@kienha/anti-chaotic 1.0.2 → 1.0.5
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.agent/rules/documentation.md +1 -1
- package/.agent/skills/backend-developer/SKILL.md +4 -14
- package/.agent/skills/business-analysis/SKILL.md +2 -4
- package/.agent/skills/designer/SKILL.md +36 -58
- package/.agent/skills/devops-engineer/SKILL.md +0 -9
- package/.agent/skills/frontend-developer/SKILL.md +17 -3
- package/.agent/skills/frontend-developer/react/SKILL.md +16 -12
- package/.agent/skills/lead-architect/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/SKILL.md +62 -19
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/workflow-basic.md +112 -0
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/references/orchestration-patterns.md +15 -3
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/references/rules-guide.md +6 -47
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/references/workflows-guide.md +12 -20
- package/.agent/skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md +18 -20
- package/.agent/skills/skill-creator/assets/skill-questionnaire.md +8 -0
- package/.agent/workflows/docs-from-codebase.md +104 -0
- package/.agent/workflows/implement-feature.md +148 -0
- package/.agent/workflows/requirement-analysis.md +113 -249
- package/.agent/workflows/setup-codebase.md +51 -58
- package/.agent/workflows/ui-ux-design.md +72 -51
- package/README.md +23 -343
- package/bin/{ag.js → anti-chaotic.js} +17 -0
- package/package.json +5 -4
- package/.agent/skills/frontend-developer/references/react-next.md +0 -67
- package/.agent/skills/frontend-developer/references/react.md +0 -91
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/example-workflow.md +0 -37
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/templates/rule-project-context.md +0 -26
- package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/templates/workflow-agile-feature.md +0 -62
- package/.agent/workflows/generate-docs-from-codebase.md +0 -335
- package/.agent/workflows/workflow-rule-from-codebase.md +0 -43
- package/.agent/workflows/workflow-rule-from-feedback.md +0 -38
- /package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/{example-rule-always-on.md → rule-always-on.md} +0 -0
- /package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/{example-rule-glob.md → rule-glob.md} +0 -0
- /package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/{example-rule-manual.md → rule-manual.md} +0 -0
- /package/.agent/skills/rules-workflows/assets/{example-rule-model-decision.md → rule-model-decision.md} +0 -0
|
@@ -8,27 +8,9 @@
|
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
## Workflow File Template
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
---
|
|
13
|
-
description: [Brief description for workflow discovery]
|
|
14
|
-
---
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
# Workflow Title
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
[Optional overview of what this workflow accomplishes]
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
## Step 1: [Action Name]
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
[Detailed instructions for this step]
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
## Step 2: [Action Name]
|
|
11
|
+
A basic workflow template is available in `../assets/workflow-basic.md`.
|
|
25
12
|
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
## Step 3: [Action Name]
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
[Detailed instructions for this step]
|
|
31
|
-
```
|
|
13
|
+
This template serves as a comprehensive guide for structuring workflows, including tool usage, step definitions, and referencing other skills.
|
|
32
14
|
|
|
33
15
|
## Calling Other Workflows
|
|
34
16
|
|
|
@@ -46,6 +28,16 @@ After performing a task manually, ask agent to formalize it:
|
|
|
46
28
|
|
|
47
29
|
> "Create a workflow from our conversation about deploying to production"
|
|
48
30
|
|
|
31
|
+
## Workflow Design Principles
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
When creating new workflows, strictly follow **"Workflow = Process"**:
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
1. **Sequence over Standards**: Define _what_ to do and _when_, but delegate _how_ to Skills.
|
|
36
|
+
2. **Refer to roles**: Use "As [Role]" or "Call [Skill]" instead of hardcoding instructions.
|
|
37
|
+
3. **Dynamic References**:
|
|
38
|
+
- ❌ `Ensure indentation is 2 spaces.` (Hardcoded knowledge)
|
|
39
|
+
- ✅ `Format code according to project standards defined in [frontend-developer] skill.` (Dynamic reference)
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
49
41
|
## Best Practices
|
|
50
42
|
|
|
51
43
|
1. **Clear step names** - Describe the action in step title
|
|
@@ -60,10 +60,24 @@ Markdown instructions for the agent. Keep under **5000 tokens** for optimal cont
|
|
|
60
60
|
|
|
61
61
|
Include:
|
|
62
62
|
|
|
63
|
-
-
|
|
63
|
+
- **Tool Usage Standards**: Standard patterns for using Antigravity tools (`run_command`, `read_file`) within this domain.
