefer:\n\n```toml\n[publish]\nmode = \"publish-final-version\"\nauth = \"trusted-publishing\"\ndist_tag = \"latest\"\n```\n\nUse `mode = \"promote-existing-version\"` only for explicit same-version\ndist-tag recovery, and pair it with `auth = \"npm-token\"`. Trusted Publishing\ndoes not authorize `npm dist-tag add`; Buildchain fails that combination before\nany publish transaction side effect.\n\n## Promotion Semantics\n\n`actions/promote-buildchain-ref` consumes `version.files`, `lifecycle.verify`,\nand optionally `lifecycle.publish`.\n\nThe verify stage runs after Buildchain has applied the generated version-state\nchanges to the local checkout, and before it creates release commits or moves\nrefs. After the command finishes, Buildchain checks that only declared\nversion-state files changed. This prevents verification from quietly adding\nextra source changes to the release commit.\n\nBuildchain-owned untracked runtime evidence is excluded only through an exact\ninternal allowlist. This includes contract-drift issue material under\n`.buildchain/contract-drift/` and the paper workflow's\n`.buildchain/publication-result.json`, alongside release-candidate, passport,\nrelease-state, KFD, and runtime evidence directories. Tracked changes, ordinary\nsource files, and undeclared `.buildchain/*` paths still fail version\nverification.\n\nOn protected alpha and release branches, the generated version-state commit is\napplied by the promotion automation after the reviewed channel PR has merged.\nBuildchain keeps review requirements, conversation resolution, strict status\nchecks, and admin enforcement for human channel changes, but adds the\nauthenticated promotion token user or app to the managed bypass allowlist for\ngenerated release bookkeeping. Buildchain also creates the configured required\ncheck on the exact generated version-state commit before patching the protected\nref, then applies the protected ref update with the declared generated ref\nupdate token. The reusable wrapper uses\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token` for that protected\nbookkeeping update. If release finalization bookkeeping is still rejected,\nBuildchain creates or reuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR\nfrom the current target channel head and reports `finalization-needed=true` so\na later idempotent promotion run can resume. Strict alpha bookkeeping remains\nfail-fast with a token/protection diagnostic instead of asking humans to review\na post-publish version-state PR.\n\nFor `version.strategy = \"anchored\"` with `version.next = \"manual\"`, release\npromotion does not generate a Buildchain-owned version-state commit. In that\nmode, a protected `alpha -> release` PR may carry the declared `version.files`\nfrom the tested alpha package version to the final package version, and may\ncarry the configured `version.manifest` with it. Buildchain only accepts that\nrelease tree difference when the PR is the valid channel-promotion PR, the\nchanged paths are limited to those declared version files plus the anchor\nmanifest, and `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` has validated the\nchecked-out release material. Any code or undeclared file change still fails the\nrelease tree gate.\n\nThe action input `verification-command` remains supported. When it is provided,\nit overrides `lifecycle.verify` for that invocation. The override inherits\n`[lifecycle.env]` and `lifecycle.verify.env`; when the configured stage declares\n`shell`, it also inherits that shell. If the stage has no explicit shell,\nBuildchain preserves the platform-default shell for compatibility.\n\n## Migration Preflight\n\nHeavy repositories can validate their Buildchain declaration before they are\nready to run the real build. `actions/validate-config` checks that\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` parses, configured version-state files exist, configured\nversion keys are strings, and required lifecycle stage names are declared.\nFor web-surface repositories it also validates `project`, `channels`, `deploy`,\n`retention`, and `security` declarations.\n\nIt does not run lifecycle commands. This is useful for repositories such as\n`libnode`, where `lifecycle.build` represents an expensive multi-platform native\nbuild and the first migration milestone is to prove the release metadata and\nlifecycle protocol without consuming build runners.\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-version-state: \"true\"\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"install,build,verify\"\n```\n\nWeb-surface repositories can use the same action without requiring version\nstate:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/validate-config@v2\n with:\n require-lifecycle-stages: \"build,verify\"\n```\n\nThe action exposes project and deploy metadata through outputs such as\n`project-type`, `project-site`, `channels`, and `deploy-adapters-json`.\n\n## Web-Surface Projects\n\n`project.type = \"web-surface\"` is for sites, docs, browser apps, and operator\nconsoles whose release object is a deployed surface, not a package version.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-libkungfu-dev\"\nsite = \"libkungfu-dev\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[deploy.production]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-production\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n```\n\nSee [Web-surface deployments](web-surface-deployments.md) for named surface host\nmappings, the manifest, preview alias, retention, cleanup, and dry-run deploy\ncontract.\n\n## Infra-Contract Projects\n\n`project.type = \"infra-contract\"` is for infrastructure contract repositories\nthat need provider-neutral desired, plan, approval, apply, observe, contract,\nand propagation evidence. `buildchain init --type infra-contract` wires\n`lifecycle.verify` to `buildchain infra-contract --mode ci`, which writes\nmutation-free plan, contract, propagation dry-run, evidence bundle, and\nverification artifacts under `.buildchain/`. The surface supports\nmanual-observed, observe-only, and mocked adapter fixtures without reading\ncloud state files or executing live infrastructure mutation. See\n[Infra Contract](infra-contract.md).\n\n## Examples\n\n### Node Workspace\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"pnpm run check\",\n]\n```\n\n### Python Package\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[version]\nrequired = true\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"toml\"\npath = \"pyproject.toml\"\nkey = \"project.version\"\n\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"python -m pip install -e .[test]\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"python -m build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"python -m build\",\n \"pytest\",\n]\n```\n\n### CMake and Conan\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"regex\"\npath = \"CMakeLists.txt\"\npattern = 'project\\([^)]* VERSION (?<version>[^ )]+)'\nreplacement = '${version}'\n\n[lifecycle.configure]\ncommands = [\n \"conan install . --build=missing\",\n \"cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"cmake --build build --config Release\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommands = [\n \"cmake --build build --config Release\",\n \"ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure\",\n]\n```\n\n### Docker Image\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[[version.files]]\ntype = \"json\"\npath = \"package.json\"\nkey = \"version\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:${BUILDCHAIN_VERSION} .\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"docker build -f Dockerfile -t kungfutrader/example:verify .\"\n```\n\nDocker publishing is an external side effect and should be gated by a release\nworkflow after version-state promotion has been verified.\n\n## Design Boundaries\n\nThe lifecycle protocol is also the command source for the reusable build\nsurface. `.github/workflows/.build.yml` runs `lifecycle.install`,\n`lifecycle.build`, and `lifecycle.verify` by default, while allowing callers to\noverride each stage with explicit workflow inputs. The underlying\n`actions/run-lifecycle` action can be used directly by repositories that need a\ncustom workflow but still want Buildchain's lifecycle and deterministic manifest\ncontract.\n\nBuildchain lifecycle commands are data, not executable configuration files.\nThey make release behavior reviewable in pull requests and keep the release\nfact chain simple:\n\n1. choose the channel branch and release line;\n2. generate a source version commit from declared version files;\n3. verify that exact tree;\n4. move exact tags and floating refs only after verification succeeds;\n5. run publish or deployment side effects in separately gated workflows."
765
765
  },
766
766
  {
767
767
  "id": "manual:map",
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@
966
966
  ],
967
967
  "maturity": "stable",
968
968
  "sourcePath": "docs/publication-artifacts.md",
969
- "digest": "sha256:e22951b5515b9b3803bbcc450d418473720aa0009318f27289fdafa7d9322d0f",
969
+ "digest": "sha256:6a5fc70b5e458ab52dc2f152bc0134b4f0710c844e7b75dd894f31721ea9cc02",
970
970
  "headings": [
971
971
  {
972
972
  "level": 1,
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@
999
999
  "anchor": "site-consumption"
1000
1000
  }
1001
1001
  ],
1002
- "markdown": "# Publication Artifact Workflow\n\nBuildchain supports `project.type = \"publication-artifact\"` for repositories\nthat produce auditable papers, reports, specifications, or similar publication\npackages. These repositories are artifact producers. They should not be forced\nto become `web-surface` repositories just because a downstream site later\nrenders the paper.\n\nThe split is:\n\n```text\npaper repo = source, PDF, metadata, source bundle, publication manifest\npapers site = layout, navigation, public web surface, downstream rendering\n```\n\n## Configuration\n\nThe paper repository owns `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"publication-artifact\"\nname = \"paper-observer-declared-timelines\"\n\n[publication]\nkind = \"paper\"\ntitle = \"Observer-Declared Timelines for Real-World Agent Work\"\nversion = \"0.1.0\"\nprimary_artifact = \"_build/main.pdf\"\nartifact_paths = [\"_build/main.pdf\"]\nmetadata_paths = [\"README.md\", \"docs/MAP.md\"]\nsource_paths = [\"paper\", \"README.md\", \"LICENSE\", \"Makefile\"]\nsite_consumers = [\"papers.libkungfu.dev\"]\nmanifest_path = \".buildchain/publication/publication-artifact.json\"\nsource_bundle_path = \".buildchain/publication/source.tar.gz\"\n\n[publication.archive]\nid = \"observer-declared-timelines\"\ncanonical_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/\"\nlatest_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/\"\nlatest_evidence_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/buildchain.release.json\"\nimmutable_base_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive\"\nregistry_path = \".buildchain/publication/publication-registry.json\"\n\n[publication.toolchain]\ntype = \"latex-docker\"\nimage = \"ghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/latex-pdf-builder\"\ndigest = \"sha256:c20f3809e96836c1c78e97c76939d12f1de3fed0ea9b7c40c43332ec2ea480f8\"\ncommand = \"latexmk -pdf -outdir=_build paper/main.tex\"\n\n[publish]\nkind = \"npm-paper-package\"\npackage = \"@kungfu-tech/paper-observer-declared-timelines\"\nauth = \"trusted-publishing\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"make pdf\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"make check\"\n```\n\n`primary_artifact` is the human-facing publication output, usually a PDF.\n`source_paths` are archived into a source bundle. `metadata_paths` are hashed\nand recorded so a site can consume the paper facts without scraping prose.\n\n`publication.archive` turns the publication into an append-only public archive\ncontract:\n\n- `canonical_url` is the stable human reader page.\n- `latest_url` and `latest_evidence_url` are movable aliases for the latest\n reader page and latest evidence.\n- `immutable_base_url` plus `id` and `publication.version` produce a versioned\n prefix such as\n `https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive/observer-declared-timelines/v0.1.0/`.\n- `immutable_url_prefix` can be used instead when the repository already owns\n the full version prefix.\n- `registry_path` records every published version and its manifest, passport,\n source bundle, primary artifact, URLs, and SHA-256 digests.\n\nImmutable archive prefixes are append-only. Do not run site deployment commands\nwith `sync --delete` or equivalent deletion semantics over those prefixes. A\nsame-version republish is allowed only when the immutable digest is unchanged;\nif PDF, source bundle, route, metadata, or toolchain evidence changes for an\nexisting version, Buildchain fails before the registry is rewritten.\n\nThe Buildchain web-surface adapter consumes this boundary from a surface-local\n`manifest.json` whose `archivePolicy.contract` is\n`kungfu-buildchain-publication-archive-policy`. It excludes the derived archive\nroot from every owning or parent `sync --delete`, verifies existing object\ndigests, uploads only missing immutable files with `--no-overwrite`, and verifies\nthem again before mutable site content is synchronized. A current package set\ndoes not need to rebuild or enumerate every historical version: the protected\narchive root remains outside deletion even when older versions disappear from\nthe current artifact.\n\n`publication.toolchain` makes the source-to-PDF transformation part of the\nmachine-readable contract. `latex-docker` is the preferred LaTeX profile. The\nBuildchain paper scaffold and reusable workflow default to\n`ghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/latex-pdf-builder:v1.2.0`, pinned by the\ndigest above. The workflow pulls the declared image by digest and runs the\ndeclared command in that pinned container. `custom-command` remains available\nfor compatibility, but the passport records it as lower trust because\nBuildchain can record the command boundary without proving the compiler or\nLaTeX distribution digest.\n\n`publish.kind = \"npm-paper-package\"` declares that Buildchain, not the consumer\nrepository, owns the standard paper npm package shape and release transaction\nmechanics. `publish.package` is the public npm package that contains the PDF,\npublication manifest, publication passport, optional archive registry, source\nbundle, and declared metadata files.\n\n## Reusable Workflow\n\nConsumer repositories that only need to build and upload paper evidence can\ncall the build-only wrapper directly:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n publication:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/publication-artifact.yml@v2\n with:\n toolchain-type: config\n verify-command: make check\n artifact-name: observer-declared-timelines\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n```\n\nThe build-only workflow:\n\n- resolves the Buildchain runtime and checks the floating contract lock before\n any paper build runs;\n- resolves the declared publication toolchain from `[publication.toolchain]` or\n workflow inputs;\n- for `latex-docker`, pulls the pinned build-images LaTeX builder digest and\n runs the declared command in the container;\n- for `custom-command`, runs the declared command and records the lower-trust\n boundary in the passport;\n- runs the verify command;\n- creates a source bundle from `publication.source_paths`;\n- writes `.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact.json`;\n- writes `.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact-passport.json`;\n- when `[publication.archive]` is configured, writes\n `.buildchain/publication/publication-registry.json` and verifies same-version\n immutability;\n- uploads one GitHub artifact containing the PDF, manifest, passport, optional\n registry, and source bundle.\n\nIt does not publish npm packages, deploy web pages, or create GitHub Releases.\n\n## Paper Release Preset\n\nPaper repositories that publish a versioned npm package should use the\nBuildchain-managed release preset instead of copying npm transaction scripts or\npromotion YAML:\n\n```yaml\nname: Paper Release\n\non:\n push:\n branches:\n - alpha/v1/v1.0\n - release/v1/v1.0\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n buildchain-ref:\n description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref\"\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n paper-release:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/paper-release.yml@v2\n permissions:\n checks: write\n contents: write\n id-token: write\n issues: write\n secrets:\n BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_AUTHORITY_TOKEN }}\n with:\n buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n toolchain-type: config\n verify-command: make check\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n```\n\n`RELEASE_AUTHORITY_TOKEN` is a caller-chosen release authority secret name.\nMap whichever repository or organization secret owns protected release\nbookkeeping into the reusable workflow's `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` contract;\nthe reusable workflow does not require that provider-side secret to use a\nspecific name. Before it builds the paper, the workflow uses that authority to\nread the target channel's branch protection and fails with a configuration\ndiagnostic if the protection is not readable. `github.token` remains a fallback\nfor repositories where its permissions are sufficient.\n\nThe preset:\n\n- resolves the same floating Buildchain runtime and contract lock as the build\n workflow;\n- verifies that the declared promotion authority can read the protected target\n channel before starting the publication build;\n- builds the PDF through the declared pinned LaTeX Docker toolchain or custom\n command;\n- verifies the paper repository;\n- writes the publication manifest, publication passport, optional archive\n registry, and source bundle;\n- synthesizes an npm package from `[publication]` and `[publish]` declarations\n under `.buildchain/publication/npm-package`;\n- computes npm-style `sha512` integrity from `npm pack --dry-run` and passes\n it as `publish-required-artifacts-json`;\n- creates a `publish-gate/<alpha|release>/.../<version>` source lock for the\n channel commit and requires `promote-buildchain-ref` to verify that lock\n before any publish side effect;\n- publishes the package through npm Trusted Publishing;\n- writes Buildchain release/passport evidence; and\n- creates or updates the exact-version GitHub Release by default.\n\nConsumers can opt out of the GitHub Release with `github-release: false`, but\nthe default is on so downstream release propagation can observe\n`release.published` without hand-written `gh release` steps.\n\nFor npm Trusted Publishing, register the consumer workflow file that calls this\npreset, for example `.github/workflows/paper-release.yml`, against the declared\npackage in npm. The trusted publisher is the consumer repository and workflow\nfile; the implementation still runs inside Buildchain's reusable workflow.\n\nStandard paper repositories should not carry local copies of\n`scripts/npm-publish-transaction.mjs`, package-generation scripts, or\npromotion/ref-lock YAML. If the default package shape is insufficient, extend\nBuildchain rather than forking the mechanics into each paper repository.\n\n## CLI And Node API\n\nGenerate the publication manifest locally or in CI:\n\n```sh\nbuildchain publication-artifact manifest --source-sha \"$(git rev-parse HEAD)\" --json\n```\n\nGenerate the npm package contents after the manifest exists:\n\n```sh\nbuildchain publication-artifact npm-package --json\n```\n\nNode API:\n\n```js\nimport {\n collectPublicationArtifact,\n writePublicationArtifact,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/publication-artifact\";\n\nimport {\n collectPublicationPackageFacts,\n preparePublicationNpmPackage,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/publication-package\";\n```\n\n`writePublicationArtifact()` is the single implementation used by the CLI and\nthe reusable workflow. The generated manifest records:\n\n- publication title, kind, authors, and primary artifact;\n- artifact paths, byte sizes, and SHA-256 digests;\n- metadata paths and SHA-256 digests;\n- source SHA, tree SHA, source files, and source bundle digest;\n- publication toolchain type, image, digest, command, invocation mode, and trust\n classification;\n- timestamp and reproducibility policy;\n- downstream site-consumption hints;\n- optional archive routes for canonical, latest, latest evidence, immutable\n version prefix, and public artifact URLs.\n\nThe companion publication artifact passport records the same source and\nartifact evidence plus an explicit responsibility split. Buildchain proves\ndeclared files and hashes; it does not peer-review paper claims.\n\nWhen archive config is present, the registry uses the\n`kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` contract. A site repository\ncan render latest pages and historical version indexes from that registry\nwithout rebuilding old PDFs from the latest npm package or paper source.\n\n## Site Consumption\n\nA downstream papers site should treat the publication manifest as the single\nfact source for the artifact. The site owns rendering and navigation; it should\nnot reinterpret the paper repository as a web deployment source.\nFor registry-level routing, sites should first consume the package-owned\nBuildchain fact source:\n\n```text\nnode_modules/@kungfu-tech/buildchain/dist/site/publication-registry.json\n```\n\nor the equivalent package export:\n\n```js\nimport registry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/publication-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\n```\n\nThat registry uses the `kungfu-buildchain-publication-release-registry`\ncontract. It separates mutable canonical/latest reader routes from immutable\nversion prefixes, publication artifacts, source bundles, and passport evidence\nso site repositories can render `/papers/**` without maintaining a parallel\nfixture truth source.\n\nFor `paper-observer-declared-timelines`, the expected adoption path is:\n\n```text\npaper repo builds PDF + manifest + source bundle\npaper repo updates publication-registry.json\npapers site consumes publication-artifact.json\npapers site consumes publication-registry.json for history\nsite renders paper page and links the PDF/source bundle\n```\n\nThis mirrors web-surface governance without mixing producer and renderer\nresponsibilities."
1002
+ "markdown": "# Publication Artifact Workflow\n\nBuildchain supports `project.type = \"publication-artifact\"` for repositories\nthat produce auditable papers, reports, specifications, or similar publication\npackages. These repositories are artifact producers. They should not be forced\nto become `web-surface` repositories just because a downstream site later\nrenders the paper.\n\nThe split is:\n\n```text\npaper repo = source, PDF, metadata, source bundle, publication manifest\npapers site = layout, navigation, public web surface, downstream rendering\n```\n\n## Configuration\n\nThe paper repository owns `.buildchain/buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"publication-artifact\"\nname = \"paper-observer-declared-timelines\"\n\n[publication]\nkind = \"paper\"\ntitle = \"Observer-Declared Timelines for Real-World Agent Work\"\nversion = \"0.1.0\"\nprimary_artifact = \"_build/main.pdf\"\nartifact_paths = [\"_build/main.pdf\"]\nmetadata_paths = [\"README.md\", \"docs/MAP.md\"]\nsource_paths = [\"paper\", \"README.md\", \"LICENSE\", \"Makefile\"]\nsite_consumers = [\"papers.libkungfu.dev\"]\nmanifest_path = \".buildchain/publication/publication-artifact.json\"\nsource_bundle_path = \".buildchain/publication/source.tar.gz\"\n\n[publication.archive]\nid = \"observer-declared-timelines\"\ncanonical_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/\"\nlatest_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/\"\nlatest_evidence_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/observer-declared-timelines/latest/buildchain.release.json\"\nimmutable_base_url = \"https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive\"\nregistry_path = \".buildchain/publication/publication-registry.json\"\n\n[publication.toolchain]\ntype = \"latex-docker\"\nimage = \"ghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/latex-pdf-builder\"\ndigest = \"sha256:c20f3809e96836c1c78e97c76939d12f1de3fed0ea9b7c40c43332ec2ea480f8\"\ncommand = \"latexmk -pdf -outdir=_build paper/main.tex\"\n\n[publish]\nkind = \"npm-paper-package\"\npackage = \"@kungfu-tech/paper-observer-declared-timelines\"\nauth = \"trusted-publishing\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"make pdf\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"make check\"\n```\n\n`primary_artifact` is the human-facing publication output, usually a PDF.\n`source_paths` are archived into a source bundle. `metadata_paths` are hashed\nand recorded so a site can consume the paper facts without scraping prose.\n\n`publication.archive` turns the publication into an append-only public archive\ncontract:\n\n- `canonical_url` is the stable human reader page.\n- `latest_url` and `latest_evidence_url` are movable aliases for the latest\n reader page and latest evidence.\n- `immutable_base_url` plus `id` and `publication.version` produce a versioned\n prefix such as\n `https://papers.libkungfu.dev/archive/observer-declared-timelines/v0.1.0/`.\n- `immutable_url_prefix` can be used instead when the repository already owns\n the full version prefix.\n- `registry_path` records every published version and its manifest, passport,\n source bundle, primary artifact, URLs, and SHA-256 digests.\n\nImmutable archive prefixes are append-only. Do not run site deployment commands\nwith `sync --delete` or equivalent deletion semantics over those prefixes. A\nsame-version republish is allowed only when the immutable digest is unchanged;\nif PDF, source bundle, route, metadata, or toolchain evidence changes for an\nexisting version, Buildchain fails before the registry is rewritten.\n\nThe Buildchain web-surface adapter consumes this boundary from a surface-local\n`manifest.json` whose `archivePolicy.contract` is\n`kungfu-buildchain-publication-archive-policy`. It excludes the derived archive\nroot from every owning or parent `sync --delete`, verifies existing object\ndigests, uploads only missing immutable files with `--no-overwrite`, and verifies\nthem again before mutable site content is synchronized. A current package set\ndoes not need to rebuild or enumerate every historical version: the protected\narchive root remains outside deletion even when older versions disappear from\nthe current artifact.\n\n`publication.toolchain` makes the source-to-PDF transformation part of the\nmachine-readable contract. `latex-docker` is the preferred LaTeX profile. The\nBuildchain paper scaffold and reusable workflow default to\n`ghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/latex-pdf-builder:v1.2.0`, pinned by the\ndigest above. The workflow pulls the declared image by digest and runs the\ndeclared command in that pinned container. `custom-command` remains available\nfor compatibility, but the passport records it as lower trust because\nBuildchain can record the command boundary without proving the compiler or\nLaTeX distribution digest.\n\n`publish.kind = \"npm-paper-package\"` declares that Buildchain, not the consumer\nrepository, owns the standard paper npm package shape and release transaction\nmechanics. `publish.package` is the public npm package that contains the PDF,\npublication manifest, publication passport, optional archive registry, source\nbundle, and declared metadata files.\n\n## Reusable Workflow\n\nConsumer repositories that only need to build and upload paper evidence can\ncall the build-only wrapper directly:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n publication:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/publication-artifact.yml@v2\n with:\n toolchain-type: config\n verify-command: make check\n artifact-name: observer-declared-timelines\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n```\n\nThe build-only workflow:\n\n- resolves the Buildchain runtime and checks the floating contract lock before\n any paper build runs;\n- resolves the declared publication toolchain from `[publication.toolchain]` or\n workflow inputs;\n- for `latex-docker`, pulls the pinned build-images LaTeX builder digest and\n runs the declared command in the container;\n- for `custom-command`, runs the declared command and records the lower-trust\n boundary in the passport;\n- runs the verify command;\n- creates a source bundle from `publication.source_paths`;\n- writes `.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact.json`;\n- writes `.buildchain/publication/publication-artifact-passport.json`;\n- when `[publication.archive]` is configured, writes\n `.buildchain/publication/publication-registry.json` and verifies same-version\n immutability;\n- uploads one GitHub artifact containing the PDF, manifest, passport, optional\n registry, and source bundle.\n\nIt does not publish npm packages, deploy web pages, or create GitHub Releases.\n\nThe paper release preset additionally hydrates every prior published package\nregistry from the npm registry before generating the current manifest. npm\npackage integrity authenticates each downloaded source; Buildchain verifies the\nregistry self-digest, merges immutable records, and fails if a cumulative\nregistry drops an accepted version or changes immutable route/artifact facts.\nThe synthesized package therefore carries complete history even on a clean\nrunner. Its cumulative registry and file SHA-256 values are bound into the paper\nrelease build summary and release passport evidence.\n\n## Paper Release Preset\n\nPaper repositories that publish a versioned npm package should use the\nBuildchain-managed release preset instead of copying npm transaction scripts or\npromotion YAML:\n\n```yaml\nname: Paper Release\n\non:\n push:\n branches:\n - alpha/v1/v1.0\n - release/v1/v1.0\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n buildchain-ref:\n description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref\"\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n paper-release:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/paper-release.yml@v2\n permissions:\n checks: write\n contents: write\n id-token: write\n issues: write\n secrets:\n BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_AUTHORITY_TOKEN }}\n with:\n buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n toolchain-type: config\n verify-command: make check\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n```\n\n`RELEASE_AUTHORITY_TOKEN` is a caller-chosen release authority secret name.\nMap whichever repository or organization secret owns protected release\nbookkeeping into the reusable workflow's `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` contract;\nthe reusable workflow does not require that provider-side secret to use a\nspecific name. Before it builds the paper, the workflow uses that authority to\nread the target channel's branch protection and fails with a configuration\ndiagnostic if the protection is not readable. `github.token` remains a fallback\nfor repositories where its permissions are sufficient.\n\nThe preset:\n\n- resolves the same floating Buildchain runtime and contract lock as the build\n workflow;\n- verifies that the declared promotion authority can read the protected target\n channel before starting the publication build;\n- builds the PDF through the declared pinned LaTeX Docker toolchain or custom\n command;\n- verifies the paper repository;\n- writes the publication manifest, publication passport, optional archive\n registry, and source bundle;\n- synthesizes an npm package from `[publication]` and `[publish]` declarations\n under `.buildchain/publication/npm-package`;\n- computes npm-style `sha512` integrity from `npm pack --dry-run` and passes\n it as `publish-required-artifacts-json`;\n- creates a `publish-gate/<alpha|release>/.../<version>` source lock for the\n channel commit and requires `promote-buildchain-ref` to verify that lock\n before any publish side effect;\n- publishes the package through npm Trusted Publishing;\n- writes Buildchain release/passport evidence; and\n- creates or updates the exact-version GitHub Release by default.\n\nConsumers can opt out of the GitHub Release with `github-release: false`, but\nthe default is on so downstream release propagation can observe\n`release.published` without hand-written `gh release` steps.\n\nFor npm Trusted Publishing, register the consumer workflow file that calls this\npreset, for example `.github/workflows/paper-release.yml`, against the declared\npackage in npm. The trusted publisher is the consumer repository and workflow\nfile; the implementation still runs inside Buildchain's reusable workflow.\n\nStandard paper repositories should not carry local copies of\n`scripts/npm-publish-transaction.mjs`, package-generation scripts, or\npromotion/ref-lock YAML. If the default package shape is insufficient, extend\nBuildchain rather than forking the mechanics into each paper repository.\n\n## CLI And Node API\n\nGenerate the publication manifest locally or in CI:\n\n```sh\nbuildchain publication-artifact manifest --source-sha \"$(git rev-parse HEAD)\" --json\n```\n\nGenerate the npm package contents after the manifest exists:\n\n```sh\nbuildchain publication-artifact npm-package --json\n```\n\nNode API:\n\n```js\nimport {\n collectPublicationArtifact,\n writePublicationArtifact,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/publication-artifact\";\n\nimport {\n collectPublicationPackageFacts,\n preparePublicationNpmPackage,\n} from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/publication-package\";\n```\n\n`writePublicationArtifact()` is the single implementation used by the CLI and\nthe reusable workflow. The generated manifest records:\n\n- publication title, kind, authors, and primary artifact;\n- artifact paths, byte sizes, and SHA-256 digests;\n- metadata paths and SHA-256 digests;\n- source SHA, tree SHA, source files, and source bundle digest;\n- publication toolchain type, image, digest, command, invocation mode, and trust\n classification;\n- timestamp and reproducibility policy;\n- downstream site-consumption hints;\n- optional archive routes for canonical, latest, latest evidence, immutable\n version prefix, and public artifact URLs.\n\nThe companion publication artifact passport records the same source and\nartifact evidence plus an explicit responsibility split. Buildchain proves\ndeclared files and hashes; it does not peer-review paper claims.\n\nWhen archive config is present, the registry uses the\n`kungfu-buildchain-publication-artifact-registry` contract. A site repository\ncan render latest pages and historical version indexes from that registry\nwithout rebuilding old PDFs from the latest npm package or paper source.\n\n## Site Consumption\n\nA downstream papers site should treat the publication manifest as the single\nfact source for the artifact. The site owns rendering and navigation; it should\nnot reinterpret the paper repository as a web deployment source.\nFor registry-level routing, sites should first consume the package-owned\nBuildchain fact source:\n\n```text\nnode_modules/@kungfu-tech/buildchain/dist/site/publication-registry.json\n```\n\nor the equivalent package export:\n\n```js\nimport registry from \"@kungfu-tech/buildchain/site/publication-registry.json\" with { type: \"json\" };\n```\n\nThat registry uses the `kungfu-buildchain-publication-release-registry`\ncontract. It separates mutable canonical/latest reader routes from immutable\nversion prefixes, publication artifacts, source bundles, and passport evidence\nso site repositories can render `/papers/**` without maintaining a parallel\nfixture truth source.\n\nFor `paper-observer-declared-timelines`, the expected adoption path is:\n\n```text\npaper repo builds PDF + manifest + source bundle\npaper repo updates publication-registry.json\npapers site consumes publication-artifact.json\npapers site consumes publication-registry.json for history\nsite renders paper page and links the PDF/source bundle\n```\n\nThis mirrors web-surface governance without mixing producer and renderer\nresponsibilities."
