@forwardimpact/schema 0.9.2 → 0.10.1

package/README.md

@@ -1,19 +1,27 @@
 # @forwardimpact/schema
 
-Schema definitions and data loading for skills, behaviours, and role frameworks.
+A public site describing the data model for consumption by AI agents and
+engineers.
 
 ## Role in the Vision
 
-The schema package defines how engineering competencies are structured. It
-provides the foundational data model that both human career progression and
-coding agent team generation build upon—ensuring consistency between how we
-define human roles and how agent teams understand their capabilities.
+The schema app is the fundamental underpinning of all Forward Impact apps. It
+defines how engineering competencies, career progression, and agent capabilities
+are structured—and publishes that structure in machine-readable formats so AI
+agents can reliably interpret and work with career framework data.
+
+Making the schema well understood is a first-class goal. By publishing JSON
+Schema and RDF/SHACL definitions alongside canonical example data, we ensure
+that every consumer—human or AI—shares a consistent understanding of the data
+model.
 
 ## What It Does
 
-- **Schema definitions** — JSON Schema and RDF/SHACL for skills, behaviours,
-  disciplines, tracks, and grades
+- **Public data model** — JSON Schema and RDF/SHACL definitions for skills,
+  behaviours, disciplines, tracks, and grades
 - **Data loading** — Parse and validate YAML data files
+- **Validation** — Enforce referential integrity, required fields, and schema
+  compliance
 - **Index generation** — Generate browser-compatible file indexes
 - **Example data** — Canonical examples for testing and reference
 

package/examples/capabilities/delivery.yaml

@@ -361,6 +361,8 @@ skills:
             - All dependencies installed and versions locked
             - Environment variables configured for local development
             - Database running locally with schema applied
+            - All credentials stored in .env — NEVER hardcoded in code,
+              including seed scripts and utility scripts
             - Linter and formatter pass on existing code
             - Development server starts and responds to requests
             - CI pipeline configuration is valid
@@ -379,6 +381,7 @@ skills:
             - Database schema supports the feature
             - Error handling spans all layers
             - Feature works end-to-end
+            - At least one test exists for each API route and passes when run
             - Deployment is automated
         review:
           focus: |
@@ -613,10 +616,12 @@ skills:
             Surface ambiguities and unknowns before attempting solutions.
           readChecklist:
             - Document the initial problem statement as understood
-            - List stakeholders and their perspectives
-            - Identify what is known vs unknown
-            - Document assumptions that need validation
-            - Mark all ambiguities with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+            - ASK the user who the stakeholders are and what their perspectives
+              are
+            - ASK the user what is known vs unknown about the problem
+            - ASK the user to confirm or reject your assumptions
+            - Mark all ambiguities with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] and ASK the user
+              to clarify them
           confirmChecklist:
             - Initial problem statement is documented
             - Stakeholders are identified
@@ -858,6 +863,9 @@ skills:
           confirmChecklist:
             - Core concept is demonstrable
             - Happy path works end-to-end
+            - At least one smoke test verifying the happy path exists
+            - SSR pages that fetch from API routes use environment-aware base
+              URLs (not hardcoded localhost)
             - Known limitations are documented
             - Stakeholders can interact with it
         review:

package/examples/questions/capabilities/business.yaml

@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
         The product team wants to add a feature that will increase revenue but
         requires significant technical investment. How would you evaluate this?
       context:
-        The feature is an AI-powered recommendation engine. Product estimates 15%
-        revenue increase. Your team estimates 4 months of work and ongoing
+        The feature is an AI-powered recommendation engine. Product estimates
+        15% revenue increase. Your team estimates 4 months of work and ongoing
         maintenance costs.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - What questions would you ask the product team?
@@ -22,16 +22,17 @@ professionalQuestions:
         - Thinks about alternatives and build vs buy decisions
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
-        - What if the CEO strongly favors this feature but your analysis suggests
-          otherwise?
+        - What if the CEO strongly favors this feature but your analysis
+          suggests otherwise?
         - How would you handle if the revenue estimate turned out to be
           optimistic?
 
