@fprad0/skill-master-mcp 0.0.8 → 0.0.9
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +7 -0
- package/README.md +47 -8
- package/VERSION.md +3 -3
- package/bin/lib/menu-core.mjs +157 -1
- package/bin/skill-master-bootstrap-global.mjs +35 -0
- package/bin/skill-master-install-global-skills.mjs +77 -0
- package/bin/skill-master-register-clients.mjs +154 -0
- package/dist/domain-router.d.ts +11 -0
- package/dist/domain-router.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/domain-router.js +79 -0
- package/dist/domain-router.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.js +134 -0
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/moral-governance.d.ts +24 -0
- package/dist/moral-governance.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/moral-governance.js +143 -0
- package/dist/moral-governance.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/prompt-router.d.ts +4 -0
- package/dist/prompt-router.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/prompt-router.js +18 -2
- package/dist/prompt-router.js.map +1 -1
- package/docs/planning/V0_0_9_APROVACAO_CRITICA_MENSAGENS_DE_VENDA.md +85 -0
- package/docs/planning/V0_0_9_FONTES_E_CRITERIOS_DE_AUTORIDADE.md +139 -0
- package/docs/planning/V0_0_9_MATRIZ_SKILLS_MULTIDISCIPLINARES.md +105 -0
- package/docs/planning/V0_0_9_POLITICA_MORAL_CATOLICA_PARA_IA.md +181 -0
- package/docs/planning/V0_0_9_PROMPTS_EXECUCAO.md +59 -0
- package/docs/planning/V0_0_9_ROADMAP_DISCERNIMENTO_E_CONHECIMENTO_AMPLO.md +181 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/ai-ethics-human-dignity/SKILL.md +32 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/broad-domain-router/SKILL.md +41 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/catholic-moral-discernment/SKILL.md +31 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/engineering-systems-master/SKILL.md +31 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/language-quality-pt-en-fr/SKILL.md +28 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/math-science-reasoning/SKILL.md +29 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/philosophy-sociology-discernment/SKILL.md +28 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/professional-boundary-triage/SKILL.md +40 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/release-ethics-gate/SKILL.md +32 -0
- package/docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/source-authority-reviewer/SKILL.md +31 -0
- package/manifests/channels/beta.json +7 -7
- package/manifests/channels/stable.json +8 -8
- package/package.json +6 -1
|
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# V0.0.9 - Roadmap de discernimento moral e conhecimento amplo
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Data: 2026-06-27
|
|
4
|
+
Status: planejamento, sem publicacao
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
## Objetivo da versao
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Evoluir o `skill-master-mcp` de um roteador tecnico de skills para uma camada mais ampla de discernimento, qualidade e conhecimento, mantendo seguranca, revisao humana e obediencia ao escopo real do produto.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Resultado esperado
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Ao final da proxima versao, o MCP deve conseguir:
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
- avaliar se uma tarefa tecnica tem risco moral ou humano;
|
|
15
|
+
- aplicar gates inspirados na moral catolica;
|
|
16
|
+
- rotear prompts por disciplinas de conhecimento;
|
|
17
|
+
- deixar claro quando uma area exige profissional habilitado;
|
|
18
|
+
- recomendar skills por dominio;
|
|
19
|
+
- criar trilhas de estudo sem ativar conteudo nao aprovado;
|
|
20
|
+
- melhorar a mensagem de venda para refletir capacidades reais.
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Fase 1 - Governanca moral
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
Arquivos:
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
- `src/moral-governance.ts`
|
|
27
|
+
- `src/moral-governance.test.ts`
|
|
28
|
+
- `docs/architecture/GOVERNANCA_MORAL_CATOLICA.md`
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Entregas:
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
- classificador de risco moral;
|
|
33
|
+
- gates de dignidade humana, verdade, bem comum, justica e limite tecnico;
|
|
34
|
+
- tool MCP `skill_master_moral_discernment`;
|
|
35
|
+
- integracao no `skill_master_prompt_router`;
|
|
36
|
+
- evals com prompts bons, ambiguos e ruins.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
Criterio de pronto:
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- prompts claramente danosos retornam `blocker`;
|
|
41
|
+
- areas profissionais sensiveis retornam `refer` ou `warning`;
|
|
42
|
+
- tarefas tecnicas comuns continuam fluindo sem friccao pesada.
