@funnycode/myclaude 0.1.72 → 0.1.73

package/seed/marketplaces/ecc/commands/cpp-test.md

@@ -1,251 +1,251 @@
----
-description: Enforce TDD workflow for C++. Write GoogleTest tests first, then implement. Verify coverage with gcov/lcov.
----
-
-# C++ TDD Command
-
-This command enforces test-driven development methodology for C++ code using GoogleTest/GoogleMock with CMake/CTest.
-
-## What This Command Does
-
-1. **Define Interfaces**: Scaffold class/function signatures first
-2. **Write Tests**: Create comprehensive GoogleTest test cases (RED)
-3. **Run Tests**: Verify tests fail for the right reason
-4. **Implement Code**: Write minimal code to pass (GREEN)
-5. **Refactor**: Improve while keeping tests green
-6. **Check Coverage**: Ensure 80%+ coverage
-
-## When to Use
-
-Use `/cpp-test` when:
-- Implementing new C++ functions or classes
-- Adding test coverage to existing code
-- Fixing bugs (write failing test first)
-- Building critical business logic
-- Learning TDD workflow in C++
-
-## TDD Cycle
-
-```
-RED     → Write failing GoogleTest test
-GREEN   → Implement minimal code to pass
-REFACTOR → Improve code, tests stay green
-REPEAT  → Next test case
-```
-
-## Example Session
-
-````
-User: /cpp-test I need a function to validate email addresses
-
-Agent:
-# TDD Session: Email Validator
-
-## Step 1: Define Interface
-
-```cpp
-// validator/email.hpp
-#pragma once
-#include <string>
-#include <expected>
-
-enum class EmailError {
-    Empty,
-    InvalidFormat
-};
-
-std::expected<void, EmailError> validate_email(const std::string& email);
-```
-
-## Step 2: Write Tests (RED)
-
-```cpp
-// validator/email_test.cpp
-#include <gtest/gtest.h>
-#include "email.hpp"
-
-TEST(ValidateEmail, AcceptsSimpleEmail) {
-    auto result = validate_email("user@example.com");
-    EXPECT_TRUE(result.has_value());
-}
-
-TEST(ValidateEmail, AcceptsSubdomain) {
-    EXPECT_TRUE(validate_email("user@mail.example.com").has_value());
-}
-
-TEST(ValidateEmail, AcceptsPlus) {
-    EXPECT_TRUE(validate_email("user+tag@example.com").has_value());
-}
-
-TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsEmpty) {
-    auto result = validate_email("");
-    ASSERT_FALSE(result.has_value());
-    EXPECT_EQ(result.error(), EmailError::Empty);
-}
-
-TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsNoAtSign) {
-    EXPECT_FALSE(validate_email("userexample.com").has_value());
-}
-
-TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsNoDomain) {
-    EXPECT_FALSE(validate_email("user@").has_value());
-}
-
-TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsNoLocalPart) {
-    EXPECT_FALSE(validate_email("@example.com").has_value());
-}
-```
-
-## Step 3: Run Tests - Verify FAIL
-
-```bash
-$ cmake --build build && ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure
-
-1/1 Test #1: email_validator_test .....***Failed
-    --- undefined reference to `validate_email`
-
-FAIL
-```
-
-✓ Tests fail as expected (unimplemented).
-
-## Step 4: Implement Minimal Code (GREEN)
-
-```cpp
-// validator/email.cpp
-#include "email.hpp"
-#include <regex>
-
-std::expected<void, EmailError> validate_email(const std::string& email) {
-    if (email.empty()) {
-        return std::unexpected(EmailError::Empty);
-    }
-    static const std::regex pattern(R"([a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,})");
-    if (!std::regex_match(email, pattern)) {
-        return std::unexpected(EmailError::InvalidFormat);
-    }
-    return {};
-}
-```
-
-## Step 5: Run Tests - Verify PASS
-
-```bash
-$ cmake --build build && ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure
-
-1/1 Test #1: email_validator_test .....   Passed    0.01 sec
-
-100% tests passed.
