@koda-sl/baker-cli 0.439.0-dev.33cf4ca99 → 0.440.0-dev.dab0aaba9

package/README.md

@@ -6009,7 +6009,7 @@ The canvas is validated before it is written. stdout returns `{ ok, canvas_path,
 
 **Who sees the ad.** `--target-adset <id>` names the Meta ad set the ad will run in. Before anything is billed, the viewer its targeting reaches is read exactly as `baker ads meta adsets --audience` reads it (`temperature`, what they already `knows`, `placements`) and written to `_definition.md` as `targetAdSet` and `viewer` (an existing definition keeps every other field). The sizes, the brief and the prefilter keep clear of that viewer's placements (`staticSafeArea`; `automatic`, a bare `facebook`/`instagram` or no placements is Advantage+, Reels included), and every `baker canvas run` checks the ad against that viewer. With no ad account, give the viewer from the Knowledge: `--viewer-temperature cold|warm|hot [--viewer-knows brand,offer,product] [--viewer-placements <placement,…>]`, recorded with `source: knowledge`; next to `--target-adset` they correct the read, and its `reasons` say so. A bad value exits 2 (`invalid_viewer`) before any billed pass; an ad set that cannot be read never stops the scaffold (a hint says why, and the sizes keep clear of every placement). With neither flag, a `viewer` (or `targetAdSet`) already in `_definition.md` is used as it is. stdout carries `target_adset`, `viewer` and a `checklist.viewer` line.
 
