@iloom/cli 0.8.2 → 0.9.0

package/dist/prompts/regular-prompt.txt

@@ -55,6 +55,43 @@ Use these Recap MCP tools:
 
 ---
 
+{{#if DRAFT_PR_MODE}}
+## Comment Routing: Draft PR Mode
+
+**IMPORTANT: This loom is using draft PR mode in branch workflow.**
+
+- **This is branch mode** - there is no associated GitHub issue
+- **Write ALL workflow comments** to PR #{{DRAFT_PR_NUMBER}} using `type: "pr"`
+
+When calling `mcp__issue_management__get_pr` to read the draft PR:
+```
+{
+  number: "{{DRAFT_PR_NUMBER}}",
+  includeComments: true
+}
+```
+
+When calling `mcp__issue_management__create_comment`:
+```
+{
+  number: "{{DRAFT_PR_NUMBER}}",
+  body: "your comment content",
+  type: "pr"
+}
+```
+
+This keeps all AI workflow comments on the draft PR for visibility and traceability.
+{{/if}}
+{{#if STANDARD_BRANCH_MODE}}
+## Comment Routing: Standard Branch Mode
+
+- **This is branch mode** - there is no associated GitHub issue
+- Comments are not persisted between sessions in branch mode
+- Context from this session is ephemeral
+{{/if}}
+
+---
+
 {{#if FIRST_TIME_USER}}
 ## First-Time User Context
 
@@ -152,21 +189,39 @@ You are orchestrating a set of agents through a development process, with human
 **Todo List:**
 1. Gather problem statement from user
 2. Run enhancement using @agent-iloom-issue-enhancer (adapted for branch mode)
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}{{#if ENHANCER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+2a. Run artifact review on enhancement output using @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer
+{{/if}}{{/if}}
 3. Display enhanced specification to user
 4. WAIT for human confirmation of enhanced specification before proceeding
 5. Run complexity evaluation using @agent-iloom-issue-complexity-evaluator (adapted for branch mode)
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}{{#if COMPLEXITY_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+5a. Run artifact review on complexity evaluation output using @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer
+{{/if}}{{/if}}
 6. Display complexity assessment to user
 7. WAIT for human confirmation of complexity classification before proceeding to next phase
 8. Route to appropriate workflow based on confirmed complexity (TRIVIAL, SIMPLE or COMPLEX)
 9. If TRIVIAL: Skip to implementation directly (no analysis or planning needed)
 10. If SIMPLE: Run combined analysis and planning using @agent-iloom-issue-analyze-and-plan
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}{{#if ANALYZE_AND_PLAN_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+10a. If SIMPLE: Run artifact review on combined analysis and plan output using @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer
+{{/if}}{{/if}}
 11. If COMPLEX: Run separate analysis using @agent-iloom-issue-analyzer
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}{{#if ANALYZER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+11a. If COMPLEX: Run artifact review on analysis output using @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer
+{{/if}}{{/if}}
 12. Display analysis results to user
 13. WAIT for human review and approval to continue, or process their other feedback
 14. If COMPLEX: Run planning using @agent-iloom-issue-planner
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}{{#if PLANNER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+14a. If COMPLEX: Run artifact review on plan output using @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer
+{{/if}}{{/if}}
 15. If COMPLEX: Display plan to user
 16. If COMPLEX: WAIT for human review of planning results and approval to continue
 17. Run implementation using @agent-iloom-issue-implementer
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}{{#if IMPLEMENTER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+17a. Run artifact review on implementation output using @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer
+{{/if}}{{/if}}
 18. Run code review using @agent-iloom-code-reviewer
 19. Provide final summary. Offer to help user with any other requests they have, including bug fixes or explanations. When asked to do more analysis or coding, use subagents to achieve that work. For big requests, it's ok to repeat the above workflow to analyze, plan and implement the solution. For simple tasks, use a generalized subagent.
 
