@kjerneverk/execution-anthropic 1.0.4-dev.0

package/output/kodrdriv/260113-0023-release-notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# @riotprompt/execution-anthropic v0.0.4 — ESM-only build, ES2024 target, Node.js 24+
+
+## Summary
+This release is primarily a packaging/build update. The published output is now **ESM-only**, compiled for **ES2024**, and the package now **requires Node.js 24+**.
+
+## Breaking changes
+### ESM-only distribution (no CommonJS entry)
+- Removed the CommonJS build (`dist/index.cjs`).
+- `package.json` no longer provides a `require` export path.
+
+**Impact:** Consumers using `require()` will break.
+
+**Migration:**
+```js
+// Before (CommonJS)
+const { AnthropicProvider } = require("@riotprompt/execution-anthropic");
+
+// After (ESM)
+import { AnthropicProvider } from "@riotprompt/execution-anthropic";
+// or
+import AnthropicProvider from "@riotprompt/execution-anthropic";
+```
+
+### Node.js engine requirement: >= 24
+- `package.json` now specifies:
+  - `engines.node: ">=24.0.0"`
+
+**Impact:** Installs may be blocked (or runtime may fail) on Node 23 and earlier.
+
+### ES2024 compilation target
+- TypeScript target/lib moved from **ES2022** to **ES2024**.
+
+**Impact:** If you were relying on running the distributed JS on older runtimes, this reinforces the Node 24+ requirement.
+
+## Build/packaging changes (developer-facing)
+- Vite library build now outputs only one format:
+  - `formats: ["es"]`
+  - `fileName: () => "index.js"`
+- `package.json` entrypoints updated accordingly:
+  - `main` now points to `./dist/index.js`
+  - `exports["."].import` points to `./dist/index.js`
+  - `exports["."].require` removed
+
+## What did *not* change
+- No functional/runtime code changes are included in this release; the changes are focused on how the package is built and consumed.

package/output/kodrdriv/260114-0655-commit-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+feat(security): redact Anthropic API keys and sanitize provider errors
+
+- add offrecord/spotclean dependencies and mark them as Vite externals
+- register Anthropic key patterns, validate key format, and configure secret guarding
+- wrap Anthropic calls to throw sanitized errors without leaking secrets

package/output/kodrdriv/260115-0616-commit-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+chore(release): bump to 1.0.0-dev.0
+
+- update package.json version to 1.0.0-dev.0
+- add v1.0.0 marker to README

package/output/kodrdriv/260115-0739-commit-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+chore(precommit): run build before lint and test

package/output/kodrdriv/260126-0919-commit-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+chore(release): bump package version to 1.0.0

package/output/kodrdriv/260126-0921-release-notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# 1.0.0 — Security hardening for Anthropic provider (API key redaction + sanitized errors)
+
+## Main story
+This 1.0.0 release focuses on **preventing Anthropic API key leakage** and **making provider failures safer to surface in logs and error reporting**, while finalizing the package version for a stable release.
+
+## Security & safety improvements
+- **Automatic API key redaction**
+  - Registers Anthropic key patterns on module load (e.g. `sk-ant-...`, `sk-ant-apiX-...`) via `@theunwalked/offrecord`.
+  - Configures secret guarding with redaction (`[REDACTED]`) via `@theunwalked/spotclean`.
+- **API key format validation**
+  - `execute()` now validates the API key format before attempting an Anthropic API call and throws an error if the key is invalid.
+- **Sanitized provider errors**
+  - Errors thrown from Anthropic SDK calls are now wrapped/sanitized using `createSafeError(...)` to reduce the risk of secrets appearing in exception messages or stack traces.
+  - Spotclean error sanitization is configured (including correlation IDs; stack traces sanitized in production).
+
+## Developer-impacting behavior changes (review for compatibility)
+These are not flagged as “obvious breaking changes” by automated detection, but they may affect existing integrations:
+- **Import-time global configuration:** the module configures redaction and error sanitization **at import time**. If your application already configures `@theunwalked/offrecord` / `@theunwalked/spotclean`, verify there’s no conflicting configuration or duplicated behavior.
+- **Error shape/message changes:** callers that relied on raw Anthropic SDK error messages, stack traces, or error types may now see sanitized/wrapped errors instead.
+- **Stricter API key acceptance:** previously accepted but non-matching key strings will now fail validation before making a request.
+
+## Build / packaging updates
+- Added runtime dependencies used for redaction and sanitization:
+  - `@theunwalked/offrecord`
+  - `@theunwalked/spotclean`
+- Updated Vite build externals to ensure these dependencies are treated as external during bundling.
+- Updated the `precommit` script to run `build` before `lint` and `test`.
+
+## Repo hygiene
+- `.gitignore` now ignores `.kodrdriv*` internal files.
+
+## Notes
+- Package version has been bumped to **1.0.0**.
+- If you surface provider errors to end users or logs, verify your monitoring/alerting still gets the information it needs now that error output is sanitized.

package/output/kodrdriv/260128-0923-commit-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+All files mentioned are not found, indicating that either they do not exist or have been deleted in the current working tree. Without any actual staged changes, there is no relevant content to commit, review, or analyze. 
+
+Please ensure that there are actual changes staged for committing.

package/output/kodrdriv/260128-0924-release-notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# Version 1.0.1
+
+## Overview
+Version 1.0.1 introduces several important updates focused on enhancing the functionality and performance of the Anthropic Claude provider. This release mainly addresses issues, improves the continuous integration pipeline, and refines the package definition.
+
+## Changes in This Release
+- **Package Updates**: The version of the primary package has been updated to 1.0.1 with corresponding adjustments to dependencies and scripts in `package.json`.
+- **Workflow Improvements**: Enhancements have been made to the GitHub workflow for npm publishing, which now ensures smoother and more reliable package deployment.
+- **File Management**: The `.gitignore` file has been refined to ensure that irrelevant and possibly harmful files do not make it into the repository.
+
+## Key Problems Solved
+- **Version Management**: The update to version 1.0.1 ensures that users are on a stable and supported release.
+- **CI/CD Reliability**: Improvements to the npm publish workflow address issues related to package deployment and version tagging, thereby reducing the likelihood of release errors.
+
+## Impact on Users and Developers
+- Users can expect a more stable integration experience with the Anthropic Claude provider.
+- Developers benefit from a more efficient and reliable workflow for versioning and releasing updates, streamlining the process of package management.
+
+## Breaking Changes
+- **No Breaking Changes Detected**: There are no identified breaking changes in this release. However, a manual review is recommended for any API changes that may affect the project's integration depending on previous versions.
+
+## Conclusion
+Version 1.0.1 focuses on stability and ease of use, making it a critical update for all users and integrators of the Anthropic Claude provider. Users are encouraged to upgrade to take advantage of the enhancements made.

