@jwikman/bc-code-intelligence-mcp 1.5.7-dev.1

package/embedded-knowledge/methodologies/phases/performance-full.md

@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+# Performance Optimization Phase - BC-Specific Enhancement Methodology
+
+## Overview
+**Objective**: Apply systematic Business Central performance optimizations based on analysis phase findings, achieving measurable improvements through domain-specific knowledge.
+
+**Key Principle**: When optimization opportunities are identified, applying BC-specific patterns and techniques produces dramatically superior results compared to generic optimization approaches.
+
+---
+
+## Phase Execution Process
+
+### Step 1: Optimization Priority Framework
+**CRITICAL**: Apply optimizations in priority order for maximum cumulative impact.
+
+#### 🟢 Priority 1: Easy Win Optimizations (Apply First)
+**High ROI + Low Risk** - These should be implemented immediately:
+
+##### Database-First Performance Hierarchy
+**CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: Always prefer database-native operations over application-layer workarounds.
+
+**Tier 1: Database-Native Operations (HIGHEST PRIORITY)**
+- Direct table CalcSums, Count(), filtering
+- Single-table aggregations with SIFT keys
+- Database-level sorting and grouping
+```al
+// ✅ PREFERRED: Direct database aggregation
+MyRecord.CalcSums(Amount);
+Total := MyRecord.Amount;
+```
+
+**Tier 2: Platform-Optimized Operations (MEDIUM PRIORITY)**
+- SetLoadFields, efficient key usage
+- Only after database-native options exhausted
+```al
+// ✅ SECONDARY: Field optimization
+MyRecord.SetLoadFields(Amount, Date);
+MyRecord.CalcSums(Amount);
+```
+
+**Tier 3: Application-Level Operations (LOWER PRIORITY)**
+- FlowFields, multi-table relationships
+- Only when database-native insufficient
+```al
+// ⚠️ LAST RESORT: Application-layer processing
+UnitStats.CalcFields("Total Revenue"); // FlowField calculation
+```
+
+##### Database-Level Operations vs Manual Processing
+**Pattern**: Replace manual loops with database aggregation operations
+```al
+// ❌ BEFORE: Manual processing (inefficient)
+Total := 0;
+if MyRecord.FindSet() then
+    repeat
+        Total += MyRecord.Amount;
+    until MyRecord.Next() = 0;
+
+// ✅ AFTER: Database aggregation (efficient)
+MyRecord.CalcSums(Amount);
+Total := MyRecord.Amount;
+```
+
+##### Field Loading Optimization
+**Pattern**: Use `SetLoadFields()` to load only required fields
+```al
+// ❌ BEFORE: Loading all fields (wasteful)
+MyRecord.FindSet();
+
+// ✅ AFTER: Selective field loading (efficient)
+MyRecord.SetLoadFields(Name, Amount, Date);
+MyRecord.FindSet();
+```
+
+#### 🟡 Priority 2: Medium Impact Optimizations
+**Moderate ROI + Medium Risk** - Implement after Priority 1:
+
+##### Infrastructure Optimization Validation
+**CRITICAL**: For optimizations applied that rely on underlying data (tables, keys, indexes), ensure the related infrastructure is updated or extended to support the necessary change.
