@htekdev/actions-debugger 1.0.88 → 1.0.90

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
1
+ id: concurrency-timing-044
2
+ title: 'Matrix jobs with a static concurrency group key serialize instead of running in parallel'
3
+ category: concurrency-timing
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - matrix
7
+ - concurrency
8
+ - parallelism
9
+ - group-key
10
+ - strategy
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'Waiting for a pending job to finish'
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ - regex: 'This workflow is waiting for a pending job to complete'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - 'Waiting for a pending job to finish — concurrency: ci-deploy'
18
+ root_cause: |
19
+ When a workflow-level or job-level concurrency group is configured with a static
20
+ key that does not include the matrix dimension values, all matrix legs share the
21
+ same concurrency slot. GitHub Actions enforces that only one run occupies each
22
+ slot at a time, so instead of running N matrix legs in parallel, the legs queue
23
+ and execute one at a time — silently serializing a job strategy that was intended
24
+ to be parallel.
25
+
26
+ This can multiply workflow duration by the number of matrix dimensions (e.g., a
27
+ 3-OS matrix that should finish in 10 minutes takes 30 minutes). The GitHub Actions
28
+ UI shows later matrix legs as "Waiting for a pending job to finish" which hints at
29
+ the problem, but developers often interpret this as runner resource contention rather
30
+ than a concurrency group misconfiguration.
31
+
32
+ Common patterns that trigger this:
33
+ concurrency:
34
+ group: ci-${{ github.ref }} # all matrix legs share "ci-refs/heads/main"
35
+
36
+ concurrency:
37
+ group: ${{ github.workflow }} # all legs share workflow name
38
+ fix: |
39
+ Include the relevant matrix dimension values in the concurrency group key so that
40
+ each matrix leg gets a unique slot. If cancel-in-progress behavior is still needed,
41
+ it will apply per-matrix-leg rather than globally across all legs.
42
+
43
+ If you intentionally want to serialize matrix legs (e.g., sequential deploys to
44
+ environments), keep the static key but document the serialization intent.
45
+ fix_code:
46
+ - language: yaml
47
+ label: 'Include matrix values in concurrency group key'
48
+ code: |
49
+ jobs:
50
+ test:
51
+ strategy:
52
+ matrix:
53
+ os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, macos-latest]
54
+ node: [18, 20, 22]
55
+ runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
56
+ concurrency:
57
+ # Unique slot per matrix leg — allows full parallelism
58
+ group: ci-${{ github.ref }}-${{ matrix.os }}-${{ matrix.node }}
59
+ cancel-in-progress: true
60
+ steps:
61
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
62
+ - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
63
+ with:
64
+ node-version: ${{ matrix.node }}
65
+ - run: npm test
66
+ - language: yaml
67
+ label: 'Workflow-level concurrency must also include matrix values'
68
+ code: |
69
+ # BAD: workflow-level concurrency applies to ALL jobs, including matrix legs
70
+ # concurrency:
71
+ # group: ci-${{ github.ref }} # serializes all legs!
