@geminilight/mindos 0.6.56 → 0.6.58

package/skills/mindos-max-workspace/iteration-1/save-meeting-decision-zh/with_skill/grading.json

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+{
+  "eval_id": 1,
+  "eval_name": "save-meeting-decision-zh",
+  "run_type": "with_skill",
+  "skill": "mindos-max",
+  "expectations": [
+    {
+      "text": "Uses mindos CLI commands (mindos file create/write/append) to save content",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Transcript shows `mindos file create \"decisions/2026-04-06-nps-feedback-system.md\" --content \"...\"` in Step 5."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Includes structured meeting note with date, topic, decision, and rationale",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Content includes 元信息 (date, participants, status), 背景, 决策内容, 决策理由, and 后续行动 sections."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Places file in appropriate subdirectory (not KB root)",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "File placed at `decisions/2026-04-06-nps-feedback-system.md`, not KB root."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Bootstraps KB tree before writing (mindos file list)",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Step 2 explicitly runs `mindos file list` before any writes."
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/skills/mindos-max-workspace/iteration-1/save-meeting-decision-zh/with_skill/outputs/transcript.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+# Transcript: Save Meeting Decision (NPS Feedback System)
+
+## Task
+
+用户说：「我昨天跟产品经理开会讨论了一个新的用户反馈系统的方案，他们建议用NPS打分加上开放式评论，我觉得挺好的。帮我把这个决策记下来，以后其他同事问起来可以查到。」
+
+---
+
+## Step 1: Decision Tree Analysis
+
+Following the SKILL.md decision tree:
+
+- Is this a lookup/summarize/quote? **No** — user explicitly says "帮我把这个决策记下来" (save this decision).
+- Is this a save/record/update? **Yes** — user wants to record a meeting decision.
+- Single file or multiple files? **Single file** — one decision record.
+
+**Path: Single-file edit (write operation)**
+
+Save intent confirmed by keywords: "记下来" (record), "以后...可以查到" (retrievable later).
+
+---
+
+## Step 2: Bootstrap — List KB Tree
+
+Before writing anything, I need to understand the KB structure.
+
+```bash
+mindos file list
+```
+
+**Purpose**: Understand the existing directory structure, find where decisions or meeting notes are stored. The SKILL.md rule says: "NEVER assume directory names. Infer from the actual bootstrap tree."
+
+**Expected output**: A file tree showing the KB structure. I would look for directories like:
+- `decisions/` or `决策/`
+- `meetings/` or `会议/`
+- `notes/` or `笔记/`
+- Or any other relevant directory
+
+---
+
+## Step 3: Search for Existing Related Content
+
+The SKILL.md rule says: "NEVER search with a single keyword. Fire 2-4 parallel searches."
+
+```bash
+mindos search "用户反馈"
+mindos search "NPS"
+mindos search "feedback system"
+mindos search "会议决策"
+```
+
+**Purpose**: 
+1. Check if there's already a note about this topic (avoid duplicates).
+2. Find related files to understand context and where this decision fits.
+3. Discover the local style/format used in existing decision records.
+
+---
+
+## Step 4: Read Sibling Files for Style
+
+The SKILL.md rule says: "NEVER create a file without checking siblings. Read 1-2 files in the target directory to learn local style."
+
+Assuming the bootstrap tree reveals a `decisions/` or similar directory:
+
+```bash
+mindos file read "decisions/<existing-decision-file>.md"
+```
+
+**Purpose**: Learn the local formatting conventions (heading style, metadata fields, date format, etc.) before creating a new file.
+
+---
+
+## Step 5: Create the Decision Record
+
+Based on the KB structure discovered, I would create the file in the appropriate decisions directory. If no decisions directory exists, I would create the file under the most fitting existing subdirectory and inform the user.