+
+- **Examine referenced objects**: If code references tables or other objects, analyze those for optimization opportunities
+- **Validate infrastructure support**: Confirm that database structures (keys, indexes, fields) support the optimization
+- **Update dependencies**: Modify tables, keys, or other infrastructure to enable optimization effectiveness
+- **Cross-reference infrastructure**: Check if shared objects provide optimization opportunities for multiple modules
+
+##### Platform-Specific Optimization Application
+- **Use knowledge base**: Apply `get_topic_content` for specific optimization techniques identified in analysis phase
+
+##### Advanced Platform Feature Application  
+- **Apply knowledge systematically**: Use `get_topic_content` for detailed implementation of optimization techniques
+- **Follow best practices**: Implement optimizations according to platform-specific guidance from knowledge base
+
+##### Database Operation Optimization
+- **Apply research findings**: Use optimization techniques discovered through MCP knowledge base analysis
+- **Implement systematically**: Follow specific guidance from `get_topic_content` for identified optimization patterns
+
+#### 🔴 Priority 3: Complex Optimizations
+**High Impact + Higher Risk** - Requires careful analysis:
+
+##### Architectural Changes
+- Restructure algorithms for better performance characteristics
+- Implement caching strategies for frequently accessed data
+- Consider background processing for heavy operations
+
+##### Advanced BC Features
+- Implement table extensions for performance gains
+- Utilize Business Central APIs for external integrations
+- Apply advanced filtering and search techniques
+
+### Step 2: Implementation Guidelines
+
+#### ⚡ Performance Best Practices
+- [ ] **Measure Before Optimizing**: Establish baseline performance metrics
+- [ ] **Single Responsibility**: Each optimization should address one specific bottleneck
+- [ ] **Preserve Functionality**: Ensure business logic remains intact
+- [ ] **Test Thoroughly**: Validate both performance improvement and correctness
+
+#### 🛠️ Technical Implementation Standards
+- [ ] **Use BC-Specific Patterns**: Prefer Business Central optimizations over generic approaches
+- [ ] **Follow AL Conventions**: Maintain code style and naming conventions
+- [ ] **Document Changes**: Comment optimization reasoning for future maintenance
+- [ ] **Consider Scalability**: Ensure optimizations work with larger datasets
+
+### Step 3: Validation Framework
+
+#### 📊 Performance Measurement
+For each optimization applied:
+- [ ] **Baseline Measurement**: Record original execution time/resource usage
+- [ ] **Implementation**: Apply the optimization technique
+- [ ] **Performance Testing**: Measure improved performance metrics
+- [ ] **Impact Calculation**: Document percentage improvement achieved
+
+#### 🎯 Success Metrics
+- **Execution Time**: Target reduction in processing duration
+- **Memory Usage**: Minimize memory consumption during operations
+- **Database Efficiency**: Reduce number of database calls
+- **Resource Utilization**: Optimize CPU and I/O usage
+
+### Step 4: Risk Management
+
+#### ⚠️ Risk Assessment Categories
+- [ ] **Low Risk**: Simple field access optimizations, basic query improvements
+- [ ] **Medium Risk**: Algorithm changes, new BC feature usage
+- [ ] **High Risk**: Architectural modifications, complex business logic changes
+
+#### 🛡️ Mitigation Strategies
+- **Code Reviews**: Peer validation of optimization approaches
+- **Incremental Testing**: Apply optimizations incrementally with testing
+- **Rollback Planning**: Maintain ability to revert changes if needed
+- **Documentation**: Clear documentation of changes for troubleshooting
+
+---
+
+## 🔒 MANDATORY COMPLETION GATES
+**CRITICAL**: Performance phase CANNOT be marked complete until ALL gates pass.
+
+### Gate 1: Optimization Coverage Validation
+- [ ] **Cross-reference file inventory**: Every file in analysis scope must be addressed
+- [ ] **Pattern application verification**: Core patterns (CalcSums, SetLoadFields) applied where identified
+- [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: ANY file in scope missing optimization analysis = INCOMPLETE
+
+### Gate 2: Infrastructure Validation  
+- [ ] **Table structure verification**: Any SIFT keys or infrastructure changes properly implemented
+- [ ] **Dependency validation**: Related objects updated to support optimizations
+- [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: Code optimizations without supporting infrastructure = INVALID
+
+### Gate 3: Documentation Completeness
+- [ ] **Optimization log accuracy**: Every claimed optimization must reference actual file/line changes
+- [ ] **No phantom optimizations**: Cannot claim optimizations for non-existent files
+- [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: Inaccurate optimization claims = VERIFICATION REQUIRED
+
+## 🚨 EXECUTION VALIDATION CHECKPOINTS - MANDATORY
+**CRITICAL**: Run execution validation frequently during performance work to prevent fraud.
