@friggframework/devtools 2.0.0-next.61 → 2.0.0-next.62

package/infrastructure/domains/health/docs/TDD-IMPLEMENTATION-SUMMARY.md

@@ -1,391 +0,0 @@
-# TDD Implementation Summary - Template Comparison Fix
-
-**Date**: 2025-10-27
-**Problem**: `frigg repair --import` generates wrong logical IDs (ImportedResource1, ImportedResource2)
-**Solution**: Template comparison with intelligent logical ID mapping
-**Architecture**: TDD, DDD, Hexagonal Architecture
-
-## 📊 Test Results
-
-### Domain Layer Tests
-
-**TemplateParser** (`template-parser.test.js`):
-- ✅ 21 tests passed
-- Coverage: Template parsing, VPC resource extraction, hardcoded ID extraction, Ref extraction
-- File operations, edge cases, error conditions
-
-**LogicalIdMapper** (`logical-id-mapper.test.js`):
-- ✅ 20 tests passed
-- Coverage: CloudFormation tag matching, VPC containment analysis, Lambda usage patterns
-- AWS SDK mocking, confidence level assignment, unmapped resource handling
-
-### Application Layer Tests
-
-**RepairViaImportUseCase** (`repair-via-import-use-case.test.js`):
-- ✅ 17 tests passed
-- Coverage: Template comparison orchestration, CloudFormation import format generation
-- Multi-resource warnings, mapped/unmapped separation, error conditions
-
-**Total: 58 tests passing ✅**
-
-## 🏗️ Architecture Layers
-
-### Domain Layer (Business Logic)
-
-**TemplateParser** (`domain/services/template-parser.js` - 265 lines):
-```javascript
-class TemplateParser {
-  parseTemplate(template)                  // Parse from file or object
-  getVpcResources(template)                // Extract VPC-related resources
-  extractHardcodedIds(template)            // Find physical IDs in deployed template
-  extractRefs(template)                    // Find Ref expressions in build template
-  findLogicalIdForPhysicalId()             // Match physical → logical
-  static getBuildTemplatePath()            // Get .serverless/cloudformation-template-update-stack.json
-  static buildTemplateExists()             // Check if build template exists
-}
-```
-
-**LogicalIdMapper** (`domain/services/logical-id-mapper.js` - 313 lines):
-```javascript
-class LogicalIdMapper {
-  async mapOrphanedResourcesToLogicalIds() // Orchestrate mapping strategies
-
-  // Strategy 1: CloudFormation tags (HIGH confidence)
-  _getLogicalIdFromTags(tags)
-
-  // Strategy 2: VPC containment analysis (HIGH confidence)
-  async _matchVpcByContainedResources()
-
-  // Strategy 3: Lambda VPC usage (MEDIUM confidence)
-  async _matchSubnetByVpcAndUsage()
-  async _matchSecurityGroupByUsage()
-}
-```
-
-### Application Layer (Use Cases)
-
-**RepairViaImportUseCase** (`application/use-cases/repair-via-import-use-case.js`):
-```javascript
-class RepairViaImportUseCase {
-  async importWithLogicalIdMapping({
-    stackIdentifier,
-    orphanedResources,
-    buildTemplatePath
-  })
-
-  // Returns:
-  {
-    success: true,
-    mappedCount: 2,
-    unmappedCount: 0,
-    mappings: [
-      { logicalId: 'FriggVPC', physicalId: 'vpc-...', matchMethod: 'tag', confidence: 'high' }
-    ],
-    resourcesToImport: [
-      { ResourceType: 'AWS::EC2::VPC', LogicalResourceId: 'FriggVPC', ResourceIdentifier: { VpcId: '...' } }
-    ],
-    warnings: []
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Presentation Layer (CLI)
-
-**repair-command** (`../../../frigg-cli/repair-command/index.js`):
-```javascript
-async function handleImportRepair(stackIdentifier, report, options) {
-  // 1. Check for build template
-  const buildTemplatePath = TemplateParser.getBuildTemplatePath();
-  const buildTemplateExists = TemplateParser.buildTemplateExists();
-
-  if (!buildTemplateExists) {
-    // Fallback to sequential IDs with warning
-  }
-
-  // 2. Execute template comparison
-  const mappingResult = await repairUseCase.importWithLogicalIdMapping({
-    stackIdentifier,
-    orphanedResources,
-    buildTemplatePath
-  });
-
-  // 3. Display results with confidence levels
-  // 4. Show multi-resource warnings
-  // 5. Confirm with user
-  // 6. Execute import (TODO)
-}
-```
-
-## 🎯 Matching Strategies
-
-### Strategy 1: CloudFormation Tags (HIGH Confidence)
-
-Checks for `aws:cloudformation:logical-id` tag on resources.
