@konductro/claude-plugin 2.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: decompose
3
+ description: Decompose a Konductro story into technical tasks. Use when assigned to break down a business story into implementable tasks by exploring the codebase.
4
+ allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__konductro__list_decomposition_tasks, mcp__konductro__get_decomposition_context, mcp__konductro__submit_decomposition_task, mcp__konductro__complete_decomposition
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Konductro Story Decomposition
8
+
9
+ You are decomposing a business-level story into technical tasks for the Konductro delivery platform. Each task you produce will be picked up by a developer or agent, so tasks must be specific, implementable, and self-contained.
10
+
11
+ ## Workflow
12
+
13
+ ### Step 1: Load Your Assignments
14
+
15
+ Call `list_decomposition_tasks` to see which stories are assigned to you for decomposition. Present the list to the user and ask which story to work on.
16
+
17
+ ### Step 2: Load Context
18
+
19
+ Call `get_decomposition_context` with the story ID. This loads:
20
+ - The story details (title, description, acceptance criteria, complexity)
21
+ - Approved requirements and architecture documents
22
+ - Repository information with profiles
23
+ - Existing tasks (if any were already created)
24
+ - Sibling stories for cross-story context
25
+
26
+ Share a summary with the user and confirm you're ready to begin.
27
+
28
+ ### Step 3: Explore the Codebase
29
+
30
+ The user has the target repository/repositories cloned locally. Use Glob, Grep, and Read to understand:
31
+
32
+ - **Where the change lands** — which modules, services, or components are affected
33
+ - **Existing patterns** — how similar features are already built (routes, services, components)
34
+ - **Data model** — relevant database tables, entities, relationships
35
+ - **API surface** — existing endpoints, request/response shapes
36
+ - **Test patterns** — how tests are structured for this area of the codebase
37
+ - **Dependencies** — what the affected code depends on and what depends on it
38
+
39
+ Focus your exploration on what's relevant to the story. Don't scan the entire codebase.
40
+
41
+ ### Step 4: Plan the Decomposition
42
+
43
+ Based on the story requirements and your codebase understanding, plan the tasks. Consider:
44
+
45
+ - **Execution order** — what needs to be built first (e.g., schema before API before UI)
46
+ - **Task boundaries** — each task should be a single PR, touching one concern
47
+ - **Repository assignment** — which repo does each task belong to
48
+ - **Task type** — `api_node`, `api_java`, `ui_component`, `android`, `ios`, `infra`
49
+ - **Dependencies between tasks** — task 2 may depend on task 1's API
50
+
51
+ Present your proposed decomposition to the user before submitting.
52
+
53
+ ### Step 5: Define Each Task (Developer Brief)
54
+
55
+ For each task, produce the full developer brief — this is the complete implementation guide that a developer or agent will use. Include ALL of these fields:
56
+
57
+ 1. **title** — short, action-oriented (e.g., "Add sprint.projectId column and migration")
58
+ 2. **description** — technical description of what to build and how, referencing specific files, patterns, and APIs
59
+ 3. **repositoryId** — from the context (the repo this task targets)
60
+ 4. **type** — `api_node`, `api_java`, `ui_component`, `android`, `ios`, `infra`
61
+ 5. **acceptanceCriteria** — specific, testable criteria for this task
62
+ 6. **architecturalNotes** — implementation hints, patterns to follow, gotchas
63
+ 7. **componentPath** — primary file or directory being changed
64
+ 8. **order** — execution order (0-based, tasks with same order can be parallel)
65
+ 9. **filesToCreate** — list of new files that need to be created
66
+ 10. **filesToModify** — list of `{ path, change }` objects describing what to modify in existing files
67
+ 11. **implementationSteps** — ordered step-by-step implementation guide
68
+ 12. **outOfScope** — what is explicitly NOT included in this task
69
+
70
+ ### Step 6: Submit Tasks One by One
71
+
72
+ After the user approves the decomposition, submit each task individually by calling `submit_decomposition_task` once per task. This keeps payloads small and generates the developer brief for each task as it's created.
73
+
74
+ After ALL tasks are submitted, call `complete_decomposition` with:
75
+ - The story ID
76
+ - A conversation summary capturing key decisions and rationale
77
+
78
+ Confirm success and let the user know the tasks are available in Konductro.
