@fission-ai/openspec 0.19.0 → 0.21.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ These tools automatically read workflow instructions from `openspec/AGENTS.md`.
140
140
 
141
141
  #### Step 1: Install the CLI globally
142
142
 
143
+ **Option A: Using npm**
144
+
143
145
  ```bash
144
146
  npm install -g @fission-ai/openspec@latest
145
147
  ```
@@ -149,6 +151,39 @@ Verify installation:
149
151
  openspec --version
150
152
  ```
151
153
 
154
+ **Option B: Using Nix (NixOS and Nix package manager)**
155
+
156
+ Run OpenSpec directly without installation:
157
+ ```bash
158
+ nix run github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec -- init
159
+ ```
160
+
161
+ Or install to your profile:
162
+ ```bash
163
+ nix profile install github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec
164
+ ```
165
+
166
+ Or add to your development environment in `flake.nix`:
167
+ ```nix
168
+ {
169
+ inputs = {
170
+ nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-unstable";
171
+ openspec.url = "github:Fission-AI/OpenSpec";
172
+ };
173
+
174
+ outputs = { nixpkgs, openspec, ... }: {
175
+ devShells.x86_64-linux.default = nixpkgs.legacyPackages.x86_64-linux.mkShell {
176
+ buildInputs = [ openspec.packages.x86_64-linux.default ];
177
+ };
178
+ };
179
+ }
180
+ ```
181
+
182
+ Verify installation:
183
+ ```bash
184
+ openspec --version
185
+ ```
186
+
152
187
  #### Step 2: Initialize OpenSpec in your project
153
188
 
154
189
  Navigate to your project directory:
@@ -428,6 +463,13 @@ We collect only command names and version to understand usage patterns. No argum
428
463
  - Develop CLI locally: `pnpm run dev` or `pnpm run dev:cli`
429
464
  - Conventional commits (one-line): `type(scope): subject`
430
465
 
466
+ <details>
467
+ <summary><strong>Maintainers & Advisors</strong></summary>
468
+
469
+ See [MAINTAINERS.md](MAINTAINERS.md) for the list of core maintainers and advisors who help guide the project.
470
+
471
+ </details>
472
+
431
473
  ## License
432
474
 
433
475
  MIT
package/dist/cli/index.js CHANGED
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ import { ChangeCommand } from '../commands/change.js';
13
13
  import { ValidateCommand } from '../commands/validate.js';
14
14
  import { ShowCommand } from '../commands/show.js';
15
15
  import { CompletionCommand } from '../commands/completion.js';
16
+ import { FeedbackCommand } from '../commands/feedback.js';
16
17
  import { registerConfigCommand } from '../commands/config.js';
17
18
  import { registerArtifactWorkflowCommands } from '../commands/artifact-workflow.js';
18
19
  import { maybeShowTelemetryNotice, trackCommand, shutdown } from '../telemetry/index.js';
@@ -279,6 +280,22 @@ program
279
280
  process.exit(1);
280
281
  }
281
282
  });
283
+ // Feedback command
284
+ program
285
+ .command('feedback <message>')
286
+ .description('Submit feedback about OpenSpec')
287
+ .option('--body <text>', 'Detailed description for the feedback')
288
+ .action(async (message, options) => {
289
+ try {
290
+ const feedbackCommand = new FeedbackCommand();
291
+ await feedbackCommand.execute(message, options);
292
+ }
293
+ catch (error) {
294
+ console.log();
295
+ ora().fail(`Error: ${error.message}`);
296
+ process.exit(1);
297
+ }
298
+ });
282
299
  // Completion command with subcommands
283
300
  const completionCmd = program
284
301
  .command('completion')
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ import path from 'path';
14
14
  import * as fs from 'fs';
15
15
  import { loadChangeContext, formatChangeStatus, generateInstructions, listSchemas, listSchemasWithInfo, getSchemaDir, resolveSchema, ArtifactGraph, } from '../core/artifact-graph/index.js';
16
16
  import { createChange, validateChangeName } from '../utils/change-utils.js';
17
- import { getExploreSkillTemplate, getNewChangeSkillTemplate, getContinueChangeSkillTemplate, getApplyChangeSkillTemplate, getFfChangeSkillTemplate, getSyncSpecsSkillTemplate, getArchiveChangeSkillTemplate, getOpsxExploreCommandTemplate, getOpsxNewCommandTemplate, getOpsxContinueCommandTemplate, getOpsxApplyCommandTemplate, getOpsxFfCommandTemplate, getOpsxSyncCommandTemplate, getOpsxArchiveCommandTemplate } from '../core/templates/skill-templates.js';
17
+ import { getExploreSkillTemplate, getNewChangeSkillTemplate, getContinueChangeSkillTemplate, getApplyChangeSkillTemplate, getFfChangeSkillTemplate, getSyncSpecsSkillTemplate, getArchiveChangeSkillTemplate, getVerifyChangeSkillTemplate, getOpsxExploreCommandTemplate, getOpsxNewCommandTemplate, getOpsxContinueCommandTemplate, getOpsxApplyCommandTemplate, getOpsxFfCommandTemplate, getOpsxSyncCommandTemplate, getOpsxArchiveCommandTemplate, getOpsxVerifyCommandTemplate } from '../core/templates/skill-templates.js';
18
18
  import { FileSystemUtils } from '../utils/file-system.js';
19
19
  const DEFAULT_SCHEMA = 'spec-driven';
20
20
  /**
@@ -587,6 +587,7 @@ async function artifactExperimentalSetupCommand() {
587
587
  const ffChangeSkill = getFfChangeSkillTemplate();
588
588
  const syncSpecsSkill = getSyncSpecsSkillTemplate();
589
589
  const archiveChangeSkill = getArchiveChangeSkillTemplate();
590
+ const verifyChangeSkill = getVerifyChangeSkillTemplate();
590
591
  // Get command templates
591
592
  const exploreCommand = getOpsxExploreCommandTemplate();
592
593
  const newCommand = getOpsxNewCommandTemplate();
@@ -595,6 +596,7 @@ async function artifactExperimentalSetupCommand() {
595
596
  const ffCommand = getOpsxFfCommandTemplate();
596
597
  const syncCommand = getOpsxSyncCommandTemplate();
597
598
  const archiveCommand = getOpsxArchiveCommandTemplate();
599
+ const verifyCommand = getOpsxVerifyCommandTemplate();
598
600
  // Create skill directories and SKILL.md files
599
601
  const skills = [
600
602
  { template: exploreSkill, dirName: 'openspec-explore' },
@@ -604,6 +606,7 @@ async function artifactExperimentalSetupCommand() {
604
606
  { template: ffChangeSkill, dirName: 'openspec-ff-change' },
605
607
  { template: syncSpecsSkill, dirName: 'openspec-sync-specs' },
606
608
  { template: archiveChangeSkill, dirName: 'openspec-archive-change' },
609
+ { template: verifyChangeSkill, dirName: 'openspec-verify-change' },
607
610
  ];
608
611
  const createdSkillFiles = [];
609
612
  for (const { template, dirName } of skills) {
@@ -630,6 +633,7 @@ ${template.instructions}
630
633
  { template: ffCommand, fileName: 'ff.md' },
631
634
  { template: syncCommand, fileName: 'sync.md' },
632
635
  { template: archiveCommand, fileName: 'archive.md' },
636
+ { template: verifyCommand, fileName: 'verify.md' },
633
637
  ];
634
638
  const createdCommandFiles = [];
635
639
  for (const { template, fileName } of commands) {
