@geraldmaron/construct 1.0.15 → 1.0.17
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +19 -3
- package/bin/construct +376 -98
- package/bin/construct-postinstall.mjs +17 -2
- package/db/schema/010_cx_scores.sql +51 -0
- package/lib/cli-commands.mjs +333 -147
- package/lib/contracts/validate.mjs +20 -10
- package/lib/contracts/violation-log.mjs +27 -12
- package/lib/embedded-contract/audit.mjs +52 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/capability.mjs +179 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/contract-version.mjs +39 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/envelope.mjs +70 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/index.mjs +71 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/ingest.mjs +77 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/model-resolve.mjs +186 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/redaction.mjs +91 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/role-facts.mjs +66 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/triage.mjs +134 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/workflow-defs.mjs +125 -0
- package/lib/embedded-contract/workflow-invoke.mjs +218 -0
- package/lib/hooks/config-protection.mjs +12 -5
- package/lib/hooks/stop-notify.mjs +7 -0
- package/lib/init-unified.mjs +36 -26
- package/lib/install/first-invocation.mjs +5 -1
- package/lib/intake/classify.mjs +6 -0
- package/lib/intake/prepare.mjs +22 -4
- package/lib/intake/tables/rnd.mjs +33 -0
- package/lib/integrations/intake-integrations.mjs +28 -2
- package/lib/mcp/server.mjs +69 -0
- package/lib/mcp/tools/embedded-contract.mjs +77 -0
- package/lib/mcp/tools/telemetry.mjs +30 -0
- package/lib/model-router.mjs +40 -0
- package/lib/op-log.mjs +61 -0
- package/lib/orchestration-policy.mjs +15 -0
- package/lib/roles/catalog.mjs +26 -95
- package/lib/roles/gateway.mjs +30 -1
- package/lib/scheduler/index.mjs +24 -4
- package/lib/server/insights.mjs +12 -0
- package/lib/service-manager.mjs +33 -11
- package/lib/setup.mjs +73 -10
- package/lib/update.mjs +31 -3
- package/lib/upgrade.mjs +31 -4
- package/lib/validators/skills.mjs +21 -0
- package/package.json +9 -3
- package/personas/construct.md +2 -0
- package/platforms/claude/CLAUDE.md +43 -15
- package/scripts/sync-specialists.mjs +32 -5
- package/skills/ai/agent-dev.md +2 -0
- package/skills/ai/llm-security.md +2 -0
- package/skills/ai/ml-ops.md +2 -0
- package/skills/ai/orchestration-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/ai/prompt-and-eval.md +2 -0
- package/skills/ai/prompt-optimizer.md +2 -0
- package/skills/ai/rag-system.md +2 -0
- package/skills/ai/trace-triage.md +36 -0
- package/skills/architecture/api-design.md +2 -0
- package/skills/architecture/caching.md +2 -0
- package/skills/architecture/cloud-native.md +2 -0
- package/skills/architecture/message-queue.md +2 -0
- package/skills/architecture/security-arch.md +2 -0
- package/skills/compliance/ai-disclosure.md +2 -0
- package/skills/compliance/data-privacy.md +2 -0
- package/skills/compliance/license-audit.md +2 -0
- package/skills/compliance/regulatory-review.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/cpp.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/go.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/java.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/kotlin.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/mobile-crossplatform.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/python.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/rust.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/shell.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/swift.md +2 -0
- package/skills/development/typescript.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/ci-cd.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/containerization.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/cost-optimization.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/data-engineering.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/database.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/dependency-management.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/devsecops.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/git-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/incident-response.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/monorepo.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/observability.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/performance.md +2 -0
- package/skills/devops/testing.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/adr-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/backlog-proposal-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/customer-profile-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/document-ingest-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/evidence-ingest-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/init-docs.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/init-project.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/memo-and-decision-capture.md +45 -0
- package/skills/docs/prd-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/prfaq-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/product-intelligence-review.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/product-intelligence-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/product-signal-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/research-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/runbook-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/strategy-workflow.md +2 -0
- package/skills/docs/transcript-synthesis.md +43 -0
- package/skills/exploration/dependency-graph-reading.md +2 -0
- package/skills/exploration/repo-map.md +2 -0
- package/skills/exploration/tracer-bullet-method.md +2 -0
- package/skills/exploration/unknown-codebase-onboarding.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frameworks/django.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frameworks/nextjs.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frameworks/react.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frameworks/spring-boot.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frontend-design/accessibility.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frontend-design/component-patterns.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frontend-design/engineering.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frontend-design/screen-reader-testing.md +34 -0
- package/skills/frontend-design/state-management.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frontend-design/ui-aesthetics.md +2 -0
- package/skills/frontend-design/ux-principles.md +2 -0
- package/skills/operating/change-management.md +2 -0
- package/skills/operating/incident-response.md +2 -0
- package/skills/operating/oncall-rotation.md +2 -0
- package/skills/operating/orchestration-reference.md +2 -0
- package/skills/operating/raw-data-structuring.md +44 -0
- package/skills/operating/unstructured-triage.md +45 -0
- package/skills/quality-gates/premortem.md +37 -0
- package/skills/quality-gates/review-work.md +2 -0
- package/skills/quality-gates/verify-change.md +2 -0
- package/skills/quality-gates/verify-module.md +2 -0
- package/skills/quality-gates/verify-quality.md +2 -0