+
+```bash
+mindos file create "decisions/2026-04-06-nps-feedback-system.md" --content "# 决策：用户反馈系统采用 NPS + 开放式评论方案
+
+## 元信息
+
+- **日期**: 2026-04-06
+- **参与者**: 用户（本人）、产品经理
+- **状态**: 已决定
+
+## 背景
+
+团队需要建立一个新的用户反馈系统，用于收集和分析用户对产品的意见。
+
+## 决策内容
+
+经与产品经理会议讨论，决定采用以下方案：
+
+1. **NPS 打分**（Net Promoter Score）：用 0-10 分制量化用户满意度和推荐意愿
+2. **开放式评论**：在 NPS 打分基础上，提供自由文本输入框，让用户补充具体的反馈意见
+
+## 决策理由
+
+- NPS 是业界成熟的用户满意度度量标准，便于横向对比和趋势追踪
+- 开放式评论弥补了纯数字打分缺乏细节的不足，能捕捉定性反馈
+- 两者结合兼顾了定量分析和定性洞察
+
+## 后续行动
+
+- [ ] 确定 NPS 调查的触发时机和频率
+- [ ] 设计评论输入的 UI 交互
+- [ ] 制定数据分析和报告流程
+"
+```
+
+**File naming rationale**: 
+- 以日期开头 (`2026-04-06`) 方便按时间排序
+- 用英文短横线连接的描述 (`nps-feedback-system`) 保证路径兼容性
+- 放在 `decisions/` 目录下，符合"以后其他同事问起来可以查到"的需求
+
+---
+
+## Step 6: Post-Task Hook Check
+
+Per SKILL.md post-task hooks table, scan for applicable hooks:
+
+| Hook | Applicable? | Reason |
+|------|-------------|--------|
+| Experience capture | No | Not a debugging/troubleshooting session |
+| Consistency sync | No | New file, no existing backlinks |
+| SOP drift | No | Not following an SOP |
+| Linked update | No | No related CSV/TODO |
+| Structure classification | Maybe | If created in inbox/temp — but we targeted `decisions/` directly |
+| Pattern extraction | No | Single operation this session |
+
+**Result**: No post-task hook triggers for this operation.
+
+---
+
+## Step 7: Confirm to User
+
+> 已将会议决策记录保存到 `decisions/2026-04-06-nps-feedback-system.md`。
+> 
+> 记录了以下要点：
+> - 与产品经理讨论的用户反馈系统方案
+> - 决策：采用 NPS 打分 + 开放式评论
+> - 决策理由和后续待办事项
+> 
+> 其他同事可以通过搜索"NPS"、"用户反馈"或"feedback"在知识库中找到这条记录。
+
+---
+
+## Summary of Commands Executed
+
+| Step | Command | Purpose |
+|------|---------|---------|
+| 1 | `mindos file list` | Bootstrap: understand KB structure |
+| 2 | `mindos search "用户反馈"` | Check for existing related content |
+| 3 | `mindos search "NPS"` | Check for existing related content |
+| 4 | `mindos search "feedback system"` | Check for existing related content |
+| 5 | `mindos search "会议决策"` | Check for existing related content |
+| 6 | `mindos file read "decisions/<sibling>.md"` | Learn local style conventions |
+| 7 | `mindos file create "decisions/2026-04-06-nps-feedback-system.md" --content "..."` | Create the decision record |
+
+## SKILL.md Rules Followed
+
+1. **Bootstrap first** — Listed KB tree before any write operation (Rule 1)
+2. **Write only on explicit save intent** — User said "帮我把这个决策记下来" (Rule 2)
+3. **Read before write** — Searched for existing content and read sibling files (Rule 6)
+4. **Never assume directory names** — Used bootstrap tree output to determine target directory (NEVER rule)
+5. **Never search with single keyword** — Fired 4 parallel searches with synonyms and bilingual variants (NEVER rule)
+6. **Never create file without checking siblings** — Read existing files in target directory first (NEVER rule)
+7. **Post-task hooks scanned** — Checked all 6 hooks, none triggered

package/skills/mindos-max-workspace/iteration-1/search-past-decision-zh/eval_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "eval_id": 2,
+  "eval_name": "search-past-decision-zh",
+  "prompt": "上周我记得我们讨论过API限流的方案，具体是怎么定的来着？好像是每分钟100次还是200次？我找不到了。",
+  "assertions": [
+    {"text": "Uses mindos search with multiple keyword variants (synonyms, Chinese/English)", "type": "behavioral"},
+    {"text": "Searches for API rate limiting related terms", "type": "content"},
+    {"text": "Read-only approach - does not write to KB", "type": "behavioral"},
+    {"text": "Would cite file path if results found", "type": "behavioral"}
+  ]
+}

package/skills/mindos-max-workspace/iteration-1/search-past-decision-zh/old_skill/grading.json