72
+ # cancel-in-progress: true
73
+
74
+ # GOOD: set concurrency at the job level with matrix dimensions in the key
75
+ jobs:
76
+ build:
77
+ strategy:
78
+ matrix:
79
+ platform: [linux, windows, macos]
80
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
81
+ concurrency:
82
+ group: build-${{ github.ref }}-${{ matrix.platform }}
83
+ cancel-in-progress: true
84
+ steps:
85
+ - run: echo "Building for ${{ matrix.platform }}"
86
+ prevention:
87
+ - 'Always include matrix dimension values in concurrency group keys: group: ci-${{ github.ref }}-${{ matrix.os }}'
88
+ - 'Check workflow execution time after adding concurrency groups — unexpected serialization increases total duration'
89
+ - 'Use workflow-level concurrency only for single-job workflows; for matrix jobs, always configure concurrency at the job level'
90
+ - 'Verify parallelism by checking the GitHub Actions timeline view — all matrix legs should show overlapping execution'
91
+ docs:
92
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/using-concurrency'
93
+ label: 'Using concurrency in GitHub Actions'
94
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstrategymatrix'
95
+ label: 'Matrix strategy syntax reference'
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
1
+ id: known-unsolved-052
2
+ title: 'GitHub-hosted runner IP addresses change on every workflow run — static IP allowlisting unreliable'
3
+ category: known-unsolved
4
+ severity: limitation
5
+ tags:
6
+ - runner
7
+ - ip-address
8
+ - firewall
9
+ - allowlist
10
+ - network
11
+ - hosted-runner
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'Connection refused|Connection timed out|Unable to connect'
14
+ flags: 'i'
15
+ - regex: 'connect ECONNREFUSED|ECONNRESET|ETIMEDOUT'
16
+ flags: 'i'
17
+ - regex: 'blocked by firewall|access denied.*firewall|ip.*not.*allowed'
18
+ flags: 'i'
19
+ error_messages:
20
+ - 'Error: connect ECONNREFUSED 10.0.0.5:5432'
21
+ - 'curl: (7) Failed to connect to internal-api.company.com port 443: Connection refused'
22
+ - 'Error: connect ETIMEDOUT'
23
+ root_cause: |
24
+ GitHub-hosted runners are allocated from a large, rotating pool of virtual machines.
25
+ The IP address assigned to each run is drawn from GitHub's published CIDR ranges
26
+ (available via https://api.github.com/meta under "actions") but changes on every
27
+ workflow run — there is no way to obtain a stable, predictable IP for a GitHub-hosted
28
+ runner in advance.
29
+
30
+ GitHub publishes these IP ranges for documentation purposes, but:
31
+ 1. The ranges are broad (/20 or larger) and overlap with other GitHub services
32
+ 2. The specific IP within the range cannot be predicted before the run starts
33
+ 3. The ranges update periodically, requiring allowlist maintenance
34
+ 4. On each run, the runner's IP can be any address in the published ranges
35
+
36
+ This makes static IP allowlisting in external firewalls, database security groups
37
+ (AWS RDS, Azure SQL, Cloudflare), or on-premise systems unreliable. Allowlisting the
38
+ entire published range exposes hundreds of thousands of IP addresses and violates
39
+ least-privilege security principles.
40
+
41
+ This is a fundamental architecture constraint of GitHub-hosted runners and has no
42
+ perfect solution — only workarounds.
43
+ fix: |
44
+ There is no way to guarantee a stable IP for GitHub-hosted runners. Use one of these
45
+ patterns instead of IP allowlisting:
46
+
47
+ 1. OIDC (preferred): Use OIDC tokens to authenticate to cloud providers (AWS, Azure,
48
+ GCP) rather than network-level access controls. No IP allowlisting needed.
49
+
50
+ 2. Self-hosted runners: Deploy runners on your network with known, stable IPs.
51
+
52
+ 3. Dynamic allowlisting: At workflow start, call your cloud provider API to add the
53
+ runner's current IP to the security group; remove it at workflow end. Brittle but
54
+ workable for database access.
55
+
56
+ 4. VPN/tunnel action: Use actions like cloudflare/cloudflare-warp-action or a
57
+ WireGuard setup action to tunnel runner traffic through a fixed gateway IP.
58
+
59
+ 5. Private hosted runners (GitHub Enterprise): If on GHEC, configure static IP ranges
60
+ via network configurations for GitHub-hosted runners.
