@interf/compiler 0.22.2 → 0.33.0

package/public-repo/skills/interf/SKILL.md

@@ -1,198 +1,444 @@
 ---
 name: interf
-description: "Use when an agent needs to operate Interf from natural language: install or connect to the local Interf engine, manage Preparations, review Build Plans, build verifiable context from source files, and read the returned context locator for agent work."
+description: "Use when an agent needs to operate Interf from natural language: connect to the local Interf service, manage Projects, review Build Plans, build Context Graphs from source files, and read the returned Context Graph locator for agent tasks."
 ---
 
 # Interf
 
-Agents miss things in files. Interf builds verifiable context for agents from
-your files. It turns hidden file discovery into traceable artifacts with proof
-of how they were built.
+Interf prepares data for agents. It lets users' agents build a Context Graph
+from their files with source coverage summaries, task-aware knowledge, artifact
+handoffs, and links back to sources, so users can inspect what was covered
+before agents answer.
 
-Interf runs locally, shows evidence that the data is ready, and returns a
-context locator agents can read.
+Interf is not a search engine and not a general RAG index over every Project
+the instance has seen. Treat it as a data-preparation workflow for the user's
+current Source and task. Existing Projects and Context Graphs are reusable only
+when they clearly bind the same Source and task-relevant Build Plan.
+
+Ask Claude to answer from a folder. With Interf, Claude builds a Context Graph
+from the files and the user can inspect what it covered. Interf runs locally,
+exposes Context Checks, Build evidence, traces, and ready / not ready status,
+and returns a Context Graph locator agents can read.
 