+
+### Trigger Points (MUST BE EXECUTED)
+1. **After optimizing 2-3 files**: `load_methodology execution-validation`
+2. **Before claiming module complete**: BLOCK until execution validation passes
+3. **When requesting permission to continue**: Validate all claimed work first
+4. **After any substantial optimization claims** (CalcSums, SetLoadFields, etc.)
+
+### Execution Validation Protocol
+```markdown
+## EXECUTION VALIDATION CHECKPOINT
+**MANDATORY**: Run real-time validation of optimization claims:
+- Load execution-validation methodology: `load_methodology execution-validation`
+- Validate file modifications and optimization existence
+- BLOCKING: Cannot proceed until all validation checks pass
+- Document any discrepancies and correct immediately
+```
+
+### Integration with Performance Work
+- **During optimization**: Run micro-validation every 2-3 files
+- **Before completion claims**: BLOCK until execution validation complete
+- **Real-time fraud detection**: Immediately catch false optimization claims
+
+## Success Criteria
+✅ **Measurable Improvement**: Documented performance gains from optimizations
+✅ **Functional Preservation**: All business functionality remains intact
+✅ **Best Practice Compliance**: Solutions follow Business Central optimization patterns
+✅ **Scalability Validation**: Optimizations work effectively with production data volumes
+✅ **MANDATORY**: ALL completion gates passed before proceeding to verification
+
+## Quality Validation
+- **Performance Verification**: Are claimed improvements actually measurable?
+- **Code Quality**: Does the optimized code maintain readability and maintainability?
+- **Business Logic Integrity**: Have you preserved all original business requirements?
+- **BC Pattern Compliance**: Are you using Business Central features appropriately?
+
+---
+
+## Next Phase
+Upon completion, proceed to **Testing & Validation Phase** to confirm optimization effectiveness in production-like scenarios.

package/embedded-knowledge/methodologies/phases/performance-quick.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Performance Phase - Quick Reference
+
+## 📚 NEED MORE DETAIL?
+For implementation examples and detailed guidance: `load_methodology performance-full`
+
+## 🎯 OBJECTIVE
+Apply systematic optimizations with real-time validation to prevent execution fraud.
+
+## ⚡ CORE PROCESS
+1. **Priority Order**: Database-native (CalcSums) → Platform-optimized (SetLoadFields) → Application-level (FlowFields)
+2. **Infrastructure Check**: Update tables/keys to support optimizations (SIFT keys for CalcSums)
+3. **Apply Optimizations**: Focus on high-impact patterns from analysis phase
+4. **Execution Validation**: Run `load_methodology execution-validation` every 2-3 files
+
+## 🚨 EXECUTION CHECKPOINTS (MANDATORY)
+- **After 2-3 files**: `load_methodology execution-validation`
+- **Before module claims**: BLOCK until validation passes
+- **Before continuing**: Validate all claimed work exists
+- **After optimization claims**: Verify CalcSums/SetLoadFields actually implemented
+
+## 🔍 OPTIMIZATION HIERARCHY
+**Tier 1**: `MyRecord.CalcSums(Amount)` - Database aggregation  
+**Tier 2**: `MyRecord.SetLoadFields()` - Field optimization  
+**Tier 3**: `MyRecord.CalcFields()` - FlowField calculations  
+
+## 🚨 BLOCKING CONDITIONS
+- **Optimization without infrastructure** = INVALID
+- **Claims without file modifications** = FRAUD  
+- **Incomplete coverage** of analysis scope = INCOMPLETE
+
+## ➡️ NEXT PHASE
+Execution validation → Verification phase for final coverage audit

package/embedded-knowledge/methodologies/phases/performance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+# Performance Optimization Phase - BC-Specific Enhancement Methodology
+
+## Overview
+**Objective**: Apply systematic Business Central performance optimizations based on analysis phase findings, achieving measurable improvements through domain-specific knowledge.
