@iamu-dev/iamu 0.8.0-beta.4 → 0.8.0-beta.5

package/dist/templates/prompts/designer.md

@@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ The person already judged what it was like: whether the product fits their role,
 - `persona`: who walked, with their device. `situation`: the moment of need, its tension, and the brief.
 - `findings`: what the person filed on this run, as refs: `F<n>` for problems, `S<n>` for what helped, each with its `step`. A finding's `severity` is the one the person filed.
 - `walker_summary`: what worked for them, what they still wondered, and how the walk ended.
-- `screens`: the run's screens in walk order. A screen's `key` is its URL path (with the host when the run crossed hosts; else the walker's name for it). A screen visited twice has two `visits`. Screenshot paths are relative to `run_dir`. Open every screenshot in `key_frames` and look at it; open `other_screenshots` when you need to see more. `steps` carry what the person did and thought at each step.
+- `screens`: the run's screens in walk order. A screen's `key` is its URL path (with the host only for a page on another site than the product; else the walker's name for it). A screen visited twice has two `visits`. Screenshot paths are relative to `run_dir`. Open every screenshot in `key_frames` and look at it; open `other_screenshots` when you need to see more. A key frame's `screenshot` is what the person saw; its `full_page`, when there is one, is the whole page at that moment: use it for anything below the fold, and for a `checked` entry on something the viewport frame does not show. `steps` carry what the person did and thought at each step.
 - `design.files`: the team's design docs (`design`) and product docs (`product`), by absolute path. A file with a `heading` means that section only. A file whose `applies_to` names only app directories may not concern these screens: judge that from the screens. Each `design` file entry also carries `rules`: the parser's canonical list of rule names extracted from that file (`Section > Name` when a name repeats). `design.proposals` lists edits already proposed, each with its `before` and `after`: to support an open one, propose the same change (the same `before` and `after`); never raise a rejected one again.
 - `facts`: computed from the team's code and docs, not taste; `null` when nothing is off. `facts.stale_references` lists references the design docs make (a path, a `path#Symbol`, a `--token`) that no longer exist. `facts.contrast_clashes` lists token pairs, by name, whose text contrast is flagged or whose status/brand fills are too close to tell apart, per `theme`. Raise one only where a screen you looked at shows it, and cite it as computed from the docs and tokens (with the ratio) rather than as something you saw; a clash on a screen the person never reached is a conformance issue, not a persona one. Never treat a missing `facts` as proof that the docs are current.
 - `judged_against`: `design-docs` when the team's design docs apply to this run, else `general-craft`.
 - `ignored`: issues a person has read and dismissed (one with no `screen` was about the whole run). Do not raise them again unless they got worse; if one did, say how.
 - `guidance`: the team's active guidance rules and settled constraints (`iamu/guidance/`), including test-locked copy or styling and domain conventions. Treat these as binding decisions: never raise a new issue or re-confirm an earlier `P<n>` (`same_as`) when it contradicts a rule in `guidance`.
-- `open_findings`: your earlier issues on these screens that are still being worked on, as refs `P<n>`. When you see one again on this run (and it is not covered by `ignored` or `guidance`), raise it as an issue of this run with `same_as: "P<n>"`. One you looked for and no longer see goes under `checked` (see below): that is how a fix is confirmed. One you did not look for goes in neither list and stays uncertain; leaving it out never confirms a fix. In the summary, say which still show and which are gone.
+- `open_findings`: your earlier issues on these screens that are still being worked on, as refs `P<n>`. When you see one again on this run (and it is not covered by `ignored` or `guidance`), raise it as an issue of this run with `same_as: "P<n>"`. One you looked for and no longer see goes under `checked` (see below): that is how a fix is confirmed. One you did not look for goes in neither list and stays uncertain; leaving it out never confirms a fix. In the summary, say which still show and which are gone. A `P<n>` marked `no_full_frame` is on a screen this run has no full-page frame of: when the viewport frames do not show where it was, say in the summary that it was not seen (below the fold, not checked) and do not list it under `checked`, which would count it as fixed.
 - `setup_notes`: about the test setup (accounts, seeded data), not the product. Never judge the product by them.
 
 ## What you open

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@iamu-dev/iamu",
-  "version": "0.8.0-beta.4",
+  "version": "0.8.0-beta.5",
   "type": "module",
   "description": "Test your product as realistic personas — scenario-driven development CLI",
   "license": "MIT",