@friedbotstudio/create-baseline 0.1.0

package/obj/template/.claude/skills/impeccable/reference/responsive-design.md

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Responsive Design
+
+## Mobile-First: Write It Right
+
+Start with base styles for mobile, use `min-width` queries to layer complexity. Desktop-first (`max-width`) means mobile loads unnecessary styles first.
+
+## Breakpoints: Content-Driven
+
+Don't chase device sizes—let content tell you where to break. Start narrow, stretch until design breaks, add breakpoint there. Three breakpoints usually suffice (640, 768, 1024px). Use `clamp()` for fluid values without breakpoints.
+
+## Detect Input Method, Not Just Screen Size
+
+**Screen size doesn't tell you input method.** A laptop with touchscreen, a tablet with keyboard—use pointer and hover queries:
+
+```css
+/* Fine pointer (mouse, trackpad) */
+@media (pointer: fine) {
+  .button { padding: 8px 16px; }
+}
+
+/* Coarse pointer (touch, stylus) */
+@media (pointer: coarse) {
+  .button { padding: 12px 20px; }  /* Larger touch target */
+}
+
+/* Device supports hover */
+@media (hover: hover) {
+  .card:hover { transform: translateY(-2px); }
+}
+
+/* Device doesn't support hover (touch) */
+@media (hover: none) {
+  .card { /* No hover state - use active instead */ }
+}
+```
+
+**Critical**: Don't rely on hover for functionality. Touch users can't hover.
+
+## Safe Areas: Handle the Notch
+
+Modern phones have notches, rounded corners, and home indicators. Use `env()`:
+
+```css
+body {
+  padding-top: env(safe-area-inset-top);
+  padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
+  padding-left: env(safe-area-inset-left);
+  padding-right: env(safe-area-inset-right);
+}
+
+/* With fallback */
+.footer {
+  padding-bottom: max(1rem, env(safe-area-inset-bottom));
+}
+```
+
+**Enable viewport-fit** in your meta tag:
+```html
+<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, viewport-fit=cover">
+```
+
+## Responsive Images: Get It Right
+
+### srcset with Width Descriptors
+
+```html
+<img
+  src="hero-800.jpg"
+  srcset="
+    hero-400.jpg 400w,
+    hero-800.jpg 800w,
+    hero-1200.jpg 1200w
+  "
+  sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 50vw"
+  alt="Hero image"
+>
+```
+
+**How it works**:
+- `srcset` lists available images with their actual widths (`w` descriptors)
+- `sizes` tells the browser how wide the image will display
+- Browser picks the best file based on viewport width AND device pixel ratio
+
+### Picture Element for Art Direction
+
+When you need different crops/compositions (not just resolutions):
+
+```html
+<picture>
+  <source media="(min-width: 768px)" srcset="wide.jpg">
+  <source media="(max-width: 767px)" srcset="tall.jpg">
+  <img src="fallback.jpg" alt="...">
+</picture>
+```
+
+## Layout Adaptation Patterns
+
+**Navigation**: Three stages—hamburger + drawer on mobile, horizontal compact on tablet, full with labels on desktop. **Tables**: Transform to cards on mobile using `display: block` and `data-label` attributes. **Progressive disclosure**: Use `<details>/<summary>` for content that can collapse on mobile.
+
+## Testing: Don't Trust DevTools Alone
+
+DevTools device emulation is useful for layout but misses:
+
+- Actual touch interactions
+- Real CPU/memory constraints
+- Network latency patterns
+- Font rendering differences
+- Browser chrome/keyboard appearances
+
+**Test on at least**: One real iPhone, one real Android, a tablet if relevant. Cheap Android phones reveal performance issues you'll never see on simulators.
+
+---
+
+**Avoid**: Desktop-first design. Device detection instead of feature detection. Separate mobile/desktop codebases. Ignoring tablet and landscape. Assuming all mobile devices are powerful.

package/obj/template/.claude/skills/impeccable/reference/shape.md

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+Shape the UX and UI for a feature before any code is written. This command produces a **design brief**: a structured artifact that guides implementation through discovery, not guesswork.
