@heihei0299/matt-skills 2.1.13 → 3.0.1

package/template/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/SKILL.md

@@ -1,116 +0,0 @@
----
-name: setup-matt-pocock-skills
-description: "Configure this repo for the engineering skills: set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills."
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# Setup Matt Pocock's Skills
-
-Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:
-
-- **Issue tracker**: where issues live (GitHub by default; local markdown is also supported out of the box)
-- **Triage labels**: the strings used for the five canonical triage roles
-- **Domain docs**: where `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading them
-
-This is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. Explore
-
-Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:
-
-- `git remote -v` and `.git/config`: is this a GitHub repo? Which one?
-- `AGENTS.md` and `CLAUDE.md` at the repo root: does either exist? Is there already an `## Agent skills` section in either?
-- `CONTEXT.md` and `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the repo root
-- `docs/adr/` and any `src/*/docs/adr/` directories
-- `docs/agents/`: does this skill's prior output already exist?
-- `.scratch/`: a sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in use
-- Is the `triage` skill installed? (a `triage` skill folder alongside this one, or `triage` in your available skills.) This decides whether Section B runs at all.
-- Monorepo signals: a `pnpm-workspace.yaml`, a `workspaces` field in `package.json`, or a populated `packages/*` with its own `src/`. These are present only in a genuinely large multi-package repo; their absence means single-context, which is almost every repo.
-
-### 2. Present findings and ask
-
-Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then take the sections in order. One section, one answer, then the next.
-
-Lead each section with the recommended answer so the user can accept it in a word. Give a one-line explainer only when the choice genuinely branches; skip the section entirely when exploration already settled it (Section B when `triage` isn't installed, Section C when there's no monorepo).
-
-**Section A: Issue tracker.**
-
-> Explainer: The "issue tracker" is where issues live for this repo. Skills like `to-tickets`, `triage`, and `to-spec` read from and write to it. They need to know whether to call `gh issue create`, write a markdown file under `.scratch/`, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.
-
-Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a `git remote` points at GitHub, propose that. If a `git remote` points at GitLab (`gitlab.com` or a self-hosted host), propose GitLab. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:
-
-- **GitHub**: issues live in the repo's GitHub Issues (uses the `gh` CLI)
-- **GitLab**: issues live in the repo's GitLab Issues (uses the [`glab`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cli) CLI)
-- **Local markdown**: issues live as files under `.scratch/<feature>/` in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)
-- **Other** (Jira, Linear, etc.): ask the user to describe the workflow in one paragraph; the skill will record it as freeform prose
-
-Record the choice in `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`. The GitHub and GitLab templates carry a "PRs as a request surface" flag, defaulted **off**. Leave it off and don't raise it: a user who wants external PRs in the triage queue can flip the flag in the file later.
-
-**Section B: Triage label vocabulary.** Skip this section entirely if the `triage` skill isn't installed (exploration told you), since an uninstalled skill needs no labels.
-
-If it is installed, ask exactly one question:
-
-> Do you want to keep the default triage labels? (recommended: **yes**)
-
-The defaults are the five canonical roles, each label string equal to its name: `needs-triage`, `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, `wontfix`. On **yes**, write them as-is. Only if the user says no, usually because their tracker already uses other names (e.g. `bug:triage` for `needs-triage`), collect the overrides so `triage` applies existing labels instead of creating duplicates.
-
-**Section C: Domain docs.** Default to **single-context** (one `CONTEXT.md` + `docs/adr/` at the repo root). This fits almost every repo; write it without asking.
-
-Offer **multi-context** (a root `CONTEXT-MAP.md` pointing to per-context `CONTEXT.md` files) only when exploration found monorepo signals. Then confirm which layout they want.
-
-### 3. Confirm and edit
-
-Show the user a draft of:
-
-- The `## Agent skills` block to add to whichever of `CLAUDE.md` / `AGENTS.md` is being edited (see step 4 for selection rules)
-- The contents of `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`, `docs/agents/domain.md`, and `docs/agents/triage-labels.md` (the last only when `triage` is installed)
-
-Let them edit before writing.
-
-### 4. Write
-
-**Pick the file to edit:**
-
-- If `CLAUDE.md` exists, edit it.
-- Else if `AGENTS.md` exists, edit it.
-- If neither exists, ask the user which one to create; don't pick for them.
-
-Never create `AGENTS.md` when `CLAUDE.md` already exists (or vice versa); always edit the one that's already there.
-
-If an `## Agent skills` block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.
-
-The block:
-
-```markdown
-## Agent skills
-
-### Issue tracker
-
-[one-line summary of where issues are tracked]. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.
-
-### Triage labels
-
-[one-line summary of the label vocabulary]. See `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`.
-
-### Domain docs
-
-[one-line summary of layout: "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.
-```
-
-Include the `### Triage labels` sub-block, and write `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`, only when `triage` is installed and Section B ran. When it isn't, both are omitted.
-
-Then write the docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:
-
-- [issue-tracker-github.md](./issue-tracker-github.md): GitHub issue tracker
-- [issue-tracker-gitlab.md](./issue-tracker-gitlab.md): GitLab issue tracker
-- [issue-tracker-local.md](./issue-tracker-local.md): local-markdown issue tracker
-- [triage-labels.md](./triage-labels.md): label mapping (only if `triage` is installed)
-- [domain.md](./domain.md): domain doc consumer rules + layout
-
-For "other" issue trackers, write `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md` from scratch using the user's description.
-
-### 5. Done
-
-Tell the user the setup is complete and which engineering skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit `docs/agents/*.md` directly later; re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch issue trackers or restart from scratch.