61
+ fix_code:
62
+ - language: yaml
63
+ label: 'Use OIDC authentication instead of IP allowlisting (AWS example)'
64
+ code: |
65
+ jobs:
66
+ deploy:
67
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
68
+ permissions:
69
+ id-token: write
70
+ contents: read
71
+ steps:
72
+ - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4
73
+ with:
74
+ role-to-assume: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/GitHubActionsRole
75
+ aws-region: us-east-1
76
+ # No IP allowlisting needed — OIDC validates the token, not the IP
77
+ - run: aws rds describe-db-instances
78
+ - language: yaml
79
+ label: 'Dynamic security group allowlisting (temporary, for legacy systems)'
80
+ code: |
81
+ jobs:
82
+ test-with-db:
83
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
84
+ steps:
85
+ - name: Get runner IP
86
+ id: ip
87
+ run: echo "ip=$(curl -s https://api.ipify.org)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
88
+
89
+ - name: Add runner IP to DB security group
90
+ run: |
91
+ aws ec2 authorize-security-group-ingress \
92
+ --group-id sg-0abc123 \
93
+ --protocol tcp \
94
+ --port 5432 \
95
+ --cidr "${{ steps.ip.outputs.ip }}/32"
96
+
97
+ - name: Run tests
98
+ run: npm test
99
+
100
+ - name: Remove runner IP from security group
101
+ if: always()
102
+ run: |
103
+ aws ec2 revoke-security-group-ingress \
104
+ --group-id sg-0abc123 \
105
+ --protocol tcp \
106
+ --port 5432 \
107
+ --cidr "${{ steps.ip.outputs.ip }}/32"
108
+ prevention:
109
+ - 'Design CI pipelines to use token-based authentication (OIDC, API keys, mTLS) rather than IP allowlisting from the start'
110
+ - 'For AWS: use IAM roles with OIDC (aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials); for Azure: use azure/login with OIDC; for GCP: use google-github-actions/auth with Workload Identity Federation'
111
+ - 'If IP allowlisting is unavoidable, use GitHub Enterprise Cloud with a configured network allowing stable egress IPs'
112
+ - 'Subscribe to GitHub changelog for updates to runner IP range publications — the ranges do expand over time'
113
+ docs:
114
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners#ip-addresses'
115
+ label: 'GitHub-hosted runner IP addresses'
116
+ - url: 'https://api.github.com/meta'
117
+ label: 'GitHub meta API — published actions IP ranges'
118
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-for-github-actions/security-hardening-your-deployments/configuring-openid-connect-in-cloud-providers'
119
+ label: 'Configuring OIDC in cloud providers'
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-082
2
+ title: "pull_request_target checkout defaults to base branch, not PR head"
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - pull_request_target
7
+ - checkout
8
+ - security
9
+ - fork
10
+ - base-branch
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'on:\s*\n\s+pull_request_target'
13
+ flags: 'im'
14
+ - regex: 'pull_request_target'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Workflow runs on base branch code instead of PR contributor changes"
18
+ - "Tests pass on base but fail on PR code with no visible error in logs"
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ When a workflow is triggered by `pull_request_target`, GitHub Actions runs the workflow
21
+ from the TARGET repository's base branch — not the contributor's PR head. This is
22
+ intentional: `pull_request_target` provides write-level token access (for labeling,
23
+ commenting, posting status checks), so GitHub protects secrets by refusing to run
24
+ untrusted fork code with elevated permissions.
25
+
26
+ As a result, `actions/checkout` checks out `github.sha`, which resolves to the merge
27
+ base commit on the target branch. Any tests, linting, or code analysis in this
28
+ workflow validate the base branch, not the contributor's changes. The workflow
29
+ succeeds silently while testing the wrong code.
30
+ fix: |
31
+ Option 1 (recommended — safe): Use `pull_request` (not `pull_request_target`) for
32
+ running PR code. `pull_request` triggers run with read-only tokens and check out the
33
+ PR head by default. Use `pull_request_target` only for privileged actions like posting
34
+ comments or labels.
35
+
36
+ Option 2 (explicit checkout — use with caution): Explicitly check out the PR head
37
+ using `github.event.pull_request.head.sha`. Only do this if you fully trust all
38
+ contributors and understand that fork code will execute with the repository write token.