   practitioner:
     - id: biz_pro_pract_decomp_1
       text:
-        Your company is considering entering a new market that requires different
-        compliance requirements. How would you approach the technical evaluation?
+        Your company is considering entering a new market that requires
+        different compliance requirements. How would you approach the technical
+        evaluation?
       context:
         The new market is healthcare (HIPAA compliance). Current systems handle
         financial data but were not designed for healthcare. Leadership wants a
@@ -60,9 +61,9 @@ managementQuestions:
         Your engineering organization needs to reduce costs by 20% while
         maintaining delivery commitments. How would you approach this?
       context:
-        Budget constraints require significant cost reduction. You manage 3 teams
-        with 18 engineers total. Current commitments include two major product
-        launches in the next quarter.
+        Budget constraints require significant cost reduction. You manage 3
+        teams with 18 engineers total. Current commitments include two major
+        product launches in the next quarter.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - How would you identify cost reduction opportunities?
         - How would you prioritize cuts while protecting critical work?
@@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ managementQuestions:
         - Renegotiates scope or timelines where necessary
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
-        - What if leadership insists on no headcount changes but still needs 20% savings?
+        - What if leadership insists on no headcount changes but still needs 20%
+          savings?
         - How would you handle if key team members leave due to uncertainty?
 
   practitioner:
@@ -85,9 +87,9 @@ managementQuestions:
         engineering organization. How would you evaluate the technical due
         diligence and integration plan?
       context:
-        The target company has 100 engineers, different tech stack, and overlapping
-        product lines. You have 6 weeks for due diligence and need to present
-        integration risks and synergies to the board.
+        The target company has 100 engineers, different tech stack, and
+        overlapping product lines. You have 6 weeks for due diligence and need
+        to present integration risks and synergies to the board.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - What technical areas would you prioritize in due diligence?
         - How would you assess organizational and cultural compatibility?
@@ -101,4 +103,5 @@ managementQuestions:
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
         - What if the acquisition goes through despite your concerns?
-        - How would you handle if the target's best engineers leave post-acquisition?
+        - How would you handle if the target's best engineers leave
+          post-acquisition?

package/examples/questions/capabilities/delivery.yaml

@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
         - Thinks about scalability and performance constraints
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
-        - What would you do differently if their data was in 5 different systems?
+        - What would you do differently if their data was in 5 different
+          systems?
         - How would you handle if a key team member left mid-project?
 
   practitioner:
@@ -78,12 +79,12 @@ managementQuestions:
   practitioner:
     - id: del_mgmt_pract_decomp_1
       text:
-        You're responsible for coordinating a major platform initiative across
-        4 engineering teams. How would you structure the delivery?
+        You're responsible for coordinating a major platform initiative across 4
+        engineering teams. How would you structure the delivery?
       context:
-        The initiative is a 12-month platform modernization affecting all products.
-        Teams have different managers, priorities, and technical preferences.
-        Executive sponsorship is strong but teams are skeptical.
+        The initiative is a 12-month platform modernization affecting all
+        products. Teams have different managers, priorities, and technical
+        preferences. Executive sponsorship is strong but teams are skeptical.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - How would you establish alignment across teams?
         - What governance and coordination mechanisms would you put in place?

package/examples/questions/capabilities/people.yaml

@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ professionalQuestions:
   practitioner:
     - id: ppl_pro_pract_decomp_1
       text:
-        Two senior engineers on your team have conflicting views on the technical
-        direction. This is affecting team morale and velocity. How do you address
-        it?
+        Two senior engineers on your team have conflicting views on the
+        technical direction. This is affecting team morale and velocity. How do
+        you address it?
       context:
         One wants to adopt a new framework for better developer experience. The
         other wants to stick with the current stack for stability. Both are high
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
       decompositionPrompts:
         - How would you understand the root cause of the conflict?
         - What process would you use to reach a decision?
-        - How would you maintain both engineers' engagement regardless of outcome?
+        - How would you maintain both engineers' engagement regardless of
+          outcome?
         - What would you do if the conflict persists after a decision?
       lookingFor:
         - Separates technical disagreement from interpersonal conflict
@@ -48,19 +49,22 @@ professionalQuestions:
         - Plans for ongoing relationship management
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
-        - What if one engineer threatens to leave if their approach isn't chosen?
-        - How would you handle if this pattern repeats with the same individuals?
+        - What if one engineer threatens to leave if their approach isn't
+          chosen?
+        - How would you handle if this pattern repeats with the same
+          individuals?
 