+
+**Key Principle**: When optimization opportunities are identified, applying BC-specific patterns and techniques produces dramatically superior results compared to generic optimization approaches.
+
+---
+
+## Phase Execution Process
+
+### Step 1: Optimization Priority Framework
+**CRITICAL**: Apply optimizations in priority order for maximum cumulative impact.
+
+#### 🟢 Priority 1: Easy Win Optimizations (Apply First)
+**High ROI + Low Risk** - These should be implemented immediately:
+
+##### Database-First Performance Hierarchy
+**CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: Always prefer database-native operations over application-layer workarounds.
+
+**Tier 1: Database-Native Operations (HIGHEST PRIORITY)**
+- Direct table CalcSums, Count(), filtering
+- Single-table aggregations with SIFT keys
+- Database-level sorting and grouping
+```al
+// ✅ PREFERRED: Direct database aggregation
+MyRecord.CalcSums(Amount);
+Total := MyRecord.Amount;
+```
+
+**Tier 2: Platform-Optimized Operations (MEDIUM PRIORITY)**
+- SetLoadFields, efficient key usage
+- Only after database-native options exhausted
+```al
+// ✅ SECONDARY: Field optimization
+MyRecord.SetLoadFields(Amount, Date);
+MyRecord.CalcSums(Amount);
+```
+
+**Tier 3: Application-Level Operations (LOWER PRIORITY)**
+- FlowFields, multi-table relationships
+- Only when database-native insufficient
+```al
+// ⚠️ LAST RESORT: Application-layer processing
+UnitStats.CalcFields("Total Revenue"); // FlowField calculation
+```
+
+##### Database-Level Operations vs Manual Processing
+**Pattern**: Replace manual loops with database aggregation operations
+```al
+// ❌ BEFORE: Manual processing (inefficient)
+Total := 0;
+if MyRecord.FindSet() then
+    repeat
+        Total += MyRecord.Amount;
+    until MyRecord.Next() = 0;
+
+// ✅ AFTER: Database aggregation (efficient)
+MyRecord.CalcSums(Amount);
+Total := MyRecord.Amount;
+```
+
+##### Field Loading Optimization
+**Pattern**: Use `SetLoadFields()` to load only required fields
+```al
+// ❌ BEFORE: Loading all fields (wasteful)
+MyRecord.FindSet();
+
+// ✅ AFTER: Selective field loading (efficient)
+MyRecord.SetLoadFields(Name, Amount, Date);
+MyRecord.FindSet();
+```
+
+#### 🟡 Priority 2: Medium Impact Optimizations
+**Moderate ROI + Medium Risk** - Implement after Priority 1:
+
+##### Infrastructure Optimization Validation
+**CRITICAL**: For optimizations applied that rely on underlying data (tables, keys, indexes), ensure the related infrastructure is updated or extended to support the necessary change.