@@ -682,6 +686,7 @@ ${template.content}
682
686
  console.log(' • /opsx:apply - Implement tasks');
683
687
  console.log(' • /opsx:ff - Fast-forward: create all artifacts at once');
684
688
  console.log(' • /opsx:sync - Sync delta specs to main specs');
689
+ console.log(' • /opsx:verify - Verify implementation matches artifacts');
685
690
  console.log(' • /opsx:archive - Archive a completed change');
686
691
  console.log();
687
692
  console.log(chalk.yellow('💡 This is an experimental feature.'));
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
1
+ /**
2
+ * Feedback command implementation
3
+ */
4
+ export declare class FeedbackCommand {
5
+ execute(message: string, options?: {
6
+ body?: string;
7
+ }): Promise<void>;
8
+ }
9
+ //# sourceMappingURL=feedback.d.ts.map
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
1
+ import { execSync, execFileSync } from 'child_process';
2
+ import { createRequire } from 'module';
3
+ import os from 'os';
4
+ const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
5
+ /**
6
+ * Check if gh CLI is installed and available in PATH
7
+ * Uses platform-appropriate command: 'where' on Windows, 'which' on Unix/macOS
8
+ */
9
+ function isGhInstalled() {
10
+ try {
11
+ const command = process.platform === 'win32' ? 'where gh' : 'which gh';
12
+ execSync(command, { stdio: 'pipe' });
13
+ return true;
14
+ }
15
+ catch {
16
+ return false;
17
+ }
18
+ }
19
+ /**
20
+ * Check if gh CLI is authenticated
21
+ */
22
+ function isGhAuthenticated() {
23
+ try {
24
+ execSync('gh auth status', { stdio: 'pipe' });
25
+ return true;
26
+ }
27
+ catch {
28
+ return false;
29
+ }
30
+ }
31
+ /**
32
+ * Get OpenSpec version from package.json
33
+ */
34
+ function getVersion() {
35
+ try {
36
+ const { version } = require('../../package.json');
37
+ return version;
38
+ }
39
+ catch {
40
+ return 'unknown';
41
+ }
42
+ }
43
+ /**
44
+ * Get platform name
45
+ */
46
+ function getPlatform() {
47
+ return os.platform();
48
+ }
49
+ /**
50
+ * Get current timestamp in ISO format
51
+ */
52
+ function getTimestamp() {
53
+ return new Date().toISOString();
54
+ }
55
+ /**
56
+ * Generate metadata footer for feedback
57
+ */
58
+ function generateMetadata() {
59
+ const version = getVersion();
60
+ const platform = getPlatform();
61
+ const timestamp = getTimestamp();
62
+ return `---
63
+ Submitted via OpenSpec CLI
64
+ - Version: ${version}
65
+ - Platform: ${platform}
66
+ - Timestamp: ${timestamp}`;
67
+ }
68
+ /**
69
+ * Format the feedback title
70
+ */
71
+ function formatTitle(message) {
72
+ return `Feedback: ${message}`;
73
+ }
74
+ /**
75
+ * Format the full feedback body
76
+ */
77
+ function formatBody(bodyText) {
78
+ const parts = [];
79
+ if (bodyText) {
80
+ parts.push(bodyText);
81
+ parts.push(''); // Empty line before metadata
82
+ }
83
+ parts.push(generateMetadata());
84
+ return parts.join('\n');
85
+ }
86
+ /**
87
+ * Generate a pre-filled GitHub issue URL for manual submission
88
+ */
89
+ function generateManualSubmissionUrl(title, body) {
90
+ const repo = 'Fission-AI/OpenSpec';
91
+ const encodedTitle = encodeURIComponent(title);
92
+ const encodedBody = encodeURIComponent(body);
93
+ const encodedLabels = encodeURIComponent('feedback');
94
+ return `https://github.com/${repo}/issues/new?title=${encodedTitle}&body=${encodedBody}&labels=${encodedLabels}`;
95
+ }
96
+ /**
97
+ * Display formatted feedback content for manual submission
98
+ */
99
+ function displayFormattedFeedback(title, body) {
100
+ console.log('\n--- FORMATTED FEEDBACK ---');
101
+ console.log(`Title: ${title}`);
102
+ console.log(`Labels: feedback`);
103
+ console.log('\nBody:');
104
+ console.log(body);
105
+ console.log('--- END FEEDBACK ---\n');
106
+ }
107
+ /**
108
+ * Submit feedback via gh CLI
109
+ * Uses execFileSync to prevent shell injection vulnerabilities
110
+ */
111
+ function submitViaGhCli(title, body) {
112
+ try {
113
+ const result = execFileSync('gh', [
114
+ 'issue',
115
+ 'create',
116
+ '--repo',
117
+ 'Fission-AI/OpenSpec',
118
+ '--title',
119
+ title,
120
+ '--body',
121
+ body,
122
+ '--label',
123
+ 'feedback',
124
+ ], { encoding: 'utf-8', stdio: 'pipe' });
125
+ const issueUrl = result.trim();
126
+ console.log(`\n✓ Feedback submitted successfully!`);
127
+ console.log(`Issue URL: ${issueUrl}\n`);
128
+ }
129
+ catch (error) {
130
+ // Display the error output from gh CLI
131
+ if (error.stderr) {
132
+ console.error(error.stderr.toString());
133
+ }
134
+ else if (error.message) {
135
+ console.error(error.message);
136
+ }
137
+ // Exit with the same code as gh CLI
138
+ process.exit(error.status ?? 1);
139
+ }
140
+ }
141
+ /**
142
+ * Handle fallback when gh CLI is not available or not authenticated
143
+ */
144
+ function handleFallback(title, body, reason) {
145
+ if (reason === 'missing') {
146
+ console.log('⚠️ GitHub CLI not found. Manual submission required.');
147
+ }
148
+ else {
149
+ console.log('⚠️ GitHub authentication required. Manual submission required.');
150
+ }
151
+ displayFormattedFeedback(title, body);
152
+ const manualUrl = generateManualSubmissionUrl(title, body);
153
+ console.log('Please submit your feedback manually:');
154
+ console.log(manualUrl);
155
+ if (reason === 'unauthenticated') {
156
+ console.log('\nTo auto-submit in the future: gh auth login');
157
+ }
158
+ // Exit with success code (fallback is successful)
159
+ process.exit(0);
160
+ }
161
+ /**
162
+ * Feedback command implementation
163
+ */
164
+ export class FeedbackCommand {
165
+ async execute(message, options) {
166
+ // Format title and body once for all code paths
167
+ const title = formatTitle(message);
168
+ const body = formatBody(options?.body);
169
+ // Check if gh CLI is installed
170
+ if (!isGhInstalled()) {
171
+ handleFallback(title, body, 'missing');
172
+ return;
173
+ }
174
+ // Check if gh CLI is authenticated
175
+ if (!isGhAuthenticated()) {
176
+ handleFallback(title, body, 'unauthenticated');
177
+ return;
178
+ }
179
+ // Submit via gh CLI
180
+ submitViaGhCli(title, body);
181
+ }
182
+ }
183
+ //# sourceMappingURL=feedback.js.map
@@ -152,6 +152,18 @@ export const COMMAND_REGISTRY = [
152
152
  },
153
153
  ],
154
154
  },
155
+ {
156
+ name: 'feedback',
157
+ description: 'Submit feedback about OpenSpec',
158
+ acceptsPositional: true,
159
+ flags: [
160
+ {
161
+ name: 'body',
162
+ description: 'Detailed description for the feedback',
163
+ takesValue: true,
164
+ },
165
+ ],
166
+ },
155
167
  {
156
168
  name: 'change',
157
169
  description: 'Manage OpenSpec change proposals (deprecated)',
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import { CompletionGenerator, CommandDefinition } from '../types.js';
5
5
