@flusys/nestjs-iam 6.1.0 → 6.1.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (39) hide show
  1. package/cjs/controllers/company-action-permission.controller.js +1 -1
  2. package/cjs/controllers/company-action-permission.controller.spec.js +1 -1
  3. package/cjs/controllers/user-action-permission.controller.js +1 -1
  4. package/cjs/controllers/user-action-permission.controller.spec.js +1 -1
  5. package/cjs/dtos/permission.dto.js +7 -0
  6. package/cjs/entities/permission-base.entity.js +1 -10
  7. package/cjs/entities/permission-with-company.entity.js +0 -3
  8. package/cjs/entities/user-iam-permission.entity.js +0 -3
  9. package/cjs/modules/iam.module.js +2 -2
  10. package/cjs/services/action.service.js +4 -4
  11. package/cjs/services/action.service.spec.js +11 -11
  12. package/cjs/services/permission-cache.service.js +363 -52
  13. package/cjs/services/permission-cache.service.spec.js +462 -15
  14. package/cjs/services/permission.service.js +92 -396
  15. package/cjs/services/permission.service.spec.js +35 -310
  16. package/cjs/services/role.service.js +1 -1
  17. package/cjs/services/role.service.spec.js +4 -7
  18. package/dtos/permission.dto.d.ts +1 -0
  19. package/entities/permission-base.entity.d.ts +0 -1
  20. package/fesm/controllers/company-action-permission.controller.js +1 -1
  21. package/fesm/controllers/company-action-permission.controller.spec.js +1 -1
  22. package/fesm/controllers/user-action-permission.controller.js +1 -1
  23. package/fesm/controllers/user-action-permission.controller.spec.js +1 -1
  24. package/fesm/dtos/permission.dto.js +7 -0
  25. package/fesm/entities/permission-base.entity.js +1 -10
  26. package/fesm/entities/permission-with-company.entity.js +0 -3
  27. package/fesm/entities/user-iam-permission.entity.js +0 -3
  28. package/fesm/modules/iam.module.js +4 -4
  29. package/fesm/services/action.service.js +4 -4
  30. package/fesm/services/action.service.spec.js +11 -11
  31. package/fesm/services/permission-cache.service.js +365 -51
  32. package/fesm/services/permission-cache.service.spec.js +462 -15
  33. package/fesm/services/permission.service.js +92 -396
  34. package/fesm/services/permission.service.spec.js +35 -310
  35. package/fesm/services/role.service.js +1 -1
  36. package/fesm/services/role.service.spec.js +4 -7
  37. package/package.json +3 -3
  38. package/services/permission-cache.service.d.ts +20 -3
  39. package/services/permission.service.d.ts +2 -16
@@ -1,4 +1,12 @@
1
1
  import { buildPermissionCacheKey } from '@flusys/nestjs-shared';
2
+ import { createMockRepository } from '@test-utils/mocks/repository.mock';
3
+ import { Action } from '../entities/action.entity';
4
+ import { RoleWithCompany } from '../entities/role-with-company.entity';
5
+ import { Role } from '../entities/role.entity';
6
+ import { ActionType } from '../enums/action-type.enum';
7
+ import { IamEntityType } from '../enums/iam-entity-type.enum';
8
+ import { IamPermissionType } from '../enums/iam-permission-type.enum';
9
+ import { IAMPermissionMode } from '../enums/permission-type.enum';
2
10
  import { PermissionCacheService } from './permission-cache.service';
3
11
  function buildCacheData(overrides = {}) {
4
12
  return {
@@ -7,17 +15,83 @@ function buildCacheData(overrides = {}) {
7
15
  ...overrides
8
16
  };
9
17
  }
18
+ function buildPermissionRow(overrides = {}) {
19
+ const row = {
20
+ id: 'perm-uuid-1',
21
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION,
22
+ sourceType: IamEntityType.USER,
23
+ sourceId: 'user-1',
24
+ targetType: IamEntityType.ACTION,
25
+ targetId: 'action-1',
26
+ companyId: null,
27
+ branchId: null,
28
+ validFrom: null,
29
+ validUntil: null,
30
+ reason: null,
31
+ createdAt: new Date(),
32
+ ...overrides
33
+ };
34
+ row.isValid = (now = new Date())=>{
35
+ if (row.validFrom && now < row.validFrom) return false;
36
+ if (row.validUntil && now > row.validUntil) return false;
37
+ return true;
38
+ };
39
+ return row;
40
+ }
41
+ function buildAction(overrides = {}) {
42
+ return {
43
+ id: 'action-1',
44
+ name: 'View Users',
45
+ code: 'user.view',
46
+ description: null,
47
+ actionType: ActionType.BACKEND,
48
+ parentId: null,
49
+ isActive: true,
50
+ ...overrides
51
