@htekdev/actions-debugger 1.0.90 → 1.0.92

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
1
+ id: caching-artifacts-051
2
+ title: 'download-artifact@v4 places each artifact in a named subdirectory, breaking v3 flat path assumption'
3
+ category: caching-artifacts
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - download-artifact
7
+ - v4-migration
8
+ - directory-structure
9
+ - breaking-change
10
+ - path
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'Downloading artifact.*to.*'
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ - regex: 'ENOENT.*no such file or directory'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ - regex: 'no such file or directory.*dist\/'
17
+ flags: 'i'
18
+ error_messages:
19
+ - "Downloading artifact: my-artifact to /home/runner/work/repo/dist"
20
+ - "Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'dist/index.js'"
21
+ - "Error: Cannot find module '/home/runner/work/repo/dist/index.js'"
22
+ - "cp: cannot stat 'dist/main.js': No such file or directory"
23
+ root_cause: |
24
+ In actions/download-artifact@v3, downloading a named artifact with `path: dist`
25
+ placed files directly inside the `dist/` directory (flat layout). In v4,
26
+ the action changed to place each artifact in a subdirectory named after the
27
+ artifact: files land at `dist/<artifact-name>/filename` instead of `dist/filename`.
28
+
29
+ This is a silent failure: the `download-artifact` step succeeds with exit code 0
30
+ and emits no warning about the path change. Downstream steps that reference
31
+ `dist/index.js` fail with "no such file" errors — the file is actually at
32
+ `dist/my-artifact/index.js`. The behavior is especially confusing in matrix
33
+ workflows where each job uploads an artifact with a unique name, and the
34
+ consuming job downloads all artifacts into a single `path:`.
35
+
36
+ The change was made to support downloading multiple artifacts into the same
37
+ `path:` without name collisions, but it breaks any workflow that migrated from
38
+ v3 without adjusting downstream path references.
39
+ fix: |
40
+ Option 1 (recommended): Set the `path:` to a staging directory and reference
41
+ files using the artifact subdirectory path, or use `merge-multiple: true` to
42
+ flatten all artifacts into the `path:` directory.
43
+
44
+ Option 2: Name the artifact the same as the target directory and download into
45
+ the parent, so the subdirectory becomes the expected location.
46
+
47
+ Option 3: Add a step to move the artifact contents up one level after download.
48
+ fix_code:
49
+ - language: yaml
50
+ label: 'Use merge-multiple: true to restore v3 flat behavior for single artifact'
51
+ code: |
52
+ - uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
53
+ with:
54
+ name: dist-bundle
55
+ path: dist
56
+ merge-multiple: true # Flattens into dist/ directly, matching v3 behavior
57
+ - language: yaml
58
+ label: 'Adjust downstream path to include artifact subdirectory'
59
+ code: |
60
+ - uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
61
+ with:
62
+ name: dist-bundle
63
+ path: staging
64
+
65
+ # Files land at staging/dist-bundle/index.js — reference accordingly
66
+ - run: node staging/dist-bundle/index.js
67
+ - language: yaml
68
+ label: 'Download all matrix artifacts and merge into one directory'
69
+ code: |
70
+ - uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
71
+ with:
72
+ pattern: build-* # Matches all matrix artifacts
73
+ path: dist
74
+ merge-multiple: true # All files merged flat into dist/
75
+ prevention:
76
+ - "When migrating from download-artifact@v3 to v4, audit all `path:` references and downstream file access patterns"
77
+ - "Use `merge-multiple: true` if you need the v3 flat download behavior for a single named artifact"
78
+ - "Set `path:` to a staging directory and explicitly reference the `path/<artifact-name>/` subdirectory in downstream steps"
79
+ - "Run the workflow once after migrating and check the action log for 'Downloading artifact: X to Y' to verify the actual destination path"
80
+ docs:
81
+ - url: 'https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/blob/main/docs/migration-guide.md'
82
+ label: 'download-artifact migration guide: v3 to v4 breaking changes'
83
+ - url: 'https://github.com/actions/download-artifact?tab=readme-ov-file#inputs'
84
+ label: 'download-artifact@v4 inputs reference — merge-multiple option'
85
+ - url: 'https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/discussions/562'
86
+ label: 'Community discussion: v4 directory structure change from v3'
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
1
+ id: permissions-auth-051
2
+ title: 'GITHUB_TOKEN push blocked by repository ruleset despite contents: write permission'
3
+ category: permissions-auth
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - github-token
7
+ - rulesets
8
+ - contents-write
9
+ - branch-protection
10
+ - bypass-list
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'GH013: Repository rule violations found for refs\/'
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ - regex: 'remote: error: Changes must be made through a pull request'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ - regex: 'refusing to allow.*to create or update'
17
+ flags: 'i'
18
+ error_messages:
19
+ - "remote: error: GH013: Repository rule violations found for refs/heads/main."
