@feng0531/dsh-code-review 0.87.6 → 0.87.7

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -2,6 +2,12 @@
 
 本文件介绍对使用者有意义的变化。安装与参数见 [README](README.md)，本次发布正文见 [发布说明](RELEASE-NOTES.md)。历史提交和安装包保留在 [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/f-e-n-g-0531/dsh-code-review/releases)；本文不把开发日志当作功能介绍。
 
+## 0.87.7 — 清晰结论与有界复核纠正
+
+- 报告区分已复核不确定与复核未完成；尚未成立的候选使用待证条件、影响假说与待验证方案，不再以确定影响和必改建议呈现。
+- 开启协议纠正时，不完整复核批次可在原调用额度内纠正一次，复用本次已读原文及回执，不重启取证；完整响应仍须全部严格校验。最终答复模式不追加纠正。
+- 保留原预算、截止时间和来源授权，记录纠正成本；本版不宣称真实审核提速，组取证续跑涉及分配安全边界，未贸然上线。
+
 ## 0.87.6 — 迁移复核成套取证
 
 - 复用宿主已校验的迁移契约，为匹配候选有界预取旧入口、旧委托实现和新入口；同套证据原子接纳，容量、预算或输入不满足时回退普通检索，减少模型重新寻找已知路径的往返。

package/RELEASE-NOTES.md

@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
-# v0.87.6 发布说明
+# v0.87.7 发布说明
 
-## 让已知迁移路径更早成为本次复核证据
+## 先看清楚结论，再减少复核返工
 
-复核已能接收宿主校验的迁移契约，但此前默认种子只覆盖候选锚点附近，旧公开入口、旧委托实现与新入口仍需模型自行检索。本版为匹配候选增加有界成套取证，减少寻找已有导航坐标的往返；完整角色无法容纳时回退普通检索，不宣称已完成比较。
+报告区分复核支持、已复核不确定、复核未完成与已反驳。候选未成立时，以待证条件、影响假说与待验证方案表达，避免把主审描述误读为独立确认的缺陷；完整证据仍保留在技术附录。
 
-种子沿用同一批准快照和读取总账；保留最多 8 次读取、16 KiB 种子输入、每次最多 200 行及最终证据复验余量。同套读取采用事务，失败或取消不发布部分回执。每次复核重新签发回执，不能借用既往主审／复核证据身份。
+## 不完整批次的有界纠正
 
-## 诊断与安全边界
+启用协议纠正时，复核返回不完整批次可再请求一次完整判定。使用同次调用最后已发送的证据与新鲜回执，不重启检索、不重新签发整套证据；仍计入相同模型调用额度、输入限制和截止时间。仅接纳少项且已有成员均为合法身份、无证据无归因的 uncertain 批次进行纠正；含支持、回执或归因的部分响应仍直接失败，避免漏项掩盖非法证据。身份、回执、原文及修改前后归因继续严格校验；再次不完整即失败。检索最终答复模式不追加纠正。
 
-执行诊断记录迁移种子接纳／回退计数，不含源码正文；预取接纳不证明模型已调用，更不证明复核支持或新增因果成立。普通比较仍要求正确主文件与来源侧；跨文件仅限已校验契约，删除导出路由仍仅允许不确定归因。
+执行诊断单列复核批次纠正的调用与原因，不将纠正当成缺陷成立。正常完整批次不增加调用；纠正可能增加一次模型往返，不承诺每次审核更快。
 
-不增加模型调用额度、检索轮数、读取总额或并发；不降低复核证据门槛。未来同任务对照同时检查端到端与分段耗时、触发链、最小修复建议、覆盖及可读性，不能以减少调用或缩短报告代替质量提升。本版没有重新执行 r7364 真实模型审核，不承诺固定提速或确认两项既往候选。
+## 验证与边界
 
-## 验证与升级
+本版采用离线正反回归、全量测试、真实宿主离线兼容检查及冻结标签四矩阵门禁。没有重新运行真实业务审核，也没有将直接审核的历史结论当作真值。分组取证续跑需要可回滚的额度转移，尚未改动该失败回退语义。
 
-新增迁移成套种子、事务回退、新鲜回执及预算边界回归，并通过全量测试与冻结标签四矩阵 CI 后发布。发布不自动安装或重启当前宿主。安装见 [README](README.md)，门禁见 [开发说明](DEVELOPMENT.md)。
+发布不自动安装或重启当前宿主。安装见 [README](README.md)，门禁见 [开发说明](DEVELOPMENT.md)。