+ };
52
+ }
53
+ function mockRawMany(repo, rows) {
54
+ const builder = {
55
+ select: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
56
+ addSelect: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
57
+ where: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
58
+ andWhere: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
59
+ getRawMany: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(rows)
60
+ };
61
+ repo.createQueryBuilder.mockReturnValue(builder);
62
+ return builder;
63
+ }
10
64
  describe('PermissionCacheService', ()=>{
11
65
  let mockCacheManager;
66
+ let mockIamConfigService;
67
+ let mockPermissionRepo;
68
+ let mockActionRepo;
69
+ let mockRoleRepo;
70
+ let mockDataSourceProvider;
12
71
  beforeEach(()=>{
13
72
  mockCacheManager = {
14
73
  get: jest.fn(),
15
74
  set: jest.fn(),
16
75
  del: jest.fn()
17
76
  };
77
+ mockIamConfigService = {
78
+ isCompanyFeatureEnabled: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(false),
79
+ getPermissionMode: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(IAMPermissionMode.FULL)
80
+ };
81
+ mockPermissionRepo = createMockRepository();
82
+ mockActionRepo = createMockRepository();
83
+ mockRoleRepo = createMockRepository();
84
+ mockDataSourceProvider = {
85
+ getRepository: jest.fn((entity)=>{
86
+ if (entity === Action) return Promise.resolve(mockActionRepo);
87
+ if (entity === Role || entity === RoleWithCompany) return Promise.resolve(mockRoleRepo);
88
+ return Promise.resolve(mockPermissionRepo);
89
+ }),
90
+ getDataSource: jest.fn()
91
+ };
18
92
  });
19
93
  function buildService(guardConfig) {
20
- return new PermissionCacheService(mockCacheManager, guardConfig);
94
+ return new PermissionCacheService(mockCacheManager, mockIamConfigService, mockDataSourceProvider, guardConfig);
21
95
  }
22
96
  describe('setMyPermissions / getMyPermissions', ()=>{
23
97
  it('stores data under the user-scoped key and tracks it', async ()=>{
@@ -35,13 +109,11 @@ describe('PermissionCacheService', ()=>{
35
109
  userId: 'user-1'
36
110
  });
37
111
  expect(mockCacheManager.set).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedKey, data, expect.any(Number));
38
- // tracked keys + tracked scopes get written too
39
- expect(mockCacheManager.set).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('permission-tracked-keys:user:user-1'), [
40
- expectedKey
41
- ], expect.any(Number));
112
+ // no company scope -> the raw cache key itself is tracked directly in the scopes index
42
113
  expect(mockCacheManager.set).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('permission-tracked-scopes:user:user-1'), [
43
- 'none'
114
+ expectedKey
44
115
  ], expect.any(Number));
116
+ expect(mockCacheManager.set).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('permission-tracked-keys'), expect.anything(), expect.any(Number));
45
117
  });
46
118
  it('does not duplicate an already-tracked key', async ()=>{
47
119
  const service = buildService();
@@ -110,20 +182,28 @@ describe('PermissionCacheService', ()=>{
110
182
  });
111
183
  });
112
184
  describe('invalidateUser', ()=>{
113
- it('invalidates only the given company scope when companyId is provided', async ()=>{
185
+ it('invalidates only the given company scope when companyId is provided, narrowing the scopes index', async ()=>{
114
186
  const service = buildService();
187
+ const trackedKeysKey = 'permission-tracked-keys:user:user-1:company:company-1';
115
188
  mockCacheManager.get.mockImplementation(async (key)=>{
116
189
  if (key.includes('permission-tracked-keys')) return [
117
190
  'tracked-key-1',
118
191
  'tracked-key-2'
119
192
  ];
193
+ if (key.includes('permission-tracked-scopes')) return [
194
+ trackedKeysKey,
195
+ 'other-scope'
196
+ ];
120
197
  return undefined;
121
198
  });
122
199
  await service.invalidateUser('user-1', 'company-1');
123
200
  expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith('tracked-key-1');
124
201
  expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith('tracked-key-2');
125
202
  expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('permission-tracked-keys:user:user-1:company:company-1'));
126
- // no company scope given -> tracked-scopes key should not be touched in this branch
