@hienlh/ppm 0.9.80 → 0.9.81

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-persona.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+---
+description: "💡💡 Customer persona management - Args: ['action']"
+---
+
+Create and manage customer personas.
+
+<action>$ARGUMENTS</action>
+
+## Actions
+- `create` - Create new persona
+- `analyze` - Analyze audience data
+- `update [name]` - Update existing persona
+- `list` - List all personas
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. **Parse Action** from `$ARGUMENTS`
+
+2. **Create Workflow**
+   - Use `lead-qualifier` agent for persona definition
+   - Gather via `AskUserQuestion`:
+     - Demographics (age, role, industry)
+     - Pain points and challenges
+     - Goals and motivations
+     - Buying behavior
+     - Preferred channels
+   - Use `researcher` agent for market validation
+   - Activate `content-marketing` skill
+
+3. **Analyze Workflow**
+   - Use `lead-qualifier` agent for audience analysis
+   - Use `analytics-analyst` for behavior data
+   - Identify segments and patterns
+   - Generate insights report
+
+4. **Update Workflow**
+   - Load existing persona
+   - Incorporate new data
+   - Validate changes
+
+5. **Output**
+   - ICP Profiles → `assets/leads/icp-profiles/{persona}.md`
+
+## Agents Used
+- `lead-qualifier` - Audience analysis
+- `researcher` - Market research
+
+## Skills Used
+- `content-marketing` - Persona frameworks
+- `assets-organizing` - Standardized output paths
+
+## Output
+- ICP Profiles → `assets/leads/icp-profiles/{persona}.md`
+
+## Examples
+```
+/persona create
+/persona analyze
+/persona update "Tech Startup Founder"
+/persona list
+```

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-archive.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+---
+description: "Write journal entries and archive specific plans or all plans - Args: [path-to-plan] (default: all plans)"
+---
+
+## Your mission
+Read and analyze the plans, then write journal entries and archive specific plans or all plans in the `plans` directory.
+
+## Plan Resolution
+1. If `$ARGUMENTS` provided → Use that path
+2. Else read all plans in the `plans` directory
+
+## Workflow
+
+### Step 1: Read Plan Files
+
+Read the plan directory:
+- `plan.md` - Overview and phases list
+- `phase-*.md` - 20 first lines of each phase file to understand the progress and status
+
+### Step 2: Summarize the plans and document them with `/journal` slash command
+Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask if user wants to document journal entries or not. 
+Skip this step if user selects "No".
+If user selects "Yes":
+- Analyze the information in previous steps and document them with `/journal` slash command.
+- Execute multiple `/journal` slash commands in parallel as `Task` tool to document all plans.
+- Journal entries should be concise and focused on the most important events, key changes, impacts, and decisions.
+- Keep journal entries in the `./docs/journal/` directory.
+
+### Step 3: Ask user to confirm the action before archiving these plans
+Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask if user wants to proceed with archiving these plans, select specific plans to archive or all completed plans only.
+Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask if user wants to delete permanently or move to the `./plans/archive` directory.
+
+### Step 4: Archive the plans
+Start archiving the plans based on the user's choice:
+- Move the plans to the `./plans/archive` directory.
+- Delete the plans permanently: `rm -rf ./plans/<plan-1> ./plans/<plan-2> ...`
+
+### Step 5: Ask if user wants to commit the changes
+Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask if user wants to commit the changes with these options:
+- Stage and commit the changes (Use `/git:cm` slash command)
+- Commit and push the changes (Use `/git:cp` slash command)
+- Nah, I'll do it later
+
+## Output
+After archiving the plans, provide summary:
+- Number of plans archived 
+- Number of plans deleted permanently
+- Table of plans that are archived or deleted (title, status, created date, LOC)
+- Table of journal entries that are created (title, status, created date, LOC)
+
+## Important Notes
+
+**IMPORTANT:** Only ask questions about genuine decision points - don't manufacture artificial choices.