1003
1003
  },
1004
1004
  {
1005
1005
  "id": "manual:publish-transaction",
@@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@
1153
1153
  ],
1154
1154
  "maturity": "stable",
1155
1155
  "sourcePath": "docs/release-flow.md",
1156
- "digest": "sha256:feb1e056975a4ffb714d8fc0583a0f6fd8ed774c30ca168c27d5e6baf02f1cde",
1156
+ "digest": "sha256:5b855ab3863e197b2ab257536b1f3ff85c79bca1fe962c45089b3f4c5ab81189",
1157
1157
  "headings": [
1158
1158
  {
1159
1159
  "level": 1,
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@
1211
1211
  "anchor": "failure-boundaries"
1212
1212
  }
1213
1213
  ],
1214
- "markdown": "# Release Flow Diagrams\n\nThis document describes the Buildchain v2 branch, tag, and version-state flow.\nSee [Release governance](release-governance.md) for the design rationale.\n\n## Architecture\n\n```mermaid\nflowchart TD\n Maintainer[\"Maintainer opens channel PR\"]\n Verify[\"Release - Verify\"]\n Review[\"Protected branch review\"]\n Merge[\"Merge PR into alpha or release\"]\n Promotion[\"Buildchain Ref Promotion\"]\n Action[\"promote-buildchain-ref action\"]\n VersionState[\"Version-state commit\"]\n ExactTag[\"Exact tag\"]\n FloatingRefs[\"Floating tags and channel branches\"]\n Consumers[\"Consumers pin stable or exact refs\"]\n\n Maintainer --> Verify\n Verify --> Review\n Review --> Merge\n Merge --> Promotion\n Promotion --> Action\n Action --> VersionState\n Action --> ExactTag\n Action --> FloatingRefs\n ExactTag --> Consumers\n FloatingRefs --> Consumers\n```\n\nBuildchain treats the PR merge as release intent and the promotion action as the\nonly component allowed to turn that intent into release refs.\n\n## Ref State\n\n| Ref kind | Example | Mutability | Purpose |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Development branch | `dev/v2/v2.0` | moves | next source state for a minor line |\n| Alpha branch | `alpha/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest test state for a minor line |\n| Release branch | `release/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest production state for a minor line |\n| Major gate branch | `publish-gate/major` | moves | reviewed administrator gate for publishing the next major |\n| Exact alpha tag | `v2.0.3-alpha.0` | immutable | audit ref for one tested prerelease |\n| Exact release tag | `v2.0.2` | immutable | audit ref for one production release |\n| Floating alpha tag | `v2.0-alpha` | moves | latest test channel for a minor line |\n| Floating minor tag | `v2.0` | moves | latest production patch on a minor line |\n| Floating major tag | `v2` | moves | selected stable major entrypoint |\n\n## Ref Protection Contract\n\nRepository rulesets must distinguish immutable evidence refs from mutable\nchannel refs.\n\nProtect exact release and alpha tags as immutable evidence:\n\n```text\nrefs/tags/v*.*.*\n```\n\nDo not apply immutable-tag rulesets to every `refs/tags/v*` ref. Buildchain\nmust be able to update floating channel tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, and\n`v2.0-alpha` after the exact tag and publish evidence are valid. A ruleset that\nmatches all `v*` tags also matches floating tags, so release finalization can\nfail with GitHub protected-ref errors even though the exact release tag and\npublished artifacts are already durable.\n\nThe intended governance split is:\n\n- exact tags such as `v2.0.14` and `v2.0.15-alpha.0` are immutable audit refs;\n- floating tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, and `v2.0-alpha` are mutable channel refs\n owned by the Buildchain promotion token;\n- protected branches still require reviewed channel PRs before Buildchain can\n move any exact or floating release refs.\n\n## Opening a Minor Line\n\nNew minor lines should be opened through Buildchain instead of hand-created\nbranches. The reusable entrypoint is the `Release Line Bootstrap` workflow. It\ndefaults to dry-run so maintainers can inspect the planned refs, protection\ncontract, initial version, and first alpha PR before any mutation.\n\nThe workflow is backed by the CLI command:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n --major 2 \\\n --minor 10 \\\n --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n --json\n```\n\nWhen the workflow is run with `apply=true`, Buildchain:\n\n- writes the initial version-state commit, such as `2.10.0-alpha.0`;\n- creates `dev/v2/v2.10` from that commit;\n- creates `alpha/v2/v2.10` and `release/v2/v2.10` from the selected source ref;\n- applies branch protection with one approving review and the configured\n required status check;\n- switches the repository default branch to the new dev line when requested;\n- opens the first `dev/v2/v2.10 -> alpha/v2/v2.10` channel PR when requested.\n\nThis makes minor-line creation a single audited operation. The channel PR still\ngoes through the normal verify/review/promotion path before an alpha is\npublished.\n\n## Alpha Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n participant PR as PR dev -> alpha\n participant Verify as Release - Verify\n participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n participant Tags as Tags\n\n Dev->>PR: open channel PR\n PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n PR->>Alpha: reviewed merge\n Alpha->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n Promote->>Promote: compute next vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n Promote->>Promote: write and verify version state\n Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z-alpha.N\nvX.Y-alpha\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nall point at the generated alpha version-state commit.\n\n## Release Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n participant PR as PR alpha -> release\n participant Verify as Release - Verify\n participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n participant Tags as Tags\n participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n\n Alpha->>PR: open channel PR\n PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n PR->>Release: reviewed merge\n Release->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n Promote->>Promote: find same-patch alpha tag\n Promote->>Promote: compare release tree with tested alpha tree\n Promote->>Promote: write final version state or verify anchored material\n Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z\n Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y\n Promote->>Tags: move vX when eligible\n Promote->>Release: move release/vX/vX.Y\n Promote->>Promote: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z\nvX.Y\nvX\nrelease/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the production version-state commit, while:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\nvX.Y-alpha\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the next alpha version-state commit.\n\n## State Machine\n\n```mermaid\nstateDiagram-v2\n [*] --> Development: work lands on dev/vX/vX.Y\n Development --> AlphaCandidate: PR dev -> alpha\n AlphaCandidate --> AlphaPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n AlphaPublished --> ReleaseCandidate: PR alpha -> release\n ReleaseCandidate --> ProductionPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n ProductionPublished --> NextAlphaPrepared: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n NextAlphaPrepared --> Development: dev and alpha refs move to next alpha\n```\n\nThe same minor line can loop through this state machine many times.\n\n## Version Examples\n\nAssume `v2.0.2-alpha.1` has been tested and a maintainer merges\n`alpha/v2/v2.0 -> release/v2/v2.0`.\n\nBuildchain should produce:\n\n```text\nv2.0.2 exact production tag\nv2.0 floating minor tag\nv2 floating major tag when v2.0 is the selected major line\nrelease/v2/v2.0 production channel branch\n```\n\nIt should also prepare:\n\n```text\nv2.0.3-alpha.0 exact next alpha tag\nv2.0-alpha floating alpha tag\nalpha/v2/v2.0 alpha channel branch\ndev/v2/v2.0 development channel branch\n```\n\nThis is expected behavior. A production release closes one patch and opens the\nnext test patch on the same minor line.\n\n## Major Gate Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n participant PR as PR release -> publish-gate/major\n participant Verify as Release - Verify\n participant Gate as publish-gate/major\n participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n participant Tags as Tags\n participant Next as dev/alpha/release v(X+1).0\n\n Release->>PR: open administrator PR\n PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n PR->>Gate: reviewed merge\n Gate->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo release -> publish-gate/major PR\n Promote->>Promote: write v(X+1).0.0 version state\n Promote->>Tags: create v(X+1).0.0\n Promote->>Tags: move v(X+1).0 and v(X+1)\n Promote->>Gate: move publish-gate/major to v(X+1).0.0\n Promote->>Next: move release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0 to v(X+1).0.0\n Promote->>Promote: prepare v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0\n Promote->>Next: move alpha/dev v(X+1).0 to next alpha\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is intentionally not an active source branch. It is the PR\ntarget for the administrator's \"publish the next major\" decision. The older\n`major-gate` name is a compatibility alias only.\n\n## Failure Boundaries\n\nPromotion should stop before moving refs when:\n\n- the run is a non-dry-run manual dispatch;\n- the expected same-repository PR cannot be found;\n- the PR was not merged;\n- the branch pair is not a valid channel path;\n- the required status check did not pass;\n- a release tree does not match the same-patch alpha tag tree, except for the\n declared anchored/manual version files and anchor manifest that\n `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` validates;\n- version-state verification fails;\n- a required exact tag already exists at a commit unrelated to the active\n transaction or finalized channel head.\n\nThese failures are intentional. They protect consumers from refs that look\nreleased but do not have a complete evidence chain.\n\nDuring transaction finalization recovery, the current channel head may be a\ngenerated version-state merge commit. Buildchain validates that the durable\ntransaction version, exact tag, evidence, and release material match, and that\nthe current target ref contains or corresponds to the recorded\n`release_material_sha`. It must then tolerate exact tags, dev refs, or alpha\nrefs that have already moved and continue filling any missing floating tags\nbefore writing the transaction state as `complete`."
1214
+ "markdown": "# Release Flow Diagrams\n\nThis document describes the Buildchain v2 branch, tag, and version-state flow.\nSee [Release governance](release-governance.md) for the design rationale.\n\n## Architecture\n\n```mermaid\nflowchart TD\n Maintainer[\"Maintainer opens channel PR\"]\n Verify[\"Release - Verify\"]\n Review[\"Protected branch review\"]\n Merge[\"Merge PR into alpha or release\"]\n Promotion[\"Buildchain Ref Promotion\"]\n StableDecision{\"Release channel?\"}\n StableGate[\"Stable only: exact-alpha canaries + soak + cooldown\"]\n Action[\"promote-buildchain-ref action\"]\n VersionState[\"Version-state commit\"]\n ExactTag[\"Exact tag\"]\n FloatingRefs[\"Floating tags and channel branches\"]\n Consumers[\"Consumers pin stable or exact refs\"]\n\n Maintainer --> Verify\n Verify --> Review\n Review --> Merge\n Merge --> Promotion\n Promotion --> StableDecision\n StableDecision -->|yes| StableGate\n StableDecision -->|no: alpha| Action\n StableGate --> Action\n Action --> VersionState\n Action --> ExactTag\n Action --> FloatingRefs\n ExactTag --> Consumers\n FloatingRefs --> Consumers\n```\n\nBuildchain treats the PR merge as release intent and the promotion action as the\nonly component allowed to turn that intent into release refs.\n\n`StableGate` applies only to Buildchain's release channel. Alpha and train\niteration bypass it. See [Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate](release-governance.md#stable-release-throttle-and-canary-gate)\nfor the versioned policy and evidence contract.\n\n## Ref State\n\n| Ref kind | Example | Mutability | Purpose |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Development branch | `dev/v2/v2.0` | moves | next source state for a minor line |\n| Alpha branch | `alpha/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest test state for a minor line |\n| Release branch | `release/v2/v2.0` | moves | latest production state for a minor line |\n| Major gate branch | `publish-gate/major` | moves | reviewed administrator gate for publishing the next major |\n| Exact alpha tag | `v2.0.3-alpha.0` | immutable | audit ref for one tested prerelease |\n| Exact release tag | `v2.0.2` | immutable | audit ref for one production release |\n| Floating alpha tag | `v2.0-alpha` | moves | latest test channel for a minor line |\n| Floating minor tag | `v2.0` | moves | latest production patch on a minor line |\n| Floating major tag | `v2` | moves | selected stable major entrypoint |\n\n## Ref Protection Contract\n\nRepository rulesets must distinguish immutable evidence refs from mutable\nchannel refs.\n\nProtect exact release and alpha tags as immutable evidence:\n\n```text\nrefs/tags/v*.*.*\n```\n\nDo not apply immutable-tag rulesets to every `refs/tags/v*` ref. Buildchain\nmust be able to update floating channel tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, and\n`v2.0-alpha` after the exact tag and publish evidence are valid. A ruleset that\nmatches all `v*` tags also matches floating tags, so release finalization can\nfail with GitHub protected-ref errors even though the exact release tag and\npublished artifacts are already durable.\n\nThe intended governance split is:\n\n- exact tags such as `v2.0.14` and `v2.0.15-alpha.0` are immutable audit refs;\n- floating tags such as `v2`, `v2.0`, and `v2.0-alpha` are mutable channel refs\n owned by the Buildchain promotion token;\n- protected branches still require reviewed channel PRs before Buildchain can\n move any exact or floating release refs.\n\n## Opening a Minor Line\n\nNew minor lines should be opened through Buildchain instead of hand-created\nbranches. The reusable entrypoint is the `Release Line Bootstrap` workflow. It\ndefaults to dry-run so maintainers can inspect the planned refs, protection\ncontract, initial version, and first alpha PR before any mutation.\n\nThe workflow is backed by the CLI command:\n\n```bash\nbuildchain release line open \\\n --major 2 \\\n --minor 10 \\\n --source-ref release/v2/v2.9 \\\n --json\n```\n\nWhen the workflow is run with `apply=true`, Buildchain:\n\n- writes the initial version-state commit, such as `2.10.0-alpha.0`;\n- creates `dev/v2/v2.10` from that commit;\n- creates `alpha/v2/v2.10` and `release/v2/v2.10` from the selected source ref;\n- applies branch protection with one approving review and the configured\n required status check;\n- switches the repository default branch to the new dev line when requested;\n- opens the first `dev/v2/v2.10 -> alpha/v2/v2.10` channel PR when requested.\n\nThis makes minor-line creation a single audited operation. The channel PR still\ngoes through the normal verify/review/promotion path before an alpha is\npublished.\n\n## Alpha Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n participant PR as PR dev -> alpha\n participant Verify as Release - Verify\n participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n participant Tags as Tags\n\n Dev->>PR: open channel PR\n PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n PR->>Alpha: reviewed merge\n Alpha->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n Promote->>Promote: compute next vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n Promote->>Promote: write and verify version state\n Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z-alpha.N\n Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z-alpha.N\nvX.Y-alpha\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nall point at the generated alpha version-state commit.\n\n## Release Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n participant Alpha as alpha/vX/vX.Y\n participant PR as PR alpha -> release\n participant Verify as Release - Verify\n participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n participant Tags as Tags\n participant Dev as dev/vX/vX.Y\n\n Alpha->>PR: open channel PR\n PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n PR->>Release: reviewed merge\n Release->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo merged PR\n Promote->>Promote: find same-patch alpha tag\n Promote->>Promote: compare release tree with tested alpha tree\n Promote->>Promote: write final version state or verify anchored material\n Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.Z\n Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y\n Promote->>Tags: move vX when eligible\n Promote->>Release: move release/vX/vX.Y\n Promote->>Promote: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n Promote->>Tags: create or reuse vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n Promote->>Tags: move vX.Y-alpha\n Promote->>Alpha: move alpha/vX/vX.Y\n Promote->>Dev: move dev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.Z\nvX.Y\nvX\nrelease/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the production version-state commit, while:\n\n```text\nvX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\nvX.Y-alpha\nalpha/vX/vX.Y\ndev/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\npoint at the next alpha version-state commit.\n\n## State Machine\n\n```mermaid\nstateDiagram-v2\n [*] --> Development: work lands on dev/vX/vX.Y\n Development --> AlphaCandidate: PR dev -> alpha\n AlphaCandidate --> AlphaPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n AlphaPublished --> ReleaseCandidate: PR alpha -> release\n ReleaseCandidate --> ProductionPublished: Verify + review + merge + promotion\n ProductionPublished --> NextAlphaPrepared: prepare vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0\n NextAlphaPrepared --> Development: dev and alpha refs move to next alpha\n```\n\nThe same minor line can loop through this state machine many times.\n\n## Version Examples\n\nAssume `v2.0.2-alpha.1` has been tested and a maintainer merges\n`alpha/v2/v2.0 -> release/v2/v2.0`.\n\nBuildchain should produce:\n\n```text\nv2.0.2 exact production tag\nv2.0 floating minor tag\nv2 floating major tag when v2.0 is the selected major line\nrelease/v2/v2.0 production channel branch\n```\n\nIt should also prepare:\n\n```text\nv2.0.3-alpha.0 exact next alpha tag\nv2.0-alpha floating alpha tag\nalpha/v2/v2.0 alpha channel branch\ndev/v2/v2.0 development channel branch\n```\n\nThis is expected behavior. A production release closes one patch and opens the\nnext test patch on the same minor line.\n\n## Major Gate Promotion\n\n```mermaid\nsequenceDiagram\n participant Release as release/vX/vX.Y\n participant PR as PR release -> publish-gate/major\n participant Verify as Release - Verify\n participant Gate as publish-gate/major\n participant Promote as Buildchain Ref Promotion\n participant Tags as Tags\n participant Next as dev/alpha/release v(X+1).0\n\n Release->>PR: open administrator PR\n PR->>Verify: run verification checks\n Verify-->>PR: check succeeds\n PR->>Gate: reviewed merge\n Gate->>Promote: Verify workflow_run completed\n Promote->>Promote: validate same-repo release -> publish-gate/major PR\n Promote->>Promote: write v(X+1).0.0 version state\n Promote->>Tags: create v(X+1).0.0\n Promote->>Tags: move v(X+1).0 and v(X+1)\n Promote->>Gate: move publish-gate/major to v(X+1).0.0\n Promote->>Next: move release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0 to v(X+1).0.0\n Promote->>Promote: prepare v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0\n Promote->>Next: move alpha/dev v(X+1).0 to next alpha\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is intentionally not an active source branch. It is the PR\ntarget for the administrator's \"publish the next major\" decision. The older\n`major-gate` name is a compatibility alias only.\n\n## Failure Boundaries\n\nPromotion should stop before moving refs when:\n\n- the run is a non-dry-run manual dispatch;\n- the expected same-repository PR cannot be found;\n- the PR was not merged;\n- the branch pair is not a valid channel path;\n- the required status check did not pass;\n- a release tree does not match the same-patch alpha tag tree, except for the\n declared anchored/manual version files and anchor manifest that\n `lifecycle.verify` or `verification-command` validates;\n- version-state verification fails;\n- a required exact tag already exists at a commit unrelated to the active\n transaction or finalized channel head.\n\nThese failures are intentional. They protect consumers from refs that look\nreleased but do not have a complete evidence chain.\n\nDuring transaction finalization recovery, the current channel head may be a\ngenerated version-state merge commit. Buildchain validates that the durable\ntransaction version, exact tag, evidence, and release material match, and that\nthe current target ref contains or corresponds to the recorded\n`release_material_sha`. It must then tolerate exact tags, dev refs, or alpha\nrefs that have already moved and continue filling any missing floating tags\nbefore writing the transaction state as `complete`."
