@indigoai-us/hq-cloud 6.14.50 → 6.15.1

package/test/e2e/watcher-scoped-coverage.test.ts

@@ -1,381 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * REAL-fs regressions for the scoped watch-root backend.
- *
- * These assert on what the OS DELIVERS, not on what TreeWatcher emits. That
- * distinction is the whole point of this backend: the emit filter has always
- * dropped excluded paths correctly, so emissions look identical whether or not
- * the watch set is scoped. What changes is whether the event reaches the
- * process at all — which is the CPU cost this backend exists to remove, and
- * the only way these regressions are observable.
- *
- * So each test drives `startScopedRecursiveWatch` directly and counts raw
- * `onEvent` calls.
- *
- * Checked against the pre-fix backend, three of these fail without their fix —
- * the new-exclusion firehose, the attach-failure report, and the mid-plan
- * window. The mid-plan case only became meaningful once the walk was made
- * deliberately slow: with a microsecond-wide window it was racing FSEvents
- * stream warm-up and flapped between runs, which is a flaky test rather than
- * a regression test.
- *
- * The delete/recreate case passes either way on macOS, because FSEvents
- * watches by PATH — a recreated directory keeps reporting through the stale
- * handle. That does not hold on Windows (`ReadDirectoryChangesW` is
- * handle-based) and is not guaranteed by any API contract, so dropping stale
- * handles is deliberate belt-and-braces and this test is kept as a guard: it
- * pins that the re-plan did not BREAK behavior that already worked.
- */
-
-import { mkdtemp, mkdir, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises";
-import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
-import path from "node:path";
-
-import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
-
-import {
-  startScopedRecursiveWatch,
-  type ScopedWatchBackend,
-} from "../../src/watcher.js";
-
-let hqRoot: string;
-let backend: ScopedWatchBackend | null = null;
-
-/** `excluded/` anywhere in the tree is out of scope, like `node_modules/`. */
-const makeFilter = (root: string) => (abs: string): boolean => {
-  const rel = path.relative(root, abs);
-  if (rel === "" || rel.startsWith("..")) return false;
-  return !rel.split(path.sep).includes("excluded");
-};
-
-beforeEach(async () => {
-  hqRoot = await mkdtemp(path.join(tmpdir(), "hqcloud-scoped-cov-"));
-});
-
-afterEach(async () => {
-  backend?.close();
-  backend = null;
-  await rm(hqRoot, { recursive: true, force: true });
-});
-
-const settle = (ms = 800) => new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, ms));
-
-/** Raw events the OS delivered for paths under `prefix`. */
-function eventsUnder(onEvent: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>, prefix: string): number {
-  return onEvent.mock.calls.filter(
-    ([p]) => typeof p === "string" && p.startsWith(prefix),
-  ).length;
-}
-
-/**
- * Guard against a vacuous pass. Half of these tests assert that ZERO events
- * arrive, which is trivially true if the backend attached no watches at all —
- * so every test first proves the backend is actually live.
- */
-function expectLiveBackend(b: ScopedWatchBackend): void {
-  expect(b.attachFailures).toBe(0);
-  expect(b.watchedPathCount()).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-}
-
-/**
- * This backend is the macOS/Windows one: it is built entirely on recursive
- * `fs.watch`, which Linux does not implement (`startTreeWatch` routes Linux to
- * chokidar instead). Running these there watches nothing, which would let the
- * "expect zero events" cases pass for the wrong reason.
- */
-const SUPPORTS_RECURSIVE_WATCH =
-  process.platform === "darwin" || process.platform === "win32";
-
-describe.skipIf(!SUPPORTS_RECURSIVE_WATCH)("scoped watch roots — the OS stops reporting excluded trees", () => {
-  it(
-    "stops delivering events from an excluded directory created AFTER planning",
-    async () => {
-      // The regression that would defeat the whole change: at plan time the
-      // tree is clean, so it collapses to ONE recursive root at hqRoot.
-      // Creating `work/excluded/` afterwards puts a high-churn bucket back
-      // inside that root. Without re-planning, the creation event looks
-      // "already covered" and every write beneath it is delivered again —
-      // exactly the firehose this backend removes.
