@fitlab-ai/agent-infra 0.7.0 → 0.7.2

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-code/reference/output-templates.en.md

@@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ Task {task-id} review completed. Verdict: approved.
 - Review report: .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 Next step - fix before commit (recommended):
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-ref}
 
 Or commit directly (skip fix):
   - Claude Code / OpenCode: /commit
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ Task {task-id} review completed. Verdict: changes requested.
 - Review report: .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 Next step - fix the findings:
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-ref}
 
 [When env-blocked > 0, append this final line:]
 Reminder: env-blocked findings must be carried in the PR description as a "manual verification required" checklist and should not trigger /code-task.
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ Task {task-id} review completed. Verdict: rejected, re-design the technical plan
 - Review report: .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 Next step - re-design the technical plan:
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-ref}
 
 > Note: Rejected means the implementation direction needs to be reworked end-to-end, not patched locally. `code-task/scripts/detect-mode.js` branch #7 refuses a direct `/code-task` and requires a fresh plan first.
 

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-code/reference/output-templates.zh-CN.md

@@ -43,9 +43,9 @@
 - 审查报告：.agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 下一步 - 修复问题后提交（推荐）：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-ref}
 
 或直接提交（跳过修复）：
   - Claude Code / OpenCode：/commit
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@
 - 审查报告：.agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 下一步 - 修复问题：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-ref}
 
 [当 env-blocked > 0 时，在最后附加一行：]
 提醒：env-blocked 项需在 PR description 的「待人工验证」清单中承接，不应触发 /code-task。
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
 - 审查报告：.agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 下一步 - 重新设计技术方案：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-ref}
 
 > 注意：Rejected 表示实现方向需要整体重做，不是局部修复。`code-task/scripts/detect-mode.js` 分支 #7 会拒绝直接 `/code-task`，要求先重新方案设计。
 

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-code/reference/report-template.en.md

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Use this template when writing `review-code.md` or `review-code-r{N}.md`.
 
 ## Evidence
 
-> Pair each "I verified X" claim with the corresponding raw tool output; the gate only checks that this section exists and at least one `$ ` line is present.
+> Pair each "I verified X" claim with the corresponding raw tool output; the gate only checks that this section exists and at least one `$ ` line is present. Every Blocker must be backed by a reproducible command (rg/grep/sed/nl) and its raw output; a judgment that cannot be reproduced must be downgraded or moved to Self-Doubt.
 
 - Claim: {verified claim}
 ```text
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ $ {command}
 {raw output}
 ```
 
+## Self-Doubt
+
+> Explicitly declare conclusions, inferences, and assumptions in this review that were **not directly verified**; downstream can rebut them on this basis. Write "None" if there are none.
+
+- {an unverified conclusion or inference; note why it was not verified and the impact if it is overturned}
+
 ## Highlights
 
 - {what went well}

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-code/reference/report-template.zh-CN.md

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
 
 ## 证据原文
 
-> 每条“我验证了 X”断言都要配对对应 tool output 原文；gate 仅校验本段存在和至少一行 `$ `。
+> 每条“我验证了 X”断言都要配对对应 tool output 原文；gate 仅校验本段存在和至少一行 `$ `。每条 Blocker 必须配可复现命令（rg/grep/sed/nl）及其原文；无法复现的判断须降级或移入「自我质疑」。
 
 - 断言：{verified claim}
 ```text
@@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ $ {command}
 {raw output}
 ```
 
+## 自我质疑
+
+> 显式声明本轮审查中**未直接验证**的结论、推断项与所作假设；下游据此可反驳。无则写「（无）」。
+
+- {未直接验证的结论或推断；说明为何未验证、若被推翻的影响}
+
 ## 亮点
 
 - {what went well}

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-code/reference/review-criteria.en.md

@@ -14,11 +14,13 @@ Follow the `code-review` step in `.agents/workflows/feature-development.yaml`.
 - [ ] Performance and security risks
 - [ ] Comments and documentation
 - [ ] Consistency with the approved technical plan
+- [ ] Every blocker is backed by reproducible grep/sed/nl evidence; conclusions not directly verified are declared under Self-Doubt
 
 **Common anti-examples**:
 - Checking only whether tests pass without reading the actual diff
 - Treating wording preferences as reproducible code problems
 - Misclassifying environment-limited verification gaps as blockers
+- Asserting a `file:line` or behavior from memory or impression without verifying via rg/nl
 
 ## Common Review Principles
 

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-code/reference/review-criteria.zh-CN.md