1215
1215
  },
1216
1216
  {
1217
1217
  "id": "manual:release-governance",
@@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@
1225
1225
  ],
1226
1226
  "maturity": "stable",
1227
1227
  "sourcePath": "docs/release-governance.md",
1228
- "digest": "sha256:9c8e3f096d314b2d0ea9a6badfdf263006e190aaa6e861489bdd05c93d3eaf04",
1228
+ "digest": "sha256:59858b6e02e42377b8a1f3d6d33ba50c5ffba476f7e1443fd61e03919046eff2",
1229
1229
  "headings": [
1230
1230
  {
1231
1231
  "level": 1,
@@ -1262,6 +1262,11 @@
1262
1262
  "title": "Release Semantics",
1263
1263
  "anchor": "release-semantics"
1264
1264
  },
1265
+ {
1266
+ "level": 3,
1267
+ "title": "Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate",
1268
+ "anchor": "stable-release-throttle-and-canary-gate"
1269
+ },
1265
1270
  {
1266
1271
  "level": 2,
1267
1272
  "title": "Major Gate Semantics",
@@ -1303,7 +1308,7 @@
1303
1308
  "anchor": "operational-reading-order"
1304
1309
  }
1305
1310
  ],
1306
- "markdown": "# Release Governance\n\nBuildchain v2 preserves the release semantics of the older ABV workflow while\nmoving the implementation into one modern repository.\n\nThe central idea is simple: a reviewed merge into a release channel is the\nrelease intent. Automation must then create the version-state commit, exact tag,\nfloating tag, and next alpha state that make that intent true in Git.\n\n## Design Problem\n\nKungfu release automation has to keep four facts aligned:\n\n1. The source tree that was reviewed.\n2. The package version recorded in manifests such as `package.json` or\n `lerna.json`.\n3. The exact immutable release or prerelease tag.\n4. The floating channel refs that consumers actually use.\n\nIf any one of these facts is updated by hand, the system can split:\n\n- a consumer can fetch `v2.0` and receive a tree whose package version still\n says the previous release;\n- a maintainer can move `v2` without producing an exact `v2.0.N` audit tag;\n- an alpha can be promoted to production even though the release tree is not the\n same tree that was tested;\n- a protected branch merge can succeed while the follow-up version commit is\n missing, or a flow-internal generated `dev`/`alpha`/`release` ref update can\n fail after publish because the automation identity was not declared in the\n branch-protection review bypass allowance.\n\nThe older ABV workflow addressed this by letting GitHub PRs drive release\nstate. Buildchain keeps that choice because it makes release intent reviewable,\nobservable, and recoverable from Git history.\n\n## What ABV Contributed\n\nThe old ABV model was not just \"bump a version number.\" It encoded a governance\nloop:\n\n- release branches are named as channels: `dev`, `alpha`, `release`, and the\n administrative `publish-gate/major`;\n- a PR from one channel to the next is the release request;\n- verify jobs check that the branch pair is valid before merge;\n- a maintainer review is required before the branch moves;\n- after merge, automation writes the version change and moves tags;\n- exact tags and floating refs are aligned with the resulting commit;\n- the next development channel is prepared automatically.\n\nABV also kept the version-state mutation in the repository. For JavaScript\nrepositories that usually meant changing `lerna.json` and/or `package.json`.\nThat commit is important because the tag alone is not enough evidence: the\nsource tree should also declare the version that the tag advertises.\n\nBuildchain v2 treats that as a hard semantic requirement for its own release\nline.\n\n## Buildchain Implementation\n\nBuildchain implements the same governance loop with:\n\n- `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` for PR verification;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for post-verify ref\n promotion; this workflow dogfoods the declarative\n `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper and does not hand-wire resolver,\n artifact download, publish-gate, or promote action steps;\n- Buildchain self promotion enables `release-passport-buildchain-self-kfd`, so\n the promote action generates KFD-1 witnesses, KFD-2 public claim JSON, and\n KFD-3 collaboration-interface witnesses from the final version-state workspace\n before release passport finalization. The witness hashes therefore bind to the\n exact published package and site facts from\n `packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js` instead of relying on prose release\n notes;\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` for branch, tag, version-state, and\n governance checks;\n- package-manager adapters that can update version state for pnpm, npm, and\n yarn style repositories;\n- `buildchain.toml` lifecycle configuration for repositories whose version\n state or verification commands are not Node package-manager defaults.\n\nThe implementation is intentionally stricter than a local release script:\n\n- manual workflow dispatch can only do dry-run promotion;\n- non-dry-run promotion must be driven by a completed `Verify` workflow;\n- target branch protection details must be readable, and branch protection must\n apply to administrators as well as regular contributors;\n- alpha promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `dev/vX/vX.Y` to `alpha/vX/vX.Y`;\n- release promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to `release/vX/vX.Y`;\n- major promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `release/vX/vX.Y` to `publish-gate/major`;\n- release promotion requires an existing same-patch alpha tag and checks the\n release source tree against that tested alpha tree;\n- generated version-state commits are verified before refs move.\n\nPromotion intents are serialized globally per caller repository with\n`cancel-in-progress: false`. A queued intent re-reads its protected target ref\nbefore checkout, dependency installation, release-candidate resolution, or any\npublish-gate/ref mutation. If the ref already points at a newer SHA, that older\nintent is no longer release authority: the workflow records the requested and\ncurrent SHAs, proves that the current target is ahead of the requested commit,\nand completes as a `target-ref-advanced` superseded no-op. Diverged or behind\ncomparisons are not superseded transactions and still fail closed.\nMissing refs, unreadable repository state, invalid channels, governance\nfailures, and artifact mismatches still fail closed. The promote action repeats\nthe target check at the mutation boundary, so a ref that advances after the\nworkflow preflight cannot receive a second set of publication side effects.\n\n## Version Lines\n\nKungfu uses Python-like version lines where a minor line can represent a\nlong-lived product train. A line such as `v2.0` can produce many production\npatch releases:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1\nv2.0.2\n...\nv2.0.1234\n```\n\nThis is why Buildchain maintains both exact and floating refs:\n\n- `v2.0.2` is immutable release evidence;\n- `v2.0` is the latest production release on the `2.0` line;\n- `v2` is the selected stable major-line entrypoint;\n- `v2.0.3-alpha.0` is immutable alpha evidence;\n- `v2.0-alpha` is the latest test channel for the `2.0` line.\n\nA release does not mean \"minor is complete.\" It means \"this patch on this minor\nline is now production.\"\n\nGitHub repository rules must preserve that distinction. Exact tags such as\n`v2.0.2` and `v2.0.3-alpha.0` should be immutable. Floating channel tags such as\n`v2`, `v2.0`, and `v2.0-alpha` must remain movable by the Buildchain promotion\ntoken after governance checks and publish evidence pass. A tag ruleset that\nprotects every `refs/tags/v*` ref is too broad because it also locks the\nfloating channel tags that Buildchain is required to update. Prefer exact-tag\npatterns such as `refs/tags/v*.*.*` for immutable release evidence, while\nleaving floating channel tags under Buildchain automation control.\n\n## Alpha Semantics\n\nAn alpha merge is:\n\n```text\ndev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Computes the next prerelease for the minor line.\n2. Writes version state such as `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N`.\n3. Verifies the generated version-state tree.\n4. Creates or reuses the exact alpha tag.\n5. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to the generated alpha commit.\n6. Moves `dev/vX/vX.Y` to the same generated alpha commit when this is a\n fast-forward update.\n7. Moves `vX.Y-alpha` to the same generated alpha commit.\n\nThis keeps the test channel self-describing. If a consumer checks out\n`v2.0-alpha`, the manifests and exact alpha tag agree.\n\nIf `dev/vX/vX.Y` has already advanced before generated alpha version-state\nbookkeeping can sync back, Buildchain records `skipped-non-fast-forward` for the\ndev sync and still completes the exact and floating alpha tags for the reviewed\nalpha commit. Later dev changes must go through their own dev-to-alpha\npromotion instead of rewinding dev. The normal path is direct: after alpha\nmerges, Buildchain applies the generated version-state commit to alpha and then\nfast-forwards dev to the same commit without a human version-state PR.\n\nIf alpha finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain accepts the current alpha head as the generated\ncommit, or as a historical merge commit that contains the recorded release\nmaterial. An already-created exact alpha tag may point at the transaction\nrelease/material SHA or at the finalized alpha head; missing floating alpha\ntags are retried before the transaction becomes `complete`.\n\n## Release Semantics\n\nA release merge is:\n\n```text\nalpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Finds the same-patch alpha tag that was tested.\n2. Checks that the release source tree matches that alpha tag tree, excluding\n only generated version-state differences.\n3. Writes final release version state such as `vX.Y.Z`.\n4. Verifies the generated release tree.\n5. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `vX.Y.Z`.\n6. Moves `release/vX/vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n7. Moves `vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n8. Moves `vX` when this minor line should be the stable major entrypoint.\n9. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0`.\n10. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y`, and `vX.Y-alpha` to that next alpha\n commit.\n\nThe production channel and the test channel therefore intentionally diverge\nafter release: production stays on the release commit, while alpha/dev continue\nat the next prerelease commit.\n\nIf release finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain applies the same recovery rule: the current\nrelease head may be the generated commit, or a historical merge commit that\ncontains the recorded release material, existing exact tags and alpha/dev refs\nare accepted when they match the transaction, and missing floating `vX.Y` or\n`vX` tags are retried idempotently before completion.\n\n## Major Gate Semantics\n\nA major gate merge is:\n\n```text\nrelease/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is the explicit replacement for the older ABV `main`\nchannel. The name is intentionally operational: it is a gate for a rare\nadministrator decision, not the active trunk. Keeping this decision in the same\nPR UI as alpha and release promotion keeps the human workflow simple while\navoiding the misleading meaning of `main`. The older `major-gate` branch name is\na compatibility alias only.\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Verifies the source is a merged same-repository PR from a protected release\n line into `publish-gate/major`.\n2. Writes the next major production version state, such as `v(X+1).0.0`.\n3. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `v(X+1).0.0`.\n4. Moves `publish-gate/major` and `release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0` to that release commit.\n5. Moves `v(X+1).0` and `v(X+1)` to that release commit.\n6. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0`.\n7. Moves `alpha/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, `dev/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, and\n `v(X+1).0-alpha` to that next alpha commit.\n\nChecking out `publish-gate/major` should therefore look like a frozen release\nstate, not like a branch where day-to-day source work continues. Day-to-day\nsource work continues on `dev/vX/vX.Y`.\n\n## Protected Dev Branches\n\n`dev/vX/vX.Y` is a protected development channel, not a scratch branch. Normal\nsource changes should be made on work branches such as `feature/*`, `fix/*`,\n`chore/*`, `docs/*`, `ci/*`, or `refactor/*`, then reviewed through a pull\nrequest into the target dev line.\n\nThis keeps the earliest development channel audit-friendly:\n\n- the version line being changed is visible in the PR base branch;\n- CI and required checks run before the channel moves;\n- branch protection can prevent direct pushes and stale merges;\n- later `dev -> alpha -> release` promotion inherits a reviewable source\n lineage instead of trying to reconstruct how the dev branch changed.\n\nBuildchain provides the reusable\n`.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` workflow for repositories that want a\nscheduled or manual \"merge ready dev PRs\" pass. The consumer repository owns\nthe trigger schedule, but the merge decision is declared through workflow\ninputs: target dev branch, required status/check names, ready and block labels,\nallowed work-branch prefixes, review requirements, maximum merges per run,\nmerge method, and dry-run mode.\n\nThe workflow defaults are conservative. A PR is skipped unless it targets the\nconfigured dev line, is not a draft, has the ready label, has no block label,\ncomes from the same repository, uses an allowed work-branch prefix, has a\ncurrent approval, is mergeable, and has the configured required checks passing.\nAfter each merge, the next PR is re-evaluated before it can move the protected\ndev branch. This prevents one merge from silently making the next candidate\nstale or conflicting.\n\nThe required check should be the `check` job. Repositories can keep that job\nname stable while changing the actual verification command declaratively in\n`buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"cargo fetch --locked\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"cargo test --workspace --locked\"\n```\n\nConsumers that want Buildchain to own the check wrapper can call\n`.github/workflows/check.yml@v2`. The wrapper runs the declared\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.verify` stages and fails the `check` job when\neither declaration is missing or the command exits non-zero.\n\nTypical consumer wrapper:\n\n```yaml\nname: Merge Ready Dev PRs\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 * * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n dry-run:\n type: boolean\n default: true\n\njobs:\n merge-dev:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml@v2\n permissions:\n contents: write\n pull-requests: write\n checks: read\n statuses: read\n with:\n target-branch: dev/v2/v2.6\n required-status-checks: check\n ready-label: ready\n block-labels: blocked,do-not-merge\n max-merges: 1\n dry-run: ${{ inputs.dry-run || false }}\n```\n\n## Buildchain Patrol\n\n`dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` remains the focused merge primitive. For repositories\nthat want a stable day-to-day operations contract, Buildchain also exposes a\npatrol workflow family:\n\n| Workflow | Intended cadence | Default intent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml` | daily | lightweight inspection plus ready dev PR maintenance |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml` | weekly | release-state, passport, gate, and stale-state health checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-monthly.yml` | monthly | governance, permission, branch-protection, and workflow drift checks as they are added |\n\nThe cadence names describe patrol intensity, not release cadence:\n\n- daily patrol can run every day without implying a daily release;\n- weekly patrol is for medium-cost maintenance and audit checks;\n- monthly patrol is for structural drift checks that should not block ordinary\n development velocity.\n\nConsumers should schedule thin callers and keep their YAML declarative. For\nexample:\n\n```yaml\nname: Buildchain Daily Patrol\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 2 * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: false\n max-actions: 1\n```\n\nWeekly and monthly callers use the matching wrapper:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: true\n```\n\nAll three wrappers default to the `v2` floating Buildchain runtime. When\n`target-branch` is omitted, the caller's current/default branch selects the\nactive semver dev line, so consumers do not pin patrol to a stale minor branch.\nThe separate workflow names keep consumer schedules readable and stable while\nBuildchain adds new checks behind the cadence wrappers.\n\n## Package-Manager Adapters\n\nOld ABV assumed JavaScript repositories with root version state and often\nLerna. Buildchain keeps the version-state contract but does not assume every\nrepository is yarn/Lerna.\n\nThe promotion action discovers and updates:\n\n- root `package.json`;\n- `lerna.json`;\n- package manifests from `package.json` workspaces;\n- package manifests from `lerna.json` packages;\n- package manifests from `pnpm-workspace.yaml`.\n\nIt then runs the repository's detected package manager semantics where needed:\n\n- pnpm repositories use pnpm-oriented workspace discovery;\n- npm repositories use npm/package-lock semantics where present;\n- yarn repositories use yarn-style metadata where present.\n\nFor Buildchain itself, version state is required. For a consumer repository that\nhas no package manifest, the same action can degrade to ref-only behavior only\nwhen that is explicitly allowed by the caller.\n\n## Lifecycle Configuration\n\n`buildchain.toml` is the v2 user configuration format. It lets a repository\ndeclare version-state files and lifecycle commands without pretending every\nproject is a Node workspace. Supported version files include JSON, TOML, and\nregex-based files such as `CMakeLists.txt` or `conanfile.py`.\n\nThe promotion action currently consumes `version.files` and `lifecycle.verify`.\nThe verify stage runs after generated version-state changes are applied locally\nand before any release refs move. If `verification-command` is passed directly\nto the action, that explicit command overrides `lifecycle.verify`.\n\nProtected release-line branches keep their normal human review gate. Managed\n`dev/vN/vN.M`, `alpha/vN/vN.M`, and `release/vN/vN.M` branches are configured\nwith one required approving review, strict GitHub Actions checks, administrator\nenforcement, conversation resolution, no force pushes, and no deletions. The\nreusable `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper defaults\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`, which lets the workflow's\nautomation identity apply generated version-state or post-publish channel\nbookkeeping after the reviewed channel PR has merged. Direct\n`promote-buildchain-ref` callers must opt into the same controlled bypass with\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps`, `branch-protection-bypass-users`, or\n`branch-protection-bypass-teams`; the action also adds the current promotion\ntoken's authenticated user or app to the managed bypass allowlist. Before\npatching a protected generated bookkeeping ref, the action creates the\nconfigured required check on the exact generated version-state commit, so strict\nstatus checks are satisfied by machine-verifiable Buildchain evidence rather\nthan a human PR. The protected ref PATCH itself uses the generated ref update\ntoken; the reusable wrapper defaults it to\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token`. If direct generated\nrelease finalization bookkeeping is still rejected, Buildchain creates or\nreuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR based on the current\ntarget channel head and records `finalization-needed=true` in the durable\ntransaction output. Strict alpha bookkeeping still fails with a\ntoken/protection diagnostic instead of creating a post-publish PR.\nBuildchain's own promotion workflow reads `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_APPS`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_USERS`, and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_TEAMS` repository variables so the declared bypass\nidentity can match the actual `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` actor, but consumers\ndo not need to duplicate that actor manually when the token identity is\ndiscoverable.\n\n## What This Guarantees\n\nWhen the loop succeeds, maintainers and consumers can rely on these facts:\n\n- every production release has an exact tag such as `v2.0.2`;\n- every production minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0`;\n- every selected stable major has a floating tag such as `v2`;\n- every next-major release is driven by a reviewed `release -> publish-gate/major` PR,\n not a hidden manual button;\n- every test channel has an exact alpha tag such as `v2.0.3-alpha.0`;\n- every alpha minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0-alpha`;\n- version manifests match the tag visible from the same commit;\n- production releases are derived from the alpha tree that was tested;\n- manual non-dry-run promotion cannot bypass PR review and verification;\n- flow-internal automation bypasses apply only to declared GitHub Apps, users,\n or teams on Buildchain-managed channel branch protection, while one-review\n protection remains enforced for humans;\n- admin users cannot make a channel promotion valid by temporarily bypassing\n branch protection.\n\nThis is the practical meaning of \"governance closed loop\" in Buildchain: the\ndecision, code, version state, and Git refs close over the same evidence chain.\n\n## What This Does Not Do\n\nBuildchain release promotion does not embed registry clients or product-specific\npublish logic. When publish transactions are enabled, `promote-buildchain-ref`\ncan run the consumer's `lifecycle.publish` command and own the transaction,\nevidence validation, durable recovery state, and ref finalization order. The\nconsumer repository still owns registry truth: npm, PyPI, OCI, S3, Conan, CMake\npackaging, download pages, dist-tags, and similar side effects must be\nimplemented by project lifecycle commands that emit Buildchain publish evidence.\n\nEvery Buildchain publish model that can run registry side effects must bind the\npublish entrypoint to an immutable `publish-gate/*` source lock. The reusable\n`release-candidate-promote.yml@v2` wrapper creates or updates that gate ref and\npasses `require-publish-source-lock`, `publish-source-ref`,\n`publish-source-sha`, and `publish-source-locked` to\n`promote-buildchain-ref`. Direct action callers must pass the same four inputs\nfrom the reusable build outputs. Workflows that only collect passports or run\ndry-run package checks do not move publish refs and are not publish-gate\npublication models.\n\nSemver GitHub Release publication is owned by `promote-buildchain-ref`, not by\nconsumer shell glue. Consumers normally use the `release-candidate-promote.yml`\nwrapper, where GitHub Release publication is enabled by default and can be\ndisabled with `github-release: false`; the wrapper passes that declaration to\nthe action. After the publish transaction reaches `complete`, Buildchain creates\nor updates the public GitHub Release and uploads the generated\n`buildchain.release.json`, release-passport assets, and publish evidence. Semver\nprerelease tags are marked `prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`; stable\nsemver tags are marked latest. For anchored/manual package releases, the public\nrelease tag defaults to `v<publishedVersion>` while the internal exact\ntransaction tag remains in the release passport and release-state ref. This is\nthe supported path for downstream\n`release.published` propagation across semver, major, and promote-only release\ncandidate publication models.\n\nBuildchain also does not maintain bare exact tags such as `1.0.0`. The supported\nexact release and alpha refs are v-prefixed:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1-alpha.0\n```\n\n## Operational Reading Order\n\nWhen debugging or extending release behavior, read in this order:\n\n1. `docs/release-flow.md`\n2. `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml`\n3. `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n4. `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml`\n5. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`\n6. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/src/`\n7. `docs/migration-inventory.md`\n\nThat path gives the policy first, the workflow trigger second, and the action\nimplementation last."
1311
+ "markdown": "# Release Governance\n\nBuildchain v2 preserves the release semantics of the older ABV workflow while\nmoving the implementation into one modern repository.\n\nThe central idea is simple: a reviewed merge into a release channel is the\nrelease intent. Automation must then create the version-state commit, exact tag,\nfloating tag, and next alpha state that make that intent true in Git.\n\n## Design Problem\n\nKungfu release automation has to keep four facts aligned:\n\n1. The source tree that was reviewed.\n2. The package version recorded in manifests such as `package.json` or\n `lerna.json`.\n3. The exact immutable release or prerelease tag.\n4. The floating channel refs that consumers actually use.\n\nIf any one of these facts is updated by hand, the system can split:\n\n- a consumer can fetch `v2.0` and receive a tree whose package version still\n says the previous release;\n- a maintainer can move `v2` without producing an exact `v2.0.N` audit tag;\n- an alpha can be promoted to production even though the release tree is not the\n same tree that was tested;\n- a protected branch merge can succeed while the follow-up version commit is\n missing, or a flow-internal generated `dev`/`alpha`/`release` ref update can\n fail after publish because the automation identity was not declared in the\n branch-protection review bypass allowance.\n\nThe older ABV workflow addressed this by letting GitHub PRs drive release\nstate. Buildchain keeps that choice because it makes release intent reviewable,\nobservable, and recoverable from Git history.\n\n## What ABV Contributed\n\nThe old ABV model was not just \"bump a version number.\" It encoded a governance\nloop:\n\n- release branches are named as channels: `dev`, `alpha`, `release`, and the\n administrative `publish-gate/major`;\n- a PR from one channel to the next is the release request;\n- verify jobs check that the branch pair is valid before merge;\n- a maintainer review is required before the branch moves;\n- after merge, automation writes the version change and moves tags;\n- exact tags and floating refs are aligned with the resulting commit;\n- the next development channel is prepared automatically.\n\nABV also kept the version-state mutation in the repository. For JavaScript\nrepositories that usually meant changing `lerna.json` and/or `package.json`.\nThat commit is important because the tag alone is not enough evidence: the\nsource tree should also declare the version that the tag advertises.\n\nBuildchain v2 treats that as a hard semantic requirement for its own release\nline.\n\n## Buildchain Implementation\n\nBuildchain implements the same governance loop with:\n\n- `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` for PR verification;\n- `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml` for post-verify ref\n promotion; this workflow dogfoods the declarative\n `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper and does not hand-wire resolver,\n artifact download, publish-gate, or promote action steps;\n- Buildchain self promotion enables `release-passport-buildchain-self-kfd`, so\n the promote action generates KFD-1 witnesses, KFD-2 public claim JSON, and\n KFD-3 collaboration-interface witnesses from the final version-state workspace\n before release passport finalization. The witness hashes therefore bind to the\n exact published package and site facts from\n `packages/core/buildchain-kfd-claims.js` instead of relying on prose release\n notes;\n- `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` for branch, tag, version-state, and\n governance checks;\n- package-manager adapters that can update version state for pnpm, npm, and\n yarn style repositories;\n- `buildchain.toml` lifecycle configuration for repositories whose version\n state or verification commands are not Node package-manager defaults.\n\nThe implementation is intentionally stricter than a local release script:\n\n- manual workflow dispatch can only do dry-run promotion;\n- non-dry-run promotion must be driven by a completed `Verify` workflow;\n- target branch protection details must be readable, and branch protection must\n apply to administrators as well as regular contributors;\n- alpha promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `dev/vX/vX.Y` to `alpha/vX/vX.Y`;\n- release promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to `release/vX/vX.Y`;\n- major promotion must come from a merged same-repository PR from\n `release/vX/vX.Y` to `publish-gate/major`;\n- release promotion requires an existing same-patch alpha tag and checks the\n release source tree against that tested alpha tree;\n- generated version-state commits are verified before refs move.\n\nPromotion intents are serialized globally per caller repository with\n`cancel-in-progress: false`. A queued intent re-reads its protected target ref\nbefore checkout, dependency installation, release-candidate resolution, or any\npublish-gate/ref mutation. If the ref already points at a newer SHA, that older\nintent is no longer release authority: the workflow records the requested and\ncurrent SHAs, proves that the current target is ahead of the requested commit,\nand completes as a `target-ref-advanced` superseded no-op. Diverged or behind\ncomparisons are not superseded transactions and still fail closed.\nMissing refs, unreadable repository state, invalid channels, governance\nfailures, and artifact mismatches still fail closed. The promote action repeats\nthe target check at the mutation boundary, so a ref that advances after the\nworkflow preflight cannot receive a second set of publication side effects.\n\n## Version Lines\n\nKungfu uses Python-like version lines where a minor line can represent a\nlong-lived product train. A line such as `v2.0` can produce many production\npatch releases:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1\nv2.0.2\n...\nv2.0.1234\n```\n\nThis is why Buildchain maintains both exact and floating refs:\n\n- `v2.0.2` is immutable release evidence;\n- `v2.0` is the latest production release on the `2.0` line;\n- `v2` is the selected stable major-line entrypoint;\n- `v2.0.3-alpha.0` is immutable alpha evidence;\n- `v2.0-alpha` is the latest test channel for the `2.0` line.\n\nA release does not mean \"minor is complete.\" It means \"this patch on this minor\nline is now production.\"\n\nGitHub repository rules must preserve that distinction. Exact tags such as\n`v2.0.2` and `v2.0.3-alpha.0` should be immutable. Floating channel tags such as\n`v2`, `v2.0`, and `v2.0-alpha` must remain movable by the Buildchain promotion\ntoken after governance checks and publish evidence pass. A tag ruleset that\nprotects every `refs/tags/v*` ref is too broad because it also locks the\nfloating channel tags that Buildchain is required to update. Prefer exact-tag\npatterns such as `refs/tags/v*.*.*` for immutable release evidence, while\nleaving floating channel tags under Buildchain automation control.\n\n## Alpha Semantics\n\nAn alpha merge is:\n\n```text\ndev/vX/vX.Y -> alpha/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Computes the next prerelease for the minor line.\n2. Writes version state such as `vX.Y.Z-alpha.N`.\n3. Verifies the generated version-state tree.\n4. Creates or reuses the exact alpha tag.\n5. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y` to the generated alpha commit.\n6. Moves `dev/vX/vX.Y` to the same generated alpha commit when this is a\n fast-forward update.\n7. Moves `vX.Y-alpha` to the same generated alpha commit.\n\nThis keeps the test channel self-describing. If a consumer checks out\n`v2.0-alpha`, the manifests and exact alpha tag agree.\n\nIf `dev/vX/vX.Y` has already advanced before generated alpha version-state\nbookkeeping can sync back, Buildchain records `skipped-non-fast-forward` for the\ndev sync and still completes the exact and floating alpha tags for the reviewed\nalpha commit. Later dev changes must go through their own dev-to-alpha\npromotion instead of rewinding dev. The normal path is direct: after alpha\nmerges, Buildchain applies the generated version-state commit to alpha and then\nfast-forwards dev to the same commit without a human version-state PR.\n\nIf alpha finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain accepts the current alpha head as the generated\ncommit, or as a historical merge commit that contains the recorded release\nmaterial. An already-created exact alpha tag may point at the transaction\nrelease/material SHA or at the finalized alpha head; missing floating alpha\ntags are retried before the transaction becomes `complete`.\n\n## Release Semantics\n\nA release merge is:\n\n```text\nalpha/vX/vX.Y -> release/vX/vX.Y\n```\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Finds the same-patch alpha tag that was tested.\n2. Checks that the release source tree matches that alpha tag tree, excluding\n only generated version-state differences.\n3. Writes final release version state such as `vX.Y.Z`.\n4. Verifies the generated release tree.\n5. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `vX.Y.Z`.\n6. Moves `release/vX/vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n7. Moves `vX.Y` to the exact release commit.\n8. Moves `vX` when this minor line should be the stable major entrypoint.\n9. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `vX.Y.(Z+1)-alpha.0`.\n10. Moves `alpha/vX/vX.Y`, `dev/vX/vX.Y`, and `vX.Y-alpha` to that next alpha\n commit.\n\nThe production channel and the test channel therefore intentionally diverge\nafter release: production stays on the release commit, while alpha/dev continue\nat the next prerelease commit.\n\n### Stable Release Throttle And Canary Gate\n\nBuildchain's own stable channel has an additional pre-publication gate. It is\nevaluated after the PR-stage release candidate has been resolved and before the\npublish-gate ref, package registry, exact stable tag, or floating stable refs\nare mutated. Train refs and alpha promotion do not execute this gate.\n\nThe policy is versioned in `.buildchain/stable-release-policy.json`. A stable\ncandidate is allowed only when all of these facts are true:\n\n- the candidate resolves to an immutable exact alpha tag and its GitHub\n prerelease timestamp;\n- at least 24 hours have passed since the preceding stable patch on the same\n minor line;\n- the preceding stable-to-alpha comparison contains a product or public\n contract path, not only version, test, evidence, or retrospective changes;\n- the version-bound impact record has a non-empty summary and at least one\n surface impact;\n- the `Build Surface Fixture` release-candidate run succeeded;\n- `site-libkungfu-dev` completed its no-apply `Buildchain Stable Canary` and an allowed\n maintainer attested that successful run on the exact alpha SHA through the\n `buildchain-canary/site-libkungfu-dev` commit-status context;\n- at least one hour has elapsed after the last required canary completed.\n\nThe machine report is written to\n`.buildchain/release-passport/stable-release-gate.json`. A passing report is\nuploaded with the stable release passport. A blocked run writes the same report\nbefore failing, so the missing or stale condition is inspectable without\nopening a publication transaction.\n\nThe cooldown is a minimum interval, not an instruction to release every day.\nCompatible work should still be batched until a stable release has a concrete\nconsumer need. Changing the interval, canary set, attestors, product path\nboundary, or soak time is a reviewed policy change.\n\nIf release finalization is resumed after generated version-state bookkeeping was\npartially applied, Buildchain applies the same recovery rule: the current\nrelease head may be the generated commit, or a historical merge commit that\ncontains the recorded release material, existing exact tags and alpha/dev refs\nare accepted when they match the transaction, and missing floating `vX.Y` or\n`vX` tags are retried idempotently before completion.\n\nOnce the durable release transaction is `complete` and the exact/floating\nstable refs have moved, next-alpha preparation is post-release bookkeeping. A\nfailure there records `deferred-post-release-bookkeeping` and\n`next-anchor-required` instead of retroactively reporting the stable release as\nfailed. Generated next-alpha merges use the current dev tree as their base and\noverlay only declared version-state paths, preserving concurrent dev changes.\n\n## Major Gate Semantics\n\nA major gate merge is:\n\n```text\nrelease/vX/vX.Y -> publish-gate/major\n```\n\n`publish-gate/major` is the explicit replacement for the older ABV `main`\nchannel. The name is intentionally operational: it is a gate for a rare\nadministrator decision, not the active trunk. Keeping this decision in the same\nPR UI as alpha and release promotion keeps the human workflow simple while\navoiding the misleading meaning of `main`. The older `major-gate` branch name is\na compatibility alias only.\n\nBuildchain then:\n\n1. Verifies the source is a merged same-repository PR from a protected release\n line into `publish-gate/major`.\n2. Writes the next major production version state, such as `v(X+1).0.0`.\n3. Creates or reuses the exact release tag `v(X+1).0.0`.\n4. Moves `publish-gate/major` and `release/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0` to that release commit.\n5. Moves `v(X+1).0` and `v(X+1)` to that release commit.\n6. Prepares the next alpha version-state commit, such as\n `v(X+1).0.1-alpha.0`.\n7. Moves `alpha/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, `dev/v(X+1)/v(X+1).0`, and\n `v(X+1).0-alpha` to that next alpha commit.\n\nChecking out `publish-gate/major` should therefore look like a frozen release\nstate, not like a branch where day-to-day source work continues. Day-to-day\nsource work continues on `dev/vX/vX.Y`.\n\n## Protected Dev Branches\n\n`dev/vX/vX.Y` is a protected development channel, not a scratch branch. Normal\nsource changes should be made on work branches such as `feature/*`, `fix/*`,\n`chore/*`, `docs/*`, `ci/*`, or `refactor/*`, then reviewed through a pull\nrequest into the target dev line.\n\nThis keeps the earliest development channel audit-friendly:\n\n- the version line being changed is visible in the PR base branch;\n- CI and required checks run before the channel moves;\n- branch protection can prevent direct pushes and stale merges;\n- later `dev -> alpha -> release` promotion inherits a reviewable source\n lineage instead of trying to reconstruct how the dev branch changed.\n\nBuildchain provides the reusable\n`.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` workflow for repositories that want a\nscheduled or manual \"merge ready dev PRs\" pass. The consumer repository owns\nthe trigger schedule, but the merge decision is declared through workflow\ninputs: target dev branch, required status/check names, ready and block labels,\nallowed work-branch prefixes, review requirements, maximum merges per run,\nmerge method, and dry-run mode.\n\nThe workflow defaults are conservative. A PR is skipped unless it targets the\nconfigured dev line, is not a draft, has the ready label, has no block label,\ncomes from the same repository, uses an allowed work-branch prefix, has a\ncurrent approval, is mergeable, and has the configured required checks passing.\nAfter each merge, the next PR is re-evaluated before it can move the protected\ndev branch. This prevents one merge from silently making the next candidate\nstale or conflicting.\n\nThe canonical consumer required check context is `check / check`, matching the\nreusable workflow call plus its `check` job. Buildchain's own `Verify` workflow\nemits the repository-local context `check`, so Buildchain self-promotion,\nrelease-line bootstrap, and dogfood patrol wrappers pass `check` explicitly.\nRelease governance preserves the exact context emitted by the repository and\nrecords branch-protection policy before/after facts; it does not rewrite one\ncontext shape into the other. Consumer repositories can keep their context\nstable while changing the actual verification command declaratively in\n`buildchain.toml`:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"cargo fetch --locked\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"cargo test --workspace --locked\"\n```\n\nConsumers that want Buildchain to own the check wrapper can call\n`.github/workflows/check.yml@v2`. The wrapper runs the declared\n`lifecycle.install` and `lifecycle.verify` stages and fails the `check` job when\neither declaration is missing or the command exits non-zero.\n\nTypical consumer wrapper:\n\n```yaml\nname: Merge Ready Dev PRs\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 * * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n dry-run:\n type: boolean\n default: true\n\njobs:\n merge-dev:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/dev-pr-auto-merge.yml@v2\n permissions:\n contents: write\n pull-requests: write\n checks: read\n statuses: read\n with:\n target-branch: dev/v2/v2.6\n required-status-checks: check / check\n ready-label: ready\n block-labels: blocked,do-not-merge\n max-merges: 1\n dry-run: ${{ inputs.dry-run || false }}\n```\n\n## Buildchain Patrol\n\n`dev-pr-auto-merge.yml` remains the focused merge primitive. For repositories\nthat want a stable day-to-day operations contract, Buildchain also exposes a\npatrol workflow family:\n\n| Workflow | Intended cadence | Default intent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml` | daily | lightweight inspection plus ready dev PR maintenance |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml` | weekly | release-state, passport, gate, and stale-state health checks as they are added |\n| `.github/workflows/patrol-monthly.yml` | monthly | governance, permission, branch-protection, and workflow drift checks as they are added |\n\nThe cadence names describe patrol intensity, not release cadence:\n\n- daily patrol can run every day without implying a daily release;\n- weekly patrol is for medium-cost maintenance and audit checks;\n- monthly patrol is for structural drift checks that should not block ordinary\n development velocity.\n\nConsumers should schedule thin callers and keep their YAML declarative. For\nexample:\n\n```yaml\nname: Buildchain Daily Patrol\n\non:\n schedule:\n - cron: \"17 2 * * *\"\n workflow_dispatch:\n\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-daily.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: false\n max-actions: 1\n```\n\nWeekly and monthly callers use the matching wrapper:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n patrol:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/patrol-weekly.yml@v2\n with:\n dry-run: true\n```\n\nAll three wrappers default to the `v2` floating Buildchain runtime. When\n`target-branch` is omitted, the caller's current/default branch selects the\nactive semver dev line, so consumers do not pin patrol to a stale minor branch.\nThe separate workflow names keep consumer schedules readable and stable while\nBuildchain adds new checks behind the cadence wrappers.\n\n## Package-Manager Adapters\n\nOld ABV assumed JavaScript repositories with root version state and often\nLerna. Buildchain keeps the version-state contract but does not assume every\nrepository is yarn/Lerna.\n\nThe promotion action discovers and updates:\n\n- root `package.json`;\n- `lerna.json`;\n- package manifests from `package.json` workspaces;\n- package manifests from `lerna.json` packages;\n- package manifests from `pnpm-workspace.yaml`.\n\nIt then runs the repository's detected package manager semantics where needed:\n\n- pnpm repositories use pnpm-oriented workspace discovery;\n- npm repositories use npm/package-lock semantics where present;\n- yarn repositories use yarn-style metadata where present.\n\nFor Buildchain itself, version state is required. For a consumer repository that\nhas no package manifest, the same action can degrade to ref-only behavior only\nwhen that is explicitly allowed by the caller.\n\n## Lifecycle Configuration\n\n`buildchain.toml` is the v2 user configuration format. It lets a repository\ndeclare version-state files and lifecycle commands without pretending every\nproject is a Node workspace. Supported version files include JSON, TOML, and\nregex-based files such as `CMakeLists.txt` or `conanfile.py`.\n\nThe promotion action currently consumes `version.files` and `lifecycle.verify`.\nThe verify stage runs after generated version-state changes are applied locally\nand before any release refs move. If `verification-command` is passed directly\nto the action, that explicit command overrides `lifecycle.verify`.\n\nProtected release-line branches keep their normal human review gate. Managed\n`dev/vN/vN.M`, `alpha/vN/vN.M`, and `release/vN/vN.M` branches are configured\nwith one required approving review, strict GitHub Actions checks, administrator\nenforcement, conversation resolution, no force pushes, and no deletions. The\nreusable `release-candidate-promote.yml` wrapper defaults\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`, which lets the workflow's\nautomation identity apply generated version-state or post-publish channel\nbookkeeping after the reviewed channel PR has merged. Direct\n`promote-buildchain-ref` callers must opt into the same controlled bypass with\n`branch-protection-bypass-apps`, `branch-protection-bypass-users`, or\n`branch-protection-bypass-teams`; the action also adds the current promotion\ntoken's authenticated user or app to the managed bypass allowlist. Before\npatching a protected generated bookkeeping ref, the action creates the\nconfigured required check on the exact generated version-state commit, so strict\nstatus checks are satisfied by machine-verifiable Buildchain evidence rather\nthan a human PR. The protected ref PATCH itself uses the generated ref update\ntoken; the reusable wrapper defaults it to\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token`. If direct generated\nrelease finalization bookkeeping is still rejected, Buildchain creates or\nreuses a same-repository `buildchain/version-state/*` PR based on the current\ntarget channel head and records `finalization-needed=true` in the durable\ntransaction output. Strict alpha bookkeeping still fails with a\ntoken/protection diagnostic instead of creating a post-publish PR.\nBuildchain's own promotion workflow reads `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_APPS`,\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_USERS`, and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_BYPASS_TEAMS` repository variables so the declared bypass\nidentity can match the actual `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN` actor, but consumers\ndo not need to duplicate that actor manually when the token identity is\ndiscoverable.\n\n## What This Guarantees\n\nWhen the loop succeeds, maintainers and consumers can rely on these facts:\n\n- every production release has an exact tag such as `v2.0.2`;\n- every production minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0`;\n- every selected stable major has a floating tag such as `v2`;\n- every next-major release is driven by a reviewed `release -> publish-gate/major` PR,\n not a hidden manual button;\n- every test channel has an exact alpha tag such as `v2.0.3-alpha.0`;\n- every alpha minor line has a floating tag such as `v2.0-alpha`;\n- version manifests match the tag visible from the same commit;\n- production releases are derived from the alpha tree that was tested;\n- manual non-dry-run promotion cannot bypass PR review and verification;\n- flow-internal automation bypasses apply only to declared GitHub Apps, users,\n or teams on Buildchain-managed channel branch protection, while one-review\n protection remains enforced for humans;\n- admin users cannot make a channel promotion valid by temporarily bypassing\n branch protection.\n\nThis is the practical meaning of \"governance closed loop\" in Buildchain: the\ndecision, code, version state, and Git refs close over the same evidence chain.\n\n## What This Does Not Do\n\nBuildchain release promotion does not embed registry clients or product-specific\npublish logic. When publish transactions are enabled, `promote-buildchain-ref`\ncan run the consumer's `lifecycle.publish` command and own the transaction,\nevidence validation, durable recovery state, and ref finalization order. The\nconsumer repository still owns registry truth: npm, PyPI, OCI, S3, Conan, CMake\npackaging, download pages, dist-tags, and similar side effects must be\nimplemented by project lifecycle commands that emit Buildchain publish evidence.\n\nEvery Buildchain publish model that can run registry side effects must bind the\npublish entrypoint to an immutable `publish-gate/*` source lock. The reusable\n`release-candidate-promote.yml@v2` wrapper creates or updates that gate ref and\npasses `require-publish-source-lock`, `publish-source-ref`,\n`publish-source-sha`, and `publish-source-locked` to\n`promote-buildchain-ref`. Direct action callers must pass the same four inputs\nfrom the reusable build outputs. Workflows that only collect passports or run\ndry-run package checks do not move publish refs and are not publish-gate\npublication models.\n\nSemver GitHub Release publication is owned by `promote-buildchain-ref`, not by\nconsumer shell glue. Consumers normally use the `release-candidate-promote.yml`\nwrapper, where GitHub Release publication is enabled by default and can be\ndisabled with `github-release: false`; the wrapper passes that declaration to\nthe action. After the publish transaction reaches `complete`, Buildchain creates\nor updates the public GitHub Release and uploads the generated\n`buildchain.release.json`, release-passport assets, and publish evidence. Semver\nprerelease tags are marked `prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`; stable\nsemver tags are marked latest. For anchored/manual package releases, the public\nrelease tag defaults to `v<publishedVersion>` while the internal exact\ntransaction tag remains in the release passport and release-state ref. This is\nthe supported path for downstream\n`release.published` propagation across semver, major, and promote-only release\ncandidate publication models.\n\nBuildchain also does not maintain bare exact tags such as `1.0.0`. The supported\nexact release and alpha refs are v-prefixed:\n\n```text\nv2.0.0\nv2.0.1-alpha.0\n```\n\n## Operational Reading Order\n\nWhen debugging or extending release behavior, read in this order:\n\n1. `docs/release-flow.md`\n2. `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml`\n3. `.github/workflows/buildchain-ref-promotion.yml`\n4. `.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml`\n5. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/README.md`\n6. `actions/promote-buildchain-ref/src/`\n7. `docs/migration-inventory.md`\n\nThat path gives the policy first, the workflow trigger second, and the action\nimplementation last."
