@fastino-ai/pioneer-cli 0.2.0 → 0.2.1

package/workspaces/santa-2025/SUMMARY.md

@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+# Santa 2025 - Competition Summary
+
+## 🎄 Challenge: Christmas Tree Packing Optimization
+
+**Goal**: Pack Christmas trees efficiently into square boxes to minimize wasted space.
+
+## 📊 Results Achieved
+
+| Metric | Baseline | Improved | Target (Leaderboard) |
+|--------|----------|----------|----------------------|
+| **Score** | 178.92 | **162.38** | ~69.0 |
+| **Improvement** | - | **-9.3%** | Still need -57% |
+| **Validity** | ✅ Valid | ✅ Valid | - |
+
+### Progress Visualization
+```
+Baseline:  178.92 ████████████████████████░░░░░░░░
+Improved:  162.38 ██████████████████████░░░░░░░░░░
+Target:     69.00 █████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
+                  0        50       100       150     200
+```
+
+## 🛠️ What We Built
+
+### 1. Analysis & Understanding
+- ✅ Downloaded and analyzed competition data
+- ✅ Understood the problem: 200 puzzles with 1-200 trees each
+- ✅ Studied the metric: Σ(bounding_square² / num_trees)
+- ✅ Reviewed top solutions and strategies
+
+### 2. Baseline Solution (Score: 178.92)
+**Algorithm**: Greedy placement with corner weighting
+- Start from empty configuration
+- Add trees incrementally (1→2→3→...→200)
+- For each tree:
+  - Try 10 random starting angles
+  - Place far from center, move inward
+  - Stop when collision detected
+  - Fine-tune position
+- Use corner-weighted angles: abs(sin(2θ))
+
+**Performance**: ~2 seconds for all 200 puzzles
+
+### 3. Improved Solution (Score: 162.38) 🎯
+**Enhancements**:
+- ✅ Multiple random seeds (tested 5 seeds)
+- ✅ Two angle strategies: aligned vs random
+- ✅ Increased placement attempts (20 for small, 15 for large)
+- ✅ Finer position adjustment (0.03 vs 0.05)
+- ✅ Adaptive starting radius based on puzzle size
+
+**Key Insight**: Random angles with seed 2024 performed best!
+
+### 4. Tools & Infrastructure
+```
+baseline_solution.py       # Greedy algorithm
+improved_solution.py       # Multi-seed optimization
+evaluate_submission.py     # Official metric validation
+visualize.py              # Generate tree arrangement plots
+test_solution.py          # Quick testing on subsets
+```
+
+## 📈 Performance Analysis
+
+### Score by Puzzle Size (Improved Solution)
+
+| Trees | Side Length | Score/Puzzle | Efficiency |
+|-------|-------------|--------------|------------|
+| 1-10  | 1.8-3.1     | 0.81-1.66    | Medium     |
+| 11-50 | 3.1-6.1     | 0.62-0.94    | Good       |
+| 51-100| 6.3-9.1     | 0.72-0.86    | Good       |
+| 101-150| 9.3-11.2   | 0.73-0.83    | Good       |
+| 151-200| 11.4-12.7  | 0.75-0.81    | Good       |
+
+### Observations
+1. **Early puzzles** (1-10 trees): Higher variance, harder to optimize
+2. **Mid-range** (20-100): Most consistent, ~0.7-0.9 per puzzle
+3. **Large puzzles** (150-200): Stable ~0.75-0.80 per puzzle
+4. **Best puzzle**: #7 with 7 trees (score: 0.62)
+5. **Worst puzzle**: #2 with 2 trees (score: 1.66)
+
+## 🎯 Gap to Leaderboard
+
+Current: **162.38**  
+Target: **~69.0**  
+**Gap: 93.38 points (57% reduction needed)**
+
+### What Top Solutions Do Better
+
+1. **Simulated Annealing**: Accept worse solutions to escape local minima
+2. **Backtracking**: Rebuild configurations from scratch (not incremental)
+3. **Ensemble**: Generate multiple solutions, pick best per puzzle
+4. **Better Initial Alignment**: Well-aligned trees (~88 score baseline)
+5. **Rotation Optimization**: Fine-tune angles after placement
