@helyx/module-moderation 1.0.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +41 -0
- package/LICENSE +725 -0
- package/README.md +107 -0
- package/dist/action-support.d.ts +48 -0
- package/dist/action-support.js +201 -0
- package/dist/case-actions.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/case-actions.js +311 -0
- package/dist/case-naming.d.ts +4 -0
- package/dist/case-naming.js +9 -0
- package/dist/case-repository.d.ts +29 -0
- package/dist/case-repository.js +199 -0
- package/dist/channel-actions.d.ts +3 -0
- package/dist/channel-actions.js +267 -0
- package/dist/commands.d.ts +4 -0
- package/dist/commands.js +309 -0
- package/dist/components.d.ts +15 -0
- package/dist/components.js +381 -0
- package/dist/configuration.d.ts +16 -0
- package/dist/configuration.js +94 -0
- package/dist/constants.d.ts +53 -0
- package/dist/constants.js +53 -0
- package/dist/contracts.d.ts +109 -0
- package/dist/contracts.js +84 -0
- package/dist/domain.d.ts +29 -0
- package/dist/domain.js +101 -0
- package/dist/events.d.ts +3 -0
- package/dist/events.js +60 -0
- package/dist/health.d.ts +10 -0
- package/dist/health.js +56 -0
- package/dist/index.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/index.js +92 -0
- package/dist/moderation-cases-resource.d.ts +14 -0
- package/dist/moderation-cases-resource.js +226 -0
- package/dist/presentation.d.ts +8 -0
- package/dist/presentation.js +69 -0
- package/dist/privacy.d.ts +8 -0
- package/dist/privacy.js +38 -0
- package/dist/provider.d.ts +4 -0
- package/dist/provider.js +335 -0
- package/dist/receipt-repository.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/receipt-repository.js +36 -0
- package/dist/records.d.ts +399 -0
- package/dist/records.js +303 -0
- package/dist/repository-model.d.ts +131 -0
- package/dist/repository-model.js +318 -0
- package/dist/repository.d.ts +21 -0
- package/dist/repository.js +41 -0
- package/dist/service.d.ts +75 -0
- package/dist/service.js +329 -0
- package/dist/tasks.d.ts +49 -0
- package/dist/tasks.js +391 -0
- package/dist/thread-controls.d.ts +23 -0
- package/dist/thread-controls.js +376 -0
- package/dist/thread-deletion-recovery.d.ts +13 -0
- package/dist/thread-deletion-recovery.js +46 -0
- package/dist/thread-delivery.d.ts +11 -0
- package/dist/thread-delivery.js +427 -0
- package/dist/thread-reconciliation.d.ts +24 -0
- package/dist/thread-reconciliation.js +181 -0
- package/dist/thread-repository.d.ts +16 -0
- package/dist/thread-repository.js +70 -0
- package/manifest.json +999 -0
- package/migrations/0001_moderation_foundation.sql +552 -0
- package/migrations/0002_staff_attempt_parameters.sql +27 -0
- package/package.json +56 -0
package/dist/provider.js
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES, MODERATION_ACTION_CONTRACT_VERSION, MODERATION_ACTION_PROVIDER_ID, } from "@helyx/sdk";
|
|
2
|
+
import { DEFAULT_MODERATION_CONFIGURATION, parseModerationConfiguration, } from "./configuration.js";
|
|
3
|
+
import { MODERATION_MODULE_ID } from "./constants.js";
|
|
4
|
+
import { appendModerationAudit, emitAutomaticModerationActionLog, moderationRetentionExpiresAt, sendWarningDirectMessage, } from "./action-support.js";
|
|
5
|
+
const ALLOWED_CALLERS = Object.freeze(["helyx.automod"]);
|
|
6
|
+
export function createModerationActionProvider(runtime) {
|
|
7
|
+
return {
|
|
8
|
+
providerId: MODERATION_ACTION_PROVIDER_ID,
|
|
9
|
+
contractVersion: MODERATION_ACTION_CONTRACT_VERSION,
|