+
+- **Examine referenced objects**: If code references tables or other objects, analyze those for optimization opportunities
+- **Validate infrastructure support**: Confirm that database structures (keys, indexes, fields) support the optimization
+- **Update dependencies**: Modify tables, keys, or other infrastructure to enable optimization effectiveness
+- **Cross-reference infrastructure**: Check if shared objects provide optimization opportunities for multiple modules
+
+##### Platform-Specific Optimization Application
+- **Use knowledge base**: Apply `get_topic_content` for specific optimization techniques identified in analysis phase
+
+##### Advanced Platform Feature Application  
+- **Apply knowledge systematically**: Use `get_topic_content` for detailed implementation of optimization techniques
+- **Follow best practices**: Implement optimizations according to platform-specific guidance from knowledge base
+
+##### Database Operation Optimization
+- **Apply research findings**: Use optimization techniques discovered through MCP knowledge base analysis
+- **Implement systematically**: Follow specific guidance from `get_topic_content` for identified optimization patterns
+
+#### 🔴 Priority 3: Complex Optimizations
+**High Impact + Higher Risk** - Requires careful analysis:
+
+##### Architectural Changes
+- Restructure algorithms for better performance characteristics
+- Implement caching strategies for frequently accessed data
+- Consider background processing for heavy operations
+
+##### Advanced BC Features
+- Implement table extensions for performance gains
+- Utilize Business Central APIs for external integrations
+- Apply advanced filtering and search techniques
+
+### Step 2: Implementation Guidelines
+
+#### ⚡ Performance Best Practices
+- [ ] **Measure Before Optimizing**: Establish baseline performance metrics
+- [ ] **Single Responsibility**: Each optimization should address one specific bottleneck
+- [ ] **Preserve Functionality**: Ensure business logic remains intact
+- [ ] **Test Thoroughly**: Validate both performance improvement and correctness
+
+#### 🛠️ Technical Implementation Standards
+- [ ] **Use BC-Specific Patterns**: Prefer Business Central optimizations over generic approaches
+- [ ] **Follow AL Conventions**: Maintain code style and naming conventions
+- [ ] **Document Changes**: Comment optimization reasoning for future maintenance
+- [ ] **Consider Scalability**: Ensure optimizations work with larger datasets
+
+### Step 3: Validation Framework
+
+#### 📊 Performance Measurement
+For each optimization applied:
+- [ ] **Baseline Measurement**: Record original execution time/resource usage
+- [ ] **Implementation**: Apply the optimization technique
+- [ ] **Performance Testing**: Measure improved performance metrics
+- [ ] **Impact Calculation**: Document percentage improvement achieved
+
+#### 🎯 Success Metrics
+- **Execution Time**: Target reduction in processing duration
+- **Memory Usage**: Minimize memory consumption during operations
+- **Database Efficiency**: Reduce number of database calls
+- **Resource Utilization**: Optimize CPU and I/O usage
+
+### Step 4: Risk Management
+
+#### ⚠️ Risk Assessment Categories
+- [ ] **Low Risk**: Simple field access optimizations, basic query improvements
+- [ ] **Medium Risk**: Algorithm changes, new BC feature usage
+- [ ] **High Risk**: Architectural modifications, complex business logic changes
+
+#### 🛡️ Mitigation Strategies
+- **Code Reviews**: Peer validation of optimization approaches
+- **Incremental Testing**: Apply optimizations incrementally with testing
+- **Rollback Planning**: Maintain ability to revert changes if needed
+- **Documentation**: Clear documentation of changes for troubleshooting
+
+---
+
+## 🔒 MANDATORY COMPLETION GATES
+**CRITICAL**: Performance phase CANNOT be marked complete until ALL gates pass.
+
+### Gate 1: Optimization Coverage Validation
+- [ ] **Cross-reference file inventory**: Every file in analysis scope must be addressed
+- [ ] **Pattern application verification**: Core patterns (CalcSums, SetLoadFields) applied where identified
+- [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: ANY file in scope missing optimization analysis = INCOMPLETE
+
+### Gate 2: Infrastructure Validation  
+- [ ] **Table structure verification**: Any SIFT keys or infrastructure changes properly implemented
+- [ ] **Dependency validation**: Related objects updated to support optimizations
+- [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: Code optimizations without supporting infrastructure = INVALID
+
+### Gate 3: Documentation Completeness
+- [ ] **Optimization log accuracy**: Every claimed optimization must reference actual file/line changes
+- [ ] **No phantom optimizations**: Cannot claim optimizations for non-existent files
+- [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: Inaccurate optimization claims = VERIFICATION REQUIRED
+
+## 🚨 EXECUTION VALIDATION CHECKPOINTS - MANDATORY
+**CRITICAL**: Run execution validation frequently during performance work to prevent fraud.
+
+### Trigger Points (MUST BE EXECUTED)
+1. **After optimizing 2-3 files**: `load_methodology execution-validation`
+2. **Before claiming module complete**: BLOCK until execution validation passes
+3. **When requesting permission to continue**: Validate all claimed work first
+4. **After any substantial optimization claims** (CalcSums, SetLoadFields, etc.)