package/output/kodrdriv/260130-1638-commit-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+feat: harden Anthropic provider with API key redaction + sanitized errors

package/output/kodrdriv/260130-1645-commit-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+chore(release): bump package version to 1.0.3

package/output/kodrdriv/260130-1646-release-notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# 1.0.3 — Hardened Anthropic provider: API key redaction + sanitized errors
+
+## Main changes
+This release focuses on preventing accidental leakage of Anthropic API keys and other secrets via error messages and logs, and on making failures safer to surface to callers.
+
+### Security & safety: secret redaction + error sanitization
+- **Registers Anthropic API key patterns on module load** using `@utilarium/offrecord` redaction rules (e.g., `sk-ant-...`, `sk-ant-api{n}-...`).
+- **Validates Anthropic API key format** before making requests. Invalid keys now fail fast with a clear error (`Invalid Anthropic API key format`).
+- **Sanitizes provider errors** with `@utilarium/spotclean` via `createSafeError(...)`, reducing the chance that secrets appear in thrown errors (and therefore in application logs).
+- Enables/configures Spotclean’s sanitizer + secret guard (including a default redaction text of `[REDACTED]`).
+
+**Why it matters:** if upstream libraries include request configuration or headers in error text, it’s easy to leak credentials. This release reduces that risk by default.
+
+### Build/runtime packaging updates
+- Adds new runtime dependencies:
+  - `@utilarium/offrecord`
+  - `@utilarium/spotclean`
+- Updates build externals in `vite.config.ts` so these dependencies (and `node:crypto`) are treated appropriately during library bundling.
+
+## Impact
+### For users
+- Expect **safer error messages** (sanitized/redacted) when requests fail.
+- If you were previously passing malformed API keys, you may now see an **earlier validation error** instead of a downstream SDK error.
+
+### For developers integrating the library
+- The module now performs some **one-time configuration at import time** (registering redaction patterns and configuring sanitization). If your application also configures `@utilarium/spotclean` globally, be aware that this package enables it with production/development-aware settings.
+
+## Breaking changes
+- No breaking changes detected in this release range.  
+  Note: behavior around error content and API key validation is stricter/safer, which can affect tests or log assertions that depended on unsanitized error strings.

package/output/kodrdriv/RELEASE_NOTES.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+## Main changes
+This release focuses on preventing accidental leakage of Anthropic API keys and other secrets via error messages and logs, and on making failures safer to surface to callers.
+
+### Security & safety: secret redaction + error sanitization
+- **Registers Anthropic API key patterns on module load** using `@utilarium/offrecord` redaction rules (e.g., `sk-ant-...`, `sk-ant-api{n}-...`).
+- **Validates Anthropic API key format** before making requests. Invalid keys now fail fast with a clear error (`Invalid Anthropic API key format`).
+- **Sanitizes provider errors** with `@utilarium/spotclean` via `createSafeError(...)`, reducing the chance that secrets appear in thrown errors (and therefore in application logs).
+- Enables/configures Spotclean’s sanitizer + secret guard (including a default redaction text of `[REDACTED]`).
+
+**Why it matters:** if upstream libraries include request configuration or headers in error text, it’s easy to leak credentials. This release reduces that risk by default.
+
+### Build/runtime packaging updates
+- Adds new runtime dependencies:
+  - `@utilarium/offrecord`
+  - `@utilarium/spotclean`
+- Updates build externals in `vite.config.ts` so these dependencies (and `node:crypto`) are treated appropriately during library bundling.
+
+## Impact
+### For users
+- Expect **safer error messages** (sanitized/redacted) when requests fail.
+- If you were previously passing malformed API keys, you may now see an **earlier validation error** instead of a downstream SDK error.
+
+### For developers integrating the library
+- The module now performs some **one-time configuration at import time** (registering redaction patterns and configuring sanitization). If your application also configures `@utilarium/spotclean` globally, be aware that this package enables it with production/development-aware settings.
+
+## Breaking changes
+- No breaking changes detected in this release range.  
+  Note: behavior around error content and API key validation is stricter/safer, which can affect tests or log assertions that depended on unsanitized error strings.

package/output/kodrdriv/RELEASE_TITLE.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1.0.3 — Hardened Anthropic provider: API key redaction + sanitized errors