+6. **Physics-based**: Treat as particle simulation with forces
+
+## 🚀 Next Steps to Reach Top 10
+
+### Phase 1: Simulated Annealing (Target: ~120-140)
+- [ ] Implement SA for each puzzle independently
+- [ ] Perturb positions and rotations
+- [ ] Temperature scheduling (start hot, cool down)
+- [ ] Run for 1000-5000 iterations per puzzle
+
+**Estimated improvement**: 15-20%
+
+### Phase 2: Smarter Initial Solutions (Target: ~100-120)
+- [ ] Align all trees to same orientation first
+- [ ] Pack in grid-like pattern
+- [ ] Then apply optimization
+- [ ] Similar to "well-aligned" approach (88.3 baseline)
+
+**Estimated improvement**: 25-30%
+
+### Phase 3: Per-Puzzle Optimization (Target: ~80-100)
+- [ ] Don't build incrementally
+- [ ] Generate each N-tree puzzle independently
+- [ ] More freedom to optimize
+- [ ] Use ensemble: try multiple approaches per puzzle
+
+**Estimated improvement**: 15-20%
+
+### Phase 4: Advanced Techniques (Target: ~69-80)
+- [ ] Gradient-based position refinement
+- [ ] Integer programming formulation
+- [ ] Genetic algorithms
+- [ ] Hybrid approaches
+
+**Estimated improvement**: 10-15%
+
+## 💡 Key Insights
+
+1. **Incremental building is suboptimal**: Reusing N-1 solution constrains N solution
+2. **Random seed matters**: 10% variation between seeds
+3. **Angle distribution critical**: Random > aligned for this problem
+4. **Early puzzles matter**: Small puzzles have high variance
+5. **Collision detection is fast**: STRtree spatial indexing is efficient
+
+## 📁 Files Generated
+
+```
+workspaces/santa-2025/
+├── baseline_submission.csv       # Score: 178.92
+├── improved_submission.csv       # Score: 162.38 ⭐
+├── baseline_log.txt             # Build logs
+├── improved_log.txt             # Optimization logs
+├── puzzle_010.png               # Visualization: 10 trees
+├── puzzle_020.png               # Visualization: 20 trees
+├── puzzle_050.png               # Visualization: 50 trees
+├── puzzle_100.png               # Visualization: 100 trees
+├── puzzle_150.png               # Visualization: 150 trees
+├── puzzle_200.png               # Visualization: 200 trees
+└── README.md                    # Documentation
+```
+
+## 🔧 Technical Details
+
+### Christmas Tree Geometry
+- **Shape**: 15-vertex irregular polygon
+- **Components**: 3 tiers (triangular) + trunk (rectangular)
+- **Dimensions**: 
+  - Height: 1.0 units (0.8 foliage + 0.2 trunk)
+  - Max width: 0.7 units at base
+  - Trunk: 0.15 × 0.2 units
+
+### Key Parameters (Improved Solution)
+```python
+num_attempts_small = 20      # For puzzles < 50 trees
+num_attempts_large = 15      # For puzzles ≥ 50 trees
+start_radius_small = 20.0    # For puzzles < 100 trees
+start_radius_large = 25.0    # For puzzles ≥ 100 trees
+step_inward = 0.5           # Coarse placement
+step_outward = 0.03         # Fine adjustment
+precision = 25 digits        # Decimal precision
+scale_factor = 1e15         # For numerical stability
+```
+
+### Dependencies
+```
+shapely >= 2.0.0     # Polygon operations
+numpy >= 1.24.0      # Array operations
+pandas >= 2.0.0      # Data manipulation
+matplotlib >= 3.7.0  # Visualization
+scipy >= 1.10.0      # Optimization (future)
+```
+
+## 🏆 Competition Context
+
+**Santa 2025 - Christmas Tree Packing Challenge**
+- Platform: Kaggle
+- Type: Optimization
+- Difficulty: Hard (NP-hard 2D bin packing)
+- Timeline: Dec 2024 - Jan 2025
+- Prize: TBD
+
+### Leaderboard (Jan 5, 2025)
+1. KiRaRe: 69.03
+2. shr: 69.03
+3. bowwowplusa: 69.16
+4. huismus: 69.21
+5. Santa AI Chaotic Elves: 69.21
+...
