@htekdev/actions-debugger 1.0.79 → 1.0.81

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
1
+ id: caching-artifacts-046
2
+ title: "actions/cache exact key hit skips save step — caches go stale when dependency hash doesn't change"
3
+ category: caching-artifacts
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - cache
7
+ - save-always
8
+ - cache-hit
9
+ - stale-cache
10
+ - cache-invalidation
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'Cache hit occurred on the primary key'
13
+ flags: i
14
+ - regex: 'Not saving cache'
15
+ flags: i
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Cache hit occurred on the primary key, not saving cache."
18
+ - "Not saving cache as it is not requested."
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ When actions/cache finds an exact match for the primary key, it sets
21
+ cache-hit: 'true' and the post-step save is skipped entirely. The rationale is
22
+ that since the key already exists, re-saving an identical entry would be wasteful.
23
+
24
+ However, this behaviour means that cache content changes that do NOT affect the
25
+ hash (e.g., transitive package security patches, tool binary updates, or
26
+ generated files included in the cached path) are never persisted. The cache
27
+ entry stays frozen at the state it was in when the key was first saved.
28
+
29
+ Common scenario: a workflow caches node_modules keyed on package-lock.json hash.
30
+ The lock file goes unchanged for weeks, but npm packages receive silent patch
31
+ updates or a cached binary becomes corrupt. Every run gets a cache hit, skips the
32
+ save, and the stale or corrupt content continues to be served until the lock file
33
+ hash finally changes.
34
+ fix: |
35
+ Set save-always: true on the cache step to force a save even when the exact key
36
+ already exists. For finer control, split the action into separate
37
+ actions/cache/restore and actions/cache/save steps so the save can run
38
+ conditionally. To immediately invalidate a specific cache entry, delete it via
39
+ the GitHub REST API or the Actions UI under Repository > Actions > Caches.
40
+ fix_code:
41
+ - language: yaml
42
+ label: "Force save on every run with save-always"
43
+ code: |
44
+ - name: Cache node_modules
45
+ uses: actions/cache@v4
46
+ with:
47
+ path: node_modules
48
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
49
+ restore-keys: ${{ runner.os }}-node-
50
+ # Always save even if exact key already exists in the cache
51
+ save-always: true
52
+
53
+ - language: yaml
54
+ label: "Split restore and save for conditional save logic"
55
+ code: |
56
+ - name: Restore cache
57
+ id: cache-restore
58
+ uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
59
+ with:
60
+ path: node_modules
61
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
62
+ restore-keys: ${{ runner.os }}-node-
63
+
64
+ - name: Install dependencies
65
+ run: npm ci
66
+
67
+ - name: Save cache
68
+ uses: actions/cache/save@v4
69
+ if: always()
70
+ with:
71
+ path: node_modules
72
+ key: ${{ steps.cache-restore.outputs.cache-primary-key }}
73
+ prevention:
74
+ - "Use save-always: true when cached content may diverge from the hash key (e.g., tool caches, binary downloads)."
75
+ - "Periodically evict stale cache entries via the GitHub REST API DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/caches/{cache_id}."
76
+ - "Include a tool version or date component in the cache key when the content should rotate on a schedule."
77
+ docs:
78
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/caching-dependencies-to-speed-up-workflows"
79
+ label: "GitHub Actions: Caching dependencies"
80
+ - url: "https://github.com/actions/cache#save-always"
81
+ label: "actions/cache README: save-always option"
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
1
+ id: caching-artifacts-048
2
+ title: "actions/cache lookup-only: true checks cache existence but does NOT restore files"
3
+ category: caching-artifacts
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - cache
7
+ - lookup-only
8
+ - cache-hit
9
+ - restore
10
+ - silent-no-op
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'lookup-only.*true'
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ - regex: 'Cache found and can be restored from key'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Cache found and can be restored from key: node-modules-abc123"
18
+ - "lookup-only is set, skipping restore."
