@gong-ym/ai-spec-auto 0.2.14 → 0.2.15

package/.agents/skills/profiles/react/vercel-react-best-practices/rules/js-min-max-loop.md

@@ -1,82 +1,82 @@
----
-title: Use Loop for Min/Max Instead of Sort
-impact: LOW
-impactDescription: O(n) instead of O(n log n)
-tags: javascript, arrays, performance, sorting, algorithms
----
-
-## Use Loop for Min/Max Instead of Sort
-
-Finding the smallest or largest element only requires a single pass through the array. Sorting is wasteful and slower.
-
-**Incorrect (O(n log n) - sort to find latest):**
-
-```typescript
-interface Project {
-  id: string
-  name: string
-  updatedAt: number
-}
-
-function getLatestProject(projects: Project[]) {
-  const sorted = [...projects].sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt - a.updatedAt)
-  return sorted[0]
-}
-```
-
-Sorts the entire array just to find the maximum value.
-
-**Incorrect (O(n log n) - sort for oldest and newest):**
-
-```typescript
-function getOldestAndNewest(projects: Project[]) {
-  const sorted = [...projects].sort((a, b) => a.updatedAt - b.updatedAt)
-  return { oldest: sorted[0], newest: sorted[sorted.length - 1] }
-}
-```
-
-Still sorts unnecessarily when only min/max are needed.
-
-**Correct (O(n) - single loop):**
-
-```typescript
-function getLatestProject(projects: Project[]) {
-  if (projects.length === 0) return null
-  
-  let latest = projects[0]
-  
-  for (let i = 1; i < projects.length; i++) {
-    if (projects[i].updatedAt > latest.updatedAt) {
-      latest = projects[i]
-    }
-  }
-  
-  return latest
-}
-
-function getOldestAndNewest(projects: Project[]) {
-  if (projects.length === 0) return { oldest: null, newest: null }
-  
-  let oldest = projects[0]
-  let newest = projects[0]
-  
-  for (let i = 1; i < projects.length; i++) {
-    if (projects[i].updatedAt < oldest.updatedAt) oldest = projects[i]
-    if (projects[i].updatedAt > newest.updatedAt) newest = projects[i]
-  }
-  
-  return { oldest, newest }
-}
-```
-
-Single pass through the array, no copying, no sorting.
-
-**Alternative (Math.min/Math.max for small arrays):**
-
-```typescript
-const numbers = [5, 2, 8, 1, 9]
-const min = Math.min(...numbers)
-const max = Math.max(...numbers)
-```
-
-This works for small arrays, but can be slower or just throw an error for very large arrays due to spread operator limitations. Maximal array length is approximately 124000 in Chrome 143 and 638000 in Safari 18; exact numbers may vary - see [the fiddle](https://jsfiddle.net/qw1jabsx/4/). Use the loop approach for reliability.
+---
+title: Use Loop for Min/Max Instead of Sort
+impact: LOW
+impactDescription: O(n) instead of O(n log n)
+tags: javascript, arrays, performance, sorting, algorithms
+---
+
+## Use Loop for Min/Max Instead of Sort
+
+Finding the smallest or largest element only requires a single pass through the array. Sorting is wasteful and slower.
+
+**Incorrect (O(n log n) - sort to find latest):**
+
+```typescript
+interface Project {
+  id: string
+  name: string
+  updatedAt: number
+}
+
+function getLatestProject(projects: Project[]) {
+  const sorted = [...projects].sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt - a.updatedAt)
+  return sorted[0]
+}
+```
+
+Sorts the entire array just to find the maximum value.
+
+**Incorrect (O(n log n) - sort for oldest and newest):**
+
+```typescript
+function getOldestAndNewest(projects: Project[]) {
+  const sorted = [...projects].sort((a, b) => a.updatedAt - b.updatedAt)
+  return { oldest: sorted[0], newest: sorted[sorted.length - 1] }
+}
+```
+
+Still sorts unnecessarily when only min/max are needed.
+
+**Correct (O(n) - single loop):**
+
+```typescript
+function getLatestProject(projects: Project[]) {
+  if (projects.length === 0) return null
+  
+  let latest = projects[0]
+  
+  for (let i = 1; i < projects.length; i++) {
+    if (projects[i].updatedAt > latest.updatedAt) {
+      latest = projects[i]
+    }
+  }
+  
+  return latest
+}
+
+function getOldestAndNewest(projects: Project[]) {
+  if (projects.length === 0) return { oldest: null, newest: null }
+  
+  let oldest = projects[0]
+  let newest = projects[0]
+  
+  for (let i = 1; i < projects.length; i++) {
+    if (projects[i].updatedAt < oldest.updatedAt) oldest = projects[i]
+    if (projects[i].updatedAt > newest.updatedAt) newest = projects[i]
+  }
+  
+  return { oldest, newest }
+}
+```
+
+Single pass through the array, no copying, no sorting.
+
+**Alternative (Math.min/Math.max for small arrays):**
+
+```typescript
+const numbers = [5, 2, 8, 1, 9]
+const min = Math.min(...numbers)
+const max = Math.max(...numbers)
+```
+
+This works for small arrays, but can be slower or just throw an error for very large arrays due to spread operator limitations. Maximal array length is approximately 124000 in Chrome 143 and 638000 in Safari 18; exact numbers may vary - see [the fiddle](https://jsfiddle.net/qw1jabsx/4/). Use the loop approach for reliability.