-```
-
-✓ All tests passing!
-
-## Step 6: Check Coverage
-
-```bash
-$ cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="--coverage" -B build && cmake --build build
-$ ctest --test-dir build
-$ lcov --capture --directory build --output-file coverage.info
-$ lcov --list coverage.info
-
-validator/email.cpp     | 100%
-```
-
-✓ Coverage: 100%
-
-## TDD Complete!
-````
-
-## Test Patterns
-
-### Basic Tests
-```cpp
-TEST(SuiteName, TestName) {
-    EXPECT_EQ(add(2, 3), 5);
-    EXPECT_NE(result, nullptr);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(is_valid);
-    EXPECT_THROW(func(), std::invalid_argument);
-}
-```
-
-### Fixtures
-```cpp
-class DatabaseTest : public ::testing::Test {
-protected:
-    void SetUp() override { db_ = create_test_db(); }
-    void TearDown() override { db_.reset(); }
-    std::unique_ptr<Database> db_;
-};
-
-TEST_F(DatabaseTest, InsertsRecord) {
-    db_->insert("key", "value");
-    EXPECT_EQ(db_->get("key"), "value");
-}
-```
-
-### Parameterized Tests
-```cpp
-class PrimeTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<std::pair<int, bool>> {};
-
-TEST_P(PrimeTest, ChecksPrimality) {
-    auto [input, expected] = GetParam();
-    EXPECT_EQ(is_prime(input), expected);
-}
-
-INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(Primes, PrimeTest, ::testing::Values(
-    std::make_pair(2, true),
-    std::make_pair(4, false),
-    std::make_pair(7, true)
-));
-```
-
-## Coverage Commands
-
-```bash
-# Build with coverage
-cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="--coverage" -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS="--coverage" -B build
-
-# Run tests
-cmake --build build && ctest --test-dir build
-
-# Generate coverage report
-lcov --capture --directory build --output-file coverage.info
-lcov --remove coverage.info '/usr/*' --output-file coverage.info
-genhtml coverage.info --output-directory coverage_html
-```
-
-## Coverage Targets
-
-| Code Type | Target |
-|-----------|--------|
-| Critical business logic | 100% |
-| Public APIs | 90%+ |
-| General code | 80%+ |
-| Generated code | Exclude |
-
-## TDD Best Practices
-
-**DO:**
-- Write test FIRST, before any implementation
-- Run tests after each change
-- Use `EXPECT_*` (continues) over `ASSERT_*` (stops) when appropriate
-- Test behavior, not implementation details
-- Include edge cases (empty, null, max values, boundary conditions)
-
-**DON'T:**
-- Write implementation before tests
-- Skip the RED phase
-- Test private methods directly (test through public API)
-- Use `sleep` in tests
-- Ignore flaky tests
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/cpp-build` - Fix build errors
-- `/cpp-review` - Review code after implementation
-- `verification-loop` skill - Run full verification loop
-
-## Related
-
-- Skill: `skills/cpp-testing/`
-- Skill: `skills/tdd-workflow/`
+---
+description: Enforce TDD workflow for C++. Write GoogleTest tests first, then implement. Verify coverage with gcov/lcov.
+---
+
+# C++ TDD Command
+
+This command enforces test-driven development methodology for C++ code using GoogleTest/GoogleMock with CMake/CTest.
