@jjlmoya/utils-chrono 1.20.0 → 1.21.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/category/index.ts +2 -0
- package/src/entries.ts +4 -1
- package/src/index.ts +1 -0
- package/src/tests/locale_completeness.test.ts +1 -1
- package/src/tests/tool_validation.test.ts +1 -1
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/bibliography.astro +16 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/bibliography.ts +16 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/client.ts +150 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/component.astro +15 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/components/CrystalPanel.astro +20 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/entry.ts +43 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/helpers.ts +49 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/de.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/en.ts +90 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/es.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/fr.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/id.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/it.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/ja.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/ko.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/nl.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/pl.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/pt.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/ru.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/sv.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/tr.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/i18n/zh.ts +35 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/index.ts +11 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/logic.ts +55 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/seo.astro +16 -0
- package/src/tool/watch-crystal-material-comparison/watch-crystal-material-comparison.css +625 -0
- package/src/tools.ts +2 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: 'Quale vetro da orologio è più resistente ai graffi?', answer: 'Il vetro zaffiro è il più resistente con una durezza di 9 sulla scala di Mohs - solo il diamante è più duro. Il minerale (5) è moderato, mentre l\'hesalite (2-3) si graffia facilmente ma può essere lucidato.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: 'Si può riparare un vetro hesalite graffiato?', answer: 'Sì, i graffi sull\'hesalite possono essere lucidati con Polywatch in pochi minuti. I vetri minerali e zaffiro non possono essere lucidati e devono essere sostituiti.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'Quale vetro è migliore per un orologio subacqueo?', answer: 'Lo zaffiro è lo standard per gli orologi subacquei per la sua resistenza ai graffi e durata. L\'hesalite non è raccomandato per le immersioni.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'Seleziona un vetro', text: 'Clicca su un vetro a sinistra per vedere la sua scheda statistica a destra.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: 'Confronta due vetri', text: 'Trascina un vetro dalla lista e rilascialo su un altro per confrontarli fianco a fianco.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: 'Chiudi confronto', text: 'Clicca su "Close Comparison" per tornare alla vista singola.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = 'Confronto Vetri da Orologio: Hesalite vs Minerale vs Zaffiro';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'confronto-vetri-orologio-hesalite-minerale-zaffiro',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'Confronta i vetri da orologio hesalite, minerale e zaffiro con schede statistiche interattive. Vedi durezza, chiarezza, resistenza agli urti e ai graffi.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'Confronto Vetri', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: 'Durezza', clarity: 'Chiarezza',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: 'Urto', scratchResistance: 'Graffi', durability: 'Durata', priceRange: 'Prezzo',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: 'Clicca su un vetro a sinistra.', step2: 'Trascinane uno su un altro per confrontare.