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## Fase 2 - Fronteiras profissionais
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
Arquivos:
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
- `src/professional-boundaries.ts`
|
|
49
|
+
- `src/professional-boundaries.test.ts`
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Dominios:
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- direito;
|
|
54
|
+
- saude;
|
|
55
|
+
- financas;
|
|
56
|
+
- psicologia;
|
|
57
|
+
- seguranca fisica;
|
|
58
|
+
- educacao de menores;
|
|
59
|
+
- decisao trabalhista;
|
|
60
|
+
- decisao de credito;
|
|
61
|
+
- privacidade e dados pessoais.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
Comportamento:
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
- permitir informacao geral;
|
|
66
|
+
- bloquear instrucao ilegal ou danosa;
|
|
67
|
+
- recomendar profissional habilitado quando houver decisao real;
|
|
68
|
+
- exigir fontes e jurisdicao quando o prompt envolver lei.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Fase 3 - Router de conhecimento amplo
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
Arquivos:
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- `src/domain-router.ts`
|
|
75
|
+
- `src/domain-router.test.ts`
|
|
76
|
+
- `network/approved-domain-sources.json`
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
Dominios iniciais:
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
- ciencia;
|
|
81
|
+
- filosofia;
|
|
82
|
+
- sociologia;
|
|
83
|
+
- direito;
|
|
84
|
+
- matematica;
|
|
85
|
+
- portugues;
|
|
86
|
+
- ingles;
|
|
87
|
+
- frances;
|
|
88
|
+
- engenharia computacional;
|
|
89
|
+
- engenharia de software;
|
|
90
|
+
- engenharia de redes;
|
|
91
|
+
- engenharia de IA;
|
|
92
|
+
- seguranca;
|
|
93
|
+
- produto;
|
|
94
|
+
- documentacao;
|
|
95
|
+
- catequese e doutrina catolica.
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
Saida esperada:
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
- dominio principal;
|
|
100
|
+
- dominios secundarios;
|
|
101
|
+
- skills recomendadas;
|
|
102
|
+
- fontes aprovadas;
|
|
103
|
+
- limites profissionais;
|
|
104
|
+
- necessidade de pesquisa atualizada;
|
|
105
|
+
- necessidade de Notion ou registro local.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Fase 4 - Skills candidatas
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
Criar pacote de skills candidatas em:
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
```text
|
|
112
|
+
docs/skill-candidates/v0.0.9/
|
|
113
|
+
```
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
Essas skills nao devem ficar ativas ate revisao humana e decisao explicita.
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
Skills candidatas iniciais:
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
- `catholic-moral-discernment`;
|
|
120
|
+
- `ai-ethics-human-dignity`;
|
|
121
|
+
- `professional-boundary-triage`;
|
|
122
|
+
- `broad-domain-router`;
|
|
123
|
+
- `language-quality-pt-en-fr`;
|
|
124
|
+
- `math-science-reasoning`;
|
|
125
|
+
- `philosophy-sociology-discernment`;
|
|
126
|
+
- `engineering-systems-master`.
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
## Fase 5 - Menu e notificacoes
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
Adicionar ao menu:
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
- `moral-status`;
|
|
133
|
+
- `moral-check-prompt`;
|
|
134
|
+
- `domain-router`;
|
|
135
|
+
- `professional-boundaries`;
|
|
136
|
+
- `study-domain-skills`;
|
|
137
|
+
- `approve-domain-skill`;
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
Notificacoes:
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
- skills candidatas aguardando aprovacao moral;
|
|
142
|
+
- fontes de dominio ainda nao revisadas;
|
|
143
|
+
- prompt bloqueado por risco moral;
|
|
144
|
+
- prompt encaminhado para profissional habilitado;
|
|
145
|
+
- evals morais pendentes antes de publicar.
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
## Fase 6 - Mensagem de venda revisada
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
Atualizar README e mensagem publica para dizer:
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
- o que o MCP faz hoje;
|
|
152
|
+
- o que e assistivo, nao automatico;
|
|
153
|
+
- o que e baseado em aprovacao humana;
|
|
154
|
+
- o que e camada moral opcional;
|
|
155
|
+
- o que ainda e roadmap.