+
+## What This Command Does
+
+1. **Define Interfaces**: Scaffold class/function signatures first
+2. **Write Tests**: Create comprehensive GoogleTest test cases (RED)
+3. **Run Tests**: Verify tests fail for the right reason
+4. **Implement Code**: Write minimal code to pass (GREEN)
+5. **Refactor**: Improve while keeping tests green
+6. **Check Coverage**: Ensure 80%+ coverage
+
+## When to Use
+
+Use `/cpp-test` when:
+- Implementing new C++ functions or classes
+- Adding test coverage to existing code
+- Fixing bugs (write failing test first)
+- Building critical business logic
+- Learning TDD workflow in C++
+
+## TDD Cycle
+
+```
+RED     → Write failing GoogleTest test
+GREEN   → Implement minimal code to pass
+REFACTOR → Improve code, tests stay green
+REPEAT  → Next test case
+```
+
+## Example Session
+
+````
+User: /cpp-test I need a function to validate email addresses
+
+Agent:
+# TDD Session: Email Validator
+
+## Step 1: Define Interface
+
+```cpp
+// validator/email.hpp
+#pragma once
+#include <string>
+#include <expected>
+
+enum class EmailError {
+    Empty,
+    InvalidFormat
+};
+
+std::expected<void, EmailError> validate_email(const std::string& email);
+```
+
+## Step 2: Write Tests (RED)
+
+```cpp
+// validator/email_test.cpp
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include "email.hpp"
+
+TEST(ValidateEmail, AcceptsSimpleEmail) {
+    auto result = validate_email("user@example.com");
+    EXPECT_TRUE(result.has_value());
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateEmail, AcceptsSubdomain) {
+    EXPECT_TRUE(validate_email("user@mail.example.com").has_value());
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateEmail, AcceptsPlus) {
+    EXPECT_TRUE(validate_email("user+tag@example.com").has_value());
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsEmpty) {
+    auto result = validate_email("");
+    ASSERT_FALSE(result.has_value());
+    EXPECT_EQ(result.error(), EmailError::Empty);
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsNoAtSign) {
+    EXPECT_FALSE(validate_email("userexample.com").has_value());
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsNoDomain) {
+    EXPECT_FALSE(validate_email("user@").has_value());
+}
+
+TEST(ValidateEmail, RejectsNoLocalPart) {
+    EXPECT_FALSE(validate_email("@example.com").has_value());
+}
+```
+
+## Step 3: Run Tests - Verify FAIL
+
+```bash
+$ cmake --build build && ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure
+
+1/1 Test #1: email_validator_test .....***Failed
+    --- undefined reference to `validate_email`
+
+FAIL
+```
+
+✓ Tests fail as expected (unimplemented).
+
+## Step 4: Implement Minimal Code (GREEN)
+
+```cpp
+// validator/email.cpp
+#include "email.hpp"
+#include <regex>
+
+std::expected<void, EmailError> validate_email(const std::string& email) {
+    if (email.empty()) {
+        return std::unexpected(EmailError::Empty);
+    }
+    static const std::regex pattern(R"([a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,})");
+    if (!std::regex_match(email, pattern)) {
+        return std::unexpected(EmailError::InvalidFormat);
+    }
+    return {};
+}
+```
+
+## Step 5: Run Tests - Verify PASS
+
+```bash
+$ cmake --build build && ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure
+
+1/1 Test #1: email_validator_test .....   Passed    0.01 sec
+
+100% tests passed.
+```
+
+✓ All tests passing!
+
+## Step 6: Check Coverage
+
+```bash
+$ cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="--coverage" -B build && cmake --build build
+$ ctest --test-dir build
+$ lcov --capture --directory build --output-file coverage.info
+$ lcov --list coverage.info
+
+validator/email.cpp     | 100%
+```
+
+✓ Coverage: 100%
+
+## TDD Complete!