+**Our position**: Would be ~rank 50-100 with 162.38
+
+## 📚 Resources
+
+- [Competition Page](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/santa-2025)
+- [Getting Started Notebook](https://www.kaggle.com/code/inversion/santa-2025-getting-started)
+- [Metric Explanation](https://www.kaggle.com/code/metric/santa-2025-metric)
+- [Top Solution (88.3)](https://www.kaggle.com/code/zaburo/88-32999-a-well-aligned-initial-solution)
+- [Shapely Documentation](https://shapely.readthedocs.io/)
+
+## 🎓 Lessons Learned
+
+1. **Quick iterations beat perfect planning**: Got working solution in 1 hour
+2. **Multiple seeds are cheap wins**: 10% improvement for 5× runtime
+3. **Visualization helps debugging**: Spotted patterns in tree arrangements
+4. **Official metric is essential**: Build it early, use it often
+5. **Reading top solutions accelerates progress**: Learned about alignment strategy
+
+## 🔜 Immediate Actions
+
+If continuing:
+1. **Submit improved solution** to Kaggle (162.38 score)
+2. **Implement simulated annealing** (1-2 hours work)
+3. **Try well-aligned initialization** (30 min work)
+4. **Ensemble approach**: Run 10 seeds, pick best per puzzle (1 hour)
+
+Expected score after these: **~110-130** (top 20%)
+
+---
+
+**Status**: ✅ Working solution delivered  
+**Best Score**: 162.38  
+**Improvement vs Baseline**: 9.3%  
+**Time Invested**: ~3 hours  
+**Next Milestone**: Break 120 score
+
+🎄 Happy Optimizing! 🎄

package/workspaces/santa-2025/advanced_optimizer.py

@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""
+Advanced optimizer combining best techniques:
+1. Load best existing solution as starting point
+2. Apply multi-directional compaction
+3. Simulated annealing with adaptive cooling
+4. Gravity-based repositioning
+5. Focus on worst-performing configurations
+"""
+
+import numpy as np
+import pandas as pd
+from shapely import affinity
+from shapely.geometry import Polygon
+from shapely.ops import unary_union
+from shapely.strtree import STRtree
+import random
+import math
+import time
+from copy import deepcopy
+
+def create_tree_polygon(x, y, angle):
+    """Create tree polygon."""
+    trunk_w, trunk_h = 0.15, 0.2
+    base_w, mid_w, top_w = 0.7, 0.4, 0.25
+    tip_y, tier_1_y, tier_2_y, base_y = 0.8, 0.5, 0.25, 0.0
+    trunk_bottom_y = -trunk_h
+
+    coords = [
+        (0.0, tip_y), (top_w/2, tier_1_y), (top_w/4, tier_1_y),
+        (mid_w/2, tier_2_y), (mid_w/4, tier_2_y), (base_w/2, base_y),
+        (trunk_w/2, base_y), (trunk_w/2, trunk_bottom_y),
+        (-trunk_w/2, trunk_bottom_y), (-trunk_w/2, base_y),
+        (-base_w/2, base_y), (-mid_w/4, tier_2_y), (-mid_w/2, tier_2_y),
+        (-top_w/4, tier_1_y), (-top_w/2, tier_1_y),
+    ]
+    poly = Polygon(coords)
+    rotated = affinity.rotate(poly, angle, origin=(0, 0))
+    return affinity.translate(rotated, xoff=x, yoff=y)
+
+
+def compute_score(config):
+    """Compute score for configuration."""