20
+ - "remote: error: GH013: Repository rule violations found for refs/tags/v1.0.0."
21
+ - "remote: error: Changes must be made through a pull request."
22
+ - "error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/ORG/REPO.git'"
23
+ - "refusing to allow a GitHub App to create or update file"
24
+ root_cause: |
25
+ GitHub Rulesets (generally available January 2025) allow organization and repository
26
+ administrators to define push rules that enforce requirements such as "all pushes
27
+ must come through a pull request", "signed commits required", or "tag patterns
28
+ must match a format". Unlike legacy branch protection rules, rulesets apply to
29
+ ALL actors including GitHub Apps and the GITHUB_TOKEN by default — regardless of
30
+ the `contents: write` permission granted in the workflow's `permissions:` block.
31
+
32
+ The `contents: write` permission only controls whether the token is *authorized*
33
+ to make write API calls; it does not grant exemption from repository rulesets.
34
+ Rulesets have a separate "bypass list" in Settings > Rules > Rulesets that must
35
+ explicitly include "GitHub Actions" (or a specific GitHub App) to allow workflow
36
+ pushes to bypass ruleset restrictions.
37
+
38
+ This error affects workflows that push commits directly (e.g., auto-format,
39
+ changelog generation, version bump commits) or push tags (e.g., release tagging)
40
+ to branches or tags governed by a ruleset.
41
+ fix: |
42
+ Option 1 (recommended): Add GitHub Actions to the ruleset bypass list.
43
+ Go to Settings > Rules > Rulesets > (select the ruleset) > Bypass list >
44
+ Add bypass > select "GitHub Actions". This allows workflow GITHUB_TOKEN
45
+ pushes to bypass the ruleset.
46
+
47
+ Option 2: Use a Personal Access Token (PAT) or GitHub App token from a user
48
+ account that is in the bypass list. Pass the token via a secret and use it
49
+ in the push step.
50
+
51
+ Option 3: Restructure the workflow to push via a pull request instead of
52
+ directly to the protected branch, satisfying the "PR required" ruleset rule.
53
+ fix_code:
54
+ - language: yaml
55
+ label: 'Use a PAT secret to push when GITHUB_TOKEN is blocked by rulesets'
56
+ code: |
57
+ jobs:
58
+ release:
59
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
60
+ steps:
61
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
62
+ with:
63
+ token: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_PAT }} # PAT from bypass-listed account
64
+ fetch-depth: 0
65
+
66
+ # ... version bump or commit steps ...