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: 'Clicca su Chiudi.', tipTitle: 'Consiglio',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: 'Il voto complessivo è una media di tutte le statistiche. Più alto non significa sempre migliore - l\'hesalite ha la migliore resistenza agli urti.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'Trascina', dragSub: 'per confrontare',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: 'Confronto Vetri da Orologio: Hesalite vs Minerale vs Zaffiro', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: 'Confronta <strong>hesalite, minerale e zaffiro</strong> con schede statistiche interattive. Durezza, chiarezza, resistenza agli urti e ai graffi a colpo d\'occhio.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: '最も傷つきにくい時計のクリスタルは?', answer: 'サファイアクリスタルはモース硬度9で最も傷つきにくく、ダイヤモンドだけがより硬いです。ミネラルガラス(5)は中程度、ヘサライト(2-3)は傷つきやすいですが研磨可能です。' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: '傷ついたヘサライトクリスタルは修理できますか?', answer: 'はい、ヘサライトの傷はPolywatchで数分で研磨できます。ミネラルガラスとサファイアは研磨できず交換が必要です。' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'ダイビングウォッチに最適なクリスタルは?', answer: 'サファイアは耐傷性と耐久性からダイビングウォッチの標準です。ヘサライトはダイビングには推奨されません。' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'クリスタルを選択', text: '左のクリスタルをクリックすると、右に統計カードが表示されます。' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: '2つのクリスタルを比較', text: 'リストからクリスタルをドラッグして別のクリスタルにドロップすると並べて比較できます。' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: '比較を閉じる', text: '「Close Comparison」をクリックすると単一表示に戻ります。' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = '時計クリスタル比較: ヘサライト vs ミネラル vs サファイア';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'watch-crystal-material-comparison',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'ヘサライト、ミネラルガラス、サファイアの時計クリスタルをインタラクティブな統計カードで比較。硬度、透明度、耐衝撃性、耐傷性、耐久性を一目で確認。',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'クリスタル比較', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: '硬度', clarity: '透明度',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: '耐衝撃', scratchResistance: '耐傷', durability: '耐久性', priceRange: '価格',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: '左のクリスタルをクリック。', step2: 'ドラッグして別のクリスタルにドロップ。',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: '閉じるをクリック。', tipTitle: 'ヒント',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: '総合評価は全ステータスの平均です。高いほど常に良いとは限りません - ヘサライトは耐衝撃性に優れています。',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'ドラッグ', dragSub: 'して比較',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: '時計クリスタル比較: ヘサライト vs ミネラル vs サファイア', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: '<strong>ヘサライト、ミネラルガラス、サファイア</strong>をインタラクティブな統計カードで比較。' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: '가장 긁힘에 강한 시계 크리스탈은?', answer: '사파이어 크리스탈은 모스 경도 9로 가장 긁힘에 강합니다 - 다이아몬드만 더 단단합니다. 미네랄(5)은 중간, 헤살라이트(2-3)는 쉽게 긁히지만 연마 가능합니다.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: '긁힌 헤살라이트 크리스탈을 수리할 수 있나요?', answer: '네, 헤살라이트의 긁힘은 Polywatch로 몇 분 만에 연마할 수 있습니다. 미네랄과 사파이어는 연마할 수 없으며 교체해야 합니다.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: '다이빙 시계에 가장 적합한 크리스탈은?', answer: '사파이어는 내구성과 긁힘 저항성 덕분에 다이빙 시계의 표준입니다. 헤살라이트는 다이빙에 권장되지 않습니다.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: '크리스탈 선택', text: '왼쪽의 크리스탈을 클릭하면 오른쪽에 통계 카드가 나타납니다.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: '두 크리스탈 비교', text: '목록에서 크리스탈을 끌어 다른 크리스탈에 놓으면 나란히 비교할 수 있습니다.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: '비교 닫기', text: '"Close Comparison"을 클릭하면 단일 보기로 돌아갑니다.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = '시계 크리스탈 비교: 헤살라이트 vs 미네랄 vs 사파이어';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'watch-crystal-material-comparison',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: '헤살라이트, 미네랄 글라스, 사파이어 시계 크리스탈을 인터랙티브 통계 카드로 비교하세요. 경도, 투명도, 내충격성, 내스크래치성, 내구성을 한눈에 확인하세요.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: '크리스탈 비교', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: '경도', clarity: '투명도',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: '내충격', scratchResistance: '내스크래치', durability: '내구성', priceRange: '가격',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: '왼쪽의 크리스탈을 클릭하세요.', step2: '하나를 다른 위로 끌어서 비교하세요.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: '닫기를 클릭하세요.', tipTitle: '팁',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: '전체 평점은 모든 통계의 평균입니다. 높다고 항상 좋은 것은 아닙니다 - 헤살라이트가 내충격성이 가장 좋습니다.