@forwardimpact/pathway 0.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/LICENSE +201 -0
- package/README.md +104 -0
- package/app/commands/agent.js +430 -0
- package/app/commands/behaviour.js +61 -0
- package/app/commands/command-factory.js +211 -0
- package/app/commands/discipline.js +58 -0
- package/app/commands/driver.js +94 -0
- package/app/commands/grade.js +60 -0
- package/app/commands/index.js +20 -0
- package/app/commands/init.js +67 -0
- package/app/commands/interview.js +68 -0
- package/app/commands/job.js +157 -0
- package/app/commands/progress.js +77 -0
- package/app/commands/questions.js +179 -0
- package/app/commands/serve.js +143 -0
- package/app/commands/site.js +121 -0
- package/app/commands/skill.js +76 -0
- package/app/commands/stage.js +129 -0
- package/app/commands/track.js +70 -0
- package/app/components/action-buttons.js +66 -0
- package/app/components/behaviour-profile.js +53 -0
- package/app/components/builder.js +341 -0
- package/app/components/card.js +98 -0
- package/app/components/checklist.js +145 -0
- package/app/components/comparison-radar.js +237 -0
- package/app/components/detail.js +230 -0
- package/app/components/error-page.js +72 -0
- package/app/components/grid.js +109 -0
- package/app/components/list.js +120 -0
- package/app/components/modifier-table.js +142 -0
- package/app/components/nav.js +64 -0
- package/app/components/progression-table.js +320 -0
- package/app/components/radar-chart.js +102 -0
- package/app/components/skill-matrix.js +97 -0
- package/app/css/base.css +56 -0
- package/app/css/bundles/app.css +40 -0
- package/app/css/bundles/handout.css +43 -0
- package/app/css/bundles/slides.css +40 -0
- package/app/css/components/badges.css +215 -0
- package/app/css/components/buttons.css +101 -0
- package/app/css/components/forms.css +105 -0
- package/app/css/components/layout.css +209 -0
- package/app/css/components/nav.css +166 -0
- package/app/css/components/progress.css +166 -0
- package/app/css/components/states.css +82 -0
- package/app/css/components/surfaces.css +243 -0
- package/app/css/components/tables.css +362 -0
- package/app/css/components/typography.css +122 -0
- package/app/css/components/utilities.css +41 -0
- package/app/css/pages/agent-builder.css +391 -0
- package/app/css/pages/assessment-results.css +453 -0
- package/app/css/pages/detail.css +59 -0
- package/app/css/pages/interview-builder.css +148 -0
- package/app/css/pages/job-builder.css +134 -0
- package/app/css/pages/landing.css +92 -0
- package/app/css/pages/lifecycle.css +118 -0
- package/app/css/pages/progress-builder.css +274 -0
- package/app/css/pages/self-assessment.css +502 -0
- package/app/css/reset.css +50 -0
- package/app/css/tokens.css +153 -0
- package/app/css/views/handout.css +30 -0
- package/app/css/views/print.css +608 -0
- package/app/css/views/slide-animations.css +113 -0
- package/app/css/views/slide-base.css +330 -0
- package/app/css/views/slide-sections.css +597 -0
- package/app/css/views/slide-tables.css +275 -0
- package/app/formatters/agent/dom.js +540 -0
- package/app/formatters/agent/profile.js +133 -0
- package/app/formatters/agent/skill.js +58 -0
- package/app/formatters/behaviour/dom.js +91 -0
- package/app/formatters/behaviour/markdown.js +54 -0
- package/app/formatters/behaviour/shared.js +64 -0
- package/app/formatters/discipline/dom.js +187 -0
- package/app/formatters/discipline/markdown.js +87 -0
- package/app/formatters/discipline/shared.js +131 -0
- package/app/formatters/driver/dom.js +103 -0
- package/app/formatters/driver/shared.js +92 -0
- package/app/formatters/grade/dom.js +208 -0
- package/app/formatters/grade/markdown.js +94 -0
- package/app/formatters/grade/shared.js +86 -0
- package/app/formatters/index.js +50 -0
- package/app/formatters/interview/dom.js +97 -0
- package/app/formatters/interview/markdown.js +66 -0
- package/app/formatters/interview/shared.js +332 -0
- package/app/formatters/job/description.js +176 -0
- package/app/formatters/job/dom.js +411 -0
- package/app/formatters/job/markdown.js +102 -0
- package/app/formatters/progress/dom.js +135 -0
- package/app/formatters/progress/markdown.js +86 -0
- package/app/formatters/progress/shared.js +339 -0
- package/app/formatters/questions/json.js +43 -0
- package/app/formatters/questions/markdown.js +303 -0
- package/app/formatters/questions/shared.js +274 -0
- package/app/formatters/questions/yaml.js +76 -0
- package/app/formatters/shared.js +71 -0
- package/app/formatters/skill/dom.js +168 -0
- package/app/formatters/skill/markdown.js +109 -0
- package/app/formatters/skill/shared.js +125 -0