package/output/kodrdriv/agentic-reflection-commit-2026-01-13T06-01-28-797Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+# Agentic Workflow - Self-Reflection Report
+
+Generated: 2026-01-13T06:01:28.798Z
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+- **Iterations**: 2
+- **Tool Calls**: 2
+- **Unique Tools**: 2
+
+## Tool Effectiveness Analysis
+
+| Tool | Calls | Success | Failures | Success Rate | Avg Duration |
+|------|-------|---------|----------|--------------|--------------|
+| get_file_modification_times | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 1ms |
+| group_files_by_concern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 1ms |
+
+### Tool Performance Insights
+
+**Most Frequently Used:**
+- get_file_modification_times: 1 calls
+- group_files_by_concern: 1 calls
+
+## Recommendations for Improvement
+
+*No specific recommendations at this time. Execution appears optimal.*
+
+## Detailed Execution Timeline
+
+| Time | Iteration | Tool | Result | Duration |
+|------|-----------|------|--------|----------|
+| 10:01:27 PM | 1 | get_file_modification_times | ✅ Success | 1ms |
+| 10:01:27 PM | 1 | group_files_by_concern | ✅ Success | 1ms |
+
+## Conversation History
+
+<details>
+<summary>Click to expand full agentic interaction</summary>
+
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "role": "system",
+    "content": "You are a professional software engineer writing commit messages for your team.\n\n## Available Tools\n\n### Understanding\n\n**get_file_history** _(cheap)_\nGet git commit history for one or more files to understand their evolution and past changes\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Array of file paths to get history for\n- `limit`: Maximum number of commits to return (default: 10)\n- `format`: Output format: \"summary\" for brief or \"detailed\" for full messages\n\n**When to use:** Get git commit history for one or more files to understand their evolution and past changes\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check if file has recent refactoring: `get_file_history({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\"],\"limit\":5})`\n- Understand evolution of multiple related files: `get_file_history({\"filePaths\":[\"src/user.ts\",\"src/auth.ts\"],\"limit\":10,\"format\":\"detailed\"})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_content** _(moderate)_\nGet the complete current content of a file to understand context around changes. Returns a message if the file does not exist (e.g., if it was deleted).\n\nParameters:\n- `filePath` (required): Path to the file\n- `includeLineNumbers`: Include line numbers in output (default: false)\n\n**When to use:** Get the complete current content of a file to understand context around changes. Returns a message if the file does not exist (e.g., if it was deleted).\n\n**Examples:**\n- See full class definition for modified method: `get_file_content({\"filePath\":\"src/services/auth.ts\",\"includeLineNumbers\":true})`\n- Check imports and structure: `get_file_content({\"filePath\":\"src/utils/helpers.ts\"})`\n\n---\n\n**get_related_tests** _(cheap)_\nFind test files related to production files to understand what the code is supposed to do\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Production file paths\n\n**When to use:** Find test files related to production files to understand what the code is supposed to do\n\n**Examples:**\n- Find tests for modified service: `get_related_tests({\"filePaths\":[\"src/services/auth.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n**analyze_diff_section** _(cheap)_\nGet expanded context around specific lines in a file to better understand changes\n\nParameters:\n- `filePath` (required): File containing the section to analyze\n- `startLine` (required): Starting line number\n- `endLine` (required): Ending line number\n- `contextLines`: Number of additional context lines to show before and after (default: 10)\n\n**When to use:** Get expanded context around specific lines in a file to better understand changes\n\n**Examples:**\n- See context around confusing change: `analyze_diff_section({\"filePath\":\"src/auth.ts\",\"startLine\":45,\"endLine\":52,\"contextLines\":15})`\n\n---\n\n**get_recent_commits** _(cheap)_\nGet recent commits that modified the same files to understand recent work in this area\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Files to check for recent commits\n- `since`: Time period to look back (e.g., \"1 week ago\", \"2 days ago\")\n- `limit`: Maximum number of commits to return (default: 5)\n\n**When to use:** Get recent commits that modified the same files to understand recent work in this area\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check for duplicate commit messages: `get_recent_commits({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\"],\"since\":\"1 week ago\",\"limit\":5})`\n\n---\n\n### Analysis\n\n**search_codebase** _(moderate)_\nSearch for code patterns, function names, or text across the codebase using git grep\n\nParameters:\n- `query` (required): Search pattern (can be plain text or regex)\n- `fileTypes`: Limit search to specific file extensions (e.g., [\"ts\", \"js\"])\n- `contextLines`: Number of context lines to show around matches (default: 2)\n\n**When to use:** Search for code patterns, function names, or text across the codebase using git grep\n\n**Examples:**\n- Find all uses of a renamed function: `search_codebase({\"query\":\"oldFunctionName\",\"fileTypes\":[\"ts\",\"tsx\"]})`\n- Check if pattern exists elsewhere: `search_codebase({\"query\":\"pattern.*string\",\"contextLines\":3})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_dependencies** _(moderate)_\nFind which files import or depend on the changed files to assess change impact\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Files to analyze dependencies for\n\n**When to use:** Find which files import or depend on the changed files to assess change impact\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check impact of util function change: `get_file_dependencies({\"filePaths\":[\"src/utils/format.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n### Organization\n\n**group_files_by_concern** _(cheap)_\nAnalyze changed files and suggest logical groupings that might represent separate commits\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): All changed files to analyze\n\n**When to use:** Analyze changed files and suggest logical groupings that might represent separate commits\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check if multiple unrelated changes should be split: `group_files_by_concern({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\",\"README.md\",\"tests/auth.test.ts\",\"package.json\"]})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_modification_times** _(cheap)_\nGet modification timestamps for changed files. Temporal proximity is one signal (among others) that can help identify related changes. Files modified close together MAY be part of the same logical change, but this is not guaranteed - always cross-reference with logical groupings.\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): All changed files to analyze\n\n**When to use:** Get modification timestamps for changed files. Temporal proximity is one signal (among others) that can help identify related changes. Files modified close together MAY be part of the same logical change, but this is not guaranteed - always cross-reference with logical groupings.\n\n**Examples:**\n- Identify files modified together vs at different times: `get_file_modification_times({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\",\"src/user.ts\",\"README.md\",\"tests/auth.test.