package/template/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "Setup Matt Pocock Skills"
-  short_description: "Configure a repo for the skills"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/domain.md

@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-# Domain Docs
-
-How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
-
-## Before exploring, read these
-
-- **`CONTEXT.md`** at the repo root, or
-- **`CONTEXT-MAP.md`** at the repo root if it exists: it points at one `CONTEXT.md` per context. Read each one relevant to the topic.
-- **`docs/adr/`**: read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. In multi-context repos, also check `src/<context>/docs/adr/` for context-scoped decisions.
-
-If any of these files don't exist, **proceed silently**. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The `/domain-modeling` skill (reached via `/grill-with-docs` and `/improve-codebase-architecture`) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
-
-## File structure
-
-Single-context repo (most repos):
-
-```
-/
-├── CONTEXT.md
-├── docs/adr/
-│   ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
-│   └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
-└── src/
-```
-
-Multi-context repo (presence of `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the root):
-
-```
-/
-├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
-├── docs/adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
-└── src/
-    ├── ordering/
-    │   ├── CONTEXT.md
-    │   └── docs/adr/                  ← context-specific decisions
-    └── billing/
-        ├── CONTEXT.md
-        └── docs/adr/
-```
-
-## Use the glossary's vocabulary
-
-When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
-
-If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal: either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
-
-## Flag ADR conflicts
-
-If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
-
-> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders), but worth reopening because…_

package/template/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/issue-tracker-github.md