|
10
|
+
allowedCallerModuleIds: ALLOWED_CALLERS,
|
|
11
|
+
execute: (context, request) => execute(runtime, context, request),
|
|
12
|
+
};
|
|
13
|
+
}
|
|
14
|
+
async function execute(runtime, context, request) {
|
|
15
|
+
const services = context.services;
|
|
16
|
+
if (!ALLOWED_CALLERS.includes(request.callerModuleId))
|
|
17
|
+
return { outcome: "rejected", code: "caller_not_allowed" };
|
|
18
|
+
if (!(await automaticRequestStillAllowed(services, request)))
|
|
19
|
+
return { outcome: "rejected", code: "subject_exempt" };
|
|
20
|
+
const configuration = await moderationConfiguration(services, request.guildId).catch(() => null);
|
|
21
|
+
if (!configuration)
|
|
22
|
+
return { outcome: "rejected", code: "module_unavailable" };
|
|
23
|
+
const pending = await atomicCases(services).createConfirmedAutoModerationOffenceCase({
|
|
24
|
+
operationKey: request.operationKey,
|
|
25
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
26
|
+
subjectUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
27
|
+
sourceModuleId: request.callerModuleId,
|
|
28
|
+
sourceEventId: request.sourceEventId,
|
|
29
|
+
sourceMessage: request.sourceMessage,
|
|
30
|
+
ruleId: request.ruleId,
|
|
31
|
+
ruleRevision: request.policy.ruleRevision,
|
|
32
|
+
configurationRevision: request.configurationRevision,
|
|
33
|
+
policyFingerprint: request.policy.policyFingerprint,
|
|
34
|
+
actionPolicy: request.policy.actionPolicy,
|
|
35
|
+
repeatWindowStartsAt: request.policy.windowStartsAt,
|
|
36
|
+
reasonCode: request.reasonCode,
|
|
37
|
+
...(request.evidenceReference
|
|
38
|
+
? { evidenceReference: request.evidenceReference }
|
|
39
|
+
: {}),
|
|
40
|
+
openViolationThread: request.policy.openViolationThread,
|
|
41
|
+
occurredAt: request.occurredAt,
|
|
42
|
+
...(request.requestKind === "observation"
|
|
43
|
+
? { observedAction: request.observedAction }
|
|
44
|
+
: {}),
|
|
45
|
+
});
|
|
46
|
+
if (pending.outcome === "rejected")
|
|
47
|
+
return rejectedCreate(pending.code);
|
|
48
|
+
if (pending.outcome === "replayed") {
|
|
49
|
+
if (pending.attemptOutcome === "pending" ||
|
|
50
|
+
pending.attemptOutcome === "ambiguous")
|
|
51
|
+
await scheduleReconciliation(services, request, pending.caseId, pending.attemptId);
|
|
52
|
+
const replayThread = request.policy.openViolationThread && applied(pending.attemptOutcome)
|
|
53
|
+
? await runtime
|
|
54
|
+
.deliverViolationThread({
|
|
55
|
+
services,
|
|
56
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
57
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
58
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
59
|
+
caseRevision: pending.revision,
|
|
60
|
+
subjectUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
61
|
+
severity: request.severity,
|
|
62
|
+
operationKey: request.operationKey,
|
|
63
|
+
evidence: context.violationEvidence,
|
|
64
|
+
})
|
|
65
|
+
.catch(() => "review_required")
|
|
66
|
+
: "not_requested";
|
|
67
|
+
if (!applied(pending.attemptOutcome))
|
|
68
|
+
return {
|
|
69
|
+
outcome: pending.attemptOutcome === "pending" ||
|
|
70
|
+
pending.attemptOutcome === "ambiguous"
|
|
71
|
+
? "ambiguous"
|
|
72
|
+
: pending.attemptOutcome === "review_required"
|
|
73
|
+
? "review_required"
|
|
74
|
+
: "failed",
|
|
75
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
76
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
77
|
+
safeCode: `replayed_${pending.attemptOutcome}`,
|
|
78
|
+