@@ -14,11 +14,13 @@
 - [ ] 性能与安全风险
 - [ ] 代码注释和文档
 - [ ] 与已批准技术方案的一致性
+- [ ] 每条 blocker 都配可复现的 grep/sed/nl 证据，未直接验证的结论已在「自我质疑」声明
 
 **常见反例**：
 - 只检查测试是否通过，没有阅读实际 diff
 - 用自然语言措辞偏好替代可复现的代码问题
 - 把环境缺失导致无法验证的事项误归类为 blocker
+- 凭印象或记忆断言 `file:line`/行为，没有用 rg/nl 复核就下结论
 
 ## 通用审查原则
 

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/SKILL.en.md

@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ ls -la .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/
 tail .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/task.md
 ```
 
+## Task id short ref
+
+> If `{task-id}` matches `^[#]?[0-9]+$` (bare numeric or `#`-prefixed), follow the "SKILL parameter resolver" section of `.agents/rules/task-short-id.md`; treat `{task-id}` as the resolved full `TASK-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS` form for every downstream command.
+
 ## Steps
 
 ### 1. Verify Prerequisites
@@ -61,7 +65,7 @@ date "+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S%:z"
 ```
 
 Set `current_step` to `technical-design-review`, refresh task metadata, and append:
-`- {YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss±HH:MM} — **Plan Review (Round {N})** by {agent} — Verdict: {Approved/Changes Requested/Rejected}, blockers: {n}, major: {n}, minor: {n}[ (+ {n} env-blocked)] → {review-artifact}`
+`- {YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss±HH:MM} — **Review Plan (Round {N})** by {agent} — Verdict: {Approved/Changes Requested/Rejected}, blockers: {n}, major: {n}, minor: {n}[ (+ {n} env-blocked)] → {review-artifact}`
 
 If task.md has a valid `issue_number`, read `.agents/rules/issue-sync.md`, sync the task comment, and publish the `{review-artifact}` comment.
 
@@ -74,3 +78,5 @@ node .agents/scripts/validate-artifact.js gate review-plan .agents/workspace/act
 ### 8. Tell the User
 
 Use the conclusion branch in `reference/output-templates.md` and show all TUI command formats.
+
+> When rendering "Next steps" commands, `{task-ref}` is the current task's short id `#NN` (see `.agents/rules/next-step-output.md` for lookup and fallback; read it before rendering). Other `{task-id}` placeholders (report titles, paths) keep the full TASK-id form.

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/SKILL.zh-CN.md

@@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ tail .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/task.md
 
 状态核对完成前，禁止任何关于外部状态的断言。
 
-## 执行步骤
+## 任务入参短号别名
+
+> 如果 `{task-id}` 入参匹配 `^[#]?[0-9]+$`（裸数字或带 `#` 前缀），先读取 `.agents/rules/task-short-id.md` 的「SKILL 入参解析」段执行解析；后续命令视 `{task-id}` 为解析后的全长 `TASK-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS` 形式。
 
+## 执行步骤
 ### 1. 验证前置条件
 
 要求存在：
@@ -73,7 +76,7 @@ date "+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S%:z"
 - `updated_at`：{当前时间}
 - `agent_infra_version`：按 `.agents/rules/version-stamp.md` 取值
 - 追加：
-  `- {YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss±HH:MM} — **Plan Review (Round {N})** by {agent} — Verdict: {Approved/Changes Requested/Rejected}, blockers: {n}, major: {n}, minor: {n}[ (+ {n} env-blocked)] → {review-artifact}`
+  `- {YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss±HH:MM} — **Review Plan (Round {N})** by {agent} — Verdict: {Approved/Changes Requested/Rejected}, blockers: {n}, major: {n}, minor: {n}[ (+ {n} env-blocked)] → {review-artifact}`
 
 如果 task.md 中存在有效的 `issue_number`，执行前先读取 `.agents/rules/issue-sync.md`，完成 upstream 仓库检测和权限检测，然后同步 task 评论并发布 `{review-artifact}` 评论。
 
@@ -89,6 +92,8 @@ node .agents/scripts/validate-artifact.js gate review-plan .agents/workspace/act
 
 按 `reference/output-templates.md` 的结论分支输出，并展示所有 TUI 的下一步命令。
 
+> 渲染「下一步」命令时，`{task-ref}` 为当前任务短号 `#NN`（取值与回退见 `.agents/rules/next-step-output.md`，渲染前先读取）。其他 `{task-id}` 占位（报告标题、路径）保持完整 TASK-id 形式。
+
 ## 完成检查清单
 
