@forgeax/engine-runtime 0.0.0-dev.8d955ade1c79

package/src/__tests__/render-system-owner-split-contract.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+// feat-20260709-editor-world-partition-editorworld-super-composite / M1 / w1
+// (RED — impl lands in w4/w5/w6). Contract test for the camera-owner /
+// resource-owner split of the extract stage.
+//
+// Today `extractFrames(worlds, owner)` takes a SINGLE owner index: cameras +
+// singleton render resources (skylight / skybox / postProcessParams) all come
+// from `worlds[owner]` (render-system-extract.ts:1671-1676). This feature
+// splits that single index into two independent indices:
+//
+//   - `cameraOwner`   — the world whose cameras are surfaced.
+//   - `resourceOwner` — the world whose skylight / skybox / postProcessParams
+//                       are surfaced.
+//
+// This test pins the FUTURE contract as the SSOT the w4-w6 implementation must
+// satisfy: `extractFrames(worlds, { cameraOwner, resourceOwner })`. It calls
+// that two-index form directly. Until w4 changes the signature, the call is a
+// compile/type mismatch and this file is RED — exactly the TDD red window
+// (test-first). Once w4 lands the `{ cameraOwner, resourceOwner }` object
+// parameter these assertions turn green with no edits here.
+//
+// rhi-null headless: extractFrames is a pure world->snapshot merge that needs
+// no GPU (no AssetRegistry, no pipelineState). It runs in the node vitest
+// project (no dawn / no browser).
+//
+// Anchors:
+//   requirements AC-08 (owner split delivered; contract covers "camera from A
+//     world, singleton resources from B world")
+//   research F2 (extract:1671-1676 cameras + skylight/skybox/postProcess read
+//     the same ownerFrame — the split point)
+//   plan-strategy §2 D-3 (explicit `{ cameraOwner, resourceOwner }` required
+//     indices) + §5.3 key test point + §3.3 interface example
+
+import { World } from '@forgeax/engine-ecs';
+import { Camera, Skylight } from '@forgeax/engine-render';
+import { Transform } from '@forgeax/engine-scene';
+import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
+import { extractFrames } from '../../../render/src/render-system-extract';
+
+// The two-index owner shape w4-w6 will introduce. Declared locally so this
+// test states the contract independent of the (not-yet-updated) source type.
+interface OwnerSplit {
+  readonly cameraOwner: number;
+  readonly resourceOwner: number;
+}
+
+// `extractFrames` currently is `(worlds, owner: number, ...)`. The future
+// contract is `(worlds, opts: { cameraOwner, resourceOwner }, ...)`. We reach
+// the future signature through a typed alias so the intent reads clearly; the
+// call is what turns green once w4 changes the real signature.
+type ExtractFramesOwnerSplit = (
+  worlds: readonly World[],
+  owner: OwnerSplit,
+) => ReturnType<typeof extractFrames>;
+
+const extractFramesSplit = extractFrames as unknown as ExtractFramesOwnerSplit;
+
+function identityTransform(): {
+  pos: number[];
+  quat: number[];
+  scale: number[];
+} {
+  return { pos: [0, 0, 0], quat: [0, 0, 0, 1], scale: [1, 1, 1] };
+}
+
+// World A: carries a camera with a DISTINGUISHING far plane so we can prove the
+// surfaced camera came from A (not B). No skylight.
+const CAMERA_A_FAR = 777;
+
+function makeCameraWorld(far: number): World {
+  const world = new World();
+  world
+    .spawn(
+      { component: Transform, data: identityTransform() },
+      { component: Camera, data: { fov: Math.PI / 4, aspect: 1, near: 0.1, far } },
+    )
+    .unwrap();
+  return world;
+}
+
+// World B: carries a skylight with a DISTINGUISHING intensity so we can prove
+// the surfaced skylight came from B (not A). No camera.