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-# Issue tracker: GitHub
-
-Issues and specs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the `gh` CLI for all operations.
-
-## Conventions
-
-- **Create an issue**: `gh issue create --title "..." --body "..."`. Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies.
-- **Read an issue**: `gh issue view <number> --comments`, filtering comments by `jq` and also fetching labels.
-- **List issues**: `gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]'` with appropriate `--label` and `--state` filters.
-- **Comment on an issue**: `gh issue comment <number> --body "..."`
-- **Apply / remove labels**: `gh issue edit <number> --add-label "..."` / `--remove-label "..."`
-- **Close**: `gh issue close <number> --comment "..."`
-
-Infer the repo from `git remote -v`; `gh` does this automatically when run inside a clone.
-
-## Pull requests as a triage surface
-
-**PRs as a request surface: no.** _(Set to `yes` if this repo treats external PRs as feature requests; `/triage` reads this flag.)_
-
-When set to `yes`, PRs run through the same labels and states as issues, using the `gh pr` equivalents:
-
-- **Read a PR**: `gh pr view <number> --comments` and `gh pr diff <number>` for the diff.
-- **List external PRs for triage**: `gh pr list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,author,authorAssociation,comments` then keep only `authorAssociation` of `CONTRIBUTOR`, `FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR`, or `NONE` (drop `OWNER`/`MEMBER`/`COLLABORATOR`).
-- **Comment / label / close**: `gh pr comment`, `gh pr edit --add-label`/`--remove-label`, `gh pr close`.
-
-GitHub shares one number space across issues and PRs, so a bare `#42` may be either: resolve with `gh pr view 42` and fall back to `gh issue view 42`.
-
-## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
-
-Create a GitHub issue.
-
-## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
-
-Run `gh issue view <number> --comments`.
-
-## Wayfinding operations
-
-Used by `/wayfinder`. The **map** is a single issue with **child** issues as tickets.
-
-- **Map**: a single issue labelled `wayfinder:map`, holding the Notes / Decisions-so-far / Fog body. `gh issue create --label wayfinder:map`.
-- **Child ticket**: an issue linked to the map as a GitHub sub-issue (`gh api` on the sub-issues endpoint). Where sub-issues aren't enabled, add the child to a task list in the map body and put `Part of #<map>` at the top of the child body. Labels: `wayfinder:<type>` (`research`/`prototype`/`grilling`/`task`). Once claimed, the ticket is assigned to the driving dev.
-- **Blocking**: GitHub's **native issue dependencies**, the canonical, UI-visible representation. Add an edge with `gh api --method POST repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<child>/dependencies/blocked_by -F issue_id=<blocker-db-id>`, where `<blocker-db-id>` is the blocker's numeric **database id** (`gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<n> --jq .id`, _not_ the `#number` or `node_id`). GitHub reports `issue_dependencies_summary.blocked_by` (open blockers only, the live gate). Where dependencies aren't available, fall back to a `Blocked by: #<n>, #<n>` line at the top of the child body. A ticket is unblocked when every blocker is closed.
-- **Frontier query**: list the map's open children (`gh issue list --state open`, scoped to the map's sub-issues / task list), drop any with an open blocker (`issue_dependencies_summary.blocked_by > 0`, or an open issue in the `Blocked by` line) or an assignee; first in map order wins.
-- **Claim**: `gh issue edit <n> --add-assignee @me`, the session's first write.
-- **Resolve**: `gh issue comment <n> --body "<answer>"`, then `gh issue close <n>`, then append a context pointer (gist + link) to the map's Decisions-so-far.

package/template/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/issue-tracker-gitlab.md

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-# Issue tracker: GitLab
-
-Issues and specs for this repo live as GitLab issues. Use the [`glab`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cli) CLI for all operations.
-
-## Conventions
-
-- **Create an issue**: `glab issue create --title "..." --description "..."`. Use a heredoc for multi-line descriptions. Pass `--description -` to open an editor.
-- **Read an issue**: `glab issue view <number> --comments`. Use `-F json` for machine-readable output.
-- **List issues**: `glab issue list -F json` with appropriate `--label` filters.
-- **Comment on an issue**: `glab issue note <number> --message "..."`. GitLab calls comments "notes".
-- **Apply / remove labels**: `glab issue update <number> --label "..."` / `--unlabel "..."`. Multiple labels can be comma-separated or by repeating the flag.
-- **Close**: `glab issue close <number>`. `glab issue close` does not accept a closing comment, so post the explanation first with `glab issue note <number> --message "..."`, then close.
-- **Merge requests**: GitLab calls PRs "merge requests". Use `glab mr create`, `glab mr view`, `glab mr note`, etc., the same shape as `gh pr ...` with `mr` in place of `pr` and `note`/`--message` in place of `comment`/`--body`.
-
-Infer the repo from `git remote -v`; `glab` does this automatically when run inside a clone.
-
-## Merge requests as a triage surface
-
-**MRs as a request surface: no.** _(Set to `yes` if this repo treats external merge requests as feature requests; `/triage` reads this flag.)_
-
-When set to `yes`, MRs run through the same labels and states as issues, using the `glab mr` equivalents:
-
-- **Read an MR**: `glab mr view <number> --comments` and `glab mr diff <number>` for the diff.
-- **List external MRs for triage**: `glab mr list -F json`, then keep only MRs whose author is not a project member/owner (a contributor's MR, not a maintainer's in-flight work).
-- **Comment / label / close**: `glab mr note`, `glab mr update --label`/`--unlabel`, `glab mr close`.
-
-Unlike GitHub, GitLab numbers issues and MRs separately, so `#42` is unambiguous once you know which surface the maintainer means.
-
-## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
-
-Create a GitLab issue.
-
-## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
-
-Run `glab issue view <number> --comments`.
-
-## Wayfinding operations
-
-Used by `/wayfinder`. The **map** is a single issue with **child** issues as tickets.
-
-- **Map**: a single issue labelled `wayfinder:map`, holding the Notes / Decisions-so-far / Fog body. `glab issue create --label wayfinder:map`. (On GitLab tiers with native epics, an epic may hold the map instead; a labelled issue works everywhere.)
-- **Child ticket**: an issue carrying `Part of #<map>` at the top of its description and labels `wayfinder:<type>` (`research`/`prototype`/`grilling`/`task`). Once claimed, the ticket is assigned to the driving dev.
-- **Blocking**: GitLab's **native blocking link**, the canonical, UI-visible representation. Add it with the `/blocked_by #<n>` quick action, posted as a note (`glab issue note <child> --message "/blocked_by #<blocker>"`). Native blocking links are a Premium/Ultimate feature; on the free tier (or where unavailable) fall back to a `Blocked by: #<n>, #<n>` line at the top of the description. A ticket is unblocked when every blocker is closed.
-- **Frontier query**: `glab issue list -F json` scoped to the map's children, drop any with an open blocker: a native `blocked_by` link to an open issue (`glab api projects/:id/issues/:iid/links`), or an open issue in the `Blocked by` line, or an assignee; first in map order wins.
-- **Claim**: `glab issue update <n> --assignee @me`, the session's first write.
-- **Resolve**: `glab issue note <n> --message "<answer>"`, then `glab issue close <n>`, then append a context pointer (gist + link) to the map's Decisions-so-far.

