@girardmedia/bootspring 2.0.36 → 2.0.37

package/core/planning/simulator.js

@@ -0,0 +1,1328 @@
+/**
+ * Planning Simulator
+ *
+ * Provides "what if" scenario planning for projects.
+ * Simulates feature additions, refactoring impacts, timeline changes,
+ * and resource allocation decisions.
+ *
+ * @package bootspring
+ * @module core/planning/simulator
+ */
+
+const fs = require('fs').promises;
+const path = require('path');
+
+/**
+ * Scenario types and their configurations
+ */
+const SCENARIO_TYPES = {
+  feature: {
+    name: 'Feature Addition',
+    description: 'Simulate adding a new feature to the project',
+    requiredInputs: ['featureName', 'complexity'],
+    optionalInputs: ['dependencies', 'timeline', 'resources'],
+    outputs: ['timeline', 'risks', 'dependencies', 'documentation', 'testing']
+  },
+  refactor: {
+    name: 'Refactoring',
+    description: 'Simulate refactoring existing code',
+    requiredInputs: ['scope', 'target'],
+    optionalInputs: ['approach', 'constraints'],
+    outputs: ['risk', 'testing', 'documentation', 'timeline']
+  },
+  timeline: {
+    name: 'Timeline Change',
+    description: 'Simulate compressing or extending project timeline',
+    requiredInputs: ['change', 'amount'],
+    optionalInputs: ['priorities', 'constraints'],
+    outputs: ['scope', 'quality', 'resources', 'risks']
+  },
+  resource: {
+    name: 'Resource Change',
+    description: 'Simulate adding or removing team resources',
+    requiredInputs: ['action', 'count'],
+    optionalInputs: ['skills', 'timing'],
+    outputs: ['velocity', 'coordination', 'timeline', 'quality']
+  },
+  dependency: {
+    name: 'Dependency Change',
+    description: 'Simulate adding, updating, or removing dependencies',
+    requiredInputs: ['action', 'package'],
+    optionalInputs: ['version', 'alternatives'],
+    outputs: ['compatibility', 'security', 'bundleSize', 'maintenance']
+  },
+  architecture: {
+    name: 'Architecture Change',
+    description: 'Simulate architectural modifications',
+    requiredInputs: ['change', 'components'],
+    optionalInputs: ['constraints', 'phases'],
+    outputs: ['complexity', 'risk', 'timeline', 'benefits']
+  },
+  migration: {
+    name: 'Technology Migration',
+    description: 'Simulate migrating to new technology',
+    requiredInputs: ['from', 'to'],
+    optionalInputs: ['scope', 'parallel'],
+    outputs: ['effort', 'risk', 'timeline', 'training']
+  }
+};
+
+/**
+ * Impact levels
+ */
+const IMPACT_LEVELS = {
+  minimal: { score: 1, label: 'Minimal', color: 'green' },
+  low: { score: 2, label: 'Low', color: 'blue' },
+  medium: { score: 3, label: 'Medium', color: 'yellow' },
+  high: { score: 4, label: 'High', color: 'orange' },
+  critical: { score: 5, label: 'Critical', color: 'red' }
+};
+
+/**
+ * Complexity multipliers
+ */
+const COMPLEXITY_MULTIPLIERS = {
+  trivial: 0.5,
+  simple: 1.0,
+  moderate: 1.5,
+  complex: 2.5,
+  very_complex: 4.0
+};
+
+/**
+ * PlanningSimulator class
+ */
+class PlanningSimulator {
+  /**
+   * @param {Object} options - Configuration options
+   */
+  constructor(options = {}) {
+    this.projectRoot = options.projectRoot || process.cwd();
+    this.projectContext = null;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Initialize with project context
+   * @param {Object} context - Project context
+   */
+  async initialize(context = null) {
+    if (context) {
+      this.projectContext = context;
+    } else {
+      this.projectContext = await this.loadProjectContext();
+    }
+    return this;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Load project context from codebase
+   */
+  async loadProjectContext() {
+    const context = {
+      framework: null,
+      language: 'javascript',
+      hasTypescript: false,
+      hasTests: false,
+      hasCI: false,
+      dependencies: [],
+      devDependencies: [],
+      structure: 'unknown'
+    };
+
+    try {
+      const pkgPath = path.join(this.projectRoot, 'package.json');
+      const pkgContent = await fs.readFile(pkgPath, 'utf-8');
+      const pkg = JSON.parse(pkgContent);
+
+      context.dependencies = Object.keys(pkg.dependencies || {});
+      context.devDependencies = Object.keys(pkg.devDependencies || {});
+
+      // Detect framework
+      if (context.dependencies.includes('next')) context.framework = 'nextjs';
+      else if (context.dependencies.includes('react')) context.framework = 'react';
+      else if (context.dependencies.includes('vue')) context.framework = 'vue';
+      else if (context.dependencies.includes('express')) context.framework = 'express';
+
+      // Detect TypeScript
+      context.hasTypescript = context.devDependencies.includes('typescript');
+
+      // Detect tests
+      context.hasTests = context.devDependencies.some(d =>
+        ['jest', 'vitest', 'mocha', 'cypress'].includes(d)
+      );
+
+      // Detect CI
+      try {
+        await fs.access(path.join(this.projectRoot, '.github/workflows'));
+        context.hasCI = true;
+      } catch {
+        context.hasCI = false;