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ The lookup-only: true input on actions/cache@v4 instructs the action to query
21
+ the cache service and report whether an entry exists (via the cache-hit output)
22
+ without transferring any data to the runner. No files are downloaded or written
23
+ to disk.
24
+
25
+ Developers who add lookup-only: true hoping to get a "lightweight restore that
26
+ skips the upload post-step" receive a misleading green step. The cache-hit output
27
+ reports 'true', the step log says "Cache found and can be restored from key",
28
+ and everything looks successful — but the working directory is empty.
29
+ Subsequent build steps that depend on the cached files fail with cryptic errors
30
+ (missing executables, import errors, or blank node_modules) that appear unrelated
31
+ to caching.
32
+
33
+ The intended use case for lookup-only is a two-job pipeline: Job A checks if the
34
+ cache exists (lookup-only: true) and, if not, builds and saves it; Job B restores
35
+ normally. It is NOT a performance shortcut for regular restore-and-save workflows.
36
+ fix: |
37
+ Remove lookup-only: true from any step that should actually restore cached files.
38
+ Use lookup-only: true only in a dedicated pre-check job that gates whether an
39
+ expensive build step needs to run, combined with a normal actions/cache step in
40
+ the subsequent job that performs the real restore.
41
+ fix_code:
42
+ - language: yaml
43
+ label: "Remove lookup-only for normal cache restore (most cases)"
44
+ code: |
45
+ - name: Restore node_modules cache
46
+ id: cache
47
+ uses: actions/cache@v4
48
+ with:
49
+ path: node_modules
50
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
51
+ restore-keys: ${{ runner.os }}-node-
52
+ # Do NOT set lookup-only: true here — files must be restored
53
+ - language: yaml
54
+ label: "Correct pattern: lookup-only in check job, real restore in build job"
55
+ code: |
56
+ jobs:
57
+ check-cache:
58
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
59
+ outputs:
60
+ cache-hit: ${{ steps.lookup.outputs.cache-hit }}
61
+ steps:
62
+ - id: lookup
63
+ uses: actions/cache@v4
64
+ with:
65
+ path: node_modules
66
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
67
+ lookup-only: true # only check — no download
68
+
69
+ build:
70
+ needs: check-cache
71
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
72
+ steps:
73
+ - uses: actions/cache@v4
74
+ with:
75
+ path: node_modules
76
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
77
+ # no lookup-only — restores files and saves after build
78
+ - if: needs.check-cache.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
79
+ run: npm ci
80
+ prevention:
81
+ - "Only use lookup-only: true in a dedicated cache-check job that feeds a conditional build gate."
82
+ - "After using lookup-only, always follow up with a standard actions/cache step (no lookup-only) in the job that needs the files."
83
+ - "If you want to skip the post-step cache save, use actions/cache/restore instead of setting lookup-only: true."
84
+ docs:
85
+ - url: "https://github.com/actions/cache#inputs"
86
+ label: "actions/cache README: inputs including lookup-only"
87
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/caching-dependencies-to-speed-up-workflows"
88
+ label: "GitHub Actions: Caching dependencies"
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
1
+ id: caching-artifacts-047
2
+ title: "Re-run job fails with 'artifact already exists' when artifact name includes github.run_id"
3
+ category: caching-artifacts
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - upload-artifact
7
+ - re-run
8
+ - run_id
9
+ - run_attempt
10
+ - artifact-name
11
+ - collision
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'An artifact with this name already exists on the workflow run'
14
+ flags: 'i'
15
+ - regex: 'Unable to upload artifact.*already exists'
16
+ flags: 'i'
17
+ error_messages:
18
+ - "An artifact with this name already exists on the workflow run."
19
+ - "Unable to upload artifact: An artifact with this name already exists on the run."
20
+ root_cause: |
21
+ github.run_id identifies a workflow run and remains the same value across all
22
+ re-run attempts triggered from the GitHub UI or REST API. When an artifact name
23
+ is constructed using github.run_id (e.g., my-build-${{ github.run_id }}), the
24
+ first attempt uploads successfully. If the job fails and is re-run, the re-run
25
+ attempt tries to create an artifact with the identical name on the same run.