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n\n\n## Your Task\n\nAnalyze the staged changes and determine the best way to commit them. Your primary goal is to create **meaningful, atomic commits** that each represent a single logical change.\n\n**CRITICAL**: When there are many changed files, especially after a long work session (multiple hours), you should almost always split them into multiple commits. A single commit with 10+ files usually indicates multiple distinct changes that should be separated.\n\nThink about:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are represented?\n- Are there natural groupings by functionality, module, or purpose?\n- When were files modified relative to each other?\n- What should reviewers focus on in each commit?\n\n## Investigation Strategy\n\nFor any non-trivial set of changes, gather multiple signals to understand how to group commits:\n\n1. **Check file modification times** using `get_file_modification_times`\n   - This reveals *when* files were changed relative to each other\n   - Files modified close together *may* be part of the same logical change\n   - Large temporal gaps *can* indicate separate work sessions\n   - Note: temporal proximity is one signal, not a guarantee of relatedness\n\n2. **Understand logical relationships** using `group_files_by_concern`\n   - Groups by module, type (tests, docs, source), and directory structure\n   - Reveals which files are functionally related regardless of when they were modified\n\n3. **Cross-reference both signals** to make informed decisions:\n   - Files modified together AND logically related → strong candidate for same commit\n   - Files modified apart BUT logically related → might still belong together\n   - Files modified together BUT logically unrelated → consider splitting\n   - Use your judgment - neither signal is definitive on its own\n\n4. **Investigate further** as needed:\n   - get_file_content - see full context when diffs are unclear\n   - get_file_history - understand how code evolved\n   - get_file_dependencies - assess impact of changes\n   - get_recent_commits - avoid duplicate messages\n   - get_related_tests - understand behavior changes\n   - search_codebase - find usage patterns\n\n## When to Split Commits\n\n**Prefer multiple commits when:**\n- Changes span multiple hours of work (check modification times!)\n- Different logical features or fixes are included\n- Test changes could be separated from production code changes\n- Documentation updates are unrelated to code changes\n- Refactoring is mixed with feature work\n- Configuration changes are mixed with implementation changes\n- Files in different modules/packages are changed for different reasons\n\n**Keep as one commit when:**\n- All changes are part of a single, cohesive feature\n- Files were modified together in a focused work session\n- Test changes directly test the production code changes\n- The changes tell a single coherent story\n\n**Default bias**: When in doubt about whether to split, **prefer splitting**. It's better to have too many focused commits than too few bloated ones. A good commit should be understandable and reviewable in isolation.\n\n## Important Context Guidelines\n\nIf additional context is provided (from context files or other sources), use your judgment:\n- If the context is relevant to these specific changes, incorporate it\n- If the context describes unrelated changes or other packages, ignore it\n- Don't force connections between unrelated information\n- Focus on accurately describing what actually changed\n\n## Writing Style\n\nWrite naturally and directly:\n- Use plain language, not corporate speak\n- Be specific and concrete\n- Avoid buzzwords and jargon\n- No emojis or excessive punctuation\n- No phrases like \"this commit\" or \"this PR\"\n- No meta-commentary about the commit itself\n\nFollow conventional commit format when appropriate (feat:, fix:, refactor:, docs:, test:, chore:), but prioritize clarity over formality.\n\n## Output Format\n\nWhen ready, format your response as:\n\nCOMMIT_MESSAGE:\n[Your commit message here - only for the FIRST group of changes if splitting]\n\nIf changes should be split into multiple commits (which is often the case with large changesets):\n\nSUGGESTED_SPLITS:\nSplit 1:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together - mention temporal clustering and/or logical relationship]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 2:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 3:\n...\n\nOutput only the commit message and splits. No conversational remarks or follow-up offers."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "user",
+    "content": "I have staged changes that need a commit message.\n\nChanged files (1):\n  - package.json\n\nDiff:\ndiff --git a/package.json b/package.json\nindex 838acd7..f1f7043 100644\n--- a/package.json\n+++ b/package.json\n@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@\n {\n   \"name\": \"@riotprompt/execution-anthropic\",\n-  \"version\": \"0.0.3-dev.0\",\n+  \"version\": \"0.0.3\",\n   \"description\": \"Anthropic Claude provider for execution interface\",\n   \"type\": \"module\",\n   \"main\": \"./dist/index.cjs\",\n\n\nRecent commit history for context:\ncommit 5b2532e52d4460949535a5972836c3a554730666\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@walmart.com>\nDate:   Mon Jan 12 17:04:36 2026 -0800\n\n    chore(ci): bump workflows to Node 24 and use npm install\n\ncommit 64337bf07fa87ad5362d033c70f7bec171ab6c6d\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Sat Jan 10 17:45:38 2026 -0800\n\n    0.0.3-dev.0\n\ncommit c2e0fb6a7146799dc3eb150fa6ac7a18fb7ba786\nMerge: 9fe4385 e5c7e5e\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Sat Jan 10 17:45:36 2026 -0800\n\n    Merge main into working for sync\n\n\n## Your Analysis Task\n\nGather signals to understand the changes:\n1. Use `get_file_modification_times` to see when files were modified relative to each other\n2. Use `group_files_by_concern` to understand how files relate by type/purpose\n3. Cross-reference both signals - temporal proximity and logical relatedness - to determine the best commit structure\n\nConsider:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are included?\n- Are files that were modified together also logically related?\n- Would separate commits make the history more understandable?\n\nIf changes represent multiple logical concerns, suggest splits.\n\nIf context information is provided, use it only if relevant to these specific changes.\nDon't force connections that don't exist - focus on what actually changed."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_XBntob315997wQoMYkvWfd77",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_modification_times",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_x48SqhVHUFBNykLK4QzqsHOP",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "group_files_by_concern",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_XBntob315997wQoMYkvWfd77",
+    "content": "## File Modification Times (sorted oldest to newest)\n\n2026-01-13 06:01:23  package.json\n\n\n## Temporal Clusters (files modified within 10 minutes of each other)\n\nAll 1 files were modified in a single work session.\n",
+    "name": "get_file_modification_times"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_x48SqhVHUFBNykLK4QzqsHOP",
+    "content": "dependencies (1 files):\n  - package.json\n\nSuggestion: All files appear to be related and should be in a single commit.",
+    "name": "group_files_by_concern"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": "COMMIT_MESSAGE:\nchore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.3"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+</details>
+
+## Generated Commit Message
+
+```
+chore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.3
+```

