@keenthemes/ktui 1.0.29 → 1.1.0

package/src/components/datepicker/__tests__/state-manager.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
+/**
+ * state-manager.test.ts - Test suite for KTDatepickerUnifiedStateManager
+ * Tests the immediate vs batched update functionality and observer patterns
+ */
+
+import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest';
+import { KTDatepickerUnifiedStateManager } from '../core/unified-state-manager';
+import { KTDatepickerState } from '../config/types';
+
+describe('KTDatepickerUnifiedStateManager', () => {
+  let stateManager: KTDatepickerUnifiedStateManager;
+  let mockObserver: any;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    // Create a new state manager for each test
+    stateManager = new KTDatepickerUnifiedStateManager({
+      enableValidation: true,
+      enableDebugging: false,
+      enableUpdateBatching: true,
+      batchDelay: 16
+    });
+
+    // Create a mock observer
+    mockObserver = {
+      onStateChange: vi.fn(),
+      getUpdatePriority: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(1)
+    };
+  });
+
+  describe('Immediate Updates', () => {
+    it('should apply immediate updates without batching delay', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      const success = stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test', true); // immediate = true
+
+      expect(success).toBe(true);
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      const [newState, oldState] = mockObserver.onStateChange.mock.calls[0];
+      expect(newState.selectedDate).toEqual(testDate);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should apply batched updates with delay when immediate is false', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      const success = stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test', false); // immediate = false
+
+      expect(success).toBe(true);
+
+      // Should not have been called immediately
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      // Wait for batch timeout (using a longer timeout for test reliability)
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 20));
+
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should default to batched updates when immediate is not specified', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      const success = stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test'); // no immediate parameter
+
+      expect(success).toBe(true);
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      // Wait for batch timeout
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 20));
+
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Convenience Methods', () => {
+    it('should use immediate updates for critical user interaction methods', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // Test setSelectedDate (should be immediate)
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      stateManager.setSelectedDate(testDate, 'test');
+
+      // Should be called immediately, not batched
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      const [newState] = mockObserver.onStateChange.mock.calls[0];
+      expect(newState.selectedDate).toEqual(testDate);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should use immediate updates for setDropdownOpen', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // Test setDropdownOpen (should be immediate)
+      stateManager.setDropdownOpen(true, 'test');
+
+      // Should be called immediately
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      const [newState] = mockObserver.onStateChange.mock.calls[0];
+      expect(newState.dropdownState.isOpen).toBe(true);
+      expect(newState.isOpen).toBe(true); // Also updates legacy field
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should use batched updates for non-critical methods', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // Test setCurrentDate (should be batched)
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      stateManager.setCurrentDate(testDate, 'test');
+
+      // Should not be called immediately
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      // Wait for batch timeout
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 20));
+
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Observer Pattern', () => {
+    it('should notify all subscribed observers', async () => {
+      const observer2 = {
+        onStateChange: vi.fn(),
+        getUpdatePriority: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(1)
+      };
+
+      const unsub1 = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+      const unsub2 = stateManager.subscribe(observer2);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test', true); // immediate
+
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect(observer2.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      unsub1();
+      unsub2();
+    });
+
+    it('should respect observer priority ordering', async () => {
+      const highPriorityObserver = {
+        onStateChange: vi.fn(),
+        getUpdatePriority: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(0) // Higher priority (lower number)
+      };
+
+      const lowPriorityObserver = {
+        onStateChange: vi.fn(),
+        getUpdatePriority: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(2) // Lower priority (higher number)
+      };
+
+      const unsub1 = stateManager.subscribe(highPriorityObserver);
+      const unsub2 = stateManager.subscribe(lowPriorityObserver);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test', true); // immediate
+
+      // Both should be called
+      expect(highPriorityObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect(lowPriorityObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      unsub1();
+      unsub2();
+    });
+
+    it('should handle observer errors gracefully', async () => {
+      const errorObserver = {
+        onStateChange: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
+          throw new Error('Observer error');
+        }),
+        getUpdatePriority: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(1)
+      };
+
+      const normalObserver = {
+        onStateChange: vi.fn(),
+        getUpdatePriority: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(1)
+      };
+
+      const unsub1 = stateManager.subscribe(errorObserver);
+      const unsub2 = stateManager.subscribe(normalObserver);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test', true); // immediate
+
+      // Normal observer should still be called despite error in first observer
+      expect(errorObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect(normalObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      unsub1();
+      unsub2();
+    });
+
+    it('should allow unsubscribing from updates', async () => {
+      const unsub = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test', true); // immediate
+
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      // Unsubscribe
+      unsub();
+
+      // This update should not notify the unsubscribed observer
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: new Date(2024, 1, 20) }, 'test2', true);