- package/app/formatters/stage/dom.js +135 -0
- package/app/formatters/stage/index.js +12 -0
- package/app/formatters/stage/shared.js +111 -0
- package/app/formatters/track/dom.js +128 -0
- package/app/formatters/track/markdown.js +105 -0
- package/app/formatters/track/shared.js +181 -0
- package/app/handout-main.js +421 -0
- package/app/handout.html +21 -0
- package/app/index.html +59 -0
- package/app/lib/card-mappers.js +173 -0
- package/app/lib/cli-output.js +270 -0
- package/app/lib/error-boundary.js +70 -0
- package/app/lib/errors.js +49 -0
- package/app/lib/form-controls.js +47 -0
- package/app/lib/job-cache.js +86 -0
- package/app/lib/markdown.js +114 -0
- package/app/lib/radar.js +866 -0
- package/app/lib/reactive.js +77 -0
- package/app/lib/render.js +212 -0
- package/app/lib/router-core.js +160 -0
- package/app/lib/router-pages.js +16 -0
- package/app/lib/router-slides.js +202 -0
- package/app/lib/state.js +148 -0
- package/app/lib/utils.js +14 -0
- package/app/lib/yaml-loader.js +327 -0
- package/app/main.js +213 -0
- package/app/model/agent.js +702 -0
- package/app/model/checklist.js +137 -0
- package/app/model/derivation.js +699 -0
- package/app/model/index-generator.js +71 -0
- package/app/model/interview.js +539 -0
- package/app/model/job.js +222 -0
- package/app/model/levels.js +591 -0
- package/app/model/loader.js +564 -0
- package/app/model/matching.js +858 -0
- package/app/model/modifiers.js +158 -0
- package/app/model/profile.js +266 -0
- package/app/model/progression.js +507 -0
- package/app/model/validation.js +1385 -0
- package/app/pages/agent-builder.js +823 -0
- package/app/pages/assessment-results.js +507 -0
- package/app/pages/behaviour.js +70 -0
- package/app/pages/discipline.js +71 -0
- package/app/pages/driver.js +106 -0
- package/app/pages/grade.js +117 -0
- package/app/pages/interview-builder.js +50 -0
- package/app/pages/interview.js +304 -0
- package/app/pages/job-builder.js +50 -0
- package/app/pages/job.js +58 -0
- package/app/pages/landing.js +305 -0
- package/app/pages/progress-builder.js +58 -0
- package/app/pages/progress.js +495 -0
- package/app/pages/self-assessment.js +729 -0
- package/app/pages/skill.js +113 -0
- package/app/pages/stage.js +231 -0
- package/app/pages/track.js +69 -0
- package/app/slide-main.js +360 -0
- package/app/slides/behaviour.js +38 -0
- package/app/slides/chapter.js +82 -0
- package/app/slides/discipline.js +40 -0
- package/app/slides/driver.js +39 -0
- package/app/slides/grade.js +32 -0
- package/app/slides/index.js +198 -0
- package/app/slides/interview.js +58 -0
- package/app/slides/job.js +55 -0
- package/app/slides/overview.js +126 -0
- package/app/slides/progress.js +83 -0
- package/app/slides/skill.js +40 -0
- package/app/slides/track.js +39 -0
- package/app/slides.html +56 -0
- package/app/types.js +147 -0
- package/bin/pathway.js +489 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/architecture-design/SKILL.md +88 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/cloud-platforms/SKILL.md +90 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/code-quality-review/SKILL.md +67 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/data-modeling/SKILL.md +99 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/developer-experience/SKILL.md +99 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/devops-cicd/SKILL.md +96 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/full-stack-development/SKILL.md +90 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/knowledge-management/SKILL.md +100 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/pattern-generalization/SKILL.md +102 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/sre-practices/SKILL.md +117 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/technical-debt-management/SKILL.md +123 -0
- package/examples/agents/.claude/skills/technical-writing/SKILL.md +129 -0
- package/examples/agents/.github/agents/se-platform-code.agent.md +181 -0
- package/examples/agents/.github/agents/se-platform-plan.agent.md +178 -0
- package/examples/agents/.github/agents/se-platform-review.agent.md +113 -0
- package/examples/agents/.vscode/settings.json +8 -0
- package/examples/behaviours/_index.yaml +8 -0
- package/examples/behaviours/outcome_ownership.yaml +44 -0
- package/examples/behaviours/polymathic_knowledge.yaml +42 -0
- package/examples/behaviours/precise_communication.yaml +40 -0
- package/examples/behaviours/relentless_curiosity.yaml +38 -0
- package/examples/behaviours/systems_thinking.yaml +41 -0
- package/examples/capabilities/_index.yaml +8 -0
- package/examples/capabilities/business.yaml +251 -0