@@ -235,6 +290,31 @@ You are orchestrating a set of agents through a development process, with human
         - If all user answers match agent assumptions: Proceed to next step
    - If no assumptions found: Proceed to next step
 {{/if}}
+{{#if ENHANCER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+2.6. Artifact Review (Enhancement):
+   - The enhancer output should be reviewed before acceptance
+   - Invoke: @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer with context: "Review this ENHANCEMENT artifact: [ENHANCER_OUTPUT]"
+   - Wait for review results
+   - If review suggests improvements:
+{{#if ONE_SHOT_MODE}}
+     a. If verdict is SUGGEST_IMPROVEMENTS:
+        - Log: "Artifact review suggests improvements: [summary]"
+        - Re-invoke @agent-iloom-issue-enhancer with: "Apply these specific improvements to your existing output: [REVIEWER_FEEDBACK]"
+        - After update, proceed to next step (do not re-review)
+     b. If verdict is RECOMMEND_REGENERATION:
+        - Log: "Artifact review recommends regeneration: [summary]"
+        - Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-enhancer from scratch with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 2
+{{else}}
+     a. Present review findings to user
+     b. Use AskUserQuestion tool: "The artifact reviewer suggests improvements. How would you like to proceed?"
+        - Options: "Accept enhancement as-is", "Regenerate with feedback", "Manually provide changes"
+     c. If regenerate: Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-enhancer with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 2
+     d. If manually provide changes: Wait for user edits, then proceed
+{{/if}}
+   - If review approves (verdict is APPROVE): Proceed to step 3
+{{/if}}
+{{/if}}
 3. Mark todos #2 and #3 as completed
 4. Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single question:
    - Question: "Enhancement complete. Does this specification accurately capture your requirements?"
@@ -276,6 +356,31 @@ You are orchestrating a set of agents through a development process, with human
         - If all user answers match agent assumptions: Proceed to next step
    - If no assumptions found: Proceed to next step
 {{/if}}
+{{#if COMPLEXITY_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+2.6. Artifact Review (Complexity Evaluation):
+   - The complexity evaluation output should be reviewed before acceptance
+   - Invoke: @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer with context: "Review this ANALYSIS artifact (complexity evaluation): [COMPLEXITY_OUTPUT]"
+   - Wait for review results
+   - If review suggests improvements:
+{{#if ONE_SHOT_MODE}}
+     a. If verdict is SUGGEST_IMPROVEMENTS:
+        - Log: "Artifact review suggests improvements: [summary]"
+        - Re-invoke @agent-iloom-issue-complexity-evaluator with: "Apply these specific improvements to your existing output: [REVIEWER_FEEDBACK]"
+        - After update, proceed to next step (do not re-review)
+     b. If verdict is RECOMMEND_REGENERATION:
+        - Log: "Artifact review recommends regeneration: [summary]"
+        - Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-complexity-evaluator from scratch with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 1
+{{else}}
+     a. Present review findings to user
+     b. Use AskUserQuestion tool: "The artifact reviewer suggests improvements to the complexity evaluation. How would you like to proceed?"
+        - Options: "Accept evaluation as-is", "Regenerate with feedback", "Manually provide changes"
+     c. If regenerate: Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-complexity-evaluator with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 1
+     d. If manually provide changes: Wait for user edits, then proceed
+{{/if}}
+   - If review approves (verdict is APPROVE): Proceed to step 2
+{{/if}}
+{{/if}}
 2. Extract complexity classification from evaluator output:
    - Search the evaluator's output for the "Complexity Assessment" section
