@jaggerxtrm/specialists 3.17.0 → 3.18.1

package/docs/archive/script-specialists.md

@@ -0,0 +1,1254 @@
+# Script-Specialists Architecture Report
+
+**Date:** 2026-04-24  
+**Scope:** Current legacy "script-specialists" design used by services and scripts in this repo  
+**Status:** Active in production-facing Python services, but conceptually superseded by the newer `.specialists/*.specialist.json` orchestration system
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+This repository currently contains **two different specialist systems**:
+
+1. **Legacy script-specialists system** — YAML-defined prompt/config artifacts used directly by Python services and scripts.
+2. **Newer orchestration specialists system** — JSON-defined agent/runtime specialists under `.specialists/` with hooks, jobs, nodes, and background execution.
+
+This report describes the **legacy script-specialists system**, because that is what the ingestion and squawk services still run today.
+
+At a high level, the script-specialists design is:
+
+- a **YAML prompt/config registry** in `specialists/`
+- a **Pydantic-backed loader** in `shared/specialist_system/`
+- several **Python service consumers** that load a named specialist at startup
+- a centralized **qwen-service** HTTP gateway (`llm_gateway/`) that executes the actual LLM request
+
+The system is best understood as a **configuration-driven prompt layer for scripts/services**, not as a complete specialist runtime. The specialist YAML provides metadata, prompt templates, and nominal execution settings, but only part of that configuration is enforced at runtime.
+
+---
+
+## Naming and Scope Clarification
+
+### What "script-specialists" means here
+
+In this report, **script-specialists** means the older system built around:
+
+- `specialists/**/*.specialist.yaml`
+- `shared/specialist_system/schema.py`
+- `shared/specialist_system/loader.py`
+
+It is called "script-specialists" because it is consumed directly by application code and service scripts.
+
+### What it is *not*
+
+It is **not** the newer orchestrated agent system found in:
+
+- `.specialists/default/*.specialist.json`
+- `.specialists/default/nodes/*.node.json`
+- `.claude/hooks/specialists-session-start.mjs`
+- `.claude/hooks/specialists-complete.mjs`
+
+That newer system has jobs, background execution, keep-alive sessions, nodes, reviewers, worktrees, and hook-driven UX. The script-specialists system has none of that.
+
+---
+
+## Repository Map
+
+### Core legacy script-specialists files
+
+- `specialists/ingestion/mercury-atomic-summarizer.specialist.yaml`
+- `specialists/ingestion/official-document-analyzer.specialist.yaml`
+- `specialists/ingestion/squawk-rolling-context.specialist.yaml`
+- `specialists/ingestion/squawk-event-curator.specialist.yaml`
+- `specialists/ingestion/squawk-session-analyst.specialist.yaml`
+- `shared/specialist_system/schema.py`
+- `shared/specialist_system/loader.py`
+- `shared/specialist_system/__init__.py`
+
+### Runtime consumers
+
+- `ingestion/summarizer.py`
+- `ingestion/official_docs.py`
+- `squawks/rolling_context.py`
+
+### LLM transport / execution layer
+
+- `shared/qwen_client.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/main.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/wrapper.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/manager.py`
+- `llm_gateway/infra/docker-compose.yml`
+
+### Infra wiring
+
+- `ingestion/infra/docker-compose.yml`
+
+### Tests and implementation notes
+
+- `specialists/SPECIALIST_SYSTEM_IMPLEMENTATION.md`
+- `specialists/test/test_specialist_system.py`
+- `tests/test_qwen_client.py`
+- `tests/test_rolling_context_specialists.py`
+- `llm_gateway/tests/test_wrapper.py`
+- `.serena/memories/specialist-system_ssot.md`
+
+---
+
+## High-Level Architecture
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart TD
+    Y[Specialist YAML files<br/>specialists/**/*.specialist.yaml] --> L[SpecialistLoader<br/>shared/specialist_system/loader.py]
+    S[Schema / Pydantic models<br/>shared/specialist_system/schema.py] --> L
+
+    L --> A1[QwenSummarizer<br/>ingestion/summarizer.py]
+    L --> A2[OfficialDocumentsImporter<br/>ingestion/official_docs.py]
+    L --> A3[RollingContextAgent<br/>squawks/rolling_context.py]
+
+    A1 --> QC[shared/qwen_client.py]
+    A3 --> QC
+    A2 --> HTTP[direct HTTP POST]
+
+    QC --> QS[qwen-service / llm_gateway<br/>POST /generate]
+    HTTP --> QS
+
+    QS --> W[QwenWrapper<br/>CLI invocation + retries]
+    W --> M[AccountManager<br/>credential rotation]
+    W --> CLI[qwen CLI]
+
+    M --> QDIR[~/.qwen<br/>oauth_creds.json + accounts/*]
+
+    A1 --> DB1[(articles table)]
+    A2 --> DB1
+    A3 --> DB2[(squawk_rolling_context)]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Design Goals of the Legacy System
+
+The legacy system was built to move prompt logic out of code and into editable config files.