39
+ fix_code:
40
+ - language: yaml
41
+ label: "Recommended: use pull_request for code execution, pull_request_target for privileged writes"
42
+ code: |
43
+ # Workflow 1: run tests on PR code (read-only, safe for forks)
44
+ on:
45
+ pull_request:
46
+ branches: [main]
47
+
48
+ jobs:
49
+ test:
50
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
51
+ steps:
52
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
53
+ # Checks out PR head automatically — no ref: override needed
54
+ - run: npm test
55
+
56
+ ---
57
+ # Workflow 2: post labels (write access via pull_request_target)
58
+ on:
59
+ pull_request_target:
60
+ types: [opened]
61
+
62
+ jobs:
63
+ label:
64
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
65
+ permissions:
66
+ pull-requests: write
67
+ steps:
68
+ - uses: actions/labeler@v5
69
+ # Never runs contributor code here — only labels the PR
70
+ - language: yaml
71
+ label: "If you must run PR code under pull_request_target (risky)"
72
+ code: |
73
+ on:
74
+ pull_request_target:
75
+ branches: [main]
76
+
77
+ jobs:
78
+ test:
79
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
80
+ steps:
81
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
82
+ with:
83
+ ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
84
+ # WARNING: executes untrusted fork code with write-level token
85
+ prevention:
86
+ - "Use pull_request (not pull_request_target) for workflows that run code — pull_request tokens are read-only and checkout the PR head correctly by default"
87
+ - "Reserve pull_request_target for privileged write-only actions: posting comments, applying labels, updating statuses — never checkout and execute untrusted PR code in these workflows"
88
+ - "If CI consistently passes but reviewers find bugs tests should catch, verify which commit your checkout step is using by printing github.sha vs github.event.pull_request.head.sha"
89
+ docs:
90
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target"
91
+ label: "pull_request_target event — security considerations"
92
+ - url: "https://securitylab.github.com/research/github-actions-preventing-pwn-requests/"
93
+ label: "GitHub Security Lab: Preventing pwn requests (pull_request_target risks)"
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-083
2
+ title: "matrix strategy fail-fast true by default silently cancels all remaining jobs on first failure"
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - matrix
7
+ - fail-fast
8
+ - cancellation
9
+ - strategy
10
+ - parallel-jobs
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'strategy:\s*\n\s+matrix:'
13
+ flags: 'im'
14
+ - regex: 'Some jobs were not executed because a previous required job failed'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Some jobs were not executed because a previous required job failed"
18
+ - "Skipping this step because a previous step failed or the workflow was cancelled"
19
+ - "This job was cancelled because another job in the workflow failed"
20
+ root_cause: |
21
+ GitHub Actions matrix strategy has `fail-fast: true` as the default. When any single
22
+ matrix job fails, GitHub immediately cancels all remaining in-progress and queued
23
+ matrix jobs from the same workflow run.
24
+
25
+ This means:
26
+ - You only see the failure from the first (or earliest) failing matrix combination
27
+ - All other combinations — whether they would pass or fail — are cancelled immediately
28
+ - The workflow summary shows cancelled jobs with no diagnostic information
29
+ - Developers may spend time fixing the first failure only to discover a second unrelated
30
+ failure in a different matrix combination afterward
31
+
32
+ Many developers set up matrix builds specifically to validate across multiple
33
+ OS/language version combinations and expect every combination to run to completion.
34
+ fix: |
35
+ Explicitly set `fail-fast: false` in your matrix strategy to allow all matrix jobs to
36
+ run to completion regardless of individual failures. This provides a complete picture
37
+ of which matrix combinations are broken.