1307
1312
  },
1308
1313
  {
1309
1314
  "id": "manual:release-passport",
@@ -1426,7 +1431,7 @@
1426
1431
  ],
1427
1432
  "maturity": "stable",
1428
1433
  "sourcePath": "docs/reusable-build-surface.md",
1429
- "digest": "sha256:5f56d66ad2798bc46acde3f8091c2e5ccee80412c1b26b70c8197ff9c7f6a406",
1434
+ "digest": "sha256:4f3699841c5a189d199db045d526b11f76ad0dff1464d6a63ca98ceadf1bb215",
1430
1435
  "headings": [
1431
1436
  {
1432
1437
  "level": 1,
@@ -1509,7 +1514,7 @@
1509
1514
  "anchor": "fixture"
1510
1515
  }
1511
1516
  ],
1512
- "markdown": "# Reusable Build Surface\n\nBuildchain v2 provides a reusable build workflow for repositories that need\nBuildchain's release semantics but cannot be described as a simple Node package.\nThe first target shape is `libnode`: expensive native builds, multiple operating\nsystems, self-hosted runner labels, and release artifacts that must be auditable.\n\n## Workflow\n\nStable consumers call:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n working-directory: .\n artifact-name: libnode\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n linux-container-preset: kungfu-verify\n artifact-name-template: \"{artifact}-{platform}-{sha}\"\n artifact-paths: |\n dist\n build/stage\n expected-artifacts-json: >-\n {\"minFiles\":2,\"requiredPaths\":[\"dist/libnode.tar.gz\",\"dist/checksums.txt\"]}\n process-summary-path: .buildchain/diagnostics/process-summary.json\n release-candidate: true\n publish-channel: release\n publish-source-ref: publish-gate/release/v22/v22.22/22.22.3-kf.0\n```\n\n`runner-preset` is the stable first-class surface for known runner fleets:\n\n| Preset | Platforms |\n| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n| `github-hosted` | `ubuntu-24.04`, `macos-latest`, `windows-2022` |\n| `kungfu-v4-self-hosted` | Kungfu Linux x64, macOS ARM64, and Windows x64 self-hosted runner labels |\n| `custom` | Requires `platforms-json` |\n\nCallers can still provide a custom matrix with `platforms-json`. Each platform\nobject has:\n\n| Field | Meaning |\n| -------- | ------------------------------------------------- |\n| `id` | Stable artifact/platform key, such as `linux-x64` |\n| `name` | Human-readable job name |\n| `runner` | JSON string passed to `runs-on` after `fromJSON` |\n\nThe runner field is intentionally a JSON string so callers can pass either\nGitHub-hosted runners or multi-label self-hosted runners without Buildchain\nguessing the labels.\n\nOnly include platforms that should run. GitHub schedules matrix jobs before\nsteps execute, so a disabled entry with unavailable runner labels can still\nblock the workflow queue.\n\n## Linux Job Containers\n\nLinux build platforms can run inside a digest-pinned job container while macOS\nand Windows keep using native runners. This is the recommended way to remove\nmoving Linux runner prerequisites from Buildchain consumers: the Linux host only\nneeds a GitHub Actions runner, Docker, and network access; common verification\ntools come from the image contract.\n\nUse the Kungfu verification image for lifecycle stages that need Git, jq,\nPython, uv, and fnm, but do not need native compilation:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n linux-container-preset: kungfu-verify\n```\n\n`kungfu-verify` resolves to:\n\n```text\nghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/kungfu-verify@sha256:11f0ba64267ce88174a4f73a9bf833ff4e9c59cd16ec3d08a6432a06c2be6fb1\n```\n\nCallers that own a different Linux image can pass it explicitly:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n linux-container-preset: custom\n linux-container-image: ghcr.io/example/project-build@sha256:<digest>\n```\n\n`linux-container-image` should be pinned by digest. A floating tag makes the\nrunner surface mutable and weakens Buildchain's release evidence.\n\nThe workflow splits the matrix into two build jobs:\n\n- Linux platforms go to `build-linux-container` when a Linux container is\n configured.\n- All other platforms go to `build-native`.\n\nArtifact names, manifest paths, expected artifact checks, publish-source locks,\nand aggregate summaries are the same in both jobs. The split is an execution\ndetail, not a different artifact contract.\n\nThe container image provides `fnm` but does not preinstall Node. Buildchain uses\n`fnm` inside the container to install the requested `node-version` before it\nruns Buildchain runtime scripts or lifecycle actions.\n\nDo not use `kungfu-verify` for stages that need CMake, Ninja, ccache, Conan, or\nDocker image publishing. Those should use a heavier native-build image or remain\non a host runner until their image contract is explicit.\n\n## Buildchain Runtime Override\n\nStable consumers should keep the reusable workflow pinned to stable refs such as\n`@v2`. The optional `buildchain-ref` input is empty by default; empty means\nBuildchain resolves and executes the stable runtime selected by the workflow\nshell. The full train validation protocol is documented in\n[`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md).\n\nFor one-off manual validation, a trusted maintainer can run the caller workflow\nwith a temporary runtime override:\n\n```yaml\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n buildchain-ref:\n description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref for trusted manual validation\"\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n```\n\nAllowed override refs are deliberately narrow:\n\n| Ref form | Meaning |\n| --- | --- |\n| `train/v2/v2.3/<capability>` | Temporary capability train under the active minor line |\n| `refs/heads/train/v2/v2.3/<capability>` | Explicit branch ref for the same train |\n| `<40-character SHA>` | Exact immutable Buildchain runtime commit |\n\nOverride requests fail closed unless the event is `workflow_dispatch` and the\nactor has write, maintain, or admin permission on the caller repository.\nPull requests, including same-repository pull requests and fork-originated pull\nrequests, cannot use `buildchain-ref` override. This keeps automated PR builds on\nthe stable runtime surface.\n\nEvery run resolves the runtime ref to an immutable SHA before checkout. The job\nsummary and aggregate build summary record the workflow shell ref, requested\nruntime ref, resolved runtime ref, runtime SHA, stability class, trust decision,\nand rollback ref. Train refs are development validation refs: they do not move\n`v2`, `vX.Y`, `vX.Y-alpha`, npm dist-tags, or production release refs, and they\nmust not be pinned as long-term production dependencies.\n\nRuntime override validates Buildchain runtime scripts, CLI code, local actions,\nconfig parsing, and lifecycle behavior. It cannot validate changes that require\nthe outer reusable workflow YAML itself to change, such as new jobs,\npermissions, workflow outputs, or matrix topology. Those changes need a canary\nworkflow path or a temporary explicit workflow ref.\n\n## Floating Ref Contract Lock\n\nStable consumers should use floating major refs such as `@v2`, but a floating\nref is not blind trust. Each released Buildchain ref carries a package-owned\nruntime contract world in `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json`. Consumers may\nkeep a small lock file, `.buildchain/contract-lock.json`, recording the\nBuildchain ref, resolved SHA, contract digest, compatibility digest, accepted\nmajor line, and compatibility policy they reviewed.\n\nThe reusable build trust gate checks this lock before any heavy matrix job:\n\n1. resolve the Buildchain runtime ref, for example `v2`, to an immutable SHA;\n2. read `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` from that checked-out Buildchain\n ref;\n3. read the consumer's `.buildchain/contract-lock.json`;\n4. compare the accepted contract with the current contract.\n\nSHA drift alone is not a failure. `v2` is expected to advance. Buildchain only\nfails fast when the accepted contract is no longer compatible, for example a\nrequired input is removed, a required output disappears, a protected behavior\npromise changes, or the major line changes. Additive changes such as optional\ninputs, optional outputs, diagnostics, or documentation updates continue under\nthe default `major-compatible` policy.\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n permissions:\n contents: read\n issues: write\n id-token: write\n with:\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n buildchain-contract-compatibility-policy: major-compatible\n buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n```\n\nWhen compatible drift is detected, the build continues and Buildchain opens or\nupdates a low-priority issue in the consumer repository. The issue records the\nold SHA/digest, new SHA/digest, compatibility result, workflow run, and the next\naction: review the Buildchain release notes and update the lock. When breaking\ndrift is detected, the same issue path is used, but the trust gate fails before\nmatrix build or publish work starts. If the workflow token cannot write issues,\nBuildchain writes a copyable issue body into the job summary.\n\nThe lock is intentionally small. It does not copy the full contract. The full\ncontract remains in the Buildchain ref and package; the consumer records only\nwhat it accepted and the policy used to compare future floating-ref movement.\n\n## Locked Source Checkout Cache\n\nSelf-hosted runners that build large repositories can opt into a locked source\ncheckout cache. This changes only the Git object transport. Buildchain still\nresolves `publish-source-sha` before any build runner starts, checks out that\nexact commit, and verifies `HEAD` plus the resolved source tree SHA before\nlifecycle commands run.\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n checkout-cache-mode: auto\n checkout-cache-mirror-url-template: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_MIRROR_URL_TEMPLATE }}\n checkout-cache-reference-repository-template: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_REFERENCE_REPOSITORY_TEMPLATE }}\n checkout-cache-fallback: github\n checkout-cache-timeout-seconds: 60\n```\n\n`checkout-cache-mode` accepts:\n\n| Mode | Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `off` | Default. Buildchain fetches the locked commit from GitHub. |\n| `auto` | Try the trusted cache first; on miss, record the miss and fall back according to `checkout-cache-fallback`. |\n| `require` | Require the cache to provide the locked commit and fail before lifecycle work if unavailable. |\n\nThe cache can be a local/LAN mirror URL template or a runner-local bare\nreference repository template. Templates support `{owner}`, `{repo}`,\n`{repository}`, `{repositorySlug}`, and `{sha}`. The workflow also reads\nrepository or organization variables named\n`BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_MIRROR_URL_TEMPLATE` and\n`BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_REFERENCE_REPOSITORY_TEMPLATE`, so consumers can keep\nprivate LAN topology out of repository YAML.\n\nDo not read cache URLs or reference paths from PR-controlled files such as\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml`. These values are trusted workflow inputs or repo/org\nvariables. Buildchain does not pass GitHub credentials to cache mirrors or\nreference repositories. If it must fall back to GitHub, the workflow token is\nused only for the GitHub fetch path.\n\nEach platform diagnostics artifact includes `source-checkout.json` and embeds a\ncompact `sourceCheckout` summary in `diagnostics.json`: mode, transport,\nhit/miss, fallback reason, duration, final HEAD verification, and tree\nverification. Remote URLs are sanitized and local reference paths are represented\nby a short display name plus fingerprint, not by secret-bearing credentials.\n\nWhen a Buildchain maintainer asks for downstream validation, the expected\nrequest is:\n\n```text\nBuildchain train ready: buildchain-ref=train/v2/v2.3/<capability>.\nKeep uses: ...@v2; run workflow_dispatch with that buildchain-ref and report the runtime evidence summary.\n```\n\nAfter validation succeeds, the Buildchain change should continue through the\nnormal mainline and release path. Do not treat the train as a pending merge\nitem; it is only a temporary fast-use, diagnostic, and rollback channel. It may\nremain for a retention window after release, with old trains handled by a\nseparate periodic cleanup task.\n\n## Workflow Outputs\n\nThe reusable workflow exposes the resolved contract:\n\n| Output | Meaning |\n| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| `runner-preset` | Resolved preset, or `custom` when `platforms-json` was provided |\n| `platforms-json` | Exact matrix JSON used by the build job |\n| `platform-count` | Number of matrix platforms |\n| `linux-container-enabled` | `true` when Linux platforms are routed through a job container |\n| `linux-container-image` | Resolved digest-pinned Linux job container image |\n| `build-summary-artifact` | Uploaded aggregate summary artifact name |\n| `build-diagnostics-summary-artifact` | Uploaded aggregate diagnostics summary artifact name |\n| `release-candidate-passport-artifact` | Uploaded PR-stage release-candidate passport artifact name when `release-candidate` is enabled |\n| `release-candidate-passport-json` | Compact release-candidate passport JSON when `release-candidate` is enabled |\n| `build-summary-json` | Compact aggregate JSON with platform count, file count, and byte total |\n| `build-diagnostics-summary-json` | Compact aggregate diagnostics JSON with platform, lifecycle warning/error, diagnostics contract warning, and sidecar manifest warning totals |\n| `trusted-event` | `true` when the event is trusted enough to reach build runners |\n| `buildchain-runtime-ref` | Runtime ref selected after applying the empty-default or override policy |\n| `buildchain-runtime-sha` | Immutable Buildchain runtime commit used by all runtime checkouts |\n| `buildchain-runtime-class` | `stable`, `alpha`, `train`, `exact-sha`, or `development` |\n| `buildchain-runtime-override` | `true` when a non-empty `buildchain-ref` override was accepted |\n| `buildchain-runtime-trust-decision` | Runtime override trust decision |\n| `buildchain-contract-lock-status` | `unchanged`, `compatible-drift`, `breaking-drift`, `missing-lock`, `non-floating-runtime`, or first-release `runtime-contract-unavailable` |\n| `buildchain-contract-lock-drift` | `true` when the floating runtime SHA or contract digest changed |\n| `buildchain-contract-digest` | Current Buildchain runtime contract digest |\n| `publish-channel` | Resolved publish channel requested by the caller |\n| `publish-allowed` | `true` only when this event/ref may publish after verification |\n| `publish-reason` | Human-readable reason for the publish gate decision |\n| `publish-source-ref` | Gate source ref that was resolved before checkout |\n| `publish-source-sha` | Exact source commit used by checkout, build, verify, and artifacts |\n| `publish-source-locked` | `true` when a `publish-gate/*` source ref was explicitly locked |\n| `publish-source-channel` | `alpha`, `release`, `anchor`, or `major` parsed from the source ref |\n| `publish-source-line` | Product line parsed from source refs such as `v22/v22.22` |\n| `publish-source-consumer-version` | Consumer package version parsed from source refs |\n| `release-manifest-json` | Resolved release manifest including source lock, version state, and anchor data |\n\nThe aggregate summaries are intentionally artifacts as well as outputs. GitHub\nActions matrix outputs are not a reliable place to carry every platform's full\nmanifest, so Buildchain uploads each platform manifest and then emits one\naggregate build summary artifact after the matrix completes. Buildchain uploads\n`diagnostics-summary.json` as a separate aggregate diagnostics summary artifact,\na compact rollup of each platform's small diagnostics upload. The rollup keeps\nper-platform runner facts, checked tool versions/missing tools, package\nmanager/cache directory details, compiler-cache availability, lifecycle timing,\nprocess sampler context, and links back to the exact platform artifacts. Each\nplatform diagnostics upload includes `diagnostics.json`,\n`diagnostics-manifest.json`, the lifecycle `events.jsonl`, and process sampler\nsidecars when enabled, so slow-build diagnosis does not require downloading the\nbinary platform artifact or the aggregate build summary. The sidecar manifest\nrecords the uploaded diagnostics files with bytes and sha256 hashes. Each\n`diagnostics.json` also records the related binary artifact name, manifest\nartifact name, diagnostics artifact name, diagnostics sidecar manifest path, and\nplatform id in `links`, so a reviewer can navigate from the small diagnostics\nartifact back to the exact platform outputs when deeper inspection is needed.\nThe workflow output `build-diagnostics-summary-json` includes\n`diagnosticsContractWarningCount` and `diagnosticsManifestWarningCount` so\nrelease jobs can detect drifting diagnostics JSON contracts and missing or\ndrifting diagnostics sidecar manifests without downloading the per-platform\ndiagnostics artifacts first.\n\n## Artifact Transfer Relay\n\nBy default, platform jobs upload payloads, manifests, and diagnostics directly\nto GitHub artifacts:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n artifact-transfer-mode: github-artifacts\n```\n\nLarge self-hosted native builds can opt into the first-class S3 relay path:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n artifact-transfer-mode: s3-to-github-artifacts\n artifact-relay-s3-bucket: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_BUCKET }}\n artifact-relay-s3-region: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_REGION }}\n artifact-relay-s3-prefix: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_PREFIX }}\n```\n\nIn relay mode, each self-hosted platform job uploads the heavy payload files to\nS3 and uploads only a small `relay-manifest.json` to GitHub. A GitHub-hosted\n`relay-artifacts` job then assumes the configured download role, downloads the\npayloads from S3, verifies every file by SHA256, and re-uploads the normal\nGitHub artifacts under the same artifact names that direct mode uses. Downstream\nsummary, release-candidate, and promote-only workflows therefore continue to\nconsume GitHub artifacts and do not need custom S3 logic.\nThe relay implementation uses Node.js plus the standard AWS environment\ncredentials from GitHub OIDC; runner images and build containers do not need the\nAWS CLI installed.\n\nAfter the GitHub artifact uploads succeed, Buildchain deletes the S3 objects\nlisted in the relay manifest for that platform. If any download, verification,\nor GitHub artifact upload fails, cleanup is skipped so maintainers can inspect\nthe retained S3 payload. Configure a short bucket lifecycle expiration as a\ncost and cleanup backstop.\n\nThe relay configuration is intentionally generic. Buildchain does not hard-code\norganization buckets, regions, or role ARNs. Callers may pass explicit inputs,\nor set repository/organization variables and secrets using these names:\n\n| Variable or secret | Meaning |\n| --- | --- |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_BUCKET` | Relay bucket name |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_REGION` | Relay bucket region |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_PREFIX` | Relay object prefix; defaults to `buildchain-artifacts` |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_ROLE_ARN` | Shared OIDC role ARN for upload and download |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_UPLOAD_ROLE_ARN` | Upload OIDC role ARN for self-hosted build jobs |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_DOWNLOAD_ROLE_ARN` | Download OIDC role ARN for the GitHub-hosted relay job |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_OIDC_AUDIENCE` | Optional OIDC audience override |\n\nFor AWS China regions, Buildchain defaults the OIDC audience to\n`sts.amazonaws.com.cn`; other regions default to `sts.amazonaws.com`. The caller\nworkflow must allow `id-token: write`, and the target role trust policy should\nrestrict GitHub OIDC claims to the expected organization, repository, workflow,\nand branch/ref. The S3 permissions should be scoped to the relay bucket/prefix\nused by the repository.\nUpload roles need write/delete access under the relay prefix; download roles\nneed read access plus delete access for successful cleanup.\n\nRelay mode is opt-in and does not affect forks or open-source users that do not\nconfigure S3. Missing bucket, region, upload role, or download role values fail\nbefore the heavy build matrix is scheduled. Buildchain treats S3 as a transport\ncache, not as the final release evidence store; the final audit entry remains\nthe GitHub artifact set plus the Buildchain build summary and release-candidate\npassport.\n\nSet `release-candidate: true` when the successful reusable build is meant to be\nthe artifact source promoted later. Buildchain then uploads\n`release-candidate-passport.json` under the\n`<artifact-name>-release-candidate-<publish-source-sha>` artifact name. Promotion\njobs can pass that passport to `promote-buildchain-ref` with\n`promote-only-release-candidate: \"true\"` so source, channel, platforms, and the\naggregate build-summary hash are checked before publish-gate side effects. The\npassport records the locked commit's Git tree SHA, so a post-merge channel HEAD\ncan be accepted only when it is tree-equivalent to the PR-stage build evidence.\n\n## Publish Gate\n\nBuildchain separates \"may build/verify\" from \"may publish.\" A same-repository\npull request may be trusted enough to run the build matrix, but it still must\nnot publish packages, S3 objects, release pages, or preview aliases. Publishing\nis allowed only when the caller explicitly requests a channel and the current\nevent/ref matches that channel.\n\nUse `publish-channel` to request a channel:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n publish-channel: release\n\n publish:\n needs: build\n if: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-allowed == 'true' }}\n runs-on: ubuntu-24.04\n steps:\n - run: ./scripts/publish.sh\n```\n\nDefault channels are:\n\n| Channel | Allowed refs |\n| --------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| `none` | Never publishes; this is the default |\n| `alpha` | `alpha/vN/vN.M` branches or exact `vN.M.P-alpha.K` tags |\n| `release` | `release/vN/vN.M` branches or release tags such as `vN.M.P`, `vN.M`, `vN` |\n| `major` | `publish-gate/major`, legacy `major-gate`, or next-major release tags such as `vN.0.0`, `vN.0`, `vN` |\n\nPull request events always produce `publish-allowed=false`, even when the PR is\nfrom the same repository. Untrusted fork events also produce\n`publish-allowed=false`; with the default `untrusted-policy: fail`, the workflow\nthen fails before any build runner starts.\n\nProjects with their own channel names can pass `publish-refs-json`:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n publish-channel: nightly\n publish-refs-json: >-\n {\"nightly\":[\"^refs/heads/nightly/v\\\\d+$\"]}\n```\n\nThe aggregate build summary includes the same publish gate decision under\n`publishGate`, so a downloaded artifact summary explains both what was built and\nwhy it was or was not eligible to publish.\n\n## Publish Source Lock\n\n`publish-channel` answers \"may this event publish?\" Source lock answers \"which\nsource tree is the publish decision about?\" A caller can pass `publish-source-ref`\nto bind a publish run to a reviewed gate branch before any checkout happens:\n\n| Ref | Meaning |\n| ------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| `publish-gate/alpha/<line>/<consumer-version>` | Build and publish an alpha candidate for a consumer line |\n| `publish-gate/release/<line>/<consumer-version>` | Build and publish a production candidate for a consumer line |\n| `publish-gate/anchor` | Resolve an explicit anchor request; it does not publish artifacts by itself |\n| `publish-gate/major` | Gate the next major source state |\n| `major-gate` | Legacy compatibility alias for the major gate |\n\nFor alpha and release refs, `<line>` is intentionally allowed to contain `/`, so\nKungfu-style lines such as `v22/v22.22` stay readable. The final path segment is\nthe consumer-visible version, for example `22.22.3-kf.0`.\n\nThe reusable workflow resolves the branch tip to `publish-source-sha`, checks out\nthat SHA in every build job, and uses the same SHA in artifact names, manifests,\nand aggregate summaries. Reruns therefore rebuild the same source tree even if a\ngate branch moves later.\n\nBefore any heavy build matrix is scheduled, the workflow also verifies that the\ntarget channel ref implied by the source lock already points at\n`publish-source-sha` and that the target channel HEAD came from the required\nmerged same-repository channel PR. `publish-gate/alpha/<line>/<version>` must\nmatch `alpha/<line>` and have PR lineage `dev/<line> -> alpha/<line>`;\n`publish-gate/release/<line>/<version>` must match `release/<line>` and have PR\nlineage `alpha/<line> -> release/<line>`. If either check fails, the run fails\nfast with a diagnostic telling maintainers to merge the source commit through\nthe channel PR first. This keeps verify from spending runner time on a source\ntree that cannot legally enter the requested publish channel.\n\nThe resolved release manifest is uploaded as an artifact and emitted as\n`release-manifest-json`. It records:\n\n- source ref, source SHA, channel, line, and consumer version;\n- configured version strategy and configured version-state files;\n- each version file's value, with release gates failing closed if the configured\n files do not equal the consumer version;\n- anchor manifest summary for anchored/manual projects;\n- explicit anchor request JSON for `publish-gate/anchor`;\n- publish registry, dist-tag, and gate visibility metadata.\n\nPublish side-effect jobs should verify the lock immediately before publishing:\n\n```yaml\n- name: Verify publish gate did not move\n run: node .buildchain/runtime/scripts/verify-publish-source-lock.mjs\n env:\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_REF: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-ref }}\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_SHA: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n BUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}\n GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}\n```\n\nIf the branch tip no longer matches the manifest SHA, the publish job must fail\nclosed. Moving a gate branch creates a new publish decision and should produce a\nnew build run.\n\n## Release Candidate Promote-Only\n\nFor native package sets, the PR build is the only heavy build. When a PR targets\n`alpha/<line>` or `release/<line>`, `.build.yml` uploads a release-candidate\nbundle next to the platform artifacts. The bundle contains:\n\n- `release-candidate.passport.json`;\n- the aggregate `build-summary.json`;\n- copied platform manifest evidence for the built platforms.\n\nThe passport records two separate source identities:\n\n- `builtSourceSha` / `builtSourceTreeSha`: the PR-stage source that produced the\n artifacts, usually the PR merge ref;\n- `promotionChannelSha` / `promotionChannelTreeSha`: the post-merge channel\n commit used for publish authority.