replayed: true,
|
|
79
|
+
};
|
|
80
|
+
return {
|
|
81
|
+
outcome: "already_applied",
|
|
82
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
83
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
84
|
+
offenceOrdinal: pending.offenceOrdinal,
|
|
85
|
+
selectedAction: pending.selectedAction,
|
|
86
|
+
actionOutcome: "already_applied",
|
|
87
|
+
threadOutcome: replayThread,
|
|
88
|
+
...(replayThread === "retry_pending" || replayThread === "review_required"
|
|
89
|
+
? { safeCode: `thread_${replayThread}` }
|
|
90
|
+
: {}),
|
|
91
|
+
replayed: true,
|
|
92
|
+
};
|
|
93
|
+
}
|
|
94
|
+
try {
|
|
95
|
+
await appendModerationAudit(services, {
|
|
96
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
97
|
+
action: "moderation.action-attempt",
|
|
98
|
+
source: "system",
|
|
99
|
+
idempotencyKey: `${request.operationKey}:audit`,
|
|
100
|
+
targetType: "moderation_case",
|
|
101
|
+
targetId: pending.caseId,
|
|
102
|
+
metadata: {
|
|
103
|
+
action: pending.selectedAction.type,
|
|
104
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
105
|
+
deleteSourceMessage: request.policy.deleteSourceMessage === true,
|
|
106
|
+
},
|
|
107
|
+
});
|
|
108
|
+
}
|
|
109
|
+
catch {
|
|
110
|
+
const settledAt = new Date();
|
|
111
|
+
await atomicCases(services).settleActionAttempt({
|
|
112
|
+
operationKey: `${request.operationKey}:audit-failed`,
|
|
113
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
114
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
115
|
+
attemptId: pending.attemptId,
|
|
116
|
+
expectedRevision: pending.revision,
|
|
117
|
+
outcome: "failed",
|
|
118
|
+
safeCode: "audit_unavailable",
|
|
119
|
+
retentionExpiresAt: moderationRetentionExpiresAt(settledAt, configuration.caseRetentionDays),
|
|
120
|
+
occurredAt: settledAt,
|
|
121
|
+
});
|
|
122
|
+
return {
|
|
123
|
+
outcome: "failed",
|
|
124
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
125
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
126
|
+
safeCode: "audit_unavailable",
|
|
127
|
+
replayed: false,
|
|
128
|
+
};
|
|
129
|
+
}
|
|
130
|
+
const messageRemoval = request.detectionSource === "enhanced" &&
|
|
131
|
+
request.policy.deleteSourceMessage === true &&
|
|
132
|
+
pending.selectedAction.type !== "delete_message"
|
|
133
|
+
? await runtime
|
|
134
|
+
.dispatchAction(services, {
|
|
135
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
136
|
+
subjectUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
137
|
+
action: { type: "delete_message" },
|
|
138
|
+
reason: boundedAuditReason(pending.caseNumber, "Automatic message removal"),
|
|
139
|
+
operationKey: `${request.operationKey}:block-message`,
|
|
140
|
+
sourceMessage: request.sourceMessage,
|
|
141
|
+
protectedRoleIds: [],
|
|
142
|
+
revalidate: () => automaticRequestStillAllowed(services, request),
|
|
143
|
+
})
|
|
144
|
+
.catch(() => ({ outcome: "ambiguous" }))
|
|
145
|
+
: null;
|
|
146
|
+
const effect = await runtime
|
|
147
|
+
.dispatchAction(services, {
|
|
148
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
149
|
+
subjectUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
150
|
+
action: pending.selectedAction,
|
|
151
|
+
reason: boundedAuditReason(pending.caseNumber, `Automatic moderation: ${request.reasonCode}`),
|
|
152
|
+
operationKey: `${request.operationKey}:discord`,
|
|
153
|
+
sourceMessage: request.sourceMessage,
|
|
154
|
+
protectedRoleIds: [
|
|
155
|
+