-      await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "work", "keep"), { recursive: true });
-      const onEvent = vi.fn();
-      backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(
-        hqRoot,
-        makeFilter(hqRoot),
-        onEvent,
-        () => {},
-      );
-      expectLiveBackend(backend);
-      // Wait out the bootstrap drain window: the temporary whole-tree watch is
-      // deliberately held open briefly after planning so in-flight events are
-      // not dropped with the handle. This test measures the steady state.
-      await settle(2600);
-
-      const excluded = path.join(hqRoot, "work", "excluded");
-      await mkdir(path.join(excluded, "deep"), { recursive: true });
-      await settle();
-
-      onEvent.mockClear();
-      for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
-        await writeFile(path.join(excluded, "deep", `build-${i}.log`), "noise\n");
-      }
-      await settle();
-
-      expect(eventsUnder(onEvent, excluded)).toBe(0);
-    },
-    20000,
-  );
-
-  it(
-    "still delivers in-scope siblings after re-planning around a new exclusion",
-    async () => {
-      // Re-planning must SPLIT the root, not tear coverage off the good part.
-      const keep = path.join(hqRoot, "work", "keep");
-      await mkdir(keep, { recursive: true });
-      const onEvent = vi.fn();
-      backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(
-        hqRoot,
-        makeFilter(hqRoot),
-        onEvent,
-        () => {},
-      );
-      expectLiveBackend(backend);
-      await settle();
-
-      await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "work", "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-      await settle();
-
-      onEvent.mockClear();
-      await writeFile(path.join(keep, "note.md"), "# hi\n");
-      await settle();
-
-      expect(eventsUnder(onEvent, keep)).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    },
-    20000,
-  );
-
-  it(
-    "re-attaches after a watched directory is deleted and recreated",
-    async () => {
-      // A recreated directory has a NEW inode. A stale handle left in the watch
-      // set makes the path look covered forever, so nothing under the
-      // replacement is ever delivered again.
-      const work = path.join(hqRoot, "work");
-      const keep = path.join(work, "keep");
-      await mkdir(keep, { recursive: true });
-      // An exclusion at the root forces `hqRoot` to be SHALLOW, so `work/` is
-      // its own recursive root — the handle that goes stale on delete.
-      await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-      const onEvent = vi.fn();
-      backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(
-        hqRoot,
-        makeFilter(hqRoot),
-        onEvent,
-        () => {},
-      );
-      expectLiveBackend(backend);
-      await settle();
-
-      await rm(work, { recursive: true, force: true });
-      await settle();
-      await mkdir(keep, { recursive: true });
-      await settle();
-
-      onEvent.mockClear();
-      await writeFile(path.join(keep, "reborn.md"), "# back\n");
-      await settle();
-
-      expect(eventsUnder(onEvent, keep)).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    },
-    25000,
-  );
-
-  it(
-    "delivers a change made while the planning walk is still running",
-    async () => {
-      // Planning is synchronous and takes seconds on a real tree. Without a
-      // bootstrap watch over the root first, anything written during that
-      // window is invisible to event-driven push until the next cadence poll.
-      await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "work"), { recursive: true });
-      await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-      const target = path.join(hqRoot, "work", "during-plan.md");
-
-      const onEvent = vi.fn();
-      let fired = false;
-      const filter = makeFilter(hqRoot);
-      /** Block the walk so the planning window is wide and unambiguous. */
-      const spin = (ms: number) => {
-        const until = Date.now() + ms;
-        while (Date.now() < until) {
-          /* deliberately synchronous — this IS the planning walk */
-        }
-      };
-      const slowFilter = (abs: string, isDir?: boolean): boolean => {
-        // Mutate from inside the planning walk itself — the one moment the
-        // tree is being traversed and no scoped watch exists yet.
-        if (!fired) {
-          fired = true;
-          // Let the OS watch stream warm up first — a write in the same
-          // microsecond as stream creation is genuinely racy on macOS and
-          // would make this test flaky rather than meaningful. Then write, and
-          // keep blocking so the write is unambiguously INSIDE the walk.