38
+ fix_code:
39
+ - language: yaml
40
+ label: "Set fail-fast: false to run all matrix combinations to completion"
41
+ code: |
42
+ jobs:
43
+ test:
44
+ strategy:
45
+ fail-fast: false # default is true — set false for full matrix visibility
46
+ matrix:
47
+ os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, macos-latest]
48
+ node: [18, 20, 22]
49
+ runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
50
+ steps:
51
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
52
+ - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
53
+ with:
54
+ node-version: ${{ matrix.node }}
55
+ - run: npm test
56
+ prevention:
57
+ - "Always explicitly set fail-fast: false when you want all matrix combinations to run — for example when building cross-platform or cross-version compatibility matrices"
58
+ - "The default fail-fast: true is intentional for workflows where you only care about any single failure (saves CI minutes), but must be changed when you need full failure visibility"
59
+ - "If matrix jobs are silently cancelled and show no error output, check whether fail-fast: true (or its absence — the default) is the cause"
60
+ docs:
61
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstrategyfail-fast"
62
+ label: "jobs.<job_id>.strategy.fail-fast documentation"
63
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstrategymatrix"
64
+ label: "Matrix strategy documentation"
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-084
2
+ title: "github.sha on pull_request event is the ephemeral merge commit SHA, not the PR head commit"
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - github-sha
7
+ - pull_request
8
+ - merge-commit
9
+ - docker
10
+ - tagging
11
+ - status-checks
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: '\$\{\{\s*github\.sha\s*\}\}'
14
+ flags: 'i'
15
+ - regex: 'github\.sha'
16
+ flags: 'i'
17
+ error_messages:
18
+ - "Docker image tagged with SHA not found in git history"
19
+ - "Deployment status does not appear on the PR commit"
20
+ - "Commit status check not visible on pull request"
21
+ root_cause: |
22
+ On `pull_request` events, `github.sha` is NOT the PR branch's head commit SHA. It is
23
+ the SHA of a temporary merge commit that GitHub creates automatically to simulate
24
+ "what would happen if this PR were merged right now." This ephemeral merge commit:
25
+
26
+ - Does NOT appear in the repository's git history
27
+ - Changes every time the base branch advances, even with no new PR commits
28
+ - Is not accessible via normal git operations outside the workflow run
29
+
30
+ Consequences developers hit in the wild:
31
+ - Docker images tagged with `github.sha` have tags that don't correspond to any real
32
+ commit, making rollbacks and tracing impossible
33
+ - Commit status checks or deployment markers posted to `github.sha` don't appear on
34
+ any commit in the PR and are effectively invisible to reviewers
35
+ - Scripts that fetch the commit from the API using github.sha return 404
36
+
37
+ The actual PR head commit SHA is available via `github.event.pull_request.head.sha`.
38
+ fix: |
39
+ Use `github.event.pull_request.head.sha` to get the actual PR head commit on
40
+ pull_request events. For workflows triggered by both push and pull_request, use a
41
+ conditional to select the correct SHA per event type.
42
+ fix_code:
43
+ - language: yaml
44
+ label: "Get the correct SHA for both push and pull_request events"
45
+ code: |
46
+ jobs:
47
+ build:
48
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
49
+ steps:
50
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
51
+
52
+ - name: Resolve commit SHA
53
+ id: sha
54
+ run: |
55
+ if [ "${{ github.event_name }}" = "pull_request" ]; then
56
+ echo "value=${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
57
+ else
58
+ echo "value=${{ github.sha }}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
59
+ fi
60
+
61
+ - name: Tag Docker image with correct SHA
62
+ run: |
63
+ docker build -t myapp:${{ steps.sha.outputs.value }} .