- package/skills/quality-gates/verify-security.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/architect.ai-systems.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/architect.data.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/architect.enterprise.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/architect.integration.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/architect.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/architect.platform.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-analyst.experiment.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-analyst.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-analyst.product-intelligence.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-analyst.product.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-analyst.telemetry.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-engineer.pipeline.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-engineer.vector-retrieval.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/data-engineer.warehouse.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/debugger.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/designer.accessibility.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/designer.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/engineer.ai.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/engineer.data.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/engineer.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/engineer.platform.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/operator.docs.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/operator.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/operator.release.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/operator.sre.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/orchestrator.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/product-manager.ai-product.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/product-manager.business-strategy.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/product-manager.enterprise.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/product-manager.growth.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/product-manager.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/product-manager.platform.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/product-manager.product.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/qa.ai-eval.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/qa.api-contract.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/qa.data-pipeline.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/qa.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/qa.test-automation.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/qa.web-ui.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/researcher.explorer.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/researcher.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/researcher.ux.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/reviewer.devil-advocate.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/reviewer.evaluator.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/reviewer.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/reviewer.trace.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/security.ai.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/security.appsec.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/security.cloud.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/security.legal-compliance.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/security.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/security.privacy.md +2 -0
- package/skills/roles/security.supply-chain.md +2 -0
- package/skills/security/blue-team.md +2 -0
- package/skills/security/code-audit.md +2 -0
- package/skills/security/pentest.md +2 -0
- package/skills/security/red-team.md +2 -0
- package/skills/security/threat-intel.md +2 -0
- package/skills/security/vuln-research.md +2 -0
- package/skills/strategy/competitive-landscape.md +2 -0
- package/skills/strategy/jobs-to-be-done.md +38 -0
- package/skills/strategy/market-research-methods.md +2 -0
- package/skills/strategy/narrative-arc.md +2 -0
- package/skills/strategy/pricing-positioning.md +2 -0
- package/skills/utility/clean-code.md +2 -0
- package/specialists/prompts/cx-engineer.md +1 -1
- package/specialists/registry.json +18 -9
- package/specialists/role-manifests.json +1 -1
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: ai-orchestration-workflow
|
|
3
3
|
description: Use this skill when the request involves agent orchestration, phase transitions, task keys, handoff quality, workflow state, or project alignment.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [agent-spec, workflow-state]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: guidance
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Construct Orchestration Workflow
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: ai-prompt-optimizer
|
|
3
3
|
description: Closed-loop prompt auto-optimization guide. Use when the task matches the trigger conditions described in the body.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [prompt, model-output, eval-dataset]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: prompt
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Prompt Auto-Optimization Loop
|
|
6
8
|
|
package/skills/ai/rag-system.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: ai-trace-triage
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Use when: agent telemetry traces need triage to find where a run went wrong — the failing step, the cause category, and whether it is a regression or a one-off."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [telemetry-traces]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: trace-findings
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
# Trace Triage
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Use this skill when agent telemetry traces need to be triaged to locate failures and separate systemic regressions from one-off noise.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
A stable median score hides high-variance agents failing silently. Triage works the tail and the deltas, not the average.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Steps
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
1. **Frame the window and baseline.** Compare the current window against a prior baseline of the same agents/skills; an absolute score means little without the delta.
|
|
16
|
+
2. **Sort by the tail, not the mean.** Surface the worst p10 runs and the largest score drops since baseline — that is where real failures live.
|
|
17
|
+
3. **For each failing run, locate the failing step**: which role/tool call produced the bad output or error. Read the span, not just the verdict.
|
|
18
|
+
4. **Classify the cause**: prompt/instruction gap, wrong model tier, missing context/evidence, tool error, or genuine task ambiguity. Do not default to "prompt issue".
|
|
19
|
+
5. **Regression vs one-off**: does the same failure recur across runs (systemic) or appear once (noise)? Only systemic failures warrant a fix; flag one-offs for watch.
|
|
20
|
+
6. **Hand off** systemic findings with the trace id, the failing span, the cause class, and a proposed direction (to prompt-optimizer, engineer, or evaluator).