+**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing outputs.
+**IMPORTANT:** In the last summary report, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
+**IMPORTANT:** Ensure token efficiency while maintaining high quality.

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-ci.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+---
+description: "Analyze Github Actions logs and provide a plan to fix the issues - Args: ['github-actions-url']"
+---
+
+Activate `planning` skill.
+
+## Github Actions URL
+ $ARGUMENTS
+
+Use the `planner` subagent to read the github actions logs, analyze and find the root causes of the issues, then provide a detailed plan for implementing the fixes.
+
+**Plan File Specification:**
+- Every `plan.md` MUST start with YAML frontmatter:
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  title: "{Brief title}"
+  description: "{One sentence for card preview}"
+  status: pending
+  priority: P1
+  effort: {estimated fix time}
+  branch: {current git branch}
+  tags: [ci, bugfix]
+  created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
+  ---
+  ```
+
+**Output:**
+Provide at least 2 implementation approaches with clear trade-offs, and explain the pros and cons of each approach, and provide a recommended approach.
+
+**IMPORTANT:** Ask the user for confirmation before implementing.
+**IMPORTANT:** Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.
+**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing outputs.

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-cro.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+---
+description: "Create a CRO plan for the given content - Args: ['issues']"
+---
+
+You are an expert in conversion optimization. Analyze the content based on the given issues:
+<issues>$ARGUMENTS</issues>
+
+Activate `planning` skill.
+
+**IMPORTANT:** Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.
+**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing outputs.
+
+## Conversion Optimization Framework
+
+1. Headline 4-U Formula: **Useful, Unique, Urgent, Ultra-specific** (80% won't read past this)
+2. Above-Fold Value Proposition: Customer problem focus, no company story, zero scroll required
+3. CTA First-Person Psychology: "Get MY Guide" vs "Get YOUR Guide" (90% more clicks)
+4. 5-Field Form Maximum: Every field kills conversions, progressive profiling for the rest
+5. Message Match Precision: Ad copy, landing page headline, broken promises = bounce
+6. Social Proof Near CTAs: Testimonials with faces/names, results, placed at decision points
+7. Cognitive Bias Stack: Loss aversion (fear), social proof (FOMO), anchoring (pricing)
+8. PAS Copy Framework: Problem > Agitate > Solve, emotion before logic
+9. Genuine Urgency Only: Real deadlines, actual limits, fake timers destroy trust forever
+10. Price Anchoring Display: Show expensive option first, make real price feel like relief
+11. Trust Signal Clustering: Security badges, guarantees, policies all visible together
+12. Visual Hierarchy F-Pattern: Eyes scan F-shape, put conversions in the path
+13. Lead Magnet Hierarchy: Templates > Checklists > Guides (instant > delayed gratification)
+14. Objection Preemption: Address top 3 concerns before they think them, FAQ near CTA
+15. Mobile Thumb Zone: CTAs where thumbs naturally rest, not stretching required
+16. One-Variable Testing: Change one thing, measure impact, compound wins over time
+17. Post-Conversion Momentum: Thank you page sells next step while excitement peaks
+18. Cart Recovery Sequence: Email in 1 hour, retarget in 4 hours, incentive at 24 hours
+19. Reading Level Grade 6: Smart people prefer simple, 11-word sentences, short paragraphs
+20. TOFU/MOFU/BOFU Logic: Awareness content ≠ decision content, match intent precisely
+21. White Space = Focus: Empty space makes CTAs impossible to miss, crowded = confused
+22. Benefit-First Language: Features tell, benefits sell, transformations compel
+23. Micro-Commitment Ladder: Small yes leads to big yes, start with email only
+24. Performance Tracking Stack: Heatmaps show problems, recordings show why, events show what
+25. Weekly Optimization Ritual: Review metrics Monday, test Tuesday, iterate or scale
+
+## Workflow
+
+- If the user provides a screenshots or videos, use `ai-multimodal` skill to describe as detailed as possible the issue, make sure copywriter can fully understand the issue easily based on the description.