+      }
+    } catch {
+      // No package.json
+    }
+
+    return context;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Run a simulation scenario
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Scenario configuration
+   */
+  async simulate(scenario) {
+    const scenarioType = SCENARIO_TYPES[scenario.type];
+    if (!scenarioType) {
+      throw new Error(`Unknown scenario type: ${scenario.type}. Valid types: ${Object.keys(SCENARIO_TYPES).join(', ')}`);
+    }
+
+    // Validate required inputs
+    for (const input of scenarioType.requiredInputs) {
+      if (!scenario[input]) {
+        throw new Error(`Missing required input: ${input}`);
+      }
+    }
+
+    // Run the appropriate simulation
+    const simulationMethod = `simulate${scenario.type.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + scenario.type.slice(1)}`;
+    const results = await this[simulationMethod](scenario);
+
+    // Add metadata
+    return {
+      timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+      scenario: {
+        type: scenario.type,
+        name: scenarioType.name,
+        inputs: scenario
+      },
+      results,
+      summary: this.generateSummary(results),
+      recommendations: this.generateRecommendations(scenario, results)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Simulate feature addition
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Feature scenario
+   */
+  async simulateFeature(scenario) {
+    const complexity = scenario.complexity || 'moderate';
+    const multiplier = COMPLEXITY_MULTIPLIERS[complexity] || 1.5;
+
+    const results = {
+      timeline: this.estimateFeatureTimeline(scenario, multiplier),
+      risks: this.identifyFeatureRisks(scenario, complexity),
+      dependencies: this.analyzeFeatureDependencies(scenario),
+      documentation: this.assessDocumentationNeeds(scenario),
+      testing: this.assessTestingNeeds(scenario, complexity),
+      impact: this.assessFeatureImpact(scenario, complexity)
+    };
+
+    return results;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Estimate feature timeline
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Feature scenario
+   * @param {number} multiplier - Complexity multiplier
+   */
+  estimateFeatureTimeline(scenario, multiplier) {
+    const baseDays = {
+      trivial: 0.5,
+      simple: 2,
+      moderate: 5,
+      complex: 10,
+      very_complex: 20
+    };
+
+    const base = baseDays[scenario.complexity] || 5;
+    const adjusted = base * multiplier;
+
+    // Factor in dependencies
+    const depFactor = (scenario.dependencies?.length || 0) * 0.5;
+
+    const totalDays = adjusted + depFactor;
+
+    return {
+      estimatedDays: Math.round(totalDays),
+      range: {
+        optimistic: Math.round(totalDays * 0.7),
+        likely: Math.round(totalDays),
+        pessimistic: Math.round(totalDays * 1.5)
+      },
+      phases: [
+        { name: 'Design', days: Math.round(totalDays * 0.15) },
+        { name: 'Implementation', days: Math.round(totalDays * 0.5) },
+        { name: 'Testing', days: Math.round(totalDays * 0.25) },
+        { name: 'Documentation', days: Math.round(totalDays * 0.1) }
+      ],
+      confidence: scenario.complexity === 'trivial' ? 'high' : 'medium'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Identify feature risks
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Feature scenario
+   * @param {string} complexity - Complexity level
+   */
+  identifyFeatureRisks(scenario, complexity) {
+    const risks = [];
+
+    // Complexity-based risks
+    if (complexity === 'complex' || complexity === 'very_complex') {
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'complexity',
+        severity: 'high',
+        description: 'High complexity increases implementation risk',
+        mitigation: 'Break into smaller increments, add review checkpoints'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // Dependency risks
+    if (scenario.dependencies?.length > 3) {
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'dependencies',
+        severity: 'medium',
+        description: 'Multiple new dependencies increase integration risk',
+        mitigation: 'Evaluate alternatives, lock versions, add integration tests'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // Timeline risks
+    if (scenario.timeline === 'tight') {
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'timeline',
+        severity: 'high',
+        description: 'Tight timeline may impact quality',
+        mitigation: 'Identify scope reduction options, prioritize core functionality'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // Integration risks
+    risks.push({
+      type: 'integration',
+      severity: complexity === 'trivial' ? 'low' : 'medium',
+      description: 'New feature may affect existing functionality',
+      mitigation: 'Comprehensive regression testing, feature flags'
+    });
+
+    return risks;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Analyze feature dependencies