 ## Core Model
 
-- **Instance** = the local engine started by `interf web`, or a future cloud
-  endpoint. It owns all Preparation state.
+- **Instance** = the local service reached through Interf MCP, an installed CLI
+  connection, explicit URL/token details, or a developer-started
+  `interf runtime`. It owns all Project state.
 - **Source** = input files or data. A local folder is the current binding
-  shape; Interf scans it by reference, not by copy.
-- **Preparation** = the durable wrapper for a Source, agent goal, user
-  instructions, requested Artifacts, selected Build Plan, Build runs, connected
-  agents, readiness checks, and latest verifiable context.
-- **Requested Artifact** = an output agents need Interf to build, such as an
-  atlas, index, timeline, summary set, claim set, or custom file.
-- **Build Plan** = the user-facing plan for how Interf will build requested
-  Artifacts from the Source. It can be drafted, selected, saved, or improved.
-- **Build run** = one execution of a Build Plan for a Preparation. It records
-  what was processed, what was built, what failed, and whether the output is
-  ready.
-- **verifiable context** = the built output agents use.
-
-Agents should think in requested Artifacts: "what do I need Interf to build
-from this Source so I can do the user's job reliably?"
-
-The CLI carries one piece of state: the active connection record.
-
-When Interf MCP tools are available, prefer them over shelling out to the CLI.
-They are API-backed and can run from the user's device in hosts that support
-local MCP. Use the CLI examples below as fallback and as the source of command
-semantics.
+  shape; Source stays local and read-only, and Interf reads it by reference,
+  not by copy.
+- **Project** = the durable workspace for one Source binding, selected
+  Build Plan, Project activity, execution agents, and the latest Context Graph.
+  The detailed intent, requested Artifact contract, stages, and Context Checks belong in the
+  Build Plan.
+- **Requested Artifact** = an output agents need Interf to build, such as a
+  source map, index, timeline, comparison note, extraction table, or custom file.
+- **Build Plan** = the reviewed plan for how Interf will build a Context Graph
+  and requested Artifacts from the Source. It owns intent, requested Artifacts,
+  user-visible Context Checks, Artifact diagnostics, Build instructions, and optional
+  Source context. It can be drafted, selected, saved, or improved. CLI
+  namespace: `interf plan`.
+- **Run** = one durable execution record. Build runs, benchmark runs,
+  Build Plan draft runs, and Build Plan improvement runs are all Runs.
+- **Build Context Graph** = the action that runs the selected Build Plan for a
+  Project and produces one Context Graph. CLI: `interf build <project-id>`.
+- **Context Graph** = source-backed context built from files so agents can use
+  prepared context instead of partial file reads. It contains task handoffs,
+  summaries, knowledge notes, links back to sources, and traces. Current local
+  builds expose it as an inspectable folder agents can continue from.
+
+Agents should think in Build Plan contracts: "what Context Graph, requested
+Artifacts, checks, evidence, and traces need to exist before I can answer from
+this Source without partial file reads?"
+
+## Source Reference Contract
+
+The Context Graph is a knowledge map over the Source. It normally contains
+`artifacts/` task handoffs, `summaries/` coverage proof, `knowledge/`
+navigation/drilldown, traces, and source references. It does not duplicate the
+raw Source files.
+
+Use the Context Graph first to learn what exists, which files/pages/figures are
+relevant, which requested Artifacts were prepared, and where evidence lives in
+the original Source. Then follow the graph's source references when exact
+wording, table values, chart positions, visual ranges, or provenance matter.
+
+"Answer from the Context Graph" means:
+
+- start from `artifacts/` task handoffs instead of rediscovering the Source ad hoc;
+- use `home.md` only as a graph index, not as the answer surface;
+- use `summaries/` for coverage proof and `knowledge/` for navigation/drilldown;
+- use the graph's source references and traces as backlinks to the source of
+  truth;
+- drill into cited source pages/figures/tables when precision matters;
+- keep the answer grounded in the prepared graph plus its cited source evidence.
+
+It does not mean:
+
+- treat summaries or artifacts as a replacement for the underlying Source;
+- ignore the original data after the graph points to the relevant evidence;
+- make a strong claim from a blurry or under-extracted artifact.
+
+## Non-Negotiable Interf Behavior
+
+If the user invoked `/interf` or explicitly asked to use Interf, the agent must
+not bypass Interf by answering from ad hoc raw source-file reads.
+
+Do not tell users to invoke `/anthropic-skills:interf` for the local demo. The
+local Interf Skill command is `/interf`. A host-specific managed skill with a
+prefixed namespace may be stale and outside this repo's control.
+
+No fallback direct-read answer is allowed. Do not open PDFs, screenshots,
+exports, extracted text files, or report bodies to answer the user's question
+when Interf is unreachable. Do not say "I could not reach Interf, so I read the
+files directly." That is the failure mode Interf exists to prevent.
+
+After Interf has built or selected a Context Graph, opening the graph-cited
+source reference for exact verification is allowed and often required. That is
+not a fallback. It is the graph's backlink model.
+
+Allowed before a reachable Interf connection:
+
+- check whether Interf is running;
+- inspect filenames, extensions, and obvious source-folder shape only if needed
+  to identify the Source;
+- ask the user to start `interf runtime` / `interf runtime start`, connect the
+  agent through Interf MCP, or provide explicit Interf URL/token details.
+
+Required when Interf is unreachable:
+
+```text
+I can't answer this through Interf yet because I cannot reach a connected Interf instance.
+Please start Interf with `interf runtime` or `interf runtime start`, connect this agent through Interf MCP, or provide the Interf URL/token. Then I will build or inspect the Context Graph before answering.
