@flydocs/cli 0.6.0-alpha.5 → 0.6.0-alpha.6

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (34) hide show
  1. package/dist/cli.js +1 -1
  2. package/package.json +1 -1
  3. package/template/.claude/CLAUDE.md +10 -8
  4. package/template/.claude/commands/knowledge.md +61 -0
  5. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/SKILL.md +31 -23
  6. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/create_issue.py +19 -2
  7. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/delete_milestone.py +21 -0
  8. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/estimate.py +9 -5
  9. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/flydocs_api.py +4 -0
  10. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/get_estimate_scale.py +23 -0
  11. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/refresh_labels.py +87 -0
  12. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/set_identity.py +38 -0
  13. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/set_preferences.py +49 -0
  14. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/update_issue.py +22 -4
  15. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/scripts/update_milestone.py +42 -0
  16. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/SKILL.md +23 -18
  17. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/reference/comment-templates.md +1 -0
  18. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/reference/pr-workflow.md +105 -0
  19. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/reference/priority-estimates.md +37 -15
  20. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/session.md +24 -16
  21. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/stages/capture.md +8 -3
  22. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/stages/close.md +4 -3
  23. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/stages/implement.md +28 -4
  24. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/stages/refine.md +20 -4
  25. package/template/.claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/stages/review.md +14 -2
  26. package/template/.flydocs/config.json +1 -1
  27. package/template/.flydocs/version +1 -1
  28. package/template/AGENTS.md +8 -8
  29. package/template/flydocs/knowledge/INDEX.md +38 -53
  30. package/template/flydocs/knowledge/README.md +60 -9
  31. package/template/flydocs/knowledge/templates/decision.md +47 -0
  32. package/template/flydocs/knowledge/templates/feature.md +35 -0
  33. package/template/flydocs/knowledge/templates/note.md +25 -0
  34. package/template/manifest.json +8 -2
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ triggers:
17
17
  - transition
18
18
  - status
19
19
  - issue
20
+ - knowledge
21
+ - document
22
+ - PR
23
+ - pull request
20
24
  ---
21
25
 
22
26
  # FlyDocs Workflow
@@ -35,32 +39,33 @@ Capture → Refine → Activate → Implement → Review → Validate → Close
35
39
 
36
40
  ## Stage Index
37
41
 
38
- | Stage | File | Intent | Agent |
39
- |-------|------|--------|-------|
40
- | Capture | stages/capture.md | Create issue from input | PM |
41
- | Refine | stages/refine.md | Triage + spec completion | PM |
42
- | Activate | stages/activate.md | Assign + start work | PM |
43
- | Implement | stages/implement.md | Build + test + simplify | Implementation |
44
- | Review | stages/review.md | Code quality validation | Review |
45
- | Validate | stages/validate.md | User acceptance testing | QE |
46
- | Close | stages/close.md | Archive completed work | PM |
42
+ | Stage | File | Intent | Agent |
43
