@indexnetwork/protocol 22.0.0-rc.499.1 → 64.0.0-rc.604.2

package/dist/negotiations/negotiation.graph.finalize.d.ts

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Negotiation graph, stage 4: persist the outcome and fan out follow-ups.
- */
-import type { NegotiationGraphDeps, NegotiationState } from "./negotiation.graph.shared.js";
-export declare function finalizeNode(state: NegotiationState, deps: NegotiationGraphDeps): Promise<{}>;

package/dist/negotiations/negotiation.graph.finalize.js

@@ -1,403 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Negotiation graph, stage 4: persist the outcome and fan out follow-ups.
- */
-import { requestContext } from "../shared/observability/request-context.js";
-import { isRejectLikeAction, isTerminalAction, negotiationAskRoundsCap } from "./negotiation.protocol.js";
-import { blocksNegotiationBeforeFirstTurn } from "./negotiation.screen.js";
-import { NEGOTIATION_QUESTION_GENERIC_COUNTERPARTY, NEGOTIATION_QUESTION_GENERIC_NETWORK, isSafeAuthoredNegotiationQuestion } from './negotiation.question-safety.js';
-import { NEGOTIATION_PARK_REASONING } from './negotiation.stall-gap.js';
-import { isNegotiationTurnCapReached } from "./negotiation.turn-cap.js";
-import { countNegotiationAskRounds, finalizeLog, retrieveClientDm, turnsFromMessages } from "./negotiation.graph.shared.js";
-export async function finalizeNode(state, deps) {
-    const traceEmitter = requestContext.getStore()?.traceEmitter;
-    const emitWide = (event) => traceEmitter?.(event);
-    const pauseReceipt = (outcome) => state.continuationExecution
-        ? {
-            continuationReceipt: {
-                priorTaskId: state.continuationExecution.taskId,
-                settlementId: state.continuationExecution.settlementId,
-                successorTaskId: state.continuationExecution.successorTaskId,
-                fence: state.continuationExecution.fence,
-                outcome,
-            },
-        }
-        : undefined;
-    if (state.status === 'waiting_for_agent') {
-        if (state.opportunityId) {
-            emitWide({
-                type: "negotiation_outcome",
-                opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                outcome: "waiting_for_agent",
-                turnCount: state.turnCount,
-                isContinuation: state.isContinuation,
-            });
-        }
-        return pauseReceipt('waiting_for_agent') ?? {};
-    }
-    // ask_user pause: no outcome, no completed state — the task stays
-    // input_required until the client answers or the window expires.
-    if (state.status === 'input_required') {
-        if (state.opportunityId) {
-            emitWide({
-                type: "negotiation_outcome",
-                opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                outcome: "input_required",
-                turnCount: state.turnCount,
-                isContinuation: state.isContinuation,
-            });
-        }
-        return pauseReceipt('input_required') ?? {};
-    }
-    // Init can fail closed before an attempt owns a task. Such a rejection is
-    // not a completed negotiation and must not write through an empty task ID,
-    // create an artifact, or advance the opportunity lifecycle.
-    if (!state.taskId) {
-        finalizeLog.info('Skipping outcome persistence because no negotiation task was claimed', {
-            opportunityId: state.opportunityId || undefined,
-            error: state.error || undefined,
-        });
-        return {};
-    }
-    const history = turnsFromMessages(state.messages);
-    const lastTurn = state.lastTurn;
-    const hasOpportunity = lastTurn?.action === "accept";
-    // P2.2: the client's own outreach gate declined before any turn — the
-    // negotiation never happened from the counterparty's perspective.
-    // IND-564: an opening-move `withdraw` blocked before any message was
-    // persisted is the same quiet screen-out outcome (no in-task outreach to
-    // retract), reached from the turn node rather than the screen node.
-    // Two DISTINCT routes reach the same quiet `screened_out` outcome, and
-    // they disagree about who authored the decision:
-    //  - the screen node blocked before any turn was drafted → the screen
-    //    decision is the reason;
-    //  - the acting agent refused on its opening turn (IND-611) → the
-    //    withdrawing TURN is the reason.
-    // They are collapsed into `screenedOut` for status/lifecycle purposes but
-    // must stay separate when attributing `outcome.reasoning` below.