203
+ // the invalidated scope is dropped from the index, but the index survives since another scope remains
204
+ expect(mockCacheManager.set).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('permission-tracked-scopes:user:user-1'), [
205
+ 'other-scope'
206
+ ], expect.any(Number));
127
207
  expect(mockCacheManager.del).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('permission-tracked-scopes'));
128
208
  });
129
209
  it('invalidates only the requested branch keys, keeping remaining branches tracked', async ()=>{
@@ -187,22 +267,23 @@ describe('PermissionCacheService', ()=>{
187
267
  });
188
268
  it('without a companyId, invalidates every tracked scope for the user and clears the scopes index', async ()=>{
189
269
  const service = buildService();
270
+ // scopes list mixes a nested tracked-keys index (company scope) with a raw cache key (untracked scope)
271
+ const trackedKeysKey = 'permission-tracked-keys:user:user-1:company:company-a';
272
+ const rawKey = 'my-permissions:user:user-1';
190
273
  mockCacheManager.get.mockImplementation(async (key)=>{
191
274
  if (key.includes('permission-tracked-scopes')) return [
192
- 'none',
193
- 'company-a'
194
- ];
195
- if (key.includes('company:none')) return [
196
- 'key-none-1'
275
+ trackedKeysKey,
276
+ rawKey
197
277
  ];
198
- if (key.includes('company:company-a')) return [
278
+ if (key === trackedKeysKey) return [
199
279
  'key-company-a-1'
200
280
  ];
201
281
  return undefined;
202
282
  });
203
283
  await service.invalidateUser('user-1');
204
- expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith('key-none-1');
205
284
  expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith('key-company-a-1');
285
+ expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith(trackedKeysKey);
286
+ expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith(rawKey);
206
287
  expect(mockCacheManager.del).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('permission-tracked-scopes:user:user-1'));
207
288
  });
208
289
  it('treats a cache read error for tracked scopes as an empty list (no throw)', async ()=>{
@@ -245,4 +326,370 @@ describe('PermissionCacheService', ()=>{
245
326
  expect(result).toBe(2);
246
327
  });
247
328
  });
329
+ describe('getMyPermissionsResponse', ()=>{
330
+ it('returns the response built directly from cached data on a cache hit', async ()=>{
331
+ const service = buildService();
332
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockResolvedValue(buildCacheData({
333
+ frontendActions: [
334
+ {
335
+ id: 'action-1',
336
+ code: 'user.view',
337
+ name: 'View',
338
+ description: null,
339
+ parentId: null
340
+ }
341
+ ],
342
+ backendCodes: [
343
+ 'user.read'
344
+ ]
345
+ }));
346
+ const result = await service.getMyPermissionsResponse('user-1', null, 'company-1');
347
+ expect(result.frontendActions).toHaveLength(1);
348
+ expect(result.cachedEndpoints).toBe(1);
349
+ expect(mockPermissionRepo.find).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
350
+ });
351
+ it('fetches from the database and caches the result on a cache miss', async ()=>{
352
+ const service = buildService();
353
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
354
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([]);
355
+ const result = await service.getMyPermissionsResponse('user-1', null, null);
356
+ expect(result).toEqual({
357
+ frontendActions: [],
358
+ cachedEndpoints: 0
359
+ });
360
+ expect(mockCacheManager.set).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(String), {
361
+ frontendActions: [],
362
+ backendCodes: []
363
+ }, expect.any(Number));
364
+ });
365
+ it('filters frontend actions by parentCodes when provided', async ()=>{
366
+ const service = buildService();
367
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockImplementation(async (key)=>{
368
+ if (key.includes('permission-tracked')) return undefined;
369
+ return buildCacheData({
370
+ frontendActions: [
371
+ {
372
+ id: 'child-1',
373
+ code: 'user.view',
374
+ name: 'View',
375
+ description: null,
376
+ parentId: 'parent-1'
377
+ },
378
+ {
379
+ id: 'child-2',
380
+ code: 'other.view',
381
+ name: 'View 2',
382
+ description: null,
383
+ parentId: 'other-parent'