64
+ docker push myapp:${{ steps.sha.outputs.value }}
65
+ - language: yaml
66
+ label: "Post commit status to the correct PR head SHA"
67
+ code: |
68
+ on:
69
+ pull_request:
70
+
71
+ jobs:
72
+ status:
73
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
74
+ steps:
75
+ - name: Post status to actual PR commit
76
+ uses: actions/github-script@v7
77
+ with:
78
+ script: |
79
+ // Use PR head SHA, not github.sha (merge commit)
80
+ await github.rest.repos.createCommitStatus({
81
+ owner: context.repo.owner,
82
+ repo: context.repo.repo,
83
+ sha: context.payload.pull_request.head.sha,
84
+ state: 'success',
85
+ description: 'Build passed',
86
+ context: 'ci/build'
87
+ });
88
+ prevention:
89
+ - "Never tag Docker images or create commit statuses using github.sha on pull_request events — use github.event.pull_request.head.sha for the real PR head"
90
+ - "If deployment statuses or commit checks are missing from PR commits, verify you are not posting them to github.sha (the merge commit)"
91
+ - "The merge commit SHA changes every time the base branch gets new commits, even without new PR activity — this makes github.sha unstable for artifact tagging on PRs"
92
+ docs:
93
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request"
94
+ label: "pull_request event — note on github.sha merge commit"
95
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/accessing-contextual-information-about-workflow-runs#github-context"
96
+ label: "GitHub context — sha property"
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-085
2
+ title: 'actions/checkout does not initialize submodules by default — empty submodule directories silently break builds'
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - checkout
7
+ - submodules
8
+ - git-submodule
9
+ - empty-directory
10
+ - build-failure
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'fatal: not a git repository'
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ - regex: 'No such file or directory'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ - regex: 'cannot open.*No such file or directory'
17
+ flags: 'i'
18
+ error_messages:
19
+ - 'fatal: not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git'
20
+ - 'CMake Error: The source directory "/home/runner/work/repo/vendor/lib" does not appear to contain CMakeLists.txt.'
21
+ - 'error: cannot open include file: ../vendor/lib/include/lib.h: No such file or directory'
22
+ root_cause: |
23
+ actions/checkout defaults to submodules: false, meaning any Git submodules
24
+ defined in .gitmodules are NOT cloned — they appear as empty directories in the
25
+ workspace. There is no warning or error in the checkout step output; it completes
26
+ successfully with exit code 0.
27
+
28
+ Downstream build steps that depend on submodule content then fail with generic
29
+ "file not found" or "not a git repository" errors that point to the submodule
30
+ directory, not to the checkout configuration. This mismatch between where the error
31
+ appears (the build step) and its root cause (the checkout step) makes it
32
+ time-consuming to diagnose, especially for contributors unfamiliar with the repo's
33
+ submodule structure.
34
+
35
+ Affected scenarios include:
36
+ - CMake projects with vendored dependencies as submodules
37
+ - Projects using git submodule for shared library code
38
+ - Repos with submodules for test fixtures or documentation themes
39
+ fix: |
40
+ Add submodules: true (or submodules: 'recursive' for nested submodules) to your
41
+ actions/checkout step. For private submodules, you may also need to set
42
+ token: with a PAT that has access to the submodule repositories — the default
43
+ GITHUB_TOKEN only has access to the current repository.
44
+ fix_code:
45
+ - language: yaml
46
+ label: 'Initialize submodules during checkout'
47
+ code: |
48
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
49
+ with:
50
+ submodules: true # 'true' for one level, 'recursive' for nested
51
+ # For private submodule repos, provide a PAT with access:
52
+ # token: ${{ secrets.SUBMODULE_PAT }}
53
+ - language: yaml
54
+ label: 'Recursive submodules for nested submodule trees'
55
+ code: |
56
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
57
+ with:
58
+ submodules: 'recursive'
59
+ fetch-depth: 0 # Full history if submodule pinning requires it
60
+ prevention:
61
+ - 'Add submodules: true to actions/checkout in all workflows that build code depending on submodule content'
62
+ - 'Add a verification step after checkout to confirm critical submodule paths are non-empty: test -f vendor/lib/README.md'
63
+ - 'Document submodule requirements in your repo README and CONTRIBUTING.md'
64
+ - 'If the submodule repo is private, use a GitHub App token or fine-grained PAT — the default GITHUB_TOKEN cannot access other repositories'
65
+ docs:
66
+ - url: 'https://github.com/actions/checkout#usage'
67
+ label: 'actions/checkout — submodules input reference'
68
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/using-submodules-in-workflows'
69
+ label: 'Using submodules in GitHub Actions workflows'
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
1
+ id: triggers-060
2
+ title: 'pull_request workflow not re-triggered when PR title or description is edited'
3
+ category: triggers
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - pull_request
7
+ - edited
8
+ - pr-title
9
+ - types
10
+ - conventional-commits
11
+ - status-check
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'on:\s*\n\s*pull_request:\s*\n(?:(?!\s*types:).*\n)*'
14
+ flags: 'ms'
15
+ error_messages: []
16
+ root_cause: |
17
+ The default pull_request event types are [opened, synchronize, reopened]. The
18
+ "edited" activity type — which fires when the PR title, body, or base branch is
19
+ changed — is NOT included in the default set. Workflows that validate PR titles
20
+ (e.g., enforcing Conventional Commits format, ticket-number requirements, or length
21
+ limits) will never re-run when a contributor fixes the PR title after an initial
22
+ failure.