|
|
64
|
+
- Step-by-step workflows (Procedures, not Lifecycle Workflows)
|
|
64
65
|
- Code examples
|
|
65
66
|
- Edge cases and troubleshooting
|
|
66
67
|
|
|
68
|
+
## Skill Design Principles
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
**Strict Separation of Concerns**:
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
- **Skill = Knowledge**: Capabilities, Standards, Best Practices, Reference Data.
|
|
73
|
+
- **Workflow = Process**: Steps, Sequences, Lifecycles, Timelines.
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
> [!WARNING]
|
|
76
|
+
> **Do NOT embed Workflows in Skills.**
|
|
77
|
+
>
|
|
78
|
+
> - ❌ Bad: A `backend-developer` skill defining a "Feature Implementation" lifecycle.
|
|
79
|
+
> - ✅ Good: A `backend-developer` skill defining "API Design Standards" and asking the user to use a generic Workflow to execute it.
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
67
81
|
## Progressive Disclosure
|
|
68
82
|
|
|
69
83
|
Skills use three-level loading to manage context efficiently:
|
|
@@ -88,29 +102,12 @@ Skills use three-level loading to manage context efficiently:
|
|
|
88
102
|
Use available tools to understand the full picture:
|
|
89
103
|
|
|
90
104
|
1. **Search tools**: Use `search_web`, `read_url_content` to research official documentation
|
|
91
|
-
2. **
|
|
92
|
-
3. **Codebase analysis**: Use `grep_search`, `find_by_name` to understand existing patterns
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
**Use MCP Sequential Thinking for complex analysis:**
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
For complex problems, use `mcp_sequential-thinking_sequentialthinking` to:
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
- Break down problems into reasoning steps
|
|
99
|
-
- Consider multiple angles, revise if needed
|
|
100
|
-
- Generate hypotheses and verify step-by-step
|
|
101
|
-
- Ensure no edge cases are missed
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
```
|
|
104
|
-
Thought 1: Identify core requirements
|
|
105
|
-
Thought 2: Analyze dependencies
|
|
106
|
-
Thought 3: Consider edge cases
|
|
107
|
-
...
|
|
108
|
-
Final: Synthesize conclusions
|
|
109
|
-
```
|
|
105
|
+
2. **Codebase analysis**: Use `grep_search`, `find_by_name` to understand existing patterns
|
|
110
106
|
|
|
111
107
|
**Analyze step-by-step:**
|
|
112
108
|
|
|
113
109
|
- What are the core capabilities needed?
|
|
110
|
+
- **What standard Antigravity tools are most relevant?** (e.g., read_file for docs, run_command for CLI)
|
|
114
111
|
- What are common use cases and edge cases?
|
|
115
112
|
- What scripts or references would be reusable?
|
|
116
113
|
|
|
@@ -196,6 +193,7 @@ Instead of generic "What constraints?", ask specific questions like:
|
|
|
196
193
|
|
|
197
194
|
- What is the specific domain? (frontend, backend, devops, AI, etc.)
|
|
198
195
|
- What tech stack or frameworks are involved?
|
|
196
|
+
- **What standard tool patterns apply?** (e.g., File system ops vs Command line ops)
|
|
199
197
|
- What constraints must be followed? (time, resources, team size)
|
|
200
198
|
|
|
201
199
|
### Phase 3: Scope (Define Boundaries)
|
|
@@ -73,6 +73,14 @@
|
|
|
73
73
|
|
|
74
74
|
<!-- Options: junior, senior, expert (20+ years) -->
|
|
75
75
|
|
|
76
|
+
### Design Principle: Separation of Concerns
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
<!-- Reminder:
|
|
79
|
+
- Skill = Knowledge (Capabilities, Standards, Best Practices)
|
|
80
|
+
- Workflow = Process (Steps, Sequences, Lifecycles)
|
|
81
|
+
Do NOT ask for "Process" definitions here. Focus on "Knowledge".
|
|
82
|
+
-->
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
76
84
|
### Which best practices must be followed?
|
|
77
85
|
|
|
78
86
|
<!-- Example: "Follow Testing Trophy pattern, AAA structure for tests" -->
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Generate comprehensive documentation from existing codebase (Architecture, API, Specs).