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
## Ordem recomendada de implementacao
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
1. Criar `moral-governance.ts` com regras puras e testes.
|
|
160
|
+
2. Integrar gates morais no `prompt-router`.
|
|
161
|
+
3. Criar tool MCP `skill_master_moral_discernment`.
|
|
162
|
+
4. Criar `professional-boundaries.ts`.
|
|
163
|
+
5. Criar `domain-router.ts`.
|
|
164
|
+
6. Adicionar menu e notificacoes.
|
|
165
|
+
7. Criar evals.
|
|
166
|
+
8. Atualizar docs.
|
|
167
|
+
9. Rodar `npm run check`.
|
|
168
|
+
10. Pedir autorizacao antes de publicar.
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
## Riscos
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
- Prometer discernimento moral alem do que o software consegue cumprir.
|
|
173
|
+
- Misturar opiniao pessoal com doutrina catolica sem fonte.
|
|
174
|
+
- Dar aconselhamento profissional indevido.
|
|
175
|
+
- Bloquear demais tarefas tecnicas comuns.
|
|
176
|
+
- Criar um sistema moral rigido sem espaco para prudencia humana.
|
|
177
|
+
- Ativar skills amplas sem revisao de fonte, licenca e risco.
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
## Decisao de produto
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
O caminho correto e tratar a proxima versao como "governanca assistiva", nao como "juiz automatico". O MCP deve ser forte para bloquear mal claro e humilde para encaminhar casos prudenciais, juridicos, espirituais e profissionais para revisao humana competente.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: ai-ethics-human-dignity
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for evaluating AI, automation, data and algorithmic decisions against human dignity, transparency, privacy, bias, accountability and the common good."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# AI Ethics And Human Dignity
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when a prompt involves AI systems, automation, data processing, scoring, recommendation engines, surveillance, personalization, synthetic content or decision support.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Identify affected people and groups.
|
|
13
|
+
- Detect whether the system changes rights, access, work, reputation, money, safety or education.
|
|
14
|
+
- Check for transparency, consent, privacy, bias, explainability and accountability.
|
|
15
|
+
- Require human oversight for sensitive decisions.
|
|
16
|
+
- Reject uses that manipulate, deceive, exploit or dehumanize.
|
|
17
|
+
- Recommend evals and monitoring before deployment.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not treat efficiency as the highest good.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not hide responsibility behind "the algorithm".
|
|
23
|
+
- Do not allow automated categorization to replace human dignity.
|
|
24
|
+
- Do not approve weaponization or coercive surveillance.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- Intended users.
|
|
29
|
+
- Data categories.
|
|
30
|
+
- Decision impact.
|
|
31
|
+
- Human oversight plan.
|
|
32
|
+
- Bias and failure-mode evaluation.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: broad-domain-router
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for routing prompts across broad knowledge domains and recommending approved local or global skills without pretending unsupported expertise."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Broad Domain Router
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when a prompt spans multiple areas of knowledge or when the agent needs to choose which skill family should guide the work.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Domains
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Catholic doctrine and moral discernment.
|
|
13
|
+
- Science.
|
|
14
|
+
- Philosophy.
|
|
15
|
+
- Sociology.
|
|
16
|
+
- Law.
|
|
17
|
+
- Mathematics.
|
|
18
|
+
- Portuguese.
|
|
19
|
+
- English.
|
|
20
|
+
- French.
|
|
21
|
+
- Computer engineering.
|
|
22
|
+
- Software engineering.
|
|
23
|
+
- Network engineering.
|
|
24
|
+
- AI engineering.
|
|
25
|
+
- Security.
|
|
26
|
+
- Product and documentation.
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
- Classify the primary and secondary domains.
|
|
31
|
+
- Identify whether the topic is stable or requires current research.
|
|
32
|
+
- Recommend approved skills first.
|
|
33
|
+
- Mark missing skills as roadmap candidates.
|
|
34
|
+
- Add professional-boundary gates when appropriate.
|
|
35
|
+
- Ask for sources or validation when the prompt has high stakes.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- Do not invent sources.
|
|
40
|
+
- Do not activate unapproved web skills.
|
|
41
|
+
- Do not claim mastery in a domain without the proper skill, source or validation path.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: catholic-moral-discernment
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for reviewing technology tasks through Catholic moral discernment, human dignity, truth, justice, common good, and responsible limits. Not active until human approval."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Catholic Moral Discernment
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when a development task may affect human dignity, truth, privacy, justice, workers, vulnerable people, social trust, religious formation, or the common good.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Identify the concrete human impact of the requested task.