+- If the user provides a URL, use `web_fetch` tool to fetch the content of the URL and analyze the current issues.
+- You can use screenshot capture tools along with `ai-multimodal` skill to capture screenshots of the exact parent container and analyze the current issues with the appropriate Gemini analysis skills (`ai-multimodal`, `gemini-video-understanding`, or `gemini-document-processing`).
+- Use `/scout:ext` (preferred) or `/scout` (fallback) slash command to search the codebase for files needed to complete the task
+- Use `planner` agent to create a comprehensive CRO plan following the progressive disclosure structure:
+  - Create a directory using naming pattern from `## Naming` section.
+  - Every `plan.md` MUST start with YAML frontmatter:
+    ```yaml
+    ---
+    title: "{Brief title}"
+    description: "{One sentence for card preview}"
+    status: pending
+    priority: P2
+    effort: {sum of phases, e.g., 4h}
+    branch: {current git branch}
+    tags: [cro, conversion]
+    created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
+    ---
+    ```
+  - Save the overview access point at `plan.md`, keep it generic, under 80 lines, and list each phase with status/progress and links.
+  - For each phase, add `phase-XX-phase-name.md` files containing sections (Context links, Overview with date/priority/statuses, Key Insights, Requirements, Architecture, Related code files, Implementation Steps, Todo list, Success Criteria, Risk Assessment, Security Considerations, Next steps).
+  - Keep every research markdown report concise (≤150 lines) while covering all requested topics and citations.
+- Do not start implementing the CRO plan yet, wait for the user to approve the plan first.
+
+**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports.
+**IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-fast.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+description: "💡💡 No research. Only analyze and create an implementation plan - Args: ['task']"
+---
+
+Think.
+Activate `planning` skill.
+
+## Your mission
+<task>
+$ARGUMENTS
+</task>
+
+## Pre-Creation Check (Active vs Suggested Plan)
+
+Check the `## Plan Context` section in the injected context:
+- If "Plan:" shows a path → Active plan exists. Ask user: "Continue with this? [Y/n]"
+- If "Suggested:" shows a path → Branch-matched hint only. Ask if they want to activate or create new.
+- If "Plan: none" → Create new plan using naming from `## Naming` section.
+
+## Workflow
+Use `planner` subagent to:
+1. If creating new: Create directory using `Plan dir:` from `## Naming` section, then run `node .opencode/scripts/set-active-plan.cjs {plan-dir}`
+   If reusing: Use the active plan path from Plan Context.
+   Make sure you pass the directory path to every subagent during the process.
+2. Follow strictly to the "Plan Creation & Organization" rules of `planning` skill.
+3. Analyze the codebase by reading `codebase-summary.md`, `code-standards.md`, `system-architecture.md` and `project-overview-pdr.md` file.
+4. Gathers all information and create an implementation plan of this task.
+5. Ask user to review the plan.
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+**Plan Directory Structure** (use `Plan dir:` from `## Naming` section)
+```
+{plan-dir}/
+├── reports/
+│   ├── XX-report.md
+│   └── ...
+├── plan.md
+├── phase-XX-phase-name-here.md
+└── ...
+```
+
+**Plan File Specification**
+- Every `plan.md` MUST start with YAML frontmatter:
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  title: "{Brief title}"
+  description: "{One sentence for card preview}"
+  status: pending
+  priority: P2
+  effort: {sum of phases, e.g., 4h}
+  branch: {current git branch}
+  tags: [relevant, tags]
+  created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
+  ---
+  ```
+- Save the overview access point at `{plan-dir}/plan.md`. Keep it generic, under 80 lines, and list each implementation phase with status and progress plus links to phase files.