    - Extract: Classification (TRIVIAL/SIMPLE/COMPLEX), Metrics (files, LOC, breaking changes, DB migrations, risk level, architectural signals), and Reasoning
@@ -374,6 +479,31 @@ Execute combined analyze-and-plan agent:
         - If all user answers match agent assumptions: Proceed to next step
    - If no assumptions found: Proceed to next step
 {{/if}}
+{{#if ANALYZE_AND_PLAN_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+3.6. Artifact Review (Combined Analysis and Plan):
+   - The analyze-and-plan output should be reviewed before acceptance
+   - Invoke: @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer with context: "Review this PLAN artifact (combined analysis and plan): [ANALYZE_AND_PLAN_OUTPUT]"
+   - Wait for review results
+   - If review suggests improvements:
+{{#if ONE_SHOT_MODE}}
+     a. If verdict is SUGGEST_IMPROVEMENTS:
+        - Log: "Artifact review suggests improvements: [summary]"
+        - Re-invoke @agent-iloom-issue-analyze-and-plan with: "Apply these specific improvements to your existing output: [REVIEWER_FEEDBACK]"
+        - After update, proceed to next step (do not re-review)
+     b. If verdict is RECOMMEND_REGENERATION:
+        - Log: "Artifact review recommends regeneration: [summary]"
+        - Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-analyze-and-plan from scratch with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 2
+{{else}}
+     a. Present review findings to user
+     b. Use AskUserQuestion tool: "The artifact reviewer suggests improvements to the analysis and plan. How would you like to proceed?"
+        - Options: "Accept plan as-is", "Regenerate with feedback", "Manually provide changes"
+     c. If regenerate: Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-analyze-and-plan with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 2
+     d. If manually provide changes: Wait for user edits, then proceed
+{{/if}}
+   - If review approves (verdict is APPROVE): Proceed to step 4
+{{/if}}
+{{/if}}
 4. Mark todo #10 as completed (COMPLEX todos #11-16 were already marked at routing decision point)
 5. Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single question:
    - Question: "Combined analysis and planning complete. How would you like to proceed?"
@@ -417,6 +547,31 @@ Execute combined analyze-and-plan agent:
         - If all user answers match agent assumptions: Proceed to next step
    - If no assumptions found: Proceed to next step
 {{/if}}
+{{#if ANALYZER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+2.6. Artifact Review (Analysis):
+   - The analysis output should be reviewed before acceptance
+   - Invoke: @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer with context: "Review this ANALYSIS artifact: [ANALYZER_OUTPUT]"
+   - Wait for review results
+   - If review suggests improvements:
+{{#if ONE_SHOT_MODE}}
+     a. If verdict is SUGGEST_IMPROVEMENTS:
+        - Log: "Artifact review suggests improvements: [summary]"
+        - Re-invoke @agent-iloom-issue-analyzer with: "Apply these specific improvements to your existing output: [REVIEWER_FEEDBACK]"
+        - After update, proceed to next step (do not re-review)
+     b. If verdict is RECOMMEND_REGENERATION:
+        - Log: "Artifact review recommends regeneration: [summary]"
+        - Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-analyzer from scratch with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 1
+{{else}}
+     a. Present review findings to user
+     b. Use AskUserQuestion tool: "The artifact reviewer suggests improvements to the analysis. How would you like to proceed?"
+        - Options: "Accept analysis as-is", "Regenerate with feedback", "Manually provide changes"
+     c. If regenerate: Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-analyzer with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 1
+     d. If manually provide changes: Wait for user edits, then proceed
+{{/if}}
+   - If review approves (verdict is APPROVE): Proceed to step 3