+    trees = [create_tree_polygon(x, y, a) for x, y, a in config]
+    bounds = unary_union(trees).bounds
+    side = max(bounds[2] - bounds[0], bounds[3] - bounds[1])
+    return side ** 2 / len(config), side, trees
+
+
+def check_collision(trees):
+    """Check if any trees overlap (not just touch)."""
+    tree_index = STRtree(trees)
+    for i, tree in enumerate(trees):
+        possible = tree_index.query(tree)
+        for j in possible:
+            if i < j:
+                if trees[i].intersects(trees[j]) and not trees[i].touches(trees[j]):
+                    return True
+    return False
+
+
+def gravity_pull(config, trees, center_x=0, center_y=0, pull_strength=0.05):
+    """Pull trees toward center while avoiding collisions."""
+    improved = False
+    for i in range(len(config)):
+        x, y, a = config[i]
+        
+        # Direction toward center
+        dx = center_x - x
+        dy = center_y - y
+        dist = math.sqrt(dx**2 + dy**2)
+        if dist < 0.01:
+            continue
+        
+        # Try moving toward center
+        move_x = dx * pull_strength
+        move_y = dy * pull_strength
+        
+        # Test new position
+        new_config = list(config)
+        new_config[i] = (x + move_x, y + move_y, a)
+        new_trees = [create_tree_polygon(x, y, a) for x, y, a in new_config]
+        
+        if not check_collision(new_trees):
+            config[i] = new_config[i]
+            trees[i] = new_trees[i]
+            improved = True
+    
+    return improved
+
+
+def eight_way_compaction(config, trees):
+    """Try compacting in 8 directions."""
+    directions = [(1,0), (-1,0), (0,1), (0,-1), (1,1), (1,-1), (-1,1), (-1,-1)]
+    improved = False
+    
+    for dx, dy in directions:
+        step = 0.01
+        max_steps = 100
+        
+        for _ in range(max_steps):
+            # Try moving all trees in this direction
+            new_config = [(x + dx*step, y + dy*step, a) for x, y, a in config]
+            new_trees = [create_tree_polygon(x, y, a) for x, y, a in new_config]
+            
+            if check_collision(new_trees):
+                break
+            
+            # Valid move
+            config[:] = new_config
+            trees[:] = new_trees
+            improved = True
+    
+    return improved
+
+
+def simulated_annealing_optimize(config, n, max_iterations=5000, initial_temp=1.0):
+    """Apply simulated annealing to optimize a single configuration."""
+    current_config = list(config)
+    current_score, current_side, current_trees = compute_score(current_config)
+    best_config = deepcopy(current_config)
+    best_score = current_score
+    
+    temperature = initial_temp
+    cooling_rate = 0.9995
+    
+    for iteration in range(max_iterations):
+        # Random perturbation
+        idx = random.randint(0, len(current_config) - 1)
+        x, y, a = current_config[idx]
+        
+        # Choose perturbation type
+        move_type = random.choice(['position', 'rotation', 'both'])
+        
+        new_x, new_y, new_a = x, y, a
+        if move_type in ['position', 'both']:
+            new_x = x + random.gauss(0, 0.05)
+            new_y = y + random.gauss(0, 0.05)
+        if move_type in ['rotation', 'both']:
+            new_a = (a + random.gauss(0, 5)) % 360
+        
+        # Test new configuration
+        test_config = list(current_config)
+        test_config[idx] = (new_x, new_y, new_a)
+        test_trees = [create_tree_polygon(x, y, a) for x, y, a in test_config]
+        
+        if not check_collision(test_trees):
+            test_score, test_side, _ = compute_score(test_config)
+            delta = test_score - current_score
+            
+            # Accept or reject
+            if delta < 0 or random.random() < math.exp(-delta / temperature):
+                current_config = test_config
+                current_score = test_score
+                current_trees = test_trees
+                
+                if test_score < best_score:
+                    best_score = test_score
+                    best_config = deepcopy(test_config)
+        
+        temperature *= cooling_rate
+        
+        # Periodic improvements
+        if iteration % 1000 == 0:
+            # Apply gravity pull
+            gravity_pull(current_config, current_trees)
+            current_score, current_side, current_trees = compute_score(current_config)
+    
+    return best_config, best_score
+
+
+def load_best_solution(path):
+    """Load existing best solution."""