+
+Primary intended benefits:
+
+- prompt changes without code edits
+- prompt changes without rebuilding images
+- discoverable specialists via filesystem scanning
+- startup validation with Pydantic
+- reusable prompt templates across multiple services
+- lighter-weight experimentation than hardcoding prompts in Python
+
+Operationally, the workflow is:
+
+1. define a specialist YAML file
+2. mount `specialists/` into a container
+3. service loads the specialist by name at startup
+4. service renders prompt variables into `task_template`
+5. service sends the rendered prompt to `qwen-service`
+6. service parses/validates the result and persists it
+
+---
+
+## Specialist File Format
+
+All legacy specialists are rooted under a top-level `specialist:` key.
+
+Example structure:
+
+```yaml
+specialist:
+  metadata:
+    name: mercury-atomic-summarizer
+    version: 1.1.0
+    description: "..."
+    category: ingestion/summarization
+    created: 2026-02-08T00:00:00Z
+    updated: 2026-02-11T02:00:00Z
+    author: jagger
+
+  validation:
+    files_to_watch:
+      - ingestion/summarizer.py
+    references:
+      - type: code
+        path: ingestion/summarizer.py
+        symbol: QwenSummarizer.generate_summary
+        purpose: "Integration point"
+    stale_threshold_days: 30
+
+  execution:
+    model: qwen-coder
+    temperature: 0.3
+    max_tokens: 2000
+    response_format: json
+    fallback_model: gemini-2.0-flash-thinking
+
+  prompt:
+    system: |
+      ...
+    task_template: |
+      ... $title ... $content ...
+    normalize_template: |
+      ... optional second-stage template ...
+    output_schema:
+      type: object
+      required: [...]
+      properties: ...
+```
+
+### Field groups
+
+#### `metadata`
+Descriptive information used for identification and traceability.
+
+#### `validation`
+Operational metadata for drift/staleness awareness:
+
+- `files_to_watch`
+- `references`
+- `stale_threshold_days`
+
+#### `execution`
+Nominal runtime settings:
+
+- `model`
+- `temperature`
+- `max_tokens`
+- `response_format`
+- `fallback_model`
+
+#### `prompt`
+The actual behavioral contract:
+
+- `system`
+- `task_template`
+- `normalize_template` (optional)
+- `output_schema`
+- `examples`
+
+---
+
+## Schema Layer
+
+File:
+
+- `shared/specialist_system/schema.py`
+
+This is the authoritative typed schema for the legacy system.
+
+### Main models
+
+- `SpecialistConfig`
+- `SpecialistMetadata`
+- `ValidationConfig`
+- `ExecutionConfig`
+- `PromptConfig`
+- `FileReference`
+- `SpecialistCategory`
+
+### Important constraints enforced at load time
+
+Examples of actual schema constraints:
+
+- `metadata.name` must match `^[a-z0-9-]+$`
+- `metadata.version` must match semantic version pattern
+- `description` has length bounds
+- `prompt.task_template` must be non-empty and at least 10 chars
+- `execution.temperature` is bounded
+- `execution.max_tokens` is bounded
+- `validation.stale_threshold_days` is bounded
+- `metadata.updated >= metadata.created`
+
+### Category model
+
+The enum in `schema.py` is still narrow and oriented around the original ingestion/analysis use case:
+
+- `ingestion/summarization`
+- `ingestion/processing`
+- `monitoring/health`
+- `monitoring/diagnostics`
+- `analysis/macro`
+- `analysis/technical`
+
+That reflects the age of the system: it was designed first for service prompts, not for general-purpose agent orchestration.