26
+
27
+ actions/upload-artifact@v4 enforces unique artifact names per run as a hard
28
+ error (changed from v3 which silently overwrote). The re-run therefore fails
29
+ immediately with "artifact already exists" before any meaningful work is done.
30
+
31
+ Teams reach for run_id because it appears to be a unique-per-execution
32
+ identifier. It is not: it is unique per workflow trigger, stable across all
33
+ re-run attempts within that trigger.
34
+ fix: |
35
+ Append github.run_attempt to the artifact name. run_attempt starts at 1 and
36
+ increments for each re-run of the same run_id, making the combined value unique
37
+ across attempts. Consumers of the artifact (download steps, workflow_run
38
+ triggers) must include run_attempt in their own references to locate the
39
+ correct artifact.
40
+ fix_code:
41
+ - language: yaml
42
+ label: "Include run_attempt to make artifact name unique across re-runs"
43
+ code: |
44
+ - name: Upload build artifact
45
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
46
+ with:
47
+ # run_attempt increments on each re-run, preventing name collision
48
+ name: my-build-${{ github.run_id }}-${{ github.run_attempt }}
49
+ path: dist/
50
+ - language: yaml
51
+ label: "Download the matching artifact in a downstream job"
52
+ code: |
53
+ - name: Download build artifact
54
+ uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
55
+ with:
56
+ name: my-build-${{ github.run_id }}-${{ github.run_attempt }}
57
+ path: dist/
58
+ prevention:
59
+ - "Never use github.run_id alone as an artifact name uniqueness guarantee — it is stable across all re-runs of the same run."
60
+ - "Combine github.run_id with github.run_attempt to produce a name that is unique within a run AND across re-run attempts."
61
+ - "Use a matrix value or job name as the differentiator instead of run_id when the artifact is consumed by a job in the same workflow."
62
+ - "Check the GitHub UI Actions > Artifacts list to inspect existing artifact names before debugging re-run failures."
63
+ docs:
64
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts"
65
+ label: "GitHub Actions: Storing workflow data as artifacts"
66
+ - url: "https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact#not-uploading-to-the-same-artifact"
67
+ label: "actions/upload-artifact: unique artifact names per run"
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
1
+ id: concurrency-timing-040
2
+ title: "workflow_dispatch and push share concurrency group, dispatch cancels in-progress CI"
3
+ category: concurrency-timing
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - concurrency
7
+ - workflow-dispatch
8
+ - push
9
+ - cancel-in-progress
10
+ - event-name
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'This run was cancelled'
13
+ flags: i
14
+ - regex: 'concurrency.*workflow_dispatch|workflow_dispatch.*concurrency'
15
+ flags: ims
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "This run was cancelled."
18
+ - "A run for this workflow is already in progress."
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ When a concurrency group key is built from github.workflow and github.ref alone,
21
+ both workflow_dispatch and push events on the same branch produce an identical key.
22
+ GitHub treats them as competing occupants of the same concurrency slot.
23
+
24
+ With cancel-in-progress: true, a manually dispatched run immediately cancels any
25
+ push-triggered CI run already in progress (or vice versa). Without cancel-in-progress,
26
+ the dispatch run queues behind the push run but still competes for the same slot.
27
+
28
+ This catches developers off guard when they manually trigger a workflow for
29
+ debugging while CI is running — the in-progress CI run is silently cancelled. Or a
30
+ push to the same branch during a long dispatch run causes the dispatch to be evicted.
31
+ fix: |
32
+ Include github.event_name in the concurrency group key to give workflow_dispatch
33
+ and push events separate concurrency slots. Alternatively, use a conditional
34
+ cancel-in-progress expression so manual dispatches are never cancelled.