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: '드래그', dragSub: '하여 비교',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: '시계 크리스탈 비교: 헤살라이트 vs 미네랄 vs 사파이어', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: '<strong>헤살라이트, 미네랄, 사파이어</strong> 시계 크리스탈을 인터랙티브 통계 카드로 비교하세요.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: 'Welk horlogeglas is het krasbestendigst?', answer: 'Saffierglas is het krasbestendigst met een hardheid van 9 op de Mohs-schaal - alleen diamant is harder. Mineraalglas (5) is matig, terwijl hesaliet (2-3) snel krassen vertoont maar gepolijst kan worden.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: 'Kan een bekrast hesalietglas worden gerepareerd?', answer: 'Ja, krassen in hesaliet kunnen met Polywatch in minuten worden weggepoetst. Mineraal- en saffierglazen kunnen niet worden gepolijst en moeten worden vervangen.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'Welk glas is het beste voor een duikhorloge?', answer: 'Saffier is de standaard voor duikhorloges vanwege zijn krasbestendigheid en duurzaamheid. Hesaliet wordt niet aanbevolen voor duiken.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'Selecteer een kristal', text: 'Klik links op een kristal om zijn statistiekenkaart rechts te zien.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: 'Vergelijk twee kristallen', text: 'Sleep een kristal uit de lijst en laat het op een ander vallen om ze naast elkaar te vergelijken.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: 'Sluit vergelijking', text: 'Klik op "Close Comparison" om terug te keren naar de enkele weergave.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = 'Horlogeglas Vergelijking: Hesaliet vs Mineraal vs Saffier';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'horlogeglas-vergelijking-hesaliet-mineraal-saffier',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'Vergelijk hesaliet, mineraal en saffier horlogeglazen met interactieve statistiekenkaarten. Zie hardheid, helderheid, slagvastheid, krasbestendigheid en duurzaamheid.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'Glas Vergelijking', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: 'Hardheid', clarity: 'Helderheid',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: 'Slag', scratchResistance: 'Kras', durability: 'Duurzaamheid', priceRange: 'Prijs',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: 'Klik links op een kristal.', step2: 'Sleep er een over een ander om te vergelijken.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: 'Klik op Sluiten.', tipTitle: 'Tip',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: 'De algemene score is een gemiddelde van alle statistieken. Hoger is niet altijd beter - hesaliet heeft de beste slagvastheid.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'Sleep', dragSub: 'om te vergelijken',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: 'Horlogeglas Vergelijking: Hesaliet vs Mineraal vs Saffier', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: 'Vergelijk <strong>hesaliet, mineraal en saffier</strong> horlogeglazen met interactieve statistiekenkaarten.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: 'Które szkiełko zegarkowe jest najbardziej odporne na zarysowania?', answer: 'Szafirowe szkiełko jest najbardziej odporne z twardością 9 w skali Mohsa - tylko diament jest twardszy. Mineralne (5) jest średnie, podczas gdy hesalit (2-3) rysuje się łatwo, ale można go wypolerować.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: 'Czy porysowane szkiełko hesalitowe można naprawić?', answer: 'Tak, rysy na hesalicie można wypolerować Polywatchem w kilka minut. Szkiełek mineralnych i szafirowych nie można polerować - trzeba je wymienić.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'Które szkiełko jest najlepsze do zegarka nurkowego?', answer: 'Szafir jest standardem dla zegarków nurkowych ze względu na odporność na zarysowania i trwałość. Hesalit nie jest zalecany do nurkowania.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'Wybierz szkiełko', text: 'Kliknij szkiełko po lewej, aby zobaczyć jego kartę statystyk po prawej.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: 'Porównaj dwa szkiełka', text: 'Przeciągnij szkiełko z listy i upuść na inne, aby porównać je obok siebie.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: 'Zamknij porównanie', text: 'Kliknij "Close Comparison", aby wrócić do widoku pojedynczego.