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Feature scenario
+   */
+  analyzeFeatureDependencies(scenario) {
+    const deps = scenario.dependencies || [];
+
+    return {
+      explicit: deps,
+      count: deps.length,
+      impact: deps.length > 3 ? 'high' : deps.length > 1 ? 'medium' : 'low',
+      suggestions: deps.length > 0 ? [
+        'Lock dependency versions for stability',
+        'Add integration tests for dependency interactions',
+        'Document dependency requirements'
+      ] : ['No external dependencies - good isolation']
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess documentation needs
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Feature scenario
+   */
+  assessDocumentationNeeds(scenario) {
+    const complexity = scenario.complexity || 'moderate';
+
+    const docs = [];
+
+    // API docs if backend
+    if (scenario.includesApi !== false) {
+      docs.push({
+        type: 'API',
+        priority: 'high',
+        description: 'API endpoint documentation'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // User docs
+    if (complexity !== 'trivial') {
+      docs.push({
+        type: 'User Guide',
+        priority: 'medium',
+        description: 'End-user documentation'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // Technical docs for complex features
+    if (complexity === 'complex' || complexity === 'very_complex') {
+      docs.push({
+        type: 'Technical',
+        priority: 'high',
+        description: 'Architecture and design documentation'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // PRD update
+    docs.push({
+      type: 'PRD',
+      priority: 'high',
+      description: 'Update PRD with new feature'
+    });
+
+    return {
+      required: docs,
+      estimatedEffort: `${docs.length * 2} hours`,
+      automatable: ['API documentation can be auto-generated from code']
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess testing needs
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Feature scenario
+   * @param {string} complexity - Complexity level
+   */
+  assessTestingNeeds(scenario, complexity) {
+    const tests = [];
+
+    // Unit tests always needed
+    tests.push({
+      type: 'Unit',
+      coverage: complexity === 'trivial' ? '70%' : '80%',
+      priority: 'high'
+    });
+
+    // Integration tests for non-trivial
+    if (complexity !== 'trivial') {
+      tests.push({
+        type: 'Integration',
+        coverage: '60%',
+        priority: 'high'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // E2E for complex features
+    if (complexity === 'complex' || complexity === 'very_complex') {
+      tests.push({
+        type: 'E2E',
+        coverage: 'Critical paths',
+        priority: 'high'
+      });
+    }
+
+    // Performance tests if needed
+    if (scenario.performanceSensitive) {
+      tests.push({
+        type: 'Performance',
+        coverage: 'Key operations',
+        priority: 'medium'
+      });
+    }
+
+    return {
+      required: tests,
+      estimatedTestCode: this.estimateTestCode(complexity),
+      regressionRisk: complexity === 'trivial' ? 'low' : 'medium'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Estimate test code effort
+   * @param {string} complexity - Complexity level
+   */
+  estimateTestCode(complexity) {
+    const ratios = {
+      trivial: '0.3x implementation',
+      simple: '0.5x implementation',
+      moderate: '0.7x implementation',
+      complex: '1x implementation',
+      very_complex: '1.2x implementation'
+    };
+    return ratios[complexity] || '0.7x implementation';
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess feature impact
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Feature scenario
+   * @param {string} complexity - Complexity level
+   */
+  assessFeatureImpact(scenario, complexity) {
+    const impactScore = COMPLEXITY_MULTIPLIERS[complexity] || 1.5;
+
+    return {
+      codebase: impactScore > 2 ? 'high' : impactScore > 1 ? 'medium' : 'low',
+      users: scenario.userFacing !== false ? 'visible' : 'internal',
+      performance: scenario.performanceSensitive ? 'may impact' : 'minimal',
+      security: scenario.securitySensitive ? 'requires review' : 'standard',
+      maintenance: impactScore > 2.5 ? 'increased' : 'normal'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Simulate refactoring
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Refactor scenario
+   */
+  async simulateRefactor(scenario) {
+    return {
+      risk: this.assessRefactoringRisk(scenario),
+      testing: this.assessRefactoringTests(scenario),
+      timeline: this.estimateRefactoringTimeline(scenario),
+      documentation: this.assessRefactoringDocs(scenario),
+      rollback: this.planRefactoringRollback(scenario)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess refactoring risk
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Refactor scenario
+   */
+  assessRefactoringRisk(scenario) {
+    const scope = scenario.scope || 'module';
+    const risks = [];
+