-
-**Example**:
-```javascript
-{
-  Tags: [
-    { Key: 'aws:cloudformation:stack-name', Value: 'acme-integrations-dev' },
-    { Key: 'aws:cloudformation:logical-id', Value: 'FriggVPC' }
-  ]
-}
-→ logicalId: 'FriggVPC' (confidence: high)
-```
-
-### Strategy 2: VPC Containment Analysis (HIGH Confidence)
-
-Checks if VPC contains expected subnets from template.
-
-**Example**:
-```javascript
-// Deployed template has: subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
-// AWS EC2 shows VPC vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7 contains: subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
-// Build template has: { Ref: 'FriggVPC' }
-→ logicalId: 'FriggVPC' (confidence: high)
-```
-
-### Strategy 3: Lambda VPC Usage (MEDIUM Confidence)
-
-Matches by subnet/security group references in Lambda VPC configs.
-
-**Example**:
-```javascript
-// Deployed template:
-MyLambda.Properties.VpcConfig.SubnetIds = ['subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3']
-
-// Build template:
-MyLambda.Properties.VpcConfig.SubnetIds = [{ Ref: 'FriggPrivateSubnet1' }]
-
-→ logicalId: 'FriggPrivateSubnet1' (confidence: medium)
-```
-
-## 📝 CloudFormation Import Format
-
-Generated output for CloudFormation import:
-
-```json
-[
-  {
-    "ResourceType": "AWS::EC2::VPC",
-    "LogicalResourceId": "FriggVPC",
-    "ResourceIdentifier": { "VpcId": "vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7" }
-  },
-  {
-    "ResourceType": "AWS::EC2::Subnet",
-    "LogicalResourceId": "FriggPrivateSubnet1",
-    "ResourceIdentifier": { "SubnetId": "subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3" }
-  },
-  {
-    "ResourceType": "AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup",
-    "LogicalResourceId": "FriggLambdaSecurityGroup",
-    "ResourceIdentifier": { "GroupId": "sg-07c01370e830b6ad6" }
-  }
-]
-```
-
-## ⚠️ Multi-Resource Warnings
-
-When multiple resources of same type are detected:
-
-```
-⚠️  Warnings:
-  • Multiple VPCs detected (3). Review relationships before importing.
-      - FriggVPC ← vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7 (tag, high)
-      - FriggVPC2 ← vpc-020a0365610c05f0b (contained-resources, high)
-      - FriggVPC3 ← vpc-0e2351eac99adcb83 (tag, high)
-```
-
-This helps users identify when manual selection is needed.
-
-## 🚀 CLI Usage Flow
-
-### Before Fix (Wrong Logical IDs)
-```bash
-$ frigg repair --import acme-integrations-dev
-
-📦 Found 3 orphaned resources:
-  1. AWS::EC2::VPC - vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7
-  2. AWS::EC2::Subnet - subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
-  3. AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup - sg-07c01370e830b6ad6
-
-# ❌ Generates:
-# - ImportedResource1
-# - ImportedResource2
-# - ImportedResource3
-```
-
-### After Fix (Correct Logical IDs)
-```bash
-$ serverless package  # Generate build template first
-
-$ frigg repair --import acme-integrations-dev
-
-📦 Found 3 orphaned resources:
-  1. AWS::EC2::VPC - vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7
-  2. AWS::EC2::Subnet - subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
-  3. AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup - sg-07c01370e830b6ad6
-
-🔍 Analyzing templates to map orphaned resources to correct logical IDs...