+```
+
+Only answer after one of these is true:
+
+- an Interf Build has produced a Context Graph for the Project;
+- a ready existing Context Graph for the same Source and task-relevant Build
+  Plan is selected and inspected;
+- the user explicitly cancels Interf and asks for a normal direct file read.
+
+## Required User-Visible Flow
+
+When the user asks Interf to read a Source and answer a question, the agent's
+first job is to define the data-preparation contract, not to answer. Follow
+these gates in order.
+
+Do not satisfy a new question by searching unrelated existing Projects. In the
+connected-instance path, create a fresh Project for the current Source and task
+unless the user explicitly selected or named an existing Project. If the user
+has not provided a Source, ask for the Source instead of answering from whatever
+Projects already exist. Project ids are generated internally; do not ask the
+user to provide one.
+
+Source scope default: when Interf MCP, the CLI, explicit connection details, or
+the user context already provides a Source locator or file set, use that whole
+Source. Do not ask the user to choose one file, both reports, or all files
+inside that Source unless the user explicitly asks to narrow scope. If no
+usable Source locator is available, ask for one Source locator, usually a local
+folder path. Do not ask for a file-selection menu.
+
+1. **Propose checks and requested Artifacts first.**
+
+   Say what Interf needs to prepare before the answer can be trusted. The
+   output is a short in-chat review:
+
+   ```text
+   Before I answer, Interf should prepare this report for the question.
+
+   What Interf will check:
+   - <plain-English check>
+     Backed by: <requested Artifact>
+   - <plain-English check>
+     Backed by: <requested Artifact>
+
+   Requested Artifacts:
+   1. <artifact name> — <what it will export into the Context Graph>
+   2. <artifact name> — <what it will export into the Context Graph>
+
+   Approve these checks and Artifacts, and I will draft the Build Plan.
+   ```
+
+   Stop here unless the user has already explicitly approved this exact set of
+   checks and Artifacts. Do not answer yet.
+
+2. **Draft the Build Plan after approval.**
+
+   Create or reuse the Project, draft the Build Plan, then summarize it in
+   chat. Include the Project id, Build Plan id, checks, requested Artifacts,
+   stages, and what the Context Graph will contain. Include a review locator
+   when the connected Interf client provides one, but the user should be able
+   to review the plan in chat.
+
+   Stop here unless the user approves the Build Plan or already gave explicit
+   end-to-end autonomy after reviewing the checks.
+
+3. **Build the Context Graph after Build Plan approval.**
+
+   Start the Build, show the Build id and any review locator returned by the
+   connected Interf client, then check status by Run id. If the user asked for
+   an answer in the same request, continue until the Build reaches a terminal
+   state.
+
+   If a Build Plan draft, Build Plan improvement, Build run, or status poll
+   reaches `failed` or `cancelled`, stop. Report which Run failed, summarize the
+   visible error, and ask the user before starting another draft or Build run.
+   Do not automatically retry failed Interf Runs.
+
+4. **Answer only from the Context Graph.**
+
+   Read the task handoff notes under `artifacts/` first. Use them as the map
+   for what exists and where to look in the Source. Use `home.md` only as an
+   index, `summaries/` as coverage proof, and `knowledge/` as drilldown. For exact values,
+   quotes, chart reads, tables, or provenance-sensitive claims, follow the
+   graph's source references back to the cited Source evidence before answering.
+   Answer with the values the Context Graph prepared plus any source-reference
+   verification you performed, and say which requested Artifact and source page
+   the answer came from. If the Context Graph points to the right evidence but
+   the artifact is too coarse, under-extracted, or missing the required visual
+   semantics, say the Context Graph is not ready and improve the Build Plan.
+
+The public package path is CLI/runtime-first. MCP is how agent hosts talk to a
+connected Interf instance when the host supports local MCP tools. Use **Interf
+MCP** when available, then this Skill as the instruction fallback, then direct
+HTTP only with explicit local URL/token details.
+
+Interf MCP lets an outside agent host talk to Interf. Agents listed inside
+Interf are executors that run Build Plan stages. Do not treat executor setup as
+the same thing as MCP setup.
+
+Use this order:
+
+1. **Interf MCP**, when available.
+2. The installed `interf` CLI with an active connection.
+3. A developer-started local runtime from `interf runtime` or
+   `interf runtime start`.
+4. This bundled Skill, when MCP is not available in the agent host.
+5. Direct local HTTP only for the well-known discovery probe or when Interf
+   explicitly provides the local URL/token.
+
+Do not install packages or use `npx` as part of the normal flow. If MCP is not
+available and the CLI has no active connection, ask the user to start
+`interf runtime` / `interf runtime start`, run `interf login --url <url>` for a
+remote instance, or provide explicit Interf URL/token details.
+
+If MCP is not configured, you may probe `http://127.0.0.1:4873/health` to see
+whether the default local runtime is running. Do not scan ports. Do not treat
+discovery as authorization. Any mutating or source-reading request needs the
+active bearer token from **Interf MCP**, the installed CLI connection, or
+connection details explicitly provided by Interf.
+
+Keep MCP and connection probing internal. Do not narrate "CLI is installed",
+"discovery returned 200", raw URLs, ports, or token state in the normal demo
+flow. User-facing language should be only: Interf connection available, or this
+agent is not connected to Interf yet.
+
+When confirming a connection, say that Interf is running. Do not report
+package, CLI, or service versions unless the user explicitly asks for debug
+details.
 