- package/examples/capabilities/delivery.yaml +352 -0
- package/examples/capabilities/people.yaml +100 -0
- package/examples/capabilities/reliability.yaml +318 -0
- package/examples/capabilities/scale.yaml +394 -0
- package/examples/disciplines/_index.yaml +5 -0
- package/examples/disciplines/data_engineering.yaml +76 -0
- package/examples/disciplines/software_engineering.yaml +76 -0
- package/examples/drivers.yaml +205 -0
- package/examples/framework.yaml +58 -0
- package/examples/grades.yaml +118 -0
- package/examples/questions/behaviours/outcome_ownership.yaml +52 -0
- package/examples/questions/behaviours/polymathic_knowledge.yaml +48 -0
- package/examples/questions/behaviours/precise_communication.yaml +55 -0
- package/examples/questions/behaviours/relentless_curiosity.yaml +51 -0
- package/examples/questions/behaviours/systems_thinking.yaml +53 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/architecture_design.yaml +54 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/cloud_platforms.yaml +48 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/code_quality.yaml +49 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/data_modeling.yaml +46 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/devops.yaml +47 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/full_stack_development.yaml +48 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/sre_practices.yaml +44 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/stakeholder_management.yaml +49 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/team_collaboration.yaml +43 -0
- package/examples/questions/skills/technical_writing.yaml +43 -0
- package/examples/self-assessments.yaml +66 -0
- package/examples/stages.yaml +76 -0
- package/examples/tracks/_index.yaml +6 -0
- package/examples/tracks/manager.yaml +53 -0
- package/examples/tracks/platform.yaml +54 -0
- package/examples/tracks/sre.yaml +58 -0
- package/examples/vscode-settings.yaml +22 -0
- package/package.json +68 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Behaviour: Think in Systems
|
|
2
|
+
# See beyond components to understand whole-system behaviour
|
|
3
|
+
|
|
4
|
+
name: Think in Systems
|
|
5
|
+
human:
|
|
6
|
+
description:
|
|
7
|
+
The ability to see beyond individual components to understand how the entire
|
|
8
|
+
system behaves. Like understanding how reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone
|
|
9
|
+
transformed not just deer but rivers, engineers recognize that every
|
|
10
|
+
service, API, and queue is part of a larger whole—isolated changes ripple
|
|
11
|
+
across the system.
|
|
12
|
+
maturityDescriptions:
|
|
13
|
+
emerging:
|
|
14
|
+
Recognizes that systems have interconnected parts; considers immediate
|
|
15
|
+
dependencies in code; understands basic cause-and-effect
|
|
16
|
+
developing:
|
|
17
|
+
Identifies upstream and downstream impacts; uses observability tools to
|
|
18
|
+
trace requests across services; understands feedback loops; maps
|
|
19
|
+
dependencies before making changes
|
|
20
|
+
practicing:
|
|
21
|
+
Maps complex system interactions across technical and business domains;
|
|
22
|
+
anticipates cascading effects; designs systems that degrade gracefully;
|
|
23
|
+
understands how technology changes impact business operations
|
|
24
|
+
role_modeling:
|
|
25
|
+
Shapes systems design practices across their function; conducts chaos
|
|
26
|
+
engineering experiments; influences cross-team architecture decisions;
|
|
27
|
+
creates clarity from complexity; bridges technical systems with business
|
|
28
|
+
processes
|
|
29
|
+
exemplifying:
|
|
30
|
+
Defines organizational systems architecture principles; recognized
|
|
31
|
+
industry authority on complex systems; advises executive leadership on
|
|
32
|
+
systemic risks and opportunities; publishes thought leadership on systems
|
|
33
|
+
thinking in technology organizations
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
agent:
|
|
36
|
+
title: Consider the whole system
|
|
37
|
+
workingStyle: |
|
|
38
|
+
For every change:
|
|
39
|
+
1. Identify upstream and downstream impacts
|
|
40
|
+
2. Consider non-functional requirements (performance, security)
|
|
41
|
+
3. Document assumptions and trade-offs
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
name: Business
|
|
2
|
+
emoji: 💼
|
|
3
|
+
displayOrder: 8
|
|
4
|
+
description: |
|
|
5
|
+
Understanding and driving business value.
|
|
6
|
+
Includes domain knowledge, stakeholder management, strategic thinking,
|
|
7
|
+
and translating between technical and business contexts.