+    if (scope === 'system' || scope === 'architecture') {
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'scope',
+        severity: 'high',
+        description: 'Wide-reaching changes increase regression risk',
+        mitigation: 'Incremental approach with feature flags'
+      });
+    }
+
+    risks.push({
+      type: 'regression',
+      severity: scope === 'file' ? 'low' : 'medium',
+      description: 'Existing functionality may break',
+      mitigation: 'Comprehensive test coverage before starting'
+    });
+
+    if (!this.projectContext?.hasTests) {
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'testing',
+        severity: 'high',
+        description: 'Lack of existing tests increases risk',
+        mitigation: 'Write characterization tests first'
+      });
+    }
+
+    return {
+      overall: scope === 'system' ? 'high' : scope === 'module' ? 'medium' : 'low',
+      factors: risks
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess refactoring test requirements
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Refactor scenario
+   */
+  assessRefactoringTests(scenario) {
+    return {
+      beforeRefactor: [
+        'Characterization tests for current behavior',
+        'Integration tests for affected modules',
+        'Performance baseline if relevant'
+      ],
+      afterRefactor: [
+        'Same tests must pass',
+        'Add tests for new structure',
+        'Regression suite execution'
+      ],
+      coverage: 'Ensure 80%+ coverage of refactored code'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Estimate refactoring timeline
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Refactor scenario
+   */
+  estimateRefactoringTimeline(scenario) {
+    const scopeMultipliers = {
+      file: 1,
+      module: 3,
+      feature: 5,
+      system: 10,
+      architecture: 20
+    };
+
+    const baseDays = scopeMultipliers[scenario.scope] || 3;
+
+    return {
+      estimatedDays: baseDays,
+      phases: [
+        { name: 'Analysis', days: Math.round(baseDays * 0.2) },
+        { name: 'Test Setup', days: Math.round(baseDays * 0.2) },
+        { name: 'Refactor', days: Math.round(baseDays * 0.4) },
+        { name: 'Validation', days: Math.round(baseDays * 0.2) }
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess refactoring documentation
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Refactor scenario
+   */
+  assessRefactoringDocs(scenario) {
+    return {
+      required: [
+        'ADR for refactoring decision',
+        'Updated architecture docs if structure changes',
+        'Migration guide if API changes'
+      ],
+      updateNeeded: ['Technical spec', 'Code comments']
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Plan refactoring rollback
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Refactor scenario
+   */
+  planRefactoringRollback(scenario) {
+    return {
+      strategy: 'git revert',
+      preparation: [
+        'Commit frequently with clear messages',
+        'Use feature branch',
+        'Tag stable points'
+      ],
+      timeToRollback: scenario.scope === 'system' ? '2-4 hours' : '15-30 minutes'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Simulate timeline change
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Timeline scenario
+   */
+  async simulateTimeline(scenario) {
+    const change = scenario.change; // 'compress' or 'extend'
+    const amount = scenario.amount || 20; // percentage
+
+    return {
+      scope: this.assessTimelineScopeImpact(change, amount),
+      quality: this.assessTimelineQualityImpact(change, amount),
+      resources: this.assessTimelineResourceImpact(change, amount),
+      risks: this.identifyTimelineRisks(change, amount)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess timeline scope impact
+   * @param {string} change - Change type
+   * @param {number} amount - Percentage change
+   */
+  assessTimelineScopeImpact(change, amount) {
+    if (change === 'compress') {
+      return {
+        impact: amount > 30 ? 'high' : 'medium',
+        recommendations: [
+          'Prioritize MVP features',
+          'Defer nice-to-have features',
+          'Consider phased release'
+        ],
+        scopeReduction: `${Math.round(amount * 0.7)}%`
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        impact: 'positive',
+        recommendations: [
+          'Can include more features',
+          'More time for polish',
+          'Better testing coverage'
+        ],
+        additionalScope: `${Math.round(amount * 0.5)}%`
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess timeline quality impact
+   * @param {string} change - Change type
+   * @param {number} amount - Percentage change
+   */
+  assessTimelineQualityImpact(change, amount) {
+    if (change === 'compress') {
+      return {
+        risk: amount > 30 ? 'high' : 'medium',
+        areas: [
+          { name: 'Test coverage', impact: 'may decrease' },
+          { name: 'Code reviews', impact: 'less thorough' },
+          { name: 'Documentation', impact: 'likely reduced' }