\n\nThe reusable promote wrapper resolves the merged PR, finds exactly one matching\nPR-stage release-candidate artifact, downloads it with the build summary and\npayload artifacts from the same PR-stage run, validates the payload count,\ncompares the built tree with the promotion channel tree, locks\n`publish-gate/{alpha,release,major}` to the promotion channel commit, and then\ncalls `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` with\n`promote-only-release-candidate: \"true\"` and\n`require-publish-source-lock: \"true\"`. The wrapper passes the created\n`publish-gate/*` ref, target SHA, and `locked=true` into the promote action, so\nfloating `@v2` consumers receive publish-side source-lock drift protection by\ndefault. It also defaults `branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`\nso the workflow automation can apply generated version-state and channel\nbookkeeping on protected `dev`/`alpha`/`release` branches after the reviewed\nchannel PR has merged; consumers using a different promotion identity can pass\n`branch-protection-bypass-users`, `branch-protection-bypass-teams`, or a\ndifferent app slug declaratively. The wrapper uses\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token` as the generated ref update\ntoken for protected bookkeeping PATCH calls, so a bypass-capable promotion token\ncan sync dev immediately after alpha/release publish without a post-publish PR.\nIt does not call `.build.yml`, does not create a matrix, and must fail before\npublish if the RC evidence, payload set, or source-lock ref is missing or\nambiguous.\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n promote:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml@v2\n secrets:\n buildchain-issue-app-id: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_ISSUE_APP_ID }}\n buildchain-issue-app-private-key: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_ISSUE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}\n with:\n channel: alpha\n target-ref: alpha/v22/v22.22\n artifact-name: libnode\n # Defaults to build.yml / Build. Override only when the PR-stage build\n # workflow uses a different file or display name.\n release-candidate-workflow-file: build.yml\n release-candidate-workflow-name: Build\n package-manager: npm\n publish-target: npm\n runner-preset: github-hosted\n trusted-publishing: true\n github-release: true\n required-status-check: check\n required-artifact-count: 3\n publish-dist-tag: alpha\n publish-package-set-order: platforms-first-main-last\n publish-package-main: \"@kungfu-tech/libnode\"\n release-passport-product-name: Libnode\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n```\n\n`buildchain-issue-app-id` and `buildchain-issue-app-private-key` are optional\nbut recommended for cross-repository consumers. They should identify a GitHub\nApp installation with `issues: write` on `kungfu-systems/buildchain`; the\nwrapper mints the installation token before calling\n`actions/report-buildchain-issue`. Consumers can also pass a pre-minted\n`buildchain-issue-token`. If both are omitted, the wrapper falls back to\n`BUILDCHAIN_ISSUE_TOKEN`, `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN`, and then the consumer\nworkflow's `github.token`; the last fallback can only report issues when it has\nwrite access to the target Buildchain repository.\n\n`publish-required-artifacts-json` can still be passed explicitly for custom\npublish targets. For the default `publish-artifact-kind: npm` path, consumers do\nnot download artifacts or run repository scripts to build publish evidence. The\nwrapper downloads the PR-stage payload artifacts, finds the downloaded `.tgz`\npackages, reads each tarball's `package/package.json` for the real scoped\npackage name and version, computes the npm `sha512-...` integrity from the\ntarball bytes, marks the package matching `publish-package-main` as `role:\nmain`, marks the rest as `role: platform`, and passes the generated\n`publish-required-artifacts-json` to `promote-buildchain-ref` before any publish\nside effect. Downloaded platform manifests are still passed into the release\npassport unless `release-passport-platform-manifest-paths` is set explicitly.\nThe same Buildchain contract lock check runs before release-candidate\nresolution and before publish. A compatible `v2` drift leaves an issue in the\nconsumer repository but does not trigger a second heavy build; an incompatible\ndrift fails before publish side effects.\n\nThe wrapper publishes the public release tag as a GitHub Release by default.\nAfter `promote-buildchain-ref` reports a complete release transaction, the\nwrapper creates or updates the public release, marks semver prerelease tags\nsuch as `v1.2.3-alpha.0`, `v1.2.3-rc.1`, or `v22.22.3-kf.3-alpha.7` as\n`prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`, marks stable semver tags as latest,\nand uploads the publish evidence file plus every file in the generated release\npassport directory, including `buildchain.release.json` and `check-report.json`.\nFor anchored/manual package releases, the public release tag is derived from the\npublished package version and the internal exact transaction tag remains\navailable in the release passport.\nConsumers do not need to hand-write `gh release` logic to trigger\n`release.published` propagation. Set `github-release: false` only for\nrepositories that intentionally do not maintain GitHub Releases.\nIf the transaction still needs protected-ref finalization, the wrapper defers\nGitHub Release creation until the later run that reaches `state=complete`.\n\nCustom publish jobs can also repeat the channel-ref preflight:\n\n```yaml\n- name: Verify publish channel ref still matches\n run: node .buildchain/runtime/scripts/verify-publish-channel-ref.mjs\n env:\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_REF: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-ref }}\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_SHA: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n BUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}\n GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}\n```\n\nAnchored/manual package release jobs should also make the Buildchain promotion\naction validate that publication is entering through the same\n`publish-gate/{alpha,release,major}` source-lock contract before any package\npublish side effect:\n\n```yaml\n- name: Promote release ref and publish npm package set\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/promote-buildchain-ref@v2\n with:\n sha: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n target-ref: release/v22/v22.22\n require-publish-source-lock: 'true'\n publish-source-ref: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-ref }}\n publish-source-sha: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n publish-source-locked: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-locked }}\n```\n\n`target-ref` stays the Buildchain channel promotion target, such as\n`alpha/v22/v22.22`, `release/v22/v22.22`, or `publish-gate/major`.\n`publish-source-ref` is the reviewed source-lock branch that authorized this\nspecific package publication. For alpha and release package publications, the\nsource-lock branch must point at the exact channel-line commit that promotion is\nvalidating; it is not a replacement for `target-ref`.\n\nThis keeps the version bump commit, publish authorization, and auditable publish\nentrypoint on the Buildchain source-lock protocol. The CLI form\n`buildchain publish-source validate-anchored-release --json` is still useful for\ncustom publish scripts, but the preferred GitHub Actions gate is the promotion\naction input above. A publish job that still runs directly from `alpha/*` or\n`release/*` channel branches fails this check because those refs are channel\nstate, not publish-gate decisions.\n\n## Package-Set Publish Plan\n\nProjects that publish multiple packages should treat package publication as a\npackage-set operation. Buildchain's package-set planner uses these rules:\n\n- platform packages publish first;\n- the main package publishes last;\n- the dist-tag move happens only after the full package set is present;\n- reruns accept already-published packages only when package name, version, and\n integrity match;\n- an existing package with different integrity is a hard failure.\n\nThis keeps a consumer from observing a floating dist-tag that points to a main\npackage before all platform artifacts for the same source SHA are available.\n\n## Command Sources\n\nThe workflow runs `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` lifecycle stages by default:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"corepack yarn install --immutable\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommands = [\n \"corepack yarn make\",\n \"corepack yarn build\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"corepack yarn test\"\n```\n\nCallers can override any stage for one invocation:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n build-command: cmake --build build --config Release\n verify-command: ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure\n```\n\nThe reusable build workflow samples the build lifecycle by default and carries\nthe generated summary into the final verify diagnostics. Callers can override\nthe sidecar path or disable sampling:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n sample-process-tree: true\n process-summary-path: .buildchain/diagnostics/process-summary.json\n process-sample-interval-ms: 15000\n requested-parallelism: 20\n```\n\nWhen `sample-process-tree` is true, Buildchain wraps either `build-command` or\nthe configured `lifecycle.build` stage with `buildchain sample process-tree`.\nThe path is relative to the checked-out workspace and is read again during the\nfinal verify lifecycle. Custom workflows can still write their own sampler\nsummary and pass `process-summary-path`; Buildchain reads the file after the\nlifecycle command finishes, so it may be produced during the same invocation.\nWhen the build stage is optional, the reusable workflow treats the default\nsampler path as optional during verify; an explicitly supplied\n`process-summary-path` remains required.\n\nFor custom workflows, use the action directly:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/run-lifecycle@v2\n with:\n stage: build\n required: \"true\"\n artifact-name: libnode-linux-x64-${{ github.sha }}\n artifact-paths: |\n dist\n build/stage\n```\n\n## Artifact Contract\n\nEach platform upload uses `artifact-name-template`. The default is:\n\n```text\n{artifact}-{platform}-{sha}\n```\n\nSupported placeholders are `{artifact}`, `{artifactName}`, `{platform}`,\n`{platformId}`, `{platformName}`, `{sha}`, `{shortSha}`, `{ref}`, `{runId}`,\nand `{runAttempt}`. Invalid GitHub artifact name characters are normalized to\n`-`, so `{ref}` remains deterministic even for refs such as\n`refs/heads/dev/v2/v2.0`.\n\nEach platform also writes and uploads:\n\n```text\n.buildchain/artifacts/<platform-id>/manifest.json\n.buildchain/artifacts/<platform-id>/summary.json\n```\n\nThe manifest schema is:\n\n```json\n{\n \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-artifact\",\n \"artifactName\": \"libnode-linux-x64-<sha>\",\n \"platform\": {\n \"id\": \"linux-x64\",\n \"name\": \"Linux x64\",\n \"os\": \"Linux\",\n \"arch\": \"X64\"\n },\n \"git\": {\n \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/libnode\",\n \"sha\": \"<sha>\",\n \"ref\": \"<ref>\",\n \"runId\": \"<run id>\",\n \"runAttempt\": \"<attempt>\"\n },\n \"lifecycle\": {\n \"stage\": \"verify\",\n \"commandSource\": \"buildchain.toml\",\n \"executed\": true\n },\n \"summary\": {\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-artifact-summary\",\n \"artifactName\": \"libnode-linux-x64-<sha>\",\n \"fileCount\": 1,\n \"totalBytes\": 1234,\n \"digest\": \"<hex>\"\n },\n \"expectedArtifacts\": {\n \"ok\": true,\n \"source\": \"expected-artifacts-json\",\n \"checks\": []\n },\n \"files\": [\n {\n \"path\": \"dist/example.zip\",\n \"size\": 1234,\n \"sha256\": \"<hex>\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\nArtifact names do not include actor names, timestamps, or retry counters. Reruns\nproduce a new GitHub Actions run but keep the same source SHA/platform contract.\n\n`expected-artifacts-json` fails the build before upload when the artifact does\nnot match the caller's declared contract. Supported checks are:\n\n| Field | Meaning |\n| --------------- | ------------------------------------ |\n| `minFiles` | Minimum number of manifest files |\n| `maxFiles` | Maximum number of manifest files |\n| `minTotalBytes` | Minimum total byte count |\n| `requiredPaths` | Exact manifest paths that must exist |\n\n## Trusted Event Gate\n\nThe workflow has an explicit `trust-gate` job. By default, pull requests from\nforks fail before any build job can reach self-hosted runners, secrets,\npublishing credentials, or heavyweight build commands. Same-repository PRs,\nworkflow dispatches, and protected branch events can proceed.\n\nIf a repository wants fork PRs to skip rather than fail, it can set:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n untrusted-policy: skip\n```\n\nDo not set `require-trusted-event: false` for workflows that use self-hosted\nrunners or secrets.\n\n`require-trusted-event` controls access to build runners. It does not override\nthe publish gate: pull requests remain non-publishing events.\n\n## Fixture\n\n`fixtures/libnode-shaped` is the contract fixture. It has:\n\n- `package.json` version state;\n- `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` with `install`, `build`, `verify`, and `publish`;\n- cross-platform Node scripts that create small `dist/` outputs;\n- `Build Surface Fixture` workflow coverage.\n\nThe fixture proves the reusable surface without running the real libnode native\nbuild."
1517
+ "markdown": "# Reusable Build Surface\n\nBuildchain v2 provides a reusable build workflow for repositories that need\nBuildchain's release semantics but cannot be described as a simple Node package.\nThe first target shape is `libnode`: expensive native builds, multiple operating\nsystems, self-hosted runner labels, and release artifacts that must be auditable.\n\n## Workflow\n\nStable consumers call:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n working-directory: .\n artifact-name: libnode\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n linux-container-preset: kungfu-verify\n artifact-name-template: \"{artifact}-{platform}-{sha}\"\n artifact-paths: |\n dist\n build/stage\n expected-artifacts-json: >-\n {\"minFiles\":2,\"requiredPaths\":[\"dist/libnode.tar.gz\",\"dist/checksums.txt\"]}\n process-summary-path: .buildchain/diagnostics/process-summary.json\n release-candidate: true\n publish-channel: release\n publish-source-ref: publish-gate/release/v22/v22.22/22.22.3-kf.0\n```\n\n`runner-preset` is the stable first-class surface for known runner fleets:\n\n| Preset | Platforms |\n| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n| `github-hosted` | `ubuntu-24.04`, `macos-latest`, `windows-2022` |\n| `kungfu-v4-self-hosted` | Kungfu Linux x64, macOS ARM64, and Windows x64 self-hosted runner labels |\n| `custom` | Requires `platforms-json` |\n\nCallers can still provide a custom matrix with `platforms-json`. Each platform\nobject has:\n\n| Field | Meaning |\n| -------- | ------------------------------------------------- |\n| `id` | Stable artifact/platform key, such as `linux-x64` |\n| `name` | Human-readable job name |\n| `runner` | JSON string passed to `runs-on` after `fromJSON` |\n\nThe runner field is intentionally a JSON string so callers can pass either\nGitHub-hosted runners or multi-label self-hosted runners without Buildchain\nguessing the labels.\n\nOnly include platforms that should run. GitHub schedules matrix jobs before\nsteps execute, so a disabled entry with unavailable runner labels can still\nblock the workflow queue.\n\n## Linux Job Containers\n\nLinux build platforms can run inside a digest-pinned job container while macOS\nand Windows keep using native runners. This is the recommended way to remove\nmoving Linux runner prerequisites from Buildchain consumers: the Linux host only\nneeds a GitHub Actions runner, Docker, and network access; common verification\ntools come from the image contract.\n\nUse the Kungfu verification image for lifecycle stages that need Git, jq,\nPython, uv, and fnm, but do not need native compilation:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n linux-container-preset: kungfu-verify\n```\n\n`kungfu-verify` resolves to:\n\n```text\nghcr.io/kungfu-systems/build-images/kungfu-verify@sha256:11f0ba64267ce88174a4f73a9bf833ff4e9c59cd16ec3d08a6432a06c2be6fb1\n```\n\nCallers that own a different Linux image can pass it explicitly:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n linux-container-preset: custom\n linux-container-image: ghcr.io/example/project-build@sha256:<digest>\n```\n\n`linux-container-image` should be pinned by digest. A floating tag makes the\nrunner surface mutable and weakens Buildchain's release evidence.\n\nThe workflow splits the matrix into two build jobs:\n\n- Linux platforms go to `build-linux-container` when a Linux container is\n configured.\n- All other platforms go to `build-native`.\n\nArtifact names, manifest paths, expected artifact checks, publish-source locks,\nand aggregate summaries are the same in both jobs. The split is an execution\ndetail, not a different artifact contract.\n\nThe container image provides `fnm` but does not preinstall Node. Buildchain uses\n`fnm` inside the container to install the requested `node-version` before it\nruns Buildchain runtime scripts or lifecycle actions.\n\nDo not use `kungfu-verify` for stages that need CMake, Ninja, ccache, Conan, or\nDocker image publishing. Those should use a heavier native-build image or remain\non a host runner until their image contract is explicit.\n\n## Buildchain Runtime Override\n\nStable consumers should keep the reusable workflow pinned to stable refs such as\n`@v2`. The optional `buildchain-ref` input is empty by default; empty means\nBuildchain resolves and executes the stable runtime selected by the workflow\nshell. The full train validation protocol is documented in\n[`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md).\n\nFor one-off manual validation, a trusted maintainer can run the caller workflow\nwith a temporary runtime override:\n\n```yaml\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n buildchain-ref:\n description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref for trusted manual validation\"\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n```\n\nAllowed override refs are deliberately narrow:\n\n| Ref form | Meaning |\n| --- | --- |\n| `train/v2/v2.3/<capability>` | Temporary capability train under the active minor line |\n| `refs/heads/train/v2/v2.3/<capability>` | Explicit branch ref for the same train |\n| `<40-character SHA>` | Exact immutable Buildchain runtime commit |\n\nOverride requests fail closed unless the event is `workflow_dispatch` and the\nactor has write, maintain, or admin permission on the caller repository.\nPull requests, including same-repository pull requests and fork-originated pull\nrequests, cannot use `buildchain-ref` override. This keeps automated PR builds on\nthe stable runtime surface.\n\nEvery run resolves the runtime ref to an immutable SHA before checkout. The job\nsummary and aggregate build summary record the workflow shell ref, requested\nruntime ref, resolved runtime ref, runtime SHA, stability class, trust decision,\nand rollback ref. Train refs are development validation refs: they do not move\n`v2`, `vX.Y`, `vX.Y-alpha`, npm dist-tags, or production release refs, and they\nmust not be pinned as long-term production dependencies.\n\nRuntime override validates Buildchain runtime scripts, CLI code, local actions,\nconfig parsing, and lifecycle behavior. It cannot validate changes that require\nthe outer reusable workflow YAML itself to change, such as new jobs,\npermissions, workflow outputs, or matrix topology. Those changes need a canary\nworkflow path or a temporary explicit workflow ref.\n\n## Floating Ref Contract Lock\n\nStable consumers should use floating major refs such as `@v2`, but a floating\nref is not blind trust. Each released Buildchain ref carries a package-owned\nruntime contract world in `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json`. Consumers may\nkeep a small lock file, `.buildchain/contract-lock.json`, recording the\nBuildchain ref, resolved SHA, contract digest, compatibility digest, accepted\nmajor line, and compatibility policy they reviewed.\n\nThe reusable build trust gate checks this lock before any heavy matrix job:\n\n1. resolve the Buildchain runtime ref, for example `v2`, to an immutable SHA;\n2. read `dist/site/buildchain-contract.json` from that checked-out Buildchain\n ref;\n3. read the consumer's `.buildchain/contract-lock.json`;\n4. compare the accepted contract with the current contract.\n\nSHA drift alone is not a failure. `v2` is expected to advance. Buildchain only\nfails fast when the accepted contract is no longer compatible, for example a\nrequired input is removed, a required output disappears, a protected behavior\npromise changes, or the major line changes. Additive changes such as optional\ninputs, optional outputs, diagnostics, or documentation updates continue under\nthe default `major-compatible` policy.\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n permissions:\n contents: read\n issues: write\n id-token: write\n with:\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n buildchain-contract-compatibility-policy: major-compatible\n buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n```\n\nWhen compatible drift is detected, the build continues and Buildchain opens or\nupdates a low-priority issue in the consumer repository. The issue records the\nold SHA/digest, new SHA/digest, compatibility result, workflow run, and the next\naction: review the Buildchain release notes and update the lock. When breaking\ndrift is detected, the same issue path is used, but the trust gate fails before\nmatrix build or publish work starts. If the workflow token cannot write issues,\nBuildchain writes a copyable issue body into the job summary.\n\nThe lock is intentionally small. It does not copy the full contract. The full\ncontract remains in the Buildchain ref and package; the consumer records only\nwhat it accepted and the policy used to compare future floating-ref movement.\n\n## Locked Source Checkout Cache\n\nSelf-hosted runners that build large repositories can opt into a locked source\ncheckout cache. This changes only the Git object transport. Buildchain still\nresolves `publish-source-sha` before any build runner starts, checks out that\nexact commit, and verifies `HEAD` plus the resolved source tree SHA before\nlifecycle commands run.\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n checkout-cache-mode: auto\n checkout-cache-mirror-url-template: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_MIRROR_URL_TEMPLATE }}\n checkout-cache-reference-repository-template: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_REFERENCE_REPOSITORY_TEMPLATE }}\n checkout-cache-fallback: github\n checkout-cache-timeout-seconds: 60\n checkout-cache-fetch-attempts: 3\n```\n\n`checkout-cache-mode` accepts:\n\n| Mode | Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `off` | Default. Buildchain fetches the locked commit from GitHub. |\n| `auto` | Try the trusted cache first; on miss, record the miss and fall back according to `checkout-cache-fallback`. |\n| `require` | Require the cache to provide the locked commit and fail before lifecycle work if unavailable. |\n\nThe cache can be a local/LAN mirror URL template or a runner-local bare\nreference repository template. Templates support `{owner}`, `{repo}`,\n`{repository}`, `{repositorySlug}`, and `{sha}`. The workflow also reads\nrepository or organization variables named\n`BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_MIRROR_URL_TEMPLATE` and\n`BUILDCHAIN_CHECKOUT_CACHE_REFERENCE_REPOSITORY_TEMPLATE`, so consumers can keep\nprivate LAN topology out of repository YAML.\n\nDo not read cache URLs or reference paths from PR-controlled files such as\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml`. These values are trusted workflow inputs or repo/org\nvariables. Buildchain does not pass GitHub credentials to cache mirrors or\nreference repositories. If it must fall back to GitHub, the workflow token is\nused only for the GitHub fetch path. Retryable timeout and transient network\nfailures use the bounded `checkout-cache-fetch-attempts` budget; permanent\nfailures stop immediately. Diagnostics record the configured budget and actual\nGitHub fetch attempts before exact HEAD/tree verification.\n\nEach platform diagnostics artifact includes `source-checkout.json` and embeds a\ncompact `sourceCheckout` summary in `diagnostics.json`: mode, transport,\nhit/miss, fallback reason, duration, final HEAD verification, and tree\nverification. Remote URLs are sanitized and local reference paths are represented\nby a short display name plus fingerprint, not by secret-bearing credentials.\n\nWhen a Buildchain maintainer asks for downstream validation, the expected\nrequest is:\n\n```text\nBuildchain train ready: buildchain-ref=train/v2/v2.3/<capability>.\nKeep uses: ...@v2; run workflow_dispatch with that buildchain-ref and report the runtime evidence summary.\n```\n\nAfter validation succeeds, the Buildchain change should continue through the\nnormal mainline and release path. Do not treat the train as a pending merge\nitem; it is only a temporary fast-use, diagnostic, and rollback channel. It may\nremain for a retention window after release, with old trains handled by a\nseparate periodic cleanup task.