@huaqiu/dsh-tool-schematic-gen 0.3.8 → 0.3.9

package/lib/client.js

@@ -104874,17 +104874,32 @@ while (n3 === a3[++i3] && n3 === a3[++i3] && n3 === a3[++i3] && n3 === a3[++i3]
 		*
 		* | Artifact  | sch | pcb | symbol | footprint | generic |
 		* |-----------|-----|-----|--------|-----------|---------|
-		* | schematic | yes | no  | no     | no        | no      |
-		* | symbol    | yes | no  | yes    | no        | no      |
-		* | footprint | no  | yes | no     | yes       | no      |
+		* | schematic | yes | no  | no     | no        | yes     |
+		* | symbol    | yes | no  | yes    | no        | yes     |
+		* | footprint | no  | yes | no     | yes       | yes     |
+		* | pcb       | no  | yes | no     | no        | yes     |
 		*
-		* `generic` appears in no row: HQ Edge may be inside *some* EDA host without
-		* knowing which editor, so placement must fail closed.
+		* `pcb` rides the same design-block RPC as schematics (`DesignContent.pcb`):
+		* the editor-side PCB placement flow is the placement team's work and builds
+		* on this channel, so it must not be assumed away. `generic` means the host
+		* did not declare a specific editor context, and per the host contract such a
+		* deployment supports ALL placement targets by design — the EDA host is the
+		* final authority (HQ Edge re-enforces the same matrix server-side). Unknown
+		* editor values still fail closed.
 		*/
 		const COMPATIBLE_EDITORS = {
-			schematic: /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["sch"]),
-			symbol: /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["sch", "symbol"]),
-			footprint: /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["pcb", "footprint"])
+			schematic: /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["sch", "generic"]),
+			symbol: /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
+				"sch",
+				"symbol",
+				"generic"
+			]),
+			footprint: /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
+				"pcb",
+				"footprint",
+				"generic"
+			]),
+			pcb: /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["pcb", "generic"])
 		};
 		/**
 		* Can `artifactType` be placed into the editor identified by `editorType`?