...request.policy.globalIgnoredRoleIds,
|
|
156
|
+
...request.policy.ruleIgnoredRoleIds,
|
|
157
|
+
...(configuration.violationAccessRoleId
|
|
158
|
+
? [configuration.violationAccessRoleId]
|
|
159
|
+
: []),
|
|
160
|
+
],
|
|
161
|
+
revalidate: () => automaticRequestStillAllowed(services, request),
|
|
162
|
+
})
|
|
163
|
+
.catch(() => ({
|
|
164
|
+
outcome: "ambiguous",
|
|
165
|
+
safeCode: "enforcement_unavailable",
|
|
166
|
+
}));
|
|
167
|
+
const settledAt = new Date();
|
|
168
|
+
const settlement = await atomicCases(services)
|
|
169
|
+
.settleActionAttempt({
|
|
170
|
+
operationKey: `${request.operationKey}:settle`,
|
|
171
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
172
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
173
|
+
attemptId: pending.attemptId,
|
|
174
|
+
expectedRevision: pending.revision,
|
|
175
|
+
outcome: effect.outcome,
|
|
176
|
+
...(effect.safeCode ? { safeCode: effect.safeCode } : {}),
|
|
177
|
+
...("removedRoleIds" in effect && effect.removedRoleIds
|
|
178
|
+
? { removedRoleIds: effect.removedRoleIds }
|
|
179
|
+
: {}),
|
|
180
|
+
retentionExpiresAt: moderationRetentionExpiresAt(settledAt, configuration.caseRetentionDays),
|
|
181
|
+
occurredAt: settledAt,
|
|
182
|
+
})
|
|
183
|
+
.catch(() => null);
|
|
184
|
+
if (!settlement) {
|
|
185
|
+
await scheduleReconciliation(services, request, pending.caseId, pending.attemptId).catch(() => undefined);
|
|
186
|
+
return {
|
|
187
|
+
outcome: "review_required",
|
|
188
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
189
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
190
|
+
safeCode: "settlement_unavailable",
|
|
191
|
+
replayed: false,
|
|
192
|
+
};
|
|
193
|
+
}
|
|
194
|
+
if (settlement.outcome === "rejected")
|
|
195
|
+
return {
|
|
196
|
+
outcome: "review_required",
|
|
197
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
198
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
199
|
+
safeCode: `settlement_${settlement.code}`,
|
|
200
|
+
replayed: false,
|
|
201
|
+
};
|
|
202
|
+
if (effect.outcome === "ambiguous")
|
|
203
|
+
await scheduleReconciliation(services, request, pending.caseId, pending.attemptId);
|
|
204
|
+
if (applied(effect.outcome))
|
|
205
|
+
await emitAutomaticModerationActionLog(services, {
|
|
206
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
207
|
+
action: pending.selectedAction,
|
|
208
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
209
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
210
|
+
subjectUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
211
|
+
operationKey: request.operationKey,
|
|
212
|
+
});
|
|
213
|
+
if (applied(effect.outcome) && pending.selectedAction.type === "warn")
|
|
214
|
+
await sendWarningDirectMessage(services, {
|
|
215
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
216
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
217
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
218
|
+
subjectUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
219
|
+
}).catch(() => undefined);
|
|
220
|
+
const threadOutcome = request.policy.openViolationThread && applied(effect.outcome)
|
|
221
|
+
? await runtime
|
|
222
|
+
.deliverViolationThread({
|
|
223
|
+
services,
|
|
224
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
225
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
226
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
227
|
+
caseRevision: settlement.revision,
