@holdyourvoice/hyv 2.4.0 → 2.4.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
1
+ # Voice DNA
2
+
3
+ ## Writing Rules
4
+ - Write like a sharp human, not a language model.
5
+ - Use contractions naturally (don't, can't, won't).
6
+ - Short paragraphs. 1-3 sentences max.
7
+ - Get to the point. No throat-clearing, no preamble.
8
+ - If making a claim, be specific. Use numbers, names, concrete details.
9
+ - Vary sentence length. Mix short punchy lines with longer ones.
10
+ - Use natural transitions, not mechanical ones ("Furthermore," "Additionally").
11
+ - When uncertain, say so plainly ("I think," "probably," "kinda"). Hedging is human.
12
+ - Never pad output to seem more thorough. Shorter and accurate beats longer and fluffy.
13
+ - Use physical verbs for abstract processes: "sanded down" not "improved," "bolted on" not "added," "stripped back" not "simplified."
14
+ - Humor comes from specificity, not from jokes. Be unexpectedly precise.
15
+ - Parenthetical asides are good. Use them for editorial commentary, honest reactions, quick tangents, and deflating your own seriousness (like this).
16
+ - Write the way you talk. Naturally.
17
+ - Use short words, short sentences, short paragraphs.
18
+ - Never use jargon. Pretend the reader is smart but unfamiliar with the topic.
19
+ - Read every sentence aloud in your head. If you'd stumble saying it, rewrite it.
20
+ - Be crystal clear about what you want the reader to do next.
21
+
22
+ ## Formatting Rules
23
+ - Short paragraphs (1-2 sentences default, 3 max).
24
+ - Numbers as digits.
25
+ - Contractions always.
26
+ - NO em dashes ever. Use commas, periods, colons, semicolons, or parentheses.
27
+ - Bold sparingly, 1-2 key moments per section.
28
+ - Code blocks for specific prompts, commands, or tool outputs.
29
+
30
+ ## Banned Phrases
31
+
32
+ ### Dead AI Language
33
+ - "In today's [anything]..."
34
+ - "It's important to note that..." / "It's worth noting..."
35
+ - "Delve" / "Dive into" / "Unpack"
36
+ - "Harness" / "Leverage" / "Utilize"
37
+ - "Landscape" / "Realm" / "Robust"
38
+ - "Game-changer" / "Cutting-edge" / "State-of-the-art"
39
+ - "Straightforward"
40
+ - "I'd be happy to help"
41
+ - "In order to"
42
+
43
+ ### Dead Transitions
44
+ - "Furthermore" / "Additionally" / "Moreover"
45
+ - "Moving forward" / "At the end of the day"
46
+ - "To put this in perspective..."
47
+ - "What makes this particularly interesting is..."
48
+ - "The implications here are..."
49
+ - "In other words..."
50
+ - "It goes without saying..."
51
+
52
+ ### Engagement Bait
53
+ - "Let that sink in" / "Read that again" / "Full stop"
54
+ - "This changes everything"
55
+ - "Are you paying attention?"
56
+ - "You're not ready for this"
57
+
58
+ ### AI Cringe
59
+ - "Supercharge" / "Unlock" / "Future-proof"
60
+ - "10x your productivity"
61
+ - "The AI revolution"
62
+ - "In the age of AI"
63
+
64
+ ### Generic Insider Claims
65
+ - "Here's the part nobody's talking about"
66
+ - "What nobody tells you"
67
+ - Anything with "nobody" or "most people don't realize"
68
+
69
+ ### The Big One (FATAL)
70
+ - "This isn't X. This is Y." and ALL variations.
71
+ - "Not X. Y."
72
+ - "Forget X. This is Y."
73
+ - "Less X, more Y."
74
+ - ANY sentence that negates one framing then asserts a corrected one.
75
+ - If even ONE of these appears, the output fails. Delete the negation, just state the positive claim.
76
+
77
+ ### Business Jargon (Ogilvy Rule)
78
+ - "Utilize" / "Leverage" / "Synergy"
79
+ - "Circle back" / "Touch base" / "Take it offline"
80
+ - "Low-hanging fruit" / "Move the needle" / "Bandwidth"
81
+ - "Deep dive" / "Boil the ocean"
82
+
83
+ ## Writing Samples
84
+
85
+ <!-- Paste your writing here. The more you give, the better the voice match.
86
+ Google docs, emails, blog posts, Slack messages, reports.
87
+ Pre-AI writing is best — your voice before it blended with AI defaults. -->
88
+
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: voice-matcher
3
+ description: Use when the user wants to write from their own writing, build a voice profile from samples, match an existing writer's style, or make new copy sound like a project/person without copying generic style advice.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Voice Matcher
7
+
8
+ Build from the writer's own writing. Do not invent a voice from adjectives.
9
+
10
+ ## Source Hierarchy
11
+
12
+ 1. User-provided samples in the conversation.
13
+ 2. Project files the user identifies as their own writing.
14
+ 3. Obvious authored prose in the repo, such as essays, posts, emails, public
15
+ copy, changelog entries, or founder notes.
16
+ 4. `assets/economic-drift-voice.md` only when the user asks for Shashank's or
17
+ "my" voice and no better current samples exist.
18
+
19
+ ## Profile Build
20
+
21
+ Run the portable profiler when files are available:
22
+
23
+ ```bash
24
+ hyv profile \
25
+ --name "project voice" \
26
+ --out .hold-your-voice/voice-profile.json \
27
+ <sample paths>
28
+ ```
29
+
30
+ The profile is a working benchmark, not a literary biography. It should capture:
31
+
32
+ - sentence rhythm
33
+ - paragraph shape
34
+ - openings
35
+ - argument pattern
36
+ - recurring concrete textures
37
+ - things the writer avoids
38
+ - sample anchors that prove the profile
39
+
40
+ ## Writing Method
41
+
42
+ - Start from the user's requested point, not from decorative tone imitation.
43
+ - Use the profile as a constraint system.
44
+ - Match cadence and thinking pattern before vocabulary.
45
+ - Keep the writer's roughness when it is part of the voice.
46
+ - Do not sand the draft into smooth, generic competence.
47
+ - After drafting, run an AI-pattern scan and repair only weak lines.
48
+
49
+ ## Verification
50
+
51
+ Before handing back final copy, ask:
52
+
53
+ - Does the opening sound like a real observation rather than a template?
54
+ - Could this line belong unchanged to five other people? If yes, rewrite it.
55
+ - Are there profile anchors that justify this cadence?
56
+ - Did the rewrite preserve the user's meaning and risk appetite?
57
+