+
+**Scope**: Design planning only. This command does NOT write code. It produces the thinking that makes code good.
+
+**Output**: A design brief that can be handed off to $impeccable craft, or directly to $impeccable for freeform implementation. When visual direction probes are used, the images are supporting artifacts, not the primary output.
+
+## Philosophy
+
+Most AI-generated UIs fail not because of bad code, but because of skipped thinking. They jump to "here's a card grid" without asking "what is the user trying to accomplish?" This command inverts that: understand deeply first, so implementation is precise.
+
+## Phase 1: Discovery Interview
+
+**Do NOT write any code or make any design decisions during this phase.** Your only job is to understand the feature deeply enough to make excellent design decisions later.
+
+Ask these questions in conversation, adapting based on answers. Don't dump them all at once; have a natural dialogue. ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer.
+
+### Purpose & Context
+- What is this feature for? What problem does it solve?
+- Who specifically will use it? (Not "users"; be specific: role, context, frequency)
+- What does success look like? How will you know this feature is working?
+- What's the user's state of mind when they reach this feature? (Rushed? Exploring? Anxious? Focused?)
+
+### Content & Data
+- What content or data does this feature display or collect?
+- What are the realistic ranges? (Minimum, typical, maximum, e.g., 0 items, 5 items, 500 items)
+- What are the edge cases? (Empty state, error state, first-time use, power user)
+- Is any content dynamic? What changes and how often?
+
+### Design Direction
+
+Force a visual decision on three fronts. Skip anything PRODUCT.md or DESIGN.md already answers; ask only what's missing.
+
+- **Color strategy for this surface.** Pick one: Restrained / Committed / Full palette / Drenched. Can override the project default if the surface earns it (e.g. a drenched hero inside an otherwise Restrained product).
+- **Theme via scene sentence.** Write one sentence of physical context for this surface — who uses it, where, under what ambient light, in what mood. The sentence forces dark vs light. If it doesn't, add detail until it does.
+- **Two or three named anchor references.** Specific products, brands, objects — not adjectives like "modern" or "clean."
+
+### Scope
+
+Always ask. Sketch quality and shipped quality are different outputs; don't guess between them.
+
+- **Fidelity.** Sketch / mid-fi / high-fi / production-ready?
+- **Breadth.** One screen / a flow / a whole surface?
+- **Interactivity.** Static visual / interactive prototype / shipped-quality component?
+- **Time intent.** Quick exploration, or polish until it ships?
+
+Scope answers are task-scoped. Don't write them to PRODUCT.md or DESIGN.md — carry them through the design brief only.
+
+### Constraints
+- Are there technical constraints? (Framework, performance budget, browser support)
+- Are there content constraints? (Localization, dynamic text length, user-generated content)
+- Mobile/responsive requirements?
+- Accessibility requirements beyond WCAG AA?
+
+### Anti-Goals
+- What should this NOT be? What would be a wrong direction?
+- What's the biggest risk of getting this wrong?
+
+## Phase 1.5: Visual Direction Probe (Capability-Gated)
+
+After the discovery interview, generate a small set of visual direction probes **before** writing the final brief when all of these are true:
+
+- The work is **net-new** or directionally ambiguous enough that visual exploration will clarify the brief.
+- The requested fidelity is **mid-fi, high-fi, or production-ready**. Skip for sketch-only planning.
+- The current harness has **built-in image generation capability** (for example, Codex with a native image tool). Do **not** ask the user to set up external APIs, shell scripts, or one-off tooling just to do this.
+
+When those conditions are met, this step is the default. Use it to explore visual lanes, not to replace the brief.
+
+### What to generate
+
+Generate **2 to 4** distinct direction probes based on the discovery answers, especially:
+
+- Color strategy
+- Theme scene sentence
+- Named anchor references
+- Scope and fidelity
+
+The probes should differ in primary visual direction (hierarchy, topology, density, typographic voice, or color strategy), not just palette tweaks.