+- For each phase, create `{plan-dir}/phase-XX-phase-name-here.md` containing the following sections in order: Context links (reference parent plan, dependencies, docs), Overview (date, description, priority, implementation status, review status), Key Insights, Requirements, Architecture, Related code files, Implementation Steps, Todo list, Success Criteria, Risk Assessment, Security Considerations, Next steps.
+
+## Important Notes
+- **IMPORTANT:** Ensure token consumption efficiency while maintaining high quality.
+- **IMPORTANT:** Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.
+- **IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports.
+- **IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
+- **IMPORTANT**: **Do not** start implementing.

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-hard.md

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+---
+description: "💡💡💡 Research, analyze, and create an implementation plan - Args: ['task']"
+---
+
+Think harder.
+Activate `planning` skill.
+
+## Your mission
+<task>
+$ARGUMENTS
+</task>
+
+## Pre-Creation Check (Active vs Suggested Plan)
+
+Check the `## Plan Context` section in the injected context:
+- If "Plan:" shows a path → Active plan exists. Ask user: "Continue with this? [Y/n]"
+- If "Suggested:" shows a path → Branch-matched hint only. Ask if they want to activate or create new.
+- If "Plan: none" → Create new plan using naming from `## Naming` section.
+
+## Workflow
+1. If creating new: Create directory using `Plan dir:` from `## Naming` section, then run `node .opencode/scripts/set-active-plan.cjs {plan-dir}`
+   If reusing: Use the active plan path from Plan Context.
+   Make sure you pass the directory path to every subagent during the process.
+2. Follow strictly to the "Plan Creation & Organization" rules of `planning` skill.
+3. Use multiple `researcher` agents (max 2 agents) in parallel to research for this task:
+   Each agent research for a different aspect of the task and are allowed to perform max 5 tool calls.
+4. Analyze the codebase by reading `codebase-summary.md`, `code-standards.md`, `system-architecture.md` and `project-overview-pdr.md` file.
+   **ONLY PERFORM THIS FOLLOWING STEP IF `codebase-summary.md` is not available or older than 3 days**: Use `/scout <instructions>` slash command to search the codebase for files needed to complete the task.
+5. Main agent gathers all research and scout report filepaths, and pass them to `planner` subagent with the prompt to create an implementation plan of this task.
+6. Main agent receives the implementation plan from `planner` subagent, and ask user to review the plan
+
+## Post-Plan Validation (Optional)
+
+After plan creation, offer validation interview to confirm decisions before implementation.
+
+**Check `## Plan Context` → `Validation: mode=X, questions=MIN-MAX`:**
+
+| Mode | Behavior |
+|------|----------|
+| `prompt` | Ask user: "Validate this plan with a brief interview?" → Yes (Recommended) / No |
+| `auto` | Automatically execute `/plan:validate {plan-path}` |
+| `off` | Skip validation step entirely |
+
+**If mode is `prompt`:** Use `AskUserQuestion` tool with options above.
+**If user chooses validation or mode is `auto`:** Execute `/plan:validate {plan-path}` SlashCommand.
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+**Plan Directory Structure** (use `Plan dir:` from `## Naming` section)
+```
+{plan-dir}/
+├── research/
+│   ├── researcher-XX-report.md
+│   └── ...
+├── reports/
+│   ├── XX-report.md
+│   └── ...
+├── scout/
+│   ├── scout-XX-report.md
+│   └── ...
+├── plan.md
+├── phase-XX-phase-name-here.md
+└── ...
+```
+
+**Research Output Requirements**
+- Ensure every research markdown report remains concise (≤150 lines) while covering all requested topics and citations.
+
+**Plan File Specification**
+- Every `plan.md` MUST start with YAML frontmatter:
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  title: "{Brief title}"
+  description: "{One sentence for card preview}"
+  status: pending
+  priority: P2
+  effort: {sum of phases, e.g., 4h}
+  branch: {current git branch}
+  tags: [relevant, tags]
+  created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
+  ---
+  ```
+- Save the overview access point at `{plan-dir}/plan.md`. Keep it generic, under 80 lines, and list each implementation phase with status and progress plus links to phase files.