+const SKYLIGHT_B_INTENSITY = 0.375;
+
+function makeResourceWorld(intensity: number): World {
+  const world = new World();
+  world
+    .spawn(
+      { component: Transform, data: identityTransform() },
+      { component: Skylight, data: { intensity } },
+    )
+    .unwrap();
+  return world;
+}
+
+describe('extractFrames camera-owner / resource-owner split contract (w1, AC-08)', () => {
+  // ── Combination 1: camera from A world, singleton resource from B world ──
+  it('cameraOwner=0 / resourceOwner=1: cameras come from world A, skylight from world B', () => {
+    const worldA = makeCameraWorld(CAMERA_A_FAR); // camera, no skylight
+    const worldB = makeResourceWorld(SKYLIGHT_B_INTENSITY); // skylight, no camera
+
+    const frame = extractFramesSplit([worldA, worldB], { cameraOwner: 0, resourceOwner: 1 });
+
+    // Camera is surfaced from A (cameraOwner=0) — recognisable by its far plane.
+    expect(frame.cameras.length).toBe(1);
+    expect(frame.cameras[0]?.far).toBe(CAMERA_A_FAR);
+
+    // Skylight is surfaced from B (resourceOwner=1) — recognisable by intensity.
+    // If skylight were (wrongly) read from cameraOwner world A, it would be
+    // undefined (A has no skylight), so this assertion has discriminating power.
+    expect(frame.skylight).toBeDefined();
+    expect(frame.skylight?.intensity).toBeCloseTo(SKYLIGHT_B_INTENSITY);
+    expect(frame.skylightCount).toBe(1);
+  });
+
+  // ── Combination 2: same world is both owners (degenerate — old owner semantics) ──
+  it('cameraOwner=resourceOwner=0 is byte-equivalent to the legacy single owner=0', () => {
+    // One world that carries BOTH a camera and a skylight.
+    const world = new World();
+    world
+      .spawn(
+        { component: Transform, data: identityTransform() },
+        { component: Camera, data: { fov: Math.PI / 4, aspect: 1, near: 0.1, far: CAMERA_A_FAR } },
+      )
+      .unwrap();
+    world
+      .spawn(
+        { component: Transform, data: identityTransform() },
+        { component: Skylight, data: { intensity: SKYLIGHT_B_INTENSITY } },
+      )
+      .unwrap();
+
+    // A second world with a DIFFERENT camera + skylight that must NOT leak in
+    // when both owners point at index 0.
+    const other = new World();
+    other
+      .spawn(
+        { component: Transform, data: identityTransform() },
+        { component: Camera, data: { fov: Math.PI / 3, aspect: 2, near: 0.5, far: 12 } },
+      )
+      .unwrap();
+    other
+      .spawn(
+        { component: Transform, data: identityTransform() },
+        { component: Skylight, data: { intensity: 0.9 } },
+      )
+      .unwrap();
+
+    const frame = extractFramesSplit([world, other], { cameraOwner: 0, resourceOwner: 0 });
+
+    // Both camera and singleton resource resolve from world 0 only.
+    expect(frame.cameras.length).toBe(1);
+    expect(frame.cameras[0]?.far).toBe(CAMERA_A_FAR);
+    expect(frame.skylight?.intensity).toBeCloseTo(SKYLIGHT_B_INTENSITY);
+    // skylightCount reports the OWNER (resource) world's live skylight count,
+    // not the other world's — proves no cross-world leak in the degenerate case.
+    expect(frame.skylightCount).toBe(1);
+  });
+
+  // ── Combination 3: owners swapped — camera from B, resource from A ──
+  it('cameraOwner=1 / resourceOwner=0: cameras come from world B, skylight from world A', () => {
+    // world0 = resource world (skylight, no camera); world1 = camera world.
+    const world0 = makeResourceWorld(SKYLIGHT_B_INTENSITY); // resourceOwner target
+    const world1 = makeCameraWorld(CAMERA_A_FAR); // cameraOwner target
+
+    const frame = extractFramesSplit([world0, world1], { cameraOwner: 1, resourceOwner: 0 });
+
+    // Camera surfaced from world1 (cameraOwner=1).
+    expect(frame.cameras.length).toBe(1);
+    expect(frame.cameras[0]?.far).toBe(CAMERA_A_FAR);
+
+    // Skylight surfaced from world0 (resourceOwner=0). If the code read skylight
+    // from cameraOwner (world1, no skylight) this would be undefined — so the
+    // swap direction is genuinely exercised.
+    expect(frame.skylight).toBeDefined();
+    expect(frame.skylight?.intensity).toBeCloseTo(SKYLIGHT_B_INTENSITY);
+    expect(frame.skylightCount).toBe(1);
+  });
+});