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Output shape
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
```
|
|
25
|
+
## Window: <range> vs baseline <range>
|
|
26
|
+
| traceId | agent/skill | failing step | cause class | regression? | Δ score |
|
|
27
|
+
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Systemic (fix) vs one-off (watch)
|
|
30
|
+
```
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Verification bar
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- Every finding cites a real traceId and the specific span that failed.
|
|
35
|
+
- Regression claims are backed by recurrence across runs, not a single bad sample.
|
|
36
|
+
- Cause classification is evidence-based; "unclear" is a valid class when the trace doesn't show why.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: architecture-message-queue
|
|
3
3
|
description: Use this skill when designing asynchronous communication, event-driven systems, or message-based integrations.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [system-design, requirements]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: guidance
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Message Queues and Event-Driven Architecture
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: compliance-ai-disclosure
|
|
3
3
|
description: Use this skill when reviewing AI features for disclosure requirements, transparency obligations, or emerging AI regulation compliance.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [artifact, data-flow]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: privacy-assessment
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# AI Disclosure
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: compliance-license-audit
|
|
3
3
|
description: Use this skill when auditing dependency licenses, evaluating OSS compliance risk, or preparing license inventories for legal review.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [dependency-manifest]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: license-report
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# License Audit
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: compliance-regulatory-review
|
|
3
3
|
description: Use this skill when conducting a compliance review before shipping features that handle user data, financial transactions, AI decisions, or regulated content.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [artifact, data-flow, dependency-manifest]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: compliance-review
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Regulatory Review
|
|
6
8
|
|
package/skills/development/go.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: development-kotlin
|
|
3
3
|
description: Patterns, anti-patterns, and reference guidance for Kotlin / Android Development. Use when the task involves kotlin / android development.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [code, repo]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: code
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Kotlin / Android Development
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: development-mobile-crossplatform
|
|
3
3
|
description: Before choosing a framework, answer:. Use when the task matches the trigger conditions described in the body.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [requirements, code]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: guidance
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Mobile Cross-Platform Development
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: development-swift
|
|
3
3
|
description: Swift 6 enforces data-race safety at compile time. Annotate isolation boundary explicitly:. Use when the task matches the trigger conditions described in the body.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [code, repo]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: code
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Swift / iOS Development
|
|
6
8
|
|
package/skills/devops/ci-cd.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: devops-data-engineering
|
|
3
3
|
description: "1. **Idempotency**: pipelines can run multiple times without duplicating data 2. **Observability**: every pipeline run logs row counts, latency, and anomalies 3. **Data contracts**: producers and consumers agree on schema and SLAs 4. **Lineage**: know where every column came from and what it feeds. Use when the task matches the trigger conditions described in the body."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [pipeline-config, data-contract]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: data-pipeline
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Data Engineering
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: devops-dependency-management
|
|
3
3
|
description: Use this skill when managing package upgrades, resolving CVEs, or establishing lock file and versioning policy.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [dependency-manifest, repo]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: dependency-report
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Dependency Management
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: devops-incident-response
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Define severity in your runbook and assign it early: it determines escalation and comms cadence. Use when the task matches the trigger conditions described in the body."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [incident, alert]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: incident-runbook
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Incident Response
|
|
6
8
|
|
package/skills/devops/testing.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-backlog-proposal-workflow
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Use when: product evidence should create or update Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, or another tracker."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [evidence-brief, prd, signal]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: backlog-proposal
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Backlog Proposal Workflow
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-document-ingest-workflow
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Use when: the user points at a PDF, Word doc, spreadsheet, slide deck, export, or mixed document folder and wants a markdown version that Construct can search efficiently later."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [document]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: ingested-markdown
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Document Ingest Workflow
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-evidence-ingest-workflow
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Use when: the user pastes customer notes, Slack threads, support tickets, sales notes, research snippets, RFCs, analytics summaries, or competitor signals."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [signal, document]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: evidence-brief
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Evidence Ingest Workflow
|
|
6
8
|
|
package/skills/docs/init-docs.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-init-docs
|
|
3
3
|
description: "`init docs`, `create docs structure`, `set up documentation`, `docs scaffold`, `documentation init`. Use when the task matches the trigger conditions described in the body."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [task-context]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: docs-scaffold
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Skill: init-docs: Initialize Project Documentation Structure
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: docs-memo-and-decision-capture
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Use when: a decision, status update, or announcement needs to be captured as a short, durable memo that states the decision, its rationale, and what changes."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [decision-context]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: memo
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
# Memo & Decision Capture
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Use this skill when a decision, status update, or announcement needs to be captured as a short, durable memo.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
A good memo is short and load-bearing: a reader six months later should understand what was decided, why, and what it changed — without attending the meeting. Length is not value; a memo that buries the decision under context has failed.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Steps
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
1. **Lead with the decision or update** in the first sentence. The reader should not have to hunt for it.
|
|
16
|
+
2. **State the context** in 2–4 sentences: what prompted this, what problem it addresses.
|
|
17
|
+
3. **Record the rationale** — why this option over the alternatives actually considered. If alternatives were weighed, name them and why they lost.
|
|
18
|
+
4. **State what changes** as a result: who does what differently, what is now in or out of scope.
|
|
19
|
+
5. **List action items** with owners, if any.
|
|
20
|
+
6. **Date and attribute** the memo. A memo without a date is not durable.
