@kombo-api/sdk 0.1.1

package/FUNCTIONS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+# Standalone Functions
+
+> [!NOTE]
+> This section is useful if you are using a bundler and targetting browsers and
+> runtimes where the size of an application affects performance and load times. 
+
+Every method in this SDK is also available as a standalone function. This
+alternative API is suitable when targetting the browser or serverless runtimes
+and using a bundler to build your application since all unused functionality
+will be tree-shaken away. This includes code for unused methods, Zod schemas,
+encoding helpers and response handlers. The result is dramatically smaller
+impact on the application's final bundle size which grows very slowly as you use
+more and more functionality from this SDK.
+
+Calling methods through the main SDK class remains a valid and generally more
+more ergonomic option. Standalone functions represent an optimisation for a
+specific category of applications.
+
+## Example
+
+```typescript
+import { KomboCore } from "@kombo-api/sdk/core.js";
+import { generalCheckApiKey } from "@kombo-api/sdk/funcs/generalCheckApiKey.js";
+
+// Use `KomboCore` for best tree-shaking performance.
+// You can create one instance of it to use across an application.
+const kombo = new KomboCore({
+  api_key: "<YOUR_BEARER_TOKEN_HERE>",
+});
+
+async function run() {
+  const res = await generalCheckApiKey(kombo);
+  if (res.ok) {
+    const { value: result } = res;
+    console.log(result);
+  } else {
+    console.log("generalCheckApiKey failed:", res.error);
+  }
+}
+
+run();
+```
+
+## Result types
+
+Standalone functions differ from SDK methods in that they return a
+`Result<Value, Error>` type to capture _known errors_ and document them using
+the type system. By avoiding throwing errors, application code maintains clear
+control flow and error-handling become part of the regular flow of application
+code.
+
+> We use the term "known errors" because standalone functions, and JavaScript
+> code in general, can still throw unexpected errors such as `TypeError`s,
+> `RangeError`s and `DOMException`s. Exhaustively catching all errors may be
+> something this SDK addresses in the future. Nevertheless, there is still a lot
+> of benefit from capturing most errors and turning them into values.
+
+The second reason for this style of programming is because these functions will
+typically be used in front-end applications where exception throwing is
+sometimes discouraged or considered unidiomatic. React and similar ecosystems
+and libraries tend to promote this style of programming so that components
+render useful content under all states (loading, success, error and so on).
+
+The general pattern when calling standalone functions looks like this:
+
+```typescript
+import { Core } from "<sdk-package-name>";
+import { fetchSomething } from "<sdk-package-name>/funcs/fetchSomething.js";
+
+const client = new Core();
+
+async function run() {
+  const result = await fetchSomething(client, { id: "123" });
+  if (!result.ok) {
+    // You can throw the error or handle it. It's your choice now.
+    throw result.error;
+  }
+
+  console.log(result.value);
+}
+
+run();
+```
+
+Notably, `result.error` above will have an explicit type compared to a try-catch
+variation where the error in the catch block can only be of type `unknown` (or
+`any` depending on your TypeScript settings).