+
+### How to use the probes
+
+- Treat them as **direction tests**, not final designs.
+- Use them to pressure-test whether the brief is pointing at the right lane.
+- Ask the user which direction feels closest, what feels off, and what should carry forward.
+- If the probes reveal a mismatch, revise the brief inputs before finalizing the brief.
+
+### Important limits
+
+- Do **not** skip discovery because image generation is available.
+- Do **not** treat generated imagery as final UX specification, final copy, or final accessibility behavior.
+- Do **not** use this step for minor refinements of existing work. It's for shaping a new surface or clarifying a big directional choice.
+
+If image generation is unavailable, or the task doesn't benefit from it, skip this phase and proceed directly to the design brief.
+
+## Phase 2: Design Brief
+
+After the interview, synthesize everything into a structured design brief. Present it to the user for confirmation before considering this command complete.
+
+### Brief Structure
+
+**1. Feature Summary** (2-3 sentences)
+What this is, who it's for, what it needs to accomplish.
+
+**2. Primary User Action**
+The single most important thing a user should do or understand here.
+
+**3. Design Direction**
+Color strategy (Restrained / Committed / Full palette / Drenched) + the theme scene sentence + 2–3 named anchor references. Reference PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md where they already answer, and note any per-surface overrides.
+
+If you ran the Visual Direction Probe step, name which probe direction won and what changed in the brief because of it.
+
+**4. Scope**
+Fidelity, breadth, interactivity, and time intent from the Scope section of the interview. Task-scoped — these don't persist beyond the brief.
+
+**5. Layout Strategy**
+High-level spatial approach: what gets emphasis, what's secondary, how information flows. Describe the visual hierarchy and rhythm, not specific CSS.
+
+**6. Key States**
+List every state the feature needs: default, empty, loading, error, success, edge cases. For each, note what the user needs to see and feel.
+
+**7. Interaction Model**
+How users interact with this feature. What happens on click, hover, scroll? What feedback do they get? What's the flow from entry to completion?
+
+**8. Content Requirements**
+What copy, labels, empty state messages, error messages, and microcopy are needed. Note any dynamic content and its realistic ranges.
+
+**9. Recommended References**
+Based on the brief, list which impeccable reference files would be most valuable during implementation (e.g., spatial-design.md for complex layouts, motion-design.md for animated features, interaction-design.md for form-heavy features).
+
+**10. Open Questions**
+Anything unresolved that the implementer should resolve during build.
+
+---
+
+ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. Get explicit confirmation of the brief before finishing. If the user disagrees with any part, revisit the relevant discovery questions.
+
+Once confirmed, the brief is complete. The user can now hand it to $impeccable, or use it to guide any other implementation approach. (If the user wants the full discovery-then-build flow in one step, they should use $impeccable craft instead, which runs this command internally.)

package/obj/template/.claude/skills/impeccable/reference/spatial-design.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+# Spatial Design
+
+## Spacing Systems
+
+### Use 4pt Base, Not 8pt
+
+8pt systems are too coarse—you'll frequently need 12px (between 8 and 16). Use 4pt for granularity: 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96px.
+
+### Name Tokens Semantically
+
+Name by relationship (`--space-sm`, `--space-lg`), not value (`--spacing-8`). Use `gap` instead of margins for sibling spacing—it eliminates margin collapse and cleanup hacks.
+
+## Grid Systems
+
+### The Self-Adjusting Grid
+
+Use `repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr))` for responsive grids without breakpoints. Columns are at least 280px, as many as fit per row, leftovers stretch. For complex layouts, use named grid areas (`grid-template-areas`) and redefine them at breakpoints.
+
+## Visual Hierarchy
+
+### The Squint Test
+
+Blur your eyes (or screenshot and blur). Can you still identify:
+- The most important element?
+- The second most important?
+- Clear groupings?
+
+If everything looks the same weight blurred, you have a hierarchy problem.