package/template/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/issue-tracker-local.md

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# Issue tracker: Local Markdown
-
-Issues and specs for this repo live as markdown files in `.scratch/`.
-
-## Conventions
-
-- One feature per directory: `.scratch/<feature-slug>/`
-- The spec is `.scratch/<feature-slug>/spec.md`
-- Implementation issues are one file per ticket at `.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md`, numbered from `01`, never a single combined tickets file
-- Triage state is recorded as a `Status:` line near the top of each issue file (see `triage-labels.md` for the role strings)
-- Comments and conversation history append to the bottom of the file under a `## Comments` heading
-
-## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
-
-Create a new file under `.scratch/<feature-slug>/` (creating the directory if needed).
-
-## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
-
-Read the file at the referenced path. The user will normally pass the path or the issue number directly.
-
-## Wayfinding operations
-
-Used by `/wayfinder`. The **map** is a file with one **child** file per ticket.
-
-- **Map**: `.scratch/<effort>/map.md` (the Notes / Decisions-so-far / Fog body).
-- **Child ticket**: `.scratch/<effort>/issues/NN-<slug>.md`, numbered from `01`, with the question in the body. A `Type:` line records the ticket type (`research`/`prototype`/`grilling`/`task`); a `Status:` line records `claimed`/`resolved`.
-- **Blocking**: a `Blocked by: NN, NN` line near the top. A ticket is unblocked when every file it lists is `resolved`.
-- **Frontier**: scan `.scratch/<effort>/issues/` for files that are open, unblocked, and unclaimed; first by number wins.
-- **Claim**: set `Status: claimed` and save before any work.
-- **Resolve**: append the answer under an `## Answer` heading, set `Status: resolved`, then append a context pointer (gist + link) to the map's Decisions-so-far in `map.md`.

package/template/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/triage-labels.md

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-# Triage Labels
-
-The skills speak in terms of five canonical triage roles. This file maps those roles to the actual label strings used in this repo's issue tracker.
-
-| Label in mattpocock/skills | Label in our tracker | Meaning                                  |
-| -------------------------- | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
-| `needs-triage`             | `needs-triage`       | Maintainer needs to evaluate this issue  |
-| `needs-info`               | `needs-info`         | Waiting on reporter for more information |
-| `ready-for-agent`          | `ready-for-agent`    | Fully specified, ready for an AFK agent  |
-| `ready-for-human`          | `ready-for-human`    | Requires human implementation            |
-| `wontfix`                  | `wontfix`            | Will not be actioned                     |
-
-When a skill mentions a role (e.g. "apply the AFK-ready triage label"), use the corresponding label string from this table.
-
-Edit the right-hand column to match whatever vocabulary you actually use.