+{{/if}}
+{{/if}}
 3. Mark todos #11 and #12 as completed
 4. Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single question:
    - Question: "Analysis complete. How would you like to proceed?"
@@ -461,6 +616,31 @@ Execute combined analyze-and-plan agent:
         - If all user answers match agent assumptions: Proceed to next step
    - If no assumptions found: Proceed to next step
 {{/if}}
+{{#if PLANNER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+2.6. Artifact Review (Plan):
+   - The planning output should be reviewed before acceptance
+   - Invoke: @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer with context: "Review this PLAN artifact: [PLANNER_OUTPUT]"
+   - Wait for review results
+   - If review suggests improvements:
+{{#if ONE_SHOT_MODE}}
+     a. If verdict is SUGGEST_IMPROVEMENTS:
+        - Log: "Artifact review suggests improvements: [summary]"
+        - Re-invoke @agent-iloom-issue-planner with: "Apply these specific improvements to your existing output: [REVIEWER_FEEDBACK]"
+        - After update, proceed to next step (do not re-review)
+     b. If verdict is RECOMMEND_REGENERATION:
+        - Log: "Artifact review recommends regeneration: [summary]"
+        - Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-planner from scratch with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 1
+{{else}}
+     a. Present review findings to user
+     b. Use AskUserQuestion tool: "The artifact reviewer suggests improvements to the plan. How would you like to proceed?"
+        - Options: "Accept plan as-is", "Regenerate with feedback", "Manually provide changes"
+     c. If regenerate: Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-planner with the reviewer's feedback, return to step 1
+     d. If manually provide changes: Wait for user edits, then proceed
+{{/if}}
+   - If review approves (verdict is APPROVE): Proceed to step 3
+{{/if}}
+{{/if}}
 3. Mark todos #14 and #15 as completed
 4. Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single question:
    - Question: "Planning complete. How would you like to proceed?"
@@ -492,6 +672,31 @@ Execute combined analyze-and-plan agent:
 2. Display implementation summary to user
    - If implementation revealed unexpected issues or required pivots, use `recap.add_entry` to log them (type: "insight" or "risk")
 3. Mark todo #17 as completed
+{{#if IMPLEMENTER_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+{{#if ARTIFACT_REVIEW_ENABLED}}
+3.5. Artifact Review (Implementation):
+   - The implementer output should be reviewed for plan alignment before code review
+   - Invoke: @agent-iloom-artifact-reviewer with context: "Review this IMPLEMENTATION artifact: [IMPLEMENTER_OUTPUT]. The plan it was executing: [PLAN_CONTENT]"
+   - Wait for review results
+   - If review suggests improvements:
+{{#if ONE_SHOT_MODE}}
+     a. If verdict is SUGGEST_IMPROVEMENTS:
+        - Log: "Artifact review suggests improvements: [summary]"
+        - Re-invoke @agent-iloom-issue-implementer with: "Apply these specific improvements to address plan gaps: [REVIEWER_FEEDBACK]"
+        - After update, proceed to next step (do not re-review)
+     b. If verdict is RECOMMEND_REGENERATION:
+        - Log: "Artifact review recommends regeneration: [summary]"
+        - Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-implementer from scratch with the reviewer's feedback
+{{else}}
+     a. Present review findings to user
+     b. Use AskUserQuestion tool: "The artifact reviewer found plan alignment issues. How would you like to proceed?"
+        - Options: "Accept implementation as-is", "Address feedback", "Manually fix"
+     c. If address feedback: Re-run @agent-iloom-issue-implementer with feedback
+     d. If manually fix: Wait for user edits, then proceed
+{{/if}}
+   - If review approves: Proceed to STEP 5.5 - Review Phase
+{{/if}}
+{{/if}}
 4. After implementation completes, proceed to STEP 5.5 - Review Phase (do NOT skip to Post-Workflow Help)
 