 managementQuestions:
   working:
     - id: ppl_mgmt_work_decomp_1
       text:
-        One of your team members is consistently underperforming despite multiple
-        feedback conversations. How would you handle this situation?
+        One of your team members is consistently underperforming despite
+        multiple feedback conversations. How would you handle this situation?
       context:
         The engineer has been on the team for 8 months. They meet basic
         expectations but are not growing. Peers are frustrated with carrying
-        extra load. You've had 3 feedback conversations with limited improvement.
+        extra load. You've had 3 feedback conversations with limited
+        improvement.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - How would you assess whether this is a skill, will, or fit issue?
         - What performance improvement approach would you take?
@@ -82,8 +86,8 @@ managementQuestions:
         You need to grow your engineering organization from 25 to 50 engineers
         over the next year. How would you approach this scaling challenge?
       context:
-        The company has secured Series B funding. Current team is strong but
-        has no formal career ladders or management structure. You're the only
+        The company has secured Series B funding. Current team is strong but has
+        no formal career ladders or management structure. You're the only
         engineering manager reporting to the CTO.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - How would you structure the hiring plan and timeline?
@@ -98,4 +102,5 @@ managementQuestions:
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
         - What if you can't find enough quality candidates?
-        - How would you handle if existing senior ICs don't want to become managers?
+        - How would you handle if existing senior ICs don't want to become
+          managers?

package/examples/questions/capabilities/reliability.yaml

@@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ professionalQuestions:
     - id: rel_pro_pract_decomp_1
       text:
         You're designing the disaster recovery strategy for a system that
-        processes customer financial transactions. Walk me through your approach.
+        processes customer financial transactions. Walk me through your
+        approach.
       context:
-        The system handles $10M in daily transactions, uses AWS in us-east-1, and
-        currently has no cross-region capability. Budget for DR is $50K annual.
+        The system handles $10M in daily transactions, uses AWS in us-east-1,
+        and currently has no cross-region capability. Budget for DR is $50K
+        annual.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - What are the key requirements you need to establish first?
         - How would you structure the technical options analysis?
@@ -46,7 +48,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
         - Plans for regular testing and runbook maintenance
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
-        - What would you do if a regional outage happened before DR was complete?
+        - What would you do if a regional outage happened before DR was
+          complete?
         - How would you handle if the $50K budget was cut in half?
 
 managementQuestions:
@@ -71,19 +74,20 @@ managementQuestions:
         - Creates sustainable practices rather than short-term fixes
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
-        - What if leadership says there's no budget for additional on-call support?
+        - What if leadership says there's no budget for additional on-call
+          support?
         - How would you handle if the most experienced engineers refuse on-call?
 
   practitioner:
     - id: rel_mgmt_pract_decomp_1
       text:
-        Your organization has grown to 20 services owned by different teams
-        but has no consistent approach to reliability. How would you establish
+        Your organization has grown to 20 services owned by different teams but
+        has no consistent approach to reliability. How would you establish
         reliability practices at scale?
       context:
-        Some teams have mature SLOs and incident response, others don't.
-        Recent cross-team incidents took too long to resolve due to unclear
-        ownership. Leadership wants to improve reliability organization-wide.
+        Some teams have mature SLOs and incident response, others don't. Recent
+        cross-team incidents took too long to resolve due to unclear ownership.
+        Leadership wants to improve reliability organization-wide.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - How would you assess current reliability maturity across teams?
         - What standards and practices would you establish?
@@ -97,4 +101,5 @@ managementQuestions:
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
         - What if teams resist reliability requirements as overhead?
-        - How would you handle if different teams have conflicting SLO definitions?
+        - How would you handle if different teams have conflicting SLO
+          definitions?