 - [ ] 已审查最新方案上下文

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/config/verify.en.json

@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
         "Environment-Blocked Findings",
         "Conclusion and Recommendations",
         "State Check",
-        "Evidence"
+        "Evidence",
+        "Self-Doubt"
       ],
       "required_patterns": [
         "^### Approval Decision$",
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@
       "freshness_minutes": 30
     },
     "activity-log": {
-      "expected_action_pattern": "Plan Review \\(Round \\d+\\)",
+      "expected_action_pattern": "(Review Plan|Plan Review) \\(Round \\d+\\)",
       "freshness_minutes": 30
     },
     "platform-sync": {

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/config/verify.zh-CN.json

@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
         "环境性遗留",
         "结论与建议",
         "状态核对",
-        "证据原文"
+        "证据原文",
+        "自我质疑"
       ],
       "required_patterns": [
         "^### 审查决定$",
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@
       "freshness_minutes": 30
     },
     "activity-log": {
-      "expected_action_pattern": "Plan Review \\(Round \\d+\\)",
+      "expected_action_pattern": "(Review Plan|Plan Review) \\(Round \\d+\\)",
       "freshness_minutes": 30
     },
     "platform-sync": {

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/reference/output-templates.en.md

@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ Task {task-id} technical plan review completed. Verdict: approved.
 [- Review report: .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}]
 
 Next step - write code:
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-ref}
 
 [When env-blocked > 0, append:]
 Reminder: env-blocked items belong in the PR description manual verification checklist and should not trigger /plan-task.
@@ -41,14 +41,14 @@ Task {task-id} technical plan review completed. Verdict: approved.
 - Review report: .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 Next step - revise plan before coding (recommended):
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-ref}
 
 Or proceed directly to coding:
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $code-task {task-ref}
 
 [When env-blocked > 0, append:]
 Reminder: env-blocked items belong in the PR description manual verification checklist and should not trigger /plan-task.
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ Task {task-id} technical plan review completed. Verdict: changes requested.
 - Review report: .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 Next step - revise technical plan:
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-ref}
 
 [When env-blocked > 0, append:]
 Reminder: env-blocked items belong in the PR description manual verification checklist and should not trigger /plan-task.
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ Task {task-id} technical plan review completed. Verdict: rejected, redesign requ
 - Review report: .agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 Next step - redesign:
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode: /plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI: /agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI: $plan-task {task-ref}
 
 [When env-blocked > 0, append:]
 Reminder: env-blocked items belong in the PR description manual verification checklist and should not trigger /plan-task.

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/reference/output-templates.zh-CN.md

@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@
 [- 审查报告：.agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}]
 
 下一步 - 编写代码：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-ref}
 
 [当 env-blocked > 0 时，在最后附加一行：]
 提醒：env-blocked 项需在 PR description 的「待人工验证」清单中承接，不应触发 /plan-task。
@@ -41,14 +41,14 @@
 - 审查报告：.agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 下一步 - 修订方案后编码（推荐）：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-ref}
 
 或直接进入编码：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/code-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:code-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$code-task {task-ref}
 
 [当 env-blocked > 0 时，在最后附加一行：]
 提醒：env-blocked 项需在 PR description 的「待人工验证」清单中承接，不应触发 /plan-task。
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@
 - 审查报告：.agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 下一步 - 修订技术方案：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-ref}
 
 [当 env-blocked > 0 时，在最后附加一行：]
 提醒：env-blocked 项需在 PR description 的「待人工验证」清单中承接，不应触发 /plan-task。
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@
 - 审查报告：.agents/workspace/active/{task-id}/{review-artifact}
 
 下一步 - 重新设计：
-  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-id}
-  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-id}
-  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-id}
+  - Claude Code / OpenCode：/plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Gemini CLI：/agent-infra:plan-task {task-ref}
+  - Codex CLI：$plan-task {task-ref}
 
 [当 env-blocked > 0 时，在最后附加一行：]
 提醒：env-blocked 项需在 PR description 的「待人工验证」清单中承接，不应触发 /plan-task。

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/reference/report-template.en.md

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Use this template when writing `review-plan.md` or `review-plan-r{N}.md`.
 
 ## Evidence
 
-> Pair each "I verified X" claim with the corresponding raw tool output; the gate only checks that this section exists and at least one `$ ` line is present.
+> Pair each "I verified X" claim with the corresponding raw tool output; the gate only checks that this section exists and at least one `$ ` line is present. Every Blocker must be backed by a reproducible command (rg/grep/sed/nl) and its raw output; a judgment that cannot be reproduced must be downgraded or moved to Self-Doubt.
 