+        ],
+        mitigations: [
+          'Automated testing critical',
+          'Focus on critical path quality',
+          'Accept technical debt consciously'
+        ]
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        risk: 'low',
+        areas: [
+          { name: 'Test coverage', impact: 'can increase' },
+          { name: 'Code reviews', impact: 'more thorough' },
+          { name: 'Documentation', impact: 'can improve' }
+        ]
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess timeline resource impact
+   * @param {string} change - Change type
+   * @param {number} amount - Percentage change
+   */
+  assessTimelineResourceImpact(change, amount) {
+    if (change === 'compress') {
+      return {
+        options: [
+          'Add team members (ramp-up overhead)',
+          'Increase working hours (burnout risk)',
+          'Outsource components (coordination overhead)'
+        ],
+        recommendation: amount > 20 ?
+          'Consider scope reduction over resource increase' :
+          'Current team may absorb with focused priorities'
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        options: [
+          'Maintain current team',
+          'Add quality-focused resources',
+          'Invest in tooling/automation'
+        ],
+        recommendation: 'Use time for quality improvements, not just features'
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Identify timeline risks
+   * @param {string} change - Change type
+   * @param {number} amount - Percentage change
+   */
+  identifyTimelineRisks(change, amount) {
+    const risks = [];
+
+    if (change === 'compress') {
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'burnout',
+        severity: amount > 30 ? 'high' : 'medium',
+        description: 'Team fatigue from accelerated pace',
+        mitigation: 'Clear priorities, sustainable pace commitment'
+      });
+
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'technical_debt',
+        severity: 'high',
+        description: 'Shortcuts accumulate',
+        mitigation: 'Track debt explicitly, plan remediation'
+      });
+    } else {
+      risks.push({
+        type: 'scope_creep',
+        severity: 'medium',
+        description: 'Extra time invites additional features',
+        mitigation: 'Lock scope, use time for quality'
+      });
+    }
+
+    return risks;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Simulate resource change
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Resource scenario
+   */
+  async simulateResource(scenario) {
+    const action = scenario.action; // 'add' or 'remove'
+    const count = scenario.count || 1;
+
+    return {
+      velocity: this.assessResourceVelocity(action, count),
+      coordination: this.assessResourceCoordination(action, count),
+      timeline: this.assessResourceTimeline(action, count),
+      quality: this.assessResourceQuality(action, count),
+      costs: this.assessResourceCosts(action, count)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess resource velocity impact
+   * @param {string} action - Add or remove
+   * @param {number} count - Number of resources
+   */
+  assessResourceVelocity(action, count) {
+    if (action === 'add') {
+      return {
+        immediate: 'Decreased (onboarding)',
+        shortTerm: `+${count * 15}% after ramp-up`,
+        longTerm: `+${count * 25}% at full productivity`,
+        rampUpTime: `${count * 2}-${count * 4} weeks`
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        immediate: `-${count * 30}%`,
+        shortTerm: 'Stabilizes as work redistributes',
+        longTerm: 'New baseline established',
+        knowledgeLoss: 'Critical knowledge may be lost'
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess resource coordination impact
+   * @param {string} action - Add or remove
+   * @param {number} count - Number of resources
+   */
+  assessResourceCoordination(action, count) {
+    if (action === 'add') {
+      return {
+        overhead: count > 2 ? 'high' : 'medium',
+        meetings: 'More coordination meetings needed',
+        communication: 'Communication channels expand',
+        recommendations: [
+          'Clear ownership boundaries',
+          'Regular sync meetings',
+          'Documentation emphasis'
+        ]
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        overhead: 'Decreased',
+        consolidation: 'Responsibilities must be reassigned',
+        recommendations: [
+          'Knowledge transfer sessions',
+          'Document tribal knowledge',
+          'Update ownership docs'
+        ]
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess resource timeline impact
+   * @param {string} action - Add or remove
+   * @param {number} count - Number of resources
+   */
+  assessResourceTimeline(action, count) {
+    if (action === 'add') {
+      return {
+        effect: 'Potential acceleration after ramp-up',
+        caution: 'Brooks Law: adding people to late projects makes them later',