package/examples/questions/capabilities/scale.yaml

@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
         1000 RPS in 6 months due to a new partnership. How would you approach
         this?
       context:
-        The API is a monolithic Node.js application backed by PostgreSQL. Response
-        time P99 is currently 200ms and must stay under 500ms.
+        The API is a monolithic Node.js application backed by PostgreSQL.
+        Response time P99 is currently 200ms and must stay under 500ms.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - What would you need to measure and understand first?
         - How would you identify the scaling bottlenecks?
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
         - What if the partnership deal accelerated and you had only 3 months?
-        - How would you handle if the new load had very different access patterns?
+        - How would you handle if the new load had very different access
+          patterns?
 
   practitioner:
     - id: scl_pro_pract_decomp_1
@@ -58,8 +59,8 @@ managementQuestions:
         but you don't have dedicated infrastructure expertise. How would you
         build this capability?
       context:
-        The system needs to 10x in capacity over the next year. Your team of
-        6 engineers has strong application development skills but limited
+        The system needs to 10x in capacity over the next year. Your team of 6
+        engineers has strong application development skills but limited
         infrastructure and performance engineering experience.
       decompositionPrompts:
         - How would you assess your team's current capabilities and gaps?
@@ -99,4 +100,5 @@ managementQuestions:
       expectedDurationMinutes: 15
       followUps:
         - What if teams push back on cost accountability?
-        - How would you handle if major cost savings require significant refactoring?
+        - How would you handle if major cost savings require significant
+          refactoring?

package/examples/questions/skills/architecture_design.yaml

@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
 professionalQuestions:
   awareness:
     - id: arch_pro_aware_1
-      text: How do you decide where to draw boundaries when structuring new code?
+      text:
+        How do you decide where to draw boundaries when structuring new code?
       lookingFor:
         - Thinks about grouping related functionality together
         - Considers how changes in one area might affect others

package/examples/questions/skills/cloud_platforms.yaml

@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ managementQuestions:
   awareness:
     - id: cp_mgmt_aware_1
       text:
-        How do you stay informed about cloud capabilities that could benefit your team?
+        How do you stay informed about cloud capabilities that could benefit
+        your team?
       lookingFor:
         - Actively explores cloud capabilities relevant to team work
         - Evaluates new services for practical team benefit
@@ -65,8 +66,7 @@ managementQuestions:
       expectedDurationMinutes: 5
   foundational:
     - id: cp_mgmt_found_1
-      text:
-        How do you support team members in developing cloud platform skills?
+      text: How do you support team members in developing cloud platform skills?
       lookingFor:
         - Creates structured learning paths for cloud skills
         - Pairs team members on cloud tasks for knowledge transfer
@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ managementQuestions:
   working:
     - id: cp_mgmt_work_1
       text:
-        How do you balance cloud costs with team productivity and delivery needs?
+        How do you balance cloud costs with team productivity and delivery
+        needs?
       followUps:
         - How do you communicate cloud spending to stakeholders?
       lookingFor:
@@ -96,8 +97,7 @@ managementQuestions:
       expectedDurationMinutes: 10
   expert:
     - id: cp_mgmt_expert_1
-      text:
-        How do you shape organizational cloud strategy and governance?
+      text: How do you shape organizational cloud strategy and governance?
       lookingFor:
         - Defines cloud governance that enables innovation within guardrails
         - Influences cloud direction across organizational boundaries