+- For each phase, create `{plan-dir}/phase-XX-phase-name-here.md` containing the following sections in order: Context links (reference parent plan, dependencies, docs), Overview (date, description, priority, implementation status, review status), Key Insights, Requirements, Architecture, Related code files, Implementation Steps, Todo list, Success Criteria, Risk Assessment, Security Considerations, Next steps.
+
+## Important Notes
+**IMPORTANT:** Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.
+**IMPORTANT:** Ensure token efficiency while maintaining high quality.
+**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports.
+**IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
+**IMPORTANT**: **Do not** start implementing.

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-parallel.md

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+---
+description: "💡💡💡 Create detailed plan with parallel-executable phases - Args: ['task']"
+---
+
+Think strategically about parallelization.
+Activate `planning` skill.
+
+## Your mission
+<task>
+$ARGUMENTS
+</task>
+
+## Workflow
+1. Create a directory using naming pattern from `## Naming` section in injected context.
+   Make sure you pass the directory path to every subagent during the process.
+2. Follow strictly to the "Plan Creation & Organization" rules of `planning` skill.
+3. Use multiple `researcher` agents (max 2 agents) in parallel to research for this task:
+   Each agent research for a different aspect of the task and are allowed to perform max 5 tool calls.
+4. Analyze the codebase by reading `codebase-summary.md`, `code-standards.md`, `system-architecture.md` and `project-overview-pdr.md` file.
+   **ONLY PERFORM THIS FOLLOWING STEP IF `codebase-summary.md` is not available or older than 3 days**: Use `/scout <instructions>` slash command to search the codebase for files needed to complete the task.
+5. Main agent gathers all research and scout report filepaths, and pass them to `planner` subagent with the prompt to create a parallel-optimized implementation plan.
+6. Main agent receives the implementation plan from `planner` subagent, and ask user to review the plan
+
+## Post-Plan Validation (Optional)
+
+After plan creation, offer validation interview to confirm decisions before implementation.
+
+**Check `## Plan Context` → `Validation: mode=X, questions=MIN-MAX`:**
+
+| Mode | Behavior |
+|------|----------|
+| `prompt` | Ask user: "Validate this plan with a brief interview?" → Yes (Recommended) / No |
+| `auto` | Automatically execute `/plan:validate {plan-path}` |
+| `off` | Skip validation step entirely |
+
+**If mode is `prompt`:** Use `AskUserQuestion` tool with options above.
+**If user chooses validation or mode is `auto`:** Execute `/plan:validate {plan-path}` SlashCommand.
+
+## Special Requirements for Parallel Execution
+
+**CRITICAL:** The planner subagent must create phases that:
+1. **Can be executed independently** - Each phase should be self-contained with no runtime dependencies on other phases
+2. **Have clear boundaries** - No file overlap between phases (each file should only be modified in ONE phase)
+3. **Separate concerns logically** - Group by architectural layer, feature domain, or technology stack
+4. **Minimize coupling** - Phases should communicate through well-defined interfaces only
+5. **Include dependency matrix** - Clearly document which phases must run sequentially vs in parallel
+
+**Parallelization Strategy:**
+- Group frontend/backend/database work into separate phases when possible
+- Separate infrastructure setup from application logic
+- Isolate different feature domains (e.g., auth vs profile vs payments)
+- Split by file type/directory (e.g., components vs services vs models)
+- Create independent test phases per module
+
+**Phase Organization Example:**
+```
+Phase 01: Database Schema (can run independently)
+Phase 02: Backend API Layer (can run independently)
+Phase 03: Frontend Components (can run independently)
+Phase 04: Integration Tests (depends on 01, 02, 03)
+```
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+**Plan Directory Structure** (use `Plan dir:` from `## Naming` section)
+```
+{plan-dir}/
+├── research/
+│   ├── researcher-XX-report.md
+│   └── ...