384
+ }
385
+ ],
386
+ backendCodes: []
387
+ });
388
+ });
389
+ mockActionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([
390
+ {
391
+ id: 'parent-1',
392
+ code: 'user'
393
+ }
394
+ ]);
395
+ const result = await service.getMyPermissionsResponse('user-1', null, null, [
396
+ 'user'
397
+ ]);
398
+ expect(result.frontendActions).toHaveLength(1);
399
+ expect(result.frontendActions[0].id).toBe('child-1');
400
+ });
401
+ it('returns an empty frontendActions list when parentCodes resolve to no known parents', async ()=>{
402
+ const service = buildService();
403
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockImplementation(async (key)=>{
404
+ if (key.includes('permission-tracked')) return undefined;
405
+ return buildCacheData({
406
+ frontendActions: [
407
+ {
408
+ id: 'child-1',
409
+ code: 'user.view',
410
+ name: 'View',
411
+ description: null,
412
+ parentId: 'parent-1'
413
+ }
414
+ ],
415
+ backendCodes: []
416
+ });
417
+ });
418
+ mockActionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([]);
419
+ const result = await service.getMyPermissionsResponse('user-1', null, null, [
420
+ 'unknown-parent-code'
421
+ ]);
422
+ expect(result.frontendActions).toEqual([]);
423
+ });
424
+ });
425
+ describe('collectAllActionIds (permission-mode branching)', ()=>{
426
+ it('RBAC mode: collects only role-derived action ids, ignoring direct user actions', async ()=>{
427
+ const service = buildService();
428
+ mockIamConfigService.getPermissionMode.mockReturnValue(IAMPermissionMode.RBAC);
429
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockImplementation(async ({ where })=>{
430
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.USER_ROLE) {
431
+ return [
432
+ buildPermissionRow({
433
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ROLE,
434
+ targetId: 'role-1'
435
+ })
436
+ ];
437
+ }
438
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.ROLE_ACTION) {
439
+ return [
440
+ buildPermissionRow({
441
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.ROLE_ACTION,
442
+ targetId: 'action-role-1'
443
+ })
444
+ ];
445
+ }
446
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION) {
447
+ throw new Error('DIRECT lookup should not run in RBAC mode');
448
+ }
449
+ return [];
450
+ });
451
+ const result = await service.collectAllActionIds('user-1', null, null);
452
+ expect(Array.from(result)).toEqual([
453
+ 'action-role-1'
454
+ ]);
455
+ });
456
+ it('DIRECT mode: collects only directly-assigned user action ids, ignoring roles', async ()=>{
457
+ const service = buildService();
458
+ mockIamConfigService.getPermissionMode.mockReturnValue(IAMPermissionMode.DIRECT);
459
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockImplementation(async ({ where })=>{
460
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.USER_ROLE) {
461
+ throw new Error('RBAC lookup should not run in DIRECT mode');
462
+ }
463
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION) {
464
+ return [
465
+ buildPermissionRow({
466
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION,
467
+ targetId: 'action-direct-1'
468
+ })
469
+ ];
470
+ }
471
+ return [];
472
+ });
473
+ const result = await service.collectAllActionIds('user-1', null, null);
474
+ expect(Array.from(result)).toEqual([
475
+ 'action-direct-1'
476
+ ]);
477
+ });
478
+ it('FULL mode: merges role-derived and direct action ids, de-duplicating overlaps', async ()=>{
479
+ const service = buildService();
480
+ mockIamConfigService.getPermissionMode.mockReturnValue(IAMPermissionMode.FULL);
481
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockImplementation(async ({ where })=>{
482
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.USER_ROLE) {
483
+ return [
484
+ buildPermissionRow({
485
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ROLE,
486
+ targetId: 'role-1'
487
+ })
488
+ ];
489
+ }
490
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.ROLE_ACTION) {
491
+ return [
492
+ buildPermissionRow({
493
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.ROLE_ACTION,
494
+ targetId: 'action-shared'
495
+ })
496
+ ];
497
+ }
498
+ if (where.permissionType === IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION) {
499
+ return [
500