-    const blockedByScreenNode = blocksNegotiationBeforeFirstTurn(state.screenDecision, state.turnCount);
-    const refusedAtOpeningTurn = state.firstTurnScreenedOut === true;
-    const screenedOut = blockedByScreenNode || refusedAtOpeningTurn;
-    const atCap = !screenedOut && isNegotiationTurnCapReached(state.turnCount, state.maxTurns) && !isTerminalAction(lastTurn?.action);
-    let agreedRoles = [];
-    if (hasOpportunity && history.length >= 2) {
-        const acceptTurn = history[history.length - 1];
-        const precedingTurn = history[history.length - 2];
-        const accepterIsSource = state.currentSpeaker === "candidate";
-        const [sourceRole, candidateRole] = accepterIsSource
-            ? [acceptTurn.assessment.suggestedRoles.ownUser, precedingTurn.assessment.suggestedRoles.ownUser]
-            : [precedingTurn.assessment.suggestedRoles.ownUser, acceptTurn.assessment.suggestedRoles.ownUser];
-        agreedRoles = [
-            { userId: state.sourceUser.id, role: sourceRole },
-            { userId: state.candidateUser.id, role: candidateRole },
-        ];
-    }
-    const outcome = {
-        hasOpportunity,
-        agreedRoles,
-        // IND-611: attribute the reasoning to whoever actually made the
-        // decision. Before the turn-0 refusal path existed, `screenedOut`
-        // implied the screen node, so preferring `screenDecision.reasoning`
-        // was always right. It is now wrong for an opening-turn refusal taken
-        // while the screen said `reach_out`: that record argues FOR the match,
-        // and surfacing it as the reason the agent did NOT reach out is exactly
-        // the dishonesty this work removes (IND-610 renders this string in the
-        // owner-only gate-decision card). The screen-node branch is unchanged.
-        reasoning: blockedByScreenNode
-            ? (state.screenDecision?.reasoning ?? lastTurn?.assessment?.reasoning ?? "")
-            : refusedAtOpeningTurn
-                ? (lastTurn?.assessment?.reasoning ?? state.screenDecision?.reasoning ?? "")
-                : (lastTurn?.assessment.reasoning ?? ""),
-        turnCount: state.turnCount,
-        ...(screenedOut
-            ? { reason: "screened_out" }
-            : atCap
-                ? { reason: "turn_cap" }
-                : {}),
-    };
-    // Unconcluded end: no opportunity, no explicit reject, and turns actually
-    // happened — turn cap, timeout, or a plain stall. Feeds both the post-stall
-    // park below and the legacy questioner enqueue further down.
-    const endedUnconcluded = !hasOpportunity && !screenedOut && !isRejectLikeAction(lastTurn?.action) && state.turnCount > 0;
-    const stallReason = atCap
-        ? 'turn_cap'
-        : (state.error && /timeout/i.test(state.error))
-            ? 'timeout'
-            : 'stalled';
-    // ─── Post-stall park (conversational-questions plan) ──────────────────
-    // Instead of ending silently, an unconcluded negotiation parks carrying
-    // the ONE question that would let a retry conclude — authored by the
-    // negotiator from this negotiation's transcript and the signal's client
-    // DM, exactly the grounding the mid-flight consult uses. The gap is
-    // persisted as an `ask_user` message in the negotiation's own record: the
-    // parked negotiation is the only durable record of the information need,
-    // the same substrate the per-side ration reads, and an `ask_user` last
-    // message keeps the floor with the asking side on retry.
-    //
-    // Bounded per negotiation: past the ask-rounds cap the negotiation stalls
-    // TERMINALLY — no authoring call, no park — so two agents cannot
-    // ping-pong their humans indefinitely. Runs on continuations too (a
-    // resumed negotiation may park again); the cap is what bounds the loop.
-    //
-    // Every failure — authoring, safety gate, persistence — degrades to
-    // today's terminal stall. A park is additive state, never a new way for
-    // finalize to fail.