+ | --------- | ------------------- | ------------------------ | -------------- |
44
+ | Capture | stages/capture.md | Create issue from input | PM |
45
+ | Refine | stages/refine.md | Triage + spec completion | PM |
46
+ | Activate | stages/activate.md | Assign + start work | PM |
47
+ | Implement | stages/implement.md | Build + test + simplify | Implementation |
48
+ | Review | stages/review.md | Code quality validation | Review |
49
+ | Validate | stages/validate.md | User acceptance testing | QE |
50
+ | Close | stages/close.md | Archive completed work | PM |
47
51
 
48
52
  ## Session
49
53
 
50
- | Action | File |
51
- |--------|------|
52
- | Start session | session.md |
53
- | Wrap session | session.md |
54
+ | Action | File |
55
+ | --------------- | ---------- |
56
+ | Start session | session.md |
57
+ | Wrap session | session.md |
54
58
  | Stale detection | session.md |
55
59
 
56
60
  ## Reference
57
61
 
58
- | Topic | File |
59
- |-------|------|
60
- | Comment templates | reference/comment-templates.md |
61
- | Status transitions | reference/status-workflow.md |
62
+ | Topic | File |
63
+ | -------------------- | ------------------------------- |
64
+ | Comment templates | reference/comment-templates.md |
65
+ | Status transitions | reference/status-workflow.md |
62
66
  | Priority & estimates | reference/priority-estimates.md |
63
- | Golden rules | reference/golden-rules.md |
67
+ | PR & git workflow | reference/pr-workflow.md |
68
+ | Golden rules | reference/golden-rules.md |
64
69
 
65
70
  ## Templates
66
71
 
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Canonical templates for all workflow transitions. Copy exactly, fill bracketed v
56
56
  **Files:** [count] modified
57
57
  **Testing:** [How it was verified]
58
58
  **Criteria:** [X]/[Y] complete
59
+ **PR:** [link or "direct commit"]
59
60
  ```
60
61
 
61
62
  ## Code Review Passed
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
1
+ # PR & Git Workflow
2
+
3
+ ## Branch Naming
4
+
5
+ Format: `<type>/<ref>-<slug>`
6
+
7
+ | Type | When |
8
+ | --------- | -------------------------------------- |
9
+ | `feature` | New functionality |
10
+ | `fix` | Bug fixes |
11
+ | `chore` | Maintenance, refactoring, dependencies |
12
+ | `docs` | Documentation only |
13
+
14
+ Examples:
15
+
16
+ - `feature/FLY-255-knowledge-capture`
17
+ - `fix/FLY-301-login-timeout`
18
+ - `chore/FLY-290-upgrade-deps`
19
+
20
+ Keep the slug short (2-4 words, kebab-case). Include the issue reference.
21
+
22
+ ## Commit Messages
23
+
24
+ Format: `<type>: <description> (<ref>)`
25
+
26
+ - Lead with what changed, not how
27
+ - Use imperative mood ("Add", not "Added")
28
+ - Keep the first line under 72 characters
29
+ - Add a body for non-obvious changes
30
+
31
+ Examples:
32
+
33
+ ```
34
+ feat: Add knowledge doc templates and /knowledge command (FLY-255)
35
+ fix: Handle null milestone in create_issue response (FLY-301)
36
+ chore: Remove deprecated auth middleware (FLY-290)
37
+ ```
38
+
39
+ ## When to Create a PR
40
+
41
+ **Create a PR when:**
42
+
43
+ - Changes affect shared code (not just local config or docs)
44
+ - Multiple files changed across different concerns
45
+ - Changes need review before merging
46
+ - Working on a branch (not committing directly to main)
47
+
48
+ **Commit directly when:**
49
+
50
+ - Single-file documentation updates
51
+ - Config changes for local development
52
+ - Trivial fixes (typos, formatting)
53
+ - The user explicitly requests direct commit
54
+
55
+ When in doubt, create a PR. It's easier to merge a PR than to revert a direct commit.