package/template/.agents/skills/show-me/SKILL.md

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
----
-name: show-me
-description: Show the current implementation or state for the user to review, using real observable evidence when an existing run entrypoint is available.
----
-
-# Show Me
-
-只读展示当前 implementation 或状态供用户 review。不要修改源码、测试或配置；不要为了演示臆造新的入口。
-
-## Steps
-
-1. **Identify**：查找项目已有的运行脚本、CLI、dev server、browser 入口或现有产物，选择最接近用户可观察行为的入口。
-2. **Run**：优先实际运行并捕获可见结果；UI 使用已有 browser/Playwright 入口，CLI 使用已有命令。没有安全、明确的运行入口时，回退到 `git status`、相关 diff、静态配置或已有产物，并明确未完成真实运行验证。
-3. **Report**：按以下固定格式在对话中汇报，不默认写报告文件：
-
-   ```text
-   展示方式：
-   实际执行的命令/入口：
-   实际可见结果：
-   产物或 URL：
-   未验证项与限制：
-   ```
-
-需要启动临时进程或目录时使用项目已有的隔离和清理方式；展示结束后清理本次创建的资源。
-
-## 出口
-
-用户获得可复核的实际结果，或获得明确的静态证据与“未真实运行”的限制说明；不以“构建成功”或推测结果代替展示。

package/template/.agents/skills/tdd/SKILL.md

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
----
-name: tdd
-description: Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
----
-
-# Test-Driven Development
-
-TDD is the red → green loop. This skill is the reference that makes that loop produce tests worth keeping: what a good test is, where tests go, the anti-patterns, and the rules of the loop. Every section applies on every cycle: consult them before and during the loop, not after.
-
-When exploring the codebase, read `CONTEXT.md` (if it exists) so test names and interface vocabulary match the project's domain language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
-
-## What a good test is
-
-Tests verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details. Code can change entirely; tests shouldn't. A good test reads like a specification: "user can checkout with valid cart" tells you exactly what capability exists, and it survives refactors because it doesn't care about internal structure.
-
-See [tests.md](tests.md) for examples and [mocking.md](mocking.md) for mocking guidelines.
-
-## Seams: where tests go
-
-A **seam** is the public boundary you test at: the interface where you observe behavior without reaching inside. Tests live at seams, never against internals.
-
-**Test only at pre-agreed seams.** Before writing any test, write down the seams under test and confirm them with the user. No test is written at an unconfirmed seam. You can't test everything, so agreeing the seams up front is how testing effort lands on the critical paths and complex logic instead of every edge case.
-
-Ask: "What's the public interface, and which seams should we test?"
-
-When the shape of that interface is itself in question (how deep the module is, where the seam belongs, what the interface should expose), call the Skill tool with "codebase-design" for the vocabulary. It is the shared source of the module, interface, depth, seam, adapter, leverage and locality terms, and it is a reference to consult, not a session to run.
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-- **Implementation-coupled**: mocks internal collaborators, tests private methods, or verifies through a side channel (querying the database instead of using the interface). The tell: the test breaks when you refactor but behavior hasn't changed.
-- **Tautological**: the assertion recomputes the expected value the way the code does (`expect(add(a, b)).toBe(a + b)`, a snapshot derived by hand the same way, a constant asserted equal to itself), so it passes by construction and can never disagree with the code. Expected values must come from an independent source of truth: a known-good literal, a worked example, the spec.
-- **Horizontal slicing**: writing all tests first, then all implementation. Bulk tests verify _imagined_ behavior: you test the _shape_ of things rather than user-facing behavior, the tests go insensitive to real changes, and you commit to test structure before understanding the implementation. Work in **vertical slices** instead: one test → one implementation → repeat, each test a **tracer bullet** that responds to what the last cycle taught you.
-
-## Rules of the loop
-
-- **Red before green.** Write the failing test first, then only enough code to pass it. Don't anticipate future tests or add speculative features.
-- **One slice at a time.** One seam, one test, one minimal implementation per cycle.
-- **Refactoring is not part of the loop.** It belongs to the review stage (see the `code-review` skill), not the red → green implementation cycle.

package/template/.agents/skills/tdd/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "TDD"
-  short_description: "Test-driven red-green-refactor"

package/template/.agents/skills/tdd/mocking.md

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-# When to Mock
-
-Mock at **system boundaries** only:
-
-- External APIs (payment, email, etc.)
-- Databases (sometimes - prefer test DB)
-- Time/randomness
-- File system (sometimes)
-
-Don't mock:
-
-- Your own classes/modules
-- Internal collaborators
-- Anything you control
-
-## Designing for Mockability
-
-At system boundaries, design interfaces that are easy to mock:
-
-**1. Use dependency injection**
-
-Pass external dependencies in rather than creating them internally:
-
-```typescript
-// Easy to mock
-function processPayment(order, paymentClient) {
-  return paymentClient.charge(order.total);
-}
-
-// Hard to mock
-function processPayment(order) {
-  const client = new StripeClient(process.env.STRIPE_KEY);
-  return client.charge(order.total);
-}
-```
-
-**2. Prefer SDK-style interfaces over generic fetchers**
-
-Create specific functions for each external operation instead of one generic function with conditional logic:
-
-```typescript
-// GOOD: Each function is independently mockable
-const api = {
-  getUser: (id) => fetch(`/users/${id}`),
-  getOrders: (userId) => fetch(`/users/${userId}/orders`),
-  createOrder: (data) => fetch('/orders', { method: 'POST', body: data }),
-};
-
-// BAD: Mocking requires conditional logic inside the mock
-const api = {
-  fetch: (endpoint, options) => fetch(endpoint, options),
-};
-```
-
-The SDK approach means:
-- Each mock returns one specific shape
-- No conditional logic in test setup
-- Easier to see which endpoints a test exercises
-- Type safety per endpoint

package/template/.agents/skills/tdd/tests.md

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-# Good and Bad Tests
-
-## Good Tests
-
-**Integration-style**: Test through real interfaces, not mocks of internal parts.
-
-```typescript
-// GOOD: Tests observable behavior
-test("user can checkout with valid cart", async () => {
-  const cart = createCart();
-  cart.add(product);
-  const result = await checkout(cart, paymentMethod);
-  expect(result.status).toBe("confirmed");
-});
-```
-
-Characteristics:
-
-- Tests behavior users/callers care about
-- Uses public API only
-- Survives internal refactors
-- Describes WHAT, not HOW
-- One logical assertion per test
-
-## Bad Tests
-
-**Implementation-detail tests**: Coupled to internal structure.
-
-```typescript
-// BAD: Tests implementation details
-test("checkout calls paymentService.process", async () => {
-  const mockPayment = jest.mock(paymentService);
-  await checkout(cart, payment);
-  expect(mockPayment.process).toHaveBeenCalledWith(cart.total);
-});
-```
-
-Red flags:
-
-- Mocking internal collaborators
-- Testing private methods
-- Asserting on call counts/order
-- Test breaks when refactoring without behavior change
-- Test name describes HOW not WHAT
-- Verifying through external means instead of interface
-
-```typescript
-// BAD: Bypasses interface to verify
-test("createUser saves to database", async () => {
-  await createUser({ name: "Alice" });
-  const row = await db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = ?", ["Alice"]);
-  expect(row).toBeDefined();
-});
-
-// GOOD: Verifies through interface
-test("createUser makes user retrievable", async () => {
-  const user = await createUser({ name: "Alice" });
-  const retrieved = await getUser(user.id);
-  expect(retrieved.name).toBe("Alice");
-});
-```
-
-**Tautological tests**: Expected value restates the implementation, so the test passes by construction.
-
-```typescript
-// BAD: Expected value is recomputed the way the code computes it
-test("calculateTotal sums line items", () => {
-  const items = [{ price: 10 }, { price: 5 }];
-  const expected = items.reduce((sum, i) => sum + i.price, 0);
-  expect(calculateTotal(items)).toBe(expected);
-});
-
-// GOOD: Expected value is an independent, known literal
-test("calculateTotal sums line items", () => {
-  expect(calculateTotal([{ price: 10 }, { price: 5 }])).toBe(15);
-});
-```