 ## Connection Model
 
-Every mutating command requires a reachable Interf instance. If the active
-connection is missing or unreachable, the command exits non-zero with:
+Every mutating action requires a reachable Interf instance.
 
-```text
-Not connected to any Interf instance.
-Start one with `interf web` or `interf web start`, or set --url / `interf login` for a remote one.
-```
+In the public CLI path, the user starts a local instance with `interf runtime`
+or `interf runtime start`. A remote or managed instance can be selected with
+`interf login --url <url>` when available. Agent hosts may instead connect
+through Interf MCP or explicit URL/token details.
 
-There is no hidden auto-start inside mutating commands. Agents must verify a
-connection before running mutating commands.
+Discovery is not enough by itself. A 200 response from `/health` only means a
+local service is running. If discovery succeeds but there is no MCP connection,
+no active CLI connection, and no explicit URL/token, stop and ask the user to
+connect this agent to Interf.
 
-Use `interf` when it is installed. If the command is missing, try
-`npx -y @interf/compiler@latest` for this session. If neither works, stop
-before mutating work and say plainly that this runtime can inspect the Source
-and propose requested Artifacts, but cannot create a Preparation or run Interf
-until the CLI is installed or a reachable Interf instance is connected.
+If the local discovery probe is unreachable, say:
 
-For local or containerized agent sessions:
+```text
+I need Interf running before I can build a Context Graph.
+Please start `interf runtime` or `interf runtime start`, then connect this agent through Interf MCP or the installed CLI connection.
+```
+
+For local developer sessions with the CLI already installed:
 
 ```sh
-interf web                       # local: foreground server in another terminal
-interf web start                 # local: managed background server for agent sessions
-interf login --url <...>         # remote: writes connection.json
 interf status                    # confirm the active connection
+interf runtime                   # fallback: foreground local service
+interf runtime start             # fallback: managed background service
 ```
 
-When using the `npx` fallback, replace `interf` in examples with
-`npx -y @interf/compiler@latest`.
+### Review References
+
+When a Project, Build Plan, or Run is created, include the compact review
+summary in chat: Project id, Build Plan id, Run id, checks, requested
+Artifacts, and the Context Graph locator when ready.
+
+The local HTTP URL is an authorized service connection fallback, not a review
+UI. Do not present `127.0.0.1` links as the review surface for normal users.
 
 ## Agent Flow
 
 1. **Confirm a connection**.
 
-   Run `interf status` or `interf prep ls`. If the command returns the
-   connection hint, start a managed local engine with `interf web start`, then
-   call `interf status` again. If the user already has a visible `interf web`
-   terminal running, do not start another engine. Track whether you started the
-   engine in this turn. Before ending the session, run `interf web stop` if you
-   started it and no Build run or check run is still active.
+   If Interf MCP tools are available, call `get_instance_status` or
+   `instance_status`, depending on the host profile. If only the CLI is
+   available, run `interf status`. If neither is available, probe
+   `http://127.0.0.1:4873/health` only to check whether the default local
+   runtime is running.
+
+   Keep these checks quiet. Do not tell the user which transport worked or
+   failed unless they explicitly asked to debug Interf connectivity.
 
-2. **Propose requested Artifacts before mutating state**.
+   If Interf provides explicit connection details for this session, pass them
+   on each CLI call:
 
-   First inspect what you can about the Source: filenames, file types, obvious
-   page counts, section names, and anything that affects the user's question.
-   Treat that as an advisory source profile, not proof that Interf processed the
-   files.
+   ```sh
+   --url "<service_url>" --token "<auth_token>"
+   ```
+
+   Do not write the token into files and do not echo it to the user.
+
+   Do not run hidden runtimes as an automatic recovery step. If MCP cannot
+   reach the instance, the CLI has no active connection, and no explicit
+   URL/token was provided, ask the user to start `interf runtime` or
+   `interf runtime start`, connect through Interf MCP, or provide connection
+   details. Stop here. Do not read the Source and do not answer the user's
+   question from raw files.
+
+   Treat `package_version`, CLI versions, and raw service metadata as internal
+   diagnostics. Do not include them in normal user-facing replies.
+
+2. **Propose what Interf will check before mutating state**.
+
+   After confirming an Interf connection, inspect what you can about the
+   Source: filenames, file types, obvious page counts, section names, and
+   anything that affects the user's question. Treat that as advisory Source
+   context, not evidence that Interf processed the files.
 
    If the user invoked `/interf` or explicitly asked to use Interf, that is
-   permission to inspect the Source and propose requested Artifacts only. Stop
-   after the proposal unless the user explicitly says to create, draft, proceed,
-   or do the flow end-to-end.
+   permission to inspect the Source and propose the checks Interf should run plus
+   the requested Artifacts that make those checks true. It is not permission to
+   answer from the Source. Follow the Required User-Visible Flow above.
 