 ---
@@ -505,11 +710,11 @@ This section is about reviewing uncommitted code changes for quality, security,
 
 1. Execute: @agent-iloom-code-reviewer with prompt "Run code review." (foreground, no extra context)
 2. Wait for review completion
-3. If critical issues found:
+3. If critical, high, or medium priority issues found:
 {{#if ONE_SHOT_MODE}}
-   - Automatically implement the recommended fixes without asking
+   - Automatically implement the recommended fixes for critical, high, and medium priority issues without asking
 {{else}}
-   - Ask the user: "Critical issues found. Do you want to proceed anyway, or address these first?"
+   - Ask the user: "Issues found. Do you want to proceed anyway, or address these first?"
    - Wait for user response before continuing
 {{/if}}
 {{/if}}
@@ -521,8 +726,8 @@ This section is about reviewing uncommitted code changes for quality, security,
 - **DO NOT** pass extra context (file lists, issue details, etc.) - the agent knows what to do
 - The reviewer will analyze uncommitted changes and report findings
 
-**When critical issues are found:**
-- Ask the user: "Critical issues found. Do you want to proceed anyway, or address these first?"
+**When issues are found:**
+- Ask the user: "Issues found. Do you want to proceed anyway, or address these first?"
 - Wait for user response before continuing
 {{/unless}}
 

package/dist/{rebase-4FNRBW3H.js → rebase-AJOJOZUG.js}

@@ -2,24 +2,24 @@
 import {
   BuildRunner,
   MergeManager
-} from "./chunk-A7XHHUEV.js";
+} from "./chunk-HZXBHMVM.js";
 import {
   installDependencies
-} from "./chunk-RD7I2Q2F.js";
+} from "./chunk-4LKGCFGG.js";
 import {
   GitWorktreeManager
-} from "./chunk-HSGZW3ID.js";
-import "./chunk-7GLZVDPQ.js";
-import "./chunk-XPKN3QWY.js";
+} from "./chunk-4GAJJUYS.js";
+import "./chunk-TL72BGP6.js";
+import "./chunk-VOGGLPG5.js";
 import {
   getWorktreeRoot,
   isValidGitRepo
-} from "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
+} from "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
 import {
   SettingsManager
-} from "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
-import "./chunk-IGKPPACU.js";
+import "./chunk-FO5GGFOV.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import {
   logger
@@ -139,4 +139,4 @@ export {
   RebaseCommand,
   WorktreeValidationError
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=rebase-4FNRBW3H.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=rebase-AJOJOZUG.js.map

package/dist/{recap-GSXFEOD6.js → recap-GKJXMDXW.js}

@@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ import {
 } from "./chunk-NXMDEL3F.js";
 import {
   IdentifierParser
-} from "./chunk-TVH67KEO.js";
+} from "./chunk-2HZX6AMR.js";
 import {
   GitWorktreeManager
-} from "./chunk-HSGZW3ID.js";
-import "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
-import "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-4GAJJUYS.js";
+import "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
+import "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import "./chunk-VT4PDUYT.js";
@@ -107,4 +107,4 @@ var RecapCommand = class {
 export {
   RecapCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=recap-GSXFEOD6.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=recap-GKJXMDXW.js.map

package/dist/{run-GZNHRJB2.js → run-QEUVZF7J.js}

@@ -1,34 +1,34 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   DevServerManager
-} from "./chunk-VZYSM7N7.js";
-import "./chunk-XHNACIHO.js";
-import "./chunk-RD7I2Q2F.js";
+} from "./chunk-2JPXGGP4.js";
+import "./chunk-NTTSUAVM.js";
 import {
   getWorkspacePort
-} from "./chunk-52MVUK5V.js";
+} from "./chunk-USSL2X4A.js";
 import {
   IdentifierParser
-} from "./chunk-TVH67KEO.js";
-import {
-  GitWorktreeManager
-} from "./chunk-HSGZW3ID.js";
-import {
-  ProjectCapabilityDetector
-} from "./chunk-7GLZVDPQ.js";
-import "./chunk-XPKN3QWY.js";
+} from "./chunk-2HZX6AMR.js";
 import {
   openBrowser
 } from "./chunk-YETJNRQM.js";
+import "./chunk-4LKGCFGG.js";
+import {
+  GitWorktreeManager
+} from "./chunk-4GAJJUYS.js";
 import {
   extractSettingsOverrides
 } from "./chunk-GYCR2LOU.js";
+import {
+  ProjectCapabilityDetector
+} from "./chunk-TL72BGP6.js";
+import "./chunk-VOGGLPG5.js";
 import {
   extractIssueNumber
-} from "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
+} from "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
 import {
   SettingsManager
-} from "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import {
@@ -238,4 +238,4 @@ Make sure the project is built (run 'il start' first)`
 export {
   RunCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=run-GZNHRJB2.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=run-QEUVZF7J.js.map