35
+ fix_code:
36
+ - language: yaml
37
+ label: "Include event_name to separate dispatch and push slots"
38
+ code: |
39
+ # WRONG: dispatch and push on same branch share a slot and cancel each other
40
+ # concurrency:
41
+ # group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
42
+ # cancel-in-progress: true
43
+
44
+ # CORRECT: each event type gets its own concurrency slot
45
+ concurrency:
46
+ group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event_name }}-${{ github.ref }}
47
+ cancel-in-progress: true
48
+
49
+ - language: yaml
50
+ label: "Alternative: only cancel-in-progress for push and pull_request, not dispatch"
51
+ code: |
52
+ concurrency:
53
+ group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
54
+ # Manual dispatches are never cancelled; push/PR runs are stacked-and-cancelled
55
+ cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.event_name != 'workflow_dispatch' }}
56
+ prevention:
57
+ - "Always include github.event_name in concurrency group keys when a workflow has multiple trigger events."
58
+ - "Test concurrency behavior by triggering both events in quick succession; bugs only surface under race conditions."
59
+ - "For release or deploy workflows, consider separate workflows for dispatch vs automated CI rather than sharing concurrency."
60
+ docs:
61
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#concurrency"
62
+ label: "GitHub Actions: Concurrency syntax"
63
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_dispatch"
64
+ label: "GitHub Actions: workflow_dispatch event"
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
1
+ id: permissions-auth-048
2
+ title: "Dependabot PR workflows cannot access repository secrets — only Dependabot secrets are injected"
3
+ category: permissions-auth
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - dependabot
7
+ - secrets
8
+ - pull-request
9
+ - registry-auth
10
+ - secret-isolation
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'Input required and not supplied'
13
+ flags: i
14
+ - regex: '401 Unauthorized'
15
+ flags: i
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Error: Input required and not supplied: token"
18
+ - "npm ERR! code E401"
19
+ - "Error: Unauthorized"
20
+ root_cause: |
21
+ When Dependabot opens or updates a pull request, GitHub Actions workflows triggered
22
+ by that PR run in an isolated secret context. Repository secrets (defined under
23
+ Settings > Secrets and variables > Actions) are NOT injected into Dependabot-triggered
24
+ workflow runs. Only secrets defined under Settings > Secrets and variables > Dependabot
25
+ are available.
26
+
27
+ This means steps that reference secrets.NPM_TOKEN, secrets.DOCKER_PASSWORD,
28
+ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN, or any custom repository secret will receive an empty string.
29
+ Actions that validate their inputs (e.g., a custom action with required: true on a
30
+ token input) will fail with "Input required and not supplied". Registry steps will
31
+ fail with 401 Unauthorized.
32
+
33
+ GITHUB_TOKEN is exempt and is still injected normally for Dependabot runs.
34
+ fix: |
35
+ Re-create the required secrets under Settings > Secrets and variables > Dependabot
36
+ (a separate namespace from Actions secrets). Dependabot reads from its own secret
37
+ store, not the repository Actions secret store. Alternatively, restructure the
38
+ workflow so secret-dependent steps only run on non-Dependabot actors using an
39
+ if: condition.
40
+ fix_code:
41
+ - language: yaml
42
+ label: "Add secrets to Dependabot secret store in GitHub UI"
43
+ code: |
44
+ # In GitHub: Settings > Secrets and variables > Dependabot
45
+ # Add the same secret names you use in your Actions secrets.
46
+ # They are stored separately and only injected for Dependabot-triggered runs.
47
+
48
+ # No workflow YAML change required — just add the secret in the UI.
49
+ # Example workflow remains unchanged:
50
+ jobs:
51
+ build:
52
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
53
+ steps:
54
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
55
+ - run: npm publish
56
+ env:
57
+ NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }} # Works once added to Dependabot secrets
58
+
59
+ - language: yaml
60
+ label: "Skip secret-dependent steps when actor is dependabot"
61
+ code: |
62
+ jobs:
63
+ build:
64
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
65
+ steps:
66
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
67
+ - name: Publish to registry
68
+ # Skip publish step for Dependabot PRs that lack the token
69
+ if: github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]'
70
+ run: npm publish
71
+ env:
72
+ NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}
73
+ prevention:
74
+ - "Maintain parallel secrets under both Actions and Dependabot secret stores for tokens Dependabot PRs need."