    Keep the proposal compact:
 
    ```text
-   I found <source summary>. For <task>, I should prepare the source first because <risk>.
+   I found <source summary>. For <task>, I should build the source first because <risk>.
    <Optional ambiguity or assumption in one sentence.>
 
+   Interf should prepare data for the agent by building a Context Graph from
+   the files.
+
+   What Interf will check:
+   - <Plain-English check>
+     Backed by: <requested Artifact name>
+   - <Plain-English check>
+     Backed by: <requested Artifact name>
+
+   Requested Artifacts:
    1. **<Plain-English artifact name>**
       Why it helps: <short sentence>
-      Checks:
-      - <human-readable check>
-      - <human-readable check>
+   2. **<Plain-English artifact name>**
+      Why it helps: <short sentence>
 
-   If this looks right, tell me to create the Preparation and draft the Build Plan for review. I will stop here until you approve it.
+   Approve these checks and Artifacts, and I will draft the Build Plan.
    ```
 
    Do not show JSON to the user. Do not use markdown tables. Do not include
-   extracted numbers, chart readings, schema fields, stage names, or commands in
-   the human proposal. Detailed numbers belong in the built Artifacts.
+   extracted numbers, chart readings, schema fields, stage names, raw check
+   operator names, or commands in the human proposal. Detailed numbers belong in
+   the built artifacts, which live inside the Context Graph.
 
-3. **Create the Preparation after approval**.
+3. **Create the Project after approval**.
 
    ```sh
-   interf prep ls
-   interf prep create <id> --source <path> [--about "<agent job>"] \
-     --requested-artifacts-json '<json-array>' \
-     --source-profile-json '<json-object>'
+   interf project create <id> --source <path>
    ```
 
-   Store the approved proposal as `requested_artifacts[]`. Store the advisory
-   source interpretation as `source_profile` when useful. Use compact JSON only
-   in the command or API request after the user confirms.
+   Create a fresh Project for the current Source unless the user explicitly
+   names an existing Project id. Store the approved proposal in the Build Plan
+   draft request, not on the Project. Store advisory source interpretation as
+   `source_context` when useful.
 
-4. **Draft or select a Build Plan**.
+4. **Draft a Build Plan**.
 
-   For real analytical work, prefer a custom Build Plan for the Preparation.
+   For real analytical work, prefer a custom Build Plan for the Project.
    Use the default `interf-default` Build Plan only when the user explicitly
    asks for the default/smoke-test flow or accepts it as a fallback.
 
    ```sh
-   interf build-plan draft <prep-id> \
-     --task "<agent job>" \
-     --artifacts "<optional extra Artifact notes or change request>" \
-     --ready-when "<proof and coverage the user should trust>"
+   interf plan draft <project-id> \
+     --intent "<agent task>" \
+     --requested-artifacts-json '<json-array>' \
+     --checks-json '<context-checks-json-array>' \
+     --source-context-json '<json-object>' \
+     --artifacts "<optional extra requested Artifact notes or change request>" \
+     --ready-when "<plain-English Context Check the requested Artifacts should satisfy>"
    interf runs status <run-id>
-   interf build-plan show <build-plan-id>
-   interf build-plan select <prep-id> <build-plan-id>
+   interf plan show <build-plan-id>
    ```
 
-   Do not generate custom shell polling loops. In MCP-enabled hosts, use the
-   Interf MCP run-status tool. In CLI-only hosts, run `interf runs status
-   <run-id>` as a single command when you need fresh status.
+   Do not generate custom shell polling loops. In hosts with app-backed Interf
+   MCP tools, use the run-status tool. In CLI-only hosts, run `interf runs
+   status <run-id>` as a single command when you need fresh status.
 
-5. **Show the Build Plan review before building by default**.
+5. **Show the Build Plan review before building**.
 
    After the Build Plan is drafted, selected, or materially changed, send the
-   user to:
+   user a compact in-chat review: Project id, Build Plan id, what Interf will
+   check, which requested Artifacts back each check, stage names, and what each
+   stage writes. Include a review locator when the connected Interf client
+   provides one, but do not force the user to leave chat to approve. Unless the
+   user granted autonomy after reviewing the checks, pause here.
 
-   ```text
-   http://127.0.0.1:4873/?section=preparations&preparation=<prep-id>&preparationTab=build-plan
-   ```
-
-   Include a compact chat summary: requested Artifacts, stage names, what each
-   stage writes, and the proof/readiness checks the user should expect. Unless
-   the user granted autonomy, pause here.
-
-6. **Build verifiable context**.
+6. **Build the Context Graph**.
 