67
+
68
+ - name: Push release commit and tag
69
+ env:
70
+ GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_PAT }}
71
+ run: |
72
+ # Use the PAT-authenticated remote for push
73
+ echo "Push authorized via PAT from bypass-listed account"
74
+ - language: yaml
75
+ label: 'Use a GitHub App token with bypass list membership'
76
+ code: |
77
+ jobs:
78
+ release:
79
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
80
+ steps:
81
+ - uses: actions/create-github-app-token@v2
82
+ id: app-token
83
+ with:
84
+ app-id: ${{ vars.RELEASE_APP_ID }}
85
+ private-key: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}
86
+
87
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
88
+ with:
89
+ token: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}
90
+
91
+ # Push step uses the App token — ensure the App is in bypass list
92
+ prevention:
93
+ - "When enabling rulesets on a repository or organization, immediately check CI/CD workflows that push directly to protected branches or tags"
94
+ - "Add GitHub Actions to ruleset bypass lists proactively when creating rulesets that restrict direct pushes"
95
+ - "Prefer pushing via pull requests (open PR, auto-merge) over direct commits in automated workflows — this satisfies 'PR required' rules and avoids bypass list management"
96
+ - "Audit existing legacy branch protection rules when migrating to rulesets — bypass behavior differs: branch protection 'Restrict who can push' exempts admins by default; rulesets do not"
97
+ docs:
98
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-rulesets/available-rules-for-rulesets'
99
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: Available rules for rulesets'
100
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-rulesets/creating-rulesets-for-a-repository#granting-bypass-permissions-for-your-ruleset'
101
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: Granting bypass permissions for a ruleset'
102
+ - url: 'https://github.blog/changelog/2025-01-29-github-rulesets-are-generally-available/'
103
+ label: 'GitHub Changelog: Rulesets generally available — January 2025'
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
1
+ id: runner-environment-157
2
+ title: 'setup-python EOL Python version triggers slow pyenv compilation on ubuntu-24.04'
3
+ category: runner-environment
4
+ severity: warning
5
+ tags:
6
+ - setup-python
7
+ - pyenv
8
+ - ubuntu-24.04
9
+ - python-version
10
+ - toolcache
11
+ - build-time
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'Version \d+\.\d+\.\d+ was not found in the local cache'
14
+ flags: 'i'
15
+ - regex: 'pyenv install python-\d+\.\d+\.\d+'
16
+ flags: 'i'
17
+ - regex: 'python-build: .*not installed'
18
+ flags: 'i'
19
+ error_messages:
20
+ - "Version 3.8.20 was not found in the local cache"
21
+ - "Version 3.9.19 was not found in the local cache"
22
+ - "pyenv install python-3.8.20"
23
+ - "python-build: python not found in PATH"
24
+ - "Successfully installed cpython: 3.9.18 (took: 523.19 seconds)"
25
+ root_cause: |
26
+ ubuntu-24.04 runners ship with Python 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13 in the pre-installed
27
+ toolcache. Python 3.8 (EOL October 2024), 3.9, and 3.10 were removed from the
28
+ ubuntu-24.04 toolcache entirely. When actions/setup-python requests one of these
29
+ versions, it cannot find a cached build and falls back to compiling Python from
30
+ source via pyenv. The compilation process — downloading Python source, running
31
+ ./configure, make, make install with GCC — typically takes 5–10 minutes and can
32
+ exhaust the default 6-hour job timeout in heavily parallelized pipelines or
33
+ cause unexpectedly slow CI on free-tier runners. The warning "Version X was not
34
+ found in the local cache" is emitted but easy to miss in long logs, and the
35
+ action still exits 0 on success, making the slowdown invisible until CI bills
36
+ or timeout failures appear.
37
+ fix: |
38
+ Option 1 (recommended): Upgrade to a Python version pre-installed on ubuntu-24.04
39
+ (3.11, 3.12, or 3.13). These are available instantly from the toolcache.
40
+
41
+ Option 2: Pin the runner to ubuntu-22.04, which retains Python 3.9 and 3.10
42
+ in the toolcache through its support window.
43
+
44
+ Option 3: Add the deadsnakes PPA before calling setup-python to provide fast
45
+ pre-built binaries for older Python versions on ubuntu-24.
46
+
47
+ Option 4: Use a container image that pre-bundles your Python version to avoid
48
+ the toolcache entirely.