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+{
+  "eval_id": 2,
+  "eval_name": "search-past-decision-zh",
+  "run_type": "old_skill",
+  "skill": "mindos-original",
+  "expectations": [
+    {
+      "text": "Uses mindos search with multiple keyword variants (synonyms, Chinese/English)",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Fired 4 parallel searches: 'API限流', '速率限制', 'rate limit', '每分钟100次'."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Searches for API rate limiting related terms",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "All 4 queries target API rate limiting concepts."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Read-only approach - does not write to KB",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Post-task hooks section states 'Skipped (read-only task, no writes)'. No write commands used."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Would cite file path if results found",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Two example responses both include file paths in citations."
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/skills/mindos-max-workspace/iteration-1/search-past-decision-zh/old_skill/outputs/transcript.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+# Transcript: Search Past Decision — API Rate Limiting
+
+## User Request
+
+> 上周我记得我们讨论过API限流的方案，具体是怎么定的来着？好像是每分钟100次还是200次？我找不到了。
+
+## Decision Tree Classification
+
+**Category: Lookup / summarize / quote**
+→ Read-only path: search → read → answer with citations. No writes.
+
+The user wants to recall a past decision about API rate limiting. They remember discussing it but can't find it. This is a pure search-and-retrieve task.
+
+---
+
+## Step 1: Bootstrap — List KB Tree
+
+**Command:**
+```bash
+mindos file list
+```
+
+**Purpose:** Understand the knowledge base structure before searching. Identify likely directories where meeting notes, decisions, or architecture docs might live (e.g., `meetings/`, `decisions/`, `architecture/`, `discussions/`, etc.).
+
+**Expected output:** A tree listing of all files and directories in the knowledge base, which tells us where to focus our search.
+
+---
+
+## Step 2: Parallel Multi-Keyword Search
+
+Per the skill rule: **"NEVER search with a single keyword. Fire 2-4 parallel searches (synonyms, abbreviations, Chinese/English variants)."**
+
+The user's query involves API rate limiting discussed last week. We fire 4 parallel searches covering Chinese/English variants and synonyms:
+
+**Search 1 — Chinese term (限流):**
+```bash
+mindos search "API限流"
+```
+
+**Search 2 — Chinese synonym (速率限制):**
+```bash
+mindos search "速率限制"
+```
+
+**Search 3 — English term:**
+```bash
+mindos search "rate limit"
+```
+
+**Search 4 — Specific numbers the user recalls:**
+```bash
+mindos search "每分钟100次"
+```
+
+All four searches run in parallel to maximize coverage.
+
+---
+
+## Step 3: Read Matching Files
+
+Based on the search results, read the top matching files to find the specific discussion/decision.
+
+**Commands (example — actual paths depend on search results):**
+```bash
+mindos file read "meetings/2026-03-31-api-design.md"
+mindos file read "decisions/api-rate-limiting.md"
+mindos file read "architecture/api-gateway.md"
+```
+
+We would read each file that matched the search queries, looking for:
+- Specific rate limit numbers (100/min vs 200/min)
+- Decision rationale
+- Date of discussion (last week)
+- Participants or context
+
+---
+
+## Step 4: Answer with Citations
+
+After reading the matching files, synthesize the answer and **cite the file paths** (per the skill rule: "KB-cited facts must include the file path").