+
+### Execution Validation Protocol
+```markdown
+## EXECUTION VALIDATION CHECKPOINT
+**MANDATORY**: Run real-time validation of optimization claims:
+- Load execution-validation methodology: `load_methodology execution-validation`
+- Validate file modifications and optimization existence
+- BLOCKING: Cannot proceed until all validation checks pass
+- Document any discrepancies and correct immediately
+```
+
+### Integration with Performance Work
+- **During optimization**: Run micro-validation every 2-3 files
+- **Before completion claims**: BLOCK until execution validation complete
+- **Real-time fraud detection**: Immediately catch false optimization claims
+
+## Success Criteria
+✅ **Measurable Improvement**: Documented performance gains from optimizations
+✅ **Functional Preservation**: All business functionality remains intact
+✅ **Best Practice Compliance**: Solutions follow Business Central optimization patterns
+✅ **Scalability Validation**: Optimizations work effectively with production data volumes
+✅ **MANDATORY**: ALL completion gates passed before proceeding to verification
+
+## Quality Validation
+- **Performance Verification**: Are claimed improvements actually measurable?
+- **Code Quality**: Does the optimized code maintain readability and maintainability?
+- **Business Logic Integrity**: Have you preserved all original business requirements?
+- **BC Pattern Compliance**: Are you using Business Central features appropriately?
+
+---
+
+## Next Phase
+Upon completion, proceed to **Testing & Validation Phase** to confirm optimization effectiveness in production-like scenarios.

package/embedded-knowledge/methodologies/phases/verification-full.md

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+# Verification Phase - Coverage Validation & Gap Resolution
+
+## Overview
+**Objective**: Ensure systematic completeness by validating that all planned analysis was completed and no critical optimizations were missed.
+
+**Key Principle**: No critical performance improvements should fall through coverage gaps. This phase serves as the final safety net to catch any missed files or patterns.
+
+## 🚨 MANDATORY PHASE - CANNOT BE SKIPPED
+**CRITICAL ENFORCEMENT**: This phase is REQUIRED for all optimization sessions. NO SESSION can be marked complete without successful verification phase completion.
+
+### Verification Phase Triggers Automatically When:
+- Performance phase claims completion
+- Optimization log contains completion markers
+- Session attempts to conclude without verification
+
+### Verification Phase BLOCKS Session Completion Until:
+- ✅ ALL files in scope verified as analyzed  
+- ✅ ALL claimed optimizations validated against actual files
+- ✅ ALL coverage gaps identified and resolved
+- ✅ NO phantom optimizations in documentation
+
+---
+
+## Phase Execution Process
+
+### Step 1: Coverage Checklist Validation
+**CRITICAL**: Cross-reference planned vs actual analysis coverage to identify gaps.
+
+#### 🚨 CONTEXT-RESISTANT FILE REDISCOVERY (MANDATORY FIRST STEP)
+**CRITICAL**: Never trust chat memory or existing logs - Context compaction can corrupt file inventories!
+
+```bash
+# REQUIRED: Always start verification by independently rediscovering file scope
+find . -name "*.al" | wc -l                    # Count actual files in workspace
+find . -name "*.al" | sort > actual-files.tmp  # Create temporary sorted file list
+grep -c "\.al" OptimizationLog.md             # Count files claimed in optimization log
+ls -la *.al | wc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0"   # Double-check with ls count
+
+# BLOCKING CONDITION: If counts don't match = INCOMPLETE WORK DETECTED
+echo "=== FILE COUNT COMPARISON ==="
+echo "Actual workspace files: $(find . -name '*.al' | wc -l)"
+echo "Files in optimization log: $(grep -c '\.al' OptimizationLog.md)"
+```
+
+#### 📋 File Coverage Validation (Using Rediscovered Files)
+- [ ] **Independent File Discovery** (ignore any chat memory or previous lists)
+  - [ ] Generate FRESH project file list using `find . -name "*.al"`
+  - [ ] Compare FRESH file list against optimization log entries
+  - [ ] Identify any files discovered but not appearing in optimization results
+  - [ ] **Red Flag**: Missing files from critical business domains (Analytics, Finance, Data Processing)
+
+#### 🔒 MANDATORY FILE VALIDATION GATES
+**CRITICAL**: These checks CANNOT be bypassed.