|
|
8
|
+
transitionChecklists:
|
|
9
|
+
plan_to_code:
|
|
10
|
+
foundational:
|
|
11
|
+
- Business context is understood
|
|
12
|
+
- User needs are identified
|
|
13
|
+
working:
|
|
14
|
+
- Business requirements are documented
|
|
15
|
+
- Stakeholder expectations are aligned
|
|
16
|
+
- Value proposition is clear
|
|
17
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
18
|
+
- Business impact is quantified
|
|
19
|
+
- Strategic alignment is verified
|
|
20
|
+
- Cross-team business needs are considered
|
|
21
|
+
expert:
|
|
22
|
+
- Enterprise business goals are addressed
|
|
23
|
+
- Strategic technology decisions are aligned
|
|
24
|
+
- Executive stakeholders are engaged
|
|
25
|
+
code_to_review:
|
|
26
|
+
foundational:
|
|
27
|
+
- Solution addresses the stated business need
|
|
28
|
+
- User-facing behavior is correct
|
|
29
|
+
- Business requirements are met
|
|
30
|
+
working:
|
|
31
|
+
- Stakeholder feedback is incorporated
|
|
32
|
+
- Business value is delivered
|
|
33
|
+
- Success metrics can be measured
|
|
34
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
35
|
+
- Cross-team business requirements are met
|
|
36
|
+
- ROI is demonstrable
|
|
37
|
+
- Business risks are mitigated
|
|
38
|
+
expert:
|
|
39
|
+
- Strategic business outcomes are enabled
|
|
40
|
+
- Enterprise value is created
|
|
41
|
+
- Business innovation is demonstrated
|
|
42
|
+
professionalResponsibilities:
|
|
43
|
+
awareness:
|
|
44
|
+
Understand the business context for your assigned work and communicate
|
|
45
|
+
progress clearly when asked
|
|
46
|
+
foundational:
|
|
47
|
+
Connect your technical work to business outcomes, engage with stakeholders
|
|
48
|
+
to clarify requirements
|
|
49
|
+
working:
|
|
50
|
+
Translate business needs into technical solutions, manage stakeholder
|
|
51
|
+
expectations, and articulate technical decisions in business terms
|
|
52
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
53
|
+
Drive business outcomes through technical solutions across your area,
|
|
54
|
+
influence product roadmaps, and partner effectively with business
|
|
55
|
+
stakeholders
|
|
56
|
+
expert:
|
|
57
|
+
Shape technology-driven business strategy, represent technical perspective
|
|
58
|
+
at executive level, and be recognized as a bridge between engineering and
|
|
59
|
+
business
|
|
60
|
+
managementResponsibilities:
|
|
61
|
+
awareness:
|
|
62
|
+
Understand business context and communicate team progress to stakeholders
|
|
63
|
+
with guidance
|
|
64
|
+
foundational:
|
|
65
|
+
Align team priorities with business objectives, manage stakeholder
|
|
66
|
+
relationships, and communicate team impact
|
|
67
|
+
working:
|
|
68
|
+
Translate business strategy into team objectives, own stakeholder
|
|
69
|
+
relationships, and ensure team delivers business value
|
|
70
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
71
|
+
Partner with business leaders to shape strategy for your area, influence
|
|
72
|
+
direction across teams, and deliver measurable business impact
|
|
73
|
+
expert:
|
|
74
|
+
Shape technology-driven business strategy, represent engineering at
|
|
75
|
+
executive level, and own strategic business outcomes
|
|
76
|
+
skills:
|
|
77
|
+
- id: stakeholder_management
|
|
78
|
+
name: Stakeholder Management
|
|
79
|
+
isHumanOnly: true
|
|
80
|
+
human:
|
|
81
|
+
description:
|
|
82
|
+
Building relationships with and managing expectations of stakeholders
|
|
83
|
+
across the organization, from frontline workers to C-level executives
|
|
84
|
+
levelDescriptions:
|
|
85
|
+
awareness:
|
|
86
|
+
You identify key stakeholders for your work and communicate status
|
|
87
|
+
when asked. You understand that different stakeholders have different
|
|
88
|
+
needs.
|
|
89
|
+
foundational:
|
|
90
|
+
You proactively update stakeholders on progress, handle basic
|
|
91
|
+
expectation setting, and escalate concerns appropriately. You build
|
|
92
|
+
rapport with regular collaborators.
|
|
93
|
+
working:
|
|
94
|
+
You manage multiple stakeholders with different interests, navigate
|
|
95
|
+
conflicting priorities diplomatically, and build trust through
|
|
96
|
+
consistent delivery. You tailor communication to each audience.
|
|
97
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
98
|
+
You influence senior stakeholders effectively across your area, manage
|
|
99
|
+
complex stakeholder landscapes with competing agendas, build trust
|
|
100
|
+
rapidly with new stakeholders, and shield teams from organizational
|
|
101
|
+
friction.
|
|
102
|
+
expert:
|
|
103
|
+
You shape stakeholder practices across the business unit. You manage
|
|
104
|
+
executive relationships, represent engineering at the highest levels,
|
|
105
|
+
and are recognized for exceptional stakeholder partnerships.
|
|
106
|
+
- id: technical_writing
|
|
107
|
+
name: Technical Writing
|
|
108
|
+
human:
|
|
109
|
+
description:
|
|
110
|
+
Creating clear, accurate, and useful technical documentation. Good specs
|
|
111
|
+
enable AI to generate accurate solutions; poor specs lead to poor
|
|
112
|
+
results.