  */
6
6
  export declare class PowerShellGenerator implements CompletionGenerator {
7
7
  readonly shell: "powershell";
8
+ private stripTrailingCommaFromLastLine;
8
9
  /**
9
10
  * Generate a PowerShell completion script
10
11
  *
@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@ import { POWERSHELL_DYNAMIC_HELPERS } from '../templates/powershell-templates.js
5
5
  */
6
6
  export class PowerShellGenerator {
7
7
  shell = 'powershell';
8
+ stripTrailingCommaFromLastLine(lines) {
9
+ if (lines.length === 0)
10
+ return;
11
+ lines[lines.length - 1] = lines[lines.length - 1].replace(/,\s*$/, '');
12
+ }
8
13
  /**
9
14
  * Generate a PowerShell completion script
10
15
  *
@@ -17,6 +22,7 @@ export class PowerShellGenerator {
17
22
  for (const cmd of commands) {
18
23
  commandLines.push(` @{Name="${cmd.name}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(cmd.description)}"},`);
19
24
  }
25
+ this.stripTrailingCommaFromLastLine(commandLines);
20
26
  const topLevelCommands = commandLines.join('\n');
21
27
  // Build command cases using push() for loop clarity
22
28
  const commandCaseLines = [];
@@ -81,6 +87,7 @@ Register-ArgumentCompleter -CommandName openspec -ScriptBlock $openspecCompleter
81
87
  lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${longFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
82
88
  }
83
89
  }
90
+ this.stripTrailingCommaFromLastLine(lines);
84
91
  lines.push(`${indent} )`);
85
92
  lines.push(`${indent} $flags | Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
86
93
  lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_.Name, $_.Name, "ParameterName", $_.Description)`);
@@ -95,6 +102,7 @@ Register-ArgumentCompleter -CommandName openspec -ScriptBlock $openspecCompleter
95
102
  for (const subcmd of cmd.subcommands) {
96
103
  lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${subcmd.name}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(subcmd.description)}"},`);
97
104
  }
105
+ this.stripTrailingCommaFromLastLine(lines);
98
106
  lines.push(`${indent} )`);
99
107
  lines.push(`${indent} $subcommands | Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
100
108
  lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_.Name, $_.Name, "ParameterValue", $_.Description)`);
@@ -137,6 +145,7 @@ Register-ArgumentCompleter -CommandName openspec -ScriptBlock $openspecCompleter
137
145
  lines.push(`${indent} @{Name="${longFlag}"; Description="${this.escapeDescription(flag.description)}"},`);
138
146
  }
139
147
  }
148
+ this.stripTrailingCommaFromLastLine(lines);
140
149
  lines.push(`${indent} )`);
141
150
  lines.push(`${indent} $flags | Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$wordToComplete*" } | ForEach-Object {`);
142
151
  lines.push(`${indent} [System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_.Name, $_.Name, "ParameterName", $_.Description)`);
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
1
- export declare const agentsTemplate = "# OpenSpec Instructions\n\nInstructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development.\n\n## TL;DR Quick Checklist\n\n- Search existing work: `openspec spec list --long`, `openspec list` (use `rg` only for full-text search)\n- Decide scope: new capability vs modify existing capability\n- Pick a unique `change-id`: kebab-case, verb-led (`add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`)\n- Scaffold: `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, `design.md` (only if needed), and delta specs per affected capability\n- Write deltas: use `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements`; include at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement\n- Validate: `openspec validate [change-id] --strict` and fix issues\n- Request approval: Do not start implementation until proposal is approved\n\n## Three-Stage Workflow\n\n### Stage 1: Creating Changes\nCreate proposal when you need to:\n- Add features or functionality\n- Make breaking changes (API, schema)\n- Change architecture or patterns \n- Optimize performance (changes behavior)\n- Update security patterns\n\nTriggers (examples):\n- \"Help me create a change proposal\"\n- \"Help me plan a change\"\n- \"Help me create a proposal\"\n- \"I want to create a spec proposal\"\n- \"I want to create a spec\"\n\nLoose matching guidance:\n- Contains one of: `proposal`, `change`, `spec`\n- With one of: `create`, `plan`, `make`, `start`, `help`\n\nSkip proposal for:\n- Bug fixes (restore intended behavior)\n- Typos, formatting, comments\n- Dependency updates (non-breaking)\n- Configuration changes\n- Tests for existing behavior\n\n**Workflow**\n1. Review `openspec/project.md`, `openspec list`, and `openspec list --specs` to understand current context.\n2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, and spec deltas under `openspec/changes/<id>/`.\n3. Draft spec deltas using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement.\n4. Run `openspec validate <id> --strict` and resolve any issues before sharing the proposal.\n\n### Stage 2: Implementing Changes\nTrack these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one.\n1. **Read proposal.md** - Understand what's being built\n2. **Read design.md** (if exists) - Review technical decisions\n3. **Read tasks.md** - Get implementation checklist\n4. **Implement tasks sequentially** - Complete in order\n5. **Confirm completion** - Ensure every item in `tasks.md` is finished before updating statuses\n6. **Update checklist** - After all work is done, set every task to `- [x]` so the list reflects reality\n7. **Approval gate** - Do not start implementation until the proposal is reviewed and approved\n\n### Stage 3: Archiving Changes\nAfter deployment, create separate PR to:\n- Move `changes/[name]/` \u2192 `changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/`\n- Update `specs/` if capabilities changed\n- Use `openspec archive <change-id> --skip-specs --yes` for tooling-only changes (always pass the change ID explicitly)\n- Run `openspec validate --strict` to confirm the archived change passes checks\n\n## Before Any Task\n\n**Context Checklist:**\n- [ ] Read relevant specs in `specs/[capability]/spec.md`\n- [ ] Check pending changes in `changes/` for conflicts\n- [ ] Read `openspec/project.md` for conventions\n- [ ] Run `openspec list` to see active changes\n- [ ] Run `openspec list --specs` to see existing capabilities\n\n**Before Creating Specs:**\n- Always check if capability already exists\n- Prefer modifying existing specs over creating duplicates\n- Use `openspec show [spec]` to review current state\n- If request is ambiguous, ask 1\u20132 clarifying questions before scaffolding\n\n### Search Guidance\n- Enumerate specs: `openspec spec list --long` (or `--json` for scripts)\n- Enumerate changes: `openspec list` (or `openspec change list --json` - deprecated but available)\n- Show details:\n - Spec: `openspec show <spec-id> --type spec` (use `--json` for filters)\n - Change: `openspec show <change-id> --json --deltas-only`\n- Full-text search (use ripgrep): `rg -n \"Requirement:|Scenario:\" openspec/specs`\n\n## Quick Start\n\n### CLI Commands\n\n```bash\n# Essential commands\nopenspec list # List active changes\nopenspec list --specs # List specifications\nopenspec show [item] # Display change or spec\nopenspec validate [item] # Validate changes or specs\nopenspec archive <change-id> [--yes|-y] # Archive after deployment (add --yes for non-interactive runs)\n\n# Project management\nopenspec init [path] # Initialize OpenSpec\nopenspec update [path] # Update instruction files\n\n# Interactive mode\nopenspec show # Prompts for selection\nopenspec validate # Bulk validation mode\n\n# Debugging\nopenspec show [change] --json --deltas-only\nopenspec validate [change] --strict\n```\n\n### Command Flags\n\n- `--json` - Machine-readable output\n- `--type change|spec` - Disambiguate items\n- `--strict` - Comprehensive validation\n- `--no-interactive` - Disable prompts\n- `--skip-specs` - Archive without spec updates\n- `--yes`/`-y` - Skip confirmation prompts (non-interactive archive)\n\n## Directory Structure\n\n```\nopenspec/\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 project.md # Project conventions\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 specs/ # Current truth - what IS built\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 [capability]/ # Single focused capability\n\u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 spec.md # Requirements and scenarios\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 design.md # Technical patterns\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 changes/ # Proposals - what SHOULD change\n\u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 [change-name]/\n\u2502 \u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 proposal.md # Why, what, impact\n\u2502 \u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 tasks.md # Implementation checklist\n\u2502 \u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 design.md # Technical decisions (optional; see criteria)\n\u2502 \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 specs/ # Delta changes\n\u2502 \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 [capability]/\n\u2502 \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 spec.md # ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 archive/ # Completed changes\n```\n\n## Creating Change Proposals\n\n### Decision Tree\n\n```\nNew request?\n\u251C\u2500 Bug fix restoring spec behavior? \u2192 Fix directly\n\u251C\u2500 Typo/format/comment? \u2192 Fix directly \n\u251C\u2500 New feature/capability? \u2192 Create proposal\n\u251C\u2500 Breaking change? \u2192 Create proposal\n\u251C\u2500 Architecture change? \u2192 Create proposal\n\u2514\u2500 Unclear? \u2192 Create proposal (safer)\n```\n\n### Proposal Structure\n\n1. **Create directory:** `changes/[change-id]/` (kebab-case, verb-led, unique)\n\n2. **Write proposal.md:**\n```markdown\n# Change: [Brief description of change]\n\n## Why\n[1-2 sentences on problem/opportunity]\n\n## What Changes\n- [Bullet list of changes]\n- [Mark breaking changes with **BREAKING**]\n\n## Impact\n- Affected specs: [list capabilities]\n- Affected code: [key files/systems]\n```\n\n3. **Create spec deltas:** `specs/[capability]/spec.md`\n```markdown\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: New Feature\nThe system SHALL provide...\n\n#### Scenario: Success case\n- **WHEN** user performs action\n- **THEN** expected result\n\n## MODIFIED Requirements\n### Requirement: Existing Feature\n[Complete modified requirement]\n\n## REMOVED Requirements\n### Requirement: Old Feature\n**Reason**: [Why removing]\n**Migration**: [How to handle]\n```\nIf multiple capabilities are affected, create multiple delta files under `changes/[change-id]/specs/<capability>/spec.md`\u2014one per capability.\n\n4. **Create tasks.md:**\n```markdown\n## 1. Implementation\n- [ ] 1.1 Create database schema\n- [ ] 1.2 Implement API endpoint\n- [ ] 1.3 Add frontend component\n- [ ] 1.4 Write tests\n```\n\n5. **Create design.md when needed:**\nCreate `design.md` if any of the following apply; otherwise omit it:\n- Cross-cutting change (multiple services/modules) or a new architectural pattern\n- New external dependency or significant data model changes\n- Security, performance, or migration complexity\n- Ambiguity that benefits from technical decisions before coding\n\nMinimal `design.md` skeleton:\n```markdown\n## Context\n[Background, constraints, stakeholders]\n\n## Goals / Non-Goals\n- Goals: [...]\n- Non-Goals: [...]\n\n## Decisions\n- Decision: [What and why]\n- Alternatives considered: [Options + rationale]\n\n## Risks / Trade-offs\n- [Risk] \u2192 Mitigation\n\n## Migration Plan\n[Steps, rollback]\n\n## Open Questions\n- [...]\n```\n\n## Spec File Format\n\n### Critical: Scenario Formatting\n\n**CORRECT** (use #### headers):\n```markdown\n#### Scenario: User login success\n- **WHEN** valid credentials provided\n- **THEN** return JWT token\n```\n\n**WRONG** (don't use bullets or bold):\n```markdown\n- **Scenario: User login** \u274C\n**Scenario**: User login \u274C\n### Scenario: User login \u274C\n```\n\nEvery requirement MUST have at least one scenario.\n\n### Requirement Wording\n- Use SHALL/MUST for normative requirements (avoid should/may unless intentionally non-normative)\n\n### Delta Operations\n\n- `## ADDED Requirements` - New capabilities\n- `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changed behavior\n- `## REMOVED Requirements` - Deprecated features\n- `## RENAMED Requirements` - Name changes\n\nHeaders matched with `trim(header)` - whitespace ignored.\n\n#### When to use ADDED vs MODIFIED\n- ADDED: Introduces a new capability or sub-capability that can stand alone as a requirement. Prefer ADDED when the change is orthogonal (e.g., adding \"Slash Command Configuration\") rather than altering the semantics of an existing requirement.\n- MODIFIED: Changes the behavior, scope, or acceptance criteria of an existing requirement. Always paste the full, updated requirement content (header + all scenarios). The archiver will replace the entire requirement with what you provide here; partial deltas will drop previous details.\n- RENAMED: Use when only the name changes. If you also change behavior, use RENAMED (name) plus MODIFIED (content) referencing the new name.