package/output/kodrdriv/agentic-reflection-commit-2026-01-13T07-40-49-371Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+# Agentic Workflow - Self-Reflection Report
+
+Generated: 2026-01-13T07:40:49.372Z
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+- **Iterations**: 2
+- **Tool Calls**: 2
+- **Unique Tools**: 2
+
+## Tool Effectiveness Analysis
+
+| Tool | Calls | Success | Failures | Success Rate | Avg Duration |
+|------|-------|---------|----------|--------------|--------------|
+| get_file_modification_times | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 1ms |
+| group_files_by_concern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0ms |
+
+### Tool Performance Insights
+
+**Most Frequently Used:**
+- get_file_modification_times: 1 calls
+- group_files_by_concern: 1 calls
+
+## Recommendations for Improvement
+
+*No specific recommendations at this time. Execution appears optimal.*
+
+## Detailed Execution Timeline
+
+| Time | Iteration | Tool | Result | Duration |
+|------|-----------|------|--------|----------|
+| 11:40:45 PM | 1 | get_file_modification_times | ✅ Success | 1ms |
+| 11:40:45 PM | 1 | group_files_by_concern | ✅ Success | 0ms |
+
+## Conversation History
+
+<details>
+<summary>Click to expand full agentic interaction</summary>
+
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "role": "system",
+    "content": "You are a professional software engineer writing commit messages for your team.\n\n## Available Tools\n\n### Understanding\n\n**get_file_history** _(cheap)_\nGet git commit history for one or more files to understand their evolution and past changes\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Array of file paths to get history for\n- `limit`: Maximum number of commits to return (default: 10)\n- `format`: Output format: \"summary\" for brief or \"detailed\" for full messages\n\n**When to use:** Get git commit history for one or more files to understand their evolution and past changes\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check if file has recent refactoring: `get_file_history({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\"],\"limit\":5})`\n- Understand evolution of multiple related files: `get_file_history({\"filePaths\":[\"src/user.ts\",\"src/auth.ts\"],\"limit\":10,\"format\":\"detailed\"})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_content** _(moderate)_\nGet the complete current content of a file to understand context around changes. Returns a message if the file does not exist (e.g., if it was deleted).\n\nParameters:\n- `filePath` (required): Path to the file\n- `includeLineNumbers`: Include line numbers in output (default: false)\n\n**When to use:** Get the complete current content of a file to understand context around changes. Returns a message if the file does not exist (e.g., if it was deleted).\n\n**Examples:**\n- See full class definition for modified method: `get_file_content({\"filePath\":\"src/services/auth.ts\",\"includeLineNumbers\":true})`\n- Check imports and structure: `get_file_content({\"filePath\":\"src/utils/helpers.ts\"})`\n\n---\n\n**get_related_tests** _(cheap)_\nFind test files related to production files to understand what the code is supposed to do\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Production file paths\n\n**When to use:** Find test files related to production files to understand what the code is supposed to do\n\n**Examples:**\n- Find tests for modified service: `get_related_tests({\"filePaths\":[\"src/services/auth.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n**analyze_diff_section** _(cheap)_\nGet expanded context around specific lines in a file to better understand changes\n\nParameters:\n- `filePath` (required): File containing the section to analyze\n- `startLine` (required): Starting line number\n- `endLine` (required): Ending line number\n- `contextLines`: Number of additional context lines to show before and after (default: 10)\n\n**When to use:** Get expanded context around specific lines in a file to better understand changes\n\n**Examples:**\n- See context around confusing change: `analyze_diff_section({\"filePath\":\"src/auth.ts\",\"startLine\":45,\"endLine\":52,\"contextLines\":15})`\n\n---\n\n**get_recent_commits** _(cheap)_\nGet recent commits that modified the same files to understand recent work in this area\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Files to check for recent commits\n- `since`: Time period to look back (e.g., \"1 week ago\", \"2 days ago\")\n- `limit`: Maximum number of commits to return (default: 5)\n\n**When to use:** Get recent commits that modified the same files to understand recent work in this area\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check for duplicate commit messages: `get_recent_commits({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\"],\"since\":\"1 week ago\",\"limit\":5})`\n\n---\n\n### Analysis\n\n**search_codebase** _(moderate)_\nSearch for code patterns, function names, or text across the codebase using git grep\n\nParameters:\n- `query` (required): Search pattern (can be plain text or regex)\n- `fileTypes`: Limit search to specific file extensions (e.g., [\"ts\", \"js\"])\n- `contextLines`: Number of context lines to show around matches (default: 2)\n\n**When to use:** Search for code patterns, function names, or text across the codebase using git grep\n\n**Examples:**\n- Find all uses of a renamed function: `search_codebase({\"query\":\"oldFunctionName\",\"fileTypes\":[\"ts\",\"tsx\"]})`\n- Check if pattern exists elsewhere: `search_codebase({\"query\":\"pattern.*string\",\"contextLines\":3})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_dependencies** _(moderate)_\nFind which files import or depend on the changed files to assess change impact\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Files to analyze dependencies for\n\n**When to use:** Find which files import or depend on the changed files to assess change impact\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check impact of util function change: `get_file_dependencies({\"filePaths\":[\"src/utils/format.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n### Organization\n\n**group_files_by_concern** _(cheap)_\nAnalyze changed files and suggest logical groupings that might represent separate commits\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): All changed files to analyze\n\n**When to use:** Analyze changed files and suggest logical groupings that might represent separate commits\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check if multiple unrelated changes should be split: `group_files_by_concern({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\",\"README.md\",\"tests/auth.test.ts\",\"package.json\"]})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_modification_times** _(cheap)_\nGet modification timestamps for changed files. Temporal proximity is one signal (among others) that can help identify related changes. Files modified close together MAY be part of the same logical change, but this is not guaranteed - always cross-reference with logical groupings.\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): All changed files to analyze\n\n**When to use:** Get modification timestamps for changed files. Temporal proximity is one signal (among others) that can help identify related changes. Files modified close together MAY be part of the same logical change, but this is not guaranteed - always cross-reference with logical groupings.\n\n**Examples:**\n- Identify files modified together vs at different times: `get_file_modification_times({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\",\"src/user.ts\",\"README.md\",\"tests/auth.test.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n\n\n## Your Task\n\nAnalyze the staged changes and determine the best way to commit them. Your primary goal is to create **meaningful, atomic commits** that each represent a single logical change.\n\n**CRITICAL**: When there are many changed files, especially after a long work session (multiple hours), you should almost always split them into multiple commits. A single commit with 10+ files usually indicates multiple distinct changes that should be separated.\n\nThink about:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are represented?\n- Are there natural groupings by functionality, module, or purpose?\n- When were files modified relative to each other?\n- What should reviewers focus on in each commit?