package/examples/questions/skills/code_quality.yaml

@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
 professionalQuestions:
   awareness:
     - id: cq_pro_aware_1
-      text: How do you ensure the next person who reads your code understands it?
+      text:
+        How do you ensure the next person who reads your code understands it?
       lookingFor:
         - Thinks about readability from another developer's perspective
         - Uses naming and structure to communicate intent
@@ -16,7 +17,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
         - What naming conventions do you follow?
         - How do you decide when to add comments?
       lookingFor:
-        - Uses consistent naming and structure that communicates intent to readers
+        - Uses consistent naming and structure that communicates intent to
+          readers
         - Formats code for scanability and groups related logic together
         - Writes comments that explain why, not what
       expectedDurationMinutes: 5
@@ -30,13 +32,13 @@ professionalQuestions:
     - id: cq_pro_work_1
       text: How do you approach code review? What do you look for?
       lookingFor:
-        - Follows a systematic approach covering correctness, clarity, and design
+        - Follows a systematic approach covering correctness, clarity, and
+          design
         - Balances thoroughness with keeping reviews timely
         - Gives constructive feedback that helps the author improve
       expectedDurationMinutes: 8
     - id: cq_pro_work_2
-      text:
-        How do you decide what to test and what level of testing to apply?
+      text: How do you decide what to test and what level of testing to apply?
       followUps:
         - How does AI-generated code change your testing approach?
       lookingFor:
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@ professionalQuestions:
     - id: cq_pro_pract_1
       text: How have you improved code quality practices in your team?
       lookingFor:
-        - Identifies specific quality gaps and addresses them with measurable actions
+        - Identifies specific quality gaps and addresses them with measurable
+          actions
         - Influences team norms around quality through mentoring and example
         - Balances quality investment with delivery commitments
       expectedDurationMinutes: 8
@@ -66,42 +69,51 @@ professionalQuestions:
   expert:
     - id: cq_pro_expert_1
       text:
-        How have you established code quality standards across an organization or
-        multiple teams?
+        How have you established code quality standards across an organization
+        or multiple teams?
       followUps:
         - How did you gain adoption?
         - How do you measure success?
       lookingFor:
-        - Creates standards that teams adopt willingly because they solve real problems
-        - Measures quality through defect rates and change failure, not just lint scores
-        - Evolves standards as practices change, especially around AI-generated code
+        - Creates standards that teams adopt willingly because they solve real
+          problems
+        - Measures quality through defect rates and change failure, not just
+          lint scores
+        - Evolves standards as practices change, especially around AI-generated
+          code
       expectedDurationMinutes: 10
     - id: cq_pro_expert_2
       text:
         How do you approach reviewing AI-generated code at scale? What practices
         ensure quality?
       lookingFor:
-        - Designs review processes that catch AI-specific failure modes like plausible but wrong logic
-        - Creates verification depth guidelines calibrated to risk, not just code origin
-        - Establishes organisational patterns for when AI-generated code needs deeper scrutiny
+        - Designs review processes that catch AI-specific failure modes like
+          plausible but wrong logic
+        - Creates verification depth guidelines calibrated to risk, not just
+          code origin
+        - Establishes organisational patterns for when AI-generated code needs
+          deeper scrutiny
       expectedDurationMinutes: 10
 