|
|
13
|
+
- Check whether the task promotes truth, dignity, justice, charity and the common good.
|
|
14
|
+
- Distinguish technical possibility from moral permissibility.
|
|
15
|
+
- Flag manipulation, fraud, exploitation, unjust discrimination, invasive surveillance and harm.
|
|
16
|
+
- Prefer official Catholic sources when moral doctrine is relevant.
|
|
17
|
+
- Recommend priestly, spiritual, legal or professional consultation when the case exceeds a technical assistant.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not claim to be the Church or magisterium.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not replace a well-formed conscience.
|
|
23
|
+
- Do not replace a priest, confessor, spiritual director, lawyer, doctor or other competent authority.
|
|
24
|
+
- Do not use Catholic language to justify abuse, humiliation or unjust coercion.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- Relevant prompt excerpt.
|
|
29
|
+
- Risk classification.
|
|
30
|
+
- Official source or reason source is needed.
|
|
31
|
+
- Safer alternative when blocking a request.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: engineering-systems-master
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for senior-level software, network, computer and AI engineering with validation, security, maintainability and release discipline."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Engineering Systems Master
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when the user asks for architecture, implementation, debugging, release planning, network design, AI engineering, automation or production hardening.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Read the existing system before proposing changes.
|
|
13
|
+
- Prefer local patterns and simple designs.
|
|
14
|
+
- Identify blast radius, risks and validation path.
|
|
15
|
+
- Implement with tests proportional to risk.
|
|
16
|
+
- Protect secrets, user changes and release boundaries.
|
|
17
|
+
- Separate local validation from public readiness.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not publish without explicit authorization.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not run destructive commands without explicit confirmation.
|
|
23
|
+
- Do not bypass security controls.
|
|
24
|
+
- Do not hide uncertainty or missing evidence.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- Files changed.
|
|
29
|
+
- Commands run.
|
|
30
|
+
- Validation result.
|
|
31
|
+
- Remaining risk.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: language-quality-pt-en-fr
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for improving Portuguese, English and French text quality, translation, tone and readability with professional-boundary warnings."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Language Quality PT EN FR
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when the user asks to write, revise, translate or improve text in Portuguese, English or French.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Identify language, audience, tone and purpose.
|
|
13
|
+
- Preserve meaning before improving style.
|
|
14
|
+
- Fix grammar, spelling, clarity and coherence.
|
|
15
|
+
- Offer concise alternatives when needed.
|
|
16
|
+
- Warn when the text has legal, medical, liturgical or official effect.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- Do not claim sworn translation.
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not silently alter doctrine, legal meaning or contractual obligations.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not over-polish text that should preserve the user's voice.
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
- Original language.
|
|
27
|
+
- Target language when translating.
|
|
28
|
+
- Audience and purpose.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: math-science-reasoning
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for structured mathematical and scientific reasoning, unit checks, uncertainty, reproducibility and evidence-based explanations."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Math Science Reasoning
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when a prompt asks for calculation, proof, scientific explanation, data interpretation, experiment planning or technical verification.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Restate the problem with assumptions.
|
|
13
|
+
- Identify units, variables and constraints.
|
|
14
|
+
- Solve step by step.
|
|
15
|
+
- Check edge cases and dimensions.
|
|
16
|
+
- Distinguish evidence, model and speculation.
|
|
17
|
+
- Recommend experiment, test or peer-reviewed source when appropriate.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not fabricate data.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not present uncertain conclusions as certainty.
|
|
23
|
+
- Do not replace professional engineering review for safety-critical systems.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
- Formula or reasoning path.
|
|
28
|
+
- Assumptions.
|
|
29
|
+
- Validation or plausibility check.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: philosophy-sociology-discernment
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for analyzing social, philosophical and cultural consequences of technology while separating doctrine, theory, evidence and opinion."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Philosophy Sociology Discernment
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when a technical decision has social, cultural, educational, organizational or philosophical consequences.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Identify assumptions about the human person, society and power.
|
|
13
|
+
- Separate empirical claims from philosophical claims.
|
|
14
|
+
- Consider effects on community, trust, family, work and vulnerable people.
|
|
15
|
+
- Compare technical optimization with human flourishing.
|
|
16
|
+
- Recommend dialogue, source review or moral governance when needed.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- Do not treat ideology as fact.