\n\nCommon pitfall: Using MODIFIED to add a new concern without including the previous text. This causes loss of detail at archive time. If you aren\u2019t explicitly changing the existing requirement, add a new requirement under ADDED instead.\n\nAuthoring a MODIFIED requirement correctly:\n1) Locate the existing requirement in `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`.\n2) Copy the entire requirement block (from `### Requirement: ...` through its scenarios).\n3) Paste it under `## MODIFIED Requirements` and edit to reflect the new behavior.\n4) Ensure the header text matches exactly (whitespace-insensitive) and keep at least one `#### Scenario:`.\n\nExample for RENAMED:\n```markdown\n## RENAMED Requirements\n- FROM: `### Requirement: Login`\n- TO: `### Requirement: User Authentication`\n```\n\n## Troubleshooting\n\n### Common Errors\n\n**\"Change must have at least one delta\"**\n- Check `changes/[name]/specs/` exists with .md files\n- Verify files have operation prefixes (## ADDED Requirements)\n\n**\"Requirement must have at least one scenario\"**\n- Check scenarios use `#### Scenario:` format (4 hashtags)\n- Don't use bullet points or bold for scenario headers\n\n**Silent scenario parsing failures**\n- Exact format required: `#### Scenario: Name`\n- Debug with: `openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only`\n\n### Validation Tips\n\n```bash\n# Always use strict mode for comprehensive checks\nopenspec validate [change] --strict\n\n# Debug delta parsing\nopenspec show [change] --json | jq '.deltas'\n\n# Check specific requirement\nopenspec show [spec] --json -r 1\n```\n\n## Happy Path Script\n\n```bash\n# 1) Explore current state\nopenspec spec list --long\nopenspec list\n# Optional full-text search:\n# rg -n \"Requirement:|Scenario:\" openspec/specs\n# rg -n \"^#|Requirement:\" openspec/changes\n\n# 2) Choose change id and scaffold\nCHANGE=add-two-factor-auth\nmkdir -p openspec/changes/$CHANGE/{specs/auth}\nprintf \"## Why\\n...\\n\\n## What Changes\\n- ...\\n\\n## Impact\\n- ...\\n\" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/proposal.md\nprintf \"## 1. Implementation\\n- [ ] 1.1 ...\\n\" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/tasks.md\n\n# 3) Add deltas (example)\ncat > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/specs/auth/spec.md << 'EOF'\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication\nUsers MUST provide a second factor during login.\n\n#### Scenario: OTP required\n- **WHEN** valid credentials are provided\n- **THEN** an OTP challenge is required\nEOF\n\n# 4) Validate\nopenspec validate $CHANGE --strict\n```\n\n## Multi-Capability Example\n\n```\nopenspec/changes/add-2fa-notify/\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 proposal.md\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 tasks.md\n\u2514\u2500\u2500 specs/\n \u251C\u2500\u2500 auth/\n \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 spec.md # ADDED: Two-Factor Authentication\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 notifications/\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 spec.md # ADDED: OTP email notification\n```\n\nauth/spec.md\n```markdown\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication\n...\n```\n\nnotifications/spec.md\n```markdown\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: OTP Email Notification\n...\n```\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### Simplicity First\n- Default to <100 lines of new code\n- Single-file implementations until proven insufficient\n- Avoid frameworks without clear justification\n- Choose boring, proven patterns\n\n### Complexity Triggers\nOnly add complexity with:\n- Performance data showing current solution too slow\n- Concrete scale requirements (>1000 users, >100MB data)\n- Multiple proven use cases requiring abstraction\n\n### Clear References\n- Use `file.ts:42` format for code locations\n- Reference specs as `specs/auth/spec.md`\n- Link related changes and PRs\n\n### Capability Naming\n- Use verb-noun: `user-auth`, `payment-capture`\n- Single purpose per capability\n- 10-minute understandability rule\n- Split if description needs \"AND\"\n\n### Change ID Naming\n- Use kebab-case, short and descriptive: `add-two-factor-auth`\n- Prefer verb-led prefixes: `add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`\n- Ensure uniqueness; if taken, append `-2`, `-3`, etc.\n\n## Tool Selection Guide\n\n| Task | Tool | Why |\n|------|------|-----|\n| Find files by pattern | Glob | Fast pattern matching |\n| Search code content | Grep | Optimized regex search |\n| Read specific files | Read | Direct file access |\n| Explore unknown scope | Task | Multi-step investigation |\n\n## Error Recovery\n\n### Change Conflicts\n1. Run `openspec list` to see active changes\n2. Check for overlapping specs\n3. Coordinate with change owners\n4. Consider combining proposals\n\n### Validation Failures\n1. Run with `--strict` flag\n2. Check JSON output for details\n3. Verify spec file format\n4. Ensure scenarios properly formatted\n\n### Missing Context\n1. Read project.md first\n2. Check related specs\n3. Review recent archives\n4. Ask for clarification\n\n## Quick Reference\n\n### Stage Indicators\n- `changes/` - Proposed, not yet built\n- `specs/` - Built and deployed\n- `archive/` - Completed changes\n\n### File Purposes\n- `proposal.md` - Why and what\n- `tasks.md` - Implementation steps\n- `design.md` - Technical decisions\n- `spec.md` - Requirements and behavior\n\n### CLI Essentials\n```bash\nopenspec list # What's in progress?\nopenspec show [item] # View details\nopenspec validate --strict # Is it correct?\nopenspec archive <change-id> [--yes|-y] # Mark complete (add --yes for automation)\n```\n\nRemember: Specs are truth. Changes are proposals. Keep them in sync.\n";
1