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Output shape
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
```
|
|
25
|
+
# Memo: <subject>
|
|
26
|
+
_<date> · <author>_
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
**Decision/Update:** <one sentence>
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Context
|
|
31
|
+
<2–4 sentences>
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Rationale
|
|
34
|
+
<why this, over what alternatives>
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## What changes
|
|
37
|
+
- <change> — owner: <name>
|
|
38
|
+
```
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Verification bar
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- The decision/update is stated in the first sentence, unhedged where the decision is firm.
|
|
43
|
+
- Rationale references only alternatives actually considered — no invented options.
|
|
44
|
+
- The memo is dated and attributed.
|
|
45
|
+
- Nothing load-bearing is asserted that the source context does not support; unknowns are written as `unknown`.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-product-intelligence-review
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Use when: reviewing PRDs, Meta PRDs, PRFAQs, evidence briefs, signal briefs, customer profiles, or backlog proposals."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [prd, evidence-brief]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: review
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Product Intelligence Review
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-product-intelligence-workflow
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Use when: the request involves customer evidence, PM synthesis, product requirements, PRDs, PRFAQs, customer profiles, product signals, or backlog proposals."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [signal, evidence-brief]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: prd
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Product Intelligence Workflow
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-product-signal-workflow
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Use when: the user asks what customers are asking for, what themes are emerging, whether evidence is strong enough, or what should become a PRD."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [signal, evidence-brief]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: signal-brief
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Product Signal Workflow
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: docs-strategy-workflow
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Use when: the user asks about product direction, strategic bets, what to prioritize, whether a signal aligns with strategy, or wants to update the strategy."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [signal, decision-context]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: strategy
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Strategy Workflow
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: docs-transcript-synthesis
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Use when: a meeting, call, or interview transcript needs to be turned into a summary, the decisions made, and concrete action items with owners."
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [transcript-text]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: meeting-summary
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
# Transcript Synthesis
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Use this skill when a meeting, call, or interview transcript needs to be turned into a structured summary with decisions and action items.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
A raw transcript is a low-signal artifact: speaker turns, filler, and tangents bury the few load-bearing outcomes. The job is to extract those outcomes faithfully without inventing any that were not actually stated.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Steps
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
1. **Read the whole transcript first.** Do not summarize incrementally — a decision late in the call often reverses an earlier one.
|
|
16
|
+
2. **Identify participants and roles** if stated. Note who owns what. If unstated, write `owner: unassigned` rather than guessing.
|
|
17
|
+
3. **Extract decisions.** A decision is an explicit commitment ("we'll ship X", "we're not doing Y"). Quote or tightly paraphrase the line that establishes it. Do not promote a musing ("maybe we could…") to a decision.
|
|
18
|
+
4. **Extract action items** as `{ action, owner, due? }`. Only include items someone actually committed to. Mark `due` only if a date was stated.
|
|
19
|
+
5. **Extract open questions** — anything raised and left unresolved.
|
|
20
|
+
6. **Write a 3–6 sentence summary** of what the conversation was about and what changed as a result.
|
|
21
|
+
7. **Flag low-confidence sections** — crosstalk, inaudible markers, ambiguous antecedents — as `[unclear]` rather than smoothing them over.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Output shape
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
## Summary
|
|
27
|
+
<3–6 sentences>
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Decisions
|
|
30
|
+
- <decision> — basis: "<quoted/paraphrased line>"
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Action items
|
|
33
|
+
- [ ] <action> — owner: <name|unassigned>[, due: <date>]
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Open questions
|
|
36
|
+
- <question>
|
|
37
|
+
```
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
## Verification bar
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
- Every decision and action item traces to an actual statement in the transcript — no invented commitments or owners.
|
|
42
|
+
- Tentative language stays tentative; do not sharpen "maybe" into "will".
|
|
43
|
+
- Unresolved or inaudible content is surfaced, not silently dropped.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: exploration-dependency-graph-reading
|
|
3
3
|
description: Use when assessing the risk surface of a project's dependencies, planning upgrades, or evaluating a new codebase's supply chain posture.
|
|
4
|
+
inputs: [dependency-manifest, repo]
|
|
5
|
+
artifactType: dependency-graph
|
|
4
6
|
---
|
|
5
7
|
# Dependency Graph Reading
|
|
6
8
|
|