 managementQuestions:
   awareness:
     - id: cq_mgmt_aware_1
-      text:
-        How do you communicate the importance of code quality to your team?
+      text: How do you communicate the importance of code quality to your team?
       lookingFor:
-        - Connects quality to outcomes the team cares about like fewer bugs and faster changes
-        - Uses concrete examples of quality impact rather than abstract principles
+        - Connects quality to outcomes the team cares about like fewer bugs and
+          faster changes
+        - Uses concrete examples of quality impact rather than abstract
+          principles
       expectedDurationMinutes: 5
   foundational:
     - id: cq_mgmt_found_1
       text:
         How do you help team members improve their coding and testing practices?
       lookingFor:
-        - Provides specific, actionable feedback in code reviews rather than vague suggestions
-        - Creates pairing opportunities that build quality skills through real work
+        - Provides specific, actionable feedback in code reviews rather than
+          vague suggestions
+        - Creates pairing opportunities that build quality skills through real
+          work
         - Identifies individual skill gaps and tailors development approaches
       expectedDurationMinutes: 5
   working:
@@ -111,29 +123,40 @@ managementQuestions:
       followUps:
         - How do you handle disagreements about code quality?
       lookingFor:
-        - Establishes review norms that balance thoroughness with turnaround time
-        - Facilitates quality disagreements toward shared standards rather than personal preference
-        - Creates review practices that work for AI-generated code, not just human-written
+        - Establishes review norms that balance thoroughness with turnaround
+          time
+        - Facilitates quality disagreements toward shared standards rather than
+          personal preference
+        - Creates review practices that work for AI-generated code, not just
+          human-written
       expectedDurationMinutes: 8
   practitioner:
     - id: cq_mgmt_pract_1
       text:
-        How do you balance code quality standards with delivery pressure from stakeholders?
+        How do you balance code quality standards with delivery pressure from
+        stakeholders?
       followUps:
         - How do you communicate quality trade-offs?
       lookingFor:
-        - Translates quality trade-offs into business terms stakeholders can act on
-        - Pushes back on shortcuts that create future cost while accepting pragmatic trade-offs
-        - Creates visibility into quality metrics so trade-offs are informed, not guesses
+        - Translates quality trade-offs into business terms stakeholders can act
+          on
+        - Pushes back on shortcuts that create future cost while accepting
+          pragmatic trade-offs
+        - Creates visibility into quality metrics so trade-offs are informed,
+          not guesses
       expectedDurationMinutes: 8
   expert:
     - id: cq_mgmt_expert_1
       text:
-        How do you drive code quality culture and standards across multiple teams?
+        How do you drive code quality culture and standards across multiple
+        teams?
       followUps:
         - How do you measure quality improvement?
       lookingFor:
-        - Creates cross-team quality standards that teams adopt without heavy governance
-        - Uses metrics like defect escape rate and change lead time to track quality trends
-        - Shapes engineering culture so quality is a shared value, not a compliance exercise
+        - Creates cross-team quality standards that teams adopt without heavy
+          governance
+        - Uses metrics like defect escape rate and change lead time to track
+          quality trends
+        - Shapes engineering culture so quality is a shared value, not a
+          compliance exercise
       expectedDurationMinutes: 10

package/examples/questions/skills/data_modeling.yaml

@@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ managementQuestions:
   awareness:
     - id: dm_mgmt_aware_1
       text:
-        How do you ensure your team considers data modeling implications in their work?
+        How do you ensure your team considers data modeling implications in
+        their work?
       lookingFor:
         - Ensures modeling decisions are considered during feature planning
         - Communicates how data model quality affects system behaviour
       expectedDurationMinutes: 5
   foundational:
     - id: dm_mgmt_found_1
-      text:
-        How do you help team members develop data modeling skills?
+      text: How do you help team members develop data modeling skills?
       lookingFor:
         - Creates learning opportunities through real project work
         - Pairs less experienced engineers with modeling-skilled colleagues
@@ -75,16 +75,21 @@ managementQuestions:
       followUps:
         - How do you handle disagreements about modeling approaches?
       lookingFor:
-        - Creates review processes that catch modeling issues before they reach production
-        - Facilitates productive disagreements about modeling by focusing on trade-offs and evidence
-        - Ensures the team aligns on modeling conventions to reduce inconsistency
+        - Creates review processes that catch modeling issues before they reach
+          production
+        - Facilitates productive disagreements about modeling by focusing on
+          trade-offs and evidence
+        - Ensures the team aligns on modeling conventions to reduce
+          inconsistency
       expectedDurationMinutes: 10
   practitioner:
     - id: dm_mgmt_pract_1
       text:
-        How do you coordinate data modeling decisions across teams to ensure consistency?
+        How do you coordinate data modeling decisions across teams to ensure
+        consistency?
       lookingFor:
-        - Creates cross-team alignment on shared data models and naming conventions
+        - Creates cross-team alignment on shared data models and naming
+          conventions
         - Facilitates discussions between teams when models need to interoperate
         - Establishes modeling standards that reduce friction at team boundaries
       expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -93,7 +98,10 @@ managementQuestions:
       text:
         How do you shape organizational data modeling standards and governance?
       lookingFor:
-        - Defines data modeling practices and governance adopted across the business unit
-        - Creates organisational standards that improve data interoperability at scale
-        - Influences how the organisation values and invests in data architecture quality
+        - Defines data modeling practices and governance adopted across the
+          business unit
+        - Creates organisational standards that improve data interoperability at
+          scale
+        - Influences how the organisation values and invests in data
+          architecture quality
       expectedDurationMinutes: 10