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@feng0531/dsh-code-review",
-  "version": "0.87.6",
+  "version": "0.87.7",
   "private": false,
   "license": "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE",
   "publishConfig": { "access": "public", "registry": "https://registry.npmjs.org/" },

package/src/candidate-verification.mjs

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 import { validateRegressionAssessment } from './regression-assessment.mjs';
 import { validateEvidenceReference } from './evidence-reference.mjs';
 // Offline only. Candidate ids come from the host, not the model.
-export function validateCandidateVerification(value, candidateIds, read, resolveEvidence = value => value, comparison = {}) {
+export function validateCandidateVerificationEnvelope(value, candidateIds) {
   if (!Array.isArray(candidateIds) || candidateIds.length > 50 || candidateIds.some(id => typeof id !== 'string' || !id || id.length > 200) || new Set(candidateIds).size !== candidateIds.length) throw new Error('Invalid candidate identities');
-  if (!value || typeof value !== 'object' || Array.isArray(value) || Object.keys(value).length !== 1 || !Array.isArray(value.verdicts) || value.verdicts.length !== candidateIds.length) throw new Error('Incomplete verification response');
+  if (!value || typeof value !== 'object' || Array.isArray(value) || Object.keys(value).length !== 1 || !Array.isArray(value.verdicts) || value.verdicts.length !== candidateIds.length) throw Object.assign(new Error('Incomplete verification response'), { code: 'MODEL_INCOMPLETE_VERIFICATION' });
   const seen = new Set();
   // Validate the entire envelope before any budgeted evidence read.
   for (const item of value.verdicts) {
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ export function validateCandidateVerification(value, candidateIds, read, resolve
     if (!['supported', 'refuted', 'uncertain'].includes(item.verdict) || typeof item.reason !== 'string' || !item.reason.trim() || item.reason.length > 8000) throw new Error('Invalid verdict explanation');
     if (!Array.isArray(item.evidence) || item.evidence.length > 8 || (item.verdict !== 'uncertain' && !item.evidence.length)) throw new Error('Missing or excessive evidence');
   }
+}
+
+export function validateCandidateVerification(value, candidateIds, read, resolveEvidence = value => value, comparison = {}) {
+  validateCandidateVerificationEnvelope(value, candidateIds);
   const results = new Map(value.verdicts.map(item => {
     const evidence = item.evidence.map(ref => validateEvidenceReference(resolveEvidence(ref), read));
     const regression = validateRegressionAssessment(item.regression, evidence, comparison.catalog ?? [], comparison.fileIds?.[item.candidateId], { ...comparison, candidateId: item.candidateId });

package/src/report-findings.mjs

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 import { groupDuplicateFindings } from './finding-groups.mjs';
-import { comparisonValidated } from './report-summary.mjs';
+import { comparisonValidated, verificationPresentation } from './report-summary.mjs';
 