+
+---
+
+## Loader Layer
+
+File:
+
+- `shared/specialist_system/loader.py`
+
+`SpecialistLoader` is the central runtime for the legacy system.
+
+### Responsibilities
+
+1. discover YAML files recursively
+2. parse YAML
+3. validate specialist configs via Pydantic
+4. cache loaded specialists in memory
+5. render prompt templates using variables
+6. perform lightweight runtime output validation
+7. warn about stale/missing watched files
+
+### Startup discovery
+
+On initialization:
+
+- `SpecialistLoader()` defaults to `Path("specialists")`
+- `_scan_specialists()` recursively scans for `*.specialist.yaml`
+- each file is loaded via `_load_yaml_file()`
+- valid specialists are cached by `metadata.name`
+
+### Cache model
+
+The cache is an in-memory dict:
+
+- key = specialist name
+- value = validated `SpecialistConfig`
+
+No persistent index exists. Discovery is filesystem-based.
+
+### Loading behavior
+
+`load(name)`:
+
+- looks up the cached config
+- runs `_check_health()`
+- returns the `SpecialistConfig`
+
+### Health checks
+
+`_check_health()` currently does basic checks only:
+
+- warn if specialist age exceeds `stale_threshold_days`
+- warn if a watched file path does not exist
+
+It does **not** currently implement deeper semantic drift detection.
+
+### Prompt rendering
+
+`render_prompt()`:
+
+- prepends `prompt.system` if present
+- renders `prompt.task_template` using `string.Template`
+- raises `KeyError` if a required template variable is missing
+
+This means all prompt variables are strict string-template substitutions like:
+
+- `$title`
+- `$content`
+- `$sender`
+- `$controlled_tags`
+
+### Runtime output validation
+
+`validate_output()` is intentionally lightweight.
+
+What it actually does today:
+
+1. if there is no `output_schema`, returns `True`
+2. if response format is not `json`, skips strict checking
+3. strips `<think>...</think>` blocks
+4. extracts the outermost JSON object from the output text
+5. parses JSON
+6. checks only presence of fields listed in `output_schema.required`
+
+What it does **not** fully enforce:
+
+- nested schema types
+- enum validity
+- array cardinality
+- string length limits
+- `properties` shape correctness
+
+So the loader gives **strong config validation** but only **shallow runtime payload validation**.
+
+---
+
+## Runtime Consumers
+
+## 1. `ingestion/summarizer.py`
+
+Class:
+
+- `QwenSummarizer`
+
+Specialist used:
+
+- `mercury-atomic-summarizer`
+
+### Role
+
+This service processes pending articles and generates structured summaries.
+
+### Startup flow
+
+At initialization it:
+
+1. constructs `QwenClient()`
+2. constructs `SpecialistLoader()`
+3. loads `mercury-atomic-summarizer`
+4. logs success or fails hard on `SpecialistLoadError`
+
+### Prompt construction
+
+For each article, `generate_summary()`:
+
+- truncates content to 40,000 chars
+- optionally injects extracted table markdown
+- injects source-specific context
+- injects controlled tags vocabulary
+- renders the specialist prompt
+
+Variables passed include:
+
+- `sender`
+- `source_type`
+- `title`
+- `content`
+- `truncation_notice`
+- `tables_section`
+- `is_truncated`
+- `controlled_tags`
+
+### LLM call path
+
+It uses:
+
+- `shared.qwen_client.QwenClient.generate(prompt)`
+
+### Result handling
+
+After response:
+
+- extracts JSON by first `{` and last `}`
+- calls `validate_output()`
+- saves even if schema validation warns
+- normalizes tags before writing to `articles.summary`
+
+### Architectural note
+
+This is the cleanest expression of the script-specialists pattern: YAML defines the prompt contract; Python provides domain variables and persistence.
+
+---
+
+## 2. `ingestion/official_docs.py`
+
+Class:
+
+- `OfficialDocumentsImporter`
+
+Specialist used:
+
+- `official-document-analyzer`
+
+### Role
+
+This service ingests official government documents from Gmail and produces policy-analysis summaries.