package/.agents/skills/profiles/react/vercel-react-best-practices/rules/js-set-map-lookups.md

@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
----
-title: Use Set/Map for O(1) Lookups
-impact: LOW-MEDIUM
-impactDescription: O(n) to O(1)
-tags: javascript, set, map, data-structures, performance
----
-
-## Use Set/Map for O(1) Lookups
-
-Convert arrays to Set/Map for repeated membership checks.
-
-**Incorrect (O(n) per check):**
-
-```typescript
-const allowedIds = ['a', 'b', 'c', ...]
-items.filter(item => allowedIds.includes(item.id))
-```
-
-**Correct (O(1) per check):**
-
-```typescript
-const allowedIds = new Set(['a', 'b', 'c', ...])
-items.filter(item => allowedIds.has(item.id))
-```
+---
+title: Use Set/Map for O(1) Lookups
+impact: LOW-MEDIUM
+impactDescription: O(n) to O(1)
+tags: javascript, set, map, data-structures, performance
+---
+
+## Use Set/Map for O(1) Lookups
+
+Convert arrays to Set/Map for repeated membership checks.
+
+**Incorrect (O(n) per check):**
+
+```typescript
+const allowedIds = ['a', 'b', 'c', ...]
+items.filter(item => allowedIds.includes(item.id))
+```
+
+**Correct (O(1) per check):**
+
+```typescript
+const allowedIds = new Set(['a', 'b', 'c', ...])
+items.filter(item => allowedIds.has(item.id))
+```

package/.agents/skills/profiles/react/vercel-react-best-practices/rules/js-tosorted-immutable.md

@@ -1,57 +1,57 @@
----
-title: Use toSorted() Instead of sort() for Immutability
-impact: MEDIUM-HIGH
-impactDescription: prevents mutation bugs in React state
-tags: javascript, arrays, immutability, react, state, mutation
----
-
-## Use toSorted() Instead of sort() for Immutability
-
-`.sort()` mutates the array in place, which can cause bugs with React state and props. Use `.toSorted()` to create a new sorted array without mutation.
-
-**Incorrect (mutates original array):**
-
-```typescript
-function UserList({ users }: { users: User[] }) {
-  // Mutates the users prop array!
-  const sorted = useMemo(
-    () => users.sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name)),
-    [users]
-  )
-  return <div>{sorted.map(renderUser)}</div>
-}
-```
-
-**Correct (creates new array):**
-
-```typescript
-function UserList({ users }: { users: User[] }) {
-  // Creates new sorted array, original unchanged
-  const sorted = useMemo(
-    () => users.toSorted((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name)),
-    [users]
-  )
-  return <div>{sorted.map(renderUser)}</div>
-}
-```
-
-**Why this matters in React:**
-
-1. Props/state mutations break React's immutability model - React expects props and state to be treated as read-only
-2. Causes stale closure bugs - Mutating arrays inside closures (callbacks, effects) can lead to unexpected behavior
-
-**Browser support (fallback for older browsers):**
-
-`.toSorted()` is available in all modern browsers (Chrome 110+, Safari 16+, Firefox 115+, Node.js 20+). For older environments, use spread operator:
-
-```typescript
-// Fallback for older browsers
-const sorted = [...items].sort((a, b) => a.value - b.value)
-```
-
-**Other immutable array methods:**
-
-- `.toSorted()` - immutable sort
-- `.toReversed()` - immutable reverse
-- `.toSpliced()` - immutable splice
-- `.with()` - immutable element replacement
+---
+title: Use toSorted() Instead of sort() for Immutability
+impact: MEDIUM-HIGH
+impactDescription: prevents mutation bugs in React state
+tags: javascript, arrays, immutability, react, state, mutation
+---
+
+## Use toSorted() Instead of sort() for Immutability
+
+`.sort()` mutates the array in place, which can cause bugs with React state and props. Use `.toSorted()` to create a new sorted array without mutation.
+
+**Incorrect (mutates original array):**
+
+```typescript
+function UserList({ users }: { users: User[] }) {
+  // Mutates the users prop array!
+  const sorted = useMemo(
+    () => users.sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name)),
+    [users]
+  )
+  return <div>{sorted.map(renderUser)}</div>
+}
+```
+
+**Correct (creates new array):**
+
+```typescript
+function UserList({ users }: { users: User[] }) {
+  // Creates new sorted array, original unchanged
+  const sorted = useMemo(
+    () => users.toSorted((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name)),
+    [users]
+  )
+  return <div>{sorted.map(renderUser)}</div>
+}
+```
+
+**Why this matters in React:**
+
+1. Props/state mutations break React's immutability model - React expects props and state to be treated as read-only
+2. Causes stale closure bugs - Mutating arrays inside closures (callbacks, effects) can lead to unexpected behavior
+
+**Browser support (fallback for older browsers):**
+
+`.toSorted()` is available in all modern browsers (Chrome 110+, Safari 16+, Firefox 115+, Node.js 20+). For older environments, use spread operator:
+
+```typescript
+// Fallback for older browsers
+const sorted = [...items].sort((a, b) => a.value - b.value)
+```
+
+**Other immutable array methods:**
+
+- `.toSorted()` - immutable sort
+- `.toReversed()` - immutable reverse
+- `.toSpliced()` - immutable splice
+- `.with()` - immutable element replacement