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not reduce people to metrics.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not use social analysis to justify manipulation or coercion.
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
- Affected groups.
|
|
27
|
+
- Social risk.
|
|
28
|
+
- Alternative that better serves human flourishing.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: professional-boundary-triage
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for detecting when a prompt enters law, health, finance, psychology or other regulated domains and must be limited to general information or referred to a qualified professional."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Professional Boundary Triage
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when a prompt asks for guidance in a regulated or high-impact professional area.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Domains
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Law and litigation.
|
|
13
|
+
- Medical, health and psychological topics.
|
|
14
|
+
- Finance, tax and investment.
|
|
15
|
+
- Employment decisions.
|
|
16
|
+
- Credit, insurance and housing.
|
|
17
|
+
- Child safety and education.
|
|
18
|
+
- Physical security and safety.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- Classify the professional domain.
|
|
23
|
+
- Ask for jurisdiction only when needed for general orientation.
|
|
24
|
+
- Provide general educational information when safe.
|
|
25
|
+
- Refuse instructions for evasion, fraud or harm.
|
|
26
|
+
- Recommend a qualified professional for real decisions.
|
|
27
|
+
- Keep clear disclaimers in output and docs.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
- Do not give definitive legal, medical, financial or psychological advice.
|
|
32
|
+
- Do not draft strategy to bypass laws or obligations.
|
|
33
|
+
- Do not predict official outcomes as certainty.
|
|
34
|
+
- Do not hide risk from the user.
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
- Domain detected.
|
|
39
|
+
- Why referral is needed.
|
|
40
|
+
- Safe general next steps.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: release-ethics-gate
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for checking release readiness through technical evidence, explicit authorization, user impact, safety and moral responsibility."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Release Ethics Gate
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill before publishing a package, release, tag, public update, automation, AI behavior change or user-facing feature.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Confirm explicit authorization to publish.
|
|
13
|
+
- Verify tests, build, changelog, version and install path.
|
|
14
|
+
- Check secrets, package contents and public claims.
|
|
15
|
+
- Review user impact, moral risk and professional boundaries.
|
|
16
|
+
- Separate local proof from public readiness.
|
|
17
|
+
- Record remaining risks before release.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not publish without explicit user authorization.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not publish behavior that expands moral or professional claims without evals.
|
|
23
|
+
- Do not include tokens, private paths or client data.
|
|
24
|
+
- Do not represent planned capabilities as current capabilities.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- Authorization statement.
|
|
29
|
+
- Validation commands.
|
|
30
|
+
- Package or artifact evidence.
|
|
31
|
+
- Claim review.
|
|
32
|
+
- Rollback or update path.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: source-authority-reviewer
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Candidate skill for reviewing source authority, provenance, trust level and approval status before content becomes part of Skill Master behavior."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# Source Authority Reviewer
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use this candidate skill when a workflow depends on external sources, doctrine, legal information, professional standards, web skills, repos, articles or documentation.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- Identify the domain and required authority level.
|
|
13
|
+
- Prefer primary official sources.
|
|
14
|
+
- Distinguish normative source, technical source, secondary guide and study material.
|
|
15
|
+
- Check provenance, author, date, license and maintenance status.
|
|
16
|
+
- Mark web material as unapproved until human review.
|
|
17
|
+
- Recommend allowlist updates only with explicit approval.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Boundaries
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Do not approve a source because it is popular.
|
|
22
|
+
- Do not use outdated docs for current technical behavior.
|
|
23
|
+
- Do not convert web content into an active skill without human approval.
|
|
24
|
+
- Do not treat opinion as doctrine, law or standard.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Evidence Required
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- Source URL.
|
|
29
|
+
- Authority level.
|
|
30
|
+
- Review status.
|
|
31
|
+
- Reason for approval, study or rejection.
|
|
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "skill_master",
|
|
3
3
|
"channel": "beta",
|
|
4
|
-
"version": "00.
|
|
5
|
-
"semver": "0.0.