\n\n## Workflow Outputs\n\nThe reusable workflow exposes the resolved contract:\n\n| Output | Meaning |\n| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| `runner-preset` | Resolved preset, or `custom` when `platforms-json` was provided |\n| `platforms-json` | Exact matrix JSON used by the build job |\n| `platform-count` | Number of matrix platforms |\n| `linux-container-enabled` | `true` when Linux platforms are routed through a job container |\n| `linux-container-image` | Resolved digest-pinned Linux job container image |\n| `build-summary-artifact` | Uploaded aggregate summary artifact name |\n| `build-diagnostics-summary-artifact` | Uploaded aggregate diagnostics summary artifact name |\n| `release-candidate-passport-artifact` | Uploaded PR-stage release-candidate passport artifact name when `release-candidate` is enabled |\n| `release-candidate-passport-json` | Compact release-candidate passport JSON when `release-candidate` is enabled |\n| `build-summary-json` | Compact aggregate JSON with platform count, file count, and byte total |\n| `build-diagnostics-summary-json` | Compact aggregate diagnostics JSON with platform, lifecycle warning/error, diagnostics contract warning, and sidecar manifest warning totals |\n| `trusted-event` | `true` when the event is trusted enough to reach build runners |\n| `buildchain-runtime-ref` | Runtime ref selected after applying the empty-default or override policy |\n| `buildchain-runtime-sha` | Immutable Buildchain runtime commit used by all runtime checkouts |\n| `buildchain-runtime-class` | `stable`, `alpha`, `train`, `exact-sha`, or `development` |\n| `buildchain-runtime-override` | `true` when a non-empty `buildchain-ref` override was accepted |\n| `buildchain-runtime-trust-decision` | Runtime override trust decision |\n| `buildchain-contract-lock-status` | `unchanged`, `compatible-drift`, `breaking-drift`, `missing-lock`, `non-floating-runtime`, or first-release `runtime-contract-unavailable` |\n| `buildchain-contract-lock-drift` | `true` when the floating runtime SHA or contract digest changed |\n| `buildchain-contract-digest` | Current Buildchain runtime contract digest |\n| `publish-channel` | Resolved publish channel requested by the caller |\n| `publish-allowed` | `true` only when this event/ref may publish after verification |\n| `publish-reason` | Human-readable reason for the publish gate decision |\n| `publish-source-ref` | Gate source ref that was resolved before checkout |\n| `publish-source-sha` | Exact source commit used by checkout, build, verify, and artifacts |\n| `publish-source-locked` | `true` when a `publish-gate/*` source ref was explicitly locked |\n| `publish-source-channel` | `alpha`, `release`, `anchor`, or `major` parsed from the source ref |\n| `publish-source-line` | Product line parsed from source refs such as `v22/v22.22` |\n| `publish-source-consumer-version` | Consumer package version parsed from source refs |\n| `release-manifest-json` | Resolved release manifest including source lock, version state, and anchor data |\n\nThe aggregate summaries are intentionally artifacts as well as outputs. GitHub\nActions matrix outputs are not a reliable place to carry every platform's full\nmanifest, so Buildchain uploads each platform manifest and then emits one\naggregate build summary artifact after the matrix completes. Buildchain uploads\n`diagnostics-summary.json` as a separate aggregate diagnostics summary artifact,\na compact rollup of each platform's small diagnostics upload. The rollup keeps\nper-platform runner facts, checked tool versions/missing tools, package\nmanager/cache directory details, compiler-cache availability, lifecycle timing,\nprocess sampler context, and links back to the exact platform artifacts. Each\nplatform diagnostics upload includes `diagnostics.json`,\n`diagnostics-manifest.json`, the lifecycle `events.jsonl`, and process sampler\nsidecars when enabled, so slow-build diagnosis does not require downloading the\nbinary platform artifact or the aggregate build summary. The sidecar manifest\nrecords the uploaded diagnostics files with bytes and sha256 hashes. Each\n`diagnostics.json` also records the related binary artifact name, manifest\nartifact name, diagnostics artifact name, diagnostics sidecar manifest path, and\nplatform id in `links`, so a reviewer can navigate from the small diagnostics\nartifact back to the exact platform outputs when deeper inspection is needed.\nThe workflow output `build-diagnostics-summary-json` includes\n`diagnosticsContractWarningCount` and `diagnosticsManifestWarningCount` so\nrelease jobs can detect drifting diagnostics JSON contracts and missing or\ndrifting diagnostics sidecar manifests without downloading the per-platform\ndiagnostics artifacts first.\n\n## Artifact Transfer Relay\n\nBy default, platform jobs upload payloads, manifests, and diagnostics directly\nto GitHub artifacts:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n artifact-transfer-mode: github-artifacts\n```\n\nLarge self-hosted native builds can opt into the first-class S3 relay path:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n runner-preset: kungfu-v4-self-hosted\n artifact-transfer-mode: s3-to-github-artifacts\n artifact-relay-s3-bucket: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_BUCKET }}\n artifact-relay-s3-region: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_REGION }}\n artifact-relay-s3-prefix: ${{ vars.BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_PREFIX }}\n```\n\nIn relay mode, each self-hosted platform job uploads the heavy payload files to\nS3 and uploads only a small `relay-manifest.json` to GitHub. A GitHub-hosted\n`relay-artifacts` job then assumes the configured download role, downloads the\npayloads from S3, verifies every file by SHA256, and re-uploads the normal\nGitHub artifacts under the same artifact names that direct mode uses. Downstream\nsummary, release-candidate, and promote-only workflows therefore continue to\nconsume GitHub artifacts and do not need custom S3 logic.\nThe relay implementation uses Node.js plus the standard AWS environment\ncredentials from GitHub OIDC; runner images and build containers do not need the\nAWS CLI installed.\n\nAfter the GitHub artifact uploads succeed, Buildchain deletes the S3 objects\nlisted in the relay manifest for that platform. If any download, verification,\nor GitHub artifact upload fails, cleanup is skipped so maintainers can inspect\nthe retained S3 payload. Configure a short bucket lifecycle expiration as a\ncost and cleanup backstop.\n\nThe relay configuration is intentionally generic. Buildchain does not hard-code\norganization buckets, regions, or role ARNs. Callers may pass explicit inputs,\nor set repository/organization variables and secrets using these names:\n\n| Variable or secret | Meaning |\n| --- | --- |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_BUCKET` | Relay bucket name |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_REGION` | Relay bucket region |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_PREFIX` | Relay object prefix; defaults to `buildchain-artifacts` |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_ROLE_ARN` | Shared OIDC role ARN for upload and download |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_UPLOAD_ROLE_ARN` | Upload OIDC role ARN for self-hosted build jobs |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_DOWNLOAD_ROLE_ARN` | Download OIDC role ARN for the GitHub-hosted relay job |\n| `BUILDCHAIN_ARTIFACT_RELAY_S3_OIDC_AUDIENCE` | Optional OIDC audience override |\n\nFor AWS China regions, Buildchain defaults the OIDC audience to\n`sts.amazonaws.com.cn`; other regions default to `sts.amazonaws.com`. The caller\nworkflow must allow `id-token: write`, and the target role trust policy should\nrestrict GitHub OIDC claims to the expected organization, repository, workflow,\nand branch/ref. The S3 permissions should be scoped to the relay bucket/prefix\nused by the repository.\nUpload roles need write/delete access under the relay prefix; download roles\nneed read access plus delete access for successful cleanup.\n\nRelay mode is opt-in and does not affect forks or open-source users that do not\nconfigure S3. Missing bucket, region, upload role, or download role values fail\nbefore the heavy build matrix is scheduled. Buildchain treats S3 as a transport\ncache, not as the final release evidence store; the final audit entry remains\nthe GitHub artifact set plus the Buildchain build summary and release-candidate\npassport.\n\nSet `release-candidate: true` when the successful reusable build is meant to be\nthe artifact source promoted later. Buildchain then uploads\n`release-candidate-passport.json` under the\n`<artifact-name>-release-candidate-<publish-source-sha>` artifact name. Promotion\njobs can pass that passport to `promote-buildchain-ref` with\n`promote-only-release-candidate: \"true\"` so source, channel, platforms, and the\naggregate build-summary hash are checked before publish-gate side effects. The\npassport records the locked commit's Git tree SHA, so a post-merge channel HEAD\ncan be accepted only when it is tree-equivalent to the PR-stage build evidence.\n\n## Publish Gate\n\nBuildchain separates \"may build/verify\" from \"may publish.\" A same-repository\npull request may be trusted enough to run the build matrix, but it still must\nnot publish packages, S3 objects, release pages, or preview aliases. Publishing\nis allowed only when the caller explicitly requests a channel and the current\nevent/ref matches that channel.\n\nUse `publish-channel` to request a channel:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n build:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.build.yml@v2\n with:\n publish-channel: release\n\n publish:\n needs: build\n if: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-allowed == 'true' }}\n runs-on: ubuntu-24.04\n steps:\n - run: ./scripts/publish.sh\n```\n\nDefault channels are:\n\n| Channel | Allowed refs |\n| --------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| `none` | Never publishes; this is the default |\n| `alpha` | `alpha/vN/vN.M` branches or exact `vN.M.P-alpha.K` tags |\n| `release` | `release/vN/vN.M` branches or release tags such as `vN.M.P`, `vN.M`, `vN` |\n| `major` | `publish-gate/major`, legacy `major-gate`, or next-major release tags such as `vN.0.0`, `vN.0`, `vN` |\n\nPull request events always produce `publish-allowed=false`, even when the PR is\nfrom the same repository. Untrusted fork events also produce\n`publish-allowed=false`; with the default `untrusted-policy: fail`, the workflow\nthen fails before any build runner starts.\n\nProjects with their own channel names can pass `publish-refs-json`:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n publish-channel: nightly\n publish-refs-json: >-\n {\"nightly\":[\"^refs/heads/nightly/v\\\\d+$\"]}\n```\n\nThe aggregate build summary includes the same publish gate decision under\n`publishGate`, so a downloaded artifact summary explains both what was built and\nwhy it was or was not eligible to publish.\n\n## Publish Source Lock\n\n`publish-channel` answers \"may this event publish?\" Source lock answers \"which\nsource tree is the publish decision about?\" A caller can pass `publish-source-ref`\nto bind a publish run to a reviewed gate branch before any checkout happens:\n\n| Ref | Meaning |\n| ------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| `publish-gate/alpha/<line>/<consumer-version>` | Build and publish an alpha candidate for a consumer line |\n| `publish-gate/release/<line>/<consumer-version>` | Build and publish a production candidate for a consumer line |\n| `publish-gate/anchor` | Resolve an explicit anchor request; it does not publish artifacts by itself |\n| `publish-gate/major` | Gate the next major source state |\n| `major-gate` | Legacy compatibility alias for the major gate |\n\nFor alpha and release refs, `<line>` is intentionally allowed to contain `/`, so\nKungfu-style lines such as `v22/v22.22` stay readable. The final path segment is\nthe consumer-visible version, for example `22.22.3-kf.0`.\n\nThe reusable workflow resolves the branch tip to `publish-source-sha`, checks out\nthat SHA in every build job, and uses the same SHA in artifact names, manifests,\nand aggregate summaries. Reruns therefore rebuild the same source tree even if a\ngate branch moves later.\n\nBefore any heavy build matrix is scheduled, the workflow also verifies that the\ntarget channel ref implied by the source lock already points at\n`publish-source-sha` and that the target channel HEAD came from the required\nmerged same-repository channel PR. `publish-gate/alpha/<line>/<version>` must\nmatch `alpha/<line>` and have PR lineage `dev/<line> -> alpha/<line>`;\n`publish-gate/release/<line>/<version>` must match `release/<line>` and have PR\nlineage `alpha/<line> -> release/<line>`. If either check fails, the run fails\nfast with a diagnostic telling maintainers to merge the source commit through\nthe channel PR first. This keeps verify from spending runner time on a source\ntree that cannot legally enter the requested publish channel.\n\nThe resolved release manifest is uploaded as an artifact and emitted as\n`release-manifest-json`. It records:\n\n- source ref, source SHA, channel, line, and consumer version;\n- configured version strategy and configured version-state files;\n- each version file's value, with release gates failing closed if the configured\n files do not equal the consumer version;\n- anchor manifest summary for anchored/manual projects;\n- explicit anchor request JSON for `publish-gate/anchor`;\n- publish registry, dist-tag, and gate visibility metadata.\n\nPublish side-effect jobs should verify the lock immediately before publishing:\n\n```yaml\n- name: Verify publish gate did not move\n run: node .buildchain/runtime/scripts/verify-publish-source-lock.mjs\n env:\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_REF: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-ref }}\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_SHA: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n BUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}\n GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}\n```\n\nIf the branch tip no longer matches the manifest SHA, the publish job must fail\nclosed. Moving a gate branch creates a new publish decision and should produce a\nnew build run.\n\n## Release Candidate Promote-Only\n\nFor native package sets, the PR build is the only heavy build. When a PR targets\n`alpha/<line>` or `release/<line>`, `.build.yml` uploads a release-candidate\nbundle next to the platform artifacts. The bundle contains:\n\n- `release-candidate.passport.json`;\n- the aggregate `build-summary.json`;\n- copied platform manifest evidence for the built platforms.\n\nThe passport records two separate source identities:\n\n- `builtSourceSha` / `builtSourceTreeSha`: the PR-stage source that produced the\n artifacts, usually the PR merge ref;\n- `promotionChannelSha` / `promotionChannelTreeSha`: the post-merge channel\n commit used for publish authority.\n\nThe reusable promote wrapper resolves the merged PR, finds exactly one matching\nPR-stage release-candidate artifact, downloads it with the build summary and\npayload artifacts from the same PR-stage run, validates the payload count,\ncompares the built tree with the promotion channel tree, locks\n`publish-gate/{alpha,release,major}` to the promotion channel commit, and then\ncalls `actions/promote-buildchain-ref` with\n`promote-only-release-candidate: \"true\"` and\n`require-publish-source-lock: \"true\"`. The wrapper passes the created\n`publish-gate/*` ref, target SHA, and `locked=true` into the promote action, so\nfloating `@v2` consumers receive publish-side source-lock drift protection by\ndefault. It also defaults `branch-protection-bypass-apps` to `github-actions`\nso the workflow automation can apply generated version-state and channel\nbookkeeping on protected `dev`/`alpha`/`release` branches after the reviewed\nchannel PR has merged; consumers using a different promotion identity can pass\n`branch-protection-bypass-users`, `branch-protection-bypass-teams`, or a\ndifferent app slug declaratively. The wrapper uses\n`secrets.BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN || github.token` as the generated ref update\ntoken for protected bookkeeping PATCH calls, so a bypass-capable promotion token\ncan sync dev immediately after alpha/release publish without a post-publish PR.\nIt does not call `.build.yml`, does not create a matrix, and must fail before\npublish if the RC evidence, payload set, or source-lock ref is missing or\nambiguous.\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n promote:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/release-candidate-promote.yml@v2\n secrets:\n buildchain-issue-app-id: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_ISSUE_APP_ID }}\n buildchain-issue-app-private-key: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_ISSUE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}\n with:\n channel: alpha\n target-ref: alpha/v22/v22.22\n artifact-name: libnode\n # Defaults to build.yml / Build. Override only when the PR-stage build\n # workflow uses a different file or display name.\n release-candidate-workflow-file: build.yml\n release-candidate-workflow-name: Build\n package-manager: npm\n publish-target: npm\n runner-preset: github-hosted\n trusted-publishing: true\n github-release: true\n required-status-check: check / check\n required-artifact-count: 3\n publish-dist-tag: alpha\n publish-package-set-order: platforms-first-main-last\n publish-package-main: \"@kungfu-tech/libnode\"\n release-passport-product-name: Libnode\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n```\n\n`buildchain-issue-app-id` and `buildchain-issue-app-private-key` are optional\nbut recommended for cross-repository consumers. They should identify a GitHub\nApp installation with `issues: write` on `kungfu-systems/buildchain`; the\nwrapper mints the installation token before calling\n`actions/report-buildchain-issue`. Consumers can also pass a pre-minted\n`buildchain-issue-token`. If both are omitted, the wrapper falls back to\n`BUILDCHAIN_ISSUE_TOKEN`, `BUILDCHAIN_PROMOTION_TOKEN`, and then the consumer\nworkflow's `github.token`; the last fallback can only report issues when it has\nwrite access to the target Buildchain repository.\n\n`publish-required-artifacts-json` can still be passed explicitly for custom\npublish targets. For the default `publish-artifact-kind: npm` path, consumers do\nnot download artifacts or run repository scripts to build publish evidence. The\nwrapper downloads the PR-stage payload artifacts, finds the downloaded `.tgz`\npackages, reads each tarball's `package/package.json` for the real scoped\npackage name and version, computes the npm `sha512-...` integrity from the\ntarball bytes, marks the package matching `publish-package-main` as `role:\nmain`, marks the rest as `role: platform`, and passes the generated\n`publish-required-artifacts-json` to `promote-buildchain-ref` before any publish\nside effect. Downloaded platform manifests are still passed into the release\npassport unless `release-passport-platform-manifest-paths` is set explicitly.\nThe same Buildchain contract lock check runs before release-candidate\nresolution and before publish. A compatible `v2` drift leaves an issue in the\nconsumer repository but does not trigger a second heavy build; an incompatible\ndrift fails before publish side effects.\n\nThe wrapper publishes the public release tag as a GitHub Release by default.\nAfter `promote-buildchain-ref` reports a complete release transaction, the\nwrapper creates or updates the public release, marks semver prerelease tags\nsuch as `v1.2.3-alpha.0`, `v1.2.3-rc.1`, or `v22.22.3-kf.3-alpha.7` as\n`prerelease=true` and `make_latest=false`, marks stable semver tags as latest,\nand uploads the publish evidence file plus every file in the generated release\npassport directory, including `buildchain.release.json` and `check-report.json`.\nFor anchored/manual package releases, the public release tag is derived from the\npublished package version and the internal exact transaction tag remains\navailable in the release passport.\nConsumers do not need to hand-write `gh release` logic to trigger\n`release.published` propagation. Set `github-release: false` only for\nrepositories that intentionally do not maintain GitHub Releases.\nIf the transaction still needs protected-ref finalization, the wrapper defers\nGitHub Release creation until the later run that reaches `state=complete`.\n\nCustom publish jobs can also repeat the channel-ref preflight:\n\n```yaml\n- name: Verify publish channel ref still matches\n run: node .buildchain/runtime/scripts/verify-publish-channel-ref.mjs\n env:\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_REF: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-ref }}\n BUILDCHAIN_PUBLISH_SOURCE_SHA: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n BUILDCHAIN_SOURCE_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}\n GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}\n```\n\nAnchored/manual package release jobs should also make the Buildchain promotion\naction validate that publication is entering through the same\n`publish-gate/{alpha,release,major}` source-lock contract before any package\npublish side effect:\n\n```yaml\n- name: Promote release ref and publish npm package set\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/promote-buildchain-ref@v2\n with:\n sha: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n target-ref: release/v22/v22.22\n require-publish-source-lock: 'true'\n publish-source-ref: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-ref }}\n publish-source-sha: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-sha }}\n publish-source-locked: ${{ needs.build.outputs.publish-source-locked }}\n```\n\n`target-ref` stays the Buildchain channel promotion target, such as\n`alpha/v22/v22.22`, `release/v22/v22.22`, or `publish-gate/major`.\n`publish-source-ref` is the reviewed source-lock branch that authorized this\nspecific package publication. For alpha and release package publications, the\nsource-lock branch must point at the exact channel-line commit that promotion is\nvalidating; it is not a replacement for `target-ref`.\n\nThis keeps the version bump commit, publish authorization, and auditable publish\nentrypoint on the Buildchain source-lock protocol. The CLI form\n`buildchain publish-source validate-anchored-release --json` is still useful for\ncustom publish scripts, but the preferred GitHub Actions gate is the promotion\naction input above. A publish job that still runs directly from `alpha/*` or\n`release/*` channel branches fails this check because those refs are channel\nstate, not publish-gate decisions.\n\n## Package-Set Publish Plan\n\nProjects that publish multiple packages should treat package publication as a\npackage-set operation. Buildchain's package-set planner uses these rules:\n\n- platform packages publish first;\n- the main package publishes last;\n- the dist-tag move happens only after the full package set is present;\n- reruns accept already-published packages only when package name, version, and\n integrity match;\n- an existing package with different integrity is a hard failure.\n\nThis keeps a consumer from observing a floating dist-tag that points to a main\npackage before all platform artifacts for the same source SHA are available.\n\n## Command Sources\n\nThe workflow runs `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` lifecycle stages by default:\n\n```toml\n[lifecycle.install]\ncommand = \"corepack yarn install --immutable\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommands = [\n \"corepack yarn make\",\n \"corepack yarn build\",\n]\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"corepack yarn test\"\n```\n\nCallers can override any stage for one invocation:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n build-command: cmake --build build --config Release\n verify-command: ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure\n```\n\nThe reusable build workflow samples the build lifecycle by default and carries\nthe generated summary into the final verify diagnostics. Callers can override\nthe sidecar path or disable sampling:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n sample-process-tree: true\n process-summary-path: .buildchain/diagnostics/process-summary.json\n process-sample-interval-ms: 15000\n requested-parallelism: 20\n```\n\nWhen `sample-process-tree` is true, Buildchain wraps either `build-command` or\nthe configured `lifecycle.build` stage with `buildchain sample process-tree`.\nThe path is relative to the checked-out workspace and is read again during the\nfinal verify lifecycle. Custom workflows can still write their own sampler\nsummary and pass `process-summary-path`; Buildchain reads the file after the\nlifecycle command finishes, so it may be produced during the same invocation.\nWhen the build stage is optional, the reusable workflow treats the default\nsampler path as optional during verify; an explicitly supplied\n`process-summary-path` remains required.\n\nFor custom workflows, use the action directly:\n\n```yaml\n- uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/actions/run-lifecycle@v2\n with:\n stage: build\n required: \"true\"\n artifact-name: libnode-linux-x64-${{ github.sha }}\n artifact-paths: |\n dist\n build/stage\n```\n\n## Artifact Contract\n\nEach platform upload uses `artifact-name-template`. The default is:\n\n```text\n{artifact}-{platform}-{sha}\n```\n\nSupported placeholders are `{artifact}`, `{artifactName}`, `{platform}`,\n`{platformId}`, `{platformName}`, `{sha}`, `{shortSha}`, `{ref}`, `{runId}`,\nand `{runAttempt}`. Invalid GitHub artifact name characters are normalized to\n`-`, so `{ref}` remains deterministic even for refs such as\n`refs/heads/dev/v2/v2.0`.\n\nEach platform also writes and uploads:\n\n```text\n.buildchain/artifacts/<platform-id>/manifest.json\n.buildchain/artifacts/<platform-id>/summary.json\n```\n\nThe manifest schema is:\n\n```json\n{\n \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-artifact\",\n \"artifactName\": \"libnode-linux-x64-<sha>\",\n \"platform\": {\n \"id\": \"linux-x64\",\n \"name\": \"Linux x64\",\n \"os\": \"Linux\",\n \"arch\": \"X64\"\n },\n \"git\": {\n \"repository\": \"kungfu-systems/libnode\",\n \"sha\": \"<sha>\",\n \"ref\": \"<ref>\",\n \"runId\": \"<run id>\",\n \"runAttempt\": \"<attempt>\"\n },\n \"lifecycle\": {\n \"stage\": \"verify\",\n \"commandSource\": \"buildchain.toml\",\n \"executed\": true\n },\n \"summary\": {\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-artifact-summary\",\n \"artifactName\": \"libnode-linux-x64-<sha>\",\n \"fileCount\": 1,\n \"totalBytes\": 1234,\n \"digest\": \"<hex>\"\n },\n \"expectedArtifacts\": {\n \"ok\": true,\n \"source\": \"expected-artifacts-json\",\n \"checks\": []\n },\n \"files\": [\n {\n \"path\": \"dist/example.zip\",\n \"size\": 1234,\n \"sha256\": \"<hex>\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\nArtifact names do not include actor names, timestamps, or retry counters. Reruns\nproduce a new GitHub Actions run but keep the same source SHA/platform contract.\n\n`expected-artifacts-json` fails the build before upload when the artifact does\nnot match the caller's declared contract. Supported checks are:\n\n| Field | Meaning |\n| --------------- | ------------------------------------ |\n| `minFiles` | Minimum number of manifest files |\n| `maxFiles` | Maximum number of manifest files |\n| `minTotalBytes` | Minimum total byte count |\n| `requiredPaths` | Exact manifest paths that must exist |\n\n## Trusted Event Gate\n\nThe workflow has an explicit `trust-gate` job. By default, pull requests from\nforks fail before any build job can reach self-hosted runners, secrets,\npublishing credentials, or heavyweight build commands. Same-repository PRs,\nworkflow dispatches, and protected branch events can proceed.\n\nIf a repository wants fork PRs to skip rather than fail, it can set:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n untrusted-policy: skip\n```\n\nDo not set `require-trusted-event: false` for workflows that use self-hosted\nrunners or secrets.\n\n`require-trusted-event` controls access to build runners. It does not override\nthe publish gate: pull requests remain non-publishing events.\n\n## Fixture\n\n`fixtures/libnode-shaped` is the contract fixture. It has:\n\n- `package.json` version state;\n- `.buildchain/buildchain.toml` with `install`, `build`, `verify`, and `publish`;\n- cross-platform Node scripts that create small `dist/` outputs;\n- `Build Surface Fixture` workflow coverage.\n\nThe fixture proves the reusable surface without running the real libnode native\nbuild."
