@every-env/compound-plugin 0.9.0 → 2.34.2

package/plugins/compound-engineering/commands/workflows/work.md

@@ -1,454 +1,10 @@
 ---
 name: workflows:work
-description: Execute work plans efficiently while maintaining quality and finishing features
+description: "[DEPRECATED] Use /ce:work instead — renamed for clarity."
 argument-hint: "[plan file, specification, or todo file path]"
+disable-model-invocation: true
 ---
 
-# Work Plan Execution Command
+NOTE: /workflows:work is deprecated. Please use /ce:work instead. This alias will be removed in a future version.
 
-Execute a work plan efficiently while maintaining quality and finishing features.
-
-## Introduction
-
-This command takes a work document (plan, specification, or todo file) and executes it systematically. The focus is on **shipping complete features** by understanding requirements quickly, following existing patterns, and maintaining quality throughout.
-
-## Input Document
-
-<input_document> #$ARGUMENTS </input_document>
-
-## Execution Workflow
-
-### Phase 1: Quick Start
-
-1. **Read Plan and Clarify**
-
-   - Read the work document completely
-   - Review any references or links provided in the plan
-   - If anything is unclear or ambiguous, ask clarifying questions now
-   - Get user approval to proceed
-   - **Do not skip this** - better to ask questions now than build the wrong thing
-
-2. **Setup Environment**
-
-   First, check the current branch:
-
-   ```bash
-   current_branch=$(git branch --show-current)
-   default_branch=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@')
-
-   # Fallback if remote HEAD isn't set
-   if [ -z "$default_branch" ]; then
-     default_branch=$(git rev-parse --verify origin/main >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "main" || echo "master")
-   fi
-   ```
-
-   **If already on a feature branch** (not the default branch):
-   - Ask: "Continue working on `[current_branch]`, or create a new branch?"
-   - If continuing, proceed to step 3
-   - If creating new, follow Option A or B below
-
-   **If on the default branch**, choose how to proceed:
-
-   **Option A: Create a new branch**
-   ```bash
-   git pull origin [default_branch]
-   git checkout -b feature-branch-name
-   ```
-   Use a meaningful name based on the work (e.g., `feat/user-authentication`, `fix/email-validation`).
-
-   **Option B: Use a worktree (recommended for parallel development)**
-   ```bash
-   skill: git-worktree
-   # The skill will create a new branch from the default branch in an isolated worktree
-   ```
-
-   **Option C: Continue on the default branch**
-   - Requires explicit user confirmation
-   - Only proceed after user explicitly says "yes, commit to [default_branch]"
-   - Never commit directly to the default branch without explicit permission
-
-   **Recommendation**: Use worktree if:
-   - You want to work on multiple features simultaneously
-   - You want to keep the default branch clean while experimenting
-   - You plan to switch between branches frequently
-
-3. **Create Todo List**
-   - Use TodoWrite to break plan into actionable tasks
-   - Include dependencies between tasks
-   - Prioritize based on what needs to be done first
-   - Include testing and quality check tasks
-   - Keep tasks specific and completable
-
-### Phase 2: Execute
-
-1. **Task Execution Loop**
-
-   For each task in priority order:
-
-   ```
-   while (tasks remain):
-     - Mark task as in_progress in TodoWrite
-     - Read any referenced files from the plan
-     - Look for similar patterns in codebase
-     - Implement following existing conventions
-     - Write tests for new functionality
-     - Run tests after changes
-     - Mark task as completed in TodoWrite
-     - Mark off the corresponding checkbox in the plan file ([ ] → [x])
-     - Evaluate for incremental commit (see below)
-   ```