+
+### Startup flow
+
+At initialization it:
+
+1. resolves `QWEN_SERVICE_URL`
+2. constructs `SpecialistLoader()`
+3. loads `official-document-analyzer`
+4. stores the specialist for later prompt rendering
+
+### Prompt construction
+
+`generate_summary()` renders prompt variables such as:
+
+- `sender`
+- `title`
+- `content`
+- `truncation_notice`
+- `is_truncated`
+
+### LLM call path
+
+Unlike `QwenSummarizer`, this module performs **direct HTTP POST** to qwen-service.
+
+It posts:
+
+```json
+{
+  "prompt": "...",
+  "model": "...",
+  "temperature": 0.1,
+  "max_tokens": 2500
+}
+```
+
+### Architectural note
+
+This consumer reveals an important mismatch:
+
+- the specialist execution block is read and forwarded
+- but the current qwen-service request model only formally defines `prompt` and `timeout`
+
+So the intent is richer than the actually enforced contract.
+
+---
+
+## 3. `squawks/rolling_context.py`
+
+Class:
+
+- `RollingContextAgent`
+
+Specialists used:
+
+- `squawk-rolling-context`
+- `squawk-event-curator`
+- `squawk-session-analyst`
+
+### Role
+
+This is the most evolved consumer of the legacy system. It uses **multiple specialists in a staged pipeline**.
+
+### Startup flow
+
+At initialization it:
+
+1. constructs `SpecialistLoader()`
+2. loads extractor specialist
+3. loads curator specialist
+4. loads analyst specialist
+5. derives `llm_model` from analyst execution config
+
+### Pipeline stages
+
+#### Stage 1 — Extraction
+Method:
+
+- `_run_extraction()`
+
+Uses:
+
+- `squawk-rolling-context.prompt.task_template`
+
+Behavior:
+
+- scans raw squawks from the last 30 minutes
+- asks the LLM to emit `new_events`
+- retries once on invalid output
+- resolves authoritative timestamps from source squawk indices
+
+#### Stage 2 — Event curation
+Method:
+
+- `_run_event_curation()`
+
+Uses:
+
+- `squawk-event-curator.prompt.task_template`
+
+Behavior:
+
+- compares new events against existing memory
+- asks the LLM to consolidate / enrich / suppress duplicates
+- returns:
+  - `curated_events`
+  - `change_summary`
+  - `material_change_hint`
+- falls back to extracted events on curator failure/emptiness
+
+#### Stage 3 — Session synthesis
+Method:
+
+- `_run_synthesis()`
+
+Uses:
+
+- `squawk-session-analyst.prompt.normalize_template`
+
+Behavior:
+
+- builds a richer synthesis prompt from:
+  - curated events
+  - change summary
+  - previous-day summary
+  - LSEG digest context
+  - economic calendar context
+  - market snapshot context
+  - trusted article context
+- asks the LLM for:
+  - `thesis`
+  - `overview`
+  - `what_changed`
+  - `contradictions`
+  - `watch_items`
+  - `mechanisms`
+  - `key_data`
+  - `session_themes`
+  - optional `previous_day_summary`
+- rejects weak candidates that fail topical grounding heuristics
+- computes degraded input metadata and confidence
+
+### Why this consumer matters
+
+This is where the legacy design stretched beyond its original shape.
+
+The script-specialists system started as:
+
+- one YAML specialist
+- one script
+- one prompt
+
+But `rolling_context.py` now uses it as a **multi-stage LLM orchestration framework**, even though the loader/runtime itself was never upgraded into a full orchestration system.
+
+---
+
+## qwen-service Integration
+
+The script-specialists design does not execute models directly. It relies on a shared qwen HTTP gateway.