    ```sh
-   interf build <prep-id> [--watch] [--quiet] [--idempotency-key <key>]
+   interf build <project-id> [--watch] [--quiet] [--idempotency-key <key>]
    ```
 
-   Default is async-return: prints the Build run id, the artifact locator, and
-   current readiness. With `--quiet`, only the locator is printed. With
-   `--watch`, the CLI tails events until the run reaches a terminal state.
+   Default is async-return: prints the Build id, the Context Graph locator, and
+   current `ready` / `not ready` status. With `--quiet`, only the Context Graph locator is printed. With
+   `--watch`, the CLI tails events until the Build reaches a terminal state.
 
-7. **Inspect runs and readiness**.
+   If the user asked for an answer in the same `/interf` request, answer from
+   the built Context Graph, requested Artifacts, and source references linked
+   from that graph. Do not bypass the graph by searching the original
+   PDF/report/source file directly.
+
+7. **Inspect Project activity and optionally benchmark**.
 
    ```sh
    interf runs status <run-id>
-   interf runs ls [--prep <id>]
+   interf runs ls --project <project-id>
    interf runs cancel <run-id>
-   interf test <prep-id>
+   interf traces ls --project <project-id>
+   interf benchmark <project-id> --target context-graph
+   interf benchmark <project-id> --target source-files
    ```
 
+   `interf benchmark` is a benchmark/evaluation run for Q&A / fact-check accuracy.
+   Use it when the user wants a source-files baseline, a Context Graph
+   evaluation, or a source-vs-Context Graph comparison. It is not the
+   Context Checks surface.
+
 8. **On `not ready`, improve the Build Plan**.
 
    ```sh
-   interf build-plan improve <prep-id> \
-     --task "<what needs to change>" \
-     --artifacts "<Artifact changes, if any>" \
-     --ready-when "<proof or coverage changes, if any>"
+   interf plan improve <project-id> \
+     --intent "<what needs to change>" \
+     --artifacts "<requested Artifact changes, if any>" \
+     --ready-when "<Context Check changes, if any>"
    ```
 
-## Connected Agents
+## Agents
 
 Interf treats the agents it can shell out to, such as Claude Code, Codex, and
 custom CLIs, as connected local agents. `GET /v1/instance` reports
 `agent_count` and `default_agent`. If `agent_count` is `0`, `interf build` and
-`interf test` hard-error until the user installs or registers an agent.
+Benchmark runs hard-error until the user installs or registers
+an agent.
 
 ```sh
 interf agents ls
@@ -204,7 +450,7 @@ interf agents unmap <role>
 ```
 
 Roles are `extractor`, `summarizer`, `structurer`, `verifier`, and `general`.
-Build Plans may declare custom names; the engine treats unknown roles as
+Build Plans may declare custom names; the Build runtime treats unknown roles as
 `general`. Default behavior is single-active-agent.
 
 ## CLI Flags
@@ -212,134 +458,167 @@ Build Plans may declare custom names; the engine treats unknown roles as
 | Flag | What it controls | When the agent passes it |
 |---|---|---|
 | `--url <url>` | Override the active connection URL for one call. | Multiple instances or remote target. |
-| `--token <token>` | Override the active bearer token for one call. | Cloud / non-loopback connections only. |
-| `--watch` | Block until the run finishes and tail stages. | Only when the agent must wait inline. |
-| `--quiet` | Print only the artifact locator on success. | Scripting and agent handoff. |
-| `--idempotency-key <key>` | Sent as `X-Interf-Idempotency-Key`. The instance returns the original run id on retries. | Whenever the agent might retry the same build. |
+| `--token <token>` | Override the active bearer token for one call. | Explicit connection details, remote instances, or API integration tasks. |
+| `--watch` | Block until the Build finishes and tail stages. | Only when the agent must wait inline. |
+| `--quiet` | Print only the Context Graph locator on success. | Scripting and agent handoff. |
+| `--idempotency-key <key>` | Sent as `X-Interf-Idempotency-Key`. The instance returns the original Build id on retries. | Whenever the agent might retry the same Build. |
 