\n\n## Investigation Strategy\n\nFor any non-trivial set of changes, gather multiple signals to understand how to group commits:\n\n1. **Check file modification times** using `get_file_modification_times`\n   - This reveals *when* files were changed relative to each other\n   - Files modified close together *may* be part of the same logical change\n   - Large temporal gaps *can* indicate separate work sessions\n   - Note: temporal proximity is one signal, not a guarantee of relatedness\n\n2. **Understand logical relationships** using `group_files_by_concern`\n   - Groups by module, type (tests, docs, source), and directory structure\n   - Reveals which files are functionally related regardless of when they were modified\n\n3. **Cross-reference both signals** to make informed decisions:\n   - Files modified together AND logically related → strong candidate for same commit\n   - Files modified apart BUT logically related → might still belong together\n   - Files modified together BUT logically unrelated → consider splitting\n   - Use your judgment - neither signal is definitive on its own\n\n4. **Investigate further** as needed:\n   - get_file_content - see full context when diffs are unclear\n   - get_file_history - understand how code evolved\n   - get_file_dependencies - assess impact of changes\n   - get_recent_commits - avoid duplicate messages\n   - get_related_tests - understand behavior changes\n   - search_codebase - find usage patterns\n\n## When to Split Commits\n\n**Prefer multiple commits when:**\n- Changes span multiple hours of work (check modification times!)\n- Different logical features or fixes are included\n- Test changes could be separated from production code changes\n- Documentation updates are unrelated to code changes\n- Refactoring is mixed with feature work\n- Configuration changes are mixed with implementation changes\n- Files in different modules/packages are changed for different reasons\n\n**Keep as one commit when:**\n- All changes are part of a single, cohesive feature\n- Files were modified together in a focused work session\n- Test changes directly test the production code changes\n- The changes tell a single coherent story\n\n**Default bias**: When in doubt about whether to split, **prefer splitting**. It's better to have too many focused commits than too few bloated ones. A good commit should be understandable and reviewable in isolation.\n\n## Important Context Guidelines\n\nIf additional context is provided (from context files or other sources), use your judgment:\n- If the context is relevant to these specific changes, incorporate it\n- If the context describes unrelated changes or other packages, ignore it\n- Don't force connections between unrelated information\n- Focus on accurately describing what actually changed\n\n## Writing Style\n\nWrite naturally and directly:\n- Use plain language, not corporate speak\n- Be specific and concrete\n- Avoid buzzwords and jargon\n- No emojis or excessive punctuation\n- No phrases like \"this commit\" or \"this PR\"\n- No meta-commentary about the commit itself\n\nFollow conventional commit format when appropriate (feat:, fix:, refactor:, docs:, test:, chore:), but prioritize clarity over formality.\n\n## Output Format\n\nWhen ready, format your response as:\n\nCOMMIT_MESSAGE:\n[Your commit message here - only for the FIRST group of changes if splitting]\n\nIf changes should be split into multiple commits (which is often the case with large changesets):\n\nSUGGESTED_SPLITS:\nSplit 1:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together - mention temporal clustering and/or logical relationship]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 2:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 3:\n...\n\nOutput only the commit message and splits. No conversational remarks or follow-up offers."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "user",
+    "content": "I have staged changes that need a commit message.\n\nChanged files (3):\n  - package.json\n  - tsconfig.json\n  - vite.config.ts\n\nDiff:\ndiff --git a/package.json b/package.json\nindex 240f1c1..b822780 100644\n--- a/package.json\n+++ b/package.json\n@@ -3,16 +3,17 @@\n   \"version\": \"0.0.4-dev.0\",\n   \"description\": \"Anthropic Claude provider for execution interface\",\n   \"type\": \"module\",\n-  \"main\": \"./dist/index.cjs\",\n-  \"module\": \"./dist/index.js\",\n+  \"main\": \"./dist/index.js\",\n   \"types\": \"./dist/index.d.ts\",\n   \"exports\": {\n     \".\": {\n       \"types\": \"./dist/index.d.ts\",\n-      \"import\": \"./dist/index.js\",\n-      \"require\": \"./dist/index.cjs\"\n+      \"import\": \"./dist/index.js\"\n     }\n   },\n+  \"engines\": {\n+    \"node\": \">=24.0.0\"\n+  },\n   \"scripts\": {\n     \"clean\": \"rm -rf dist\",\n     \"build\": \"vite build\",\ndiff --git a/tsconfig.json b/tsconfig.json\nindex 50dd1ef..85ef4cf 100644\n--- a/tsconfig.json\n+++ b/tsconfig.json\n@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@\n {\n   \"compilerOptions\": {\n-    \"target\": \"ES2022\",\n-    \"lib\": [\"ES2022\"],\n+    \"target\": \"ES2024\",\n+    \"lib\": [\"ES2024\"],\n     \"module\": \"ESNext\",\n     \"moduleResolution\": \"bundler\",\n     \"strict\": true,\n@@ -18,4 +18,3 @@\n   \"include\": [\"src/**/*\"],\n   \"exclude\": [\"node_modules\", \"dist\", \"tests\"]\n }\n-\ndiff --git a/vite.config.ts b/vite.config.ts\nindex b324a7f..f14b1fd 100644\n--- a/vite.config.ts\n+++ b/vite.config.ts\n@@ -1,14 +1,13 @@\n import { defineConfig } from \"vite\";\n import dts from \"vite-plugin-dts\";\n-import { resolve } from \"path\";\n \n export default defineConfig({\n   build: {\n     lib: {\n-      entry: resolve(__dirname, \"src/index.ts\"),\n+      entry: \"src/index.ts\",\n       name: \"execution-anthropic\",\n-      fileName: (format) => (format === \"es\" ? \"index.js\" : \"index.cjs\"),\n-      formats: [\"es\", \"cjs\"],\n+      fileName: () => \"index.js\",\n+      formats: [\"es\"],\n     },\n     rollupOptions: {\n       external: [\"@anthropic-ai/sdk\", \"execution\"],\n@@ -18,4 +17,3 @@ export default defineConfig({\n   },\n   plugins: [dts({ rollupTypes: true })],\n });\n-\n\n\nUser direction: --model\n\nRecent commit history for context:\ncommit 784261ab373a7312e1e29d6b227f220fdfc0d1fb\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Mon Jan 12 22:04:11 2026 -0800\n\n    chore: bump to v0.0.4-dev.0\n\ncommit 78e81b101cb0bb7e4a3a6e5069ec1d2ed7d0f7a6\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Mon Jan 12 22:03:01 2026 -0800\n\n    chore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.3 (#6)\n    \n    * 0.0.2-dev.0\n    \n    * Updated and separated tests\n    \n    * 0.0.3-dev.0\n    \n    * chore(ci): bump workflows to Node 24 and use npm install\n    \n    * chore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.3\n\ncommit e5c7e5ef9205658262a326a55e882e8c3598b7a9\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Sat Jan 10 17:41:07 2026 -0800\n\n    Updated and separated tests (#5)\n    \n    * 0.0.2-dev.0\n    \n    * Updated and separated tests\n\n\n## Your Analysis Task\n\nGather signals to understand the changes:\n1. Use `get_file_modification_times` to see when files were modified relative to each other\n2. Use `group_files_by_concern` to understand how files relate by type/purpose\n3. Cross-reference both signals - temporal proximity and logical relatedness - to determine the best commit structure\n\nConsider:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are included?\n- Are files that were modified together also logically related?\n- Would separate commits make the history more understandable?\n\nIf changes represent multiple logical concerns, suggest splits.\n\nIf context information is provided, use it only if relevant to these specific changes.\nDon't force connections that don't exist - focus on what actually changed."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_y3QXwgwl1fDhpMfXVyXOHG0i",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_modification_times",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\", \"tsconfig.json\", \"vite.config.ts\"]}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_6BTog8OhJcyrlTMtvUOGjOlh",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "group_files_by_concern",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\", \"tsconfig.json\", \"vite.config.ts\"]}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_y3QXwgwl1fDhpMfXVyXOHG0i",
+    "content": "## File Modification Times (sorted oldest to newest)\n\n2026-01-13 07:16:51  vite.config.ts\n2026-01-13 07:16:51  package.json\n2026-01-13 07:16:51  tsconfig.json\n\n\n## Temporal Clusters (files modified within 10 minutes of each other)\n\nAll 3 files were modified in a single work session.\n",
+    "name": "get_file_modification_times"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_6BTog8OhJcyrlTMtvUOGjOlh",
+    "content": "dependencies (1 files):\n  - package.json\n\nother (2 files):\n  - tsconfig.json\n  - vite.config.ts\n\nSuggestion: These 2 groups might be better as separate commits if they represent different concerns.",
+    "name": "group_files_by_concern"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": "COMMIT_MESSAGE:\nchore(build): switch to ESM-only output, target ES2024, and require Node 24"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+</details>
+
+## Generated Commit Message
+
+```
+chore(build): switch to ESM-only output, target ES2024, and require Node 24
+```