|
|
113
|
+
levelDescriptions:
|
|
114
|
+
awareness:
|
|
115
|
+
You document your own work following team templates and standards. You
|
|
116
|
+
keep code comments current and write basic README content.
|
|
117
|
+
foundational:
|
|
118
|
+
You write clear READMEs, inline documentation, and technical guides.
|
|
119
|
+
You update existing docs when making changes and ensure documentation
|
|
120
|
+
matches implementation.
|
|
121
|
+
working:
|
|
122
|
+
You create comprehensive documentation for complex systems. You write
|
|
123
|
+
precise specifications that enable accurate AI-generated code,
|
|
124
|
+
establish documentation practices for your projects, and ensure docs
|
|
125
|
+
are discoverable.
|
|
126
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
127
|
+
You define documentation standards across teams in your area, create
|
|
128
|
+
documentation systems and templates, train engineers on spec-driven
|
|
129
|
+
development, and ensure documentation quality across projects.
|
|
130
|
+
expert:
|
|
131
|
+
You shape documentation culture and standards across the business
|
|
132
|
+
unit. You innovate on documentation approaches, are recognized for
|
|
133
|
+
exceptional technical writing clarity, and lead documentation
|
|
134
|
+
initiatives.
|
|
135
|
+
agent:
|
|
136
|
+
name: technical-writing
|
|
137
|
+
description: >
|
|
138
|
+
Guide for creating clear technical documentation. Use when writing
|
|
139
|
+
READMEs,
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
API docs, specifications, or any technical content that needs to be
|
|
142
|
+
clear
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
and accurate.
|
|
145
|
+
body: |
|
|
146
|
+
# Technical Writing
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
## When to use this skill
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
Use this skill when:
|
|
151
|
+
- Writing README files
|
|
152
|
+
- Creating API documentation
|
|
153
|
+
- Writing technical specifications
|
|
154
|
+
- Documenting code and systems
|
|
155
|
+
- Creating guides and tutorials
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
## Writing Principles
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
### Clarity First
|
|
160
|
+
- Use simple, direct language
|
|
161
|
+
- One idea per sentence
|
|
162
|
+
- Active voice over passive
|
|
163
|
+
- Avoid jargon unless defined
|
|
164
|
+
- Be specific, not vague
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
### Know Your Audience
|
|
167
|
+
- What do they already know?
|
|
168
|
+
- What do they need to accomplish?
|
|
169
|
+
- What's their skill level?
|
|
170
|
+
- What questions will they have?
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
### Structure for Scanning
|
|
173
|
+
- Lead with the most important information
|
|
174
|
+
- Use headings and subheadings
|
|
175
|
+
- Keep paragraphs short
|
|
176
|
+
- Use lists for multiple items
|
|
177
|
+
- Highlight key terms
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
## Document Types
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
### README
|
|
182
|
+
- What is this project?
|
|
183
|
+
- How do I get started?
|
|
184
|
+
- How do I use it?
|
|
185
|
+
- Where do I get help?
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
### API Documentation
|
|
188
|
+
- Endpoint description
|
|
189
|
+
- Parameters and types
|
|
190
|
+
- Request/response examples
|
|
191
|
+
- Error codes and handling
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
### Technical Specification
|
|
194
|
+
- Problem statement
|
|
195
|
+
- Proposed solution
|
|
196
|
+
- Alternatives considered
|
|
197
|
+
- Implementation plan
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
### Tutorial
|
|
200
|
+
- Clear learning objective
|
|
201
|
+
- Prerequisites listed
|
|
202
|
+
- Step-by-step instructions
|
|
203
|
+
- Expected outcomes shown
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
## README Template
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
```markdown
|
|
208
|
+
# Project Name
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
Brief description of what this project does.
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
## Getting Started
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### Prerequisites
|
|
215
|
+
- Required software and versions
|
|
216
|
+
|
|
217
|
+
### Installation
|
|
218
|
+
Step-by-step installation instructions.
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
### Quick Start
|
|
221
|
+
Minimal example to get running.
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
## Usage
|
|
224
|
+
Common use cases with examples.
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
## Contributing
|
|
227
|
+
How to contribute to the project.