+├── reports/
+│   ├── XX-report.md
+│   └── ...
+├── scout/
+│   ├── scout-XX-report.md
+│   └── ...
+├── plan.md
+├── phase-XX-phase-name-here.md
+└── ...
+```
+
+**Research Output Requirements**
+- Ensure every research markdown report remains concise (≤150 lines) while covering all requested topics and citations.
+
+**Plan File Specification**
+- Every `plan.md` MUST start with YAML frontmatter:
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  title: "{Brief title}"
+  description: "{One sentence for card preview}"
+  status: pending
+  priority: P2
+  effort: {sum of phases, e.g., 4h}
+  branch: {current git branch}
+  tags: [relevant, tags]
+  created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
+  ---
+  ```
+- Save the overview access point at `{plan-dir}/plan.md`. Keep it generic, under 80 lines, and list each implementation phase with status, progress, parallelization group, and links to phase files.
+- For each phase, create `{plan-dir}/phase-XX-phase-name-here.md` containing the following sections in order:
+  - Context links (reference parent plan, dependencies, docs)
+  - **Parallelization Info** (which phases can run concurrently, which must wait)
+  - Overview (date, description, priority, implementation status, review status)
+  - Key Insights
+  - Requirements
+  - Architecture
+  - **Related code files** (MUST be exclusive to this phase - no overlap with other phases)
+  - **File Ownership** (explicit list of files this phase owns/modifies)
+  - Implementation Steps
+  - Todo list
+  - Success Criteria
+  - **Conflict Prevention** (how this phase avoids conflicts with parallel phases)
+  - Risk Assessment
+  - Security Considerations
+  - Next steps
+
+**Main plan.md must include:**
+- Dependency graph showing which phases can run in parallel
+- Execution strategy (e.g., "Phases 1-3 parallel, then Phase 4")
+- File ownership matrix (which phase owns which files)
+
+## Important Notes
+**IMPORTANT:** Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.
+**IMPORTANT:** Ensure token efficiency while maintaining high quality.
+**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports.
+**IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
+**IMPORTANT:** Do not start implementing.
+**IMPORTANT:** Each phase MUST have exclusive file ownership - no file can be modified by multiple phases.

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-two.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+---
+description: "💡💡💡💡 Research & create an implementation plan with 2 approaches - Args: ['task']"
+---
+
+Think harder.
+Activate `planning` skill.
+
+## Your mission
+Use the `planner` subagent to create 2 detailed implementation plans for this following task:
+<task>
+ $ARGUMENTS
+</task>
+
+## Workflow
+1. First: Create a directory using naming pattern from `## Naming` section in injected context.
+   Make sure you pass the directory path to every subagent during the process.
+2. Follow strictly to the "Plan Creation & Organization" rules of `planning` skill.
+3. Use multiple `researcher` agents in parallel to research for this task, each agent research for a different aspect of the task and perform max 5 researches (max 5 tool calls).
+4. Use `scout` agent to search the codebase for files needed to complete the task.
+5. Main agent gathers all research and scout report filepaths, and pass them to `planner` subagent with the detailed instructions prompt to create an implementation plan of this task.
+  **Output:** Provide at least 2 implementation approaches with clear trade-offs, and explain the pros and cons of each approach, and provide a recommended approach.
+1. Main agent receives the implementation plan from `planner` subagent, and ask user to review the plan
+
+## Plan File Specification
+- Every `plan.md` MUST start with YAML frontmatter:
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  title: "{Brief title}"
+  description: "{One sentence for card preview}"
+  status: pending
+  priority: P2
+  effort: {sum of phases, e.g., 4h}
+  branch: {current git branch}
+  tags: [relevant, tags]
+  created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
+  ---
+  ```
+
+## Important Notes
+**IMPORTANT:** Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.
+**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports.
+**IMPORTANT:** Ensure token efficiency while maintaining high quality.