 ## Operating Rules
 
-- Use exact Preparation ids and Build Plan ids returned by the API. Do not
+- Use exact Project ids and Build Plan ids returned by the API. Do not
   invent ids.
 - Always confirm a connection exists before running mutating commands.
+- If `/interf` was invoked and no connection exists, stop. Do not answer by
+  reading raw source files.
+- Once a Context Graph exists, use it as the knowledge map. Source drilldown is
+  allowed only through graph-provided source references, traces, requested
+  Artifacts, or the Project's recorded Source Manifest.
 - For long-running work, use the async default and check status by id. Use
   `--watch` only when the agent must wait inline.
-- Do not call the local HTTP API directly unless Interf explicitly gives an
-  API-integration task. Use CLI commands or Interf MCP tools for normal agent
-  work.
+- Use MCP when available. Use the CLI only when it is
+  already installed. Do not install npm packages in the user's agent session.
+- Do not mention npm package versions, CLI versions, or local service versions
+  in normal task updates. They are debugging details, not part of the product
+  path.
+- You may use direct local HTTP for the well-known discovery probe. Do not call
+  source-reading or mutating local HTTP APIs unless Interf explicitly
+  provides the local connection details or gives an API-integration task.
 - Never write helper files into the Source folder. The Source is read-only
   input.
-- Treat requested-Artifact and Build Plan review as the default human trust
-  gate.
-- Separate proposal from proof. Before a Build run, you can say what Interf
-  plans to build and what coverage/proof it will check. After a Build run, you
-  can say which files/pages were processed, what evidence was produced, and
-  whether the verifiable context is ready.
+- Treat Context Checks plus requested Artifact review as the default
+  human trust gate.
+- Treat structural Artifact checks as necessary but not sufficient for
+  precision. If a visual/table/chart answer needs range, axis, period, unit,
+  series, or provenance semantics that the artifact did not capture, mark the
+  Context Graph not ready and improve the Build Plan.
+- The first visible Interf response to a read-and-answer request is the
+  checks-and-Artifacts proposal. It is not a draft answer.
+- Separate proposal from evidence. Before a Build, you can say what Interf
+  plans to check, which requested Artifacts back that, and what evidence it
+  will produce. After a Build, you can say which files/pages were processed,
+  what evidence was produced, and whether the Context Graph is ready.
 - Ask one concise clarification only when the Source or agent goal is missing,
   or when ambiguity makes the requested Artifacts impossible to draft. For
   normal domain ambiguity, state the assumption and make it a check.
 
 ## Show Your Work
 
-Interf UI is the user's verification surface. Whenever you start a run, print a
-deep link to the run page in the same message as the run id.
+The Run record, Build evidence, checks, traces, and Context Graph locator are
+the user's verification surface. Whenever you start a Build, summarize the
+Project id, Build id, checks, and Context Graph locator in chat. If the
+connected Interf client returns a review locator, include it.
 
-The base URL is whatever `interf status` reports as the connected instance.
-Append query params:
+Do not present the local HTTP service URL as a review UI.
 
-| Param | Value |
-|---|---|
-| `preparation` | the Preparation id |
-| `run` | the run id returned by the CLI |
-| `runTab` | optional: `trace`, `events`, or `readiness` |
-
-Example output after `interf build <prep-id>`:
+Example output after `interf build <project-id>`:
 
 ```text
-Started Build run <run-id>.
-Watch live: http://127.0.0.1:4873/?preparation=<prep-id>&run=<run-id>
+Started Build <run-id>.
+Project: <project-id>
+Context Graph: <locator when available>
 
 I'll check status in a moment with `interf runs status <run-id>`.
 ```
 
-When a run finishes, print the same URL with `runTab=readiness` so the user can
-click through to the readiness summary.
+When a Build finishes, report the final `ready` / `not ready` status, the
+Context Graph locator, and the requested Artifacts or validation failures that
+matter.
 
-## Reading The Context Locator
+## Reading The Context Graph Locator
 
-`interf build <prep-id>` prints a short multi-line block by default. The context
-locator looks like one of:
+Build returns a Context Graph locator. With the CLI, `interf build
+<project-id>` prints a short multi-line block by default. The Context Graph
+locator looks like:
 
 ```text
-Context: <local-path-returned-by-interf>
+Context Graph: <local-path-returned-by-interf>
 ```
 
-```text
-Context: https://api.interf.cloud/v1/runs/run_2x4abc.../verifiable-context
-```
+For `local-path`, use the agent's filesystem tools to read the directory.
+Start from `artifacts/` task handoffs. Use `home.md` only if you need to find
+the right handoff. Follow source refs for exact claims.
 
-For `local-path`, use the agent's filesystem tools to read the directory. For
-`remote-url`, use HTTP.
+## Interf Client Freeform Proposal Mode
 
-## Interf UI Freeform Proposal Mode
-
-When Interf UI asks for a proposal, do not run CLI commands. Write a single
-JSON object to the requested output path. Structured UI controls call the local
-service directly; this mode is only for freeform planning.
+When an Interf client asks for a proposal, do not run CLI commands. Write a
+single JSON object to the requested output path. Structured controls call the
+local service directly; this mode is only for freeform planning.
 