-    if (endedUnconcluded
-        && deps.stallGapAuthor
-        && state.opportunityId
-        && state.sourceIntentId
-        && state.indexContext.networkId) {
-        const askRounds = countNegotiationAskRounds(state.messages);
-        const askRoundsCap = negotiationAskRoundsCap();
-        if (askRounds >= askRoundsCap) {
-            finalizeLog.info('negotiation_ask_cap_terminal', {
-                taskId: state.taskId,
-                opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                askRounds,
-                askRoundsCap,
-                stallReason,
-            });
-            emitWide({
-                type: 'negotiation_ask_cap_terminal',
-                opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                askRounds,
-                askRoundsCap,
-            });
-        }
-        else {
-            try {
-                const clientDm = await retrieveClientDm(deps, state.sourceUser.id, state.sourceIntentId);
-                const parkIntent = state.sourceUser.intents.find((intent) => intent.id === state.sourceIntentId);
-                const gap = await deps.stallGapAuthor.author({
-                    userName: state.sourceUser.profile.name ?? 'your user',
-                    signal: parkIntent
-                        ? { title: parkIntent.title, description: parkIntent.description }
-                        : { title: 'Signal', description: 'the signal attached to this match' },
-                    seedReasoning: state.seedAssessment.reasoning,
-                    history,
-                    stallReason,
-                    ...(clientDm.length > 0 && { clientDm }),
-                });
-                // Same identifier-aware gate as the mid-flight authored question, with
-                // the same inputs in hand: the counterparty's name and the evaluator's
-                // reasoning. An unsafe question never parks — there is no enum-only
-                // downgrade here because a park without its gap records nothing.
-                const counterpartyName = state.candidateUser.profile?.name?.trim();
-                const seedReasoning = state.seedAssessment?.reasoning?.trim();
-                const safeGap = gap && isSafeAuthoredNegotiationQuestion(gap.question, {
-                    ...(counterpartyName ? { forbiddenIdentifiers: [counterpartyName] } : {}),
-                    ...(seedReasoning ? { forbiddenSourceText: [seedReasoning] } : {}),
-                });
-                if (safeGap) {
-                    const parkTurn = {
-                        action: 'ask_user',
-                        assessment: {
-                            reasoning: NEGOTIATION_PARK_REASONING,
-                            suggestedRoles: lastTurn?.assessment.suggestedRoles ?? { ownUser: 'peer', otherUser: 'peer' },
-                        },
-                        message: null,
-                        askUser: { reason: gap.reason, question: gap.question },
-                    };
-                    await deps.database.createMessage({
-                        conversationId: state.conversationId,
-                        senderId: `agent:${state.sourceUser.id}`,
-                        role: 'agent',
-                        parts: [{ kind: 'data', data: parkTurn }],
-                        taskId: state.taskId,
-                        ...(state.continuationExecution ? { continuationExecution: state.continuationExecution } : {}),
-                    });
-                    finalizeLog.info('negotiation_parked', {
-                        taskId: state.taskId,
-                        opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                        recipientUserId: state.sourceUser.id,
-                        recipientIntentId: state.sourceIntentId,
-                        askRounds: askRounds + 1,
-                        askRoundsCap,
-                        stallReason,
-                    });
-                    emitWide({
-                        type: 'negotiation_parked',
-                        opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                        negotiationConversationId: state.conversationId,
-                        askRounds: askRounds + 1,
-                        askRoundsCap,
-                        stallReason,
-                    });
-                }
-                else if (gap) {
-                    finalizeLog.warn('Dropping unsafe post-stall gap question; negotiation stalls without a park', {
-                        taskId: state.taskId,
-                        opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                    });
-                }
-            }
-            catch (err) {
-                finalizeLog.error('Failed to park stalled negotiation with its gap', {
-                    taskId: state.taskId,
-                    opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                    error: err,
-                });
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    try {
-        await deps.database.updateTaskState(state.taskId, "completed", undefined, state.continuationExecution);
-        await deps.database.createArtifact({
-            taskId: state.taskId,
-            name: "negotiation-outcome",
-            parts: [{ kind: "data", data: outcome }],
-            metadata: {
-                hasOpportunity,
-                turnCount: state.turnCount,
-                ...(state.continuationExecution ? {
-                    continuationOutcome: hasOpportunity
-                        ? 'accepted'
-                        : (screenedOut || isRejectLikeAction(lastTurn?.action)) ? 'rejected' : 'stalled',
-                } : {}),
-            },
-            ...(state.continuationExecution ? { continuationExecution: state.continuationExecution } : {}),
-        });
-        finalizeLog.info('Session complete', {
-            conversationId: state.conversationId,
-            taskId: state.taskId,
-            isContinuation: state.isContinuation,
-            turnsAdded: state.turnCount,
-            priorTurnCount: state.priorTurnCount,
-            outcome: hasOpportunity ? 'accepted' : screenedOut ? 'screened_out' : (atCap ? 'turn_cap' : (lastTurn?.action ?? 'unknown')),
-            opportunityId: state.opportunityId || undefined,
-        });
-        if (state.opportunityId) {
-            // screened_out → 'rejected': quiet terminal status (hidden from
-            // default lists), never 'stalled' — with zero turns the generic
-            // mapping would misfile the client's own gate decision.