1513
1518
  },
1514
1519
  {
1515
1520
  "id": "manual:runtime-train-validation",
@@ -1710,7 +1715,7 @@
1710
1715
  ],
1711
1716
  "maturity": "stable",
1712
1717
  "sourcePath": "docs/web-surface-deployments.md",
1713
- "digest": "sha256:4c88b27af8aeb3f72fc8b979529b68d5fbc910dce70fe4219192c09aeb404e5c",
1718
+ "digest": "sha256:f1e92ba87417dc9aac4f8cf080565f7f2c114b5007bb68b90f33692c73fdad88",
1714
1719
  "headings": [
1715
1720
  {
1716
1721
  "level": 1,
@@ -1813,7 +1818,7 @@
1813
1818
  "anchor": "boundaries"
1814
1819
  }
1815
1820
  ],
1816
- "markdown": "# Web-Surface Deployment Contract\n\nBuildchain supports `project.type = \"web-surface\"` for repositories that publish\nsites, docs, product pages, operator consoles, or browser apps. These projects\nneed auditable deployment semantics, but they are not package release lines and\nshould not be forced into `dev/alpha/release` version-state automation.\n\nThe release object for a web surface is:\n\n```text\nsource commit + build artifact + deploy target + channel + deployment manifest\n```\n\nThis keeps the evidence chain clear:\n\n- the source SHA explains what code was built;\n- the artifact hash explains exactly what was deployed;\n- the channel explains who can see it and whether it is promotable;\n- the deploy target and adapter explain where it would be published;\n- the deployment manifest records retention, rollback, security, and secret\n reference metadata.\n\n## Configuration\n\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is the source of truth. Web-surface projects must declare\npreview, staging, and production channels plus a deploy adapter for each.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nrequires_auth = false\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[deploy.preview]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"kungfu-tech-preview\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-PREVIEW\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n# Optional. Defaults to \"buildchain\".\n# Use \"external\" when an existing viewer-request CloudFront Function already\n# owns preview alias, surface-prefix, and directory-index routing.\ndirectory_index_rewrite = \"buildchain\"\n# Optional. Defaults to HTTP for public channels and S3 object evidence for\n# managed-network channels. Use \"s3-object\" when CI should verify uploaded\n# objects and manifests instead of waiting for public edge convergence.\nhealth_strategy = \"http\"\n```\n\n### Multi-Surface Host Mapping\n\nSome site repositories publish more than one first-class web surface from the\nsame artifact. For example, `site-libkungfu-dev` has a hub plus separate\nhostnames for core, Buildchain, and Kung Fu Decisions. These are not just\nnavigation paths; staging, production preflight, and post-deploy health checks\nmust verify host-level behavior for each surface.\n\nDeclare named surfaces with per-channel URLs:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.buildchain]\npath = \"/buildchain/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://buildchain.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://buildchain.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://buildchain-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.kfd]\npath = \"/kfd/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://kfd.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://kfd.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://kfd-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n```\n\nBuildchain resolves every `(channel, surface)` pair. A preview alias such as\n`pr-12` becomes:\n\n```text\nhub: https://pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\ncore: https://core-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nbuildchain: https://buildchain-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nkfd: https://kfd-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\n```\n\nWhen `surfaces` is omitted, Buildchain preserves the legacy single-surface\ncontract by creating an implicit `default` surface from the channel URL. When a\nsurface is intentionally path-only, declare it explicitly:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.docs]\npath = \"/docs/\"\npath_only = true\n```\n\n`path_only = true` is an exception, not the default. Without it, every named\nsurface must declare `preview_url_pattern`, `staging_url`, and\n`production_url`. This makes staging/production mismatches fail during\nvalidation instead of becoming invisible deploy drift.\n\nAdapter strategy remains explicit. The default `aws-s3-cloudfront` plan uses the\nchannel deploy target for every surface, and each binding records its own\nbucket, distribution id, object prefix, manifest key, source path, and URL. A\nchannel can override target details per surface:\n\n```toml\n[deploy.staging.surfaces.core]\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-core-staging\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-CORE-STAGING\"\norigin_path = \"/core\"\n```\n\nBuildchain validates these hard constraints:\n\n- `channels.preview.url_pattern` is required and must contain the alias shape\n used by preview deployments.\n- `channels.staging.access_control` must protect staging. Supported modes are\n `managed-network`, `edge-basic-auth`, `oidc`, and `app-auth`.\n- `channels.staging.edge_auth` records whether the edge layer owns auth. Use\n `edge_auth = \"none\"` when staging is protected by managed network controls\n such as WAF/IP allowlists or VPN access.\n- `channels.staging.noindex = true` is required.\n- `channels.production.url` is required.\n- deploy adapters must be declared per channel.\n- named surfaces must declare first-class URLs for every channel unless\n `path_only = true` is explicitly set.\n- secret material must be declared as reference names, such as\n `secret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]`; inline secret-like deploy keys are rejected.\n\n### Floating Runtime Contract Lock\n\nWeb-surface repositories can consume the stable Buildchain workflow shell with a\nfloating ref, such as:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n web:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n buildchain-contract-compatibility-policy: major-compatible\n buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n build-command: pnpm build\n artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe caller repository commits `.buildchain/contract-lock.json` after reviewing an\naccepted Buildchain runtime SHA and contract digest. The reusable workflow then\nresolves the floating runtime to an immutable SHA, checks the lock before the\ncaller build command, and applies these rules:\n\n- unchanged lock: continue without feedback;\n- compatible drift: continue, write the drift summary, and open or update a\n caller-repository issue when permissions allow;\n- breaking drift: fail closed before rendering, deployment planning, deploy\n apply, or release publication.\n\nThe caller no longer needs to run `scripts/buildchain-contract-lock.mjs` inside\nits own build command. That check belongs to Buildchain because the actual\ncontract world is stored in the Buildchain runtime ref being used.\n\nSupported adapter names are:\n\n| Adapter | Initial use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `aws-s3-cloudfront` | Static site artifact sync plus CDN invalidation plan |\n| `aws-elastic-beanstalk` | Future dynamic app environment adapter |\n| `aws-ecs-service` | Future dynamic service adapter |\n\nThe channel ontology is independent of the adapter. A future dynamic staging\nenvironment still remains `channel = \"staging\"` with protected/noindex/security\nrequirements.\n\n## Preview Aliases\n\nPreview uses subdomains, not path prefixes:\n\n```text\nhttps://pr-123.preview.kungfu.tech\nhttps://sha-abcdef123456.preview.kungfu.tech\n```\n\nAlias semantics are explicit:\n\n| Alias | Meaning | Mutable | Retention |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `pr-123` | Current preview for a pull request | yes | short-lived |\n| `sha-abcdef123456` | Immutable preview for one source SHA | no | longer-lived |\n\nThis allows PR comments to stay stable while preserving immutable evidence for a\nspecific source commit.\n\n## Deployment Manifest\n\nBuildchain emits a manifest with the deployment facts that matter for audit and\nrollback:\n\n```json\n{\n \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-deployment\",\n \"site\": \"libkungfu-dev\",\n \"channel\": \"preview\",\n \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n \"generatedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"publishedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"reproducible\": true,\n \"timestampPolicy\": \"ci-injected\",\n \"deterministicInputs\": [\n \"web-surface artifact content\",\n \"buildchain.toml web-surface channels/deploy/surfaces\",\n \"sourceSha\",\n \"artifactHash\",\n \"deployment channel\",\n \"deployment alias\"\n ],\n \"sourceRevision\": \"...\",\n \"timestampPolicyDetails\": {\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-surface-timestamp-policy\",\n \"timestampFields\": [\"generatedAt\", \"publishedAt\", \"deployedAt\"],\n \"timestampFieldsParticipateInArtifactDigest\": false,\n \"artifactDigestScope\": \"web-surface artifactHash excludes deployment manifest timestamps\"\n },\n \"sourceSha\": \"...\",\n \"artifactHash\": \"...\",\n \"deployTarget\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n \"adapter\": \"aws-s3-cloudfront\",\n \"deployedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"retentionClass\": \"preview-sha-immutable\",\n \"expiresAt\": \"2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"accessControl\": \"none\",\n \"edgeAuth\": \"none\",\n \"noindex\": true,\n \"secretRefs\": [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"],\n \"surfaceBindings\": [\n {\n \"surface\": \"hub\",\n \"channel\": \"preview\",\n \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n \"sourcePath\": \"/\",\n \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n \"directoryIndexResolution\": true,\n \"canonicalUrl\": \"https://libkungfu.dev\",\n \"bucket\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n \"distributionId\": \"E-PREVIEW\",\n \"originPath\": \"\",\n \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"manifestKey\": \".buildchain/deployments/sha-abcdef123456/hub.json\",\n \"routing\": {\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\",\n \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n \"directoryIndexResolution\": true\n },\n \"smokeUrls\": [\n {\n \"kind\": \"root\",\n \"requestPath\": \"/\",\n \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev/\",\n \"required\": true\n }\n ],\n \"noindex\": true,\n \"accessControl\": \"none\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\nDynamic adapters can also fill `runtimeId`, `configFingerprint`,\n`healthCheck`, `migrationState`, `rollbackPointer`, and\n`rollbackLimitations`. Buildchain records secret reference names only, never\nsecret values.\n\nThe timestamp policy is shared with package site bundles. Public deployment\nmanifests should expose real workflow generation/publication times while\nseparately declaring why the deployed artifact remains reproducible. For\nweb-surface deployment manifests, `artifactHash` is the static site artifact\ndigest and does not include deployment timestamp fields; the manifest itself\nstill records those fields for human and agent audit.\n\n## Deploy Plans\n\nDeploy planning is the default behavior. It plans the adapter steps and writes\nmanifest JSON, but it does not touch AWS, DNS, CloudFront, or deployment\ncredentials.\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode deploy-plan \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --alias sha-aaaaaaaaaaaa\n```\n\nFor manifest-only output:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode manifest \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --alias pr-123 \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-manifest.json\n```\n\nThe CLI emits GitHub outputs when `GITHUB_OUTPUT` is present:\n\n- `web-surface-channel`\n- `web-surface-alias`\n- `web-surface-url`\n- `web-surface-urls-json`\n- `web-surface-artifact-hash`\n- `web-surface-manifest-json`\n\n## Explicit Apply\n\n`deploy-apply` and `cleanup-apply` are explicit execution modes for the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` static-site adapter. They still default to `--dry-run true`;\nlive AWS mutation requires `--dry-run false`.\n\nDeploy apply syncs the artifact, writes the deployment manifest, and invalidates\nCloudFront when a distribution id is configured:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode deploy-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --channel staging \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --artifact-path dist \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\n### Immutable publication paths\n\nWhen a surface artifact contains `manifest.json` with\n`archivePolicy.contract = \"kungfu-buildchain-publication-archive-policy\"`,\nBuildchain treats every declared `publications[].versions[].immutablePath` as\nan append-only publication boundary. This applies identically to preview,\nstaging, and production adapters.\n\nThe adapter derives the protected archive root from those declared version\npaths and applies four ordered safeguards:\n\n1. every local immutable file is checked against an existing S3 object;\n2. missing files are uploaded with `aws s3 sync --no-overwrite` and a SHA-256\n checksum;\n3. every immutable file is checked again after upload, closing the race between\n the first check and the no-overwrite transfer;\n4. mutable site content keeps normal `sync --delete` behavior, but every parent\n or owning surface sync excludes the protected archive root from deletion.\n\nAn existing object with a different SHA-256 digest fails apply before mutable\ncontent is changed. Older objects without a stored S3 SHA-256 checksum are read\nand byte-hashed for compatibility. Directory-index alias writes are skipped\nunder protected roots so they cannot overwrite immutable route objects; viewer\nrequest rewriting remains the directory-index authority.\n\nThe deploy plan and manifest record `immutablePublication`,\n`mutableDeleteExcludes`, and the parent-surface coverage. Apply output records\n`immutablePreservation` plus every pre-check, no-overwrite sync, post-check, and\nmutable sync operation. Health output adds an `__immutable__` check proving that\nthe owning and parent surface syncs carried their required delete exclusions.\nThe runner must provide an AWS CLI version whose `s3 sync` supports\n`--no-overwrite`.\n\nFor multi-surface sites, each surface host is treated as a root-relative view\nof that surface's artifact path prefix. For example, a `buildchain` surface with\n`path = \"/buildchain/\"` and preview URL\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev` syncs the artifact subtree\n`dist/buildchain/` to the preview object prefix `pr-29/buildchain`. A viewer\nrequest for `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` therefore\nresolves against the artifact's `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html`, not\n`dist/docs/index.html` and not the hub surface root. The deployment manifest\nrecords this as `routing.contract =\n\"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\"` with\n`viewerPathPrefix = \"/\"`, `artifactPathPrefix = \"buildchain\"`, and\n`directoryIndexResolution = true`.\n\nWhen a surface uses an S3 object prefix, directory-index routing must be handled\nat the viewer-request layer. By default, `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"buildchain\"` makes Buildchain install or update one CloudFront Function per\ndistribution before uploading payloads. The function rewrites any request path\nending in `/` to the corresponding `index.html`, so\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/index.html` and\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/docs/index.html`. This keeps multi-host preview roots\ncompatible with S3 REST origins, where copying alias objects such as\n`pr-29/buildchain` or `pr-29/buildchain/` is not a reliable substitute for an\nedge rewrite.\n\nIf the distribution already has a viewer-request function that owns preview\nalias routing and surface-prefix routing, set `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"external\"` on the deploy channel or surface override. In that mode Buildchain\ndoes not create, update, or attach a generic directory-index function. Instead,\nthe deployment manifest records `directoryIndexRewrite = \"external\"` and\n`directoryIndexStrategy = \"external-viewer-request-function\"`, then the normal\nhealth check still verifies every required root and nested surface URL. This is\nthe correct contract for shared preview distributions such as\n`site-libkungfu-dev`, where a generic function cannot replace the existing\nprefix router.\n\nBuildchain still writes directory-index alias objects during apply as\ncompatibility evidence, but root correctness comes from the viewer-request\nrewrite contract, not from extensionless S3 keys. If Buildchain-managed mode\nfinds a distribution with a different viewer-request function, apply fails\nclosed and records that conflict in the apply result instead of silently serving\n403s. The reusable workflow uploads `buildchain-web-surface-*-diagnostics`\nartifacts containing the apply and health JSON so the failing AWS operation or\nHTTP check is visible from the consumer run.\n\nIt can also execute a previously saved deploy plan. In that mode Buildchain\nrecomputes the local artifact hash before running AWS commands and fails closed\nif the artifact no longer matches the saved plan:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode deploy-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --plan .buildchain/web-surface-staging-plan.json \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply deletes preview content, deletes the preview manifest, and\ninvalidates CloudFront:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode cleanup-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --event pull-request-closed \\\n --pull-number 123 \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply can also execute a saved cleanup plan:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode cleanup-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --plan .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-plan.json \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nApply output records the channel, alias, source SHA, artifact hash, target\nbucket, object prefix, manifest key, all surface URLs, all surface bindings, CDN\ninvalidation paths, actor/run metadata, immutable preservation evidence, and\nevery adapter operation with\n`executed`, `exitCode`, `stdout`, and `stderr`. If an operation fails,\nBuildchain records the failed operation, stops subsequent adapter operations,\nand exits non-zero after writing the result JSON. Buildchain records secret\nreference names only; the runner must provide the AWS CLI and credentials\noutside Buildchain, typically through OIDC and the declared `secret_refs`.\n\n## Production Preflight And Health\n\nProduction promotion is not just `deploy-apply --channel production`. Before a\nlive production apply, the reusable workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode production-preflight \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --plan .buildchain/web-surface-production-plan.json \\\n --execute true \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-preflight.json\n```\n\nThe production preflight checks that:\n\n- `channels.production` is canonical and indexable;\n- every surface has concrete production bucket and CloudFront targets;\n- every production surface URL is HTTPS;\n- the production AWS role can inspect the declared bucket and distribution;\n- CloudFront aliases cover every surface host, including product hosts such as\n `kfd.libkungfu.dev`;\n- DNS resolves for every surface host.\n\nAfter preview, staging, and production apply, the workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode health-check \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --result .buildchain/web-surface-production-apply.json \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-health.json\n```\n\nWhen the apply result includes CloudFront invalidations from the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` adapter, health check waits for those invalidations to reach\n`Completed` before fetching public smoke URLs. This avoids reporting stale\nCloudFront 403 responses as deployment failures immediately after a successful\nS3 sync and invalidation request.\n\nAfter the invalidation wait, HTTP smoke checks also retry transient 403, 404, and\n5xx responses before recording failure. This keeps the public health signal\nstrict while absorbing short CloudFront edge propagation windows that can remain\nvisible after the invalidation waiter returns. By default, Buildchain attempts\neach HTTP smoke URL 12 times with a 10 second interval. Consumers can override\nthat window with `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_ATTEMPTS` and\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_INTERVAL_MS` when they need a\nsite-specific health policy.\n\nThe health check fetches every surface root URL and any nested smoke URLs\nrecorded in each surface binding. Nested smoke URLs are derived from nested HTML\nartifact files under the surface path prefix, with directory index resolution\nsuch as `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html` becoming `/docs/` on the buildchain\npreview host. If a surface has no nested HTML route, Buildchain records only\nthe root smoke URL; absence of nested HTML is not a deployment failure. When a\nnested route is present, the check fails closed if a deploy reports success but\nthat child page returns 403 or another unexpected status. Surface root checks\nexpect the apply result to have installed the directory-index rewrite, so a\nmulti-host preview root such as `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/`\nmust resolve to the surface `index.html`, not the bare prefix directory.\nProduction additionally fails if a response is unreachable, returns an\nunexpected status, or still sends `x-robots-tag: noindex`. The health check also\nverifies that each surface binding recorded a deployment manifest pointer. The\nproduction release passport embeds the deploy plan, apply result, production\npreflight, and health check so a reviewer or agent can audit why the production\nsite changed and whether every declared host and every existing nested route was\nactually covered.\n\nPublic channels can opt into object-level health with\n`deploy.<channel>.health_strategy = \"s3-object\"` when the deployment contract is\nalready covered by S3 manifest/object writes and public edge convergence is not\nthe right CI gate. This is useful for preview distributions whose viewer-request\nrouting is owned by an external CloudFront Function. The channel remains public;\nonly the CI health evidence changes from HTTP fetches to S3 `head-object`\nchecks.\n\nChannels declared with `access_control = \"managed-network\"` use a different\nhealth strategy by default. Buildchain does not require a GitHub-hosted runner\nto fetch a URL that is intentionally reachable only from an approved network.\nInstead, after a live apply the health check uses the deploy role to run S3\n`head-object` checks for each surface manifest and the smoke target object, such\nas the surface `index.html` or a nested `docs/index.html`. The check records\n`healthStrategy = \"s3-object\"` and skips the public HTTP fetch. Dry-run and\nplan-only checks fall back to deployment evidence: each surface must have a\nmanifest key, bucket, object prefix, `sync-static-artifact`, and\n`write-deployment-manifest` evidence, recorded as\n`healthStrategy = \"deployment-evidence\"`. If the workflow is running on a runner\nthat is allowed to reach the managed network, set\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_ALLOWED_RUNNER=true` or pass\n`--allowed-managed-network-runner true` to keep the normal HTTP smoke checks.\nSet `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_S3_OBJECTS=false` or pass\n`--managed-network-s3-object-verification false` only when an external channel\npolicy owns managed-network object verification.\n\n## Cleanup Plans\n\nPreview cleanup is an auditable cleanup contract. It can run as a dry-run plan,\nan apply-mode plan, or the explicit `cleanup-apply` executor with preview-only\ncredentials:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode cleanup-plan \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --event pull-request-closed \\\n --pull-number 123 \\\n --aliases pr-123,sha-abcdef123456\n```\n\nThe plan and apply result keep mutable PR aliases and immutable SHA aliases\ndistinct so a caller can expire them with different retention windows. Closed-PR\ncleanup can derive `pr-N` from `--pull-number`, records the event, source SHA,\nactor, run id, preview bucket/prefix, manifest key, and adapter steps, and is an\nauditable no-op when no aliases are requested.\n\n## Reusable Workflow Shape\n\nBuildchain ships `.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml` for repositories that want\nthe standard PR review and promotion flow without copying bespoke glue:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n build-command: npm run build\n verify-command: npm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe reusable workflow maps GitHub events to Buildchain web-surface semantics:\n\n| Event | Buildchain behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `pull_request` opened / synchronized / reopened | validate, build, verify, and plan `preview` for `pr-N` |\n| `pull_request` closed | plan apply-mode cleanup for the `pr-N` preview alias and manifest |\n| `push` to `main` | validate, build, verify, plan and apply `staging` from the merged `main` SHA, then optionally open a production release PR |\n| `push` to `main` from a matching release PR merge | validate the associated release PR, plan `production`, and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n| `workflow_dispatch` with `production-approved = true` | plan `production` and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n\nThe optional `buildchain-ref` input is empty by default. Empty keeps the\nweb-surface run on the stable Buildchain runtime selected by the reusable\nworkflow ref, normally `@v2`. A trusted maintainer can expose a\n`workflow_dispatch` input and pass it through for one-off train validation.\nSee [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) for the shared\ntrain protocol and notification template:\n\n```yaml\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n buildchain-ref:\n description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref for trusted manual validation\"\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n build-command: pnpm run build\n verify-command: pnpm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nOnly trusted `workflow_dispatch` runs by repository actors with write,\nmaintain, or admin permission may use a non-empty runtime override. Train refs\nsuch as `train/v2/v2.3/site-source-of-truth` are temporary validation refs, not\nstable production dependencies or pending merge targets. They may remain for a\nretention window after release as a fast-use and rollback channel, with old\ntrains handled by periodic Buildchain cleanup. The web-surface deployment\nmanifest records the resolved runtime SHA as `runtimeId` and the stable\nrollback ref as `rollbackPointer`.\n\nThe workflow deliberately plans and emits manifests by default. Live mutation is\nopt-in per channel:\n\n```yaml\npermissions:\n contents: read\n id-token: write\n pull-requests: write\n\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n build-command: pnpm run build\n verify-command: pnpm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n preview-apply: true\n preview-cleanup-apply: true\n preview-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-preview-github-actions\n staging-apply: true\n staging-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-staging-github-actions\n production-apply: false\n production-release-on-main: false\n production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n production-environment: production\n release-feedback-actor-privacy: public\n```\n\nWhen enabled, Buildchain owns the full release apply state machine:\n\n- PR preview deploys run `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n and update a single idempotent PR comment.\n- Closed PR cleanup runs `cleanup-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n only.\n- Pushes to `main` run staging `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the staging\n role, then write a staging release feedback passport artifact and comment the\n associated merged PR with the staging URL, source SHA, artifact identity, run\n URL, and failure context when apply did not complete.\n- When `production-release-on-main=true`, successful staging applies open or\n update a Buildchain-owned release PR from\n `release/<channel>-<short-sha>` to `main`, unless the current push already\n came from a matching release PR merge. The release PR contains one empty\n release-intent commit, carries `production-release-label`, and includes the\n staging URLs, source SHA, artifact hash, and staging release-passport artifact\n link in the PR body.\n- Production release PR handoff is permission-aware. Staging apply and staging\n health remain successful even when the repository or organization has\n GitHub Actions workflow permissions set to read-only. In that case Buildchain\n records `release-pr-status=permission-denied`, uploads the release PR handoff\n summary/body plus staging release passport artifacts, and writes an exact\n manual `gh pr create` command to the step summary. Set\n `fail-on-release-pr-error=true` only when PR creation failure should fail the\n whole workflow.\n- Release pull requests that match the configured production gate get a\n Buildchain review comment with the staging URL and production target, so the\n operator can verify staging from the PR page and use merge as the approval\n action. Consumers do not need to hand-write `gh pr create` or production\n release-intent glue.\n- Production runs when `production-apply` is true and either:\n - a trusted `workflow_dispatch` passes `production-approved=true`; or\n - `production-release-on-main=true` and the `main` push commit is associated\n with exactly one same-repository, merged release pull request matching\n `production-release-label` and `production-release-head-prefix`.\n The production job is then gated by the configured GitHub Environment.\n- Production apply writes a production release feedback passport artifact and\n comments the release PR with the production URL, source SHA, artifact\n identity, run URL, rollback pointer, and failure context when apply did not\n complete.\n\nThe feedback passport records the release responsibility chain:\n\n- human decision actor;\n- trigger actor;\n- runner/execution actor;\n- OIDC/deploy identity reference;\n- decision type and time;\n- source event, PR number, merge commit, and required gate label/head-prefix.\n\n`release-feedback-actor-privacy` controls actor values in the passport and\ncomments. `public` records GitHub actor names, `redacted` records only the actor\nrole, and `private-ref` records a stable private reference hash without exposing\nthe actor name.\n\nFor release-PR publishing, callers opt in explicitly:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n build-command: npm run build\n verify-command: npm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n production-apply: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref_name == 'main' }}\n production-release-on-main: true\n production-release-label: buildchain-release\n production-release-head-prefix: release/\n production-release-branch-channel: production\n production-release-pr-mode: auto\n production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n production-environment: production\n```\n\n`production-release-pr-mode` controls the post-staging handoff:\n\n| Mode | Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `auto` | Generate release PR facts, create/update the empty release-intent branch and PR, and label it when token permissions allow. This is the default. |\n| `summary-only` | Generate and upload release PR facts, body, passport evidence, and manual command, but do not call the GitHub PR API. |\n| `disabled` | Record a disabled handoff and skip release PR API calls. |\n\nAutomatic release PR creation normally uses the workflow `github.token`.\nConsumers that cannot enable \"GitHub Actions can create and approve pull\nrequests\" globally should prefer the first-class GitHub App path. Pass the App\nclient id as an input and the private key as a reusable workflow secret; Buildchain\ncreates an installation token inside the release PR job and uses it only for the\nrelease-intent branch, PR, and label operations:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n production-release-app-client-id: ${{ vars.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_CLIENT_ID }}\nsecrets:\n production-release-app-private-key: ${{ secrets.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}\n```\n\nWhen either side of the App configuration is missing, Buildchain does not hide\nthat behind the fallback `github.token`. The handoff JSON and job summary report\n`status: \"app-token-unavailable\"` with an `appTokenStatus` such as\n`missing-client-id`, `missing-private-key`, or `create-failed`, and still include\nthe manual PR creation command. If the repository intentionally uses another\nnarrow token, pass it through `production-release-pr-token`.\n\n`production-release-app-id` remains accepted as a deprecated alias for the input\nname, but the value should be the GitHub App client id. GitHub App numeric App\nIDs and client IDs are distinct, and Buildchain passes the value to\n`actions/create-github-app-token` through its non-deprecated `client-id` input so\nnew runs do not emit the deprecated `app-id` warning.\n\nIf a repository already generates its own narrow token or PAT, it can still pass\nthat through `production-release-pr-token`:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n production-release-pr-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_PR_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nToken priority is: generated GitHub App installation token,\n`production-release-pr-token`, then `github.token`.\n\nThe merge button becomes the production approval only for a PR that carries the\nrelease label and comes from the configured source-branch prefix. Ordinary pull\nrequests merged into `main` deploy staging and open a release-intent PR; merging\nthat release PR triggers production. A release PR merge push does not open\nanother release PR.\n\nApply-only inputs are validated before the caller build or verification command\nruns. If the current event would run preview, staging, or production apply,\nmissing role inputs or a production apply without `production-approved=true`\non manual dispatch fail immediately instead of spending the build and plan jobs\nfirst.\n\nCallers must grant `id-token: write` for OIDC role assumption. Preview comments\nneed `pull-requests: write`. Automatic release PR creation also needs\n`contents: write`, `pull-requests: write`, and `issues: write` so Buildchain can\ncreate the release branch, write the empty release-intent commit, open or update\nthe PR, and apply the release label. If these permissions are unavailable,\nBuildchain degrades the release handoff instead of marking a successful staging\ndeployment as failed, unless `fail-on-release-pr-error=true`. The AWS roles remain caller-owned and\nshould be scoped by channel: preview can mutate only preview resources, staging\ncan mutate only staging resources, and production can mutate only production\nresources.\n\nApply mode fails closed when the deploy config still contains placeholder AWS\ntargets such as `pending-preview-distribution`. Planning can use placeholders\nfor dry-run-only design work, but live apply requires concrete bucket and\nCloudFront distribution identifiers.\n\n## Site Repository Shape\n\nA site repository can start with:\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"pnpm run build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"pnpm run check\"\n```\n\nThen add the channel, deploy, retention, and security declarations shown above.\nThe project may use pnpm, npm, yarn, Vite, Astro, Next static export, Sphinx,\nMkDocs, CMake-generated docs, or another lifecycle command source. Buildchain\nonly needs a deterministic artifact path and the manifest facts.\n\n## Boundaries\n\nBuildchain only performs live AWS mutations in explicit apply modes with\n`--dry-run false`. Production deploys must still be gated by a human-controlled\nworkflow, release, or GitHub Environment. DNS changes, staging auth\nimplementation, CloudFront distribution creation, and credential provisioning\nremain explicitly authorized infrastructure operations outside the web-surface\nartifact apply contract."