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = 'Porównanie Szkiełek Zegarkowych: Hesalit vs Mineralne vs Szafir';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'porownanie-szkielek-zegarkowych-hesalit-mineralne-szafir',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'Porównaj szkiełka zegarkowe hesalitowe, mineralne i szafirowe z interaktywnymi kartami statystyk. Zobacz twardość, przejrzystość, odporność na uderzenia i zarysowania.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'Porównanie Szkiełek', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: 'Twardość', clarity: 'Przejrzystość',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: 'Uderzenia', scratchResistance: 'Zarysowania', durability: 'Trwałość', priceRange: 'Cena',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: 'Kliknij szkiełko po lewej.', step2: 'Przeciągnij jedno na drugie, aby porównać.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: 'Kliknij Zamknij.', tipTitle: 'Wskazówka',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: 'Ogólna ocena to średnia wszystkich statystyk. Wyższa nie zawsze oznacza lepszą - hesalit ma najlepszą odporność na uderzenia.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'Przeciągnij', dragSub: 'aby porównać',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: 'Porównanie Szkiełek Zegarkowych: Hesalit vs Mineralne vs Szafir', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: 'Porównaj <strong>hesalit, mineralne i szafir</strong> z interaktywnymi kartami statystyk.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: 'Qual cristal de relógio é mais resistente a arranhões?', answer: 'O cristal de safira é o mais resistente com dureza 9 na escala de Mohs - apenas o diamante é mais duro. O mineral (5) é moderado, enquanto o hesalite (2-3) arranha facilmente mas pode ser polido.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: 'Um cristal hesalite arranhado pode ser reparado?', answer: 'Sim, arranhões no hesalite podem ser polidos com Polywatch em minutos. Cristais minerais e de safira não podem ser polidos e devem ser substituídos.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'Qual cristal é melhor para relógio de mergulho?', answer: 'A safira é o padrão para relógios de mergulho por sua resistência a arranhões e durabilidade. O hesalite não é recomendado para mergulho.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'Selecionar um cristal', text: 'Clique num cristal à esquerda para ver sua ficha de estatísticas à direita.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: 'Comparar dois cristais', text: 'Arraste um cristal da lista e solte sobre outro para compará-los lado a lado.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: 'Fechar comparação', text: 'Clique em "Close Comparison" para voltar à vista individual.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = 'Comparação de Cristais de Relógio: Hesalite vs Mineral vs Safira';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'comparacao-cristais-relogio-hesalite-mineral-safira',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'Compare cristais de relógio hesalite, mineral e safira com cartas de estatísticas interativas. Veja dureza, clareza, resistência ao impacto e a arranhões.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'Comparação de Cristais', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: 'Dureza', clarity: 'Clareza',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: 'Impacto', scratchResistance: 'Arranhão', durability: 'Durabilidade', priceRange: 'Preço',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: 'Clique num cristal à esquerda.', step2: 'Arraste um sobre outro para comparar.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: 'Clique em Fechar.', tipTitle: 'Dica',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: 'A classificação geral é uma média de todas as estatísticas. Mais alto nem sempre é melhor - o hesalite tem a melhor resistência ao impacto.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'Arrastar', dragSub: 'para comparar',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: 'Comparação de Cristais de Relógio: Hesalite vs Mineral vs Safira', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: 'Compare <strong>hesalite, mineral e safira</strong> com cartas de estatísticas interativas. Dureza, clareza, resistência ao impacto e a arranhões.