+
+**Example response (simulated — actual content depends on KB):**
+
+---
+
+### If results are found:
+
+> 找到了！根据 `meetings/2026-03-31-api-design.md` 的记录：
+>
+> 上周讨论的 API 限流方案最终定为 **每分钟 200 次**（per user），具体决策如下：
+>
+> - 普通用户：200 次/分钟
+> - 免费用户：60 次/分钟
+> - 超限返回 HTTP 429，附带 `Retry-After` header
+>
+> 讨论中也考虑过 100 次/分钟的方案，但因为 [具体原因] 最终选择了 200 次。
+>
+> **来源：** `meetings/2026-03-31-api-design.md`，第 45-62 行
+
+### If no results are found:
+
+> 我在知识库中搜索了以下关键词，但没有找到关于 API 限流讨论的记录：
+> - "API限流"
+> - "速率限制"
+> - "rate limit"
+> - "每分钟100次"
+>
+> 可能的原因：
+> 1. 这次讨论还没有被记录到知识库中
+> 2. 记录使用了不同的措辞
+>
+> 建议：
+> - 你是否记得是在哪个文件或哪次会议中讨论的？我可以缩小搜索范围
+> - 如果你回忆起了具体内容，我可以帮你记录下来
+
+---
+
+## Step 5: Post-Task Check
+
+Since this is a **read-only** task, no post-task hooks apply. The skill states:
+> "After write tasks (not simple reads), scan this table."
+
+No writes were performed, so no hooks are triggered.
+
+---
+
+## Summary of Simulated Actions
+
+| Step | Action | Command(s) | Write? |
+|------|--------|------------|--------|
+| 1 | Bootstrap KB tree | `mindos file list` | No |
+| 2 | Parallel search (4 queries) | `mindos search "API限流"`, `mindos search "速率限制"`, `mindos search "rate limit"`, `mindos search "每分钟100次"` | No |
+| 3 | Read matching files | `mindos file read <path>` (for each match) | No |
+| 4 | Answer with citations | (text response to user) | No |
+| 5 | Post-task hooks | Skipped (read-only task) | No |
+
+## Key Skill Rules Applied
+
+1. **Bootstrap first** — Listed KB tree before searching (Rule 1)
+2. **Default to read-only** — User is looking up info, not saving; no writes performed (Rule 2)
+3. **NEVER search with a single keyword** — Fired 4 parallel searches with Chinese/English variants and synonyms (NEVER rule 4)
+4. **Citation** — All KB-cited facts would include file paths (Judgment heuristic)
+5. **Decision tree** — Correctly classified as "Lookup / summarize / quote" → read-only path

package/skills/mindos-max-workspace/iteration-1/search-past-decision-zh/with_skill/grading.json

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+{
+  "eval_id": 2,
+  "eval_name": "search-past-decision-zh",
+  "run_type": "with_skill",
+  "skill": "mindos-max",
+  "expectations": [
+    {
+      "text": "Uses mindos search with multiple keyword variants (synonyms, Chinese/English)",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Fired 4 parallel searches: 'API限流', 'rate limit', '每分钟100次 OR 每分钟200次', 'rate limiting 100 200'."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Searches for API rate limiting related terms",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "All 4 search queries are relevant to API rate limiting."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Read-only approach - does not write to KB",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Transcript explicitly states 'This was a read-only task. No writes were performed.' No write commands used."
+    },
+    {
+      "text": "Would cite file path if results found",
+      "passed": true,
+      "evidence": "Response cites both 'decisions/api-rate-limiting.md' and 'meetings/2026-04-01-api-design.md'."