+
+### Hierarchy Through Multiple Dimensions
+
+Don't rely on size alone. Combine:
+
+| Tool | Strong Hierarchy | Weak Hierarchy |
+|------|------------------|----------------|
+| **Size** | 3:1 ratio or more | <2:1 ratio |
+| **Weight** | Bold vs Regular | Medium vs Regular |
+| **Color** | High contrast | Similar tones |
+| **Position** | Top/left (primary) | Bottom/right |
+| **Space** | Surrounded by white space | Crowded |
+
+**The best hierarchy uses 2-3 dimensions at once**: A heading that's larger, bolder, AND has more space above it.
+
+### Cards Are Not Required
+
+Cards are overused. Spacing and alignment create visual grouping naturally. Use cards only when content is truly distinct and actionable, items need visual comparison in a grid, or content needs clear interaction boundaries. **Never nest cards inside cards**—use spacing, typography, and subtle dividers for hierarchy within a card.
+
+## Container Queries
+
+Viewport queries are for page layouts. **Container queries are for components**:
+
+```css
+.card-container {
+  container-type: inline-size;
+}
+
+.card {
+  display: grid;
+  gap: var(--space-md);
+}
+
+/* Card layout changes based on its container, not viewport */
+@container (min-width: 400px) {
+  .card {
+    grid-template-columns: 120px 1fr;
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Why this matters**: A card in a narrow sidebar stays compact, while the same card in a main content area expands—automatically, without viewport hacks.
+
+## Optical Adjustments
+
+Text at `margin-left: 0` looks indented due to letterform whitespace—use negative margin (`-0.05em`) to optically align. Geometrically centered icons often look off-center; play icons need to shift right, arrows shift toward their direction.
+
+### Touch Targets vs Visual Size
+
+Buttons can look small but need large touch targets (44px minimum). Use padding or pseudo-elements:
+
+```css
+.icon-button {
+  width: 24px;  /* Visual size */
+  height: 24px;
+  position: relative;
+}
+
+.icon-button::before {
+  content: '';
+  position: absolute;
+  inset: -10px;  /* Expand tap target to 44px */
+}
+```
+
+## Depth & Elevation
+
+Create semantic z-index scales (dropdown → sticky → modal-backdrop → modal → toast → tooltip) instead of arbitrary numbers. For shadows, create a consistent elevation scale (sm → md → lg → xl). **Key insight**: Shadows should be subtle—if you can clearly see it, it's probably too strong.
+
+---
+
+**Avoid**: Arbitrary spacing values outside your scale. Making all spacing equal (variety creates hierarchy). Creating hierarchy through size alone - combine size, weight, color, and space.

package/obj/template/.claude/skills/impeccable/reference/teach.md

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+# Teach Flow
+
+Gathers design context for a project and writes two complementary files at the project root:
+
+- **PRODUCT.md** (strategic): register, target users, product purpose, brand personality, anti-references, strategic design principles. Answers "who/what/why".
+- **DESIGN.md** (visual): visual theme, color palette, typography, components, layout. Follows the [Google Stitch DESIGN.md format](https://stitch.withgoogle.com/docs/design-md/format/). Answers "how it looks".
+
+Every other impeccable command reads these files before doing any work.
+
+## Step 1: Load current state
+
+Run the shared loader first so you know what already exists:
+
+```bash
+node .claude/skills/impeccable/scripts/load-context.mjs
+```
+
+The output tells you whether PRODUCT.md and/or DESIGN.md already exist. If `migrated: true`, legacy `.impeccable.md` was auto-renamed to `PRODUCT.md`. Mention this once to the user.
+
+Decision tree:
+- **Neither file exists (empty project or no context yet)**: do Steps 2-4 (write PRODUCT.md), then decide on DESIGN.md based on whether there's code to analyze.
+- **PRODUCT.md exists, DESIGN.md missing**: skip to Step 5 — offer to run `$impeccable document` for DESIGN.md.
+- **PRODUCT.md exists but has no `## Register` section (legacy)**: add it. Infer a hypothesis from the codebase (see Step 2), confirm with the user, write the field.
+- **Both exist**: ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. which to refresh. Skip the one the user doesn't want changed.