package/output/kodrdriv/agentic-reflection-commit-2026-01-13T08-22-38-911Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+# Agentic Workflow - Self-Reflection Report
+
+Generated: 2026-01-13T08:22:38.911Z
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+- **Iterations**: 2
+- **Tool Calls**: 2
+- **Unique Tools**: 2
+
+## Tool Effectiveness Analysis
+
+| Tool | Calls | Success | Failures | Success Rate | Avg Duration |
+|------|-------|---------|----------|--------------|--------------|
+| get_file_modification_times | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0ms |
+| group_files_by_concern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0ms |
+
+### Tool Performance Insights
+
+**Most Frequently Used:**
+- get_file_modification_times: 1 calls
+- group_files_by_concern: 1 calls
+
+## Recommendations for Improvement
+
+*No specific recommendations at this time. Execution appears optimal.*
+
+## Detailed Execution Timeline
+
+| Time | Iteration | Tool | Result | Duration |
+|------|-----------|------|--------|----------|
+| 12:22:38 AM | 1 | get_file_modification_times | ✅ Success | 0ms |
+| 12:22:38 AM | 1 | group_files_by_concern | ✅ Success | 0ms |
+
+## Conversation History
+
+<details>
+<summary>Click to expand full agentic interaction</summary>
+
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "role": "system",
+    "content": "You are a professional software engineer writing commit messages for your team.\n\n## Available Tools\n\n### Understanding\n\n**get_file_history** _(cheap)_\nGet git commit history for one or more files to understand their evolution and past changes\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Array of file paths to get history for\n- `limit`: Maximum number of commits to return (default: 10)\n- `format`: Output format: \"summary\" for brief or \"detailed\" for full messages\n\n**When to use:** Get git commit history for one or more files to understand their evolution and past changes\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check if file has recent refactoring: `get_file_history({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\"],\"limit\":5})`\n- Understand evolution of multiple related files: `get_file_history({\"filePaths\":[\"src/user.ts\",\"src/auth.ts\"],\"limit\":10,\"format\":\"detailed\"})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_content** _(moderate)_\nGet the complete current content of a file to understand context around changes. Returns a message if the file does not exist (e.g., if it was deleted).\n\nParameters:\n- `filePath` (required): Path to the file\n- `includeLineNumbers`: Include line numbers in output (default: false)\n\n**When to use:** Get the complete current content of a file to understand context around changes. Returns a message if the file does not exist (e.g., if it was deleted).\n\n**Examples:**\n- See full class definition for modified method: `get_file_content({\"filePath\":\"src/services/auth.ts\",\"includeLineNumbers\":true})`\n- Check imports and structure: `get_file_content({\"filePath\":\"src/utils/helpers.ts\"})`\n\n---\n\n**get_related_tests** _(cheap)_\nFind test files related to production files to understand what the code is supposed to do\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Production file paths\n\n**When to use:** Find test files related to production files to understand what the code is supposed to do\n\n**Examples:**\n- Find tests for modified service: `get_related_tests({\"filePaths\":[\"src/services/auth.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n**analyze_diff_section** _(cheap)_\nGet expanded context around specific lines in a file to better understand changes\n\nParameters:\n- `filePath` (required): File containing the section to analyze\n- `startLine` (required): Starting line number\n- `endLine` (required): Ending line number\n- `contextLines`: Number of additional context lines to show before and after (default: 10)\n\n**When to use:** Get expanded context around specific lines in a file to better understand changes\n\n**Examples:**\n- See context around confusing change: `analyze_diff_section({\"filePath\":\"src/auth.ts\",\"startLine\":45,\"endLine\":52,\"contextLines\":15})`\n\n---\n\n**get_recent_commits** _(cheap)_\nGet recent commits that modified the same files to understand recent work in this area\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Files to check for recent commits\n- `since`: Time period to look back (e.g., \"1 week ago\", \"2 days ago\")\n- `limit`: Maximum number of commits to return (default: 5)\n\n**When to use:** Get recent commits that modified the same files to understand recent work in this area\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check for duplicate commit messages: `get_recent_commits({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\"],\"since\":\"1 week ago\",\"limit\":5})`\n\n---\n\n### Analysis\n\n**search_codebase** _(moderate)_\nSearch for code patterns, function names, or text across the codebase using git grep\n\nParameters:\n- `query` (required): Search pattern (can be plain text or regex)\n- `fileTypes`: Limit search to specific file extensions (e.g., [\"ts\", \"js\"])\n- `contextLines`: Number of context lines to show around matches (default: 2)\n\n**When to use:** Search for code patterns, function names, or text across the codebase using git grep\n\n**Examples:**\n- Find all uses of a renamed function: `search_codebase({\"query\":\"oldFunctionName\",\"fileTypes\":[\"ts\",\"tsx\"]})`\n- Check if pattern exists elsewhere: `search_codebase({\"query\":\"pattern.*string\",\"contextLines\":3})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_dependencies** _(moderate)_\nFind which files import or depend on the changed files to assess change impact\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): Files to analyze dependencies for\n\n**When to use:** Find which files import or depend on the changed files to assess change impact\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check impact of util function change: `get_file_dependencies({\"filePaths\":[\"src/utils/format.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n### Organization\n\n**group_files_by_concern** _(cheap)_\nAnalyze changed files and suggest logical groupings that might represent separate commits\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): All changed files to analyze\n\n**When to use:** Analyze changed files and suggest logical groupings that might represent separate commits\n\n**Examples:**\n- Check if multiple unrelated changes should be split: `group_files_by_concern({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\",\"README.md\",\"tests/auth.test.ts\",\"package.json\"]})`\n\n---\n\n**get_file_modification_times** _(cheap)_\nGet modification timestamps for changed files. Temporal proximity is one signal (among others) that can help identify related changes. Files modified close together MAY be part of the same logical change, but this is not guaranteed - always cross-reference with logical groupings.\n\nParameters:\n- `filePaths` (required): All changed files to analyze\n\n**When to use:** Get modification timestamps for changed files. Temporal proximity is one signal (among others) that can help identify related changes. Files modified close together MAY be part of the same logical change, but this is not guaranteed - always cross-reference with logical groupings.\n\n**Examples:**\n- Identify files modified together vs at different times: `get_file_modification_times({\"filePaths\":[\"src/auth.ts\",\"src/user.ts\",\"README.md\",\"tests/auth.test.ts\"]})`\n\n---\n\n\n\n## Your Task\n\nAnalyze the staged changes and determine the best way to commit them. Your primary goal is to create **meaningful, atomic commits** that each represent a single logical change.