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: 'Какое стекло для часов самое устойчивое к царапинам?', answer: 'Сапфировое стекло самое устойчивое с твердостью 9 по шкале Мооса - только алмаз тверже. Минеральное (5) среднее, хесалит (2-3) легко царапается, но поддается полировке.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: 'Можно ли отремонтировать поцарапанное стекло хесалит?', answer: 'Да, царапины на хесалите можно заполировать Polywatch за几分钟. Минеральные и сапфировые стекла не полируются - их нужно заменять.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'Какое стекло лучше для дайверских часов?', answer: 'Сапфир - стандарт для дайверских часов благодаря устойчивости к царапинам и долговечности. Хесалит не рекомендуется для дайвинга.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'Выберите стекло', text: 'Нажмите на стекло слева, чтобы увидеть карточку статистики справа.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: 'Сравните два стекла', text: 'Перетащите стекло из списка на другое, чтобы сравнить их рядом.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: 'Закрыть сравнение', text: 'Нажмите "Close Comparison", чтобы вернуться к одиночному виду.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = 'Сравнение Стекол для Часов: Хесалит vs Минеральное vs Сапфир';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'sravnenie-stekol-chasov-hesalit-mineralnoe-sapfir',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'Сравните стекла для часов из хесалита, минерала и сапфира с интерактивными карточками статистики. Твердость, прозрачность, ударопрочность и устойчивость к царапинам.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'Сравнение Стекол', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: 'Твердость', clarity: 'Прозрачность',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: 'Удар', scratchResistance: 'Царапины', durability: 'Долговечность', priceRange: 'Цена',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: 'Нажмите на стекло слева.', step2: 'Перетащите одно на другое для сравнения.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: 'Нажмите Закрыть.', tipTitle: 'Совет',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: 'Общий рейтинг - среднее всех показателей. Выше не всегда значит лучше - хесалит имеет лучшую ударопрочность.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'Перетащите', dragSub: 'для сравнения',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: 'Сравнение Стекол для Часов: Хесалит vs Минеральное vs Сапфир', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: 'Сравните <strong>хесалит, минеральное и сапфир</strong> стекла с интерактивными карточками статистики.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: 'Vilket urglas är mest reptåligt?', answer: 'Safirglas är mest reptåligt med en hårdhet på 9 på Mohs-skalan - endast diamant är hårdare. Mineralglas (5) är måttligt, medan hesalit (2-3) repas lätt men kan poleras.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: 'Kan ett repat hesalitglas repareras?', answer: 'Ja, repor i hesalit kan poleras bort med Polywatch på några minuter. Mineral- och safirglas kan inte poleras och måste bytas ut.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'Vilket glas är bäst för en dykarklocka?', answer: 'Safir är standard för dykarklockor tack vare sin reptålighet och hållbarhet. Hesalit rekommenderas inte för dykning.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'Välj ett glas', text: 'Klicka på ett glas till vänster för att se dess statistik-kort till höger.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: 'Jämför två glas', text: 'Dra ett glas från listan och släpp det på ett annat för att jämföra dem sida vid sida.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: 'Stäng jämförelsen', text: 'Klicka på "Close Comparison" för att återgå till enkelvyn.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = 'Urglasjämförelse: Hesalit vs Mineral vs Safir';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'urglasjamforelse-hesalit-mineral-safir',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'Jämför hesalit, mineral och safir urglas med interaktiva statistik-kort. Se hårdhet, klarhet, slagtålighet, reptålighet och hållbarhet.