56
+
57
+ ## PR Description Template
58
+
59
+ ```markdown
60
+ ## Summary
61
+
62
+ [1-3 bullet points describing what changed and why]
63
+
64
+ Closes [ISSUE-REF]
65
+
66
+ ## Changes
67
+
68
+ - [Key change 1]
69
+ - [Key change 2]
70
+ - [Key change 3]
71
+
72
+ ## Test Plan
73
+
74
+ - [ ] [How to verify change 1]
75
+ - [ ] [How to verify change 2]
76
+
77
+ ## Notes
78
+
79
+ [Anything reviewers should know — tradeoffs, follow-up work, decisions made]
80
+ ```
81
+
82
+ ## PR Workflow in Practice
83
+
84
+ ### During Implement Stage
85
+
86
+ After self-review (step 7 in `implement.md`), before handing off to review:
87
+
88
+ 1. Create branch: `git checkout -b <type>/<ref>-<slug>`
89
+ 2. Stage and commit changes with a descriptive message
90
+ 3. Push branch: `git push -u origin <branch>`
91
+ 4. Create PR with the template above, linking the issue
92
+ 5. Include the PR link in the "Ready for Review" comment
93
+
94
+ ### During Review Stage
95
+
96
+ The reviewer should:
97
+
98
+ - Review the PR diff (not just local git diff)
99
+ - Leave comments on the PR for specific code feedback
100
+ - Reference the PR in review comments on the issue
101
+
102
+ ### After Review
103
+
104
+ - **Approved**: Merge the PR, then transition issue to Testing
105
+ - **Changes needed**: Push fixes to the same branch, re-request review
@@ -2,27 +2,49 @@
2
2
 
3
3
  ## Priority Values
4
4
 
5
- | Value | Name | Use When |
6
- |-------|------|----------|
7
- | 0 | None | Not yet triaged |
8
- | 1 | Urgent | Drop everything, fix now |
9
- | 2 | High | Next up, unblocks others |
10
- | 3 | Medium | Normal priority (default) |
11
- | 4 | Low | Nice to have |
5
+ | Value | Name | Use When |
6
+ | ----- | ------ | ------------------------- |
7
+ | 0 | None | Not yet triaged |
8
+ | 1 | Urgent | Drop everything, fix now |
9
+ | 2 | High | Next up, unblocks others |
10
+ | 3 | Medium | Normal priority (default) |
11
+ | 4 | Low | Nice to have |
12
12
 
13
13
  ## Estimate Values (Complexity)
14
14
 
15
- | Value | Name | Rough Effort |
16
- |-------|------|--------------|
17
- | 1 | XS | < 1 hour |
18
- | 2 | S | 1-4 hours |
19
- | 3 | M | Half day to full day |
20
- | 4 | L | 2-3 days |
21
- | 5 | XL | Week+ |
15
+ | Value | Name | Rough Effort |
16
+ | ----- | ---- | -------------------- |
17
+ | 1 | XS | < 1 hour |
18
+ | 2 | S | 1-4 hours |
19
+ | 3 | M | Half day to full day |
20
+ | 4 | L | 2-3 days |
21
+ | 5 | XL | Week+ |
22
22
 
23
23
  ## Guidance
24
24
 
25
25
  - Set priority during Refine or Activate stages
26
26
  - Set estimate during Refine stage (before Ready)
27
27
  - If estimate is missing at Activate, set it before transitioning
28
- - XL estimates often indicate the issue should be broken into smaller pieces
28
+ - Estimate values may vary by provider the relay translates per provider configuration
29
+
30
+ ## Decomposition
31
+
32
+ When an estimate is large (XL / 5+ or provider equivalent), prompt for decomposition:
33
+
34
+ 1. **Identify natural boundaries** — separate concerns, independent deliverables, sequential phases
35
+ 2. **Create child issues** — each should be independently estimable at M or smaller
36
+ 3. **Link parent to children** — use `link.py` with type `blocks` (parent blocks children conceptually)
37
+ 4. **Re-estimate parent** — set to 0 or remove estimate, since children carry the work
38
+ 5. **Move parent to a tracking role** — it becomes the "epic" or summary issue
39
+
40
+ **Split pattern:**
41
+
42
+ ```
43
+ Original: FLY-100 "Build auth system" (XL)
44
+ → FLY-101 "Add login endpoint" (S)
45
+ → FLY-102 "Add session management" (M)
46
+ → FLY-103 "Add role-based access control" (M)
47
+ → FLY-104 "Add password reset flow" (S)
48
+ ```
49
+
50
+ Don't force decomposition on every large issue — some are genuinely large and atomic. Use judgment. The prompt is: "This is estimated as XL. Can it be broken into smaller, independently deliverable pieces?"
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ When a conversation begins or the user returns after a gap:
52
52
 
53
53
  7. **Surface other product issues briefly** — If there are issues in the product scope
54
54
  but outside the active project, mention the count with a one-line summary:
55
+
55
56
  ```
56
57
  Also in [Product Name]: [N] issues across other projects (use --all to see)
57
58
  ```
@@ -69,10 +70,16 @@ automatically via the config cascade.