75
+ - "Audit workflows triggered by pull_request to identify steps using custom secrets — they silently fail for Dependabot."
76
+ - "Use github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' guards on publish/deploy steps that Dependabot PRs should skip."
77
+ docs:
78
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/working-with-dependabot/automating-dependabot-with-github-actions#accessing-secrets"
79
+ label: "GitHub Docs: Accessing secrets in Dependabot workflows"
80
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/working-with-dependabot/configuring-access-to-private-registries-for-dependabot"
81
+ label: "GitHub Docs: Dependabot and private registries"
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-075
2
+ title: "if: failure() notification job is skipped when workflow is manually cancelled"
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - if-condition
7
+ - failure
8
+ - cancelled
9
+ - always
10
+ - notification
11
+ - cleanup
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'if:\s*failure\(\)'
14
+ flags: 'i'
15
+ - regex: 'Skipping.*cancelled'
16
+ flags: 'i'
17
+ error_messages:
18
+ - "Skipping: The job was skipped because one or more of its needs jobs was cancelled."
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ When a workflow is manually cancelled (via the GitHub UI "Cancel run" button or
21
+ the REST API), in-progress jobs receive a cancellation signal. Jobs that have not
22
+ yet started are given the conclusion "cancelled". Jobs with if: failure() are
23
+ only evaluated against the "failure" conclusion — "cancelled" is a distinct
24
+ conclusion value. Because cancelled != failure, the condition evaluates to false
25
+ and the notification or cleanup job is silently skipped.
26
+
27
+ This catches teams by surprise when they add an alerting job intended to fire
28
+ whenever CI does not succeed:
29
+
30
+ notify-on-failure:
31
+ needs: build
32
+ if: failure()
33
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
34
+ steps:
35
+ - name: Send Slack alert
36
+ ...
37
+
38
+ When an operator cancels a run mid-flight, the build job is marked cancelled,
39
+ not failed. The notify job evaluates if: failure() → false and is skipped with
40
+ no Slack message. The on-call team receives no signal that a run was interrupted.
41
+
42
+ The failure() function returns true only when at least one needed job has a
43
+ "failure" conclusion. It does NOT return true for "cancelled" conclusions.
44
+ fix: |
45
+ Use if: failure() || cancelled() to catch both failure and cancellation, or use
46
+ if: always() combined with a conditional check on the job's outcome inside the
47
+ step if you only want to act on non-success outcomes.
48
+ fix_code:
49
+ - language: yaml
50
+ label: "Catch both failure and cancellation in a notification job"
51
+ code: |
52
+ jobs:
53
+ build:
54
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
55
+ steps:
56
+ - run: make build
57
+
58
+ notify-on-failure:
59
+ needs: build
60
+ # failure() catches job failures; cancelled() catches manual cancellation
61
+ if: failure() || cancelled()
62
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
63
+ steps:
64
+ - name: Send failure or cancellation alert
65
+ run: |
66
+ echo "Build concluded: ${{ needs.build.result }}"
67
+ # Send Slack/PagerDuty notification here
68
+ - language: yaml
69
+ label: "Use always() and gate on outcome inside the step for fine-grained control"
70
+ code: |
71
+ jobs:
72
+ build:
73
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
74
+ steps:
75
+ - run: make build
76
+
77
+ notify:
78
+ needs: build
79
+ if: always()
80
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
81
+ steps:
82
+ - name: Notify only on non-success outcomes
83
+ if: needs.build.result != 'success'
84
+ run: |
85
+ echo "Build result: ${{ needs.build.result }}"
86
+ # Handles: failure, cancelled, skipped
87
+ prevention:
88
+ - "Use if: failure() || cancelled() instead of if: failure() for any alert, notification, or cleanup job that must run whenever CI does not succeed."
89
+ - "Prefer if: always() when the downstream job should run regardless of upstream outcome (e.g., always upload test reports)."
90
+ - "Audit all notification and cleanup jobs after cancellation to confirm they fired as expected — cancelled runs don't generate failure alerts by default."