+
+      // Should still be 1 call (not 2)
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('State Validation', () => {
+    it('should validate state before applying updates', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // Try to set an invalid date (NaN)
+      const invalidDate = new Date(NaN);
+      const success = stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: invalidDate }, 'test', true);
+
+      expect(success).toBe(false);
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should validate range constraints', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // Set start date after end date (invalid range)
+      const startDate = new Date(2024, 1, 15);
+      const endDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      const success = stateManager.updateState({
+        selectedRange: { start: startDate, end: endDate }
+      }, 'test', true);
+
+      expect(success).toBe(false);
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should allow valid state updates', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      const validDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      const success = stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: validDate }, 'test', true);
+
+      expect(success).toBe(true);
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Batching Behavior', () => {
+    it('should batch multiple rapid updates', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // Multiple rapid updates
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: new Date(2024, 0, 15) }, 'test1', false);
+      stateManager.updateState({ currentDate: new Date(2024, 1, 20) }, 'test2', false);
+      stateManager.updateState({ viewMode: 'months' }, 'test3', false);
+
+      // Should not have been called yet
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      // Wait for batch timeout
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 20));
+
+      // Should be called once with merged updates
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      const [newState] = mockObserver.onStateChange.mock.calls[0];
+      expect(newState.selectedDate).toEqual(new Date(2024, 0, 15));
+      expect(newState.currentDate).toEqual(new Date(2024, 1, 20));
+      expect(newState.viewMode).toBe('months');
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should reset batch timeout on new batched updates', async () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // First update
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: new Date(2024, 0, 15) }, 'test1', false);
+
+      // Wait partial time
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 5));
+
+      // Second update (should reset timeout)
+      stateManager.updateState({ currentDate: new Date(2024, 1, 20) }, 'test2', false);
+
+      // Wait another partial time
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 5));
+
+      // Should still not have been called
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      // Wait for full timeout from second update
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 12));
+
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Change Tracking', () => {
+    it('should provide access to changed properties after state update', () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      stateManager.updateState({ isOpen: true }, 'test', true);
+
+      const changedProperties = stateManager.getLastChangedProperties();
+      expect(changedProperties).toBeInstanceOf(Set);
+      expect(changedProperties.has('isOpen')).toBe(true);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should track multiple changed properties', () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      stateManager.updateState({
+        selectedDate: new Date(2024, 0, 15),
+        isOpen: true,
+        currentDate: new Date(2024, 1, 1)
+      }, 'test', true);
+
+      const changedProperties = stateManager.getLastChangedProperties();
+      expect(changedProperties.has('selectedDate')).toBe(true);
+      expect(changedProperties.has('isOpen')).toBe(true);
+      expect(changedProperties.has('currentDate')).toBe(true);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should return empty set when no changes occurred', () => {
+      // Initially, no changes
+      const changedProperties = stateManager.getLastChangedProperties();
+      expect(changedProperties.size).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    it('should update changed properties for each state update', () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // First update
+      stateManager.updateState({ isOpen: true }, 'test1', true);
+      let changedProperties = stateManager.getLastChangedProperties();
+      expect(changedProperties.has('isOpen')).toBe(true);
+      expect(changedProperties.has('selectedDate')).toBe(false);
+
+      // Second update
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: new Date(2024, 0, 15) }, 'test2', true);
+      changedProperties = stateManager.getLastChangedProperties();
+      expect(changedProperties.has('isOpen')).toBe(false); // Previous update
+      expect(changedProperties.has('selectedDate')).toBe(true); // Current update
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should track nested properties in selectedRange', () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      // First, set an initial range
+      const initialRange = {
+        start: new Date(2024, 0, 15),
+        end: new Date(2024, 0, 20)
+      };
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedRange: initialRange }, 'test', true);
+      mockObserver.onStateChange.mockClear();
+
+      // Then update the range (now both old and new are objects, so nested tracking applies)
+      const updatedRange = {
+        start: new Date(2024, 0, 16), // Changed
+        end: new Date(2024, 0, 20) // Same
+      };
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedRange: updatedRange }, 'test2', true);
+
+      const changedProperties = stateManager.getLastChangedProperties();
+      expect(changedProperties.has('selectedRange')).toBe(true);
+      // Nested properties should be tracked when both old and new are objects
+      expect(changedProperties.has('selectedRange.start')).toBe(true); // Changed
+      expect(changedProperties.has('selectedRange.end')).toBe(false); // Not changed
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+
+    it('should maintain backward compatibility with existing observer pattern', () => {
+      const observer = stateManager.subscribe(mockObserver);
+
+      const testDate = new Date(2024, 0, 15);
+      stateManager.updateState({ selectedDate: testDate }, 'test', true);
+
+      // Existing behavior should still work
+      expect(mockObserver.onStateChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      const [newState, oldState] = mockObserver.onStateChange.mock.calls[0];
+      expect(newState.selectedDate).toEqual(testDate);
+
+      // New functionality should also work
+      const changedProperties = stateManager.getLastChangedProperties();
+      expect(changedProperties.has('selectedDate')).toBe(true);
+
+      observer(); // unsubscribe
+    });
+  });
+});