49
+ fix_code:
50
+ - language: yaml
51
+ label: 'Upgrade to a toolcache-available Python version'
52
+ code: |
53
+ - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
54
+ with:
55
+ python-version: '3.12' # Pre-installed on ubuntu-24.04; no pyenv fallback
56
+ - language: yaml
57
+ label: 'Use ubuntu-22.04 runner if 3.9 or 3.10 is required'
58
+ code: |
59
+ jobs:
60
+ test:
61
+ runs-on: ubuntu-22.04 # Retains Python 3.9/3.10 in toolcache
62
+ steps:
63
+ - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
64
+ with:
65
+ python-version: '3.10'
66
+ - language: yaml
67
+ label: 'Deadsnakes PPA for fast pre-built older Python on ubuntu-24.04'
68
+ code: |
69
+ jobs:
70
+ test:
71
+ runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
72
+ steps:
73
+ - name: Add deadsnakes PPA
74
+ run: |
75
+ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:deadsnakes/ppa
76
+ sudo apt-get update
77
+ sudo apt-get install -y python3.9 python3.9-venv python3.9-dev
78
+ - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
79
+ with:
80
+ python-version: '3.9'
81
+ prevention:
82
+ - "Avoid pinning `python-version` to EOL releases (3.8 EOL Oct 2024, 3.9 EOL Oct 2025)"
83
+ - "Check the ubuntu-24.04 runner toolcache inventory at github.com/actions/runner-images for available Python versions"
84
+ - "Use `python-version-file: .python-version` or `pyproject.toml` to track the project's minimum supported version and update it when runners drop EOL toolcache entries"
85
+ - "Set a `timeout-minutes` on the job so pyenv compilation failures surface quickly rather than running for hours"
86
+ docs:
87
+ - url: 'https://github.com/actions/setup-python/issues/726'
88
+ label: 'setup-python: Python 3.8/3.9 not found in toolcache on ubuntu-24.04'
89
+ - url: 'https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/main/images/ubuntu/Ubuntu2404-Readme.md'
90
+ label: 'ubuntu-24.04 runner image readme — pre-installed Python versions'
91
+ - url: 'https://devguide.python.org/versions/'
92
+ label: 'Python release lifecycle — EOL dates by version'
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
1
+ id: runner-environment-158
2
+ title: 'Windows MAX_PATH 260-character limit causes npm and build tool failures'
3
+ category: runner-environment
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - windows
7
+ - max-path
8
+ - npm
9
+ - node_modules
10
+ - path-length
11
+ - enoent
12
+ - build
13
+ patterns:
14
+ - regex: 'The filename or extension is too long'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ - regex: 'ENOENT.*node_modules.*node_modules'
17
+ flags: 'i'
18
+ - regex: 'error MSB3095.*path.*too long'
19
+ flags: 'i'
20
+ - regex: 'The system cannot find the path specified'
21
+ flags: 'i'
22
+ error_messages:
23
+ - "The filename or extension is too long."
24
+ - "ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'C:\\Users\\runner\\work\\..."
25
+ - "error MSB3095: Invalid argument. 'path' is too long."
26
+ - "npm ERR! path C:\\Users\\runner\\work\\..."
27
+ root_cause: |
28
+ Windows enforces a 260-character maximum path length (MAX_PATH) inherited from
29
+ the Win32 API. Deep node_modules dependency trees easily exceed this limit: the
30
+ GitHub-hosted runner workspace is already at
31
+ C:\Users\runner\work\<repository>\<repository>\ (~50 characters) before any
32
+ source files are added. A typical transitive npm dependency path like
33
+ node_modules\pkg\node_modules\sub\node_modules\deep\index.js can push the total
34
+ well past 260 characters. MSBuild, Java build tools, and other Windows toolchains
35
+ have the same limitation.
36
+
37
+ GitHub-hosted Windows runners (windows-2022, windows-latest) have the
38
+ LongPathsEnabled registry key set to 1 at the OS level, but Git must still be
39
+ separately configured with core.longpaths = true, and some Node.js internal APIs
40
+ call the legacy Win32 CreateFile path which ignores the registry opt-in unless
41
+ the application explicitly declares long-path awareness in its executable manifest.
42
+ The result is ENOENT or "path too long" failures that appear to indicate missing
43
+ files rather than a path-length limit.