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'Glasjämförelse', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: 'Hårdhet', clarity: 'Klarhet',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: 'Slag', scratchResistance: 'Repor', durability: 'Hållbarhet', priceRange: 'Pris',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: 'Klicka på ett glas till vänster.', step2: 'Dra ett över ett annat för att jämföra.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: 'Klicka på Stäng.', tipTitle: 'Tips',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: 'Totalbetyget är ett genomsnitt av alla statistikvärden. Högre är inte alltid bättre - hesalit har bäst slagtålighet.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'Dra', dragSub: 'för att jämföra',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: 'Urglasjämförelse: Hesalit vs Mineral vs Safir', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: 'Jämför <strong>hesalit, mineral och safir</strong> urglas med interaktiva statistik-kort.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: 'Hangi saat camı en çizilmez?', answer: 'Safir cam, Mohs ölçeğinde 9 sertliği ile en çizilmezdir - sadece elmas daha serttir. Mineral cam (5) orta düzeydedir, hesalit (2-3) kolay çizilir ancak cilalanabilir.' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: 'Çizilmiş bir hesalit cam tamir edilebilir mi?', answer: 'Evet, hesalitteki çizikler Polywatch ile dakikalar içinde cilalanabilir. Mineral ve safir camlar cilalanamaz ve değiştirilmelidir.' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: 'Dalış saati için hangi cam en iyisidir?', answer: 'Safir, çizilme direnci ve dayanıklılığı nedeniyle dalış saatleri için standarttır. Hesalit dalış için önerilmez.' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: 'Bir kristal seçin', text: 'Soldaki bir kristale tıklayarak sağdaki istatistik kartını görün.' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: 'İki kristali karşılaştırın', text: 'Listeden bir kristali sürükleyip başka birinin üzerine bırakarak yan yana karşılaştırın.' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: 'Karşılaştırmayı kapatın', text: 'Tekli görünüme dönmek için "Close Comparison" düğmesine tıklayın.' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = 'Saat Camı Karşılaştırması: Hesalit vs Mineral vs Safir';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'saat-cami-karsilastirmasi-hesalit-mineral-safir',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: 'Hesalit, mineral ve safir saat camlarını interaktif istatistik kartlarıyla karşılaştırın. Sertlik, berraklık, darbe ve çizilme direncini görün.',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: 'Cam Karşılaştırması', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: 'Sertlik', clarity: 'Berraklık',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: 'Darbe', scratchResistance: 'Çizilme', durability: 'Dayanıklılık', priceRange: 'Fiyat',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: 'Soldaki bir kristale tıklayın.', step2: 'Birini diğerinin üzerine sürükleyerek karşılaştırın.',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: 'Kapat\'a tıklayın.', tipTitle: 'İpucu',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: 'Genel puan tüm istatistiklerin ortalamasıdır. Daha yüksek her zaman daha iyi değildir - hesalit en iyi darbe direncine sahiptir.',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: 'Sürükle', dragSub: 'karşılaştırmak için',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: 'Saat Camı Karşılaştırması: Hesalit vs Mineral vs Safir', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: '<strong>Hesalit, mineral ve safir</strong> saat camlarını interaktif istatistik kartlarıyla karşılaştırın.' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolLocaleContent } from '../../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI } from '../entry';
|
|
3
|
+
import { bibliography } from '../bibliography';
|
|
4
|
+
import { buildSchemas } from '../helpers';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const faq = [
|
|
7
|
+
{ question: '哪种表镜最耐刮?', answer: '蓝宝石表镜最耐刮,莫氏硬度为9 - 只有钻石更硬。矿物玻璃(5)中等,树脂玻璃(2-3)容易刮花但可以抛光。' },
|
|
8
|
+
{ question: '刮花的树脂玻璃表镜可以修复吗?', answer: '可以,树脂玻璃的划痕可以用Polywatch在几分钟内抛光。矿物和蓝宝石表镜无法抛光,必须更换。' },
|
|
9
|
+
{ question: '潜水表最适合哪种表镜?', answer: '蓝宝石是潜水表的标准选择,因其耐刮性和耐用性。树脂玻璃不建议用于潜水。' },