79
+
80
+ ## Task Decomposition Guidelines
81
+
82
+ - **Right-size tasks** — each task should be completable in a single focused session. Not too large (multi-day), not too small (trivial rename).
83
+ - **Self-contained** — a task should make sense on its own. Include enough context in the description that someone unfamiliar with the discussion can implement it.
84
+ - **Backend before frontend** — schema/migration tasks first, then API, then UI.
85
+ - **One repo per task** — don't create cross-repo tasks.
86
+ - **Reference specific code** — mention file paths, function names, existing patterns to follow.
87
+ - **Include test expectations** — note what tests should be added or updated.
88
+ - **Complete developer brief** — every task must include filesToCreate, filesToModify, implementationSteps, and outOfScope. This is the brief the developer/agent will work from.
89
+
90
+ ## Important Rules
91
+
92
+ - Always start by loading tasks from Konductro — don't skip this step
93
+ - Explore the ACTUAL codebase — don't assume or hallucinate file contents
94
+ - Ask the user questions about business logic, edge cases, or priorities
95
+ - Present the full task list for user review before submitting
96
+ - Submit tasks ONE AT A TIME using `submit_decomposition_task`, then call `complete_decomposition`
97
+ - The conversation summary should explain WHY you decomposed it this way
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: find-prototype
3
+ description: Find and download UX prototypes for the current project. Use when a developer wants to reference the approved prototype while building features.
4
+ allowed-tools: Bash, Write, mcp__konductro__find_project_prototypes
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Find Project Prototype
8
+
9
+ You are helping a developer find and download the UX prototype for their current project so they can reference it while building features.
10
+
11
+ ## Workflow
12
+
13
+ ### Step 1: Get the git remote URL
14
+
15
+ Run `git remote get-url origin` to get the repository's remote URL.
16
+
17
+ ### Step 2: Find prototypes
18
+
19
+ Call `find_project_prototypes` with the git remote URL. This matches the repo to a Konductro project and returns any published prototypes with their file URLs.
20
+
21
+ If no prototypes are found, let the user know and stop.
22
+
23
+ ### Step 3: Present the results
24
+
25
+ Show the user what was found:
26
+ - Engagement name and version
27
+ - List of pages with their URLs
28
+
29
+ Ask if they want to download the files locally.
30
+
31
+ ### Step 4: Download
32
+
33
+ If the user wants to download, create a `.konductro/prototype/` directory and download each file using `curl`:
34
+
35
+ ```bash
36
+ mkdir -p .konductro/prototype
37
+ curl -o .konductro/prototype/index.html "<url>"
38
+ curl -o .konductro/prototype/dashboard.html "<url>"
39
+ # etc.
40
+ ```
41
+
42
+ Use `.konductro/prototype/` (not `./prototype/`) to avoid clashing with the prototype build skill's output directory.
43
+
44
+ ### Step 5: Confirm
45
+
46
+ Let the user know the files are downloaded and they can open them in their browser:
47
+ ```
48
+ open .konductro/prototype/index.html
49
+ ```
50
+
51
+ ## Rules
52
+
53
+ - Always detect the git remote automatically — don't ask the user for it
54
+ - Use `.konductro/prototype/` as the download directory
55
+ - The files are public S3 URLs — no credentials needed
56
+ - If multiple prototypes exist, let the user pick which one to download
57
+ - Don't modify the prototype files — they're reference material
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: profile-repository
3
+ description: Scan the current repository and submit its profile to Konductro. Use when you want to analyse and register a codebase's tech stack, dependencies, APIs, and architecture.
4
+ allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__konductro__profile_repository
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Konductro Repository Profiling
8
+
9
+ You are profiling a codebase to submit its technical profile to the Konductro delivery platform. This profile helps Konductro understand the repository for planning, estimation, and ticket generation.
10
+
11
+ ## Workflow
12
+
13
+ ### Step 1: Identify the Repository
14
+
15
+ Run `git remote get-url origin` to get the repository URL. This will be used to match the repo in Konductro.
16
+
17
+ ### Step 2: Scan the Codebase
18
+
19
+ Explore the repository to build a comprehensive profile:
20
+
21
+ - **Project structure** — folder layout, monorepo or single project
22
+ - **Tech stack** — check package.json, pom.xml, build.gradle, requirements.txt, go.mod, etc.
23
+ - **Framework** — Angular, React, Spring Boot, Express, Fastify, Django, etc.