+ buildPermissionRow({
501
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION,
502
+ targetId: 'action-shared'
503
+ }),
504
+ buildPermissionRow({
505
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION,
506
+ targetId: 'action-direct-only'
507
+ })
508
+ ];
509
+ }
510
+ return [];
511
+ });
512
+ const result = await service.collectAllActionIds('user-1', null, null);
513
+ expect(Array.from(result).sort()).toEqual([
514
+ 'action-direct-only',
515
+ 'action-shared'
516
+ ]);
517
+ });
518
+ it('excludes expired/not-yet-valid permission rows via isValid()', async ()=>{
519
+ const service = buildService();
520
+ mockIamConfigService.getPermissionMode.mockReturnValue(IAMPermissionMode.DIRECT);
521
+ const expired = buildPermissionRow({
522
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION,
523
+ targetId: 'action-expired',
524
+ validUntil: new Date('2000-01-01')
525
+ });
526
+ const active = buildPermissionRow({
527
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION,
528
+ targetId: 'action-active'
529
+ });
530
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([
531
+ expired,
532
+ active
533
+ ]);
534
+ const result = await service.collectAllActionIds('user-1', null, null);
535
+ expect(Array.from(result)).toEqual([
536
+ 'action-active'
537
+ ]);
538
+ });
539
+ });
540
+ describe('buildAndCachePermissionData (via getMyPermissionsResponse on a cache miss)', ()=>{
541
+ it('splits actions into frontend/backend and caches them', async ()=>{
542
+ const service = buildService();
543
+ mockIamConfigService.getPermissionMode.mockReturnValue(IAMPermissionMode.DIRECT);
544
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([
545
+ buildPermissionRow({
546
+ permissionType: IamPermissionType.USER_ACTION,
547
+ targetId: 'action-1'
548
+ })
549
+ ]);
550
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
551
+ mockActionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([
552
+ buildAction({
553
+ id: 'action-1',
554
+ actionType: ActionType.BOTH,
555
+ code: 'user.view'
556
+ })
557
+ ]);
558
+ const result = await service.getMyPermissionsResponse('user-1', null, null);
559
+ expect(result.cachedEndpoints).toBe(1);
560
+ expect(result.frontendActions).toEqual([
561
+ {
562
+ id: 'action-1',
563
+ code: 'user.view',
564
+ name: 'View Users',
565
+ description: null
566
+ }
567
+ ]);
568
+ expect(mockCacheManager.set).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(String), expect.objectContaining({
569
+ backendCodes: [
570
+ 'user.view'
571
+ ]
572
+ }), expect.any(Number));
573
+ });
574
+ });
575
+ describe('invalidateCompanyMembersCache', ()=>{
576
+ it('returns 0 without querying when the company feature is disabled', async ()=>{
577
+ const service = buildService();
578
+ const result = await service.invalidateCompanyMembersCache('company-1');
579
+ expect(result).toBe(0);
580
+ expect(mockPermissionRepo.createQueryBuilder).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
581
+ });
582
+ it('returns 0 when the company has no members with permissions', async ()=>{
583
+ const service = buildService();
584
+ mockIamConfigService.isCompanyFeatureEnabled.mockReturnValue(true);
585
+ mockRawMany(mockPermissionRepo, []);
586
+ const result = await service.invalidateCompanyMembersCache('company-1');
587
+ expect(result).toBe(0);
588
+ });
589
+ it('invalidates every distinct member user id for the company', async ()=>{
590
+ const service = buildService();
591
+ mockIamConfigService.isCompanyFeatureEnabled.mockReturnValue(true);
592
+ mockRawMany(mockPermissionRepo, [
593
+ {
594
+ userId: 'user-1'
595
+ },
596
+ {
597
+ userId: 'user-2'
598
+ }
599
+ ]);
600
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
601
+ const result = await service.invalidateCompanyMembersCache('company-1');
602
+ expect(result).toBe(2);
603
+ });
604
+ it('wipes every tracked cache entry per member instead of only branches with an existing permission row', async ()=>{
605
+ // Company-wide action changes are merged into every branch a member queries, including
606
+ // branches where the member holds no explicit permission row — so invalidation must not
607
+ // be narrowed to whatever branch_ids happen to already exist in the permission table.