package/.agents/skills/profiles/react/vercel-react-best-practices/rules/rendering-activity.md

@@ -1,26 +1,26 @@
----
-title: Use Activity Component for Show/Hide
-impact: MEDIUM
-impactDescription: preserves state/DOM
-tags: rendering, activity, visibility, state-preservation
----
-
-## Use Activity Component for Show/Hide
-
-Use React's `<Activity>` to preserve state/DOM for expensive components that frequently toggle visibility.
-
-**Usage:**
-
-```tsx
-import { Activity } from 'react'
-
-function Dropdown({ isOpen }: Props) {
-  return (
-    <Activity mode={isOpen ? 'visible' : 'hidden'}>
-      <ExpensiveMenu />
-    </Activity>
-  )
-}
-```
-
-Avoids expensive re-renders and state loss.
+---
+title: Use Activity Component for Show/Hide
+impact: MEDIUM
+impactDescription: preserves state/DOM
+tags: rendering, activity, visibility, state-preservation
+---
+
+## Use Activity Component for Show/Hide
+
+Use React's `<Activity>` to preserve state/DOM for expensive components that frequently toggle visibility.
+
+**Usage:**
+
+```tsx
+import { Activity } from 'react'
+
+function Dropdown({ isOpen }: Props) {
+  return (
+    <Activity mode={isOpen ? 'visible' : 'hidden'}>
+      <ExpensiveMenu />
+    </Activity>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+Avoids expensive re-renders and state loss.

package/.agents/skills/profiles/react/vercel-react-best-practices/rules/rendering-animate-svg-wrapper.md

@@ -1,47 +1,47 @@
----
-title: Animate SVG Wrapper Instead of SVG Element
-impact: LOW
-impactDescription: enables hardware acceleration
-tags: rendering, svg, css, animation, performance
----
-
-## Animate SVG Wrapper Instead of SVG Element
-
-Many browsers don't have hardware acceleration for CSS3 animations on SVG elements. Wrap SVG in a `<div>` and animate the wrapper instead.
-
-**Incorrect (animating SVG directly - no hardware acceleration):**
-
-```tsx
-function LoadingSpinner() {
-  return (
-    <svg 
-      className="animate-spin"
-      width="24" 
-      height="24" 
-      viewBox="0 0 24 24"
-    >
-      <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="10" stroke="currentColor" />
-    </svg>
-  )
-}
-```
-
-**Correct (animating wrapper div - hardware accelerated):**
-
-```tsx
-function LoadingSpinner() {
-  return (
-    <div className="animate-spin">
-      <svg 
-        width="24" 
-        height="24" 
-        viewBox="0 0 24 24"
-      >
-        <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="10" stroke="currentColor" />
-      </svg>
-    </div>
-  )
-}
-```
-
-This applies to all CSS transforms and transitions (`transform`, `opacity`, `translate`, `scale`, `rotate`). The wrapper div allows browsers to use GPU acceleration for smoother animations.
+---
+title: Animate SVG Wrapper Instead of SVG Element
+impact: LOW
+impactDescription: enables hardware acceleration
+tags: rendering, svg, css, animation, performance
+---
+
+## Animate SVG Wrapper Instead of SVG Element
+
+Many browsers don't have hardware acceleration for CSS3 animations on SVG elements. Wrap SVG in a `<div>` and animate the wrapper instead.
+
+**Incorrect (animating SVG directly - no hardware acceleration):**
+
+```tsx
+function LoadingSpinner() {
+  return (
+    <svg 
+      className="animate-spin"
+      width="24" 
+      height="24" 
+      viewBox="0 0 24 24"
+    >
+      <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="10" stroke="currentColor" />
+    </svg>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+**Correct (animating wrapper div - hardware accelerated):**
+
+```tsx
+function LoadingSpinner() {
+  return (
+    <div className="animate-spin">
+      <svg 
+        width="24" 
+        height="24" 
+        viewBox="0 0 24 24"
+      >
+        <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="10" stroke="currentColor" />
+      </svg>
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+This applies to all CSS transforms and transitions (`transform`, `opacity`, `translate`, `scale`, `rotate`). The wrapper div allows browsers to use GPU acceleration for smoother animations.