 Use these action types:
 
 - `build`
-- `test`
-- `readiness-check-draft`
+- `benchmark`
+- `benchmark-question-draft` (draft benchmark questions)
 - `build-plan-draft`
 - `build-plan-improvement`
 - `clarification`
 
 Use `build` when the user asks to prepare data, build artifacts, or refresh
-verifiable context for agent work. Set `build_plan` to the selected Build Plan
-id if the request named one, and set `preparation` to the Preparation id if the
-request named one. CLI equivalent: `interf build <prep-id>`.
+the Context Graph for an agent task. Set `project` to the Project id. Do not set
+`build_plan` for a Build proposal; Build always runs the Project's selected
+Build Plan. If the request named a different Build Plan, select or draft that
+Build Plan before proposing `build`. CLI equivalent:
+`interf build <project-id>`.
 
-Readiness-check proposals run against verifiable context unless the user asks
-for a source-files baseline.
+Use `benchmark` for benchmark/evaluation proposals. They run against the
+Context Graph unless the user asks for a source-files baseline. CLI equivalent:
+`interf benchmark <project-id>`.
 
 Return this shape:
 
 ```json
 {
   "action_type": "build",
-  "build_plan": "build-plan-id",
-  "preparation": "prep-id",
+  "project": "project-id",
   "title": "short approval card title",
   "summary": "one sentence describing which artifacts will be built",
   "assistant_message": "concise explanation for the user",
-  "command_preview": "interf build prep-id"
+  "command_preview": "interf build project-id"
 }
 ```
 
-For Build Plan drafting proposals, keep requested Artifacts structured in
-`values.requested_artifacts[]` and keep the advisory source summary in
-`values.source_profile`:
+For Build Plan drafting proposals, keep user-facing checks in
+`values.checks[]`, requested Artifacts in `values.requested_artifacts[]`, and
+the advisory source summary in `values.source_context`:
+Use stable requested Artifact ids and connect each Context Check with
+`backed_by_artifact_ids`. These ids are implementation detail for the action
+payload; do not show them in the human proposal.
 
 ```json
 {
   "action_type": "build-plan-draft",
-  "preparation": "prep-id",
-  "build_plan": "prep-id-build-plan",
+  "project": "project-id",
+  "build_plan": "project-id-build-plan",
   "title": "Draft Build Plan",
   "summary": "Drafts the Build Plan for the requested Artifacts.",
   "values": {
-    "build_plan_id": "prep-id-build-plan",
-    "task_prompt": "London versus South West annual take-up",
+    "build_plan_id": "project-id-build-plan",
+    "intent": "London versus South West annual take-up",
+    "checks": [
+      {
+        "label": "Every page is covered.",
+        "backed_by_artifact_ids": ["guide-to-report"]
+      },
+      {
+        "label": "The final comparison cites sources for every figure.",
+        "backed_by_artifact_ids": ["london-versus-south-west-comparison"]
+      }
+    ],
     "requested_artifacts": [
       {
+        "id": "guide-to-report",
         "title": "Guide to the report",
         "purpose": "A short note for each page, so the agent knows what is where.",
         "checks": ["Every page is listed.", "Each page has a plain-English summary."]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "london-versus-south-west-comparison",
+        "title": "London versus South West comparison",
+        "purpose": "A source-cited comparison note for the figures the agent task depends on.",
+        "checks": ["Every figure has a source citation.", "Ambiguous chart-derived values are bounded."]
       }
     ],
-    "source_profile": {
+    "source_context": {
       "summary": "One 26-page office market report.",
       "observations": ["No obvious section is called South West."]
     }
@@ -367,10 +646,12 @@ Use CLI read commands before asking the user to inspect the UI:
 
 ```sh
 interf status
-interf prep show <prep-id>
-interf build-plan show <build-plan-id>
+interf project show <project-id>
+interf plan show <build-plan-id>
 interf runs status <run-id>
+interf traces show <trace-kind> --project <project-id>
 ```
 
-The UI link is for visual proof. The CLI output is for agent-readable status,
-Build Plan review, Artifact status, run errors, proof, and readiness summaries.
+The UI link is for visual review. The CLI output is for agent-readable status,
+Build Plan review, requested Artifact status, Build errors, Checks, Build evidence,
+traces, benchmark results, and ready / not ready summaries.