44
+ fix: |
45
+ Option 1 (most effective): Use a short path: in actions/checkout to reduce the
46
+ base path length. path: a sets the workspace to C:\...\work\repo\a.
47
+ Option 2: Configure Git long paths and use --legacy-peer-deps to flatten
48
+ npm dependency nesting.
49
+ Option 3: Shorten the repository name, which directly reduces the workspace
50
+ path length.
51
+ fix_code:
52
+ - language: yaml
53
+ label: 'Use short checkout path to reduce base path length'
54
+ code: |
55
+ jobs:
56
+ build:
57
+ runs-on: windows-latest
58
+ steps:
59
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
60
+ with:
61
+ path: a # Reduces base path by ~20-30 characters vs default
62
+ - run: npm ci
63
+ working-directory: a
64
+ - language: yaml
65
+ label: 'Enable Git long paths and flatten npm tree'
66
+ code: |
67
+ jobs:
68
+ build:
69
+ runs-on: windows-latest
70
+ steps:
71
+ - name: Configure Git long paths
72
+ run: git config --global core.longpaths true
73
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
74
+ - name: Install with flattened dependencies
75
+ run: npm ci --legacy-peer-deps
76
+ prevention:
77
+ - 'Use path: a (or another single-char name) in actions/checkout to reduce baseline path length on Windows'
78
+ - 'Keep GitHub repository names short when Windows CI is required'
79
+ - 'Avoid deeply nested workspace directory structures'
80
+ - 'Run npm ci --legacy-peer-deps to reduce node_modules nesting on npm 7+ which introduced deeper trees'
81
+ docs:
82
+ - url: 'https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/maximum-file-path-limitation'
83
+ label: 'Microsoft Docs: Maximum file path limitation (MAX_PATH)'
84
+ - url: 'https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#Documentation/git-config.txt-coreprotectNTFS'
85
+ label: 'Git: core.longpaths config'
86
+ - url: 'https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v10/commands/npm-ci'
87
+ label: 'npm ci — clean install'
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-086
2
+ title: 'on.pull_request does not inherit branches filter from sibling on.push trigger'
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - pull_request
7
+ - push
8
+ - branches-filter
9
+ - trigger
10
+ - unexpected-runs
11
+ - filter-inheritance
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'on:\s*\n\s*push:\s*\n\s*branches:\s*\n.*\n\s*pull_request:\s*\n(?!\s*branches:)'
14
+ flags: 'ms'
15
+ error_messages: []
16
+ root_cause: |
17
+ When a workflow defines multiple triggers under on:, each trigger's configuration
18
+ is fully independent — there is no filter inheritance between sibling triggers.
19
+ A common pattern is to restrict on.push to specific branches (e.g., main,
20
+ release/**) while adding on.pull_request with no branches: key, expecting the
21
+ PR trigger to respect the same branch scope.
22
+
23
+ In YAML mapping semantics, on.push.branches: [main] applies exclusively to push
24
+ events. on.pull_request with no branches: key means "trigger for pull requests
25
+ targeting ANY branch in the repository." This causes the workflow to run on every
26
+ PR opened against feature branches, release candidates, or any other branch —
27
+ running expensive CI on PRs the developer intended to exclude.
28
+
29
+ The GitHub Actions UI shows these runs as triggered by pull_request with no
30
+ indication that the branches: filter was missing. The behavior appears correct
31
+ (workflow ran) but occurs on unintended PRs.
32
+ fix: |
33
+ Explicitly add a branches: filter to on.pull_request that defines the target
34
+ branches for which CI should run. Note that on.pull_request.branches matches the
35
+ BASE branch (the branch the PR targets), not the head/feature branch.
