@icntswm/skillcheck 0.1.0 → 1.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. package/README.md +9 -18
  2. package/package.json +1 -1
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -12,22 +12,12 @@ some of your requests load the wrong skill. Nothing warns you: the agent still
12
12
  answers, just with the wrong instructions. skillcheck catches this before your
13
13
  users do.
14
14
 
15
- ```
16
- $ skillcheck run examples/demo/skillcheck.yaml --skill test-guard,find-bug
17
- 5 cases × 1 repeat × 1 agent = 5 runs
18
- ok #bug-500 POST /orders returns 500 with 'nil pointer deref… → find-bug
19
- FAIL #flaky-ci-only this test is red in CI roughly once a day but I … → find-bug · not loaded test-guard
20
- FAIL #flaky-retry TestCartMerge fails sometimes and goes green w… → find-bug · not loaded test-guard; forbidden find-bug
21
- ok #bug-consistent TestCheckoutTotal fails on every run since this … → find-bug
22
- ok #perf-latency the /search endpoint went from 80ms to 900ms aft… → perf-profile
23
-
24
- confusion:
25
- expected test-guard → got find-bug (2)
26
- 2 failed of 5 · runs 5 · cost $0.25
27
- ```
15
+ ![skillcheck catching a routing regression](docs/assets/demo.gif)
28
16
 
29
- This is a real run from the [demo](examples/demo): one skill's description got
30
- wider, and it started taking requests that belong to its neighbour.
17
+ A real run on the [demo](examples/demo): one skill's description got wider,
18
+ and it started taking requests that belong to its neighbour. The free `lint`
19
+ flags a suspicious description, and one batch call finds the two misrouted
20
+ requests.
31
21
 
32
22
  ## What you get
33
23
 
@@ -46,8 +36,9 @@ wider, and it started taking requests that belong to its neighbour.
46
36
  from a broken one instead of letting you guess.
47
37
  - 🏷️ **Catches renames and typos.** Case names are checked against the skills
48
38
  the agent really has, so a renamed skill can't pass silently.
49
- - ⚙️ **CI-ready.** JUnit and JSON reports, clear exit codes, a spending cap
50
- (`--budget`), and `--config-dir` to test only the skills in your repository.
39
+ - ⚙️ **CI-ready.** A GitHub Action (`uses: icntswm/skillcheck@v1`), JUnit
40
+ and JSON reports, clear exit codes, a spending cap (`--budget`), and
41
+ `--config-dir` to test only the skills in your repository.
51
42
  - 📄 **Plain YAML, one dependency.** Cases are readable by anyone on the team
52
43
  and live next to the skills they test.
53
44
 
@@ -86,7 +77,7 @@ Start at the cheapest level and go up only when it finds nothing.
86
77
  | `skillcheck run --batch` | one per 25 cases | which skill the model *says* it would load |
87
78
  | `skillcheck run` | one per case | which skill the model *actually* loads |
88
79
 
89
- On the demo suite one batch call covered all 12 cases for $0.05 and agreed
80
+ On the demo suite one batch call covered all 12 cases for $0.05–0.10 and agreed
90
81
  with the normal run in 34 checks out of 34. More in [docs/cost.md](docs/cost.md).
91
82
 
92
83
  ## Does it really catch regressions?
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@icntswm/skillcheck",
3
- "version": "0.1.0",
3
+ "version": "1.0.0",
4
4
  "description": "Regression tests for Claude Code skills: check that every request still loads the right skill",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {