@harness-forge/cli 0.1.0

package/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-specify"
+description: "Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/specify.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before specification)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_specify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+The text the user typed after `/speckit.specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
+
+Given that feature description, do this:
+
+1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the branch:
+   - Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
+   - Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
+   - Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
+   - Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
+   - Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
+   - Examples:
+     - "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
+     - "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
+     - "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
+     - "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
+
+2. **Create the feature branch** by running the script with `--short-name` (and `--json`). In sequential mode, do NOT pass `--number` — the script auto-detects the next available number. In timestamp mode, the script generates a `YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS` prefix automatically:
+
+   **Branch numbering mode**: Before running the script, check if `.specify/init-options.json` exists and read the `branch_numbering` value.
+   - If `"timestamp"`, add `--timestamp` (Bash) or `-Timestamp` (PowerShell) to the script invocation
+   - If `"sequential"` or absent, do not add any extra flag (default behavior)
+
+   - Bash example: `.specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1 "$ARGUMENTS" --json --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
+   - Bash (timestamp): `.specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1 "$ARGUMENTS" --json --timestamp --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
+   - PowerShell example: `.specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1 "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
+   - PowerShell (timestamp): `.specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1 "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Timestamp -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
+
+   **IMPORTANT**:
+   - Do NOT pass `--number` — the script determines the correct next number automatically
+   - Always include the JSON flag (`--json` for Bash, `-Json` for PowerShell) so the output can be parsed reliably
+   - You must only ever run this script once per feature
+   - The JSON is provided in the terminal as output - always refer to it to get the actual content you're looking for
+   - The JSON output will contain BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE paths
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot")
+
+3. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
+
+4. Follow this execution flow:
+
+    1. Parse user description from Input
+       If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
+    2. Extract key concepts from description
+       Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
+    3. For unclear aspects:
+       - Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
+       - Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
+         - The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
+         - Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
+         - No reasonable default exists
+       - **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
+       - Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+    4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
+       If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
+    5. Generate Functional Requirements
+       Each requirement must be testable
+       Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
+    6. Define Success Criteria
+       Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
+       Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
+       Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
+    7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
+    8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
+
+5. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
+
+6. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
+
+   a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
+
+      ```markdown
+      # Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
+      
+      **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+      **Created**: [DATE]
+      **Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
+      
+      ## Content Quality
+      
+      - [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+      - [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
+      - [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+      - [ ] All mandatory sections completed
+      
+      ## Requirement Completeness
+      
+      - [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+      - [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+      - [ ] Success criteria are measurable
+      - [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+      - [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+      - [ ] Edge cases are identified
+      - [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
+      - [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+      
+      ## Feature Readiness
+      
+      - [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+      - [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
+      - [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+      - [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
+      
+      ## Notes
+      
+      - Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
+      ```
+
+   b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
+      - For each item, determine if it passes or fails
+      - Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
+
+   c. **Handle Validation Results**:
+
+      - **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 7
+
+      - **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
+        1. List the failing items and specific issues
+        2. Update the spec to address each issue
+        3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
+        4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
+
+      - **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
+        1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
+        2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
+        3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
+
+           ```markdown
+           ## Question [N]: [Topic]
+           
+           **Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
+           
+           **What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
+           
+           **Suggested Answers**:
+           
+           | Option | Answer | Implications |
+           |--------|--------|--------------|
+           | A      | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | B      | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | C      | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
+           
+           **Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
+           ```
+
+        4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
+           - Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
+           - Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
+           - Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
+           - Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
+        5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
+        6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
+        7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
+        8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
+        9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
+
+   d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
+
+7. Report completion with branch name, spec file path, checklist results, and readiness for the next phase (`/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`).
+
+8. **Check for extension hooks**: After reporting completion, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+   - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_specify` key
+   - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+   - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+   - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+     - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+     - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+   - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+     - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+       Command: `/{command}`
+       Description: {description}
+
+       Prompt: {prompt}
+       To execute: `/{command}`
+       ```
+     - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+       Executing: `/{command}`
+       EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+       ```
+   - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+**NOTE:** The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
+
+## Quick Guidelines
+
+- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
+- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
+- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
+- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
+
+### Section Requirements
+
+- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
+- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
+- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
+
+### For AI Generation
+
+When creating this spec from a user prompt:
+
+1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
+2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
+3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
+   - Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
+   - Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
+   - Lack any reasonable default
+4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
+6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
+   - Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
+   - User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
+   - Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
+
+**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
+
+- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
+- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
+- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
+- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
+- Integration patterns: Use project-appropriate patterns (REST/GraphQL for web services, function calls for libraries, CLI args for tools, etc.)
+
+### Success Criteria Guidelines
+
+Success criteria must be:
+
+1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
+2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
+3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
+4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
+
+**Good examples**:
+
+- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
+- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
+- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
+- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
+
+**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
+
+- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
+- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
+- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
+- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)

package/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-tasks"
+description: "Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/tasks.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before tasks generation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_tasks` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
+   - **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
+   - **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (interface contracts), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
+   - Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
+
+3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
+   - Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
+   - Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
+   - If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
+   - If contracts/ exists: Map interface contracts to user stories
+   - If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
+   - Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
+   - Create parallel execution examples per user story
+   - Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
+
+4. **Generate tasks.md**: Use `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` as structure, fill with:
+   - Correct feature name from plan.md
+   - Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
+   - Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
+   - Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
+   - Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
+   - Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
+   - All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Clear file paths for each task
+   - Dependencies section showing story completion order
+   - Parallel execution examples per story
+   - Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
+
+5. **Report**: Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
+   - Total task count
+   - Task count per user story
+   - Parallel opportunities identified
+   - Independent test criteria for each story
+   - Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
+   - Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
+
+6. **Check for extension hooks**: After tasks.md is generated, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+   - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_tasks` key
+   - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+   - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+   - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+     - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+     - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+   - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+     - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+       Command: `/{command}`
+       Description: {description}
+
+       Prompt: {prompt}
+       To execute: `/{command}`
+       ```
+     - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+       Executing: `/{command}`
+       EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+       ```
+   - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
+
+The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
+
+## Task Generation Rules
+
+**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
+
+**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
+
+### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
+
+Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
+
+```text
+- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
+```
+
+**Format Components**:
+
+1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
+2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
+3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
+4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
+   - Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
+   - Setup phase: NO story label
+   - Foundational phase: NO story label  
+   - User Story phases: MUST have story label
+   - Polish phase: NO story label
+5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
+
+**Examples**:
+
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
+- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
+
+### Task Organization
+
+1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
+   - Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
+   - Map all related components to their story:
+     - Models needed for that story
+     - Services needed for that story
+     - Interfaces/UI needed for that story
+     - If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
+   - Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
+
+2. **From Contracts**:
+   - Map each interface contract → to the user story it serves
+   - If tests requested: Each interface contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
+
+3. **From Data Model**:
+   - Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
+   - If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
+   - Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
+
+4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
+   - Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
+   - Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
+   - Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
+
+### Phase Structure
+
+- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
+- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
+- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
+  - Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
+  - Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
+- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns

package/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-taskstoissues"
+description: "Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/taskstoissues.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Outline
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
+1. Get the Git remote by running:
+
+```bash
+git config --get remote.origin.url
+```
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
+
+1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL

package/skills/swift-engineering/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+---
+name: swift-engineering
+description: swift engineering guidance for structured Harness Forge language packs.
+---
+
+# Swift Engineering
+
+Use this skill when the repository is primarily Swift or when the task touches `.swift` or `Package.swift`.
+
+## Activation
+
+- Swift dominates the task or repository
+- the work touches package modules, platform code, or concurrency-sensitive logic
+
+## Load Order
+
+- `rules/common/`
+- `rules/swift/`
+- `knowledge-bases/structured/swift/docs/`
+- `knowledge-bases/structured/swift/examples/`
+
+## Execution Contract
+
+1. inspect module boundaries, platform assumptions, and concurrency concerns
+2. select the common and Swift-specific rules for the change
+3. implement with explicit API, ownership, and build decisions
+4. verify with the repo package or Xcode-equivalent validation path and the checklist
+
+## Outputs
+
+- touched-module summary
+- implementation summary
+- validation result or blocker note
+
+## Validation
+
+- run the repo Swift validation path when available
+- consult `knowledge-bases/structured/swift/docs/review-checklist.md`
+
+## Escalation
+
+- escalate when platform behavior, Apple ecosystem constraints, or concurrency tradeoffs are unclear
+- escalate when the task affects multiple targets or package boundaries

package/skills/test-strategy-and-coverage/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+name: test-strategy-and-coverage
+description: Define right-sized test layers and coverage priorities for a change.
+---
+
+# Test Strategy And Coverage
+
+## Trigger Signals
+
+- the task adds or changes behavior and the right test depth is unclear
+
+## Inspect First
+
+- changed files, existing test layers, and validation commands
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. map the behavioral risk of the change
+2. choose the minimum test layers that cover that risk
+3. identify critical missing cases
+4. summarize the coverage strategy
+
+## Output Contract
+
+- recommended test layers
+- critical cases to cover
+- explicit gaps or acceptable deferrals
+
+## Failure Modes
+
+- no executable validation surface exists
+
+## Escalation
+
+- escalate when a risky change has no trustworthy test path