36
+ fix_code:
37
+ - language: yaml
38
+ label: 'Explicit branches filter on both triggers'
39
+ code: |
40
+ on:
41
+ push:
42
+ branches: [main, 'release/**']
43
+ pull_request:
44
+ branches: [main, 'release/**'] # Required — NOT inherited from on.push
45
+ jobs:
46
+ ci:
47
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
48
+ steps:
49
+ - run: npm test
50
+ - language: yaml
51
+ label: 'Common mistake — missing branches on pull_request'
52
+ code: |
53
+ # WRONG — pull_request triggers for ALL target branches
54
+ on:
55
+ push:
56
+ branches: [main]
57
+ pull_request: # No branches filter — triggers for every PR
58
+ # CORRECT
59
+ on:
60
+ push:
61
+ branches: [main]
62
+ pull_request:
63
+ branches: [main] # Only PRs targeting main
64
+ prevention:
65
+ - 'Review each trigger block independently — on.push and on.pull_request filters are never shared'
66
+ - 'Add an explicit branches: under on.pull_request whenever you use branches: under on.push'
67
+ - 'Remember: on.pull_request.branches matches the BASE branch of the PR, not the feature branch'
68
+ - 'Use actionlint to validate trigger configurations before committing'
69
+ docs:
70
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#using-filters'
71
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: Using filters — each trigger is configured independently'
72
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#onpull_requestpull_request_targetbranchesbranches-ignore'
73
+ label: 'GitHub Actions: pull_request branches filter matches base branch'
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
1
+ id: triggers-061
2
+ title: 'on.delete fires for branch and tag deletion — no ref_type filter at trigger level'
3
+ category: triggers
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - delete
7
+ - ref_type
8
+ - branch
9
+ - tag
10
+ - unexpected-runs
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'on:\s*\n\s*delete:'
13
+ flags: 'ms'
14
+ error_messages: []
15
+ root_cause: |
16
+ The on.delete event fires whenever any branch or tag is deleted in the repository.
17
+ Unlike some events that support a types: activity filter, on.delete has no types
18
+ option — there is no trigger-level way to restrict it to branch deletions only or
19
+ tag deletions only. Workflows that perform branch-specific cleanup (removing
20
+ temporary deployment environments, rotating secrets, updating external project
21
+ boards, or archiving feature branch artifacts) run for EVERY tag deletion as well,
22
+ unless an explicit runtime condition is added inside the workflow.
23
+
24
+ The on.create event has the same dual-fire behavior (documented separately). Both
25
+ events expose github.event.ref_type in the workflow context as either 'branch' or
26
+ 'tag', but this value is only available inside the workflow body — it cannot be
27
+ used as a trigger-level filter.
28
+
29
+ A common scenario: a workflow cleans up branch-specific cloud environments on
30
+ delete. When a developer deletes the release tag v1.2.3, the workflow fires
31
+ unexpectedly — potentially tearing down a production environment that was deployed
32
+ from that tag.
33
+ fix: |
34
+ Add an if: condition using github.event.ref_type to guard jobs or steps that
35
+ should only execute for one type of deletion. Use 'branch' or 'tag' as the
36
+ comparison value.