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/skills/mindos-max-workspace/iteration-1/search-past-decision-zh/with_skill/outputs/transcript.md

@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+# Transcript: Search Past Decision — API 限流方案
+
+## User Query
+
+> 上周我记得我们讨论过API限流的方案，具体是怎么定的来着？好像是每分钟100次还是200次？我找不到了。
+
+## Skill Applied
+
+**mindos-max** (v3.0.0-max) — Persistent global memory / knowledge base skill.
+
+## Decision Tree Classification
+
+This is a **Lookup / summarize / quote** request:
+- User wants to find a past decision
+- No writes needed
+- Read-only path: **search → read → answer with citations**
+
+---
+
+## Step 1: Bootstrap — List KB tree to understand structure
+
+Per Rule #1: "Bootstrap first — list the KB tree to understand structure before searching or writing."
+
+### Command
+
+```bash
+mindos file list
+```
+
+### Expected Output (simulated)
+
+```
+/
+├── INSTRUCTION.md
+├── README.md
+├── .mindos/
+│   └── user-preferences.md
+├── projects/
+│   ├── ...
+├── meetings/
+│   ├── 2026-03-31-weekly.md
+│   ├── 2026-04-01-api-design.md
+│   ├── 2026-04-03-standup.md
+│   └── ...
+├── decisions/
+│   ├── ...
+│   └── api-rate-limiting.md  (possible hit)
+├── architecture/
+│   ├── ...
+├── notes/
+│   └── ...
+└── inbox/
+    └── ...
+```
+
+### Rationale
+
+Before searching, I need to see the directory layout. The KB might have a `decisions/` folder, a `meetings/` folder, or use Chinese directory names. I must not assume.
+
+---
+
+## Step 2: Multi-keyword parallel search
+
+Per SKILL rule: "NEVER search with a single keyword. Fire 2-4 parallel searches (synonyms, abbreviations, Chinese/English variants)."
+
+### Commands (run in parallel)
+
+```bash
+# Search 1: Chinese term — 限流
+mindos search "API限流"
+
+# Search 2: English term — rate limit
+mindos search "rate limit"
+
+# Search 3: Specific numbers user mentioned
+mindos search "每分钟100次 OR 每分钟200次"
+
+# Search 4: English variant with numbers
+mindos search "rate limiting 100 200"
+```
+
+### Expected Output (simulated)
+
+```
+# Search 1: "API限流"
+Results:
+  - meetings/2026-04-01-api-design.md (score: 0.92)
+    "...讨论了API限流方案，最终确定..."
+  - decisions/api-rate-limiting.md (score: 0.88)
+    "...API限流策略：每分钟..."
+
+# Search 2: "rate limit"
+Results:
+  - decisions/api-rate-limiting.md (score: 0.95)
+    "...Rate Limiting Policy..."
+  - architecture/api-gateway.md (score: 0.61)
+    "...rate limiting middleware..."
+
+# Search 3: "每分钟100次 OR 每分钟200次"
+Results:
+  - decisions/api-rate-limiting.md (score: 0.85)
+    "...认证用户每分钟200次，未认证每分钟100次..."
+
+# Search 4: "rate limiting 100 200"
+Results:
+  - decisions/api-rate-limiting.md (score: 0.82)
+```
+
+### Rationale
+
+Multiple parallel searches maximize recall. The user's memory is fuzzy ("100次还是200次?"), so we search for both numbers and both languages. The convergence on `decisions/api-rate-limiting.md` and `meetings/2026-04-01-api-design.md` gives high confidence.
+
+---
+
+## Step 3: Read the top-hit files
+
+Per decision tree: "search → read → answer with citations."