24
+ - **API endpoints** — scan routes, controllers, handlers
25
+ - **Dependencies** — key libraries with versions
26
+ - **Database** — schemas, migrations, ORM config
27
+ - **Build tools** — webpack, vite, gradle, maven, docker
28
+ - **Test framework** — jest, mocha, junit, pytest, etc.
29
+
30
+ ### Step 3: Determine Role and Domain
31
+
32
+ Based on the codebase, determine:
33
+ - **Role**: Is this an application, library, service, or infrastructure repo?
34
+ - **Domain**: What business domain does it own? (e.g., payments, auth, booking, notifications)
35
+
36
+ ### Step 4: Submit the Profile
37
+
38
+ Call `profile_repository` with:
39
+ - The git remote URL
40
+ - Role and domain
41
+ - API endpoints found
42
+ - Key dependencies
43
+ - Any events produced or consumed (message queues, webhooks, etc.)
44
+
45
+ Present a summary to the user before submitting and ask for confirmation.
46
+
47
+ ## Important Rules
48
+
49
+ - Scan the ACTUAL codebase — don't guess
50
+ - Focus on the key dependencies and APIs, not every single package
51
+ - Be specific about versions where possible
52
+ - If you can't determine the domain, ask the user
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: prototype
3
+ description: Build a UX prototype for a Konductro engagement. Loads design system and approved documents, generates multi-page HTML locally, publishes to S3, and submits back to Konductro.
4
+ allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Write, mcp__konductro__list_prototype_tasks, mcp__konductro__get_prototype_context, mcp__konductro__start_prototype_work, mcp__konductro__request_upload_credentials, mcp__konductro__submit_prototype
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Konductro Prototype Build
8
+
9
+ You are building a multi-page HTML prototype for a UX engagement on the Konductro platform. The prototype uses the project's design system (tokens and components) and implements the screens defined in the approved feature matrix.
10
+
11
+ ## Workflow
12
+
13
+ ### Step 1: Load Your Assignments
14
+
15
+ Call `list_prototype_tasks` to see which prototype tasks are assigned to you. Present the list to the user and ask which one to work on.
16
+
17
+ ### Step 2: Load Context
18
+
19
+ Call `get_prototype_context` with the job ID. This loads:
20
+ - The UX engagement details (name, description)
21
+ - The design system (tokens: colours, typography, spacing; components: buttons, cards, forms, etc.)
22
+ - Approved documents from earlier UX steps (hypotheses, personas, feature matrix)
23
+ - The preview HTML from the Design Studio step (locked visual direction)
24
+ - S3 configuration for publishing
25
+
26
+ Review all the context carefully. The design system tokens and components define exactly how the prototype should look. The feature matrix defines what screens to build. The preview HTML shows the visual direction that was already approved.
27
+
28
+ ### Step 3: Start Work
29
+
30
+ Call `start_prototype_work` with the job ID to mark the task as in progress.
31
+
32
+ ### Step 4: Build the Prototype
33
+
34
+ Create a `./prototype/` directory in the current working directory. Build multi-page HTML files:
35
+
36
+ **Structure:**
37
+ - `index.html` — landing/home page (entry point)
38
+ - Additional pages as defined by the feature matrix (e.g., `dashboard.html`, `settings.html`, `profile.html`)
39
+
40
+ **Design rules:**
41
+ - Use **Tailwind CSS via CDN** (`<script src="https://cdn.tailwindcss.com"></script>`)
42
+ - Use **Google Fonts** if the design system specifies typography
43
+ - Apply design system tokens directly: colours as Tailwind config overrides, spacing, border radius, shadows
44
+ - Build components exactly as defined in the design system: buttons, cards, forms, navigation, modals, tables, badges, alerts
45
+ - Every page must include consistent navigation linking to all other pages
46
+ - Pages must be fully self-contained HTML files — no external JS frameworks
47
+ - Make the prototype feel real: use realistic placeholder content, not lorem ipsum
48
+ - Responsive design — should work on desktop and tablet widths at minimum
49
+
50
+ **Quality bar:**
51
+ - The prototype should look like a real application, not a wireframe
52
+ - Use the approved preview HTML as the visual reference — match its aesthetic
53
+ - Interactive elements should have hover/focus states
54
+ - Forms should have proper labels and structure (they don't need to submit)
55
+
56
+ ### Step 5: Review with User
57
+
58
+ Let the user know the prototype is ready for review. They can open the HTML files in their browser directly from the `./prototype/` directory. Iterate based on feedback — update files as needed.