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Always update the original plan document by checking off completed items. Use the Edit tool to change `- [ ]` to `- [x]` for each task you finish. This keeps the plan as a living document showing progress and ensures no checkboxes are left unchecked.
-
-2. **Incremental Commits**
-
-   After completing each task, evaluate whether to create an incremental commit:
-
-   | Commit when... | Don't commit when... |
-   |----------------|---------------------|
-   | Logical unit complete (model, service, component) | Small part of a larger unit |
-   | Tests pass + meaningful progress | Tests failing |
-   | About to switch contexts (backend → frontend) | Purely scaffolding with no behavior |
-   | About to attempt risky/uncertain changes | Would need a "WIP" commit message |
-
-   **Heuristic:** "Can I write a commit message that describes a complete, valuable change? If yes, commit. If the message would be 'WIP' or 'partial X', wait."
-
-   **Commit workflow:**
-   ```bash
-   # 1. Verify tests pass (use project's test command)
-   # Examples: bin/rails test, npm test, pytest, go test, etc.
-
-   # 2. Stage only files related to this logical unit (not `git add .`)
-   git add <files related to this logical unit>
-
-   # 3. Commit with conventional message
-   git commit -m "feat(scope): description of this unit"
-   ```
-
-   **Handling merge conflicts:** If conflicts arise during rebasing or merging, resolve them immediately. Incremental commits make conflict resolution easier since each commit is small and focused.
-
-   **Note:** Incremental commits use clean conventional messages without attribution footers. The final Phase 4 commit/PR includes the full attribution.
-
-3. **Follow Existing Patterns**
-
-   - The plan should reference similar code - read those files first
-   - Match naming conventions exactly
-   - Reuse existing components where possible
-   - Follow project coding standards (see CLAUDE.md)
-   - When in doubt, grep for similar implementations
-
-4. **Test Continuously**
-
-   - Run relevant tests after each significant change
-   - Don't wait until the end to test
-   - Fix failures immediately
-   - Add new tests for new functionality
-
-5. **Figma Design Sync** (if applicable)
-
-   For UI work with Figma designs:
-
-   - Implement components following design specs
-   - Use figma-design-sync agent iteratively to compare
-   - Fix visual differences identified
-   - Repeat until implementation matches design
-
-6. **Track Progress**
-   - Keep TodoWrite updated as you complete tasks
-   - Note any blockers or unexpected discoveries
-   - Create new tasks if scope expands
-   - Keep user informed of major milestones
-
-### Phase 3: Quality Check
-
-1. **Run Core Quality Checks**
-
-   Always run before submitting:
-
-   ```bash
-   # Run full test suite (use project's test command)
-   # Examples: bin/rails test, npm test, pytest, go test, etc.
-
-   # Run linting (per CLAUDE.md)
-   # Use linting-agent before pushing to origin
-   ```
-
-2. **Consider Reviewer Agents** (Optional)
-
-   Use for complex, risky, or large changes. Read agents from `compound-engineering.local.md` frontmatter (`review_agents`). If no settings file, invoke the `setup` skill to create one.
-
-   Run configured agents in parallel with Task tool. Present findings and address critical issues.
-
-3. **Final Validation**
-   - All TodoWrite tasks marked completed
-   - All tests pass
-   - Linting passes
-   - Code follows existing patterns
-   - Figma designs match (if applicable)
-   - No console errors or warnings
-
-4. **Prepare Operational Validation Plan** (REQUIRED)
-   - Add a `## Post-Deploy Monitoring & Validation` section to the PR description for every change.
-   - Include concrete:
-     - Log queries/search terms
-     - Metrics or dashboards to watch
-     - Expected healthy signals
-     - Failure signals and rollback/mitigation trigger
-     - Validation window and owner
-   - If there is truly no production/runtime impact, still include the section with: `No additional operational monitoring required` and a one-line reason.