\n\n**CRITICAL**: When there are many changed files, especially after a long work session (multiple hours), you should almost always split them into multiple commits. A single commit with 10+ files usually indicates multiple distinct changes that should be separated.\n\nThink about:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are represented?\n- Are there natural groupings by functionality, module, or purpose?\n- When were files modified relative to each other?\n- What should reviewers focus on in each commit?\n\n## Investigation Strategy\n\nFor any non-trivial set of changes, gather multiple signals to understand how to group commits:\n\n1. **Check file modification times** using `get_file_modification_times`\n   - This reveals *when* files were changed relative to each other\n   - Files modified close together *may* be part of the same logical change\n   - Large temporal gaps *can* indicate separate work sessions\n   - Note: temporal proximity is one signal, not a guarantee of relatedness\n\n2. **Understand logical relationships** using `group_files_by_concern`\n   - Groups by module, type (tests, docs, source), and directory structure\n   - Reveals which files are functionally related regardless of when they were modified\n\n3. **Cross-reference both signals** to make informed decisions:\n   - Files modified together AND logically related → strong candidate for same commit\n   - Files modified apart BUT logically related → might still belong together\n   - Files modified together BUT logically unrelated → consider splitting\n   - Use your judgment - neither signal is definitive on its own\n\n4. **Investigate further** as needed:\n   - get_file_content - see full context when diffs are unclear\n   - get_file_history - understand how code evolved\n   - get_file_dependencies - assess impact of changes\n   - get_recent_commits - avoid duplicate messages\n   - get_related_tests - understand behavior changes\n   - search_codebase - find usage patterns\n\n## When to Split Commits\n\n**Prefer multiple commits when:**\n- Changes span multiple hours of work (check modification times!)\n- Different logical features or fixes are included\n- Test changes could be separated from production code changes\n- Documentation updates are unrelated to code changes\n- Refactoring is mixed with feature work\n- Configuration changes are mixed with implementation changes\n- Files in different modules/packages are changed for different reasons\n\n**Keep as one commit when:**\n- All changes are part of a single, cohesive feature\n- Files were modified together in a focused work session\n- Test changes directly test the production code changes\n- The changes tell a single coherent story\n\n**Default bias**: When in doubt about whether to split, **prefer splitting**. It's better to have too many focused commits than too few bloated ones. A good commit should be understandable and reviewable in isolation.\n\n## Important Context Guidelines\n\nIf additional context is provided (from context files or other sources), use your judgment:\n- If the context is relevant to these specific changes, incorporate it\n- If the context describes unrelated changes or other packages, ignore it\n- Don't force connections between unrelated information\n- Focus on accurately describing what actually changed\n\n## Writing Style\n\nWrite naturally and directly:\n- Use plain language, not corporate speak\n- Be specific and concrete\n- Avoid buzzwords and jargon\n- No emojis or excessive punctuation\n- No phrases like \"this commit\" or \"this PR\"\n- No meta-commentary about the commit itself\n\nFollow conventional commit format when appropriate (feat:, fix:, refactor:, docs:, test:, chore:), but prioritize clarity over formality.\n\n## Output Format\n\nWhen ready, format your response as:\n\nCOMMIT_MESSAGE:\n[Your commit message here - only for the FIRST group of changes if splitting]\n\nIf changes should be split into multiple commits (which is often the case with large changesets):\n\nSUGGESTED_SPLITS:\nSplit 1:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together - mention temporal clustering and/or logical relationship]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 2:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 3:\n...\n\nOutput only the commit message and splits. No conversational remarks or follow-up offers."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "user",
+    "content": "I have staged changes that need a commit message.\n\nChanged files (1):\n  - package.json\n\nDiff:\ndiff --git a/package.json b/package.json\nindex b822780..3e42b09 100644\n--- a/package.json\n+++ b/package.json\n@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@\n {\n   \"name\": \"@riotprompt/execution-anthropic\",\n-  \"version\": \"0.0.4-dev.0\",\n+  \"version\": \"0.0.4\",\n   \"description\": \"Anthropic Claude provider for execution interface\",\n   \"type\": \"module\",\n   \"main\": \"./dist/index.js\",\n\n\nRecent commit history for context:\ncommit 0e7461b3103ddb85388a29216688e3b784258c8f\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Mon Jan 12 23:40:49 2026 -0800\n\n    chore(build): switch to ESM-only output, target ES2024, and require Node 24\n\ncommit 784261ab373a7312e1e29d6b227f220fdfc0d1fb\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Mon Jan 12 22:04:11 2026 -0800\n\n    chore: bump to v0.0.4-dev.0\n\ncommit 78e81b101cb0bb7e4a3a6e5069ec1d2ed7d0f7a6\nAuthor: Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\nDate:   Mon Jan 12 22:03:01 2026 -0800\n\n    chore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.3 (#6)\n    \n    * 0.0.2-dev.0\n    \n    * Updated and separated tests\n    \n    * 0.0.3-dev.0\n    \n    * chore(ci): bump workflows to Node 24 and use npm install\n    \n    * chore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.3\n\n\n## Your Analysis Task\n\nGather signals to understand the changes:\n1. Use `get_file_modification_times` to see when files were modified relative to each other\n2. Use `group_files_by_concern` to understand how files relate by type/purpose\n3. Cross-reference both signals - temporal proximity and logical relatedness - to determine the best commit structure\n\nConsider:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are included?\n- Are files that were modified together also logically related?\n- Would separate commits make the history more understandable?\n\nIf changes represent multiple logical concerns, suggest splits.\n\nIf context information is provided, use it only if relevant to these specific changes.\nDon't force connections that don't exist - focus on what actually changed."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_tQsLHnBxmKlel2GqX02HzfbC",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_modification_times",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_mxD8oVpG14QIiQiMJly2PgzQ",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "group_files_by_concern",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_tQsLHnBxmKlel2GqX02HzfbC",
+    "content": "## File Modification Times (sorted oldest to newest)\n\n2026-01-13 08:22:35  package.json\n\n\n## Temporal Clusters (files modified within 10 minutes of each other)\n\nAll 1 files were modified in a single work session.\n",
+    "name": "get_file_modification_times"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_mxD8oVpG14QIiQiMJly2PgzQ",
+    "content": "dependencies (1 files):\n  - package.json\n\nSuggestion: All files appear to be related and should be in a single commit.",
+    "name": "group_files_by_concern"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": "COMMIT_MESSAGE:\nchore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.4"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+</details>
+
+## Generated Commit Message
+
+```
+chore(release): bump @riotprompt/execution-anthropic to 0.0.4
+```