package/dist/schema/settings.schema.json

@@ -214,6 +214,10 @@
                           ]
                         },
                         "description": "Map of review providers to model names. Keys: claude, gemini, codex. Values: model name strings (e.g., \"sonnet\", \"gemini-3-pro-preview\", \"gpt-5.2-codex\")"
+                      },
+                      "review": {
+                        "type": "boolean",
+                        "description": "Whether artifacts from this agent should be reviewed before posting (defaults to false)"
                       }
                     },
                     "additionalProperties": false
@@ -225,7 +229,7 @@
               "type": "null"
             }
           ],
-          "description": "Per-agent configuration overrides. Available agents: iloom-issue-analyzer (analyzes issues), iloom-issue-planner (creates implementation plans), iloom-issue-analyze-and-plan (combined analysis and planning), iloom-issue-complexity-evaluator (evaluates complexity), iloom-issue-enhancer (enhances issue descriptions), iloom-issue-implementer (implements code changes), iloom-code-reviewer (reviews code changes against requirements)"
+          "description": "Per-agent configuration overrides. Available agents: iloom-issue-analyzer (analyzes issues), iloom-issue-planner (creates implementation plans), iloom-issue-analyze-and-plan (combined analysis and planning), iloom-issue-complexity-evaluator (evaluates complexity), iloom-issue-enhancer (enhances issue descriptions), iloom-issue-implementer (implements code changes), iloom-code-reviewer (reviews code changes against requirements), iloom-artifact-reviewer (reviews artifacts before posting)"
         },
         "spin": {
           "type": "object",
@@ -437,6 +441,10 @@
             },
             "remote": {
               "type": "string"
+            },
+            "autoCommitPush": {
+              "type": "boolean",
+              "description": "Auto-commit and push after code review in draft PR mode. Defaults to true when mode is github-draft-pr."
             }
           },
           "additionalProperties": false,

package/dist/{shell-2SPM3Z5O.js → shell-DAAVG4YN.js}

@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   IdentifierParser
-} from "./chunk-TVH67KEO.js";
+} from "./chunk-2HZX6AMR.js";
 import {
   GitWorktreeManager
-} from "./chunk-HSGZW3ID.js";
+} from "./chunk-4GAJJUYS.js";
 import {
   extractIssueNumber
-} from "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
+} from "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
 import {
   SettingsManager
-} from "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import {
@@ -235,4 +235,4 @@ var ShellCommand = class {
 export {
   ShellCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=shell-2SPM3Z5O.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=shell-DAAVG4YN.js.map

package/dist/{summary-Z4F7YFXE.js → summary-WNEYCO4S.js}

@@ -1,30 +1,30 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   SessionSummaryService
-} from "./chunk-PBSHQVCT.js";
+} from "./chunk-Z6F5CUS6.js";
 import "./chunk-NXMDEL3F.js";
-import {
-  GitWorktreeManager
-} from "./chunk-HSGZW3ID.js";
 import {
   PRManager
-} from "./chunk-44Y5IF7P.js";
+} from "./chunk-I23OQB4Y.js";
+import "./chunk-YETJNRQM.js";
 import "./chunk-UDZCTLD6.js";
 import "./chunk-RNBIISBZ.js";
-import "./chunk-YETJNRQM.js";
+import {
+  GitWorktreeManager
+} from "./chunk-4GAJJUYS.js";
 import "./chunk-FXDYIV3K.js";
-import "./chunk-66QOCD5N.js";
+import "./chunk-QN47QVBX.js";
 import {
   extractIssueNumber
-} from "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
+} from "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
 import {
   SettingsManager
-} from "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import {
   MetadataManager
 } from "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-THS5L54H.js";
-import "./chunk-IGKPPACU.js";
+import "./chunk-FO5GGFOV.js";
 import {
   getLogger
 } from "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
@@ -280,4 +280,4 @@ Please provide an issue number, PR number, or branch name.`
 export {
   SummaryCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=summary-Z4F7YFXE.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=summary-WNEYCO4S.js.map