+        netEffect: count > 2 ? 'Diminishing returns likely' : 'Moderate acceleration possible'
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        effect: 'Timeline extension likely needed',
+        amount: `${count * 15}-${count * 25}% longer`,
+        alternatives: ['Reduce scope', 'Accept delays', 'Backfill']
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess resource quality impact
+   * @param {string} action - Add or remove
+   * @param {number} count - Number of resources
+   */
+  assessResourceQuality(action, count) {
+    if (action === 'add') {
+      return {
+        shortTerm: 'May decrease (new contributors learning)',
+        longTerm: 'Can increase (more reviewers, diverse perspectives)',
+        risks: ['Inconsistent coding styles', 'Knowledge silos']
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        shortTerm: 'May decrease (remaining team stretched)',
+        risks: ['Fewer reviewers', 'Burnout risk', 'Knowledge gaps']
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess resource costs
+   * @param {string} action - Add or remove
+   * @param {number} count - Number of resources
+   */
+  assessResourceCosts(action, count) {
+    // Assuming $150k/year average fully loaded cost
+    const avgCost = 150000;
+    const monthlyImpact = Math.round((avgCost / 12) * count);
+
+    if (action === 'add') {
+      return {
+        monthly: `+$${monthlyImpact.toLocaleString()}`,
+        oneTime: `$${(count * 5000).toLocaleString()} (equipment, onboarding)`,
+        notes: 'Productivity lag during ramp-up'
+      };
+    } else {
+      return {
+        monthly: `-$${monthlyImpact.toLocaleString()}`,
+        oneTime: 'Potential severance costs',
+        notes: 'Hidden costs: knowledge loss, morale impact'
+      };
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Simulate dependency change
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Dependency scenario
+   */
+  async simulateDependency(scenario) {
+    return {
+      compatibility: this.assessDependencyCompatibility(scenario),
+      security: this.assessDependencySecurity(scenario),
+      bundleSize: this.assessDependencyBundleSize(scenario),
+      maintenance: this.assessDependencyMaintenance(scenario)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess dependency compatibility
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Dependency scenario
+   */
+  assessDependencyCompatibility(scenario) {
+    return {
+      risk: scenario.action === 'add' ? 'medium' : 'low',
+      checks: [
+        'Verify version compatibility with existing deps',
+        'Check peer dependency requirements',
+        'Test in staging environment'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess dependency security
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Dependency scenario
+   */
+  assessDependencySecurity(scenario) {
+    return {
+      action: 'Run npm audit after change',
+      considerations: [
+        'Check for known vulnerabilities',
+        'Review package maintainer reputation',
+        'Consider supply chain risks'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess dependency bundle size
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Dependency scenario
+   */
+  assessDependencyBundleSize(scenario) {
+    if (scenario.action === 'add') {
+      return {
+        impact: 'Increased',
+        recommendations: [
+          'Check bundle size with bundlephobia.com',
+          'Consider tree-shaking support',
+          'Evaluate alternatives'
+        ]
+      };
+    }
+    return {
+      impact: 'Decreased',
+      recommendations: ['Verify bundle reduction']
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess dependency maintenance
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Dependency scenario
+   */
+  assessDependencyMaintenance(scenario) {
+    return {
+      ongoing: [
+        'Monitor for security updates',
+        'Track breaking changes in major versions',
+        'Consider dependabot or similar'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Simulate architecture change
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Architecture scenario
+   */
+  async simulateArchitecture(scenario) {
+    return {
+      complexity: this.assessArchitectureComplexity(scenario),
+      risk: this.assessArchitectureRisk(scenario),
+      timeline: this.estimateArchitectureTimeline(scenario),
+      benefits: this.identifyArchitectureBenefits(scenario)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess architecture complexity
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Architecture scenario
+   */
+  assessArchitectureComplexity(scenario) {
+    const components = scenario.components?.length || 1;
+    return {
+      level: components > 5 ? 'very_high' : components > 2 ? 'high' : 'medium',
+      factors: [
+        'Cross-cutting concerns',
+        'Data migration needs',
+        'API compatibility',
+        'Testing strategy changes'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess architecture risk