37
+ fix_code:
38
+ - language: yaml
39
+ label: 'Guard cleanup by ref_type at the job level'
40
+ code: |
41
+ on:
42
+ delete:
43
+ jobs:
44
+ cleanup-branch-environment:
45
+ # Only run for branch deletions — skip tag deletions
46
+ if: github.event.ref_type == 'branch'
47
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
48
+ steps:
49
+ - name: Remove branch-specific deployment
50
+ run: echo "Cleaning up env for branch ${{ github.event.ref }}"
51
+ - language: yaml
52
+ label: 'Separate jobs for branch vs tag deletion'
53
+ code: |
54
+ on:
55
+ delete:
56
+ jobs:
57
+ cleanup-branch:
58
+ if: github.event.ref_type == 'branch'
59
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
60
+ steps:
61
+ - run: echo "Branch deleted ${{ github.event.ref }}"
62
+ cleanup-tag:
63
+ if: github.event.ref_type == 'tag'
64
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
65
+ steps:
66
+ - run: echo "Tag deleted ${{ github.event.ref }}"
67
+ prevention:
68
+ - 'Always guard on.delete workflow jobs with if: github.event.ref_type == ''branch'' or ''tag'''
69
+ - 'Be aware that on.create has the same behavior — both create and delete fire for branches and tags'
70
+ - 'Test delete workflows by deleting both a branch and a tag to verify they behave as expected'
71
+ docs:
72
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#delete'
73
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: delete event — fires for branches and tags'
74
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/contexts#github-context'
75
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: github.event.ref_type context'
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
1
+ id: triggers-062
2
+ title: 'on.pull_request_review fires for all review types (submitted, edited, dismissed) when types is omitted'
3
+ category: triggers
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - pull_request_review
7
+ - review
8
+ - types
9
+ - dismissed
10
+ - submitted
11
+ - unexpected-runs
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'on:\s*\n\s*pull_request_review:\s*\n(?!\s*types:)'
14
+ flags: 'ms'
15
+ error_messages: []
16
+ root_cause: |
17
+ The pull_request_review event fires for three activity types:
18
+ - submitted: a new review is posted (approved, changes_requested, or commented)
19
+ - edited: a reviewer edits their review comment text
20
+ - dismissed: an existing approval or changes_requested review is dismissed
21
+
22
+ When on.pull_request_review: is specified without a types: filter, GitHub fires
23
+ the workflow for ALL three activity types. Developers typically use this event to
24
+ trigger a deployment or notification on PR approval. Without types: [submitted],
25
+ the workflow also runs when a reviewer edits their comment spelling or when an
26
+ approval is dismissed by a maintainer — often causing incorrect or failed workflow
27
+ runs in contexts where the PR is no longer in an approved state.
28
+
29
+ This behavior mirrors on.pull_request without types: (which fires for opened,
30
+ synchronize, and reopened by default) but is arguably more surprising because
31
+ "editing a review comment" and "dismissing a review" are far less common
32
+ developer actions than submitting a new review.
33
+ fix: |
34
+ Add types: [submitted] to restrict the trigger to new review submissions.
35
+ If you only want to react to approvals specifically, also add an if: condition
36
+ checking github.event.review.state == 'approved'.
37
+ fix_code:
38
+ - language: yaml
39
+ label: 'Restrict to submitted reviews only'
40
+ code: |
41
+ on:
42
+ pull_request_review:
43
+ types: [submitted] # Only new review submissions — not edited or dismissed
44
+ jobs:
45
+ notify-on-review:
46
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
47
+ steps:
48
+ - run: echo "Review state ${{ github.event.review.state }}"
49
+ - language: yaml
50
+ label: 'Trigger only on PR approvals'
51
+ code: |
52
+ on:
53
+ pull_request_review:
54
+ types: [submitted]
55
+ jobs:
56
+ deploy-on-approval:
57
+ if: github.event.review.state == 'approved'
58
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
59
+ steps:
60
+ - run: echo "PR approved — proceeding with staging deploy"
61
+ prevention:
62
+ - 'Always specify types: [submitted] under on.pull_request_review unless dismissed or edited is explicitly needed'
63
+ - 'Combine types: [submitted] with if: github.event.review.state == ''approved'' for approval-gated workflows'
64
+ - 'Test pull_request_review workflows by also dismissing reviews to ensure unexpected runs are avoided'
65
+ docs:
66
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review'
67
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: pull_request_review event — activity types'
68
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#pull_request_review'
69
+ label: 'GitHub Webhooks: pull_request_review payload — review.state values'
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
1
+ id: yaml-syntax-057
2
+ title: 'needs: referencing undefined job ID causes instant workflow validation failure'
3
+ category: yaml-syntax
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - needs
7
+ - job-id
8
+ - validation
9
+ - typo
10
+ - workflow-syntax
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: "Job '.*' depends on unknown job '.*'"
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ - regex: "A job named '.*' does not exist in this workflow"
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ - regex: 'The workflow is not valid.*depends on unknown job'
17
+ flags: 'i'
18
+ error_messages:
19
+ - "The workflow is not valid. .github/workflows/ci.yml (Line 42, Col 14): Job 'deploy' depends on unknown job 'biuld'."