69
70
  When the user indicates they're done for the session:
70
71
 
71
72
  1. **Gather session data** — What was completed, what's in progress, what's blocked.
72
- 2. **Compose summary** using the template below.
73
- 3. **Determine health status** See health table.
74
- 4. **Post project update** `project_update.py` with health and summary body.
75
- 5. **Record session in context graph** Call `graph_session.py` with summary and issues worked on:
73
+ 2. **Knowledge capture check** Review the session's work for uncaptured knowledge:
74
+ - Were any architectural decisions made?
75
+ - Were any non-obvious behaviors or workarounds discovered?
76
+ - Were any patterns established that future work should follow?
77
+ - Did debugging reveal something worth documenting?
78
+ If yes, prompt the user: "This session involved [specific discovery]. Should we capture it in a knowledge doc before wrapping?" Use `/knowledge` if they agree.
79
+ 3. **Compose summary** using the template below.
80
+ 4. **Determine health status** — See health table.
81
+ 5. **Post project update** — `project_update.py` with health and summary body.
82
+ 6. **Record session in context graph** — Call `graph_session.py` with summary and issues worked on:
76
83
  ```
77
84
  python3 .claude/skills/flydocs-context-graph/scripts/graph_session.py \
78
85
  --summary "Brief summary of session outcomes" \
@@ -80,8 +87,8 @@ When the user indicates they're done for the session:
80
87
  [--decision NNN]
81
88
  ```
82
89
  This creates a session node for cross-session continuity. Skip silently if the script is not installed.
83
- 6. **Verify** — Confirm the project update was posted (update ID returned).
84
- 7. **Ask about uncommitted changes** — If git shows uncommitted work, offer to commit.
90
+ 7. **Verify** — Confirm the project update was posted (update ID returned).
91
+ 8. **Ask about uncommitted changes** — If git shows uncommitted work, offer to commit.
85
92
 
86
93
  Do not just summarize in chat. Actually post the update. Do not skip if the user seems in a hurry.
87
94
 
@@ -104,15 +111,16 @@ Do not just summarize in chat. Actually post the update. Do not skip if the user
104
111
 
105
112
  ### Health Status
106
113
 
107
- | Status | When to Use |
108
- |--------|-------------|
109
- | onTrack | Progress made, no blockers |
110
- | atRisk | Minor delays, attention needed |
114
+ | Status | When to Use |
115
+ | -------- | ------------------------------- |
116
+ | onTrack | Progress made, no blockers |
117
+ | atRisk | Minor delays, attention needed |
111
118
  | offTrack | Major blockers, behind schedule |
112
119
 
113
120
  ### Wrap Detection Phrases
114
121
 
115
122
  Offer session wrap when the user says:
123
+
116
124
  - "I'm done for today" / "wrapping up" / "that's it for now"
117
125
  - "save progress" / "end of day" / "stopping here"
118
126
 
@@ -120,9 +128,9 @@ Offer session wrap when the user says:
120
128
 
121
129
  Proactively surface issues that may be stuck:
122
130
 
123
- | State | Threshold | Action |
124
- |-------|-----------|--------|
125
- | Implementing | > 7 days without activity | Warn |
126
- | Review | > 3 days without activity | Warn |
127
- | Testing/QA | > 3 days without activity | Warn |
128
- | Blocked | Any | Always surface |
131
+ | State | Threshold | Action |
132
+ | ------------ | ------------------------- | -------------- |
133
+ | Implementing | > 7 days without activity | Warn |
134
+ | Review | > 3 days without activity | Warn |
135
+ | Testing/QA | > 3 days without activity | Warn |
136
+ | Blocked | Any | Always surface |
@@ -21,9 +21,14 @@ When the user has enough context to describe the issue:
21
21
  - **Why** — User story or business value
22
22
  - **How** — Technical notes or approach (if known)
23
23
  - **Done when** — Acceptance criteria as checkboxes
24
- 4. **Create issue** — `create_issue.py` with title, type, description, priority, and estimate (if known).