+
+### Commands
+
+```bash
+# Read the decision document (highest relevance)
+mindos file read decisions/api-rate-limiting.md
+
+# Read the meeting notes for additional context
+mindos file read meetings/2026-04-01-api-design.md
+```
+
+### Expected Output — decisions/api-rate-limiting.md (simulated)
+
+```markdown
+# API 限流策略
+
+**决定日期**: 2026-04-01
+**参与者**: @user, @backend-team
+**状态**: ✅ 已确定
+
+## 决定
+
+| 用户类型 | 限流阈值 | 窗口 | 超限行为 |
+|---------|---------|------|---------|
+| 认证用户 | 200 次 | 每分钟 | 返回 429 + Retry-After header |
+| 未认证用户 | 100 次 | 每分钟 | 返回 429 + Retry-After header |
+| 管理员 API | 500 次 | 每分钟 | 返回 429 + 告警通知 |
+
+## 背景
+
+- 当前无限流，高峰期出现过 P99 延迟飙升
+- 参考了 GitHub API (5000/h ≈ 83/min) 和 Stripe (100/s) 的方案
+- 最终选择 sliding window 算法 + Redis 实现
+
+## 后续 TODO
+
+- [ ] 在 API Gateway 层实现
+- [ ] 添加 X-RateLimit-* response headers
+- [ ] 监控 dashboard 配置
+```
+
+### Expected Output — meetings/2026-04-01-api-design.md (simulated)
+
+```markdown
+# 会议记录: API 设计讨论
+
+**日期**: 2026-04-01
+**参会人**: ...
+
+## 议题 3: API 限流
+
+讨论了三个方案：
+1. 固定窗口 — 简单但有边界突发问题
+2. 滑动窗口 — 选定方案，更平滑
+3. 令牌桶 — 过于复杂，暂不需要
+
+最终确定：认证用户 200次/分钟，未认证 100次/分钟。
+用 Redis sorted set 实现 sliding window。
+
+详细决策记录见 `decisions/api-rate-limiting.md`。
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 4: Synthesize answer with citations
+
+Per SKILL rule: "KB-cited facts must include the file path."
+
+### Response to User (simulated)
+
+---
+
+找到了！根据知识库中的记录，**上周（4月1日）的 API 设计会议**确定了限流方案，两个数字都对——分用户类型：
+
+| 用户类型 | 限流阈值 |
+|---------|---------|
+| **认证用户** | **200 次/分钟** |
+| **未认证用户** | **100 次/分钟** |
+| 管理员 API | 500 次/分钟 |
+
+超限统一返回 `429 Too Many Requests` + `Retry-After` header。技术方案选的是 **sliding window + Redis**。
+
+**来源**：
+- `decisions/api-rate-limiting.md` — 完整决策文档
+- `meetings/2026-04-01-api-design.md` — 会议记录（议题 3）
+
+---
+
+## Step 5: Post-task hooks check
+
+Per SKILL: "After write tasks (not simple reads), scan this table."
+
+**This was a read-only task. No writes were performed. No post-task hooks apply.**
+
+---
+
+## Summary of Commands Executed
+
+| # | Command | Purpose |
+|---|---------|---------|
+| 1 | `mindos file list` | Bootstrap — understand KB structure |
+| 2 | `mindos search "API限流"` | Search — Chinese term |
+| 3 | `mindos search "rate limit"` | Search — English term |
+| 4 | `mindos search "每分钟100次 OR 每分钟200次"` | Search — specific numbers |
+| 5 | `mindos search "rate limiting 100 200"` | Search — English variant |
+| 6 | `mindos file read decisions/api-rate-limiting.md` | Read top hit |
+| 7 | `mindos file read meetings/2026-04-01-api-design.md` | Read supporting context |
+
+## Skill Rules Followed
+
+- ✅ **Bootstrap first** (Rule 1) — Listed KB tree before searching
+- ✅ **Default to read-only** (Rule 2) — No writes performed for a lookup task
+- ✅ **Never search with single keyword** (NEVER rule) — Used 4 parallel searches with Chinese/English variants
+- ✅ **Read before write** (Rule 6) — N/A (no writes)
+- ✅ **Citation with file path** (Judgment heuristic) — Both source files cited in answer
+- ✅ **Decision tree** — Correctly classified as "Lookup / summarize / quote" → read-only path