20
+ - "A job named 'biuld' does not exist in this workflow."
21
+ - "Job 'release' depends on unknown job 'test-and-build'."
22
+ - "The workflow is not valid. .github/workflows/release.yml: Job 'publish' depends on unknown job 'build_and_test'."
23
+ root_cause: |
24
+ The `needs:` key in a job definition must exactly reference the IDs of other jobs
25
+ defined under `jobs:` in the same workflow file. Job IDs are the YAML map keys
26
+ (e.g., `jobs.build:`, `jobs.test:`), not the `name:` display values.
27
+
28
+ A typo in a `needs:` value (e.g., `needs: [biuld]` instead of `needs: [build]`,
29
+ or `needs: test-and-build` when the job is named `test_and_build`) causes GitHub
30
+ Actions to reject the entire workflow at parse time with a validation error.
31
+ No jobs run — the workflow fails before any step executes.
32
+
33
+ This error is particularly common after renaming jobs, since the `name:` field
34
+ (display name in the UI) can be changed without affecting the job ID used in
35
+ `needs:`. Developers who update `name:` but forget to update downstream `needs:`
36
+ references see the workflow fail immediately on next push with no prior warning.
37
+ fix: |
38
+ Ensure every value in `needs:` exactly matches a job ID key defined at the
39
+ same level under `jobs:`. Job IDs are case-sensitive and use the exact YAML key
40
+ name — not the `name:` display value.
41
+
42
+ Use `actionlint` locally or in pre-commit hooks to catch unknown `needs:` references
43
+ before pushing.
44
+ fix_code:
45
+ - language: yaml
46
+ label: 'Correct needs: to match the exact job ID key'
47
+ code: |
48
+ jobs:
49
+ build: # <-- This is the job ID (the YAML key)
50
+ name: Build and Test # This is the display name — NOT used in needs:
51
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
52
+ steps:
53
+ - run: echo "building"
54
+
55
+ deploy:
56
+ needs: [build] # Must reference the job ID key, not the name: value
57
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
58
+ steps:
59
+ - run: echo "deploying"
60
+ - language: yaml
61
+ label: 'Rename both job ID and needs: reference after a job rename'
62
+ code: |
63
+ # WRONG — job was renamed from 'build' to 'build-and-test' but needs: not updated
64
+ # jobs:
65
+ # build-and-test:
66
+ # ...
67
+ # deploy:
68
+ # needs: [build] # Error: 'build' no longer exists
69
+
70
+ # CORRECT — update needs: to match the new job ID
71
+ jobs:
72
+ build-and-test:
73
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
74
+ steps:
75
+ - run: echo "building"
76
+
77
+ deploy:
78
+ needs: [build-and-test] # Updated to match renamed job ID
79
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
80
+ steps:
81
+ - run: echo "deploying"
82
+ prevention:
83
+ - "Use `actionlint` (rhysd/actionlint) locally or as a pre-commit hook — it validates `needs:` references against defined job IDs at lint time"
84
+ - "Keep job IDs short and stable (e.g., `build`, `test`, `deploy`); use the `name:` field for human-readable display names that can be changed freely"
85
+ - "When renaming a job ID, search the entire workflow file for all `needs:` references to that ID before committing"
86
+ - "Enable the actionlint GitHub Actions workflow check in your repository to catch validation errors in PRs before merge"
87
+ docs:
88
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idneeds'
89
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: jobs.<job_id>.needs syntax'
90
+ - url: 'https://rhysd.github.io/actionlint/'
91
+ label: 'actionlint — static checker for GitHub Actions workflow files'
92
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idname'
93
+ label: 'GitHub Docs: jobs.<job_id>.name vs job ID distinction'
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@htekdev/actions-debugger",
3
- "version": "1.0.90",
3
+ "version": "1.0.92",
4
4
  "description": "65+ real GitHub Actions errors, queryable by agents. CLI + MCP server + Copilot skills + error database.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "main": "./dist/index.js",