91
+ - "The cancelled() function returns true when the workflow or job has been cancelled; combine with failure() using || for comprehensive coverage."
92
+ docs:
93
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/using-conditions-to-control-job-execution"
94
+ label: "GitHub Actions: Using conditions to control job execution"
95
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/using-conditions-to-control-job-execution#available-status-check-functions"
96
+ label: "GitHub Actions: Available status check functions — failure(), cancelled(), always()"
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
1
+ id: triggers-054
2
+ title: "workflow_dispatch choice input not validated when triggered via REST API — invalid values silently accepted"
3
+ category: triggers
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - workflow-dispatch
7
+ - choice-input
8
+ - rest-api
9
+ - inputs
10
+ - validation
11
+ - gh-cli
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'type:\s*choice'
14
+ flags: 'i'
15
+ - regex: 'inputs\.\w+.*choice'
16
+ flags: 'i'
17
+ error_messages:
18
+ - "Workflow ran with input value not in declared choices list"
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ The type: choice input in on.workflow_dispatch.inputs renders a dropdown
21
+ selector in the GitHub Actions UI and prevents users from submitting values
22
+ outside the declared options list. This validation is enforced entirely
23
+ client-side in the browser.
24
+
25
+ When a workflow is triggered via the GitHub REST API
26
+ (POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/workflows/{id}/dispatches) or the GitHub
27
+ CLI (gh workflow run --field key=value), GitHub does NOT validate that the
28
+ supplied value matches any of the declared choices. Any arbitrary string is
29
+ accepted and forwarded as-is to the workflow.
30
+
31
+ A workflow dispatched with inputs: { environment: "PROD" } when the declared
32
+ choices are ["prod", "staging", "dev"] will run with inputs.environment == "PROD".
33
+ Every if: condition that compares against the lower-case variants evaluates to
34
+ false, all deployment branches are skipped, and the workflow exits successfully
35
+ with no indication that the value was invalid. The mistyped run is invisible
36
+ unless logs are inspected manually.
37
+ fix: |
38
+ Add an explicit allowlist validation step at the top of the workflow that checks
39
+ the input value and exits with a non-zero status and a descriptive error message
40
+ if the value is not in the expected set. This makes API-triggered runs fail fast
41
+ with a clear error rather than silently no-oping.
42
+ fix_code:
43
+ - language: yaml
44
+ label: "Validate choice input with an allowlist check"
45
+ code: |
46
+ on:
47
+ workflow_dispatch:
48
+ inputs:
49
+ environment:
50
+ type: choice
51
+ description: Target deployment environment
52
+ options:
53
+ - prod
54
+ - staging
55
+ - dev
56
+
57
+ jobs:
58
+ deploy:
59
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
60
+ steps:
61
+ - name: Validate environment input
62
+ run: |
63
+ allowed="prod staging dev"
64
+ input="${{ inputs.environment }}"
65
+ if [[ ! " $allowed " =~ " ${input} " ]]; then
66
+ echo "::error::Invalid environment '${input}'. Allowed values: $allowed"
67
+ exit 1
68
+ fi
69
+
70
+ - name: Deploy to ${{ inputs.environment }}
71
+ run: echo "Deploying to ${{ inputs.environment }}"
72
+ - language: yaml
73
+ label: "Case-insensitive validation with normalisation"
74
+ code: |
75
+ - name: Validate and normalise environment input
76
+ id: validate
77
+ run: |
78
+ input=$(echo "${{ inputs.environment }}" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')
79
+ allowed=("prod" "staging" "dev")
80
+ valid=false
81
+ for v in "${allowed[@]}"; do
82
+ [[ "$input" == "$v" ]] && valid=true && break
83
+ done
84
+ if [[ "$valid" != "true" ]]; then
85
+ echo "::error::Unrecognised environment '${{ inputs.environment }}' (normalised: '$input'). Allowed: ${allowed[*]}"
86
+ exit 1
87
+ fi
88
+ echo "environment=$input" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
89
+ prevention:
90
+ - "Treat type: choice as a UI hint only — always validate inputs programmatically inside the workflow."