-          spin(600);
-          // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-require-imports
-          require("node:fs").writeFileSync(target, "# mid-plan\n");
-          spin(400);
-        }
-        return filter(abs, isDir);
-      };
-
-      backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(hqRoot, slowFilter, onEvent, () => {});
-      expectLiveBackend(backend);
-      await settle(1500);
-
-      expect(fired).toBe(true);
-      expect(eventsUnder(onEvent, target)).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    },
-    20000,
-  );
-
-  it(
-    "drops watches BELOW a deleted directory, not just the directory itself",
-    async () => {
-      // The OS reports the removed directory, not each of its descendants, so
-      // a drop that only removes the exact path leaks every watch underneath
-      // it — open handles that never close, plus a stale recursive root that
-      // will mark a later recreation as already-covered. These runners live
-      // for many hours, so the leak accumulates.
-      const outer = path.join(hqRoot, "outer");
-      // `excluded` children make outer and outer/inner SHALLOW, so both they
-      // and their in-scope children each hold their own watch.
-      await mkdir(path.join(outer, "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-      await mkdir(path.join(outer, "inner", "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-      await mkdir(path.join(outer, "inner", "keep"), { recursive: true });
-      await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-
-      const onEvent = vi.fn();
-      backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(
-        hqRoot,
-        makeFilter(hqRoot),
-        onEvent,
-        () => {},
-      );
-      expectLiveBackend(backend);
-      const before = backend.watchedPathCount();
-      // hqRoot + outer + outer/inner + outer/inner/keep
-      expect(before).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4);
-      await settle(2600);
-
-      await rm(outer, { recursive: true, force: true });
-      await settle();
-
-      // Every watch at or below `outer` must be gone — only hqRoot remains.
-      expect(backend.watchedPathCount()).toBe(1);
-    },
-    25000,
-  );
-
-  it(
-    "keeps re-planning bounded when several exclusions appear at once",
-    async () => {
-      // Each newly-created excluded directory under a recursive root forces a
-      // re-plan, and a re-plan walks that root's subtree synchronously — so an
-      // install creating many excluded directories at once looks like it should
-      // cost that walk once per directory, on the event loop.
-      //
-      // It does not, and this test pins WHY: the first re-plan SPLITS the
-      // covering root, so each subsequent exclusion is re-planned against a
-      // much smaller root. The work is self-limiting. This is a guard, not a
-      // regression test — it passes without any coalescing precisely because
-      // the splitting already bounds the cost, and it would start failing if a
-      // future change made re-plans walk from the top each time.
-      const work = path.join(hqRoot, "work");
-      for (const n of ["p1", "p2", "p3", "p4"]) {
-        await mkdir(path.join(work, n, "src"), { recursive: true });
-      }
-      const seen = vi.fn();
-      backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(
-        hqRoot,
-        makeFilter(hqRoot),
-        () => {},
-        () => {},
-        seen,
-      );
-      expectLiveBackend(backend);
-      await settle(2600);
-
-      // One directory visit per in-scope dir per walk. Four exclusions
-      // appearing together must cost ONE walk, not four.
-      const perWalk = seen.mock.calls.length;
-      expect(perWalk).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-      seen.mockClear();
-
-      await Promise.all(
-        ["p1", "p2", "p3", "p4"].map((n) =>
-          mkdir(path.join(work, n, "excluded"), { recursive: true }),
-        ),
-      );
-      await settle(2000);
-
-      // Allow one full walk plus slack; four independent walks would be ~4x.
-      expect(seen.mock.calls.length).toBeLessThan(perWalk * 2);
-    },
-    30000,
-  );
-
-  it(
-    "does not report an error when a watched directory is simply deleted",
-    async () => {
-      // A deleted watched root could plausibly be re-added by a re-plan, with
-      // fs.watch then throwing ENOENT and surfacing a watcher error plus a full
-      // resync for an ordinary delete. It is not, because the stale-handle drop
-      // returns before any re-plan is considered. A guard on that ordering:
-      // deleting a directory must stay silent.
-      const work = path.join(hqRoot, "work");
-      await mkdir(path.join(work, "keep"), { recursive: true });
-      await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-
-      const errors: unknown[] = [];
-      backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(
-        hqRoot,
-        makeFilter(hqRoot),
-        () => {},
-        (e) => errors.push(e),
-      );
-      expectLiveBackend(backend);
-      await settle(2600);
-
-      await rm(work, { recursive: true, force: true });
-      await settle(1500);
-
-      expect(errors).toEqual([]);
-    },
-    25000,
-  );
-
-  it("reports attach failures so the caller can reject a partial plan", async () => {
-    // Real attach failure, no mocking: `b/` is planned during the walk, then
-    // deleted before applyPlan reaches it, so its fs.watch throws ENOENT.