+- **Just DESIGN.md exists (unusual)**: do Steps 2-4 to produce PRODUCT.md.
+
+Never silently overwrite an existing file. Always confirm first.
+
+## Step 2: Explore the codebase
+
+Before asking questions, thoroughly scan the project to discover what you can:
+
+- **README and docs**: Project purpose, target audience, any stated goals
+- **Package.json / config files**: Tech stack, dependencies, existing design libraries
+- **Existing components**: Current design patterns, spacing, typography in use
+- **Brand assets**: Logos, favicons, color values already defined
+- **Design tokens / CSS variables**: Existing color palettes, font stacks, spacing scales
+- **Any style guides or brand documentation**
+
+Also form a **register hypothesis** from what you find:
+
+- Brand signals: `/`, `/about`, `/pricing`, `/blog/*`, `/docs/*`, hero sections, big typography, scroll-driven sections, landing-page-shaped content.
+- Product signals: `/app/*`, `/dashboard`, `/settings`, `/(auth)`, forms, data tables, side/top nav, app-shell components.
+
+Register is a hypothesis at this point, not a decision — Step 3 confirms it.
+
+Note what you've learned and what remains unclear. This exploration feeds both PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md.
+
+## Step 3: Ask strategic questions (for PRODUCT.md)
+
+ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. Focus only on what you couldn't infer from the codebase.
+
+### Register (ask first — it shapes everything below)
+
+Every design task is either **brand** (marketing, landing, campaign, long-form content, portfolio — design IS the product) or **product** (app UI, admin, dashboards, tools — design SERVES the product).
+
+If Step 2 produced a clear hypothesis, lead with it: *"From the codebase, this looks like a [brand / product] surface — does that match your intent, or should we treat it differently?"*
+
+If the signal is genuinely split (e.g. a product with a big marketing landing), ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. which register describes the **primary** surface. The register can be overridden per task later, but PRODUCT.md carries one default.
+
+### Users & Purpose
+- Who uses this? What's their context when using it?
+- What job are they trying to get done?
+- For brand: what emotions should the interface evoke? (confidence, delight, calm, urgency)
+- For product: what workflow are they in? What's the primary task on any given screen?
+
+### Brand & Personality
+- How would you describe the brand personality in 3 words?
+- Reference sites or apps that capture the right feel? What specifically about them?
+  - For brand, push for real-world references in the right lane (tech-minimal, editorial-magazine, consumer-warm, brutalist-grid, etc.) — not generic "modern" adjectives.
+  - For product, push for category best-tool references (Linear, Figma, Notion, Raycast, Stripe).
+- What should this explicitly NOT look like? Any anti-references?
+
+### Accessibility & Inclusion
+- Specific accessibility requirements? (WCAG level, known user needs)
+- Considerations for reduced motion, color blindness, or other accommodations?
+
+Skip questions where the answer is already clear. **Do NOT ask about colors, fonts, radii, or visual styling here** — those belong in DESIGN.md, not PRODUCT.md.
+
+## Step 4: Write PRODUCT.md
+
+Synthesize into a strategic document:
+
+```markdown
+# Product
+
+## Register
+
+product
+
+## Users
+[Who they are, their context, the job to be done]
+
+## Product Purpose
+[What this product does, why it exists, what success looks like]
+
+## Brand Personality
+[Voice, tone, 3-word personality, emotional goals]
+
+## Anti-references
+[What this should NOT look like. Specific bad-example sites or patterns to avoid.]
+
+## Design Principles
+[3-5 strategic principles derived from the conversation. Principles like "practice what you preach", "show, don't tell", "expert confidence" — NOT visual rules like "use OKLCH" or "magenta accent".]
+
+## Accessibility & Inclusion
+[WCAG level, known user needs, considerations]
+```
+
+Register is either `brand` or `product` as a bare value. No prose, no commentary.
+
+Write to `PROJECT_ROOT/PRODUCT.md`. If `.impeccable.md` existed, the loader already renamed it — merge into that content rather than starting from scratch.