package/template/.agents/skills/tdd-implement/SKILL.md

@@ -1,81 +0,0 @@
----
-name: tdd-implement
-description: "完成已确认的 spec/ticket 的 test-first/TDD 交付闭环。"
-disable-model-invocation: true
----
-
-# TDD Implement
-
-完成已确认的 spec/task。TDD 的红绿语义、测试质量、seam 和 mock 规则以 [tdd](.agents/skills/tdd/SKILL.md) 为唯一事实源；本技能只负责 issue 级实现、验证、Review 与收尾编排。
-
-## 入口
-
-- **单 issue**：直接按下方 Steps 执行。
-- **多 issue**：存在多个 `Type: task` 时，读取 [orchestration.md](references/orchestration.md) 后按依赖顺序逐个完成。
-- `research`、`prototype`、`grilling` 类型任务分流到对应技能。
-
-## Steps
-
-### ① Red-Green
-
-按 `tdd` 完成当前 issue 的所有 Acceptance Criteria。
-
-将需要实现或修改的内容拆成可独立验证的 Behavior。一次只推进一个 Behavior：每个尚未实现的 Behavior 都必须分别完成 `tdd` 的 Red → Green cycle，完成后才能进入下一个 Behavior。
-
-前一个 Behavior 已完成 TDD，不代表后续 Behavior 可以直接修改实现代码。
-
-已有行为若无需修改且已由现有测试充分覆盖，不强制制造 Red。
-
-**出口：**
-
-- 所有需要实现或修改的 Behavior 均完成各自的 Red → Green cycle；
-- Acceptance Criteria 对应行为通过相关验证。
-
-### ② Verify
-
-读取 [verify.md](references/verify.md)，执行当前 issue 所需的最终验证。
-
-最终验证通过且 diff 稳定后执行完整 `code-review`。
-
-#### Review
-
-每个 issue 只在 Verify 的最终 diff 稳定后调用一次完整 `code-review`；审查维度、reviewer 数量、提示词和输出格式全部由 `code-review` 自己定义，`tdd-implement` 不复制这些规则。`code-review` 未完成或存在 blocking finding 时 issue 不得收敛；多 issue 层收敛不再次调用完整 Review。
-
-若完整 Review 存在 blocking finding：
-
-1. 仅修复对应 finding，不扩大当前 issue 范围；
-2. 修复后仅对该 finding 及其直接影响执行增量 Review；
-3. 未受影响的 Review 结论继续有效；
-4. 不重新执行完整双轴 Review；
-5. 若增量 Review 仍存在问题，仅继续修复并复核剩余 finding。
-
-所有 blocking finding 关闭后 Review 才算通过。
-
-**出口：**
-
-- 当前 issue 所需最终验证通过；
-- 要求的真实运行验证完成；
-- 完整 Review 已完成；
-- 所有 blocking finding 已关闭。
-
-## Finalize
-
-Verify 通过后读取 [finalize.md](references/finalize.md)，完成当前 issue 的必要同步、独立 commit 与 tracker/progress 收尾。
-
-Finalize 不新增产品 Behavior；若发现实现或验证遗漏，回到对应 Step 完成后再收尾。
-
-## 运行纪律
-
-- Red-Green 必须覆盖当前 issue 的全部待实现 Behavior，不能只对第一个改动执行 TDD。
-- 一个 Behavior 完成后继续下一个 Behavior，直到 Step ① 出口满足。
-- Verify 只做当前 issue 必要的最终验证；已通过的等价验证不机械重复。
-- 完整双轴 Review 每个 issue 只执行一次；后续修复只执行受影响 finding 的增量 Review。
-- 当前 Step 达到出口后继续进入下一 Step；仅在需要用户决策或存在外部阻塞时暂停。
-
-## References
-
-- TDD：[tdd](.agents/skills/tdd/SKILL.md)
-- Verify：[verify.md](references/verify.md)
-- Finalize：[finalize.md](references/finalize.md)
-- Review：[code-review](.agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md)
-- 多 issue 编排：[orchestration.md](references/orchestration.md)

package/template/.agents/skills/tdd-implement/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-interface:
-  display_name: "TDD Implement"
-  short_description: "Implement from spec/ticket via TDD red-green loop"
-policy:
-  allow_implicit_invocation: false

package/template/.agents/skills/tdd-implement/references/finalize.md

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-# Finalize
-
-仅在 Verify 通过后执行；不新增产品 Behavior。
-
-1. 完成实现要求的必要 docs/config 同步。
-2. 为当前 issue 创建一个独立 commit。
-3. 更新 progress/tracker，记录 commit、Review、验证与运行结果，并解除已满足的 blockers。
-4. 将 Acceptance Criteria 标记完成，issue 标记 `resolved`。
-
-若发现实现或验证遗漏，返回对应 Step 完成后再收尾。
-
-## 出口
-
-- 当前 issue 的独立 commit 已创建；
-- Acceptance Criteria 全部通过；
-- tracker/progress 与实际完成状态一致。