|
|
6
|
-
"publishedAt": "2026-06-
|
|
4
|
+
"version": "00.03-beta",
|
|
5
|
+
"semver": "0.0.9",
|
|
6
|
+
"publishedAt": "2026-06-28T00:02:47-03:00",
|
|
7
7
|
"git": {
|
|
8
8
|
"repo": "https://github.com/FPrad0/skill-master-mcp",
|
|
9
9
|
"branch": "main",
|
|
10
|
-
"commit": "
|
|
10
|
+
"commit": "69c220f"
|
|
11
11
|
},
|
|
12
12
|
"node": {
|
|
13
13
|
"minimum": "18.0.0"
|
|
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
|
|
|
19
19
|
"buildCommand": "npm run build"
|
|
20
20
|
},
|
|
21
21
|
"changelog": [
|
|
22
|
-
"Canal beta acompanha
|
|
23
|
-
"
|
|
24
|
-
"
|
|
22
|
+
"Canal beta acompanha governanca moral, roteamento amplo e bootstrap global.",
|
|
23
|
+
"Skills globais candidatas ficam empacotadas para validacao e estudo.",
|
|
24
|
+
"Menu exibe alerta forte quando o MCP ainda nao esta aplicado globalmente."
|
|
25
25
|
]
|
|
26
26
|
}
|
|
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "skill_master",
|
|
3
3
|
"channel": "stable",
|
|
4
|
-
"version": "00.
|
|
5
|
-
"semver": "0.0.
|
|
6
|
-
"publishedAt": "2026-06-
|
|
4
|
+
"version": "00.03",
|
|
5
|
+
"semver": "0.0.9",
|
|
6
|
+
"publishedAt": "2026-06-28T00:02:47-03:00",
|
|
7
7
|
"git": {
|
|
8
8
|
"repo": "https://github.com/FPrad0/skill-master-mcp",
|
|
9
9
|
"branch": "main",
|
|
10
|
-
"commit": "
|
|
10
|
+
"commit": "69c220f"
|
|
11
11
|
},
|
|
12
12
|
"node": {
|
|
13
13
|
"minimum": "18.0.0"
|
|
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
|
|
|
19
19
|
"buildCommand": "npm run build"
|
|
20
20
|
},
|
|
21
21
|
"changelog": [
|
|
22
|
-
"
|
|
23
|
-
"
|
|
24
|
-
"
|
|
25
|
-
"
|
|
22
|
+
"Governanca moral adiciona discernimento, gates de dignidade humana, verdade, bem comum e limites profissionais.",
|
|
23
|
+
"Roteamento amplo recomenda skills globais aprovadas por dominio tecnico, linguagem, ciencia, filosofia e engenharia.",
|
|
24
|
+
"Skills globais embutidas podem ser instaladas em CODEX_HOME/skills ou ~/.codex/skills.",
|
|
25
|
+
"Bootstrap global registra o MCP para Codex, Claude Desktop e Gemini com alerta visual no menu."
|
|
26
26
|
]
|
|
27
27
|
}
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@fprad0/skill-master-mcp",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.9",
|
|
4
4
|
"private": false,
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"description": "Personal MCP server that catalogs, recommends and reports skills with update-aware metadata.",
|
|
@@ -9,8 +9,11 @@
|
|
|
9
9
|
"skill-master-activation": "./bin/skill-master-activation.mjs",
|
|
10
10
|
"skill-master-configure-private-registry": "./bin/skill-master-configure-private-registry.mjs",
|
|
11
11
|
"skill-master-eval-activation": "./bin/skill-master-eval-activation.mjs",
|
|
12
|
+
"skill-master-bootstrap-global": "./bin/skill-master-bootstrap-global.mjs",
|
|
13
|
+
"skill-master-install-global-skills": "./bin/skill-master-install-global-skills.mjs",
|
|
12
14
|
"skill-master-menu": "./bin/skill-master-menu.mjs",
|
|
13
15
|
"skill-master-mcp": "./bin/skill-master.mjs",
|
|
16
|
+
"skill-master-register-clients": "./bin/skill-master-register-clients.mjs",
|
|
14
17
|
"skill-master-success-skills": "./bin/skill-master-success-skills.mjs",
|
|
15
18
|
"skill-master-update": "./bin/skill-master-update.mjs"
|
|
16
19
|
},
|
|
@@ -18,6 +21,8 @@
|
|
|
18
21
|
"bin",
|
|
19
22
|
"dist",
|
|
20
23
|
"docs/architecture",
|
|
24
|
+
"docs/planning",
|
|
25
|
+
"docs/skill-candidates",
|
|
21
26
|
"docs/operations/GUIA_NPM_PRIVADO.md",
|
|
22
27
|
"manifests",
|
|
23
28
|
"network",
|