|
|
10
|
+
];
|
|
11
|
+
const howTo = [
|
|
12
|
+
{ name: '选择表镜', text: '点击左侧的表镜,右侧将显示其统计卡片。' },
|
|
13
|
+
{ name: '比较两种表镜', text: '从列表中拖拽一个表镜放到另一个上,即可并排比较。' },
|
|
14
|
+
{ name: '关闭比较', text: '点击"Close Comparison"按钮返回单个表镜视图。' },
|
|
15
|
+
];
|
|
16
|
+
const title = '表镜材料对比:树脂玻璃 vs 矿物玻璃 vs 蓝宝石';
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
export const content: ToolLocaleContent<WatchCrystalMaterialComparisonUI> = {
|
|
19
|
+
slug: 'watch-crystal-material-comparison',
|
|
20
|
+
title,
|
|
21
|
+
description: '通过交互式统计卡片对比树脂玻璃、矿物玻璃和蓝宝石表镜。一目了然查看硬度、清晰度、抗冲击性、耐刮性和耐用性。',
|
|
22
|
+
ui: {
|
|
23
|
+
title: '表镜对比', subTitle: 'Interactive Crystal Stats', hardness: '硬度', clarity: '清晰度',
|
|
24
|
+
impactResistance: '抗冲击', scratchResistance: '耐刮', durability: '耐用性', priceRange: '价格',
|
|
25
|
+
step1: '点击左侧的表镜。', step2: '拖拽一个到另一个上进行比较。',
|
|
26
|
+
step3: '点击关闭。', tipTitle: '提示',
|
|
27
|
+
tipContent: '综合评分是所有统计数据的平均值。越高不一定越好 - 树脂玻璃的抗冲击性最好。',
|
|
28
|
+
dragHint: '拖拽', dragSub: '进行比较',
|
|
29
|
+
},
|
|
30
|
+
seo: [
|
|
31
|
+
{ type: 'title', text: '表镜材料对比:树脂玻璃 vs 矿物玻璃 vs 蓝宝石', level: 2 },
|
|
32
|
+
{ type: 'paragraph', html: '通过交互式统计卡片对比<strong>树脂玻璃、矿物玻璃和蓝宝石</strong>表镜。' },
|
|
33
|
+
],
|
|
34
|
+
faq, bibliography, howTo, schemas: buildSchemas(title, faq, howTo),
|
|
35
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ToolDefinition } from '../../types';
|
|
2
|
+
import { watchCrystalMaterialComparison } from './entry';
|
|
3
|
+
|
|
4
|
+
export * from './entry';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
export const WATCH_CRYSTAL_MATERIAL_COMPARISON_TOOL: ToolDefinition = {
|
|
7
|
+
entry: watchCrystalMaterialComparison,
|
|
8
|
+
Component: () => import('./component.astro'),
|
|
9
|
+
SEOComponent: () => import('./seo.astro'),
|
|
10
|
+
BibliographyComponent: () => import('./bibliography.astro'),
|
|
11
|
+
};
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
export interface CrystalData {
|
|
2
|
+
id: string;
|
|
3
|
+
name: string;
|
|
4
|
+
overall: number;
|
|
5
|
+
hardness: number;
|
|
6
|
+
clarity: number;
|
|
7
|
+
impactResistance: number;
|
|
8
|
+
scratchResistance: number;
|
|
9
|
+
durability: number;
|
|
10
|
+
priceLevel: number;
|
|
11
|
+
color: string;
|
|
12
|
+
colorBg: string;
|
|
13
|
+
}
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
export const CRYSTAL_TYPES: CrystalData[] = [
|
|
16
|
+
{
|
|
17
|
+
id: 'hesalite',
|
|
18
|
+
name: 'Hesalite',
|
|
19
|
+
overall: 72,
|
|
20
|
+
hardness: 25,
|
|
21
|
+
clarity: 45,
|
|
22
|
+
impactResistance: 92,
|
|
23
|
+
scratchResistance: 15,
|
|
24
|
+
durability: 55,
|
|
25
|
+
priceLevel: 1,
|
|
26
|
+
color: '#fbbf24',
|
|
27
|
+
colorBg: 'linear-gradient(135deg, #92400e, #a16207)',
|
|
28
|
+
},
|
|
29
|
+
{
|
|
30
|
+
id: 'mineral',
|
|
31
|
+
name: 'Mineral Glass',
|
|
32
|
+
overall: 78,
|
|
33
|
+
hardness: 58,
|
|
34
|
+
clarity: 72,
|
|
35
|
+
impactResistance: 55,
|
|
36
|
+
scratchResistance: 58,
|
|
37
|
+
durability: 65,
|
|
38
|
+
priceLevel: 2,
|
|
39
|
+
color: '#60a5fa',
|
|
40
|
+
colorBg: 'linear-gradient(135deg, #1e3a5f, #1e40af)',
|
|
41
|
+
},
|
|
42
|
+
{
|
|
43
|
+
id: 'sapphire',
|
|
44
|
+
name: 'Sapphire',
|
|
45
|
+
overall: 88,
|
|
46
|
+
hardness: 92,
|
|
47
|
+
clarity: 95,
|
|
48
|
+
impactResistance: 35,
|
|
49
|
+
scratchResistance: 98,
|
|
50
|
+
durability: 72,
|
|
51
|
+
priceLevel: 3,
|
|
52
|
+
color: '#a78bfa',
|
|
53
|
+
colorBg: 'linear-gradient(135deg, #4c1d95, #5b21b6)',
|
|
54
|
+
},
|
|
55
|
+
];
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
import { SEORenderer } from '@jjlmoya/utils-shared';
|
|
3
|
+
import { watchCrystalMaterialComparison } from './index';
|
|
4
|
+
import type { KnownLocale } from '../../types';
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
interface Props {
|
|
7
|
+
locale?: KnownLocale;
|
|
8
|
+
}
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
const { locale = 'en' } = Astro.props;
|
|
11
|
+
const loader = watchCrystalMaterialComparison.i18n[locale] || watchCrystalMaterialComparison.i18n.en;
|
|
12
|
+
const content = await loader?.();
|
|
13
|
+
if (!content) return null;
|
|
14
|
+
---
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
{content.seo?.length > 0 && <SEORenderer content={{ locale, sections: content.seo }} />}
|