608
+ const service = buildService();
609
+ mockIamConfigService.isCompanyFeatureEnabled.mockReturnValue(true);
610
+ mockRawMany(mockPermissionRepo, [
611
+ {
612
+ userId: 'user-1'
613
+ }
614
+ ]);
615
+ const trackedKeysKey = 'permission-tracked-keys:user:user-1:company:company-1';
616
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockImplementation(async (key)=>{
617
+ if (key.includes('permission-tracked-keys')) {
618
+ return [
619
+ 'cached-key-branch-untracked-by-any-permission-row'
620
+ ];
621
+ }
622
+ return undefined;
623
+ });
624
+ const result = await service.invalidateCompanyMembersCache('company-1');
625
+ const deletedKeys = mockCacheManager.del.mock.calls.map(([key])=>key);
626
+ expect(deletedKeys).toContain('cached-key-branch-untracked-by-any-permission-row');
627
+ expect(deletedKeys).toContain(trackedKeysKey);
628
+ expect(result).toBe(1);
629
+ });
630
+ });
631
+ describe('invalidateRoleMembersCache', ()=>{
632
+ it('returns 0 when the role has no members', async ()=>{
633
+ const service = buildService();
634
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([]);
635
+ const result = await service.invalidateRoleMembersCache('role-1');
636
+ expect(result).toBe(0);
637
+ expect(mockRoleRepo.findOne).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
638
+ });
639
+ it('invalidates every distinct user holding the role, scoped to the role company', async ()=>{
640
+ const service = buildService();
641
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([
642
+ buildPermissionRow({
643
+ sourceId: 'user-9'
644
+ }),
645
+ buildPermissionRow({
646
+ id: 'perm-2',
647
+ sourceId: 'user-9'
648
+ })
649
+ ]);
650
+ mockRoleRepo.findOne.mockResolvedValue({
651
+ id: 'role-1',
652
+ companyId: null
653
+ });
654
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
655
+ const result = await service.invalidateRoleMembersCache('role-1');
656
+ expect(mockRoleRepo.findOne).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
657
+ where: {
658
+ id: 'role-1'
659
+ }
660
+ });
661
+ expect(result).toBe(1);
662
+ });
663
+ it('wipes every tracked cache entry for role members instead of only branches with an existing permission row', async ()=>{
664
+ // Role actions are merged into every branch a member queries, including branches
665
+ // where the member holds no explicit permission row — so invalidation must not be
666
+ // narrowed to whatever branch_ids happen to already exist in the permission table.
667
+ const service = buildService();
668
+ mockIamConfigService.isCompanyFeatureEnabled.mockReturnValue(true);
669
+ mockPermissionRepo.find.mockResolvedValue([
670
+ buildPermissionRow({
671
+ sourceId: 'user-9'
672
+ })
673
+ ]);
674
+ mockRoleRepo.findOne.mockResolvedValue({
675
+ id: 'role-1',
676
+ companyId: 'company-1'
677
+ });
678
+ const trackedKeysKey = 'permission-tracked-keys:user:user-9:company:company-1';
679
+ mockCacheManager.get.mockImplementation(async (key)=>{
680
+ if (key.includes('permission-tracked-keys')) {
681
+ return [
682
+ 'cached-key-branch-untracked-by-any-permission-row'
683
+ ];
684
+ }
685
+ return undefined;
686
+ });
687
+ const result = await service.invalidateRoleMembersCache('role-1');
688
+ expect(mockPermissionRepo.createQueryBuilder).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
689
+ const deletedKeys = mockCacheManager.del.mock.calls.map(([key])=>key);
690
+ expect(deletedKeys).toContain('cached-key-branch-untracked-by-any-permission-row');
691
+ expect(deletedKeys).toContain(trackedKeysKey);
692
+ expect(result).toBe(1);
693
+ });
694
+ });
248
695
  });