-    // A planned root we could not attach is a permanent hole in coverage —
-    // the caller must see it and fall back rather than run half-blind.
-    const doomed = path.join(hqRoot, "b");
-    await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "a"), { recursive: true });
-    await mkdir(doomed, { recursive: true });
-    // An exclusion at the root keeps hqRoot shallow, so `a/` and `b/` are
-    // planned as their own recursive roots instead of collapsing into one.
-    await mkdir(path.join(hqRoot, "excluded"), { recursive: true });
-
-    const errors: unknown[] = [];
-    const { rmSync } = await import("node:fs");
-    backend = startScopedRecursiveWatch(
-      hqRoot,
-      makeFilter(hqRoot),
-      () => {},
-      (e) => errors.push(e),
-      (dir) => {
-        if (dir === doomed) rmSync(doomed, { recursive: true, force: true });
-      },
-    );
-
-    expect(backend.attachFailures).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-  }, 20000);
-});

package/test/invite-flow.integration.test.ts

@@ -1,244 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Invite → Accept → Promote integration test (VLT-7 US-003).
- *
- * Mocks the vault-service HTTP API to test the full lifecycle round-trip:
- * admin creates invite → invitee accepts → admin promotes to guest with paths.
- *
- * Uses mocked fetch (not a real vault-service) to keep the test self-contained
- * and runnable offline. Real E2E tests against dev stage are in the e2eTests
- * section of the PRD.
- */
-
-import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach, afterEach } from "vitest";
-import { invite } from "../src/cli/invite.js";
-import { accept, parseToken } from "../src/cli/accept.js";
-import { promote } from "../src/cli/promote.js";
-import type { VaultServiceConfig } from "../src/types.js";
-import type { Membership } from "../src/vault-client.js";
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Helpers
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function jsonResponse(status: number, body: unknown): Response {
-  return new Response(JSON.stringify(body), {
-    status,
-    headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
-  });
-}
-
-const VAULT_CONFIG: VaultServiceConfig = {
-  apiUrl: "https://vault.test.example.com",
-  authToken: "admin-jwt",
-};
-
-const INVITEE_CONFIG: VaultServiceConfig = {
-  apiUrl: "https://vault.test.example.com",
-  authToken: "invitee-jwt",
-};
-
-let fetchSpy: ReturnType<typeof vi.spyOn>;
-
-beforeEach(() => {
-  fetchSpy = vi.spyOn(globalThis, "fetch");
-});
-
-afterEach(() => {
-  vi.restoreAllMocks();
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Token parsing
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe("parseToken", () => {
-  it("extracts token from hq:// magic link", () => {
-    expect(parseToken("hq://accept/tok_abc123")).toBe("tok_abc123");
-  });
-
-  it("extracts token from https:// URL", () => {
-    expect(parseToken("https://example.com/accept/tok_xyz")).toBe("tok_xyz");
-  });
-
-  it("returns raw token unchanged", () => {
-    expect(parseToken("tok_raw_token")).toBe("tok_raw_token");
-  });
-
-  it("trims whitespace", () => {
-    expect(parseToken("  hq://accept/tok_abc  ")).toBe("tok_abc");
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Full round-trip
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe("invite → accept → promote lifecycle", () => {
-  const pendingMembership: Membership = {
-    membershipKey: "psn_invitee#cmp_acme",
-    personUid: "psn_invitee",
-    companyUid: "cmp_acme",
-    role: "member",
-    status: "pending",
-    inviteToken: "tok_secure_random_32bytes",
-    invitedBy: "psn_admin",
-    invitedAt: "2026-04-15T00:00:00Z",
-    createdAt: "2026-04-15T00:00:00Z",
-    updatedAt: "2026-04-15T00:00:00Z",
-  };
-
-  const activeMembership: Membership = {
-    ...pendingMembership,
-    status: "active",
-    inviteToken: undefined,
-    acceptedAt: "2026-04-15T00:01:00Z",
-    updatedAt: "2026-04-15T00:01:00Z",
-  };
-
-  it("admin invites → invitee accepts → admin promotes to guest with paths", async () => {
-    // --- Step 1: Admin creates invite ---
-    fetchSpy
-      // entity.findBySlug("company", "acme")
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, { entity: { uid: "cmp_acme", slug: "acme", type: "company", status: "active" } }),