package/dist/{test-LBSPYIJW.js → test-5GPWWO3P.js}

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   ScriptCommandBase
-} from "./chunk-O6LECMT6.js";
-import "./chunk-RD7I2Q2F.js";
-import "./chunk-TVH67KEO.js";
-import "./chunk-HSGZW3ID.js";
-import "./chunk-XPKN3QWY.js";
-import "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
-import "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-TGRK3CHF.js";
+import "./chunk-2HZX6AMR.js";
+import "./chunk-4LKGCFGG.js";
+import "./chunk-4GAJJUYS.js";
+import "./chunk-VOGGLPG5.js";
+import "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
+import "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import "./chunk-VT4PDUYT.js";
@@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ var TestCommand = class extends ScriptCommandBase {
 export {
   TestCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=test-LBSPYIJW.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=test-5GPWWO3P.js.map

package/dist/{test-git-ZPSPA2TP.js → test-git-EJUKDB7F.js}

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   findMainWorktreePath
-} from "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
+} from "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
 import {
   SettingsManager
-} from "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import {
@@ -51,4 +51,4 @@ var TestGitCommand = class {
 export {
   TestGitCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=test-git-ZPSPA2TP.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=test-git-EJUKDB7F.js.map

package/dist/{test-prefix-6DLB2BHE.js → test-prefix-23TOBUXY.js}

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   generateWorktreePath
-} from "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
+} from "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
 import {
   SettingsManager
-} from "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import {
@@ -67,4 +67,4 @@ var TestPrefixCommand = class {
 export {
   TestPrefixCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=test-prefix-6DLB2BHE.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=test-prefix-23TOBUXY.js.map

package/dist/{test-webserver-XLJ2TZFP.js → test-webserver-CKROHFBQ.js}

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   ProcessManager
-} from "./chunk-XHNACIHO.js";
-import "./chunk-52MVUK5V.js";
-import "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
+} from "./chunk-NTTSUAVM.js";
+import "./chunk-USSL2X4A.js";
+import "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
 import {
   SettingsManager
-} from "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import "./chunk-6MLEBAYZ.js";
 import {
@@ -81,4 +81,4 @@ var TestWebserverCommand = class {
 export {
   TestWebserverCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=test-webserver-XLJ2TZFP.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=test-webserver-CKROHFBQ.js.map

package/dist/{vscode-LH3VSQ2W.js → vscode-6TOLFCI2.js}

@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 import {
   IdentifierParser
-} from "./chunk-TVH67KEO.js";
+} from "./chunk-2HZX6AMR.js";
 import {
   GitWorktreeManager
-} from "./chunk-HSGZW3ID.js";
+} from "./chunk-4GAJJUYS.js";
 import {
   getInstallHint,
   isIdeAvailable
 } from "./chunk-O7VL5N6S.js";
 import {
   extractIssueNumber
-} from "./chunk-GDS2HXSW.js";
-import "./chunk-IWIIOFEB.js";
+} from "./chunk-H6ST2TGP.js";
+import "./chunk-XFEK2X2D.js";
 import "./chunk-KBEIQP4G.js";
 import {
   waitForKeypress
@@ -161,4 +161,4 @@ var VSCodeCommand = class {
 export {
   VSCodeCommand
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=vscode-LH3VSQ2W.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=vscode-6TOLFCI2.js.map

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@iloom/cli",
-  "version": "0.8.2",
+  "version": "0.9.0",
   "description": "Control plane for maintaining alignment between you and Claude Code as you work across multiple issues using isolated environments, visible context, and multi-agent workflows to scale understanding, not just output",
   "keywords": [
     "ai",
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
     "jsonc-parser": "^3.3.1",
     "omelette": "^0.4.17",
     "ora": "^7.0.1",
-    "string-width": "^8.1.1",
+    "string-width": "^6.1.0",
     "zod": "^3.23.8"
   },
   "devDependencies": {