+    df = pd.read_csv(path)
+    df['n'] = df['id'].str.split('_').str[0].astype(int)
+    
+    configs = {}
+    for n in range(1, 201):
+        group = df[df['n'] == n]
+        config = []
+        for _, row in group.iterrows():
+            x = float(row['x'].strip('s'))
+            y = float(row['y'].strip('s'))
+            angle = float(row['deg'].strip('s'))
+            config.append((x, y, angle))
+        configs[n] = config
+    
+    return configs
+
+
+def main():
+    print("=" * 70)
+    print("ADVANCED OPTIMIZER - Extended Run")
+    print("=" * 70)
+    
+    # Load best existing solution
+    print("\nLoading best solution...")
+    configs = load_best_solution('/Users/kz/code/drop/workspace/santa-2025/best_public/submission_best.csv')
+    
+    # Calculate initial score
+    print("\nCalculating initial score...")
+    initial_total = 0
+    for n in range(1, 201):
+        score, _, _ = compute_score(configs[n])
+        initial_total += score
+    print(f"Initial total score: {initial_total:.6f}")
+    
+    # Identify worst configurations
+    print("\nIdentifying worst configurations...")
+    scores = []
+    for n in range(1, 201):
+        score, side, _ = compute_score(configs[n])
+        scores.append((n, score, side))
+    
+    # Sort by score/n ratio (efficiency)
+    scores.sort(key=lambda x: x[1] / x[0], reverse=True)
+    worst_configs = [n for n, _, _ in scores[:30]]  # Focus on worst 30
+    
+    print(f"Worst configurations to optimize: {worst_configs[:10]}...")
+    
+    # Optimize each worst configuration
+    print("\n" + "=" * 70)
+    print("OPTIMIZING WORST CONFIGURATIONS")
+    print("=" * 70)
+    
+    improvements = []
+    
+    for i, n in enumerate(worst_configs):
+        print(f"\n[{i+1}/{len(worst_configs)}] Optimizing n={n}...")
+        old_score, old_side, _ = compute_score(configs[n])
+        print(f"  Current: score={old_score:.6f}, side={old_side:.6f}")
+        
+        # Run optimization
+        iterations = min(10000, 2000 + n * 20)  # More iterations for larger n
+        new_config, new_score = simulated_annealing_optimize(
+            configs[n], n, max_iterations=iterations, initial_temp=0.5
+        )
+        
+        improvement = old_score - new_score
+        if improvement > 0:
+            configs[n] = new_config
+            improvements.append((n, improvement))
+            print(f"  ✓ Improved: score={new_score:.6f}, Δ={improvement:.6f}")
+        else:
+            print(f"  ✗ No improvement: score={new_score:.6f}")
+    
+    # Calculate final score
+    print("\n" + "=" * 70)
+    print("FINAL RESULTS")
+    print("=" * 70)
+    
+    final_total = 0
+    for n in range(1, 201):
+        score, _, _ = compute_score(configs[n])
+        final_total += score
+    
+    total_improvement = initial_total - final_total
+    
+    print(f"\nInitial score: {initial_total:.6f}")
+    print(f"Final score:   {final_total:.6f}")
+    print(f"Improvement:   {total_improvement:.6f}")
+    
+    if improvements:
+        print(f"\nConfigurations improved: {len(improvements)}")
+        print("Top improvements:")
+        improvements.sort(key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
+        for n, imp in improvements[:10]:
+            print(f"  n={n:3d}: {imp:.6f}")
+    
+    # Save result
+    print("\nSaving optimized submission...")
+    rows = []
+    for n in range(1, 201):
+        for i, (x, y, angle) in enumerate(configs[n]):
+            rows.append({
+                'id': f'{n:03d}_{i}',
+                'x': f's{x:.15f}',
+                'y': f's{y:.15f}',
+                'deg': f's{angle:.15f}'
+            })
+    
+    df = pd.DataFrame(rows)
+    output_file = f'optimized_submission_score{final_total:.2f}.csv'
+    df.to_csv(output_file, index=False)
+    
+    print(f"Saved to: {output_file}")
+    print("=" * 70)
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    random.seed(42)
+    np.random.seed(42)
+    main()

package/workspaces/santa-2025/analysis_summary.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+================================================================================
+SANTA 2025 - QUICK ANALYSIS SUMMARY
+================================================================================
+
+CURRENT STATUS:
+- Best submission: C_n2000_r90 with score 71.0077
+- Location: /Users/kz/code/drop/workspace/santa-2025/
+- You're in top 20% (estimated rank 20-30)
+
+GAP TO TOP:
+- Current: 71.01
+- Target (1st place): 69.03
+- Gap: 1.98 points (2.8%)
+
+KEY FINDINGS:
+
+1. SMALL CONFIGS ARE ALREADY OPTIMIZED
+   n=1-10 scores are nearly identical across all your solutions
+   - n=1: 0.6612 (appears to be a limitation, not improvable)
+   - n=2-10: Already very good (~0.37-0.45 per config)
+
+2. LARGE CONFIGS SHOW VARIATION
+   Comparing best_public vs C_n2000_r90:
+   - n=8:   0.3866 vs 0.3902 (+0.0036)
+   - n=180: 0.3342 vs 0.3430 (+0.0088)  
+   - n=200: 0.3388 vs 0.3389 (+0.0001)
+   
+   Most variation is in n=100-200 range
+
+3. NEARLY PERFECT PACKING
+   - All configs are square (width ≈ height)
+   - No obvious geometric inefficiencies
+   - Suggests you're near theoretical optimum
+
+OPPORTUNITIES:
+
+1. Ensemble Approach (0.2-0.4 points)
+   - Combine best results from all your runs
+   - Pick best score for each n across:
+     * best_public/submission_best.csv
+     * best_keeping/fast3h_out/*.csv  
+     * Other solver outputs
+   
+2. Extended Optimization (0.3-0.5 points)
+   - Run C_n2000 with higher n (n=5000, n=10000)
+   - Focus on n=100-200 where there's most variation
+   - Might take 6-12 hours
+
+3. Study Top 3 Solutions (0.5-1.0 points)
+   - Deep dive into what they do differently
+   - Implement novel techniques
+   - Requires significant time investment
+
+RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS:
+
+OPTION A: QUICK WIN (15 min, 0.2-0.3 points expected)
+- Create ensemble from all existing solutions
+- Target score: 70.7-70.8
+
+OPTION B: MEDIUM EFFORT (2-3 hours, 0.3-0.5 points expected)  
+- Run extended optimization on worst 50 configs
+- Target score: 70.5-70.7
+
+OPTION C: DEEP DIVE (1-2 days, 0.5-1.0 points expected)
+- Study top solutions in detail
+- Implement their unique approaches
+- Target score: 69.5-70.5
+
+================================================================================

package/workspaces/santa-2025/baseline_log.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+================================================================================
+Santa 2025 - Baseline Greedy Solution
+================================================================================
+
+Generating greedy solution...
+
+  20 trees: side length = 4.075499
+  40 trees: side length = 5.881665
+  60 trees: side length = 7.166137
+  80 trees: side length = 8.688082
+  100 trees: side length = 9.476442
+  120 trees: side length = 10.054136
+  140 trees: side length = 10.948304
+  160 trees: side length = 11.344507
+  180 trees: side length = 12.127983
+  200 trees: side length = 13.125883
+
+Creating submission file...
+
+Baseline submission saved to baseline_submission.csv
+================================================================================