 const safe = value => Array.from(String(value ?? '')).map(c => {
   if (c.charCodeAt(0) < 32 || c.charCodeAt(0) === 127) return ' ';
@@ -30,23 +30,32 @@ export function findingsMarkdown(report) {
   const findings = Array.isArray(report.findings) ? report.findings : [];
   const duplicate = new Map();
   for (const group of groupDuplicateFindings(findings)) for (const i of group.findingIndices.slice(1)) duplicate.set(i, group.findingIndices[0]);
-  const sections = new Map([['本次新增（复核支持）',[]],['当前源码问题（复核支持）',[]],['待核实',[]],['原有问题（复核支持）',[]],['已反驳',[]]]);
-  findings.forEach((f,i)=>{ if (!duplicate.has(i)) sections.get(findingDisposition(f,report)).push({f,i}); });
+  const sections = new Map([['本次新增（复核支持）',[]],['当前源码问题（复核支持）',[]],['复核后不确定',[]],['复核未完成',[]],['原有问题（复核支持）',[]],['已反驳',[]]]);
+  findings.forEach((f,i)=>{
+    const state = verificationPresentation(f, report);
+    const label = state === 'uncertain' ? '复核后不确定' : state === 'incomplete' ? '复核未完成' : findingDisposition(f,report);
+    if (!duplicate.has(i)) sections.get(label).push({f,i});
+  });
   const output = ['', '## 审查发现'];
   if (!findings.length) return [...output, '本轮没有形成问题记录；这不等于已经排除未完成范围内的问题。'];
-  output.push('以下区分复核支持、待核实和已反驳的记录；证据引用通过校验不等于运行复现或因果证明。');
+  output.push('以下分开列示复核支持、复核后不确定、复核未完成和已反驳的记录；证据引用通过校验不等于运行复现或因果证明。');
   for (const [label, items] of sections) {
     if (!items.length) continue;
     output.push('', '### ' + label);
     for (const {f,i} of items) {
       const severity = ({critical:'严重',high:'高',medium:'中',low:'低'})[f.severity] ?? safe(f.severity ?? '未分级');
-      output.push('', '#### ' + (i+1) + '. ' + safe(f.title) + '（严重程度：' + severity + '）', '- 位置：' + location(f));
-      for (const [key,title] of [['trigger','什么情况下发生'],['impact','可能造成的影响'],['evidence','已看到的依据']]) if (f[key]) output.push('- ' + title + '：' + safe(f[key]));
-      if (label === '待核实') output.push('- 尚未确定：' + safe(f.verification?.reason ?? '候选尚未完成有效的独立复核或修改前后对照，不能作为已确认缺陷。'));
+      const hypothesis = label === '复核后不确定' || label === '复核未完成' || label === '已反驳';
+      output.push('', '#### ' + (i+1) + '. ' + (hypothesis ? '主审假说：' : '') + safe(f.title) + '（' + (hypothesis ? '主审拟议严重程度' : '严重程度') + '：' + severity + '）', '- 位置：' + location(f));
+      if (hypothesis) output.push('- 阅读方式：以下为主审记录的线索和假说，不是确定事实或必改建议；原始字段及完整证据保留在技术附录。');
+      const fields = hypothesis ? [['evidence','已知差异／线索（主审记录，非缺陷证明）'],['trigger','待证触发条件'],['impact','影响假说']] : [['trigger','什么情况下发生'],['impact','可能造成的影响'],['evidence','已看到的依据']];
+      for (const [key,title] of fields) if (f[key]) output.push('- ' + title + '：' + safe(f[key]));
+      if (label === '复核后不确定') output.push('- 复核结论：本候选已完成复核记录，但缺陷或新增归因仍未确定。' + safe(f.verification?.reason ?? '现有证据不足以支持或排除该假说。'));
+      if (label === '复核未完成') output.push('- 复核进度：尚未完成有效复核，不能当作已复核不确定或已确认缺陷。' + safe(f.verification?.reason ?? '尚无有效复核结论。'));
       if (label === '已反驳') output.push('- 反证结论：' + safe(f.verification?.reason ?? '复核反驳该候选；不计为待修缺陷。'));
-      if (f.attribution?.beforeBehavior) output.push('- 修改前：' + safe(f.attribution.beforeBehavior));
-      if (f.attribution?.afterBehavior) output.push('- 修改后：' + safe(f.attribution.afterBehavior));
-      if (f.suggestion) output.push('- 建议：' + safe(f.suggestion));
+      if (f.attribution?.beforeBehavior) output.push('- 修改前' + (hypothesis ? '（主审描述，待核实）' : '') + '：' + safe(f.attribution.beforeBehavior));
+      if (f.attribution?.afterBehavior) output.push('- 修改后' + (hypothesis ? '（主审描述，待核实）' : '') + '：' + safe(f.attribution.afterBehavior));
+      if (hypothesis) output.push('- 待验证方案：先核对触发条件、实际调用路径及修改前后行为，再决定是否需要修复。' + (f.suggestion ? '原主审建议（待验证，不是必改项）：' + safe(f.suggestion) : '原记录未提供建议。'));
+      else if (f.suggestion) output.push('- 建议：' + safe(f.suggestion));
       const related = [...duplicate].filter(([,first])=>first===i).map(([index])=>location(findings[index]));
       if (related.length) output.push('- 相同证据与解释的其他位置：' + related.join('；') + '。正文合并展示，原始候选仍保留。');
       if (f.reused || f.priorRun) output.push('- 来源：包含既往审核结果，不表示本轮重新取证。');

package/src/report-summary.mjs

@@ -17,6 +17,19 @@ export function comparisonValidated(finding) {
   return old.every(i => typeof evidence[i].sourceId === 'string' && evidence[i].sourceId) && fresh.every(i => typeof evidence[i].sourceId === 'string' && evidence[i].sourceId && old.every(j => evidence[j].sourceId !== evidence[i].sourceId));
 }
 