+
+## Shared client
+
+File:
+
+- `shared/qwen_client.py`
+
+### Responsibilities
+
+- resolve `QWEN_SERVICE_URL`
+- send prompt to `/generate`
+- expose `health_check()`
+- emit Prometheus metrics
+- normalize connection failures into a simple result dict
+
+### Effective request contract
+
+`QwenClient.generate(prompt, timeout=...)` sends:
+
+```json
+{
+  "prompt": "...",
+  "timeout": 60
+}
+```
+
+This is the main path used by:
+
+- `ingestion/summarizer.py`
+- `squawks/utils.py`
+- `ext_mcp/server.py`
+- effectively most non-direct callers
+
+---
+
+## qwen-service server
+
+Files:
+
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/main.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/wrapper.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/manager.py`
+
+Container:
+
+- `qwen-service`
+
+### API surface
+
+#### `GET /health`
+Returns:
+
+- `status`
+- `current_account`
+- `total_switches`
+
+#### `POST /generate`
+Consumes a request model with:
+
+- `prompt`
+- `timeout`
+
+Returns:
+
+- `success`
+- `output`
+- `error`
+- `error_type`
+- `attempts`
+- `accounts_tried`
+
+#### Additional endpoints
+
+- `POST /switch-next`
+- `GET /accounts`
+- `POST /accounts/{account_id}/reset`
+- `GET /metrics`
+
+### Concurrency and resilience
+
+`main.py` enforces:
+
+- semaphore with concurrency limit = 2
+- circuit breaker after repeated all-account failures
+- HTTP 503 while breaker is open
+
+---
+
+## qwen CLI wrapper and account rotation
+
+### Wrapper
+
+File:
+
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/wrapper.py`
+
+The wrapper shells out to the installed CLI:
+
+```bash
+qwen <prompt> --output-format text --auth-type qwen-oauth --model qwen3-coder-plus --yolo
+```
+
+It classifies failures into:
+
+- quota
+- auth
+- safety
+- timeout
+- network/unknown
+
+### Rotation manager
+
+File:
+
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/manager.py`
+
+Responsibilities:
+
+- discover account files under `~/.qwen/accounts/`
+- physically swap active credentials into `~/.qwen/oauth_creds.json`
+- persist state in `~/.qwen/state.yaml`
+- write rotation events to `~/.qwen/rotation.log`
+- avoid races with file lock
+
+### Storage assumptions
+
+The design assumes the following layout:
+
+- `~/.qwen/oauth_creds.json` — active credential
+- `~/.qwen/accounts/oauth_creds_<n>.json` — account pool
+- `~/.qwen/state.yaml` — rotation state
+- `/tmp/qwen_rotation.lock` — lock file used by account manager
+
+### Why this matters for script-specialists
+
+Every script-specialist consumer ultimately depends on this wrapper behavior. If the Qwen CLI changes:
+
+- flags
+- output patterns
+- auth file layout
+- refresh behavior
+- model naming
+
+then the legacy specialist stack breaks even if the YAML files remain valid.
+
+---
+
+## Container / Infra Wiring
+
+File:
+
+- `ingestion/infra/docker-compose.yml`
+
+### Volume mount contract
+
+The legacy specialist registry is mounted into consuming containers as:
+
+```yaml
+- ../../specialists:/app/specialists:ro
+```
+
+This appears on:
+
+- `ext-official-documents`
+- `ext-summarizer`
+- `ext-squawk-summarizer`
+- some adjacent services
+
+### qwen-service contract
+
+Consuming services rely on:
+
+```yaml
+- QWEN_SERVICE_URL=http://qwen-service:8000
+```
+
+### Operational pattern
+
+The legacy system is therefore **volume-driven** and **restart-applied**:
+
+1. edit YAML on host
+2. container sees file via read-only mount
+3. restart service/container
+4. service reloads specialist at startup
+
+This is often described as "hot reload", but it is not live in-process auto-reload.
+
+---
+
+## Detailed End-to-End Flows
+
+## Flow A — Article summarization
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    participant DB as articles table
+    participant S as ingestion/summarizer.py
+    participant L as SpecialistLoader
+    participant Y as mercury-atomic-summarizer YAML
+    participant Q as shared.qwen_client
+    participant G as qwen-service
+    participant C as qwen CLI
+
+    S->>L: load("mercury-atomic-summarizer")
+    L->>Y: parse + validate
+    S->>DB: fetch pending articles
+    S->>L: render_prompt(sender,title,content,...)