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
## License
|
|
230
|
+
License information.
|
|
231
|
+
```
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
## Code Examples
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
Good examples are:
|
|
236
|
+
- Complete and runnable
|
|
237
|
+
- Minimal but realistic
|
|
238
|
+
- Copy-pasteable
|
|
239
|
+
- Annotated with comments
|
|
240
|
+
- Tested and verified
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
## Technical Writing Checklist
|
|
243
|
+
|
|
244
|
+
- [ ] Purpose is clear in first paragraph
|
|
245
|
+
- [ ] Audience is identified
|
|
246
|
+
- [ ] Prerequisites are listed
|
|
247
|
+
- [ ] Examples are tested and work
|
|
248
|
+
- [ ] Technical terms are defined
|
|
249
|
+
- [ ] Structure supports scanning
|
|
250
|
+
- [ ] No ambiguous pronouns
|
|
251
|
+
- [ ] Updated when code changes
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
name: Delivery
|
|
2
|
+
emoji: 🚀
|
|
3
|
+
displayOrder: 1
|
|
4
|
+
description: |
|
|
5
|
+
Building and shipping solutions that solve real problems.
|
|
6
|
+
Encompasses full-stack development, data integration, problem discovery,
|
|
7
|
+
and rapid prototyping.
|
|
8
|
+
transitionChecklists:
|
|
9
|
+
plan_to_code:
|
|
10
|
+
foundational:
|
|
11
|
+
- Requirements are understood and documented
|
|
12
|
+
- Acceptance criteria are defined
|
|
13
|
+
working:
|
|
14
|
+
- Technical approach is documented
|
|
15
|
+
- Dependencies are identified and planned for
|
|
16
|
+
- Scope is broken into deliverable increments
|
|
17
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
18
|
+
- Cross-team dependencies are coordinated
|
|
19
|
+
- Risks are identified with mitigation strategies
|
|
20
|
+
- Delivery timeline is realistic and communicated
|
|
21
|
+
expert:
|
|
22
|
+
- Strategic alignment is validated with stakeholders
|
|
23
|
+
- Resource allocation is optimized across teams
|
|
24
|
+
- Success metrics are defined and measurable
|
|
25
|
+
code_to_review:
|
|
26
|
+
foundational:
|
|
27
|
+
- Feature works end-to-end
|
|
28
|
+
- Basic tests cover critical paths
|
|
29
|
+
- Code is self-reviewed before submitting
|
|
30
|
+
working:
|
|
31
|
+
- All acceptance criteria are met
|
|
32
|
+
- Edge cases are handled
|
|
33
|
+
- Technical debt is explicitly documented
|
|
34
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
35
|
+
- Solution addresses cross-team requirements
|
|
36
|
+
- Integration points are tested
|
|
37
|
+
- Rollback plan exists
|
|
38
|
+
expert:
|
|
39
|
+
- Organizational standards are followed
|
|
40
|
+
- Pattern can be reused across teams
|
|
41
|
+
- Documentation enables others to extend
|
|
42
|
+
professionalResponsibilities:
|
|
43
|
+
awareness:
|
|
44
|
+
Complete assigned implementation tasks within established patterns with
|
|
45
|
+
guidance from senior engineers
|
|
46
|
+
foundational:
|
|
47
|
+
Deliver small features end-to-end with minimal guidance, understanding how
|
|
48
|
+
your code fits the broader system
|
|
49
|
+
working:
|
|
50
|
+
Own feature delivery from design through deployment, making sound technical
|
|
51
|
+
trade-offs to ship value on time
|
|
52
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
53
|
+
Lead technical delivery of complex projects across multiple teams, unblock
|
|
54
|
+
others through hands-on contributions, and ensure engineering quality
|
|
55
|
+
expert:
|
|
56
|
+
Drive delivery of the most critical technical initiatives, establish
|
|
57
|
+
engineering delivery practices across the business unit, and be the
|
|
58
|
+
technical authority on high-stakes projects
|
|
59
|
+
managementResponsibilities:
|
|
60
|
+
awareness:
|
|
61
|
+
Track team progress and communicate status to stakeholders with guidance
|
|
62
|
+
foundational:
|
|
63
|
+
Coordinate team delivery by managing dependencies, removing blockers, and
|
|
64
|
+
keeping stakeholders informed
|
|
65
|
+
working:
|
|
66
|
+
Own team delivery outcomes—balance scope, staffing, and timeline; make
|
|
67
|
+
resourcing decisions to meet commitments
|
|
68
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
69
|
+
Drive delivery excellence across multiple teams, establish delivery metrics
|
|
70
|
+
and practices for your area, hold teams accountable, and escalate cross-team
|
|
71
|
+
risks
|
|
72
|
+
expert:
|
|
73
|
+
Shape delivery culture across the business unit, lead strategic delivery
|
|
74
|
+
transformations, and represent delivery commitments at executive level
|
|
75
|
+
skills:
|
|
76
|
+
- id: architecture_design
|
|
77
|
+
name: Architecture & Design
|
|
78
|
+
human:
|
|
79
|
+
description:
|
|
80
|
+
Ability to design software systems that are scalable, maintainable, and
|
|
81
|
+
fit for purpose. In the AI era, this includes designing systems that
|
|
82
|
+
effectively leverage AI capabilities while maintaining human oversight.