|
|
228
|
+
subjectUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
229
|
+
severity: request.severity,
|
|
230
|
+
operationKey: request.operationKey,
|
|
231
|
+
evidence: context.violationEvidence,
|
|
232
|
+
})
|
|
233
|
+
.catch(() => "review_required")
|
|
234
|
+
: "not_requested";
|
|
235
|
+
if (!applied(effect.outcome))
|
|
236
|
+
return {
|
|
237
|
+
outcome: effect.outcome === "ambiguous"
|
|
238
|
+
? "ambiguous"
|
|
239
|
+
: effect.outcome === "review_required"
|
|
240
|
+
? "review_required"
|
|
241
|
+
: "failed",
|
|
242
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
243
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
244
|
+
...(effect.safeCode ? { safeCode: effect.safeCode } : {}),
|
|
245
|
+
replayed: false,
|
|
246
|
+
};
|
|
247
|
+
return {
|
|
248
|
+
outcome: "applied",
|
|
249
|
+
caseId: pending.caseId,
|
|
250
|
+
caseNumber: pending.caseNumber,
|
|
251
|
+
offenceOrdinal: pending.offenceOrdinal,
|
|
252
|
+
selectedAction: pending.selectedAction,
|
|
253
|
+
actionOutcome: effect.outcome === "succeeded" ? "succeeded" : "already_applied",
|
|
254
|
+
threadOutcome,
|
|
255
|
+
...(!messageRemoval || applied(messageRemoval.outcome)
|
|
256
|
+
? threadOutcome === "retry_pending" || threadOutcome === "review_required"
|
|
257
|
+
? { safeCode: `thread_${threadOutcome}` }
|
|
258
|
+
: {}
|
|
259
|
+
: { safeCode: "message_removal_unconfirmed" }),
|
|
260
|
+
replayed: false,
|
|
261
|
+
};
|
|
262
|
+
}
|
|
263
|
+
async function automaticRequestStillAllowed(services, request) {
|
|
264
|
+
if (!services.has(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.installations) ||
|
|
265
|
+
!(await services
|
|
266
|
+
.get(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.installations)
|
|
267
|
+
.isModuleEnabled(request.guildId, MODERATION_MODULE_ID)) ||
|
|
268
|
+
(services.has(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.moduleAvailability) &&
|
|
269
|
+
!(await services
|
|
270
|
+
.get(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.moduleAvailability)
|
|
271
|
+
.isAvailable(MODERATION_MODULE_ID))) ||
|
|
272
|
+
!(await request.revalidatePolicy()))
|
|
273
|
+
return false;
|
|
274
|
+
const member = await services
|
|
275
|
+
.get(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.memberEnforcement)
|
|
276
|
+
.inspectMember({
|
|
277
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
278
|
+
memberUserId: request.subjectUserId,
|
|
279
|
+
});
|
|
280
|
+
if (member.outcome !== "present" ||
|
|
281
|
+
member.isGuildOwner ||
|
|
282
|
+
member.isAdministrator ||
|
|
283
|
+
member.isBot ||
|
|
284
|
+
member.helyxHierarchy !== "above")
|
|
285
|
+
return false;
|
|
286
|
+
const ignored = new Set([
|
|
287
|
+
...request.policy.globalIgnoredRoleIds,
|
|
288
|
+
...request.policy.ruleIgnoredRoleIds,
|
|
289
|
+
]);
|
|
290
|
+
return !member.roleIds.some((roleId) => ignored.has(roleId));
|
|
291
|
+
}
|
|
292
|
+
function rejectedCreate(code) {
|
|
293
|
+
return {
|
|
294
|
+
outcome: "rejected",
|
|
295
|
+
code: code === "operation_key_conflict"
|
|
296
|
+
? "operation_key_conflict"
|
|
297
|
+
: code === "stale_policy"
|
|
298
|
+
? "stale_operation"
|
|
299
|
+
: "invalid_request",
|
|
300
|
+
};
|
|
301
|
+
}
|
|
302
|
+
function atomicCases(services) {
|
|
303
|
+
return services.get(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.atomicModerationCases);
|
|
304
|
+
}
|
|
305
|
+