+````
+
+## Test Patterns
+
+### Basic Tests
+```cpp
+TEST(SuiteName, TestName) {
+    EXPECT_EQ(add(2, 3), 5);
+    EXPECT_NE(result, nullptr);
+    EXPECT_TRUE(is_valid);
+    EXPECT_THROW(func(), std::invalid_argument);
+}
+```
+
+### Fixtures
+```cpp
+class DatabaseTest : public ::testing::Test {
+protected:
+    void SetUp() override { db_ = create_test_db(); }
+    void TearDown() override { db_.reset(); }
+    std::unique_ptr<Database> db_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(DatabaseTest, InsertsRecord) {
+    db_->insert("key", "value");
+    EXPECT_EQ(db_->get("key"), "value");
+}
+```
+
+### Parameterized Tests
+```cpp
+class PrimeTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<std::pair<int, bool>> {};
+
+TEST_P(PrimeTest, ChecksPrimality) {
+    auto [input, expected] = GetParam();
+    EXPECT_EQ(is_prime(input), expected);
+}
+
+INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(Primes, PrimeTest, ::testing::Values(
+    std::make_pair(2, true),
+    std::make_pair(4, false),
+    std::make_pair(7, true)
+));
+```
+
+## Coverage Commands
+
+```bash
+# Build with coverage
+cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="--coverage" -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS="--coverage" -B build
+
+# Run tests
+cmake --build build && ctest --test-dir build
+
+# Generate coverage report
+lcov --capture --directory build --output-file coverage.info
+lcov --remove coverage.info '/usr/*' --output-file coverage.info
+genhtml coverage.info --output-directory coverage_html
+```
+
+## Coverage Targets
+
+| Code Type | Target |
+|-----------|--------|
+| Critical business logic | 100% |
+| Public APIs | 90%+ |
+| General code | 80%+ |
+| Generated code | Exclude |
+
+## TDD Best Practices
+
+**DO:**
+- Write test FIRST, before any implementation
+- Run tests after each change
+- Use `EXPECT_*` (continues) over `ASSERT_*` (stops) when appropriate
+- Test behavior, not implementation details
+- Include edge cases (empty, null, max values, boundary conditions)
+
+**DON'T:**
+- Write implementation before tests
+- Skip the RED phase
+- Test private methods directly (test through public API)
+- Use `sleep` in tests
+- Ignore flaky tests
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/cpp-build` - Fix build errors
+- `/cpp-review` - Review code after implementation
+- `verification-loop` skill - Run full verification loop
+
+## Related
+
+- Skill: `skills/cpp-testing/`
+- Skill: `skills/tdd-workflow/`

package/seed/marketplaces/ecc/commands/ecc-guide.md

@@ -1,93 +1,93 @@
----
-description: Navigate ECC's current agents, skills, commands, hooks, install profiles, and docs from the live repository surface.
----
-
-# /ecc-guide
-
-Use this command as a conversational map of Everything Claude Code. It should help the user discover the right ECC surface for their task without dumping the entire README or stale catalog counts.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/ecc-guide
-/ecc-guide setup
-/ecc-guide skills
-/ecc-guide commands
-/ecc-guide hooks
-/ecc-guide install
-/ecc-guide find: <query>
-/ecc-guide <feature-or-file-name>
-```
-
-## Operating Rules
-
-1. Read current repository files before answering when the checkout is available.
-2. Prefer current filesystem/catalog data over hard-coded counts.
-3. Keep the first answer short, then offer specific drill-down paths.
-4. Link users to canonical files instead of copying long sections.
-5. Do not invent commands, skills, agents, or install profiles that are not present.
-
-## What To Inspect
-
-Use these files as the canonical map:
-
-- `README.md` for install paths, reset/uninstall guidance, and high-level positioning
-- `AGENTS.md` for contributor and project-structure guidance
-- `agent.yaml` for exported agent and command surface
-- `commands/` for maintained slash-command shims
-- `skills/*/SKILL.md` for reusable skill workflows
-- `agents/*.md` for delegated agent roles
-- `hooks/README.md` and `hooks/hooks.json` for hook behavior
-- `manifests/install-*.json` for selective install modules, components, and profiles
-- `scripts/ci/catalog.js --json` for live catalog counts when running inside ECC
-
-## Response Patterns
-
-### No Arguments
-
-Give a compact menu:
-
-- setup and install
-- choosing skills
-- command compatibility shims
-- agents and delegation
-- hooks and safety
-- troubleshooting an install
-- finding a specific feature
-
-Then ask what they want to do next.
-
-### Topic Lookup
-
-For topics like `skills`, `commands`, `hooks`, `install`, or `agents`:
-
-1. Summarize the current surface in 3-6 bullets.
-2. Point to the canonical directories/files.
-3. Suggest one or two commands that can verify the state.
-4. Avoid exhaustive lists unless the user asks for one.