-
-### Phase 4: Ship It
-
-1. **Create Commit**
-
-   ```bash
-   git add .
-   git status  # Review what's being committed
-   git diff --staged  # Check the changes
-
-   # Commit with conventional format
-   git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
-   feat(scope): description of what and why
-
-   Brief explanation if needed.
-
-   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
-
-   Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
-   EOF
-   )"
-   ```
-
-2. **Capture and Upload Screenshots for UI Changes** (REQUIRED for any UI work)
-
-   For **any** design changes, new views, or UI modifications, you MUST capture and upload screenshots:
-
-   **Step 1: Start dev server** (if not running)
-   ```bash
-   bin/dev  # Run in background
-   ```
-
-   **Step 2: Capture screenshots with agent-browser CLI**
-   ```bash
-   agent-browser open http://localhost:3000/[route]
-   agent-browser snapshot -i
-   agent-browser screenshot output.png
-   ```
-   See the `agent-browser` skill for detailed usage.
-
-   **Step 3: Upload using imgup skill**
-   ```bash
-   skill: imgup
-   # Then upload each screenshot:
-   imgup -h pixhost screenshot.png  # pixhost works without API key
-   # Alternative hosts: catbox, imagebin, beeimg
-   ```
-
-   **What to capture:**
-   - **New screens**: Screenshot of the new UI
-   - **Modified screens**: Before AND after screenshots
-   - **Design implementation**: Screenshot showing Figma design match
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Always include uploaded image URLs in PR description. This provides visual context for reviewers and documents the change.
-
-3. **Create Pull Request**
-
-   ```bash
-   git push -u origin feature-branch-name
-
-   gh pr create --title "Feature: [Description]" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
-   ## Summary
-   - What was built
-   - Why it was needed
-   - Key decisions made
-
-   ## Testing
-   - Tests added/modified
-   - Manual testing performed
-
-   ## Post-Deploy Monitoring & Validation
-   - **What to monitor/search**
-     - Logs:
-     - Metrics/Dashboards:
-   - **Validation checks (queries/commands)**
-     - `command or query here`
-   - **Expected healthy behavior**
-     - Expected signal(s)
-   - **Failure signal(s) / rollback trigger**
-     - Trigger + immediate action
-   - **Validation window & owner**
-     - Window:
-     - Owner:
-   - **If no operational impact**
-     - `No additional operational monitoring required: <reason>`
-
-   ## Before / After Screenshots
-   | Before | After |
-   |--------|-------|
-   | ![before](URL) | ![after](URL) |
-
-   ## Figma Design
-   [Link if applicable]
-
-   ---
-
-   [![Compound Engineered](https://img.shields.io/badge/Compound-Engineered-6366f1)](https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
-   EOF
-   )"
-   ```
-
-4. **Update Plan Status**
-
-   If the input document has YAML frontmatter with a `status` field, update it to `completed`:
-   ```
-   status: active  →  status: completed
-   ```
-
-5. **Notify User**
-   - Summarize what was completed
-   - Link to PR
-   - Note any follow-up work needed
-   - Suggest next steps if applicable
-
----
-
-## Swarm Mode (Optional)
-
-For complex plans with multiple independent workstreams, enable swarm mode for parallel execution with coordinated agents.
-
-### When to Use Swarm Mode
-
-| Use Swarm Mode when... | Use Standard Mode when... |
-|------------------------|---------------------------|
-| Plan has 5+ independent tasks | Plan is linear/sequential |
-| Multiple specialists needed (review + test + implement) | Single-focus work |
-| Want maximum parallelism | Simpler mental model preferred |
-| Large feature with clear phases | Small feature or bug fix |
-
-### Enabling Swarm Mode
-
-To trigger swarm execution, say:
-
-> "Make a Task list and launch an army of agent swarm subagents to build the plan"
-