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Generate Documentation from Codebase
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Automatically generates structured documentation from an existing codebase.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
> [!IMPORTANT]
|
|
10
|
+
> **MANDATORY**: Apply `.agent/rules/documentation.md` for all document creation.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
---
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## MCP Usage Guidelines
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
| MCP Tool | When to Use |
|
|
17
|
+
| -------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- |
|
|
18
|
+
| `mcp_sequential-thinking_sequentialthinking` | Analyze complex architecture, design decisions |
|
|
19
|
+
| `mcp_context7_query-docs` | Research framework patterns, diagram syntax |
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
---
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Step 1: Codebase Discovery
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
// turbo
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `sequential-thinking` to analyze unfamiliar project structures
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
1. **Invoke `[lead-architect]` skill** to analyze codebase structure
|
|
30
|
+
2. Identify: tech stack, entry points, API routes, DB schemas
|
|
31
|
+
3. **WAIT** for user to confirm understanding
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
---
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Step 2: Determine Scope
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
// turbo
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
Ask user which documentation to generate:
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
- System Architecture
|
|
42
|
+
- API Documentation
|
|
43
|
+
- Database Schema
|
|
44
|
+
- Component Reference
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
**Default**: Generate all if not specified.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
---
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
## Step 3: Generate Architecture Documentation
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
// turbo
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `sequential-thinking` + `context7` with `/mermaid-js/mermaid` for C4 diagrams
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
1. **Invoke `[lead-architect]` skill** to create:
|
|
57
|
+
- System Context (C4 Context Diagram)
|
|
58
|
+
- Component View (C4 Component Diagram)
|
|
59
|
+
- Data Flow documentation
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
---
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
## Step 4: Generate API Documentation
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
// turbo
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `context7` for framework-specific API patterns
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
1. **Invoke `[backend-developer]` skill** to:
|
|
70
|
+
- Scan and document API routes
|
|
71
|
+
- Create endpoint specifications
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
---
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
## Step 5: Generate Database Schema Documentation
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
// turbo
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `context7` with `/drizzle-team/*` or `/prisma/*` + `/mermaid-js/mermaid` for ERD
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
1. **Invoke `[backend-developer]` skill** to:
|
|
82
|
+
- Document entities and relationships
|
|
83
|
+
- Generate ERD diagram
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
---
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
## Step 6: Finalize
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
// turbo
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
1. Create/update MOC files
|
|
92
|
+
2. Validate wiki-links and frontmatter
|
|
93
|
+
3. Present summary and suggest next steps
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
---
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
| Step | Skill | Output |
|
|
100
|
+
| ---- | ----------------- | ----------------- |
|
|
101
|
+
| 1 | lead-architect | Codebase analysis |
|
|
102
|
+
| 3 | lead-architect | Architecture docs |
|
|
103
|
+
| 4 | backend-developer | API docs |
|
|
104
|
+
| 5 | backend-developer | Schema docs |
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: End-to-end feature implementation workflow (Spec → Design → Code → Test → Deploy)
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Feature Implementation Workflow
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Orchestrates feature implementation from specification to deployment.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
> [!IMPORTANT]
|
|
10
|
+
> **MANDATORY**: Read `.agent/rules/documentation.md` before creating any document.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
---
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## MCP Usage Guidelines
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
| MCP Tool | When to Use | Example Query |
|
|
17
|
+
| -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
|
|
18
|
+
| `mcp_sequential-thinking_sequentialthinking` | Complex decisions, debugging, architecture design | Break down feature into tasks |
|
|
19
|
+
| `mcp_context7_resolve-library-id` | Find library ID before querying docs | "react hook form" |
|
|
20
|
+
| `mcp_context7_query-docs` | Research library patterns, APIs, best practices | "How to setup auth in Next.js" |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
---
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Step 0: Quick Specification (Optional)