|
|
83
|
+
levelDescriptions:
|
|
84
|
+
awareness:
|
|
85
|
+
You understand basic architectural concepts (separation of concerns,
|
|
86
|
+
modularity, coupling) and can read architecture diagrams. You follow
|
|
87
|
+
established patterns with guidance.
|
|
88
|
+
foundational:
|
|
89
|
+
You explain and apply common patterns (MVC, microservices,
|
|
90
|
+
event-driven) to familiar problems. You contribute to design
|
|
91
|
+
discussions and identify when existing patterns don't fit.
|
|
92
|
+
working:
|
|
93
|
+
You design components and services independently for moderate
|
|
94
|
+
complexity. You make appropriate trade-off decisions, document design
|
|
95
|
+
rationale, and consider AI integration points in your designs.
|
|
96
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
97
|
+
You design complex multi-component systems end-to-end, evaluate
|
|
98
|
+
architectural options for large initiatives across teams, guide
|
|
99
|
+
technical decisions for your area, and mentor engineers on
|
|
100
|
+
architecture. You balance elegance with delivery needs.
|
|
101
|
+
expert:
|
|
102
|
+
You define architecture standards and patterns across the business
|
|
103
|
+
unit. You innovate on approaches to large-scale challenges, shape
|
|
104
|
+
AI-integrated system design, and are recognized externally as an
|
|
105
|
+
architecture authority.
|
|
106
|
+
agent:
|
|
107
|
+
name: architecture-design
|
|
108
|
+
description: |
|
|
109
|
+
Guide for designing software systems and making architectural decisions.
|
|
110
|
+
Use when asked to design a system, evaluate architecture options, or
|
|
111
|
+
make structural decisions about code organization.
|
|
112
|
+
body: >
|
|
113
|
+
# Architecture & Design
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
## When to use this skill
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
Use this skill when:
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
- Designing new systems or major features
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
- Evaluating architectural options and trade-offs
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
- Making decisions about code organization and structure
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
- Reviewing or improving existing architecture
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
## Design Process
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
### 1. Understand Requirements
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
Before designing, clarify:
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
- What problem are we solving?
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
- What are the non-functional requirements (scale, latency,
|
|
141
|
+
availability)?
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
- What are the constraints (existing systems, team skills, timeline)?
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
- What will change over time?
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
### 2. Identify Key Decisions
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
Architecture is the set of decisions that are hard to change:
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
- Data storage and schema design
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
- Service boundaries and communication patterns
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
- Synchronous vs asynchronous processing
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
- Stateful vs stateless components
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
### 3. Evaluate Trade-offs
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
Every architectural choice has trade-offs:
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
- Consistency vs availability
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
- Simplicity vs flexibility
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
- Performance vs maintainability
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
- Build vs buy
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
Document trade-offs explicitly.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
### 4. Design for Change
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
Good architecture accommodates change:
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
- Separate what changes from what stays the same
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
- Define clear interfaces between components
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
- Prefer composition over inheritance
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
- Make dependencies explicit
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
## Common Patterns
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
### Service Architecture
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
- Microservices: Independent deployment, clear boundaries
|
|
199
|
+
|
|
200
|
+
- Monolith: Simpler deployment, easier refactoring
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
- Modular monolith: Boundaries within single deployment
|
|
203
|
+
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
### Data Patterns
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
- Event sourcing: Full audit trail, complex queries
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
- CQRS: Separate read and write models
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
- Repository pattern: Abstract data access
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### Communication Patterns
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
- REST: Synchronous, request-response
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
- Event-driven: Asynchronous, loose coupling
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
- gRPC: Efficient, strongly typed
|
|
221
|
+
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
## Architecture Checklist
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
- [ ] Requirements are clearly understood
|
|
227
|
+
|
|
228
|
+
- [ ] Key decisions are documented with rationale
|
|
229
|
+
|
|
230
|
+
- [ ] Trade-offs are explicit
|
|
231
|
+
|
|
232
|
+
- [ ] Failure modes are considered
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
234
|
+
- [ ] Scalability requirements are addressed
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
- [ ] Security implications are reviewed
|
|
237
|
+
|
|
238
|
+
- [ ] Dependencies are minimal and explicit
|
|
239
|
+
- id: full_stack_development
|
|
240
|
+
name: Full-Stack Development
|
|
241
|
+
human:
|
|
242
|
+
description:
|
|
243
|
+
Building complete solutions across frontend, APIs, databases, and
|
|
244
|
+
infrastructure without dependencies on specialists. JavaScript and
|
|
245
|
+
Python are our primary languages, with CloudFormation and Terraform for
|
|
246
|
+
infrastructure. Essential for rapid delivery and embedded engineering
|
|
247
|
+
work.
|
|
248
|
+
levelDescriptions:
|
|
249
|
+
awareness:
|
|
250
|
+
You understand how frontend, backend, and database layers work
|
|
251
|
+
together. You can make changes in one layer with guidance and
|
|
252
|
+
understand the impact on other layers.