+ export declare const agentsTemplate = "# OpenSpec Instructions\n\nInstructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development.\n\n## TL;DR Quick Checklist\n\n- Search existing work: `openspec spec list --long`, `openspec list` (use `rg` only for full-text search)\n- Decide scope: new capability vs modify existing capability\n- Pick a unique `change-id`: kebab-case, verb-led (`add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`)\n- Scaffold: `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, `design.md` (only if needed), and delta specs per affected capability\n- Write deltas: use `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements`; include at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement\n- Validate: `openspec validate [change-id] --strict --no-interactive` and fix issues\n- Request approval: Do not start implementation until proposal is approved\n\n## Three-Stage Workflow\n\n### Stage 1: Creating Changes\nCreate proposal when you need to:\n- Add features or functionality\n- Make breaking changes (API, schema)\n- Change architecture or patterns \n- Optimize performance (changes behavior)\n- Update security patterns\n\nTriggers (examples):\n- \"Help me create a change proposal\"\n- \"Help me plan a change\"\n- \"Help me create a proposal\"\n- \"I want to create a spec proposal\"\n- \"I want to create a spec\"\n\nLoose matching guidance:\n- Contains one of: `proposal`, `change`, `spec`\n- With one of: `create`, `plan`, `make`, `start`, `help`\n\nSkip proposal for:\n- Bug fixes (restore intended behavior)\n- Typos, formatting, comments\n- Dependency updates (non-breaking)\n- Configuration changes\n- Tests for existing behavior\n\n**Workflow**\n1. Review `openspec/project.md`, `openspec list`, and `openspec list --specs` to understand current context.\n2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, and spec deltas under `openspec/changes/<id>/`.\n3. Draft spec deltas using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement.\n4. Run `openspec validate <id> --strict --no-interactive` and resolve any issues before sharing the proposal.\n\n### Stage 2: Implementing Changes\nTrack these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one.\n1. **Read proposal.md** - Understand what's being built\n2. **Read design.md** (if exists) - Review technical decisions\n3. **Read tasks.md** - Get implementation checklist\n4. **Implement tasks sequentially** - Complete in order\n5. **Confirm completion** - Ensure every item in `tasks.md` is finished before updating statuses\n6. **Update checklist** - After all work is done, set every task to `- [x]` so the list reflects reality\n7. **Approval gate** - Do not start implementation until the proposal is reviewed and approved\n\n### Stage 3: Archiving Changes\nAfter deployment, create separate PR to:\n- Move `changes/[name]/` \u2192 `changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/`\n- Update `specs/` if capabilities changed\n- Use `openspec archive <change-id> --skip-specs --yes` for tooling-only changes (always pass the change ID explicitly)\n- Run `openspec validate --strict --no-interactive` to confirm the archived change passes checks\n\n## Before Any Task\n\n**Context Checklist:**\n- [ ] Read relevant specs in `specs/[capability]/spec.md`\n- [ ] Check pending changes in `changes/` for conflicts\n- [ ] Read `openspec/project.md` for conventions\n- [ ] Run `openspec list` to see active changes\n- [ ] Run `openspec list --specs` to see existing capabilities\n\n**Before Creating Specs:**\n- Always check if capability already exists\n- Prefer modifying existing specs over creating duplicates\n- Use `openspec show [spec]` to review current state\n- If request is ambiguous, ask 1\u20132 clarifying questions before scaffolding\n\n### Search Guidance\n- Enumerate specs: `openspec spec list --long` (or `--json` for scripts)\n- Enumerate changes: `openspec list` (or `openspec change list --json` - deprecated but available)\n- Show details:\n - Spec: `openspec show <spec-id> --type spec` (use `--json` for filters)\n - Change: `openspec show <change-id> --json --deltas-only`\n- Full-text search (use ripgrep): `rg -n \"Requirement:|Scenario:\" openspec/specs`\n\n## Quick Start\n\n### CLI Commands\n\n```bash\n# Essential commands\nopenspec list # List active changes\nopenspec list --specs # List specifications\nopenspec show [item] # Display change or spec\nopenspec validate [item] # Validate changes or specs\nopenspec archive <change-id> [--yes|-y] # Archive after deployment (add --yes for non-interactive runs)\n\n# Project management\nopenspec init [path] # Initialize OpenSpec\nopenspec update [path] # Update instruction files\n\n# Interactive mode\nopenspec show # Prompts for selection\nopenspec validate # Bulk validation mode\n\n# Debugging\nopenspec show [change] --json --deltas-only\nopenspec validate [change] --strict --no-interactive\n```\n\n### Command Flags\n\n- `--json` - Machine-readable output\n- `--type change|spec` - Disambiguate items\n- `--strict` - Comprehensive validation\n- `--no-interactive` - Disable prompts\n- `--skip-specs` - Archive without spec updates\n- `--yes`/`-y` - Skip confirmation prompts (non-interactive archive)\n\n## Directory Structure\n\n```\nopenspec/\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 project.md # Project conventions\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 specs/ # Current truth - what IS built\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 [capability]/ # Single focused capability\n\u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 spec.md # Requirements and scenarios\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 design.md # Technical patterns\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 changes/ # Proposals - what SHOULD change\n\u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 [change-name]/\n\u2502 \u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 proposal.md # Why, what, impact\n\u2502 \u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 tasks.md # Implementation checklist\n\u2502 \u2502 \u251C\u2500\u2500 design.md # Technical decisions (optional; see criteria)\n\u2502 \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 specs/ # Delta changes\n\u2502 \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 [capability]/\n\u2502 \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 spec.md # ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED\n\u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 archive/ # Completed changes\n```\n\n## Creating Change Proposals\n\n### Decision Tree\n\n```\nNew request?\n\u251C\u2500 Bug fix restoring spec behavior? \u2192 Fix directly\n\u251C\u2500 Typo/format/comment? \u2192 Fix directly \n\u251C\u2500 New feature/capability? \u2192 Create proposal\n\u251C\u2500 Breaking change? \u2192 Create proposal\n\u251C\u2500 Architecture change? \u2192 Create proposal\n\u2514\u2500 Unclear? \u2192 Create proposal (safer)\n```\n\n### Proposal Structure\n\n1. **Create directory:** `changes/[change-id]/` (kebab-case, verb-led, unique)\n\n2. **Write proposal.md:**\n```markdown\n# Change: [Brief description of change]\n\n## Why\n[1-2 sentences on problem/opportunity]\n\n## What Changes\n- [Bullet list of changes]\n- [Mark breaking changes with **BREAKING**]\n\n## Impact\n- Affected specs: [list capabilities]\n- Affected code: [key files/systems]\n```\n\n3. **Create spec deltas:** `specs/[capability]/spec.md`\n```markdown\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: New Feature\nThe system SHALL provide...