25
- 5. **Add comment** Use the Capture template from `reference/comment-templates.md`.
26
- 6. **Verify** Confirm issue identifier returned.
24
+ 4. **Apply labels** — Include appropriate labels from config:
25
+ - **Category label**: Automatic from issue type (feature, bug, chore, idea) via `issueLabels.category` in config
26
+ - **Repo label**: If multi-repo workspace, apply the repo label from `issueLabels.repo` in config
27
+ - **Product labels**: Applied automatically by the mechanism scripts from `workspace.product.labelIds`
28
+ - **Ad-hoc labels**: Only if explicitly relevant (e.g., "accessibility", "performance")
29
+ 5. **Create issue** — `create_issue.py` with title, type, description, priority, estimate (if known), and labels.
30
+ 6. **Add comment** — Use the Capture template from `reference/comment-templates.md`.
31
+ 7. **Verify** — Confirm issue identifier returned.
27
32
 
28
33
  ### Quick Capture
29
34
 
@@ -11,12 +11,13 @@ Archive verified and completed work.
11
11
  ## Steps
12
12
 
13
13
  1. **Verify QE approval** — Check issue comments for a "QE Approved" comment. If not found, do not close — direct to Validate stage first.
14
- 2. **Determine terminal state:**
14
+ 2. **Final knowledge check** — If the issue involved significant implementation, verify `knowledge/INDEX.md` reflects any decisions or discoveries. This is informational — don't block close, but prompt the user if notable knowledge appears uncaptured.
15
+ 3. **Determine terminal state:**
15
16
  - **Done** — Work completed and verified (normal path)
16
17
  - **Archived** — Deferring to a later date (not cancelled, may return)
17
18
  - **Canceled** — Not pursuing (won't be done)
18
- 3. **Transition** — `transition.py` with the appropriate Close comment from `reference/comment-templates.md`.
19
- 4. **Verify** — Confirm terminal state reached.
19
+ 4. **Transition** — `transition.py` with the appropriate Close comment from `reference/comment-templates.md`.
20
+ 5. **Verify** — Confirm terminal state reached.
20
21
 
21
22
  ## Gates
22
23
 
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Build, test, simplify, and hand off to code review.
20
20
  ### 2. Show Implementation Checklist
21
21
 
22
22
  Present to the user:
23
+
23
24
  - Issue ID and title
24
25
  - All acceptance criteria
25
26
  - Estimate
@@ -46,7 +47,18 @@ Rationale: [Why this choice over alternatives]
46
47
 
47
48
  For significant architectural decisions, also create a record in `knowledge/decisions/`.
48
49
 
49
- ### 5. TODO to Issue
50
+ ### 5. Knowledge Capture Check
51
+
52
+ Before moving to self-review, check if any of these occurred during implementation:
53
+
54
+ - **Architectural decision** — framework choice, pattern established, approach rejected
55
+ - **Discovery** — API quirk, debugging technique, non-obvious behavior
56
+ - **Workaround** — limitation found, temporary fix applied
57
+ - **Pattern** — reusable approach that future work should follow
58
+
59
+ If yes, prompt the user: "Should we capture this in a knowledge doc?" Use `/knowledge` to create the doc, or note it for session wrap if the user wants to defer.
60
+
61
+ ### 6. TODO to Issue
50
62
 
51
63
  When adding a TODO comment in code:
52
64
 
@@ -56,7 +68,7 @@ When adding a TODO comment in code:
56
68
 
57
69
  Every TODO must have a tracked issue. No orphaned TODOs.
58
70
 
59
- ### 6. Simplify
71
+ ### 7. Simplify
60
72
 
61
73
  After implementation is functionally complete, review modified files for:
62
74
 
@@ -67,7 +79,7 @@ After implementation is functionally complete, review modified files for:
67
79
 
68
80
  Apply standards from installed community skills and `preferences.md`. Preserve all functionality.