package/.agents/skills/profiles/react/vercel-react-best-practices/rules/rendering-conditional-render.md

@@ -1,40 +1,40 @@
----
-title: Use Explicit Conditional Rendering
-impact: LOW
-impactDescription: prevents rendering 0 or NaN
-tags: rendering, conditional, jsx, falsy-values
----
-
-## Use Explicit Conditional Rendering
-
-Use explicit ternary operators (`? :`) instead of `&&` for conditional rendering when the condition can be `0`, `NaN`, or other falsy values that render.
-
-**Incorrect (renders "0" when count is 0):**
-
-```tsx
-function Badge({ count }: { count: number }) {
-  return (
-    <div>
-      {count && <span className="badge">{count}</span>}
-    </div>
-  )
-}
-
-// When count = 0, renders: <div>0</div>
-// When count = 5, renders: <div><span class="badge">5</span></div>
-```
-
-**Correct (renders nothing when count is 0):**
-
-```tsx
-function Badge({ count }: { count: number }) {
-  return (
-    <div>
-      {count > 0 ? <span className="badge">{count}</span> : null}
-    </div>
-  )
-}
-
-// When count = 0, renders: <div></div>
-// When count = 5, renders: <div><span class="badge">5</span></div>
-```
+---
+title: Use Explicit Conditional Rendering
+impact: LOW
+impactDescription: prevents rendering 0 or NaN
+tags: rendering, conditional, jsx, falsy-values
+---
+
+## Use Explicit Conditional Rendering
+
+Use explicit ternary operators (`? :`) instead of `&&` for conditional rendering when the condition can be `0`, `NaN`, or other falsy values that render.
+
+**Incorrect (renders "0" when count is 0):**
+
+```tsx
+function Badge({ count }: { count: number }) {
+  return (
+    <div>
+      {count && <span className="badge">{count}</span>}
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+
+// When count = 0, renders: <div>0</div>
+// When count = 5, renders: <div><span class="badge">5</span></div>
+```
+
+**Correct (renders nothing when count is 0):**
+
+```tsx
+function Badge({ count }: { count: number }) {
+  return (
+    <div>
+      {count > 0 ? <span className="badge">{count}</span> : null}
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+
+// When count = 0, renders: <div></div>
+// When count = 5, renders: <div><span class="badge">5</span></div>
+```

package/.agents/skills/profiles/react/vercel-react-best-practices/rules/rendering-content-visibility.md

@@ -1,38 +1,38 @@
----
-title: CSS content-visibility for Long Lists
-impact: HIGH
-impactDescription: faster initial render
-tags: rendering, css, content-visibility, long-lists
----
-
-## CSS content-visibility for Long Lists
-
-Apply `content-visibility: auto` to defer off-screen rendering.
-
-**CSS:**
-
-```css
-.message-item {
-  content-visibility: auto;
-  contain-intrinsic-size: 0 80px;
-}
-```
-
-**Example:**
-
-```tsx
-function MessageList({ messages }: { messages: Message[] }) {
-  return (
-    <div className="overflow-y-auto h-screen">
-      {messages.map(msg => (
-        <div key={msg.id} className="message-item">
-          <Avatar user={msg.author} />
-          <div>{msg.content}</div>
-        </div>
-      ))}
-    </div>
-  )
-}
-```
-
-For 1000 messages, browser skips layout/paint for ~990 off-screen items (10× faster initial render).
+---
+title: CSS content-visibility for Long Lists
+impact: HIGH
+impactDescription: faster initial render
+tags: rendering, css, content-visibility, long-lists
+---
+
+## CSS content-visibility for Long Lists
+
+Apply `content-visibility: auto` to defer off-screen rendering.
+
+**CSS:**
+
+```css
+.message-item {
+  content-visibility: auto;
+  contain-intrinsic-size: 0 80px;
+}
+```
+
+**Example:**
+
+```tsx
+function MessageList({ messages }: { messages: Message[] }) {
+  return (
+    <div className="overflow-y-auto h-screen">
+      {messages.map(msg => (
+        <div key={msg.id} className="message-item">
+          <Avatar user={msg.author} />
+          <div>{msg.content}</div>
+        </div>
+      ))}
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+For 1000 messages, browser skips layout/paint for ~990 off-screen items (10× faster initial render).