\n\n#### Scenario: Success case\n- **WHEN** user performs action\n- **THEN** expected result\n\n## MODIFIED Requirements\n### Requirement: Existing Feature\n[Complete modified requirement]\n\n## REMOVED Requirements\n### Requirement: Old Feature\n**Reason**: [Why removing]\n**Migration**: [How to handle]\n```\nIf multiple capabilities are affected, create multiple delta files under `changes/[change-id]/specs/<capability>/spec.md`\u2014one per capability.\n\n4. **Create tasks.md:**\n```markdown\n## 1. Implementation\n- [ ] 1.1 Create database schema\n- [ ] 1.2 Implement API endpoint\n- [ ] 1.3 Add frontend component\n- [ ] 1.4 Write tests\n```\n\n5. **Create design.md when needed:**\nCreate `design.md` if any of the following apply; otherwise omit it:\n- Cross-cutting change (multiple services/modules) or a new architectural pattern\n- New external dependency or significant data model changes\n- Security, performance, or migration complexity\n- Ambiguity that benefits from technical decisions before coding\n\nMinimal `design.md` skeleton:\n```markdown\n## Context\n[Background, constraints, stakeholders]\n\n## Goals / Non-Goals\n- Goals: [...]\n- Non-Goals: [...]\n\n## Decisions\n- Decision: [What and why]\n- Alternatives considered: [Options + rationale]\n\n## Risks / Trade-offs\n- [Risk] \u2192 Mitigation\n\n## Migration Plan\n[Steps, rollback]\n\n## Open Questions\n- [...]\n```\n\n## Spec File Format\n\n### Critical: Scenario Formatting\n\n**CORRECT** (use #### headers):\n```markdown\n#### Scenario: User login success\n- **WHEN** valid credentials provided\n- **THEN** return JWT token\n```\n\n**WRONG** (don't use bullets or bold):\n```markdown\n- **Scenario: User login** \u274C\n**Scenario**: User login \u274C\n### Scenario: User login \u274C\n```\n\nEvery requirement MUST have at least one scenario.\n\n### Requirement Wording\n- Use SHALL/MUST for normative requirements (avoid should/may unless intentionally non-normative)\n\n### Delta Operations\n\n- `## ADDED Requirements` - New capabilities\n- `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changed behavior\n- `## REMOVED Requirements` - Deprecated features\n- `## RENAMED Requirements` - Name changes\n\nHeaders matched with `trim(header)` - whitespace ignored.\n\n#### When to use ADDED vs MODIFIED\n- ADDED: Introduces a new capability or sub-capability that can stand alone as a requirement. Prefer ADDED when the change is orthogonal (e.g., adding \"Slash Command Configuration\") rather than altering the semantics of an existing requirement.\n- MODIFIED: Changes the behavior, scope, or acceptance criteria of an existing requirement. Always paste the full, updated requirement content (header + all scenarios). The archiver will replace the entire requirement with what you provide here; partial deltas will drop previous details.\n- RENAMED: Use when only the name changes. If you also change behavior, use RENAMED (name) plus MODIFIED (content) referencing the new name.\n\nCommon pitfall: Using MODIFIED to add a new concern without including the previous text. This causes loss of detail at archive time. If you aren\u2019t explicitly changing the existing requirement, add a new requirement under ADDED instead.\n\nAuthoring a MODIFIED requirement correctly:\n1) Locate the existing requirement in `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`.\n2) Copy the entire requirement block (from `### Requirement: ...` through its scenarios).\n3) Paste it under `## MODIFIED Requirements` and edit to reflect the new behavior.\n4) Ensure the header text matches exactly (whitespace-insensitive) and keep at least one `#### Scenario:`.\n\nExample for RENAMED:\n```markdown\n## RENAMED Requirements\n- FROM: `### Requirement: Login`\n- TO: `### Requirement: User Authentication`\n```\n\n## Troubleshooting\n\n### Common Errors\n\n**\"Change must have at least one delta\"**\n- Check `changes/[name]/specs/` exists with .md files\n- Verify files have operation prefixes (## ADDED Requirements)\n\n**\"Requirement must have at least one scenario\"**\n- Check scenarios use `#### Scenario:` format (4 hashtags)\n- Don't use bullet points or bold for scenario headers\n\n**Silent scenario parsing failures**\n- Exact format required: `#### Scenario: Name`\n- Debug with: `openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only`\n\n### Validation Tips\n\n```bash\n# Always use strict mode for comprehensive checks\nopenspec validate [change] --strict --no-interactive\n\n# Debug delta parsing\nopenspec show [change] --json | jq '.deltas'\n\n# Check specific requirement\nopenspec show [spec] --json -r 1\n```\n\n## Happy Path Script\n\n```bash\n# 1) Explore current state\nopenspec spec list --long\nopenspec list\n# Optional full-text search:\n# rg -n \"Requirement:|Scenario:\" openspec/specs\n# rg -n \"^#|Requirement:\" openspec/changes\n\n# 2) Choose change id and scaffold\nCHANGE=add-two-factor-auth\nmkdir -p openspec/changes/$CHANGE/{specs/auth}\nprintf \"## Why\\n...\\n\\n## What Changes\\n- ...\\n\\n## Impact\\n- ...\\n\" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/proposal.md\nprintf \"## 1. Implementation\\n- [ ] 1.1 ...\\n\" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/tasks.md\n\n# 3) Add deltas (example)\ncat > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/specs/auth/spec.md << 'EOF'\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication\nUsers MUST provide a second factor during login.\n\n#### Scenario: OTP required\n- **WHEN** valid credentials are provided\n- **THEN** an OTP challenge is required\nEOF\n\n# 4) Validate\nopenspec validate $CHANGE --strict --no-interactive\n```\n\n## Multi-Capability Example\n\n```\nopenspec/changes/add-2fa-notify/\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 proposal.md\n\u251C\u2500\u2500 tasks.md\n\u2514\u2500\u2500 specs/\n \u251C\u2500\u2500 auth/\n \u2502 \u2514\u2500\u2500 spec.md # ADDED: Two-Factor Authentication\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 notifications/\n \u2514\u2500\u2500 spec.md # ADDED: OTP email notification\n```\n\nauth/spec.md\n```markdown\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication\n...\n```\n\nnotifications/spec.md\n```markdown\n## ADDED Requirements\n### Requirement: OTP Email Notification\n...\n```\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### Simplicity First\n- Default to <100 lines of new code\n- Single-file implementations until proven insufficient\n- Avoid frameworks without clear justification\n- Choose boring, proven patterns\n\n### Complexity Triggers\nOnly add complexity with:\n- Performance data showing current solution too slow\n- Concrete scale requirements (>1000 users, >100MB data)\n- Multiple proven use cases requiring abstraction\n\n### Clear References\n- Use `file.ts:42` format for code locations\n- Reference specs as `specs/auth/spec.md`\n- Link related changes and PRs\n\n### Capability Naming\n- Use verb-noun: `user-auth`, `payment-capture`\n- Single purpose per capability\n- 10-minute understandability rule\n- Split if description needs \"AND\"\n\n### Change ID Naming\n- Use kebab-case, short and descriptive: `add-two-factor-auth`\n- Prefer verb-led prefixes: `add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`\n- Ensure uniqueness; if taken, append `-2`, `-3`, etc.