-Or explicitly request: "Use swarm mode for this work"
-
-### Swarm Workflow
-
-When swarm mode is enabled, the workflow changes:
-
-1. **Create Team**
-   ```
-   Teammate({ operation: "spawnTeam", team_name: "work-{timestamp}" })
-   ```
-
-2. **Create Task List with Dependencies**
-   - Parse plan into TaskCreate items
-   - Set up blockedBy relationships for sequential dependencies
-   - Independent tasks have no blockers (can run in parallel)
-
-3. **Spawn Specialized Teammates**
-   ```
-   Task({
-     team_name: "work-{timestamp}",
-     name: "implementer",
-     subagent_type: "general-purpose",
-     prompt: "Claim implementation tasks, execute, mark complete",
-     run_in_background: true
-   })
-
-   Task({
-     team_name: "work-{timestamp}",
-     name: "tester",
-     subagent_type: "general-purpose",
-     prompt: "Claim testing tasks, run tests, mark complete",
-     run_in_background: true
-   })
-   ```
-
-4. **Coordinate and Monitor**
-   - Team lead monitors task completion
-   - Spawn additional workers as phases unblock
-   - Handle plan approval if required
-
-5. **Cleanup**
-   ```
-   Teammate({ operation: "requestShutdown", target_agent_id: "implementer" })
-   Teammate({ operation: "requestShutdown", target_agent_id: "tester" })
-   Teammate({ operation: "cleanup" })
-   ```
-
-See the `orchestrating-swarms` skill for detailed swarm patterns and best practices.
-
----
-
-## Key Principles
-
-### Start Fast, Execute Faster
-
-- Get clarification once at the start, then execute
-- Don't wait for perfect understanding - ask questions and move
-- The goal is to **finish the feature**, not create perfect process
-
-### The Plan is Your Guide
-
-- Work documents should reference similar code and patterns
-- Load those references and follow them
-- Don't reinvent - match what exists
-
-### Test As You Go
-
-- Run tests after each change, not at the end
-- Fix failures immediately
-- Continuous testing prevents big surprises
-
-### Quality is Built In
-
-- Follow existing patterns
-- Write tests for new code
-- Run linting before pushing
-- Use reviewer agents for complex/risky changes only
-
-### Ship Complete Features
-
-- Mark all tasks completed before moving on
-- Don't leave features 80% done
-- A finished feature that ships beats a perfect feature that doesn't
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-Before creating PR, verify:
-
-- [ ] All clarifying questions asked and answered
-- [ ] All TodoWrite tasks marked completed
-- [ ] Tests pass (run project's test command)
-- [ ] Linting passes (use linting-agent)
-- [ ] Code follows existing patterns
-- [ ] Figma designs match implementation (if applicable)
-- [ ] Before/after screenshots captured and uploaded (for UI changes)
-- [ ] Commit messages follow conventional format
-- [ ] PR description includes Post-Deploy Monitoring & Validation section (or explicit no-impact rationale)
-- [ ] PR description includes summary, testing notes, and screenshots
-- [ ] PR description includes Compound Engineered badge
-
-## When to Use Reviewer Agents
-
-**Don't use by default.** Use reviewer agents only when:
-
-- Large refactor affecting many files (10+)
-- Security-sensitive changes (authentication, permissions, data access)
-- Performance-critical code paths
-- Complex algorithms or business logic
-- User explicitly requests thorough review
-
-For most features: tests + linting + following patterns is sufficient.
-
-## Common Pitfalls to Avoid
-
-- **Analysis paralysis** - Don't overthink, read the plan and execute
-- **Skipping clarifying questions** - Ask now, not after building wrong thing
-- **Ignoring plan references** - The plan has links for a reason
-- **Testing at the end** - Test continuously or suffer later
-- **Forgetting TodoWrite** - Track progress or lose track of what's done
-- **80% done syndrome** - Finish the feature, don't move on early
-- **Over-reviewing simple changes** - Save reviewer agents for complex work
+/ce:work $ARGUMENTS