-
-### Search Mode
-
-For `find: <query>`:
-
-1. Search the relevant files with `rg`.
-2. Group results by surface: skills, commands, agents, rules, docs, hooks.
-3. Return the strongest matches first with file paths.
-4. Recommend the next action for each match.
-
-### Feature Lookup
-
-For a specific feature name:
-
-1. Check exact paths first, such as `skills/<name>/SKILL.md`, `commands/<name>.md`, and `agents/<name>.md`.
-2. If exact lookup fails, search with `rg`.
-3. Explain what the feature does, when to use it, and what file is canonical.
-4. Mention adjacent features only when they reduce confusion.
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/project-init` for stack-aware ECC onboarding of a target project
-- `/harness-audit` for deterministic repo readiness scoring
-- `/skill-health` for skill quality checks
-- `/skill-create` for extracting a new skill from local git history
-- `/security-scan` for Claude/OpenCode configuration security review
+---
+description: Navigate ECC's current agents, skills, commands, hooks, install profiles, and docs from the live repository surface.
+---
+
+# /ecc-guide
+
+Use this command as a conversational map of Everything Claude Code. It should help the user discover the right ECC surface for their task without dumping the entire README or stale catalog counts.
+
+## Usage
+
+```text
+/ecc-guide
+/ecc-guide setup
+/ecc-guide skills
+/ecc-guide commands
+/ecc-guide hooks
+/ecc-guide install
+/ecc-guide find: <query>
+/ecc-guide <feature-or-file-name>
+```
+
+## Operating Rules
+
+1. Read current repository files before answering when the checkout is available.
+2. Prefer current filesystem/catalog data over hard-coded counts.
+3. Keep the first answer short, then offer specific drill-down paths.
+4. Link users to canonical files instead of copying long sections.
+5. Do not invent commands, skills, agents, or install profiles that are not present.
+
+## What To Inspect
+
+Use these files as the canonical map:
+
+- `README.md` for install paths, reset/uninstall guidance, and high-level positioning
+- `AGENTS.md` for contributor and project-structure guidance
+- `agent.yaml` for exported agent and command surface
+- `commands/` for maintained slash-command shims
+- `skills/*/SKILL.md` for reusable skill workflows
+- `agents/*.md` for delegated agent roles
+- `hooks/README.md` and `hooks/hooks.json` for hook behavior
+- `manifests/install-*.json` for selective install modules, components, and profiles
+- `scripts/ci/catalog.js --json` for live catalog counts when running inside ECC
+
+## Response Patterns
+
+### No Arguments
+
+Give a compact menu:
+
+- setup and install
+- choosing skills
+- command compatibility shims
+- agents and delegation
+- hooks and safety
+- troubleshooting an install
+- finding a specific feature
+
+Then ask what they want to do next.
+
+### Topic Lookup
+
+For topics like `skills`, `commands`, `hooks`, `install`, or `agents`:
+
+1. Summarize the current surface in 3-6 bullets.
+2. Point to the canonical directories/files.
+3. Suggest one or two commands that can verify the state.
+4. Avoid exhaustive lists unless the user asks for one.
+
+### Search Mode
+
+For `find: <query>`:
+
+1. Search the relevant files with `rg`.
+2. Group results by surface: skills, commands, agents, rules, docs, hooks.
+3. Return the strongest matches first with file paths.
+4. Recommend the next action for each match.
+
+### Feature Lookup
+
+For a specific feature name:
+
+1. Check exact paths first, such as `skills/<name>/SKILL.md`, `commands/<name>.md`, and `agents/<name>.md`.
+2. If exact lookup fails, search with `rg`.
+3. Explain what the feature does, when to use it, and what file is canonical.
+4. Mention adjacent features only when they reduce confusion.
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/project-init` for stack-aware ECC onboarding of a target project
+- `/harness-audit` for deterministic repo readiness scoring
+- `/skill-health` for skill quality checks
+- `/skill-create` for extracting a new skill from local git history
+- `/security-scan` for Claude/OpenCode configuration security review