 - Claim: {verified claim}
 ```text
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ $ {command}
 {raw output}
 ```
 
+## Self-Doubt
+
+> Explicitly declare conclusions, inferences, and assumptions in this review that were **not directly verified**; downstream can rebut them on this basis. Write "None" if there are none.
+
+- {an unverified conclusion or inference; note why it was not verified and the impact if it is overturned}
+
 ## Highlights
 
 - {what went well}

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/reference/report-template.zh-CN.md

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
 
 ## 证据原文
 
-> 每条“我验证了 X”断言都要配对对应 tool output 原文；gate 仅校验本段存在和至少一行 `$ `。
+> 每条“我验证了 X”断言都要配对对应 tool output 原文；gate 仅校验本段存在和至少一行 `$ `。每条 Blocker 必须配可复现命令（rg/grep/sed/nl）及其原文；无法复现的判断须降级或移入「自我质疑」。
 
 - 断言：{verified claim}
 ```text
@@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ $ {command}
 {raw output}
 ```
 
+## 自我质疑
+
+> 显式声明本轮审查中**未直接验证**的结论、推断项与所作假设；下游据此可反驳。无则写「（无）」。
+
+- {未直接验证的结论或推断；说明为何未验证、若被推翻的影响}
+
 ## 亮点
 
 - {what went well}

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/reference/review-criteria.en.md

@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ Follow the `design-review` step in `.agents/workflows/feature-development.yaml`.
 - [ ] Test strategy covers critical paths, regression risks, and edge cases
 - [ ] Risks, migration, rollback, or compatibility handling are sufficient
 - [ ] The plan avoids over-design and unrelated scope expansion
+- [ ] Every blocker is backed by reproducible grep/sed/nl evidence; conclusions not directly verified are declared under Self-Doubt
 
 **Common anti-examples**:
 - Saying "modify related code" without executable steps and verification points
 - Ignoring risks or constraints listed in the analysis
 - Introducing unnecessary abstractions, configuration, or frameworks for a single-use requirement
+- Asserting a `file:line` or behavior from memory or impression without verifying via rg/nl
 
 ## Common Review Principles
 

package/templates/.agents/skills/review-plan/reference/review-criteria.zh-CN.md

@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@
 - [ ] 测试策略是否覆盖关键路径、回归风险和边界情况
 - [ ] 风险、迁移、回滚或兼容性处理是否充分
 - [ ] 方案是否避免过度设计和无关扩张
+- [ ] 每条 blocker 都配可复现的 grep/sed/nl 证据，未直接验证的结论已在「自我质疑」声明
 
 **常见反例**：
 - 方案只写“修改相关代码”，没有可执行步骤和验证点
 - 设计没有回应分析中列出的风险或约束
 - 为单次需求引入不必要的新抽象、配置或框架
+- 凭印象或记忆断言 `file:line`/行为，没有用 rg/nl 复核就下结论
 
 ## 通用审查原则
 

package/templates/.agents/skills/update-agent-infra/SKILL.en.md

@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ The script outputs JSON to stdout. Parse and record the report.
 - `managed.written` / `managed.created`: updated / newly created managed files
 - `managed.removed`: deleted managed files (including old paths removed during template migrations)
 - `managed.skippedPlatform`: managed / merged entries skipped because they belong to a different platform
+- `managed.skippedTUI`: managed / merged entries skipped because they are owned by a built-in TUI that is disabled in `tuis` (customTUI command files under the same path prefix are preserved)
 - `merged.pending`: list of merged files for AI to process
   - Each item has `target` (project-relative path) and `template` (template-root-relative path)
 - `registryAdded`: newly added file registry entries

package/templates/.agents/skills/update-agent-infra/SKILL.zh-CN.md

@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ node .agents/skills/update-agent-infra/scripts/sync-templates.js
 - `managed.written` / `managed.created`：已更新/新建的 managed 文件
 - `managed.removed`：被删除的 managed 文件（包括模板迁移时移除的旧路径）
 - `managed.skippedPlatform`：因归属其他平台而被跳过的 managed / merged 条目
+- `managed.skippedTUI`：因 `tuis` 中未启用对应内建 TUI 而被跳过的 managed / merged 条目（落在同一路径前缀下的 customTUI 命令文件会被保留）
 - `merged.pending`：需要 AI 处理的 merged 文件列表
   - 每项包含 `target`（项目中的目标路径）和 `template`（模板根目录下的相对路径）
 - `registryAdded`：新增的文件注册条目