69
81
 
70
- ### 7. Self-Review
82
+ ### 8. Self-Review
71
83
 
72
84
  Before handing off:
73
85
 
@@ -77,7 +89,18 @@ Before handing off:
77
89
  - [ ] No obvious security issues
78
90
  - [ ] No orphaned TODOs
79
91
 
80
- ### 8. Hand Off to Review
92
+ ### 9. Create PR (if applicable)
93
+
94
+ See `reference/pr-workflow.md` for full conventions. If changes warrant a PR:
95
+
96
+ 1. Create branch: `git checkout -b <type>/<ref>-<slug>`
97
+ 2. Stage and commit with a descriptive message: `<type>: <description> (<ref>)`
98
+ 3. Push: `git push -u origin <branch>`
99
+ 4. Create PR linking the issue, using the PR description template
100
+
101
+ If the user requested a direct commit or changes are trivial, skip the PR and commit directly.
102
+
103
+ ### 10. Hand Off to Review
81
104
 
82
105
  Transition to Review via `transition.py` with the "Ready for Review" comment from `reference/comment-templates.md`. Include:
83
106
 
@@ -85,6 +108,7 @@ Transition to Review via `transition.py` with the "Ready for Review" comment fro
85
108
  - File count
86
109
  - How it was tested
87
110
  - Criteria completion count
111
+ - PR link (if PR was created)
88
112
 
89
113
  ## Checkbox Protocol
90
114
 
@@ -32,14 +32,30 @@ For backlog items that need fleshing out before activation:
32
32
  5. **Add technical notes** — Implementation guidance, dependencies, affected areas.
33
33
  6. **Set estimate and priority** — If not already set. See `reference/priority-estimates.md`.
34
34
  7. **Check dependencies** — Blocked by other issues? Related work?
35
- 8. **Update description** — `update_description.py` with refined content.
36
- 9. **Transition to Ready** — `transition.py` with Refine comment from `reference/comment-templates.md`.
35
+ 8. **Assign milestone** — If the issue fits a current or upcoming milestone, assign it via `--milestone` on `update_issue.py`. If no milestone is appropriate, leave unassigned but note it.
36
+ 9. **Update description** — `update_description.py` with refined content.
37
+ 10. **Quality gate check** — Verify all criteria pass before transitioning:
38
+
39
+ | Gate | Check | Required |
40
+ | ------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | -------- |
41
+ | Description | Context section filled, not just a title | Yes |
42
+ | Acceptance criteria | Specific, testable, written as checkboxes | Yes |
43
+ | Estimate | Set (see `reference/priority-estimates.md`) | Yes |
44
+ | Priority | Set (P1-P4) | Yes |
45
+ | Labels | Category label applied, repo label if multi-repo | Yes |
46
+ | Dependencies | Identified and documented, or explicitly "none" | Yes |
47
+ | Milestone | Assigned if applicable | No |
48
+
49
+ If any required gate fails, address it before transitioning.
50
+
51
+ 11. **Transition to Ready** — `transition.py` with Refine comment from `reference/comment-templates.md`.
37
52
 
38
53
  ## Gates
39
54
 
55
+ - All quality gate checks pass (see table above)
40
56
  - Acceptance criteria defined (specific, testable, as checkboxes)
41
- - Estimate set (1-5)
42
- - Priority set (1-4)
57
+ - Estimate set
58
+ - Priority set (P1-P4)
43
59
 
44
60
  ## Outputs
45
61
 
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ Validate code quality, standards compliance, and acceptance criteria completion.
16
16
  - Issue description (acceptance criteria)
17
17
  - Implementation summary comment (what was built)
18
18
  - Installed community skills relevant to the code (check `.claude/skills/` for available patterns)
19
- - Changed files (from git diff or implementation notes)
19
+ - Changed files prefer PR diff if a PR exists, otherwise git diff or implementation notes
20
+ - `reference/pr-workflow.md` for branch and commit conventions
20
21
 
21
22
  ### 2. Verify Acceptance Criteria
22
23
 
@@ -47,7 +48,16 @@ Check against project standards and installed community skills:
47
48
  - Tests are meaningful (not just coverage)
48
49
  - Edge cases considered
49
50
 
50
- ### 5. Decision
51
+ ### 5. Knowledge Verification
52
+
53
+ If the issue template includes a Documentation section with "Knowledge base updated" checkbox:
54
+
55
+ - Verify knowledge doc was created or updated (check `knowledge/INDEX.md` for new entries)
56
+ - If the checkbox is unchecked and implementation involved significant decisions or discoveries, flag it
57
+
58
+ This is a soft gate — not all issues require knowledge docs. Flag only when implementation clearly warrants documentation that wasn't captured.