|
|
253
|
+
foundational:
|
|
254
|
+
You build simple features across frontend and backend using JavaScript
|
|
255
|
+
or Python. You understand how layers connect through APIs and can
|
|
256
|
+
debug across the stack.
|
|
257
|
+
working:
|
|
258
|
+
You deliver complete features end-to-end independently—frontend,
|
|
259
|
+
backend, database, and infrastructure (CloudFormation/Terraform). You
|
|
260
|
+
make pragmatic technology choices and deploy what you build.
|
|
261
|
+
practitioner:
|
|
262
|
+
You build complete applications rapidly across any technology stack
|
|
263
|
+
for teams in your area. You select the right tools for each problem,
|
|
264
|
+
balance technical debt with delivery speed, and mentor engineers on
|
|
265
|
+
full-stack development.
|
|
266
|
+
expert:
|
|
267
|
+
You work comfortably in any language and rapidly acquire new skills as
|
|
268
|
+
needed. You deliver production solutions in days not months, shape
|
|
269
|
+
full-stack practices across the business unit, and exemplify
|
|
270
|
+
polymathic engineering.
|
|
271
|
+
agent:
|
|
272
|
+
name: full-stack-development
|
|
273
|
+
description: >
|
|
274
|
+
Guide for building complete solutions across the full technology stack.
|
|
275
|
+
|
|
276
|
+
Use when asked to implement features spanning frontend, backend,
|
|
277
|
+
database,
|
|
278
|
+
|
|
279
|
+
and infrastructure layers.
|
|
280
|
+
body: |
|
|
281
|
+
# Full-Stack Development
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
## When to use this skill
|
|
284
|
+
|
|
285
|
+
Use this skill when:
|
|
286
|
+
- Building features that span multiple layers
|
|
287
|
+
- Implementing end-to-end functionality
|
|
288
|
+
- Working across frontend, backend, and infrastructure
|
|
289
|
+
- Debugging issues that cross layer boundaries
|
|
290
|
+
|
|
291
|
+
## Technology Stack
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
293
|
+
### Primary Languages
|
|
294
|
+
- **JavaScript/TypeScript**: Frontend and Node.js backend
|
|
295
|
+
- **Python**: Backend APIs and data processing
|
|
296
|
+
|
|
297
|
+
### Infrastructure
|
|
298
|
+
- **Terraform**: Cloud infrastructure as code
|
|
299
|
+
- **CloudFormation**: AWS-specific infrastructure
|
|
300
|
+
- **Docker**: Containerization
|
|
301
|
+
|
|
302
|
+
## Layer Responsibilities
|
|
303
|
+
|
|
304
|
+
### Frontend
|
|
305
|
+
- User interface and experience
|
|
306
|
+
- Client-side validation
|
|
307
|
+
- API integration
|
|
308
|
+
- State management
|
|
309
|
+
|
|
310
|
+
### Backend API
|
|
311
|
+
- Business logic
|
|
312
|
+
- Data validation
|
|
313
|
+
- Authentication/authorization
|
|
314
|
+
- External service integration
|
|
315
|
+
|
|
316
|
+
### Database
|
|
317
|
+
- Data persistence
|
|
318
|
+
- Query optimization
|
|
319
|
+
- Schema migrations
|
|
320
|
+
- Data integrity
|
|
321
|
+
|
|
322
|
+
### Infrastructure
|
|
323
|
+
- Deployment pipelines
|
|
324
|
+
- Environment configuration
|
|
325
|
+
- Scaling and reliability
|
|
326
|
+
- Monitoring and logging
|
|
327
|
+
|
|
328
|
+
## Development Process
|
|
329
|
+
|
|
330
|
+
### 1. Start with the Interface
|
|
331
|
+
- Define the API contract first
|
|
332
|
+
- Frontend and backend can work in parallel
|
|
333
|
+
- Clear interface = fewer integration issues
|
|
334
|
+
|
|
335
|
+
### 2. Build Vertically
|
|
336
|
+
- Complete one feature end-to-end before starting another
|
|
337
|
+
- Validates assumptions early
|
|
338
|
+
- Delivers demonstrable progress
|
|
339
|
+
|
|
340
|
+
### 3. Test Across Layers
|
|
341
|
+
- Unit tests per layer
|
|
342
|
+
- Integration tests across layers
|
|
343
|
+
- End-to-end tests for critical paths
|
|
344
|
+
|
|
345
|
+
## Full-Stack Checklist
|
|
346
|
+
|
|
347
|
+
- [ ] API contract is defined
|
|
348
|
+
- [ ] Frontend connects to backend correctly
|
|
349
|
+
- [ ] Database schema supports the feature
|
|
350
|
+
- [ ] Error handling spans all layers
|
|
351
|
+
- [ ] Feature works end-to-end
|
|
352
|
+
- [ ] Deployment is automated
|