+    S->>Q: generate(prompt)
+    Q->>G: POST /generate
+    G->>C: run qwen CLI
+    C-->>G: output
+    G-->>Q: JSON result
+    Q-->>S: {success, output, error_type}
+    S->>L: validate_output(cleaned_json)
+    S->>DB: save summary JSONB
+```
+
+## Flow B — Official document analysis
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    participant M as Gmail messages
+    participant O as ingestion/official_docs.py
+    participant L as SpecialistLoader
+    participant Y as official-document-analyzer YAML
+    participant G as qwen-service
+    participant DB as articles table
+
+    O->>L: load("official-document-analyzer")
+    L->>Y: parse + validate
+    O->>M: fetch and parse emails
+    O->>L: render_prompt(sender,title,content,...)
+    O->>G: POST /generate (direct HTTP)
+    G-->>O: JSON result
+    O->>L: validate_output(output)
+    O->>DB: save article and summary
+```
+
+## Flow C — Rolling context multi-stage pipeline
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    participant RC as RollingContextAgent
+    participant L as SpecialistLoader
+    participant E as squawk-rolling-context YAML
+    participant C as squawk-event-curator YAML
+    participant A as squawk-session-analyst YAML
+    participant G as qwen-service
+    participant DB as squawk_rolling_context
+
+    RC->>L: load extractor, curator, analyst
+    RC->>DB: fetch recent squawks + last context
+    RC->>L: extractor task_template render
+    RC->>G: extraction prompt
+    G-->>RC: new_events JSON
+    RC->>L: validate_output(extractor)
+    RC->>L: curator task_template render
+    RC->>G: curation prompt
+    G-->>RC: curated_events/change_summary
+    RC->>L: validate_output(curator)
+    RC->>L: analyst normalize_template render
+    RC->>G: synthesis prompt
+    G-->>RC: thesis/overview/... JSON
+    RC->>L: validate_output(analyst)
+    RC->>DB: save processed context row
+```
+
+---
+
+## Strengths of the Legacy Design
+
+## 1. Clear separation of prompt logic from application logic
+
+Service code owns:
+
+- data retrieval
+- truncation
+- variable assembly
+- persistence
+
+Specialist YAML owns:
+
+- system prompt
+- task instructions
+- output contract
+
+## 2. Fast iteration on prompts
+
+Because `specialists/` is mounted into containers, prompt changes do not require code changes.
+
+## 3. Startup-time safety via Pydantic
+
+Malformed YAML fails early.
+
+## 4. Good fit for domain-specific scripted tasks
+
+The pattern works well for:
+
+- article summarization
+- policy document analysis
+- structured extraction
+- deterministic script pipelines that need prompt externalization
+
+## 5. Rolling context proved the concept can scale to multi-stage prompting
+
+Even though the runtime is simple, the staged use in `rolling_context.py` demonstrates that a specialist registry can support richer chains.
+
+---
+
+## Real Design Limits and Mismatches
+
+## 1. `execution` is mostly declarative, not operative
+
+This is the biggest architectural mismatch.
+
+The YAML exposes:
+
+- `model`
+- `temperature`
+- `max_tokens`
+- `fallback_model`
+
+But in the main runtime path:
+
+- `shared.qwen_client.QwenClient.generate()` only sends `prompt` and `timeout`
+
+That means the specialist execution block is largely **not enforced** for the main consumers.
+
+### Consequence
+
+The system *looks* like a full execution config layer, but operationally it is mostly a prompt/config registry.
+
+## 2. Direct and shared call paths diverge
+
+There are two LLM transport patterns:
+
+- shared client (`QwenClient`)
+- direct `requests.post()`
+
+That means behavior is not fully centralized.
+
+## 3. Runtime output validation is shallow
+
+The loader checks required fields, but not the full JSON schema contract.
+
+### Consequence
+
+Specialists can declare rich schemas, but runtime enforcement is weaker than the YAML suggests.
+
+## 4. Hot reload is restart-based, not live
+
+The implementation supports:
+
+- edit YAML
+- restart process/container
+- reload at startup
+
+It does not provide live watches or in-process reload triggers.
+
+## 5. The design is tightly coupled to qwen-service internals
+
+The entire stack assumes:
+
+- qwen CLI exists
+- CLI flags remain stable
+- CLI output patterns are classifiable by substring checks
+- OAuth files live in the expected shape
+- model names remain stable
+
+When Qwen changes behavior, script-specialists break at the transport layer even if the specialist configs are fine.