+
+- [ ] **Gate 1: Phantom File Detection**
+  - [ ] Cross-reference optimization log claims against actual project files
+  - [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: Any claimed optimizations for non-existent files = INVALID SESSION
+  
+- [ ] **Gate 2: Missing File Detection**  
+  - [ ] Generate complete project file inventory using automated tools
+  - [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: ANY files in scope missing from optimization log = INCOMPLETE SESSION
+  
+- [ ] **Gate 3: Coverage Accuracy Validation**
+  - [ ] Verify optimization claims match actual file contents
+  - [ ] **BLOCKING CONDITION**: False optimization claims = VERIFICATION RESTART REQUIRED
+
+#### 🔍 Pattern Coverage Validation  
+- [ ] **Review Pattern Detection Checklist**
+  - [ ] Verify each planned pattern was checked for each analyzed file
+  - [ ] Identify incomplete pattern coverage across file set
+  - [ ] **Red Flag**: Core patterns (Manual Summation, N+1 Queries) not checked consistently
+
+#### 📊 Coverage Reporting
+- [ ] **Generate Coverage Report**:
+  ```
+  PLANNED: 23 files across 4 modules for 17 patterns
+  ACTUAL: 22 files analyzed, 396 pattern checks completed
+  GAPS: 1 file missing (T4_BusinessIntelligence.Codeunit.al)
+  ```
+
+### Step 2: Gap Analysis & Risk Assessment
+**CRITICAL**: Assess impact of any identified coverage gaps.
+
+#### 🚨 Missing File Analysis
+For each identified missing file:
+- [ ] **Determine Business Criticality**
+  - High Risk: Analytics, Finance, Core Data Processing
+  - Medium Risk: Reporting, User Interface, Utilities  
+  - Low Risk: Configuration, Setup, Administrative functions
+
+- [ ] **Quick Pattern Scan** (for High/Medium risk files)
+  - [ ] Scan for manual summation loops (`repeat...until` with `+=`)
+  - [ ] Check for missing SetLoadFields optimizations
+  - [ ] Identify N+1 query anti-patterns (nested record loops)
+  - [ ] Look for FlowField vs CalcSums optimization opportunities
+
+#### ⚠️ Risk Classification
+- [ ] **CRITICAL**: High-risk files with confirmed performance anti-patterns
+- [ ] **MODERATE**: Medium-risk files with potential optimizations  
+- [ ] **MINOR**: Low-risk files or optimization patterns with minimal impact
+
+### Step 3: Automated Gap Resolution
+**CRITICAL**: Apply immediate fixes for critical gaps to prevent performance regressions.
+
+#### 🔥 Critical Gap Resolution
+For files classified as CRITICAL:
+- [ ] **Apply Standard Optimization Patterns**
+  - [ ] Replace manual summation with CalcSums operations
+  - [ ] Add SetLoadFields for selective field loading
+  - [ ] Eliminate N+1 query patterns with proper aggregation
+  - [ ] Apply database-first performance hierarchy principles
+
+- [ ] **Update Documentation**
+  - [ ] Add "VERIFICATION_PHASE" entries to optimization log
+  - [ ] Document pattern fixes and expected performance impact
+  - [ ] Update overall performance predictions
+
+#### 📋 Moderate Gap Documentation
+For files classified as MODERATE:
+- [ ] **Document for Future Analysis**
+  - [ ] Add to "Future Optimization Opportunities" section
+  - [ ] Note potential improvement areas for subsequent sessions
+  - [ ] Estimate impact and implementation effort
+
+### Step 4: Final Validation
+**CRITICAL**: Confirm systematic completeness before concluding optimization session.