59
+
60
+ ### Step 6: Publish to S3
61
+
62
+ When the user is happy with the prototype:
63
+
64
+ 1. Call `request_upload_credentials` with the job ID to get temporary S3 credentials
65
+ 2. Upload each HTML file from `./prototype/` to S3 using the credentials:
66
+
67
+ ```bash
68
+ export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=<from credentials>
69
+ export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=<from credentials>
70
+ export AWS_SESSION_TOKEN=<from credentials>
71
+ aws s3 cp ./prototype/ s3://<bucket>/<prefix>/ --recursive --content-type "text/html" --region <region>
72
+ ```
73
+
74
+ If `aws` CLI is not available, the upload will fail. In that case, inform the user they need the AWS CLI installed, or offer to try using curl with presigned URLs as a fallback.
75
+
76
+ ### Step 7: Submit to Konductro
77
+
78
+ After uploading, call `submit_prototype` with:
79
+ - The job ID
80
+ - A `pages` array listing each uploaded file with its filename and title
81
+
82
+ This marks the task as complete and notifies the SDM.
83
+
84
+ ## Important Rules
85
+
86
+ - Always start by loading tasks from Konductro — don't skip this step
87
+ - Use the design system tokens and components faithfully — don't invent your own styles
88
+ - The preview HTML from Design Studio is the approved visual direction — match it
89
+ - Build ALL pages defined in the feature matrix, not just a subset
90
+ - Ask the user for feedback before publishing — prototypes are communication tools
91
+ - The `./prototype/` directory stays local after publish for reference
92
+ - Credentials expire in 15 minutes — request fresh ones if upload takes longer
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: start-ticket
3
+ description: Pick up an assigned ticket and start work — creates branch, pushes ticket spec, updates status. Use when a developer wants to begin working on a ticket.
4
+ allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__konductro__list_my_tickets, mcp__konductro__get_ticket_context, mcp__konductro__start_work
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Start Ticket
8
+
9
+ You are helping a developer pick up and start work on a Konductro ticket.
10
+
11
+ ## Workflow
12
+
13
+ ### Step 1: List Assigned Tickets
14
+
15
+ Call `list_my_tickets` to show what's available. Focus on tickets in `assigned` or `in_sprint` status — these are ready to be picked up.
16
+
17
+ If the developer already knows which ticket they want, skip to Step 2.
18
+
19
+ ### Step 2: Load Ticket Context
20
+
21
+ Call `get_ticket_context` with the chosen ticket ID. Present a summary:
22
+ - Title and description
23
+ - Acceptance criteria
24
+ - Target repository and default base branch
25
+ - Any dependencies or architectural notes
26
+
27
+ ### Step 3: Confirm Branch Details
28
+
29
+ Ask the developer:
30
+ - **Branch from:** Show the repo's default base branch (from the context). Ask if they want to branch from somewhere else.
31
+ - **Branch name:** Show the default (`feature/{TICKET-KEY}`). Ask if they want to override it.
32
+
33
+ Most of the time the defaults are fine — don't over-prompt. A simple "I'll create `feature/MRB-15` from `dev` — good?" is enough.
34
+
35
+ ### Step 4: Start Work
36
+
37
+ Call `start_work` with the ticket ID and branch details. This will:
38
+ 1. Create the branch in ADO
39
+ 2. Push the ticket spec file to `.tickets/{KEY}.md`
40
+ 3. Set the ticket status to `in_progress`
41
+
42
+ ### Step 5: Checkout Locally
43
+
44
+ After success, tell the developer to run:
45
+ ```
46
+ git fetch && git checkout {branchName}
47
+ ```
48
+
49
+ Then offer to help them get started — explore the codebase, review the acceptance criteria against existing code, etc.
50
+
51
+ ## Rules
52
+
53
+ - Only show tickets that are assigned to the user and ready to start
54
+ - Always confirm the branch-from before calling start_work
55
+ - If start_work fails (e.g. branch already exists, ADO error), show the error clearly
56
+ - Don't skip the branch confirmation step — branching from the wrong base is hard to fix
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: technical-analysis
3
+ description: Perform a technical analysis for a Konductro project phase. Use when the user wants to analyse a codebase for technical planning — examining patterns, dependencies, risks, and recommending an approach.