+**IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
+**IMPORTANT**: **Do not** start implementing.

package/.opencode/commands/ckm-plan-validate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+---
+description: "Validate plan with critical questions interview - Args: ['plan-path']"
+---
+
+## Your mission
+
+Interview the user with critical questions to validate assumptions, confirm decisions, and surface potential issues in an implementation plan before coding begins.
+
+## Plan Resolution
+
+1. If `$ARGUMENTS` provided → Use that path
+2. Else check `## Plan Context` section → Use active plan path
+3. If no plan found → Ask user to specify path or run `/plan:hard` first
+
+## Configuration (from injected context)
+
+Check `## Plan Context` section for validation settings:
+- `mode` - Controls auto/prompt/off behavior
+- `questions` - Range like `3-8` (min-max)
+
+These values are automatically injected from user config. Use them as constraints.
+
+## Workflow
+
+### Step 1: Read Plan Files
+
+Read the plan directory:
+- `plan.md` - Overview and phases list
+- `phase-*.md` - All phase files
+- Look for decision points, assumptions, risks, tradeoffs
+
+### Step 2: Extract Question Topics
+
+Scan plan content for:
+
+| Category | Keywords to detect |
+|----------|-------------------|
+| **Architecture** | "approach", "pattern", "design", "structure", "database", "API" |
+| **Assumptions** | "assume", "expect", "should", "will", "must", "default" |
+| **Tradeoffs** | "tradeoff", "vs", "alternative", "option", "choice", "either/or" |
+| **Risks** | "risk", "might", "could fail", "dependency", "blocker", "concern" |
+| **Scope** | "phase", "MVP", "future", "out of scope", "nice to have" |
+
+### Step 3: Generate Questions
+
+For each detected topic, formulate a concrete question:
+
+**Question format rules:**
+- Each question must have 2-4 concrete options
+- Mark recommended option with "(Recommended)" suffix
+- Include "Other" option is automatic - don't add it
+- Questions should surface implicit decisions
+
+**Example questions:**
+
+```
+Category: Architecture
+Question: "How should the validation results be persisted?"
+Options:
+1. Save to plan.md frontmatter (Recommended) - Updates existing plan
+2. Create validation-answers.md - Separate file for answers
+3. Don't persist - Ephemeral validation only
+```
+
+```
+Category: Assumptions
+Question: "The plan assumes API rate limiting is not needed. Is this correct?"
+Options:
+1. Yes, rate limiting not needed for MVP
+2. No, add basic rate limiting now (Recommended)
+3. Defer to Phase 2
+```
+
+### Step 4: Interview User
+
+Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to present questions.
+
+**Rules:**
+- Use question count from `## Plan Context` → `Validation: mode=X, questions=MIN-MAX`
+- Group related questions when possible (max 4 questions per tool call)
+- Focus on: assumptions, risks, tradeoffs, architecture
+
+### Step 5: Document Answers
+
+After collecting answers, update the plan:
+
+1. Add `## Validation Summary` section to `plan.md`:
+```markdown
+## Validation Summary
+
+**Validated:** {date}
+**Questions asked:** {count}
+
+### Confirmed Decisions
+- {decision 1}: {user choice}
+- {decision 2}: {user choice}
+
+### Action Items
+- [ ] {any changes needed based on answers}
+```
+
+2. If answers require plan changes, note them but **do not modify phase files** - just document what needs updating.
+
+## Output
+
+After validation completes, provide summary:
+- Number of questions asked
+- Key decisions confirmed
+- Any items flagged for plan revision
+- Recommendation: proceed to implementation or revise plan first
+
+## Important Notes
+
+**IMPORTANT:** Only ask questions about genuine decision points - don't manufacture artificial choices.
+**IMPORTANT:** If plan is simple with few decisions, it's okay to ask fewer than min questions.
+**IMPORTANT:** Prioritize questions that could change implementation significantly.