-      )
-      // createInvite
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, {
-          membership: pendingMembership,
-          inviteToken: "tok_secure_random_32bytes",
-        }),
-      );
-
-    const inviteResult = await invite({
-      target: "alice@example.com",
-      role: "member",
-      company: "acme",
-      vaultConfig: VAULT_CONFIG,
-      callerUid: "psn_admin",
-    });
-
-    expect(inviteResult.magicLink).toBe("hq://accept/tok_secure_random_32bytes");
-    expect(inviteResult.membership.status).toBe("pending");
-
-    // --- Step 2: Invitee accepts ---
-    fetchSpy
-      // acceptInvite
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, { membership: activeMembership }),
-      )
-      // entity.get for company slug resolution
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, { entity: { uid: "cmp_acme", slug: "acme", type: "company", status: "active" } }),
-      );
-
-    const acceptResult = await accept({
-      tokenOrLink: inviteResult.magicLink,
-      callerUid: "psn_invitee",
-      vaultConfig: INVITEE_CONFIG,
-    });
-
-    expect(acceptResult.membership.status).toBe("active");
-    expect(acceptResult.membership.role).toBe("member");
-    expect(acceptResult.companySlug).toBe("acme");
-
-    // --- Step 3: Admin promotes member → guest with paths ---
-    fetchSpy
-      // entity.findBySlug for company resolution
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, { entity: { uid: "cmp_acme", slug: "acme", type: "company", status: "active" } }),
-      )
-      // updateRole
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, {
-          membership: {
-            ...activeMembership,
-            role: "guest",
-            allowedPrefixes: ["docs/"],
-            updatedAt: "2026-04-15T00:02:00Z",
-          },
-        }),
-      );
-
-    const promoteResult = await promote({
-      target: "psn_invitee",
-      newRole: "guest",
-      paths: "docs/",
-      company: "acme",
-      callerUid: "psn_admin",
-      vaultConfig: VAULT_CONFIG,
-    });
-
-    expect(promoteResult.membership.role).toBe("guest");
-    expect(promoteResult.membership.allowedPrefixes).toEqual(["docs/"]);
-  });
-
-  it("double-accept returns conflict error", async () => {
-    fetchSpy.mockResolvedValueOnce(
-      jsonResponse(409, { message: "Already accepted" }),
-    );
-
-    await expect(
-      accept({
-        tokenOrLink: "tok_already_accepted",
-        callerUid: "psn_invitee",
-        vaultConfig: INVITEE_CONFIG,
-      }),
-    ).rejects.toThrow("This invite was already accepted");
-  });
-
-  it("demoting last owner returns conflict error", async () => {
-    fetchSpy
-      // entity.findBySlug
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, { entity: { uid: "cmp_acme", slug: "acme", type: "company", status: "active" } }),
-      )
-      // updateRole — 409 because last owner
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(409, { message: "Cannot remove last owner" }),
-      );
-
-    await expect(
-      promote({
-        target: "psn_owner",
-        newRole: "member",
-        company: "acme",
-        callerUid: "psn_owner",
-        vaultConfig: VAULT_CONFIG,
-      }),
-    ).rejects.toThrow("Cannot leave company without an owner");
-  });
-
-  it("non-admin invite returns permission error", async () => {
-    fetchSpy
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(200, { entity: { uid: "cmp_acme", slug: "acme", type: "company", status: "active" } }),
-      )
-      .mockResolvedValueOnce(
-        jsonResponse(403, { message: "Forbidden" }),
-      );
-
-    await expect(
-      invite({
-        target: "bob@example.com",
-        company: "acme",
-        vaultConfig: VAULT_CONFIG,
-        callerUid: "psn_member",
-      }),
-    ).rejects.toThrow("Permission denied — only admins and owners can invite members");
-  });
-
-  it("accept with wrong person returns permission error", async () => {
-    fetchSpy.mockResolvedValueOnce(
-      jsonResponse(403, { message: "Identity mismatch" }),
-    );
-
-    await expect(
-      accept({
-        tokenOrLink: "tok_for_someone_else",
-        callerUid: "psn_wrong",
-        vaultConfig: INVITEE_CONFIG,
-      }),
-    ).rejects.toThrow("This invite was for a different person");
-  });
-});