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
**Skip if**: User Stories or specs already exist in `docs/`.
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `sequential-thinking` to analyze ambiguous requirements
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
1. **Invoke `[product-manager]` skill** to clarify requirements
|
|
31
|
+
2. Create `feature-spec.md` artifact with: Goal, User, Acceptance Criteria
|
|
32
|
+
3. **WAIT** for user confirmation
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
---
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## Step 1: Locate Existing Artifacts
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
// turbo
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `context7` to research unfamiliar tech in existing codebase
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
1. Search `docs/` for related: User Stories, SDD, Designs
|
|
43
|
+
2. **Invoke `[lead-architect]` skill** to identify scope and dependencies
|
|
44
|
+
3. List files to create/modify
|
|
45
|
+
4. **WAIT** for user to confirm scope
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
---
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## Step 2: Implementation Plan
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
// turbo
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: **MUST** use `sequential-thinking` to break down complex features into atomic tasks
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
1. **Invoke `[lead-architect]` skill** to create task breakdown
|
|
56
|
+
2. Create `implementation-plan.md` artifact with phased tasks
|
|
57
|
+
3. Save to `docs/050-Tasks/Task-{FeatureName}.md` after approval
|
|
58
|
+
4. **WAIT** for user approval
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
---
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
## Step 3: Design Review (If UI Feature)
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
// turbo
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
**Skip if**: Feature is purely backend/API.
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `context7` with `/radix-ui/*` or `/shadcn/*` for component patterns
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
1. Check `docs/040-Design/` for existing designs
|
|
71
|
+
2. **Invoke `[designer]` skill** for new component specifications
|
|
72
|
+
3. **WAIT** for user confirmation
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
---
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
## Step 4: Backend Implementation
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
// turbo
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**:
|
|
81
|
+
>
|
|
82
|
+
> - Use `context7` with `/supabase/supabase`, `/prisma/prisma` for DB patterns
|
|
83
|
+
> - Use `sequential-thinking` for complex business logic
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
1. **Invoke `[backend-developer]` skill** for:
|
|
86
|
+
- Data models/migrations
|
|
87
|
+
- API endpoints/server functions
|
|
88
|
+
- Unit tests (TDD approach)
|
|
89
|
+
2. Run tests and verify
|
|
90
|
+
3. **WAIT** for user checkpoint
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
---
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
## Step 5: Frontend Implementation
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
// turbo
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**: Use `context7` with `/vercel/next.js`, `/tanstack/react-query`, `/react-hook-form/*` for patterns
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
1. **Invoke `[frontend-developer]` skill** for:
|
|
101
|
+
- Components following design specs
|
|
102
|
+
- State management
|
|
103
|
+
- Component tests
|
|
104
|
+
2. **WAIT** for user checkpoint
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
---
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## Step 6: Integration & QA
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
// turbo
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
> 💡 **MCP**:
|
|
113
|
+
>
|
|
114
|
+
> - Use `context7` with `/vitest-dev/vitest`, `/playwright/*` for testing patterns
|
|
115
|
+
> - Use `sequential-thinking` to analyze test failures
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
1. **Invoke `[qa-tester]` skill** for:
|
|
118
|
+
- E2E test execution
|
|
119
|
+
- Acceptance criteria verification
|
|
120
|
+
- Edge case testing
|
|
121
|
+
2. Create `qa-report.md` artifact
|
|
122
|
+
3. **WAIT** for user to confirm ready
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
---
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## Step 7: Finalize
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
// turbo
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
1. **Invoke `[lead-architect]` skill** to:
|
|
131
|
+
- Update MOC files
|
|
132
|
+
- Move task to `docs/050-Tasks/Completed/`
|
|
133
|
+
- Update API/changelog if applicable
|
|
134
|
+
2. Present completion summary with next steps
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
---
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
| Step | Skill | Output |
|
|
141
|
+
| ---- | ------------------ | ---------------------- |
|
|
142
|
+
| 0 | product-manager | feature-spec.md |
|
|
143
|
+
| 1-2 | lead-architect | implementation-plan.md |
|
|
144
|
+
| 3 | designer | Component specs |
|
|
145
|
+
| 4 | backend-developer | API, Models, Tests |
|
|
146
|
+
| 5 | frontend-developer | Components, Tests |
|
|
147
|
+
| 6 | qa-tester | qa-report.md |
|
|
148
|
+
| 7 | lead-architect | Updated docs |
|