+
+## 6. The schema/doc story has drifted ahead of the actual implementation
+
+`.serena/memories/specialist-system_ssot.md` describes a richer pipeline:
+
+- normalize phase
+- field-drift correction
+- word-count checks
+- more advanced validation semantics
+
+But `shared/specialist_system/loader.py` is much simpler.
+
+### Consequence
+
+The conceptual docs describe a more mature system than the actual loader/runtime currently implements.
+
+## 7. The repo now contains two overlapping specialist concepts
+
+Legacy:
+
+- `specialists/*.specialist.yaml`
+
+New:
+
+- `.specialists/*.specialist.json`
+
+There is also UX overlap: hooks and docs increasingly describe the newer system, while runtime services still depend on the older one.
+
+---
+
+## Testing and Operational Evidence
+
+## Specialist system tests
+
+File:
+
+- `specialists/test/test_specialist_system.py`
+
+Confirms the legacy loader can:
+
+- load specialists
+- render prompts
+- validate basic output
+- list specialists
+
+## Rolling-context specialist tests
+
+File:
+
+- `tests/test_rolling_context_specialists.py`
+
+This is important because it shows the intended boundary behavior of the legacy multi-specialist pipeline:
+
+- multiple specialists load together
+- invalid curator output falls back safely
+- extraction retries once on invalid output
+- synthesis candidate validation enforces topical grounding
+- source-coverage and degraded input metadata are computed
+
+## qwen client tests
+
+File:
+
+- `tests/test_qwen_client.py`
+
+Confirms:
+
+- URL configuration
+- HTTP request shape
+- timeout behavior
+- health check behavior
+- Prometheus metric emission
+
+## qwen wrapper tests
+
+File:
+
+- `llm_gateway/tests/test_wrapper.py`
+
+Confirms:
+
+- quota/auth/safety error classification
+- rotation logic
+- retry behavior
+- auth-failure clearing
+
+---
+
+## Architectural Interpretation
+
+The legacy script-specialists design should be interpreted as a **four-layer system**:
+
+### Layer 1 — Config registry
+Filesystem YAML specialists.
+
+### Layer 2 — Local runtime adapter
+`SpecialistLoader` parses, validates, renders, and lightly validates outputs.
+
+### Layer 3 — Service-specific orchestration
+Each Python service decides:
+
+- what variables to inject
+- when to call the LLM
+- how to parse results
+- how to handle fallbacks
+- how to persist output
+
+### Layer 4 — Shared LLM gateway
+`qwen-service` abstracts CLI execution and credential rotation.
+
+This means the legacy system is **not** a standalone runtime platform. It is a **thin config layer embedded into service code**.
+
+---
+
+## Contrast With the Newer `.specialists` System
+
+The newer system under `.specialists/` introduces concepts absent from the script-specialists design:
+
+- specialist jobs
+- background runs
+- keep-alive interactions
+- worktree isolation
+- nodes and coordinators
+- hook-driven notifications
+- reusable reviewer/executor patterns
+- JSON specialist definitions aligned to an agent platform
+
+By contrast, legacy script-specialists provide only:
+
+- config file discovery
+- template rendering
+- shallow schema checking
+
+### Practical implication
+
+A migration from script-specialists to the new system is **not** just a file-format rewrite. It is a shift from:
+
+- prompt templates consumed by services
+
+to:
+
+- a richer specialist runtime/orchestration platform
+
+That migration requires decisions about:
+
+- how services invoke specialists
+- whether specialists remain in-process/config-driven or become external runtime entities
+- how execution config is actually enforced
+- whether qwen-service remains the transport layer or is replaced
+
+---
+
+## Key Findings for Refactor Planning
+
+## Finding 1
+The legacy system is still structurally important.
+
+It is not dead code. It is active in:
+
+- `ingestion/summarizer.py`
+- `ingestion/official_docs.py`
+- `squawks/rolling_context.py`
+
+## Finding 2
+The biggest hidden debt is the **illusion of execution control**.
+
+Specialists declare execution parameters that are not consistently honored.