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Architecture scenario
+   */
+  assessArchitectureRisk(scenario) {
+    return {
+      overall: 'high',
+      factors: [
+        {
+          type: 'scope',
+          severity: 'high',
+          description: 'Architecture changes affect many components'
+        },
+        {
+          type: 'knowledge',
+          severity: 'medium',
+          description: 'Team needs to learn new patterns'
+        },
+        {
+          type: 'rollback',
+          severity: 'high',
+          description: 'Difficult to revert once started'
+        }
+      ],
+      mitigation: [
+        'Incremental migration',
+        'Parallel running period',
+        'Feature flags for gradual rollout'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Estimate architecture timeline
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Architecture scenario
+   */
+  estimateArchitectureTimeline(scenario) {
+    const components = scenario.components?.length || 1;
+    const weeks = components * 2;
+
+    return {
+      estimatedWeeks: weeks,
+      phases: [
+        { name: 'Design', weeks: Math.ceil(weeks * 0.2) },
+        { name: 'Foundation', weeks: Math.ceil(weeks * 0.3) },
+        { name: 'Migration', weeks: Math.ceil(weeks * 0.35) },
+        { name: 'Validation', weeks: Math.ceil(weeks * 0.15) }
+      ],
+      parallelWork: 'Limited - changes are often sequential'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Identify architecture benefits
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Architecture scenario
+   */
+  identifyArchitectureBenefits(scenario) {
+    return {
+      shortTerm: [
+        'Cleaner code structure',
+        'Better separation of concerns'
+      ],
+      longTerm: [
+        'Easier to maintain',
+        'Better scalability',
+        'Improved testability',
+        'Faster feature development'
+      ],
+      breakEven: 'Typically 3-6 months post-migration'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Simulate technology migration
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Migration scenario
+   */
+  async simulateMigration(scenario) {
+    return {
+      effort: this.estimateMigrationEffort(scenario),
+      risk: this.assessMigrationRisk(scenario),
+      timeline: this.estimateMigrationTimeline(scenario),
+      training: this.assessMigrationTraining(scenario)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Estimate migration effort
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Migration scenario
+   */
+  estimateMigrationEffort(scenario) {
+    return {
+      level: 'high',
+      components: [
+        'Code migration',
+        'Configuration updates',
+        'Testing updates',
+        'Documentation updates',
+        'CI/CD pipeline changes'
+      ],
+      hiddenEffort: [
+        'Learning curve',
+        'Debugging new issues',
+        'Performance tuning'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess migration risk
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Migration scenario
+   */
+  assessMigrationRisk(scenario) {
+    return {
+      overall: 'high',
+      factors: [
+        'Breaking changes likely',
+        'Knowledge gaps in new technology',
+        'Integration unknowns',
+        'Performance differences'
+      ],
+      mitigation: [
+        'Proof of concept first',
+        'Incremental migration',
+        'Comprehensive testing',
+        'Rollback plan'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Estimate migration timeline
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Migration scenario
+   */
+  estimateMigrationTimeline(scenario) {
+    const scope = scenario.scope || 'full';
+    const baseWeeks = scope === 'full' ? 8 : 4;
+
+    return {
+      estimatedWeeks: baseWeeks,
+      phases: [
+        { name: 'Planning & POC', weeks: 2 },
+        { name: 'Core Migration', weeks: Math.round(baseWeeks * 0.5) },
+        { name: 'Testing & Fixes', weeks: Math.round(baseWeeks * 0.25) },
+        { name: 'Deployment', weeks: 1 }
+      ],
+      parallel: scenario.parallel ? 'Run both systems during transition' : 'Big bang cutover'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Assess migration training needs
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Migration scenario
+   */
+  assessMigrationTraining(scenario) {
+    return {
+      needed: true,
+      areas: [
+        `${scenario.to} fundamentals`,
+        'New patterns and best practices',
+        'Tooling changes',
+        'Debugging techniques'
+      ],
+      estimatedHours: '20-40 hours per developer',
+      resources: [
+        'Official documentation',
+        'Online courses',
+        'Pair programming sessions',
+        'Code reviews'
+      ]
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Generate simulation summary
+   * @param {Object} results - Simulation results
+   */
+  generateSummary(results) {
+    const summaryPoints = [];
+
+    // Extract key insights from results