+// Rendering-only states. A completed uncertain verdict may legitimately have no
+// evidence (the verifier contract allows this); it is not an unfinished run.
+export function verificationPresentation(finding, report = {}) {
+  const v = finding?.verification;
+  if (v?.status !== 'completed' || !['supported', 'uncertain', 'refuted'].includes(v.verdict)) return 'incomplete';
+  const evidenceValid = rows(v.evidence).length > 0 && v.evidence.every(ref => ref?.status === 'references-validated');
+  if (v.verdict === 'refuted' && evidenceValid) return 'refuted';
+  if (v.verdict !== 'supported' || !evidenceValid) return 'uncertain';
+  if (report.mode === 'project' || report.reviewMode === 'project' || report.projectScope || finding.attribution?.causality === 'current-source-only') return 'current';
+  if (comparisonValidated(finding) && ['introduced', 'preexisting'].includes(v.regression.classification)) return v.regression.classification;
+  return 'uncertain';
+}
+
 /**
  * Pure presentation data for Markdown/Lead renderers. Counts are candidate records,
  * not proven defects. coverage counts main-review entries (directories included in
@@ -86,6 +99,11 @@ export function reportSummaryMarkdown(report = {}) {
     const labels = { introduced: '复核支持本次新增', unresolved: '待核实', preexisting: '复核支持原有', refuted: '复核反驳', current: '当前源码复核支持' };
     output.push('- 候选复核：' + Object.entries(labels).filter(([key]) => counts[key] > 0).map(([key, label]) => label + ' ' + counts[key]).join('；') + '。');
   }
+  const states = rows(report.findings).map(finding => verificationPresentation(finding, report));
+  const uncertain = states.filter(state => state === 'uncertain').length;
+  const incomplete = states.filter(state => state === 'incomplete').length;
+  output.push('- 复核状态分列：复核支持 ' + (counts.introduced + counts.preexisting + counts.current) + '；已复核不确定 ' + uncertain + '；复核未完成（未复核或未完成有效复核） ' + incomplete + (counts.refuted ? '；已反驳 ' + counts.refuted : '') + '。');
+  if (counts.unresolved) output.push('- “待核实”为合计：已复核不确定与复核未完成分开列示，前者不表示复核未执行；均不能直接视为缺陷或必改项。');
   const unit = coverage.unit === 'files' ? '个文件' : '个变更条目（含目录）';
   const labels = { completed: '主审完成', excluded: '排除', blocked: '阻断', failed: '失败', cancelled: '取消', pending: '待审', running: '执行中', interrupted: '中断', unaccounted: '状态未记账' };
   output.push('- 覆盖：' + coverage.total + ' ' + unit + '；' + Object.entries(labels).filter(([key]) => coverage[key] > 0).map(([key, label]) => label + ' ' + coverage[key]).join('，') + (coverage.total ? '。' : '未执行。'));