-**After a run** the CLI reads the finished ad back on what makes a static win, not a checklist of elements: every delivered image's pixel shape against its format; **every line of `prompt.json`'s copy (in-scene and designed alike) read back with its box by a box reader and compared** (a line more than 2% off, missing, or joined by words nobody asked for is blocking; case and punctuation fold, as does a capital I read as an l (one stroke in a sans-serif), accents do not; words the picture adds are blocking only when set at the copy's usual size or making a claim (a figure, a price, an offer), and otherwise a note, as a screen's code, a poster or a mug in the scene; a copy line is "on the ad twice" only when most of its words repeat, never a word or two echoed on a prop; on a native screen, which code typesets from the spec, a line read differently is the reader's error and only a missing one counts); **the ad's own copy and its logo measured against the format's safe area** (`staticSafeArea`, the one owner of those areas; `must-show.ts` decides what is measured: never what the scene prints, nor a copy line printed again in the scene while the line itself sits clear). On a 9:16, which runs in Stories and Reels alike, what Stories' header or bottom bar covers (and any other app's interface named) is said as "where Stories and Reels cover it" ("where Reels covers it" for an ad set that runs only in Reels) and blocks for the logo, the button, the headline, the figure and the offer, while a supporting line (body, caption, label, small print) there is a note; what only Reels' taller footer covers is one note, and only for the lead line, since Stories shows it and the 9:16 is laid out in Stories' band; words merely close to where an app draws are no finding. The steps that place a size clear of an interface (`static_safe_fit`, `static_place`) are told the same copy (`prompt.json`'s lines, their roles, and the brand's name and the logo's words, a wordmark read close to them counting as the logo) and move the ad for those alone, a supporting line included only where the frame cuts it; on a feed image such as a 4:5, only a design margin, so words close to the edge are a warning and only words the frame cuts are blocking); a copy line written over two lines (`"15%\noff"`) is matched part by part wherever the reader finds each; designed type in a colour far from the brand palette is a warning; supporting lines too small to read on a phone are one note per size; the main line set smaller than a supporting one is a note, the brand's wordmark never counted as part of a line that starts with its name; the logo set twice is a note, a far smaller mark printed on something in the scene (a hoodie, a bag) is not. When the copy names a real person ("Lautaro Suarez, CTO at Vibiz"), the run casts them as themselves before it renders (`baker avatars research --create`, their avatar's sheet added to `prompt.json` `references` as a `PERSON_n`), and a face shown as a named person the ad has no photo of is blocking. When the reader cannot answer, the vision pass transcribes the copy instead and judges the safe zones by eye. Then one vision pass for clipping, overlaps, artifacts, one dominant idea, the brand with the logo covered and the concept's mechanisms, with every format shown a second time at phone-feed thumbnail size (240px wide, same call): a lead message unreadable at that size is blocking. A missing logo, CTA or copy is never a finding; a logo that is drawn and broken is. stdout carries `verdict` (`ready` | `ready_with_notes` | `needs_fixes` | `not_reviewed`), `judge` (the per-candidate scores) and hints that end with what the run made; the findings are stored on the run as its `review`. `needs_fixes` means the ad is not done even though every node completed, and the run is recorded with `presentable: false` so it is never shown as a version; every fix is an edit to `prompt.json` and a re-run (wrong words: the lines in `copy`; wrong picture: the `scene`; a bad roll: `--regenerate static_variants`; one size wrong while the chosen picture is right: `--regenerate adapt_<size>`, which re-lays it out, named in the hints); a blocking defect is first corrected by the run itself (`--autofix`, above). The checks rank the variants before the pick and the judge only breaks an exact tie, comparing pairwise against the compiled brief, knowing the brand and the viewer; every variant stays on offer to the person in Baker. There is no render limit. When a defect still stands after the automatic rounds, the hints say to fix it with a `--fix`, then by changing the spec or the approach, and if it still cannot be fixed to show the best version and name what is left in one plain sentence, without a question.
+**After a run** the CLI reads the finished ad back on what makes a static win, not a checklist of elements: every delivered image's pixel shape against its format; **every line of `prompt.json`'s copy (in-scene and designed alike) read back with its box by a box reader and compared** (a line more than 2% off, missing, or joined by words nobody asked for is blocking; case and punctuation fold, as does a capital I read as an l (one stroke in a sans-serif), accents do not; words the picture adds are blocking only when set at the copy's usual size or making a claim (a figure, a price, an offer), and otherwise a note, as a screen's code, a poster or a mug in the scene; a copy line is "on the ad twice" only when most of its words repeat, never a word or two echoed on a prop; on a native screen, which code typesets from the spec, a line read differently is the reader's error and only a missing one counts); **the ad's own copy and its logo measured against the format's safe area** (`staticSafeArea`, the one owner of those areas; `must-show.ts` decides what is measured: never what the scene prints, nor a copy line printed again in the scene while the line itself sits clear). On a 9:16, which runs in Stories and Reels alike, what Stories' header or bottom bar covers (and any other app's interface named) is said as "where Stories and Reels cover it" ("where Reels covers it" for an ad set that runs only in Reels) and blocks for the logo, the button, the headline, the figure and the offer, while a supporting line (body, caption, label, small print) there is a note; what only Reels' taller footer covers is one note, and only for the lead line, since Stories shows it and the 9:16 is laid out in Stories' band; words merely close to where an app draws are no finding. The steps that place a size clear of an interface (`static_safe_fit`, `static_place`) are told the same copy (`prompt.json`'s lines, their roles, and the brand's name and the logo's words, a wordmark read close to them counting as the logo) and move the ad for those alone, a supporting line included only where the frame cuts it; on a feed image such as a 4:5, only a design margin, so words close to the edge are a warning and only words the frame cuts are blocking); a copy line written over two lines (`"15%\noff"`) is matched part by part wherever the reader finds each; designed type in a colour far from the brand palette is a warning; supporting lines too small to read on a phone are one note per size; the main line set smaller than a supporting one is a note, the brand's wordmark never counted as part of a line that starts with its name; the logo set twice is a note, a far smaller mark printed on something in the scene (a hoodie, a bag) is not. When the copy names a real person ("Lautaro Suarez, CTO at Vibiz"), the run casts them as themselves before it renders (`baker avatars research --create`, their avatar's sheet added to `prompt.json` `references` as a `PERSON_n`), and a face shown as a named person the ad has no photo of is blocking. When the reader cannot answer, the vision pass transcribes the copy instead and judges the safe zones by eye. Then one vision pass for clipping, overlaps, artifacts, one dominant idea, the brand with the logo covered and the concept's mechanisms, with every format shown a second time at phone-feed thumbnail size (240px wide, same call): a lead message unreadable at that size is blocking. A missing logo, CTA or copy is never a finding; a logo that is drawn and broken is. stdout carries `verdict` (`ready` | `ready_with_notes` | `needs_fixes` | `not_reviewed`), `judge` (the per-candidate scores) and hints that end with what the run made; the findings are stored on the run as its `review`. `needs_fixes` means the ad is not done even though every node completed, and the run is recorded with `presentable: false` so it is never shown as a version; every fix is an edit to `prompt.json` and a re-run (wrong words: the lines in `copy`; wrong picture: the `scene`; a bad roll: `--regenerate static_variants`; one size wrong while the chosen picture is right: `--regenerate adapt_<size>`, which re-lays it out, named in the hints); a blocking defect is first corrected by the run itself (`--autofix`, above). The checks rank the variants before the pick and the judge only breaks an exact tie, comparing pairwise against the compiled brief, knowing the brand and the viewer; every variant stays on offer to the person in Baker. Within one chat turn an ad gets two runs you start (each with its automatic corrections), and none once it is `ready` or `ready_with_notes`: the next is refused (`CONFLICT`, exit 2) with what to show instead; the person's next message starts a new turn (`turn-renders.ts`). When a defect still stands after the automatic rounds, the hints say to fix it with a `--fix`, then by changing the spec or the approach, and if it still cannot be fixed to show the best version and name what is left in one plain sentence, without a question.
 
 The render prompt is **model-aware**: each model's profile (`src/engine/lib/prompt-profiles.ts`) sets its shape, word budget, picture order and request params. gpt-image gets short labelled sections with the constraints last; Gemini gets sentences that give the reason and a positive closing list of the only words allowed. A profile change, or a new model on the router (`src/engine/lib/image-model-router.ts`), is re-run on the static bench (`scripts/creative-evals`, `--job static`) before it ships. Run `baker canvas critique` on the scaffolded canvas for an advisory read before you spend.