-   Build template: .serverless/cloudformation-template-update-stack.json
-   Deployed template: CloudFormation (via AWS API)
-
-✅ Successfully mapped 3 resource(s) to logical IDs:
-  • FriggVPC ← vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7 (tag, high confidence)
-  • FriggPrivateSubnet1 ← subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3 (vpc-usage, high confidence)
-  • FriggLambdaSecurityGroup ← sg-07c01370e830b6ad6 (usage, medium confidence)
-
-📋 The following will be imported into CloudFormation:
-  • FriggVPC (AWS::EC2::VPC)
-  • FriggPrivateSubnet1 (AWS::EC2::Subnet)
-  • FriggLambdaSecurityGroup (AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup)
-
-Proceed with import of 3 resource(s)? (y/N):
-```
-
-## 📦 Commits Made
-
-1. **8b13ab3e** - feat(health): implement template comparison for correct logical ID mapping
-2. **9b24e8e0** - docs(health): comprehensive implementation guide for template comparison fix
-3. **e864c890** - test(health): comprehensive TDD tests for template comparison services
-4. **57de216e** - test(health): TDD tests for importWithLogicalIdMapping use case
-5. **26fd97ad** - feat(cli): integrate template comparison for correct logical ID mapping
-
-## 🧪 Test Coverage
-
-- **Domain Services**: 41 tests (TemplateParser + LogicalIdMapper)
-- **Application Use Cases**: 17 tests (RepairViaImportUseCase)
-- **Total**: 58 tests passing ✅
-- **Test Types**: Unit tests, integration tests, edge cases, error conditions
-- **Mocking**: AWS SDK mocked for EC2 operations
-- **Patterns**: Arrange-Act-Assert, dependency injection
-
-## 📚 Documentation
-
-1. **TEMPLATE-COMPARISON-IMPLEMENTATION.md** (551 lines) - Complete implementation guide
-2. **TDD-IMPLEMENTATION-SUMMARY.md** (This file) - Test results and architecture
-3. **Inline JSDoc** - All methods documented with purpose and examples
-
-## 🎯 Next Steps
-
-1. ✅ Domain layer tests (template-parser, logical-id-mapper)
-2. ✅ Application layer tests (repair-via-import-use-case)
-3. ✅ CLI adapter integration
-4. ⏳ Test with real acme-integrations-dev stack
-5. ⏳ Execute CloudFormation import operation
-6. ⏳ Monitor import status
-7. ⏳ Verify health score improvement
-
-## 💡 Key Insights
-
-### Problem Discovery
-
-The root cause was discovered by analyzing build vs deployed templates:
-
-**Build Template** (`.serverless/cloudformation-template-update-stack.json`):
-```json
-{
-  "Resources": {
-    "FriggVPC": { "Type": "AWS::EC2::VPC" },
-    "MyLambda": {
-      "Properties": {
-        "VpcConfig": {
-          "SubnetIds": [{ "Ref": "FriggPrivateSubnet1" }]
-        }
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Deployed Template** (CloudFormation):
-```json
-{
-  "Resources": {
-    "FriggVPC": { "Type": "AWS::EC2::VPC" },
-    "MyLambda": {
-      "Properties": {
-        "VpcConfig": {
-          "SubnetIds": ["subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3"]  // Hardcoded!
-        }
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-By comparing these templates, we can map physical IDs back to logical IDs!
-
-### Architecture Benefits
-
-**Hexagonal Architecture**:
-- Domain layer has NO AWS dependencies
-- Application layer orchestrates domain services
-- Infrastructure layer (AWS adapters) separated
-- Presentation layer (CLI) only handles user interaction
-
-**TDD Benefits**:
-- Caught edge cases early
-- Provides regression protection
-- Documents expected behavior
-- Enables confident refactoring
-
-**DDD Benefits**:
-- Clear separation of concerns
-- Ubiquitous language (logical ID, physical ID, mapping, confidence)
-- Domain services contain pure business logic
-- Value objects (StackIdentifier, mappings)
-
-## 🔍 Testing Strategy
-
-### Unit Tests (Domain Layer)
-
-```javascript
-// TemplateParser tests
-test('should extract hardcoded VPC IDs from deployed template', () => {
-  const template = { /* deployed template with hardcoded IDs */ };
-  const result = parser.extractHardcodedIds(template);
-
-  expect(result.vpcIds).toEqual(['vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7']);
-  expect(result.subnetIds).toEqual(['subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3']);
-});
-```
-
-### Integration Tests (Application Layer)
-
-```javascript
-// RepairViaImportUseCase tests
-test('should successfully map orphaned resources to logical IDs', async () => {
-  const mappingResult = await useCase.importWithLogicalIdMapping({
-    stackIdentifier,
-    orphanedResources,
-    buildTemplatePath
-  });
-
-  expect(mappingResult.success).toBe(true);
-  expect(mappingResult.mappings[0].logicalId).toBe('FriggVPC');
-});
-```
-
-### End-to-End Tests (Presentation Layer)
-
-```bash
-# Manual testing with real AWS stack
-$ frigg repair --import acme-integrations-dev
-
-# Expected: Correct logical IDs mapped via template comparison
-# Actual: (to be tested)
-```
-
-## 🎓 Lessons Learned
-
-1. **Always compare templates** - Build template ≠ Deployed template
-2. **Multiple matching strategies** - Use tags first, fallback to analysis
-3. **Confidence levels matter** - Help users make informed decisions
-4. **TDD catches edge cases** - Multiple VPCs, unmapped resources, etc.
-5. **Hexagonal architecture scales** - Easy to test, easy to extend
-6. **Good documentation saves time** - Clear explanations prevent confusion
-
----
-
-**Status**: Implementation complete, ready for real-world testing ✅