+    for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(results)) {
+      if (value.overall) {
+        summaryPoints.push(`${key}: ${value.overall} impact`);
+      } else if (value.estimatedDays) {
+        summaryPoints.push(`Timeline: ${value.estimatedDays} days estimated`);
+      } else if (value.level) {
+        summaryPoints.push(`${key}: ${value.level}`);
+      }
+    }
+
+    return {
+      keyPoints: summaryPoints,
+      overallAssessment: this.determineOverallAssessment(results)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Determine overall assessment
+   * @param {Object} results - Simulation results
+   */
+  determineOverallAssessment(results) {
+    // Count high-risk/high-impact items
+    let highCount = 0;
+    const checkValue = (val) => {
+      if (typeof val === 'object' && val !== null) {
+        if (val.severity === 'high' || val.level === 'high' || val.impact === 'high') {
+          highCount++;
+        }
+        Object.values(val).forEach(checkValue);
+      }
+    };
+
+    Object.values(results).forEach(checkValue);
+
+    if (highCount >= 3) {
+      return 'High risk - careful planning required';
+    } else if (highCount >= 1) {
+      return 'Moderate risk - manageable with proper planning';
+    } else {
+      return 'Low risk - straightforward to execute';
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Generate recommendations from simulation
+   * @param {Object} scenario - Input scenario
+   * @param {Object} results - Simulation results
+   */
+  generateRecommendations(scenario, results) {
+    const recommendations = [];
+
+    // Add risk-based recommendations
+    if (results.risks) {
+      const highRisks = results.risks.filter(r => r.severity === 'high');
+      if (highRisks.length > 0) {
+        recommendations.push({
+          priority: 'high',
+          action: 'Address high-severity risks before proceeding',
+          details: highRisks.map(r => r.mitigation)
+        });
+      }
+    }
+
+    // Add testing recommendations
+    if (results.testing) {
+      recommendations.push({
+        priority: 'medium',
+        action: 'Establish testing strategy',
+        details: results.testing.required?.map(t => t.type) || []
+      });
+    }
+
+    // Add documentation recommendations
+    if (results.documentation) {
+      recommendations.push({
+        priority: 'medium',
+        action: 'Update documentation',
+        details: results.documentation.required?.map(d => d.type) || []
+      });
+    }
+
+    // Add scenario-specific recommendations
+    if (scenario.type === 'feature') {
+      recommendations.push({
+        priority: 'low',
+        action: 'Consider feature decomposition',
+        command: `bootspring plan decompose "${scenario.featureName}"`
+      });
+    }
+
+    return recommendations.sort((a, b) => {
+      const order = { high: 0, medium: 1, low: 2 };
+      return order[a.priority] - order[b.priority];
+    });
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Compare multiple scenarios
+   * @param {Array} scenarios - Array of scenarios to compare
+   */
+  async compare(scenarios) {
+    const results = [];
+
+    for (const scenario of scenarios) {
+      const result = await this.simulate(scenario);
+      results.push({
+        scenario: scenario,
+        result: result
+      });
+    }
+
+    return {
+      comparisons: results,
+      recommendation: this.determinePreferredScenario(results),
+      tradeoffs: this.identifyTradeoffs(results)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Determine preferred scenario
+   * @param {Array} results - Simulation results
+   */
+  determinePreferredScenario(results) {
+    // Simple scoring based on overall assessment
+    const scores = results.map((r, i) => {
+      let score = 100;
+      const assessment = r.result.summary?.overallAssessment || '';
+
+      if (assessment.includes('High risk')) score -= 40;
+      else if (assessment.includes('Moderate risk')) score -= 20;
+
+      return { index: i, scenario: r.scenario, score };
+    });
+
+    scores.sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score);
+
+    return {
+      preferred: scores[0]?.scenario,
+      ranking: scores.map(s => ({
+        scenario: s.scenario.type,
+        score: s.score
+      }))
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Identify tradeoffs between scenarios
+   * @param {Array} results - Simulation results
+   */
+  identifyTradeoffs(results) {
+    if (results.length < 2) return [];
+
+    const tradeoffs = [];
+
+    // Compare timeline vs risk for each pair
+    for (let i = 0; i < results.length; i++) {
+      for (let j = i + 1; j < results.length; j++) {
+        tradeoffs.push({
+          scenarios: [results[i].scenario.type, results[j].scenario.type],
+          factors: ['timeline', 'risk', 'effort']
+        });
+      }
+    }
+
+    return tradeoffs;
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  PlanningSimulator,
+  SCENARIO_TYPES,
+  IMPACT_LEVELS,
+  COMPLEXITY_MULTIPLIERS
+};