23
+
24
+ This creates a persistent UX problem: the required status check shows as failed
25
+ after the title is corrected, and the PR cannot be merged without manually
26
+ re-running the workflow or pushing a new commit. The fix is visible in the GitHub
27
+ UI and source, but the root cause is non-obvious — nothing in the failure log
28
+ indicates the workflow won't respond to a title edit.
29
+ fix: |
30
+ Add "edited" to the pull_request types list for any workflow that validates PR
31
+ metadata (title, description, or target branch). The "edited" type also fires on
32
+ body changes and base branch changes, which is typically harmless for title-checking
33
+ workflows. Do not add "edited" to workflows that trigger expensive CI operations
34
+ unless you intend them to run on every title/body change.
35
+ fix_code:
36
+ - language: yaml
37
+ label: 'Add edited type to re-run on PR title changes'
38
+ code: |
39
+ on:
40
+ pull_request:
41
+ types:
42
+ - opened
43
+ - synchronize
44
+ - reopened
45
+ - edited # Re-run when PR title or description is changed
46
+
47
+ jobs:
48
+ lint-pr-title:
49
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
50
+ steps:
51
+ - uses: amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v5
52
+ env:
53
+ GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
54
+ - language: yaml
55
+ label: 'Conditional execution — only validate title on edited events'
56
+ code: |
57
+ on:
58
+ pull_request:
59
+ types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, edited]
60
+
61
+ jobs:
62
+ check-title:
63
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
64
+ steps:
65
+ - name: Validate PR title format
66
+ if: >
67
+ github.event_name == 'pull_request' &&
68
+ (github.event.action == 'opened' ||
69
+ github.event.action == 'edited' ||
70
+ github.event.action == 'reopened')
71
+ run: |
72
+ TITLE="${{ github.event.pull_request.title }}"
73
+ if ! echo "$TITLE" | grep -qP '^(feat|fix|docs|chore|refactor|test|ci)(\(.+\))?: .+'; then
74
+ echo "PR title does not follow Conventional Commits format: $TITLE"
75
+ exit 1
76
+ fi
77
+ prevention:
78
+ - 'Always include "edited" in pull_request types when the workflow validates PR title or description format'
79
+ - 'Test that your PR title validation workflow re-runs when you edit the title — do not assume it does'
80
+ - 'Document required PR title format in CONTRIBUTING.md so contributors know title edits (not just new commits) trigger re-checks'
81
+ - 'Consider adding a job summary or annotation with the exact format requirement when validation fails'
82
+ docs:
83
+ - url: 'https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request'
84
+ label: 'pull_request event — activity types reference'
85
+ - url: 'https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request'
86
+ label: 'action-semantic-pull-request (popular PR title lint action)'
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
1
+ id: yaml-syntax-056
2
+ title: "env context unavailable inside with: inputs of uses: steps"
3
+ category: yaml-syntax
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - env-context
7
+ - with-inputs
8
+ - uses
9
+ - expression-context
10
+ - action-inputs
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: "Unrecognized named-value: 'env'"
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ - regex: 'Invalid workflow file.*Unrecognized named-value'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Unrecognized named-value: 'env'. Located at position 1 within expression: env.MY_VAR"
18
+ - "Invalid workflow file: .github/workflows/ci.yml (Line 14, Col 15): Unrecognized named-value: 'env'"
19
+ - "The workflow is not valid. .github/workflows/build.yml: Unrecognized named-value: 'env'"
20
+ root_cause: |
21
+ The `env` context is NOT available inside the `with:` input block of a `uses:` step.