+
+#### ✅ Completeness Checklist
+- [ ] **Coverage Validation Complete**: All planned files verified
+- [ ] **Critical Gaps Resolved**: High-risk missed optimizations applied
+- [ ] **Documentation Updated**: Optimization log reflects all changes
+- [ ] **Performance Predictions Revised**: Impact estimates include verification fixes
+
+#### 📊 Final Coverage Report
+- [ ] **Generate Final Summary**:
+  ```
+  VERIFICATION PHASE RESULTS:
+  - Files Analyzed: 23/23 (100% coverage achieved)
+  - Critical Gaps Found: 1 (T4_BusinessIntelligence.Codeunit.al)
+  - Critical Gaps Resolved: 1 (Manual summation → CalcSums conversion)
+  - Additional Optimizations Applied: 3 procedures optimized
+  - Updated Performance Prediction: +15% improvement from gap resolution
+  ```
+
+---
+
+## Success Criteria
+✅ **Complete Coverage Achieved**: All files in scope verified as analyzed  
+✅ **Critical Gaps Resolved**: No high-risk performance anti-patterns remaining
+✅ **Documentation Complete**: All optimization work properly documented
+✅ **Risk Assessment**: Any remaining gaps classified and documented for future work
+
+## Quality Validation
+- **Coverage Completeness**: Did you verify every file in the analysis scope?
+- **Gap Resolution**: Were critical missed optimizations properly addressed?
+- **Documentation Accuracy**: Does the optimization log reflect all work completed?
+- **Risk Management**: Are any remaining gaps properly classified and documented?
+
+---
+
+## Next Phase
+Upon completion, the optimization session is ready for **Testing & Validation Phase** with confidence that all critical performance improvements have been systematically applied.

package/embedded-knowledge/methodologies/phases/verification-quick.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Verification Phase - Quick Reference
+
+## 📚 NEED MORE DETAIL?
+For detailed validation procedures and examples: `load_methodology verification-full`
+
+## 🎯 OBJECTIVE
+Final coverage audit to catch missed files and validate optimization completeness.
+
+## ⚡ CORE VERIFICATION
+
+### 🚨 CONTEXT-RESISTANT FILE REDISCOVERY (MANDATORY FIRST STEP)
+**CRITICAL**: Never trust chat memory or existing logs - always rediscover independently
+```bash
+# 1. Rediscover actual file scope in workspace
+find . -name "*.al" | wc -l
+find . -name "*.al" > actual-files.tmp
+
+# 2. Count files claimed in optimization log
+grep -c "\.al" OptimizationLog.md
+
+# 3. BLOCKING CONDITION: Mismatched counts = INCOMPLETE WORK
+```
+
+### Standard Verification Steps
+1. **File Coverage Audit**: Compare rediscovered files vs optimization log claims
+2. **Phantom File Detection**: Check for claimed work on non-existent files  
+3. **Missing File Detection**: Find actual files missing from optimization log
+4. **Gap Resolution**: Address ALL discovered coverage gaps
+5. **Accuracy Validation**: Cross-reference claims with actual file contents
+
+## 🚨 COVERAGE VALIDATION
+- **File Inventory vs Reality**: `find . -name "*.al"` vs analysis file list
+- **Modification Evidence**: All claimed files must show recent timestamps
+- **Pattern Verification**: `grep -l "CalcSums" *.al` must match optimization claims
+- **Anti-Pattern Check**: Claimed eliminated patterns must be gone
+
+## 🔧 GAP RESOLUTION PROTOCOL
+1. **Identify gaps** in coverage (missed files, phantom claims)
+2. **BLOCK completion** until all gaps resolved
+3. **Return to analysis/performance** for missed files
+4. **Re-validate** after gap resolution
+5. **Document accuracy** in final report
+
+## ✅ SUCCESS CRITERIA  
+Zero phantom files + Zero missing files + 100% claimed optimizations verified + All gaps resolved + Complete accuracy validation
+
+## 🏁 COMPLETION
+Only mark complete when ALL verification checks pass - no exceptions