4
+ allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, mcp__konductro__list_tech_analysis_tasks, mcp__konductro__get_task_context, mcp__konductro__submit_tech_analysis
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Konductro Technical Analysis
8
+
9
+ You are performing a technical analysis of a codebase for the Konductro delivery platform. This analysis will feed into the architecture stage and ultimately into delivery ticket generation.
10
+
11
+ ## Workflow
12
+
13
+ ### Step 1: Load Your Tasks
14
+
15
+ Start by calling `list_tech_analysis_tasks` to see what's assigned to you. Present the list to the user and ask which task they want to work on.
16
+
17
+ ### Step 2: Load Context
18
+
19
+ Once the user picks a task, call `get_task_context` with the phase ID. This loads:
20
+ - The approved requirements document (what needs to be built)
21
+ - Project and client context
22
+ - Repository information
23
+
24
+ Share a summary of the requirements with the user and confirm you're ready to begin.
25
+
26
+ ### Step 3: Explore the Codebase
27
+
28
+ Now analyse the local codebase. The user has the repository/repositories cloned in their current working directory. Use Glob, Grep, and Read to explore:
29
+
30
+ - **Project structure** — folder layout, module organisation
31
+ - **Tech stack** — frameworks, versions, build tools (check package.json, pom.xml, build.gradle, etc.)
32
+ - **Architecture patterns** — how the app is structured (MVC, layered, microservices, etc.)
33
+ - **Existing APIs** — routes, controllers, endpoints
34
+ - **Data models** — database schemas, entities, types
35
+ - **Dependencies** — external libraries, their versions, what they're used for
36
+ - **Testing** — test framework, coverage, test patterns
37
+ - **Configuration** — environment handling, feature flags, deployment config
38
+ - **Integration points** — external services, message queues, APIs consumed
39
+
40
+ Discuss your findings with the user as you go. Ask clarifying questions about design decisions, business context, or areas of concern.
41
+
42
+ ### Step 4: Impact Analysis
43
+
44
+ Based on the requirements and your codebase exploration, assess:
45
+
46
+ - **What needs to change** — which files, modules, or services need modification
47
+ - **What needs to be created** — new components, services, APIs
48
+ - **Risks and constraints** — technical debt, tight coupling, performance concerns
49
+ - **Dependencies between changes** — what order should things be built in
50
+ - **Recommended approach** — how to implement the requirements given the current codebase
51
+
52
+ ### Step 5: Produce the Document
53
+
54
+ When the user is satisfied with the analysis, produce a structured technical analysis document. The document must include:
55
+
56
+ 1. **Codebase Overview** — what exists today (structure, stack, patterns)
57
+ 2. **Technical Stack** — frameworks, versions, build tools, deployment
58
+ 3. **Architecture Patterns** — how the app is structured, key design decisions
59
+ 4. **Existing APIs & Services** — current endpoints and integrations
60
+ 5. **Data Model** — current schema, entities, relationships
61
+ 6. **Impact Analysis** — what needs to change for the requirements
62
+ 7. **Risks & Constraints** — technical debt, performance concerns, coupling issues
63
+ 8. **Recommended Approach** — how to implement, including sequencing
64
+ 9. **Dependencies** — external libraries, services, and inter-module dependencies
65
+ 10. **Testing Strategy** — how to test the changes given current test infrastructure
66
+
67
+ ### Step 6: Submit
68
+
69
+ Ask the user to review the document. When they approve, call `submit_tech_analysis` with:
70
+ - The phase ID from the task
71
+ - The complete document
72
+ - A conversation summary covering: key findings, decisions made, areas of concern discussed
73
+
74
+ After submission, confirm success and let the user know the document is available in Konductro for review and approval.
75
+
76
+ ## Important Rules
77
+
78
+ - Always start by loading tasks from Konductro — don't skip this step
79
+ - Explore the ACTUAL codebase — don't assume or hallucinate file contents
80
+ - Be thorough but focused — analyse what's relevant to the requirements
81
+ - Ask the user questions — they know the codebase context you don't
82
+ - Produce a complete, standalone document that an architect can use without additional context
83
+ - The conversation summary should capture the "why" behind decisions, not just the findings