22
+ GitHub Actions evaluates `uses:` step inputs using a restricted set of contexts, and
23
+ `env` is explicitly excluded because env var values may depend on previous step
24
+ outputs (which are also unavailable at `with:` evaluation time).
25
+
26
+ Contexts available in `with:` inputs: `github`, `needs`, `strategy`, `matrix`,
27
+ `secrets`, `inputs`, `vars`, and `steps` (but only from previously completed steps).
28
+ The `env` context, `runner` context, and job-level env vars are all unavailable.
29
+
30
+ This catches developers who define env vars at the workflow or job level and then try
31
+ to pass them as action inputs, which fails with "Unrecognized named-value: 'env'".
32
+ fix: |
33
+ Three options:
34
+ 1. Reference the value directly (hardcoded or via a different supported context)
35
+ 2. Use `vars` context (repository/org variables) — available in `with:` blocks
36
+ 3. Capture the env value in a prior step's GITHUB_OUTPUT and reference it via
37
+ `steps.<id>.outputs.<name>` in the subsequent `uses:` step
38
+ fix_code:
39
+ - language: yaml
40
+ label: "Wrong: env context in with: inputs (causes parse error)"
41
+ code: |
42
+ env:
43
+ API_URL: https://api.example.com
44
+
45
+ jobs:
46
+ deploy:
47
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
48
+ steps:
49
+ - uses: my-org/deploy-action@v1
50
+ with:
51
+ url: ${{ env.API_URL }} # ERROR: Unrecognized named-value: 'env'
52
+ - language: yaml
53
+ label: "Fix option A: use vars context (repository variable)"
54
+ code: |
55
+ # Set API_URL as a repository variable in Settings > Secrets and variables > Variables
56
+ jobs:
57
+ deploy:
58
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
59
+ steps:
60
+ - uses: my-org/deploy-action@v1
61
+ with:
62
+ url: ${{ vars.API_URL }} # vars context IS available in with:
63
+ - language: yaml
64
+ label: "Fix option B: capture in prior step output, reference via steps context"
65
+ code: |
66
+ env:
67
+ API_URL: https://api.example.com
68
+
69
+ jobs:
70
+ deploy:
71
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
72
+ steps:
73
+ - id: config
74
+ run: echo "api_url=$API_URL" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
75
+
76
+ - uses: my-org/deploy-action@v1
77
+ with:
78
+ url: ${{ steps.config.outputs.api_url }} # steps context IS available
79
+ prevention:
80
+ - "In with: inputs, only use: github, needs, strategy, matrix, secrets, inputs, vars, and steps (from prior completed steps) — never env or runner"
81
+ - "For static configuration values, prefer repository variables (vars context) over env — vars are available everywhere env is not"
82
+ - "If you need a dynamically computed value (from a script or env var) in a with: block, capture it to GITHUB_OUTPUT in a prior step and reference via steps.<id>.outputs"
83
+ docs:
84
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/accessing-contextual-information-about-workflow-runs#context-availability"
85
+ label: "Context availability table — which contexts are valid per syntax location"
86
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstepswith"
87
+ label: "jobs.<job_id>.steps[*].with syntax documentation"
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@htekdev/actions-debugger",
3
- "version": "1.0.88",
3
+ "version": "1.0.90",
4
4
  "description": "65+ real GitHub Actions errors, queryable by agents. CLI + MCP server + Copilot skills + error database.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "main": "./dist/index.js",