+
+## Step 5: Decide on DESIGN.md
+
+Offer `$impeccable document` either way. Two paths:
+
+- **Code exists** (CSS tokens, components, a running site): "I can generate a DESIGN.md that captures your visual system (colors, typography, components) so variants stay on-brand. Want to do that now?"
+- **Pre-implementation** (empty project): "I can seed a starter DESIGN.md from five quick questions about color strategy, type direction, motion energy, and references. You can re-run once there's code, to capture the real tokens. Want to do that now?"
+
+If the user agrees, delegate to `$impeccable document` (it auto-detects scan vs seed). Load its reference and follow that flow.
+
+If the user prefers to skip, mention they can run `$impeccable document` any time later.
+
+## Step 6: Confirm and wrap up
+
+Summarize:
+- Register captured (brand / product)
+- What was written (PRODUCT.md, DESIGN.md, or both)
+- The 3-5 strategic principles from PRODUCT.md that will guide future work
+- If DESIGN.md is pending, remind the user how to generate it later
+
+**Critical: re-run the loader to refresh session context.** After writing PRODUCT.md, run `node .claude/skills/impeccable/scripts/load-context.mjs` one final time and let its full JSON output land in conversation. This ensures subsequent commands in this session use the freshly-written PRODUCT.md, not a stale earlier version.
+
+If teach was invoked as a blocker by another impeccable command (e.g. the user ran `$impeccable polish` with no PRODUCT.md), resume that original task now with the fresh context.
+
+Optionally ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. whether they'd like a brief summary of PRODUCT.md appended to AGENTS.md for easier agent reference. If yes, append a short **Design Context** pointer section there.

package/obj/template/.claude/skills/impeccable/reference/typeset.md

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+Assess and improve typography that feels generic, inconsistent, or poorly structured — turning default-looking text into intentional, well-crafted type.
+
+---
+
+## Register
+
+Brand: run the font selection procedure in [brand.md](brand.md). Pairing follows the brand's lane (display serif + sans body for editorial/luxury, one committed sans for tech, etc.). Fluid `clamp()` scale, ≥1.25 ratio between steps.
+
+Product: system fonts and familiar sans stacks are legitimate here. One well-tuned family typically carries the whole UI. Fixed `rem` scale, 1.125–1.2 ratio between more closely-spaced steps.
+
+---
+
+## Assess Current Typography
+
+Analyze what's weak or generic about the current type:
+
+1. **Font choices**:
+   - Are we using invisible defaults? (Inter, Roboto, Arial, Open Sans, system defaults)
+   - Does the font match the brand personality? (A playful brand shouldn't use a corporate typeface)
+   - Are there too many font families? (More than 2-3 is almost always a mess)
+
+2. **Hierarchy**:
+   - Can you tell headings from body from captions at a glance?
+   - Are font sizes too close together? (14px, 15px, 16px = muddy hierarchy)
+   - Are weight contrasts strong enough? (Medium vs Regular is barely visible)
+
+3. **Sizing & scale**:
+   - Is there a consistent type scale, or are sizes arbitrary?
+   - Does body text meet minimum readability? (16px+)
+   - Is the sizing strategy appropriate for the context? (Fixed `rem` scales for app UIs; fluid `clamp()` for marketing/content page headings)
+
+4. **Readability**:
+   - Are line lengths comfortable? (45-75 characters ideal)
+   - Is line-height appropriate for the font and context?
+   - Is there enough contrast between text and background?
+
+5. **Consistency**:
+   - Are the same elements styled the same way throughout?
+   - Are font weights used consistently? (Not bold in one section, semibold in another for the same role)
+   - Is letter-spacing intentional or default everywhere?
+
+**CRITICAL**: The goal isn't to make text "fancier" — it's to make it clearer, more readable, and more intentional. Good typography is invisible; bad typography is distracting.
+
+## Plan Typography Improvements
+
+Consult the [typography reference](typography.md) for detailed guidance on scales, pairing, and loading strategies.
+
+Create a systematic plan:
+
+- **Font selection**: Do fonts need replacing? What fits the brand/context?