-            const nextStatus = lastTurn?.action === 'accept'
-                ? 'pending'
-                : (screenedOut || isRejectLikeAction(lastTurn?.action))
-                    ? 'rejected'
-                    : 'stalled';
-            await deps.database.updateOpportunityStatus(state.opportunityId, nextStatus, undefined, state.continuationExecution).catch((err) => {
-                finalizeLog.error("Failed to update opportunity status", { opportunityId: state.opportunityId, nextStatus, error: err });
-            });
-        }
-    }
-    catch (err) {
-        finalizeLog.error("Failed to persist outcome", { error: err });
-    }
-    if (state.opportunityId) {
-        const emittedOutcome = hasOpportunity
-            ? "accepted"
-            : screenedOut
-                ? "screened_out"
-                : atCap
-                    ? "turn_cap"
-                    : state.error && /timeout/i.test(state.error)
-                        ? "timed_out"
-                        : "rejected_stalled";
-        emitWide({
-            type: "negotiation_outcome",
-            opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-            outcome: emittedOutcome,
-            turnCount: state.turnCount,
-            isContinuation: state.isContinuation,
-            turnsAdded: state.turnCount,
-            priorTurnCount: state.priorTurnCount,
-            ...(outcome.reasoning && { reasoning: outcome.reasoning }),
-            ...(hasOpportunity && agreedRoles.length >= 2 && {
-                agreedRoles: {
-                    ownUser: agreedRoles[0]?.role,
-                    otherUser: agreedRoles[1]?.role,
-                },
-            }),
-        });
-    }
-    if (state.consultationPolicyReason) {
-        // Stable, content-free terminal funnel telemetry. This executes only
-        // after a fenced continuation has reached its terminal outcome.
-        finalizeLog.info('negotiation_consultation_policy', {
-            stage: 'terminal_outcome',
-            reason: state.consultationPolicyReason,
-            outcome: hasOpportunity ? 'accepted' : (screenedOut || isRejectLikeAction(lastTurn?.action)) ? 'rejected' : 'stalled',
-        });
-        emitWide({
-            type: 'negotiation_consultation_policy',
-            stage: 'terminal_outcome',
-            reason: state.consultationPolicyReason,
-            outcome: hasOpportunity ? 'accepted' : (screenedOut || isRejectLikeAction(lastTurn?.action)) ? 'rejected' : 'stalled',
-        });
-    }
-    // Enqueue post-negotiation reflection (P5.2 memory write path) — fire
-    // and forget: a reflection failure must never affect the outcome. Only
-    // sessions that actually exchanged turns teach anything; init/turn
-    // errors with turnCount 0 are skipped.
-    if (deps.reflectEnqueue && state.turnCount > 0 && !state.continuationExecution) {
-        deps.reflectEnqueue({
-            negotiationId: state.taskId,
-            conversationId: state.conversationId,
-            ...(state.opportunityId && { opportunityId: state.opportunityId }),
-            sourceUser: {
-                id: state.sourceUser.id,
-                ...(state.sourceUser.profile.name && { name: state.sourceUser.profile.name }),
-                ...(state.sourceUser.profile.bio && { bio: state.sourceUser.profile.bio }),
-            },
-            candidateUser: {
-                id: state.candidateUser.id,
-                ...(state.candidateUser.profile.name && { name: state.candidateUser.profile.name }),
-                ...(state.candidateUser.profile.bio && { bio: state.candidateUser.profile.bio }),
-            },
-            initiatorUserId: state.initiatorUserId ?? state.sourceUser.id,
-            outcome: { hasOpportunity, reasoning: outcome.reasoning, turnCount: state.turnCount },
-        }).catch((err) => finalizeLog.error('Failed to enqueue negotiation reflection', {
-            taskId: state.taskId,
-            error: err,
-        }));
-    }
-    // Enqueue question generation for stalled/capped negotiations (not accepted or explicitly rejected).
-    // Require turnCount > 0 so early init/turn errors don't enqueue with empty context.
-    // Kept alongside the post-stall park above until the conversational-questions
-    // delivery lane retires the blind questioner path.
