@girs/amtk-5 5.0.0-4.0.4 → 5.0.0

package/amtk-5-vocabulary.js

@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+// The widget vocabulary of Amtk-5 as runtime data.
+//
+// GENERATED — do not edit. Provenance: Amtk-5 — dropped empty base(s): GObject.InitiallyUnowned GObject.Object Atk.ImplementorIface
+//
+// The type half of this subpath is the sibling `.d.ts`. This file exists because
+// types are erased: a consumer that wants to ask the installed library whether every
+// name here is real needs values, not declarations.
+
+export const PROVENANCE = {
+    namespace: 'Amtk',
+    version: '5',
+    libraryVersion: null,
+    childHolders: 0,
+    droppedBases: ['GObject.InitiallyUnowned', 'GObject.Object', 'Atk.ImplementorIface'],
+    inlinedBases: [],
+    unsettableProps: [],
+};
+
+export const OWN_PROPS = {
+    AmtkTreeViewScrolledWindowSizing: ['monitor-limit-enabled'],
+};
+
+export const OWN_SIGNALS = {};
+
+export const DECLS = {
+    AmtkTreeViewScrolledWindowSizing: ['AmtkTreeViewScrolledWindowSizing', 'GtkScrolledWindow', 'GtkBin', 'GtkContainer', 'GtkWidget', 'GtkBuildable'],
+};
+
+// The GTypes above that are NOT widgets: they hold one through `set_child`/`get_child`
+// and descend from `GObject.Object`. A renderer places them like a container; a check
+// asking "is this a widget" must not count them. Derived from the accessor pair, never
+// from a list — the count is in the provenance line above.
+export const CHILD_HOLDERS = [];
+
+export const ENUM_NICKS = {};
+
+// The number behind each of those nicks, read from GIR's own `value` attribute.
+//
+// It ships because position in `ENUM_NICKS` is not the value and a consumer with no
+// typelib has no other way to learn it: a surface without GI still has to hand GObject an
+// integer. The alternative a consumer reaches for first is counting, and counting is wrong
+// on 6 of the 129 enums a GTK 4 vocabulary carries (104 in Gtk-4.0, 25 in Adw-1) --
+// `GtkResponseType` runs -1 down to
+// -11, `GtkTextWindowType` starts at 1, and `GtkConstraintStrength.required` is
+// 1001001000 where counting answers 0.
+//
+// Same provenance as the nicks above, which is the point: a consumer that reads the numbers
+// from an INSTALLED library instead gets two provenances for one table, and a member the
+// vocabulary describes but the host predates then looks like a missing number rather than a
+// version gap.
+export const ENUM_VALUES = {};
+
+// The nicks GIR marks `deprecated="1"`.
+//
+// Two members of one enum may share a value -- that is how GObject spells an alias, and
+// `GTK_ALIGN_BASELINE` and `GTK_ALIGN_BASELINE_FILL` are both 4. `ENUM_VALUES` keeps
+// both names, so nothing is lost, and this is what says which of the two a number should be
+// spelled back as. Stated rather than derived: the pairing is visible in the values, the
+// DIRECTION is not.
+//
+// Read it as evidence, not as a negative: 4 registered-enum members in the 718 GIRs carry
+// the attribute at all, and 179 of the 182 value-sharing pairs carry it on neither half.
+// A nick missing from here is a nick GIR says nothing about, not a nick GIR calls current.
+export const ENUM_DEPRECATED = [];
+
+// The declared remainder: nicks whose GIR `value` is not a number this can carry.
+//
+// Every nick in `ENUM_NICKS` is in `ENUM_VALUES` or here -- a nick in neither would be a
+// silent drop. GIR carries two shapes no integer holds: a symbolic or absent value (Vala
+// writes `(null)`, a char enum writes a letter) and an integer past
+// `Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER`. The value kept here is the raw attribute, so the entry says
+// WHAT was unreadable rather than only that something was. Measured over the 718 GIRs in
+// ts-for-gir's `girs/`: 32 of 34096 registered-enum members, none in Gtk, Adw, GLib or Gio.
+export const ENUM_VALUES_UNREADABLE = {};
+
+// The number behind each member of a registered BITFIELD, keyed the same way.
+//
+// `ENUM_NICKS` refuses a bitfield because GObject cannot resolve a nick SET, and that
+// reason says nothing about one member's number. 21 writable widget properties in Gtk-4.0
+// and Adw-1 are bitfield-typed -- `GtkEntry:input-hints`, `GtkPopoverMenu:flags`,
+// `AdwTabView:shortcuts`, ... -- and they are typed bare `number`, so a host without GI
+// has nothing to compute one from. Counting is worst exactly here: 95 of 121 Gtk-4.0
+// bitfield members disagree with their position, against 29 of 685 enumeration members.
+//
+// A table of its own rather than more rows in `ENUM_VALUES`, so that "every nick in
+// `ENUM_NICKS` has a number or a declared reason" stays a claim about one set.
+export const FLAG_VALUES = {
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.flags-none': 0,
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.ignore-accels': 16,
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.ignore-accels-for-app': 64,
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.ignore-accels-for-doc': 32,
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.ignore-gaction': 1,
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.ignore-icon': 2,
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.ignore-label': 4,
+    'AmtkFactoryFlags.ignore-tooltip': 8,
+};
+
+// The same declared remainder for the bitfields. Every one of the 13 members in ts-for-gir's
+// `girs/` whose value is past `Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER` is a bitfield member (Fwupd, Qmi),
+// so this is the table that shape actually reaches.
+export const FLAG_VALUES_UNREADABLE = {};
+
+// Declaration GType + property name -> the GType of that property's enum or bitfield.
+//
+// Without it the value tables above are half an answer. A host with no GI knows it must set
+// `orientation` to the number behind the nick `vertical`; `ENUM_VALUES` is keyed
+// `GtkOrientation.vertical`, and nothing else says that `orientation` is a
+// `GtkOrientation`. Deriving it is not available: `never` is a member of several Gtk enums,
+// and choosing between them produces a wrong number rather than a missing one.
+//
+// Only where the property's OWN type is the enum. An array of them and a union that mentions
+// one are both entries a consumer would resolve wrongly, so neither is written.
+//
+// A GType named here has numbers in SOME vocabulary, not necessarily this one: the namespace
+// that OWNS an enum publishes it, so 57 of the 438 entries a full run emits want the owner's
+// vocabulary loaded too. Owners that emit none (Gdk, Pango) are inlined into the tables above.
+export const PROP_ENUMS = {};
+
+export const SLOT_CANDIDATES = {};
+
+export const SINCE = {
+    'AmtkTreeViewScrolledWindowSizing.monitor-limit-enabled': '5.10',
+};