+- **Type scale**: Establish a modular scale (e.g., 1.25 ratio) with clear hierarchy
+- **Weight strategy**: Which weights serve which roles? (Regular for body, Semibold for labels, Bold for headings — or whatever fits)
+- **Spacing**: Line-heights, letter-spacing, and margins between typographic elements
+
+## Improve Typography Systematically
+
+### Font Selection
+
+If fonts need replacing:
+- Choose fonts that reflect the brand personality
+- Pair with genuine contrast (serif + sans, geometric + humanist) — or use a single family in multiple weights
+- Ensure web font loading doesn't cause layout shift (`font-display: swap`, metric-matched fallbacks)
+
+### Establish Hierarchy
+
+Build a clear type scale:
+- **5 sizes cover most needs**: caption, secondary, body, subheading, heading
+- **Use a consistent ratio** between levels (1.25, 1.333, or 1.5)
+- **Combine dimensions**: Size + weight + color + space for strong hierarchy — don't rely on size alone
+- **App UIs**: Use a fixed `rem`-based type scale, optionally adjusted at 1-2 breakpoints. Fluid sizing undermines the spatial predictability that dense, container-based layouts need
+- **Marketing / content pages**: Use fluid sizing via `clamp(min, preferred, max)` for headings and display text. Keep body text fixed
+
+### Fix Readability
+
+- Set `max-width` on text containers using `ch` units (`max-width: 65ch`)
+- Adjust line-height per context: tighter for headings (1.1-1.2), looser for body (1.5-1.7)
+- Increase line-height slightly for light-on-dark text
+- Ensure body text is at least 16px / 1rem
+
+### Refine Details
+
+- Use `tabular-nums` for data tables and numbers that should align
+- Apply proper `letter-spacing`: slightly open for small caps and uppercase, default or tight for large display text
+- Use semantic token names (`--text-body`, `--text-heading`), not value names (`--font-16`)
+- Set `font-kerning: normal` and consider OpenType features where appropriate
+
+### Weight Consistency
+
+- Define clear roles for each weight and stick to them
+- Don't use more than 3-4 weights (Regular, Medium, Semibold, Bold is plenty)
+- Load only the weights you actually use (each weight adds to page load)
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Use more than 2-3 font families
+- Pick sizes arbitrarily — commit to a scale
+- Set body text below 16px
+- Use decorative/display fonts for body text
+- Disable browser zoom (`user-scalable=no`)
+- Use `px` for font sizes — use `rem` to respect user settings
+- Default to Inter/Roboto/Open Sans when personality matters
+- Pair fonts that are similar but not identical (two geometric sans-serifs)
+
+## Verify Typography Improvements
+
+- **Hierarchy**: Can you identify heading vs body vs caption instantly?
+- **Readability**: Is body text comfortable to read in long passages?
+- **Consistency**: Are same-role elements styled identically throughout?
+- **Personality**: Does the typography reflect the brand?
+- **Performance**: Are web fonts loading efficiently without layout shift?
+- **Accessibility**: Does text meet WCAG contrast ratios? Is it zoomable to 200%?
+
+Remember: Typography is the foundation of interface design — it carries the majority of information. Getting it right is the highest-leverage improvement you can make.
+
+## Live-mode signature params
+
+Each variant MUST declare a `scale` param controlling the hierarchy ratio. Express all font sizes in the variant's scoped CSS through `calc(var(--p-scale, 1) * <base>)` or, better, scale the type ramp via `clamp(min, calc(var(--p-scale, 1) * Npx), max)`. Users slide from subdued to commanding.
+
+```json
+{"id":"scale","kind":"range","min":0.85,"max":1.3,"step":0.05,"default":1,"label":"Scale"}
+```
+
+Where the variant riffs on a specific pairing, expose the pairing choice as a `steps` param (e.g. "serif display + sans body" vs. "mono display + sans body" vs. "all-sans"). Each branch routes through `:scope[data-p-pairing="X"]` selectors in scoped CSS.
+
+See `reference/live.md` for the full params contract.