async function moderationConfiguration(services, guildId) {
|
|
306
|
+
if (!services.has(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.configuration))
|
|
307
|
+
return DEFAULT_MODERATION_CONFIGURATION;
|
|
308
|
+
const stored = await services
|
|
309
|
+
.get(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.configuration)
|
|
310
|
+
.get(guildId, MODERATION_MODULE_ID);
|
|
311
|
+
return stored
|
|
312
|
+
? parseModerationConfiguration(stored.value)
|
|
313
|
+
: DEFAULT_MODERATION_CONFIGURATION;
|
|
314
|
+
}
|
|
315
|
+
async function scheduleReconciliation(services, request, caseId, attemptId) {
|
|
316
|
+
if (!services.has(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.scheduledTasks))
|
|
317
|
+
return;
|
|
318
|
+
await services
|
|
319
|
+
.get(HELYX_SERVICE_NAMES.scheduledTasks)
|
|
320
|
+
.schedule({
|
|
321
|
+
moduleId: MODERATION_MODULE_ID,
|
|
322
|
+
taskKind: "moderation.action-reconcile",
|
|
323
|
+
guildId: request.guildId,
|
|
324
|
+
idempotencyKey: `${request.operationKey}:reconcile`,
|
|
325
|
+
payload: { caseId, attemptId },
|
|
326
|
+
scheduledFor: new Date(Date.now() + 2_000),
|
|
327
|
+
});
|
|
328
|
+
}
|
|
329
|
+
function applied(outcome) {
|
|
330
|
+
return outcome === "succeeded" || outcome === "already_applied";
|
|
331
|
+
}
|
|
332
|
+
function boundedAuditReason(caseNumber, reason) {
|
|
333
|
+
return `[Helyx case ${caseNumber}] ${reason}`.slice(0, 512);
|
|
334
|
+
}
|
|
335
|
+
//# sourceMappingURL=provider.js.map
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ModuleRecordService } from "@helyx/sdk";
|
|
2
|
+
import { type StoredModerationDmReceipt } from "./repository-model.js";
|
|
3
|
+
export declare class ModerationReceiptRepository {
|
|
4
|
+
private readonly records;
|
|
5
|
+
constructor(records: ModuleRecordService);
|
|
6
|
+
findDmReceipt(guildId: string, caseId: string): Promise<StoredModerationDmReceipt | null>;
|
|
7
|
+
upsertDmReceipt(input: StoredModerationDmReceipt): Promise<void>;
|
|
8
|
+
}
|
|
9
|
+
//# sourceMappingURL=receipt-repository.d.ts.map
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { MODERATION_MODULE_ID } from "./constants.js";
|
|
2
|
+
import { DM_RECEIPT_FIELDS, dmReceiptWrite, mapDmReceipt, } from "./repository-model.js";
|
|
3
|
+
export class ModerationReceiptRepository {
|
|
4
|
+
records;
|
|
5
|
+
constructor(records) {
|
|
6
|
+
this.records = records;
|
|
7
|
+
}
|
|
8
|
+
async findDmReceipt(guildId, caseId) {
|
|
9
|
+
const row = await this.records.findOne({
|
|
10
|
+
moduleId: MODERATION_MODULE_ID,
|
|
11
|
+
collection: "dm_receipts",
|
|
12
|
+
select: DM_RECEIPT_FIELDS,
|
|
13
|
+
where: { guild_id: guildId, case_id: caseId },
|
|
14
|
+
});
|
|
15
|
+
return row ? mapDmReceipt(row) : null;
|
|
16
|
+
}
|
|
17
|
+
async upsertDmReceipt(input) {
|
|
18
|
+
const write = dmReceiptWrite(input);
|
|
19
|
+
await this.records.upsert({
|
|
20
|
+
moduleId: MODERATION_MODULE_ID,
|
|
21
|
+
collection: "dm_receipts",
|
|
22
|
+
values: write.values,
|
|
23
|
+
uniqueBy: ["guild_id", "case_id"],
|
|
24
|
+
update: [
|
|
25
|
+
"template_revision",
|
|
26
|
+
"delivery_state",
|
|
27
|
+
"safe_code",
|
|
28
|
+
"message_id",
|
|
29
|
+
"attempted_at",
|
|
30
|
+
"updated_at",
|
|
31
|
+
].filter((field) => Object.hasOwn(write.values, field)),
|
|
32
|
+
clear: write.clear,
|
|
33
|
+
});
|
|
34
|
+
}
|
|
35
|
+
}
|
|
36
|
+
//# sourceMappingURL=receipt-repository.js.map
|