package/src/review-diagnostics.mjs

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 import { REVIEW_RUNTIME } from './runtime-identity.mjs';
 const PHASES = ['business-grouping', 'risk-planning', 'primary', 'group-primary', 'file-interaction', 'window-synthesis', 'verification'];
-const PURPOSES = ['primary-initial', 'retrieval-followup', 'budget-finalization', 'json-correction', 'business-grouping', 'risk-planning', 'group-primary', 'window-synthesis', 'file-interaction', 'verification'];
+const PURPOSES = ['primary-initial', 'retrieval-followup', 'budget-finalization', 'json-correction', 'business-grouping', 'risk-planning', 'group-primary', 'window-synthesis', 'file-interaction', 'verification', 'verification-correction'];
 const READER_FIELDS = ['calls', 'outputBytes', 'maxCalls', 'maxOutputBytes', 'remainingCalls', 'remainingOutputBytes', 'maxResultBytes', 'cacheHits', 'deliveries', 'cacheEntries', 'cacheBytes'];
 const JSON_ISSUES = ['property-name', 'colon', 'separator', 'invalid-escape', 'control-character', 'unterminated-string', 'unexpected-end', 'trailing-content', 'syntax'];
-const CORRECTION_CODES = ['MODEL_INVALID_JSON', 'MODEL_INVALID_REVIEW_RESPONSE', 'MODEL_INVALID_FINDING_IDENTITY', 'MODEL_INVALID_FINDING_SEVERITY', 'MODEL_MISSING_FINDING_FIELD', 'MODEL_INVALID_ANCHOR', 'MODEL_ANCHOR_MISMATCH', 'RETRIEVAL_PROTOCOL_ERROR'];
+const CORRECTION_CODES = ['MODEL_INVALID_JSON', 'MODEL_INVALID_REVIEW_RESPONSE', 'MODEL_INVALID_FINDING_IDENTITY', 'MODEL_INVALID_FINDING_SEVERITY', 'MODEL_MISSING_FINDING_FIELD', 'MODEL_INVALID_ANCHOR', 'MODEL_ANCHOR_MISMATCH', 'RETRIEVAL_PROTOCOL_ERROR', 'MODEL_INCOMPLETE_VERIFICATION'];
 const LIMIT_CODES = ['READER_CALL_BUDGET_EXCEEDED', 'READER_OUTPUT_BUDGET_EXCEEDED', 'RETRIEVAL_ROUND_BUDGET_EXCEEDED'];
 const RECOVERY_KINDS = ['native-tool', 'text-compatible', 'trailing-prose'];
 const FALLBACK_REASONS = ['mode-notauto', 'smallchange', 'disabled', 'project', 'laterround', 'multi-batch', 'incomplete-edit-scope', 'input-budget'];
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ export function reviewDiagnostics(report, { reviewWallMs = null, executionWallMs
   const readerBudget = Object.fromEntries(READER_FIELDS.map(field => [field, number(report.readerBudget?.[field])]));
   const correctionCounts = new Map();
   for (const event of sources.flatMap(f => f.modelCorrections ?? [])) {
-    if (!['explicit-json-correction', 'retrieval-protocol-correction', 'review-format-correction'].includes(event?.action) || !CORRECTION_CODES.includes(event.code)) continue;
+    if (!['explicit-json-correction', 'retrieval-protocol-correction', 'review-format-correction', 'verification-response-correction'].includes(event?.action) || !CORRECTION_CODES.includes(event.code)) continue;
     const jsonIssue = JSON_ISSUES.includes(event.jsonIssue) ? event.jsonIssue : null;
     const key = JSON.stringify([event.code, jsonIssue]);
     correctionCounts.set(key, (correctionCounts.get(key) ?? 0) + 1);
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ export function diagnosticsMarkdown(d) {
     output.push('', '累计调用墙钟可能并发重叠，且包含生命周期观察／初始检查点等待，不是纯提供方耗时，也不能从总耗时中相减当作本地开销。');
   } else output.push('- 逐阶段模型观测不可用（未产生或旧报告未记录），不按零耗时解释。');
   if (d.modelCallPurposes?.length) {
-    const labels = { 'primary-initial': '阶段初始', 'retrieval-followup': '检索后续', 'budget-finalization': '预算受限最终答复', 'json-correction': 'JSON纠正', 'business-grouping': '业务分组', 'risk-planning': '风险计划', 'group-primary': '分组主审', 'window-synthesis': '窗口综合', 'file-interaction': '跨文件综合', verification: '复核' };
+    const labels = { 'primary-initial': '阶段初始', 'retrieval-followup': '检索后续', 'budget-finalization': '预算受限最终答复', 'json-correction': 'JSON纠正', 'business-grouping': '业务分组', 'risk-planning': '风险计划', 'group-primary': '分组主审', 'window-synthesis': '窗口综合', 'file-interaction': '跨文件综合', verification: '复核', 'verification-correction': '复核批次纠正' };
     output.push('- 调用目的：' + d.modelCallPurposes.filter(row => PURPOSES.includes(row.purpose)).map(row => labels[row.purpose] + ' ' + (number(row.calls) ?? '不可用')).join('；') + '。');
   }
   if (d.readerBudget && READER_FIELDS.some(field => number(d.readerBudget[field]) !== null)) {

package/src/review.mjs

@@ -312,6 +312,7 @@ export async function reviewSnapshot(snapshot, model, options = {}) {
       const onProtocolEvent = async info => {
         if (info.action === 'json-transport-recovery') (state.modelRecoveries ??= []).push(info);
         if (info.action === 'retrieval-protocol-correction') pendingStageCorrection = { action: info.action, code: 'RETRIEVAL_PROTOCOL_ERROR' };
+        if (info.action === 'verification-response-correction' && info.code === 'MODEL_INCOMPLETE_VERIFICATION') (state.modelCorrections ??= []).push({ action: info.action, code: info.code });
         await options.onProgress?.({ stage: 'protocol-correction', fileId: file.id, path: file.path, ...info });
       };
       const trackedModel = request => {