91
+ - "Add an allowlist guard as the first step of any job that branches on a choice input."
92
+ - "Document valid values and casing rules in the input description field so API callers know the expected format."
93
+ - "Use actionlint to detect misspelled choices at authoring time before they reach production."
94
+ docs:
95
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_dispatch"
96
+ label: "GitHub Actions: workflow_dispatch event — inputs"
97
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflows#create-a-workflow-dispatch-event"
98
+ label: "GitHub REST API: Create a workflow dispatch event"
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
1
+ id: yaml-syntax-050
2
+ title: "secrets context used in job/step if: condition rejected — only valid in env: and with: blocks"
3
+ category: yaml-syntax
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - secrets
7
+ - if-condition
8
+ - expression-context
9
+ - actionlint
10
+ - context-availability
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'Unrecognized named-value: ''secrets'''
13
+ flags: i
14
+ - regex: 'Context access might be invalid: secrets'
15
+ flags: i
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Unrecognized named-value: 'secrets'. Located at position 1 within expression"
18
+ - "Context access might be invalid: secrets"
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ The secrets context is only available inside env: blocks and action input with: blocks.
21
+ It cannot be used in if: conditions at the job or step level.
22
+
23
+ A common pattern is to conditionally run a deployment step only when a secret is
24
+ configured: if: secrets.DEPLOY_TOKEN != ''. GitHub's expression evaluator rejects
25
+ this at runtime with "Unrecognized named-value: 'secrets'", failing the step or job
26
+ before it even starts. actionlint reports this as a static analysis error under
27
+ "Context access might be invalid: secrets".
28
+
29
+ The restriction is documented in GitHub's context availability table: the secrets
30
+ context is listed as unavailable for job.<job_id>.if and steps.<step_id>.if.
31
+ fix: |
32
+ Map the secret to an environment variable in an env: block, then check the
33
+ environment variable in the if: condition using the env context. For a job-level
34
+ gate, set the env var at the job level and reference it in a step if: condition.
35
+ fix_code:
36
+ - language: yaml
37
+ label: "Bridge secret through env var for step-level if:"
38
+ code: |
39
+ # WRONG: secrets context not available in if: conditions
40
+ # - name: Deploy
41
+ # if: secrets.DEPLOY_TOKEN != ''
42
+ # run: ./deploy.sh
43
+
44
+ # CORRECT: map secret to env var, check env var in if:
45
+ - name: Deploy
46
+ if: env.DEPLOY_TOKEN != ''
47
+ env:
48
+ DEPLOY_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_TOKEN }}
49
+ run: ./deploy.sh
50
+
51
+ - language: yaml
52
+ label: "Job-level env gate evaluated in step if:"
53
+ code: |
54
+ jobs:
55
+ deploy:
56
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
57
+ env:
58
+ # Set at job level so all steps can reference it
59
+ DEPLOY_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_TOKEN }}
60
+ steps:
61
+ - name: Deploy
62
+ if: env.DEPLOY_TOKEN != ''
63
+ run: ./deploy.sh
64
+ prevention:
65
+ - "Never reference secrets.* in if: conditions — always bridge through an env: variable first."
66
+ - "Run actionlint in CI to catch 'Context access might be invalid: secrets' errors before they reach production."
67
+ - "Consider using a boolean repository variable (vars.DEPLOY_ENABLED) as a conditional gate rather than checking secret presence."
68
+ docs:
69
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions#context-availability"
70
+ label: "GitHub Actions: Context availability"
71
+ - url: "https://rhysd.github.io/actionlint/checks.html#check-contexts-and-special-functions"
72
+ label: "actionlint: Context availability checks"
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@htekdev/actions-debugger",
3
- "version": "1.0.79",
3
+ "version": "1.0.81",
4
4
  "description": "65+ real GitHub Actions errors, queryable by agents. CLI + MCP server + Copilot skills + error database.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "main": "./dist/index.js",