-    if (endedUnconcluded && state.opportunityId && state.sourceIntentId && state.indexContext.networkId && deps.questionerEnqueue && !state.continuationExecution) {
-        const userContext = (await deps.database.getUserContext(state.sourceUser.id, null))?.text ?? '';
-        const sourceIntent = state.sourceUser.intents.find((intent) => intent.id === state.sourceIntentId);
-        deps.questionerEnqueue({
-            mode: 'negotiation',
-            purpose: 'stalled_followup',
-            userId: state.sourceUser.id,
-            sourceType: 'opportunity',
-            sourceId: state.opportunityId,
-            negotiation: {
-                purpose: 'stalled_followup',
-                recipientUserId: state.sourceUser.id,
-                recipientIntentId: state.sourceIntentId,
-                opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-                taskId: state.taskId,
-                networkId: state.indexContext.networkId,
-            },
-            context: {
-                negotiationId: state.taskId,
-                counterpartyHint: NEGOTIATION_QUESTION_GENERIC_COUNTERPARTY,
-                indexContext: NEGOTIATION_QUESTION_GENERIC_NETWORK,
-                outcomeReason: stallReason,
-                recipientIntent: sourceIntent
-                    ? `${sourceIntent.title}: ${sourceIntent.description}`
-                    : 'the signal attached to this match',
-                userContext,
-            },
-        }).catch((err) => finalizeLog.error('Failed to enqueue negotiation question generation', {
-            opportunityId: state.opportunityId,
-            error: err,
-        }));
-    }
-    const terminalReceipt = state.continuationExecution
-        ? {
-            continuationReceipt: {
-                priorTaskId: state.continuationExecution.taskId,
-                settlementId: state.continuationExecution.settlementId,
-                successorTaskId: state.continuationExecution.successorTaskId,
-                fence: state.continuationExecution.fence,
-                outcome: hasOpportunity
-                    ? 'accepted'
-                    : (screenedOut || isRejectLikeAction(lastTurn?.action)) ? 'rejected' : 'stalled',
-            },
-        }
-        : undefined;
-    return { outcome, status: 'completed', ...terminalReceipt };
-}

package/dist/negotiations/negotiation.graph.init.d.ts

@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Negotiation graph, stage 1: claim the conversation, task and seat.
- */
-import { type NegotiationConsultationReason } from "./negotiation.consultation-policy.js";
-import type { NegotiationProtocolVersion } from "../shared/schemas/negotiation-state.schema.js";
-import type { NegotiationGraphDeps, NegotiationState } from "./negotiation.graph.shared.js";
-export declare function initNode(state: NegotiationState, deps: NegotiationGraphDeps): Promise<{
-    error: string;
-} | {
-    messages?: {
-        id: string;
-        senderId: string;
-        role: "agent";
-        parts: unknown[];
-        createdAt: Date;
-        taskId: string | null;
-    }[] | undefined;
-    privateConsultation?: import("../shared/interfaces/database.negotiation.js").NegotiationPrivateConsultation | undefined;
-    userAnswers?: import("../shared/interfaces/database.negotiation.js").NegotiationUserAnswer[] | undefined;
-    priorAttribution?: import("./negotiation.attribution.js").SeededAttribution | undefined;
-    conversationId: string;
-    taskId: string;
-    currentSpeaker: "source" | "candidate";
-    turnCount: number;
-    maxTurns: number;
-    isContinuation: boolean;
-    initiatorUserId: string;
-    protocolVersion: NegotiationProtocolVersion;
-    priorTurnCount: number;
-    error?: undefined;
-} | {
-    messages?: {
-        id: string;
-        senderId: string;
-        role: "agent";
-        parts: unknown[];
-        createdAt: Date;
-        taskId: string | null;
-    }[] | undefined;
-    consultationPolicyReason: NegotiationConsultationReason;
-    privateConsultation?: import("../shared/interfaces/database.negotiation.js").NegotiationPrivateConsultation | undefined;
-    userAnswers?: import("../shared/interfaces/database.negotiation.js").NegotiationUserAnswer[] | undefined;
-    priorAttribution?: import("./negotiation.attribution.js").SeededAttribution | undefined;
-    conversationId: string;
-    taskId: string;
-    currentSpeaker: "source" | "candidate";
-    turnCount: number;
-    maxTurns: number;
-    isContinuation: boolean;
-    initiatorUserId: string;
-    protocolVersion: NegotiationProtocolVersion;
-    priorTurnCount: number;
-    error?: undefined;
-}>;