1821
+ "markdown": "# Web-Surface Deployment Contract\n\nBuildchain supports `project.type = \"web-surface\"` for repositories that publish\nsites, docs, product pages, operator consoles, or browser apps. These projects\nneed auditable deployment semantics, but they are not package release lines and\nshould not be forced into `dev/alpha/release` version-state automation.\n\nThe release object for a web surface is:\n\n```text\nsource commit + build artifact + deploy target + channel + deployment manifest\n```\n\nThis keeps the evidence chain clear:\n\n- the source SHA explains what code was built;\n- the artifact hash explains exactly what was deployed;\n- the channel explains who can see it and whether it is promotable;\n- the deploy target and adapter explain where it would be published;\n- the deployment manifest records retention, rollback, security, and secret\n reference metadata.\n\n## Configuration\n\n`.buildchain/buildchain.toml` is the source of truth. Web-surface projects must declare\npreview, staging, and production channels plus a deploy adapter for each.\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[channels.preview]\nurl_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"ephemeral\"\nrequires_auth = false\nnoindex = true\n\n[channels.staging]\nurl = \"https://staging.kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"protected\"\naccess_control = \"managed-network\"\nedge_auth = \"none\"\nnoindex = true\npromotable = true\n\n[channels.production]\nurl = \"https://kungfu.tech\"\nvisibility = \"public\"\ncanonical = true\nnoindex = false\n\n[deploy.preview]\nadapter = \"aws-s3-cloudfront\"\nbucket = \"kungfu-tech-preview\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-PREVIEW\"\nartifact_path = \"dist\"\nsecret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]\n# Optional. Defaults to \"buildchain\".\n# Use \"external\" when an existing viewer-request CloudFront Function already\n# owns preview alias, surface-prefix, and directory-index routing.\ndirectory_index_rewrite = \"buildchain\"\n# Optional. Defaults to HTTP for public channels and S3 object evidence for\n# managed-network channels. Use \"s3-object\" when CI should verify uploaded\n# objects and manifests instead of waiting for public edge convergence.\nhealth_strategy = \"http\"\n```\n\n### Multi-Surface Host Mapping\n\nSome site repositories publish more than one first-class web surface from the\nsame artifact. For example, `site-libkungfu-dev` has a hub plus separate\nhostnames for core, Buildchain, and Kung Fu Decisions. These are not just\nnavigation paths; staging, production preflight, and post-deploy health checks\nmust verify host-level behavior for each surface.\n\nDeclare named surfaces with per-channel URLs:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.hub]\npath = \"/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.core]\npath = \"/core/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://core.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://core.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://core-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.buildchain]\npath = \"/buildchain/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://buildchain.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://buildchain.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://buildchain-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n\n[surfaces.kfd]\npath = \"/kfd/\"\nproduction_url = \"https://kfd.libkungfu.dev\"\nstaging_url = \"https://kfd.staging.libkungfu.dev\"\npreview_url_pattern = \"https://kfd-{alias}.preview.libkungfu.dev\"\n```\n\nBuildchain resolves every `(channel, surface)` pair. A preview alias such as\n`pr-12` becomes:\n\n```text\nhub: https://pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\ncore: https://core-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nbuildchain: https://buildchain-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\nkfd: https://kfd-pr-12.preview.libkungfu.dev\n```\n\nWhen `surfaces` is omitted, Buildchain preserves the legacy single-surface\ncontract by creating an implicit `default` surface from the channel URL. When a\nsurface is intentionally path-only, declare it explicitly:\n\n```toml\n[surfaces.docs]\npath = \"/docs/\"\npath_only = true\n```\n\n`path_only = true` is an exception, not the default. Without it, every named\nsurface must declare `preview_url_pattern`, `staging_url`, and\n`production_url`. This makes staging/production mismatches fail during\nvalidation instead of becoming invisible deploy drift.\n\nAdapter strategy remains explicit. The default `aws-s3-cloudfront` plan uses the\nchannel deploy target for every surface, and each binding records its own\nbucket, distribution id, object prefix, manifest key, source path, and URL. A\nchannel can override target details per surface:\n\n```toml\n[deploy.staging.surfaces.core]\nbucket = \"libkungfu-dev-core-staging\"\ncloudfront_distribution = \"E-CORE-STAGING\"\norigin_path = \"/core\"\n```\n\nBuildchain validates these hard constraints:\n\n- `channels.preview.url_pattern` is required and must contain the alias shape\n used by preview deployments.\n- `channels.staging.access_control` must protect staging. Supported modes are\n `managed-network`, `edge-basic-auth`, `oidc`, and `app-auth`.\n- `channels.staging.edge_auth` records whether the edge layer owns auth. Use\n `edge_auth = \"none\"` when staging is protected by managed network controls\n such as WAF/IP allowlists or VPN access.\n- `channels.staging.noindex = true` is required.\n- `channels.production.url` is required.\n- deploy adapters must be declared per channel.\n- named surfaces must declare first-class URLs for every channel unless\n `path_only = true` is explicitly set.\n- secret material must be declared as reference names, such as\n `secret_refs = [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"]`; inline secret-like deploy keys are rejected.\n\n### Floating Runtime Contract Lock\n\nWeb-surface repositories can consume the stable Buildchain workflow shell with a\nfloating ref, such as:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n web:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n buildchain-contract-lock-path: .buildchain/contract-lock.json\n buildchain-contract-compatibility-policy: major-compatible\n buildchain-contract-drift-issue-mode: compatible-and-breaking\n build-command: pnpm build\n artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe caller repository commits `.buildchain/contract-lock.json` after reviewing an\naccepted Buildchain runtime SHA and contract digest. The reusable workflow then\nresolves the floating runtime to an immutable SHA, checks the lock before the\ncaller build command, and applies these rules:\n\n- unchanged lock: continue without feedback;\n- compatible drift: continue, write the drift summary, and open or update a\n caller-repository issue when permissions allow;\n- breaking drift: fail closed before rendering, deployment planning, deploy\n apply, or release publication.\n\nThe caller no longer needs to run `scripts/buildchain-contract-lock.mjs` inside\nits own build command. That check belongs to Buildchain because the actual\ncontract world is stored in the Buildchain runtime ref being used.\n\nSupported adapter names are:\n\n| Adapter | Initial use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `aws-s3-cloudfront` | Static site artifact sync plus CDN invalidation plan |\n| `aws-elastic-beanstalk` | Future dynamic app environment adapter |\n| `aws-ecs-service` | Future dynamic service adapter |\n\nThe channel ontology is independent of the adapter. A future dynamic staging\nenvironment still remains `channel = \"staging\"` with protected/noindex/security\nrequirements.\n\n## Preview Aliases\n\nPreview uses subdomains, not path prefixes:\n\n```text\nhttps://pr-123.preview.kungfu.tech\nhttps://sha-abcdef123456.preview.kungfu.tech\n```\n\nAlias semantics are explicit:\n\n| Alias | Meaning | Mutable | Retention |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `pr-123` | Current preview for a pull request | yes | short-lived |\n| `sha-abcdef123456` | Immutable preview for one source SHA | no | longer-lived |\n\nThis allows PR comments to stay stable while preserving immutable evidence for a\nspecific source commit.\n\n## Deployment Manifest\n\nBuildchain emits a manifest with the deployment facts that matter for audit and\nrollback:\n\n```json\n{\n \"schemaVersion\": 1,\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-deployment\",\n \"site\": \"libkungfu-dev\",\n \"channel\": \"preview\",\n \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n \"generatedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"publishedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"reproducible\": true,\n \"timestampPolicy\": \"ci-injected\",\n \"deterministicInputs\": [\n \"web-surface artifact content\",\n \"buildchain.toml web-surface channels/deploy/surfaces\",\n \"sourceSha\",\n \"artifactHash\",\n \"deployment channel\",\n \"deployment alias\"\n ],\n \"sourceRevision\": \"...\",\n \"timestampPolicyDetails\": {\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-surface-timestamp-policy\",\n \"timestampFields\": [\"generatedAt\", \"publishedAt\", \"deployedAt\"],\n \"timestampFieldsParticipateInArtifactDigest\": false,\n \"artifactDigestScope\": \"web-surface artifactHash excludes deployment manifest timestamps\"\n },\n \"sourceSha\": \"...\",\n \"artifactHash\": \"...\",\n \"deployTarget\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n \"adapter\": \"aws-s3-cloudfront\",\n \"deployedAt\": \"2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"retentionClass\": \"preview-sha-immutable\",\n \"expiresAt\": \"2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"accessControl\": \"none\",\n \"edgeAuth\": \"none\",\n \"noindex\": true,\n \"secretRefs\": [\"AWS_ROLE_ARN\"],\n \"surfaceBindings\": [\n {\n \"surface\": \"hub\",\n \"channel\": \"preview\",\n \"alias\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev\",\n \"sourcePath\": \"/\",\n \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n \"directoryIndexResolution\": true,\n \"canonicalUrl\": \"https://libkungfu.dev\",\n \"bucket\": \"libkungfu-dev-preview\",\n \"distributionId\": \"E-PREVIEW\",\n \"originPath\": \"\",\n \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"manifestKey\": \".buildchain/deployments/sha-abcdef123456/hub.json\",\n \"routing\": {\n \"contract\": \"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\",\n \"viewerPathPrefix\": \"/\",\n \"artifactPathPrefix\": \"\",\n \"objectPrefix\": \"sha-abcdef123456\",\n \"directoryIndex\": \"index.html\",\n \"directoryIndexResolution\": true\n },\n \"smokeUrls\": [\n {\n \"kind\": \"root\",\n \"requestPath\": \"/\",\n \"url\": \"https://sha-abcdef123456.preview.libkungfu.dev/\",\n \"required\": true\n }\n ],\n \"noindex\": true,\n \"accessControl\": \"none\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\nDynamic adapters can also fill `runtimeId`, `configFingerprint`,\n`healthCheck`, `migrationState`, `rollbackPointer`, and\n`rollbackLimitations`. Buildchain records secret reference names only, never\nsecret values.\n\nThe timestamp policy is shared with package site bundles. Public deployment\nmanifests should expose real workflow generation/publication times while\nseparately declaring why the deployed artifact remains reproducible. For\nweb-surface deployment manifests, `artifactHash` is the static site artifact\ndigest and does not include deployment timestamp fields; the manifest itself\nstill records those fields for human and agent audit.\n\n## Deploy Plans\n\nDeploy planning is the default behavior. It plans the adapter steps and writes\nmanifest JSON, but it does not touch AWS, DNS, CloudFront, or deployment\ncredentials.\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode deploy-plan \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --alias sha-aaaaaaaaaaaa\n```\n\nFor manifest-only output:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode manifest \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --alias pr-123 \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-manifest.json\n```\n\nThe CLI emits GitHub outputs when `GITHUB_OUTPUT` is present:\n\n- `web-surface-channel`\n- `web-surface-alias`\n- `web-surface-url`\n- `web-surface-urls-json`\n- `web-surface-artifact-hash`\n- `web-surface-manifest-json`\n\nThe reusable workflow resolves that same effective channel before running the\ncaller build or verify command. Both steps receive\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_CHANNEL` (`preview`, `staging`, or `production`) and\n`BUILDCHAIN_PREVIEW_ALIAS` for previews. Compatibility aliases\n`BUILDCHAIN_SURFACE_CHANNEL` and `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_ALIAS` are also\nprovided. Callers should consume these variables instead of reconstructing the\nrelease-intent state machine from raw GitHub events.\nAn unapproved manual canary resolves to `staging`; a trusted manual dispatch\nwith `production-approved=true` resolves to `production` through the same path.\n\n## Explicit Apply\n\n`deploy-apply` and `cleanup-apply` are explicit execution modes for the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` static-site adapter. They still default to `--dry-run true`;\nlive AWS mutation requires `--dry-run false`.\n\nDeploy apply syncs the artifact, writes the deployment manifest, and invalidates\nCloudFront when a distribution id is configured:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode deploy-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --channel staging \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --artifact-path dist \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\n### Immutable publication paths\n\nWhen a surface artifact contains `manifest.json` with\n`archivePolicy.contract = \"kungfu-buildchain-publication-archive-policy\"`,\nBuildchain treats every declared `publications[].versions[].immutablePath` as\nan append-only publication boundary. This applies identically to preview,\nstaging, and production adapters.\n\nThe adapter derives the protected archive root from those declared version\npaths and applies four ordered safeguards:\n\n1. every local immutable file is checked against an existing S3 object;\n2. missing files are uploaded with `aws s3 sync --no-overwrite` and a SHA-256\n checksum;\n3. every immutable file is checked again after upload, closing the race between\n the first check and the no-overwrite transfer;\n4. mutable site content keeps normal `sync --delete` behavior, but every parent\n or owning surface sync excludes the protected archive root from deletion.\n\nAn existing object with a different SHA-256 digest fails apply before mutable\ncontent is changed. Older objects without a stored S3 SHA-256 checksum are read\nand byte-hashed for compatibility. Directory-index alias writes are skipped\nunder protected roots so they cannot overwrite immutable route objects; viewer\nrequest rewriting remains the directory-index authority.\n\nThe deploy plan and manifest record `immutablePublication`,\n`mutableDeleteExcludes`, and the parent-surface coverage. Apply output records\n`immutablePreservation` plus every pre-check, no-overwrite sync, post-check, and\nmutable sync operation. Health output adds an `__immutable__` check proving that\nthe owning and parent surface syncs carried their required delete exclusions.\nThe runner must provide an AWS CLI version whose `s3 sync` supports\n`--no-overwrite`.\n\nFor multi-surface sites, each surface host is treated as a root-relative view\nof that surface's artifact path prefix. For example, a `buildchain` surface with\n`path = \"/buildchain/\"` and preview URL\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev` syncs the artifact subtree\n`dist/buildchain/` to the preview object prefix `pr-29/buildchain`. A viewer\nrequest for `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` therefore\nresolves against the artifact's `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html`, not\n`dist/docs/index.html` and not the hub surface root. The deployment manifest\nrecords this as `routing.contract =\n\"kungfu-buildchain-web-surface-path-prefix-rewrite\"` with\n`viewerPathPrefix = \"/\"`, `artifactPathPrefix = \"buildchain\"`, and\n`directoryIndexResolution = true`.\n\nWhen a surface uses an S3 object prefix, directory-index routing must be handled\nat the viewer-request layer. By default, `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"buildchain\"` makes Buildchain install or update one CloudFront Function per\ndistribution before uploading payloads. The function rewrites any request path\nending in `/` to the corresponding `index.html`, so\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/index.html` and\n`https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/docs/` resolves to\n`pr-29/buildchain/docs/index.html`. This keeps multi-host preview roots\ncompatible with S3 REST origins, where copying alias objects such as\n`pr-29/buildchain` or `pr-29/buildchain/` is not a reliable substitute for an\nedge rewrite.\n\nIf the distribution already has a viewer-request function that owns preview\nalias routing and surface-prefix routing, set `directory_index_rewrite =\n\"external\"` on the deploy channel or surface override. In that mode Buildchain\ndoes not create, update, or attach a generic directory-index function. Instead,\nthe deployment manifest records `directoryIndexRewrite = \"external\"` and\n`directoryIndexStrategy = \"external-viewer-request-function\"`, then the normal\nhealth check still verifies every required root and nested surface URL. This is\nthe correct contract for shared preview distributions such as\n`site-libkungfu-dev`, where a generic function cannot replace the existing\nprefix router.\n\nBuildchain still writes directory-index alias objects during apply as\ncompatibility evidence, but root correctness comes from the viewer-request\nrewrite contract, not from extensionless S3 keys. If Buildchain-managed mode\nfinds a distribution with a different viewer-request function, apply fails\nclosed and records that conflict in the apply result instead of silently serving\n403s. The reusable workflow uploads `buildchain-web-surface-*-diagnostics`\nartifacts containing the apply and health JSON so the failing AWS operation or\nHTTP check is visible from the consumer run.\n\nIt can also execute a previously saved deploy plan. In that mode Buildchain\nrecomputes the local artifact hash before running AWS commands and fails closed\nif the artifact no longer matches the saved plan. Before any adapter operation,\nit also checks channel-aware JSON manifests in the artifact: top-level\n`canonicalHost` and declared `pages[].host` facts must belong to the plan's\nsurface hosts. A production plan therefore rejects staging/preview host facts\nbefore AWS apply:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode deploy-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --plan .buildchain/web-surface-staging-plan.json \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-staging-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply deletes preview content, deletes the preview manifest, and\ninvalidates CloudFront:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode cleanup-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --event pull-request-closed \\\n --pull-number 123 \\\n --source-sha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nCleanup apply can also execute a saved cleanup plan:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode cleanup-apply \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --plan .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-plan.json \\\n --dry-run false \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-cleanup-apply.json\n```\n\nApply output records the channel, alias, source SHA, artifact hash, target\nbucket, object prefix, manifest key, all surface URLs, all surface bindings, CDN\ninvalidation paths, actor/run metadata, immutable preservation evidence, and\nevery adapter operation with\n`executed`, `exitCode`, `stdout`, and `stderr`. If an operation fails,\nBuildchain records the failed operation, stops subsequent adapter operations,\nand exits non-zero after writing the result JSON. Buildchain records secret\nreference names only; the runner must provide the AWS CLI and credentials\noutside Buildchain, typically through OIDC and the declared `secret_refs`.\n\n## Production Preflight And Health\n\nProduction promotion is not just `deploy-apply --channel production`. Before a\nlive production apply, the reusable workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode production-preflight \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --plan .buildchain/web-surface-production-plan.json \\\n --execute true \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-preflight.json\n```\n\nThe production preflight checks that:\n\n- `channels.production` is canonical and indexable;\n- every surface has concrete production bucket and CloudFront targets;\n- every production surface URL is HTTPS;\n- the production AWS role can inspect the declared bucket and distribution;\n- CloudFront aliases cover every surface host, including product hosts such as\n `kfd.libkungfu.dev`;\n- DNS resolves for every surface host.\n\nAfter preview, staging, and production apply, the workflow runs:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode health-check \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --result .buildchain/web-surface-production-apply.json \\\n --output .buildchain/web-surface-production-health.json\n```\n\nWhen the apply result includes CloudFront invalidations from the\n`aws-s3-cloudfront` adapter, health check waits for those invalidations to reach\n`Completed` before fetching public smoke URLs. This avoids reporting stale\nCloudFront 403 responses as deployment failures immediately after a successful\nS3 sync and invalidation request.\n\nAfter the invalidation wait, HTTP smoke checks also retry transient 403, 404, and\n5xx responses before recording failure. This keeps the public health signal\nstrict while absorbing short CloudFront edge propagation windows that can remain\nvisible after the invalidation waiter returns. By default, Buildchain attempts\neach HTTP smoke URL 12 times with a 10 second interval. Consumers can override\nthat window with `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_ATTEMPTS` and\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_HTTP_RETRY_INTERVAL_MS` when they need a\nsite-specific health policy.\n\nThe health check fetches every surface root URL and any nested smoke URLs\nrecorded in each surface binding. Nested smoke URLs are derived from nested HTML\nartifact files under the surface path prefix, with directory index resolution\nsuch as `dist/buildchain/docs/index.html` becoming `/docs/` on the buildchain\npreview host. If a surface has no nested HTML route, Buildchain records only\nthe root smoke URL; absence of nested HTML is not a deployment failure. When a\nnested route is present, the check fails closed if a deploy reports success but\nthat child page returns 403 or another unexpected status. Surface root checks\nexpect the apply result to have installed the directory-index rewrite, so a\nmulti-host preview root such as `https://buildchain-pr-29.preview.libkungfu.dev/`\nmust resolve to the surface `index.html`, not the bare prefix directory.\nProduction additionally fails if a response is unreachable, returns an\nunexpected status, or still sends `x-robots-tag: noindex`. The health check also\nverifies that each surface binding recorded a deployment manifest pointer. The\nproduction release passport embeds the deploy plan, apply result, production\npreflight, and health check so a reviewer or agent can audit why the production\nsite changed and whether every declared host and every existing nested route was\nactually covered.\n\nPublic channels can opt into object-level health with\n`deploy.<channel>.health_strategy = \"s3-object\"` when the deployment contract is\nalready covered by S3 manifest/object writes and public edge convergence is not\nthe right CI gate. This is useful for preview distributions whose viewer-request\nrouting is owned by an external CloudFront Function. The channel remains public;\nonly the CI health evidence changes from HTTP fetches to S3 `head-object`\nchecks.\n\nChannels declared with `access_control = \"managed-network\"` use a different\nhealth strategy by default. Buildchain does not require a GitHub-hosted runner\nto fetch a URL that is intentionally reachable only from an approved network.\nInstead, after a live apply the health check uses the deploy role to run S3\n`head-object` checks for each surface manifest and the smoke target object, such\nas the surface `index.html` or a nested `docs/index.html`. The check records\n`healthStrategy = \"s3-object\"` and skips the public HTTP fetch. Dry-run and\nplan-only checks fall back to deployment evidence: each surface must have a\nmanifest key, bucket, object prefix, `sync-static-artifact`, and\n`write-deployment-manifest` evidence, recorded as\n`healthStrategy = \"deployment-evidence\"`. If the workflow is running on a runner\nthat is allowed to reach the managed network, set\n`BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_ALLOWED_RUNNER=true` or pass\n`--allowed-managed-network-runner true` to keep the normal HTTP smoke checks.\nSet `BUILDCHAIN_WEB_SURFACE_HEALTH_S3_OBJECTS=false` or pass\n`--managed-network-s3-object-verification false` only when an external channel\npolicy owns managed-network object verification.\n\n## Cleanup Plans\n\nPreview cleanup is an auditable cleanup contract. It can run as a dry-run plan,\nan apply-mode plan, or the explicit `cleanup-apply` executor with preview-only\ncredentials:\n\n```bash\nnode scripts/web-surface.mjs \\\n --mode cleanup-plan \\\n --cwd fixtures/web-surface-shaped \\\n --event pull-request-closed \\\n --pull-number 123 \\\n --aliases pr-123,sha-abcdef123456\n```\n\nThe plan and apply result keep mutable PR aliases and immutable SHA aliases\ndistinct so a caller can expire them with different retention windows. Closed-PR\ncleanup can derive `pr-N` from `--pull-number`, records the event, source SHA,\nactor, run id, preview bucket/prefix, manifest key, and adapter steps, and is an\nauditable no-op when no aliases are requested.\n\n## Reusable Workflow Shape\n\nBuildchain ships `.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml` for repositories that want\nthe standard PR review and promotion flow without copying bespoke glue:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n build-command: npm run build\n verify-command: npm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nThe reusable workflow maps GitHub events to Buildchain web-surface semantics:\n\n| Event | Buildchain behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `pull_request` opened / synchronized / reopened | validate, build, verify, and plan `preview` for `pr-N` |\n| `pull_request` closed | plan apply-mode cleanup for the `pr-N` preview alias and manifest |\n| `push` to `main` | validate, build, verify, plan and apply `staging` from the merged `main` SHA, then optionally open a production release PR |\n| `push` to `main` from a matching release PR merge | validate the associated release PR, plan `production`, and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n| `workflow_dispatch` with `production-approved = true` | plan `production` and enter the configured GitHub Environment gate |\n\nThe optional `buildchain-ref` input is empty by default. Empty keeps the\nweb-surface run on the stable Buildchain runtime selected by the reusable\nworkflow ref, normally `@v2`. A trusted maintainer can expose a\n`workflow_dispatch` input and pass it through for one-off train validation.\nSee [`runtime-train-validation.md`](runtime-train-validation.md) for the shared\ntrain protocol and notification template:\n\n```yaml\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\n inputs:\n buildchain-ref:\n description: \"Temporary Buildchain runtime ref for trusted manual validation\"\n required: false\n default: \"\"\n\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n buildchain-ref: ${{ inputs.buildchain-ref || '' }}\n build-command: pnpm run build\n verify-command: pnpm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n```\n\nOnly trusted `workflow_dispatch` runs by repository actors with write,\nmaintain, or admin permission may use a non-empty runtime override. Train refs\nsuch as `train/v2/v2.3/site-source-of-truth` are temporary validation refs, not\nstable production dependencies or pending merge targets. They may remain for a\nretention window after release as a fast-use and rollback channel, with old\ntrains handled by periodic Buildchain cleanup. The web-surface deployment\nmanifest records the resolved runtime SHA as `runtimeId` and the stable\nrollback ref as `rollbackPointer`.\n\nThe workflow deliberately plans and emits manifests by default. Live mutation is\nopt-in per channel:\n\n```yaml\npermissions:\n contents: read\n id-token: write\n pull-requests: write\n\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n build-command: pnpm run build\n verify-command: pnpm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n preview-apply: true\n preview-cleanup-apply: true\n preview-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-preview-github-actions\n staging-apply: true\n staging-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-staging-github-actions\n production-apply: false\n production-release-on-main: false\n production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n production-environment: production\n release-feedback-actor-privacy: public\n```\n\nWhen enabled, Buildchain owns the full release apply state machine:\n\n- PR preview deploys run `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n and update a single idempotent PR comment.\n- Closed PR cleanup runs `cleanup-apply --dry-run false` with the preview role\n only.\n- Pushes to `main` run staging `deploy-apply --dry-run false` with the staging\n role, then write a staging release feedback passport artifact and comment the\n associated merged PR with the staging URL, source SHA, artifact identity, run\n URL, and failure context when apply did not complete.\n- When `production-release-on-main=true`, successful staging applies open or\n update a Buildchain-owned release PR from\n `release/<channel>-<short-sha>` to `main`, unless the current push already\n came from a matching release PR merge. The release PR contains one empty\n release-intent commit, carries `production-release-label`, and includes the\n staging URLs, source SHA, artifact hash, and staging release-passport artifact\n link in the PR body.\n- Production release PR handoff is permission-aware. Staging apply and staging\n health remain successful even when the repository or organization has\n GitHub Actions workflow permissions set to read-only. In that case Buildchain\n records `release-pr-status=permission-denied`, uploads the release PR handoff\n summary/body plus staging release passport artifacts, and writes an exact\n manual `gh pr create` command to the step summary. Set\n `fail-on-release-pr-error=true` only when PR creation failure should fail the\n whole workflow.\n- Release pull requests that match the configured production gate get a\n Buildchain review comment with the staging URL and production target, so the\n operator can verify staging from the PR page and use merge as the approval\n action. Consumers do not need to hand-write `gh pr create` or production\n release-intent glue.\n- Production runs when `production-apply` is true and either:\n - a trusted `workflow_dispatch` passes `production-approved=true`; or\n - `production-release-on-main=true` and the `main` push commit is associated\n with exactly one same-repository, merged release pull request matching\n `production-release-label` and `production-release-head-prefix`.\n The production job is then gated by the configured GitHub Environment.\n- Production apply writes a production release feedback passport artifact and\n comments the release PR with the production URL, source SHA, artifact\n identity, run URL, rollback pointer, and failure context when apply did not\n complete.\n\nThe feedback passport records the release responsibility chain:\n\n- human decision actor;\n- trigger actor;\n- runner/execution actor;\n- OIDC/deploy identity reference;\n- decision type and time;\n- source event, PR number, merge commit, and required gate label/head-prefix.\n\n`release-feedback-actor-privacy` controls actor values in the passport and\ncomments. `public` records GitHub actor names, `redacted` records only the actor\nrole, and `private-ref` records a stable private reference hash without exposing\nthe actor name.\n\nFor release-PR publishing, callers opt in explicitly:\n\n```yaml\njobs:\n web-surface:\n uses: kungfu-systems/buildchain/.github/workflows/.web-surface.yml@v2\n with:\n build-command: npm run build\n verify-command: npm run check\n artifact-path: dist\n production-apply: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref_name == 'main' }}\n production-release-on-main: true\n production-release-label: buildchain-release\n production-release-head-prefix: release/\n production-release-branch-channel: production\n production-release-pr-mode: auto\n production-aws-role-arn: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/site-production-github-actions\n production-environment: production\n```\n\n`production-release-pr-mode` controls the post-staging handoff:\n\n| Mode | Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| `auto` | Generate release PR facts, create/update the empty release-intent branch and PR, and label it when token permissions allow. This is the default. |\n| `summary-only` | Generate and upload release PR facts, body, passport evidence, and manual command, but do not call the GitHub PR API. |\n| `disabled` | Record a disabled handoff and skip release PR API calls. |\n\nAutomatic release PR creation normally uses the workflow `github.token`.\nConsumers that cannot enable \"GitHub Actions can create and approve pull\nrequests\" globally should prefer the first-class GitHub App path. Pass the App\nclient id as an input and the private key as a reusable workflow secret; Buildchain\ncreates an installation token inside the release PR job and uses it only for the\nrelease-intent branch, PR, and label operations:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n production-release-app-client-id: ${{ vars.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_CLIENT_ID }}\nsecrets:\n production-release-app-private-key: ${{ secrets.KUNGFU_RELEASE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}\n```\n\nWhen either side of the App configuration is missing, Buildchain does not hide\nthat behind the fallback `github.token`. The handoff JSON and job summary report\n`status: \"app-token-unavailable\"` with an `appTokenStatus` such as\n`missing-client-id`, `missing-private-key`, or `create-failed`, and still include\nthe manual PR creation command. If the repository intentionally uses another\nnarrow token, pass it through `production-release-pr-token`.\n\n`production-release-app-id` remains accepted as a deprecated alias for the input\nname, but the value should be the GitHub App client id. GitHub App numeric App\nIDs and client IDs are distinct, and Buildchain passes the value to\n`actions/create-github-app-token` through its non-deprecated `client-id` input so\nnew runs do not emit the deprecated `app-id` warning.\n\nIf a repository already generates its own narrow token or PAT, it can still pass\nthat through `production-release-pr-token`:\n\n```yaml\nwith:\n production-release-pr-token: ${{ secrets.BUILDCHAIN_RELEASE_PR_TOKEN }}\n```\n\nToken priority is: generated GitHub App installation token,\n`production-release-pr-token`, then `github.token`.\n\nThe merge button becomes the production approval only for a PR that carries the\nrelease label and comes from the configured source-branch prefix. Ordinary pull\nrequests merged into `main` deploy staging and open a release-intent PR; merging\nthat release PR triggers production. A release PR merge push does not open\nanother release PR.\n\nApply-only inputs are validated before the caller build or verification command\nruns. If the current event would run preview, staging, or production apply,\nmissing role inputs or a production apply without `production-approved=true`\non manual dispatch fail immediately instead of spending the build and plan jobs\nfirst.\n\nCallers must grant `id-token: write` for OIDC role assumption. Preview comments\nneed `pull-requests: write`. Automatic release PR creation also needs\n`contents: write`, `pull-requests: write`, and `issues: write` so Buildchain can\ncreate the release branch, write the empty release-intent commit, open or update\nthe PR, and apply the release label. If these permissions are unavailable,\nBuildchain degrades the release handoff instead of marking a successful staging\ndeployment as failed, unless `fail-on-release-pr-error=true`. The AWS roles remain caller-owned and\nshould be scoped by channel: preview can mutate only preview resources, staging\ncan mutate only staging resources, and production can mutate only production\nresources.\n\nApply mode fails closed when the deploy config still contains placeholder AWS\ntargets such as `pending-preview-distribution`. Planning can use placeholders\nfor dry-run-only design work, but live apply requires concrete bucket and\nCloudFront distribution identifiers.\n\n## Site Repository Shape\n\nA site repository can start with:\n\n```toml\nschema = 1\n\n[project]\ntype = \"web-surface\"\nname = \"site-kungfu-tech\"\nsite = \"kungfu-tech\"\n\n[lifecycle.build]\ncommand = \"pnpm run build\"\n\n[lifecycle.verify]\ncommand = \"pnpm run check\"\n```\n\nThen add the channel, deploy, retention, and security declarations shown above.\nThe project may use pnpm, npm, yarn, Vite, Astro, Next static export, Sphinx,\nMkDocs, CMake-generated docs, or another lifecycle command source. Buildchain\nonly needs a deterministic artifact path and the manifest facts.\n\n## Boundaries\n\nBuildchain only performs live AWS mutations in explicit apply modes with\n`--dry-run false`. Production deploys must still be gated by a human-controlled\nworkflow, release, or GitHub Environment. DNS changes, staging auth\nimplementation, CloudFront distribution creation, and credential provisioning\nremain explicitly authorized infrastructure operations outside the web-surface\nartifact apply contract."
1817
1822
  },
1818
1823
  {
1819
1824
  "id": "fixture:infra-contract-aws-cdk-shaped",
@@ -2346,7 +2351,7 @@
2346
2351
  "path": "docs/lifecycle-protocol.md",
2347
2352
  "plane": "use",
2348
2353
  "exists": true,
2349
- "digest": "sha256:16c8e4994276142e6b57a61a18a88998727dce5911cb2da96d3900c049fb76dc"
2354
+ "digest": "sha256:60c39693878258d275e9d47983b306faed35d6416297c14570429de73284604c"
2350
2355
  },
2351
2356
  {
2352
2357
  "id": "reusable-build-surface",
@@ -2354,7 +2359,7 @@
2354
2359
  "path": "docs/reusable-build-surface.md",
2355
2360
  "plane": "use",
2356
2361
  "exists": true,
2357
- "digest": "sha256:5f56d66ad2798bc46acde3f8091c2e5ccee80412c1b26b70c8197ff9c7f6a406"
2362
+ "digest": "sha256:4f3699841c5a189d199db045d526b11f76ad0dff1464d6a63ca98ceadf1bb215"
2358
2363
  },
2359
2364
  {
2360
2365
  "id": "publish-transaction",
@@ -2370,7 +2375,7 @@
2370
2375
  "path": "docs/release-governance.md",
2371
2376
  "plane": "why",
2372
2377
  "exists": true,
2373
- "digest": "sha256:9c8e3f096d314b2d0ea9a6badfdf263006e190aaa6e861489bdd05c93d3eaf04"
2378
+ "digest": "sha256:59858b6e02e42377b8a1f3d6d33ba50c5ffba476f7e1443fd61e03919046eff2"
2374
2379
  },
2375
2380
  {
2376
2381
  "id": "release-flow",
@@ -2378,7 +2383,7 @@
2378
2383
  "path": "docs/release-flow.md",
2379
2384
  "plane": "verify",
2380
2385
  "exists": true,
2381
- "digest": "sha256:feb1e056975a4ffb714d8fc0583a0f6fd8ed774c30ca168c27d5e6baf02f1cde"
2386
+ "digest": "sha256:5b855ab3863e197b2ab257536b1f3ff85c79bca1fe962c45089b3f4c5ab81189"
2382
2387
  },
2383
2388
  {
2384
2389
  "id": "runtime-train-validation",
@@ -2402,7 +2407,7 @@
2402
2407
  "path": "docs/web-surface-deployments.md",
2403
2408
  "plane": "use",
2404
2409
  "exists": true,
2405
- "digest": "sha256:4c88b27af8aeb3f72fc8b979529b68d5fbc910dce70fe4219192c09aeb404e5c"
2410
+ "digest": "sha256:f1e92ba87417dc9aac4f8cf080565f7f2c114b5007bb68b90f33692c73fdad88"
2406
2411
  }
2407
2412
  ],
2408
2413
  "releaseModel": {