\n\n## Tool Selection Guide\n\n| Task | Tool | Why |\n|------|------|-----|\n| Find files by pattern | Glob | Fast pattern matching |\n| Search code content | Grep | Optimized regex search |\n| Read specific files | Read | Direct file access |\n| Explore unknown scope | Task | Multi-step investigation |\n\n## Error Recovery\n\n### Change Conflicts\n1. Run `openspec list` to see active changes\n2. Check for overlapping specs\n3. Coordinate with change owners\n4. Consider combining proposals\n\n### Validation Failures\n1. Run with `--strict` flag\n2. Check JSON output for details\n3. Verify spec file format\n4. Ensure scenarios properly formatted\n\n### Missing Context\n1. Read project.md first\n2. Check related specs\n3. Review recent archives\n4. Ask for clarification\n\n## Quick Reference\n\n### Stage Indicators\n- `changes/` - Proposed, not yet built\n- `specs/` - Built and deployed\n- `archive/` - Completed changes\n\n### File Purposes\n- `proposal.md` - Why and what\n- `tasks.md` - Implementation steps\n- `design.md` - Technical decisions\n- `spec.md` - Requirements and behavior\n\n### CLI Essentials\n```bash\nopenspec list # What's in progress?\nopenspec show [item] # View details\nopenspec validate --strict --no-interactive # Is it correct?\nopenspec archive <change-id> [--yes|-y] # Mark complete (add --yes for automation)\n```\n\nRemember: Specs are truth. Changes are proposals. Keep them in sync.\n";
2
2
  //# sourceMappingURL=agents-template.d.ts.map
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Instructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development
9
9
  - Pick a unique \`change-id\`: kebab-case, verb-led (\`add-\`, \`update-\`, \`remove-\`, \`refactor-\`)
10
10
  - Scaffold: \`proposal.md\`, \`tasks.md\`, \`design.md\` (only if needed), and delta specs per affected capability
11
11
  - Write deltas: use \`## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements\`; include at least one \`#### Scenario:\` per requirement
12
- - Validate: \`openspec validate [change-id] --strict\` and fix issues
12
+ - Validate: \`openspec validate [change-id] --strict --no-interactive\` and fix issues
13
13
  - Request approval: Do not start implementation until proposal is approved
14
14
 
15
15
  ## Three-Stage Workflow
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Skip proposal for:
44
44
  1. Review \`openspec/project.md\`, \`openspec list\`, and \`openspec list --specs\` to understand current context.
45
45
  2. Choose a unique verb-led \`change-id\` and scaffold \`proposal.md\`, \`tasks.md\`, optional \`design.md\`, and spec deltas under \`openspec/changes/<id>/\`.
46
46
  3. Draft spec deltas using \`## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements\` with at least one \`#### Scenario:\` per requirement.
47
- 4. Run \`openspec validate <id> --strict\` and resolve any issues before sharing the proposal.
47
+ 4. Run \`openspec validate <id> --strict --no-interactive\` and resolve any issues before sharing the proposal.
48
48
 
49
49
  ### Stage 2: Implementing Changes
50
50
  Track these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one.
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ After deployment, create separate PR to:
61
61
  - Move \`changes/[name]/\` → \`changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/\`
62
62
  - Update \`specs/\` if capabilities changed
63
63
  - Use \`openspec archive <change-id> --skip-specs --yes\` for tooling-only changes (always pass the change ID explicitly)
64
- - Run \`openspec validate --strict\` to confirm the archived change passes checks
64
+ - Run \`openspec validate --strict --no-interactive\` to confirm the archived change passes checks
65
65
 
66
66
  ## Before Any Task
67
67
 
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ openspec validate # Bulk validation mode
108
108
 
109
109
  # Debugging
110
110
  openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only
111
- openspec validate [change] --strict
111
+ openspec validate [change] --strict --no-interactive
112
112
  \`\`\`
113
113
 
114
114
  ### Command Flags
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ Example for RENAMED:
306
306
 
307
307
  \`\`\`bash
308
308
  # Always use strict mode for comprehensive checks
309
- openspec validate [change] --strict
309
+ openspec validate [change] --strict --no-interactive
310
310
 
311
311
  # Debug delta parsing
312
312
  openspec show [change] --json | jq '.deltas'
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ Users MUST provide a second factor during login.
343
343
  EOF
344
344
 
345
345
  # 4) Validate
346
- openspec validate $CHANGE --strict
346
+ openspec validate $CHANGE --strict --no-interactive
347
347
  \`\`\`
348
348
 
349
349
  ## Multi-Capability Example
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ Only add complexity with:
449
449
  \`\`\`bash
450
450
  openspec list # What's in progress?
451
451
  openspec show [item] # View details
452
- openspec validate --strict # Is it correct?
452
+ openspec validate --strict --no-interactive # Is it correct?
453
453
  openspec archive <change-id> [--yes|-y] # Mark complete (add --yes for automation)
454
454
  \`\`\`
455
455
 
@@ -79,8 +79,22 @@ export declare function getArchiveChangeSkillTemplate(): SkillTemplate;
79
79
  * Template for /opsx:sync slash command
80
80
  */
81
81
  export declare function getOpsxSyncCommandTemplate(): CommandTemplate;
82
+ /**
83
+ * Template for openspec-verify-change skill
84
+ * For verifying implementation matches change artifacts before archiving
85
+ */
86
+ export declare function getVerifyChangeSkillTemplate(): SkillTemplate;
82
87
  /**
83
88
  * Template for /opsx:archive slash command
84
89
  */
85
90
  export declare function getOpsxArchiveCommandTemplate(): CommandTemplate;
91
+ /**
92
+ * Template for /opsx:verify slash command
93
+ */
94
+ export declare function getOpsxVerifyCommandTemplate(): CommandTemplate;
95
+ /**
96
+ * Template for feedback skill
97
+ * For collecting and submitting user feedback with context enrichment
98
+ */
99
+ export declare function getFeedbackSkillTemplate(): SkillTemplate;
86
100
  //# sourceMappingURL=skill-templates.d.ts.map