+
+## Finding 3
+The main fragility is now **qwen-service coupling**, not YAML itself.
+
+The YAML loader is simple and stable. The unstable piece is the Qwen transport/execution substrate.
+
+## Finding 4
+Rolling context is the hardest migration case.
+
+It already behaves like a multi-stage orchestration pipeline while still using the simple legacy loader.
+
+## Finding 5
+The repository has a **conceptual split-brain** around the word "specialists".
+
+Any refactor should explicitly resolve the distinction between:
+
+- runtime script/service specialists
+- agent/orchestration specialists
+
+---
+
+## Recommended Mental Model
+
+If you need one sentence to explain the current script-specialists design:
+
+> The current script-specialists system is a YAML-backed prompt/config registry for Python services, loaded via a lightweight Pydantic/Template runtime, with actual LLM execution delegated to qwen-service.
+
+And if you need one sentence about its main limitation:
+
+> It looks like a full specialist execution framework, but in reality it is mostly a prompt registry layered on top of service code and a fragile qwen-service transport.
+
+---
+
+## Appendix A — Active Legacy Specialists
+
+### `mercury-atomic-summarizer`
+Used by article summarization pipeline.
+
+### `official-document-analyzer`
+Used by official government document importer.
+
+### `squawk-rolling-context`
+Extractor stage for rolling context.
+
+### `squawk-event-curator`
+Event curation stage for rolling context.
+
+### `squawk-session-analyst`
+Session synthesis stage for rolling context.
+
+---
+
+## Appendix B — Current Consumer Matrix
+
+| Consumer | Specialist(s) | Call path | Output target |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| `ingestion/summarizer.py` | `mercury-atomic-summarizer` | `shared.qwen_client.QwenClient` | `articles.summary` |
+| `ingestion/official_docs.py` | `official-document-analyzer` | direct HTTP to qwen-service | article summary / DB |
+| `squawks/rolling_context.py` | `squawk-rolling-context`, `squawk-event-curator`, `squawk-session-analyst` | direct HTTP helper to qwen-service | `squawk_rolling_context.processed_data` |
+
+---
+
+## Appendix C — Current Runtime Reality vs Declared Model
+
+| Area | Declared by design | Actual current behavior |
+|---|---|---|
+| Specialist config | full structured runtime config | mostly prompt + metadata + nominal execution hints |
+| Execution settings | model/temperature/max_tokens specialist-specific | mostly ignored on main client path |
+| Output schema validation | JSON-schema-like contract | required-fields-only check in practice |
+| Hot reload | implied quick prompt iteration | edit + container restart |
+| Orchestration | specialist-defined behavior | still owned mostly by Python service code |
+| LLM backend independence | specialist abstracted from model transport | tightly coupled to qwen-service/qwen CLI assumptions |
+
+---
+
+## Appendix D — Files Most Relevant to Any Migration
+
+### Must-read
+
+- `shared/specialist_system/loader.py`
+- `shared/specialist_system/schema.py`
+- `shared/qwen_client.py`
+- `ingestion/summarizer.py`
+- `ingestion/official_docs.py`
+- `squawks/rolling_context.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/main.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/wrapper.py`
+- `llm_gateway/src/llm_gateway/manager.py`
+- `ingestion/infra/docker-compose.yml`
+
+### Useful context
+
+- `specialists/SPECIALIST_SYSTEM_IMPLEMENTATION.md`
+- `docs/guides/qwen-service-integration-guide.md`
+- `tests/test_rolling_context_specialists.py`
+- `.serena/memories/specialist-system_ssot.md`
+
+---
+
+## Closing Assessment
+
+The script-specialists design was a strong and pragmatic step: it externalized prompt logic, enabled fast iteration, and proved especially useful in ingestion and rolling-context services. But the system has now outgrown its original shape.
+
+Today it sits in an in-between state:
+
+- more structured than hardcoded prompts
+- less capable than the newer specialist runtime
+- increasingly constrained by qwen-service assumptions
+- partially mismatched between declared configuration and actual execution behavior
+
+That makes this a good moment to replace or adapt it — especially because the brittle part is no longer the YAML concept itself, but the old execution substrate and the conceptual split with the newer `.specialists` platform.