package/src/verification-loop.mjs

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { modelWireBudget } from './model-wire-budget.mjs';
 import { createEvidenceReceipts } from './evidence-receipts.mjs';
 import { retrievalLoop, retrievalRequest } from './retrieval-loop.mjs';
 import { verificationSeeds } from './verification-seeds.mjs';
-import { validateCandidateVerification } from './candidate-verification.mjs';
+import { validateCandidateVerification, validateCandidateVerificationEnvelope } from './candidate-verification.mjs';
 
 export { VERIFICATION_INSTRUCTIONS };
 
@@ -44,7 +44,34 @@ export async function verificationLoop(model, request, candidates, scope, option
   const resolveEvidence = value => (seedReceipts.get(value?.receiptId) ?? receipts.resolve)(value);
   // No caller/model-supplied seed inputs: every initial result above was freshly
   // read under this invocation's receipt table and the shared approved budget.
-  const response = await retrievalLoop(model, verificationRequest, retrievalScope, { ...options, initialRetrieved });
+  let lastRequest;
+  const response = await retrievalLoop(value => { lastRequest = value; return model(value); }, verificationRequest, retrievalScope, { ...options, initialRetrieved });
+  let accepted = response;
+  try { validateCandidateVerificationEnvelope(response, ids); } catch (error) {
+    request.signal?.throwIfAborted();
+    // Correct only a structurally incomplete batch, before any final evidence
+    // reads. Never retry bad identities, invented receipts or regression failures.
+    if (options.correctProtocol !== true || error.code !== 'MODEL_INCOMPLETE_VERIFICATION' || JSON.parse(lastRequest.input).retrievalFinalization) throw error;
+    // Admit only an otherwise valid subset of evidence-free uncertain entries.
+    // Do not let a missing member hide an invalid identity, receipt or regression.
+    if (!response || Object.keys(response).length !== 1 || !Array.isArray(response.verdicts) || response.verdicts.length >= ids.length) throw error;
+    const subset = response.verdicts.map(item => item?.candidateId);
+    validateCandidateVerificationEnvelope(response, subset);
+    if (subset.some(id => !ids.includes(id)) || response.verdicts.some(item => item.verdict !== 'uncertain' || item.evidence.length || Object.hasOwn(item, 'regression'))) throw error;
+    const correction = { ...lastRequest, callPurpose: 'verification-correction', instructions: lastRequest.instructions + '\n本次仅纠正不完整的候选复核批次。必须为本次 candidates 每个 candidateId 恰好返回一个 verdict；不可漏项、重复或添加身份。仅返回完整 verdicts，不得 requests，不得再次检索。沿用已提供的原文回执；缺证据的候选明确 uncertain 并说明缺失条件，不得编造支持或删除候选。全部结果仍须通过原校验。' };
+    const max = options.maxInputBytes ?? 96 * 1024;
+    if (!(request.nativeOutputTools === true ? modelWireBudget(correction, max).fits : Buffer.byteLength(correction.input) + Buffer.byteLength(correction.instructions) <= max)) throw error;
+    options.beforeCall?.();
+    request.signal?.throwIfAborted();
+    await request.onProtocolEvent?.({ action: 'verification-response-correction', code: error.code });
+    request.signal?.throwIfAborted();
+    const next = await model(correction);
+    request.signal?.throwIfAborted();
+    const serialized = typeof next === 'string' ? next : JSON.stringify(next);
+    if (typeof serialized !== 'string' || Buffer.byteLength(serialized) > 128 * 1024) throw new Error('Verification response too large');
+    accepted = JSON.parse(serialized);
+    validateCandidateVerificationEnvelope(accepted, ids);
+  }
   request.signal?.throwIfAborted();
-  return validateCandidateVerification(response, ids, scope.read, resolveEvidence, { enableMigrationRegression: options.enableMigrationRegression === true && !project, migrationContext, catalog: scope.catalog(), fileIds: Object.fromEntries(ids.map((id, i) => [id, candidates[i].fileId])) });
+  return validateCandidateVerification(accepted, ids, scope.read, resolveEvidence, { enableMigrationRegression: options.enableMigrationRegression === true && !project, migrationContext, catalog: scope.catalog(), fileIds: Object.fromEntries(ids.map((id, i) => [id, candidates[i].fileId])) });
 }