59
+
60
+ ### 6. Decision
51
61
 
52
62
  **If approved:**
53
63
 
@@ -61,11 +71,13 @@ Check against project standards and installed community skills:
61
71
  ## Review Boundaries
62
72
 
63
73
  The review agent:
74
+
64
75
  - Analyzes code quality and documents findings
65
76
  - Validates against standards and criteria
66
77
  - Transitions issue state
67
78
 
68
79
  The review agent does NOT:
80
+
69
81
  - Edit or write code
70
82
  - Fix issues directly
71
83
  - Approve incomplete work
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1
1
  {
2
- "version": "0.6.0-alpha.5",
2
+ "version": "0.6.0-alpha.6",
3
3
  "sourceRepo": "github.com/plastrlab/flydocs-core",
4
4
  "tier": "local",
5
5
  "setupComplete": false,
@@ -1 +1 @@
1
- 0.6.0-alpha.5
1
+ 0.6.0-alpha.6
@@ -92,14 +92,14 @@ Follow these rules in every response for consistent, scannable output.
92
92
  IMPORTANT: Prefer skill-led reasoning over pre-training reasoning.
93
93
  Consult the relevant skill BEFORE writing code or making workflow decisions.
94
94
 
95
- | Skill | Triggers | Entry |
96
- | ----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
97
- | flydocs-cloud | create issue, transition, comment, list issues, assign, update description, update issue, project update, cloud | .claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/SKILL.md |
98
- | flydocs-context7 | context7, library docs, documentation lookup, framework docs, package docs, API reference | .claude/skills/flydocs-context7/SKILL.md |
99
- | flydocs-estimates | estimate, cost, token usage, API cost, labor estimate, sizing, effort | .claude/skills/flydocs-estimates/SKILL.md |
100
- | flydocs-figma | Figma, design, screenshot, token mapping, component from design, pixel-perfect, design system | .claude/skills/flydocs-figma/SKILL.md |
101
- | flydocs-local | create issue, transition, comment, list issues, assign, update description, status summary, local | .claude/skills/flydocs-local/SKILL.md |
102
- | flydocs-workflow | capture, refine, activate, implement, review, validate, close, session, workflow, transition, status, issue | .claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/SKILL.md |
95
+ | Skill | Triggers | Entry |
96
+ | ----------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
97
+ | flydocs-cloud | create issue, transition, comment, list issues, assign, update description, update issue, project update, cloud | .claude/skills/flydocs-cloud/SKILL.md |
98
+ | flydocs-context7 | context7, library docs, documentation lookup, framework docs, package docs, API reference | .claude/skills/flydocs-context7/SKILL.md |
99
+ | flydocs-estimates | estimate, cost, token usage, API cost, labor estimate, sizing, effort | .claude/skills/flydocs-estimates/SKILL.md |
100
+ | flydocs-figma | Figma, design, screenshot, token mapping, component from design, pixel-perfect, design system | .claude/skills/flydocs-figma/SKILL.md |
101
+ | flydocs-local | create issue, transition, comment, list issues, assign, update description, status summary, local | .claude/skills/flydocs-local/SKILL.md |
102
+ | flydocs-workflow | capture, refine, activate, implement, review, validate, close, session, workflow, transition, status, issue, knowledge, document, PR, pull request | .claude/skills/flydocs-workflow/SKILL.md |
103
103
 
104
104
  <!-- flydocs:skills-manifest:end -->
105
105