package/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md

@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ topic: <kebab-case-topic>
 - [Any unresolved questions for the planning phase]
 
 ## Next Steps
-→ `/workflows:plan` for implementation details
+→ `/ce:plan` for implementation details
 ```
 
 **Output Location:** `docs/brainstorms/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-brainstorm.md`
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ topic: <kebab-case-topic>
 
 Present clear options for what to do next:
 
-1. **Proceed to planning** → Run `/workflows:plan`
+1. **Proceed to planning** → Run `/ce:plan`
 2. **Refine further** → Continue exploring the design
 3. **Done for now** → User will return later
 
@@ -187,4 +187,4 @@ Planning answers **HOW** to build it:
 - Technical details and code patterns
 - Testing strategy and verification
 
-When brainstorm output exists, `/workflows:plan` should detect it and use it as input, skipping its own idea refinement phase.
+When brainstorm output exists, `/ce:plan` should detect it and use it as input, skipping its own idea refinement phase.

package/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/create-agent-skills/workflows/add-workflow.md

@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 # Workflow: Add a Workflow to Existing Skill
 
+## Interaction Method
+
+If `AskUserQuestion` is available, use it for all prompts below.
+
+If not, present each question as a numbered list and wait for a reply before proceeding to the next step. Never skip or auto-configure.
+
 <required_reading>
 **Read these reference files NOW:**
 1. references/recommended-structure.md

package/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/create-agent-skills/workflows/create-new-skill.md

@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 # Workflow: Create a New Skill
 
+## Interaction Method
+
+If `AskUserQuestion` is available, use it for all prompts below.
+
+If not, present each question as a numbered list and wait for a reply before proceeding to the next step. For multiSelect questions, accept comma-separated numbers (e.g. `1, 3`). Never skip or auto-configure.
+
 <required_reading>
 **Read these reference files NOW:**
 1. references/recommended-structure.md

package/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/document-review/SKILL.md

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Score the document against these criteria:
 | **Specificity** | Concrete enough for next step (brainstorm → can plan, plan → can implement) |
 | **YAGNI** | No hypothetical features, simplest approach chosen |
 
-If invoked within a workflow (after `/workflows:brainstorm` or `/workflows:plan`), also check:
+If invoked within a workflow (after `/ce:brainstorm` or `/ce:plan`), also check:
 - **User intent fidelity** — Document reflects what was discussed, assumptions validated
 
 ## Step 4: Identify the Critical Improvement

package/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/file-todos/SKILL.md

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Work logs serve as:
 
 | Trigger | Flow | Tool |
 |---------|------|------|
-| Code review | `/workflows:review` → Findings → `/triage` → Todos | Review agent + skill |
+| Code review | `/ce:review` → Findings → `/triage` → Todos | Review agent + skill |
 | PR comments | `/resolve_pr_parallel` → Individual fixes → Todos | gh CLI + skill |
 | Code TODOs | `/resolve_todo_parallel` → Fixes + Complex todos | Agent + skill |
 | Planning | Brainstorm → Create todo → Work → Complete | Skill |

package/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/git-worktree/SKILL.md

@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ git worktree add .worktrees/feature-name -b feature-name main
 
 Use this skill in these scenarios:
 
-1. **Code Review (`/workflows:review`)**: If NOT already on the target branch (PR branch or requested branch), offer worktree for isolated review
-2. **Feature Work (`/workflows:work`)**: Always ask if user wants parallel worktree or live branch work
+1. **Code Review (`/ce:review`)**: If NOT already on the target branch (PR branch or requested branch), offer worktree for isolated review
+2. **Feature Work (`/ce:work`)**: Always ask if user wants parallel worktree or live branch work
 3. **Parallel Development**: When working on multiple features simultaneously
 4. **Cleanup**: After completing work in a worktree
 
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Use this skill in these scenarios:
 
 ### In Claude Code Workflows
 
-The skill is automatically called from `/workflows:review` and `/workflows:work` commands:
+The skill is automatically called from `/ce:review` and `/ce:work` commands:
 
 ```
 # For review: offers worktree if not on PR branch
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/git-worktree/scripts/worktree-manager.sh clean
 
 ## Integration with Workflows
 
-### `/workflows:review`
+### `/ce:review`
 
 Instead of always creating a worktree:
 
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ Instead of always creating a worktree:
    - no → proceed with PR diff on current branch
 ```
 
-### `/workflows:work`
+### `/ce:work`
 
 Always offer choice: